Category: Shared Consciousness

  • Do Plants And Trees Have Consciousness?

    Do Plants And Trees Have Consciousness?

    Is it possible that the green, silent world around us is far more aware than we’ve ever imagined? For centuries, humans have considered consciousness to be a uniquely animal – and primarily human – trait. But new scientific inquiries and philosophical debates are forcing us to rethink this assumption. As we deepen our understanding of biology and intelligence, the idea that plants and trees may possess a form of consciousness is gaining serious academic traction.

    Modern research in plant neurobiology, bioacoustics, and environmental responsiveness suggests that plants are far from passive. They process information, react to stimuli, and even engage in intricate behaviors that resemble problem-solving. Such revelations are blurring the once-clear line between sentient beings and vegetation. The implications are profound, inviting us to reconsider ethical, ecological, and spiritual relationships with the botanical world.

    This blog explores this compelling question from multiple angles—biological, philosophical, and cultural. Drawing upon the latest science, ancient traditions, and notable thinkers, it delves into whether what we’ve long thought of as inanimate greenery might be conscious in a way we have yet to fully comprehend.


    1- Definitions of Consciousness

    To tackle whether plants and trees have consciousness, we must first define what consciousness is. Consciousness is typically characterized as the capacity for awareness, experience, and intentionality. In humans and animals, it’s linked with the ability to perceive the environment, process sensory data, and respond with purpose. The challenge lies in applying this anthropocentric model to life forms without brains or central nervous systems. However, some scholars argue for broader definitions, such as philosopher Thomas Nagel’s idea that “an organism is conscious if there is something it is like to be that organism.”

    From an ecological standpoint, even basic responsiveness to environmental changes can be seen as a rudimentary form of awareness. If we shift from a binary view of consciousness (either you have it or you don’t) to a spectrum model, we create space to explore non-animal consciousness. Michael Pollan, in The Botany of Desire, asserts that plants might have “intelligence without a brain,” compelling us to reframe what it means to be aware.


    2- Scientific Advances in Plant Behavior

    Research over the past two decades has revealed that plants exhibit behaviors akin to memory, communication, and learning. Dr. Monica Gagliano’s work in plant bioacoustics, for example, shows that plants can respond to sound cues, suggesting a kind of sensory processing previously thought impossible in flora. Her experiments with Mimosa pudica (the sensitive plant) demonstrated that plants can learn from experience and retain that learning.

    Further studies by Stefano Mancuso, author of The Revolutionary Genius of Plants, show that root tips operate much like neurons, suggesting decentralized processing akin to neural networks. Plants also display swarm intelligence, collaborating with mycorrhizal fungi and other plants to exchange nutrients and signals. This web of interaction hints at an emergent intelligence that is not bound by animal physiology.


    3- Philosophical Perspectives on Plant Consciousness

    Philosophers like Daniel Dennett argue that consciousness must be defined by function, not structure. If consciousness is about responses to environmental complexity, then the behavioral repertoire of plants qualifies them for consideration. Panpsychism, a view gaining traction in modern philosophy of mind, posits that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of all matter—a view that would certainly include plant life.

    Aldous Huxley once wrote, “There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.” Perhaps our limited perception has prevented us from recognizing vegetal consciousness. Indigenous worldviews have long held that plants are sentient beings, a notion only now being entertained by mainstream science and philosophy.


    4- Indigenous Knowledge and Plant Consciousness

    Long before Western science began probing the intelligence of plants, indigenous cultures around the world had already established deep, respectful relationships with plant beings. For example, the Amazonian tribes view certain plants like ayahuasca as sentient teachers. These relationships are not metaphorical but are grounded in generations of experiential knowledge and spiritual dialogue.

    Books like Braiding Sweetgrass by Robin Wall Kimmerer blend indigenous wisdom with scientific training, illustrating how plants “speak” and humans can learn to listen. Such traditions challenge the materialist worldview and support a more relational, holistic understanding of consciousness that includes flora.


    5- Plant Communication and Information Exchange

    Plants are not solitary organisms; they engage in sophisticated communication systems using chemicals, electrical signals, and even sound. Through volatile organic compounds, they can warn neighboring plants of pest attacks, triggering defensive responses. This cooperative behavior indicates a level of community awareness.

    Additionally, the mycorrhizal network—dubbed the “Wood Wide Web”—is a stunning example of interplant communication. Through this fungal symbiosis, plants share resources and send chemical messages, which some scientists liken to a form of plant language. This network shows a level of interdependence and responsiveness characteristic of sentient systems.


    6- Memory and Learning in Plants

    Experimental evidence suggests that plants are capable of retaining information from past experiences. In one study, Mimosa pudica stopped closing its leaves when repeatedly exposed to a non-harmful stimulus, indicating habituation—a basic form of learning.

    Such capacity for memory without neurons upends traditional views of intelligence. Philosopher Andy Clark has proposed that cognition is not limited to the brain but is distributed across systems—supporting the idea that plant “intelligence” is embedded in its entire structure.


    7- Ethical Implications

    If plants possess a form of consciousness or sentience, then our ethical frameworks must evolve. Should deforestation, monoculture farming, and genetic modification be reevaluated from a moral standpoint? The philosopher Peter Singer’s animal liberation arguments, while not focused on plants, could inspire a broader ethical discourse on non-animal life.

    Bioethicist Michael Marder argues in Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life that plants deserve ethical consideration due to their unique modes of being. Recognizing their agency could transform environmental policy and human consumption patterns.


    8- Comparative Analysis with Animal Consciousness

    Plants do not have brains or nervous systems, but neither do all animals that we accept as conscious. Octopuses, for instance, have decentralized nervous systems, yet are acknowledged as sentient. Similarly, if function over form is the criterion, plants’ adaptive responses and communicative behaviors suggest a parallel form of awareness.

    Furthermore, invertebrates like jellyfish or sponges lack complex brains but still show purposeful behavior. This comparison supports the notion that consciousness might manifest in many ways, not all of which resemble human cognition.


    9- The Role of Emotions in Consciousness

    Emotions are often linked with consciousness, but are they necessary to define it? While plants may not feel in the way animals do, they show stress responses and can prioritize certain actions over others—suggesting internal value systems.

    Physiological changes such as the release of defense hormones and growth toward beneficial stimuli indicate a decision-making process. As Dr. Mancuso notes, plants behave in ways that appear goal-directed, which is a key characteristic of conscious beings.


    10- The Language of Plants

    Though plants don’t use words, their biochemical signaling constitutes a kind of language. Research by Suzanne Simard on intertree communication via the mycorrhizal network demonstrates complex information exchange resembling linguistic structures.

    Furthermore, new studies in plant acoustics suggest they emit sounds under stress—tiny crackles that neighboring plants seem to perceive. These findings open up the idea of a silent language that is just beginning to be deciphered.


    11- Time Perception in Plants

    Plants operate on different temporal scales than humans, but that doesn’t mean they are passive. Circadian rhythms, photoperiodism, and growth patterns show that plants perceive and respond to time. Their internal clocks regulate behaviors much like ours do.

    Daniel Chamovitz’s book What a Plant Knows highlights how plants “know” when to flower, when to rest, and how to prepare for environmental changes—all signs of temporal awareness.


    12- Consciousness as a Spectrum

    Instead of treating consciousness as an on/off switch, many scholars advocate for a spectrum model. This view allows for varying degrees of awareness across species. Plants may occupy a lower end of this continuum but still register as conscious.

    As philosopher David Chalmers states, “Consciousness might be a fundamental property of the universe.” In this framework, plant consciousness becomes a natural extension of the continuity of life.


    13- Plant Cognition and Problem Solving

    Plants exhibit problem-solving capabilities, such as optimizing resource allocation in response to competing stimuli. In one study, climbing plants altered their growth direction to avoid obstacles and reach support structures—a calculated behavior.

    Such decision-making under constraints mirrors basic cognitive functions. As Mancuso explains, cognition does not require a brain but rather a capacity to interpret and adapt to complex conditions.


    14- Symbiotic Intelligence

    Symbiotic relationships in the plant world are examples of distributed intelligence. From lichens to nitrogen-fixing bacteria, these partnerships show co-evolved intelligence systems where plants actively participate and respond.

    This networked intelligence strengthens the argument that consciousness need not be isolated within a single organism but can emerge in relationships and interactions.


    15- Cultural and Spiritual Perspectives

    From the sacred Bodhi tree under which the Buddha attained enlightenment to the tree spirits of Celtic lore, cultures worldwide have long viewed plants as possessing spiritual consciousness. These views may now find support in emerging science.

    Such perspectives invite a synthesis between spirituality and ecology, offering new ways to appreciate and protect our vegetal kin.


    16- Limitations of Human-Centric Science

    Our tools and biases limit our ability to detect non-human consciousness. Just as Galileo’s telescope revealed celestial truths invisible to the naked eye, so too may future technologies reveal aspects of plant awareness currently beyond our perception.

    Cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman argues that reality is filtered through our species-specific senses. Thus, what seems like unconsciousness in plants may be a failure of our detection, not of their awareness.


    17- Consciousness Without Neurons

    The nervous system is not the only medium for awareness. Bacteria, which lack neurons, still exhibit chemotaxis and complex behaviors. Similarly, plant cells use electrical and chemical signaling for decision-making.

    These findings dismantle the neurological chauvinism that has long dominated consciousness studies. As life evolved different paths, so too might consciousness have evolved diverse forms.


    18- Emerging Technologies and Discoveries

    Innovations in electrophysiology, AI modeling, and imaging are helping scientists “listen” to plants in new ways. These tools are opening a frontier in plant studies, allowing researchers to decode signals that once seemed like noise.

    Such interdisciplinary collaboration between neuroscience, botany, and informatics is helping to bridge the gap between speculation and empirical evidence.


    19- Counterarguments and Skepticism

    Skeptics argue that attributing consciousness to plants risks anthropomorphism. They caution against interpreting adaptive behavior as intentionality. However, the same caution once met claims about animal emotions and intelligence.

    This resistance underscores the philosophical discomfort of expanding moral and cognitive boundaries. Yet science thrives when it questions assumptions and explores anomalies.


    20- Future of Plant Consciousness Research

    The future holds promise for a deeper understanding of plant intelligence. Interdisciplinary fields like plant neurobiology, ecopsychology, and synthetic biology are at the forefront. These domains could revolutionize not just science, but our worldview.

    As our ecological crises deepen, recognizing the agency and intelligence of plants may be key to fostering more respectful and sustainable relationships with the natural world.


    21- There is Research

    Significant research has been conducted over the past few decades that supports the idea that plants exhibit behaviors associated with awareness and communication. Institutions such as the University of Western Australia, under the leadership of Dr. Monica Gagliano, have conducted groundbreaking experiments showing plants’ ability to learn and remember. Her experiments with classical conditioning—once thought exclusive to animals—revealed that pea plants could associate a neutral stimulus with a beneficial one.

    In addition, Stefano Mancuso’s International Laboratory of Plant Neurobiology has documented how plants process environmental data through electrical impulses, akin to neuronal signaling in animals. These findings, while controversial, suggest that the botanical world is far more complex and aware than previously assumed, inviting a reevaluation of cognitive thresholds in living organisms.


    22- Trees Are Polite to Each Other

    Ecologist Suzanne Simard’s research has shown that trees in a forest avoid shading each other excessively, a behavior often described as “polite.” Through spatial awareness and growth regulation, trees adjust their branches to maximize light access for the collective, not just for themselves.

    This altruistic behavior appears especially among trees of the same species, indicating a communal ethic in plant life. It subverts the Darwinian model of ruthless competition and leans toward mutual cooperation, as described in Peter Wohlleben’s The Hidden Life of Trees. This polite conduct reveals a silent social intelligence operating within forests.


    23- Theory

    Multiple theories attempt to explain plant behavior through a conscious lens. One such theory is the theory of decentralized intelligence, which suggests that intelligence can be diffused across a system rather than localized in a brain. This suits the plant structure, where root tips, leaves, and stems can operate semi-autonomously in response to local stimuli.

    Another is the integrated information theory (IIT), popularized by neuroscientist Giulio Tononi, which proposes that consciousness corresponds to the level of integrated information a system can generate. Though plants are not typical candidates, their complex signaling networks and information-processing capabilities make them a curious fit for further IIT-based inquiry.


    24- Crown Shyness

    Crown shyness is a phenomenon where the uppermost branches of some trees avoid touching each other, forming distinctive patterns in the canopy. This spatial restraint, though not fully understood, appears to be a form of mechanical or light-sensing self-regulation.

    Some scientists speculate that this behavior reduces the spread of disease and prevents branch damage during high winds. Whether it is due to tactile awareness or light detection, the fact that trees engage in this form of arboreal etiquette again underscores the sophistication of their environmental interactions.


    25- They Share Resources

    Through the vast underground mycorrhizal networks, trees and plants share essential nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. This resource allocation often favors younger, weaker, or kin trees, reflecting a form of support system within plant communities.

    Suzanne Simard’s studies revealed that “mother trees” can identify and prioritize their own offspring in the forest. This resource sharing contradicts the idea that nature is purely competitive and aligns more closely with social and communal behavior observed in conscious beings.


    26- Mycorrhizal Networks

    These fungal-root symbiotic systems act like neural networks beneath the soil, connecting individual plants into a larger collective. Through these networks, information, stress signals, and nutrients are transmitted across large distances.

    The mycorrhizal system enables what some researchers term “plant sociality.” As described in Merlin Sheldrake’s Entangled Life, these networks blur the lines between individual organisms, fostering an ecological consciousness that may function similarly to a brain’s interconnected neurons.


    27- They ‘Talk’ to Each Other

    Plants “talk” using a complex system of electrical impulses, chemical signals, and even sound frequencies. These messages are often triggered by environmental stressors such as insect attacks or drought.

    These silent conversations form a defense network, allowing neighboring plants to brace themselves. In essence, plants are not only aware of their own condition but can also relay warnings and coordinate responses, a behavior highly suggestive of collective consciousness.


    28- They Help Each Other Out

    Cooperation among plants is now well-documented. Beech trees, for instance, share sugars through their root systems to nourish shaded companions. Similarly, legumes host nitrogen-fixing bacteria that enrich the soil, indirectly supporting surrounding flora.

    Such acts of botanical generosity defy the Darwinian paradigm of survival of the fittest. Instead, they showcase a model of cooperative evolution where community well-being often takes precedence over individual gain—a behavior we typically associate with intelligent life.


    29- They Communicate Through Scents

    Plants emit specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when under attack. These airborne chemicals act as alarm signals to nearby plants, prompting them to fortify their defenses. For example, when a tomato plant is damaged, it releases a scent that causes neighboring tomatoes to boost their production of anti-herbivore compounds.

    This olfactory signaling system mirrors pheromonal communication in animals and indicates a sensory world that plants actively engage with. It’s not merely reactionary; it is deliberate, targeted, and intelligent.


    30- They Can Call for Help

    Plants under attack by pests have been shown to “call for help” by releasing VOCs that attract predators of those pests. Corn plants, for example, emit chemicals that lure parasitic wasps when caterpillars feed on their leaves.

    This strategic deployment of chemical SOS signals indicates a level of environmental awareness and adaptive behavior that borders on intelligent self-preservation—traits often linked to conscious organisms.


    31- Jasmone

    Jasmone is a compound produced by plants in response to herbivore attacks. It acts both internally, enhancing the plant’s own defenses, and externally, signaling other plants and attracting predatory insects.

    The dual role of jasmone as a local and systemic defense agent shows that plants are capable of multifaceted chemical communication. Such biochemical sophistication is not random but highly coordinated—traits synonymous with awareness and intention.


    32- Chain Reaction

    When one plant is attacked and emits warning signals, it can trigger a chain reaction across a forest. Nearby plants pick up the cues and pass them along, preparing even distant members for possible danger.

    This cascading defense mechanism is akin to a distributed alarm system, reflecting both memory and foresight. Such coordination among disparate organisms is a strong argument for viewing plant life through the lens of distributed cognition.


    33- Lawn

    Even lawns, often dismissed as biologically trivial, participate in these processes. When mowed, grasses emit green leaf volatiles that alert neighboring blades and trigger rapid growth or chemical changes.

    These reactions are not simply byproducts of damage but strategic, coordinated responses. It invites reconsideration of our treatment of these common but complex life forms.


    34- They Recognize Family

    Studies have shown that plants can distinguish between kin and non-kin. Impatiens plants, for instance, alter their root growth when planted with relatives, showing less competitive behavior.

    This kin recognition leads to preferential sharing of resources and minimized root entanglement. Such discernment reflects a form of relational memory and suggests a social dimension to plant existence.


    35- They Are Vocal

    Some researchers have discovered that plants emit ultrasonic clicks and pops—vocalizations that may carry meaning within the plant kingdom. While inaudible to humans, these sounds can be detected with specialized equipment.

    These noises often increase under stress, such as drought or injury. Though the purpose is still under investigation, early studies suggest that other plants respond to these signals, implying a vocal component in plant communication.


    36- They Can ‘Hear’

    Plants appear to respond to sound frequencies. In one study, roots grew toward a sound source emitting frequencies similar to insect buzzes. Likewise, corn roots accelerated growth in response to specific vibrations.

    This auditory perception suggests plants have sensory modalities far richer than previously imagined. The capacity to detect and respond to sound strengthens the argument for a form of environmental awareness.


    37- They Might ‘See’

    Plants have photoreceptors that detect not only light intensity but also color, direction, and even shade patterns. These receptors enable behaviors such as phototropism (growing toward light) and shade avoidance.

    Some studies propose that plants can detect silhouettes of neighboring plants and adjust growth accordingly. This quasi-visual awareness allows them to compete or cooperate strategically, revealing a type of visual cognition.


    38- They Learn

    Through habituation and conditioning, plants have shown they can modify behavior based on past experiences. In experiments, Mimosa pudica learned to stop reacting to harmless stimuli, demonstrating that learning does not require a nervous system.

    Such findings defy the traditional belief that learning is an exclusive hallmark of animal life. Instead, they suggest that cognition may be embedded in cellular and biochemical frameworks.


    39- They Can Remember

    Memory in plants is evident in their ability to retain information over time. Vernalization, the process by which plants “remember” winter to flower in spring, is a well-documented form of seasonal memory.

    Plants also remember light and moisture levels and adjust growth patterns accordingly. These biological memories are stored in gene expression and cellular states—suggesting an epigenetic form of memory without neurons.


    40- Can They Feel Pain?

    Pain, as we know it, requires a central nervous system and subjective experience. Plants do not feel pain in the way animals do, but they do respond to injury with stress signals and defensive measures.

    Philosopher Michael Marder suggests we reconsider what “pain” means in biological terms. If it includes detection of harm and appropriate reaction, then plants experience a non-conscious form of pain—functional, though not emotional.


    41- How About Consciousness?

    If we accept that consciousness is not limited to animals with brains, the plant kingdom becomes a compelling candidate for a different kind of awareness. Their behaviors—memory, learning, communication—indicate a decentralized but responsive presence.

    The idea of plant consciousness invites us to expand the philosophical and scientific definitions of mind. As awareness becomes recognized as a spectrum, plant consciousness fits naturally into the lower, but meaningful, end of that continuum.


    42- Are Plants Conscious?

    While the answer is still under debate, the evidence suggests that plants exhibit many traits we associate with consciousness: perception, memory, learning, and decision-making. They lack a brain, but not intelligence. They lack emotions, but not reaction.

    Books like Plant Intelligence and the Imaginal Realm by Stephen Harrod Buhner argue that our inability to see plant consciousness may lie not in plants but in our own cognitive limits. As science evolves, so too must our understanding of what it means to be conscious.


    Conclusion

    The silent, green world of plants is not as passive as we once believed. Modern research, coupled with ancient wisdom, reveals that plants engage with their environment in ways that reflect memory, communication, and perhaps even a form of consciousness. From root to leaf, they respond to the world with purpose and strategy.

    While we may never fully grasp what it’s like to be a plant, the growing body of evidence compels us to reevaluate long-held assumptions. Expanding our definition of consciousness to include the vegetal realm not only challenges our scientific boundaries but also deepens our ethical and ecological responsibilities. As we seek to live in harmony with nature, recognizing the intelligence and sentience of plants may be one of the most revolutionary steps we take.

    The question of whether plants and trees have consciousness invites a profound reexamination of how we define life, intelligence, and awareness. While plants do not think or feel in ways familiar to humans, they exhibit remarkable complexity, responsiveness, and communication that challenge traditional boundaries of consciousness.

    Recognizing even a rudimentary form of awareness in plants could reshape ethics, ecology, and our relationship with the biosphere. As Aldo Leopold once said, “The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals.” Perhaps it’s time to extend that ethic even further—to the sentient green beings quietly sustaining the planet.

    Bibliography

    1. Buhner, Stephen Harrod. Plant Intelligence and the Imaginal Realm: Beyond the Doors of Perception into the Dreaming of Earth. Inner Traditions, 2014.
    2. Gagliano, Monica. Thus Spoke the Plant: A Remarkable Journey of Groundbreaking Scientific Discoveries and Personal Encounters with Plants. North Atlantic Books, 2018.
    3. Mancuso, Stefano, and Viola, Alessandra. Brilliant Green: The Surprising History and Science of Plant Intelligence. Island Press, 2015.
    4. Simard, Suzanne. Finding the Mother Tree: Discovering the Wisdom of the Forest. Knopf, 2021.
    5. Wohlleben, Peter. The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate – Discoveries from a Secret World. Greystone Books, 2016.
    6. Sheldrake, Merlin. Entangled Life: How Fungi Make Our Worlds, Change Our Minds & Shape Our Futures. Random House, 2020.
    7. Marder, Michael. Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. Columbia University Press, 2013.
    8. Trewavas, Anthony. Plant Behaviour and Intelligence. Oxford University Press, 2014.
    9. Chamovitz, Daniel. What a Plant Knows: A Field Guide to the Senses. Scientific American / Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012.
    10. Tononi, Giulio. Phi: A Voyage from the Brain to the Soul. Pantheon, 2012. (For theoretical insights into consciousness and Integrated Information Theory)
    11. Calvo, Paco, and Friston, Karl. “Predictive Processing in Plants: A Perspective on Plant Intelligence.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 2017, Article 1056.
    12. Karban, Richard. Plant Sensing and Communication. University of Chicago Press, 2015.
    13. Gagliano, Monica, Renton, Michael, and Vyazovskiy, Vladyslav V. “Experience teaches plants to learn faster and forget slower in environments where it matters.” Oecologia, vol. 192, 2020.
    14. Trewavas, Anthony. “Plant Intelligence: Mindless Mastery.” Nature, vol. 410, 2001, pp. 1117.
    15. Mancuso, Stefano. “The Roots of Plant Intelligence.” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 18, no. 11, 2013, pp. 601–607.

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • The Unbounded Mind: Exploring Our Shared Consciousness

    The Unbounded Mind: Exploring Our Shared Consciousness

    The provided text, likely excerpts from a book titled “One Mind” by Larry Dossey, explores the concept of a unified consciousness that transcends individual minds and connects all living beings. The author presents anecdotal evidence, scientific theories such as nonlocality and entanglement, and philosophical perspectives to support the idea that our minds are not isolated but are part of a larger, interconnected awareness. The text examines various phenomena, including telepathy, premonitions, shared experiences, animal behavior, and near-death experiences, through the lens of this “One Mind” theory, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness that has implications for our understanding of consciousness, healing, and our relationship with the world. Ultimately, the text posits the “One Mind” as a source of wisdom, creativity, and a potential solution to the challenges facing humanity, urging a shift from a materialistic worldview to one that embraces this deeper unity.

    The One Mind: Collective Consciousness and Interconnectedness

    The concept of the One Mind as presented in the sources refers to a collective, unitary domain of intelligence of which all individual minds are a part. It is described as an overarching, inclusive dimension to which all the mental components of all individual minds belong. This perspective suggests that the separateness of individual minds is an illusion, and at some level, all minds come together to form a single mind.

    Here are some key aspects of the One Mind concept discussed in the sources:

    • Nonlocality: A fundamental characteristic of the One Mind is its nonlocality. This means that individual minds are not confined or localized to specific points in space (like brains or bodies) or time (like the present). Instead, minds are spatially and temporally infinite, suggesting that the connectedness of minds transcends physical distance and time.
    • Importance: The concept of the One Mind is presented as potentially vital for addressing global challenges such as division, selfishness, and destruction. Recognizing our interconnectedness through the One Mind can lead to a recalibration of our ethical stance, inspiring us to “Be kind to others, because in some sense they are you”. It can also foster cooperation, heightened imagination, and creativity.
    • Experiencing the One Mind: Individuals may encounter the One Mind in various ways, such as transcendent moments, epiphanies, creative breakthroughs, or inexplicably acquired information. It can also manifest as shared emotions, thoughts, or feelings between people at a distance, including spouses, siblings, twins, and even across species.
    • Evidence and Manifestations: The book explores a wide range of phenomena as glimpses of the One Mind. These include:
    • Acts of selfless saving, where the rescuer’s consciousness seems to fuse with the person in need.
    • Experiences of telepathy and the sense of being stared at, suggesting a direct mind-to-mind connection.
    • The coordinated behavior of large groups of animals, implying shared, overlapping minds.
    • Near-death experiences (NDEs), where individuals report contact with a transcendent domain and access to universal knowledge.
    • Reincarnation phenomena.
    • Communication with the deceased.
    • The remarkable abilities of savants, who possess knowledge seemingly beyond their individual learning.
    • The deep connections and shared experiences of twins, even when separated.
    • Telesomatic events, where distant individuals experience similar physical sensations.
    • Experiences of remote viewing and precognition.
    • The One Mind is Not a Homogeneous Blob: Despite the interconnectedness, the One Mind does not result in a featureless muddle. Specificity and individuality are preserved in One-Mind experiences. The analogy of stem cells is used, suggesting the One Mind awaits instructions and prompting to manifest in unique ways.
    • Relationship to the Brain: The book challenges the dominant view that the brain produces consciousness. Instead, it explores the idea that the brain may function as an intermediary or receiver for the mind, which originates from a broader, nonlocal source.
    • Connection to Ancient Wisdom and Modern Science: The concept of the One Mind has ancient roots in various wisdom traditions and is also finding resonance in modern science through concepts like quantum entanglement and the idea of a holographic universe.
    • The Self and the One Mind: While some may fear losing individuality, the One Mind perspective suggests that the illusion of separateness can be overcome to realize a deeper unity. This can lead to a sense of shared identity and fellowship.
    • Is the One Mind God? The book addresses the question of whether the One Mind equates to God, noting similarities such as omniscience, omnipresence, and eternality. While some, like Erwin Schrödinger, saw the One Mind as God, the book also emphasizes potential differences and the importance of recognizing gradations of being.
    • Accessing the One Mind: Various pathways to experiencing the One Mind are discussed, including meditation, reverie, prayer, dreams, and love. The key seems to involve a letting go of the discursive, rational mind and approaching with respect and an openness to a source of wisdom beyond oneself.

    Ultimately, the One Mind concept, as presented in the sources, offers a paradigm shift in understanding consciousness, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness that has profound implications for our understanding of ourselves, our relationship with the world, and our potential for collective action and spiritual growth.

    Nonlocal Consciousness and the One Mind

    The concept of nonlocal consciousness is central to the idea of the One Mind, as discussed in the sources.

    Definition of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    • Nonlocality of consciousness means that individual minds are not confined or localized to specific points in space, such as brains or bodies, nor to specific points in time, such as the present.
    • Instead, minds are spatially and temporally infinite.
    • Nonlocal mind is a term coined to express this spatially and temporally infinite aspect of our consciousness.

    Relationship to the One Mind:

    • The nonlocality of consciousness is presented as the ultimate argument for the One Mind.
    • Because individual minds are not confined, the separateness of minds is considered an illusion.
    • At a fundamental level, all minds come together to form a single mind due to their nonlocal nature.
    • The One Mind is described as an overarching, inclusive dimension to which all the mental components of all individual minds belong. Nonlocality makes this interconnectedness possible.

    Evidence and Manifestations of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    The book explores various phenomena as evidence for nonlocal consciousness and its manifestation in the One Mind:

    • Telepathy: The ability to share thoughts, emotions, and even physical sensations with a distant individual without sensory contact. This suggests that minds are not bounded by physical distance.
    • Remote Viewing and Clairvoyance: The capacity to demonstrate detailed knowledge of distant scenes or find hidden objects without sensory means. This indicates that awareness extends beyond the physical body.
    • Premonitions: Acquiring valid information about future events. This points to a consciousness that is not limited by linear time.
    • Near-Death Experiences (NDEs): Experiences of direct contact with a transcendent domain, often accompanied by a sense of unity and access to universal knowledge, occurring when the brain is significantly impaired. This challenges the idea that consciousness is solely a product of the brain.
    • Shared Experiences: Instances where spouses, siblings, twins, lovers, or groups share emotions, thoughts, or feelings at a distance. Telesomatic events, where distant individuals experience similar physical sensations, also fall under this category.
    • Animal Behavior: The coordinated behavior of large groups of animals, suggesting shared, overlapping minds. The ability of lost animals to return home across vast distances without known sensory cues also hints at nonlocal connections.
    • Savants: Individuals with remarkable abilities or knowledge seemingly beyond their individual learning, possibly tapping into the One Mind.
    • Experiences of Twins: The deep connections and shared experiences of twins, even when separated, suggest a fundamental link in consciousness.

    Challenge to the Brain-Centric View:

    • The concept of nonlocal consciousness directly challenges the dominant view in science that the brain produces consciousness. This brain-as-producer model struggles to explain nonlocal phenomena.
    • The book explores the alternative idea that the brain may function as an intermediary or receiver for the mind, which originates from a broader, nonlocal source.
    • The persistence of coherent experiences during unconsciousness in NDEs further challenges the brain-as-sole-generator theory.

    Implications of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    • The realization of nonlocal consciousness and the One Mind can lead to a sense of felt unity with all other minds, conveying renewed meaning, purpose, and possibility.
    • It fosters the understanding that we are all deeply interconnected, potentially inspiring compassion, responsibility, and cooperation in addressing global challenges. As stated, recognizing our interconnectedness can lead to the ethical stance of being kind to others because “in some sense they are you” [The initial summary provided before the sources].
    • Nonlocal consciousness suggests that information and knowledge are potentially accessible beyond the limitations of individual experience.

    In conclusion, nonlocal consciousness, as presented in the sources, posits that the mind transcends the physical constraints of the brain and body, existing in a spatially and temporally infinite domain. This nonlocality underpins the concept of the One Mind, a unitary field of consciousness of which all individual minds are a part. The existence of various seemingly paranormal phenomena is presented as evidence for this nonlocal nature of consciousness, challenging conventional, brain-centric views and suggesting profound implications for our understanding of ourselves and our interconnectedness with the world.

    One Mind: Shared Experiences and Interconnectedness

    The sources discuss various forms of shared experiences, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness between individuals, which aligns with the concept of the One Mind. These experiences often transcend typical sensory limitations and point to a deeper level of shared consciousness.

    Here are some key types of shared experiences discussed in the sources:

    • Shared Emotions, Thoughts, and Feelings at a Distance: The sources provide numerous examples of individuals sharing emotions, thoughts, or feelings with distant loved ones, such as spouses, siblings, twins, and close friends.
    • A mother inexplicably sensed her young daughter was in trouble and then received a call about her daughter’s car accident.
    • A young academic in New York awoke knowing her twin in Arizona was in trouble, which coincided with a car bomb exploding near her sister’s apartment.
    • Dr. Larry Dossey notes that these One-Mind experiences involve unbounded, extended awareness.
    • Telesomatic Events: These involve individuals separated by distance experiencing similar physical sensations or actual physical changes.
    • A mother writing to her daughter felt a severe burning in her right hand at the same time her daughter’s right hand was burned by acid in a lab accident.
    • A woman suddenly felt severe chest pain and knew something had happened to her daughter Nell, who had simultaneously been in a car accident with a steering wheel penetrating her chest.
    • The case of the infant twins Ricky and Damien suggests a telesomatic link with survival value, as Ricky’s distress alerted his mother to Damien suffocating.
    • These events often occur between people with emotional closeness and empathy.
    • Shared Dreams: The sources mention instances where multiple people report similar dreams on the same night or dream of each other in a common space.
    • The example of the two Japanese women who had strikingly similar dreams of one stabbing the other in a hotel lobby illustrates mutual dreaming.
    • Anthropologist Marianne George experienced shared dreams with a Barok female leader in New Guinea, whose instructions in the dream were later verified by her sons, highlighting the possibility of dream communication across distance.
    • A curious historical anecdote describes a shared dream of a rat attack between individuals living 143 miles apart, suggesting that shared anxieties and dreams can occur even in modern cultures.
    • Shared-Death Experiences (SDEs): These are near-death-like experiences that happen to healthy individuals in the proximity of a loved one who is dying.
    • Raymond Moody first heard of SDEs from a Dr. Jamieson who, upon her mother’s death, found herself out of her body with her mother, witnessing a mystical light and deceased relatives.
    • Moody and his siblings experienced a shared sense of joy and a change in the light of the room as their mother died, with one brother-in-law reporting an out-of-body experience with her.
    • SDEs often include elements of NDEs such as tunnel experiences, bright light, out-of-body sensations, and a life review. A key difference is the shared sensation of a mystical light by several healthy people, which challenges the idea that the light in NDEs is solely a result of a dying brain. Another feature is the observation of an apparent mist leaving the dying person.
    • Collective Experiences in Groups: The sources allude to shared mental states in larger groups.
    • The coordinated behavior of large animal groups like herds, flocks, and schools suggests shared, overlapping minds.
    • The Nuremberg Rallies are presented as an example of how coherent thought and solidarity can be fostered in a large group, though for destructive purposes.
    • The experience of the Hotshot firefighting crew, where each member had a near-death experience during a life-threatening fire, sometimes appearing in each other’s NDE, demonstrates a collective fear-death experience with overlapping elements.
    • Empathy and Pro-Social Behavior: The demonstrated empathy in rats, where a free rat persistently works to liberate a trapped cagemate, suggests a shared emotional experience and a drive towards pro-social behavior. This indicates that shared feelings and a sense of connection may extend beyond humans and influence actions.

    These diverse examples illustrate the concept of shared consciousness extending beyond the individual, supporting the notion of a One Mind where the boundaries of individual awareness are more permeable than conventionally understood. The emotional closeness between individuals appears to be a significant factor in many of these shared experiences. The sources suggest that recognizing these connections can foster compassion and a sense of shared responsibility.

    Animal Minds and Human-Animal Connections

    The sources provide extensive discussion on animal connections, both among animals and between humans and animals, often linking these connections to the concept of the One Mind.

    Connections Among Animals:

    • The book explores the highly coordinated behavior of large groups of animals such as bison herds, wildebeest migrations, passenger pigeon flocks, starling murmurations, and schools of fish. These movements often appear unified, as if the group is a single entity.
    • Swarm intelligence is presented as one scientific explanation, where local interactions between individuals lead to intelligent group behavior without centralized control. However, the book also notes that some biologists suspect this theory doesn’t fully account for the speed and coordination observed, with some speculating about “collective thinking” or telepathy.
    • Rupert Sheldrake’s morphic fields hypothesis is introduced as a potential explanation for this nonsensory group intelligence. He suggests that these fields of influence, shaped by evolution, operate nonlocally and facilitate communication within groups, acting as an evolutionary basis for telepathy. The coordinated movements happen too quickly for sensory explanations like vision alone.
    • The book also discusses animal grief and mourning, citing examples of elephants gathering around the dead, burying them, and revisiting the site, as well as similar behaviors in dogs, horses, and gorillas. The “magpie funeral” and crows reacting to a crow being shot are also given as examples of apparent collective responses.
    • Evidence of empathy and pro-social behavior in animals is presented, such as the study where lab rats would persistently work to free a trapped cagemate, even when offered chocolate as an alternative. This suggests innate, unselfish behavior in animals.

    Connections Between Humans and Animals:

    • Numerous anecdotes and some experimental evidence are provided to illustrate a deep and often inexplicable bond between humans and animals.
    • Returning lost pets are a key example, such as Bobbie the Collie who traveled 2,800 miles over six months to return to his owners. The book challenges conventional explanations like a highly developed sense of smell over such distances and between species, proposing instead that the minds of the animal and owner are part of a larger One Mind, allowing a sharing of information often associated with love and caring. Similar cases of cats returning home over long distances are also mentioned.
    • Animals reacting to the needs and emotions of distant owners are discussed. The case of Prince, the dog who became disconsolate when his soldier owner returned to the front in World War I and then disappeared, is given as an example. Susan Armstrong’s experience of her dog suddenly killing a parakeet at the exact moment she felt a violent emotion while gardening outside also suggests a distant emotional link.
    • Anticipation of an owner’s return by pets, even when the time or mode of transport is varied and unknown to others in the household, is highlighted, referencing Rupert Sheldrake’s experiments. This suggests a bond operating at a distance in both space and time.
    • Pets detecting their owners’ moods, thoughts, and intentions are commonly reported. Sheldrake’s survey found that a significant percentage of dog and cat owners believed their pets responded to their thoughts or silent commands and were sometimes telepathic.
    • Instances of animals rescuing humans and humans rescuing animals are presented as evidence of the One Mind uniting different species. Mythologist Joseph Campbell and philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s idea of minds fusing at critical moments is extended to interspecies rescues, suggesting that the rescuer, in a sense, is rescuing itself. Examples include dolphins protecting swimmers from sharks and a horse charging a cow to save its owner.
    • The phenomenon of apparent distant, cross-species communication is mentioned, such as Queen Elizabeth’s dogs barking when she reaches the gate half a mile away.
    • Dreams involving animals that seem to have a connection to real-world events are noted, such as Jim Harrison’s vivid dream about his neighbor’s missing dogs, which corresponded to the path they took.
    • The historical and cultural reverence for animals and beliefs about their connection to the spiritual realm are briefly touched upon, using the example of bees in various cultures.

    Overall, the sources present a compelling case for significant connections between animals and between humans and animals that go beyond conventional sensory explanations. These connections are presented as supportive evidence for the concept of a unitary One Mind that encompasses all sentient creatures. The book suggests that recognizing these profound links can foster compassion and a sense of interconnectedness with the wider web of life.

    Limits of Science: Consciousness and the Unknown

    The sources discuss several limits of science, both inherent and self-imposed, particularly in its understanding of mind, consciousness, and related phenomena.

    Firstly, the very nature of mind and consciousness poses a significant limit to scientific inquiry as currently practiced. Dr. Dossey recounts an interaction with an Indian physician who pointed out the multiple levels of consciousness, a subtlety often overlooked in Western science. The author acknowledges the difficulty in providing a specific definition of mind and consciousness that satisfies all perspectives. He suggests that perhaps these terms are best left with a degree of deliberate ambiguity.

    Furthermore, there’s a “tool problem” in trying to comprehend consciousness with the mind itself, likened to seeing one’s eye with one’s eye. Similarly, the writer’s tool of language is deemed insufficient to fully describe the unification of individual minds in a unitary One Mind. Bohr’s analogy of cleaning plates with dirty water and dishcloths illustrates this limitation of using unclear concepts to understand nature. Because of this, Dr. Dossey frequently relies on individual experiences, which he argues are essential for grasping the complementarity between individual minds and the One Mind, even if skeptics dismiss them as “mere anecdotes”. Max Planck’s quote underscores this, stating that science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature because we are part of that mystery.

    The sources also highlight self-imposed limits of science, often stemming from dogmatic assumptions and “pathological disbelief”. Nobel physicist Brian Josephson terms the staunch refusal to consider evidence for a nonlocal, unified aspect of mind as “pathological disbelief”. This is compared to 18th-century scientists denying the existence of meteorites despite physical evidence because “stones cannot fall from the sky”. A similar dogmatism persists today, with many scientists insisting consciousness cannot exist outside the brain and body, disregarding evidence suggesting otherwise. This “aggressive, hubristic pathological disbelief” not only disgraces scientific tradition but also diminishes the “hope of wisdom” needed for survival. Rupert Sheldrake also argues that science is being constricted by assumptions that have hardened into dangerous dogmas.

    The arrogance and certainty that science knows more than it does also create serious obstacles in understanding consciousness. Wes Nisker’s playful suggestion to publicly admit “we don’t know what the hell’s going on here” serves as a corrective to this hubris.

    Methodologically, science faces limitations when trying to study certain phenomena. J. B. Priestley suggests that precognitive dreams and similar experiences might wither away when brought into the controlled environment of scientific experiment. Similarly, the One Mind, thriving on uncertainty and freedom, is not easily studied through formalized entry methods, which can become a trap. The attempt to study prayer in highly artificial ways is given as another example of how concretization can hinder understanding.

    Historically, science has often shown resistance to new ideas, with prominent scientists facing ridicule and opposition for challenging established views. The image of the open-minded scientist is contrasted with the reality of narrow-mindedness, dullness, and even stupidity that can exist within the scientific community, as noted by Nobel laureate James Watson and psychologist Hans Eysenck. Prejudice against consciousness research is openly admitted in some cases. Furthermore, science has been accused of “skimming off the top,” accepting data that aligns with the prevailing paradigm and ignoring contradictory evidence.

    The sources also touch upon the limits of science in fully grasping the concept of “self”. While spiritual traditions have long addressed the illusion of a fixed self, science’s attempts to eradicate the self might be an overreach, potentially killing off consciousness as well. Carl Jung believed it’s absurd to suppose existence can only be physical, as our immediate knowledge is psychic.

    However, the sources also suggest that acknowledging these limits can be an opportunity for science to expand. Lewis Thomas recognized the importance of admitting our ignorance. Sir Arthur Eddington’s quote, “Something unknown is doing we don’t know what,” is presented as an excellent motto for exploring beyond-the-brain-and-body phenomena, emphasizing humility, awe, and wonder, which Socrates considered the beginning of wisdom. The call for “more and better science” includes a science that embraces the “hope of wisdom” and recognizes our interconnectedness with life on Earth. By ceasing to sacrifice empirical findings to protect pet notions, science can evolve and contribute to a more holistic understanding of reality.

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • The Unbounded Mind: Exploring Our Shared Consciousness

    The Unbounded Mind: Exploring Our Shared Consciousness

    The provided text, likely excerpts from a book titled “One Mind” by Larry Dossey, explores the concept of a unified consciousness that transcends individual minds and connects all living beings. The author presents anecdotal evidence, scientific theories such as nonlocality and entanglement, and philosophical perspectives to support the idea that our minds are not isolated but are part of a larger, interconnected awareness. The text examines various phenomena, including telepathy, premonitions, shared experiences, animal behavior, and near-death experiences, through the lens of this “One Mind” theory, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness that has implications for our understanding of consciousness, healing, and our relationship with the world. Ultimately, the text posits the “One Mind” as a source of wisdom, creativity, and a potential solution to the challenges facing humanity, urging a shift from a materialistic worldview to one that embraces this deeper unity.

    The One Mind: Collective Consciousness and Interconnectedness

    The concept of the One Mind as presented in the sources refers to a collective, unitary domain of intelligence of which all individual minds are a part. It is described as an overarching, inclusive dimension to which all the mental components of all individual minds belong. This perspective suggests that the separateness of individual minds is an illusion, and at some level, all minds come together to form a single mind.

    Here are some key aspects of the One Mind concept discussed in the sources:

    • Nonlocality: A fundamental characteristic of the One Mind is its nonlocality. This means that individual minds are not confined or localized to specific points in space (like brains or bodies) or time (like the present). Instead, minds are spatially and temporally infinite, suggesting that the connectedness of minds transcends physical distance and time.
    • Importance: The concept of the One Mind is presented as potentially vital for addressing global challenges such as division, selfishness, and destruction. Recognizing our interconnectedness through the One Mind can lead to a recalibration of our ethical stance, inspiring us to “Be kind to others, because in some sense they are you”. It can also foster cooperation, heightened imagination, and creativity.
    • Experiencing the One Mind: Individuals may encounter the One Mind in various ways, such as transcendent moments, epiphanies, creative breakthroughs, or inexplicably acquired information. It can also manifest as shared emotions, thoughts, or feelings between people at a distance, including spouses, siblings, twins, and even across species.
    • Evidence and Manifestations: The book explores a wide range of phenomena as glimpses of the One Mind. These include:
    • Acts of selfless saving, where the rescuer’s consciousness seems to fuse with the person in need.
    • Experiences of telepathy and the sense of being stared at, suggesting a direct mind-to-mind connection.
    • The coordinated behavior of large groups of animals, implying shared, overlapping minds.
    • Near-death experiences (NDEs), where individuals report contact with a transcendent domain and access to universal knowledge.
    • Reincarnation phenomena.
    • Communication with the deceased.
    • The remarkable abilities of savants, who possess knowledge seemingly beyond their individual learning.
    • The deep connections and shared experiences of twins, even when separated.
    • Telesomatic events, where distant individuals experience similar physical sensations.
    • Experiences of remote viewing and precognition.
    • The One Mind is Not a Homogeneous Blob: Despite the interconnectedness, the One Mind does not result in a featureless muddle. Specificity and individuality are preserved in One-Mind experiences. The analogy of stem cells is used, suggesting the One Mind awaits instructions and prompting to manifest in unique ways.
    • Relationship to the Brain: The book challenges the dominant view that the brain produces consciousness. Instead, it explores the idea that the brain may function as an intermediary or receiver for the mind, which originates from a broader, nonlocal source.
    • Connection to Ancient Wisdom and Modern Science: The concept of the One Mind has ancient roots in various wisdom traditions and is also finding resonance in modern science through concepts like quantum entanglement and the idea of a holographic universe.
    • The Self and the One Mind: While some may fear losing individuality, the One Mind perspective suggests that the illusion of separateness can be overcome to realize a deeper unity. This can lead to a sense of shared identity and fellowship.
    • Is the One Mind God? The book addresses the question of whether the One Mind equates to God, noting similarities such as omniscience, omnipresence, and eternality. While some, like Erwin Schrödinger, saw the One Mind as God, the book also emphasizes potential differences and the importance of recognizing gradations of being.
    • Accessing the One Mind: Various pathways to experiencing the One Mind are discussed, including meditation, reverie, prayer, dreams, and love. The key seems to involve a letting go of the discursive, rational mind and approaching with respect and an openness to a source of wisdom beyond oneself.

    Ultimately, the One Mind concept, as presented in the sources, offers a paradigm shift in understanding consciousness, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness that has profound implications for our understanding of ourselves, our relationship with the world, and our potential for collective action and spiritual growth.

    Nonlocal Consciousness and the One Mind

    The concept of nonlocal consciousness is central to the idea of the One Mind, as discussed in the sources.

    Definition of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    • Nonlocality of consciousness means that individual minds are not confined or localized to specific points in space, such as brains or bodies, nor to specific points in time, such as the present.
    • Instead, minds are spatially and temporally infinite.
    • Nonlocal mind is a term coined to express this spatially and temporally infinite aspect of our consciousness.

    Relationship to the One Mind:

    • The nonlocality of consciousness is presented as the ultimate argument for the One Mind.
    • Because individual minds are not confined, the separateness of minds is considered an illusion.
    • At a fundamental level, all minds come together to form a single mind due to their nonlocal nature.
    • The One Mind is described as an overarching, inclusive dimension to which all the mental components of all individual minds belong. Nonlocality makes this interconnectedness possible.

    Evidence and Manifestations of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    The book explores various phenomena as evidence for nonlocal consciousness and its manifestation in the One Mind:

    • Telepathy: The ability to share thoughts, emotions, and even physical sensations with a distant individual without sensory contact. This suggests that minds are not bounded by physical distance.
    • Remote Viewing and Clairvoyance: The capacity to demonstrate detailed knowledge of distant scenes or find hidden objects without sensory means. This indicates that awareness extends beyond the physical body.
    • Premonitions: Acquiring valid information about future events. This points to a consciousness that is not limited by linear time.
    • Near-Death Experiences (NDEs): Experiences of direct contact with a transcendent domain, often accompanied by a sense of unity and access to universal knowledge, occurring when the brain is significantly impaired. This challenges the idea that consciousness is solely a product of the brain.
    • Shared Experiences: Instances where spouses, siblings, twins, lovers, or groups share emotions, thoughts, or feelings at a distance. Telesomatic events, where distant individuals experience similar physical sensations, also fall under this category.
    • Animal Behavior: The coordinated behavior of large groups of animals, suggesting shared, overlapping minds. The ability of lost animals to return home across vast distances without known sensory cues also hints at nonlocal connections.
    • Savants: Individuals with remarkable abilities or knowledge seemingly beyond their individual learning, possibly tapping into the One Mind.
    • Experiences of Twins: The deep connections and shared experiences of twins, even when separated, suggest a fundamental link in consciousness.

    Challenge to the Brain-Centric View:

    • The concept of nonlocal consciousness directly challenges the dominant view in science that the brain produces consciousness. This brain-as-producer model struggles to explain nonlocal phenomena.
    • The book explores the alternative idea that the brain may function as an intermediary or receiver for the mind, which originates from a broader, nonlocal source.
    • The persistence of coherent experiences during unconsciousness in NDEs further challenges the brain-as-sole-generator theory.

    Implications of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    • The realization of nonlocal consciousness and the One Mind can lead to a sense of felt unity with all other minds, conveying renewed meaning, purpose, and possibility.
    • It fosters the understanding that we are all deeply interconnected, potentially inspiring compassion, responsibility, and cooperation in addressing global challenges. As stated, recognizing our interconnectedness can lead to the ethical stance of being kind to others because “in some sense they are you” [The initial summary provided before the sources].
    • Nonlocal consciousness suggests that information and knowledge are potentially accessible beyond the limitations of individual experience.

    In conclusion, nonlocal consciousness, as presented in the sources, posits that the mind transcends the physical constraints of the brain and body, existing in a spatially and temporally infinite domain. This nonlocality underpins the concept of the One Mind, a unitary field of consciousness of which all individual minds are a part. The existence of various seemingly paranormal phenomena is presented as evidence for this nonlocal nature of consciousness, challenging conventional, brain-centric views and suggesting profound implications for our understanding of ourselves and our interconnectedness with the world.

    One Mind: Shared Experiences and Interconnectedness

    The sources discuss various forms of shared experiences, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness between individuals, which aligns with the concept of the One Mind. These experiences often transcend typical sensory limitations and point to a deeper level of shared consciousness.

    Here are some key types of shared experiences discussed in the sources:

    • Shared Emotions, Thoughts, and Feelings at a Distance: The sources provide numerous examples of individuals sharing emotions, thoughts, or feelings with distant loved ones, such as spouses, siblings, twins, and close friends.
    • A mother inexplicably sensed her young daughter was in trouble and then received a call about her daughter’s car accident.
    • A young academic in New York awoke knowing her twin in Arizona was in trouble, which coincided with a car bomb exploding near her sister’s apartment.
    • Dr. Larry Dossey notes that these One-Mind experiences involve unbounded, extended awareness.
    • Telesomatic Events: These involve individuals separated by distance experiencing similar physical sensations or actual physical changes.
    • A mother writing to her daughter felt a severe burning in her right hand at the same time her daughter’s right hand was burned by acid in a lab accident.
    • A woman suddenly felt severe chest pain and knew something had happened to her daughter Nell, who had simultaneously been in a car accident with a steering wheel penetrating her chest.
    • The case of the infant twins Ricky and Damien suggests a telesomatic link with survival value, as Ricky’s distress alerted his mother to Damien suffocating.
    • These events often occur between people with emotional closeness and empathy.
    • Shared Dreams: The sources mention instances where multiple people report similar dreams on the same night or dream of each other in a common space.
    • The example of the two Japanese women who had strikingly similar dreams of one stabbing the other in a hotel lobby illustrates mutual dreaming.
    • Anthropologist Marianne George experienced shared dreams with a Barok female leader in New Guinea, whose instructions in the dream were later verified by her sons, highlighting the possibility of dream communication across distance.
    • A curious historical anecdote describes a shared dream of a rat attack between individuals living 143 miles apart, suggesting that shared anxieties and dreams can occur even in modern cultures.
    • Shared-Death Experiences (SDEs): These are near-death-like experiences that happen to healthy individuals in the proximity of a loved one who is dying.
    • Raymond Moody first heard of SDEs from a Dr. Jamieson who, upon her mother’s death, found herself out of her body with her mother, witnessing a mystical light and deceased relatives.
    • Moody and his siblings experienced a shared sense of joy and a change in the light of the room as their mother died, with one brother-in-law reporting an out-of-body experience with her.
    • SDEs often include elements of NDEs such as tunnel experiences, bright light, out-of-body sensations, and a life review. A key difference is the shared sensation of a mystical light by several healthy people, which challenges the idea that the light in NDEs is solely a result of a dying brain. Another feature is the observation of an apparent mist leaving the dying person.
    • Collective Experiences in Groups: The sources allude to shared mental states in larger groups.
    • The coordinated behavior of large animal groups like herds, flocks, and schools suggests shared, overlapping minds.
    • The Nuremberg Rallies are presented as an example of how coherent thought and solidarity can be fostered in a large group, though for destructive purposes.
    • The experience of the Hotshot firefighting crew, where each member had a near-death experience during a life-threatening fire, sometimes appearing in each other’s NDE, demonstrates a collective fear-death experience with overlapping elements.
    • Empathy and Pro-Social Behavior: The demonstrated empathy in rats, where a free rat persistently works to liberate a trapped cagemate, suggests a shared emotional experience and a drive towards pro-social behavior. This indicates that shared feelings and a sense of connection may extend beyond humans and influence actions.

    These diverse examples illustrate the concept of shared consciousness extending beyond the individual, supporting the notion of a One Mind where the boundaries of individual awareness are more permeable than conventionally understood. The emotional closeness between individuals appears to be a significant factor in many of these shared experiences. The sources suggest that recognizing these connections can foster compassion and a sense of shared responsibility.

    Animal Minds and Human-Animal Connections

    The sources provide extensive discussion on animal connections, both among animals and between humans and animals, often linking these connections to the concept of the One Mind.

    Connections Among Animals:

    • The book explores the highly coordinated behavior of large groups of animals such as bison herds, wildebeest migrations, passenger pigeon flocks, starling murmurations, and schools of fish. These movements often appear unified, as if the group is a single entity.
    • Swarm intelligence is presented as one scientific explanation, where local interactions between individuals lead to intelligent group behavior without centralized control. However, the book also notes that some biologists suspect this theory doesn’t fully account for the speed and coordination observed, with some speculating about “collective thinking” or telepathy.
    • Rupert Sheldrake’s morphic fields hypothesis is introduced as a potential explanation for this nonsensory group intelligence. He suggests that these fields of influence, shaped by evolution, operate nonlocally and facilitate communication within groups, acting as an evolutionary basis for telepathy. The coordinated movements happen too quickly for sensory explanations like vision alone.
    • The book also discusses animal grief and mourning, citing examples of elephants gathering around the dead, burying them, and revisiting the site, as well as similar behaviors in dogs, horses, and gorillas. The “magpie funeral” and crows reacting to a crow being shot are also given as examples of apparent collective responses.
    • Evidence of empathy and pro-social behavior in animals is presented, such as the study where lab rats would persistently work to free a trapped cagemate, even when offered chocolate as an alternative. This suggests innate, unselfish behavior in animals.

    Connections Between Humans and Animals:

    • Numerous anecdotes and some experimental evidence are provided to illustrate a deep and often inexplicable bond between humans and animals.
    • Returning lost pets are a key example, such as Bobbie the Collie who traveled 2,800 miles over six months to return to his owners. The book challenges conventional explanations like a highly developed sense of smell over such distances and between species, proposing instead that the minds of the animal and owner are part of a larger One Mind, allowing a sharing of information often associated with love and caring. Similar cases of cats returning home over long distances are also mentioned.
    • Animals reacting to the needs and emotions of distant owners are discussed. The case of Prince, the dog who became disconsolate when his soldier owner returned to the front in World War I and then disappeared, is given as an example. Susan Armstrong’s experience of her dog suddenly killing a parakeet at the exact moment she felt a violent emotion while gardening outside also suggests a distant emotional link.
    • Anticipation of an owner’s return by pets, even when the time or mode of transport is varied and unknown to others in the household, is highlighted, referencing Rupert Sheldrake’s experiments. This suggests a bond operating at a distance in both space and time.
    • Pets detecting their owners’ moods, thoughts, and intentions are commonly reported. Sheldrake’s survey found that a significant percentage of dog and cat owners believed their pets responded to their thoughts or silent commands and were sometimes telepathic.
    • Instances of animals rescuing humans and humans rescuing animals are presented as evidence of the One Mind uniting different species. Mythologist Joseph Campbell and philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s idea of minds fusing at critical moments is extended to interspecies rescues, suggesting that the rescuer, in a sense, is rescuing itself. Examples include dolphins protecting swimmers from sharks and a horse charging a cow to save its owner.
    • The phenomenon of apparent distant, cross-species communication is mentioned, such as Queen Elizabeth’s dogs barking when she reaches the gate half a mile away.
    • Dreams involving animals that seem to have a connection to real-world events are noted, such as Jim Harrison’s vivid dream about his neighbor’s missing dogs, which corresponded to the path they took.
    • The historical and cultural reverence for animals and beliefs about their connection to the spiritual realm are briefly touched upon, using the example of bees in various cultures.

    Overall, the sources present a compelling case for significant connections between animals and between humans and animals that go beyond conventional sensory explanations. These connections are presented as supportive evidence for the concept of a unitary One Mind that encompasses all sentient creatures. The book suggests that recognizing these profound links can foster compassion and a sense of interconnectedness with the wider web of life.

    Limits of Science: Consciousness and the Unknown

    The sources discuss several limits of science, both inherent and self-imposed, particularly in its understanding of mind, consciousness, and related phenomena.

    Firstly, the very nature of mind and consciousness poses a significant limit to scientific inquiry as currently practiced. Dr. Dossey recounts an interaction with an Indian physician who pointed out the multiple levels of consciousness, a subtlety often overlooked in Western science. The author acknowledges the difficulty in providing a specific definition of mind and consciousness that satisfies all perspectives. He suggests that perhaps these terms are best left with a degree of deliberate ambiguity.

    Furthermore, there’s a “tool problem” in trying to comprehend consciousness with the mind itself, likened to seeing one’s eye with one’s eye. Similarly, the writer’s tool of language is deemed insufficient to fully describe the unification of individual minds in a unitary One Mind. Bohr’s analogy of cleaning plates with dirty water and dishcloths illustrates this limitation of using unclear concepts to understand nature. Because of this, Dr. Dossey frequently relies on individual experiences, which he argues are essential for grasping the complementarity between individual minds and the One Mind, even if skeptics dismiss them as “mere anecdotes”. Max Planck’s quote underscores this, stating that science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature because we are part of that mystery.

    The sources also highlight self-imposed limits of science, often stemming from dogmatic assumptions and “pathological disbelief”. Nobel physicist Brian Josephson terms the staunch refusal to consider evidence for a nonlocal, unified aspect of mind as “pathological disbelief”. This is compared to 18th-century scientists denying the existence of meteorites despite physical evidence because “stones cannot fall from the sky”. A similar dogmatism persists today, with many scientists insisting consciousness cannot exist outside the brain and body, disregarding evidence suggesting otherwise. This “aggressive, hubristic pathological disbelief” not only disgraces scientific tradition but also diminishes the “hope of wisdom” needed for survival. Rupert Sheldrake also argues that science is being constricted by assumptions that have hardened into dangerous dogmas.

    The arrogance and certainty that science knows more than it does also create serious obstacles in understanding consciousness. Wes Nisker’s playful suggestion to publicly admit “we don’t know what the hell’s going on here” serves as a corrective to this hubris.

    Methodologically, science faces limitations when trying to study certain phenomena. J. B. Priestley suggests that precognitive dreams and similar experiences might wither away when brought into the controlled environment of scientific experiment. Similarly, the One Mind, thriving on uncertainty and freedom, is not easily studied through formalized entry methods, which can become a trap. The attempt to study prayer in highly artificial ways is given as another example of how concretization can hinder understanding.

    Historically, science has often shown resistance to new ideas, with prominent scientists facing ridicule and opposition for challenging established views. The image of the open-minded scientist is contrasted with the reality of narrow-mindedness, dullness, and even stupidity that can exist within the scientific community, as noted by Nobel laureate James Watson and psychologist Hans Eysenck. Prejudice against consciousness research is openly admitted in some cases. Furthermore, science has been accused of “skimming off the top,” accepting data that aligns with the prevailing paradigm and ignoring contradictory evidence.

    The sources also touch upon the limits of science in fully grasping the concept of “self”. While spiritual traditions have long addressed the illusion of a fixed self, science’s attempts to eradicate the self might be an overreach, potentially killing off consciousness as well. Carl Jung believed it’s absurd to suppose existence can only be physical, as our immediate knowledge is psychic.

    However, the sources also suggest that acknowledging these limits can be an opportunity for science to expand. Lewis Thomas recognized the importance of admitting our ignorance. Sir Arthur Eddington’s quote, “Something unknown is doing we don’t know what,” is presented as an excellent motto for exploring beyond-the-brain-and-body phenomena, emphasizing humility, awe, and wonder, which Socrates considered the beginning of wisdom. The call for “more and better science” includes a science that embraces the “hope of wisdom” and recognizes our interconnectedness with life on Earth. By ceasing to sacrifice empirical findings to protect pet notions, science can evolve and contribute to a more holistic understanding of reality.

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • Do Plants And Trees Have Consciousness?

    Do Plants And Trees Have Consciousness?

    Is it possible that the green, silent world around us is far more aware than we’ve ever imagined? For centuries, humans have considered consciousness to be a uniquely animal – and primarily human – trait. But new scientific inquiries and philosophical debates are forcing us to rethink this assumption. As we deepen our understanding of biology and intelligence, the idea that plants and trees may possess a form of consciousness is gaining serious academic traction.

    Modern research in plant neurobiology, bioacoustics, and environmental responsiveness suggests that plants are far from passive. They process information, react to stimuli, and even engage in intricate behaviors that resemble problem-solving. Such revelations are blurring the once-clear line between sentient beings and vegetation. The implications are profound, inviting us to reconsider ethical, ecological, and spiritual relationships with the botanical world.

    This blog explores this compelling question from multiple angles—biological, philosophical, and cultural. Drawing upon the latest science, ancient traditions, and notable thinkers, it delves into whether what we’ve long thought of as inanimate greenery might be conscious in a way we have yet to fully comprehend.


    1- Definitions of Consciousness

    To tackle whether plants and trees have consciousness, we must first define what consciousness is. Consciousness is typically characterized as the capacity for awareness, experience, and intentionality. In humans and animals, it’s linked with the ability to perceive the environment, process sensory data, and respond with purpose. The challenge lies in applying this anthropocentric model to life forms without brains or central nervous systems. However, some scholars argue for broader definitions, such as philosopher Thomas Nagel’s idea that “an organism is conscious if there is something it is like to be that organism.”

    From an ecological standpoint, even basic responsiveness to environmental changes can be seen as a rudimentary form of awareness. If we shift from a binary view of consciousness (either you have it or you don’t) to a spectrum model, we create space to explore non-animal consciousness. Michael Pollan, in The Botany of Desire, asserts that plants might have “intelligence without a brain,” compelling us to reframe what it means to be aware.


    2- Scientific Advances in Plant Behavior

    Research over the past two decades has revealed that plants exhibit behaviors akin to memory, communication, and learning. Dr. Monica Gagliano’s work in plant bioacoustics, for example, shows that plants can respond to sound cues, suggesting a kind of sensory processing previously thought impossible in flora. Her experiments with Mimosa pudica (the sensitive plant) demonstrated that plants can learn from experience and retain that learning.

    Further studies by Stefano Mancuso, author of The Revolutionary Genius of Plants, show that root tips operate much like neurons, suggesting decentralized processing akin to neural networks. Plants also display swarm intelligence, collaborating with mycorrhizal fungi and other plants to exchange nutrients and signals. This web of interaction hints at an emergent intelligence that is not bound by animal physiology.


    3- Philosophical Perspectives on Plant Consciousness

    Philosophers like Daniel Dennett argue that consciousness must be defined by function, not structure. If consciousness is about responses to environmental complexity, then the behavioral repertoire of plants qualifies them for consideration. Panpsychism, a view gaining traction in modern philosophy of mind, posits that consciousness is a fundamental aspect of all matter—a view that would certainly include plant life.

    Aldous Huxley once wrote, “There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception.” Perhaps our limited perception has prevented us from recognizing vegetal consciousness. Indigenous worldviews have long held that plants are sentient beings, a notion only now being entertained by mainstream science and philosophy.


    4- Indigenous Knowledge and Plant Consciousness

    Long before Western science began probing the intelligence of plants, indigenous cultures around the world had already established deep, respectful relationships with plant beings. For example, the Amazonian tribes view certain plants like ayahuasca as sentient teachers. These relationships are not metaphorical but are grounded in generations of experiential knowledge and spiritual dialogue.

    Books like Braiding Sweetgrass by Robin Wall Kimmerer blend indigenous wisdom with scientific training, illustrating how plants “speak” and humans can learn to listen. Such traditions challenge the materialist worldview and support a more relational, holistic understanding of consciousness that includes flora.


    5- Plant Communication and Information Exchange

    Plants are not solitary organisms; they engage in sophisticated communication systems using chemicals, electrical signals, and even sound. Through volatile organic compounds, they can warn neighboring plants of pest attacks, triggering defensive responses. This cooperative behavior indicates a level of community awareness.

    Additionally, the mycorrhizal network—dubbed the “Wood Wide Web”—is a stunning example of interplant communication. Through this fungal symbiosis, plants share resources and send chemical messages, which some scientists liken to a form of plant language. This network shows a level of interdependence and responsiveness characteristic of sentient systems.


    6- Memory and Learning in Plants

    Experimental evidence suggests that plants are capable of retaining information from past experiences. In one study, Mimosa pudica stopped closing its leaves when repeatedly exposed to a non-harmful stimulus, indicating habituation—a basic form of learning.

    Such capacity for memory without neurons upends traditional views of intelligence. Philosopher Andy Clark has proposed that cognition is not limited to the brain but is distributed across systems—supporting the idea that plant “intelligence” is embedded in its entire structure.


    7- Ethical Implications

    If plants possess a form of consciousness or sentience, then our ethical frameworks must evolve. Should deforestation, monoculture farming, and genetic modification be reevaluated from a moral standpoint? The philosopher Peter Singer’s animal liberation arguments, while not focused on plants, could inspire a broader ethical discourse on non-animal life.

    Bioethicist Michael Marder argues in Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life that plants deserve ethical consideration due to their unique modes of being. Recognizing their agency could transform environmental policy and human consumption patterns.


    8- Comparative Analysis with Animal Consciousness

    Plants do not have brains or nervous systems, but neither do all animals that we accept as conscious. Octopuses, for instance, have decentralized nervous systems, yet are acknowledged as sentient. Similarly, if function over form is the criterion, plants’ adaptive responses and communicative behaviors suggest a parallel form of awareness.

    Furthermore, invertebrates like jellyfish or sponges lack complex brains but still show purposeful behavior. This comparison supports the notion that consciousness might manifest in many ways, not all of which resemble human cognition.


    9- The Role of Emotions in Consciousness

    Emotions are often linked with consciousness, but are they necessary to define it? While plants may not feel in the way animals do, they show stress responses and can prioritize certain actions over others—suggesting internal value systems.

    Physiological changes such as the release of defense hormones and growth toward beneficial stimuli indicate a decision-making process. As Dr. Mancuso notes, plants behave in ways that appear goal-directed, which is a key characteristic of conscious beings.


    10- The Language of Plants

    Though plants don’t use words, their biochemical signaling constitutes a kind of language. Research by Suzanne Simard on intertree communication via the mycorrhizal network demonstrates complex information exchange resembling linguistic structures.

    Furthermore, new studies in plant acoustics suggest they emit sounds under stress—tiny crackles that neighboring plants seem to perceive. These findings open up the idea of a silent language that is just beginning to be deciphered.


    11- Time Perception in Plants

    Plants operate on different temporal scales than humans, but that doesn’t mean they are passive. Circadian rhythms, photoperiodism, and growth patterns show that plants perceive and respond to time. Their internal clocks regulate behaviors much like ours do.

    Daniel Chamovitz’s book What a Plant Knows highlights how plants “know” when to flower, when to rest, and how to prepare for environmental changes—all signs of temporal awareness.


    12- Consciousness as a Spectrum

    Instead of treating consciousness as an on/off switch, many scholars advocate for a spectrum model. This view allows for varying degrees of awareness across species. Plants may occupy a lower end of this continuum but still register as conscious.

    As philosopher David Chalmers states, “Consciousness might be a fundamental property of the universe.” In this framework, plant consciousness becomes a natural extension of the continuity of life.


    13- Plant Cognition and Problem Solving

    Plants exhibit problem-solving capabilities, such as optimizing resource allocation in response to competing stimuli. In one study, climbing plants altered their growth direction to avoid obstacles and reach support structures—a calculated behavior.

    Such decision-making under constraints mirrors basic cognitive functions. As Mancuso explains, cognition does not require a brain but rather a capacity to interpret and adapt to complex conditions.


    14- Symbiotic Intelligence

    Symbiotic relationships in the plant world are examples of distributed intelligence. From lichens to nitrogen-fixing bacteria, these partnerships show co-evolved intelligence systems where plants actively participate and respond.

    This networked intelligence strengthens the argument that consciousness need not be isolated within a single organism but can emerge in relationships and interactions.


    15- Cultural and Spiritual Perspectives

    From the sacred Bodhi tree under which the Buddha attained enlightenment to the tree spirits of Celtic lore, cultures worldwide have long viewed plants as possessing spiritual consciousness. These views may now find support in emerging science.

    Such perspectives invite a synthesis between spirituality and ecology, offering new ways to appreciate and protect our vegetal kin.


    16- Limitations of Human-Centric Science

    Our tools and biases limit our ability to detect non-human consciousness. Just as Galileo’s telescope revealed celestial truths invisible to the naked eye, so too may future technologies reveal aspects of plant awareness currently beyond our perception.

    Cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman argues that reality is filtered through our species-specific senses. Thus, what seems like unconsciousness in plants may be a failure of our detection, not of their awareness.


    17- Consciousness Without Neurons

    The nervous system is not the only medium for awareness. Bacteria, which lack neurons, still exhibit chemotaxis and complex behaviors. Similarly, plant cells use electrical and chemical signaling for decision-making.

    These findings dismantle the neurological chauvinism that has long dominated consciousness studies. As life evolved different paths, so too might consciousness have evolved diverse forms.


    18- Emerging Technologies and Discoveries

    Innovations in electrophysiology, AI modeling, and imaging are helping scientists “listen” to plants in new ways. These tools are opening a frontier in plant studies, allowing researchers to decode signals that once seemed like noise.

    Such interdisciplinary collaboration between neuroscience, botany, and informatics is helping to bridge the gap between speculation and empirical evidence.


    19- Counterarguments and Skepticism

    Skeptics argue that attributing consciousness to plants risks anthropomorphism. They caution against interpreting adaptive behavior as intentionality. However, the same caution once met claims about animal emotions and intelligence.

    This resistance underscores the philosophical discomfort of expanding moral and cognitive boundaries. Yet science thrives when it questions assumptions and explores anomalies.


    20- Future of Plant Consciousness Research

    The future holds promise for a deeper understanding of plant intelligence. Interdisciplinary fields like plant neurobiology, ecopsychology, and synthetic biology are at the forefront. These domains could revolutionize not just science, but our worldview.

    As our ecological crises deepen, recognizing the agency and intelligence of plants may be key to fostering more respectful and sustainable relationships with the natural world.


    21- There is Research

    Significant research has been conducted over the past few decades that supports the idea that plants exhibit behaviors associated with awareness and communication. Institutions such as the University of Western Australia, under the leadership of Dr. Monica Gagliano, have conducted groundbreaking experiments showing plants’ ability to learn and remember. Her experiments with classical conditioning—once thought exclusive to animals—revealed that pea plants could associate a neutral stimulus with a beneficial one.

    In addition, Stefano Mancuso’s International Laboratory of Plant Neurobiology has documented how plants process environmental data through electrical impulses, akin to neuronal signaling in animals. These findings, while controversial, suggest that the botanical world is far more complex and aware than previously assumed, inviting a reevaluation of cognitive thresholds in living organisms.


    22- Trees Are Polite to Each Other

    Ecologist Suzanne Simard’s research has shown that trees in a forest avoid shading each other excessively, a behavior often described as “polite.” Through spatial awareness and growth regulation, trees adjust their branches to maximize light access for the collective, not just for themselves.

    This altruistic behavior appears especially among trees of the same species, indicating a communal ethic in plant life. It subverts the Darwinian model of ruthless competition and leans toward mutual cooperation, as described in Peter Wohlleben’s The Hidden Life of Trees. This polite conduct reveals a silent social intelligence operating within forests.


    23- Theory

    Multiple theories attempt to explain plant behavior through a conscious lens. One such theory is the theory of decentralized intelligence, which suggests that intelligence can be diffused across a system rather than localized in a brain. This suits the plant structure, where root tips, leaves, and stems can operate semi-autonomously in response to local stimuli.

    Another is the integrated information theory (IIT), popularized by neuroscientist Giulio Tononi, which proposes that consciousness corresponds to the level of integrated information a system can generate. Though plants are not typical candidates, their complex signaling networks and information-processing capabilities make them a curious fit for further IIT-based inquiry.


    24- Crown Shyness

    Crown shyness is a phenomenon where the uppermost branches of some trees avoid touching each other, forming distinctive patterns in the canopy. This spatial restraint, though not fully understood, appears to be a form of mechanical or light-sensing self-regulation.

    Some scientists speculate that this behavior reduces the spread of disease and prevents branch damage during high winds. Whether it is due to tactile awareness or light detection, the fact that trees engage in this form of arboreal etiquette again underscores the sophistication of their environmental interactions.


    25- They Share Resources

    Through the vast underground mycorrhizal networks, trees and plants share essential nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. This resource allocation often favors younger, weaker, or kin trees, reflecting a form of support system within plant communities.

    Suzanne Simard’s studies revealed that “mother trees” can identify and prioritize their own offspring in the forest. This resource sharing contradicts the idea that nature is purely competitive and aligns more closely with social and communal behavior observed in conscious beings.


    26- Mycorrhizal Networks

    These fungal-root symbiotic systems act like neural networks beneath the soil, connecting individual plants into a larger collective. Through these networks, information, stress signals, and nutrients are transmitted across large distances.

    The mycorrhizal system enables what some researchers term “plant sociality.” As described in Merlin Sheldrake’s Entangled Life, these networks blur the lines between individual organisms, fostering an ecological consciousness that may function similarly to a brain’s interconnected neurons.


    27- They ‘Talk’ to Each Other

    Plants “talk” using a complex system of electrical impulses, chemical signals, and even sound frequencies. These messages are often triggered by environmental stressors such as insect attacks or drought.

    These silent conversations form a defense network, allowing neighboring plants to brace themselves. In essence, plants are not only aware of their own condition but can also relay warnings and coordinate responses, a behavior highly suggestive of collective consciousness.


    28- They Help Each Other Out

    Cooperation among plants is now well-documented. Beech trees, for instance, share sugars through their root systems to nourish shaded companions. Similarly, legumes host nitrogen-fixing bacteria that enrich the soil, indirectly supporting surrounding flora.

    Such acts of botanical generosity defy the Darwinian paradigm of survival of the fittest. Instead, they showcase a model of cooperative evolution where community well-being often takes precedence over individual gain—a behavior we typically associate with intelligent life.


    29- They Communicate Through Scents

    Plants emit specific volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when under attack. These airborne chemicals act as alarm signals to nearby plants, prompting them to fortify their defenses. For example, when a tomato plant is damaged, it releases a scent that causes neighboring tomatoes to boost their production of anti-herbivore compounds.

    This olfactory signaling system mirrors pheromonal communication in animals and indicates a sensory world that plants actively engage with. It’s not merely reactionary; it is deliberate, targeted, and intelligent.


    30- They Can Call for Help

    Plants under attack by pests have been shown to “call for help” by releasing VOCs that attract predators of those pests. Corn plants, for example, emit chemicals that lure parasitic wasps when caterpillars feed on their leaves.

    This strategic deployment of chemical SOS signals indicates a level of environmental awareness and adaptive behavior that borders on intelligent self-preservation—traits often linked to conscious organisms.


    31- Jasmone

    Jasmone is a compound produced by plants in response to herbivore attacks. It acts both internally, enhancing the plant’s own defenses, and externally, signaling other plants and attracting predatory insects.

    The dual role of jasmone as a local and systemic defense agent shows that plants are capable of multifaceted chemical communication. Such biochemical sophistication is not random but highly coordinated—traits synonymous with awareness and intention.


    32- Chain Reaction

    When one plant is attacked and emits warning signals, it can trigger a chain reaction across a forest. Nearby plants pick up the cues and pass them along, preparing even distant members for possible danger.

    This cascading defense mechanism is akin to a distributed alarm system, reflecting both memory and foresight. Such coordination among disparate organisms is a strong argument for viewing plant life through the lens of distributed cognition.


    33- Lawn

    Even lawns, often dismissed as biologically trivial, participate in these processes. When mowed, grasses emit green leaf volatiles that alert neighboring blades and trigger rapid growth or chemical changes.

    These reactions are not simply byproducts of damage but strategic, coordinated responses. It invites reconsideration of our treatment of these common but complex life forms.


    34- They Recognize Family

    Studies have shown that plants can distinguish between kin and non-kin. Impatiens plants, for instance, alter their root growth when planted with relatives, showing less competitive behavior.

    This kin recognition leads to preferential sharing of resources and minimized root entanglement. Such discernment reflects a form of relational memory and suggests a social dimension to plant existence.


    35- They Are Vocal

    Some researchers have discovered that plants emit ultrasonic clicks and pops—vocalizations that may carry meaning within the plant kingdom. While inaudible to humans, these sounds can be detected with specialized equipment.

    These noises often increase under stress, such as drought or injury. Though the purpose is still under investigation, early studies suggest that other plants respond to these signals, implying a vocal component in plant communication.


    36- They Can ‘Hear’

    Plants appear to respond to sound frequencies. In one study, roots grew toward a sound source emitting frequencies similar to insect buzzes. Likewise, corn roots accelerated growth in response to specific vibrations.

    This auditory perception suggests plants have sensory modalities far richer than previously imagined. The capacity to detect and respond to sound strengthens the argument for a form of environmental awareness.


    37- They Might ‘See’

    Plants have photoreceptors that detect not only light intensity but also color, direction, and even shade patterns. These receptors enable behaviors such as phototropism (growing toward light) and shade avoidance.

    Some studies propose that plants can detect silhouettes of neighboring plants and adjust growth accordingly. This quasi-visual awareness allows them to compete or cooperate strategically, revealing a type of visual cognition.


    38- They Learn

    Through habituation and conditioning, plants have shown they can modify behavior based on past experiences. In experiments, Mimosa pudica learned to stop reacting to harmless stimuli, demonstrating that learning does not require a nervous system.

    Such findings defy the traditional belief that learning is an exclusive hallmark of animal life. Instead, they suggest that cognition may be embedded in cellular and biochemical frameworks.


    39- They Can Remember

    Memory in plants is evident in their ability to retain information over time. Vernalization, the process by which plants “remember” winter to flower in spring, is a well-documented form of seasonal memory.

    Plants also remember light and moisture levels and adjust growth patterns accordingly. These biological memories are stored in gene expression and cellular states—suggesting an epigenetic form of memory without neurons.


    40- Can They Feel Pain?

    Pain, as we know it, requires a central nervous system and subjective experience. Plants do not feel pain in the way animals do, but they do respond to injury with stress signals and defensive measures.

    Philosopher Michael Marder suggests we reconsider what “pain” means in biological terms. If it includes detection of harm and appropriate reaction, then plants experience a non-conscious form of pain—functional, though not emotional.


    41- How About Consciousness?

    If we accept that consciousness is not limited to animals with brains, the plant kingdom becomes a compelling candidate for a different kind of awareness. Their behaviors—memory, learning, communication—indicate a decentralized but responsive presence.

    The idea of plant consciousness invites us to expand the philosophical and scientific definitions of mind. As awareness becomes recognized as a spectrum, plant consciousness fits naturally into the lower, but meaningful, end of that continuum.


    42- Are Plants Conscious?

    While the answer is still under debate, the evidence suggests that plants exhibit many traits we associate with consciousness: perception, memory, learning, and decision-making. They lack a brain, but not intelligence. They lack emotions, but not reaction.

    Books like Plant Intelligence and the Imaginal Realm by Stephen Harrod Buhner argue that our inability to see plant consciousness may lie not in plants but in our own cognitive limits. As science evolves, so too must our understanding of what it means to be conscious.


    Conclusion

    The silent, green world of plants is not as passive as we once believed. Modern research, coupled with ancient wisdom, reveals that plants engage with their environment in ways that reflect memory, communication, and perhaps even a form of consciousness. From root to leaf, they respond to the world with purpose and strategy.

    While we may never fully grasp what it’s like to be a plant, the growing body of evidence compels us to reevaluate long-held assumptions. Expanding our definition of consciousness to include the vegetal realm not only challenges our scientific boundaries but also deepens our ethical and ecological responsibilities. As we seek to live in harmony with nature, recognizing the intelligence and sentience of plants may be one of the most revolutionary steps we take.

    The question of whether plants and trees have consciousness invites a profound reexamination of how we define life, intelligence, and awareness. While plants do not think or feel in ways familiar to humans, they exhibit remarkable complexity, responsiveness, and communication that challenge traditional boundaries of consciousness.

    Recognizing even a rudimentary form of awareness in plants could reshape ethics, ecology, and our relationship with the biosphere. As Aldo Leopold once said, “The land ethic simply enlarges the boundaries of the community to include soils, waters, plants, and animals.” Perhaps it’s time to extend that ethic even further—to the sentient green beings quietly sustaining the planet.

    Bibliography

    1. Buhner, Stephen Harrod. Plant Intelligence and the Imaginal Realm: Beyond the Doors of Perception into the Dreaming of Earth. Inner Traditions, 2014.
    2. Gagliano, Monica. Thus Spoke the Plant: A Remarkable Journey of Groundbreaking Scientific Discoveries and Personal Encounters with Plants. North Atlantic Books, 2018.
    3. Mancuso, Stefano, and Viola, Alessandra. Brilliant Green: The Surprising History and Science of Plant Intelligence. Island Press, 2015.
    4. Simard, Suzanne. Finding the Mother Tree: Discovering the Wisdom of the Forest. Knopf, 2021.
    5. Wohlleben, Peter. The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate – Discoveries from a Secret World. Greystone Books, 2016.
    6. Sheldrake, Merlin. Entangled Life: How Fungi Make Our Worlds, Change Our Minds & Shape Our Futures. Random House, 2020.
    7. Marder, Michael. Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. Columbia University Press, 2013.
    8. Trewavas, Anthony. Plant Behaviour and Intelligence. Oxford University Press, 2014.
    9. Chamovitz, Daniel. What a Plant Knows: A Field Guide to the Senses. Scientific American / Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012.
    10. Tononi, Giulio. Phi: A Voyage from the Brain to the Soul. Pantheon, 2012. (For theoretical insights into consciousness and Integrated Information Theory)
    11. Calvo, Paco, and Friston, Karl. “Predictive Processing in Plants: A Perspective on Plant Intelligence.” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, 2017, Article 1056.
    12. Karban, Richard. Plant Sensing and Communication. University of Chicago Press, 2015.
    13. Gagliano, Monica, Renton, Michael, and Vyazovskiy, Vladyslav V. “Experience teaches plants to learn faster and forget slower in environments where it matters.” Oecologia, vol. 192, 2020.
    14. Trewavas, Anthony. “Plant Intelligence: Mindless Mastery.” Nature, vol. 410, 2001, pp. 1117.
    15. Mancuso, Stefano. “The Roots of Plant Intelligence.” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 18, no. 11, 2013, pp. 601–607.

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • How to nurture a long-distance friendship

    How to nurture a long-distance friendship

    In a world where people move cities, countries, and even continents for work, study, or love, long-distance friendships have become increasingly common—and increasingly necessary to preserve. But maintaining these relationships across miles and time zones isn’t always easy. The effort to keep connections alive requires intention, creativity, and emotional investment that many overlook.

    Friendship, at its core, is about shared experiences, trust, and presence. When distance enters the picture, those shared daily moments vanish, making it easier for friendships to drift if we’re not careful. Fortunately, technology and emotional intelligence can bridge the gap, allowing people to maintain meaningful bonds despite the physical divide. What matters most is the quality of connection, not the quantity of contact.

    Psychologist and researcher Dr. William Rawlins, who has studied friendship for decades, says, “Friendship is a sheltering tree.” Like trees, friendships need nurturing through time and care. In this guide, we’ll explore twenty ways to cultivate and sustain long-distance friendships with depth, authenticity, and love—so your relationships can stand the test of time, no matter how far apart you are.

    Not all soulmates live in the same city, and friendship isn’t bound by geography. In a world more interconnected than ever before, long-distance friendships have become both more common and more complex. Whether your best friend moved away for a job, school, or love, maintaining that emotional bond across miles can feel like navigating a delicate balance of intention, effort, and time.

    The strength of a long-distance friendship lies in the willingness to adapt and the courage to stay vulnerable. Technology offers plenty of shortcuts, but true connection demands presence—even when you’re not physically together. According to sociologist Sherry Turkle in Reclaiming Conversation, digital communication can enhance relationships, but it takes mindful use to preserve authenticity and depth.

    While long-distance friendships may require more conscious nurturing, they often reveal a higher level of emotional maturity. They invite us to be deliberate with our communication and generous with our empathy. As Aristotle once said, “Wishing to be friends is quick work, but friendship is a slow-ripening fruit.” The following strategies can help cultivate that fruit, no matter how far apart you are.


    1- Make Regular Communication a Priority
    Consistency is the lifeblood of any long-distance friendship. When life gets busy, it’s easy to put off that catch-up call or leave a message on read. But setting regular communication habits—be it weekly video calls, bi-weekly voice notes, or monthly letters—demonstrates reliability and interest in the relationship. Psychologist Sherry Turkle in Reclaiming Conversation notes that authentic communication strengthens empathy, and without it, relationships risk becoming superficial.

    By embedding communication into your schedule, you turn contact into ritual rather than obligation. It becomes something both parties can rely on and look forward to. Whether you choose early morning check-ins or midnight chats, having those touchpoints helps reinforce the sense that your friend is still a vital part of your life—even if they live thousands of miles away.


    2- Be Present, Even from Afar
    Presence isn’t about geography—it’s about emotional availability. Long-distance friends may not be physically near, but they can still offer support, empathy, and laughter when it’s most needed. Dr. John Gottman’s research highlights that emotional bids—those small moments of reaching out—are crucial in relationships. Responding with warmth and attention makes the other person feel seen and valued.

    Small gestures like remembering an important date or acknowledging a rough day go a long way. These acts show your friend that their emotional reality matters to you, no matter the distance. As author Brené Brown suggests in The Gifts of Imperfection, “Connection is the energy that exists between people when they feel seen, heard, and valued.” Be that source of energy.


    3- Celebrate Important Milestones Together
    Birthdays, promotions, anniversaries—these moments matter, and recognizing them can deepen your connection. Even if you can’t be there in person, a thoughtful message, gift, or virtual celebration can show your friend that you’re still celebrating life’s highs with them. Consider using shared calendars to keep track of key dates, ensuring you never miss a beat.

    Going the extra mile—like organizing a surprise Zoom party or sending a care package—adds a personal touch that transcends digital limits. Social psychologist Dr. Susan Pinker, in The Village Effect, emphasizes how meaningful relationships foster happiness and longevity. Marking milestones together strengthens that sense of meaning and mutual joy.


    4- Use Technology Creatively
    Technology isn’t just for texting or calling; it offers a playground of ways to connect meaningfully. Apps like Marco Polo, shared playlists on Spotify, or games like Words With Friends can make interactions more dynamic. These shared experiences simulate the kind of bonding you’d enjoy in person.

    Creative use of technology turns routine into ritual. Watching movies together with apps like Teleparty or exploring new podcasts simultaneously can spark fresh conversations and emotional closeness. As author Howard Rheingold noted in The Virtual Community, “The power of a networked relationship lies in its ability to transcend conventional barriers of time and space.”


    5- Share the Little Things
    Day-to-day details—the lunch you enjoyed, the book you’re reading, the weather in your city—may seem trivial, but they build intimacy. Sharing these snippets helps recreate the feeling of living life side by side. Dr. Deborah Tannen’s work on conversational style emphasizes that these small exchanges form the backbone of closeness in relationships.

    Think of it like a friendship scrapbook made of texts, pictures, and spontaneous thoughts. It’s not about profound conversations all the time; it’s about showing up in the mundane moments, making your presence felt. As sociologist Ray Oldenburg put it, “Informal conversations are the heartbeat of friendship.”


    6- Be Honest About Life Changes
    Distance often means missing the visual cues of change—body language, mood shifts, or signs of emotional distress. That’s why it’s crucial to be honest about personal developments, whether it’s a new job, relationship, or emotional struggle. Transparency nurtures trust and invites vulnerability.

    Let your friend into your world, even if it feels messy or complicated. As Esther Perel writes in The State of Affairs, “Intimacy is not something you have; it’s something you do.” By sharing your evolving life story, you give your friend a seat at your metaphorical table.


    7- Schedule In-Person Visits When Possible
    Nothing can fully replace face-to-face interaction. If circumstances allow, scheduling occasional visits helps reinforce the emotional bond and renews memories. Shared experiences—however rare—become emotional anchors that sustain the relationship over time.

    Plan these trips with intention, filling them with activities you both enjoy. Whether it’s a weekend getaway or just catching up over coffee, these visits remind both of you why your friendship is worth the effort. As sociologist Eric Klinenberg states in Palaces for the People, “The places we gather matter. They create durable relationships that enrich our lives.”


    8- Respect Each Other’s Time Zones and Schedules
    A long-distance friendship often involves juggling time differences and varied routines. Being mindful of each other’s availability shows respect and thoughtfulness. It’s helpful to establish communication windows that work for both parties, minimizing frustration.

    Avoid demanding instant replies or late-night calls unless previously agreed upon. A respectful rhythm of interaction honors each other’s boundaries while preserving connection. As the Dalai Lama once said, “A lack of transparency results in distrust and a deep sense of insecurity.” Predictability in communication builds that trust.


    9- Embrace Silence Without Panic
    Not every quiet spell is a sign of trouble. Sometimes, life simply gets in the way. A healthy long-distance friendship can withstand occasional silence without either party feeling abandoned. This maturity in expectation prevents unnecessary friction.

    Instead of assuming the worst, extend grace and patience. When communication resumes, reconnect with warmth rather than guilt-tripping. As Emotional Intelligence author Daniel Goleman puts it, “Self-regulation and empathy are key pillars of emotional wisdom.” Practicing both nurtures the friendship through life’s ebbs and flows.


    10- Support Each Other’s Growth
    True friends want to see each other evolve. From career advancements to personal milestones, being a cheerleader for your friend’s growth shows genuine care. Offer encouragement, constructive feedback, and heartfelt celebration.

    Long-distance friendships thrive when they include mutual empowerment. According to psychologist Carl Rogers, “The curious paradox is that when I accept myself just as I am, then I can change.” Having a friend who supports that process, even from afar, is a treasure.


    11- Keep Shared Memories Alive
    Photos, inside jokes, and mutual experiences are glue for long-distance friendships. Revisiting those moments brings laughter, nostalgia, and reaffirmation of your bond. Keep a digital scrapbook or periodically reminisce during calls.

    Remembering your shared past strengthens your sense of identity together. Philosopher Søren Kierkegaard wrote, “Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” Recalling the past together helps you navigate the future as friends.


    12- Read and Watch the Same Things
    Consuming the same content—books, movies, shows—gives you common ground for discussion. These shared cultural references create intellectual intimacy and spark new conversations that go beyond personal updates.

    Choose a book to read together or binge a series you both enjoy. This acts like a virtual book club or movie night and keeps your friendship intellectually stimulating. The Reading Promise by Alice Ozma highlights how shared stories can be powerful bonding agents over time.


    13- Be a Reliable Sounding Board
    Everyone needs someone to vent to, brainstorm with, or seek advice from. Being a consistent listener and trusted confidant cements your role in your friend’s emotional world. Offer nonjudgmental space for thoughts, whether they’re logical or raw.

    Listening well—even from afar—is a gift. Author Kate Murphy in You’re Not Listening underscores that “being heard is so close to being loved that for the average person, they are almost indistinguishable.” Show up with open ears.


    14- Avoid Comparisons with Other Friendships
    It’s easy to romanticize in-person friendships and feel like long-distance ones are lacking. But every friendship is unique, and comparison dilutes appreciation. Focus on the strengths and special nature of your connection.

    Embrace what your long-distance friendship can offer rather than what it can’t. As psychologist Barry Schwartz says in The Paradox of Choice, too many comparisons can lead to dissatisfaction. Gratitude and acceptance nurture better bonds.


    15- Share Goals and Dreams
    Discussing future ambitions—whether personal, professional, or relational—builds forward momentum in your friendship. These conversations reveal who you are becoming and what matters to you.

    When friends know your aspirations, they become your motivators and accountability partners. In Drive, Daniel H. Pink notes that shared purpose strengthens bonds and fuels motivation. Your friend becomes part of your inner vision board.


    16- Practice Gratitude Often
    Saying thank you, expressing love, or simply acknowledging their presence matters deeply. Gratitude solidifies emotional connection and strengthens mutual appreciation.

    Make it a habit to tell your friend how much they mean to you. Positive psychology expert Dr. Robert Emmons emphasizes that “gratitude blocks toxic emotions and nurtures resilience.” A grateful heart keeps your friendship healthy.


    17- Engage in Mutual Hobbies
    Whether it’s writing, gaming, or cooking, sharing a hobby creates a dynamic layer to the friendship. It gives you something to do together, not just talk about.

    Create online challenges or collaborative projects. These joint efforts mimic real-life activities and help your friendship evolve with time. As Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi writes in Flow, shared immersion leads to deeper happiness and connection.


    18- Check In During Tough Times
    Life’s storms are when true friendship shows. If your friend is facing grief, burnout, or stress, reach out more—not less. Your voice or message can be a lifeline.

    Even if you’re not sure what to say, your presence alone matters. As Fred Rogers famously said, “Anything that’s human is mentionable, and anything that is mentionable can be more manageable.” Be that safe space.


    19- Be Open to Change
    Friendships evolve just like people do. Life stages, priorities, and values can shift—and that’s okay. The key is flexibility and open communication about changing needs or expectations.

    By accepting evolution instead of resisting it, you give the friendship room to grow. As Rainer Maria Rilke wrote in Letters to a Young Poet, “The only journey is the one within.” Long-distance friendships are about honoring each other’s journeys.


    20- Never Take the Friendship for Granted
    Lastly, recognize that a long-distance friendship that lasts is a rare and beautiful thing. Acknowledge it. Treasure it. And never assume it will survive without effort.

    As Aristotle once said, “What is a friend? A single soul dwelling in two bodies.” It takes intention to protect that soul across borders and time. But when you do, the bond becomes unbreakable.

    21 – Embrace Social Media Thoughtfully

    Social media can be a lifeline in long-distance friendships when used with care. Instead of passive scrolling, use platforms like Instagram or Facebook as interactive spaces to comment, share memories, and react to life updates. Sending memes, tagging each other in relatable posts, or reminiscing over old photos can act like small gestures of affection that keep emotional presence alive.

    However, social media should supplement—not replace—genuine connection. Dr. Susan Pinker, in The Village Effect, emphasizes that the most fulfilling relationships require real interaction, not just virtual engagement. So, be intentional with your social media use, transforming it from a distraction into a thread that ties your bond together.


    22 – Communicate Outside of Social Media

    Direct communication often feels more meaningful than a “like” or emoji reaction. Set aside time to send a voice note, write an email, or engage in an unhurried phone call. These methods allow for a richer exchange of thoughts and emotions that social media can rarely achieve.

    In his book Digital Minimalism, Cal Newport stresses the importance of “high-quality analog communication” for sustaining deep connections. Text messages and scheduled calls may not be flashy, but their consistency shows commitment and intention—qualities that are the bedrock of enduring friendships.


    23 – Keep Each Other Posted

    Keep your friend in the loop about the ordinary and the extraordinary aspects of your life. Share your new routines, goals, setbacks, or even the book you’re reading this week. These details create a mosaic of presence, letting your friend remain a part of your day-to-day life.

    As Brene Brown notes in The Gifts of Imperfection, “Connection is the energy that exists between people when they feel seen, heard, and valued.” By consistently sharing updates, you validate your friend’s role in your life and allow mutual investment in each other’s journey.


    24 – Recommend Favorites Regularly

    Recommending books, music, podcasts, or even recipes is an easy and heartfelt way to stay connected. When your friend reads a novel you’ve loved or listens to a playlist you curated, it offers a shared emotional space and common experiences despite physical distance.

    These small but intentional acts can create intellectual intimacy. As philosopher Alain de Botton explains, shared taste is not trivial—it often reflects shared values and perceptions. Exchanging favorites becomes a way of reaffirming your compatibility and offering each other a window into your evolving selves.


    25 – Lean on Each Other During Tough Times

    Friendship shines brightest in adversity. Reach out during moments of stress, uncertainty, or grief, and be that calm voice across the miles. Vulnerability fosters connection, and showing up emotionally—even virtually—deepens trust.

    Psychologist Dr. John Gottman argues that “bids for connection”—those moments when we seek affirmation or support—are crucial in maintaining strong relationships. When you honor these moments for each other, you’re reinforcing the foundation of mutual care that makes long-distance friendships thrive.


    26 – Create Virtual ‘Sit Downs’

    Schedule regular video calls where you both treat it like catching up at a café or on a living room couch. Share coffee, a glass of wine, or a meal over Zoom and let the conversation flow without distractions.

    Simulating shared experiences can trigger the same emotional responses as physical proximity. Dr. Robin Dunbar, in Friends: Understanding the Power of our Most Important Relationships, highlights that the brain reacts strongly to time spent in laughter and synchronized communication, which video calls can uniquely provide when done intentionally.


    27 – Make Time to Meet in Person

    No virtual method truly replaces the magic of face-to-face meetings. Plan occasional visits or trips to reconnect in person. Even rare meetups can act as emotional recharges for your bond, creating fresh memories and reinforcing your shared history.

    Meeting in person also strengthens your relational neural pathways. According to neuropsychologist Dr. Amy Banks in Wired to Connect, in-person interactions activate core brain systems responsible for emotional well-being—making these meetups vital for sustaining long-term closeness.


    28 – Stick to a Consistent Schedule

    Consistency is key when spontaneity isn’t an option. Whether it’s a monthly video chat or weekly text check-ins, sticking to a schedule provides structure and predictability—two things that help long-distance relationships feel stable.

    Rituals offer psychological comfort. In The Power of Moments, authors Chip and Dan Heath explain how intentional scheduling transforms routine interactions into anticipated events, which enhances emotional significance and builds momentum in maintaining connection.


    29 – Plan a Getaway Together

    Plan a vacation or retreat where you can unwind and make new memories. Traveling together helps you step out of routine and reconnect with the essence of your friendship in a shared space.

    This kind of intentional escape fosters growth. Author Esther Perel writes in The State of Affairs that novelty and shared adventures enhance emotional intimacy. A getaway offers a valuable chance to deepen your connection in ways everyday communication may not allow.


    30 – Invest Time and Effort

    Every friendship needs nurturing, but distance magnifies the importance of effort. Be deliberate in planning calls, remembering important dates, and following through on promises. Actions, not just words, show your commitment.

    Investing time is a declaration of value. According to psychologist Roy Baumeister in Meanings of Life, relationships are one of the greatest sources of life satisfaction, and they thrive on active participation. Demonstrating consistent care affirms the worth of your friendship.


    31 – Talk About Them in Your Life

    Speak about your friend in conversations with others to affirm their place in your life. Mentioning them to mutual friends or sharing their achievements builds a continued sense of relevance and belonging.

    By doing so, you’re reinforcing the psychological reality of their presence. As Dr. Daniel Kahneman discusses in Thinking, Fast and Slow, repeated cognitive referencing strengthens emotional ties. Keeping them present in your life narrative shows they’re not forgotten.


    32 – Surprise Them Occasionally

    Unexpected gifts, letters, or even a voice message out of the blue can go a long way in making your friend feel special. Surprises inject joy and novelty, and they’re often remembered for years.

    In The Art of Showing Up, Rachel Wilkerson Miller emphasizes that thoughtfulness in relationships often comes from these spontaneous gestures. A handwritten card or an unexpected playlist might just be the emotional glue your friendship needs.


    33 – Be Open and Share Freely

    Being emotionally open allows your friend to feel needed and trusted. Share your insecurities, dreams, and daily anecdotes—even the boring ones. True friendships thrive on mutual authenticity.

    Dr. Brené Brown, in Daring Greatly, writes, “Vulnerability is the birthplace of connection.” When you share without pretense, you’re building a bridge that miles cannot weaken. Emotional transparency creates a space where both friends feel genuinely seen.


    34 – Know When to Let Go

    Not all friendships are meant to last forever, and that’s okay. If the effort becomes one-sided, or the connection no longer brings joy or growth, it’s okay to release it with gratitude.

    In Necessary Endings, Dr. Henry Cloud explains that letting go is sometimes essential for personal growth. Ending a friendship doesn’t diminish what it once was—it simply honors the reality of change. Closure, when done kindly, allows both people to move forward with peace.


    Conclusion

    Long-distance friendships, like fine art, require intention, patience, and care to flourish. They challenge us to be better communicators, deeper listeners, and more compassionate companions. While they may demand more work, they often yield deeper rewards—trust, empathy, and resilience.

    In an age of fleeting interactions, choosing to nurture a friendship across distance is a bold act of loyalty. It’s a quiet testament to the power of human connection—that even miles apart, two hearts can still be in step. As the poet Kahlil Gibran once wrote, “Let there be spaces in your togetherness… and let the winds of the heavens dance between you.”

    Long-distance friendships may lack physical proximity, but they make up for it in emotional resilience and intentionality. These relationships demand presence, patience, and creativity—qualities that deepen emotional bonds over time. They teach us to love in ways that transcend the tangible and to prioritize connection over convenience.

    In nurturing such a friendship, you’re building more than just companionship; you’re creating a lasting emotional legacy. As you practice these twenty strategies, remember that the truest friendships don’t fade with distance—they evolve, expand, and often become stronger than ever before.

    Bibliography

    1. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Terence Irwin, Hackett Publishing, 1999.
      – Classical reference on the philosophy of friendship and virtue.
    2. Brown, Brené. Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead. Gotham Books, 2012.
      – Discusses the power of vulnerability and connection in maintaining meaningful relationships.
    3. Duck, Steve. Human Relationships. SAGE Publications, 2007.
      – A foundational text on the psychology and development of interpersonal relationships.
    4. Helgesen, Sally, and Marshall Goldsmith. How Women Rise: Break the 12 Habits Holding You Back from Your Next Raise, Promotion, or Job. Hachette Books, 2018.
      – Contains insights into building supportive professional and personal networks.
    5. Levine, Amir, and Rachel Heller. Attached: The New Science of Adult Attachment and How It Can Help You Find—and Keep—Love. TarcherPerigee, 2010.
      – Relevant for understanding emotional dynamics in all types of long-term relationships, including friendships.
    6. Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, 2000.
      – Analyzes the decline of social capital and the impact of distance on relationships.
    7. Suttie, Jill. “How to Stay Close When You’re Far Apart.” Greater Good Magazine, Greater Good Science Center, 14 May 2018.
      https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_to_stay_close_when_youre_far_apart
      – Offers science-based tips on maintaining long-distance friendships.
    8. Turkle, Sherry. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Books, 2015.
      – Explores how digital communication can affect the quality of our conversations and relationships.
    9. Waldinger, Robert, and Marc Schulz. The Good Life: Lessons from the World’s Longest Scientific Study of Happiness. Simon & Schuster, 2023.
      – Draws on longitudinal research showing the importance of social bonds to well-being.
    10. Yalom, Irvin D. Love’s Executioner and Other Tales of Psychotherapy. Basic Books, 1989.
      – Explores the human need for connection and emotional support through compelling therapeutic case studies.

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • The Unbounded Mind: Exploring Our Shared Consciousness

    The Unbounded Mind: Exploring Our Shared Consciousness

    The provided text, likely excerpts from a book titled “One Mind” by Larry Dossey, explores the concept of a unified consciousness that transcends individual minds and connects all living beings. The author presents anecdotal evidence, scientific theories such as nonlocality and entanglement, and philosophical perspectives to support the idea that our minds are not isolated but are part of a larger, interconnected awareness. The text examines various phenomena, including telepathy, premonitions, shared experiences, animal behavior, and near-death experiences, through the lens of this “One Mind” theory, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness that has implications for our understanding of consciousness, healing, and our relationship with the world. Ultimately, the text posits the “One Mind” as a source of wisdom, creativity, and a potential solution to the challenges facing humanity, urging a shift from a materialistic worldview to one that embraces this deeper unity.

    The One Mind: Collective Consciousness and Interconnectedness

    The concept of the One Mind as presented in the sources refers to a collective, unitary domain of intelligence of which all individual minds are a part. It is described as an overarching, inclusive dimension to which all the mental components of all individual minds belong. This perspective suggests that the separateness of individual minds is an illusion, and at some level, all minds come together to form a single mind.

    Here are some key aspects of the One Mind concept discussed in the sources:

    • Nonlocality: A fundamental characteristic of the One Mind is its nonlocality. This means that individual minds are not confined or localized to specific points in space (like brains or bodies) or time (like the present). Instead, minds are spatially and temporally infinite, suggesting that the connectedness of minds transcends physical distance and time.
    • Importance: The concept of the One Mind is presented as potentially vital for addressing global challenges such as division, selfishness, and destruction. Recognizing our interconnectedness through the One Mind can lead to a recalibration of our ethical stance, inspiring us to “Be kind to others, because in some sense they are you”. It can also foster cooperation, heightened imagination, and creativity.
    • Experiencing the One Mind: Individuals may encounter the One Mind in various ways, such as transcendent moments, epiphanies, creative breakthroughs, or inexplicably acquired information. It can also manifest as shared emotions, thoughts, or feelings between people at a distance, including spouses, siblings, twins, and even across species.
    • Evidence and Manifestations: The book explores a wide range of phenomena as glimpses of the One Mind. These include:
    • Acts of selfless saving, where the rescuer’s consciousness seems to fuse with the person in need.
    • Experiences of telepathy and the sense of being stared at, suggesting a direct mind-to-mind connection.
    • The coordinated behavior of large groups of animals, implying shared, overlapping minds.
    • Near-death experiences (NDEs), where individuals report contact with a transcendent domain and access to universal knowledge.
    • Reincarnation phenomena.
    • Communication with the deceased.
    • The remarkable abilities of savants, who possess knowledge seemingly beyond their individual learning.
    • The deep connections and shared experiences of twins, even when separated.
    • Telesomatic events, where distant individuals experience similar physical sensations.
    • Experiences of remote viewing and precognition.
    • The One Mind is Not a Homogeneous Blob: Despite the interconnectedness, the One Mind does not result in a featureless muddle. Specificity and individuality are preserved in One-Mind experiences. The analogy of stem cells is used, suggesting the One Mind awaits instructions and prompting to manifest in unique ways.
    • Relationship to the Brain: The book challenges the dominant view that the brain produces consciousness. Instead, it explores the idea that the brain may function as an intermediary or receiver for the mind, which originates from a broader, nonlocal source.
    • Connection to Ancient Wisdom and Modern Science: The concept of the One Mind has ancient roots in various wisdom traditions and is also finding resonance in modern science through concepts like quantum entanglement and the idea of a holographic universe.
    • The Self and the One Mind: While some may fear losing individuality, the One Mind perspective suggests that the illusion of separateness can be overcome to realize a deeper unity. This can lead to a sense of shared identity and fellowship.
    • Is the One Mind God? The book addresses the question of whether the One Mind equates to God, noting similarities such as omniscience, omnipresence, and eternality. While some, like Erwin Schrödinger, saw the One Mind as God, the book also emphasizes potential differences and the importance of recognizing gradations of being.
    • Accessing the One Mind: Various pathways to experiencing the One Mind are discussed, including meditation, reverie, prayer, dreams, and love. The key seems to involve a letting go of the discursive, rational mind and approaching with respect and an openness to a source of wisdom beyond oneself.

    Ultimately, the One Mind concept, as presented in the sources, offers a paradigm shift in understanding consciousness, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness that has profound implications for our understanding of ourselves, our relationship with the world, and our potential for collective action and spiritual growth.

    Nonlocal Consciousness and the One Mind

    The concept of nonlocal consciousness is central to the idea of the One Mind, as discussed in the sources.

    Definition of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    • Nonlocality of consciousness means that individual minds are not confined or localized to specific points in space, such as brains or bodies, nor to specific points in time, such as the present.
    • Instead, minds are spatially and temporally infinite.
    • Nonlocal mind is a term coined to express this spatially and temporally infinite aspect of our consciousness.

    Relationship to the One Mind:

    • The nonlocality of consciousness is presented as the ultimate argument for the One Mind.
    • Because individual minds are not confined, the separateness of minds is considered an illusion.
    • At a fundamental level, all minds come together to form a single mind due to their nonlocal nature.
    • The One Mind is described as an overarching, inclusive dimension to which all the mental components of all individual minds belong. Nonlocality makes this interconnectedness possible.

    Evidence and Manifestations of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    The book explores various phenomena as evidence for nonlocal consciousness and its manifestation in the One Mind:

    • Telepathy: The ability to share thoughts, emotions, and even physical sensations with a distant individual without sensory contact. This suggests that minds are not bounded by physical distance.
    • Remote Viewing and Clairvoyance: The capacity to demonstrate detailed knowledge of distant scenes or find hidden objects without sensory means. This indicates that awareness extends beyond the physical body.
    • Premonitions: Acquiring valid information about future events. This points to a consciousness that is not limited by linear time.
    • Near-Death Experiences (NDEs): Experiences of direct contact with a transcendent domain, often accompanied by a sense of unity and access to universal knowledge, occurring when the brain is significantly impaired. This challenges the idea that consciousness is solely a product of the brain.
    • Shared Experiences: Instances where spouses, siblings, twins, lovers, or groups share emotions, thoughts, or feelings at a distance. Telesomatic events, where distant individuals experience similar physical sensations, also fall under this category.
    • Animal Behavior: The coordinated behavior of large groups of animals, suggesting shared, overlapping minds. The ability of lost animals to return home across vast distances without known sensory cues also hints at nonlocal connections.
    • Savants: Individuals with remarkable abilities or knowledge seemingly beyond their individual learning, possibly tapping into the One Mind.
    • Experiences of Twins: The deep connections and shared experiences of twins, even when separated, suggest a fundamental link in consciousness.

    Challenge to the Brain-Centric View:

    • The concept of nonlocal consciousness directly challenges the dominant view in science that the brain produces consciousness. This brain-as-producer model struggles to explain nonlocal phenomena.
    • The book explores the alternative idea that the brain may function as an intermediary or receiver for the mind, which originates from a broader, nonlocal source.
    • The persistence of coherent experiences during unconsciousness in NDEs further challenges the brain-as-sole-generator theory.

    Implications of Nonlocal Consciousness:

    • The realization of nonlocal consciousness and the One Mind can lead to a sense of felt unity with all other minds, conveying renewed meaning, purpose, and possibility.
    • It fosters the understanding that we are all deeply interconnected, potentially inspiring compassion, responsibility, and cooperation in addressing global challenges. As stated, recognizing our interconnectedness can lead to the ethical stance of being kind to others because “in some sense they are you” [The initial summary provided before the sources].
    • Nonlocal consciousness suggests that information and knowledge are potentially accessible beyond the limitations of individual experience.

    In conclusion, nonlocal consciousness, as presented in the sources, posits that the mind transcends the physical constraints of the brain and body, existing in a spatially and temporally infinite domain. This nonlocality underpins the concept of the One Mind, a unitary field of consciousness of which all individual minds are a part. The existence of various seemingly paranormal phenomena is presented as evidence for this nonlocal nature of consciousness, challenging conventional, brain-centric views and suggesting profound implications for our understanding of ourselves and our interconnectedness with the world.

    One Mind: Shared Experiences and Interconnectedness

    The sources discuss various forms of shared experiences, suggesting a fundamental interconnectedness between individuals, which aligns with the concept of the One Mind. These experiences often transcend typical sensory limitations and point to a deeper level of shared consciousness.

    Here are some key types of shared experiences discussed in the sources:

    • Shared Emotions, Thoughts, and Feelings at a Distance: The sources provide numerous examples of individuals sharing emotions, thoughts, or feelings with distant loved ones, such as spouses, siblings, twins, and close friends.
    • A mother inexplicably sensed her young daughter was in trouble and then received a call about her daughter’s car accident.
    • A young academic in New York awoke knowing her twin in Arizona was in trouble, which coincided with a car bomb exploding near her sister’s apartment.
    • Dr. Larry Dossey notes that these One-Mind experiences involve unbounded, extended awareness.
    • Telesomatic Events: These involve individuals separated by distance experiencing similar physical sensations or actual physical changes.
    • A mother writing to her daughter felt a severe burning in her right hand at the same time her daughter’s right hand was burned by acid in a lab accident.
    • A woman suddenly felt severe chest pain and knew something had happened to her daughter Nell, who had simultaneously been in a car accident with a steering wheel penetrating her chest.
    • The case of the infant twins Ricky and Damien suggests a telesomatic link with survival value, as Ricky’s distress alerted his mother to Damien suffocating.
    • These events often occur between people with emotional closeness and empathy.
    • Shared Dreams: The sources mention instances where multiple people report similar dreams on the same night or dream of each other in a common space.
    • The example of the two Japanese women who had strikingly similar dreams of one stabbing the other in a hotel lobby illustrates mutual dreaming.
    • Anthropologist Marianne George experienced shared dreams with a Barok female leader in New Guinea, whose instructions in the dream were later verified by her sons, highlighting the possibility of dream communication across distance.
    • A curious historical anecdote describes a shared dream of a rat attack between individuals living 143 miles apart, suggesting that shared anxieties and dreams can occur even in modern cultures.
    • Shared-Death Experiences (SDEs): These are near-death-like experiences that happen to healthy individuals in the proximity of a loved one who is dying.
    • Raymond Moody first heard of SDEs from a Dr. Jamieson who, upon her mother’s death, found herself out of her body with her mother, witnessing a mystical light and deceased relatives.
    • Moody and his siblings experienced a shared sense of joy and a change in the light of the room as their mother died, with one brother-in-law reporting an out-of-body experience with her.
    • SDEs often include elements of NDEs such as tunnel experiences, bright light, out-of-body sensations, and a life review. A key difference is the shared sensation of a mystical light by several healthy people, which challenges the idea that the light in NDEs is solely a result of a dying brain. Another feature is the observation of an apparent mist leaving the dying person.
    • Collective Experiences in Groups: The sources allude to shared mental states in larger groups.
    • The coordinated behavior of large animal groups like herds, flocks, and schools suggests shared, overlapping minds.
    • The Nuremberg Rallies are presented as an example of how coherent thought and solidarity can be fostered in a large group, though for destructive purposes.
    • The experience of the Hotshot firefighting crew, where each member had a near-death experience during a life-threatening fire, sometimes appearing in each other’s NDE, demonstrates a collective fear-death experience with overlapping elements.
    • Empathy and Pro-Social Behavior: The demonstrated empathy in rats, where a free rat persistently works to liberate a trapped cagemate, suggests a shared emotional experience and a drive towards pro-social behavior. This indicates that shared feelings and a sense of connection may extend beyond humans and influence actions.

    These diverse examples illustrate the concept of shared consciousness extending beyond the individual, supporting the notion of a One Mind where the boundaries of individual awareness are more permeable than conventionally understood. The emotional closeness between individuals appears to be a significant factor in many of these shared experiences. The sources suggest that recognizing these connections can foster compassion and a sense of shared responsibility.

    Animal Minds and Human-Animal Connections

    The sources provide extensive discussion on animal connections, both among animals and between humans and animals, often linking these connections to the concept of the One Mind.

    Connections Among Animals:

    • The book explores the highly coordinated behavior of large groups of animals such as bison herds, wildebeest migrations, passenger pigeon flocks, starling murmurations, and schools of fish. These movements often appear unified, as if the group is a single entity.
    • Swarm intelligence is presented as one scientific explanation, where local interactions between individuals lead to intelligent group behavior without centralized control. However, the book also notes that some biologists suspect this theory doesn’t fully account for the speed and coordination observed, with some speculating about “collective thinking” or telepathy.
    • Rupert Sheldrake’s morphic fields hypothesis is introduced as a potential explanation for this nonsensory group intelligence. He suggests that these fields of influence, shaped by evolution, operate nonlocally and facilitate communication within groups, acting as an evolutionary basis for telepathy. The coordinated movements happen too quickly for sensory explanations like vision alone.
    • The book also discusses animal grief and mourning, citing examples of elephants gathering around the dead, burying them, and revisiting the site, as well as similar behaviors in dogs, horses, and gorillas. The “magpie funeral” and crows reacting to a crow being shot are also given as examples of apparent collective responses.
    • Evidence of empathy and pro-social behavior in animals is presented, such as the study where lab rats would persistently work to free a trapped cagemate, even when offered chocolate as an alternative. This suggests innate, unselfish behavior in animals.

    Connections Between Humans and Animals:

    • Numerous anecdotes and some experimental evidence are provided to illustrate a deep and often inexplicable bond between humans and animals.
    • Returning lost pets are a key example, such as Bobbie the Collie who traveled 2,800 miles over six months to return to his owners. The book challenges conventional explanations like a highly developed sense of smell over such distances and between species, proposing instead that the minds of the animal and owner are part of a larger One Mind, allowing a sharing of information often associated with love and caring. Similar cases of cats returning home over long distances are also mentioned.
    • Animals reacting to the needs and emotions of distant owners are discussed. The case of Prince, the dog who became disconsolate when his soldier owner returned to the front in World War I and then disappeared, is given as an example. Susan Armstrong’s experience of her dog suddenly killing a parakeet at the exact moment she felt a violent emotion while gardening outside also suggests a distant emotional link.
    • Anticipation of an owner’s return by pets, even when the time or mode of transport is varied and unknown to others in the household, is highlighted, referencing Rupert Sheldrake’s experiments. This suggests a bond operating at a distance in both space and time.
    • Pets detecting their owners’ moods, thoughts, and intentions are commonly reported. Sheldrake’s survey found that a significant percentage of dog and cat owners believed their pets responded to their thoughts or silent commands and were sometimes telepathic.
    • Instances of animals rescuing humans and humans rescuing animals are presented as evidence of the One Mind uniting different species. Mythologist Joseph Campbell and philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer’s idea of minds fusing at critical moments is extended to interspecies rescues, suggesting that the rescuer, in a sense, is rescuing itself. Examples include dolphins protecting swimmers from sharks and a horse charging a cow to save its owner.
    • The phenomenon of apparent distant, cross-species communication is mentioned, such as Queen Elizabeth’s dogs barking when she reaches the gate half a mile away.
    • Dreams involving animals that seem to have a connection to real-world events are noted, such as Jim Harrison’s vivid dream about his neighbor’s missing dogs, which corresponded to the path they took.
    • The historical and cultural reverence for animals and beliefs about their connection to the spiritual realm are briefly touched upon, using the example of bees in various cultures.

    Overall, the sources present a compelling case for significant connections between animals and between humans and animals that go beyond conventional sensory explanations. These connections are presented as supportive evidence for the concept of a unitary One Mind that encompasses all sentient creatures. The book suggests that recognizing these profound links can foster compassion and a sense of interconnectedness with the wider web of life.

    Limits of Science: Consciousness and the Unknown

    The sources discuss several limits of science, both inherent and self-imposed, particularly in its understanding of mind, consciousness, and related phenomena.

    Firstly, the very nature of mind and consciousness poses a significant limit to scientific inquiry as currently practiced. Dr. Dossey recounts an interaction with an Indian physician who pointed out the multiple levels of consciousness, a subtlety often overlooked in Western science. The author acknowledges the difficulty in providing a specific definition of mind and consciousness that satisfies all perspectives. He suggests that perhaps these terms are best left with a degree of deliberate ambiguity.

    Furthermore, there’s a “tool problem” in trying to comprehend consciousness with the mind itself, likened to seeing one’s eye with one’s eye. Similarly, the writer’s tool of language is deemed insufficient to fully describe the unification of individual minds in a unitary One Mind. Bohr’s analogy of cleaning plates with dirty water and dishcloths illustrates this limitation of using unclear concepts to understand nature. Because of this, Dr. Dossey frequently relies on individual experiences, which he argues are essential for grasping the complementarity between individual minds and the One Mind, even if skeptics dismiss them as “mere anecdotes”. Max Planck’s quote underscores this, stating that science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature because we are part of that mystery.

    The sources also highlight self-imposed limits of science, often stemming from dogmatic assumptions and “pathological disbelief”. Nobel physicist Brian Josephson terms the staunch refusal to consider evidence for a nonlocal, unified aspect of mind as “pathological disbelief”. This is compared to 18th-century scientists denying the existence of meteorites despite physical evidence because “stones cannot fall from the sky”. A similar dogmatism persists today, with many scientists insisting consciousness cannot exist outside the brain and body, disregarding evidence suggesting otherwise. This “aggressive, hubristic pathological disbelief” not only disgraces scientific tradition but also diminishes the “hope of wisdom” needed for survival. Rupert Sheldrake also argues that science is being constricted by assumptions that have hardened into dangerous dogmas.

    The arrogance and certainty that science knows more than it does also create serious obstacles in understanding consciousness. Wes Nisker’s playful suggestion to publicly admit “we don’t know what the hell’s going on here” serves as a corrective to this hubris.

    Methodologically, science faces limitations when trying to study certain phenomena. J. B. Priestley suggests that precognitive dreams and similar experiences might wither away when brought into the controlled environment of scientific experiment. Similarly, the One Mind, thriving on uncertainty and freedom, is not easily studied through formalized entry methods, which can become a trap. The attempt to study prayer in highly artificial ways is given as another example of how concretization can hinder understanding.

    Historically, science has often shown resistance to new ideas, with prominent scientists facing ridicule and opposition for challenging established views. The image of the open-minded scientist is contrasted with the reality of narrow-mindedness, dullness, and even stupidity that can exist within the scientific community, as noted by Nobel laureate James Watson and psychologist Hans Eysenck. Prejudice against consciousness research is openly admitted in some cases. Furthermore, science has been accused of “skimming off the top,” accepting data that aligns with the prevailing paradigm and ignoring contradictory evidence.

    The sources also touch upon the limits of science in fully grasping the concept of “self”. While spiritual traditions have long addressed the illusion of a fixed self, science’s attempts to eradicate the self might be an overreach, potentially killing off consciousness as well. Carl Jung believed it’s absurd to suppose existence can only be physical, as our immediate knowledge is psychic.

    However, the sources also suggest that acknowledging these limits can be an opportunity for science to expand. Lewis Thomas recognized the importance of admitting our ignorance. Sir Arthur Eddington’s quote, “Something unknown is doing we don’t know what,” is presented as an excellent motto for exploring beyond-the-brain-and-body phenomena, emphasizing humility, awe, and wonder, which Socrates considered the beginning of wisdom. The call for “more and better science” includes a science that embraces the “hope of wisdom” and recognizes our interconnectedness with life on Earth. By ceasing to sacrifice empirical findings to protect pet notions, science can evolve and contribute to a more holistic understanding of reality.

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog