Pakistan’s War on Terror by Rohan Khanna India

This text discusses Pakistan’s struggle with terrorism, particularly focusing on cross-border issues with Afghanistan. It critiques Pakistan’s military approach, arguing that solely focusing on military solutions, like Operation Radd ul Fasaad, is insufficient. The author advocates for a multifaceted approach, including diplomatic solutions and addressing internal factors fueling terrorism. The piece highlights the human cost of the conflict and criticizes those who exploit the situation for political gain. Finally, it emphasizes the need for regional cooperation to effectively combat terrorism and achieve lasting peace.

Analyzing the Complexities of Terrorism in Pakistan and Afghanistan

Short Answer Quiz

1. According to the text, what event prompted the writing of this article, and what was the author’s immediate reaction?
2. What specific action did Jamal Ahra take responsibility for, and what were the consequences?
3. How does the author portray Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s response to terrorist attacks?
4. What does the author mean by “a non-military approach by using wisdom and foresight in its fiscal policy”?
5. What is the author’s critique of Pakistan’s tendency to blame Afghanistan for terrorist attacks?
6. What is the significance of the Tor Kam and Chaman crossing point closures mentioned in the text?
7. How does the author describe the relationship between the Pakistani people and the Afghan people?
8. What solution does the author propose for the ongoing tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan?
9. How does the text characterize the public’s reaction to the return of cricket in Pakistan amidst the threat of terrorism?
10. According to the author, what change in leadership’s approach is a positive development?

Answer Key

1. The article was written in response to a terrorist attack on August 3, 2017, and the author indicates a sense of frustration and a feeling of being at a standstill, as the problems seem to persist without a solution.
2. Jamal Ahra claimed responsibility for an attack in which “five crore of our people lost the game of life,” indicating a significant loss of life, which also suggests that sports may have been the target of the attack.
3. The author portrays Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif as condemning terrorism and calling for its elimination, also suggesting that terrorists are the common enemies of both Pakistan and Afghanistan.
4. The author is suggesting that relying solely on military action is insufficient and that a more thoughtful, financially savvy, and strategic plan must be implemented.
5. The author criticizes Pakistan for blaming Afghanistan without acknowledging its own past actions and contributions to the current issues, and how that may be hindering resolution.
6. The closures of the Tor Kam and Chaman crossing points aimed to restrict terrorist movement, but failed to prevent attacks; therefore, they proved to be ineffective and detrimental to bilateral relations.
7. The author suggests a sense of shared suffering, noting that the Afghan people also suffer under the Taliban and the need for a common strategy to combat terrorism, which would suggest a connection.
8. The author proposes that Pakistan and Afghanistan should engage in dialogue, develop a common strategy, and work together to address the root causes of terrorism.
9. The public’s reaction to the return of cricket is characterized by both enthusiasm and anger, specifically a former cricketer’s remarks that express hostility toward foreign players.
10. The author notes that the military and political leadership have united against terrorism through Operation Radd ul Fasad as a positive development that will extend its positive influence throughout South Asia.

Essay Questions

1. Analyze the author’s argument regarding the root causes of terrorism in the Pakistan-Afghanistan region. How does the author’s analysis challenge popular narratives?
2. Discuss the author’s use of historical context and analogy to explain the complexities of the conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan. How effective are these rhetorical strategies?
3. Critically evaluate the author’s call for a non-military approach to combat terrorism. What are the potential benefits and limitations of the author’s proposed approach?
4. Examine the role of public opinion and national identity in shaping the dynamics of the Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict, as portrayed in the text.
5. Assess the significance of the author’s concluding remarks regarding the unity of political and military leaders and their potential implications for the future of South Asia.

Glossary of Key Terms

• Operation Radd ul Fasaad: A military operation initiated by the Pakistan Army aimed at eliminating terrorism from the country.
• Mehmad Agency: A former administrative area in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) of Pakistan, known for its proximity to the Afghan border.
• Tor Kam and Chaman: Key border crossing points between Pakistan and Afghanistan, often subject to closures and security measures.
• Jihadis: Individuals who engage in what they believe to be a holy war or struggle in accordance with religious doctrine.
• Karma: The principle of cause and effect, suggesting that one’s actions can have consequences that may be experienced later.
• Fiscal Policy: Government policy on taxation, spending, and borrowing, to influence the economy.
• Non-Military Approach: A method of conflict resolution and national security that emphasizes diplomacy, economic measures, and social engagement instead of armed conflict.
• Mohit Dun Dine: The Durand Line, the internationally recognized border between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
• Zarbe Arab: A previous operation referenced as occurring before “Operation Radd ul Fasaad,” indicating the Pakistani military is working to fight against terrorism over an extended period.
• Mujja Karta: A slogan used during previous Pakistani operations, suggesting the Pakistani military has struggled to garner public support against terrorism.

Pakistan-Afghan Relations and the Terrorism Challenge

Okay, here’s a briefing document summarizing the key themes and ideas from the provided text:

Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” on Pakistani-Afghan Relations and Terrorism

Date: October 26, 2023

Subject: Analysis of “Pasted Text” on Pakistani-Afghan Relations, Terrorism, and Internal Dynamics

1. Executive Summary

This document analyzes a text arguing that Pakistan faces a complex challenge of terrorism, deeply intertwined with its relationship with Afghanistan. The text criticizes simplistic solutions, advocates for nuanced strategies, and calls for regional cooperation. It highlights the need to move beyond military-centric approaches and address the underlying ideological drivers of terrorism, while acknowledging past missteps and present internal societal issues.

2. Key Themes and Ideas

• The Enduring Threat of Terrorism: The text opens by lamenting that the situation regarding terrorism feels unchanged despite previous efforts, citing an attack in Mehmad Agency where “five crore of our people lost the game of life”. The author emphasizes that terrorist attacks continue to plague Pakistan, including more recent clashes in Swabi. This ongoing threat is attributed to groups operating from Afghanistan.
• Quote: “…if we look at the situation today then it feels as if we are standing at the same place even today…”
• Complex Relationship with Afghanistan: The document highlights that while Pakistan desires peace in Afghanistan, the countries have a strained relationship because of terrorist groups operating across the border. Pakistan believes that Afghanistan’s soil is used against them.
• Quote: “Today, many groups hiding on the soil of Afghanistan are very much against us and with full planning, they send their terrorists here to attack.”
• Critique of Military-Centric Approaches: The text critiques the reliance on military solutions, arguing that they are insufficient. The author explicitly states that solutions cannot be resolved by “love, passion, power or war,” and closing borders has failed to stop terrorists.
• Quote: “If we think that by throwing shells or missiles on Afghan soil from here, we will end terrorism, then we should get out of this misunderstanding.”
• Call for Non-Military Strategies: The text emphasizes the need for “a non-military approach by using wisdom and foresight in its fiscal policy” suggesting economic and diplomatic engagement. This includes addressing root causes, moving beyond simple enemy identification, and promoting dialogue.
• Quote: “For this, while there is a need to take various steps within the country, the importance of adopting a non-military approach by using wisdom and foresight in its fiscal policy is also important.”
• Need for Regional Cooperation: The author strongly advocates for Pakistan and Afghanistan to adopt a “common strategy through talks” against terrorism. It emphasizes that both countries have a shared enemy and working together is the most beneficial path.
• Quote: “When both of us or the three people of the entire Indian continent are facing a common real enemy, then is it not better that instead of threatening each other, we sit together and adopt a common strategy through talks…”
• Internal Responsibility and Self-Reflection: The text acknowledges that Pakistan played a role in past events that contributed to the current situation. It calls for introspection and not solely blaming the Afghan government for all issues. The author emphasizes that Pakistan should not “dump all the debris on the Afghan administration”.
• Quote: “There was a time when we also played a role in promoting the treaty. Whatever were our compulsions and today we regret it a lot, but among these unknown faces, some faces were ours too.”
• The Role of Ideology: The text argues that the terrorist ideology must be combatted. The author calls for cutting “the roots of the scourge,” stating those who disregard humanity’s value must be eliminated through a “joint national decision” The ideology is called “selfish”.
• Quote: “Those who do not respect human life or humanity should take a joint national decision that we have to wipe out their selfish views.”
• Societal Disconnect and Misplaced Priorities: The text criticizes individuals who celebrate terrorism and use it as a basis for hate. It cites the public’s interest in a recent cricket match as an example of their desire to move past terrorism. There is criticism for “uncivilized words” used by individuals against foreign players, implying a societal issue.
• Quote: “How anxious our Pakistani society is to get rid of this curse can be gauged from the public interest in the recent cricket match.”
• Support for Government Action and Unity: The author expressed support for Operation Radd ul Fasad, and the unity of the political and military leadership against terrorism. The text expresses the hope that this effort will impact South Asia positively.
• Quote: “We are happy that today our military and political leadership have united against Operation Radd ul Fasad and have raised their voice in this appeal. This awareness and valor will no longer be limited to the country; rather, the entire South Asia will be perfumed by its fragrance.”

3. Important Facts:

• The attacks on the checkposts were claimed by Jamal Ahra.
• Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, called the terrorists the common enemy of both Pakistan and Afghanistan.
• Operation Radd ul Fasaad was referenced as the current anti-terror operation.
• Border closures have not stopped terrorist movement.
• The border is around 2400 km.
• Balochistan Assembly approved an agreement regarding these issues.

4. Conclusion

The provided text presents a complex and multi-faceted perspective on the challenges of terrorism in Pakistan and its relationship with Afghanistan. It cautions against oversimplification and calls for a more nuanced approach that involves regional cooperation, internal reflection, addressing the root causes of terrorism and ideological issues, and not relying solely on military action. The author presents a view that is in favor of unity, peace, and a move away from the violence, hate, and terror impacting Pakistani society.

Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Counter-Terrorism

FAQ on Terrorism, Pakistan-Afghanistan Relations, and Counter-Terrorism Strategies

1. What is Article Hazaar and what does its continued relevance suggest about the current situation?
2. Article Hazaar was revealed on August 3, 2017, and it addressed the issue of terrorism and the shared threat it posed to Pakistan and Afghanistan. The fact that the issues raised in the article still seem relevant today highlights the persistent challenge of terrorism. It underscores the cyclical nature of attacks and the difficulty in achieving lasting stability despite efforts made. The article pointed out how even amidst national celebrations, such as the resumption of cricket, terror attacks continued, demonstrating how deeply entrenched the issue is.
3. What specific events triggered the discussion on terrorism in the provided text?
4. The discussion is triggered by several terror attacks: one in Mehmad Agency where terrorists in Afghanistan targeted check posts resulting in the loss of five soldiers, and a subsequent clash in Swabi resulting in the loss of two soldiers. These incidents led to renewed discussions about the common enemy faced by Pakistan and Afghanistan, and highlighted the need for a more effective counter-terrorism strategy. Additionally, the text mentions the closure of crossing points between the countries as part of a counter-terrorism response, which ultimately proved ineffective at preventing attacks.
5. What is Pakistan’s official stance towards Afghanistan regarding the issue of terrorism?
6. Pakistan’s official stance, as stated by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, is that terrorists are a common enemy of both Pakistan and Afghanistan. Pakistan seeks a peaceful and strong Afghanistan, recognizing that stability in Afghanistan is beneficial for Pakistan. While Pakistan acknowledges the role of groups operating from Afghan soil, it insists on peace and cooperation with Afghanistan rather than blaming or military-only approaches. However, there appears to be underlying frustration with Afghanistan and skepticism of their actions.
7. What criticisms are leveled against Pakistan’s approach to combating terrorism?
8. The text criticizes Pakistan’s approach as sometimes reactive and emotionally driven, noting a tendency to escalate tensions by creating “nominal enemies.” It argues that relying on military force alone will not resolve the problem. It also critiques the closing of border crossings as ineffective and detrimental to bilateral relations. There is a call for wiser fiscal policy and a non-military approach emphasizing “wisdom and foresight” that looks inwards and acknowledges past mistakes in creating conditions for terrorism to thrive. The text calls out the tendency to blame Afghanistan without looking at our own role in the issue.
9. What non-military approaches are suggested in the article for addressing terrorism?
10. The article proposes a non-military approach that emphasizes diplomacy and dialogue with Afghanistan. It suggests that instead of blaming each other, Pakistan and Afghanistan should jointly strategize and honestly implement a plan. They should move past issues of national pride to address the core causes of terrorism. Furthermore, it recommends strengthening infrastructure at border crossing points while resuming legal movement and increasing trade. This suggests a more holistic approach that tackles both the symptoms and causes of instability and conflict.
11. How does the text perceive the impact of border closures on terrorism?

The text views the closure of crossing points like Tor Kam and Chaman as ineffective in preventing terror attacks. Despite an 18-day closure, terrorists were still able to cross and carry out attacks. This highlights that those bent on committing terror attacks can bypass formal borders. The text suggests that instead of closing borders, the focus should be on creating secure crossing points with strict security measures while resuming regular, legal movement and trade. The text implies border closures are an ineffective and blunt policy tool.

1. What is the significance of the former cricketer’s “irresponsible” statement in the context of the text?
2. The former cricketer’s “irresponsible” statement, which includes a slogan against foreign players visiting Pakistan, represents a disturbing element within the society. This uncivil and extreme statement, indicative of bitterness and desperation, highlights the volatility within the nation’s views and raises concerns about the political influence of such rhetoric. This illustrates that there are elements of the Pakistani population with extreme views that undermine national unity and foreign relations, who are using fear and nationalism to promote their political agendas.
3. What is Operation Radd ul Fasaad, and what does its success signify according to the text?
4. Operation Radd ul Fasaad is a counter-terrorism operation involving a united military and political leadership that aims to fight every terrorist within the country and to dismantle their social ideology. The fact that Pakistan’s leadership has joined together is seen as a positive development, indicating a united front against terrorism. The success of this operation is seen as a positive change that could have a wider positive impact in South Asia. This signifies a shift towards a more unified and comprehensive approach in combating terrorism both internally and externally.

Pakistan-Afghanistan Border Conflict

The provided text discusses the conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan, focusing on terrorism and border security. Here’s a breakdown:

• Terrorism as a Common Enemy: The text emphasizes that both Pakistan and Afghanistan face a common enemy in terrorists. It mentions that terrorists hiding in Afghanistan have attacked Pakistani check posts, resulting in casualties. Pakistan’s Prime Minister has stated that terrorists are a common enemy and will be eliminated.
• Cross-Border Attacks: Terrorists launch attacks from Afghanistan into Pakistan. The text argues that simply closing border crossing points is not an effective solution, as terrorists do not need these official routes to carry out their attacks. The border is very wide and difficult to fully control.
• Pakistan’s Perspective and Actions:Pakistan is conducting Operation Radd ul Fasaad against terrorists within the country.
• The text states that Pakistan desires peace in Afghanistan and wants to see it as a strong and powerful country. According to the text, Pakistan feels that peace in Afghanistan would benefit Pakistan.
• Pakistan has tried closing border crossing points such as Tor Kam and Chaman, but these measures have not been effective in stopping attacks.
• The text notes that Pakistan’s military and political leaders have united against terrorism.
• Afghan Perspective: According to the text, the Afghan government is hurt by criticism from Pakistan, and Afghan citizens seek protection from American forces due to fear of the Taliban. The text suggests that instead of blaming each other, Pakistan and Afghanistan should work together.
• Need for Non-Military Approach: The text argues that the conflict cannot be resolved through force alone. It suggests using wisdom and foresight in fiscal policy and adopting a non-military approach. The text argues that focusing on creating nominal enemies and engaging in an emotional atmosphere is not helpful.
• Call for Cooperation: The text advocates for a common strategy through talks between Pakistan and Afghanistan. The text argues that they should rise above the issue of identifying “good” or “bad” terrorists. It recommends a joint national decision to eliminate those who do not respect human life and humanity.
• Role of Past Actions: The text acknowledges that Pakistan has played a role in promoting treaties and that it now regrets these actions. It recognizes that some of the groups now acting against Pakistan may have had connections to Pakistan in the past.
• Public Opinion: The text describes how the Pakistani public’s desire to get rid of terrorism is evident in their interest in cricket matches. The text notes that the public reacted negatively to an irresponsible statement made by a former cricketer, indicating that there is widespread public desire for peace and security.
• Proposed Solution: The text suggests strengthening security at crossing points, resuming legal movement with new infrastructure, and moving towards open relations. It mentions that the Balochistan Assembly has approved an agreement regarding border issues.

Combating Terrorism in Pakistan and Afghanistan

The sources discuss terrorism elimination primarily in the context of the Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict, highlighting the need for a multifaceted approach. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

• Terrorism as a Shared Threat: The text emphasizes that both Pakistan and Afghanistan face a common enemy in terrorism. Terrorist groups operating in Afghanistan launch attacks into Pakistan, causing casualties. This shared threat suggests the need for a cooperative approach to eliminate terrorism.
• Military Action and its Limitations: Operation Radd ul Fasaad is Pakistan’s effort to combat terrorists within its borders. However, the text argues that military force alone is insufficient to resolve the conflict. The text suggests that closing borders or launching attacks on Afghan soil are not effective solutions. The porous nature of the border makes it difficult to prevent cross-border movement of terrorists. The text also mentions that such measures may harm bilateral relations.
• Non-Military Strategies: The text stresses the importance of using wisdom and foresight in fiscal policy and adopting a non-military approach to address the root causes of terrorism. The text argues against creating an emotional environment of national interest and nominal enemies. It also stresses the need for a non-military approach and a focus on peace.
• Cooperative Solutions: Instead of blaming each other, the text advocates for a joint strategy through talks between Pakistan and Afghanistan. The text calls for a collaborative approach, rising above the distinction between “good” and “bad” terrorists. The text argues that the countries should jointly decide to eliminate those who do not respect human life.
• Addressing Root Causes: According to the text, merely focusing on border control will not stop terrorists. The text implies that broader issues such as the social ideology of terrorists, past actions, and geopolitical factors should also be addressed. The text also calls for cutting off the roots of the scourge of terrorism.
• Public Opinion and Awareness: Public opinion in Pakistan is against terrorism and this is evident from the public interest in cricket matches. The text suggests that the public is aware of the issue and wants it to be resolved peacefully. The military and political leadership of Pakistan have also united against terrorism and have raised their voice in support of this approach.
• Proposed Actions: The text suggests strengthening security at border crossing points and resuming legal movement with new infrastructure. It mentions that the Balochistan Assembly has approved an agreement in this regard.

In summary, the text argues that terrorism elimination requires a multi-pronged approach that combines military action with non-military strategies, collaboration between Pakistan and Afghanistan, and addressing the root causes of the problem. The text suggests that blaming each other will not be beneficial and instead both countries should work together.

Pakistan-Afghanistan Cooperation Against Terrorism

The text emphasizes the importance of regional cooperation, particularly between Pakistan and Afghanistan, to address the shared threat of terrorism. Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of regional cooperation discussed in the text:

• Shared Enemy: The text clearly states that both Pakistan and Afghanistan face a common enemy in terrorism. This shared threat forms the basis for the need for cooperation.
• Need for Dialogue: The text argues that instead of blaming each other or engaging in hostile actions, Pakistan and Afghanistan should sit together and adopt a common strategy through talks. The text also suggests that rising above the distinction between “good” and “bad” terrorists is essential for effective cooperation.
• Joint Strategy: The text advocates for a joint national decision to eliminate those who do not respect human life or humanity. This implies a unified approach to counter terrorism, moving beyond individual national interests. The text also states that the countries should work together to cut the roots of terrorism.
• Non-Military Approach: The text emphasizes that military force alone is not the solution. It stresses the need for wisdom and foresight in fiscal policy and a non-military approach to resolving the conflict. This suggests that cooperation should extend beyond security measures and include economic and social strategies.
• Border Management: The text discusses the need to strengthen security at border crossing points, such as Tor Kam and Chaman, and resume legal movement with new infrastructure. It also mentions that the Balochistan Assembly has approved an agreement regarding border issues. This highlights the importance of cooperation in managing shared borders and preventing cross-border movement of terrorists.
• Mutual Benefit: The text suggests that peace in Afghanistan is in the interest and benefit of Pakistan. This emphasizes that cooperation is not just a matter of necessity but also beneficial for both nations. The text also points out that the citizens of Afghanistan are also victims of terrorism and seek shelter due to threats from the Taliban.
• Addressing Past Actions: The text acknowledges that Pakistan has played a role in promoting treaties and that it now regrets these actions. This acknowledgement suggests that cooperation should also involve addressing past grievances and working towards reconciliation.
• Public Opinion: The text suggests that there is a need to work with the public to resolve the problem peacefully. It also notes that public opinion in Pakistan is against terrorism, which further emphasizes the need for regional cooperation to resolve the issue.

In summary, the text strongly advocates for regional cooperation between Pakistan and Afghanistan, emphasizing the need for dialogue, joint strategies, a non-military approach, and mutual benefit. The text suggests that by working together, both countries can effectively address the shared threat of terrorism and achieve peace and stability in the region.

Pakistan-Afghanistan: A Common Enemy

The concept of a “common enemy” is central to the discussion of the Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict in the provided text, primarily referring to terrorist groups that threaten both nations. Here’s a breakdown of how the “common enemy” is presented:

• Terrorism as the Shared Threat: The text explicitly identifies terrorism as the primary common enemy of both Pakistan and Afghanistan. It details how terrorist groups, often hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan, launch attacks across the border into Pakistan, causing loss of life and instability.
• Cross-Border Attacks: The text highlights that these terrorists operate from Afghan soil, targeting Pakistani check posts and personnel. This shared experience of cross-border terrorism creates a common ground for both nations to unite against a shared foe.
• Statements from Leadership: The Prime Minister of Pakistan is quoted as saying that terrorists are the common enemies of both Pakistan and Afghanistan. This statement emphasizes the official recognition of terrorism as a shared threat that requires a unified response.
• Need for Joint Action: The concept of a common enemy is used to advocate for regional cooperation. The text suggests that instead of blaming each other, Pakistan and Afghanistan should work together to combat terrorism. It implies that the presence of a common enemy should unite the two nations.
• Beyond National Interests: The text argues that both nations should rise above distinctions of “good” or “bad” terrorists and focus on eliminating all terrorists who threaten human life and humanity. This broader perspective suggests that the common enemy is not just a specific group but the ideology and actions of terrorism itself.
• Impact on Public Opinion: Public opinion in Pakistan is strongly against terrorism, and people want peace. The fact that the public desires a resolution to the conflict further emphasizes the importance of recognizing terrorism as a common enemy and acting against it.
• The roots of terrorism: The text emphasizes that the roots of the scourge of terrorism must be cut. This implies that the common enemy includes not only the terrorists themselves, but the causes that allow them to thrive.

In summary, the text uses the idea of a “common enemy” to highlight the shared threat of terrorism faced by Pakistan and Afghanistan. This concept serves as a basis for calling for greater cooperation, dialogue, and joint strategies to eliminate terrorism and achieve peace and stability in the region. The text urges that both nations must look beyond their differences and unite against the ideology and acts of terror that threaten both of them.

A Non-Military Approach to Terrorism

The text emphasizes that a non-military approach is crucial in addressing the complex issue of terrorism, particularly in the context of the Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict. Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of this approach as detailed in the sources:

• Limitations of Military Force: The text argues that military actions alone, such as closing borders or launching attacks on Afghan soil, are insufficient and ineffective in combating terrorism. The text points out that despite measures such as closing border crossings, terrorists still manage to infiltrate, highlighting the porous nature of the border and the limitations of purely military solutions. The text also states that such actions can harm bilateral relations.
• Importance of Wisdom and Foresight: The text stresses the need for wisdom and foresight in fiscal policy and adopting a non-military approach to address the root causes of terrorism. This implies a need for economic and social policies that address the underlying issues that can lead to radicalization and terrorism.
• Avoiding Emotional Responses: The text cautions against creating an emotional environment of national interest and nominal enemies, suggesting that such an approach can be counterproductive. Instead, the text calls for a more reasoned and measured response to the problem.
• Focus on Peace and Dialogue: The text advocates for a peaceful resolution through dialogue between Pakistan and Afghanistan, rather than resorting to military action. The text suggests that instead of blaming each other, both countries should work together to adopt a common strategy through talks.
• Addressing Root Causes: The text implies that broader issues such as the social ideology of terrorists, past actions, and geopolitical factors should also be addressed. The text also calls for cutting off the roots of the scourge of terrorism. This focus on root causes goes beyond military action and seeks to address the underlying factors that contribute to terrorism.
• Cooperative Strategies: The text emphasizes the need for a cooperative approach, urging both countries to rise above the distinction between “good” and “bad” terrorists and to jointly eliminate those who do not respect human life. The text also suggests a joint national decision to wipe out selfish views of terrorists. This suggests the need for cooperation on strategies that extend beyond military operations.
• Economic Cooperation: While not explicitly stated, the text’s call for wisdom and foresight in fiscal policy suggests a role for economic cooperation and development in addressing the root causes of terrorism. Economic development is likely to be a key factor to ensure peace.

In summary, the text strongly advocates for a non-military approach to terrorism that emphasizes dialogue, cooperation, and addressing the underlying causes of the problem. The text argues that military action alone is insufficient and that a more comprehensive approach that includes economic and social strategies, is essential for achieving lasting peace and stability.

The Original Text

मुश्तरका दुश्मन के महलक नजरिया का सफाया आर्टिकल हाजा जंग में शाया हुआ और आज की सूरत हाल को मुलाहिजा करें तो यूं महसूस होता है कि आज भी हम वहीं के वहीं खड़े हुए हैं इसका एक-एक लफ्ज़ इसकी निशानदेही कर रहा है दहशतगर्दी के अफरेय से डसे पाकिस्तानी आवाम अभी क्रिकेट की बहाली पर खुशी मना रहे थे कि अफगानिस्तान के पहाड़ों में छुपे दहशत गर्दों ने मेहमद एजेंसी में तीन चेक पोस्टों को निशाना बना डाला जमाल अहरा ने सान की जिम्मेदारी कबूल कर ली जिसमें हमारे पाच कोटी अहल का जान की बाजी हार गए और अब स्वाबी झड़प में भी हमने दो जवानों की कुर्बानी दी वजीर आजम नवाज शरीफ ने हमले की मजम्मत करते हुए कहा है कि दहशत गर्द पाकिस्तान और अफगानिस्तान दोनों मु मालिक के मुश्तरका दुश्मन हैं पाकिस्तान के इन दुश्मनों का इनके महलक नजरिया समेत सफाया और खात्मा कर दिया जाएगा ऑपरेशन रद्द उल फसाद हर दहशत गर्द के खिलाफ है खवा वो मुल्क के अंदर से कारवाही कर रहा है या बैरून मुल्क से रेट कर रहा है हम खुलूस उसे दिल से अफगानिस्तान में अमन चाहते हैं उसे मुस्तहकम और मजबूत मुल्क की हैसियत से देखना चाहते हैं क्योंकि अफगानिस्तान में अमन पाकिस्तान के अपने वसीत और मुफद में है वजीर आजम का यह जज्बा और वलव बिला शुबह लायक तहसीन है लेकिन बाज मसाइल इतने गंभीर होते हैं कि उन्हें मोहत जज्बे ताकत या लड़ाई से खत्म नहीं किया जा सकता दहशतगर्दी की लानत भी इन्हीं में से एक है इसके लिए जहां मुल्क के अंदर मुख्तलिफ नौ इदामा उठाने की जरूरत है वहीं बरने मुल्क अपनी खजा पॉलिसी में भी असली तकाज की मुनास बत से हिकमत फरासत को काम में लाते हुए गैर र वायती सलूब इख्तियार करने की अहमियत वाज है सबसे सहल और आसान तीरा यह है कि हम अंदर मुल्क मुनाफ की जज्बाती फजा मुसल्लत करते हुए अपने नामना दुश्मनों की तादाद या फरिश बढ़ाते चले जाएं या यह सोचकर खुश हो जाएं कि हम ईंट का जवाब पत्थर से देंगे अगर मुकाबला पत्थरों से ही करना है तो फिर यह साबित होगा कि हम 21वीं सदी के जदीद साइंटिफिक त में नहीं बल्कि पत्थर के दौर में जी रहे हैं कहा जाता है कि ताली दोनों हाथों से बजती है जब भी कोई खराबी वकू पजीर होती है तो बा शूर वो होता है जो जज्बा खुद साबी के साथ पहले अपनी कुता हों पर नजर डालता है और फिर दूसरे पर दलाल के साथ यह वाज करता है कि इसकी कौन सी और क्या-क्या ज्यादति यां हैं एक दौर था जब शिद्दत संधी को फरोग बख्शने में रोल हमने भी अदा किया था हमारी जो भी मजबूरियां थी और आज हमें इसका जितना भी पछतावा है लेकिन इन ना आशना चेहरों में कुछ चेहरे हमारे भी नासा थे आज अफगानिस्तान की सरजमीन पर छुपे बहुत से ग्रोह हमारे खिलाफ बहुत सरे पकार हैं और पूरी प्लानिंग के साथ अपने दहशत गर्दों को हमलावर होने के लिए इधर रवाना करते हैं यकीनन उन्हें ऐसे नहीं करना चाहिए और काबल हुकूमत की भी यह जिम्मेदारी बनती है कि वो अपनी सरजमीन हमारे खिलाफ इस्तेमाल ना होने दे मगर हमारे कुछ कर्म फरमा इसी रोह में बहते हुए जब सारा मलबा अफगान इंतजाम या इनके लीफों पर डालकर सरख होने की कोशिश करते हैं तो उसे किसी तरह भी मसले का हल करार नहीं दिया जा सकता अगर हम यह समझते हैं कि यहां से अफगान सरजमीन पर गोले फेंक कर या मिजल मारकर हम दहशतगर्दी का खात्मा कर देंगे तो हमें इस गलतफहमी से बाहर आ जाना चाहिए हमने 18 रोज तोर कम और चमन या स्मन बोलते क्रॉसिंग पॉइंट्स को कामल बंद करके भी देख लिया इसके बावजूद घुस बैठिए इधर घुसे और हमारे पांच जवानों की जाने ले गए इस नौ के जुनूनी दहशत गर्द अपनी वारदातों के लिए तोर कम या चमन बॉर्डर के मोहताज नहीं है जायज रास्तों का इस्तेमाल तो जायज तरीकों से आने वाले करते हैं वैश के लिए तो 2400 किमी पर मोहित डन डाइन बहुत वसी है जिसे बंद करने से हर दो ममालाकंडम क्रासिंग पॉइंट्स पर सिक्योरिटी चेकिंग को कतई सख्त करते हुए तमाम तर जदीद इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर के साथ कानूनी आमदो रफत को जारी और सारी कर दिया जाए दो दिन के लिए खोलकर फिर बंदिश लगाने से कोई फायदा हुआ है या नहीं अलबत्ता दो तरफा तालुकात बदत मादी और मुनाफ की सूरत नुकसान साफ मुलाज किया जा सकता है बलूचिस्तान असेंबली ने भी इस हवाले से करार दद मंजूर की है अफगान इंतजाम पर तन कीद की हम जितनी चाहे बु छाड़ करें मगर यह याद रखें कि वह खुद हमारी फेंकी हुई वाकत से जखम खोरता है उनके शहरी यो की अपनी जिंदगियां गैर महफूज हैं वो दहशत गर्द तालिबान के खौफ से अमरकी तहफ्फुज और पनाह लेने पर मजबूर हैं फिर वजीर आजम नवाज शरीफ की वही बात के दहशत गर्द पाक अफगान दोनों मुमा के मुश्तरका दुश्मन है जब हम दोनों या बशम पूल इंडिया खिता की तीनों अवाम को एक मुश्तरका हकीकी दुश्मन का सामना है तो क्या बेहतर नहीं कि हम एक दूसरे को मतान करने की बजाय मिल बैठकर मुजाकी के जरिए मुश्तरका स्ट्रेटजी अपनाते हुए ईमानदारी और दियानत के साथ इस पर अमल पैरा हो जाएं अपने या बेगाने अच्छे या बुरे तालिबान या दहशत गर्दों की तमीज से बुलंद होकर हर दो अतरा से इस नासूर की जड़ें काटे जिनकी नजरों में इंसानी जानों की हुरमत है ना इंसानियत की यह मुश्तरका कौमी फैसला होना चाहिए कि हमने इनके महलक नजरिया का सफाया करना है लेकिन अगर हमने एक दूसरे को नीचा दिखाने के लिए अपने कुछ मखू असास की पॉकेट्स कायम रखनी है तो फिर अल्हम्दुलिल्लाह आप फसादी कहे या जिहादी इस नौ के मारके होते रहेंगे नतीजतन बिन लाद के अल्फाज में जिहाद या शहादत फी कुल्ले मकाम इंसानी सोसाइटिस दहशत और वहशत की यर माली बनी रहेगी हमारी साबका वजीर खर्जा ने भी पाक अफगान तनाव का हल सफर कारी को ही करार दिया है ताकि तल कीयो को रोका जा सके हमारी पाकिस्तानी सोसाइटी इस लानत से छुटकारा पाने के लिए कितनी बेचैन है इसका अंदाजा हालिया क्रिकेट मरके में आवामी दिलचस्पी से लगाया जा सकता है इस मौके पर क्रिकेट के साबिक खिलाड़ी ने जो गैर जिम्मेदाराना बयानबाजी की है उसे क्रिकेट के शकीन ने ही नहीं कौम के तमाम जिम्मेदार तबकात ने भी नापसंद किया है अब उन्होंने पाकिस्तान आने वाले गैर मुल्की खिलाड़ियों के खिलाफ जो गैर तहजीब अल्फाज इस्तेमाल किए हैं इससे इनके अंदर छुपी मायूसी और कड़वाहट का अंदाजा लगाया जा सकता है और समझा जा सकता है कि क्या इस जह नियत का कोई शख्स मैदान सियासत में कामयाबी का हकदार है ऑपरेशन जरबे अर्ब से कबल जब तालिबान से मुजा करत के नारे लगाए जा रहे थे तो इस अजानी और तूफानी फजा में दहशत के अलंबरदार ने अपनी मजाक टीम का हिस्सा बनाकर हमारे इस खिलाड़ी लीडर को जिस तरह पेश किया वोह कितना वाजिया था जिन लोगों की इस वक्त आंखें नहीं खुली थी इनकी अब खुल जानी चाहिए हमें खुशी है कि आज हमारी आस्करी और सियासी कयादत ऑपरेशन रद्द उल फसाद पर एका करते हुए जिस अर्ज में नौ के साथ उठी है यह आगाही और शूर अब अंदर मुल्क तक महदूद नहीं रहेगा बल्कि इसकी खुशबू से पूरा जनूबी एशिया महकेगा

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog

Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!