This text is a transcript of a political interview with Rohan, discussing Imran Khan’s political career and actions, particularly focusing on the events of May 9th. The interview critiques Khan’s leadership style, labeling him hypocritical and inconsistent, and analyzes his actions in the context of Pakistani democracy and law. The speaker contrasts Khan’s approach with that of other political figures, drawing parallels to historical dictators. Finally, the conversation concludes by reflecting on the implications of Khan’s actions for Pakistan’s stability and future.
FAQ: Analyzing Imran Khan’s Political Journey
1. What is the main criticism leveled against Imran Khan in this analysis?
Rohan argues that Imran Khan’s downfall stems from his hypocrisy and dictatorial tendencies. While publicly advocating for democracy and the rule of law, Khan allegedly engaged in backroom dealings and manipulated institutions to maintain power. His intolerance of dissent and labeling of those not supporting him as “animals” further highlights this hypocrisy. Rohan criticizes Khan’s refusal to accept defeat gracefully and his attempts to undermine democratic processes, culminating in the events of May 9th.
2. How does Rohan compare Imran Khan to historical figures like Hitler?
Rohan uses the comparison to Hitler to emphasize Khan’s perceived authoritarianism and disregard for democratic norms. He suggests that Khan, even in civilian clothes, exhibited a “Hitler-like” mentality, prioritizing his own power above the interests of the nation and its institutions. This comparison underscores the danger Rohan sees in Khan’s approach to politics.
3. What is the significance of the “diaper” analogy used in the analysis?
The “diaper” analogy paints a picture of Imran Khan as being politically immature and reliant on external forces for his rise to power. He initially enjoyed support and “pampering” but, upon losing that backing, became incapable of navigating the political landscape independently. This analogy suggests Khan’s lack of political acumen and unpreparedness for the challenges of leadership.
4. What specific events are highlighted as evidence of Khan’s alleged hypocrisy?
Several events are cited as evidence of Khan’s hypocrisy:
Secret meetings and promises: Rohan points to Khan’s alleged pursuit of power through backroom deals, contrasting it with his public image as a man of the people.
May 9th incidents: The violent protests following Khan’s arrest are presented as a consequence of his incitement and a demonstration of his willingness to use undemocratic means.
Attacks on institutions: Khan’s criticisms of the judiciary and military are viewed as attempts to undermine these institutions when they did not support him.
5. What is Rohan’s perspective on the allegations of election rigging made by Khan?
Rohan challenges the notion of widespread election rigging in Khan’s favor by pointing to PTI’s success in KP and Punjab. He argues that if rigging occurred, it would likely have benefitted PTI, not harmed them. Rohan suggests that Khan’s claims of rigging are a way to deflect responsibility for his electoral losses.
6. What alternative path does Rohan suggest Khan should have taken?
Rohan believes Khan should have engaged in constructive parliamentary politics instead of resorting to disruptive tactics. He criticizes Khan’s refusal to participate in the National Assembly and his calls for fresh elections, arguing that these actions undermined the democratic process.
7. How does Rohan view the role of the “establishment” in Khan’s political journey?
Rohan implies that Khan initially benefited from the support of the “establishment” (likely referring to the military and powerful figures), which helped him rise to power. However, he suggests that Khan lost this support due to his actions and overreach, leading to his eventual downfall.
8. What is the ultimate message Rohan conveys about Khan’s political trajectory?
Rohan presents Khan’s political journey as a cautionary tale, highlighting the dangers of hypocrisy, authoritarian tendencies, and disregard for democratic principles. He suggests that Khan’s fall from grace serves as a lesson for future leaders and emphasizes the importance of respecting institutions and engaging in politics with integrity.
Understanding Pakistani Political Discourse: A Study Guide
Glossary of Key Terms
Bismillah Ra Rahman Rahim: An Arabic phrase meaning “In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful” often used at the beginning of Islamic texts or speeches.
Assalam Walekum: An Arabic greeting meaning “Peace be upon you.”
Saheb/Sahib: A title of respect used in South Asia, similar to “Mr.” or “Sir.”
Khairiyat Patra: A letter or message inquiring about someone’s well-being.
Taj (tahj): Refers to the recitation of the Quran, specifically the ability to recite it beautifully and with proper pronunciation.
9th May: Likely refers to a significant political event in Pakistan that involved protests and possibly violence.
Ivane: Context unclear, likely a proper noun or a mispronounced term.
Vane Sadar: Unclear in this context, potentially a misspelling or slang term.
Hippocritus: Likely a reference to Hippocrates, an ancient Greek physician considered the father of medicine, used here to denote hypocrisy.
Referendum: A general vote by the electorate on a single political question referred to them for a direct decision.
Wazir Azam: Urdu term for Prime Minister.
Sakhiya: An Urdu word for generosity, possibly used here sarcastically.
No Confidence Motion: A formal vote in a legislative body to determine whether a person in a position of responsibility (like a Prime Minister) still has the support of the majority.
Mirroring the Rights of the People: Likely referring to actions taken in accordance with democratic principles and the will of the people.
Gas Leak and Treatment Being Done to the Punjab Assembly: Context unclear, likely referring to a specific political incident or scandal involving the Punjab Assembly.
Chaz Groups: Context unclear, possibly a slang term or local reference.
Awaam: Urdu word for “the people,” often used in political contexts.
Institution of Army: Refers to the Pakistani military as an organized and powerful entity.
Shahbaz Gill: Likely a Pakistani politician or public figure.
Red Line: A boundary or limit that should not be crossed.
Laad Paan: Context unclear, potentially slang or a local phrase.
Jamaat-e-Islami: A prominent Islamic political party in Pakistan.
Noon League: Likely refers to the Pakistan Muslim League (N), a major political party in Pakistan.
PP: Likely refers to the Pakistan Peoples Party, another major political party in Pakistan.
KP: Abbreviation for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a province in Pakistan.
Modi: Refers to Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India.
Taji: Context unclear, possibly a misspelling or slang term.
Shiba Sharif: Likely refers to Shehbaz Sharif, the current Prime Minister of Pakistan.
NRO: Likely stands for National Reconciliation Ordinance, a controversial amnesty law passed in Pakistan in 2007.
Gausia University: A specific university in Pakistan, likely referenced due to a potential scandal or connection to a political figure.
Tosh Khana: A government department in Pakistan responsible for managing gifts received by government officials.
Dilip Barham: Unclear in this context, potentially a mispronounced name or an unknown reference.
Rooj and Jawal: Symbolic terms for “rise” and “fall,” likely used to analyze political trajectories.
Bhutto: Likely refers to Zulfikar Bhutto, a former Prime Minister of Pakistan.
Hitler: A reference to Adolf Hitler, the dictator of Nazi Germany, used to denote authoritarian tendencies.
Hajre Awad: Likely refers to the Black Stone, a sacred Islamic relic located in the Kaaba in Mecca.
Quiz
Instructions: Please answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.
What is the speaker’s main criticism of Imran Khan’s political behavior?
According to the speaker, how did Imran Khan’s actions on 9th May impact his legitimacy?
What is the significance of the speaker’s repeated references to Parliament and the democratic process?
How does the speaker compare Imran Khan’s political approach to that of Shehbaz Sharif and Nawaz Sharif?
What does the speaker suggest as a more appropriate course of action for Imran Khan and his supporters?
What historical analogies does the speaker use to explain Imran Khan’s political trajectory?
How does the speaker use the concepts of “Rooj” and “Jawal” to analyze political success and failure?
According to the speaker, what role does social media play in shaping public opinion and political movements?
What specific examples of alleged corruption or misconduct does the speaker mention in relation to Imran Khan?
What message does the speaker convey in his closing remarks regarding respect, humility, and the pursuit of justice?
Answer Key
The speaker criticizes Imran Khan for hypocrisy, claiming he acts one way in public and another in private. The speaker argues Khan manipulates the public, incites unrest, and refuses to accept the democratic process.
The speaker suggests Khan’s actions on 9th May, involving violence and attacks on state institutions, undermined his claims of being a peaceful, democratic leader and alienated him from the people.
By emphasizing Parliament and the democratic process, the speaker highlights the importance of following legal and constitutional procedures for expressing dissent and seeking political change. He frames Khan’s actions as undermining these principles.
While critical of the Sharif brothers, the speaker acknowledges their acceptance of democratic norms and their ability to form alliances and govern effectively within the existing political system. He contrasts this with Khan’s rejection of these norms.
The speaker suggests Khan should engage in politics through Parliament, respect democratic institutions, apologize for his past actions, and pursue justice through legal means rather than inciting public unrest.
The speaker draws parallels between Khan’s trajectory and that of Zulfikar Bhutto, suggesting both leaders initially enjoyed popular support but ultimately faced downfall due to their authoritarian tendencies.
The speaker utilizes “Rooj” (rise) and “Jawal” (fall) to illustrate the cyclical nature of political power. He argues Khan’s initial rise was fueled by populist rhetoric but his fall resulted from actions contrary to democratic principles.
The speaker acknowledges the power of social media in mobilizing support but argues it can create an echo chamber and distort the perception of public sentiment, suggesting Khan’s online popularity did not translate into real-world support.
The speaker mentions Khan’s alleged misuse of funds related to Gausia University, his handling of gifts received through Tosh Khana, and financial dealings with individuals like Dilip Barham as examples of corruption.
The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of mutual respect, humility, and adherence to the rule of law in political discourse. He suggests true leadership involves acknowledging mistakes, seeking forgiveness, and working within the established system for positive change.
Essay Questions
Analyze the speaker’s use of religious language and imagery in his critique of Imran Khan. What rhetorical effect does this language create?
To what extent does the speaker’s critique of Imran Khan reflect broader tensions and divisions within Pakistani society and politics?
Evaluate the speaker’s arguments regarding the role of Parliament and the democratic process in Pakistan. Are his perspectives convincing? Why or why not?
How does the speaker’s analysis of Imran Khan’s political trajectory compare and contrast with other interpretations of Khan’s rise and fall from power?
Consider the speaker’s closing remarks about the importance of respect, humility, and the pursuit of justice. What implications do these ideas hold for the future of Pakistani politics and society?
A Conversation with Rohan: Analyzing Imran Khan’s Political Trajectory
Source: Youtube interview of Rohan by Waqas Malana for 360 Digital
I. Introduction & Framing the Discussion (0:00-2:10)
Waqas Malana introduces Rohan and sets the stage for the discussion: exploring the reasons behind liberal opposition to Imran Khan and comparing his political approach to that of figures like Hafiz Saeed and Shahbaz Sharif.
II. Deconstructing Imran Khan’s Character and Political Style (2:10-7:55)
Imran Khan’s Rise to Popularity: Rohan questions the legitimacy of Khan’s popularity and criticizes his actions on May 9th. He argues Khan’s political ascent was fueled by external forces, and his behavior since losing power contradicts his claims of being a “man of the people.”
Hypocrisy and Contradictions: Rohan uses his past interviews with Khan to highlight contradictions in his personality and political stances. He calls out Khan’s hypocrisy in publicly attacking those he privately lobbies for support.
A “Clumsy Player” in Politics: Rohan labels Khan a “clumsy player” in politics, pointing to his early political ambitions during Musharraf’s referendum and his shifting allegiances. He argues Khan lacks political integrity and has “dirty hands,” disqualifying him from seeking justice.
III. The Fall from Grace: Examining Khan’s Ouster and Subsequent Actions (7:55-15:30)
Parliamentary Process and the No-Confidence Motion: Rohan emphasizes the supremacy of parliament in a democracy and criticizes Khan’s efforts to subvert the no-confidence motion. He denounces Khan’s actions as illegal and undemocratic, including dissolving the assembly.
The May 9th Incident and its Aftermath: Rohan criticizes Khan for inciting violence on May 9th, questioning his claims of widespread popular support. He condemns the attacks on state institutions and suggests they were part of a larger, dangerous plan to destabilize Pakistan.
Allegations of Rigging and Political Miscalculations: Rohan addresses allegations of election rigging by Khan, highlighting contradictions in his claims by pointing to PTI’s victories in KP and Punjab. He criticizes Khan’s inability to form political alliances, contrasting it with Modi’s approach in India.
IV. Khan’s Current Predicament and the Future of Pakistani Politics (15:30-24:15)
The “Diaper Changing” Analogy: Rohan uses a metaphor of a child needing their diaper changed to describe Khan’s dependence on external forces and his unwillingness to accept responsibility for his actions. He argues Khan is stuck in a state of immaturity and seeks a return to a time when he was “pampered” by powerful entities.
The Importance of Parliamentary Politics: Rohan stresses the significance of engaging in politics through parliamentary processes. He criticizes Khan’s dismissive attitude towards parliament and his reliance on disruptive tactics, advocating for a strong and vocal opposition within the system.
Hope for Redemption and a Call for Accountability: Rohan suggests that Khan should seek forgiveness for his actions and face legal consequences for alleged corruption. He emphasizes the importance of upholding the law and holding leaders accountable for their actions.
V. Concluding Reflections: Rooj vs. Jawal and the Lessons for Pakistan (24:15-25:30)
The Dichotomy of Rooj and Jawal: Malana summarizes Rohan’s analysis, framing it within the concepts of “Rooj” (ascent) and “Jawal” (descent) in political leadership. He draws parallels between Khan and Bhutto, suggesting they both experienced a fall from grace due to their authoritarian tendencies.
The Importance of Stability and Security: Malana concludes by emphasizing the need for stability and security in Pakistan. He suggests that the rise and fall of leaders like Khan offer valuable lessons for the future of Pakistani democracy.
Political Analysis: The Rise and Fall of Imran Khan
This briefing document analyzes a political commentary by Rohan Saheb on the political career of Imran Khan. The commentary criticizes Khan’s actions and motives, comparing him unfavorably to other Pakistani leaders and highlighting his alleged hypocrisy, incompetence, and undemocratic behavior.
Key Themes:
Imran Khan’s hypocrisy: Rohan Saheb accuses Khan of double standards, claiming he seeks favor from the same institutions he publicly criticizes. He highlights Khan’s alleged pleas to powerful figures despite his public stance of independence and reliance on “the power of the people”.
“You are spreading filth and going inside and begging them to meet me… are you luring them that as long as I will stay, you are the only one? I will continue to give extension to you… what is this hypocrisy?”
Imran Khan’s political ineptitude: Rohan Saheb criticizes Khan’s political maneuvering, particularly his handling of the no-confidence motion and his decision to dissolve the assembly. He argues these actions demonstrate a lack of understanding of democratic processes and political strategy.
“If you had political wisdom then you would not have broken the PP, don’t think if you would have brought the PP with you, then you yourself would have formed the Noon League brother, alliances are also formed in democracy…”
Questioning Khan’s popularity: Rohan Saheb challenges Khan’s claims of representing the majority of Pakistanis, pointing to the relatively small size of his rallies compared to historical demonstrations. He suggests Khan’s popularity is inflated by social media and a dedicated but limited base.
“It is maintained that I am the representative of 90 per cent of the people, how many people should come with 90 per cent of the 90 per cent of the register… Well, then they are coming out for you, 2000 00 groups are coming out.”
Condemnation of May 9th incidents: The commentary strongly condemns the violence that occurred on May 9th, attributing it to Khan’s incitement and suggesting a deliberate plan to destabilize the country. Rohan Saheb argues that a truly popular leader would not have resorted to such tactics.
“Their crimes were very dangerous and they were thinking that what Pakistan was doing was There is a strong bond of security which has tied them together in such a way that they have to be kept in that base and within them they become so playful that they break each other’s heads and stand up against each other…”
Important Ideas & Facts:
Emphasis on the supremacy of Parliament: Rohan Saheb stresses the importance of democratic institutions, particularly Parliament, as the true representatives of the people. He criticizes Khan for undermining these institutions through his actions and rhetoric.
Favorable comparison to other leaders: While critical of other politicians like Shahbaz Sharif, Rohan Saheb presents them as more pragmatic and politically savvy compared to Khan. He cites their ability to form alliances and navigate the political landscape effectively.
Historical parallels: Rohan Saheb draws comparisons between Khan and previous Pakistani leaders, including Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, suggesting a pattern of charismatic leaders succumbing to authoritarian tendencies and ultimately failing.
Conclusion:
Rohan Saheb’s commentary provides a scathing critique of Imran Khan’s political career. It accuses him of hypocrisy, political ineptitude, and a dangerous disregard for democratic norms. Rohan Saheb advocates for respect for institutions and adherence to the rule of law, implicitly suggesting Khan’s actions threaten Pakistan’s stability and future.
It is important to note that this commentary represents a single perspective and may not reflect the views of all Pakistani citizens. Further research and analysis of diverse opinions are necessary to form a comprehensive understanding of Pakistani politics and Imran Khan’s legacy.
Imran Khan’s Actions: A Critical Perspective
Here is a discussion of Imran Khan’s actions, based on the provided sources:
Imran Khan’s actions on May 9th are considered indefensible. While the sources do not explicitly state what occurred on this date, they heavily imply that Khan’s actions were unacceptable.
Khan is criticized for contradictory behavior, publicly condemning individuals and groups while privately seeking their support. He is accused of hypocrisy for criticizing those who remain neutral while simultaneously pleading for their support.
The sources describe Khan as a “clumsy person in politics” who lacked understanding and relied on manipulative tactics. His pursuit of power is highlighted, with references to his alleged attempts to secure the position of Prime Minister through deals and secret meetings.
Khan’s handling of the no-confidence motion is criticized. He is accused of acting against the law by delaying the process and attempting to dissolve the assembly. His actions are seen as disrespectful to the Parliament and its authority.
The sources question Khan’s claims of popular support. They point to the relatively small number of his supporters who participated in protests and rallies, contrasting it with the massive public response seen in other countries like Bangladesh.
Khan is accused of making dangerous accusations and spreading misinformation. His rhetoric about a “strong bond of security” and a “mean thinking” within Pakistan is perceived as an attempt to incite division and violence.
Khan’s criticism of the army is condemned, particularly his suggestion that individuals within the institution should disobey their superiors. This is seen as a dangerous and selfish attempt to sow discord.
The sources point to Khan’s history of violating laws and receiving preferential treatment. They argue that he has been forgiven for actions that ordinary citizens would be punished for.
Khan’s calls for accountability and justice are seen as hypocritical, given his own alleged corrupt practices. The sources mention accusations of misusing funds and improperly benefiting from gifts received as Prime Minister.
The sources question Khan’s political strategy, arguing that he failed to build alliances and understand the dynamics of democratic politics. They contrast his approach with that of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who successfully formed a coalition government.
Khan is portrayed as immature and incapable of accepting responsibility. The analogy of a child who refuses to stop using diapers is used to illustrate his perceived dependence on others and his inability to stand on his own.
Khan’s frequent shifts in strategy and contradictory statements are highlighted, suggesting a lack of clear direction and a tendency to act impulsively.
Khan is urged to accept the current political reality, respect the law, and engage in parliamentary processes. He is criticized for his dismissive attitude towards the Parliament and his preference for disruptive tactics.
Overall, the sources paint a highly critical picture of Imran Khan’s actions, emphasizing his perceived hypocrisy, political ineptitude, and dangerous rhetoric.
Understanding Pakistani Politics: Insights from a Critical Commentary
The sources offer a sharp critique of Pakistani politics through their assessment of Imran Khan’s actions. Here’s what we can understand about the country’s political landscape from these insights:
Parliamentary System and Democratic Values: The sources stress the importance of the Parliament in Pakistan’s system of governance, emphasizing that it is the supreme legal authority representing the voice of the people. This highlights the country’s commitment, at least in principle, to democratic values where elected representatives hold power.
Challenges to Democratic Norms: Despite the emphasis on parliamentary authority, the sources also reveal behaviors and actions that undermine democratic norms. Khan’s alleged attempts to circumvent the no-confidence motion process, his disrespect for the Parliament, and his criticism of the judiciary all point to a disregard for established democratic procedures.
Power Struggles and Allegations of Manipulation: The sources suggest that Pakistani politics is marked by intense power struggles, with accusations of manipulation and backroom deals. Khan is accused of seeking personal gain through secret meetings and maneuvering for power. The sources also hint at a potentially tense relationship between political leaders and the army, with Khan’s comments about disobedience being met with strong disapproval.
Role of Public Opinion and Popular Support: The sources highlight the importance of public perception in Pakistani politics. Khan’s claims of representing the majority of the population are challenged by pointing to the limited turnout at his rallies. This suggests that politicians’ legitimacy and ability to retain power are linked to their perceived popularity and public support.
Importance of Alliances and Political Strategy: The sources criticize Khan’s political strategy, highlighting his failure to build alliances and navigate the complexities of coalition politics. This indicates that success in Pakistani politics likely requires the ability to form strategic partnerships and negotiate with other political groups.
Prevalence of Corruption Allegations: The sources make several allegations of corruption against Khan, including misuse of funds and improper handling of gifts. These accusations, if true, reflect a potential problem of corruption within the political system.
Emphasis on Accountability and Justice: Despite the negativity surrounding Khan’s actions, the sources advocate for accountability and justice, regardless of an individual’s position or power. They call for Khan to face legal consequences for his alleged wrongdoings, emphasizing the need for a fair and impartial legal system that applies to everyone.
While focusing on Imran Khan, the sources provide a window into the larger political landscape of Pakistan. They reveal a system where democratic ideals coexist with challenges to those norms, where power struggles and allegations of corruption are prominent, and where public opinion plays a significant role.
Examining Principles of Democracy through Pakistani Politics
While the sources don’t directly list the principles of democracy, they provide a case study of Pakistani politics, particularly through a critical lens on Imran Khan’s actions. Examining this critique helps understand how democratic principles are understood and sometimes challenged in practice.
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Rule of Law: The sources repeatedly emphasize the importance of the Parliament as the highest law-making body, reflecting the core democratic principle of popular sovereignty where power resides in the people and is exercised through their elected representatives. The sources stress that the Parliament is “the translation of the people” and “the voice of the whole crore people”. Upholding the rule of law is central, meaning everyone is subject to the law and no one is above it. Khan’s alleged attempts to bypass legal processes and disregard parliamentary procedures are heavily criticized for violating this principle.
Free and Fair Elections: Although not explicitly stated, the concept of free and fair elections is implied as foundational to a functioning democracy. The sources mention accusations of rigging, implying that a fair electoral process is expected. The very fact that elections take place and transitions of power are (ideally) determined by the electorate speaks to this principle.
Accountability and Transparency: Democratic principles demand that leaders are accountable to the people they govern. The sources repeatedly call for Khan to be held accountable for his actions, highlighting the expectation of transparency and responsibility from those in power. The demand for investigations into alleged corruption and misuse of funds further underlines this principle.
Respect for Democratic Institutions: The sources emphasize the importance of respecting democratic institutions like the Parliament, the judiciary, and even the electoral process itself. Criticism of Khan often stems from his perceived disrespect for these institutions, including his comments on the army, which is considered a crucial institution in Pakistan. The sources suggest that healthy democratic function relies on the proper functioning and mutual respect among these institutions.
Freedom of Speech and Assembly: While not directly addressed, Khan’s ability to hold rallies and voice his opinions, even if controversial, points to an underlying assumption of freedom of speech and assembly. However, the sources also warn against using these freedoms to spread misinformation or incite violence, suggesting a nuanced understanding of these rights.
Peaceful Transitions of Power: Implicit in the discussion of no-confidence motions and electoral processes is the democratic principle of peaceful transitions of power based on the will of the people. The sources critique Khan’s attempts to cling to power despite losing a vote of no confidence, highlighting the importance of accepting democratic outcomes.
It’s important to note that while these principles are central to a democratic system, the sources reveal the complexities and challenges of upholding them in practice. Accusations of corruption, power struggles, attempts to circumvent the law, and inflammatory rhetoric all point to the fragility of democratic norms and the constant need for vigilance in safeguarding them.
Unveiling Political Hypocrisy: A Case Study from Pakistani Politics
The sources offer a compelling exploration of political hypocrisy through their examination of Imran Khan’s actions and statements. Khan is repeatedly accused of engaging in hypocritical behavior, particularly regarding his public pronouncements versus his private actions.
Condemnation vs. Supplication: The sources point out a stark contrast between Khan’s public criticism of certain groups and his private attempts to secure their support. He denounces those who remain neutral in political conflicts, labeling them as “animals,” yet he simultaneously seeks their backing behind closed doors. This double standard exposes a blatant hypocrisy, revealing a willingness to compromise principles for political expediency.
Champion of Democracy vs. Disrespect for Institutions: Khan frequently proclaims his commitment to democratic values and the rule of law. However, his actions often contradict these pronouncements. He is accused of attempting to subvert the no-confidence motion process, undermining the authority of the Parliament, and criticizing the judiciary. This dissonance between words and actions reveals a hypocritical stance, suggesting a selective adherence to democratic principles that serves his own interests.
Accusations of Corruption While Engaging in Questionable Practices: Khan positions himself as a crusader against corruption, yet he faces allegations of misusing funds, benefiting improperly from gifts as Prime Minister, and engaging in financial misconduct. This discrepancy between his anti-corruption rhetoric and the accusations leveled against him raises serious questions about his sincerity and points to potential hypocrisy in his stance.
Demands for Accountability While Resisting Scrutiny: Khan vehemently demands accountability from his political opponents, but he seems reluctant to face similar scrutiny himself. He avoids engaging in parliamentary processes that would hold him accountable and instead resorts to disruptive tactics and fiery rhetoric. This unwillingness to subject himself to the same standards he demands of others further reinforces the perception of hypocrisy.
The sources utilize a powerful analogy to illustrate Khan’s hypocrisy, comparing him to a child who demands to have his diaper changed despite being capable of doing it himself. This imagery effectively portrays Khan’s perceived immaturity and his refusal to take responsibility for his actions, preferring to rely on others to clean up his messes while simultaneously presenting himself as a strong and independent leader.
The critique of Khan’s actions serves as a broader commentary on the nature of political hypocrisy. The sources suggest that hypocrisy is a common feature of the political landscape, where individuals often prioritize personal gain and power over principles and consistency. This behavior erodes public trust, undermines democratic processes, and perpetuates a cynical view of politics.
Analyzing National Security through the Lens of Pakistani Politics
The sources, while primarily focused on Imran Khan’s political actions and alleged hypocrisy, offer insights into how national security is perceived and potentially impacted within the Pakistani context. The conversation about Khan’s actions, particularly his relationship with the army and his controversial rhetoric, sheds light on some key concerns surrounding national security.
The Military’s Role in National Security: While not explicitly discussed, the sources allude to the significant role of the army in Pakistan’s national security apparatus. The strong disapproval of Khan’s comments urging disobedience within the army ranks highlights the sensitivity surrounding this institution and its importance in maintaining stability and security. The very fact that Khan’s comments are considered problematic speaks volumes about the perceived power and influence of the military in matters of national security.
Threats to Security from Internal Divisions: The sources express concern over Khan’s actions potentially creating divisions within Pakistani society and weakening national security. His inflammatory rhetoric, targeting those who hold different political views, is seen as contributing to societal fragmentation. This divisiveness is presented as a threat to national security, as a united front is generally considered crucial in facing external threats and maintaining internal stability.
The Dangers of Undermining Democratic Institutions: The sources repeatedly criticize Khan for disrespecting democratic institutions like the Parliament and the judiciary. This behavior is portrayed not only as undemocratic but also as potentially damaging to national security. A weakened or dysfunctional democratic system is presented as vulnerable to instability and more susceptible to internal and external threats.
The Importance of Responsible Leadership for National Security: The sources strongly imply that responsible and ethical leadership is crucial for safeguarding national security. Khan’s alleged hypocrisy, his attempts to circumvent legal processes, and his disregard for democratic norms are portrayed as detrimental to national security. This critique suggests that leaders who act irresponsibly, prioritize personal gain over national interest, and undermine democratic institutions ultimately weaken the country’s security.
It’s worth noting that the sources present a particular perspective on Pakistani politics and national security, primarily through a critical assessment of Imran Khan. While insightful, this perspective may not represent the full spectrum of views on these complex issues.
Dissecting Imran Khan’s Political Strategies and Their Fallout: A Critical Examination
The sources provide a scathing critique of Imran Khan’s political strategies, highlighting how his actions have led to negative consequences for both his political career and, arguably, Pakistani democracy.
Populism and Emotional Appeals: Khan’s political strategy has relied heavily on populist rhetoric, appealing directly to the emotions of the public, particularly by positioning himself as a champion of the people against a corrupt elite. He frequently uses charged language, denounces his opponents as morally compromised, and paints himself as a lone warrior fighting for justice. This strategy has proven successful in mobilizing support, particularly among younger voters disillusioned with traditional political parties. However, this emotionally driven approach often lacks substantive policy proposals and relies on simplistic solutions to complex problems.
Undermining Democratic Processes: One of the most concerning consequences of Khan’s strategies has been his willingness to undermine democratic processes and institutions when they don’t favor him. His rejection of the no-confidence motion, his criticism of the judiciary, and his attempts to dissolve the Parliament are all cited as examples of his disregard for democratic norms. This behavior is seen as eroding public trust in institutions and setting dangerous precedents for future political leaders.
Accusations of Hypocrisy and Inconsistency: Khan’s actions and statements often clash, leading to accusations of hypocrisy. He denounces corruption while facing allegations of financial impropriety. He champions democracy while simultaneously trying to subvert democratic processes. This inconsistency undermines his credibility and fuels public distrust. The sources use a poignant analogy, comparing Khan to a child demanding a diaper change despite being capable of doing it himself, to illustrate his perceived lack of maturity and responsibility.
Cultivating a Divisive Political Environment: Khan’s rhetoric often creates divisions within society, pitting groups against each other and exacerbating existing tensions. His labeling of those who don’t support him as “animals” and his attacks on the “neutral” further contribute to polarization. This divisive approach undermines national unity and could potentially harm social cohesion and stability in the long run.
Damage to Personal Credibility and Political Future: Khan’s strategies have ultimately backfired, leading to a loss of political power and a tarnished reputation. His attempts to cling to power despite losing a vote of no confidence were unsuccessful and further alienated him from political allies. His incendiary rhetoric has damaged his image and made it difficult to build bridges with those who oppose him.
Consequences Beyond Khan: The sources suggest that the consequences of Khan’s political strategies extend beyond his personal political fortunes. His actions raise concerns about the future of democracy in Pakistan, demonstrating how populist tactics can be used to erode democratic norms and institutions. His willingness to exploit divisions within society for political gain poses a threat to social stability and national unity.
The sources present a critical perspective on Imran Khan and his political strategies. While acknowledging his initial popularity and success in mobilizing support, they ultimately argue that his actions have had negative consequences for both his political career and the broader political landscape in Pakistan.
Imran Khan: A Portrait of Hypocrisy and Political Recklessness
The speaker in the provided source paints a highly critical picture of Imran Khan’s political behavior, emphasizing his hypocrisy, disregard for democratic norms, and damaging political strategies.
A Master of Double Standards: The speaker repeatedly accuses Khan of hypocrisy, highlighting the stark contrast between his public pronouncements and his private actions. While publicly condemning certain groups, he privately seeks their support. He claims to champion democracy while actively working to undermine democratic processes. This double standard is seen as a blatant attempt to manipulate public perception for personal gain.
A Disrespect for Democratic Institutions and Processes: Khan’s political behavior is characterized by a disregard for democratic institutions and norms. He is accused of attempting to circumvent the no-confidence motion process, disrespecting the Parliament, and criticizing the judiciary. His rejection of democratic processes when they don’t favor him is presented as evidence of his authoritarian tendencies and his belief that he is above the law.
A Propensity for Divisive Rhetoric and Tactics: The speaker argues that Khan intentionally uses divisive rhetoric to polarize society and consolidate his power. He labels those who oppose him as enemies of the people, fuels distrust in institutions, and creates an “us vs. them” mentality. This strategy, while effective in rallying his base, is seen as detrimental to national unity and social harmony.
Immaturity and a Refusal to Take Responsibility: The speaker utilizes a striking analogy to portray Khan’s political behavior, comparing him to a child who demands to have his diaper changed despite being fully capable of doing it himself. This imagery highlights Khan’s perceived immaturity, his refusal to accept responsibility for his actions, and his expectation that others will clean up his messes.
Destructive Political Strategies with Lasting Consequences: The speaker contends that Khan’s political strategies, while initially successful in garnering support, have ultimately backfired and resulted in significant damage. His populist rhetoric, reliance on emotional appeals, and willingness to undermine democratic processes have eroded public trust, polarized society, and weakened democratic institutions. The speaker suggests that Khan’s actions have not only harmed his own political career but have also left a lasting negative impact on Pakistani politics.
In essence, the speaker portrays Imran Khan as a politician driven by self-interest and a lust for power. His actions are characterized by hypocrisy, a disregard for democratic principles, a willingness to sow division, and a lack of political maturity. The speaker’s critique goes beyond a simple assessment of Khan’s actions; it serves as a warning about the dangers of populism and the fragility of democratic institutions when confronted with leaders who prioritize personal gain over the common good.
Contrasting Imran Khan with Hafiz Saeed: A Lack of Direct Comparison
While the sources heavily criticize Imran Khan’s political behavior and strategies, they do not offer a direct comparison between Imran Khan and Hafiz Saeed.
Focus on Khan’s Political Conduct: The speaker’s primary concern is analyzing Khan’s political actions, highlighting his perceived hypocrisy, manipulation of democratic processes, and divisive rhetoric. The critique centers on Khan’s conduct as a political leader and its impact on Pakistani democracy.
Hafiz Saeed Mentioned Briefly: Hafiz Saeed is mentioned only in passing at the beginning of the conversation. The question posed to the speaker asks why a “liberal person” like Imran Khan is opposed by someone like Hafiz Saeed, who is seen as more favorable in comparison. However, the speaker doesn’t elaborate on this comparison or delve into Hafiz Saeed’s actions or ideology.
No Substantive Analysis of Saeed: The sources do not provide information about Hafiz Saeed’s political strategies or his views on national security. Consequently, it’s not possible to draw a meaningful contrast between the two figures based on the provided sources.
In summary, the sources primarily focus on critiquing Imran Khan, without offering a comparative analysis that includes Hafiz Saeed. To understand how the speaker might contrast the two figures, additional information about Hafiz Saeed’s political stance and actions would be necessary.
Imran Khan’s Political Actions: A Tapestry of Hypocrisy, Disregard for Democracy, and Divisive Tactics
The speaker in the sources weaves a highly critical narrative of Imran Khan’s political actions, emphasizing his perceived hypocrisy, his blatant disregard for democratic norms and processes, and his penchant for employing divisive rhetoric and tactics to achieve his political objectives.
Hypocrisy as a Hallmark: A recurring theme in the speaker’s critique is the accusation of hypocrisy that pervades Khan’s political behavior. The speaker repeatedly points out the stark contradictions between Khan’s public pronouncements and his private actions. For instance, while Khan publicly denounces certain groups or individuals, he is accused of privately seeking their support, exposing a calculated attempt to manipulate public perception for personal gain. This hypocrisy extends to his stance on democracy; despite championing democratic ideals, Khan is accused of actively working to subvert democratic processes when they don’t align with his goals.
Disrespecting the Pillars of Democracy: The speaker’s condemnation extends to Khan’s evident disregard for democratic institutions and processes. He is criticized for his attempts to circumvent the no-confidence motion, his disrespectful treatment of the Parliament, and his critical remarks directed at the judiciary. These actions are presented as clear signs of Khan’s authoritarian tendencies, suggesting a belief that he is above the law and not bound by the principles he claims to uphold. The speaker underscores this point by highlighting Khan’s violation of legal boundaries, even citing instances where he allegedly received preferential treatment from law enforcement compared to an ordinary citizen.
Sowing Seeds of Discord: The speaker argues that Khan deliberately employs divisive rhetoric and tactics to polarize Pakistani society and consolidate his grip on power. He resorts to labeling those who oppose him as “animals” and targets those who remain neutral, further fueling existing tensions and distrust. This strategy, while potentially effective in galvanizing his base, is seen as a dangerous game that undermines national unity and social cohesion. The speaker expresses concern that Khan’s divisive approach could have long-lasting negative consequences for Pakistani society, fostering animosity and hindering collaborative efforts towards progress.
Immaturity and Shirking Responsibility: The speaker employs a striking analogy to depict Khan’s political behavior, comparing him to a child demanding a diaper change despite possessing the ability to do it himself. This vivid imagery effectively portrays Khan’s perceived immaturity, his unwillingness to accept accountability for his actions, and his expectation that others will bear the burden of rectifying his mistakes. This analogy serves as a powerful indictment of Khan’s leadership, suggesting a lack of the responsibility and maturity expected of a national leader.
Political Strategies that Ultimately Backfire: The speaker contends that while Khan’s political strategies, particularly his populist rhetoric and emotional appeals, initially garnered significant support, they ultimately backfired and caused considerable damage. His relentless pursuit of power, even after losing a vote of no confidence, further alienated him from potential allies and tarnished his reputation. The speaker argues that Khan’s actions have not only harmed his political prospects but have also inflicted lasting damage on Pakistani politics, eroding public trust and weakening democratic institutions.
In essence, the speaker portrays Imran Khan as a political figure driven by self-interest and an insatiable thirst for power. His political actions are characterized by hypocrisy, a blatant disregard for democratic principles, a willingness to sow division within society, and a lack of the maturity and responsibility expected of a leader entrusted with a nation’s well-being. The speaker’s critique transcends a mere assessment of Khan’s actions; it serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of populism and the vulnerability of democratic institutions when confronted with leaders who prioritize personal gain above the collective good.
Imran Khan’s Actions Under Fire: A Detailed Examination of the Speaker’s Criticisms
The sources offer a scathing critique of Imran Khan’s political actions, painting a picture of a leader driven by self-interest and a willingness to undermine democratic processes for personal gain. Let’s break down the specific actions that draw the speaker’s ire:
Circumventing the No-Confidence Motion: The speaker condemns Khan’s actions during the no-confidence motion process, accusing him of attempting to delay and ultimately thwart the democratic procedure. He criticizes Khan for going against the established law and for his role in the “changing of stones” that occurred overnight, implying underhanded tactics to cling to power. Khan’s decision to dissolve the assembly, despite a pending motion, is deemed a blatant violation of democratic norms.
Disrespecting Parliament and the Judiciary: Khan’s conduct towards key democratic institutions is heavily criticized. His refusal to participate in parliamentary proceedings after the no-confidence motion is seen as a rejection of democratic engagement. Additionally, his attacks against the Supreme Judiciary are condemned as attempts to undermine the rule of law and intimidate those who challenge his authority.
Inciting Violence and Disrupting Public Order: The speaker directly implicates Khan in the events of May 9th, suggesting that he either orchestrated or, at the very least, failed to prevent the violence and destruction that took place. Khan’s rhetoric, encouraging his supporters to cross “red lines” and challenge authority, is seen as directly contributing to the unrest. The speaker questions the size of Khan’s support base, highlighting the discrepancy between his claims of representing 90% of the population and the limited turnout at protests.
Hypocrisy and Manipulation: Khan is repeatedly accused of hypocrisy, with the speaker highlighting the contradictions between his public persona and his behind-the-scenes maneuvering. He is accused of publicly condemning certain groups while privately seeking their support. He is also condemned for using public platforms to spread false narratives and deflect blame onto others.
Breaking Political Alliances and Misjudging Opponents: The speaker criticizes Khan’s political strategy of breaking alliances, particularly with the PP (Pakistan Peoples Party), arguing that this move weakened his position and ultimately benefited his rivals, the Noon League. He suggests that Khan’s political miscalculations and his failure to understand the dynamics of Pakistani politics contributed to his downfall.
Refusal to Accept Defeat and Take Responsibility: The speaker highlights Khan’s persistent refusal to accept the outcome of the no-confidence motion and his subsequent removal from office. Instead of acknowledging his political defeat, Khan resorts to blaming external forces and making excuses for his failures. He is portrayed as clinging to a narrative of victimhood and refusing to take responsibility for his actions.
These specific actions, as described by the speaker, paint a damning picture of Khan’s political conduct. He is presented as a leader who prioritizes personal ambition over democratic principles and national unity. The speaker’s criticisms suggest that Khan’s actions have not only damaged his own political career but have also had a detrimental impact on Pakistan’s political landscape.
From Diaper Changes to Political Defeat: The Analogy of a Child’s Regression
The sources employ a striking analogy to illustrate Imran Khan’s political trajectory, comparing him to a child who regresses in his development. Initially, the child progresses, learning to stand and walk, symbolizing Khan’s rise to political prominence. However, instead of continuing this forward momentum, the child demands to have his diaper changed again, demonstrating a reluctance to embrace responsibility and a yearning for the comfort of being cared for.
This analogy poignantly captures several key aspects of Khan’s political journey as perceived by the speaker:
Early Promise Followed by Regression: The child’s initial steps represent Khan’s early popularity and his promises of a “Naya Pakistan” (New Pakistan). However, his subsequent actions, characterized by hypocrisy, disregard for democratic norms, and divisive rhetoric, are seen as a regression from these initial ideals, mirroring the child’s return to dependency.
Unwillingness to Accept Responsibility: The child’s demand for a diaper change, despite being capable of self-care, symbolizes Khan’s refusal to take responsibility for his actions and his expectation that others, perhaps powerful entities or the “establishment,” will step in to resolve his problems. This unwillingness to acknowledge his own role in his political downfall is a central theme in the speaker’s criticism.
Yearning for Past Support and “NEPIA”: The analogy also highlights Khan’s perceived longing for the support he once enjoyed, potentially alluding to the backing he allegedly received from certain quarters in his rise to power. The “NEPIA” (diaper) represents this past support, which he now finds lacking. The speaker suggests that Khan fails to recognize that the political landscape has changed, and those who may have previously assisted him have adopted a neutral stance.
Immaturity and Lack of Political Acumen: By likening Khan to a child, the speaker implicitly criticizes his perceived political immaturity and lack of strategic thinking. The child’s inability to understand the consequences of his actions mirrors Khan’s miscalculations and his failure to adapt to changing political circumstances.
In essence, the analogy of the child’s regression effectively encapsulates the speaker’s critique of Imran Khan’s political trajectory. It suggests that while Khan initially held promise, his actions ultimately revealed a lack of maturity, a refusal to embrace accountability, and a misplaced reliance on past support systems. This powerful imagery underscores the speaker’s disappointment in Khan’s leadership, depicting him as a figure who failed to live up to his initial potential and instead regressed into a state of political dependency and blame-shifting.
Criticisms of Imran Khan’s Leadership: A Multifaceted Critique
The sources offer a comprehensive and pointed critique of Imran Khan’s leadership, highlighting several key flaws that contributed to his political downfall. The criticisms extend beyond mere policy disagreements, focusing instead on his character, his approach to governance, and his political strategies.
Authoritarian Tendencies Masquerading as Democracy: While Khan often presented himself as a champion of democracy, his actions revealed a concerning disregard for democratic principles and institutions. The speaker criticizes his attempts to circumvent the no-confidence motion, his dissolution of the assembly despite a pending motion, and his attacks on the Supreme Judiciary. These actions are seen as indicative of an authoritarian mindset, where personal power takes precedence over the rule of law and the will of the people. The speaker emphasizes that Khan, despite his claims of representing the people, ultimately rejected democratic processes when they threatened his hold on power.
Hypocrisy and Calculated Manipulation: The speaker repeatedly accuses Khan of hypocrisy, highlighting a pattern of discrepancy between his public pronouncements and his private actions. He criticizes Khan for publicly denouncing individuals and groups while simultaneously seeking their support behind closed doors. This behavior is interpreted as a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception and gain political advantage through deceptive means. The speaker suggests that Khan’s actions were driven by self-interest rather than a genuine commitment to the principles he espoused.
Divisiveness and Incitement of Unrest: A major criticism leveled against Khan’s leadership is his use of divisive rhetoric and tactics to polarize society and consolidate his support base. He is accused of resorting to inflammatory language, labeling his opponents as “animals” and targeting those who remain neutral. The speaker expresses concern that Khan’s approach fostered animosity and distrust within Pakistani society, potentially undermining national unity and hindering collaborative efforts toward progress. His rhetoric is seen as contributing to the unrest and violence that marred his final days in office, particularly the events of May 9th.
Immaturity and Lack of Accountability: The sources utilize a potent analogy to depict Khan’s political behavior, comparing him to a child who regresses in his development. The analogy highlights Khan’s perceived immaturity, his unwillingness to accept responsibility for his actions, and his expectation that others will step in to rectify his mistakes. The speaker contends that Khan, despite his age and experience, displayed a lack of political maturity and a tendency to shirk accountability. He is portrayed as clinging to a narrative of victimhood rather than acknowledging his role in his own political downfall.
Flawed Political Strategy and Misplaced Reliance: The speaker criticizes Khan’s strategic decisions, arguing that they ultimately backfired and contributed to his loss of power. He points to Khan’s decision to break political alliances, particularly with the PP, as a miscalculation that strengthened his rivals. Additionally, the speaker suggests that Khan’s reliance on past support systems, perhaps alluding to alleged backing from powerful entities, proved misplaced as the political landscape shifted.
In conclusion, the criticisms presented in the sources paint a highly critical picture of Imran Khan’s leadership style. He is portrayed as a figure who, while initially promising, ultimately succumbed to his own flaws, undermining democratic norms, sowing division, and displaying a lack of maturity and accountability. The speaker’s critique serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of populism and the fragility of democratic institutions when confronted with leaders who prioritize personal gain over the collective good.
Imran Khan’s Missteps: A Catalogue of Criticisms
The speaker in the sources presents a pointed critique of Imran Khan’s leadership, outlining specific events and actions that he perceives as major failings. These criticisms highlight Khan’s alleged disregard for democratic processes, his tendency towards hypocrisy and manipulation, and his role in exacerbating political divisions and instability in Pakistan.
Mishandling the No-Confidence Motion: The speaker condemns Khan’s response to the no-confidence motion brought against him, arguing that he attempted to circumvent the democratic process through various means. Khan is accused of:
Delaying the Vote: He is criticized for intentionally delaying the vote on the no-confidence motion, contravening established legal procedures.
Dissolving the Assembly: Khan’s decision to dissolve the assembly before the vote could take place is condemned as a blatant attempt to cling to power and avoid facing the consequences of the motion. This action is seen as a violation of the democratic principle that a leader must submit to the will of the parliament.
Engaging in Suspicious “Stone Changing”: The speaker alludes to mysterious “stones being changed” overnight during the no-confidence process, implying underhanded tactics and potentially corrupt dealings to influence the outcome.
Attacks on Democratic Institutions and Principles: The speaker expresses deep concern over Khan’s actions and rhetoric towards key pillars of Pakistani democracy:
Disrespecting Parliament: Khan’s refusal to engage with parliamentary proceedings after the no-confidence motion is seen as a rejection of democratic norms and a sign of disrespect for the institution.
Undermining the Judiciary: His attacks on the Supreme Judiciary are condemned as an attempt to intimidate and silence those who challenge his authority. This behavior is viewed as an assault on the rule of law and a dangerous precedent for a leader to set.
Encouraging Military Insubordination: The speaker references comments made by Shahbaz Gill, a close associate of Khan, that seemingly encouraged disobedience within the military. This is presented as a highly irresponsible and potentially dangerous action that could undermine the chain of command and national security.
Inciting Violence and Exploiting Public Sentiment: Khan is accused of playing a direct role in the escalation of political tensions and the outbreak of violence, particularly surrounding the events of May 9th:
Crossing “Red Lines” and Encouraging Unrest: The speaker points to Khan’s use of inflammatory language, urging his supporters to cross “red lines” and challenge authority, as directly contributing to the unrest and violence that ensued.
Orchestrating or Failing to Prevent May 9th Violence: The speaker directly implicates Khan in the violence and destruction that occurred on May 9th, suggesting he either orchestrated the events or, at the very least, failed to take adequate measures to prevent them. This raises serious questions about Khan’s judgment and his commitment to peaceful political processes.
Inflated Claims of Public Support: The speaker challenges Khan’s assertion of representing 90% of the population, pointing to the relatively small turnout at his rallies as evidence that his support base was not as widespread as he claimed. This discrepancy is used to undermine Khan’s claims of popular legitimacy and suggest that he was out of touch with the true sentiments of the Pakistani people.
Seeking Undue Favors and Evading Accountability: The speaker criticizes Khan for allegedly seeking special treatment and attempting to avoid facing the legal consequences of his actions:
Seeking “NEPIA” (Diaper Changes) from Powerful Entities: The speaker utilizes the analogy of a child demanding a diaper change to illustrate Khan’s perceived reliance on external forces to resolve his problems. This suggests that Khan expected powerful entities, perhaps those who previously supported his rise to power, to intervene on his behalf and shield him from accountability.
Exploring “Backdoor” Deals for Clemency: The speaker mentions Khan’s visit to Jeddah and suggests that it may have been an attempt to secure a favorable deal or “NRO” (National Reconciliation Ordinance) to evade prosecution for alleged corruption and financial improprieties. This reinforces the image of Khan as a leader who seeks to operate outside the bounds of law and accountability.
The speaker’s detailed account of these specific events aims to present a comprehensive picture of Imran Khan’s leadership failings. He portrays Khan as a figure who prioritized personal ambition over democratic principles, manipulated public sentiment for political gain, and ultimately left a legacy of instability and division. The criticisms, while undoubtedly coming from a particular perspective, offer a valuable insight into the complex political landscape of Pakistan and the challenges faced by leaders who navigate its turbulent waters.
Parallels and Contrasts: Imran Khan in the Context of Other Leaders
The sources draw implicit and explicit comparisons between Imran Khan and other political figures, both historical and contemporary, to highlight his perceived failings and contextualize his actions within broader political trends. These comparisons serve to illuminate the speaker’s view of Khan’s leadership style and his assessment of Khan’s place within Pakistani political history.
Imran Khan and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto: A Shared Trajectory of Authoritarianism: The speaker suggests a parallel between Imran Khan and former Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, both of whom are characterized as initially popular leaders who ultimately embraced authoritarian tendencies. The speaker argues that both figures, despite their initial democratic credentials, developed a mindset that prioritized personal power over the principles of democratic governance. He points to their shared unwillingness to accept challenges to their authority and their tendency to suppress dissent as evidence of their authoritarian leanings. The speaker’s comparison suggests that Khan, like Bhutto, ultimately failed to live up to the democratic ideals he espoused, succumbing instead to the allure of unchecked power.
Imran Khan and Nawaz Sharif: A Contrast in Political Strategy and Public Perception: The speaker implicitly contrasts Imran Khan’s approach to politics with that of Nawaz Sharif, highlighting key differences in their political strategies and their relationships with the public. While Khan is criticized for his confrontational style, his tendency to break alliances, and his reliance on populist rhetoric, Sharif is presented as a more pragmatic figure who understands the importance of building coalitions and maintaining stability. The speaker suggests that Sharif’s ability to navigate the complexities of Pakistani politics and secure alliances, even when lacking a simple majority, demonstrates a level of political acumen that Khan lacked.
Imran Khan and Narendra Modi: A Cautionary Tale of Populism and Division: The speaker draws a comparison between Imran Khan and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, both of whom are seen as examples of populist leaders who have utilized divisive rhetoric and tactics to consolidate their power. The speaker expresses concern that Khan, like Modi, has exploited societal divisions and fueled polarization for political gain. The comparison serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the potential dangers of populist leadership and the long-term consequences of eroding social cohesion for short-term political expediency.
Imran Khan and Adolf Hitler: An Extreme Analogy Highlighting Authoritarian Mindsets: The speaker utilizes a hyperbolic comparison between Imran Khan and Adolf Hitler, albeit in a limited context, to emphasize his view of Khan’s authoritarian tendencies. The speaker argues that Khan, like Hitler, exhibited a disregard for democratic norms and a willingness to suppress opposition. While acknowledging the extreme nature of this analogy, the speaker uses it to underscore his belief that Khan’s mindset and actions posed a threat to democratic institutions and values in Pakistan.
By drawing these comparisons, the speaker provides a broader context for understanding Imran Khan’s leadership and its impact on Pakistani politics. The parallels and contrasts he draws highlight the complexities of leadership, the challenges of balancing democratic ideals with political realities, and the potential pitfalls of populism and authoritarianism. The speaker’s analysis encourages reflection on the lessons to be learned from the past and the importance of safeguarding democratic institutions against the erosion of values and principles.
Targeting the “Imranistas”: Criticisms of Khan’s Supporters
The speaker not only criticizes Imran Khan directly but also takes aim at his supporters, questioning their motives, judgment, and actions. These criticisms shed light on the speaker’s perception of the broader political dynamics surrounding Khan’s movement and the role his supporters played in both his rise and fall.
Blind Loyalty and Unquestioning Support: The speaker suggests that many of Khan’s supporters exhibit blind loyalty, accepting his claims and narratives without critical scrutiny. He points to their acceptance of Khan’s assertions about representing 90% of the population, despite evidence suggesting otherwise, as an example of this unquestioning support. This unwavering loyalty is framed as a weakness, preventing Khan’s followers from recognizing his flaws and holding him accountable for his actions.
Susceptibility to Manipulation and Propaganda: The speaker argues that Khan’s supporters have been manipulated by his populist rhetoric and social media campaigns. He contends that the enthusiasm and energy of some, particularly young people, have been misdirected and exploited for Khan’s political gain. This manipulation, according to the speaker, has blinded them to the reality of Khan’s leadership and the potential harm caused by his divisive tactics.
Violence and Disregard for the Rule of Law: The speaker directly condemns the actions of Khan’s supporters who engaged in violence and destruction, particularly during the events of May 9th. He attributes this behavior to the inflammatory rhetoric and encouragement of Khan, who urged his followers to cross “red lines” and challenge authority. The speaker sees this violence as a direct consequence of Khan’s leadership and a testament to the negative influence he has exerted on his supporters.
Lack of Genuine Popular Support: The speaker challenges the notion of widespread popular support for Khan, pointing to the relatively small turnout at his rallies as evidence that his base was not as broad as he claimed. This observation serves to undermine the legitimacy of Khan’s movement and suggest that his supporters were a vocal but ultimately limited segment of the population.
Immaturity and Unrealistic Expectations: The speaker employs the analogy of a child demanding a diaper change to describe the mindset of some of Khan’s supporters. This comparison implies that they have been coddled and shielded from responsibility, leading to unrealistic expectations and an inability to cope with the complexities of political reality. The speaker suggests that they are unwilling to accept that Khan is no longer in a position of power and are clinging to the hope of a return to the past.
The speaker’s criticisms of Khan’s supporters reveal a deeper concern about the broader political climate in Pakistan. He sees the blind loyalty, susceptibility to manipulation, and propensity for violence exhibited by some as warning signs of a society vulnerable to demagoguery and instability. By highlighting these concerns, the speaker aims to encourage critical thinking, responsible political engagement, and a rejection of divisive rhetoric and tactics.
From Political Darling to “Diaper-Changer” Dependent: The Analogy of a Child’s Maturation
The speaker in the sources uses a striking and extended analogy to characterize Imran Khan’s political career, likening it to the developmental stages of a child. This comparison serves not only to highlight Khan’s perceived political immaturity and dependence on external forces but also to explain his current struggles and disillusionment.
Early Stages: Pampered and Protected: The analogy begins by depicting Khan’s initial rise to power as akin to a child being cared for by doting parents. The speaker describes how Khan was initially “pampered,” supported, and seemingly destined for success, implying that he benefited from powerful backers who facilitated his ascent. This period is characterized by a sense of ease and effortless achievement, much like a child who has their needs met without having to exert much effort.
Demands and Expectations: As the child grows, so do their expectations and demands. Similarly, the speaker suggests that Khan, once in power, developed a sense of entitlement and an unwillingness to accept limitations or challenges to his authority. This stage is marked by a shift from passive reliance to active demands, mirroring a child’s growing awareness of their own desires and their ability to assert them.
Confrontation and Disillusionment: The pivotal moment in the analogy arrives when the child, accustomed to having their needs met, demands a “diaper change” but is met with refusal. This refusal represents Khan’s removal from power and the withdrawal of support from those who previously enabled him. The speaker suggests that Khan, like a frustrated child, is struggling to comprehend this change in circumstances and is lashing out in anger and confusion.
Unprepared for Independence: The analogy concludes by highlighting the child’s inability to function independently. The speaker argues that Khan, having grown accustomed to being “pampered,” lacks the political maturity and skills necessary to navigate the challenges of being in opposition or rebuilding his movement without the support he once enjoyed. He is portrayed as clinging to the hope that his previous benefactors will return, unable to adapt to the new reality of his situation.
By comparing Khan’s political trajectory to a child’s development, the speaker effectively conveys his assessment of Khan’s shortcomings as a leader. The analogy paints a picture of a figure who was initially elevated to a position of power without necessarily possessing the maturity, resilience, and independence required to sustain it. The speaker implies that Khan’s struggles stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of political realities and an inability to adapt to changing circumstances.
Doubting the “Awam”: The Speaker’s Skepticism of Khan’s Popularity
The speaker in the sources expresses significant doubt about Imran Khan’s claims of representing the will of the people and enjoying widespread popular support. He utilizes multiple lines of reasoning and evidence to challenge this narrative, presenting a counter-argument that portrays Khan’s support as both limited and manufactured.
Low Rally Turnout: The speaker directly challenges Khan’s assertion of representing 90% of the population by pointing to the relatively small crowds attending his rallies. He argues that if Khan genuinely commanded such widespread support, his rallies would be overflowing with people. Instead, the speaker observes that the turnout has been modest, consisting of only a few thousand individuals. This discrepancy between Khan’s claims and the observable reality forms the basis of the speaker’s skepticism.
Social Media Hype vs. Ground Reality: The speaker contends that much of the perceived support for Khan is a product of social media hype and online activism rather than genuine grassroots enthusiasm. He criticizes the tendency to conflate online engagement with real-world political power, arguing that the vocal presence of Khan’s supporters on social media does not necessarily translate into widespread popular support. The speaker suggests that this disconnect between the virtual and the real has inflated Khan’s perception of his own popularity.
Manipulated Youth and Misguided Enthusiasm: The speaker expresses concern that young people, in particular, have been manipulated by Khan’s populist rhetoric and social media campaigns. He suggests that their enthusiasm and energy have been misdirected and exploited for Khan’s political gain. While acknowledging the sincerity of their beliefs, the speaker argues that their lack of experience and susceptibility to emotional appeals have led them to support a leader who ultimately does not have their best interests at heart.
The “Pressure Group” Phenomenon: The speaker dismisses Khan’s claims of being a “popular leader” by suggesting that his support base is largely comprised of a “pressure group” consisting of loyalists and beneficiaries of his patronage. He implies that this group is motivated more by personal gain and allegiance to Khan than by genuine belief in his policies or vision for the country. This characterization seeks to undermine the legitimacy of Khan’s support by suggesting that it is driven by narrow interests rather than broad-based popular appeal.
Inability to Mobilize Mass Support: The speaker further undermines Khan’s claims of popularity by highlighting his inability to mobilize mass support when it mattered most. He points to the lack of widespread protests and demonstrations following Khan’s removal from power as evidence that his support base is not as deep or committed as he claims. The speaker argues that if Khan truly represented the will of the people, there would have been a much stronger public reaction to his ouster.
Through these arguments and observations, the speaker constructs a narrative that challenges the dominant portrayal of Imran Khan as a leader with overwhelming popular support. He encourages listeners to look beyond the surface-level enthusiasm and social media hype to consider the actual evidence of Khan’s popularity, which he argues is far more limited and manufactured than Khan and his supporters would have people believe.
The Speaker’s Scathing Critique of Imran Khan’s Leadership
The speaker in the sources presents a highly critical view of Imran Khan’s leadership style, portraying him as a deeply flawed figure characterized by hypocrisy, immaturity, and a dangerous disregard for democratic norms and the rule of law. Throughout their analysis, the speaker utilizes a variety of rhetorical techniques, including pointed comparisons, historical parallels, and biting sarcasm, to underscore their negative assessment of Khan’s leadership.
Hypocrisy and Duplicity: The speaker repeatedly accuses Khan of hypocrisy, highlighting the disconnect between his public pronouncements and his private actions. They point to Khan’s appeals to the “power of the people” while simultaneously engaging in backroom deals and seeking support from powerful institutions as evidence of this duplicity. The speaker further criticizes Khan’s tendency to publicly condemn individuals and institutions while privately seeking their favor, accusing him of engaging in “filth” and “luring” those he claims to oppose. This inconsistency, according to the speaker, reveals a lack of integrity and a willingness to manipulate others for personal gain.
Immaturity and Lack of Political Acumen: The speaker utilizes the analogy of a child demanding a diaper change to emphasize Khan’s political immaturity and inability to cope with the complexities of governing. They suggest that Khan, accustomed to being “pampered” and supported by powerful backers, lacks the resilience and adaptability necessary to navigate the challenges of political leadership. The speaker criticizes Khan’s tendency to lash out and make impulsive decisions when faced with setbacks, arguing that this behavior demonstrates a lack of strategic thinking and an inability to learn from his mistakes.
Disregard for Democratic Norms and Institutions: The speaker condemns Khan’s actions in undermining democratic processes and institutions, particularly his attempts to circumvent parliamentary procedures and challenge the authority of the judiciary. They highlight Khan’s decision to dissolve the assembly and his attacks on the Supreme Court as examples of his willingness to violate the rule of law to maintain his grip on power. The speaker argues that this behavior sets a dangerous precedent and threatens the stability of Pakistan’s democratic system.
Inciting Violence and Divisiveness: The speaker holds Khan directly responsible for the violence and unrest that erupted following his removal from power, specifically referencing the events of May 9th. They accuse Khan of inciting his supporters to cross “red lines” and challenge authority, leading to attacks on state institutions and personnel. The speaker views this violence as a direct consequence of Khan’s inflammatory rhetoric and his willingness to exploit the passions of his followers for political ends.
Appealing to Extremism and “Hitlerian” Tendencies: The speaker employs particularly strong language to condemn Khan’s leadership, drawing parallels to historical figures known for authoritarianism and extremism. They accuse Khan of harboring “Hitlerian” tendencies, suggesting that his desire for absolute power and his disregard for democratic norms pose a threat to Pakistan’s future. This comparison serves to highlight the speaker’s deep concern about the direction of Khan’s leadership and the potential consequences of his actions.
The speaker’s analysis of Imran Khan’s leadership paints a bleak picture of a figure who is driven by self-interest, lacking in political maturity, and willing to undermine democratic institutions to achieve his goals. The speaker utilizes a variety of rhetorical strategies to underscore the dangers posed by Khan’s leadership style, urging listeners to reject his divisive tactics and support a more responsible and democratic approach to governance.
Skeptical of the Hype: Assessing Imran Khan’s Popularity
The speaker in the sources expresses strong skepticism regarding Imran Khan’s claims of widespread popular support, arguing that the perception of Khan’s popularity is largely manufactured and inflated. They challenge the notion that Khan represents the will of the majority, suggesting that his support base is narrower and more strategically cultivated than his rhetoric suggests.
Questioning the Numbers: The speaker directly challenges Khan’s assertions of representing a vast majority of the Pakistani population by highlighting the relatively small turnout at his rallies. They contrast the image of massive, overwhelming support projected by Khan with the reality of modest gatherings, implying that the actual level of grassroots enthusiasm for Khan falls far short of his claims.
Social Media Illusion vs. Real-World Support: The speaker draws a sharp distinction between the online fervor surrounding Khan and the tangible evidence of his popularity on the ground. They argue that much of the perceived support for Khan stems from a vocal online presence, amplified by social media algorithms and echo chambers. However, the speaker contends that this virtual support does not accurately reflect the broader sentiment of the Pakistani population.
Manufactured Enthusiasm and the Youth Factor: The speaker expresses concern that a significant portion of Khan’s support, particularly among young people, is a product of calculated manipulation and exploitation. They suggest that Khan and his allies have effectively leveraged social media to cultivate a sense of excitement and devotion among a demographic that is particularly susceptible to emotional appeals and charismatic leadership. While acknowledging the genuine enthusiasm of many young Khan supporters, the speaker implies that this fervor is often misdirected and based on a superficial understanding of complex political realities.
The “Pressure Group” Dynamic: The speaker seeks to deconstruct the image of Khan as a universally beloved leader by suggesting that his support is largely confined to a dedicated “pressure group” composed of loyalists and individuals who have benefited directly from his patronage. This framing implies that Khan’s support is driven more by self-interest and allegiance to a personality than by genuine belief in his policies or vision.
Absence of Mass Mobilization: The speaker points to the lack of widespread public outcry following Khan’s removal from power as further evidence that his popularity is not as pervasive as he claims. They argue that if Khan truly enjoyed the support of a vast majority, his ouster would have triggered mass protests and demonstrations across the country. The relative absence of such a response suggests that Khan’s support base is less substantial and less motivated to act on his behalf than his rhetoric would lead one to believe.
In essence, the speaker encourages listeners to adopt a more critical and discerning perspective when evaluating Imran Khan’s claims of widespread popularity. They suggest that the image of Khan as a universally beloved leader is carefully constructed and strategically amplified through various means, including social media manipulation and appeals to emotion. The speaker emphasizes the importance of looking beyond the surface-level hype and considering the tangible evidence of Khan’s support, which they argue is far more limited than he portrays.
Questioning the Legitimacy of Power: A Multifaceted Critique of Imran Khan
The sources present a sustained and multifaceted critique of the legitimacy of Imran Khan’s political power, challenging both the basis of his support and the nature of his leadership. The speaker weaves together a tapestry of arguments, drawing on historical parallels, political analysis, and sharp observations of Khan’s behavior to undermine the foundations of his political authority.
Challenging the Narrative of Popular Support: The speaker’s critique begins by questioning the very premise of Khan’s legitimacy: his claim to represent the will of the people. While Khan asserts widespread popular support, the speaker counters this narrative by highlighting the disparity between Khan’s rhetoric and the observable evidence.
Low rally attendance is cited as a key indicator that Khan’s support is not as extensive as he claims. The speaker argues that if Khan truly enjoyed the backing of a vast majority, his rallies would be overflowing, not populated by modest crowds. This discrepancy fuels the speaker’s skepticism and suggests that Khan’s perception of his popularity may be inflated.
Social media is identified as another factor contributing to the distorted image of Khan’s support. The speaker contends that online platforms create an echo chamber where Khan’s supporters can amplify their voices, creating a false impression of widespread approval. The speaker cautions against conflating online engagement with genuine political power, implying that Khan’s support base may be more virtual than real.
Unmasking a Flawed Leader: Beyond questioning the extent of Khan’s support, the speaker goes further to dissect his leadership style, exposing what they perceive as deep flaws and dangerous tendencies. The speaker employs a range of rhetorical techniques to portray Khan as a leader who is fundamentally unfit for the position he held.
The analogy of a child’s development is used to illustrate Khan’s political immaturity and dependence on external forces. Initially, Khan is depicted as a pampered child, enjoying the support and protection of powerful backers who facilitated his rise to power. However, as he matured politically, his demands and expectations grew, leading to a sense of entitlement and an inability to cope with challenges or setbacks. When this support was withdrawn, Khan is shown to regress, lashing out in anger and confusion, much like a child denied a diaper change.
Khan’s hypocrisy and duplicity are repeatedly emphasized, highlighting the disconnect between his public image and private actions. The speaker criticizes Khan for publicly championing the “power of the people” while simultaneously seeking favor from powerful institutions and engaging in backroom deals. This inconsistency, according to the speaker, reveals a lack of integrity and a willingness to manipulate others for personal gain.
Khan’s disregard for democratic norms and institutions is condemned as a particularly dangerous aspect of his leadership. The speaker points to Khan’s attempts to dissolve the assembly and his attacks on the Supreme Court as evidence of his willingness to subvert the rule of law to maintain power. These actions, the speaker argues, set a dangerous precedent and threaten the stability of Pakistan’s democratic system.
Drawing a Troubling Historical Parallel: The speaker’s critique culminates in a chilling comparison that underscores their deep concern about the trajectory of Khan’s leadership. They draw a parallel between Khan’s style of governance and that of authoritarian figures like Hitler, suggesting that Khan’s desire for absolute power and his disregard for democratic principles pose a grave threat to Pakistan’s future. This historical parallel serves as a stark warning, urging listeners to recognize the potential consequences of Khan’s unchecked ambition.
The Case Against Legitimacy: The speaker effectively constructs a case against the legitimacy of Imran Khan’s political power by:
Undermining the foundation of his popular support.
Exposing the flaws in his leadership style.
Drawing alarming parallels to historical figures associated with authoritarianism.
This comprehensive critique serves to challenge the prevailing narrative surrounding Khan’s political authority, prompting a reassessment of his role in Pakistan’s political landscape.
From Pampered Child to Frustrated “Diaper Changer”: Imran Khan and the Analogy of Regression
The sources employ a striking analogy to illuminate their assessment of Imran Khan’s political trajectory, comparing him to a child who regresses in behavior after being denied the special treatment he has grown accustomed to. This analogy serves to illustrate what the speaker perceives as Khan’s political immaturity, sense of entitlement, and inability to cope with the loss of power.
The Pampered Child: Initially, Khan is portrayed as a child who enjoys the constant care and attention of his parents, symbolizing the powerful forces that propelled him to political prominence. This period of “pampering” represents Khan’s early years in politics, when he benefited from the support of influential figures who nurtured his ambitions and shielded him from criticism.
The Shift in Expectations: As the child grows older, the parents naturally expect him to become more independent and responsible, just as Khan’s backers anticipated his political maturation. However, the analogy suggests that Khan, like the child, failed to develop the necessary skills and resilience to stand on his own.
The Tantrum: When the child’s demands for constant attention and assistance are not met, he throws a tantrum, unable to comprehend or accept the change in dynamics. This mirrors Khan’s reaction to the loss of power, according to the speaker. He is depicted as lashing out at his opponents, engaging in reckless behavior, and refusing to accept responsibility for his actions.
The Unwillingness to Grow Up: The analogy culminates in the image of a child who, even after experiencing the consequences of his actions, still longs for the days when his every need was met. This symbolizes Khan’s persistent belief that he deserves to be in power and his inability to adapt to the realities of political life.
This analogy is further strengthened by the speaker’s assertion that Khan’s supporters are also complicit in perpetuating this cycle of immaturity. By echoing his grievances and encouraging his defiance, they act like enablers, preventing Khan from confronting his own shortcomings and accepting the need for growth.
Beyond the Analogy: Historical Parallels
While the analogy of the child provides a vivid illustration of Khan’s perceived character flaws, the sources go further by drawing explicit comparisons between Khan and historical figures associated with authoritarianism. The speaker suggests that Khan’s actions and rhetoric align with those of leaders who sought to consolidate power, suppress dissent, and undermine democratic norms.
The “Hitler” Comparison: The most direct and controversial parallel drawn is the comparison to Adolf Hitler, the dictator of Nazi Germany. The speaker suggests that Khan shares Hitler’s disregard for democratic principles, desire for absolute control, and willingness to exploit public fears and prejudices to achieve his goals.
The “Dictator in Civilian Clothes” Label: This phrase encapsulates the speaker’s broader critique of Khan’s leadership style. They argue that while Khan may present himself as a champion of democracy, his actions betray a deeply authoritarian mindset. His attempts to dissolve the assembly, his attacks on the judiciary, and his rhetoric demonizing opponents are all cited as evidence of this tendency.
The Significance of Historical Comparisons:
The speaker’s use of historical comparisons serves several purposes:
Raising the Stakes: By invoking the specter of authoritarian figures like Hitler, the speaker seeks to heighten the sense of urgency and alarm surrounding Khan’s leadership. The implication is that Khan’s actions, if left unchecked, could lead Pakistan down a dangerous path toward tyranny.
Exposing Underlying Motivations: The historical comparisons aim to strip away the veneer of Khan’s populist rhetoric and reveal what the speaker believes are his true motivations: a thirst for power and a disdain for democratic processes.
Challenging Perceptions: By juxtaposing Khan with figures widely recognized as villains, the speaker challenges the positive perceptions that many hold of Khan. They force the audience to confront the possibility that Khan, despite his charisma and popularity, may harbor dangerous authoritarian impulses.
The sources’ use of historical analogies and comparisons serves to paint a deeply critical portrait of Imran Khan, casting him as a figure who combines political immaturity with potentially dangerous authoritarian tendencies.
Disdain and Disengagement: Imran Khan’s Antagonistic Relationship with Parliament
The sources portray Imran Khan’s relationship with the Pakistani Parliament as one marked by disdain and disengagement, characterized by his refusal to participate in parliamentary processes and his open contempt for the institution’s authority. The speaker argues that Khan’s actions demonstrate a fundamental lack of respect for democratic norms and a willingness to subvert the rule of law to achieve his political objectives.
Rejection of Parliamentary Politics: The speaker criticizes Khan’s decision to withdraw from Parliament, opting instead to mobilize his supporters through rallies and public appearances. This boycott is framed as a deliberate rejection of the established channels of political discourse and a sign of Khan’s unwillingness to engage in constructive debate or compromise. The speaker emphasizes that a strong and effective opposition participates in parliamentary proceedings, holding the government accountable through scrutiny and debate. By choosing to operate outside the parliamentary framework, Khan undermines the very principles of democratic representation he claims to uphold.
Undermining Parliamentary Authority: The speaker points to Khan’s actions, such as dissolving the assembly and challenging the Supreme Court’s rulings, as blatant attempts to circumvent parliamentary authority. These actions are presented as evidence of Khan’s belief that he is above the law and his willingness to disregard established procedures to retain power. The speaker argues that such behavior not only weakens democratic institutions but also sets a dangerous precedent for future leaders who may seek to circumvent the rule of law.
Hypocrisy and Double Standards: The speaker highlights the hypocrisy in Khan’s rhetoric, accusing him of championing the “power of the people” while simultaneously demonstrating contempt for the institution that is meant to embody that power – the Parliament. Khan’s calls for public mobilization are juxtaposed with his refusal to engage with elected representatives, suggesting that his commitment to popular sovereignty is selective and self-serving. The speaker suggests that Khan only respects the will of the people when it aligns with his own ambitions, revealing a cynical manipulation of democratic ideals for personal gain.
Immaturity and Entitlement: Drawing on the analogy of a child who refuses to take responsibility for his actions, the speaker suggests that Khan’s approach to Parliament reflects a lack of political maturity and a sense of entitlement. The speaker argues that Khan’s expectation of constant support and his inability to cope with setbacks reveal a flawed understanding of the complexities of democratic governance. His unwillingness to accept the outcome of the no-confidence vote and his subsequent attempts to undermine the new government are presented as further evidence of his immaturity and his refusal to accept the legitimacy of the parliamentary process.
The sources present a scathing indictment of Imran Khan’s relationship with the Pakistani Parliament, depicting him as a leader who is disrespectful of democratic institutions, dismissive of parliamentary processes, and ultimately more interested in personal power than in serving the interests of the nation.
Imran Khan and the Shadow of Authoritarianism: Historical Parallels and the Critique of Leadership
The speaker in the sources draws stark historical parallels to critique Imran Khan’s leadership, positioning him as a figure who exhibits alarming similarities to authoritarian leaders, particularly Adolf Hitler. These comparisons are strategically deployed to expose what the speaker perceives as Khan’s dangerous disregard for democratic principles and his underlying desire for unchecked power.
The “Hitler” Analogy: This direct and highly charged comparison is central to the speaker’s argument. They suggest that Khan mirrors Hitler’s:
Disregard for Democratic Processes: Both Khan’s attempts to dissolve the assembly and his challenges to the Supreme Court’s rulings are presented as evidence of his willingness to circumvent established democratic procedures. This echoes Hitler’s own rise to power, marked by the erosion of democratic institutions and the concentration of authority in his hands.
Desire for Absolute Control: Khan’s actions are interpreted as a drive for absolute control, similar to Hitler’s ambition for total dominance. His intolerance of opposition, as seen in his rhetoric and actions against his political rivals, is presented as a key indicator of this authoritarian tendency.
Exploitation of Public Fears and Prejudices: The speaker suggests that Khan, like Hitler, leverages public fears and anxieties to consolidate his power. While the sources do not explicitly identify the specific fears being exploited, they imply that Khan manipulates public sentiment to create an “us vs. them” dynamic that paints him as the savior and his opponents as enemies of the people.
Beyond Hitler: The Broader “Dictator” Critique: The speaker goes beyond the specific comparison to Hitler, framing Khan as a “dictator in civilian clothes,” signifying that Khan embodies the essence of authoritarianism despite operating within a nominally democratic system. This broader critique is supported by several observations:
Contempt for Parliament: Khan’s consistent efforts to bypass or undermine the Pakistani Parliament are cited as a core element of his authoritarian tendencies. His withdrawal from parliament, his criticism of its legitimacy, and his attempts to circumvent its authority all suggest a fundamental rejection of democratic norms and a preference for unchallenged rule.
Suppression of Dissent: The sources suggest that Khan, like many dictators, seeks to silence opposition voices and stifle dissent. While the sources do not provide specific examples of this suppression, they highlight his inflammatory rhetoric and his demonization of opponents, creating an environment that discourages criticism and fosters fear.
Cult of Personality: The speaker alludes to a “cult of personality” surrounding Khan, suggesting that he cultivates an image of infallibility and encourages unwavering loyalty among his followers. This is often a hallmark of authoritarian leaders who seek to place themselves above scrutiny and accountability.
The Strategic Significance of Historical Parallels
The speaker’s use of historical parallels, particularly the Hitler analogy, serves several strategic purposes:
Amplifying the Threat: By invoking the specter of one of history’s most notorious dictators, the speaker dramatically heightens the perceived threat posed by Khan. The comparison is intended to shock the audience and galvanize them into recognizing the potential danger of Khan’s leadership.
Delegitimatizing Khan’s Leadership: The historical parallels are meant to strip away any remaining legitimacy Khan might hold. By aligning him with figures universally condemned as tyrants, the speaker seeks to dismantle any positive perceptions of Khan and portray him as unfit to lead.
Predicting a Dangerous Trajectory: The speaker uses historical comparisons to suggest that Khan, if unchecked, could lead Pakistan down a path similar to that of other nations that have fallen under authoritarian rule. The implication is that Khan’s actions, if not confronted, could have disastrous consequences for the country’s democratic future.
It’s important to note that these historical comparisons are presented from a particular perspective and are highly contested by Khan and his supporters. The speaker’s interpretation of Khan’s actions and motivations is not universally accepted.
Summary: This passage is a critique of Imran Khan, a Pakistani politician. The speaker argues that Khan is hypocritical and power-hungry, pointing to his actions and statements as evidence.
Explanation: The speaker criticizes Imran Khan for his actions and words, calling him a hypocrite. He questions Khan’s claims of being a “man of the people” while simultaneously insulting and alienating those who don’t support him. The speaker points out Khan’s attempts to gain power, including alleged secret meetings and a desire to become Prime Minister. He criticizes Khan’s response to the no-confidence motion against him, highlighting actions that went against parliamentary procedures and the rule of law. The speaker uses strong language to denounce Khan’s character, referring to him as “clumsy,” “fallen,” and having “dirty hands.” The passage concludes by emphasizing the importance of Parliament and the rule of law in a democracy.
Key terms:
Wazir Azam: Prime Minister
No Confidence Motion: A parliamentary procedure where a vote is taken to determine if the head of government (in this case, Imran Khan) still has the support of the majority.
Assembly: Refers to the legislative body, similar to Parliament.
Hypocrite: A person who claims to have certain moral beliefs or principles but acts in a way that contradicts those beliefs.
Maxim of the Law: A well-established principle or rule in legal systems.
Summary: This passage criticizes the actions of a political leader, likely in Pakistan, arguing that they are undemocratic and harmful to the country. The leader is accused of manipulating legal processes, suppressing dissent, and potentially inciting violence.
Explanation: The passage expresses strong disapproval of a political leader’s actions. It accuses the leader of bypassing democratic processes, referencing a “no confidence motion” and suggesting that the leader improperly dissolved an assembly. The passage condemns the leader’s potential role in violence and unrest, pointing to an incident on May 9th and alleging that the leader’s supporters engaged in destructive behavior. The speaker challenges the leader’s claim of representing 90% of the people, highlighting the relatively small number of supporters who actually participated in protests. The passage concludes by suggesting that the leader’s actions are even more harmful than those of the country’s enemies.
Key terms:
No confidence motion: A formal parliamentary procedure used to express a lack of confidence in a government or leader.
Assembly: In this context, likely refers to a legislative body, similar to a parliament or congress.
Mace: A ceremonial object symbolizing authority, often used in legislative settings. The removal or disrespect of the mace indicates a disruption of order.
Awaam: Urdu word meaning “the people.”
Shahbaz Gill: Likely a political figure or commentator.
Summary: The passage criticizes a political leader and their supporters for their actions and claims of election rigging, highlighting their hypocrisy and lack of public support.
Explanation: The author criticizes a political leader who claims to represent the majority while questioning the validity of their support. The author points out the hypocrisy of the leader and their supporters by mentioning past incidents where they violated laws and escaped accountability. The passage also challenges the leader’s claims of election rigging by pointing out the inconsistencies in their arguments. If the elections were rigged against them, how did they manage to win a significant number of seats in certain regions? The author further argues that if the leader genuinely enjoyed widespread public support, people would have protested against their perceived mistreatment. The absence of such protests indicates a lack of genuine support and exposes the leader’s claims as hollow. The author concludes by dismissing the leader’s accusations of rigging as baseless and emphasizes the lack of evidence supporting such allegations.
Key terms:
Rigged elections: Elections that are manipulated to ensure a specific outcome, often through fraudulent practices.
Hypocrisy: Behaving in a way that contradicts one’s stated beliefs or values.
Pressure group: A group that attempts to influence public policy or decisions, often by lobbying government officials.
Constituency: A body of voters who elect a representative.
Accountability: The obligation to explain or justify one’s actions.
Summary: The speaker is analyzing Pakistani politics, arguing that former Prime Minister Imran Khan lost power because he refused to compromise and form alliances, unlike other successful leaders.
Explanation: The passage criticizes Imran Khan’s approach to politics, comparing him unfavorably to other leaders who formed coalitions to maintain power. The speaker argues that Khan’s stubbornness and refusal to engage in democratic processes like forming alliances ultimately led to his downfall. He suggests that Khan’s insistence on being the sole decision-maker alienated potential allies and made him appear dictatorial, resulting in his political demise. The speaker uses historical examples and metaphors, like the “Napiya” (diaper) analogy, to illustrate Khan’s political immaturity and dependence on others to change his situation. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of respecting democratic norms, forming alliances, and engaging in parliamentary processes for political success and stability in Pakistan.
Key Terms:
Noon League: Refers to the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), a major political party in Pakistan.
PP: Refers to the Pakistan Peoples Party, another prominent political party in Pakistan.
KP: Abbreviation for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a province in Pakistan.
Tosh Khana: A government repository in Pakistan where gifts received by officials are kept.
Muja Kart: Refers to protesting or resisting.
This text is an interview and commentary on Pakistani politics, focusing heavily on critiquing the actions and character of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. The speaker argues that Khan’s behavior demonstrates hypocrisy, a lust for power, and a disregard for democratic norms.
The speaker criticizes Khan for claiming to be a “man of the people” while simultaneously resorting to underhanded tactics and insulting those who don’t align with him. He questions Khan’s legitimacy by pointing to his alleged past actions, such as secret meetings and a thirst for power that contradict his current stance. Khan’s response to the no-confidence motion brought against him is heavily scrutinized, with the speaker accusing him of disrespecting parliamentary procedures and attempting to cling to power illegitimately.
The speaker uses strong, negative language to describe Khan, calling him “clumsy,” “fallen,” and a “hypocrite”. He suggests that Khan’s actions are driven by self-interest and a desire to manipulate the system for his own benefit. The events of May 9th are cited as a prime example of Khan’s dangerous rhetoric and potential incitement of violence. The speaker challenges Khan’s claims of widespread public support by pointing out the relatively small number of protesters who turned out in his defense. He further argues that Khan’s inability to secure alliances and work within the existing political framework ultimately led to his downfall.
The speaker compares Khan’s approach to politics unfavorably to leaders like Narendra Modi in India, who successfully formed coalitions to maintain power. He uses a metaphor of a child needing a diaper change to illustrate Khan’s political immaturity and dependence on external forces to resolve his situations.
The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of adhering to democratic principles, respecting the rule of law, and engaging in parliamentary processes for the stability and progress of Pakistan. He suggests that Khan’s failure to do so ultimately resulted in his removal from power and serves as a cautionary tale for future leaders.
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
The text is a critical analysis of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party and its leader, Imran Khan. It accuses the PTI of employing violent tactics and spreading misinformation, citing instances of contradictory statements and exaggerations. The author questions the party’s democratic claims and criticizes its leadership’s strategic decisions, particularly regarding a major protest. The analysis contrasts the PTI’s actions with genuine democratic processes, highlighting the dangers of their approach and advocating for a more pragmatic political strategy. Ultimately, the piece argues that the PTI’s methods are unsustainable and ultimately self-defeating.
FAQ: PTI’s Political Strategy and the November 26th Protest
1. What is the main criticism being leveled against PTI and its founder?
The author criticizes PTI for claiming to be a democratic party while reacting harshly to criticism. They compare PTI’s behavior to extremist groups like the Taliban, Hamas, and Boko Haram, accusing them of hypocrisy and using violence while playing the victim.
2. What is the significance of the “278 testimonies” and the later clarification of “a dozen testimonies”?
An elderly barrister initially claimed there were 278 testimonies supporting PTI’s version of events on November 26th, when protestors were removed from D-Chowk. This claim was later contradicted by another barrister who clarified that there were only a dozen testimonies. This discrepancy highlights inconsistencies and potential exaggeration within PTI’s narrative.
3. What was the purpose of the “last call” protest according to the author?
The author suggests that PTI’s “last call” protest, inspired by student protests in Dhaka, aimed to mobilize enough public support to occupy the Parliament and Prime Minister’s House, paralyzing the government and paving the way for Imran Khan’s “revolution.”
4. How does the author critique this plan?
The author criticizes the plan as dangerous and unrealistic, comparing it to the occupation of the Kaaba, a holy site in Islam. They argue that such actions are driven by “madness” and disregard the complexities of modern politics.
5. What is the author’s opinion on the potential consequences of the protest lasting longer?
The author believes that if the protest had continued for an extended period, it could have resulted in significant casualties and chaos, similar to the occupation of the Haram. They argue that PTI’s approach is unsustainable and lacks the necessary public support.
6. What does the author believe is the difference between Imran Khan and “Mr. Hafiz”?
The author contrasts Imran Khan with “Mr. Hafiz,” suggesting that the latter has proven the strength of democracy. This implies that Imran Khan’s methods are incompatible with democratic principles.
7. What advice does the author give to Imran Khan?
The author advises Imran Khan to abandon his confrontational approach and acknowledge that he lacks the public support to challenge the existing power structures. They suggest that political maneuvering, not conflict, is the path to gaining power.
8. What is the overall tone and purpose of the text?
The text is a highly critical commentary on PTI and Imran Khan’s political strategy. The author employs sarcasm, historical comparisons, and strong language to portray PTI’s actions as hypocritical, dangerous, and ultimately futile. The purpose appears to be to discredit PTI’s narrative and expose the flaws in their approach to achieving political power.
PTI and the Politics of Protest: A Study Guide
Glossary of Key Terms:
PTI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, a political party in Pakistan founded by Imran Khan.
Youthia: A term used in Pakistani media to refer to young PTI supporters.
D Chowk: A major intersection in Islamabad, Pakistan, often the site of political rallies and protests.
Sangjani: A town located near Islamabad, Pakistan.
Bushra Begum (Pinki Peerni Sahiba): The third and current wife of Imran Khan, known for her spiritual influence on him.
Barrister: A type of lawyer in some common law jurisdictions.
Imran Reham Khan: Imran Khan’s second wife, a journalist and author.
Jamaima Khan: Imran Khan’s first wife, a British socialite and filmmaker.
Haram Sharif: The holiest mosque in Islam, located in Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
Imam Mehdi: A messianic figure in Islamic tradition who is believed to appear at the end of times.
Hafiz: A term of respect used for someone who has memorized the entire Quran.
Lanka Dahan: The burning of Lanka, an event in the Hindu epic Ramayana, often used as a metaphor for destruction.
Hasul Layli: A metaphor for achieving a difficult goal, often used in the context of love and longing.
Short Answer Questions:
How does the author compare the reactions of PTI supporters to criticism with the actions of groups like the Taliban, Hamas, or Boko Haram?
What is the author’s perspective on the use of terms like “Mother of the Nation” for political figures?
Explain the conflicting accounts of the number of testimonies related to the November 26th protest at D Chowk.
What role did Bushra Begum allegedly play in the planning and execution of the protest at D Chowk?
What historical event does the author use to illustrate Imran Khan’s alleged plan for the protest?
What critique does the author offer of Imran Khan’s approach to achieving political power?
What does the author suggest is the “real point” of Imran Khan’s protest?
What metaphor does the author use to describe the difference between Imran Khan and his political opponents?
According to the author, what is the more effective strategy for gaining political power?
How does the author utilize religious imagery and metaphors to make his points?
Short Answer Key:
The author criticizes PTI supporters for reacting defensively and aggressively to criticism, comparing them to extremist groups who resort to violence and refuse accountability.
The author finds the use of such terms to be excessive flattery and possibly unwelcome by the individuals being addressed.
The author highlights discrepancies between the initial claim of 278 testimonies and the later clarification of a dozen testimonies, suggesting exaggeration and a lack of credibility within PTI.
The author suggests that Bushra Begum influenced the decision to return from D Chowk and that blame for the protest’s failure is unfairly placed on her.
The author compares Imran Khan’s alleged plan to the 1971 student protests in Dhaka, Bangladesh, which ultimately led to the country’s independence.
The author criticizes Imran Khan’s confrontational approach and argues that he lacks the public support necessary to succeed through such tactics.
The author posits that the protest was not merely a rally but an attempt to paralyze the government and force a change in leadership.
The author uses the metaphor of a storm to contrast the resilience of a genuine leader with the fragility of someone focused on selfish ambitions.
The author suggests that political maneuvering and negotiation are more effective than direct confrontation in achieving power.
The author draws parallels with religious figures and events like the occupation of the Haram Sharif to emphasize the potential dangers of Imran Khan’s alleged plan and his followers’ blind faith.
Essay Questions:
Analyze the author’s use of language and tone in portraying PTI and its supporters. How does the author employ rhetorical devices to construct his argument?
Explore the author’s criticism of Imran Khan’s leadership style. Do you agree with the author’s assessment? Provide evidence from the text to support your position.
Examine the author’s use of historical and religious analogies. How effective are these comparisons in conveying his message?
Discuss the role of Bushra Begum in Imran Khan’s political life as portrayed in the text. Is her influence depicted as positive or negative? Explain your reasoning.
What broader commentary does the text offer on the nature of political power and the strategies for achieving it?
Table of Contents: Decoding PTI’s Political Strategy
Source: Excerpts from “Pasted Text”
I. Critique of PTI’s Self-Image
This section analyzes the dissonance between PTI’s self-proclaimed democratic identity and its reactions to criticism. The author uses provocative comparisons to groups like the Taliban and Boko Haram to highlight PTI’s perceived intolerance and aggressive tendencies when faced with dissent.
II. PTI’s Internal Contradictions
This section explores inconsistencies within PTI’s leadership and rhetoric. The author points out contradictory stances on figures like Bushra Begam and Imran Khan’s ex-wives, highlighting the party’s fluctuating narratives and tendency towards hero-worship and personality cults.
III. Examining the November 26th Incident
This section focuses on conflicting accounts of the November 26th protest at D-Chowk. The author emphasizes the discrepancies between claims of violence against PTI protestors and the lack of evidence, exposing potential exaggerations and attempts to manipulate public perception.
IV. Deconstructing the “Last Call” Protest
This section scrutinizes the true objectives of Imran Khan’s “Last Call” protest. The author questions whether the protest aimed for a peaceful rally or a prolonged sit-in with more radical goals, drawing parallels to historical examples like student protests in Dhaka and the occupation of the Kaaba.
V. The “Consciousness and Madness” Dichotomy
This section delves into the author’s critique of PTI’s political strategy, contrasting it with a more pragmatic and realistic approach. The author argues against the romanticized and potentially dangerous aspects of PTI’s revolutionary zeal, advocating for a shift from “madness” to “consciousness” in political engagement.
VI. The Limits of PTI’s Power
This section analyzes the limitations of PTI’s confrontational approach to power. The author acknowledges the challenges of challenging entrenched power structures through brute force and suggests that PTI may need to adopt more nuanced political strategies to achieve its goals.
Briefing Doc: PTI’s Political Strategy and the “Long March”
This briefing document analyzes the political strategy employed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and its leader, Imran Khan, focusing on their use of protest and agitation. The analysis is based on the provided source, which appears to be an opinion piece or blog post critical of PTI.
Main Themes:
PTI’s Aggressive Protest Tactics: The source compares PTI’s actions to extremist groups like the Taliban and Hamas, criticizing their “attacking, killing, and looting” while simultaneously claiming victimhood. This highlights the perception of PTI’s aggressive approach to protests and their tendency to escalate situations.
Cult of Personality around Imran Khan: The source criticizes the excessive praise and devotion directed towards Imran Khan, comparing him to a “player” and highlighting the use of hyperbolic titles like “Mother of the Nation” for figures associated with him. This suggests a personality-driven political strategy that relies heavily on Khan’s charisma and popularity.
Manipulation and Misinformation: The source accuses PTI of manipulating facts and using misleading narratives, specifically regarding the events of November 26th and the number of casualties. This emphasizes concerns about the party’s reliance on propaganda and potentially false information to bolster their claims.
Unrealistic Expectations and Dangerous Rhetoric: The source argues that PTI’s protest strategy, inspired by student protests in Dhaka, is unrealistic and potentially dangerous. It suggests that PTI aimed to paralyze the government and seize power through mass mobilization, drawing parallels to extremist groups occupying religious sites. This highlights concerns about the potential for violence and instability stemming from PTI’s actions.
Key Facts and Ideas:
PTI claims to be a democratic party but faces criticism for its aggressive tactics.
The party is accused of exaggerating events and manipulating information for political gain.
Imran Khan’s leadership style is characterized as charismatic but potentially reckless.
PTI’s protest strategy is seen as unrealistic and potentially dangerous, aiming to overthrow the government through mass mobilization.
Key Quotes:
“Like Taliban Hamas or Boko Haram, these people have a strange attitude. While being attackers, killing and looting slogans of ‘Jihad Al-Jihad’ is also permissible, but when their punch is slapped in retaliation, they immediately put on a black veil of innocence while shedding tissues.” This quote highlights the perception of PTI’s hypocrisy and aggressive approach.
“His claimant was sitting on the same lines, that gradually so much in a few days. There will be more public participation that one night, the event will be occupied by the Parliament and the Prime Minister’s House in a very close manner, which will leave the entire government system paralyzed and jammed. In other words, the sun of Imran’s revolution will rise.” This quote describes PTI’s alleged strategy of seizing power through mass mobilization.
Conclusion:
The source presents a highly critical view of PTI’s political strategy, portraying the party as manipulative, aggressive, and potentially dangerous. While the source’s biases should be considered, it raises important questions about the role of personality cults, misinformation, and aggressive tactics in Pakistani politics.
What are the central goals and strategies of the PTI party?
The sources discuss the actions and rhetoric of the leader of the PTI party, Imran Khan, more than they lay out the party’s central goals. The author of the sources is critical of Khan’s approach. Here is a summary of what the sources say about Khan’s goals and strategies:
Goal: To gain power by inciting a popular uprising similar to a student protest in Dhaka that paralyzed the government.
Strategy: Khan urged supporters to participate in a sit-in protest in Islamabad with the goal of attracting so many people that it would overwhelm government buildings like the Parliament and Prime Minister’s house. The author compares this approach to the dangerous fanaticism of those who might try to occupy the Kaaba in Mecca.
Criticism: The author of the sources argues that Khan’s strategy was dangerous and reckless and could have led to widespread violence and death. The author claims that Khan should recognize he lacks the public support to take power by force and should instead focus on achieving his goals through political maneuvering.
The sources do not explicitly list the central goals of the PTI party, but they imply that Khan’s personal goal of taking power is also the party’s goal.
How does the PTI’s rhetoric and actions compare to other groups?
Comparisons Between PTI and Other Groups
The sources compare the rhetoric and actions of the Pakistani political party, PTI, to several other groups, including:
Taliban, Hamas, and Boko Haram: The sources suggest that PTI, like these extremist organizations, exhibits aggressive behavior and justifies violence. They employ inflammatory rhetoric, using phrases such as “Jihad Al-Jihad”, but quickly adopt a posture of innocence when facing repercussions for their actions.
Individuals involved in the occupation of the Haram Sharif: The sources draw a parallel between PTI’s actions and the hypothetical scenario of individuals justifying the occupation of the Kaaba by claiming the appearance of Imam Mehdi. This comparison highlights what the author sees as PTI’s tendency to pursue their objectives with a disregard for potential consequences, driven by a “consciousness and madness”.
An individual referred to as “Mr. Hafiz”: While the sources do not explicitly identify “Mr. Hafiz,” they suggest that he may be playing a “duplicate role” similar to “Lanka Dhane” within PTI. This comparison possibly implies that certain figures within PTI are mirroring the actions or strategies of individuals associated with extremism.
The sources also criticize PTI’s internal dynamics, particularly their approach to leadership figures:
PTI members’ use of familial titles for leaders: The sources find fault with PTI members addressing leaders with familial titles like “mother” and “father”. They highlight the inconsistency in attributing these titles to various individuals, including Bushra Begum, Imran Khan’s wife, and Jamaima Khan, his ex-wife. This critique suggests an element of opportunism and insincerity within the party’s culture.
Overall, the sources express concern about PTI’s rhetoric and actions, comparing them to extremist groups and highlighting potentially problematic internal dynamics. They suggest that PTI’s approach to politics is characterized by aggression, justification of violence, and a disregard for potential consequences, driven by a “consciousness and madness”.
What are the long-term consequences of PTI’s political tactics?
Based on the provided sources, there are several potential long-term consequences of PTI’s political tactics:
Increased political instability and violence: The sources suggest that PTI’s tactics, which include inciting supporters to engage in violent protests and making unsubstantiated claims of election fraud, could lead to increased political instability and violence in Pakistan.
Erosion of public trust in democratic institutions: PTI’s rhetoric, which often portrays democratic institutions as corrupt and illegitimate, could erode public trust in these institutions, making it more difficult to govern effectively and peacefully.
Damage to Pakistan’s international reputation: PTI’s actions, particularly its allegations of foreign interference in Pakistani politics, could damage Pakistan’s international reputation and make it more difficult for the country to attract foreign investment and build strong relationships with other countries.
Empowerment of extremist groups: The sources imply that PTI’s use of religious rhetoric and its willingness to engage in violent confrontations could empower extremist groups in Pakistan, further destabilizing the country.
It is important to note that these are potential consequences based on the provided sources. The actual long-term consequences of PTI’s political tactics will depend on a variety of factors, including the response of other political parties, the actions of the Pakistani government, and the broader political and social context in Pakistan.
An Overview of PTI’s Actions
The sources primarily focus on criticizing the actions and rhetoric of PTI’s leader, Imran Khan, during a specific protest event, which they frame as reckless and potentially dangerous.
Incitement of Protestors: Khan encouraged his supporters to participate in a large-scale sit-in protest in Islamabad. The sources claim his intention was to attract such a large crowd that it would overwhelm government buildings like the Parliament and Prime Minister’s house and effectively paralyze the government.
Comparisons to Dangerous Groups: The sources draw alarming parallels between PTI’s actions and those of extremist organizations like the Taliban, Hamas, and Boko Haram. They suggest that PTI, under Khan’s leadership, similarly employs aggressive tactics and violent rhetoric, while attempting to evade responsibility for any resulting consequences.
Unsubstantiated Claims and Shifting Narratives: The sources point to inconsistencies in PTI’s claims regarding the protest. They mention an instance where a PTI lawyer initially claimed to have 278 testimonies of violence against protesters, but later reduced this number to a dozen. This, along with conflicting accounts of Khan’s instructions to his supporters during the protest, suggests an attempt to manipulate the narrative and avoid accountability.
Exploitation of Religious Sentiment: The sources criticize Khan for invoking religious imagery and language, drawing a comparison with those who might justify occupying the Kaaba in Mecca by claiming the appearance of Imam Mehdi. This comparison suggests that Khan may be using religious sentiment to incite his followers and legitimize potentially dangerous actions.
The sources also express concern about the potential long-term consequences of PTI’s actions, including increased political instability, violence, erosion of public trust in democratic institutions, damage to Pakistan’s international reputation, and the empowerment of extremist groups. [from our conversation history]
The sources paint a negative picture of PTI’s actions, highlighting the potential dangers of its tactics and rhetoric. However, it’s important to note that these sources represent a single perspective and may not provide a complete or unbiased view of the situation.
PTI’s Use of the Concept of “Political Mothers”
The sources mention the concept of “political mothers” in the context of Pakistani politics, specifically within the PTI party. The author critiques the practice of assigning familial titles like “mother” and “father” to political leaders.1 While the tradition of calling leaders “fathers” for political gain has existed, the author notes that creating “political mothers” is less common.1
The author cites the example of Fatima Jinnah, sister of Pakistan’s founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah, who was positioned as a “mother of the nation.”1 However, the author also highlights a disparaging remark made by former President Ayub Khan, who questioned her role as a “mother of the nation” due to her never having given birth.1
Within PTI, the author observes an inconsistent and opportunistic application of the “political mother” label.1 Bushra Begum, the wife of PTI leader Imran Khan, is referred to as a “mother” by some party members.12 The author questions whether Begum welcomes this title, drawing a parallel with singer Madam Noor Jahan who rejected such a label from an elderly person.1
The author also notes that some within PTI bestowed the title “Mother of the Nation” on Imran Khan’s ex-wife, Reham Khan.1 They suggest that others might similarly address Khan’s first wife, Jemima Khan, as “mother” despite the likelihood that she, too, would find such a label undesirable.1
The author’s criticism of PTI’s use of “political mothers” suggests that the practice is:
Inconsistent: The title is applied to different women with varying relationships to the party leader, highlighting a lack of clear criteria or meaning.
Opportunistic: The use of familial terms like “mother” appears to be a calculated strategy to evoke emotional connections and garner support, rather than a genuine reflection of respect or admiration.
Potentially disrespectful: The author implies that using such titles without the individual’s consent is disrespectful and potentially objectifies women by reducing them to their familial roles.
The author’s observations suggest that the concept of “political mothers” within PTI is more about political maneuvering and leveraging emotional appeals than about genuine respect or recognition of women’s contributions to the party.
A Critical Look at Imran Khan’s “Protest Call”
The sources focus on a specific “protest call” made by Imran Khan, the leader of the Pakistani political party PTI. The author strongly criticizes Khan’s approach and the potential consequences of his actions.
The Nature of the Protest Call: Khan called for a large-scale sit-in protest in Islamabad, encouraging his supporters to gather in such large numbers that they would overwhelm government buildings like the Parliament and Prime Minister’s house. The sources suggest that his ultimate goal was to paralyze the government and seize power through this disruptive demonstration. Khan drew inspiration from a student protest in Dhaka, which he presented as a model for success.
Dangerous Comparisons and Reckless Tactics: The author expresses deep concern about Khan’s methods, comparing them to the tactics of extremist groups like the Taliban, Hamas, and Boko Haram. They argue that Khan, like these organizations, utilizes aggressive rhetoric and justifies violence, while quickly adopting a posture of innocence when facing consequences. They also compare his approach to the dangerous fanaticism of individuals who might attempt to occupy the Kaaba in Mecca, driven by a reckless disregard for potential consequences.
Shifting Narratives and Unsubstantiated Claims: The sources point out inconsistencies in the accounts of events surrounding the protest. They highlight an incident where a PTI lawyer initially claimed to have 278 testimonies of violence against protesters but later revised the number down to a dozen. This discrepancy, along with conflicting narratives about Khan’s instructions to his supporters during the protest, raises concerns about PTI’s attempts to manipulate the narrative and avoid accountability for their actions.
The “Consciousness and Madness” of the Protest Call: The author characterizes Khan’s approach as a dangerous mix of “consciousness and madness.” They argue that while his goals may be driven by a desire for political change, his methods are reckless and potentially disastrous. The author contends that Khan’s romanticized view of historical events and his disregard for the complexities of the modern world make his approach unsustainable and dangerous.
Potential Consequences: The author warns of severe long-term consequences if Khan continues to employ such tactics. These include increased political instability and violence, erosion of public trust in democratic institutions, damage to Pakistan’s international reputation, and empowerment of extremist groups. [5, from our conversation history]
A Call for a Change in Approach: The sources ultimately suggest that Khan should abandon his confrontational approach and recognize that he lacks the public support to achieve his goals through force. They urge him to focus on building political alliances and engaging in constructive dialogue rather than pursuing a path of conflict and disruption.
Public Power and PTI’s Political Strategy
The sources discuss the concept of “public power” in relation to the political strategies of the Pakistani political party, PTI, and its leader, Imran Khan. The author argues that Khan’s pursuit of power relies on a flawed understanding of public support and the dynamics of political change.
Khan’s Belief in Mass Mobilization: Khan appears to believe that he can achieve his political objectives through mass mobilization and disruptive protests, as evidenced by his call for a large-scale sit-in in Islamabad. He aimed to attract a massive crowd to paralyze the government and force his way into power. This strategy is based on the assumption that overwhelming displays of public support can effectively challenge the existing power structures.
The Limits of Public Power: The author, however, contends that Khan overestimates his level of public support and the effectiveness of his confrontational approach. They argue that he lacks the necessary “public power” to succeed in his attempts to seize control through force. This suggests that relying solely on mass mobilization and disruptive tactics is insufficient to achieve lasting political change.
The Need for Political Strategy: The sources suggest that true political power lies in building broad-based support through political maneuvering and strategic alliances rather than relying on brute force or emotional appeals. The author advises Khan to change his approach, recognizing that “the goddess of power can only be embraced in the feet of Aap Sir,” but “the path that the player has taken to Hasul Layli is of colliding with power, in which he will not be able to succeed.” This implies that a more nuanced and strategic approach is necessary to navigate the complexities of Pakistani politics.
The Importance of Political Acceptability: The author emphasizes that sustainable political power requires more than just mobilizing crowds; it necessitates building legitimacy and acceptance within the existing political framework. Khan’s confrontational tactics and his attempts to bypass established political processes, as seen in his “protest call,” ultimately undermine his ability to gain lasting power.
The Dangers of Miscalculating Public Power: The author warns that Khan’s miscalculation of his public power and his reliance on disruptive tactics could have significant negative consequences for Pakistan. They express concern about the potential for increased political instability, violence, and the empowerment of extremist groups. [4, 5, from our conversation history]
The sources highlight the importance of accurately assessing one’s level of public support and understanding the limitations of relying solely on mass mobilization to achieve political goals. They argue that building lasting political power requires a more strategic approach that involves political negotiation, coalition-building, and a recognition of the existing power structures.
Examining Imran Khan’s Plan and its Underlying Assumptions
The sources provide a critical analysis of Imran Khan’s political strategy, particularly his plan to orchestrate a massive sit-in protest in Islamabad. The author portrays this plan as dangerous and built on a flawed understanding of political power dynamics.
Khan’s Goal: The sources indicate that Khan’s objective was to mobilize such a large number of supporters that they would effectively paralyze the government by occupying key government buildings like Parliament and the Prime Minister’s House. This suggests an attempt to seize power through disruptive force, rather than through established political processes.
Inspiration from a Student Protest: Khan drew inspiration from a student protest in Dhaka, presenting it as a successful model for his own plan. However, the sources do not provide details about this specific protest or its outcome, leaving it unclear whether it serves as a valid comparison or a realistic basis for Khan’s strategy.
A Dangerous Gamble: The sources characterize Khan’s plan as a dangerous gamble that could have disastrous consequences for Pakistan. They highlight several concerning aspects:
Unsubstantiated Claims of Violence: The sources point to discrepancies in PTI’s accounts of violence against protesters during a previous event. A lawyer initially claimed to have 278 testimonies but later reduced the number to a dozen, raising questions about the party’s credibility and attempts to manipulate narratives.
Unrealistic Expectations of Public Support: The sources suggest that Khan overestimates his level of public support and the effectiveness of mass mobilization as a means to achieve his goals. They argue that he lacks the necessary “public power” to succeed in seizing control through force alone.
Ignoring Potential for Violence and Instability: The sources warn that Khan’s confrontational approach could lead to increased political instability, violence, and the empowerment of extremist groups. [4, 5, from our conversation history] They draw alarming parallels between his tactics and those of organizations like the Taliban, Hamas, and Boko Haram, suggesting that he may be inciting his followers towards dangerous actions while attempting to evade accountability for the consequences.
A Flawed Understanding of Political Power: The sources ultimately argue that Khan’s plan reflects a flawed understanding of political power. They suggest that sustainable political change requires building broad-based support through strategic alliances, political negotiation, and engagement within existing power structures, rather than relying on brute force or emotional appeals. They advise him to recognize the limitations of his approach and focus on building legitimacy through established political processes.
Summary: The author argues that the Pakistani political party PTI, led by Imran Khan, employs dangerous and deceptive tactics to gain power, comparing their behavior to extremist groups.
Explanation: This passage criticizes the tactics of the Pakistani political party PTI and its leader, Imran Khan (referred to as “the player”). The author contends that despite claiming to be democratic, PTI reacts aggressively to criticism and utilizes inflammatory rhetoric reminiscent of extremist groups like the Taliban. The author points to inconsistencies in PTI’s narrative surrounding a protest they held, particularly regarding the number of injuries and the role of Imran Khan’s wife, Bushra Begum. The passage suggests that PTI’s ultimate goal is to seize power through disruptive means, even at the expense of public safety, comparing their ambitions to dangerous historical events. The author concludes by advising Imran Khan to abandon his confrontational approach and embrace more conventional political strategies.
Key terms:
PTI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, a political party in Pakistan led by Imran Khan.
Youthia: A term used in Pakistani media to refer to young PTI supporters.
D Chowk: A major intersection in Islamabad, Pakistan, often the site of political protests.
Bushra Begum: The wife of Imran Khan.
Sangjani: A town on the outskirts of Islamabad, Pakistan.
Examining Conflicting Narratives about the PTI’s November 26th Protest
The sources highlight a notable inconsistency in witness accounts regarding the events of the PTI’s November 26th protest, specifically regarding the alleged violence against protesters. A PTI lawyer initially claimed to possess 278 testimonies supporting their claims of violence against demonstrators during the protest. However, this number was later significantly revised downward, with the lawyer stating that there were only “a dozen testimonies of PTI workers in the process of killing our protestors.”
Significance of the Discrepancy: This change in the number of testimonies raises concerns about the reliability of PTI’s narrative and their potential attempts to exaggerate the level of violence against their supporters. The drastic reduction from 278 to a dozen suggests either a significant misrepresentation of the facts or a lack of organization in gathering evidence.
Impact on PTI’s Credibility: The discrepancy in the number of testimonies could damage PTI’s credibility and their attempts to portray themselves as victims of state oppression. It casts doubt on their claims and raises questions about their motives in presenting an inflated number of testimonies initially.
Broader Context of Conflicting Narratives: This inconsistency aligns with a broader pattern identified in the sources, where PTI is accused of shifting narratives and utilizing inflammatory rhetoric to manipulate public perception and avoid accountability for their actions. The sources draw comparisons between PTI’s tactics and those of extremist groups, alleging that they readily adopt a posture of victimhood while engaging in aggressive behavior.
Implications for Understanding the Protest: The conflicting witness accounts make it difficult to ascertain the true extent of violence and the overall events of the November 26th protest. The lack of reliable information underscores the importance of critical analysis and consideration of multiple perspectives when evaluating political events and the claims made by different actors.
The PTI’s Goals for the November 26th Protest: A Drive for Disruptive Power
The sources offer a critical perspective on the PTI’s November 26th protest, suggesting that its primary goals revolved around disrupting the government and projecting an image of mass public support for Imran Khan. While the sources don’t explicitly state the protest’s intended outcomes, they do shed light on the underlying motivations and strategies driving the PTI’s actions.
Paralyzing the Government: The sources indicate that Khan aimed to mobilize a sufficiently large crowd to effectively paralyze the government by occupying key government buildings like Parliament and the Prime Minister’s House. This tactic suggests an intention to seize power through forceful disruption rather than through established political processes.
Emulating a Student Protest Model: The sources mention that Khan drew inspiration from a student protest in Dhaka, viewing it as a successful blueprint for his own plan. However, the specifics of this protest and its outcomes remain unclear in the sources, raising questions about the validity of the comparison and the feasibility of replicating its success.
Projecting an Image of Mass Support: The sources imply that a crucial goal of the protest was to showcase the scale of public support for Imran Khan and the PTI. By creating a spectacle of mass mobilization, the PTI sought to bolster its political legitimacy and influence public perception, even if the actual level of support might have been overstated.
Pressuring the Government through Public Display: The protest can also be interpreted as a tactic to exert pressure on the government through a massive display of public discontent. By showcasing the strength of their opposition, the PTI aimed to force the government into concessions or potentially even trigger a collapse of the ruling structure, paving the way for their own ascension to power.
However, the sources are highly critical of the PTI’s approach, arguing that their goals were ultimately driven by a flawed understanding of political power and a dangerous reliance on disruptive tactics. The sources warn that such actions could destabilize the country and empower extremist elements, ultimately harming Pakistan’s political landscape.
Contradictions in Claims Surrounding the PTI’s November 26th Protest
The sources reveal several conflicting narratives surrounding the PTI’s November 26th protest, particularly regarding the scale of violence against protesters and Imran Khan’s intentions behind the demonstration.
Discrepancies in Witness Accounts: A significant contradiction arises from the varying accounts provided by a PTI lawyer regarding the number of witness testimonies supporting allegations of violence against protesters. The lawyer initially claimed to have 278 testimonies, but later reduced this number to a mere “dozen.” This drastic change casts doubt on the PTI’s claims and raises questions about their efforts to portray themselves as victims.
Shifting Narratives Regarding Imran Khan’s Role: The sources suggest that Khan initially presented the protest as a peaceful demonstration, emphasizing a plan to sit-in at a specific location. However, his actions and subsequent rhetoric appeared to shift towards a more aggressive and disruptive stance, with allusions to occupying government buildings and paralyzing the state. This shift in messaging, coupled with his praise of a student protest in Dhaka, potentially involving forceful takeover, raises concerns about his true intentions and the potential for escalating violence.
Contradictions Regarding the Protest’s Goals: While the PTI initially framed the protest as a peaceful demonstration of public support for Khan, the sources imply that a more strategic and disruptive objective was at play. The goal appeared to be to create a spectacle of mass mobilization to pressure the government, potentially leading to its collapse and paving the way for the PTI’s rise to power. This underlying ambition contradicts the image of a peaceful sit-in and reveals a more calculated and potentially dangerous political strategy.
These contradictions highlight the challenges in assessing the true nature of the November 26th protest and the PTI’s motives. The conflicting narratives, coupled with the PTI’s tendency to employ inflammatory rhetoric and shift blame, necessitate a cautious and critical approach to evaluating their claims and understanding the complexities of Pakistani politics.
Analyzing the Contradiction Between PTI’s Actions and its Democratic Image
The sources paint a critical picture of the PTI, arguing that the party’s actions often clash with its self-proclaimed democratic image.
Aggressive Response to Criticism: Despite positioning itself as a democratic party, the PTI exhibits a notable intolerance towards criticism, responding aggressively to any questioning of its actions or motives. The sources highlight the party’s tendency to react with hostility and accusations, suggesting a lack of openness to dialogue or dissent, characteristics that are typically associated with authoritarian rather than democratic approaches.
Inflammatory Rhetoric and Comparisons to Extremist Groups: The sources draw alarming parallels between PTI’s rhetoric and tactics and those of extremist groups like the Taliban, Hamas, and Boko Haram. This comparison underscores the party’s proclivity for inflammatory language and its willingness to employ disruptive and potentially violent methods to achieve its political goals, contradicting its claims to uphold democratic values.
Shifting Narratives and Lack of Accountability: The sources expose inconsistencies in the PTI’s accounts of events, particularly concerning the November 26th protest, where witness testimonies were dramatically altered and narratives shifted to deflect blame and evade responsibility. This manipulation of information and lack of transparency raise serious questions about the party’s commitment to honesty and accountability, core principles of democratic governance.
Undermining Democratic Processes: The sources suggest that the PTI, under Imran Khan’s leadership, seeks to gain power through disruptive means rather than through established democratic processes. Khan’s plan to paralyze the government by occupying key institutions reflects a disregard for democratic norms and a preference for forceful tactics over dialogue and negotiation.
Manipulating Public Perception: The PTI is accused of employing emotional appeals and manipulating public sentiment to advance its agenda. The sources suggest that the party leverages religious symbolism and plays on the public’s desire for change, potentially exploiting these sentiments to gain support without offering concrete solutions or engaging in constructive political discourse.
The sources ultimately argue that the PTI’s actions, characterized by aggression, manipulation, and a disregard for democratic norms, directly contradict its carefully crafted image as a democratic force for positive change. This disconnect between rhetoric and reality raises concerns about the party’s true commitment to democracy and its potential to erode democratic values in Pakistan.
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
The sources describe the D Chowk incident as a protest led by the PTI (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf) party, orchestrated by Bushra Begum (wife of PTI founder Imran Khan).
The protest aimed to pressure the establishment for Imran Khan’s release.
Bushra Begum encouraged supporters to remain at D Chowk until Khan was freed, even if it meant death.
However, the protest ended with PTI leaders retreating and leaving supporters vulnerable.
Criticisms of the Protest
The sources criticize the PTI’s handling of the protest, particularly Bushra Begum’s leadership:
Bushra Begum is described as lacking political wisdom despite her enthusiasm.
The sources condemn the decision to leave supporters behind while leaders retreated.
Questions are raised about the conflicting reports of casualties, suggesting potential exaggeration for political gain.
Broader Implications
The D Chowk incident is presented as an example of the PTI’s manipulative tactics:
The author argues the PTI uses rallies and protests for self-interest, not for the benefit of the people.
They point out that PTI leaders, like Imran Khan and Bushra Begum, do not involve their own children in these potentially dangerous events.
The incident is used to illustrate a broader pattern of Pakistani politics where power is sought through connections with the establishment, not through genuine public service.
The sources ultimately urge Pakistani youth to be wary of political manipulation and prioritize their own futures rather than blindly following political leaders.
The sources portray the PTI’s involvement in the D Chowk incident as a manipulative attempt to leverage public support for personal gain. They specifically highlight the role of Bushra Begum, wife of PTI founder Imran Khan, in orchestrating the protest. Bushra Begum is depicted as a driving force behind the protest, urging supporters to remain steadfast even in the face of danger.
The sources allege that the PTI’s true objective was to destabilize the government by inciting chaos and potentially even violence. They suggest that the party leadership, including Bushra Begum, were aware of the risks involved but were willing to exploit their supporters’ loyalty for their own political ambitions. This manipulation is further emphasized by the claim that PTI leaders shielded their own children from the dangers they exposed their supporters to.
The sources also point to the PTI’s strategic use of religious rhetoric and symbolism during the protest, particularly by Bushra Begum, as evidence of their calculated attempt to emotionally manipulate the crowd. This approach is presented as a cynical ploy to bypass rational discourse and exploit the religious sentiments of the populace for political ends.
The sources ultimately condemn the PTI’s involvement in the D Chowk incident as a betrayal of the trust placed in them by their supporters. They argue that the party leadership prioritized their own power struggles over the well-being of the people they claimed to represent, leaving their supporters vulnerable and disillusioned.
Bushra Begum’s Role in the D Chowk Incident
The sources portray Bushra Begum, the wife of PTI founder Imran Khan, as a key figure in the D Chowk protest. She is presented as the driving force behind the event, even more so than the PTI leadership itself.
While some PTI officials preferred a less confrontational approach, Bushra Begum insisted on the D Chowk location, believing her own party officials might compromise with the establishment.
She actively encouraged supporters, using speeches and oaths, to remain at D Chowk until Imran Khan was released, even if it meant death.
However, the sources are highly critical of her leadership and the protest’s outcome:
Despite her enthusiasm and sincerity, Bushra Begum is described as lacking the necessary political wisdom to navigate such a complex and sensitive situation.
Her approach is characterized as overly emotional and naive, relying on grand gestures and fervent pronouncements rather than strategic planning and adaptability.
The sources condemn the decision to leave supporters behind while leaders, including Bushra Begum, retreated, calling it a betrayal of their trust and a demonstration of placing self-interest above the well-being of the people.
The author specifically questions Bushra Begum’s decision to leave the supporters, contrasting it with a hypothetical scenario where she chooses to stand with them and face the consequences.
The sources highlight a disparity between Bushra Begum’s rhetoric and actions, suggesting a degree of hypocrisy:
She encouraged others to risk their lives for the cause while her own children were not present at the protest.
This is compared to a drug dealer who keeps their children away from their dangerous business.
The sources ultimately frame Bushra Begum’s role in the D Chowk incident as a cautionary tale, illustrating the dangers of political manipulation and blind faith in leaders who prioritize personal gain over the welfare of their supporters.
Political Strategies in the Context of the D Chowk Incident
The sources, while focusing on the D Chowk incident and its aftermath, offer insight into various political strategies employed by different actors.
PTI’s Strategies: Populism and Manipulation
The sources heavily criticize the PTI’s political strategies, particularly those employed during the D Chowk protest. These strategies are characterized as populist and manipulative, aimed at mobilizing public support for the party’s own interests rather than genuine public service.
The sources highlight the PTI’s use of emotionally charged rhetoric and symbolism, especially religious themes, as a way to bypass rational discourse and sway public opinion.
Bushra Begum’s impassioned speeches and calls for unwavering commitment, even in the face of potential death, exemplify this approach.
The sources argue that the PTI’s decision to hold the protest at D Chowk, a highly sensitive location, was a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction from the establishment and escalate the situation.
This strategy, according to the sources, was driven by a desire to create chaos and destabilize the government for the PTI’s political advantage.
The sources further accuse the PTI of hypocrisy, pointing out that while they encouraged supporters to risk their lives, the party’s leaders, including Imran Khan and Bushra Begum, shielded their own children from these dangers.
This is presented as evidence of the PTI’s willingness to exploit the loyalty of their supporters for their own gain.
Establishment’s Strategies: Force and Control
The sources also allude to the political strategies employed by the establishment in response to the PTI’s actions. These strategies are characterized by the use of force and a desire to maintain control.
The sources suggest that the establishment, likely referring to powerful entities like the military or intelligence agencies, exerted pressure on the PTI to abandon the D Chowk protest.
The swift crackdown on the protest and the alleged presence of armed individuals within the crowd suggest a readiness to use force to quell dissent.
The sources criticize the establishment’s heavy-handed approach while also acknowledging their effectiveness in containing the situation.
They warn against the dangers of excessive repression, predicting that such actions will eventually backfire and lead to further instability.
Alternative Strategies: Reason and Public Service
The sources advocate for alternative political strategies based on reason, dialogue, and genuine public service.
They criticize the PTI’s reliance on emotional appeals and manipulative tactics, urging the Pakistani youth to think critically and prioritize their own futures rather than blindly following political leaders.
They implicitly support engaging with political issues through reasoned debate and peaceful means rather than resorting to violence or disruption.
They emphasize the need for politicians to prioritize the well-being of the people they represent, placing public service above personal ambition and power struggles.
The D Chowk incident, as portrayed in the sources, serves as a case study in contrasting political strategies. The incident highlights the dangers of populism, manipulation, and the use of force, while advocating for a more reasoned and ethical approach to political engagement.
The Plight of Pakistani Youth: Exploitation and Disillusionment
The sources paint a bleak picture of the plight of Pakistani youth, particularly those involved in political movements like the PTI. They are depicted as victims of political manipulation, their idealism and energy exploited for the personal gain of ambitious leaders.
The sources highlight the dangers these youth are exposed to, particularly during events like the D Chowk protest, where they are encouraged to risk their lives while their leaders remain protected.
This disparity is exemplified by the contrast between Bushra Begum’s impassioned calls for unwavering commitment, even in the face of death, and the absence of her own children from the protest.
The author draws a parallel with a drug dealer who keeps their own children away from their dangerous business, highlighting the hypocrisy inherent in the PTI’s approach.
The sources lament the wasted potential of these young individuals, whose talents and passion are squandered in futile political battles.
They argue that participation in these movements ultimately leaves the youth with nothing but regret and disillusionment, hindering their personal growth and future prospects.
The author directly addresses the youth, urging them to break free from the manipulative slogans of these leaders and prioritize their own futures.
They are encouraged to critically evaluate the motivations of political figures and question why those leaders’ own children are absent from the rallies and protests.
The sources suggest that the broader political landscape in Pakistan contributes to the youth’s predicament.
The emphasis on connections with the establishment, rather than genuine public service, perpetuates a system where power is concentrated among a select few, leaving the youth with limited opportunities for meaningful political participation.
This lack of representation and agency fuels a sense of frustration and disillusionment, pushing some towards more extreme ideologies or actions.
The sources, while focused on the specific context of the D Chowk incident and the PTI, offer a broader commentary on the challenges faced by Pakistani youth. They serve as a call for greater awareness, critical thinking, and a rejection of political manipulation, urging the youth to forge their own paths and build a better future for themselves and their country.
The author criticizes PTI’s leadership, particularly Bushra Begum (Pinki Perni) and Imran Khan, for their handling of the D Chowk protest, calling it a betrayal of their supporters.
The author questions the wisdom of the aggressive protest strategy, arguing that it lacked political nuance and led to unnecessary hardship for the participants.
The author accuses the PTI leadership of hypocrisy for inciting their followers to potentially violent actions while their own families remained safe.
The author condemns the alleged involvement of armed groups and questions the motives behind pushing for a potentially chaotic situation in Islamabad.
The author urges the youth to think critically and not blindly follow political leaders, while also warning the government against overreach and suppression of legitimate political activity.
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
1. What is the current situation with the upcoming Cricket Champions Trophy and Pakistan’s participation?
Pakistan is facing challenges regarding its participation in the Champions Trophy due to India’s reluctance to play in Pakistan, citing security concerns. While a hybrid model, with some matches played in Pakistan and others in a neutral venue, was accepted for the Asia Cup, Pakistan is pushing for equal treatment. Pakistan argues that if India is unwilling to play in Pakistan, then future ICC events hosted by India should also adopt a hybrid model with some matches played outside India.
2. What is Pakistan’s proposed solution to the Champions Trophy hosting dilemma?
Pakistan proposes a reciprocal hybrid model. If India insists on a hybrid model for the Champions Trophy in Pakistan, then future ICC events hosted in India should also follow a hybrid model. This would ensure fairness and avoid a two-tiered system within ICC events.
3. What are the financial implications of the Champions Trophy standoff?
The primary broadcaster for the Champions Trophy, an Indian company, has stated that if India and Pakistan do not play, the financial viability of the tournament will be severely impacted. This puts pressure on the ICC to find a solution that satisfies both India and Pakistan.
4. What is the situation with political unrest in Pakistan and how does it relate to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)?
Following events on November 24th, there are allegations of excessive force used against PTI supporters, with claims of injuries and deaths. PTI leaders are calling for an investigation into the incidents.
5. What is the role of Bushra Bibi (wife of Imran Khan) and Pervez Khattak (senior PTI leader) in the current political climate?
Both Bushra Bibi and Pervez Khattak are seen as influential figures within the PTI and capable of controlling and directing the party’s supporters. Their potential arrest and isolation are being viewed as a tactic to weaken the PTI’s ability to mobilize protests.
6. Is there a possibility of the PTI being banned and what are the implications?
Resolutions to ban the PTI have been discussed, but many believe a ban would be counterproductive. It could galvanize PTI supporters and further escalate tensions. Additionally, the effectiveness of such a ban is questioned, as previous attempts to restrict political parties through symbols have had little impact.
7. What are the potential consequences of imposing Governor’s Rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP)?
Imposing Governor’s Rule in KP, a province where PTI holds significant influence, is seen as a risky move. It could backfire by further alienating PTI supporters and triggering larger-scale protests, potentially even targeting the Governor’s House. Furthermore, such a move may face legal challenges and lack of support from other political parties.
8. What is the significance of Aseefa Bhutto Zardari’s comments on Imran Khan’s safety?
Aseefa Bhutto Zardari, a prominent figure in the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), raising concerns about Imran Khan’s safety on an international platform suggests the PPP is positioning itself as a potential alternative to the current government. It also signals a potential willingness to work with Imran Khan in the future, creating a point of friction within the ruling coalition.
What is the “hybrid model” being discussed in the context of the cricket Champions Trophy, and why is it causing tension between India and Pakistan?
What are the arguments presented for and against holding the Champions Trophy in Pakistan? What are the potential financial implications for the ICC if India and Pakistan do not play?
According to the speaker, how does the political climate in Pakistan affect the potential hosting of the Champions Trophy? What evidence do they provide to support their claim?
What specific claims are being made by the Pakistan Tehreek Insaaf (PTI) regarding the events of November 24th? What evidence do they present to support their allegations?
How does the speaker analyze the potential impact of Governor’s Rule in KP? What are the potential benefits and disadvantages they highlight?
What is the significance of Bushra Bibi and Gandapur in the current political situation, according to the speaker’s analysis?
Why does the speaker believe that banning PTI would be ineffective? What historical example do they cite to support their viewpoint?
What is the significance of Asifa Bhutto Zardari’s statement about the threat to Imran Khan’s life, and how does the speaker interpret the People’s Party’s motives?
According to the speaker, how has the political dynamic between Imran Khan and the establishment shifted since November 24th?
In the speaker’s view, what is the likely future of the political situation in Pakistan, and what role might the People’s Party play?
The “hybrid model” proposes holding some Champions Trophy matches in Pakistan and others in a neutral country, likely due to India’s reluctance to play in Pakistan. This causes tension as Pakistan insists on hosting all games or implementing the hybrid model for future tournaments in India as well, seeking reciprocal treatment.
Arguments for holding the Champions Trophy in Pakistan cite contractual obligations, Pakistan’s right to host, and the potential for generating revenue. Arguments against it focus on security concerns and potential civil unrest. The ICC faces significant financial losses from broadcasting rights if India and Pakistan do not participate.
The speaker argues that the current political climate in Pakistan, characterized by potential civil unrest and the PTI’s challenges against the government, makes hosting the Champions Trophy difficult. They point to the PTI’s claims of violence against their supporters as evidence of instability.
PTI alleges excessive force used against their supporters on November 24th, claiming over 5000 arrests, hundreds injured by bullets, and 12 deaths. They claim to possess evidence, including witness testimonies and medical records, to support these allegations.
The speaker suggests Governor’s Rule in KP would give the administration greater control over potential PTI protests and disrupt their mobilization efforts. However, they also point out potential disadvantages, including public backlash, bureaucratic resistance, and legal challenges, arguing that it might ultimately prove ineffective and unsustainable.
Bushra Bibi and Gandapur are identified as crucial figures for PTI due to their influence over supporters and potential to persuade Imran Khan towards a more moderate approach. Their detention, the speaker argues, aims to limit PTI’s mobilization capacity while maintaining channels for negotiation.
The speaker believes banning PTI would be counterproductive, arguing that it would not diminish popular support and could even bolster their appeal as victims of political oppression. They cite the example of the ban on Jamaat-e-Islami, which failed to significantly impact their electoral performance.
Asifa Bhutto Zardari’s statement is interpreted as a strategic move by the People’s Party to signal their potential willingness to work with Imran Khan if the opportunity arises. By expressing concern for his safety, they subtly distance themselves from the government’s hardline stance and position themselves as potential allies.
The speaker observes that the power dynamic has shifted since November 24th, with the establishment appearing stronger and Imran Khan’s position weakened due to the crackdown on PTI. Despite this shift, the speaker believes Khan might eventually re-emerge and return to the political scene.
The speaker predicts that the political landscape will eventually transition away from street protests and back into the parliamentary arena. They foresee the People’s Party potentially playing a pivotal role in this transition, positioning themselves as a more palatable alternative to the PML-N for accommodating Imran Khan and his supporters.
Analyze the arguments for and against the “hybrid model” in the context of the Champions Trophy. Consider the perspectives of Pakistan, India, and the ICC, and discuss the potential implications of each proposed solution.
Evaluate the speaker’s claims about the political situation in Pakistan. To what extent do you agree or disagree with their assessment of the events of November 24th and the potential impact of Governor’s Rule in KP?
Explore the significance of the “safe passage” reportedly granted to Bushra Bibi and Gandapur. Analyze the speaker’s interpretation of this event, and consider its potential implications for the ongoing power struggle between PTI and the government.
Discuss the potential motives behind Asifa Bhutto Zardari’s statement about the threat to Imran Khan’s life. Analyze the speaker’s interpretation of the People’s Party’s strategy, and evaluate its potential effectiveness in the current political climate.
Based on the speaker’s analysis, predict the future of Pakistani politics. Consider the potential for Imran Khan’s return, the role of the establishment, and the possible realignment of political forces.
Hybrid Model: A proposed format for hosting the Champions Trophy where some matches are held in Pakistan and others in a neutral country.
Champions Trophy: A prestigious international cricket tournament organized by the ICC.
ICC: The International Cricket Council, the governing body for cricket worldwide.
PTI: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, a political party led by Imran Khan.
Governor’s Rule: A constitutional provision in Pakistan that allows the federal government to assume direct control of a province under specific circumstances.
KP: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a province in Pakistan where PTI holds a majority in the provincial assembly.
Establishment: A term often used in Pakistan to refer to the powerful military and intelligence apparatus.
Safe Passage: The act of granting someone permission and protection to travel through a dangerous or contested area.
People’s Party: Pakistan Peoples Party, a major political party in Pakistan.
Noon League: Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, a major political party in Pakistan.
BCCI: Board of Control for Cricket in India.
ACC: Asian Cricket Council.
Pakistani Politics & the Future of Cricket: A Deep Dive
Source 1: “Pasted Text” (Transcript of a Pakistani Political Commentary Show)
I. The Fate of the Champions Trophy: A Hybrid Model Emerges
This section analyzes the ongoing debate regarding the location of the upcoming Champions Trophy. With India refusing to play in Pakistan due to security concerns, and Pakistan rejecting a full hybrid model that would see them play most of their matches abroad, a potential solution is presented: a reciprocal hybrid model. This model would require India to also play some of its matches in future ICC tournaments at neutral venues if Pakistan is forced to do so for this tournament.
II. Political Turmoil: Analyzing Claims of Violence & Repression
This section delves into allegations by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) regarding state-sanctioned violence against their supporters on November 24th. The commentator analyzes the validity of these claims, scrutinizing evidence and urging for thorough investigations using available footage from safe city cameras.
III. The Potential for Governor’s Rule & a PTI Ban
This segment examines the potential consequences of imposing Governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and a nationwide ban on PTI. The commentator argues that such actions would be ultimately counterproductive, potentially galvanizing public support for PTI and facing legal challenges. He emphasizes the importance of provincial autonomy and predicts a lack of support from the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) for such measures.
IV. Shifting Power Dynamics & the Role of Key PTI Figures
This part explores the changing political landscape following the events of November 24th. The commentator posits a shift in power dynamics, with the establishment gaining strength and Imran Khan experiencing a relative weakening. He discusses the importance of figures like Bushra Bibi and Pervez Khattak for PTI and speculates on the possibility of their detention and isolation as a means to exert control and facilitate negotiations.
V. Asif Zardari’s Strategic Maneuvering & Potential PPP-PTI Alliance
This section focuses on Asif Zardari’s political maneuvering and the potential for an alliance between PPP and PTI. The commentator highlights Asif’s deliberate choice of Aseefa Bhutto Zardari to voice concerns regarding threats to Imran Khan’s life, interpreting it as a strategic move to distance PPP from the current government’s policies and position themselves as a potential ally for PTI in future political scenarios.
Briefing Doc: Pakistani Politics and Cricket Controversy
Main Themes:
Political turmoil in Pakistan: This source focuses heavily on the ongoing conflict between the PTI (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf) and the ruling government. The PTI alleges excessive force and human rights violations during protests, demanding an independent inquiry. The government denies these claims.
The future of the Champions Trophy: A significant portion of the discussion centers around the upcoming Champions Trophy and the conflict surrounding India’s participation in Pakistan. Financial and political factors are intertwined with proposed solutions like the ‘hybrid model’ and potential venue changes.
PTI claims: The PTI alleges that over 5,000 of their supporters were arrested before November 24th, with hundreds suffering bullet injuries and 12 fatalities. They cite evidence from medical professionals and demand an independent inquiry.
Government’s response: The government dismisses these claims, stating they used appropriate force to control riots. They challenge the PTI to provide concrete evidence and suggest the Safe City camera footage could be examined.
PTI’s future: The discussion explores the possibility of banning the PTI, implementing Governor’s rule in KP (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa), and the potential consequences of such actions.
Possible reconciliation: The source hints at potential back-channel negotiations and the possibility of Imran Khan returning to the political scene in the future. Asif Ali Zardari’s daughter, Aseefa Bhutto Zardari, expressing concern over threats to Imran Khan’s life, is interpreted as the PPP (Pakistan People’s Party) potentially positioning itself as a mediator.
The Champions Trophy dispute: The core issue is India’s reluctance to play in Pakistan due to security concerns.
The ‘hybrid model’: This proposes holding some Champions Trophy matches in Pakistan and others in a neutral venue like Dubai or Sri Lanka. The source suggests a counter-proposal: applying the hybrid model reciprocally to future ICC events in India, ensuring fairness.
Financial implications: The source highlights the financial pressure on the ICC due to the potential loss of broadcast revenue if India-Pakistan matches don’t take place.
Possible outcomes: The source discusses possible scenarios like the Champions Trophy being shifted to another country, Pakistan refusing to play, or a negotiated agreement through the reciprocal hybrid model.
Omar Ayub (PTI): “They fired bullets of destruction. They have an agenda to destroy everything, destroy everything. This is not a political party, this is a fad.”
Najam Sethi (Analyst): “If India and ICC do not accept my point, then we will not play… then this champion trophy will be shifted.”
Najam Sethi (Analyst): “The Indian government gets hurt when India comes and plays with Pakistan… If Pakistan doesn’t play in India then they don’t have any problem.”
The source provides a detailed insight into the current political landscape of Pakistan and the complexities surrounding the Champions Trophy. It offers multiple perspectives, analyzing potential scenarios and their implications. The tone is speculative, relying heavily on insider information and predictions based on the speaker’s experience and understanding of the political players involved.
Note: The source appears to be a transcript from a talk show or similar format. The informal language and conversational style should be considered when assessing the validity of the information presented.
Here are the central political and sporting conflicts discussed in the sources:
The central sporting conflict revolves around the upcoming Cricket Champions Trophy and Pakistan’s participation in it. Pakistan is demanding reciprocal treatment from the International Cricket Council (ICC) and India. [1, 2] Pakistan argues that if India is allowed to host some of its matches in the Champions Trophy outside of India in a “hybrid model” due to security concerns about playing in Pakistan, then Pakistan should be granted the same concession for future ICC events held in India. [1, 2]
Pakistan believes that the ICC’s acceptance of India’s “hybrid model” sets a dangerous precedent of unequal treatment. They argue that the ICC should either require India to play all its matches in Pakistan or enforce the same “hybrid model” for future ICC events in India. [1, 2] Pakistan believes its stance is strengthened by the fact that they won the Champions Trophy in the past on their own terms and that respecting international relations requires reciprocal treatment. [2]
The sources suggest that the financial implications of India and Pakistan not playing each other are significant, putting pressure on the ICC and broadcasters. [3] It’s noted that the broadcaster, an Indian company with global rights, has threatened financial penalties if Pakistan pulls out of the tournament. [3]
The central political conflict discussed involves the aftermath of events on November 24th, with Pakistan Tehreek Insaaf (PTI) and the current government clashing over the use of force and the treatment of PTI supporters. PTI claims that their supporters were subjected to excessive force, including the use of snipers and live ammunition, resulting in injuries and deaths. [4] They demand an investigation into the events. [5]
The government denies PTI’s claims, stating that no snipers were used and that any force applied was in response to PTI’s actions. [5] They argue that PTI is exaggerating the situation and that their demands for an inquiry are politically motivated. [5]
There are discussions about potential actions against PTI, including a ban on the party and the imposition of Governor’s Rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP). [6, 7] The sources debate the effectiveness and potential consequences of such actions, with concerns raised about backlash from the public and the judiciary. [7, 8]
The role of key figures like Bushra Bibi (Imran Khan’s wife) and Pervez Elahi (former Chief Minister of Punjab) is also discussed, particularly regarding their potential influence on the situation and the possibility of negotiations. [4, 6, 8]
The People’s Party’s position is analyzed, noting their potential as a mediating force between PTI and the government. [9, 10] Asifa Bhutto’s statements about threats to Imran Khan’s life are interpreted as a signal of the People’s Party’s willingness to accommodate PTI in future political arrangements. [9, 10]
These conflicts highlight the deep political and sporting divisions within Pakistan and the challenges faced in navigating these complex issues.
Power dynamics heavily influence decision-making, particularly in the context of international relations and politics, as evidenced by the sources.
The sources, which analyze the dynamics between the International Cricket Council (ICC), the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), illustrate how financial power and political influence can dictate the terms of engagement and shape outcomes. [1, 2]
The BCCI, due to its financial strength stemming from lucrative broadcasting deals and strong domestic cricket, holds significant sway within the ICC. [1, 2] This allows them to influence decisions in their favor, such as potentially determining the venue for the Champions Trophy. [1, 2]
The sources suggest that the BCCI leverages its position to exert pressure on other boards, many of whom are financially dependent on matches against India. [1] This creates a situation where these boards are more likely to side with India, even if it goes against the interests of other nations like Pakistan. [1, 3]
The sources further highlight the political dimension, with the Indian government’s stance on playing against Pakistan impacting the BCCI’s decisions. [4] The Indian government’s reluctance to engage with Pakistan on the cricket field, stemming from political tensions, restricts the BCCI’s freedom of action and ultimately shapes the ICC’s choices regarding tournament venues and formats. [4]
The sources propose that Pakistan could utilize a “hybrid model” for hosting the Champions Trophy, with some matches being played in a neutral country like Bangladesh to accommodate India’s concerns, while ensuring Pakistan retains some hosting rights. [5, 6] This model aims to address the power imbalance by advocating for reciprocal treatment: if India benefits from a hybrid model in Pakistan, future ICC events in India should also adopt a similar format. [5, 6]
The sources suggest that this strategy could force the ICC to acknowledge and address the unequal treatment of nations, potentially leading to a more equitable decision-making process within the organization. [6] By demanding reciprocity and highlighting the financial implications of India’s potential non-participation, Pakistan could leverage its position and gain an advantage in the negotiations. [4, 6]
In essence, the sources demonstrate how power dynamics, driven by financial clout and political influence, significantly impact decision-making processes, particularly in international sporting events like the Champions Trophy. They highlight how these power imbalances can be challenged through strategic negotiation and a push for greater reciprocity and fairness.
Here is a breakdown of potential consequences based on the outcomes discussed in the sources:
Potential Outcomes and Their Consequences
Pakistan stands firm on its demand for reciprocal hybrid model treatment: [1-3]
Positive Consequences for Pakistan:Levels the playing field with India. Pakistan would gain an advantage by ensuring that future ICC events in India also follow a hybrid model, reducing India’s leverage over Pakistan in cricketing matters. [3]
Strengthens Pakistan’s position in the ICC. By forcing a reciprocal arrangement, Pakistan asserts its independence and challenges India’s dominance in the ICC. [3, 4]
Potential for Pakistan to win the Champions Trophy on its own terms. This outcome allows Pakistan to maintain its stance and potentially achieve a favorable outcome in the tournament. [4]
Negative Consequences:Possible rejection by India and the ICC. India, with its financial clout and influence within the ICC, might resist the proposal. [3, 5]
Risk of the Champions Trophy being shifted to another country. This would result in financial losses for the ICC and potentially harm Pakistan’s cricketing reputation. [6]
Potential legal challenges from India. India could dispute the decision and initiate legal action against the ICC. [3]
Pakistan accepts a limited hybrid model: [1, 2, 7]
Consequences:Loss of bargaining power for future ICC events. Pakistan concedes to India’s demands, setting a precedent for future tournaments. [2, 3]
Perception of Pakistan surrendering to India’s pressure. Accepting a limited hybrid model without reciprocal terms weakens Pakistan’s position. [2]
Pakistan refuses to play in the Champions Trophy: [6]
Consequences:Financial losses for the ICC. The absence of India-Pakistan matches significantly reduces the tournament’s appeal and revenue. [5]
Damage to Pakistan’s cricketing relationships. This action could strain ties with the ICC and other cricket boards.
Potential for the Champions Trophy to be postponed or shifted. The ICC might be forced to reschedule or relocate the tournament. [6]
The source highlights the power dynamics within the ICC, emphasizing the financial influence of the BCCI and India’s ability to sway decisions in its favor. [5, 8]
The speaker suggests that Pakistan’s successful implementation of the PSL has provided it with greater financial independence and leverage. [1]
The analysis emphasizes the need for Pakistan to act strategically, capitalizing on any opportunity to secure reciprocal treatment and avoid being subjected to unequal terms by the ICC. [3, 4]
The source presents a nuanced view of the situation, emphasizing the complexities of international cricket politics and the financial stakes involved. The potential consequences outlined above provide a framework for understanding the possible outcomes and their implications for Pakistan’s cricketing future.
A Look at Pakistan Cricket: Politics, Finances, and the Champions Trophy
The sources provide a glimpse into the current state of Pakistan cricket, highlighting the intricate interplay between politics, finance, and international relations. The impending Champions Trophy serves as a focal point, with Pakistan demanding equitable treatment from the ICC and India.
At the heart of this discussion lies the “hybrid model,” which allows India to play some of its Champions Trophy matches outside of Pakistan due to security concerns. The sources argue that accepting this model without a reciprocal arrangement for future ICC events held in India would perpetuate an imbalance of power. [1-4]
The sources emphasize that this isn’t just about cricket – it’s about national pride and respect on the international stage. Pakistan, having won the Champions Trophy in the past, seeks to maintain its cricketing integrity and avoid being perceived as bowing to pressure. [4]
The financial implications of this situation are significant, with broadcasters and the ICC heavily reliant on the viewership and revenue generated by India-Pakistan matches. This reality puts Pakistan in a position to negotiate, as their absence from the tournament could lead to substantial financial losses. [5, 6]
The sources paint a picture of a complex landscape where Pakistan faces a crucial decision:
Option 1: Stand Firm on Reciprocal Hybrid Model: This path, while upholding principles of fairness, carries the risk of India and the ICC rejecting the proposal, potentially resulting in the Champions Trophy being shifted to another country. [4]
Option 2: Accept a Limited Hybrid Model: This would involve conceding to India’s demands, risking the perception of Pakistan surrendering to pressure and setting a precedent for future tournaments. [3]
Option 3: Refuse to Play in the Champions Trophy: This drastic step, though impactful, could damage Pakistan’s relationships with the ICC and other cricket boards, potentially leading to further isolation and financial consequences. [5]
The sources suggest that the success of the Pakistan Super League (PSL) has given Pakistan more financial independence and leverage in these negotiations. [2] This development provides them with a stronger platform to advocate for their interests and resist being subjected to unequal treatment.
The conversation history emphasizes the role of power dynamics, underscoring the influence wielded by the BCCI due to its financial strength. This power allows them to influence decisions within the ICC, often to the detriment of other boards, particularly those financially dependent on matches against India. [5, 7, 8]
The analysis presented in the sources suggests that Pakistan must adopt a strategic approach. This approach involves leveraging its newfound financial independence, highlighting the financial risks associated with India’s potential non-participation, and advocating for reciprocal treatment to ensure a more balanced and equitable cricketing future. [2, 4, 6]
A Divided PTI: Internal Conflicts and Political Maneuvering
The sources depict a Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) grappling with internal discord and facing political challenges. While not explicitly stating “disarray,” the conversations reveal a party navigating complex power dynamics and struggling to maintain a unified front.
The sources suggest a rift within the PTI, with some members openly criticizing party leadership, particularly Bushra Bibi, wife of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. [1] These internal conflicts raise questions about the party’s cohesion and its ability to present a united front against its political opponents.
Adding to this internal tension, the sources highlight varying accounts regarding the events of November 24th, specifically concerning the number of PTI supporters injured or killed during protests. [2] This discrepancy in information, with PTI officials claiming higher figures than independent sources, indicates possible attempts to manipulate the narrative and exploit the situation for political gain.
The sources further depict a PTI caught between a desire to protest and a need to negotiate. [3] They illustrate the dilemma of a party seeking to mobilize its base while also recognizing the potential consequences of escalating confrontations with the government. This delicate balancing act underscores the precarious position the PTI finds itself in.
The sources also reveal external pressures impacting the PTI’s stability. [4] They describe how the current government, led by Shahbaz Sharif, is actively seeking to restrict the PTI’s political activities, potentially through bans or limitations on public gatherings. This external pressure further complicates the PTI’s ability to operate effectively and maintain its influence.
The sources, while focused on cricket politics, indirectly provide insights into the broader political landscape in Pakistan. The PTI’s struggles are contextualized within a broader environment of political tension and power struggles, where maneuvering and strategic alliances are essential for survival.
Champions Trophy: A Stage for Cricket and Politics
The sources, while primarily focused on the political landscape in Pakistan, provide a compelling look at the upcoming Champions Trophy tournament and the complex dynamics surrounding its potential hosting in Pakistan. The conversation centers on the “hybrid model” proposed to accommodate India’s reluctance to play in Pakistan due to security concerns.
The sources emphasize the significance of this event, extending beyond mere sport. For Pakistan, hosting the Champions Trophy is a matter of national pride and international recognition. Successfully navigating the challenges and securing hosting rights, potentially through the hybrid model, would represent a significant victory.
Here’s a closer look at the key elements surrounding the Champions Trophy discussion:
Hybrid Model: This concept lies at the heart of the debate. The sources suggest that Pakistan is willing to accept this model, with some matches played in a neutral country like Bangladesh to address India’s concerns. However, Pakistan insists on reciprocity – if India benefits from this model in Pakistan, future ICC events held in India should also adopt a similar format. This demand for equality aims to prevent a situation where Pakistan is subjected to different standards than India.
Power Dynamics: The sources repeatedly underscore the uneven power distribution within the ICC. The BCCI, fueled by its financial might derived from lucrative broadcasting deals and strong domestic cricket, holds significant influence. This allows them to exert pressure on other boards, many of whom are financially dependent on matches against India. This power dynamic creates a scenario where decisions often favor India, potentially sidelining the interests of other nations like Pakistan.
Financial Stakes: The sources acknowledge the substantial financial implications tied to the Champions Trophy. India-Pakistan matches are highly sought after by broadcasters and contribute significantly to the tournament’s revenue. Pakistan can leverage this reality to negotiate, as their absence could lead to significant financial losses for the ICC.
National Pride: The sources highlight that for Pakistan, the Champions Trophy is not just about cricket. It’s about asserting their position on the world stage and resisting perceived pressure from India. Winning the tournament on their own terms would be a symbolic victory, demonstrating their resilience and cricketing prowess.
The sources suggest several potential outcomes for Pakistan regarding the Champions Trophy:
Stand firm and demand a reciprocal hybrid model: This approach, though principled, carries risks. India and the ICC, influenced by the BCCI, might reject the proposal, leading to the tournament being moved to another country.
Accept a limited hybrid model without reciprocity: This option would be seen as a concession to India, potentially weakening Pakistan’s position within the ICC and setting a precedent for future events.
Refuse to participate in the Champions Trophy: This extreme step, while making a statement, could lead to financial losses for Pakistan, damage relationships with the ICC and other cricket boards, and potentially lead to further isolation within the cricketing world.
The sources advocate for Pakistan to adopt a strategic and assertive approach. By highlighting the financial risks associated with India’s potential non-participation and demanding reciprocal treatment, Pakistan can leverage its position and potentially secure a more favorable outcome.
The Champions Trophy, as depicted in the sources, represents more than just a cricket tournament. It’s a platform where political tensions, financial interests, and national pride intersect, making for a complex and fascinating case study in international relations.
Analyzing Pakistan’s Political Turmoil
The sources offer a detailed account of the current political climate in Pakistan, highlighting a landscape marked by political tension, internal divisions, and the maneuvering of various political actors. Although the focus is mainly on the impact of these events on the cricketing world, the sources provide valuable insight into the broader political struggles unfolding in the nation.
PTI Facing Internal & External Pressures: The sources portray a Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party grappling with internal disagreements and facing external pressure from the ruling government. The conversation reveals concerns over the influence of Bushra Bibi, Imran Khan’s wife, within the party, suggesting possible internal rifts and challenges to leadership. This internal discord is compounded by the government’s active efforts to limit PTI’s activities, potentially through bans or restrictions, further hindering their ability to function effectively. [1-5]
Controversial Events of November 24th: The sources describe the events of November 24th, a significant turning point in the PTI’s political journey. The conversation highlights conflicting narratives regarding the severity of the protests and the number of PTI supporters injured or killed, suggesting attempts to control the narrative and utilize the situation for political gain. [6, 7] The sources also reveal differing perspectives on the role of key figures like Bushra Bibi and Gandapur, with some arguing for their detention to maintain control and others suggesting their importance in negotiating with Imran Khan. [3, 6] This uncertainty surrounding the events and the roles of key figures further underscores the political turmoil and the challenges the PTI faces. [3]
Shift in Power Dynamics: The sources describe a notable shift in the balance of power following the events of November 24th. They suggest a change from a situation where Imran Khan held significant influence to one where the establishment now wields more power. This shift in dynamics has altered the political landscape, impacting the PTI’s ability to operate freely and influencing negotiations with the government. [8]
People’s Party Positioning for Future Influence: The sources highlight the People’s Party’s strategic maneuvering within this volatile political climate. They suggest that the People’s Party, by distancing itself from the government’s actions and expressing concern over the treatment of Imran Khan, is positioning itself for potential future alliances. This strategy is evident in Asifa Bhutto’s public statements, which create space for potential collaboration with PTI should the political situation shift. [8, 9] This calculated approach underscores the fluidity of political alliances in Pakistan and the importance of maintaining options in an unpredictable environment.
The sources, while focused on cricket-related issues, paint a vivid picture of a nation embroiled in political turmoil. The PTI’s internal conflicts, the government’s attempts to restrict their activities, and the People’s Party’s strategic positioning all contribute to an atmosphere of uncertainty and tension. This analysis reveals the complexity of Pakistani politics and highlights the continuous struggle for power and influence among various political actors.
The sources offer a detailed account of the current political climate in Pakistan, highlighting a landscape marked by political tension, internal divisions, and the maneuvering of various political actors. Although the focus is mainly on the impact of these events on the cricketing world, the sources provide valuable insight into the broader political struggles unfolding in the nation.
PTI Facing Internal & External Pressures: The sources portray a Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party grappling with internal disagreements and facing external pressure from the ruling government. The conversation reveals concerns over the influence of Bushra Bibi, Imran Khan’s wife, within the party, suggesting possible internal rifts and challenges to leadership. This internal discord is compounded by the government’s active efforts to limit PTI’s activities, potentially through bans or restrictions, further hindering their ability to function effectively. [1-5]
Controversial Events of November 24th: The sources describe the events of November 24th, a significant turning point in the PTI’s political journey. The conversation highlights conflicting narratives regarding the severity of the protests and the number of PTI supporters injured or killed, suggesting attempts to control the narrative and utilize the situation for political gain. [6, 7] The sources also reveal differing perspectives on the role of key figures like Bushra Bibi and Gandapur, with some arguing for their detention to maintain control and others suggesting their importance in negotiating with Imran Khan. [3, 6] This uncertainty surrounding the events and the roles of key figures further underscores the political turmoil and the challenges the PTI faces. [3]
Shift in Power Dynamics: The sources describe a notable shift in the balance of power following the events of November 24th. They suggest a change from a situation where Imran Khan held significant influence to one where the establishment now wields more power. This shift in dynamics has altered the political landscape, impacting the PTI’s ability to operate freely and influencing negotiations with the government. [8]
People’s Party Positioning for Future Influence: The sources highlight the People’s Party’s strategic maneuvering within this volatile political climate. They suggest that the People’s Party, by distancing itself from the government’s actions and expressing concern over the treatment of Imran Khan, is positioning itself for potential future alliances. This strategy is evident in Asifa Bhutto’s public statements, which create space for potential collaboration with PTI should the political situation shift. [8, 9] This calculated approach underscores the fluidity of political alliances in Pakistan and the importance of maintaining options in an unpredictable environment.
The sources, while focused on cricket-related issues, paint a vivid picture of a nation embroiled in political turmoil. The PTI’s internal conflicts, the government’s attempts to restrict their activities, and the People’s Party’s strategic positioning all contribute to an atmosphere of uncertainty and tension. This analysis reveals the complexity of Pakistani politics and highlights the continuous struggle for power and influence among various political actors.
The sources, while discussing Pakistani politics and the PTI’s current challenges, touch upon the issue of a potential threat to Bushra Bibi’s life. This concern, voiced by Asifa Bhutto of the People’s Party, adds another layer of complexity to the already turbulent political situation.
Here’s a breakdown of the information presented in the sources:
Asifa Bhutto’s Statement: The sources emphasize that Asifa Bhutto, daughter of former President Asif Ali Zardari, publicly expressed concerns about a threat to Bushra Bibi’s safety [1]. This statement, made to an international news outlet, Al-Arabiya, holds significance due to its public nature and the potential for international attention.
Strategic Messaging: The sources suggest that Asifa Bhutto’s statement may be part of a broader political strategy employed by the People’s Party [1]. They argue that by voicing concern for Bushra Bibi, the People’s Party aims to distance itself from the ruling government’s actions and potentially create an opening for future collaboration with PTI. This calculated approach indicates the fluidity of political alliances in Pakistan.
Lack of Specificity: The sources do not provide details about the nature of the threat to Bushra Bibi, its origin, or the evidence supporting it. This lack of concrete information raises questions about the validity of the claim and whether it is based on credible intelligence or is a political maneuver.
It is important to note that the sources do not offer definitive proof of an actual threat against Bushra Bibi. The information presented is primarily focused on the political implications of Asifa Bhutto’s statement rather than confirming the existence of a threat. Further investigation and independent verification would be necessary to determine the credibility and severity of any potential danger to Bushra Bibi’s safety.
Here are the summaries of each page of the provided source, focusing on the key points and information presented:
Page 1:
The speaker introduces the topic of the conversation, which will focus on current events in Pakistan, including the political situation of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), the controversy surrounding the Champions Trophy, and other significant news.
The speaker highlights concerns regarding PTI’s internal disarray due to a lack of clarity and direction from party leadership.
Allegations made by Omar Ayub, a PTI leader, during a press conference are mentioned as requiring further investigation.
The speaker expresses uncertainty about the future of the Champions Trophy, acknowledging both Pakistan and India’s interest in the tournament’s outcome.
The speaker also mentions predictions made in a previous conversation, particularly those related to Faisal Vavda and Asifa Bhutto.
The speaker acknowledges the importance of cricket in Pakistan, recognizing it as a source of national interest and a respite from political turmoil.
The conversation shifts focus to cricket and the Champions Trophy, acknowledging the widespread interest in the sport, even amidst political tensions.
The speaker expresses confusion regarding the actions of PCB Chairman Mohsin Naqvi, questioning his sudden trip to Dubai and the subsequent adjournment of the ICC meeting.
The speaker claims to have insight into the potential outcomes of the Champions Trophy debate based on their past experience and negotiations with Jay Shah, head of the BCCI.
The speaker recalls their involvement in negotiating the Asia Cup hosting arrangement, highlighting the challenges faced in securing Pakistan’s right to host matches.
The speaker details the challenges of convincing other Asian cricket boards, particularly India, to agree to a hybrid model for the Asia Cup, where some matches would be held in Pakistan.
The speaker recounts their efforts in convincing the Indian media and ICC officials to accept a partial hosting arrangement for Pakistan, ultimately leading to a compromise where some matches were played in Pakistan and others in neutral venues.
The speaker emphasizes the acceptance of the hybrid model for the Asia Cup and questions whether Pakistan should now accept a similar arrangement for the Champions Trophy.
The speaker highlights the contrasting positions of Pakistan and India regarding the hybrid model, with Pakistan demanding a reciprocal arrangement for future ICC events held in India.
The speaker continues to outline the arguments surrounding the Champions Trophy hosting debate. They mention Pakistan’s strong stance, rooted in their contractual agreement with the ICC and the government’s position that they will not play under a hybrid model unless it’s reciprocal.
The speaker dismisses India’s concerns about security and civil unrest in Pakistan, arguing that similar issues exist in other countries.
The speaker discusses the potential for voting within the ICC on the hybrid model, predicting that some Asian countries, influenced by India’s pressure, might not openly support Pakistan.
The speaker highlights the potential deadlock in negotiations between India and Pakistan, leaving the ICC in a challenging position.
The speaker emphasizes the financial consequences for the ICC if India and Pakistan do not participate in the Champions Trophy, particularly due to the potential loss of revenue from broadcasting deals.
The speaker predicts that the ICC will likely propose a compromise formula, driven by financial interests and the desire to ensure India-Pakistan matches.
The speaker acknowledges the BCCI’s significant influence within the ICC, stemming from its financial power and control over broadcasting rights.
The speaker suggests that the BCCI uses its influence to secure favorable outcomes for India, often at the expense of other boards who are financially dependent on matches against India.
The speaker recounts a previous meeting with Jay Shah and ICC officials where they proposed a reciprocal hybrid model, emphasizing the benefits for both India and Pakistan in future ICC events.
The speaker suggests that a hybrid model, with matches played in Bangladesh, could be a viable solution for Pakistan’s matches in the Champions Trophy, addressing India’s security concerns while ensuring Pakistan’s participation.
The speaker criticizes the previous PCB Chairman, Jaka Ashraf, for accepting a limited hybrid model without securing reciprocity for future events in India.
The speaker argues that Pakistan should leverage its position and demand a reciprocal arrangement for the hybrid model, ensuring equality and fairness within the ICC.
The speaker reiterates their proposal for a reciprocal hybrid model, where future ICC events in India would also adopt a similar arrangement if Pakistan agrees to it for the Champions Trophy.
The speaker emphasizes the importance of securing a written guarantee from the ICC that India would be penalized for not adhering to the agreed-upon hybrid model in future events.
The speaker suggests that this approach could potentially force India to reconsider its position and agree to a reciprocal arrangement, preventing a two-tier system within the ICC.
The speaker predicts that a vote within the ICC on this proposal could favor Pakistan, forcing India to accept the hybrid model for future events.
The speaker highlights the potential benefits for Pakistan if they successfully secure a reciprocal hybrid model, asserting their independence and establishing a precedent for fair treatment within the ICC.
The speaker argues that this approach would be beneficial for cricket as a whole, ensuring a level playing field and promoting a sense of respect and equality among member boards.
The speaker suggests that the BCCI might be willing to accept this arrangement as a “goodwill gesture,” potentially easing pressure from the Indian government.
The speaker highlights the conflicting interests of the Indian government and the BCCI, with the government potentially opposing matches against Pakistan while the BCCI prioritizes financial gains from these high-profile encounters.
The speaker continues to analyze the potential outcomes of the Champions Trophy debate, suggesting that the Indian government might not object to Pakistan not playing in India as long as the BCCI benefits financially from hosting other matches.
The speaker expresses confidence in the viability of the reciprocal hybrid model as a solution, urging the PCB Chairman to adopt a firm stance and negotiate effectively.
The speaker also mentions other potential outcomes, including the possibility of the Champions Trophy being postponed or moved to another country, though emphasizing the financial losses associated with these options.
The conversation shifts back to the political situation in Pakistan, focusing on the events of November 24th and the claims made by PTI regarding the number of supporters injured or killed during protests.
The speaker questions the validity of some PTI claims, suggesting that they may be exaggerating figures for political gain and urging for independent verification of the information.
The speaker analyzes the government’s response to the protests, highlighting their use of force and attempts to discredit PTI.
The speaker also discusses the potential for a judicial inquiry into the events of November 24th, acknowledging the challenges in obtaining accurate information and the possibility of political interference.
The speaker continues to discuss the events of November 24th, specifically addressing the claims made by PTI regarding the alleged firing on the car of PTI leaders.
The speaker dismisses these claims as “nonsense,” asserting that no firing took place and that the PTI leaders were given safe passage.
The speaker calls for an investigation into the use of weapons during the protests, suggesting that footage from safe city cameras could provide evidence.
The speaker also criticizes the government’s rhetoric and calls for a more constructive approach to resolving the political standoff.
The speaker criticizes PTI’s demands for a committee or judicial commission to investigate the events of November 24th, suggesting that these are political tactics rather than genuine attempts to seek justice.
The speaker expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of such inquiries, highlighting the challenges in accessing sensitive information and the potential for political bias.
The speaker argues that the government should focus on addressing the root causes of the political unrest instead of resorting to bans or restrictions on PTI’s activities.
The speaker emphasizes the importance of dialogue and compromise in resolving political differences, urging both sides to find a peaceful solution.
The speaker analyzes a statement made by Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif regarding PTI’s actions, highlighting the government’s hardline stance and their attempts to portray PTI as a threat to national security.
The speaker suggests that this rhetoric is aimed at further isolating PTI and justifying the government’s crackdown on their activities.
The speaker discusses the potential for banning PTI, acknowledging the disadvantages and the likelihood that such a move would backfire by generating sympathy for the party.
The speaker also criticizes the government’s focus on Governor’s Rule, arguing that it is an ineffective solution and would likely face legal challenges.
The speaker continues to discuss the possibility of Bushra Bibi’s arrest, suggesting that it might be a strategic move by the government to control her influence and potentially use her as a bargaining chip in negotiations with Imran Khan.
The speaker argues that Bushra Bibi’s detention could backfire, generating further sympathy for PTI and potentially leading to more unrest.
The speaker highlights the importance of Bushra Bibi and Gandapur in controlling PTI’s supporters and potentially influencing Imran Khan’s decisions, suggesting that their detention could escalate the situation.
The speaker also discusses the potential for restrictions on PTI’s activities, acknowledging the government’s attempts to limit their freedom of movement and assembly.
The speaker analyzes resolutions passed in various assemblies regarding the potential banning of PTI, dismissing them as political maneuvering and emphasizing the ineffectiveness of such bans.
The speaker argues that banning PTI would not address the underlying issues and would likely strengthen the party’s support base.
The speaker highlights the negative consequences of Governor’s Rule, arguing that it would face legal challenges, create further unrest in KP province, and alienate the People’s Party, who are strong advocates for provincial autonomy.
The speaker predicts that the government’s attempts to suppress PTI will ultimately fail, suggesting that dialogue and compromise are the only viable solutions to the political crisis.
The speaker continues to discuss the potential consequences of Governor’s Rule, highlighting the risks of alienating the bureaucracy and provoking further protests and unrest in KP province.
The speaker argues that Governor’s Rule would be ineffective in suppressing PTI’s activities and would likely backfire by strengthening their support base.
The speaker suggests that the judiciary would likely challenge the legality of Governor’s Rule, further complicating the situation.
The speaker emphasizes the importance of addressing the underlying issues fueling the political unrest, arguing that suppression and restrictions will only exacerbate the situation.
The speaker summarizes their predictions regarding the political situation, suggesting that Bushra Bibi might be detained but not formally arrested, and that Imran Khan will eventually return to prominence after a period of negotiation and compromise.
The speaker highlights the shift in power dynamics following the events of November 24th, suggesting that the establishment now holds more influence than Imran Khan.
The speaker analyzes Asifa Bhutto’s statement regarding the threat to Bushra Bibi’s life, suggesting that it could be a strategic move by the People’s Party to position themselves for future collaboration with PTI.
The speaker emphasizes the fluidity of political alliances in Pakistan, highlighting the People’s Party’s attempts to distance themselves from the government’s actions and maintain their options for future political maneuvering.
The speaker continues to analyze the motivations behind Asifa Bhutto’s statement, suggesting that it is a deliberate attempt to create space for potential collaboration with PTI.
The speaker highlights the People’s Party’s strategic positioning within the political landscape, seeking to capitalize on the current instability and potentially form a new alliance with PTI.
The speaker contrasts the People’s Party’s approach with that of the ruling Noon League, suggesting that the People’s Party is more open to negotiation and compromise.
The speaker concludes by emphasizing the dynamic nature of Pakistani politics and the constant maneuvering of different actors seeking power and influence.
The discussion centers around the upcoming Cricket World Cup and the uncertainty of Pakistan’s participation due to India’s reluctance to play in Pakistan.
A “hybrid model” is being considered, where Pakistan’s matches would be held in a neutral venue, while India’s would be held in India. However, Pakistan prefers to host all its matches, as agreed upon in the original contract.
The ICC is facing pressure, especially from broadcasters, as matches between India and Pakistan are crucial for revenue.
The financial implications are significant, with the broadcaster threatening reduced payments if India-Pakistan matches don’t occur. Many ICC member countries are financially dependent on India’s participation.
Najam Sethi proposes a reciprocal hybrid model: If India’s matches involving Pakistan are played in a neutral venue for this World Cup, Pakistan would reciprocate when India hosts future tournaments. This was suggested previously and received positive initial feedback.
Hybrid Model Dispute: A disagreement exists regarding a “hybrid model” for cricket matches involving Pakistan and India. Pakistan proposes accepting the hybrid model for upcoming World Cup matches if India reciprocates in future ICC events hosted by India. This means Pakistan would play some matches in India if India also plays some matches at neutral venues when hosting Pakistan.
Neutral Venue Options: If India refuses the hybrid model, Pakistan suggests their World Cup matches in India could be moved to Bangladesh. This is presented as a financially beneficial solution for Bangladesh.
Pakistan’s Stance: Pakistan’s position is that any rules applied to them for hosting matches should also apply to India when they host. They are willing to play at neutral venues for some matches if India does the same in the future.
ICC’s Role: Pakistan wants the ICC to guarantee that any agreement regarding the hybrid model will be enforced and that penalties will be levied against India if they back out of the agreement. They believe this will force India to accept the reciprocal arrangement.
Potential Outcomes: Pakistan believes they have leverage due to upcoming tournaments they are hosting and feels confident a vote on this issue within the ICC would favor their position. They see this as a win for Pakistan and for cricket as a whole.
Thousands of PTI supporters were allegedly arrested and injured, some fatally, before and during protests around November 24th. PTI claims to have evidence, while the government disputes the figures.
There are conflicting accounts regarding an incident involving firing on the car of Bura B and Gandapur. The government claims they were provided safe passage, while PTI alleges they were attacked.
PTI demands an inquiry or judicial commission into the government’s actions against protesters, alleging excessive force and use of inappropriate weaponry. The government appears reluctant.
There are calls to ban PTI, similar to a resolution passed in the Balochistan Assembly. However, it’s argued that such a ban would be ineffective and potentially counterproductive.
Debate surrounds the possibility of Governor’s rule, with differing opinions on its potential benefits and drawbacks. The current governor’s actions are being closely watched.
The ban on PTI has not diminished their popular support and has not significantly impacted them politically.
Governor’s rule is unlikely to be imposed, as it is believed to have more disadvantages than advantages, including potential internal resistance and bureaucratic pushback.
The judiciary is unlikely to support Governor’s rule, viewing it as unconstitutional and a politically motivated maneuver. The People’s Party is also expected to oppose it due to their stance on provincial autonomy.
Asifa Bhutto’s statements about threats to Imran Khan’s life are interpreted as a strategic move by the People’s Party to distance themselves from the PML-N and position themselves as a potential political ally for Imran Khan in the future.
The People’s Party is attempting to create political space for themselves and exert pressure on the government, similar to how Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman previously positioned himself.
Here is a comprehensive response to your query regarding the key disagreements regarding the Champions Trophy, based on the information provided in the sources:
Disagreement over the Hybrid Model: The sources indicate a disagreement between Pakistan and India regarding the hybrid model for the Champions Trophy. Pakistan initially proposed the hybrid model for the Asia Cup, suggesting that matches involving India be held in a neutral venue due to India’s unwillingness to play in Pakistan [1]. India eventually accepted this model for the Asia Cup, with India’s matches being held in Dubai or Sri Lanka and the remaining matches in Pakistan [2]. However, when it came to the Champions Trophy, Pakistan objected to the hybrid model, arguing that if India wanted a hybrid model, it should be applied equally to both countries [2, 3]. Pakistan proposed that its matches in India during ICC events also be held in a neutral venue, such as Bangladesh [4]. This proposal was met with resistance from India, likely due to concerns about losing hosting rights and potential revenue [4, 5].
Financial Implications and Broadcaster Pressure: The sources reveal that the disagreements are heavily influenced by financial considerations. The Indian broadcaster, holding global rights, has reportedly threatened to reduce payments if India-Pakistan matches don’t occur, putting pressure on the ICC to ensure these matches take place [6]. This financial pressure gives India leverage, as many cricket boards rely on revenue generated from matches involving India [6].
Governmental Influence and Political Tensions: The sources suggest that governmental influence and political tensions between India and Pakistan are significant factors in the disagreements. India cites security concerns and civil unrest in Pakistan as reasons for not playing there [3]. The sources also highlight that the Indian government is particularly sensitive about India playing in Pakistan, viewing it as a foreign policy issue [5]. This governmental stance adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
Possible Resolution and Pakistan’s Position: The sources suggest that Pakistan is pushing for a reciprocal hybrid model where matches involving either India in Pakistan or Pakistan in India are held in neutral venues [4, 7]. This approach aims to ensure fairness and equality while addressing security and political concerns. Pakistan believes that this proposal, if accepted by the ICC, could provide a way out of the deadlock and lead to a successful Champions Trophy [5, 7].
The sources depict the International Cricket Council (ICC) as a key player in the Champions Trophy dispute, stuck mediating between the strong stances of India and Pakistan.
The ICC is responsible for making the final decision on the tournament’s format and venue. [1]
While the sources suggest that India holds considerable sway within the ICC due to its financial clout, the organization aims to reach a resolution that benefits all stakeholders, including broadcasters and participating nations. [2, 3]
The sources highlight the ICC’s role in facilitating dialogue between India and Pakistan, encouraging them to find common ground. [2]
It is expected that the ICC will consider Pakistan’s proposal for a reciprocal hybrid model and potentially put it to a vote among member boards. [4, 5]
The sources indicate that the ICC faces a challenging task. The organization must balance the interests of various stakeholders, including:
The financial implications of the tournament, particularly the broadcaster’s demand for India-Pakistan matches. [2]
The need to maintain the integrity and fairness of the competition. [5]
The importance of upholding the ICC’s own rules and regulations. [5, 6]
The sources imply that the ICC’s decision will have significant implications for the future of international cricket. A fair and balanced outcome could help ease tensions and pave the way for more consistent engagement between India and Pakistan. However, failure to reach a satisfactory resolution could exacerbate existing conflicts and further fracture the cricketing world. [3, 5]
While the sources discuss the disagreements and potential resolutions surrounding the Champions Trophy, they do not explicitly state the outcome of the ICC meeting.
The sources mention that the ICC meeting was adjourned after a short duration and postponed until the following day. [1, 2]
The discussion revolves around the events leading up to the meeting and potential solutions, but there is no information on what transpired in the meeting itself or any decisions made.
To learn about the meeting’s outcome, you would need to consult additional sources that cover developments after the initial postponement.
Allegations Against Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)
The sources, primarily a conversation between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi, outline various allegations made against the PTI, particularly in the context of the events surrounding November 24th. These allegations come from PTI members themselves and paint a picture of alleged government suppression and violence against the party.
Excessive Arrests: Omar Ayub, a PTI leader, claims over 5,000 party members were arrested before November 24th. [1] This suggests a targeted crackdown on PTI in the lead-up to the events.
Violence and Casualties: The sources cite allegations from PTI of shootings, with “hundreds” hit by bullets and 12 confirmed deaths. [1] They claim to have evidence of these casualties. Additionally, they mention interviews on BBC with a doctor who reported an unprecedented number of surgeries performed, further supporting the claim of violence. [1]
Use of Military-Grade Weapons: The PTI accuses the government of using weapons meant for combating terrorism against its members, including snipers. [2] They argue that the use of such weaponry against civilians protesting or engaging in political activity is disproportionate and unjustified.
Suppression of Evidence: PTI challenges the government to release footage from Safe City cameras to prove or disprove the allegations of violence. [2] This implies that the government may be withholding evidence that could shed light on the events and potentially expose their actions.
The sources present these allegations as serious concerns raised by PTI, demanding an inquiry or judicial commission to investigate the events of November 24th. [2] They highlight the need for transparency and accountability from the government in addressing these allegations.
The sources point to a proposed solution to the Champions Trophy venue issue centered around a reciprocal hybrid model. This concept, put forth by Najam Sethi, stems from Pakistan’s objection to the one-sided application of the hybrid model for the Asia Cup, where India’s matches were held in neutral venues while Pakistan hosted the rest.
Here’s the breakdown of the proposed solution:
Equal Application of the Hybrid Model: Pakistan argues that the hybrid model, if used, should apply to both countries equally. This means that not only should Pakistan’s matches in India during ICC events be held in a neutral venue, but also India’s matches in Pakistan should follow the same principle. [1-3]
Neutral Venues for Both India and Pakistan Matches: The sources suggest Bangladesh as a possible neutral venue for Pakistan’s matches in ICC events held in India. This is due to its geographical proximity, making travel for Pakistan relatively easier. [2]
ICC Guarantee and Penalties: Pakistan emphasizes the need for the ICC to provide a guarantee that the reciprocal hybrid model will be enforced for future tournaments. They also call for penalties against India if they refuse to comply at the last minute. This ensures that the agreement is not simply for the upcoming Champions Trophy but sets a precedent for future ICC events. [3]
This proposed solution aims to achieve several objectives:
Fairness and Reciprocity: The reciprocal hybrid model addresses Pakistan’s concerns about the unequal application of the hybrid model, ensuring fairness and equal treatment for both countries. [1, 3]
Addressing Security and Political Concerns: By holding matches in neutral venues, the proposal seeks to alleviate India’s security concerns regarding playing in Pakistan, while simultaneously acknowledging Pakistan’s stance on not playing in India under the current political climate. [2, 3]
Financial Viability: The proposal attempts to balance the financial interests of the ICC and the broadcaster by ensuring the high-revenue-generating India-Pakistan matches take place, even if not on either country’s soil. [4, 5]
Shifting the Burden to the ICC: By making the ICC responsible for enforcing the reciprocal hybrid model and imposing penalties, the proposal aims to reduce the direct conflict between India and Pakistan. [3]
Sethi expresses confidence that this proposal, if presented strongly by Pakistan, could force India and the ICC to accept it. He believes it could lead to Pakistan gaining a strategic advantage, showcasing their firm stance and commitment to fairness. [3, 5] However, it’s important to note that the sources do not provide information on whether this proposal was formally presented at the ICC meeting or the response it elicited.
The sources, mainly focusing on Najam Sethi’s perspective, indicate a complex and evolving stance of the Pakistani government on the hybrid model. While not explicitly stating the official government position, the conversation reveals the following:
Initial Support for the Hybrid Model: During the Asia Cup negotiations, Pakistan, under Sethi’s leadership, proposed the hybrid model as a solution to India’s reluctance to play in Pakistan [1, 2]. This suggests an initial acceptance of the model as a way to ensure the tournament’s viability.
Shifting Position and Demand for Reciprocity: Following the Asia Cup, where India’s matches were held in neutral venues while Pakistan hosted others, Pakistan’s stance shifted. They objected to the one-sided application of the hybrid model for the Champions Trophy [3, 4]. The sources highlight Pakistan’s demand for reciprocity – if India wants its matches in Pakistan played at neutral venues, the same should apply to Pakistan’s matches in India during ICC events [4, 5].
Leveraging the Hybrid Model for Strategic Advantage: Sethi suggests that Pakistan should use the hybrid model as a bargaining chip, pushing for its reciprocal application to gain an advantage in negotiations with India and the ICC [5]. This indicates a view that the hybrid model, while initially seen as a compromise, could be used to level the playing field and assert Pakistan’s position.
Focus on Fairness and Equality: The sources emphasize Pakistan’s focus on fairness and equality in the application of the hybrid model. They argue that a one-sided model undermines the integrity of the competition and creates an imbalance in favor of India [5].
Linking the Hybrid Model with Future ICC Events: Pakistan’s proposal is not limited to the Champions Trophy. They advocate for the inclusion of the reciprocal hybrid model in future ICC tournament contracts, ensuring its long-term implementation [5, 6].
Based on Sethi’s statements, the Pakistani government’s stance appears to have evolved from accepting the hybrid model as a necessary compromise to leveraging it as a tool for achieving fairness and reciprocity in international cricket. The sources suggest a strong belief that the reciprocal hybrid model is crucial for protecting Pakistan’s interests and ensuring a level playing field in future tournaments.
The sources, primarily a discussion between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi, touch upon the potential imposition of Governor’s Rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and outline arguments both for and against it. The context revolves around the political climate following events on November 24th, involving protests and clashes related to PTI.
Arguments for Governor’s Rule:
Controlling PTI’s Mobilization: Sethi suggests that Governor’s Rule could limit PTI’s ability to mobilize large-scale protests or marches. [1] The administration, under the Governor’s control, might be less supportive of such actions, potentially curbing PTI’s political activities. This argument implies that Governor’s Rule could be used to maintain order and prevent disruptions caused by PTI’s mobilization efforts.
Arguments against Governor’s Rule:
Public Backlash and Resistance: The sources highlight that the mood in KP is largely against PTI, and potentially against other major parties like PMLN and PPP. [2] Imposing Governor’s Rule in this environment could further inflame public sentiment, leading to increased resistance, protests, and potentially violent backlash against the government.
Bureaucratic Challenges and Non-Compliance: Sethi notes that the KP bureaucracy is largely sympathetic to PTI and Imran Khan. [2] Governor’s Rule might face significant challenges in enforcing its authority, as the bureaucracy, including the police, might be reluctant to comply with directives that go against PTI’s interests.
Legal and Constitutional Challenges: The sources point out that Governor’s Rule is likely to face legal challenges in court. [2] They argue that the judiciary tends to view Governor’s Rule negatively, seeing it as a politically motivated maneuver rather than a legitimate constitutional measure. This suggests that Governor’s Rule might be deemed unconstitutional and ultimately overturned by the courts.
Lack of Support for Provincial Autonomy Infringement: The discussion highlights that the People’s Party, with its emphasis on provincial autonomy, is unlikely to support Governor’s Rule. [2] They fear setting a precedent that could be used against them in Sindh. This implies that imposing Governor’s Rule in KP would face opposition not only from PTI but potentially from other political parties concerned about safeguarding provincial autonomy.
Sethi concludes that, based on these factors, Governor’s Rule is likely not a viable option. The potential disadvantages, including public backlash, bureaucratic resistance, legal challenges, and political opposition, outweigh the limited benefits of curbing PTI’s mobilization. The sources suggest that the government should explore alternative strategies to address the political situation in KP without resorting to Governor’s Rule, which is perceived as a heavy-handed and potentially counterproductive measure.
Proposed Solution for Cricket Match Dispute: Reciprocal Hybrid Model and Venue Options
The sources, focusing on a conversation between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi, offer insights into potential solutions for the ongoing dispute surrounding India-Pakistan cricket matches, particularly within the context of the upcoming Champions Trophy. While the specific outcome of the ICC meeting regarding the tournament isn’t stated, the sources highlight proposed solutions and potential strategies.
Reciprocal Hybrid Model:
One prominent solution revolves around the concept of a “reciprocal hybrid model” for ICC tournaments [1, 2]. This idea stems from Pakistan’s dissatisfaction with the one-sided hybrid model implemented during the Asia Cup, where India’s matches were held in neutral venues, while Pakistan hosted the remaining games [3, 4].
Under this proposal, if India insists on its matches in Pakistan being played at neutral venues, Pakistan demands the same treatment for its matches scheduled in India during ICC events [1, 2, 5]. This ensures equal application of the hybrid model, addressing Pakistan’s concerns about fairness and reciprocity.
The sources propose Bangladesh as a potential neutral venue for Pakistan’s matches in ICC tournaments hosted by India [2]. Bangladesh’s proximity is cited as a key advantage, making travel more convenient for the Pakistani team and fans.
Pakistan also emphasizes the need for robust guarantees and enforcement mechanisms for the reciprocal hybrid model [5]. This includes:
ICC Guarantee: A formal guarantee from the ICC that the reciprocal hybrid model will be applied in future tournaments, ensuring it’s not a one-off arrangement for the Champions Trophy.
Penalties for Non-Compliance: Clear penalties for India if they back out of the agreement at the last minute. This safeguards Pakistan’s interests and deters potential breaches of the agreement.
Sethi suggests that Pakistan can use this proposal as leverage in negotiations with the ICC and India [5]. By taking a firm stance and demanding fairness, Pakistan could gain a strategic advantage and demonstrate its commitment to a level playing field in international cricket.
Alternative Venues:
Apart from the reciprocal hybrid model, the sources mention alternative venues as potential solutions, though less extensively:
Dubai and Sri Lanka: These locations have been suggested as possible neutral venues for the Champions Trophy if the hybrid model isn’t adopted [6]. Both have hosted ICC tournaments in the past, making them logistically viable options.
Postponement:
While not favored, the sources acknowledge the possibility of postponing the Champions Trophy if the venue dispute remains unresolved [6]. This would be a last resort, considering the potential financial losses for the ICC and the disruption to the cricketing calendar.
Key Considerations:
The sources present these potential solutions alongside various considerations influencing the decision-making process:
Financial Implications: The financial impact on the ICC, broadcasters, and participating nations is a significant factor in venue selection. India-Pakistan matches generate substantial revenue, making their inclusion crucial for the tournament’s commercial success.
Political Climate: The strained political relationship between India and Pakistan undoubtedly plays a role in the venue discussions. Security concerns and governmental restrictions on travel and sporting engagements add complexity to the situation.
ICC’s Role: The ICC’s ability to enforce agreements and ensure fairness is paramount. The success of any proposed solution hinges on the ICC’s willingness to take a strong stance and ensure equitable treatment for both India and Pakistan.
The sources provide a glimpse into the complexities of the venue dispute and highlight potential solutions that could address the concerns of both India and Pakistan. However, it’s crucial to remember that the conversation represents one perspective, and further developments and official statements from the ICC and the respective cricket boards are needed to fully understand the situation’s trajectory.
Potential Consequences of Resolving the Cricket Dispute
The resolution of the cricket dispute between India and Pakistan, particularly concerning the venue for their matches in ICC tournaments, carries several potential consequences, as highlighted in the sources and previous conversation. These consequences extend beyond the immediate outcome of the Champions Trophy and have implications for future tournaments, the financial health of international cricket, and the broader relationship between the two nations.
Impact on Future ICC Tournaments and the Hybrid Model
Establishing a Precedent: The chosen resolution for the Champions Trophy will likely set a precedent for future ICC tournaments. If the reciprocal hybrid model is adopted and successfully implemented, it could become the standard approach for handling India-Pakistan matches, ensuring fairness and a level playing field.
Strengthening or Weakening the ICC’s Authority: The ICC’s handling of this dispute will significantly impact its perceived authority and effectiveness. A firm stance that upholds fairness and enforces agreements would strengthen the ICC’s position as a governing body. Conversely, a weak or biased resolution could undermine its credibility and embolden nations to disregard its decisions in the future.
Financial Ramifications for International Cricket
Revenue Generation and Broadcast Deals: India-Pakistan matches are among the most lucrative in cricket, attracting massive viewership and generating substantial revenue for the ICC, broadcasters, and participating nations. The dispute’s resolution will directly affect these financial aspects.
Positive Outcome: A solution that guarantees India-Pakistan matches, whether through the hybrid model or neutral venues, would safeguard this revenue stream and benefit the financial health of international cricket.
Negative Outcome: If the dispute leads to Pakistan’s withdrawal from the Champions Trophy or the cancellation of India-Pakistan matches in future tournaments, the financial losses would be significant. Broadcasters might renegotiate deals, and the overall value of ICC events could diminish.
Implications for India-Pakistan Relations
Potential for Goodwill or Further Strain: While cricket itself cannot resolve deep-rooted political issues, the handling of this dispute could have symbolic implications for the India-Pakistan relationship.
Opportunity for Positive Gesture: A mutually agreeable solution that prioritizes fairness and respects both nations’ concerns could be perceived as a positive gesture, fostering goodwill and potentially paving the way for dialogue in other areas.
Risk of Heightened Tensions: A contentious or one-sided resolution could further strain relations, fueling animosity and making future cooperation more difficult.
Additional Considerations
Impact on Pakistani Cricket: The outcome will directly affect Pakistan’s ability to host and participate in international tournaments. A favorable resolution, ensuring Pakistan’s participation in ICC events on equal terms, would boost Pakistani cricket and help develop the sport within the country.
Public Sentiment in Both Nations: The resolution will likely evoke strong reactions from cricket fans and the general public in both India and Pakistan. This could influence public opinion and potentially impact political discourse in both countries.
It’s important to acknowledge that these potential consequences are based on analysis of the sources provided and the previous conversation. The actual outcome and its full implications might vary depending on factors not explicitly discussed, such as unforeseen political developments or shifts in the stances of the ICC, BCCI, or the PCB.
Jay Shah’s Role in the Champions Trophy Dispute: A Pakistani Perspective
The sources, recounting a conversation between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi, offer a Pakistani perspective on the Champions Trophy venue dispute and the perceived role of Jay Shah, the BCCI Secretary and influential figure in the ICC. While the sources don’t reveal specific actions taken by Shah regarding the Champions Trophy, they portray him as a key player whose stance and influence significantly impact the situation.
Control over ICC and Asian Cricket: Sethi asserts that Shah effectively controls the ICC due to the BCCI’s financial dominance and influence over other cricket boards, particularly in Asia. He suggests that even without formally becoming the ICC chairman, Shah’s position within the BCCI grants him significant sway over ICC decisions. [1]
Resistance to the Hybrid Model for Pakistan: Sethi recalls past negotiations with Shah regarding the hybrid model during his own tenure as PCB chairman. He claims Shah initially rejected the concept for the Asia Cup, preferring to hold all matches in a neutral venue rather than having some in Pakistan. [2, 3] Sethi implies that Shah’s reluctance stemmed from a desire to protect India’s interests and maintain control over hosting rights for major tournaments. [4]
Potential for Continued Opposition to Reciprocity: Sethi speculates that Shah might resist the proposed reciprocal hybrid model for the Champions Trophy and future ICC tournaments. He believes Shah would prefer to maintain the status quo, where India’s matches are always played in India or neutral venues, giving them a perceived advantage. [1, 5]
Influence on ICC’s Financial Decisions: The sources highlight the ICC’s dependence on revenue generated from India-Pakistan matches, primarily driven by the Indian broadcast market. [1] Sethi suggests that Shah, representing the BCCI, could leverage this financial influence to pressure the ICC into adopting decisions favorable to India, potentially at the expense of Pakistan’s interests.
Interpreting Sethi’s Perspective:
It’s important to note that Sethi’s statements about Shah’s role are presented without direct evidence or confirmation from other sources. His perspective might be influenced by his own experiences negotiating with Shah and the broader political context surrounding India-Pakistan cricket relations.
Additional Insights from Previous Conversation:
The previous conversation about potential consequences of the dispute’s resolution further underscores Shah’s potential influence. The discussion highlights the ICC’s need to balance financial considerations with fairness and the risk of its authority being undermined if it’s perceived as favoring one nation over another. Shah’s position within the BCCI and his potential control over the ICC’s financial levers make him a crucial figure in this balancing act.
Need for Further Information:
To fully understand Shah’s role in the Champions Trophy dispute, it’s necessary to consider information from additional sources, including official statements from the ICC, the BCCI, and Shah himself. The sources provided offer a valuable but limited Pakistani perspective, and further research is needed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the situation.
While the sources do not explicitly state the ICC’s final decision regarding the Champions Trophy, they provide extensive discussion about the factors influencing the decision-making process and the various perspectives involved.
Lack of Definitive Outcome: The provided excerpts from “Pasted Text” primarily focus on a conversation between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi about potential solutions and strategic considerations surrounding the Champions Trophy venue dispute. They do not disclose the actual outcome of the ICC meeting or any official announcements regarding the tournament’s fate. [1-10]
Emphasis on Potential Solutions and Strategies: The conversation heavily emphasizes potential solutions, particularly the “reciprocal hybrid model,” and Pakistan’s negotiating strategies. Sethi, drawing from his past experience, outlines how Pakistan could leverage this model to ensure fairness and reciprocity in ICC tournaments. However, the discussion remains speculative and doesn’t confirm whether the ICC ultimately adopted or rejected this proposal. [1-10]
Focus on Influencing Factors: The sources highlight various factors that likely influenced the ICC’s decision, including the financial implications of India-Pakistan matches, the political sensitivities surrounding the dispute, and the pressure exerted by powerful figures like Jay Shah. However, they stop short of revealing the ICC’s final judgment based on these considerations. [1-10]
Conclusion:
Based on the information provided in the sources, the ICC’s decision regarding the Champions Trophy remains undisclosed. The conversation between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi provides valuable insights into the factors at play and potential solutions discussed, but it lacks concrete details about the ICC’s final determination. To ascertain the actual outcome, it would be necessary to consult additional sources, such as official statements from the ICC, the BCCI, or the PCB.
Political Implications of PTI’s Actions: A Pakistani Perspective
The sources, featuring a discussion between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi, primarily center on the Champions Trophy venue dispute and offer limited direct insights into the broader political implications of PTI’s actions. However, they provide glimpses into the political landscape in Pakistan and the potential consequences of PTI’s strategies, particularly in the context of their confrontational approach towards the government.
Public Sentiment and Potential for Unrest: Sethi notes that public sentiment in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), a PTI stronghold, is currently against the party. He suggests that this disillusionment stems from PTI’s actions, potentially referring to their protests and calls for street mobilization. This negative sentiment could pose challenges for PTI’s future political prospects and potentially lead to further unrest if the party continues its confrontational tactics.
Government Response and Crackdown: The sources describe the government’s response to PTI’s protests, including allegations of excessive force, arrests, and the potential imposition of Governor’s Rule in KP. Sethi analyzes the government’s motives and the potential implications of these actions, suggesting that the government aims to curtail PTI’s influence and prevent further mobilization. He also speculates on the effectiveness and legality of these measures, highlighting the potential for legal challenges and the possibility of further inflaming public anger.
Impact on Political Stability and Dialogue: The sources indirectly touch upon the broader political implications of PTI’s actions and the government’s response. The confrontational dynamics between the two sides contribute to political instability and hinder potential dialogue or compromise. Sethi’s analysis of the situation suggests that both PTI and the government are engaged in a power struggle, with potential consequences for the functioning of democratic processes in Pakistan.
Connecting to Previous Conversation:
The previous discussions about the Champions Trophy dispute highlight the broader context of political tension between India and Pakistan. This tension, reflected in the cricket world, likely spills over into other areas, influencing domestic politics and shaping the actions of political parties like PTI.
Limitations of the Sources:
It’s crucial to recognize that the sources primarily focus on a specific conversation and offer a limited perspective on the political implications of PTI’s actions. The analysis presented is primarily Sethi’s interpretation of the situation, and other political analysts or stakeholders might hold differing views. To gain a more comprehensive understanding, it would be beneficial to consult additional sources, including statements from PTI leaders, government officials, and independent political commentators.
Need for Further Context:
The sources lack specific details about the particular PTI actions being discussed. To fully grasp the political implications, it’s essential to understand the specific events or policies that have sparked controversy and shaped public perception. Further research and analysis are necessary to connect these actions to the broader political landscape in Pakistan and assess their long-term consequences.
Potential Consequences of a PTI Ban in Pakistan: A Speculative Analysis
The sources, primarily focused on the Champions Trophy dispute and other political matters, don’t explicitly discuss a potential PTI ban or its consequences. However, Sethi’s analysis of the political landscape in Pakistan, particularly regarding PTI’s confrontational approach and the government’s crackdown, offers some insights that could be extrapolated to speculate on the potential fallout of such a ban.
Exacerbated Public Anger and Unrest: Sethi points out that public sentiment in KP, a PTI stronghold, is already turning against the party. Banning PTI could further alienate its supporters and fuel resentment against the government, potentially leading to more intense protests, civil disobedience, and even violence. The sources highlight previous instances of unrest in KP, suggesting a pre-existing potential for escalation.
Increased Political Polarization: A PTI ban would likely deepen the existing political polarization in Pakistan. It could be perceived as an undemocratic move to silence opposition, pushing PTI supporters further away from mainstream politics and potentially encouraging more radical or extremist viewpoints. This polarization could make dialogue, compromise, and constructive political engagement even more challenging.
Legal Challenges and Questions of Legitimacy: Sethi emphasizes the potential legal ramifications of the government’s actions, particularly regarding the imposition of Governor’s Rule in KP. He suggests that such measures could face legal challenges and be deemed unconstitutional, further undermining the government’s legitimacy and fueling accusations of authoritarianism. A PTI ban would likely face similar legal scrutiny and could be challenged in court, prolonging the political conflict and raising questions about the rule of law in Pakistan.
International Criticism and Reputational Damage: Banning a major political party like PTI could attract international criticism and damage Pakistan’s reputation on the global stage. It could be viewed as a suppression of democratic rights and freedom of expression, potentially harming Pakistan’s relationships with other countries and impacting its standing in international organizations.
Limited Effectiveness in Curbing PTI’s Influence: While a ban might temporarily restrict PTI’s formal political activities, it’s unlikely to completely eradicate the party’s influence or quell its support base. PTI could potentially operate underground or find alternative ways to mobilize its followers, potentially through social media or other informal channels. The ban could also backfire, turning PTI into a martyr and further strengthening its narrative of victimhood and resistance.
Important Considerations:
Speculative Nature of the Analysis: It’s crucial to emphasize that the sources do not directly address a PTI ban, and this analysis is based on extrapolations from Sethi’s broader commentary on Pakistani politics. The actual consequences of a ban could differ significantly depending on various factors, including the specific circumstances surrounding the ban, the public’s reaction, and the international community’s response.
Need for Broader Context: Understanding the potential consequences requires considering the broader political landscape in Pakistan, the specific actions and rhetoric of PTI that might lead to a ban, and the government’s overall approach to dealing with political dissent. A more comprehensive assessment necessitates information beyond the provided sources.
Importance of Diverse Perspectives: This analysis primarily reflects Sethi’s perspective, which might be influenced by his own political affiliations or biases. Consulting additional sources, including statements from PTI leaders, government officials, and independent political analysts, would provide a more balanced and nuanced understanding of the potential consequences of a PTI ban.
The sources offer a nuanced discussion of the potential imposition of Governor’s Rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), analyzing both the perceived benefits and drawbacks from Najam Sethi’s perspective.
Arguments in Favor of Governor’s Rule:
Controlling PTI’s Mobilization: Sethi suggests that Governor’s Rule could effectively limit PTI’s ability to mobilize supporters for protests or other disruptive actions. By transferring administrative control to the Governor, the government could potentially hinder PTI’s logistical capabilities and prevent large-scale gatherings. [1] This is particularly relevant in the context of the government’s concerns about PTI’s calls for street mobilization and potential unrest. [1, 2]
Preventing Further Unrest: The government’s rationale for considering Governor’s Rule stems from a desire to maintain order and prevent further escalation of protests or violence. [1] The sources highlight the volatile situation in KP, with allegations of excessive force used against PTI supporters and the potential for continued unrest. [1, 2] Governor’s Rule is presented as a way to stabilize the situation and restore control.
Arguments Against Governor’s Rule:
Ineffectiveness in Curbing PTI’s Influence: Sethi argues that while Governor’s Rule might temporarily disrupt PTI’s organized activities, it won’t eliminate the party’s influence or diminish its support base. He suggests that PTI could operate through informal channels, like social media, or even gain sympathy as a perceived victim of government oppression. [3] This viewpoint aligns with the broader discussion about the potential ineffectiveness of banning political parties.
Exacerbating Public Anger and Backlash: Imposing Governor’s Rule could further alienate PTI supporters and intensify anti-government sentiment in KP. [3] Sethi highlights the already existing negative sentiment towards PTI in the region and warns that Governor’s Rule could backfire, leading to more resistance and protests, potentially targeting the Governor’s House itself. [3]
Legal Challenges and Constitutional Concerns: Sethi emphasizes the potential legal and constitutional hurdles associated with Governor’s Rule. [3] He cites past instances where the judiciary viewed Governor’s Rule unfavorably, perceiving it as a political maneuver rather than a legitimate administrative measure. [3] This legal uncertainty could lead to prolonged court battles, further destabilizing the political landscape.
Lack of Support for Limiting Provincial Autonomy: The sources suggest that imposing Governor’s Rule could be seen as an infringement on provincial autonomy, a principle that the People’s Party, another major political force, strongly advocates for. [3] Sethi speculates that the People’s Party would likely oppose Governor’s Rule based on this principle, further complicating the government’s efforts to implement it. [3]
Conclusion:
The sources present a complex picture of the potential consequences of Governor’s Rule in KP. While it’s presented as a tool for controlling PTI and preventing unrest, Sethi argues that its effectiveness is questionable and warns of potential negative consequences like further instability, public backlash, and legal challenges. The discussion highlights the delicate political situation in Pakistan and the government’s difficult choices in navigating dissent and maintaining order.
The sources, primarily a conversation between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi, focus heavily on the Champions Trophy venue dispute and don’t explicitly detail specific allegations against PTI in a broader context. However, within the discussion of the political climate surrounding PTI’s actions, several accusations emerge:
Violent Protests and Destruction: The sources mention PTI protests leading up to November 24th and the government’s subsequent response. Shahbaz Sharif, characterized as a “fun player” in politics by Sethi, is quoted accusing PTI of destructive behavior, stating they “fired bullets of destruction” and have an agenda to “destroy everything.” [1] This statement, though lacking specific details, paints PTI as a force of chaos and instability.
Exaggerated Claims of Casualties and Arrests: Sethi casts doubt on PTI’s claims regarding the scale of violence and arrests during their protests. He contrasts PTI’s assertions of 5000 arrests and numerous bullet injuries, including 12 martyrs, with his own understanding, suggesting the numbers are inflated for political gain. He encourages media investigation into PTI’s claims, specifically urging them to examine Safe City camera footage for evidence. [2, 3]
Staging Incidents for Publicity: Sethi dismisses the alleged firing on the car of “Bura B and Gandapur Saheb,” asserting it was staged for publicity. He claims there was an “understanding” beforehand and points to their safe passage as evidence that no real threat existed. He further suggests Bushra Bibi’s participation was calculated to garner attention and fuel controversy. [2-4]
Manipulating Public Sentiment: The sources describe a political landscape where PTI is accused of exploiting public sentiment for political ends. Sethi suggests PTI’s calls for protests and potential unrest are designed to generate sympathy and portray themselves as victims of government oppression. He specifically highlights the potential for unrest in KP, where public sentiment is already turning against PTI, and warns of their ability to mobilize supporters through emotional appeals. [5, 6]
Important Considerations:
Sethi’s Perspective: It’s crucial to recognize that the allegations against PTI are presented from Sethi’s viewpoint. He positions himself as an experienced political analyst who can discern PTI’s strategies and motives. However, his interpretations could be influenced by his own political leanings.
Lack of Specific Evidence: The sources offer limited concrete evidence to substantiate the allegations against PTI. Sethi relies heavily on his analysis and understanding of political dynamics, encouraging further investigation but not presenting conclusive proof.
Need for Multiple Perspectives: To fully understand the accusations against PTI, it’s essential to consider other viewpoints, including PTI’s own statements and independent assessments of their actions. The provided sources offer a glimpse into one perspective on the political landscape but lack a comprehensive overview.
BCCI’s Influence in the Cricket Dispute: Money, Power, and Control
The sources, primarily a discussion between Syed Anaz and Najam Sethi about the Champions Trophy venue dispute, highlight the significant role the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) plays in international cricket, particularly in influencing decisions within the International Cricket Council (ICC).
Financial Dominance: Sethi repeatedly emphasizes the BCCI’s financial clout as a key factor in its power. He states, “BCCI is inside, whether the Chairman is there or not, ICC is in control, okay, there is money, right” [1]. This financial dominance stems from India’s massive cricket fanbase and lucrative broadcasting rights. The sources note that the broadcaster for the Champions Trophy is Indian, holding global rights, and that the BCCI generates substantial revenue from full-house stadiums during matches held in India [1, 2]. This financial power translates into influence over other cricketing boards, particularly those struggling financially. Sethi explains, “the rest of the boards except for Australia and Pakistan and England, the rest of the boards are poor, their condition is bad…if India does not play with them then they cannot sail their boat because Money comes in on the matches of India” [3]. This creates a situation where the BCCI can pressure other boards to align with its interests.
Political Influence within the ICC: Sethi asserts that the BCCI effectively controls the ICC, regardless of who holds the chairmanship. He suggests that Jai Shah, the head of the ACC and likely future ICC chairman, already wields significant influence within the ICC [1]. This control, according to Sethi, allows the BCCI to sway decisions in its favor, often using its financial leverage to secure votes from other boards [1].
Impact on the Hybrid Model Proposal: The sources highlight how the BCCI’s influence affects the proposed hybrid model for the Champions Trophy, where some matches would be held in Pakistan and others in a neutral venue. Sethi recounts his negotiations with Jai Shah, revealing that the BCCI initially rejected the model for the Asia Cup, preferring to hold all matches outside Pakistan [4]. He suggests that Shah was reluctant to accept any model that involved playing matches in Pakistan, potentially due to political pressure from the Indian government. Sethi argues that the BCCI’s stance stems from a desire to protect its revenue streams, as matches held in neutral venues like Dubai would likely generate more revenue than those in Pakistan [2].
Potential for Exploiting the Hybrid Model: While Sethi advocates for the hybrid model as a compromise, he also expresses concerns that the BCCI could exploit it to its advantage. He proposes that the ICC should impose the same hybrid model on future tournaments held in India if the BCCI refuses to play in Pakistan for the Champions Trophy [5]. This reciprocal arrangement, he believes, would ensure fairness and prevent the BCCI from dictating terms unilaterally.
The Indian Government’s Role: The sources also touch upon the Indian government’s role in influencing the BCCI’s stance on playing in Pakistan. Sethi notes that the Indian government is hesitant to allow the BCCI to engage in matches with Pakistan due to political sensitivities [2]. This suggests a complex interplay between the BCCI, the Indian government, and the ICC in determining the future of cricket relations between India and Pakistan.
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
The provided text is an excerpt from the first assembly speech of the new Chief Minister (CM) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Sohail Afridi, following his appointment. Afridi begins by passionately declaring his devotion to Imran Khan, the leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, stating he would rather die for Khan than in any war. He expresses deep gratitude to Khan for selecting him, a middle-class worker with no political family background, emphasizing his origins in the tribal districts and his pride in being a Pakistani and a Pashtun. Afridi criticizes the historical mindset that has marginalized tribal people, promising to work for their rights and development, and also thanks other party leaders, social media wings, and journalists who stood for truth and justice. Finally, he affirms his unwavering loyalty to Imran Khan and the PTI ideology, vowing to fight for Khan’s and his wife’s release from jail, and warns against shifting Khan’s jail location without proper consultation.
KPK Chief Minister Declares Loyalty to Imran Khan
The speech by the newly appointed Chief Minister (CM) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Sohail Afridi, delivered in the Assembly, serves primarily as a strong declaration of loyalty to Imran Khan and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) ideology, coupled with a commitment to addressing the historical grievances of the tribal districts [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 1, 2].
Dedication to Imran Khan and Personal Background
The CM expresses profound gratitude to his leader, Janaab Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi, who he describes as the most popular and acceptable leader in Pakistan and the heartbeat of 250 million people.
Afridi repeatedly emphasizes his humble origins and commitment to meritocracy, contrasting himself with dynastic political figures:
He identifies himself as an ordinary worker (“adna worker”) from a middle-class family with no political lineage; neither his brother, father, uncle, nor grandfather is involved in politics.
He explicitly states that he did not become Chief Minister via a “slip” (“parchi se wazir-e-ala nahi bana”) but reached his position through hard work.
He proudly mentions that his name does not carry the family association of “Zardari,” “Bhutto,” or “Sharif”.
A central theme is his declared love for the PTI leader, stating a poetic resolve: “I will not die in any war now… I have decided this time I will die in the love of Imran” (“ishq Imran mein mara jaa’un ga”). He calls himself an “ashique” (lover) of Imran Khan, contrasting himself with those who merely “do politics”.
Focus on Tribal Areas and Historical Marginalization
Sohail Afridi highlights his identity and connection to the tribal districts (“qaba’ili azla”). He states he is a Pakistani first, a Pashtun, and proudly identifies as tribal.
He details the historical neglect and exploitation of these regions:
He notes the “destruction” (“hashr nashar”) inflicted on the tribal districts over the past 78 years.
He criticizes the long-standing mindset, which he believes was validated by certain press conferences following his announcement, that assumes tribal people should be barred from the mainstream.
He asserts that the prevailing mindset has historically been that tribal people are meant “only and only for dying,” kept behind, and their rights, minerals, and finances are perpetually subject to seizure by those who have governed them for 78 years.
He praises Imran Khan for realizing the deprivation of the merged districts (“marj azla”) and giving him the opportunity, leading to a wave of happiness and gratitude among the entire tribal community, irrespective of their political affiliation.
Commitment to Principles and Action Plan
The CM outlines the vision, inspired by Imran Khan, to eliminate social evils such as caste systems, political discrimination, sectarianism, and the divide between the wealthy and the poor. He stresses that leadership is only given to those who work hard, have a clear ideology, and work on the ground, rather than those who possess wealth.
Afridi makes strong commitments regarding the PTI leadership currently facing incarceration:
He assures the workers and Pakistani citizens (including overseas Pakistanis) that he will immediately begin taking steps and actions for the release of Imran Khan.
He notes that Imran Khan’s wife, Bushra Bibi, is a non-political, veiled woman kept in jail solely to pressure Imran Khan.
He sends a message to all PTI prisoners (“asiran”) who are unjustly detained, assuring them that he will take action to secure their release.
Afridi declares himself the “champion” of protest politics (“ehtijaji siyasat ka… champion hoon”), emphasizing that since he has nothing to lose (no money, cars, or bungalows), he will not abandon his principles.
He confirms that he will follow all directions from the party and Imran Khan, promising to continue leading from the front.
Acknowledgments and Warning
The CM offers thanks to various groups:
He thanks the PTI party leadership (including Senators, MNAs, and Chairmen) for their role in the election.
He offers high tribute (“khiraj-e-tahseen”) to the PTI social media, calling it “Pakistan’s largest establishment”.
He honors journalists who stood by truth and justice, enduring oppression, losing their jobs, and serving jail time.
He specifically pays tribute to martyred journalist Arshad Sharif, who accepted martyrdom rather than bowing before the oppressors.
Afridi expresses immense gratitude to his colleague and former CM, Ali Amin Gandapur, for his timely and graceful submission of his resignation at Imran Khan’s request.
Furthermore, he issues a severe public warning regarding Imran Khan’s safety and confinement:
He states that if Imran Khan’s jail location is shifted without consultation with his family or political party, the CM warns that “the whole of Pakistan will act” (“pura Pakistan kaam karengay”).
Critique of Regime Change
Afridi provides a definitive political assessment of the events leading to the change in government:
He maintains that Pakistan and KPK only experienced peace, development, and prosperity during the three years when Imran Khan was the Prime Minister.
He asserts that a plan was hatched in London (“London Plan”) resulting in a “Regime Change Operation” that toppled Imran Khan’s democratic government.
This regime change, he claims, was triggered by Imran Khan’s refusal to recognize Israel, his refusal to say “Yes Boss,” and his firm stance encapsulated by “Absolutely Not”.
He also claims the London Plan sought to eliminate PTI from KPK, but failed because the people—young and old, men and women—are united by their love for Imran Khan and his ideology.
He concludes with the declaration that “Khyber Pakhtunkhwa belongs to Imran Khan, and only Imran Khan’s will shall prevail here”.
KPK Chief Minister Declares Unwavering Support for Imran Khan
The newly appointed Chief Minister (CM) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Sohail Afridi, utilized his first speech in the Assembly to issue a powerful declaration of unwavering support for Imran Khan [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 1, 2].
This support is expressed through profound personal loyalty, affirmation of Khan’s ideology, active political commitment to his release, and a strong defense of his conduct during the regime change operation.
I. Personal and Emotional Loyalty
CM Afridi positioned himself not merely as a political ally but as a dedicated follower and “lover” of Imran Khan:
Profound Gratitude: He expressed extreme gratitude to his leader, Janaab Imran Ahmed Khan Niazi, calling him the most popular and acceptable leader in Pakistan and the “heartbeat of 250 million people”.
The “Ashique” Declaration: Afridi stated that he considers himself an “ashique” (lover) of Imran Khan, contrasting this with those who merely “do politics”. He captured his loyalty in a poetic resolve: “I will not die in any war now… I have decided this time I will die in the love of Imran” (“ishq Imran mein mara jaa’un ga”).
Proof of Meritocracy: The CM consistently credited Imran Khan for his rise to power, emphasizing that he is an “ordinary worker” (“adna worker”) from a middle-class family with no political lineage (no Zardari, Bhutto, or Sharif connection). He asserted that he became CM through hard work, not through a “slip” (“parchi se wazir-e-ala nahi bana”), serving as a “living proof” (“zinda saboot”) that Khan only grants opportunities to those with clear ideology, hard work, and ground experience, not merely wealth.
II. Ideological and Political Adherence
Afridi repeatedly stressed his alignment with Khan’s vision and promised total subservience to his directives:
KP Under Khan’s Will: The CM confidently declared that “Khyber Pakhtunkhwa belongs to Imran Khan, and only Imran Khan’s will shall prevail here”.
Following Directives: He pledged to follow all guidelines (“hidayat”) that come from the party and his leader, confirming he would continue to lead from the front, just as he did before attaining this position.
Commitment to Principles: He asserted that his humble background means he has nothing to lose (no cars, bungalows, or money) and therefore will not abandon his “purpose and ideology”. He emphasized that he would instantly resign if his leader asked him to leave the position.
III. Commitment to Action for Release and Safety
A major focus of the speech was the CM’s commitment to take action regarding Imran Khan’s legal situation and confinement:
Immediate Action for Release: Afridi assured PTI workers and Pakistani citizens (including overseas Pakistanis) that he would immediately begin taking “steps and actions for the release of Imran Khan”.
Support for Family and Prisoners: This commitment extends to Khan’s wife, Bushra Bibi, who he noted is a non-political, veiled woman kept in jail solely to pressure Khan. He also pledged action for the release of all PTI prisoners (“asiran”) who are unjustly detained.
Warning Regarding Safety: The CM issued a serious public warning concerning Khan’s safety in jail. He declared that if Imran Khan’s jail location is shifted without consultation with his family or political party, the CM warned that “the whole of Pakistan will act” (“pura Pakistan kaam karengay”).
IV. Defense Against Regime Change
CM Afridi vehemently defended Imran Khan’s tenure and attributed his downfall to his principled stand against external pressure:
Principled Stand: He maintained that the “Regime Change Operation,” hatched in a “London Plan,” was triggered by Imran Khan’s refusal to recognize Israel, his refusal to say “Yes Boss,” and his firm stance of “Absolutely Not”.
Success of PTI Ideology in KPK: He asserted that the London Plan failed in its objective to eliminate PTI from KPK because the people—including the youth, the elderly, men, and women—are united by their love for Imran Khan and his ideology.
Recognition of Tribal Rights: He also lauded Imran Khan for realizing the historical deprivation of the tribal districts (“marj azla”) and giving him the opportunity, which brought a wave of happiness and gratitude across the entire tribal community.
Chief Minister Afridi on Tribal Rights and Historical Injustice
The issue of Tribal Areas Rights was a central and emotionally charged component of the inaugural speech delivered by the newly appointed Chief Minister (CM) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Sohail Afridi, in the Assembly [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
Afridi, who identifies strongly with the region, used his platform to highlight historical injustices and celebrate the recognition of these areas by his party leader, Imran Khan [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
CM Afridi’s Identity and the Tribal Cause
CM Afridi explicitly established his connection to the tribal districts (“qaba’ili azla”), stating:
He is foremost a Pakistani, then a Pashtun, and proudly identifies as “tribal” (“qaba’ili”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
He emphasized that his background as an “ordinary worker” from a middle-class family, without dynastic political ties, makes him a representative of the hard-working people, reinforcing his credibility to speak on behalf of the marginalized [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 1].
Historical Marginalization and Exploitation
The CM detailed the profound and long-standing historical neglect and systemic exploitation of the tribal districts (referred to as “qaba’ili azla” and “marj azla” or merged districts) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
He offered a scathing critique of the mindset that governed these areas for decades:
78 Years of Destruction: He pointed out the “destruction” (“hashr nashar”) inflicted upon the tribal districts over the past 78 years [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
Exclusion from Mainstream: He criticized the prevailing mindset that suggested tribal people should be barred from the “main stream” [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
Role Defined as Sacrificial: Afridi claimed that the long-standing mindset dictated that tribal people were meant “only and only for dying” (“sirf aur sirf marne ke liye hain”) and were perpetually intended to “remain behind” (“hamesha peeche rehne ke liye hain”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
Systematic Seizure of Assets: He argued that the authorities governing them for 78 years have historically sought to “always seize their minerals, their rights, and their finances” (“unke ma’daniyat par unke huqooq par unke paison par hamesha unhone qabza karna hai”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
Recognition and Empowerment by Imran Khan
Afridi repeatedly praised Imran Khan for being the leader who finally recognized and acted upon the deprivation of the merged districts, thereby providing a platform for their rights [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
Awareness of Deprivation: He stated that Khan recognized the “deprivation” (“mehroomiyon”) of the tribal people and knew that the merged districts had been left behind (“peeche reh chuke hain”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
CM Selection as Recognition: Afridi celebrated his own appointment as CM, stating that Khan’s decision to give him the opportunity led to a wave of happiness (“khushi ki lehr”) and gratitude across the entire tribal community, regardless of their political party affiliation [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2, 3].
Countering the Mindset: The CM noted with sorrow that the same historical mindset—that tribal people should be kept behind—was validated through press conferences following his name announcement, underscoring the ongoing battle for their rights (“huqooq ki haq talfi”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2].
Afridi’s speech framed his leadership position as a direct challenge to the historical injustices faced by the tribal areas, secured through the support and vision of Imran Khan [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 2, 6].
KPK Chief Minister Afridi Outlines PTI Challenges
The speech by Chief Minister (CM) Sohail Afridi outlined a landscape rife with profound political challenges currently facing the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), and Pakistan as a whole.
These challenges range from systemic political warfare and attempts at democratic subversion to immediate legal and security threats concerning the party leadership.
I. Systemic and Existential Challenges
CM Afridi began his tenure acknowledging that he was entrusted with the responsibility at a critical juncture, stating that PTI, KPK, and Pakistan face “extremely serious circumstances” and are “confronted with various types of challenges” (“mukhtalif qism ke challenges ka samna hai”).
The primary systemic challenge he identified was the “Regime Change Operation,” which he asserted was hatched under a “London Plan” and resulted in the toppling of Imran Khan’s democratic government. According to Afridi, this operation was triggered by Khan’s principled stands, including:
Refusal to say “Yes Boss”.
Refusal to recognize Israel.
His firm stance encapsulated by “Absolutely Not”.
Furthermore, a specific objective of the London Plan was to “eliminate Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa”.
II. Legal and Security Challenges for Leadership
The CM identified the unjust incarceration of PTI leadership and workers as an immediate and severe political challenge requiring urgent governmental action:
Imran Khan’s Release: Afridi pledged to immediately begin taking “steps and actions for the release of Imran Khan”.
Bushra Bibi’s Detention: He highlighted the challenge posed by the confinement of Imran Khan’s wife, Bushra Bibi, who he described as a non-political, veiled woman kept in jail solely to pressure Imran Khan.
Release of Prisoners: Afridi promised to take action for all PTI prisoners (“asiran”) who are currently in “unjust custody” (“nahq qaid mein hain”).
Security Warning: The CM issued a public warning regarding the safety of Imran Khan, stating that if his jail location is shifted without consultation with his family or political party, “the whole of Pakistan will act” (“pura Pakistan kaam karengay”).
III. Regional and Governance Challenges
Afridi noted challenges specific to the governance and security of KPK:
Return of Terrorism: He cited that the change of regime led to efforts to “bring back terrorism” (“dihshat gard”) to the region. He noted that under Imran Khan’s premiership, KPK and Pakistan experienced peace, development, and prosperity only during those three years.
Social Reform: The CM acknowledged the challenge of fulfilling Imran Khan’s vision to eliminate social evils such as caste systems, political discrimination, sectarianism, and the divide between the wealthy and the poor.
Combating Historical Mindsets: As a tribal representative, he faces the challenge of overcoming the long-standing, 78-year-old mindset that attempts to keep tribal people marginalized, excluded from the “main stream,” and perpetually deprived of their rights and resources.
IV. Opposition and Personal Challenges
Afridi also referenced the political difficulties posed by opposition figures and their efforts to undermine his appointment:
He noted campaigns launched against him in the days leading up to his speech, though he could not respond earlier as he was busy with the election.
He also alluded to the persistent “mindset” that utilized press conferences following his announcement to validate the historical marginalization of the tribal communities and contest their rights.
Despite these challenges, Afridi maintained that he is the “champion” of protest politics (“ehtijaji siyasat ka… champion hoon”) and would not abandon his ideology, as he has nothing material to lose.
KPK Chief Minister Pledges Imran Khan’s Release and Security
The issue of the Release of Imran Khan is a top priority and a central political challenge addressed by the newly appointed Chief Minister (CM) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Sohail Afridi, in his inaugural speech [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 6, 7].
The CM made firm commitments to take immediate action and issued a severe warning regarding the former Prime Minister’s safety and confinement.
I. CM’s Commitment to Action
CM Afridi made an explicit and direct promise to his party workers and the public regarding securing Imran Khan’s release:
Immediate Steps: Afridi addressed Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) workers, the people of Pakistan, and overseas Pakistanis (whom he called Pakistan’s valuable asset) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 6]. He gave them assurance that he would “immediately begin taking steps and actions for the release of Imran Khan” (“Imran Khan ki rehai ke liye… qadam utha iqdamat uthane shuru kar dene hain”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 6].
Political Motivation for Detention: The CM implied that Imran Khan’s detention and the confinement of his wife are politically motivated. He stated that the former Prime Minister’s wife, Bushra Bibi, who is a non-political, veiled woman, is being kept in jail “only and only to pressure Imran Khan” (“sirf aur sirf Imran Khan ko jhukane ke liye jail mein rakha gaya hai”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 6].
Promise to Other PTI Prisoners: Afridi extended his commitment to all other PTI prisoners (“asiran”) who are in “unjust custody” (“nahq qaid mein hain”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 6]. He stated that he would undertake actions for them that would lead to results, even if previous attempts had been slow or ineffective [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 7].
II. The CM’s Role as a “Champion”
Afridi framed his personal capacity to fight for Khan’s release by emphasizing his commitment to protest politics and his lack of material concerns:
Protest Champion: He declared himself the “champion” of protest politics (“ehtijaji siyasat ka… champion hoon”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 7].
Lack of Fear: He reasoned that he can lead this struggle effectively because he has “nothing to lose” (“khone ke liye kuch nahi hai”)—neither cars, bungalows, nor money—and is not motivated by the lure of his office [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 7]. This personal conviction suggests he will pursue forceful political action for Khan’s freedom.
III. Warning Regarding Security and Movement
In a strong political move, CM Afridi issued a public and serious warning against any unauthorized movement of Imran Khan while he is incarcerated:
Condition for Shift: The CM stated that there were reports that Imran Khan was being shifted from his jail location “without any consultation with his family and party” [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 8].
Threat of National Action: Afridi declared from the Assembly floor that if anyone shifts Imran Khan “without the consultation of his family, without the consultation of his political party, the whole of Pakistan will act” (“pura Pakistan kaam karengay”) [NEW YOUTUBE SOURCE, 8].
نہیں مروں گا اب کسی جنگ میں نہیں مروں گا اب کسی جنگ میں یہ سوچ لیا میں اب کی بار عشق عمران میں مارا جاؤں گا بسم اللہ الرحمن الرحیم جی جی جیے جیے جیے جیے جیے جیوے جیے جیے جیوے جیوے جیوے جیوے جیوے جیوے بسم اللہ الرحمن الرحیم ایاک نعبد وایاک نستعین نہیں مروں گا اب کسی جنگ میں نہیں مروں گا اب کسی جنگ میں یہ سوچ لیا میں میں اب کی بار عشق عمران میں مارا جاؤں گا میں اپنے لیڈر اپنے قائد پاکستان کے سب سے مقبول ترین لیڈر پاکستان کے سب سے قبول ترین لیڈر 25 کروڑ عوام کی دلوں کی دھڑکن جناب عمران احمد خان نیازی صاحب کا انتہائی مشکور مشکور و ممنون ہوں کہ اس نے مجھ جیسے ایک ادنی ورکر ایک مڈل کلاس فیملی سے تعلق رکھنے والا بندہ جس کا نہ بھائی سیاست میں ہے نہ والد سیاست میں ہے نہ چچا سیاست میں ہے نہ دادا سیاست میں ہے اور نہ ہی فیملی کا اس طرح بیک گراؤنڈ ہے اور میرے نام کے ساتھ نہ زرداری ہے نہ بٹو ہے نہ شریف ہے اپنے ان بازوں پر یہاں تک پہنچاؤں بازوں پر اپنی یہاں تک پہنچاؤں محنت کر کے پہنچاؤں پرچی سے وزیر اعلی نہیں بنا میں جماعت اور تص میں میں اپنے لیڈر اپنے قائد کا اس لیے بھی شکر گزار ہوں کہ میرا تعلق قبائلی اضلاح سے ہیں میں سب سے پہلے پاکستانی ہوں میں پختون ہوں اور میں فخر کرتا ہوں کہ میں قبائلی ہوں قبائلی اضلاع کا جو حشر نشر انہوں نے 78 سال سے کر رکھا ہے اور جس سوچ کے ساتھ جس مائنڈ سیٹ کے ساتھ مجھے افسوس سے کہنا پڑ رہا ہے کہ میرے نام کے ساتھ افریدی ہے اس وجہ سے جس دن میرا نام اناؤنس ہوا اس مائنڈ سیٹ نے جو ہے پریس کانفرنسز کے ذریعے ان قبائلوں کی تصدیق کی ان قبائلوں کے حقوق کی حق تلفی کیونکہ یہ ایک مائنڈ سیٹ 78 سال سے بنا ہوا ہے کہ یہ لوگ مین سٹریم میں نہیں ائیں گے ان کا مائنڈ سیٹ صرف یہی ہے کہ قبائل ہمیشہ صرف اور صرف مرنے کے لیے ہیں کہ قبائل ہمیشہ پیچھے رہنے کے لیے ہیں قبائلوں پر ہمیشہ ان کے معدنیات پر ان کے حقوق پر ان کے پیسوں پر ہمیشہ انہوں نے قبضہ کرنا ہے یہ اس مائنڈ سیٹ کے 78 سال سے ہم پر حکومت کر رہے تھے۔ میرا لیڈر میرا قائد صرف خیبر پختونخواہ کا نہیں صرف پاکستان کا نہیں وہ پوری دنیا کا مقبول ترین لیڈر ہے۔ ان کو ہمارے قبائلوں کی محرومیوں کا احساس تھا۔ وہ جانتا تھا کہ ہمارے جو مرج اضلاح ہیں وہ پیچھے رہ چکے ہیں۔ تو انہوں نے میرا نام دیا میں ان کا جتنا شکریہ ادا کروں ان کا جتنا شکریہ ادا کروں کم ہے اور ہماری جتنی بھی قبائلی ہیں اپ ان میں یہ خوشی کی لہر پچھلے تین چار دنوں سے دیکھ رہے ہیں کہ پورا قبائل نکلا ہے چاہے وہ کسی بھی پارٹی کا ہے وہ اس فیصلے پر خوش ہے اور عمران خان کا شکریہ ادا کر رہے ہیں پاکستان تحریک انصاف کا شکریہ ادا کر رہے ہیں جناب اسپیکر ہم نے بحیثیت قوم ہم نے بحیثیت پاکستان کا شہری یہ ذات پات یہ پولیٹیکل ڈسکریمنیشن یہ فرقہ واریت یہ امیر امیر اور غریب کا فرق یہ نکالنا ہے جس طرح میرے قائد میرے لیڈر جناب عمران خان صاحب کا ویژن ہے کہ وہ صرف اور صرف نام کے ساتھ ایک بڑا سا شریف یا بھٹو یا زرداری لکھنے سے کوئی لیڈر نہیں بنتا بلکہ محنت کر کے جس نے محنت کی ہو جس نے گراؤنڈ پر ورک کیا ہو جس کا نظریہ کلیئر ہو اسی کو صرف موقع دیتا ہے پیسوں والے کو موقع نہیں دیتا اور میں زندہ ثبوت ہوں اس چیز کا میں اپنے لیڈر اپنے قائد جناب عمران خان صاحب کے ساتھ ساتھ اپنی پارٹی کی لیڈرشپ کا جو مسلسل تین چار دن سے یہاں پر ہمارے ساتھ رہے اور انہوں نے اس الیکشن میں بھرپور کردار ادا کیا ان سب کا بھی شکریہ ادا کرتا ہوں چاہے وہ ہماری تنظیم ہے پاکستان تحریک انصاف کی چاہے سینیٹرز ہیں چاہے ایم این ایز ہیں اور چاہے چیئرمینز ہیں سب کا دل سے شکریہ ادا کرتا ہوں میں اپنی پاکستان کی سب سے بڑی اسٹیبلشمنٹ کا جو ہماری پاکستان تحریک انصاف کی سوشل میڈیا ہے ان کا بھی شکریہ ادا کرتا ہوں اور ان پر بھی جو ہے خراج تحسین پیش کرتا ہوں میں ان تمام صحافیوں کا جو پاکستان میں حق اور سچ کے ساتھ کھڑے ہوئے جنہوں نے حق اور سچ کے ساتھ کھڑے ہونے سے اپنی نوکریاں گوائیں ظلم اور ستم اور بربریت برداشت کی جیلیں کاٹی ان سے اواز چھیننے کی کوشش کی گئی لیکن اس کے باوجود وہ حق اور سچ کے ساتھ کھڑے رہے میں ان کو بھی خراج تحسین پیش کرتا ہوں میں پاکستان کے سب سے بڑے صحافی پاکستان میں ایک ایسے صحافی جس نے شہادت قبول کی لیکن ظالموں کے اگے سر نہیں جھکایا شہید ارشد شریف کو بھی خراج تحسین پیش کرتا ہوں اس کے ساتھ ساتھ ہمارے تقریبا 17 18 سال سے دوست بھائی اور ابھی ہمارے وزیراعلی خیبر پختون خواہ جناب علی امین گنڈاپور صاحب کا انتہائی مشکور و ممنون ہوں۔ کیونکہ ہم پوری دنیا کو کہتے تھے۔ کہ جب بھی موقع ایا۔ اور عمران خان صاحب نے ہمارے اس بھائی سے قربانی مانگی تو ایک سیکنڈ کی دیر نہیں کرے گا اس قربانی سے دریغ نہیں کرے گا یہ علی امین بھائی جس گریس کے ساتھ اپ نے استعفی دیا اس کے بعد انہوں نے وہ استعفی ملنے سے انکار کیا اس کے بعد اپ نے دوبارہ استعفی دیا انہوں نے کہا سائن غلط ہے اپ نے اج ایک دفعہ پھر اسمبلی کے فلور پر کہا کہ میں نے استعفی دیا ہے اور عمران خان کے کہنے پر دیا ہے وہ میرا لیڈر ہے ہم اپ کو ایک دفعہ پھر خراج تحسین پیش کرتے ہیں علی جو میرے خلاف چار پانچ دنوں سے کمپین چلا چونکہ ہم الیکشن میں مصروف تھے ان کو میں جواب نہ دے سکا تو کچھ اشعار عرض ہیں اپ کے وہ ایک سمندر کھنگالنے میں لگے ہوئے ہیں۔ ہماری کمیاں نکالنے میں لگے ہوئے ہیں۔ وہ جن کی اپنی لنگوٹیاں تک پٹی ہوئی ہے ہماری پگڑی اچھالنے میں لگے ہوئے ہیں۔ میں اپنے لیڈر اپنے قائد جناب عمران خان صاحب کو اج یہ باور کرانا چاہتا ہوں اس فلور سے اس کو یہ پیغام دینا چاہتا ہوں انتہائی عاجزی کے کہ عمران خان صاحب میں اپ کا عاشق ہوں ہم اپ سے عشق کرتے ہیں اس سے پہلے شاید اپ نے لوگ دیکھے ہوں گے جو سیاست کرتے تھے اج پہلی دفعہ اپ عاشق دیکھ رہے ہیں ہم عشق کرتے ہیں اپنے لیڈر اپنے قائد تو جناب عمران خان صاحب تو جناب عمران خان صاحب اپ نے جس طرح مجھے میری قوم کو قبائلیوں کو پختونوں کو پورے پاکستان کو جو عزت بخشی جو شعور دیا جو بہادری ان میں ڈالی تو میں اپ کو یہ یقین دلاتا ہوں کہ خیبر پختون خواہ عمران خان کا ہے اور یہاں پر صرف عمران خان کی چلے گی انشاء اللہ تعالی جناب اسپیکر میرے لیڈر میرے قائد جناب عمران خان صاحب نے اس وقت مجھ پر اعتماد اور یقین کیا جس وقت پاکستان تحریک انصاف پر خیبر پختونخواہ پر پاکستان پر انتہائی سنگین حالات ہیں اور مختلف قسم کے چیلنجز کا سامنا ہے لیکن سب سے پہلے میں اپنے کارکنان کو پاکستان تحریک انصاف کے جتنے ورکرز ہیں پاکستان کی جتنی عوام ہے چاہے وہ پاکستان میں ہیں یا ہمارے اوورسیز پاکستانی جو پاکستان کا قیمتی اثاثہ ہے ان کو یقین دلاتا ہوں کہ عمران خان کی رہائی کے لیے میں نے اج سے جو ہے قدم اٹھا اقدامات اٹھانے شروع کر دینے ہیں انشاء اللہ تعالی عمران خان کے ساتھ ساتھ ان کی اہلیہ بشرا بی بی جو ایک غیر سیاسی اور پردہ دار خاتون ہیں ان کو صرف اور صرف عمران خان کو جھکانے کے لیے جیل میں رکھا گیا ہے اس کے ساتھ ساتھ ہمارے جتنے بھی پاکستان تحریک انصاف کے اسیران ہیں جو اس وقت ناحق قید میں ہیں ان سب کو یہ پیغام دیتا ہوں انتہائی عاجزی کے ساتھ کہ انشاء اللہ تعالی اپ کا یہ بھائی اج سے جو ہے اپ کے لیے وہ اقدامات اٹھائے گا جو اس سے پہلے ہم میں ہم نے یا کوتاہی کی یا اٹھائی اس کا نتیجہ نہیں نکلا یا جہاں تک پہنچے ہیں اس سے اگے لے کے جاؤں گا انشاء اللہ تعالی زندہ باد زندہ باد زندہ بادی زندہ باد زندہ باد جناب اسپیکر جناب اسپیکر ایا ہے ائے گا حسین ایا ہے زندہ ائے گا ایا ہے زندہ ائے گا جناب اسپیکر عمران خان کی رہائی کے لیے اپ کو پتہ ہے کہ میں احتجاجی سیاست کا الحمدللہ چیمپئن ہوں۔ صبر کوی حوصلہ کوائی میں احتجاجی سیاست کا الحمدللہ چیمپئن ہوں کیونکہ مجھے میرے پاس کھونے کے لیے کچھ نہیں ہے نہ گاڑیاں ہیں نہ بنگلے ہیں نہ پیسے ہیں نہ اس کرسی کے لالچ ہیں کیونکہ جس دن میرے لیڈر میرے قائد نے کہا کہ یہ کرسی نہیں تو اس اس طرح لات دوں گا اور ادھر پڑی ہوگی انشاءاللہ تو کوئی یہ نہ سوچے تو کوئی یہ نہ سوچے تو کوئی یہ نہ سوچے کہ اج میں اس منصب پر اگیا ہوں اور چار پانچ گاڑیاں اگے پیچھے ہوں گی اور چار پانچ لوگ مجھے سلوٹ کریں گے اور اس تخت و تاج کو دیکھ کر اس شاہانہ لائف کو دیکھ کر میں اپنے مقصد و نظریے سے ہٹ جاؤں گا یہ اپ کی بھول ہے انشاء اللہ تعالی جیسا میں تھا ایسا میں ہوں ایسا میں رہوں گا انشاء اللہ تعالی جناب اسپیکر پارٹی کی طرف سے جو بھی ہدایات ائیں اپنے لیڈر اپنے قائد کی طرف سے جو بھی ہدایات ائی انشاءاللہ تعالی جیسے پہلے فرنٹ پر لیڈ کیا تھا اب بھی فرنٹ پہ لیڈ کروں گا انشاء اللہ تعالی جناب اسپیکر کچھ دنوں سے یہ چل رہا ہے کہ میرے لیڈر میں رکھا ہے جناب عمران خان صاحب کو وؤٹ اینی کنسلٹیشن یر فیملی اینڈ پارٹی اس کی جیل کو شفٹ کیا جا رہا ہے میں اج یہاں سے اعلان کرتا ہوں وان کرتا کرتا ہوں کہ اگر عمران خان صاحب کو اس کی فیملی کے کنسلٹیشن کے بغیر اس کے پولیٹیکل پارٹی کے کنسلٹیشن کے بغیر کسی نے ادھر سے ادھر بھی کیا پورا پاکستان کام کریں گے انشاء اللہ تعالی سرکار جناب اسپیکر میرا لیڈر میرا قائد جناب عمران خان صاحب جب اس ملک کا وزیراعظم تھا خیبر پختونخواہ نے صرف ان تین سالوں میں امن دیکھا تھا پاکستان نے صرف ان تین سالوں نے امن ترقی اور خوشحالی دیکھی تھی لیکن بدقسمتی سے ایبسولیوٹلی ناٹ بولنے کے بعد لیکن بدقسمتی سے اسرائیل کو تسلیم نہ کرنے کے بعد لیکن بد قسمتی سے یس بوس نہ کہنے کے بعد لندن پلین میں ایک پلان بنا اور ریجیم چینج اپریشن ہوا اور میرے لیڈر میرے قائد جناب عمران خان صاحب صاحب کی جمہوری حکومت کو گرایا گیا۔ جناب اسپیکر اسی لندن پلان میں خیبر پختونخواہ سے پاکستان تحریک انصاف کو ختم کرنے کا پلان بھی بنایا گیا۔ کیسے ختم کرتے؟ یہاں کے نوجوان یہاں یہاں کے بچے یہاں کے بوڑھے یہاں کی عورتیں سب کے سب صرف اور صرف عمران خان سے محبت کرتے ہیں اور عمران خان کے نظریے کو مانتے ہیں باقی ایک چیز کو نہیں مانتے تو انہوں نے کوشش کی یہاں پر دوبارہ سے دہشت گرد لائے ہم نے خیبر سے لے کر باجاواڑ وزیرستان تک ترغرب بٹ گرام کوہستان تک ڈی ائی خان ڈان ٹانگ تک چترال تک بنیر شانگلہ ان سب جگہوں پر امن پسون کیے اور اس قوم کو بتایا جو
The text comprises transcripts of various discussions and news reports surrounding the Al-Qadr Trust case and the subsequent conviction of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. The conversations involve legal experts, politicians, and journalists debating the legality and fairness of the verdict, exploring the evidence presented, and discussing potential appeals. The core issue centers on allegations of corruption, misuse of authority, and money laundering involving a £190 million settlement. Reactions to the verdict are sharply divided, with some celebrating justice and others denouncing it as politically motivated. The discussions also touch upon broader political implications and the state of Pakistani justice.
Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and the Al-Qadir Trust Case Study Guide
Quiz
Instructions: Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.
What was the primary accusation against Bani PTI in the £190 million reference case?
What was the relationship between Malik Riaz and the Al-Qadir Trust case?
How did the government present the initial agreement for the £190 million to the cabinet? What was controversial about this method?
What was the role of Bushra Bibi in the Al-Qadir Trust?
What specific legal arguments did Faisal Vawda use to support his claim that Bani PTI would be found guilty?
What were the sentences given to Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi, respectively?
What was the court’s decision regarding Al-Qadir University?
What was PTI’s response to the verdict and what course of action did they announce?
How did the stock market react to the announcement of the verdict?
What comparisons were drawn between this case and previous corruption allegations against Nawaz Sharif and his family?
Answer Key:
Bani PTI was accused of receiving a £190 million settlement from the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) meant for the Pakistani government, misusing his authority to gain personal benefits, and hiding the truth from the cabinet.
Malik Riaz was a real estate tycoon who allegedly received favorable treatment and land allotments in exchange for transferring the £190 million settlement to the Pakistani government and settling a liability he had with the Supreme Court.
The agreement was presented in a sealed envelope, claiming confidentiality due to a supposed agreement with the UK government. This method was controversial because it bypassed typical cabinet discussion and transparency.
Bushra Bibi, Bani PTI’s wife, served as a trustee of the Al-Qadir Trust and was accused of being complicit in the corruption scheme, potentially using her influence and experience to secure illicit deals.
Faisal Vawda argued that the case was an “open and shut” case due to the clear misuse of authority, lack of cabinet approval for the agreement, and evidence of personal benefit obtained by Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi.
Bani PTI was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and fined ₹10 lakh, while Bushra Bibi was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and fined ₹5 lakh.
The court ordered Al-Qadir University to be brought under government control.
PTI denounced the verdict as politically motivated and vowed to challenge it in the High Court. They also announced plans for protests and condemned the government’s actions.
The stock market reacted positively to the verdict, with a significant rise of 1000 points, indicating renewed business confidence in the government’s policies.
Supporters of the verdict drew parallels with allegations against Nawaz Sharif, highlighting the alleged misuse of authority, hidden financial transactions, and acquisition of properties through illicit means in both cases. Critics, however, contested these comparisons and argued for the innocence of Bani PTI.
Essay Questions:
Analyze the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defense in the £190 million reference case. What evidence was presented by each side? Evaluate the strength of each argument.
Discuss the role of political motivations in the Al-Qadir Trust case. To what extent did political factors influence the investigation, trial, and verdict? Consider the perspectives of both PTI and the government.
Examine the implications of the verdict on the future of PTI and Pakistani politics. How might this case impact public perception of the party and its leadership? Consider potential scenarios for the upcoming elections.
Analyze the portrayal of the Al-Qadir Trust case in the media. How did different media outlets present the case and its key players? Did the media coverage contribute to or challenge existing political narratives?
Explore the potential legal challenges PTI could raise in their appeal against the verdict. What legal arguments might they present to overturn or reduce the sentences? Assess the likelihood of success for their appeal based on legal precedents and the evidence presented.
Glossary of Key Terms:
Al-Qadir Trust: A charitable trust founded by Bani PTI with Bushra Bibi as a trustee.
£190 Million Reference Case: The legal case against Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi concerning the alleged misappropriation of a £190 million settlement from the UK’s NCA.
National Crime Agency (NCA): The UK’s law enforcement agency responsible for tackling serious and organized crime.
Malik Riaz: A Pakistani real estate tycoon implicated in the Al-Qadir Trust case.
Open and Shut Case: A legal case with seemingly overwhelming evidence that points towards a clear verdict.
Misuse of Authority: Using one’s official position for personal gain or to benefit specific individuals.
Cabinet Approval: The process by which a government body approves proposals and decisions before they are implemented.
Sealed Envelope: A method of presenting confidential information, often used in this case to bypass usual transparency procedures.
Conflict of Interest: A situation where an individual’s personal interests could improperly influence their decisions or actions in an official capacity.
Political Victimization: Accusations of using legal proceedings to target political opponents rather than pursuing genuine justice.
High Court Appeal: The legal process of challenging a lower court’s verdict in a higher court.
Stay Order: A court order that temporarily halts a legal proceeding or the enforcement of a judgment.
Prosecution: The legal team responsible for presenting evidence and arguments against the accused in a criminal trial.
Defense: The legal team representing the accused in a criminal trial.
Mujah Kararay: A term used by PTI to describe their planned protests and rallies against the verdict.
Mega Corruption: Large-scale corruption involving significant sums of money and high-ranking officials.
Kickback: A bribe or illicit payment given in exchange for favorable treatment or access to contracts.
Documentary Evidence: Written or recorded materials presented as evidence in a legal case.
Witness Testimony: Oral statements given by individuals with knowledge of the facts related to a case.
Conviction: A legal determination that a person is guilty of a crime.
Acquittal: A legal determination that a person is not guilty of a crime.
Sentence: The punishment imposed by a court on a person convicted of a crime.
Fine: A monetary penalty imposed as part of a criminal sentence.
Imprisonment: A custodial sentence where a person is confined to a prison for a specified period.
Political Bugbear: A persistent political issue or problem that is frequently raised and used to attack opponents.
Narrative: A story or account of events, often used to explain complex situations and influence public opinion.
Public Perception: The way in which the general public views a particular issue, person, or organization.
Briefing Doc: Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi Sentencing in the £190 Million Reference Case
Date: January 17th, 2025
Summary: This briefing doc analyzes the reactions and commentary surrounding the sentencing of Bani PTI (Imran Khan’s wife) and Bushra Bibi in the £190 million reference case. The court found them guilty of corruption and corrupt practices, sentencing Bani PTI to 14 years imprisonment and Bushra Bibi to 7 years. This decision has sparked outrage from PTI supporters who claim political victimization, while government officials and legal experts affirm the court’s just ruling in a high-profile corruption case.
Key Themes and Ideas:
Corruption and Misuse of Authority: The core of the case revolves around allegations that Bani PTI, in collusion with others, misused her husband’s position as Prime Minister to illegally acquire land and funds for the Al-Qadir University Trust. The court found evidence of “corrupt practices” and “misuse of authority” which led to their conviction.
“This is the biggest robbery in Pakistan till date. This cannot be hidden by playing the religion card.”– Senator Faisal Bada
Political Victimization vs. Rule of Law: PTI supporters vehemently claim that the case is politically motivated, intended to target Imran Khan and his family. However, government officials and legal analysts emphasize that the trial was conducted fairly, with ample opportunity for defense, and the decision is based on concrete evidence.
“This is a criminal case which is being investigated. After the investigation is done you can in a reference sent to him by a court, I have tried this for more than a year now.”– Law Minister Azam Nazir Tar
Impact on PTI and Muzakarat: The sentencing has dealt a significant blow to PTI, intensifying the ongoing political turmoil. PTI leaders have announced plans to challenge the verdict in the High Court, while their participation in the Muzakarat (political negotiations) remains uncertain. Some analysts believe this conviction will weaken PTI’s position and bargaining power in the talks.
“This decision will not end the government and PTI. Both of them want Bani of PTI jail. Stay inside, from today this fun will stop. Drama and fun are expected from January 20. They feel disappointed on applying.”– [Source]
Public Perception and Implications: The case and its verdict are deeply polarizing public opinion. While some celebrate the conviction as a victory against corruption, others express concern over the perceived targeting of political opponents. The long-term impact on Pakistan’s political landscape and the fight against corruption remains to be seen.
Important Facts:
Sentences and Fines:Bani PTI: 14 years imprisonment, Rs 10 lakh fine
Bushra Bibi: 7 years imprisonment, Rs 5 lakh fine
Al-Qadir University Trust: The court ordered the university to be brought under government control.
Key Evidence: Documentary evidence, witness testimonies (including from former PTI cabinet members), and financial records presented by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) solidified the prosecution’s case.
Notable Quotes:
Faisal Chaudhary (PTI Lawyer): “They say that they support today’s decision and today is the darkest day… There is a case that someone was punished for giving benefits, they questioned Hassan Nawaz who bought the property, where did he get 9 billion for that… Today is the best day for Imran Khan, politically considered another means of targeting.”
Sharjeel Memon (PPP Leader): “The ways in which from PTI leader Imran Khan for years he has been raining down on all his opponents, thieves, and trying to create a narrative by calling him a dacoit… Pakistanis were telling the whole public that yes, he is the only honest person in that country.”
Law Minister Azam Nazir Tar: “It is very unfair to link this thing with politics. It is appropriate that the governance of countries should be based on one law. The police work under the law. This is a criminal case in that regard.”
Next Steps:
Monitor PTI’s legal challenge to the verdict in the High Court.
Observe the impact of this sentencing on the political landscape and the Muzakarat process.
Analyze public reaction and expert commentary to gauge the long-term implications for Pakistan’s political system and the fight against corruption.
FAQ: The Al-Qadir Trust Case and Its Implications
What is the Al-Qadir Trust Case?
The Al-Qadir Trust Case, also known as the £190 million case, involves allegations of corruption and illegal land acquisition against former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi. It revolves around a settlement with the UK’s National Crime Agency where funds recovered from a property tycoon, Malik Riaz, were transferred to Pakistan. The accusation is that Khan and Bibi, through the Al-Qadir Trust (linked to Al-Qadir University), misused their authority to obtain benefits from this settlement and acquire land illegally.
What was the verdict in the case?
A Pakistani court found Imran Khan guilty and sentenced him to 14 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakh. Bushra Bibi was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 5 lakh. Additionally, the court ordered the government to take control of Al-Qadir University.
Why is this case considered significant?
This case is considered highly significant due to several factors:
High-Profile Individual: It involves a former Prime Minister and his wife, making it a highly publicized and politically charged case.
Mega Corruption: The alleged financial sum involved (£190 million, approximately Rs 70 billion) marks it as one of the largest corruption scandals in Pakistan’s history.
Political Implications: The verdict has led to heightened political tensions and protests, with PTI supporters alleging political victimization and the government emphasizing the prevalence of law.
What are the main arguments presented by the prosecution?
The prosecution argued that Khan and Bibi misused their authority to benefit personally from the settlement with the UK’s National Crime Agency. They pointed to irregularities in the cabinet’s approval process for the settlement, the transfer of valuable land to Malik Riaz’s sons, and the subsequent acquisition of land for Al-Qadir University as evidence of corrupt practices.
What is the defense’s stance?
Imran Khan and his supporters maintain their innocence and claim that the case is politically motivated. They argue that there is no evidence of personal gain from the settlement and that the procedures followed were within legal bounds. They criticize the prosecution for relying on speculation and political biases instead of concrete evidence.
What is the potential impact of this verdict on Pakistani politics?
The verdict is likely to further escalate political tensions between the current government and PTI. Khan’s supporters have already staged protests, and there are concerns about potential unrest. The case will likely be a focal point in the upcoming elections and could significantly influence the political landscape.
What are the next steps in the legal process?
Imran Khan’s legal team has announced their intention to challenge the verdict in the High Court. They aim to highlight legal flaws in the trial process and contest the evidence presented. The appeals process is likely to be lengthy and drawn out, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.
What is the significance of the public debate surrounding the case?
The public debate surrounding this case reflects the deep polarization within Pakistani society. While some view the verdict as a victory for accountability and justice, others perceive it as an act of political vendetta. The conversation underscores broader concerns about corruption, transparency, and the rule of law in Pakistan.
Bani PTI Corruption Conviction and Sentencing
On December 18, 2022, a Pakistani court reserved its decision in the £190 million case against Bani PTI, postponing the announcement of the verdict three times before finally delivering it. [1, 2] The court found Bani PTI guilty of corruption and corrupt practices and sentenced him to 14 years in prison and a fine of Rs 10 lakh. [1-3] Bushra Bibi, his wife, was also found guilty and sentenced to seven years in prison and a fine of Rs 5 lakh. [1-3] The court ordered Al-Qadir University, which was linked to the case, to be brought under government control. [1, 2]
Several sources stated that the case was considered an “open and shut” case, indicating that the evidence against Bani PTI was strong and a conviction was highly likely. [1, 3-5] The prosecution successfully proved its case, presenting documentary evidence that Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi were involved in corrupt practices. [6-9]
PTI supporters and members reacted with disappointment and outrage, claiming that the decision was politically motivated and that Bani PTI was being targeted. [10-13] They argued that there was no evidence of financial corruption or crime proceeds. [10] They also claimed that the trial was rushed and that justice was not served. [7, 10] Some PTI members, like Faisal Vada, who were previously part of the cabinet, expressed satisfaction with the verdict, stating that the evidence against Bani PTI was clear. [5, 14, 15]
The court’s decision has significant implications for PTI, as it disqualifies Bani PTI from holding public office for 10 years. [16] The case also adds to the growing list of legal challenges faced by PTI and its leadership. [12] PTI has announced that they will challenge the verdict in the High Court, seeking to overturn the conviction and the sentences. [1, 7, 8, 12]
The Al-Qadir Trust Case: Imran Khan’s £190 Million Conviction
The £190 million case, also known as the Al-Qadir Trust case, revolved around allegations that former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, misused their authority during his time in office [1-20]. The case involved a settlement between the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) and the Pakistani government regarding funds recovered from a property tycoon, Malik Riaz, in a money laundering investigation [6, 8, 10, 11, 16, 19, 21, 22]. The NCA determined these funds belonged to the Pakistani government and should be returned [6, 10, 11, 16].
Here are the key events and allegations related to the £190 million:
Cabinet Approval and Alleged Misrepresentation: Shahzad Akbar, then an advisor to Imran Khan, negotiated the settlement with the NCA [8, 11, 22]. The agreement was presented to the Pakistani cabinet for approval in a sealed envelope, allegedly without prior discussion or transparency [3, 6, 8, 11, 22, 23]. Several cabinet members later claimed they were unaware of the details and that Imran Khan had pushed for approval without proper deliberation [3, 6, 8, 11, 22, 23].
Transfer of Funds to Malik Riaz: The £190 million, equivalent to approximately 59 billion rupees at the time [10, 22], was initially intended to be deposited into a Pakistani government account [11]. However, the funds were allegedly diverted to an account associated with Malik Riaz, the same individual from whom the NCA had recovered the money [3, 6, 8, 10, 16, 19, 22]. This transfer was allegedly facilitated by Imran Khan and was used to settle part of a Supreme Court fine imposed on Malik Riaz related to the Bahria Town Karachi project [6, 10, 16].
Al-Qadir Trust and Land Acquisition: The prosecution alleged that Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi formed the Al-Qadir Trust and used the diverted funds to acquire hundreds of kanals of land for the trust’s university [2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 16, 24, 25]. Bushra Bibi, a close friend of Fara Gogi (who was allegedly involved in corrupt land dealings during Imran Khan’s tenure), became a trustee of the Al-Qadir Trust [16, 25, 26]. Critics questioned the legitimacy of the trust, the value of the land acquired, and the lack of significant progress in developing the university [2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 16, 24, 25].
Conviction and Sentencing: The court found Imran Khan guilty of corruption and corrupt practices, specifically for misusing his authority to benefit Malik Riaz by directing the £190 million to his account and receiving land in return for the Al-Qadir Trust [2-5, 16, 27]. Imran Khan was sentenced to 14 years in prison and fined Rs 10 lakh [2-5, 15]. Bushra Bibi was also convicted and sentenced to seven years in prison and fined Rs 5 lakh [2-5, 15].
The £190 million case became a significant political controversy in Pakistan, with PTI supporters denouncing the verdict as politically motivated and a conspiracy to target Imran Khan [7, 14, 18, 28]. They argued that there was no evidence of Imran Khan personally benefiting financially from the funds [7, 28]. However, the court’s decision was based on the misuse of authority and the facilitation of a transfer that ultimately benefited Malik Riaz, contradicting the initial intent for the funds to be returned to the Pakistani government.
The Al-Qadir Trust: Corruption and Land Acquisition
The Al-Qadir Trust, central to the £190 million corruption case against former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi, was allegedly used as a vehicle for illicit financial gain and land acquisition. The trust, with Bushra Bibi as a trustee, was purportedly established for educational purposes, specifically for the development of Al-Qadir University. However, the prosecution in the case successfully argued that the trust was a sham, designed to mask corrupt practices.
Here’s what the sources reveal about the Al-Qadir Trust:
Origins and Purpose: While the stated purpose of the trust was to establish a university focusing on Islamic studies and research, critics questioned its legitimacy and the lack of transparency surrounding its operations. [1-3] The sources don’t offer specific details about the trust’s founding date or its initial structure.
Land Acquisition: The Al-Qadir Trust acquired hundreds of kanals of land, allegedly as part of a quid-pro-quo arrangement with Malik Riaz. [2, 4] The prosecution argued that this land was transferred in exchange for Imran Khan using his authority to direct the £190 million recovered by the NCA to Malik Riaz’s account, effectively settling a portion of a Supreme Court fine imposed on him. [5, 6]
Lack of Progress and Financial Irregularities: Despite the acquisition of valuable land, there was little evidence of substantial progress in developing the university. [3] Some sources mention the existence of a few departments and a limited number of students, suggesting a lack of genuine commitment to the trust’s educational goals. [3, 7] The sources also highlight that the trust lacked a clear source of income and was heavily reliant on external funding, raising concerns about its financial sustainability. [8]
Connection to Fara Gogi: Bushra Bibi’s close friend, Fara Gogi, was implicated in corrupt land dealings during Imran Khan’s tenure as Prime Minister. [9] The prosecution suggested that Gogi’s involvement in land acquisition for the Al-Qadir Trust further pointed towards a pattern of corrupt practices. [10]
Government Control: Following the guilty verdict in the £190 million case, the court ordered the Al-Qadir University to be brought under government control. [11] This action suggests the court’s recognition of the trust’s involvement in illegal activities and its intention to prevent further misuse of the acquired assets.
The Al-Qadir Trust case, as revealed through the sources, highlights the alleged misuse of power, financial irregularities, and lack of transparency that characterized Imran Khan’s administration. The trust’s involvement in the £190 million scandal served as a key piece of evidence in the corruption charges brought against him and Bushra Bibi, ultimately contributing to their convictions.
Imran Khan’s Al-Qadir Trust Corruption Case
The corruption case against former Prime Minister Imran Khan, centered around the Al-Qadir Trust and the misappropriation of £190 million, resulted in his conviction and a 14-year prison sentence. His wife, Bushra Bibi, was also convicted and sentenced to seven years. This case, considered “open and shut” by many observers, exposed a pattern of corrupt practices involving abuse of power, financial irregularities, and a lack of transparency within Imran Khan’s administration.
Here are the key elements of the corruption case:
Cabinet Approval in a “Sealed Envelope”: Shahzad Akbar, then an advisor to Imran Khan, negotiated a settlement with the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) to recover £190 million linked to Malik Riaz, a property tycoon. The agreement was presented to the Pakistani cabinet for approval in a sealed envelope, allegedly without prior discussion or disclosure of its contents. This lack of transparency raised immediate concerns about the legitimacy of the deal. Several cabinet members later testified that they were unaware of the details and that Imran Khan had pressured them to approve it without proper scrutiny.
Diversion of Funds to Malik Riaz: The £190 million, intended for the Pakistani government, was instead directed to an account associated with Malik Riaz, the individual from whom the funds were initially recovered. This diversion, allegedly orchestrated by Imran Khan, allowed Riaz to settle a portion of a Supreme Court fine related to his Bahria Town Karachi project. This transfer of funds, contradicting the original purpose of the NCA settlement, formed the basis of the corruption charges.
Al-Qadir Trust as a Vehicle for Personal Gain: The prosecution successfully argued that the Al-Qadir Trust, with Bushra Bibi as a trustee, was established as a front to conceal corrupt activities. The trust acquired hundreds of kanals of land, allegedly as a quid-pro-quo for Imran Khan’s facilitation of the £190 million transfer to Malik Riaz. Despite the acquisition of this valuable land, there was little evidence of actual progress in developing the Al-Qadir University, the trust’s stated purpose.
Connection to Fara Gogi and Land Dealings: The prosecution highlighted Bushra Bibi’s close friendship with Fara Gogi, who was implicated in corrupt land dealings during Imran Khan’s time in office. Gogi’s alleged involvement in the Al-Qadir Trust land acquisitions further solidified the perception of a pattern of corrupt practices benefiting those close to Imran Khan and his wife.
The court’s decision to convict Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi and to place Al-Qadir University under government control reflects the severity of the corruption charges and the compelling evidence presented. The case significantly damaged Imran Khan’s reputation and has fueled ongoing political turmoil in Pakistan. While PTI supporters maintain that the charges are politically motivated, the court’s findings of corrupt practices and misuse of authority have cast a shadow over Imran Khan’s legacy.
Imran Khan’s Conviction: Political Targeting in Pakistan
The corruption case against Imran Khan and his subsequent conviction have ignited accusations of political targeting from PTI supporters. They argue that the charges, trial, and verdict are part of a broader strategy to sideline Imran Khan and damage his political prospects. While the court’s decision was based on evidence of misuse of authority and corrupt practices, the perception of political motivations underlying the case remains a point of contention in Pakistan’s political landscape.
Here’s how the sources and our conversation history support the claims of political targeting:
PTI’s History of Antagonizing Powerful Institutions: Imran Khan’s tenure as Prime Minister was marked by confrontations with Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies. He openly criticized their interference in politics and resisted attempts to influence his government’s decisions. This antagonism created powerful adversaries who may have had a vested interest in weakening his political standing.
Targeting Through NAB: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB), an anti-corruption body, was widely perceived as being used by previous governments to target political opponents. Imran Khan, during his time in power, utilized NAB to pursue cases against members of the PML-N and PPP, further fueling the perception of its use as a political tool. When the same institution turned its attention towards him and his allies, PTI supporters saw it as a retaliatory measure.
Selective Prosecution and Lack of Accountability for Others: PTI supporters argue that the focus on the Al-Qadir Trust case while ignoring alleged corruption by members of other parties points towards selective prosecution. They highlight cases like those involving Hassan Nawaz (son of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif) and the lack of significant legal action against them, despite accusations of financial improprieties. This perceived double standard contributes to the belief that the justice system is being weaponized against Imran Khan and PTI.
Timing of the Case and Trial: The initiation and swift conclusion of the Al-Qadir Trust case occurred after Imran Khan’s removal from office through a vote of no confidence. This timing led PTI supporters to view the case as an attempt to prevent his return to power and discredit him in the eyes of the public. The speed of the trial, compared to the lengthy legal processes often seen in Pakistan, further fueled these suspicions.
PTI’s Narrative of a “Foreign Conspiracy”: Imran Khan has consistently maintained that his removal from office was orchestrated by a foreign conspiracy involving the United States. He has presented the corruption charges against him as an extension of this alleged plot, aiming to punish him for his independent foreign policy stance. This narrative, widely accepted among PTI supporters, reinforces their belief that he is being unfairly targeted for challenging powerful interests.
Suppression of Dissent and Restrictions on PTI: Following Imran Khan’s conviction, there have been reports of crackdowns on PTI rallies, restrictions on media coverage of his case, and arrests of his supporters. These actions are seen by PTI as further attempts to silence dissent and curtail their political activities, contributing to the perception of a broader strategy to suppress the party.
While the corruption charges against Imran Khan were ultimately adjudicated by a court of law, the context in which they emerged, the perceived selective application of accountability, and the subsequent actions against PTI have fueled allegations of political targeting. This situation has intensified political divisions in Pakistan and raised concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the justice system.
The Original Text
It was postponed and the date of 13 January was given It has been done today 17th January at 11:30 The time given for this decision was The case went on for a year to be heard More than 100 cases have been resolved 35 The witness statements have been recorded and henceforth The verdict will be announced shortly. 190 Million Pound Reference Bani PTI and Will Bushra Bibi be punished or will she be acquitted? I decided to go after some time A £190 million bailout will be made The trial was completed in one year and this The decision of the reference may be stated three times Eht sahib the court has given its decision on 18 December 20224 was reserved for giving the verdict for that first 23 December then 6 January and after that Later the date of 13 January was given by Nab on 13 £190 million by November 2023 Arrest of Bani PTI in reference and remained with PTI for 17 days Hussain Ahmed was also investigated in Adala Jail Chaudhry is with us Hussein 1:30 11 The time given was 11:00, but now it’s 11:4 What is being told? When will the verdict be announced? will Yes, look at the court staff It has been stated from the side that at any time It is a safe decision that will be given Because the time mentioned was 11:30 now That has already happened and he has been put in jail if If so, Shoaib Shaheen also reached the court as a lawyer Salman Akram Raja has arrived and Barrister Salman Barrister Gauhar who is also Barrister Gauhar has arrived and he is We also had a brief conversation, he said that The £10 million verdict is out today It will not be postponed, we have come prepared whatever decision comes to be heard It will come today, apart from this he also said that that when justice was decided then Bani PTA was formed You will be in jail, you will be acquitted, you will be released We will go and Barrister Gohar will also be in the room Similarly any other lawyer present in the court There is Salman Akram Raja Shoaib Shaheen and that too The decision has been reached in the court Right now I am a victim of Takhi, the rhythm cannot be heard could because in prison we often see that whenever a lawyer or media goes there then their The process of security is that It is quite long, two to three grades are fine Hussain, Majeed also seeks guidance from you in this matter taking The Senate session is ongoing, the minister’s law Azam Nazir Tara please take care, he is the target Its mechanism of recovery is all that we have recently abhi aaj conclusion places in Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi from the point of view of litigating the case Ministry of Law for Effective Prosecution and justice has training program which is He had started Islamabad and Lahore whatever investigation has been done The officers are of customs and the prosecutors are theirs He is still training for Karachi today Conclusion has been issued and for that Asrat Murat it will be obvious when you investigate officers and prosecutors they would be efficient knowing the laws and Technically, these are my senior lawyers sitting here There has been an investigation in the house because of that Meyer is better because of the prosci The chances of being successful increase a lot All these mayors are being given ji ji Senator Shahadat Awan sahab question question number He said, Jana Chairman sahab, in this I have said this It is said that question number sir question number 24 ji 24 Sir Sir in this I have got this from my CDA asked if you have the attack weapon These are salty plants which we call evasive Species say there is no end to flora and fauna Whether there is a law or not sir its background is this yes sir this is what we are going to do here in f9 There is a park, there is no cutting of trees in it The Supreme Court was prosecuting him which is done with full intention in Karachi Ali Shah is chatting There are so many mawa’s and for this The Sindh government has tried its best like I told you about the department’s presentation and in the briefing When you and I visit the stalls then You will see that the Live Stock Department has We have a complete center here in Korangi In which we have expanded in the last few years In That the vaccine which was imported from outside They used to do about 10 to 15 percent of what our The cost of import was coming on it Vaccines are being made and this will help, Insha Allah Those people who are in the private sector, Our farmers are rich in business They will benefit from it as well to increase yields The department is also in the manner in which The potential of fisheries is being worked upon We have All right ji, here is some big news for you. want to give that in Al Qaid Trust case Acquitted in £190 million case This is the news that has reached us so far, the decision has come PTI has been summoned by the court He has been acquitted, this is a big decision that this was not what I expected said this I was thinking that maybe I would be punished It was being called an open and shut case but here But Bani PTI has been acquitted just now Till then this decision came out 190 million pound reference case verdict You got the news from this Give it to me and let me tell you that Bushra Beeb PTI’s Digar Araki has reached Ad jail Judges who have also reached jail have They too have become adamant about giving the verdict and The decision of this case was heard after some time Clarification Let us be told in this context that he was not acquitted but sentenced to 14 years He was sentenced and sentenced to 14 years PTI has been told £190 million This was the case in which it was stated that Bani PTI has been sentenced to 14 years Initially it was said something else but now it is this that this confirmation has come regarding that Bani PTI was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment So this is a case worth £190 million there is a decision in which you can see that from this Earlier the case was also being called Al Qadir Trust and inside this again this National from Batania Refund of money through crime agency There was a case and this deal was made in it. Ejaz is present with us that is Majeed Tafsi I will give you pride Ejaz please tell me about this force Nar Javed Rana £190 million The decision of the reference has been announced, Bani PTI sentenced to 10 years imprisonment Along with this, a penalty of Rs 10 lakh fine is imposed Bushra Bibi has been sentenced to 16 years imprisonment The sentence was pronounced and five more Tell me again, he was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment Has been Ji Bani PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and 10 lakh rupees Uchhra Biwi has been sentenced to a fine Sentenced to 16 years imprisonment and 5 lakh fine It went well and also in the context of Bushra Bibi tell me once again yes exactly 190 million pounds reference Bani PTI sentenced to 14 years and Rs 10 lakh was sentenced to a fine and the fine was paid If this is not done, then six months’ imprisonment will have to be deducted for this Bushra didi was also sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment It has been heard that the fine has been imposed and If the fine is not paid then a three I’ll have to serve a month’s imprisonment, okay? Stay with us, our representative is warning you is 190 million pounds reference Ete Saab The court has given its verdict of Rs 190 million 14 years for Bani PTI in pound reference The Ehte Saab court has pronounced the sentence of Bani PTI also sentenced to ₹ lakh fine Bushra Bibi was also sentenced He has been sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment Court fines Bushra Biwi Rs 1 lakh Even if the sentence is pronounced, as it was said today The verdict will be announced on December 18 The decision was reserved and the first date The date for pronouncing the verdict was given on 23 December and then on 6 December The date of January was given and then 13 January The date was given like this for the fourth time today when it was told It was said that the verdict will be announced so now this decision The tradition of the day of Jam came before us The Supreme Court upheld the verdict Even when decisions came through the court, they were called Fridays this day used to be very important now this is that the sentence has been pronounced and that it is said This was going the way Faisal Vada sahab They said it was an open and shut case At that very moment I told him that in this matter you will be punished in the manner prescribed by the court The way a sealed cover was placed in front of the cabinet Parvez Khattak when the envelope was presented Saheb also said this later I had certified that brother, we already knew I did not know what caste his temple was, Shahzad Akbar sahab had brought him inside and then Afterwards you saw that now on this matter The sentence has been pronounced and a fine of 10 lakh rupees has also been imposed This has been done and some more details have also come to light Well, our representative Farooq has come If you are with me, I will ask him, Farooq will you tell me Because Bushra Bibi was also present in the court so was he arrested because he has been sentenced to 10 years in prison When the sentence of imprisonment has been pronounced When the sentence was pronounced, Bani PTI and Bushra Both the wives were present in the court room It was said while giving the verdict on behalf of that the Procu is without any doubt Bani has been successful in proving the case PTI and Bushra Bibi Cup practice The dead have been found, therefore Bani PTI 14 years imprisonment and 10 lakh rupees under Nam 1999 A fine is imposed and Bushra Wife sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and 5 lakh fine The sentence is pronounced by the court Both the accused were formally sentenced Now the court has been given by the jail staff From there Bushra Bibi was taken into custody and kill them in a nice cell can be done well along with al Qadir University is also under government control I have been ordered to take it, yes Of course, along with this, the court which Al Qader University is a warning to the government of Vifa that he should also take it in your fold, it’s ok, i will blow it on you We will find out more details at this time. warn you that £190 million Reference Ehte Saab The court pronounced the verdict Bani PTI has been sentenced to 14 years of imprisonment A fine of Rs 10 lakh has also been imposed It has also been narrated by Bushra Bibi who Elia is his son and he was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and sentenced to a fine of ₹ lakh It has been narrated and addressed to Al-Qadir University He also gave the order to take it under government custody If it has been decided then it is expected that the decision will be taken today The decision will be announced, the brief has arrived The decision has been issued, now its details We’ll find out later what that is what are the matters like asfaq is concerned with this Earlier, some time ago, I was giving details of a The case ended in a year and the 100th There are about 59 witnesses presented in it. Out of which the statements of 35 were also recorded and They were questioned and after that this decision was taken 18 December and the case were saved Let me also tell you a little history about Where did the case start in December 2019 It was being smuggled that the meeting would take place at This entry had happened when Khattak sahab When I tested, he told me that there Mirza Shahzad Akbar Sahib said this had presented the annual on which someone There was no deliberation and it was accepted Farukh Eza ji had gone and is present with us Let us talk to him further as well, Farukh Majeed please tell me what are the options now It is obvious that an appeal will be taken What else is the reaction in the High Court over this What has come out so far on this decision and Will the Tehri decision also be given today? Yes, absolutely, a statement from the court The decision will be given shortly only the operative part which is the decision was read out by the court in which it was said by the court that The prosecution has proven its worth without any doubt proved his case and formed PTI and Bushra Bibi found dead due to corrupt practice Hence, PTI got NAB amendment 14 years under section 16A of Ordinance 99 He would have been sentenced to imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakhs Along with this Bushra Bibi got 10 years of age Sentenced to imprisonment and fine of Rs. lakh Along with this the Alkad Trust which The case was built on the foundation that this It was said that the deal was worth £190 million. There was an adjustment in return for Al Qadr Along with this the trust’s land was acquired with us workers we will talk like this Sabiq Sadar is present with us right now supreme court bar association man sahab very thank you for joining 190 million The verdict is given in the Pound case Bani PTI sentenced to 14 years and her wife sentenced to 7 years imprisonment with fine are also given if we talk about asaf case Should we talk about Toshakhana Case One or Cipher? Talking about the case, the plea taken in it It was said that the end was in a great hurry It happened and I did not get the time and it was done properly There was no trial but let’s talk about this case So it has been 100 years since this case The witness is going to appear, now if there is a loss PTI goes and challenges this case See what plea she can take in the court PTI has all the pulleys that can be It could be political and other things could also be there can lead to political victimisation One can talk about it, but one thing you like that this case I tried it properly after trying it together it took a year and a half and a year In one and a half year its all and its defense also got full opportunity and the process also gave full evidence, now the thing is that They have to file an appeal against this Malaj Mann has the right to appeal and he You can appeal whatever is lacuna in this But one thing that is Maybe he is a friend who doesn’t understand shame that the spectrum of nab laaj is totally different and he looked at it from different perspectives It is said that someone’s dear friend is in trouble Is he a frontman or someone in front or behind? Misuse of authority such as I have been watching it on TV, I am not into this I am a lawyer but the thing that has come up in this And according to that this is 190 million Approximately 70 billion rupees are earned And that is what the Government of Pakistan He adjusted the property worth Rs. In the times of Saheb and in the times of Mal La Saheb In 2014, the Supreme Court specifically stated that when the State of Pakistan that money he a phrase in full wrote it down to loot the pal and there after to pay the pal If a person says that I did this by dictating If you pay off a man’s debt, then this can’t be justified so good This is the method of misuse of The element of authority is visible The front is good but there are many other things inside One of the factors is that Esan saheb, presented it before the cabinet in a proper manner You might remember that a lot of people have commented on this Zubaida Jalal Sahiba then after that Pravesh Khatak sahab had also certified that Shaikh Rasheed saheb in the cabinet also said There was no discussion on it at all The prince was pure and pure in it Everything that came forward was that he said this The document is a confidential matter And which has an agreement with the UK Government and that amount has to be transferred now did not know that this money which was to be given to Prime Minister minister sahab This money is being presented in the cabinet That National Crime Agency had recovered the money from a London The money has been recovered from Malik Riaz and he is the property of the State of Pakistan and They have to give it to the State of Pakistan ok now if anyone can understand this that all these other things are here in the country there is politics in this if they want If there is such a thing then go and appeal to him View and appeal in do well that means you are saying that if You have the right to file an appeal, and can go to high court in appeal To go to court, yes to go to the high court Yes, we can see Faisal Chaudhary He is outside the court and he is talking to the media are Yaju, please talk to me Yaya sir, please tell me that what does it seem in the case the way in which It was said from PTI that Too much haste and not enough justice were done but their own people who now he is not with them they kept saying that brother this So it already seemed like an open and shut case This will be your thoughts on the case and the Look at the decision, it was an open and shut case, so Because whatever evidence there is in this case came forward and because within this evidence UK Government and NCA National Crime agency was also present within it and the way There was evidence of this, it is being proved It was thought that maybe this case was against Imran Khan and PTI It will prove to be the most serious case for and that’s what we saw i will interrupt you Obviously we are doing live transmission Faisal Chaudhary is talking outside the court Is there any evidence of monetary gun in it? of crime proceeds or financial corruption not a single evidence of Till date Tasa has taken a decision from Moneyl Mutalik or UK court or Pakistani I did not put it on court record earlier Day said that this judge sahib I am looking for the decision of this judge which date There is a hand pick of such a judge who is not a member of the Supreme Court declared that he was fit to be a judge No There was a man picked up who did bad things The one who set an example for Imran Khan Punish your loyalty and your appointment justified what is This is a ridiculous verdict in a ridiculous case We will go everywhere against this decision and this decision is being accepted all over the world We will also present the evidence of the case against this today is a wonderful day again day on the rights of the people of Pakistan Imran Khan was robbed again today Another way to target politically I agree today is an attempt to give Bushra Bibi a try Imran Khan’s demand to be punished for being a Jauza Today is the day that establishes this I hope the justice and order in this country is destroyed There are no urban courts in this country could not protect the basic rights She has given this decision according to the law According to the law, this decision was filed before it should have been a day the manner in which the case was tried When the power goes off in Ayala prison during winter When it happened the judge got up I asked him if you You are on winter vacation so soon after do this but because the punishment Dena Maqsood Faisal Chaudhary was chatting Before this Yaya Farid Mahire Law our Were together let’s go towards them once again yaya You will continue depending on this decision Look at this decision, it is as much evidence as it is Kiss was revealed in this case Look at this, it has multiple stages on which misuse of authority is visible Miss it is a property that the UK government A settlement was reached with the Pakistani The government has evolved and what is inside it Please return this money to the government It is available because UK has also declared this that this money, this government Pakistan makes money but it has a which of the Supreme Court was adjusted The liability was with Malik Riaz saheb And look the most important thing is that Approval was never taken from the cabinet before sending prince Akbar but prince Akbar sahab is the ruler of Pakistan As a representative, please tell me one thing that the way in which you get approval from the cabinet on which azam khan sahab talked that Ji had brought a note that Ji was the cabinet’s A sealed unfold will be presented in front Entry again for approval, again knocked sir After that Zubaida Jalal Sahiba Baqi Sheikh Rashid sahib, all these people said that we I didn’t know what was inside it He said that there is a matter which needs to be approved yes this happens look yes look sir two the first thing is that Shahzad Akbar wanted first before sending to the cabinet that the cabinet decides this She discusses and debates above but First of all, without taking the cabinet into the loop Shehzad has settled with NCA Akbar criticized the behavior of the Government of Pakistan An agreement after pay settlement after doing it, sign it and then It was said in front of the cabinet, look at this It is confidential, you cannot open it You cannot read this, you cannot debate this I can do it because we have already made a deal and then the cabinet was told that If you want to sign it silently then The cabinet was never kept in the loop If this decision is taken then Imran Khan has taken it I did it myself that this money which belonged to the government which was the money of the people of Pakistan The looted money was with the government that day Now it has been given to the Supreme Court Malik was returned to Riyaz’s pocket The cabinet never came in the loop If not before or later then the first is the biggest The allegation is against Imran Khan that being prime minister of pakistan He hid it from his cabinet He hid the public from the government agencies The money is to a private person I returned the money to the person who stole it And this was said by the UK government that this money is from bribery and corruption The first allegation against Khan saheb would be this The second thing is that all this alkad trust was formed and under that Al Qade Trust He became a trustee and after that he got Rs 490 a The canal land is being transferred There is no reason to transfer it There is no logic behind it, nor was his money paid Nothing was given to me then the watch and all this This is a clear cut connection that develops that it misses This is an appropriate case and its verdict has come. You can also give your opinion regarding the decision Second, give this Pakistan Tehreek Insaaf It is obvious that every court I will go and challenge this decision look at this case what it is about PTI people themselves used to say in closed rooms that it is very difficult to avoid it Bani PTI and the manner in which the court heard this case and has left no legal point and Any chance that they asked for Its founder is PTI and its partners are the accused He has not been given that much opportunity, so They have taken a lot of money I tried and during this time I became PTI has put its full emphasis on this judge sahab twice and expressed complete confidence in the court and then but because case two It is a deposit two, it was an open and shut case Absolutely the biggest tikka of Pakistan And there were so many martyrs from his home present in it ranging from his cabinet members to his It was impossible to escape and that is why his own team also the one who is doing muja was saying that Even if the joke is punished, we will continue joking because they could see that every man to one who understands the law and who has studied the case and after this punishment a taser which An atmosphere was being created by PTI It was being made that we did not know any NRO has been taken, today it should also end well senator sir you too are obviously Your community is still a part of the government And there have been and we see many such cases which cannot be proven in any way that is, cases are formed against them But call it such a big mistake, call it a blunder in which his own people were saying that it is open and shut so what can you do on it I will say that it illuminates so much every day The cabinet in front of the cabinet came like that In front of that, this is the method of approval which was adopted in that any he should take the unfolded bag and say yes to this First of all you should take a look at the whole government Starting from Buzdar, there was a market there Who used to get all the transfer postings done? Who was Gogi Gogi? Bushra Bibi was the front man ki bani gala you are the one who calls a lot Hero’s rings got leaked, I am not small A big amount is required even to get NOC from someone You can also contact Tsunami Tree for co-contract. After that you can see the service which is Pisha Mate That means four houses have been built in Punjab in 100 billion rupees. not even one was made there in one and a quarter billion then in the same way You can find any story of this, any such foreign funding You can see the stories of his own hospital Who will listen to the Atiyat, that means you are everywhere This was the job of these people and in this case Because which His wife is Bushra Bibi, he has only one He is an expert when even in his first marriage She was the wife of a government officer there too How to catch the specialty of these deals In this connection and here also he did the same business had started and this Imran Khan He used to support me completely and that was his strength To appoint a minister Who got the chief minister of Punjab removed? This is the kind of deals he did and this Now they have no such solution for punishment in the case This is not an excuse in any High Court This case will be taken again to end the punishment L Right ji, thank you very much your broker Choudhary sahab was present with us at Noon leader and he says that yes, this is good Time ji, the leader of Tehreek Insaaf, talking This is Lin Shibli Faraz saheb, this conversation is for you Let me show you if there was any loss, Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi benefited by a penny The intention was right and the objective was also right But this custom is being made in this country that whoever in this country a person who So much for a serious disease like cancer builds big hospitals which are different It is one of the largest cities in Pakistan He is in the cities, he should be punished for this that he has studied at Al Qader University In which Seeratul Nabi was to be recited Huzoor Research was to be done on Salam’s life and The youth of Pakistan need it It had to happen but no one could commit such a big crime could In this country where there is no law that it is the hand of the law or not And those people who kept looting this country Are Every decision is taken by the leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf outside the court after the hearing Before this Faisal is talking to media Choudhary who is a lawyer was talking to this At this time Faraz is chatting and On behalf of Pakistan Tehreek Insaf, The decision of this case on behalf of the lawyer There will be a challenge but our leader is Imran Khan, he is a proven step, we are also a proven step Insha Allah we will take them to other courts We will take whatever type of past cases we want be it a cipher, be it a treasury, be it a Whatever the case may be, the courts have thrown it out thrown away because all these are political cases which From Imran Khan to below him, that party Inshallah the morning is made on the basis of the factors We will definitely prove our point, we are the law and I want to be the master of the law within it we are playing a lot Thank you Bimla Rehman Rahim our country this is alright ji so this You are watching this scene on your television The decisions on the screen are also something from now on If this pamphlet reaches us late, we will also I’ll tell you what’s written in it Are the details written in it and now The decision will be taken in brief and then in detail The decision will be issued and after that the appeal will be heard There will also be a stage which is completely an option will be given to PTI so that it can look into the matter go to a court aalia i.e. high court Turn towards it and if your eyes look at it If you want to get it done then however in this case I would say the case is that there are other people This included those who were made public proclamation have been adjudged as offenders and they Basically, Shamu was not adopted in this case In which Zulfi Bukhari is also Mirza Shahzad Akbar is also there, these people are also included in it and Now that the sentence has been pronounced, Let’s see a little bit about its background let’s go to that £190 million or It was also called the Al Qadi Trust case The allegation made was that Former Prime Minister means the PTI formed by him Ahliya during PTI’s rule By Britain’s National Crime Agency 50 billion sent to Pakistan by the government Billions of rupees in exchange for giving legal status and acquired hundreds of kanal of Malian land and This case is regarding the land for Alkaid University Obviously illegal acquisition and construction Now this was the whole matter and Then it was also alleged that Bani had pertaining to the compensation which is to be obtained by reference He hid the truth from the cabinet and even hid the cabinet misled and the amount is for Tasfia It was discussed under the terms of the article and we are talking about it Let us take the oath of office of the minister Talat Attaar saheb Ata Tar sahab is present with us, the decision has come This was what was anticipated, this was the decision It was being termed an open and shut case From your side to your friends as well Also see this is a history of Pakistan The biggest mega corruption scam is that due to which Inside a crime proceeding which is from the UK crime agency ruled by pakistan handed over the government of Pakistan The money and the government belong to the people of Pakistan Pakistan has sought approval of a sealed envelope Through this the Prime Minister and his family formed a trust Create a trust and give all the money to that person gave the person from whom it was confiscated this is this which marzi kept saying it was an open and shut case and I believe justice prevails And it is also true that this case is political. It was fought on the foundation, it was fought on the media No such evidence was presented in the court which proves that he is innocent Now, as far as the rings are concerned, they are five carat that the house in Lahore was 25 of Zaman Park Crores and all other things were taken The land of Fara Gogi proves all these things shows that they have relationship with that business was transactional with the tycoons and they 8 billion rupees worth of vaccine to provide facilities That community was imposed for caste benefit Was imposed if you date of Pakistan If you look, you will find this type of glaring aid Proclaim which will not be available in any other case what will happen to the offenders the way you did it The name given is Mirza Shahzad Akbar sahab Zulfi Bukhari is there, the rest are above him Now what will happen, some action should be taken against them, let’s see So obviously this is towards theft of property The matter goes towards attachment and legal Processes exist if you are sentenced Even after that they do not come to Pakistan and that law if you don’t face it then obviously it will be late B consequences but in this what Pri Sahab Tell me one more thing, obviously in reference to this Majeed will also come in detail PTI is saying we will await the decision of this case We will also do a challenge but during this time there is another Things are happening Hukum Mujah Karrai and PTI during the committee What is the decision that has come, it is obvious the decision So it has come against PTI, it will have an impact In this Muja Kararay I understand that Muja Never give any deal or NRO This is the same as if a person committed murder And after killing he comes and says that I am Muja’s I am a part of it, my murder has not been accounted for Go and see, the crime was present at its place, the trial was there We are a charter for the betterment of the country for the economy and in this country Doing this to bring stability You wanted to see the one who is against you They say this is a politically motivated case He was not satisfied with this decision either Do you think he might back out? yes, I think they enjoy it I don’t know Kararay and this Tasur at all That a single person should because Conviction in corruption and bribery case so we will do mujra and the other thing is that In Mujah Carracks Today You Can See That Stock The market has also gone up by 1000 points immediately after this means that the business The sentiment is based on the policies of the government If it is with me then I want me to move forward We will grow and Inshallah we will grow but we are still So we want that the condition of life of the people should also be good You better be in the stock market Just look at the inflation since last year, even flour Petrol is also cheaper than 38 per cent If inflation has come at 3.9 per cent then this is the situation Sir, we are moving towards betterment but at this time if we take decisions But please tell me the way in which This was presented in the cabinet at that time Obviously he is quite certified about it now. What Parvez Khadak sahab said there Jalal Sahiba told Sheikh Rashid Sahib quite well Among all the people that the sealed unveil you Because right now he is part of the cabinet How is the cabinet practiced Any document is presented in I served in the cabinet for approval I have been in the cabinet of Punjab and two I have been in the cabinet of loyal people till today In these three tenures till date I have made a profit I did not see it but our law minister Azam Nazirar sahab has a big debate on every issue A walk is an easy conversation, and every matter is discussed There is a thread bare analysis and there is freedom that your views are yours whatever they may be You can give them secret sealed envelopes there. to keep things this way we’ve got three I have never seen this in Kabina’s tenor till date This is the first time that such a case has happened and He wanted to hide something so he did this if there was nothing to hide then why give closed tafa ok so what what is the cabinet on top of it it becomes a responsibility, because at that time If approval is given then the cabinet of the cabinet which was the responsibility of some officials of the cabinet inspite of the opposition the Prime Minister then he got this approved by over ruling everybody The prime minister at that time, who did the whole course by force The responsibility lies with them and they Even if a trust is created, it will prove to be a bribe It would have happened if that trust for Eid had not been formed Why was Shipa’s trust not created? Why didn’t you make a beautiful foundation? why didn’t you make it from Fami Foundation Why didn’t Abrar Ul Haq make Shahzad Rai’s why didn’t so many people make it you do the same kind of work, you trust him only who gave you the money or the one who made it You gave them advantage, so they got their hands dirty They were embroiled in corruption and today they speak of justice it is hairy ok so now further you are saying that it will have no effect on the mujrak or it should not be there aali should not be read and we should move on from Muja Kararay and that Those who were talking, some smuggler was coming, some There was a discussion in the media as well that There should also be an apology through executive order there can be an attack on this decision too They will talk about what if it happens in this too So what’s the matter if someone looks at this If you pardon me then all the jails of Pakistan It should be disclosed that there is a robbery of 80 billion rupees and there is absolutely glaring evidence then that What should I apologize for with that country? How long will the joke continue that who we are is this I will keep forgiving Mujma in every way I don’t see any possibility, good and There was one news, I don’t know that Bushra The wife is there and someone is having fun there too The one whom she is leading has denied it. Mukhra is with Kati and Bushra is with his wife I did not see any character in it and They have their own politics, they can put it aside but Muja Carrax is out of process as of now A written demand was also presented by them A judicial commission has been formed so that We would like you to explain a little bit about that what are you doing who will decide what you The court gave a request to Uzma in this regard I understand that a judicial commission is formed which But now we are here when we have no say in this matter If it is not on 9th May but on 26th November then who will get the commission about the matter and anyway there is a legal commission Commission finding that it is legally binding If it weren’t so, I think that this There is no legitimate demand, however that is my mandate there is no this committee will give it but your I am thinking of you again Muja, see Muja There is a consensus that this country’s SIM is fine To bring stability to this country for the sake of the people of this country We should also talk about the people, shouldn’t we? They are always fighting with each other We want that opposition from others If there is a betterment of the people then I am for that I think he is a good forward Inshallah your situation will get better They do not even accept the mandate, see do not accept the mandate of the House is part of the mandate and does not accept it Acceptance of mandate is part of committees I do not do my role in the 26th Amendment Their public paid homage as soon as the camera was If there is a dam then better people than these are from the media There is no one else in front of the camera and behind the camera there are others well this will tell me one thing that there is mujra you said they should be forwarded that is absolutely correct but take some more something happens on the basis of two things, right If you have any other issue then please tell them I think there will be talks but this corruption case it was an open and shut case so I I understand that justice has become very important ji thank you were doing solo and He has spoken out and this is happening in every way The dead person has become so, he said this It is a case, it will not affect you, read I don’t want any action related to corruption And obviously you see that this is a One basic thing is that if there is a legal requirement are completed and things like these or The way this decision has come, inside it So his own people were saying as an example Faisal Vada sahab who is not with him today But they say that a voice came from there If she comes, I will go and talk to you I will listen but they say I will tell you myself It was given that this is an open ended shed case in this The decision will come for the rest of the people at that time He was part of the cabinet and he was saying that If it is not appropriate then Azam Nazir Taar at this time Sir ji, Vifa’s minister is present with us Law and justice, thank you very much Azam Nazir Mr. Tar, the decision has come at this time. Tar sahab was present with us, he was saying that the justice of the law prevails What is your reaction, what are your thoughts? no this is correct look at us No, everything has been linked to politics There is a criminal case which is being investigated After the investigation is done you can In a reference sent to him by a court, I have tried this for more than a year now It was off shoots i.e. rate is accepted or The issue of jurisdiction is before the High Court Some things were dealt with by the Supreme Court that after all this has happened, everything It is very unfair to link this thing with politics It is appropriate that the governance of countries should be based on one law The police work under the law This is a criminal case in that regard We also understood that it was a criminal case that the regimes of governance, the governments which Obviously you are also a ruler If it is a part then it is under a whole job let’s go that means hack panky is inside it it doesn’t happen this way but who is this in the cabinet the sealed unfolded was presented in a proper manner then his It was approved, then it was all rejected right there The matter started like this in the cabinet Something may not be approved at all There should be and this is perhaps a sign of one’s intentions There is a unique case in which a sealed envelope contains a The document was brought and then it was presented to the cabinet It was said on behalf of Wazir Azam Sahib and his who was the special move of that time Shahzad Akbar Sir said that this is a confidentiality It is an agreement, it is a secret thing which Which has to be authorized by the Government of Pakistan If we do this Maida then it will be 190 million The amount of pounds that money earning proceeds from The NCA has consolidated them as If there has been a settlement, then this amount will be refunded again This is written in the Government of Pakistan Pakistan will get this amount in minutes You will be killed if you are from Pakistan Want to get 190 million pounds for the government If it is there then they would have approved it quickly Approval was taken knowing that this amount The government is not coming to Pakistan but to that country Shahzad Akbar before the Confidence Agreement Sir had already entered and he was doing Mahida We were with NCA under which this 190 It was said that the amount was a million pounds and I I understand that it was not their mistake This is the account of the Supreme Court as stated Because the government had to tell that In which account do they want it It was said that this is the account of the Supreme Court now for all more reason to the next agency then we cannot be accused, he understood that the The government is saying it is right but It is not known whether this is actually a penalty There is an account of Malik Riyas Sahab Settlement of land of Bahria Town Karachi It was good 400 rupees per billion When his installment was fixed in Mume This amount is for the payment of those installments which It was used and the biggest proof of this is that it was ordered here by mistake that when the loyalty of the same Supreme Court came to notice the Government of brought this matter when the Government transformed and when this theft was discovered then loyalty The cabinet decided that this should be investigated and the matter was referred to NAB Also in that cabinet meeting it was It was decided that this was because Pakistan Is it the public’s money to pay the fine to someone? If this money is not sent to tax should be imposed on the people of Pakistan and a The petition was filed in the Supreme Court That request was accepted as loyalty to Pakistan And the Supreme Court returned that money to that account. by taking out all these details from Now when Azam Naj Tar Sahab is saying this Are we the people of Pakistan Tehreek Insaaf that we are We will challenge this decision in the High Court So you think this case is so interesting that despite the challenge, it still worked out like this It will come or else some other decision may come As a student of law from higher court I have read the case and I am in the cabinet It was at that time when this whole case was discussed and Then I also put the reference on top of a stage I have read it in your daily TV as well as in the newspaper. There has been reporting on what witnesses said given statements this is an open and shut case and I don’t think there is much in this Anything more technical or it’s mush kafiya I am not going to comment though because Under our constitutional dispensation These domains are the property of the courts under Article 175. If yes, then they should definitely appeal to this They have the right to go for appeal, this is just my I definitely have a wish that I wish in Pakistan There should be such a system of justice in which there is more justice than Akbar From Bashir to Anwar to Bute to Imran Khan Shahbaz Sharif should be treated equally like everyone else Whatever the treatment here is for five years Appeals are pending and people are in jail People are in the Supreme Court since 2121 years I am waiting for my decisions, if sir refuses then After you have done so much, it is better for him Will this decision today shock him? I don’t think this is a legal thing The issue was good and in my opinion Pakistan So much politics in Tehreek Insaf the Pukhtun leadership is respected then how can they Look, it will come out, then I don’t care about it The government will be in a position to make a 14 issue an order after one year of sentence that he Yes, give this authority to a person and that is the case of the prisoner and If Imran Khan sahab during the whole matter If Imran Khan sahab files mercy petition If you do that, contact Sardar Asaf Ali Zardari saheb. They can do this, I am a law abiding citizen I am a seeker of knowledge more than this I will not comment or if they appeal Do People’s Party with Pakistan then you I am saying that there is no scope for it, it is written on it Isn’t it true that Article 45 has all the rights? The person who is the chief has this authority and in this There are also court rulings that if someone He appeals to them for mercy and they feel that this person is worthy of mercy, then he could have done this Thank you very much and we will talk about it Senator Faisal Bada will join us Was Faisal Vader sahab sure that this case I will be punished and Kerr is quite satisfied with this Faisal had been chatting for a long time Mr Bader, the decision has come and the anticipation The punishment was being done and it has been 14 years year and fine so what do you say about this decision Look at it from the perspective of this it is a great misfortune that Imran Khan sahab stood forward on this issue Where he had never seen any such case before 2018 didn’t work and I told you In fact even yesterday I told you to decorate your show Both of them will have back diplomacy and it was said If it is running then one will get it and not the other It will happen, I said both of them will because it is open And it was a shut case from day one the day it arrived Inside the malus approval cabinet I saw that Din had also told Khan sahab and Khan sahab After saying this I also went to their house and told them who had come to collect the first prize of this crime Where there is a story, open it when the prince by nominating Akbar to form the Government of Sent to negotiate from Pakistan side Even then there was no cabinet approval Well no we knew that it was without approval Mother, if I tell you a crime today, you are gone If I tell the story then the principle is if someone from Pakistan On what basis is he going to behave? Negotiate So the cabinet will give its approval too, right? He was neither elected nor a minister nor anything tha number one number two that the NCA had said This is Pakistan’s money, the third thing is that Transparency International, which is based in the UK, I objected to this and said it was wrong we said this is going wrong and this 46 billion had to be paid to the Supreme Court Suppose if there were 100 billion more then it would have been 56 This was increased to 36 for Pakistan when If it is done justly then there will be an example profit of 100 billion and if you take 10 billion from him then Germany Otherwise, what is the point of us and you making such a decision We have never done this in our life till date got a chance But there is no problem in it or you who are very It is very sad that religious card I brought religion into the picture, I can’t tell the Maulvi If I am a Muslim, there is no heaven or hell And not this drama that you are doing and I regret it that this work is being done by a face which is against the party I was one of the sincere men inside but Fail sahab please tell me when at that time the cabinet were a part of and you also talked about it later when If everything was being reported with so much secrecy then At that time, did you discuss this in the cabinet or At that time you tried to explain it to me because You were also listened to at that time, nothing happened at that time nothing happened at that time and after Witness That day’s headlines are there as well as the cabinet And I explained it to them a lot, they resisted a lot and we were surrounded by three ministers Started first, see which one is good Even when it came into the agenda, it was part of the agenda Was not a part of it by using special power I called you suddenly the agenda came which documents were given to us then the envelope came Then the envelope was not opened and it was said It seemed that the contract was done and no one would do anything about it. There is no discussion going on about the way the approval process is being done. There was a big case too and let me tell you that all these people sitting here today who are saying Which of these is a big mistake The minister was there and he too went there silently and looked have come your Where is my story and this saab in the nab Write your statement and tell me your name The more majority you have, the more ministers you have He was good at that time, compared to other people That means they all have gone and said the same thing We request that our name not be used Ok, but this thing is for Pakistani nation Do you know what this F sir says, whatever you proclaim The rest of the names of the offenders are as follows: did not even get involved in the investigation Now see what will happen to them in this case It is Pakistan’s misfortune that someone We cannot catch him because he creates terror. But he is the chief minister of Gandapur I am talking to some prime minister It is old, forgive it under active order Some Prime Minister should be given to the country and then from time to time If any Prime Minister comes back then he is present Some TM, some BM, some setter, some minister This drama keeps going on in Pakistan because he is out of the country Part Before today till yesterday we were watching Hamid Raza sahab and other PTI members were very happy They were saying that now Bani is going to come out Some meetings were also being cited Then it was being said by executive order Whatever it is, it is possible Then he also presented his written complaint There was a different presentation going on you will remember this tomorrow you will remember this tomorrow Story made up prop propaganda done that we had a wonderful meeting with the Army Chief It happened and one on one happened, both were lies I told him that I was in trouble and difficulty There is a difference of three and a half hours and if he comes then this they propagate they propagate They do drama but they are very fast in it Now you are busy creating lies and deceit Kushan was praising the cheese yesterday and was saying Now you will join that same army in the coming days I should write it down right now that from today onwards we will go after them Tolling will start, so what am I talking about? Manu did not believe in 9 May They used to say that we didn’t do it, it was made on us It’s a drama and it comes on your own channel Gandapur saheb a shirt on Wasi Badami’s show Let’s pretend that my men were not there in the earth I turn them on they crossed the line or else give them this punishment after this Now what do you do, how many open ends after this We have set things, now what does the future look like? Tell me the future of Mujra and Mukra Then I told you that you guys I told all the channels that I am not This must be a joke, this is a drama From today onwards the Mujra will stop, after 20 the trams will stop When you feel dejected about the card then come forward In the coming days, he will do it late at that time The government will do this I am waiting absolutely waiting Both parties are waiting and but You should be very clear, what is the limit The governments of both are negotiating And PTI negotiated jokingly at night The limit for both is that both want that Inside Those who are from PTI also want him to go to jail PCI people are here today who are praying tomorrow were going to announce the decision today and thank you We will fall inside, we will stay in Idar too We will also enjoy the money and I have told you guys I had told him a long time ago that he understood this He can get relief if he goes to higher court will challenge and what they are saying So they should hurry to hear the decision Look, the higher court listened to me I told you a long time ago that You are great, I will talk to you only after 26th November I said and I’m still telling you that It is an open and shut case in higher court There is more secret and open case in any Even a blind person doesn’t need it We are defeated but why are our people I would like him to stay in Bani PTI than what is their benefit this is their benefit that if Bani comes out today then any one of these There will be no doubt that half of these people are him who by holding a press conference against these Khans Even today sitting on chairs and on E90 All those ministers who were with me during that time Nab has come to testify against Imran Khan and other places and in which there is a clause that you will not disclose their names okay and now pti do you understand What will happen next from the side of practical wisdom Because he has great expectations from Muja He had also added hopes from 20 January they have got quite a lot of stuff in that It’s going to be a time of very, very troublesome good for them and I think they Now some things should be done with intelligence and eyes A bandage should be tied and Imran before 2018 If Khan sahab was a thief then when he When I bid farewell to my jamaaya sahiba, at that time He could have gotten millions of dollars no, this means who is this person He came into my life because of whom everything went wrong work hard theft alkad trust money rodrick And Tikkar, a lot of things are open right now there is nothing left besides that then do this when And Begum Sahiba and her children will also benefit from this What happened to Iran Khan sahab’s children But why the sign off from Imran Khan Sahab Did It was Imran Khan sahab’s, so I got trapped, and it went a long way Thank you Senator Faisal D for being with us. Vifa Vajra was present at this time and Azam Nazir is present Mr. Tar had just finished talking to us. And Mr. Telegraph is going to discuss this had brought forward the point that in Britain money Asset reported some investigation citing Laring had started Which also includes the property of Hussain Nawaz Sahab I want to say this openly, but He was cleared after the inquiry investigation were done and when the matter proceeded further The matter reached Bahria Town Malik Riyas Sahab about the family and then there Ultimately that was £190 million Laws that became part of the settlement set in the case that even when the weaving is done then this This is a matter of confidential amounts And there has also been this tradition in the country that this Fatf’s Practices Are the Laws of Money Learning There was also a concept in this that the world Spades surface against the kind of money You remember trying to combat Once upon a time, the banks of Switzerland It was said that he was involved in money laundering There are many havens and many destinations in the world I am in this mamalakandam Is it not the public’s money which is paid as tax? Earning from Aven or through some other means If it is taken out, it should be prevented If you want this 190 million pounds, it was We were to get back the rule of loyalty to the state Account number one in the Bank of Pakistan You say you’ve heard all this The story goes that in a cabinet session I brought a sealed envelope and said that this The prince went on behalf of Akbar Sahib and the minister Azam was on Imran Khan’s side at that time The National Crime Agency in Batania The 190 million pounds is seized And that government is written in Pakistan that it has to be transferred to the ruling party So if we make this a confidential agreement A secret agent will reveal its details If I don’t go then this money will be easily will be transferred and this pre tax pay A decision was taken by the cabinet, although it A few days ago Shahzad Akbar sahab was Agent of Government of Pakistan is there He had already done Mahida and that money Unfortunately, the conversion at that time According to the report, the huge amount is around 59 billion That money belongs to the Supreme Court of Pakistan Through a decision which Malik Riyas Sahib had taken The people of Sindh were paid compensation in the settlement to that account i.e. in that penalty account If it was deposited, then it was Second confirmation again after Supreme Court order When the cabinet decision is taken, When this was seen in the Prime Minister Shahbaz Sahib ordered beyond that The matter was referred to the NAB And also instructions were given to the Attorney General’s Office that he will appear in the Supreme Court on behalf of Wafa file an application for money in that case Is this some settlement of the people of Pakistan Money will not be spent on payment of fines or any such work then beyond that The Supreme Court of Pakistan awarded that amount This is the order after this case is registered And that money, whatever came, was wasted It happened in Wafa’s Pakistan account so that he could serve the people of Pakistan It seems this case is pending for more than a year now. It is run for this, martyrdom was recorded in it Yes Bani Tehreek Insaaf had this right that he would give evidence in his defense All who have just chatted here And he was part of that cabinet on media it would have been better to face it instead He goes to court as a witness The government lawyers who appeared would cross-examine them. So that if he is truthful then it can be proved it would have happened if it was not correct then other The court takes wise e fare but it is their His choice was to give evidence in his explanation As far as I remember, an investigating officer It seems that 30 or 31 times the chances were given that A complete policy is being made on that now has the right to file an appeal and I maintain that the appeal is likely to be This is my experience as a Pakistani citizen in Surat But I wish that our system is just it must have a leg in it There should be consistency like Akbar’s Anwar’s Bashir The timelines in the cases of Ke Booth The policy of first in first out is The same should happen in cases that lawsuits If filed, he should take up his number They should be decided on merit go and besides that I think I have nothing further to comment I would only like to request that in this case because it is Pakistan’s Biggest case of bribery and mega corruption till date It was a big case which was the defense council He fought the case politically He based his case on evidence over merit No, and the judgement also says the same thing The lawyer who was defending the case was neither a proof of innocence nor a proof of innocence. could not produce evidence on behalf of the prosecution Evidence was presented of this bribe and I could not answer the question of corruption This was fought on the political basis of the media But the fight continues even today using the religion card It’s been happening for the past three or four days An unsuccessful attempt is being made to expose this disgusting Hiding crime behind the religion card Now tell me this can be hidden, you are the kingdom They used to take the name of Medina, what kind of justice is this that you had collected a confiscated amount of money which was in Britain given to you by the crime agency from which it was confiscated that you returned it to him and got Rs. 25 Zaman Park’s house worth crores was bought by 5 Took carat rings and 200 kanal land And this husband and wife created a sham trust It was not Edhi’s trust but Chipa’s trust This was not a trust of any selfish institution This trust which is black money did not exist Bribe was taken to make it white It was built to hide for now where can I go It is for Sirat we did this work Please stop this heinous crime Don’t portray corruption as bribery in this way Did you do this for character or religion? You carry the religion card everywhere you go They come and take the name of the state of Madinah but Don’t accept bribe and corruption with patience Add Naz Billah I think this is from him This trend on social media is a big crime It is being said that this happened because of character you are the character, the religion, the Islam, once Keep it aside and answer legally, this is any Not the way to get caught red handed May your crime be proven, may the sealed envelope be proven Let it be proved that he also took bribe There has been corruption as well, a sealed envelope has also arrived You have also confiscated the money which was yours to give This was the trust of the people of Pakistan That money was a trust of the country, you saved it in such a way handed it over to the person from whom it was confiscated Had to catch a fine as a penalty paid the second fine and his After you took the money, I understand that that today justice has become very important Pakistan’s appeal date is a big decision He said that they have achieved it but they have to fight the case legally It will have to be proved that the NCA has The money that was given to the government of Pakistan Pakistan had come to power to prove to you It will have to be done that Pakistan should not rule You have to prove that you’re off I did not take you to the cabinet with the envelope You will have to prove that you have established a sham trust I didn’t make you prove it You must have invested 2 crore rupees in Lahore Taking money from the same property tycoon, Was not made not a five carat ring 200 kanal land was demanded but was not given here Now you have to prove all these things If you also go for appeal then I I understand that religion should not be brought into the picture and Religion considers its heinous crimes as dark acts Do not use this open to hide End Shirt Case Was Open End Shirt From Day One The case was, corruption was proved and along with that Bribery is proven along with its misuse Power misuse of authority is proved by you one by one If you look at the steps of this case then you will find It will be clear cut that legal proceedings will be successful while completing the sentence which has been pronounced, It is completely according to the law, it is on merit it is according to the evidence and you Today we have failed to prove our innocence After that there is so much mega corruption in Pakistan Someone will think 100 times while doing it because you You also delayed ending the case You tried, you made excuses, you made political excuses also gave statements but today it is legal There is a decision and I am hearing it all over the country I am all the leading lawyers in this Regarding the decision, they are saying that this law and these were the judge’s cuts and these If things were proven then the judge gave this decision I am listening to neutral observers I am listening to the analysts, everyone says the same thing If you are doing this then it is mega corruption of bribery The £190 million case is a robbery This is the biggest robbery in Pakistan till date This cannot be hidden by playing the religion card You play the religion card, you play the Brunei card play inside card play whichever card you want This bribery corruption robbery will be proved Now there is no escape from this so be kind and answer it The answer to this question is not religion but merits and Nor is the answer to this that it is because of character We asked you this question, this is the law, you and Let me answer the first two or three questions I will have another meeting after the namaz If I have to go then Ata sahab will be with you Okay, tell me this, you are the minister of law, PTI People are saying that this case is in Islamabad The High Court is a burden of three muscles and this Earlier also in the case of cipher, the government has If the Proter Journal is unable to produce evidence then Do you think that now Imran Khan’s he will get bail and will be released Principles of bail after conviction of case As far as I remember, the sentence is 14 years. Bail is not available as a matter of right The second thing is that after one application for bail A Basic Principal for Conviction Bail The Supreme Court of Pakistan has done it that he says that you have proved the merits of the case No go just floating on the record If there is a very big thing floating right on top If he sees a major legal mistake, he I want to see it and I will not comment more than that I will do it in my opinion this law The decision on the case has come today in three days If there is someone more important than the journalist The decision is already taken after sitting on the tee If you have announced it then it is in your legal capacity How do you see that a decision has already been made He has come and Ula Saheb, I have this question for you because you are fooling the media Will the camera handle this type of action? That’s why I always take precautions I have held on to it and I am still saying it today that when the Islamabad High Court heard the case If they want to see it, they have to decide I am not even sure about what you said A very sweeping statement has been made that The decision was announced and it was Did anybody sit down and tell him how many There is a lump sum on Safat and did anyone say In which fences will this punishment be given? It is speckle, you people have made this speckle I hope you understand the punishment in this case If I tell the law minister that the punishment If it’s not there then you’ll scold me I love the streets Whatever decision comes, keep it in our court and The court is present, you people also said Nawaz Sharif to face all kinds of problems at the time I went to jail and was burnt The basic question is what it is a teacher Idarpalli will not be damaged, court said As much as I have learned in this short time that the court has said that in that case I will take the government, be it Subaai or Markaz, whichever if provincial and central governments will come into it Hundreds of universities are running in the country if yes then why are kids studying there I can’t run it but whatever I did The troublesome thing about this is that in this way the sacred work of training and teaching in this I shouldn’t have linked it like this I am talking about if the government is so There is opposition to his personality till today For Shaukat Khan’s imprisonment or his case Why it did not open, till date no news has been received where there is a color there is a remedy But if there is a crime and action is taken then this When the government later realized that this The money has been diverted in the wrong way and when the revenue records were checked So in those very dates 243 kanal of land which is that which was given to Fara Gogi Sahiba by him Returns as per Income Tax were worth it According to her, she was not so old that she could turn 60 That land worth 50 crores or 43 crores She could buy it so she gave it in return That land was not mentioned in those days This trust was formed in the trust first two There were other trustees, he left and then he Layering was done to land of Zulfi Bukhari sahab It was first transferred from there to the trust and then there is the cost of all the repair work That too was given by Baria town fixtures computers chairs and that too Bairia town gave me a great job but before that the 59 billion rupees went into account which then went to Supreme Court sent it back, these two are connected things among themselves and in the over velminic court was presented and the manner in which the case was dealt with It was done in the cabinet so with this reference I I do not understand as Atta Tar sahab said That is the relation of education and teaching with religion The decision of this case has no bearing on every The case is heard on its merits and its decision based on the merits of the evidence that has come Gawa Han just like I did in the beginning I had the great opportunity to have many of my friends Those who have just talked should go as a witness to the clarification that yes we We were in the cabinet, I read every word Sitting in the cabinet myself, my colleague is with me we are standing, we are trying to solve many issues I am on record that someone else would rule I wanted to decide there This is not legally possible in Convincible If it is not there and our word is accepted then it even if he had said these things there And he thought it was a very good decision This was a joke, it was against the law The country was in my favor, if this was what was supposed to happen then Why don’t you go to court and testify there? His not going to present his defence was also a The prisoners are such that they have nothing to say Tha bur cuff because the case also has to go to the epaulet It was a very complicated matter in the court With Mulk, if you look at the volume I think in about 60 you will find this Arab figures will not be seen anywhere which Ackley is there not saying it in the air This was given to him for Rs. 16 billion It was done and a case was made against Ayane 0 Applicants have applied for Rs. 1 lakh,000 0 lakh rupees to allot the house there or 6 crore rupees deposited and that too government It was said that thousands were lying in the account Shahbaz Sharif who is robbing people of their billions of rupees He ruined the government, that’s on record I am doing court with tha court papers so That money was present in it when he was caught When he went, the Supreme Court transferred him So let’s see what applet will be available in future what decisions do they make as a law as an understander or as a measure of the law But as far as I have read this is an open end shut case very sh a new I want to bring something new to your notice hmm the important thing was the asset recovery unit of Shahzad Akbar saheb which he headed We have got hold of the documents of Inside it is written as recovered amount. This is an asset worth 1990 million pounds The recovery unit has recorded this in the official records. Recovery is shown by Asset Recovery Unit Shad Akbar sahab became the prime minister inside the office of for this thing that corruption should be stopped, corruption should be eradicated and corruption money bribe money It should be recovered now and deposited in the treasury Now he should go to Shad Akbar’s office This 190 million pound is inside the document is shown as the recovered amount The amount of corruption that is in Pakistan Tired of going to government treasury Demands have come up in reference to the Nal Commission if it is not made today but we know your opinion I want to do it but it got rejected I am not a part of that demand Our senior colleague from the committee used to sit there but like I was talking about earlier that there are some things that are only legal within the mechanism itself You can do this while staying inside on May 9th Quoting him he said that on 9 May a Such a commission should be formed to see that the incident How did it happen and how did people reach there and then who did all this The case is pending and is at an advanced stage even if punishments have been given then sub judice There are no fact-finding commissions in matters They are now at an advanced stage in the courts there are some other demands like this which are It is not legally possible to say this now that the courts should release the people Releasing is just another way of releasing and he is the President under Article 45 has the authority that if someone comes to them with mercy We should make an appeal which we call mercy petition If there is any possibility of pardon in anyone’s punishment, finish it completely or completely Besides that I can think of Our legal framework is dispensation in that, anyone other than the court’s decision Rahai is not possible, thank you very much Tired, I was looking into this matter and the He also went and chatted with us in a manner Azam Nazir Tar sahab so he said that this The ball is there, if there is an appeal for mercy later There can’t be an executive order, but If there is an appeal for mercy then Article 45 Under him Sadar-e-Pakistan Sadar-e-Mamlakat this can you please consider the matter if you can pardon the punishment So anyway this decision was given The document is in front of you which is You can see it on the television screen This is the brief decision if I am not mistaken And inside this, sir, write the decision in detail. The verdict will be issued later and the sentence will be 14 years. Bani was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment along with her wife has been sentenced and Al Qadir The university should take that into consideration as well. The order has come from the court Tehreek Insaaf says we are going to Islamabad High Court We will go to court and challenge this decision And it is also said that now this We will decide to take all possible action against the decision. Now we have to see when people like Azam Nazi will do it Tar sahab was saying that if this appeal If they go, they will have to prove it and many more Ata Tarr also said that he has to prove something that it is corruption and to prove innocence I failed in this and all the lawyers are saying According to Ata Taar’s decision today It has been made on merit, sir, so this decision has come It is done and basically its document Those who were with us were saying that not even one Both will be punished Both will be punished Both will be punished and both have been punished Then in the same spirit he is saying this further too Now we are just waiting for 20 January but even from the later situation he no point will include news headlines here 14 years sentence was given to Bani PTI This was a case of 190 million pounds The decision is a shameful decision The political bugle has been orphaned The decision was made in reference to £190 million PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and ₹ lakh fine Basha Biwi was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment ₹ Punishment of fine of up to one lakh rupees for not paying the fine But PTI was made to buy land after 6 months and its owner was his wife Majeed will have to serve 3 months imprisonment in Tisab court Alka University brought under government control Judge Nasir Javed Rana gave the order to take the case Adiya gave the verdict to Bush’s wife 190 million was seized from the court Pound reference decision on December 18 The court had postponed the date thrice but judgement was not given Today is a sad day for that person, that’s why He made this university a Nam university 47 The government dislikes it because If these people have committed corruption then ask questions Brother you want this money from Hassan Nawaz which way PTI’s £190 million gone for reference Omar Ayub announced to challenge the decision It is said in the court date of Pakistan Today is a dark day, the decision has to be made only Shibli is there to target PTI Faraz said there is a need for law and order in the country There is no violence, thieves are free and innocent people are imprisoned There are many cases against Bani PTI We are political, we are rulers of law and order want lawyer Faisal Chaudhary said 190 No evidence in the million pound reference Was it not a rape, the investigation has become a fraud The world will go to every stage against the decision will present a solidarity agreement across the This is a criminal case which is being investigated The court heard the case for more than a year It is not appropriate to link everything to politics Law Minister Azam Nazir Tad says knowingly The government of Pakistan will not get the money again Approval was also taken from the cabinet Minister Talat Ata Taar said it was an open and shut case, justice will be done today This is the dominance of Pakistan’s history This is the biggest mega corruption scandal Hands were stained with corruption, impact of the decision Leader Talal Chaudhary said that Mujah will take action It was difficult for him to survive in this case PTI People also knew what the decision would be Hai Muzzam said what Bani PTI and Bushra The wife will be punished in this case by religious Senator tried to play the card of shame Faisal Wada says that even after going to Ala Adaliya This decision will not end the government and PTI Both of them want Bani of PTI jail Stay inside, from today this fun will stop Drama and fun are expected from January 20 They feel disappointed on applying It must have been a very long time How many taxes have been imposed on this and How much have we put into it There is a shortage of PTI in the assembly of the Senate Arkan’s protest for the release of Bani PTI Slogans raised by PTI members in National Assembly People’s Party tore copies of the agenda Rukun Shazia Marri said in Awan Bani The country is crying about PTI The speaker is not talking about the issues Said PTI members adopt a serious attitude The Senate does not adjourn the session until the end Even in the court of Peer till 4:00 p.m. put it on hold He is referring to the meeting in Gaya Security of Khyber Pakhtoon Khan is in his hands There is a meeting called, I have full authority I am saying on the basis of that meeting In Barrister Ali Gauhar Sahib Gandapur Sir has tried to keep his political views Or political demands should be presented and those We had a discussion but I turned them down It has been said that this is in reference to security This meeting has nothing to do with politics Barrister Gauhar has no connection with Tasur Dia is having conversation at front or back door Hey barrister Gauhar which string should I play on We want to go away from that committee only We will talk about those who were established under the leadership of Omar Ayub The government has been formed as per the translation of the Muzakr Committee Senator Irfan Siddiqui of PTI says We have made the Charter of Demands strict. There is no demand for it to be made A committee has been formed, says Ijazul Haq There is no special mention on either side Want Supreme Court to form Judicial Commission Only a request can be made to the court The government and the opposition cannot decide that Makh Suss judge should be brought into the commission The crime of 9 May has been committed in the court verdict Clean chit was not given, the question is that Where will the trial take place as stated in the 21st amendment Cases of political era in army court Justice Jamal Madu will not play the game Remarks by Vizarat Defai Khwaja Harris Said there is a limit to political activism Attack on princely state is not political activity Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi said police are It is a crime here to tear the uniform of a Corps Commander Lahore house burnt down Askari camp Justice Jamal said there were attacks on his office If the parliament is attacked then the military Why the trial did not take place? Parliament is the most Is the parliament supreme? Is it an attack on itself? Justice Hasan said she does not consider it an insult There was an attack on the Supreme Court as well and that too was a serious one The Supreme Court should also be included in the postponed till the end Khyber prisoners sentenced by military court 27 criminals from Pakhtoon Khawa court of Qazi Anwar filed an appeal in the appeal Advocate and barrister Server Muzaffar presented the occasion The accused was not given a chance to explain himself fully The legal requirements of the trial were not met Appeal made to Kur Andaga during trial Military was deprived of basic rights It is illegal to conduct trial of a civilian in court The accusation against Malj Mann is illegal and unlawful acquitted from defeat Go and prepare Sparko first Electro-optical satellite launched into space has been done, says Chinese media The satellite was launched from China’s launching center Electro-optical satellite launched in Produced locally in Pakistan which was used for making masks can go The caretaker is available within nine months of setup The site did not work, said the chief of that time Minister sahab, can’t he see it? that university road khuda that month This is how we wasted those 10-12 days we started working again Sindh’s Wazir Transport redlined Tahir’s responsibility in BRT is [ __ ] Sharjeel Memon put the onus on the government, said 9 The work remained closed for a month at that time the high minister did not notice that University Road is the only road It has happened now the car showroom people are saying bridge Make them the Asian Trilateral Travel Bank I have lodged a complaint on the portal saying it is worth two and a half billion Build bridges only for car showroom owners The Red Line will be completed in 2026 but If there is a clash, the reason will not be the government The accused wants the extreme of yellow colour Khan alias Abdullah Mehsud from Karachi Arrested, arms and ammunition recovered According to the translation of Rangers, the accused Taluk Fina was arrested from Ithad Town Khawarij Mufti Noor Wali alias Abu Asim The accused is from the group and further legal action is to be taken was handed over to the police for V Faki cabinet right sizing the institution approved the second stage of any Idar has more than three years of service Stopped from upgrading Idar Inzamam’s opinion on translation and different institutions Approval of third party audit is also given. For this we have good reputation of being a consultant. received service Another good news for Pakistani Mashhad News July to December current account 1 billion 21 Gujarat’s Mali is thriving with millions of dollars Current account in the first six months of 2017-18 increased by Rs 1 billion to Rs 2.5 billion. The entire amount of 7 crore dollar was continuously in the fifth Current account 58 even in the month of December 20224 November 2024: Surplus of 20 million dollars Current account is 68 crore 40 lakh dollars There was a surplus A severe cold wave struck the country and The cheeks of snow falling from the sky in melted The weather made Gilgit Baltistan and Extreme cold in Skardu in Balochistan The status of heat is forbidden and the visit is forbidden as seven Manfi six in Quetta and five in Gilgit Cold winds recorded in Karachi The intensity of cold increased due to walking, including Lahore With cold in the plains of Punjab The fog has settled in the limits of vision The bias motorway has been closed from different locations Did Gaya and Pakistan West Indies first test match The game of the first session will start late, bad The weather has an eye on three in the national team Specialist spinner included, young batsman Mohammad Huraira will make his Test debut Wahid fast bowler Khuram Shahzad included in The series was played on A Sports B is shown You know the headlines from the news right now This much This grease is frozen, it’s greasy, look The kadhai and the pot demanded a lot of rubbing You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it without rubbing Max Liquid is three times more Cleaning and to a that my paint cost ₹ lakh and my 4 lakh but how come I bought it for paint He gave the money and bought the paint along with the Tokens If you pay only for the paint then you will save money Master paint will be applied and tokens will be increased Get rid of the expense Pay for paint No Tokens Master Paints No Tokens Jhalak Hand Paints & Foot Beauty Cream for your hands and feet Get perfect glow and smooth softness Jhalak Hand & Foot Beauty cream say it with fingers say it with cut bury Mini Fingers Your Catberry Now With Urgent Beauty Cream for all skin types Give a fresh glow and fair complexion urgently May the beauty cream dissolve in your heart How can this magic be felt did o just take my heart o just chocolate for the dildo O! just tell you welcome back that 190 million 14 years for Bani PTI in pound reference Sentenced to imprisonment and fine of Rs 10 lakh Yes sir, the court has formed PTI Ahliya Bushra Bibi sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and ₹ lakh sentenced to a fine; fine not paid If this is done then Bani PTI will have to undergo another six months. Bushra Bibi sentenced to three months imprisonment Bushra Bibi will get a room from the court Ehat sahab has been arrested by the court Al Qader University brought under government control Eht sahib the court has also given the order to take it The decision states that Bani PTI Found involved in corruption and corrupt practices Bushra Bibi has gone to corruption and corrupt PTI’s Mawat was made in the practices Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi against the decision If an appeal can be filed on the related issue then PTI was bought for £190 million sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and ₹ lakh fine has been heard and the verdict has been announced today Now Bushra Bibi also appeared besides this Chairman PTI Barrister Gauhar was also there were present and now the verdict has been given and That Bani PTI has been sentenced to 14 years imprisonment While his wife Bushra Bibi was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and sentenced to a fine of Rs. lakh and If this fine is not paid Bani PTI to undergo six months imprisonment And Bushra Bibi gets another 3 months imprisonment Now Bushra Bibi will also get a room from the court Arrested now Eht sahab court gave Al-Qadir University under government control I have ordered to take it, Eht sahab The court’s decision stated that Bani PTI Corruption and Corrupt Practices Mullas have been found in Bushra Bibi’s corruption and PTI’s corrupt practices It is of move and due to this reason, she is now PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and ₹1 lakh fine They will also have to pay a fine while their Ahalya who is Bushra Bibi has been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and sentenced to a fine of 5 lakh rupees She has been blown away, Ijaz is with us, blown away cautioned Do a £190 million reference today The verdict has been given to PTI has been sentenced and with and pay the fine ok farooq i am trying to contact you Your voice will not reach us I am telling your audience that 190 million pound reference whose verdict was heard Now Bani PTI has been given 14 years of age The sentence has been pronounced while his wife Bushra The wife has been sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment has been narrated and besides this Buthra Biwi A fine of Rs. lakh has also been imposed and Bani PTI sentenced to 10 lakh fine has been pronounced and if the fine is not paid If this is done then Bani PTI will be given 6 months imprisonment will be kept and Bushra Bibi will be kept in Majeed 3 Now Bushra Bibi will be sentenced to one month imprisonment The room has now been arrested from the court While PTI has given 190 million pounds Announcement to challenge the decision of reference It came to light that this was said on behalf of Omar Ayub that today in the court date of Pakistan The decision is due to happen today only for Bani PTI This has been done to target and Shibli Faraz said that there is law and order in the country of Baladev people are imprisoned against Bani PTI All cases are political, we are of law and order Hook wants to refuse while his lawyer Faisal It was said on behalf of Chaudhary that 190 million There was not a single proof in the pound reference nab The investigation is done by Ala, the verdict is fraud If we go to every forum against it then we will get 190 billion Bani PTI and Mushra Biwi in pound case The punishment has been pronounced to Faraq Ejaz once Then tell us who is present with us today what is the court report Yes, today there is an extraordinary security PTI was also in a bad condition and that too here Neither PTI nor the other was present in the court room Bushra Bibi is also present in the court room the court pronounced approximately when it started then after that After the recitation, the verdict was announced Reading of the brief judgment by the judge The verdict given by the court It was said that the prosecution would present its case Bani has been successful in proving PTI And Bushra Bibi was found dead after practice PTI has been sent the NAB ordinance 14 years imprisonment and 10 lakh fine under section 10A is sentenced to a fine and if If the fine is not paid then six months’ imprisonment Bachhra Bibi will also have to serve prison term like this Ten years imprisonment under section 10A of the ordinance and sentenced to a fine of Rs 5 lakhs and If Bushra Biwi does not pay the fine then He will have to serve the additional three months of imprisonment from the side of the court as well as Superintendent Ayala is in jail, he is also afraid ok Farooq stay with us Mahire Lawyer Khalid Ranja sahab joined us Thank you very much your speaker Khalid sahab Bani PTI was imprisoned for 14 years and Bushra Bibi has now been sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment Please tell me what is being said by PTI What do you say that you will challenge the punishment Look at this context as far as the punishment is concerned If it comes to challenge then it is their legal There is a right and appeal is provided within the ordinance and in any case our The criminal law allows The appeal form is available and the appeal right anytime that any state or anybody who Wherever there is justice and law, cannot be withdrawn it is the basic and the fundamental right of the accused in so far as If we talk about their case and even now Some channel had asked me about relief Let us talk about this that from there they can go to the appellate court can one get relief from this or not kindly look at my name khalid ranja aa He is Khalid Ranja not Raja Khalid Mahmud This is Khalid Raja sahab’s picture coming this Please fix it, I am sorry sir, I am sorry for this GP Khalid Raja is doing fine right now Sir, they put up his picture from Lahore well the second thing is if its If you see National Crime running in the background An investigating agency of Joe Batania The agency has raised £190 million, which Bataniya from Pakistan through money laundering He was murdered for that amount It was frozen there and that amount went to Pakistan that is, their law says that the money which Any amount was seized there through lending She should have been returned to that country it is in the account of the government of that country He has to go but Imran Khan sahab Just the prime minister taking advantage of it This is what I did because I was accused of misuse of authority It is said in the Jamra that the amount is from Malik Riaz Sahab They benefit by colluding with facilitate them while delivering To do this, he filed a case against the Supreme Court of Pakistan had imposed a fine of 460 billion there I got that amount canceled and transferred it there and the government which is on Pakistan’s account The money was to come to the Supreme Court It went into Pakistan’s account, said here But it is totally confused that If yes, then that money is in Pakistan only, right? Pakistan Supreme Court which fined That was separate, they had to pay that separately and this £190 million is the government This should have gone to Pakistan’s account The amount was different from what he was fined Lisa He had to pay the fine amount separately But Malik Riaz sahab told them I requested that this amount of mine be deposited here The money was brought through landing which got confused The rule which is being returned to Pakistan This amount should be adjusted there. in the item of fine and it is said that Yes, what benefit did they get from the university The question that they created arises that His Elia Madam, in which capacity is she became its trustee and Imran Khan sahab Imran Khan sahab prime minister of not as Pakistan but as a Become its trustee in the capacity of an individual And becoming a trustee means that your Ownership is visible there, it is your property it becomes apparent to you in return for that What did we get? It was 458 kanal of land The state of the university is such that there But today in four years there are more than 200 students none of his very big ones could go The positive outcome was not visible to the community and Then you see that Fara Gogi Sahiba who is Bushra Bibi’s close friend and Imran Khan sahab’s name is also his It is quoted in many places He was made the 248-kanal conscience of Gala Appearance of crores of rupees cash allotted Bushra Bibi also gave away her jewellery In Surat you have heard the details that Diamond Jwara and that necklace and bangles and These rings, all these details come before the community In this context, if PTI is the king then Khalid saheb is saying that Ahliya who Badni is PTI’s wife, that is some rule She did not hold any position, she was only a trustee Then why was he given such a punishment? Yes, this is important, I will answer this I will give you the section no. A1 and A2 She says that if any individual who Is he a public office holder or someone else? Fard means if a public office holder Imran Khan sahab will be in his ad If anyone is in league with them in help A private person can also join that proceeding commits illegal proceedings or offence participates in what is liable to be Procu under the revent province of lot e ok you are with us in section no a Stay tuned, we will discuss this issue further Waqt Sheikh Waqas Am press conference Tax Service’s Judicial Powers R Win it is directed to another judicial officer be posted in this place Case 1: Rahul Pindi’s case: Suo moto case Number One of 2004 decided on 26 October, in it he writes that Magistrate Magistrate in Circumstances had libre miss conducted himself and Past illegal orders handed over to a senior lawyer in police custody e atmosphere and in A manner on the other side Daniel Chaudhary conversation They are trying to gain popularity and this is what politics is all about gave the frogo I think it should be added for another 6 months from both sides Today, the number of supporters of PTI or Leadership is the first message to them that You don’t have to panic even on 9th May Decisions are to come on the cases of 9 May too will reach a logical conclusion which will be a punishment What happened to this country on this com of the injustice that was done to this country their ajala one by one inshaallah this is complete The community will do calculations and also settle accounts today The first time you saw this Like everyone is a lie Fraud and the way it gives a religious touch to politics was given the fog and in every thing in every thing If we bring this religion then today Al Qadar one of the university He was made a Baniya so that he could read Seerat Nabi there It is taught and perhaps some religious education is given Caste is Al Qader Trust University or Al Qader Alhamdulillah to the university today has been handed over to the government and the government Inshallah she will take him under her fold as well Because this was a sham trust, they had no one There was a source of income and it was a miss for caste mafa Using the authority of Tema and Bringing the Conflict of Interest to a close What he said in an envelope sealed in the cabinet He is in front of you for approval and today Alhamdulillah by the power of Allah He has done justice to his character and delivered both the characters and I It would also be pertinent to say here because their There are various groupings in the party He wanted both of them to be punished and This is according to his wishes and prayers. The blessings of Allah are also due to Him accepted and listened because now Aalima Sahiba had also said that my I wish and pray that Imran Khan sahab should be punished and Bushra Bibi should be punished and Like they have to fulfill all the requirements of law He was punished for doing this, which is irrefutable There was evidence which was according to the law and the law There was evidence which was the dead body which was the documentary Was there any evidence or any other dead body among them a piece of edens pyu disprove it could not prosecute all the cases On top of that even a little bit from these sides to him Had to counter it or do something against it He had to prove himself but he couldn’t do it The prosecutor could not prove his innocence He proved his case completely And to prove it with the law and regulations According to this, they were sentenced to 14 years and 7 years respectively. I have made the entire Pakistani nation listen to me Today I offer my many congratulations to you Thank you Ikhtiyar Wali sahab for this will shed some light Bismillah Rehman Rahim very Thank you first of all I told my friend to add some salt and get the cardamom sowed by the people behind so that May their throats feel fresh, their throats have become sore And congratulations to my community, Pakistani community Congratulations, today it has been proved that it was theft No receipt for goods There is no receipt for stolen goods There would be no use of the goods of corruption that’s not proof of it Whatever happened, he came to Pakistan from London It is the property of the Pakistani nation and is the property of the people of Pakistan and it Malik took the money and put it in Riaz’s account Hundreds of kanal land given to Malik Riaz again taken as a bribe and then a very valuable I don’t know how many carat the rings were No one was willing to take Kerat’s work D Those who collect the goods of Ramas and De Beers Those who used to call others thieves, today they themselves I say that stolen certificates are being received yes today is a day of congratulations to muslim league To the workers also and Mian Nawaz Sharif who said that I will make my decision I leave this time with them to Allah Imran is doing justice Khan, you should see what is Makafat Amal whatever is happening to you today Makafat is amal and Shahbaz Sharif gets clean water Today they used to call me and make me sit in dirty water what is your status where are you Stand up and let the history of Pakistan be written that the person who is most against corruption He used to walk carrying a big flag and used to say His throat would have torn and he himself turned out to be a thief And congratulations to you too Saqib Nisar congratulations to your generations too when you A thief and robber is called Sadiq and Ameen You gave me the title Saqib Nisar The decision will be staring you in the face today Have you ever considered a thief, a robber as honest and The man who gave the title of Amin He messed with Pakistan’s Assas The person who used to tell lies every morning and evening is called Sadiq And Amin used to say Umar Ata Bandiya today Your decisions also make you laugh They must have existed if conscience was alive somewhere But if you had made decisions, then today you would have also Your conscience will not let you sleep but if Press Trust of India holding a conference and busting Akil Janib was told that the court did justice And both the characters are linked to the Kaifer character The court has delivered all the demands of justice We have completed them and currently we are working on the cases of 9th May Decisions are also to come, a message for PTI people You just don’t have to panic and remain calm PTI gave impetus to the politics of plunder If yes, then they have got punishment for that today 190 Bani PTI gets 14 crores in million pound case Sal and Bus Bibi sentenced to 7 years imprisonment It has been narrated and in the dens of Rawalpindi £190 million reference expired Judge Nasir Javed of Asaf Court Islamabad Rana held a meeting and gave his verdict The court awarded ₹10 lakh more to Bani PTI Bibi was also sentenced to a fine of ₹ lakh and the court also said today that the fine For not paying the fine, Bani PTI will get another six months’ imprisonment Jailed and sentenced to nine months imprisonment for Bua Bibi There will be police presence and security on this occasion There was a lot of tension and pressure of security too. Strict arrangements were made for the reference The decision has been postponed thrice and the court The decision was secured last year on 18 December and MKM Rahnama by Mustafa Kamal sahab Join us and let’s chat Sir today the issue of 190 million pounds reference The result came in which PTI was made 14 years old He has been sentenced to imprisonment while his wife Bushra Bibi has been sentenced to seven years imprisonment what is punishment comment We will see when Imran Khan sahab ends his rule So his first press I remember the conference very well He held his first press conference After the removal from power, people were realizing that He will tell his reasons, he will tell all his Tell him about the development projects for four years The economy will tell After he came the whole press Only Fara Gogi was defended in the conference What happened to Gogi Bachari, he is innocent and then after that what we saw on tv On TV, they showed that brother, what In a way Bushra Bibi Sahiba is our She is scolding the staff for the gifts that have arrived why have their photos been taken which are their Why are records kept? Then we saw that That Fara Gogi Sahaba, how did Bushra Together with his wife, he earned all the precious things go and see whoever is in Dubai ITV sold all those things to the businessman But all his proofs came out after that Then it comes to this Al Qadir Trust This is the case where you have the right to a principality The money deposited in the Ka Ke was transferred to the state capital I had to provide the number of a bank account there But this account of the Supreme Court that you have I gave it to you and I will complete this work if you conclusion to this Those who know Imran Khan sahab those people who are his and I tell them his point that maybe I should also do this, they say that Imran Khan sahab is not corrupt, he has money Even if we accept his point in the case of If it goes, I think it will be more Imran Khan is very unlucky for the Bushra Bibi to whom he think that instead of Allah there is probably someone who That Bushra Bibi has given him the title of Uzma Because of the thefts of the same Bushra Bibi, today He has been caught red handed but must Kamal sahab, PTI says that We are being targeted politically We are now challenging this politically We will do revenge, we are being targeted From the government’s side, this is not a big deal for us open and shut i wish it were like this because of millions of people who Those hopes are attached to Imran Khan sahab I wish they would listen to what PTI is saying I wish he could go and prove it There is no shut case in the courts nor in that inside this there is someone who is called that It is not a lacuna as far as it is whatever things have become apparent well then Let them go and prove it, it’s a great thing He will challenge it in the High Court Definitely go and challenge him and prove it That brother, all these things are political There is no evidence of this being victimization If there is any proof then I will give you full details. I am telling you sequencing from the watch brother from and and all from Tahayi to and all from things to this point I It is convincing a system of nature that where But you probably thought that some lady those who have been blessed by the great Allah I have given you status, I have given you closeness, to give rule into their hands and to take power from them Allah has to bring out the Taala of that same lady through this I am telling you that your party the disgrace of the party and your Whatever is in the government is a drain seed and There is a charge of corruption against you which you might not have noticed you may have done it or you yourself but that you were with him which she wanted to do in everything, you had everything You are included in everything So today you will know everything that Allah is Showing you how to provide them with the means God is making you what you are today in this disgrace And you are facing this decision This is the very Archnet and what is being denied Do you understand the impact this decision will have on him? There will be a fight between the government and PTI Fun night, take pity on PTI friends We need our friends from PTI He cannot come and say this jokingly apart from that for the release of brother Imran Khan talk about anything else and they might If there was an option to shut down everyone, brother Do it, leave Imran Khan alone, then he will Maybe we can agree on this as well? Is this possible? The answer is that it is not possible. This is not possible so whatever has to happen It has to be done through court and if this is not possible If this is his point then what kind of jokes are these? night and how they joked at night someone else They can’t talk about anything else isn’t he in a position that anyone else your thing on something else your things on something else Imran Khan sahab should get it decided I will expel you from the party if If such a thing happens then I don’t think that Muja There has to be some result or solution but Mustafa sahab blames PTI government She feels that she is threatening us with political revenge They are targeting from the same government If you will mock then I will mock What else will happen or will PTI back off? Tax I understand that whatever I have seen, which is for political optus and PTI has tried its best and He couldn’t kill me with street power could not convince the government or if he cannot instill much fear then he Definitely it is a procedure of joke It has started from both sides, probably both This thing suited both the parties to the opposition to the government but if you ask this I think this will yield results will not yield any result at all because Their only demand is to release Imran Khan How can the government leave the government in Kath What will happen if Imran Khan leaves the government? When there is nothing else apart from that thing if it is there then how can it be a joke and who it’s a joke ok thank you very much Conversation with Mustafa Kamal Sahib will be back after a break stay together How can my hair be as thick and strong as yours? You should apply onion to your hair like me You will have to put in a lot of effort, yes, but Its New Life Boy Naturally Strong Shampoo It contains onion which goes deep into the hair roots And gives thicker and stronger hair up to five times 10 Group one shot and full shot in the saash too Abundant production of herbs This is the real reason for taking tea hydration I use Ban Skin Institute Super light chanting with ranic acid which is inside Hydrate your skin with 200 gms to get Water Fresh Glow Miracles Another historical institution of Sindh government A new journey, a new beginning for the people of Sub Sindh Great news, Phase 1 of Rae Bhutto’s announcement 91 km long city chairman Bilawal Bhutto From Quy Mabad to Shah Faisal under the leadership of Ifta has been done, Bhutto is doing the same Your destination is easy, fast and safe in Karachi Travel on busy roads or across Sindh This 39 km long four lane road is suitable for trade This road will bring hustle bustle in Karachi’s busy life Convenience created through KPT interchange The journey to the M9 motorway is just 25 minutes to important makama through the six interchanges decided in Easy recipes that are opening new avenues of progress Routes from Korangi Creek Avenue to Super Faster travel on the highway, traffic jam and fuel The lack of standards is evident in life Improvement is certain, new and strong Infrastructure Kamil Sharay Bhutto’s journey It will take you to a new era where time It saves money and also provides a comfortable travel facility sharai bhutto’s takkal sharai bhutto where every The path brings you closer to your destination has been at the forefront in service Sindh of those who have L Chocolate Bus I’m new to coal gut strong teeth I will buy it but grandma what will you do with it Hey, this is what gives my bite the nutrition The machine gets only this calcium boost Give nutrition to your teeth with this Str Paste It is not only nutrition Welcome back Tehreek Insaaf’s lawyer Faisal Chaudhry They say that they support today’s decision and today is the darkest day will go everywhere against the decision and will present the first condemnation agreement against There is a case that someone was punished for giving benefits questioned Hassan Nawaz who bought the property Where did he get 9 billion for that and then 18 billion You will have to answer why you sold it for rupees Today is the best day for Imran Khan political considered another means of targeting I try to support this decision We will go everywhere to protest against the decision There is also a protest against it in the world Will present the first case in which you will get benefit This punishment was given and this money was deposited in State Bank Account There is a profit of more than 20 billion rupees in What Nawaz Sharif’s son earned Property worth billion rupees was purchased This question has not been asked to Nawaz Sharif till date that these 9 billion rupees are with his son Hasan Where will you get this answer from? You will have to answer this. Create a feed and loot the country’s money go and after that you come back after dealing with it and your get the case pardoned and reduce the cost of this money Sat today is a dark day in the history of Pakistan Position leader Umar Ayub says decision Just to target Bani PTI If there is a question then it should be asked about Hassan Nawaz Senator Shibli Faraz says in this country There is no law There is a dark day ahead, that’s why that person is being targeted He built a university 47 The government feels bad because these If people have questioned corruption then ask I want this money from Hassan Nawaz brother. How did we take this thing to Kandan Let’s do it in the superior court People will challenge the thief to go out there is kader university in which The government has suffered a huge loss, right Imran? Khan and Bushra Bibi benefited by a penny What happened is that he is being punished for this Aalima Khanum: Anyone can commit a big crime She says she will challenge the decision in the High Court We knew for a month that they would do it A person like Bani PTI needs to be punished I felt pained by the punishment; I am very sad about this system Bani said what happened today happened earlier in the date It has also been punished because Why was a university established in the High Court? We knew for months that there would be a challenge I have to punish you today, I am very sad for sure I felt very sad about this system when I heard the sentence A personality like Imran Khan was ruling over him I also felt very sad because of what Imran Khan said today What is happening tomorrow should be earlier in the date has been punished because you Why was a university created? This is also a punishment It includes taking over the university What was Imran Khan’s dream is unfortunate It is because Bani PTI is standing at this crossroads have gone, yesterday also Bani PTI and Bushra said this Senator Faisal promises his wife will be punished It is said that NCA had said this money Pakistan has a religious card in this matter A shameful attempt was made to play the government and Both PTI people want Bani PTI He stayed in jail and also went to the High Court This decision will not end from today Mujah Kirat This drama and joke will stop on 20th January did not get the trump card despite hoping They are disappointed It was said that both will be punished Because the cabinet was an open and shut case That day too I had told Khan saheb inside Even when it came into the agenda, it was part of the agenda I was not a part of it, suddenly the agenda came up The envelope was not opened it was said The contract has been done and there is nothing more to it It is very sad that it is happening If this drama brings in the religious card then religion It keeps happening in Pakistan, I had told you that it won’t be fun this is a joke Drama is happening, Muja will stop from today what the government is negotiating and what PTI negotiated a joke at night The thing about both of them is that both of them want that Stay inside Bani PTI and Bada Bibi’s 190 million pound reference jail against The trial was completed in one year, this reference The decision has been made thrice Tajab court will give its verdict on 18 December 2024 had reserved before giving the verdict 23 December, then 6 January, then 13 NAB gave the date of January 13 November £190 billion by 2023 in terms of NAB arrests 17 PTI workers Till the day, the PTI made a lot of investigation NAB has announced a loan of Rs 190 million in December 2023 Pound reference filed in Tisab court More than 100 ended and from the side of Nav 59 Witness Ferris presented in reference In total 35 witnesses’ statements were kept pending and Previous Principles in the Reference Filed Under Secretary Azam Khan Former Chief Minister of KP Parvez Ghatak was among the witnesses in the court Zulfi Bukhari Farhad Shahzadi Mirza Shahzad Akbar Ziaul Mustafa Naseem and six other accused was declared a case against and His property and bank account Munjampalli The question is that no chit was given Where will the trial take place? Said in the 21st amendment It has been said that the cases of political era are against the army Justice Samal Mant will not appear in court Military trial cases of civilians in sports Remarks in the Vizarat of Di Vakil Khawaja Harris said there is a limit to political activism The state’s staff is attacked by the state’s staff Breaking security is not political activity Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi said police is a police officer Tearing a person’s uniform is a crime here Commander Lahore’s house burnt at Akri Camp Justice Hassan Azar Rizvi said the Supreme There was an attack on the court as well and that too was serious Khwaja should also include the Supreme Court Harris replied here it is about 21 d1 Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar said crime If the crime is written in the law book If he fits in the Army Act then he will be tried The decision will be made in a military court The case has been written quoting the Attorney General 9th May we will see the accused in the drama Right to appeal conviction in military trial The government refused to give justice Samal Mando Kel resigned from Khawaja Harris that you Which decision of the military trial do you agree with? Khwaja Harris said I am not going to do anything The military does not agree with the decision Supreme Court’s decision regarding the trial Liaquat Hussain case decision of nine judges Are you concerned about your meeting with the Army Chief? What does the government say on the question of Safi Translation of Muzakr Committee by Senator Irfan Siddiqui says barrister Gauhar and Ali Amin Gandapur meets in Pisha There was a discussion on the security situation In a conversation with Eve News he said that PTI demands charter not be presented A committee has been formed to respond to the demand Majeed knows it has been done by Azhar Farooq And tell me what do you know about other things A security related meeting has taken place there is pisha inside them they claim that We had a conversation with one of our muja The series has been started by Ali Gaur sahab Where is the back door, there is a front door, now these are two If they have kept the door open then they should blow it which of these doors does he want to go to if they prefer the back door Then what is the importance of this committee? He has set up a mob committee, that is the same which is in front of us is Imran Khan sahab She is sitting there naming the one whose age is long Ayub Khan sahab is talking to him We are running a charter of demands which The language is very tough, it’s only four seats We have definitely given a little reaction No one cancelled it, we just formed a committee Yes Majeed, a committee has been formed for the whole world He has prepared a response to that After that, they will go to their respective leadership We will go and talk to someone 27 criminals from Khyber Pakhtoon Khan attacked the military In the Court of Appeal against the court sentence Appeal filed Appeal Qazi Anwar Advocate and the colony of Barrister Server Muzaffar Shah have been filed from which the occasion was adopted There is an appeal in the case to condemn the arrest and his trial was conducted in a military court On January 4, the military court sentenced them The accused was not given a chance to give a full explanation The legal requirements of the trial were not met Civilian’s trial in military court Conducting a trial is illegal and unlawful The appeal was condemned during the trial deprived of basic rights Gaya Islamabad High Court formed PTI A look at the prison facilities The High Court removed the objection on the request The registrar’s office had raised objections The court directed the Registrar Office Peer Schedule the request for completion Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Amir Farooq concluded That’s it for now, more news and Keep watching AR for updates News don’t ask from you, ask from you only Siya Gold Beauty Cream tells you that your face is so fair Sia Gold Beauty Cream is available in clear It blooms step by step, it is at the forefront To all Laugh simple happiness above I love simple happiness Pai says a lot Walon’s Chocolate O! Just what you need for shiny hair Sun Sulph Black Shine contains five natural oils With super mix of Vitamin E which will give you Hair up to 24 hours shine on the balcony Shine All The Time with Sun Silk Black Shine This grease is frozen, it’s greasy, look The kadhai and the pot demanded a lot of rubbing You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it No-Rubbing, No-Fuss Max Liquid Three Mahi you love me more than ever That’s a lot, oh no crazy girl I have a lot of data Enjoy the Social Extreme offer of Haiy F 4G get 25gb data and 100 onet minutes because YF 4G has lots of data Mahi, you love me a lot, right? I have lot of data or 4G social Enjoy 25GB data with extreme offer 100 off net minutes because yf has 4g very stubborn Lemon Max bar is a comparison of two bars It dissolves less and hence lasts longer and Cleans lots of utensils, wow now cheating I will not eat it, I will only bring Lemon Max bar Lemon Max Bar dissolves less and lasts longer Only those who are not afraid of increasing age are Insurance that drives away illness and weakness Keep you fit and active, it contains essential oils The vitamins and minerals that make it a Complete and complete bajan gaja with 50 years of Global Experience Across More Than 85 Countries Insure the Number One Nutritional Supplement Drink in the World It Hair Removal Cream Just Apply Leave on and remove to get silky smooth skin Skin Nisa Hair Removal Cream says a lot let’s go Say It With Fingers Say It With Catberry Mini Fingers your catberry now with Biscuit Bunty is your soap slow New Life B Super Fast Hand Wash Now J De Mango Soap with Vitamins 100% stronger protection than Zaraasi Use Ajuba Beauty Cream in just 10 seconds New Magical Formula Be New Ra White For Ultimate Fairness Now Go Beyond Glow with new ajuba beauty cream seedhi sadhi Happiness d sap is simple Khushi How can my hair be thick and strong like yours? You should apply onion to your hair like me You will have to put in a lot of effort, yes, but Its New Life Boy Naturally Strong Shampoo It contains onion which goes deep into the hair roots And gives thicker and five times stronger hair 0 in the sash of o those with hearts Chocolate is not for you, ask it from you only Gold Beauty Cream tells you that your face is so fair Clearly Sia Gold Beauty Cream is available in every The simple joy of time is super The golden color of the morning is in the cup of sacrifice of life with Love is a slavery which is from Juba Laugh simple happiness above But two waves of super laughter arose from the friends wave super evenings ka hasta saath Your talk in super nights Super meets step by step, blooms step by step top of the step on the front simple happiness simple happiness Haite see you smiling All these moments mixing the colors of life in hands Drink Vital tea to increase your life How to live deep and strong like me You should apply onion to your hair like me You will have to put in a lot of effort, yes, but Its New Life Boy Naturally Strong Shampoo It contains onion which goes deep into the hair roots And gives thicker and five times stronger hair ₹ 10 in the sash of also o questions Chocolate Bus Create Bonus Tri Star and remove more foam Wash clothes with more stains the most wow what about the bonus when will this paint come off Master is there, Master Weather will last long Restorative paint that keeps your home’s interior clean protects the walls from all effects of storm and cold Mahfooz Master Weather Resistant will last long If PTI thinks that some people will gather together We will make a big crowd of state employees She will not let both of them gather together I am worthless, we never refuse dialogue we can’t do it, the dialogue is we are people Can I deliver it then not sir, this happens every day The protests will not be allowed when They attacked the state, so now If the TI answers the question, then the truth is true Wasim is no more, I don’t look like a mess I’ll catch you in this fire and then Watch the chant on 11th Birta Jumerat at 11:3 PM only ava new Per Spicy Chicken This is the donut that knocks everybody out says the specialist move sabroso Spicy Chicken Donut that of the Ring War Weather Rest Put that will keep your home’s bare walls clean Master is safe from all effects of cold Weather Resistant Tall My choice will always be favorable and successful Because of my right decisions, I am proud of my beauty My verdict for Dew Beauty Cream To reach my goal and win I need was the best health and fitness marhaba honey number the purity of becoming a forest Mithai 12 group one shot and full shot jada Abundant harvest of herbs Uncle, think about it, yes I have thought about it but it is a pant It is not expensive and is light on the pocket for many years If the paint got applied then it got applied Paint Asia Number One Paint Brand Jas Maree Super Power this alley click i but to you by as me Super 14 years sentence was given to PTI It is granted that this was a million pound case The decision is a shameful decision Decision taken on political bugbear orphan is worth £190 million PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and Rs 10 lakh fine Barsha Bibi was sentenced to seven years in prison Imprisonment, fine of Rs 5 lakh, fine paid If they do not comply, Bani PTI will have to face another 6 months of hard labour. The wife will have to serve three more months’ imprisonment Bushra found guilty of PTI corruption The court convicted the wife for the crime Al Qaid University placed under government control Judge Nasir Javed Rana gave the order to take it judgement in Ayala prison mush wife was arrested from Kamara Court £190 million decision reference 18 The court had reserved the case on December 3 The date was given again but the verdict was not announced Was When the verdict was announced to Khan Saheb, Khan Saheb I laughed, we could see the writing on the wall Neither Khan sahab is disappointed nor am I disappointed Vidan Will file an appeal in the High Court for a few days Etemad Inshallah Tala Khan Sahab Surah Ru Tehreek Insaaf will have 190 million pounds Announcement to challenge the reference decision Barrister Gauhar said today’s decision has given us relief It was no surprise when the verdict was announced Bani PTI laughed against the decision soon Lima Khanam says we will go to the High Court He already knew he was going to punish him Today Umar Ayub felt very sad about this system It is said that today is the court date in Pakistan It is a dark day, the decision is only for Bani PTI Shibli Faraz says this is to target Law and order have a strong hold in the country No, thieves are free and innocent people are imprisoned Bani All the cases against PTI are political. want rulers of law and order This is a criminal case which is being investigated The court heard the case for more than a year It is not appropriate to link everything to politics Law Minister Azam Nazir Dar says he knows this The Government of Pakistan will not get the money Yet the cabinet gave approval to the minister Ata Tar said it was an open and shut case today This is Pakistan’s reign of justice The biggest mega corruption scandal to date their hands were stained with corruption The decision should not affect Muzaki Talal Chaudhary said that he will survive in this case It was difficult, even PTI people knew it what decision come yesterday also I told you on your show that we should decorate it Both would have to because it was an open and shut case That day too I saw Khan saheb inside the cabinet who was told when this came on the agenda It was not part of the agenda all of a sudden The agenda arrived but the envelope was not opened It seemed that the contract was done and no one would do anything about it. it doesn’t matter Yesterday also I had said that Bani PTI and Vishra Senator Faisal promises his wife will be punished It is said that NCA had said this money Pakistan has played religious card in this matter A shameful attempt was made to play Ala Adliya This decision will not end even after going to Both the government and PTI want it Bani PTI remained in jail from today Muza Karrai This is a drama and a joke, we will go on 20th January Trump card will not come, they will be disappointed It must have been a very long time How many taxes have been imposed on this and How much have we put into it PTI is in the National Assembly and Senate Arkan’s objection barred the release of PTI Slogans raised by PTI members in National Assembly People’s Party tore copies of the agenda Rukun Shazia Marri said in Awan Bani The country is crying about PTI The speaker is not talking about the issues Said PTI members adopt a serious attitude The Senate does not adjourn the session until the end The hearing has also been postponed till 4 p.m. on Thursday. Gave They go on claiming that our There has been a discussion about our Muja starting one Ali Gaur sahab said that one back has been taken there is a door there is a front door now these two doors if If they have opened it then they should say that Which of these tors does he want to go to? Imran Khan sahab’s nomination is pending and Which is being headed by Umar Ayub Khan We are in talks with him, barrister Gauhar gave Tasur on front or back door Talks are going on with Barrister Gauhar Waje Which door do we want to go to? We will talk to this committee which is headed by Maryu settled in Senator, Translation of Hukum Muzakr Committee Irfan Siddiqui says PTI’s charter of The tongue of demand is strong, we have no demands A committee was formed to ensure that the matter was not justified Ijazul Haq has given it, says both sides Some Nasir Mujahi do not want judicial commission To make the Supreme Court only Government and opposition can make a request It cannot decide whether to appoint a judge for commission be brought into Nomai’s punishment has been proved in the court’s decision Clean chit was not given, the question is that Where will the trial take place as stated in the 21st amendment Cases of political era in army court Justice Jamal Mando will not work against Khali Remarks Vizarat There is a limit to the activity in the princely area The attack was not a political activism, Justice Hassan Asas Rizvi said police personnel’s uniforms were torn It is a crime here that the house of Corps Commander Lahore was burnt Askari Camp Office was attacked Justice Jamal called it an attack on Parliament If it happened then why was there no military trial Is the parliament the most supreme? Parliament itself is not an attack or an insult Justice Hasan said that the Supreme Court There was an attack on him too and that too was serious Include the court also till the end postponed and Pakistan against West Indies Batting continues in the first test in Multan First session played due to bad weather It was not possible to have three in the national team Specialist spinners and a fast bowler included Test of young batsman Mohammad Huraira Barah on sports from debut test series is showing the way Here are the headlines, did you know 190 million pounds In the reference, Bani PTI was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and A penalty of 10 lakh rupees has been awarded to Tasa The court sentenced Bushra Bibi to 7 years imprisonment and ₹ Sentenced to a fine of one lakh rupees For not paying the fine, Bani PTI will get another six months’ imprisonment And Bushra Bibi was sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment. Basha Bibi will be arrested from the room court This was done thus by the court To take the university under government control The court ruled in its judgment that Tisab It has been said that PTI is corrupt and corrupt Bushra has been found to be a mongrel in her practices BB on corruption and corrupt practices of Bani PTI and of Bani PTI and forum for dispute against the decision of the wife and the elder brother But if you can file an appeal then Bani PTI 190 million pounds against Bush BB Reference’s jail trial completed in one year Hafiz Ehsan saheb has become an expert in law Thank you very much for being with us Time’s 190 million pound case is in the works 14 years for PTI and 7 years for Bua Bibi The jail sentence has been pronounced, says PTI that she will challenge this what do you say about this Quoted from Bismillah Rehman Rahim Pakistan’s criminal justice system if there is any court within it that If punishment is given then it is for the accused or now it is for one conviviality and go and say inside that thing that The lower court did not make the right decision And what about Pakistan and the world all the accused or those who come later It is convincing to appeal and Ultimately if it is difficult even inside the High Court If he was not inside the bench then Pakistan That Supreme Court form is also available Thereafter the Supreme Court of Pakistan The review form is also available but The basic point is that the case Today the Accountability Court has decided that I have decided that those four or five things are big It is important and this is what forms the foundation At this time, the decision which has come today, which section Pakistan’s accountability below nine Whatever the court has said is corrupt or not. Section 9A1 and 9A1 of Practices 2 did exercise is this section 10 or Then section 15 comes under it which Some things automatically trigger that dis Qualification also comes under it if Yours If it comes, you can avail any loan for 10 years. Disqualified to hold public office If what is there is considered then this is a there are things on the basis of which this It can be said that the things that have come today The way inside this trial court, Prime Minister This was a challenge for Minister Former A challenge can come in the court as well when you have something in front of you that The admitted position is that money is earning money The one who was there had gone from Pakistan The law of Britain Crime of Seed Act It is 2002 and he was made four feet below it after four feeds which is one with the understanding that Pakistan’s It will not come under the State of Accounts Came inside the Supreme Court of Pakistan which was a civil liability of Baria town 460 billion in that amount An attempt was made to adjust and Britain had made its entire process Under the Proceeds of Crime Act, Include them in the investigation 2000 rupees of their accounts have been frozen By December 2017, from approximately 10 accounts and Berea Town gave away what was there The option was of a civil liability if If you accept this thing then Your money will be returned to you inside the country and if you contest it If you do this, not only will you get your money back Rather the punishment you will get is that of Bitaniya if it can be done according to the law then when all Things were admitted that money was being laundered from Pakistan Baria Town had him or Malik Riaz Sir or his family accepted him and the money that was deposited in Pakistan’s account he should have come inside who at that time was a Civil liability was the supreme law of Pakistan 460 billion rupees worth of his property inside the court not only against getting it adjusted An attempt was made but the money was transferred from that account Whoever is inside came and went to Pakistan Supreme Court’s account misused It was revealed that the one that had a penny inside it was white I had to get inside Mani’s face, there was Mani inside him The learning money was received and adjustment was made to it was done inside the thing which was later The Supreme Court of Pakistan said that Money Learning money is not in our account It must go to the same place it could come The law of Britain is that the State of should go inside the accounts and that money what was there was provincial government and federal came under the government and Simal Nius Lee is in this process when the trust agent if he was not doing it then one of the cabinet members The name above the minister is Malik Riaz Saheb’s sons own 458 kanal of land transfer and the Government of Pakistan is in those negotiations The asset recovery unit goes to whose cabinet did not even give them the authority to They should go and take action on these things and this And due to all these aspects they were punished Thank you very much Hafiz Ehsan sahab To chat with Ava New, it costs 190 Bani PTI gets 14 crores in million pound case Father-in-law and wife sentenced to 7 years imprisonment was given Prime Minister Rifa Khawaja will take Sialkot Asif don’t do a news conference, don’t lie in the charge So the robbery was going on at that time It was worth £190 million at that time. committing an offence it was not a question not that it is All the money has come out in the case When he was shouting slogans against thief and dacoit we of the people Against this, there is Rs 190 million in the government account The pound which was to be credited was a national crime The agency had seized it from Britannia He sent it and put it in Malik Riyaz’s account It is a very simple case that money is what it is of Pakistani government and Pakistani people and there is a loan account of Malik Riyas he was fined and fined which has been converted into loan This was the judgement of the Supreme Court During the regime, the Sakan Sar and the Account The account that was opened is still in default today In In that, my loan is one or two installments or Rs. 190 million pounds this credit was done which was reverse Done It is a very simple thing, for some it is a puzzle or I don’t know if that money is from Pakistani 190 million pounds belonged to the public which Malik Riyaz this fact went into the account of or this Nobody cares about the reality it may be that it was the money of the national treasury and that Malak went to Riaz’s account and it was passed by the Supreme Court also in which other people like Sak Saad sat happened Whatever tours he had, he was supreme all this in the court Did you calculate what happened against Nawaz Sharif? The case could not be proved inside the court been imprisoned and this is against what Shaukat Khanum said His party is accused of embezzling money I have installed it myself, I have installed it It has $3 million on its balance sheet thrown out of real estate project In and there is no university This is something the media should highlight Kader University is not a university it does not have any charter it is HEC Approval from Higher Education Commission etc. any there application There has been no application till date For the University No, there is no spirituality in it There are two departments in the caste and 300 There are about 350 or so kids there reading and there is 400 acres of land and the trustee which is the lady who is Alia is Imran Khan’s wife and Imran himself khan sahab his trustees first he is gogi She has gone out, I don’t know how long If there is any fight among the people after collecting the goods goods because she has gone away with the goods it here It has been 4 years since this fake university which is known as University Al Qadr University said its been 4 years I went there and found 300 or 400 left at the most. I don’t have much authority, but hundreds I have more than 400 children, you don’t have any seen on tv you should take your child to university There is a rush of children and there is excitement there are two children sitting there Whoever sits there, feels four crows There was no one left to give, no one to give their computer that all the kids used to tell me again and again Are you getting a computer degree? or someone he has dated Having more On top of that, this web is being set up and all It is said that Hassan Nawaz also has no All transactions were done by NCA Investigation was done and Hassan Nawaz was given a clean chit chit was given there was no charge against him If there is any allegation then tell me, there are roads But those who keep running after vehicles PTI people should be held responsible for this Don’t tell me which one is against As Nawaz Co case the way his money came here So their money came here It has never happened in Pakistan that The amount of the estate which is someone’s personal should be put into the account and then it is Four or five ministers have given statements on TV There are four or five ministers in different capacities There are four or five bawda sahabs in me, Fawad Chaudhary Sir we were not told anything The entrance is to the sealed envelope which is why was the sealed envelope brought why was the sealed envelope brought why was it an agenda item if so Item: When the cabinet meeting was being wrapped up It was getting over, brother this too is a It’s an item, people asked what’s in it I did not say give approval give approval Give because an incident is happening The plan was to grab the stolen goods At that time the incident was taking place and his cabinet Took approval from Cho ever in Pakistan The approval of the incident is given by the cabinet No one needed to take anything from Imran Khan also did this which made the whole world a thief says Now I heard it on TV The university which is under government control is going or so called university university then If it is not there then it can lead to some misunderstanding can’t stay It should be a university Or is this money in some government account I went to Sarkar Malik Riaz sahab so forgive me That’s why he doesn’t come to Pakistan Malak Sir, he has got the benefit and his They have defaulted on the account action should be taken against them His recovery so that whatever they did the Supreme Court the amount that has been placed under their responsibility Recovered Let this series of lies in false politics go away Lies must end to make it true It still happens today, it’s a lie 100 years from now still a lie after The ruling class which is called Pakistan’s The public kills them and sends them away or to someone through which they become rulers is it not enough that Allah has I am honored that you have arrived here then you start stealing Start putting your hands in people’s pockets start putting in the throws of pickpockets Do the movements So this is for the whole country for 25 crore people who There is shame and this is the destination And there are countless people who are his voters for those who sing his praises point of thinking that this government money is yours, ours, everyone’s Why is the money in Malik Riaz’s account? one question only one question that malak riyaz’s Why in the account tried to ask some long questions There is no need for just Che’s Malik Riaz Why did it go to the account The money was government’s money and I put my money into it the letter is present and when the letter is there They did not know that this incident was This incident is bound to happen with the money I will repeatedly tell this to the media people as well I will tell everyone that wherever you are there is no debate it happens that he is in the palace of Malag Riyas Why was this government money spent and please explain is it a university or not a university No how much is it not two two two just There is no department there and neither are 400 children He studies there, it has been four years since he going to the university and somewhere else He has taken leave from the university It’s such a big fraud If it goes then they say yak na budh yak On fraud in the name of Natai religion fraud and whatever you do with your opponent What he did is in front of you Mayan Aash now says now he cries strangely that us in prison this is us in prison His mother Maryam Nawaz has died Mian Nawaz Sharif kept telling me that he will be my Someone please make me talk to my wife Di, these are not old things, these are five Four or five years old things This person has committed atrocities He is the best amongst the Pakistani people that The oppression that is happening with the Pakistani people is The person has done this and even today many people are doing this This nation of India is mired in deception this is nausar baaz fadia here fadia And it is a matter of sorrow for us and for 25 crore people. talk that such people reach the position of ruler There are women of the law here in this country There should be a hand of Pakistani people who This decision should be the final decision to be respected by him This sequence must stop We need people like Imran Khan The thieves enter the place through the door and then someone starts looting Some are intelligent, some are gogi, some are strange It is a strange name and the name itself is Sharifa Wale no the name is goga gogi of crime broken ears If not then I request you to come here But my problem is that you are not bothered about anything else If you wish to ask a question then my lord Today’s HIB court decision came after this This is what started as a dialogue will it continue or will it end and Along with this I want ten times that this came It is possible during dialogue order First of all the punishment will be changed There is no issue of active order etc. This is their demand of PTI The prisoner who is under the Mujrak is staying here go but it’s not They must have been punished by the courts I can give them relief if relief is possible So one of them is this The second time you went you met me I am big in the series of Karrai Muja Karta If I am infamous then I should not become more infamous How can I refuse to ask this question? Le Maryam Nawaz and especially on you But don’t let yourself be denied by applying your faith in it did someone tell me i am a duck I am in the team of Muza karti ba shool Rana sunala I am also like the Azam Nazir tar of the respected sir Speaker sahab is a part of that team Someone please tell me that I stopped him from going to Mazara did you do it or did you meet me in some party meeting that which is opposed that I am just saying that these thieves and robbers If something could come out of the mujra that I have Pavlo’s first seizure you are having fun with these people right I am the biggest supporter among political dogs I am a shy dog, but I am a shy dog I keep saying again and again that I will make fun of them Spread these and also those who are dependent There are other forces in Pakistan too bring it in the middle so that it is only once a solution to the whole problem should be found instead Who would deny this dance but I would meet you and then I would go to you that my We did not meet, I told you this only yesterday or the day before He will not meet me later I got to know that we had met, someone was meeting us Greetings! meeting long story sunari gal G pocket shaft for boost if yes then this is me he himself said it PTI people protested against the decision of Mujahideen It will not have any effect on Mujah, may Allah bless him I am happy with who I am and who I am for caste anarchy, for this country, for this For the people of this country do something for interest so that the country obstacles in improving the situation in They are protesting against those who are outside Their people are sitting there doing propaganda Inflation is going down at your place Your debts are getting reduced, inflation is what it is 37 38 it has come down to four three four Your remittance is your civil disobedience I told people that there was no money at home send me what happened four billion dollars which is more Came Fasla I think that technically this The cabinet does not take a decision because The cabinet hasn’t even seen it I am talking about some technicalities I don’t want to tell you anything, just do it like this It was taken that the approval has been done has been done and the second is that the cabinet is Cannot give approval for illegal work If she gives it then the value of that approval There is no one doing any illegal work There is no value of anything except cabinet Whatever authority there is, if it endorses it She does it, it has no value bha sahib Whatever corruption has happened, every single thing of Fara Gogi The name has come in the place, it will come in the coming days Fara Gogi can also be arrested and brought Is I don’t want it, it’s Masru’s property Recovered This whole market should go and ask saheb also and silence is required I went, I don’t know ga maal nakrae la ke to In this case, Gamal is the real culprit There is money in the account, today he is in Dubai There is a plan there in collaboration with the government Whatever he is doing, he is doing that for his building. if it is there then will that also be brought back and this The money will be taken back, I will take it from the media People ask why don’t you take his name First of all, media people should answer I took your name, no, no After that, I did not respond and it appeared on the screen Jio users no one looks like goods after boll harvest did you see the future of any party Whatever the situation, the people of Pakistan decide it. and we are the people of Pakistan Imran Khan is trying to understand what PTI is What is Khan and what are the people around him? There are such people who should be expelled from the party It has been given and he is still doing Kawali There is a gentleman who is earning 190 million tomorrow What’s above the pound is what I’m talking about I am doing what I was doing today for the party very large hud how is it that you know You will go away in such a wrong way 201 of After doing the badra it started and now this series Before them there was no ism What do you think, whoever comes under the influence of Satan Do you care, can you tell me who Nawaz Sharif is? There was an allegation against him for which the Supreme Court he had punished her, right Tell me if any allegation was made against him Yes if someone tells me all these stories then it would be good that what he did There is a network of roads laid across this country Happened she has a daughter who is in the hands of your children instead of teaching them abuses i am what i am Instead of that, whatever he has, no one should give it to him. Teach them to embrace what is in their hands yes she is giving them scholarship giving laptop so that he can go to any maktaba He is the master of any thought without worry The urban people of Pakistan are useful Only Shabaz Sharif can become a responsible citizen has been doing this and is doing your turn even today He has driven around in an economy car she was falling in the ditch, shahbaz sharif told her I reversed it and put it on the road again put on the road to progress He told me that he is the one who is self-made PTI reported from inside that the efforts are being managed. He himself praised the rule of Shabaz Sharif of What can be a bigger certificate than this? This is very kind thank you very much Vajra Dafa Khawaja Asif News Conference and he quoted the decision as saying that during the period of Chaudhary Saki Visar 190 The Million Pound Affair and Shaukat Khanum by removing $3 billion from the balance sheet of Media should highlight real estate should do al-qad university Not a University is Pakistan’s Electro Optical The satellite has been launched into space Chinese media says the satellite was developed by China KG Chavan from Satellite Launch Centre in Khala Long March was sent to the satellite D Carrier Rocket Launched From Joe Madar Eon successfully entered in Pakistan’s first self-created satellite which can be used for such purposes in which the female surveillance may be a bit Sparks says Satellite launch in Pakistan’s offshore journey An important item is stool There is more news but it is time for one Brake what does one get at every step and it blooms at every step at the forefront of the simple happiness above super simple happiness This grease is super frozen, look it’s greasy The kadhai and the pot demanded a lot of rubbing You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it No-Rubbing, No-Fuss Max Liquid Three Cleanliness increases and tea becomes even more enjoyable Thakar is now present inside the ₹ Tej Dam get the code by sending it to star 806 star K 100 AB exactly Free my choice is always free, success is inevitable Because of my right decisions, I am proud of my beauty My Verdict for Dew Beauty Cream Say It With Fingers Say It With Catberry Mini Fingers your catberry now with biscuit of the morning listen belly of the cup of life with Speed in the open moment friend it is a story from Juba There’s simple happiness above Super meets step by step, blooms step by step at the forefront of the steps There is simple happiness above It’s simple happiness UP 129 Quality Tests & Checks and DNA Gal Standard for Trust in Barcoding Now no rattle from quality Karshi Tathia only Smile, just the chocolate of the hearted o a lot goes This is another historic new achievement of the Sindh government New thought, new journey, new beginning, people of province Sindh Great news for Rae Bhutto’s Phase One up to 91 km long city chairman Bilawal Shah from Quu Abad under Bhutto’s leadership Sharay Bhutto says Faisal’s Ifta has been done Making your destination easy, fast and safe Be it travelling on the busy roads of Karachi or the This 39 km long area is good for trade in Sindh Lane road in the busy life of Karachi KPT will create ease through this the way from the interchange to the motorway m9 Through six interchanges, covered in just 25 minutes Easy access to important sites which are opening New avenues of progress Korangi Creek Avenue Fast travel from super highway to traffic jam and the visible decrease in fuel consumption Betterment in life is certain, new and strong Hamid Sharai Bhutto’s vision of infrastructure The journey will take you to a new era where It saves time and gives a comfortable travel experience also sharai bhutto’s takkal sharai bhutto where Every path takes you closer to your destination Sindh is leading in providing service Jhalak Hand & Foot Beauty Cream in your hands And your feet get a perfect glow and smoothness Softness Glance Hand and Foot Beauty Cream Sensation rapid action in just 60 seconds It gives relief, I recommend it Daily dosage of Sensodyne Rapid Action Patients who use it come back and tell It Works O Bas Dil Walon Ki Chocolate OOOOO Just add one cup of tapal to it and add another cup of it to it. Tea is a simple pleasure for us every moment The golden color of the super subhaa after the first cup With of life Speed in the open moments, love is a slavery that is from Juba There’s simple happiness above The afternoon was filled with super laughter with friends wave super evenings ka hasta saath Super Come, tell me your story at night Super meets step by step, blooms step by step at the forefront of the steps There’s simple happiness above super simple marriage happiness is golden These moments are very special Let’s add colors to life in all these moments Drink Vital tea, live life with sense Rapid action provides relief in just 60 seconds yes i recommend sensation rapid Daily use of the action is a must for the patient come back and tell me it works Welcome Back Kabina Right Sizing Idar has approved the second stage of Alim Malik is present with us, more than him You will know Alim and Faqi cabinet did right sizing This is phase two, the second stage, please approve it Idar has given the second phase in this Various players including upgradation and Inzamam Your mother is also approved in this One important development is that the cabinet of Wafa The third party audit of various departments has given its approval and it has been decided It has been found that third party audit is a good option Received the services of Aamil Consultants of Fame and to those consultants who are public Private Partnership Authority is through it It will be taken along with this decision also It has been said that the Committee for Rightsizing is for third party consultants who are she will also face the market of Later PO RAS will be decided along with this It has been decided that Pakistan Industrial Technical Assistant Centre His fate was decided a year later It will be seen after one year that this institution what should we do with this should we end this do I have to do right sizing in this also or What will be its future along with this All of Pakistan has been warned To Industrial Technical Assist Center He should himself create a son-in-law for the principles of Kafa Along with this the cabinet also decided that the right sizing committee of the cabinet there is his jelly committee which is involved in all this Review of the implementation of the process It’ll be ok, thank you very much The United Arab Emirates further extended the one-year Confirmation to roll over two billion dollars for State Bank says UE has given Rs 2 billion Dollars are kept in the State Bank of Pakistan The maturity period of these deposits is January 2025 is coming to an end There was another good news for Pakistani Mashhad July to December current account 1 billion 21 Gujarat’s financial year was a billion dollar surplus Current account in the first six months of 2019 stood at Rs 1 billion 39 lakh crore. The entire amount of 7 crore dollar was continuously in the fifth Current account 58 even in the month of December 20224 November 2024: Surplus of 20 million dollars Current account is 68 crore 40 lakh dollars Surplus 1225 from ADB and All India Bank Shoaib is a victim of a billion dollar conspiracy Nizami is present with us, more than him You will know Shoaib ji from ADB and those from World Bank There is funding for different projects A lot of effort is made but when When our turn for Amal Ramat comes, we have the capacity but it is not capable of that Whatever they have properly, it is all Funds can be used for five years Inside, there are about 15 million dollars worth of Financing has been done so far, a lot of it The project which has a budget of 15 crore dollars Project Emergency Assistant Project was ADB’s For him, he has not been able to do anything in two years Physical progress has not been made by Alamy Bank for the Khyber Pass Economic Corridor with 46 billion dollar project signed in 2019 was signed and so far only on top of it One percent of physical progress has been seen While financial progress is not yet visible On one side we are talking about the amount of funding On the other side we do what The implementation is so slow that the funds I am not able to utilize it completely, ok hey thanks a lot You have more news but it’s time to come here have a break O on the chocolate for the people with heart oh i mean for sure this is the same color no yes yes One thing is for sure that this color will be applied once If you go, wait for years for leave Light on the pocket, Nippon pants last for years When I went, Nippon Paint became Asia’s number one paint brand simple happiness simple happiness Hape As if it was a cadre fix stubborn stains aunty surf excel is it new Surf Excel’s Stain Lifter Technology Removes all kinds of stubborn stains Why be afraid of stains, it’s all single and not a glimpse Glimpse for Wining Serum Extra Results Or mix it in any cream and see 10x More Glow Glimpse Whitening Serum Glow do it Jhamke Paw Skin Institute’s new Paw Bright Beauty Face Wash with New Cinemale Give it 4x brightness so you get Ultimate Bright Skin Point Miracles Happen Sensation Rapid Action Just 60 Seconds I relax and after that you can do your I can enjoy my favorite food and drink I recommend Sensation Rapid Action use it daily because it It has an immediate effect, patients come back and tell how it works this grease is frozen He is Greek, look he is studying and asking for a pot I rubbed it a lot, I rubbed it a lot, now I clean it It will be easily removed without any hassle and without any rubbing. Liquid will clean you three times more, Mahi I love you very much oh no crazy girl There is too much data and this is the social extreme of 4G Enjoy 25GB data and Rs 100 off net with this offer Minutes because yf 4g has lot of data Is The golden color of the morning is in the cup of sacrifice with the slogan of life Speed, love in open moments, a story which is from Juba There is simple happiness above It is found at every step and blooms at every step the foremost most There’s simple happiness above sapna is simple happiness sapna Say It With Fingers Say It With Cat Bury Mini Fingers bury your cut now with biscuit sense Rapid action, relief in just 60 seconds and after that you can do whatever you want And you can enjoy the food, I recommend I use Sensan Rapid Action daily Use it carefully as it gives instant effect The patient comes back and tells it Works Welcome Back Wazir Ala Punjab Maryam Check out the Nawaz Scholar Program’s speech You are watching the scene, it is being divided High Minister of Punjab Maryam Nawaz in Talwa Checks are issued under the scholarship program Mizpah Zulfikh Sawal Medical College I request you to come on stage and give your check recovered do so the wait is finally over students You will listen to a mother today. by calling on stage Earlier this and that mother, till today everybody has said Will they give us scholarships? Nobody gave us any By providing scholarships we get access to education Chief after giving merit and training Clapping for the minister from every corner to be should madam i can have you on the stage speech please bismillah rahman Rahim Nare Bal Parliamentarians MNS MPA ministers go astray Karam and my today The Chief Guests of my promising one Children my sons and daughters you on my side Assalam Walekum Walekum to everyone Alarm to you all First of all I am thankful to Allah I thank you that we are gathered here today and To celebrate such a beautiful achievement we are all gathered here and after that I will tell you all the depths of the heart more promising than Congratulations on winning the scholarship Many many congratulations to you and I am yours I congratulate the parents of your house I congratulate those who have such a big achievement that I want to say The boys and kids are sitting a little behind me The sound is coming no and these special children are also sitting It is very nice to see you I liked it You are as happy today as your parents are. I am happy kids Honestly, from the depths of my heart, maybe I am happier than you are today The biggest to date for Pakistan program this is a scholarship program and We chose it and named it promising because in Punjab I knew that There is no dearth of talented kids, so today I very happy right now this girl was sitting here and she told me whispered in my ear we weren’t sure you would When you come to the small town of Okada, I It is said that Okada is not a small town Okada is such a beautiful city and it belongs to my heart and very close to the heart of Nawaz Sharif sahab No person is big or small Things are neither small nor big, now look at this So many Mashallahs in Okada for the promising ones Achievers are sitting here and there Mashallah and now I Who is your education minister Rana Sikandar I also want to congratulate them And Their Rana, you have become a hero Mashallah I like the way it is Rana like my younger brothers for the first time He has become an MP and has become a minister for the first time But he has told that the students of Punjab There is a thirst for money, there is a thirst for money in their hearts Maqam has made a place for itself because it see you look at this Children, I want to share some heartfelt things with you today. I have come to talk about your heart came to hear things I am a minister who is always on the chair Guests always sit on high chairs like of honor but you look at that since We have come here to protect your Rana The education minister is standing behind me He hasn’t sat down for a minute and it looks like he is one of you and you are one of them And I am a child of good morals Sometimes I get frustrated that this work Why didn’t it happen sooner? Even if I scold you, you do it like a good child He keeps quiet and takes the scolding but he works hard works from Hey kids, I made a decision I thought I could have been Rana She tells Sikandar that in all the universities in colleges where this laptop sorry this which There are scholarships, they are going there Give these cheques to the children so that they The fee is payable but I thought that This is how I tell my children who have so many those who have made great achievements who have worked so hard day and night This position has been achieved by hard work He is eligible for scholarship, I tell him I will be deprived of seeing them, of meeting them remain deprived I will go but I have to leave my children, my sons and Girls, I did not know that Honestly he says its too good to be True I didn’t know I would be like this when I will come to you with so much love You will welcome me with so much love and you will establish that relationship with me which a never ending relationship yesterday when I was in Faisalabad a child He said that we had heard that the state is like a mother and today as our Chief Minister We have also seen in the state that mother would be like I have three kids Mehr Nisa and Junaid and I am as proud of his achievements as I am of them. I am as happy as I am with their achievements I celebrate for her as much as I do for them I think I would work as hard for them I’m sure he’s happier than that Yours Good I think about you more than that and this relationship that I have with you This relationship which is between us, our hearts This thing has been decided in the meantime on oath I say this is the most precious thing in my life Sarmaya and I have traveled a lot in the world Scholarships given Mashallah in DG Khan This is my last visit to him on Monday after the scholarships which this one which this one This is the stage when its division will be complete My heart was saddened because it was all I did not sit in the office during the month of January I would have never been with children in a city I would have never been with kids in some city I am and I think I think in 10-11 months this will be mine This love that I have received is my greatest love The biggest achievement is the biggest Achievement but I will not weaken this relationship being I will not give these relationships everyday Inshallah I am becoming a lock with laptops now near you I will come And I have told Rana Sikandar that whatever There are meritorious students and laptops I don’t have the means to buy them all Providing laptops without any hassle is our goal Responsibility Having more Kids I have top of the line laptop which I have selected it for you myself. Rana to Rana please tell someone about that laptop We will bring it and very soon your first shipment will be Laptops are here I think you stay tuned to all laptops And I will come myself and give you laptops, Insha Allah I will thank you look this is a laptop which you will get it right now is this look sit down sit down Please this is the latest laptop from Core i hai inshallah this laptop will be launched very soon will also be in your hands and you can Assignments If you need research I can do it I encourage all of you to do research You should search for the truth and answer your questions The best use of it is studies I should use the laptop, inshallah I will bring the children to wherever I go To travel to and from the university, visit your college Where e-bikes are needed for commuting If yes then insha allah next year Absolutely free 100000 one lakh e bikes which We will give that to our students, Inshallah So that you can also get scholarship from your parents on top of that your just now that girl said that four I have sisters and brothers for my parents It was difficult to bear their burden so I tell you this I want to tell this to your parents too I want to say that Inshallah now this You don’t have to bear the burden because now it’s The responsibility is of your mother Maryam Nawaz Sharif I just received a request from you There is an under pass and boarding If the facility is not available here then I will come to you today. I am going with you with the promise that Insha may allah taala as soon as it is possible this under pass I will get it completed under my supervision And you will see that inshallah lock boarding Facility will also be available very soon at Okada University will be ready inshallah This morning I was having a meeting which was under Construction is our whole intention in which Our Roads program also includes Nearly 700 roads are being built in Punjab At this moment, Mashallah, when I am watching that Was So when I became the Chief Minister, So initially I went to Safe City Lahore I saw there were many young girls She was working and Big When it came to meticulousness, you would have gone and talked about it If you interact, you will get to know The people sitting on the chairs have no relation with the public should be connected in such a way that The message doesn’t reach them because it gets filtered Whatever is there, it should reach them directly Direct contact with the public If I wanted I saw today that they The girls told me that we have no There is no boarding facility, what is this bring bring bring boarding facility If not, I promised him today and The boarding works which began next month It is done and now it is on the verge of completion Alhamdulillah similar facility is available here but we are in ukra university I will make it and want to make another announcement for the children of Kara that we will soon Inshallah Tala Okada Medical in 2025 Inshallah we will give you college also So that the children of Okada can get admission in medical college I don’t have to go far for this, what is this son, take it come bring it take it come on come on You all love my photos so much, you too come come come come sleep sweet naa you are so sweet look here i got a picture Choti is shaking hands with Nawaz Sharif sahab She is big now, Mashallah look at this how Nice to be your loser I got it by the way thank you Oh thank you, you made this yourself, very nice How long did you take to make it, you spent the entire night I have made it, thank you so much, where are you from son? Got more scholarship from Okar today Mashala because okay okay let’s apply I will get it inshallah thank you thank you so much please take this thank you you small Children, thank you so much, son, thank you thank you children please help them don’t fall Come on kids I want to tell you that Mashallah thousands of children are sitting here A child cannot stand up and tell me this That He did not get any scholarship on merit The kid can’t stand up and tell me that While giving scholarship, any minister’s was it recommended by any MNAC MPA or You were asked which political party you belong to and if you belong to PMLN If you belong to then you will get scholarship will get it and if not associated with PMLN If you keep this, you will not get any scholarship from anyone did not question Went Because whichever party you belong to Whatever your political philosophy is You belong to the family but you don’t rule You are my responsibility for Punjab responsibility and that responsibility to me Feeling I have heard so many emotional stories and yesterday the children told me one of them said that My mother had a tumor and that tumor When it resurfaced, my father said that Either you get yourself treated or I get your mother treated If I can continue your training Then he got a scholarship and then a child told me yesterday about the condition of our house I was bad so I had to postpone my training for a year had to suspend his degree I got a scholarship next year so I I am so happy and today the child who said that It was the last animal and my father sold it If my fees were paid I would take the child to the place where he is also sitting here i want to tell him this Now you don’t need to sell your animal It will happen inshallah Tala and I are in the news in front of Allah Tala I am and the boys and kids are listening to me did not listen no no I don’t have any voice Let any child of mine come, let him come My son or my daughter is sitting here. Yes sir I meet hmm thank you thank you oh so sweet one more hey thank you so much thank you I call you I am a trouble son I am here right now I will talk to you again ok ok son sit down i don’t forget No Sit down kids I want to tell you this Everyone may face a shortage of jobs The professions are not the same but the education is He is the biggest social equalizer, have you heard? It may be that someone’s origin is very humble He comes from a very humble background in the background and he stands for a great deal What was the reason if the reason was education then now This promising scholarship is for you My heart is the beginning of the interpretation of dreams wants that even if you don’t have a job and the child who is having an occupation, if he One can go to Lums University fast I can go to hell so now even a child who does not have that kind of occupation can go fast can go in lams can go to waste and without the worry that his Who will pay the fee and who will pay it for his parents If it will be a burden then I want you now that your attention Focus 100% on building your career for my higher education and for my in making the life you have better I will help you to improve your prospects I have dreamt, all children dream All daughters dream, all sons dream and they dream that we We too have reached a better place in life If someone says that this person is successful in life then You all dream, work hard, I will help you I have come with a promise to fulfill your dreams inshallah And you said this scholarship, I thank you. I tell you over and over again, my children don’t say thank you this is what scholarship is I have no God, no favors is this scholarship you have worked hard day and night Through your hard work, through your dedication, through your studies, With your courage, you can create a pile of business You won this scholarship despite being This is your hard earned money from day and night whom I just honored and I want you to raise your head and Take the scholarship by holding your head high among the people Go, I have earned this by my hard work Won a scholarship and these scholarships help you Many children should have been found long ago There are those who remained deprived of education or those whose education remained incomplete or He had to leave his education because he had no business If they were not there, it would mean a lot of loss A lot of loss has been done to me Going from city to city, she is mourning that loss The damage I didn’t do but be I am done with having kids so I have a lot of fun There was a demand that only first year students Why only them, second year children also Scholarships should be available for third year Children should also get scholarships I have decided that this year we Scholarships given to 300 children of Punjab this coming June next year we These scholarships are given to 50000 children Inshallah we will give you second chance and very soon I am also for year and third year children I am bringing some scholarships don’t miss out on education What you guys need right now The song was prepared for me, children performed by these are his words these were who is this who we Staying inside and burning our house I want to tell you this and my No, it’s not a political matter at all Understand that I am like a mother to you for your future, for your condition, for your For the present, I am concerned for you Like a mother to her children There is concern like a state has about its There should be concern for children like a To the Chief Minister for his children There should be concern and every son and daughter of Punjab I am concerned for my daughter you are my side, you are my strength I have my courage, I have my courage and because and why am I saying this yes i am saying this that at 65 now Look at their population in Japan and China. Whatever it is, she is doing it as opposed to that Our youth in Pakistan is 65 The end of the population is 65 Growing so what is this decision of Pakistan This is the flag of Pakistan in my hand No, it’s in your hands to decide You have to raise this flag high, to do so i think you i can’t Function without you I am the only chief minister Sitting in the House chair or in your office Sitting in this I am the 15 crore citizen of this state what is the matter i can’t decide I need your support in this I need your strength, you are my core strength and I want you guys to You all become my stakeholders become my arm, become my strength I need the service of this state at this time to bring progress in this province Of For And you guys, Mashallah, are hardworking and intelligent. You have intelligence, you have knowledge, you are educated Mashallah your thinking, your ability, yours Your enthusiasm, your passion, is my biggest encouragement and this is no longer my courage, now this It’s become my hope It’s the promise that you make I did it to you and you did it to me and I look at you you guys The Architects of Pakistan Be the architects of the future of Pakistan This flag of Pakistan is in your hands It’s invisible but you can feel it of this thing that it’s in your hands is mine My favourite is Milli Nagma I go everywhere and see this I say this country is yours, you are near There are two or three cities for this Children in two or three cities said this He said that you said that this is the country It is yours, you are near it The song he sang for me in response to this I had prepared his words, these were these The country is ours and we are near it It is said that the country is the mother earth Have you heard the word mother or mother earth? It means that this earth is your mother. There is a huge reward for being loyal to your mother It is a huge success, a huge reward is ours just as our affiliation is ours We are with our parents to persuade them we keep on serving them I feel happy and this is my message to all of you as a mother This is an advice, I have seen this in my life that the child who served his parents that and his parents would have agreed with him A child never lacks anything in life into something Today as I stand before you, I am Allah After the grace and kindness of Tala, I am in my Because of the prayers of parents, today he is the Chief sitting in the minister’s chair Even today, when I leave the house, my My mother is not in this world, I am in jail When my mother died she had cancer Now they have to care for my mother and my father he is my father so I am as much as you can be Whether I’m late or in a hurry yes, even today every day before I leave the house Before going to work, I go to my father’s I go near them, I salute them and pray for them leaving the house again and the same way when I get back home I go, no matter how tired I am Also I have some important work when I return home When she enters I go to my room I go to my father’s room before I salute them, take their prayers and then when we sit down to eat at night I always eat with them, I No one keeps my dinners outside Socializing isn’t my everything My father has it and I sit with him When I eat food he asks me that what did you do all day today and you You know, these are the videos of your functions This is my father who is responsible for the functions of the promising ones Sitting at the dining table, he and those who There are videos, enlarge them and zoom in let’s try it and then say The kids loved you so much The more you do for them the less it is Whatever this country is like right now my children There are many flaws in it and it is our dog It is because of them that this country is the way it is We have to fix this, we have to fix it we haven’t spoiled it, we haven’t spoiled it I have to groom myself and now look I am listening to the news Was that they were smuggling on their way to Spain People and boats capsized and many lives were lost went into it 90% of them are from Pakistan I was so sorry to see this and I am so sorry to hear this news Wherever we go my children we are on our own represent the country and this country if we do not take care of the honor of this Nobody has done any good to the country by coming from outside and this country doesn’t need hatred The nation needs unity This country doesn’t need tension, this country needs peace This country doesn’t need any trouble, my Children, this country needs progress This country doesn’t need bad culture, it needs culture We need a community that knows how to talk yes you may have political differences but it must be accompanied by reasoning It should be done with civility if it is for civility and the matter has gone beyond the scope of the argument It went beyond the bounds of logic for me So it’s very easy I’ll stand here and you I should teach everyone to pick up sticks with nails in them Go out and burn everything to ashes Attack your own country and tell lies People’s crazy crazy people, throw them in the gatherings I stand before you and I I’ll tell you my story if you like. If he doesn’t come then you can disregard it but Listen to me and put it in front of you, you will get food It is my responsibility to give thought It’s right, I don’t like what you say Regard me but this is my story Very and now let me inform you that the Court has PTI was bought for £190 million Sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakh I have sentenced my wife to 10 years imprisonment and 5 Al Kade was sentenced to a fine of Rs 1 lakh There is a plan to take the trust under government control as well The order was given on the order of the court Bushra Bibi has been arrested Bani PTI in court to hear verdict Present He was sentenced to 14 years in prison, PTI was told This was a case of 190 million pounds The decision is a shameful decision Political bug is a decision made by an orphan We knew for months that he was going to punish us If the verdict is given to Khan sahab then Khan Sir laughed 190 million pounds reference I have created Tehreek Insaaf with bad name and corrupt Mulas Karar Mushra Bibi also in practices The culprit has been proven for the crime, Aite Sahib Court judge Nasir Javed Rana said that Al Qadr By reading the safe decision related to the trust PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and 10 Bushra Bibi sentenced to a fine of Rs 1 lakh Sentenced to 16 years imprisonment and 5 lakh fine PTI banned for not paying the fine for 6 months and for Bushra Bibi for 3 months Bushra Bibi will have to serve a month’s imprisonment in a room arrested from court Gaya et Saab court ordered Al Qadr University ordered to take it under government custody According to the Tafsi judgment, the prosecution against Bani PTI and Buchra Biwi Your case based on documentary evidence Proved capable of trust against the accused Marbupalli Despite getting the opportunity, there was no concrete answer failed to present a plea Rahe Wani PTI and Bachra Biwi Naib Sentenced under section 10A of the Act Both have the right to appeal against the decision PTI files 190 million pound case Announced to challenge in High Court Diya Chairman PTI Barrister Gauhar says When the verdict was announced Bani laughed not at all disappointed he says this Muzaqr will continue despite the verdict but If the commission is not presented within 7 days then no muzak will be in Al Qader University Trust case The verdict is given when Khan saheb gets the verdict When this was narrated to us, Khan sahab laughed. You could see it on the wall, right Khan sahab? I am sad, I am sad for Khan sahab The message is that despondency is a crime for people Don’t be disheartened, Inshallah taala with these few Etamad will file an appeal in Delhi High Court inshallah tala khan saheb surah ru everyone will be Despite all this, Khan sahab has said today The jokes will continue for seven days if presented There is no commission on this again, Muja Sir’s spirits are high, not because of convention There is faith in the fearful and I am sure that InshaAllah Like a lock, three punishments in five days He was sentenced to 30 years inshallah This punishment also ends in the same way Hoga opposition leader Umar Ayub says today It is the 12th day of Pakistan’s history will appeal to the top court against the verdict He also said that the decision was just If the question is to target PTI then Asking Hassan Nawaz one day that body should be put to test because He made 47 governments a damp university I feel bad because these people If the question is about corruption then you should ask Hasan Nawaz sei, by whom did you take this money we do this thing in pig court We will go and leave, he is a thief roaming around there is Al Qader University in which The government has suffered a huge loss, right Imran? Khan and Bushra Bibi benefited by a penny What happened is that he is being punished for this Aalima Khanum: Anyone can commit a big crime She says she will challenge the decision in the High Court I knew a month ago that I would be sentenced A person like Bani PTI will be punished I felt bad today, I am very sad about this system Bani said what happened today has happened before in history too The punishment has been given because Created a University Why will we have to challenge this in the High Court I knew since months that he has to give punishment today I am definitely very saddened by this situation I felt sad when Imran Khan was pronouncing the sentence A lot of trouble for a person like him Imran Khan said that whatever happens today, happens tomorrow He has already been punished on the previous date This is why you created this university Why is this also included in the punishment that this The university should be taken over a dream of imran khan Talal Chaudhary was the leader of Muslim League Noon says Bani PTI will be punished with NRO the custom of giving has been ended During its conclusion, Bani PTI again Expressed confidence in the court and the judge PTI people also knew what the decision was PTI had said that the impact of the decision is yet to come Mujkuwa is the biggest tavern in Pakistan There were so many martyrs from his home to his Even the members of the cabinet were aware of their survival It was impossible during the Samaat by Bani PTI Twice on this judge and on the court as a whole He has expressed confidence that his team too, which she was saying that muja Even if I am punished, we will continue the joke Because they could see it after the punishment A taser that was being given by PTI An atmosphere was being created from the side that we I don’t know if someone has taken NRO today Let it end, today justice has become prevalent PTI could not prove the minister innocent Lawyer Azam Nazir Tad says the country’s A disgusting thing happened with me, it was an open and shut case PTI now only has the right to appeal Vifa’s minister Talat Ata Tar said after today There is no such big corruption in Pakistan 100 times before doing it He will think that justice had this right He would give evidence in his defense should have gone as a witness to the clarification that His not going is also a prison that his They had nothing to say now right to file an appeal The timelines are first in first out which The policy should be the same in these cases as well If they are so opposed to the government Till date, Shaukat Khanum’s personality is well known For bandish or why his case is not open What happened in the future is applet forums what decisions do you make i have read this is an open end chat case You failed to prove your innocence I have been open ended shirt case since day one today After that there is so much mega corruption in Pakistan While doing this he will think 100 times that he was a lawyer for clarification He could not present any proof of his innocence The evidence presented by Na Prosan Was there any EB who could give him an answer There was no trust of Shapa there was no trust of Shapa Black money was taken as bribe and he was made white was made to hide The appeal said that they have got it but it is a legal case Fighting We will have to go to Karachi where Sharjeel Ina Memon at this time news conference are doing wearing a cloak wearing a mask of truth the people of pakistan it rained for being a fool was throwing dust in the eyes of the people the people of pakistan was trying to tell him that he was a He is an honest man, he is a wise man and In comparison to that, there are as many They are all thieves and robbers the ways in which from PTI leader Imran Khan For years he has been raining down on all his opponents, thieves and Trying to create a narrative by calling him a dacoit Pakistanis were telling the whole public were that Yes he is the only honest person in that country is a person who is involved in some corruption That thing which is not fundamental in Parvari is once Then it became clear to the public that this man is a hawk this person is a liar and this person Throwing dust in the eyes of the public Is The decision which the court gave today regarding NAB Imran Khan and his wife in the case who was sentenced to These are all the things that Imran Khan himself did Chosen Imran Khan himself was in praise of this Nav He used to keep on reciting Tasbi and all his opponents They arrested him through the Nab got all his opponents killed He carried this much caravan through the Nab targeted and to this extent their tolerance the situation was such that when even when Any person on any TV or any media Imran Khan at some rally or procession But did anyone accuse him or oppose him? does if that person had known about it the next day then notices came And the thinking behind this is that not only Siyasi He made the leaders the target of revenge but along with that those political It has also affected the families and clans of the leaders target of revenge Imran Khan was made at the behest of Imran Khan that time’s Namaaz on his stage addressed the leadership of Pakistan Peoples Party In prison Respected Asif Ali Zardari sahab was put in jail I put in Mohtarma Faryal Talpur Sahiba put in jail without any punishment In the same manner as the crime was proven, Pamela N He also put the leadership of and his purpose was that he could see through the nub Rule over this country do this to justice javed iqbal The chairman blackmails them and takes decisions as per his wish Imran Khan’s favorite actions Hawayo Imran Khan today spoke out against his opponent is getting punished for his own mistakes You are getting punishment for your wrongdoings In the decision that has come today, this is It proved to what extent this was bad intention. the person was I would say he was a smart man as well and In international norms it is said that Corporate Criminal This Corporate Criminal through which it enjoyed eating tosha watches stolen in the incident sold watches and lied to people that I lived this moment in Pakistan I found out that the watch was sold to someone else in the country Someone of ours who is a Pakistani Purchased Then he said that with that money I built roads These were blatant lies which then came to light The way Punjab is being affected in the presence of Imran Khan that Fara Gogi saheb was running the government who is there to get money on transfer posting The market of corruption was hot on the basis of which In this way, sitting with Bunny Gala, Punjab Which women used to do the transfer posting Whose friend was she and where is that lady today? It is like Tehreek in Imran Khan’s rule When she came, first of all Fara Gogi was taken out of the country I chased him out so that he could not be caught and then said You even defended him on TV, so what a shame That poor thing didn’t have anyone in her life Whatever she is doing, the case doesn’t stand it was valid and legitimate, then if it was not in reality whatever do it he should go was with him I am going to say something very important today All of you every Pakistani should understand that thing the need of Today Imran Khan has been sentenced to 14 years in prison There was only one person in the whole of Pakistan Went for Aitzaz is there any one person who has done some mockery Is there any public reaction from you that is natural? If it is written then Imran Khan will be punished Despite this, there is one person in the whole of Pakistan He was sentenced to 14 years in prison, no one said anything Khyber Pakht is on the road across Pakistan No one including me came out on the road but in no When he was arrested, the manner in which The terrorism that is spreading across Pakistan The manner in which the Corps Commander’s House was attacked The way it happened that I had to go inside GS They tried to attack there karachi in a fun way Bus burnt in Damage to people’s Imala the manner in which it was delivered Radio Pakistan gets attention in Khyber Pakht The way it was done there Edhi The manner in which the ambulance was seen being cleaned terrorism, this proves that the Imran Khan himself was the mastermind of the whole thing. The reaction that came at that time was just The arrest was minor; the arrest was minor The manner in which the whole of Pakistan reacted to the arrest if terrorism is committed then it Today, people who say that Imran Khan has a mindset I didn’t know that he was poor and he didn’t know anything I did not know about this thing, today it is natural Where did the reaction go? It’s been four or five hours. why is there a man somewhere who has come for punishment The same person who was the leader of PTI did not turn out We entered here too, opening our collars We will go there too and close this road too We will burn this house too today where did you go because you had to give them directions If the person himself is in jail then this thing also today it has become absolutely fine in the nine minutes The only person responsible for this is the convenience of the The one who was his brain child was Imran Khan And that was Imran Khan who ruled the state since 20188 A war has been started against the principality There has been a war against Pakistan since 2018 and that war which is there is different That war is being fought on the social platform Social media is also being fought over media But our stand is against the dignity of our country Main opposition against different governments The way in which one fights against the leader She is hiding from someone on social media it has not happened and after that international The way in which these are facilitated on forums juice of Lobby Israel, the Israel which openly opposed them Israel gave statements in their favor, which openly that his Israel Jerusalem Post in which Articles appeared in their support and then In big meetings at international forums The way in which PTI has made a well thought out move To target Pakistan as part of a conspiracy Tried to do the same against the principality They have started a war, that very war He also tried to fight with the IMF that by sitting with the IMF, Pakistan The debt should be stopped if God shows mercy God forbid if Pakistan defaults People in Pakistan do not get salary Khudan Khasta turned out to be a fan of Pakistan The Fard who started the war against the state This has happened only and only for the benefit of his caste The 120-26 day long dharna is also for this was part of the war against that kingdom in which He blackmailed the state that if I If you are given the order then you people are from Pakistan You people should not pay electricity bills in Pakistan What I am doing is Money Laundering Do not earn money in Pakistan through legal means Send money from Pakistan, do not withdraw money from people It was told that the money was transferred through hawala hundi Send things abroad and through hawala bills Do all this for the war against that kingdom Was part of the war against that same kingdom While issuing it he also said, If an atomic bomb explodes on the Pakistani nation This person was arrested from Pakistan by Pakistanis No one from our community or our people There is no love or affection of any kind even today This person is fighting against the state of Pakistan He is fighting only for his one and only son is for relief and He is seen distributing ikdarm and sweets If so, then this whole thing is proof of that that this person is not sincere with Pakistan Having more Its of 2018 This was a disgusting joke with Pakistan The way in which a thief hides himself from the door Political and Democratic leaders say The way in which this came through the back door person I have been harmed by this evil I ask that some one feat be told about this Whatever he did for Pakistan In the midst of the storms we remember that Parliament was attacked on the same grounds Meanwhile, we remember that Pakistan When the television was attacked, the person who This is being spread in a bright manner on every department of Pakistan. It is not that this is only against one organisation To harm every institution of Pakistan Try to that it has Pakistan trying to harm everyone How come this man is loyal to Pakistan It is possible that this is a corporate criminal and its The whole history is full, this is just one There has been a conviction in the case against him just now There are many such cases which perhaps I didn’t even start what I was going to say when this Punjab police on the eve of court When the time for arrest passed, then it reached its own home Petrol bombs were used from inside the all over the world on our police Someone call me a political leader Tell me whom to arrest at any time The police went and they attacked with petrol bombs. What is the whole Pakistan about its forces? Give me an example from around the world And if someone attacks him, what will happen to him? It is said that if someone is going to arrest you Come, you have to face the courts for bail Leni Hai did not refuse the court’s work I tried to arrest you You attacked that police with petrol bombs And you say that you are a public leader and you You say that you are talking about which public? This crime was forgiven in the world then it goes in the same way that foreign funding case in which according to them if these were okay then good If he was honest then he was in foreign funding case Why were these high officials seeking stay after stay? If his name was clean from the courts then stay should be granted But why were you taking stay from the courts that We should be given a stay and they should not pursue the cases go because you will find a straw in the thief’s beard I knew you did something wrong and you lost some 20 2 The accounts you have are not even declared did the work in Election Commission of Pakistan You have been taking foreign funding and that foreign Funding You are living from India and Israel You will get foreign funding from India and Israel You are waiting in your country, spread the wait You spread terrorism in your country You should tell your youth that they have fallen from morality Teach your youth to behave socially Teach your youth about terrorism through media You can tell them how to use social media People are trolling Idar from this how people are defamed and to Sarra of Idar and to the rest of the people in their Which family is targeted? The leader of the country gives so much strength to his youth the disgusting and filthy things it teaches All these things are proof of this That was the case in the foreign funding case as well The judgement had come but a case was filed against them should have gone on till now in that princely state Pakistan did not and then the way in which Al Qadir Trust for which you were sentenced what did you always do that honestly wearing a mask of You told the public that you are very big You are a social worker, you are a very big social worker. You are an activist, you only talk about goodness you do it for the good that you You have met Shaukat Khanam The hospital which we consider to be a noble The cause was in that Shaukat Khanum Hospital which you You made a board, in that board you and your father Sir, your sister and your entire family are on board he is sitting and then the matter also came up that Shaukat How did you manage to fund Khanum’s work? Invest in various private projects Invested in rail state projects You gambled with him, you made him answer People played this game for cancer patients did you give money or in real estate gave it to you for investment or he gave it away for gambling Money is your character and it is proved from there also Then only this one case of Navbharat happens No, there was a case against Malam Jabba also. of the nub The case was also about KPK’s BRT In the BRT of which under your own rule The Chief Minister Inspection Team present there said That billion rupees worth of kickbacks only and only If you are going then what do you think about Prime Minister, if you speak with your chest puffed up Has there been any kickback during my rule If there is corruption in any project then it court nab f ia everyone please prop him which was the Pesha High Court of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa the judge there This was the judgement of Justice Waqar Sachi Sahib that this should be nabbed and FIA should investigate KP You have taken BIT to the Supreme Court I took a stay order against you No case should be filed and FIA news of KP If you do not even put your hand inside the BRT then you will be so You were an honest man, you were such a wealthy man and But all your other parties can be stolen only from this Why are you honest in the country? Justice Banyal took you and gave stay order I gave it and kept getting stay orders on stay orders so why did you take the stay order? You are honest, you speak, let me inquire Who is a person if he is honest and knowledgeable He will tell some investigation department You cannot look for me and take the car If I go anywhere, a policeman stops me if yes then you will say that I will not search If you say you will not allow a search then what will happen to you? will do In this way you have got rid of every corruption. You took a stay order in the case and that The purpose of getting a stay order means that you do not want to be searched and do not want to be searched the idea is that you are a thief His motive is that you have bad intentions then you can’t fool the public By fooling people in this way, You love the garb of honesty that you are wearing now your day is getting worse All the cases are a very big deal against you it is a cheat I understand I believe that the people of Pakistan should know all this It should mix the fabric of things Don’t see if the opposition is talking he is just wrong Will PTI leader Fara Gogi be killed today? in position to defend Is it the way KP’s BRT or Malam Jabba like lawsuit or foreign funding Like in the case that has come up, Pakistan The public is in this position which is of PTI What is the leader and what is he doing in this position? Defend it Any one can defend on any channel can i do that yes that’s why we placed the order or the way in which you keep yourself honest And the way in which donors say of Toshakhana Those who sell Taif and then lie, this he is in a position to defend exactly like this not in position I think the public needs to open their eyes The public should see that the impersonator The man who is an impersonator has been raining on them for years He is coming fooling his cafeteria reaching the character and The doors of the courts are open for those superiors I will go to court and appeal But the attempt to fool the public The drama that is going on, Aurang, will not continue further If I could I understand it Whatever Imran Khan dug pits for others Tried to defame Allah today That person is disgracing himself in court and who He also has a course in law and he will do his work The court will do its job, they should appeal You should appeal but don’t fool the public Make a Turk card in the playing cards This trump card has great importance every Pauline has a trump card or a trump card It is necessary to keep the card at this time when Khan sahab Khan sahab’s trump card has been punished Or it will not work, see the full story of PTI try this is of In some way or the other, he will target Imran Khan Taken out and Imran Khan Sahaul is asking to get out who is demanding facilities even inside the jail Sahul can still hear Imran Khan from inside the jail He has not supported any politician till date You all have found one thing, tell me Tell him that you have seen the leader’s words, sir I also saw Asif Ali Zardari sahab in jail Oh Madam Fariyal, have you seen Talpur Sahib imprisoned? Look, the PMLN leader is also in jail Have you ever seen anyone inside a jail I am running the whole party from you all I ask you, have you ever seen anyone go to jail? He also looked like a chief minister sitting inside the you are setting up the cabinet too muja I am sorry that he is the darling of many places He is still getting VIP treatment Is And I understand that what you are saying is Their attempt is to play a trump card or such and such card It is complete, it may come in handy as a trump card But I think that Pakistan Courts and laws of Pakistan Will anyone do as per the orders of Pakistanis Trump did not listen to Card This party is PTI, it is punished By the way she kept talking about Mukra and still does Bani will come to Mujra after PTI’s punishment This statement is issued by the government and the party is participating in it. I have seen that Muja’s People’s Party is always in support We want there to be a dialogue should never be closed but The law is there and its implementation continues as well Raheny should thank you On the other hand Vifa’s minister S News conference is being held, 64 billion wasted There are at least six banners from this 64 billion rupees Akwaaba rupees to thousands inside the country Schools could have been established with this Rs 64 billion There are many dispensers and can be a hospital With this Rs 64 billion, thousands of youngsters have been given excellent opportunities. Scholarships for education could be available Pakistan’s money is Pakistani community’s money has been blown up and if it is accused of this theft If caught, punishment is given along with this This is the only time I spend away from the news studio Keep watching ARVA for news and updates New It is found at every step and blooms at every step the foremost most There is simple happiness above pai straight granny happiness is up This grease is frozen, it’s greasy, look The pan and the pot demand a lot of money You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it No-Rubbing, No-Fuss Max Liquid Three times more Cleaning a cup and tuber granular you in another cup The golden color of the morning tea after the first cup with the slogan of life Love is a slavery in the speed of moments is from Juba There’s simple happiness above Soup is available step by step, it blooms step by step at the forefront of the There’s simple happiness above super simple happiness When Hap was leaving the house, Aunt angrily said He said listen, sit at home and eat onions cut it but I didn’t just cut my onion The parlor is also open, they are breaking and cutting two onions Onion will not break your hair, let it grow friend New Sun Sulp Onion Shampoo is made from onion Reduces hair breakage by 90% from the first wash wonderful nice no break only sun became this time I can’t follow the match It’s the same every time Magic happens only when everyone is together yes coca cola is sure to win when we meet it opens up If you crave for something sweet, the cafe opens Glimpse Watney Serum for Extra Results Mix it in Jhalak or any cream and Look 10x More Glow Luck Whitening Serum Glow Up The flashes are frozen, it’s greasy, look The kadhai and the pot demanded a lot of rubbing You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it No-Rubbing, No-Fuss Max Liquid Three multiple cleaning Hello everyone and thank you for being here Today, I am entitled to as much as I want on this scholarship The same is the friendship of my two special friends. Candy is made for this sweetness which contains Special brown and white sugar and caramel Sweetness is that special sweetness in candy which is very sweet And I am not asking you, ask yourself Saya Gold Beauty Cream said that the face is so fair Clearly Sya Gold Beauty Cream Coke Pick Up Scan and find the code under the button gap call me with code 032 cocacola fee A chance to win match tickets or Coke prizes Get this offer on Sprite as well as Coca Cola The new A Beauty Cream is a victory of faith Magical Formula New Ra wi fur Almet Now go ahead and glow with this new wonder Beauty Cream sir what all have I done in the name of my country One piece of paper is enough to illuminate If you win then Pakistan will win go and show it your strength for the pride of your country The one who becomes strong waves the green flag Makes everyone in the world proud The field becomes the identity of the community, my strength This became my identity which strengthened Pakistan That steel grade 6 bar has a higher strength Tareen Mayar Only then do we win with strength and Every strong part makes the feet stronger Pakistan is our Intro Hello Everyone and Thank You for Being Here today, as much as I am entitled to on this scholarship It is as much the friendship between my two special friends Candy is made for this sweetness in which It is special for brown and white sugar and camel Sweetness is that special sweetness in candy which is very sweet And where will this Jhua (mind) dissolve in my heart? How is this magic did the opus take my heart O I took the chocolate of the dil people just says a lot hain naya gluta bright beauty cream Unlock your beauty, include it in Gluta Thiane With Halic Acid And Amino Peptides that penetrate deep into the skin to brighten it and smooth Skin Beautiful of the osals Chocolate Bus Keep me glowing in the sunshine keep glow end Lovely Serum Cream Its Multi Vitamin Serum Goes deep and reduces blemishes three times Bright Glow Glow & Lovely Serum Cream I mean for sure this is the color no yes yes One thing is for sure that this color will be applied once I went on leave for years Wait, it is light on the pocket, Nipan lasts for years When the paint was applied then it became Asia number one Paint Brand Spicy Chicken This is the donut that knocks everybody out says The Specialist Mood Sabroso Spicy Chicken Doner King of the Ring Say It With Fingers Say It With Cadbury Mini Fingers your catberry now with biscuits Don’t ask me from her, ask me yourself Saya Gold Beauty The cream makes the face so transparent that it is clear Gold Beauty Cream Master Weather Resistant paint that will keep your home clean protecting the British walls from all effects of winter Mahfooz Master Weather Resistant will last long Jhalak Hand & Foot Beauty Cream in your hands And your feet get a perfect glow and smoothness Softness Glance Hand and Foot Beauty Cream My choice is always unique, every success is mine For your beauty with the right decisions My verdict Dew Beauty Cream Original Marhaba Jasha made according to the formula so that Live your life openly, openly, Gie Urgent Beauty Cream of all types Give fresh glow and fair complexion to the skin That’s why I am so beautiful and fair skinned Secret Urgent Beauty Cream It Hair Removal cream just apply, leave and remove And get silky smooth skin n hair removal Cream Naya Gluta Bright Beauty Cream Unlock your beauty, include it in Gluta Than with Hyalur Acid and Amino Peptides that penetrate deep into the skin to brighten it and smooth skin And uncle think about it, yes think, Ryan paints everything It is not expensive and is light on the pocket for years If the paint got applied then it got applied Paint Asia Number One Paint Brand Hail Mary Super Power this ally click i but to you by js mary super Power sentenced to 14 years in prison for PTI This was a case of 190 million pounds The decision is a shameful decision The decision has been taken by the political bug to orphan us I knew for months that he had to punish Khan When the decision was announced to Sahib, Khan Sahib laughed 190 million pounds were spent in reference PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakh Bushra Bibi was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment Punishment of a fine of Rs. lakhs for not paying the fine For doing this, Bani PTI got additional 6 months imprisonment from Bushra The wife will have to serve 3 months more imprisonment Musra Bibi found guilty of PTI corruption I made a request to the court in advance Al-Qadh University brought under government control Judge Nasir Javed gave the order to take it Rana announced the decision in Addala Jail Bibi was arrested from the court room 190 million pound reference decision 18 The court had reserved the case on December 3 gave date but no decision I heard that the verdict was announced to Khan Saheb, then Khan Sir laughed, we could see the writing on the wall I was feeling sad, Khan sahab, neither am I sad I have won a few days and filed an appeal in the High Court Will do mad insha Allah Tala Khan sahab tune honge re saaf 90 million pound reference chairman announces to challenge the decision of PTI Bust Gohar said today’s decision There was no surprise when the verdict was announced Bani laughed and she was not sad at all He says despite this decision Muja will remain in jail but if commission within 7 days But if there is no rift then I felt very sad on account of Bani saying that today Punishment has already been given on date given that why the university today is a sad day that’s why Targeted he made a damp university 47 The government dislikes it because If these people have committed corruption then ask questions I want this money from Hassan Nawaz brother. taking Went to a court hearing in Pakistan Only PTI accepted the decision of dark day Opposition leader Omar is to be targeted Ayub says if you have any question then ask Hassan Nawaz Shibli Faraz says it is needed in the country The thief is free, not the power of law and order And innocent people are imprisoned, meaning PTI All the cases against us are political, we are against the law and Sheikh Makkas wants to follow the rule of law Akram says to the head of the biggest group This high court sentenced him for doing a wrong deed ending at the first court appearance The case is about Rana Sanala’s press conference After this I see no hope Now religious and You will be given both worldly education Wazir Aala will not be taught magic amulets Punjab Maryam Nawaz’s funeral in Okara Title: Girls of Al-Qaeda University Maryam Nawaz says come to us tomorrow too Saw his video today at Al Qaid University Al Qaid University came under my control The first minister took the land as a bribe Azam is the one who was expelled for taking bribe Gaya Tehreek Insaaf had the right to They had to go to give evidence in their defense His name was needed as a witness in defence It is also known that this pressman has nothing to say had nothing, now they have this right that that appeal file Let justice become prevalent today Vifa could not prove PTI’s innocence that Law Minister Azam Nazir Tarr says This open ended relationship with the country did not work PTI had a chat case, now it is just an appeal The minister has the right, this much is what Ata Tar says today After this no one in Pakistan has been as big as this He will think 100 times before doing corruption The biggest corruption scandal of the country till date their hands are stained with corruption The impact of the verdict on Muja Karray spirituality is not taught to the envelope which was once stolen in Pakistan the approval of the incident which is from someone in the cabinet Imran Khan did not need to take this this nausar baaz did the same hai fadiya Minister of Defense declared PTI a free country Diya said to grab the stolen goods PTI’s demand was approved by the cabinet The prisoners should be released through execution order The courts have given the punishment, only the courts can give relief can It’s my fault, Dalal Chaudhary He said it was difficult for him to survive in this case PTI people also knew what the decision was The punishment for giving NRO to PTI is to come Tasur should also end I went to your show yesterday too and told you to decorate both of them because it was an open and shut case That day too I saw Khan saheb inside the cabinet even when this came up on the agenda Was not a part of the agenda, suddenly the agenda came The envelope was not opened it was said that The contract is done and there is no issue with it yes PTI and Bushra Bibi were also said yesterday will be punished, says Senator Faisal Bawda NCA had said that this money belongs to Pakistan There is a need to play religious card in this matter A shameful attempt was made even in the highest court This decision will not end the rule and Both PTI people want water PTI He remained in jail, from today he will be pardoned Trump on January 20 is a drama and a joke They will be disappointed if their card does not arrive Today’s decision proves that PTI is a To what extent does Bani PTI have bad intentions No person is out despite being sentenced Wazir turned out to be the son of Sharjeel Memon, says Bani PTI took revenge on the opposition Bani was targeted by the actions PTI has control over the country through the NAB wanted Punjab rule in his presence Fara Gogi was running PTI with a deliberate intention Attempt to target N under conspiracy that he had canceled his first press conference
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
The text comprises transcripts of various discussions and news reports surrounding the Al-Qadr Trust case and the subsequent conviction of Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi. The conversations involve legal experts, politicians, and journalists debating the legality and fairness of the verdict, exploring the evidence presented, and discussing potential appeals. The core issue centers on allegations of corruption, misuse of authority, and money laundering involving a £190 million settlement. Reactions to the verdict are sharply divided, with some celebrating justice and others denouncing it as politically motivated. The discussions also touch upon broader political implications and the state of Pakistani justice.
Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and the Al-Qadir Trust Case Study Guide
Quiz
Instructions: Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.
What was the primary accusation against Bani PTI in the £190 million reference case?
What was the relationship between Malik Riaz and the Al-Qadir Trust case?
How did the government present the initial agreement for the £190 million to the cabinet? What was controversial about this method?
What was the role of Bushra Bibi in the Al-Qadir Trust?
What specific legal arguments did Faisal Vawda use to support his claim that Bani PTI would be found guilty?
What were the sentences given to Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi, respectively?
What was the court’s decision regarding Al-Qadir University?
What was PTI’s response to the verdict and what course of action did they announce?
How did the stock market react to the announcement of the verdict?
What comparisons were drawn between this case and previous corruption allegations against Nawaz Sharif and his family?
Answer Key:
Bani PTI was accused of receiving a £190 million settlement from the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) meant for the Pakistani government, misusing his authority to gain personal benefits, and hiding the truth from the cabinet.
Malik Riaz was a real estate tycoon who allegedly received favorable treatment and land allotments in exchange for transferring the £190 million settlement to the Pakistani government and settling a liability he had with the Supreme Court.
The agreement was presented in a sealed envelope, claiming confidentiality due to a supposed agreement with the UK government. This method was controversial because it bypassed typical cabinet discussion and transparency.
Bushra Bibi, Bani PTI’s wife, served as a trustee of the Al-Qadir Trust and was accused of being complicit in the corruption scheme, potentially using her influence and experience to secure illicit deals.
Faisal Vawda argued that the case was an “open and shut” case due to the clear misuse of authority, lack of cabinet approval for the agreement, and evidence of personal benefit obtained by Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi.
Bani PTI was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and fined ₹10 lakh, while Bushra Bibi was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and fined ₹5 lakh.
The court ordered Al-Qadir University to be brought under government control.
PTI denounced the verdict as politically motivated and vowed to challenge it in the High Court. They also announced plans for protests and condemned the government’s actions.
The stock market reacted positively to the verdict, with a significant rise of 1000 points, indicating renewed business confidence in the government’s policies.
Supporters of the verdict drew parallels with allegations against Nawaz Sharif, highlighting the alleged misuse of authority, hidden financial transactions, and acquisition of properties through illicit means in both cases. Critics, however, contested these comparisons and argued for the innocence of Bani PTI.
Essay Questions:
Analyze the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defense in the £190 million reference case. What evidence was presented by each side? Evaluate the strength of each argument.
Discuss the role of political motivations in the Al-Qadir Trust case. To what extent did political factors influence the investigation, trial, and verdict? Consider the perspectives of both PTI and the government.
Examine the implications of the verdict on the future of PTI and Pakistani politics. How might this case impact public perception of the party and its leadership? Consider potential scenarios for the upcoming elections.
Analyze the portrayal of the Al-Qadir Trust case in the media. How did different media outlets present the case and its key players? Did the media coverage contribute to or challenge existing political narratives?
Explore the potential legal challenges PTI could raise in their appeal against the verdict. What legal arguments might they present to overturn or reduce the sentences? Assess the likelihood of success for their appeal based on legal precedents and the evidence presented.
Glossary of Key Terms:
Al-Qadir Trust: A charitable trust founded by Bani PTI with Bushra Bibi as a trustee.
£190 Million Reference Case: The legal case against Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi concerning the alleged misappropriation of a £190 million settlement from the UK’s NCA.
National Crime Agency (NCA): The UK’s law enforcement agency responsible for tackling serious and organized crime.
Malik Riaz: A Pakistani real estate tycoon implicated in the Al-Qadir Trust case.
Open and Shut Case: A legal case with seemingly overwhelming evidence that points towards a clear verdict.
Misuse of Authority: Using one’s official position for personal gain or to benefit specific individuals.
Cabinet Approval: The process by which a government body approves proposals and decisions before they are implemented.
Sealed Envelope: A method of presenting confidential information, often used in this case to bypass usual transparency procedures.
Conflict of Interest: A situation where an individual’s personal interests could improperly influence their decisions or actions in an official capacity.
Political Victimization: Accusations of using legal proceedings to target political opponents rather than pursuing genuine justice.
High Court Appeal: The legal process of challenging a lower court’s verdict in a higher court.
Stay Order: A court order that temporarily halts a legal proceeding or the enforcement of a judgment.
Prosecution: The legal team responsible for presenting evidence and arguments against the accused in a criminal trial.
Defense: The legal team representing the accused in a criminal trial.
Mujah Kararay: A term used by PTI to describe their planned protests and rallies against the verdict.
Mega Corruption: Large-scale corruption involving significant sums of money and high-ranking officials.
Kickback: A bribe or illicit payment given in exchange for favorable treatment or access to contracts.
Documentary Evidence: Written or recorded materials presented as evidence in a legal case.
Witness Testimony: Oral statements given by individuals with knowledge of the facts related to a case.
Conviction: A legal determination that a person is guilty of a crime.
Acquittal: A legal determination that a person is not guilty of a crime.
Sentence: The punishment imposed by a court on a person convicted of a crime.
Fine: A monetary penalty imposed as part of a criminal sentence.
Imprisonment: A custodial sentence where a person is confined to a prison for a specified period.
Political Bugbear: A persistent political issue or problem that is frequently raised and used to attack opponents.
Narrative: A story or account of events, often used to explain complex situations and influence public opinion.
Public Perception: The way in which the general public views a particular issue, person, or organization.
Briefing Doc: Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi Sentencing in the £190 Million Reference Case
Date: January 17th, 2025
Summary: This briefing doc analyzes the reactions and commentary surrounding the sentencing of Bani PTI (Imran Khan’s wife) and Bushra Bibi in the £190 million reference case. The court found them guilty of corruption and corrupt practices, sentencing Bani PTI to 14 years imprisonment and Bushra Bibi to 7 years. This decision has sparked outrage from PTI supporters who claim political victimization, while government officials and legal experts affirm the court’s just ruling in a high-profile corruption case.
Key Themes and Ideas:
Corruption and Misuse of Authority: The core of the case revolves around allegations that Bani PTI, in collusion with others, misused her husband’s position as Prime Minister to illegally acquire land and funds for the Al-Qadir University Trust. The court found evidence of “corrupt practices” and “misuse of authority” which led to their conviction.
“This is the biggest robbery in Pakistan till date. This cannot be hidden by playing the religion card.”– Senator Faisal Bada
Political Victimization vs. Rule of Law: PTI supporters vehemently claim that the case is politically motivated, intended to target Imran Khan and his family. However, government officials and legal analysts emphasize that the trial was conducted fairly, with ample opportunity for defense, and the decision is based on concrete evidence.
“This is a criminal case which is being investigated. After the investigation is done you can in a reference sent to him by a court, I have tried this for more than a year now.”– Law Minister Azam Nazir Tar
Impact on PTI and Muzakarat: The sentencing has dealt a significant blow to PTI, intensifying the ongoing political turmoil. PTI leaders have announced plans to challenge the verdict in the High Court, while their participation in the Muzakarat (political negotiations) remains uncertain. Some analysts believe this conviction will weaken PTI’s position and bargaining power in the talks.
“This decision will not end the government and PTI. Both of them want Bani of PTI jail. Stay inside, from today this fun will stop. Drama and fun are expected from January 20. They feel disappointed on applying.”– [Source]
Public Perception and Implications: The case and its verdict are deeply polarizing public opinion. While some celebrate the conviction as a victory against corruption, others express concern over the perceived targeting of political opponents. The long-term impact on Pakistan’s political landscape and the fight against corruption remains to be seen.
Important Facts:
Sentences and Fines:Bani PTI: 14 years imprisonment, Rs 10 lakh fine
Bushra Bibi: 7 years imprisonment, Rs 5 lakh fine
Al-Qadir University Trust: The court ordered the university to be brought under government control.
Key Evidence: Documentary evidence, witness testimonies (including from former PTI cabinet members), and financial records presented by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) solidified the prosecution’s case.
Notable Quotes:
Faisal Chaudhary (PTI Lawyer): “They say that they support today’s decision and today is the darkest day… There is a case that someone was punished for giving benefits, they questioned Hassan Nawaz who bought the property, where did he get 9 billion for that… Today is the best day for Imran Khan, politically considered another means of targeting.”
Sharjeel Memon (PPP Leader): “The ways in which from PTI leader Imran Khan for years he has been raining down on all his opponents, thieves, and trying to create a narrative by calling him a dacoit… Pakistanis were telling the whole public that yes, he is the only honest person in that country.”
Law Minister Azam Nazir Tar: “It is very unfair to link this thing with politics. It is appropriate that the governance of countries should be based on one law. The police work under the law. This is a criminal case in that regard.”
Next Steps:
Monitor PTI’s legal challenge to the verdict in the High Court.
Observe the impact of this sentencing on the political landscape and the Muzakarat process.
Analyze public reaction and expert commentary to gauge the long-term implications for Pakistan’s political system and the fight against corruption.
FAQ: The Al-Qadir Trust Case and Its Implications
What is the Al-Qadir Trust Case?
The Al-Qadir Trust Case, also known as the £190 million case, involves allegations of corruption and illegal land acquisition against former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi. It revolves around a settlement with the UK’s National Crime Agency where funds recovered from a property tycoon, Malik Riaz, were transferred to Pakistan. The accusation is that Khan and Bibi, through the Al-Qadir Trust (linked to Al-Qadir University), misused their authority to obtain benefits from this settlement and acquire land illegally.
What was the verdict in the case?
A Pakistani court found Imran Khan guilty and sentenced him to 14 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakh. Bushra Bibi was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 5 lakh. Additionally, the court ordered the government to take control of Al-Qadir University.
Why is this case considered significant?
This case is considered highly significant due to several factors:
High-Profile Individual: It involves a former Prime Minister and his wife, making it a highly publicized and politically charged case.
Mega Corruption: The alleged financial sum involved (£190 million, approximately Rs 70 billion) marks it as one of the largest corruption scandals in Pakistan’s history.
Political Implications: The verdict has led to heightened political tensions and protests, with PTI supporters alleging political victimization and the government emphasizing the prevalence of law.
What are the main arguments presented by the prosecution?
The prosecution argued that Khan and Bibi misused their authority to benefit personally from the settlement with the UK’s National Crime Agency. They pointed to irregularities in the cabinet’s approval process for the settlement, the transfer of valuable land to Malik Riaz’s sons, and the subsequent acquisition of land for Al-Qadir University as evidence of corrupt practices.
What is the defense’s stance?
Imran Khan and his supporters maintain their innocence and claim that the case is politically motivated. They argue that there is no evidence of personal gain from the settlement and that the procedures followed were within legal bounds. They criticize the prosecution for relying on speculation and political biases instead of concrete evidence.
What is the potential impact of this verdict on Pakistani politics?
The verdict is likely to further escalate political tensions between the current government and PTI. Khan’s supporters have already staged protests, and there are concerns about potential unrest. The case will likely be a focal point in the upcoming elections and could significantly influence the political landscape.
What are the next steps in the legal process?
Imran Khan’s legal team has announced their intention to challenge the verdict in the High Court. They aim to highlight legal flaws in the trial process and contest the evidence presented. The appeals process is likely to be lengthy and drawn out, potentially reaching the Supreme Court.
What is the significance of the public debate surrounding the case?
The public debate surrounding this case reflects the deep polarization within Pakistani society. While some view the verdict as a victory for accountability and justice, others perceive it as an act of political vendetta. The conversation underscores broader concerns about corruption, transparency, and the rule of law in Pakistan.
Bani PTI Corruption Conviction and Sentencing
On December 18, 2022, a Pakistani court reserved its decision in the £190 million case against Bani PTI, postponing the announcement of the verdict three times before finally delivering it. [1, 2] The court found Bani PTI guilty of corruption and corrupt practices and sentenced him to 14 years in prison and a fine of Rs 10 lakh. [1-3] Bushra Bibi, his wife, was also found guilty and sentenced to seven years in prison and a fine of Rs 5 lakh. [1-3] The court ordered Al-Qadir University, which was linked to the case, to be brought under government control. [1, 2]
Several sources stated that the case was considered an “open and shut” case, indicating that the evidence against Bani PTI was strong and a conviction was highly likely. [1, 3-5] The prosecution successfully proved its case, presenting documentary evidence that Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi were involved in corrupt practices. [6-9]
PTI supporters and members reacted with disappointment and outrage, claiming that the decision was politically motivated and that Bani PTI was being targeted. [10-13] They argued that there was no evidence of financial corruption or crime proceeds. [10] They also claimed that the trial was rushed and that justice was not served. [7, 10] Some PTI members, like Faisal Vada, who were previously part of the cabinet, expressed satisfaction with the verdict, stating that the evidence against Bani PTI was clear. [5, 14, 15]
The court’s decision has significant implications for PTI, as it disqualifies Bani PTI from holding public office for 10 years. [16] The case also adds to the growing list of legal challenges faced by PTI and its leadership. [12] PTI has announced that they will challenge the verdict in the High Court, seeking to overturn the conviction and the sentences. [1, 7, 8, 12]
The Al-Qadir Trust Case: Imran Khan’s £190 Million Conviction
The £190 million case, also known as the Al-Qadir Trust case, revolved around allegations that former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, misused their authority during his time in office [1-20]. The case involved a settlement between the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) and the Pakistani government regarding funds recovered from a property tycoon, Malik Riaz, in a money laundering investigation [6, 8, 10, 11, 16, 19, 21, 22]. The NCA determined these funds belonged to the Pakistani government and should be returned [6, 10, 11, 16].
Here are the key events and allegations related to the £190 million:
Cabinet Approval and Alleged Misrepresentation: Shahzad Akbar, then an advisor to Imran Khan, negotiated the settlement with the NCA [8, 11, 22]. The agreement was presented to the Pakistani cabinet for approval in a sealed envelope, allegedly without prior discussion or transparency [3, 6, 8, 11, 22, 23]. Several cabinet members later claimed they were unaware of the details and that Imran Khan had pushed for approval without proper deliberation [3, 6, 8, 11, 22, 23].
Transfer of Funds to Malik Riaz: The £190 million, equivalent to approximately 59 billion rupees at the time [10, 22], was initially intended to be deposited into a Pakistani government account [11]. However, the funds were allegedly diverted to an account associated with Malik Riaz, the same individual from whom the NCA had recovered the money [3, 6, 8, 10, 16, 19, 22]. This transfer was allegedly facilitated by Imran Khan and was used to settle part of a Supreme Court fine imposed on Malik Riaz related to the Bahria Town Karachi project [6, 10, 16].
Al-Qadir Trust and Land Acquisition: The prosecution alleged that Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi formed the Al-Qadir Trust and used the diverted funds to acquire hundreds of kanals of land for the trust’s university [2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 16, 24, 25]. Bushra Bibi, a close friend of Fara Gogi (who was allegedly involved in corrupt land dealings during Imran Khan’s tenure), became a trustee of the Al-Qadir Trust [16, 25, 26]. Critics questioned the legitimacy of the trust, the value of the land acquired, and the lack of significant progress in developing the university [2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 16, 24, 25].
Conviction and Sentencing: The court found Imran Khan guilty of corruption and corrupt practices, specifically for misusing his authority to benefit Malik Riaz by directing the £190 million to his account and receiving land in return for the Al-Qadir Trust [2-5, 16, 27]. Imran Khan was sentenced to 14 years in prison and fined Rs 10 lakh [2-5, 15]. Bushra Bibi was also convicted and sentenced to seven years in prison and fined Rs 5 lakh [2-5, 15].
The £190 million case became a significant political controversy in Pakistan, with PTI supporters denouncing the verdict as politically motivated and a conspiracy to target Imran Khan [7, 14, 18, 28]. They argued that there was no evidence of Imran Khan personally benefiting financially from the funds [7, 28]. However, the court’s decision was based on the misuse of authority and the facilitation of a transfer that ultimately benefited Malik Riaz, contradicting the initial intent for the funds to be returned to the Pakistani government.
The Al-Qadir Trust: Corruption and Land Acquisition
The Al-Qadir Trust, central to the £190 million corruption case against former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his wife Bushra Bibi, was allegedly used as a vehicle for illicit financial gain and land acquisition. The trust, with Bushra Bibi as a trustee, was purportedly established for educational purposes, specifically for the development of Al-Qadir University. However, the prosecution in the case successfully argued that the trust was a sham, designed to mask corrupt practices.
Here’s what the sources reveal about the Al-Qadir Trust:
Origins and Purpose: While the stated purpose of the trust was to establish a university focusing on Islamic studies and research, critics questioned its legitimacy and the lack of transparency surrounding its operations. [1-3] The sources don’t offer specific details about the trust’s founding date or its initial structure.
Land Acquisition: The Al-Qadir Trust acquired hundreds of kanals of land, allegedly as part of a quid-pro-quo arrangement with Malik Riaz. [2, 4] The prosecution argued that this land was transferred in exchange for Imran Khan using his authority to direct the £190 million recovered by the NCA to Malik Riaz’s account, effectively settling a portion of a Supreme Court fine imposed on him. [5, 6]
Lack of Progress and Financial Irregularities: Despite the acquisition of valuable land, there was little evidence of substantial progress in developing the university. [3] Some sources mention the existence of a few departments and a limited number of students, suggesting a lack of genuine commitment to the trust’s educational goals. [3, 7] The sources also highlight that the trust lacked a clear source of income and was heavily reliant on external funding, raising concerns about its financial sustainability. [8]
Connection to Fara Gogi: Bushra Bibi’s close friend, Fara Gogi, was implicated in corrupt land dealings during Imran Khan’s tenure as Prime Minister. [9] The prosecution suggested that Gogi’s involvement in land acquisition for the Al-Qadir Trust further pointed towards a pattern of corrupt practices. [10]
Government Control: Following the guilty verdict in the £190 million case, the court ordered the Al-Qadir University to be brought under government control. [11] This action suggests the court’s recognition of the trust’s involvement in illegal activities and its intention to prevent further misuse of the acquired assets.
The Al-Qadir Trust case, as revealed through the sources, highlights the alleged misuse of power, financial irregularities, and lack of transparency that characterized Imran Khan’s administration. The trust’s involvement in the £190 million scandal served as a key piece of evidence in the corruption charges brought against him and Bushra Bibi, ultimately contributing to their convictions.
Imran Khan’s Al-Qadir Trust Corruption Case
The corruption case against former Prime Minister Imran Khan, centered around the Al-Qadir Trust and the misappropriation of £190 million, resulted in his conviction and a 14-year prison sentence. His wife, Bushra Bibi, was also convicted and sentenced to seven years. This case, considered “open and shut” by many observers, exposed a pattern of corrupt practices involving abuse of power, financial irregularities, and a lack of transparency within Imran Khan’s administration.
Here are the key elements of the corruption case:
Cabinet Approval in a “Sealed Envelope”: Shahzad Akbar, then an advisor to Imran Khan, negotiated a settlement with the UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) to recover £190 million linked to Malik Riaz, a property tycoon. The agreement was presented to the Pakistani cabinet for approval in a sealed envelope, allegedly without prior discussion or disclosure of its contents. This lack of transparency raised immediate concerns about the legitimacy of the deal. Several cabinet members later testified that they were unaware of the details and that Imran Khan had pressured them to approve it without proper scrutiny.
Diversion of Funds to Malik Riaz: The £190 million, intended for the Pakistani government, was instead directed to an account associated with Malik Riaz, the individual from whom the funds were initially recovered. This diversion, allegedly orchestrated by Imran Khan, allowed Riaz to settle a portion of a Supreme Court fine related to his Bahria Town Karachi project. This transfer of funds, contradicting the original purpose of the NCA settlement, formed the basis of the corruption charges.
Al-Qadir Trust as a Vehicle for Personal Gain: The prosecution successfully argued that the Al-Qadir Trust, with Bushra Bibi as a trustee, was established as a front to conceal corrupt activities. The trust acquired hundreds of kanals of land, allegedly as a quid-pro-quo for Imran Khan’s facilitation of the £190 million transfer to Malik Riaz. Despite the acquisition of this valuable land, there was little evidence of actual progress in developing the Al-Qadir University, the trust’s stated purpose.
Connection to Fara Gogi and Land Dealings: The prosecution highlighted Bushra Bibi’s close friendship with Fara Gogi, who was implicated in corrupt land dealings during Imran Khan’s time in office. Gogi’s alleged involvement in the Al-Qadir Trust land acquisitions further solidified the perception of a pattern of corrupt practices benefiting those close to Imran Khan and his wife.
The court’s decision to convict Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi and to place Al-Qadir University under government control reflects the severity of the corruption charges and the compelling evidence presented. The case significantly damaged Imran Khan’s reputation and has fueled ongoing political turmoil in Pakistan. While PTI supporters maintain that the charges are politically motivated, the court’s findings of corrupt practices and misuse of authority have cast a shadow over Imran Khan’s legacy.
Imran Khan’s Conviction: Political Targeting in Pakistan
The corruption case against Imran Khan and his subsequent conviction have ignited accusations of political targeting from PTI supporters. They argue that the charges, trial, and verdict are part of a broader strategy to sideline Imran Khan and damage his political prospects. While the court’s decision was based on evidence of misuse of authority and corrupt practices, the perception of political motivations underlying the case remains a point of contention in Pakistan’s political landscape.
Here’s how the sources and our conversation history support the claims of political targeting:
PTI’s History of Antagonizing Powerful Institutions: Imran Khan’s tenure as Prime Minister was marked by confrontations with Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies. He openly criticized their interference in politics and resisted attempts to influence his government’s decisions. This antagonism created powerful adversaries who may have had a vested interest in weakening his political standing.
Targeting Through NAB: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB), an anti-corruption body, was widely perceived as being used by previous governments to target political opponents. Imran Khan, during his time in power, utilized NAB to pursue cases against members of the PML-N and PPP, further fueling the perception of its use as a political tool. When the same institution turned its attention towards him and his allies, PTI supporters saw it as a retaliatory measure.
Selective Prosecution and Lack of Accountability for Others: PTI supporters argue that the focus on the Al-Qadir Trust case while ignoring alleged corruption by members of other parties points towards selective prosecution. They highlight cases like those involving Hassan Nawaz (son of former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif) and the lack of significant legal action against them, despite accusations of financial improprieties. This perceived double standard contributes to the belief that the justice system is being weaponized against Imran Khan and PTI.
Timing of the Case and Trial: The initiation and swift conclusion of the Al-Qadir Trust case occurred after Imran Khan’s removal from office through a vote of no confidence. This timing led PTI supporters to view the case as an attempt to prevent his return to power and discredit him in the eyes of the public. The speed of the trial, compared to the lengthy legal processes often seen in Pakistan, further fueled these suspicions.
PTI’s Narrative of a “Foreign Conspiracy”: Imran Khan has consistently maintained that his removal from office was orchestrated by a foreign conspiracy involving the United States. He has presented the corruption charges against him as an extension of this alleged plot, aiming to punish him for his independent foreign policy stance. This narrative, widely accepted among PTI supporters, reinforces their belief that he is being unfairly targeted for challenging powerful interests.
Suppression of Dissent and Restrictions on PTI: Following Imran Khan’s conviction, there have been reports of crackdowns on PTI rallies, restrictions on media coverage of his case, and arrests of his supporters. These actions are seen by PTI as further attempts to silence dissent and curtail their political activities, contributing to the perception of a broader strategy to suppress the party.
While the corruption charges against Imran Khan were ultimately adjudicated by a court of law, the context in which they emerged, the perceived selective application of accountability, and the subsequent actions against PTI have fueled allegations of political targeting. This situation has intensified political divisions in Pakistan and raised concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the justice system.
The Original Text
It was postponed and the date of 13 January was given It has been done today 17th January at 11:30 The time given for this decision was The case went on for a year to be heard More than 100 cases have been resolved 35 The witness statements have been recorded and henceforth The verdict will be announced shortly. 190 Million Pound Reference Bani PTI and Will Bushra Bibi be punished or will she be acquitted? I decided to go after some time A £190 million bailout will be made The trial was completed in one year and this The decision of the reference may be stated three times Eht sahib the court has given its decision on 18 December 20224 was reserved for giving the verdict for that first 23 December then 6 January and after that Later the date of 13 January was given by Nab on 13 £190 million by November 2023 Arrest of Bani PTI in reference and remained with PTI for 17 days Hussain Ahmed was also investigated in Adala Jail Chaudhry is with us Hussein 1:30 11 The time given was 11:00, but now it’s 11:4 What is being told? When will the verdict be announced? will Yes, look at the court staff It has been stated from the side that at any time It is a safe decision that will be given Because the time mentioned was 11:30 now That has already happened and he has been put in jail if If so, Shoaib Shaheen also reached the court as a lawyer Salman Akram Raja has arrived and Barrister Salman Barrister Gauhar who is also Barrister Gauhar has arrived and he is We also had a brief conversation, he said that The £10 million verdict is out today It will not be postponed, we have come prepared whatever decision comes to be heard It will come today, apart from this he also said that that when justice was decided then Bani PTA was formed You will be in jail, you will be acquitted, you will be released We will go and Barrister Gohar will also be in the room Similarly any other lawyer present in the court There is Salman Akram Raja Shoaib Shaheen and that too The decision has been reached in the court Right now I am a victim of Takhi, the rhythm cannot be heard could because in prison we often see that whenever a lawyer or media goes there then their The process of security is that It is quite long, two to three grades are fine Hussain, Majeed also seeks guidance from you in this matter taking The Senate session is ongoing, the minister’s law Azam Nazir Tara please take care, he is the target Its mechanism of recovery is all that we have recently abhi aaj conclusion places in Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi from the point of view of litigating the case Ministry of Law for Effective Prosecution and justice has training program which is He had started Islamabad and Lahore whatever investigation has been done The officers are of customs and the prosecutors are theirs He is still training for Karachi today Conclusion has been issued and for that Asrat Murat it will be obvious when you investigate officers and prosecutors they would be efficient knowing the laws and Technically, these are my senior lawyers sitting here There has been an investigation in the house because of that Meyer is better because of the prosci The chances of being successful increase a lot All these mayors are being given ji ji Senator Shahadat Awan sahab question question number He said, Jana Chairman sahab, in this I have said this It is said that question number sir question number 24 ji 24 Sir Sir in this I have got this from my CDA asked if you have the attack weapon These are salty plants which we call evasive Species say there is no end to flora and fauna Whether there is a law or not sir its background is this yes sir this is what we are going to do here in f9 There is a park, there is no cutting of trees in it The Supreme Court was prosecuting him which is done with full intention in Karachi Ali Shah is chatting There are so many mawa’s and for this The Sindh government has tried its best like I told you about the department’s presentation and in the briefing When you and I visit the stalls then You will see that the Live Stock Department has We have a complete center here in Korangi In which we have expanded in the last few years In That the vaccine which was imported from outside They used to do about 10 to 15 percent of what our The cost of import was coming on it Vaccines are being made and this will help, Insha Allah Those people who are in the private sector, Our farmers are rich in business They will benefit from it as well to increase yields The department is also in the manner in which The potential of fisheries is being worked upon We have All right ji, here is some big news for you. want to give that in Al Qaid Trust case Acquitted in £190 million case This is the news that has reached us so far, the decision has come PTI has been summoned by the court He has been acquitted, this is a big decision that this was not what I expected said this I was thinking that maybe I would be punished It was being called an open and shut case but here But Bani PTI has been acquitted just now Till then this decision came out 190 million pound reference case verdict You got the news from this Give it to me and let me tell you that Bushra Beeb PTI’s Digar Araki has reached Ad jail Judges who have also reached jail have They too have become adamant about giving the verdict and The decision of this case was heard after some time Clarification Let us be told in this context that he was not acquitted but sentenced to 14 years He was sentenced and sentenced to 14 years PTI has been told £190 million This was the case in which it was stated that Bani PTI has been sentenced to 14 years Initially it was said something else but now it is this that this confirmation has come regarding that Bani PTI was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment So this is a case worth £190 million there is a decision in which you can see that from this Earlier the case was also being called Al Qadir Trust and inside this again this National from Batania Refund of money through crime agency There was a case and this deal was made in it. Ejaz is present with us that is Majeed Tafsi I will give you pride Ejaz please tell me about this force Nar Javed Rana £190 million The decision of the reference has been announced, Bani PTI sentenced to 10 years imprisonment Along with this, a penalty of Rs 10 lakh fine is imposed Bushra Bibi has been sentenced to 16 years imprisonment The sentence was pronounced and five more Tell me again, he was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment Has been Ji Bani PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and 10 lakh rupees Uchhra Biwi has been sentenced to a fine Sentenced to 16 years imprisonment and 5 lakh fine It went well and also in the context of Bushra Bibi tell me once again yes exactly 190 million pounds reference Bani PTI sentenced to 14 years and Rs 10 lakh was sentenced to a fine and the fine was paid If this is not done, then six months’ imprisonment will have to be deducted for this Bushra didi was also sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment It has been heard that the fine has been imposed and If the fine is not paid then a three I’ll have to serve a month’s imprisonment, okay? Stay with us, our representative is warning you is 190 million pounds reference Ete Saab The court has given its verdict of Rs 190 million 14 years for Bani PTI in pound reference The Ehte Saab court has pronounced the sentence of Bani PTI also sentenced to ₹ lakh fine Bushra Bibi was also sentenced He has been sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment Court fines Bushra Biwi Rs 1 lakh Even if the sentence is pronounced, as it was said today The verdict will be announced on December 18 The decision was reserved and the first date The date for pronouncing the verdict was given on 23 December and then on 6 December The date of January was given and then 13 January The date was given like this for the fourth time today when it was told It was said that the verdict will be announced so now this decision The tradition of the day of Jam came before us The Supreme Court upheld the verdict Even when decisions came through the court, they were called Fridays this day used to be very important now this is that the sentence has been pronounced and that it is said This was going the way Faisal Vada sahab They said it was an open and shut case At that very moment I told him that in this matter you will be punished in the manner prescribed by the court The way a sealed cover was placed in front of the cabinet Parvez Khattak when the envelope was presented Saheb also said this later I had certified that brother, we already knew I did not know what caste his temple was, Shahzad Akbar sahab had brought him inside and then Afterwards you saw that now on this matter The sentence has been pronounced and a fine of 10 lakh rupees has also been imposed This has been done and some more details have also come to light Well, our representative Farooq has come If you are with me, I will ask him, Farooq will you tell me Because Bushra Bibi was also present in the court so was he arrested because he has been sentenced to 10 years in prison When the sentence of imprisonment has been pronounced When the sentence was pronounced, Bani PTI and Bushra Both the wives were present in the court room It was said while giving the verdict on behalf of that the Procu is without any doubt Bani has been successful in proving the case PTI and Bushra Bibi Cup practice The dead have been found, therefore Bani PTI 14 years imprisonment and 10 lakh rupees under Nam 1999 A fine is imposed and Bushra Wife sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and 5 lakh fine The sentence is pronounced by the court Both the accused were formally sentenced Now the court has been given by the jail staff From there Bushra Bibi was taken into custody and kill them in a nice cell can be done well along with al Qadir University is also under government control I have been ordered to take it, yes Of course, along with this, the court which Al Qader University is a warning to the government of Vifa that he should also take it in your fold, it’s ok, i will blow it on you We will find out more details at this time. warn you that £190 million Reference Ehte Saab The court pronounced the verdict Bani PTI has been sentenced to 14 years of imprisonment A fine of Rs 10 lakh has also been imposed It has also been narrated by Bushra Bibi who Elia is his son and he was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and sentenced to a fine of ₹ lakh It has been narrated and addressed to Al-Qadir University He also gave the order to take it under government custody If it has been decided then it is expected that the decision will be taken today The decision will be announced, the brief has arrived The decision has been issued, now its details We’ll find out later what that is what are the matters like asfaq is concerned with this Earlier, some time ago, I was giving details of a The case ended in a year and the 100th There are about 59 witnesses presented in it. Out of which the statements of 35 were also recorded and They were questioned and after that this decision was taken 18 December and the case were saved Let me also tell you a little history about Where did the case start in December 2019 It was being smuggled that the meeting would take place at This entry had happened when Khattak sahab When I tested, he told me that there Mirza Shahzad Akbar Sahib said this had presented the annual on which someone There was no deliberation and it was accepted Farukh Eza ji had gone and is present with us Let us talk to him further as well, Farukh Majeed please tell me what are the options now It is obvious that an appeal will be taken What else is the reaction in the High Court over this What has come out so far on this decision and Will the Tehri decision also be given today? Yes, absolutely, a statement from the court The decision will be given shortly only the operative part which is the decision was read out by the court in which it was said by the court that The prosecution has proven its worth without any doubt proved his case and formed PTI and Bushra Bibi found dead due to corrupt practice Hence, PTI got NAB amendment 14 years under section 16A of Ordinance 99 He would have been sentenced to imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakhs Along with this Bushra Bibi got 10 years of age Sentenced to imprisonment and fine of Rs. lakh Along with this the Alkad Trust which The case was built on the foundation that this It was said that the deal was worth £190 million. There was an adjustment in return for Al Qadr Along with this the trust’s land was acquired with us workers we will talk like this Sabiq Sadar is present with us right now supreme court bar association man sahab very thank you for joining 190 million The verdict is given in the Pound case Bani PTI sentenced to 14 years and her wife sentenced to 7 years imprisonment with fine are also given if we talk about asaf case Should we talk about Toshakhana Case One or Cipher? Talking about the case, the plea taken in it It was said that the end was in a great hurry It happened and I did not get the time and it was done properly There was no trial but let’s talk about this case So it has been 100 years since this case The witness is going to appear, now if there is a loss PTI goes and challenges this case See what plea she can take in the court PTI has all the pulleys that can be It could be political and other things could also be there can lead to political victimisation One can talk about it, but one thing you like that this case I tried it properly after trying it together it took a year and a half and a year In one and a half year its all and its defense also got full opportunity and the process also gave full evidence, now the thing is that They have to file an appeal against this Malaj Mann has the right to appeal and he You can appeal whatever is lacuna in this But one thing that is Maybe he is a friend who doesn’t understand shame that the spectrum of nab laaj is totally different and he looked at it from different perspectives It is said that someone’s dear friend is in trouble Is he a frontman or someone in front or behind? Misuse of authority such as I have been watching it on TV, I am not into this I am a lawyer but the thing that has come up in this And according to that this is 190 million Approximately 70 billion rupees are earned And that is what the Government of Pakistan He adjusted the property worth Rs. In the times of Saheb and in the times of Mal La Saheb In 2014, the Supreme Court specifically stated that when the State of Pakistan that money he a phrase in full wrote it down to loot the pal and there after to pay the pal If a person says that I did this by dictating If you pay off a man’s debt, then this can’t be justified so good This is the method of misuse of The element of authority is visible The front is good but there are many other things inside One of the factors is that Esan saheb, presented it before the cabinet in a proper manner You might remember that a lot of people have commented on this Zubaida Jalal Sahiba then after that Pravesh Khatak sahab had also certified that Shaikh Rasheed saheb in the cabinet also said There was no discussion on it at all The prince was pure and pure in it Everything that came forward was that he said this The document is a confidential matter And which has an agreement with the UK Government and that amount has to be transferred now did not know that this money which was to be given to Prime Minister minister sahab This money is being presented in the cabinet That National Crime Agency had recovered the money from a London The money has been recovered from Malik Riaz and he is the property of the State of Pakistan and They have to give it to the State of Pakistan ok now if anyone can understand this that all these other things are here in the country there is politics in this if they want If there is such a thing then go and appeal to him View and appeal in do well that means you are saying that if You have the right to file an appeal, and can go to high court in appeal To go to court, yes to go to the high court Yes, we can see Faisal Chaudhary He is outside the court and he is talking to the media are Yaju, please talk to me Yaya sir, please tell me that what does it seem in the case the way in which It was said from PTI that Too much haste and not enough justice were done but their own people who now he is not with them they kept saying that brother this So it already seemed like an open and shut case This will be your thoughts on the case and the Look at the decision, it was an open and shut case, so Because whatever evidence there is in this case came forward and because within this evidence UK Government and NCA National Crime agency was also present within it and the way There was evidence of this, it is being proved It was thought that maybe this case was against Imran Khan and PTI It will prove to be the most serious case for and that’s what we saw i will interrupt you Obviously we are doing live transmission Faisal Chaudhary is talking outside the court Is there any evidence of monetary gun in it? of crime proceeds or financial corruption not a single evidence of Till date Tasa has taken a decision from Moneyl Mutalik or UK court or Pakistani I did not put it on court record earlier Day said that this judge sahib I am looking for the decision of this judge which date There is a hand pick of such a judge who is not a member of the Supreme Court declared that he was fit to be a judge No There was a man picked up who did bad things The one who set an example for Imran Khan Punish your loyalty and your appointment justified what is This is a ridiculous verdict in a ridiculous case We will go everywhere against this decision and this decision is being accepted all over the world We will also present the evidence of the case against this today is a wonderful day again day on the rights of the people of Pakistan Imran Khan was robbed again today Another way to target politically I agree today is an attempt to give Bushra Bibi a try Imran Khan’s demand to be punished for being a Jauza Today is the day that establishes this I hope the justice and order in this country is destroyed There are no urban courts in this country could not protect the basic rights She has given this decision according to the law According to the law, this decision was filed before it should have been a day the manner in which the case was tried When the power goes off in Ayala prison during winter When it happened the judge got up I asked him if you You are on winter vacation so soon after do this but because the punishment Dena Maqsood Faisal Chaudhary was chatting Before this Yaya Farid Mahire Law our Were together let’s go towards them once again yaya You will continue depending on this decision Look at this decision, it is as much evidence as it is Kiss was revealed in this case Look at this, it has multiple stages on which misuse of authority is visible Miss it is a property that the UK government A settlement was reached with the Pakistani The government has evolved and what is inside it Please return this money to the government It is available because UK has also declared this that this money, this government Pakistan makes money but it has a which of the Supreme Court was adjusted The liability was with Malik Riaz saheb And look the most important thing is that Approval was never taken from the cabinet before sending prince Akbar but prince Akbar sahab is the ruler of Pakistan As a representative, please tell me one thing that the way in which you get approval from the cabinet on which azam khan sahab talked that Ji had brought a note that Ji was the cabinet’s A sealed unfold will be presented in front Entry again for approval, again knocked sir After that Zubaida Jalal Sahiba Baqi Sheikh Rashid sahib, all these people said that we I didn’t know what was inside it He said that there is a matter which needs to be approved yes this happens look yes look sir two the first thing is that Shahzad Akbar wanted first before sending to the cabinet that the cabinet decides this She discusses and debates above but First of all, without taking the cabinet into the loop Shehzad has settled with NCA Akbar criticized the behavior of the Government of Pakistan An agreement after pay settlement after doing it, sign it and then It was said in front of the cabinet, look at this It is confidential, you cannot open it You cannot read this, you cannot debate this I can do it because we have already made a deal and then the cabinet was told that If you want to sign it silently then The cabinet was never kept in the loop If this decision is taken then Imran Khan has taken it I did it myself that this money which belonged to the government which was the money of the people of Pakistan The looted money was with the government that day Now it has been given to the Supreme Court Malik was returned to Riyaz’s pocket The cabinet never came in the loop If not before or later then the first is the biggest The allegation is against Imran Khan that being prime minister of pakistan He hid it from his cabinet He hid the public from the government agencies The money is to a private person I returned the money to the person who stole it And this was said by the UK government that this money is from bribery and corruption The first allegation against Khan saheb would be this The second thing is that all this alkad trust was formed and under that Al Qade Trust He became a trustee and after that he got Rs 490 a The canal land is being transferred There is no reason to transfer it There is no logic behind it, nor was his money paid Nothing was given to me then the watch and all this This is a clear cut connection that develops that it misses This is an appropriate case and its verdict has come. You can also give your opinion regarding the decision Second, give this Pakistan Tehreek Insaaf It is obvious that every court I will go and challenge this decision look at this case what it is about PTI people themselves used to say in closed rooms that it is very difficult to avoid it Bani PTI and the manner in which the court heard this case and has left no legal point and Any chance that they asked for Its founder is PTI and its partners are the accused He has not been given that much opportunity, so They have taken a lot of money I tried and during this time I became PTI has put its full emphasis on this judge sahab twice and expressed complete confidence in the court and then but because case two It is a deposit two, it was an open and shut case Absolutely the biggest tikka of Pakistan And there were so many martyrs from his home present in it ranging from his cabinet members to his It was impossible to escape and that is why his own team also the one who is doing muja was saying that Even if the joke is punished, we will continue joking because they could see that every man to one who understands the law and who has studied the case and after this punishment a taser which An atmosphere was being created by PTI It was being made that we did not know any NRO has been taken, today it should also end well senator sir you too are obviously Your community is still a part of the government And there have been and we see many such cases which cannot be proven in any way that is, cases are formed against them But call it such a big mistake, call it a blunder in which his own people were saying that it is open and shut so what can you do on it I will say that it illuminates so much every day The cabinet in front of the cabinet came like that In front of that, this is the method of approval which was adopted in that any he should take the unfolded bag and say yes to this First of all you should take a look at the whole government Starting from Buzdar, there was a market there Who used to get all the transfer postings done? Who was Gogi Gogi? Bushra Bibi was the front man ki bani gala you are the one who calls a lot Hero’s rings got leaked, I am not small A big amount is required even to get NOC from someone You can also contact Tsunami Tree for co-contract. After that you can see the service which is Pisha Mate That means four houses have been built in Punjab in 100 billion rupees. not even one was made there in one and a quarter billion then in the same way You can find any story of this, any such foreign funding You can see the stories of his own hospital Who will listen to the Atiyat, that means you are everywhere This was the job of these people and in this case Because which His wife is Bushra Bibi, he has only one He is an expert when even in his first marriage She was the wife of a government officer there too How to catch the specialty of these deals In this connection and here also he did the same business had started and this Imran Khan He used to support me completely and that was his strength To appoint a minister Who got the chief minister of Punjab removed? This is the kind of deals he did and this Now they have no such solution for punishment in the case This is not an excuse in any High Court This case will be taken again to end the punishment L Right ji, thank you very much your broker Choudhary sahab was present with us at Noon leader and he says that yes, this is good Time ji, the leader of Tehreek Insaaf, talking This is Lin Shibli Faraz saheb, this conversation is for you Let me show you if there was any loss, Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi benefited by a penny The intention was right and the objective was also right But this custom is being made in this country that whoever in this country a person who So much for a serious disease like cancer builds big hospitals which are different It is one of the largest cities in Pakistan He is in the cities, he should be punished for this that he has studied at Al Qader University In which Seeratul Nabi was to be recited Huzoor Research was to be done on Salam’s life and The youth of Pakistan need it It had to happen but no one could commit such a big crime could In this country where there is no law that it is the hand of the law or not And those people who kept looting this country Are Every decision is taken by the leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf outside the court after the hearing Before this Faisal is talking to media Choudhary who is a lawyer was talking to this At this time Faraz is chatting and On behalf of Pakistan Tehreek Insaf, The decision of this case on behalf of the lawyer There will be a challenge but our leader is Imran Khan, he is a proven step, we are also a proven step Insha Allah we will take them to other courts We will take whatever type of past cases we want be it a cipher, be it a treasury, be it a Whatever the case may be, the courts have thrown it out thrown away because all these are political cases which From Imran Khan to below him, that party Inshallah the morning is made on the basis of the factors We will definitely prove our point, we are the law and I want to be the master of the law within it we are playing a lot Thank you Bimla Rehman Rahim our country this is alright ji so this You are watching this scene on your television The decisions on the screen are also something from now on If this pamphlet reaches us late, we will also I’ll tell you what’s written in it Are the details written in it and now The decision will be taken in brief and then in detail The decision will be issued and after that the appeal will be heard There will also be a stage which is completely an option will be given to PTI so that it can look into the matter go to a court aalia i.e. high court Turn towards it and if your eyes look at it If you want to get it done then however in this case I would say the case is that there are other people This included those who were made public proclamation have been adjudged as offenders and they Basically, Shamu was not adopted in this case In which Zulfi Bukhari is also Mirza Shahzad Akbar is also there, these people are also included in it and Now that the sentence has been pronounced, Let’s see a little bit about its background let’s go to that £190 million or It was also called the Al Qadi Trust case The allegation made was that Former Prime Minister means the PTI formed by him Ahliya during PTI’s rule By Britain’s National Crime Agency 50 billion sent to Pakistan by the government Billions of rupees in exchange for giving legal status and acquired hundreds of kanal of Malian land and This case is regarding the land for Alkaid University Obviously illegal acquisition and construction Now this was the whole matter and Then it was also alleged that Bani had pertaining to the compensation which is to be obtained by reference He hid the truth from the cabinet and even hid the cabinet misled and the amount is for Tasfia It was discussed under the terms of the article and we are talking about it Let us take the oath of office of the minister Talat Attaar saheb Ata Tar sahab is present with us, the decision has come This was what was anticipated, this was the decision It was being termed an open and shut case From your side to your friends as well Also see this is a history of Pakistan The biggest mega corruption scam is that due to which Inside a crime proceeding which is from the UK crime agency ruled by pakistan handed over the government of Pakistan The money and the government belong to the people of Pakistan Pakistan has sought approval of a sealed envelope Through this the Prime Minister and his family formed a trust Create a trust and give all the money to that person gave the person from whom it was confiscated this is this which marzi kept saying it was an open and shut case and I believe justice prevails And it is also true that this case is political. It was fought on the foundation, it was fought on the media No such evidence was presented in the court which proves that he is innocent Now, as far as the rings are concerned, they are five carat that the house in Lahore was 25 of Zaman Park Crores and all other things were taken The land of Fara Gogi proves all these things shows that they have relationship with that business was transactional with the tycoons and they 8 billion rupees worth of vaccine to provide facilities That community was imposed for caste benefit Was imposed if you date of Pakistan If you look, you will find this type of glaring aid Proclaim which will not be available in any other case what will happen to the offenders the way you did it The name given is Mirza Shahzad Akbar sahab Zulfi Bukhari is there, the rest are above him Now what will happen, some action should be taken against them, let’s see So obviously this is towards theft of property The matter goes towards attachment and legal Processes exist if you are sentenced Even after that they do not come to Pakistan and that law if you don’t face it then obviously it will be late B consequences but in this what Pri Sahab Tell me one more thing, obviously in reference to this Majeed will also come in detail PTI is saying we will await the decision of this case We will also do a challenge but during this time there is another Things are happening Hukum Mujah Karrai and PTI during the committee What is the decision that has come, it is obvious the decision So it has come against PTI, it will have an impact In this Muja Kararay I understand that Muja Never give any deal or NRO This is the same as if a person committed murder And after killing he comes and says that I am Muja’s I am a part of it, my murder has not been accounted for Go and see, the crime was present at its place, the trial was there We are a charter for the betterment of the country for the economy and in this country Doing this to bring stability You wanted to see the one who is against you They say this is a politically motivated case He was not satisfied with this decision either Do you think he might back out? yes, I think they enjoy it I don’t know Kararay and this Tasur at all That a single person should because Conviction in corruption and bribery case so we will do mujra and the other thing is that In Mujah Carracks Today You Can See That Stock The market has also gone up by 1000 points immediately after this means that the business The sentiment is based on the policies of the government If it is with me then I want me to move forward We will grow and Inshallah we will grow but we are still So we want that the condition of life of the people should also be good You better be in the stock market Just look at the inflation since last year, even flour Petrol is also cheaper than 38 per cent If inflation has come at 3.9 per cent then this is the situation Sir, we are moving towards betterment but at this time if we take decisions But please tell me the way in which This was presented in the cabinet at that time Obviously he is quite certified about it now. What Parvez Khadak sahab said there Jalal Sahiba told Sheikh Rashid Sahib quite well Among all the people that the sealed unveil you Because right now he is part of the cabinet How is the cabinet practiced Any document is presented in I served in the cabinet for approval I have been in the cabinet of Punjab and two I have been in the cabinet of loyal people till today In these three tenures till date I have made a profit I did not see it but our law minister Azam Nazirar sahab has a big debate on every issue A walk is an easy conversation, and every matter is discussed There is a thread bare analysis and there is freedom that your views are yours whatever they may be You can give them secret sealed envelopes there. to keep things this way we’ve got three I have never seen this in Kabina’s tenor till date This is the first time that such a case has happened and He wanted to hide something so he did this if there was nothing to hide then why give closed tafa ok so what what is the cabinet on top of it it becomes a responsibility, because at that time If approval is given then the cabinet of the cabinet which was the responsibility of some officials of the cabinet inspite of the opposition the Prime Minister then he got this approved by over ruling everybody The prime minister at that time, who did the whole course by force The responsibility lies with them and they Even if a trust is created, it will prove to be a bribe It would have happened if that trust for Eid had not been formed Why was Shipa’s trust not created? Why didn’t you make a beautiful foundation? why didn’t you make it from Fami Foundation Why didn’t Abrar Ul Haq make Shahzad Rai’s why didn’t so many people make it you do the same kind of work, you trust him only who gave you the money or the one who made it You gave them advantage, so they got their hands dirty They were embroiled in corruption and today they speak of justice it is hairy ok so now further you are saying that it will have no effect on the mujrak or it should not be there aali should not be read and we should move on from Muja Kararay and that Those who were talking, some smuggler was coming, some There was a discussion in the media as well that There should also be an apology through executive order there can be an attack on this decision too They will talk about what if it happens in this too So what’s the matter if someone looks at this If you pardon me then all the jails of Pakistan It should be disclosed that there is a robbery of 80 billion rupees and there is absolutely glaring evidence then that What should I apologize for with that country? How long will the joke continue that who we are is this I will keep forgiving Mujma in every way I don’t see any possibility, good and There was one news, I don’t know that Bushra The wife is there and someone is having fun there too The one whom she is leading has denied it. Mukhra is with Kati and Bushra is with his wife I did not see any character in it and They have their own politics, they can put it aside but Muja Carrax is out of process as of now A written demand was also presented by them A judicial commission has been formed so that We would like you to explain a little bit about that what are you doing who will decide what you The court gave a request to Uzma in this regard I understand that a judicial commission is formed which But now we are here when we have no say in this matter If it is not on 9th May but on 26th November then who will get the commission about the matter and anyway there is a legal commission Commission finding that it is legally binding If it weren’t so, I think that this There is no legitimate demand, however that is my mandate there is no this committee will give it but your I am thinking of you again Muja, see Muja There is a consensus that this country’s SIM is fine To bring stability to this country for the sake of the people of this country We should also talk about the people, shouldn’t we? They are always fighting with each other We want that opposition from others If there is a betterment of the people then I am for that I think he is a good forward Inshallah your situation will get better They do not even accept the mandate, see do not accept the mandate of the House is part of the mandate and does not accept it Acceptance of mandate is part of committees I do not do my role in the 26th Amendment Their public paid homage as soon as the camera was If there is a dam then better people than these are from the media There is no one else in front of the camera and behind the camera there are others well this will tell me one thing that there is mujra you said they should be forwarded that is absolutely correct but take some more something happens on the basis of two things, right If you have any other issue then please tell them I think there will be talks but this corruption case it was an open and shut case so I I understand that justice has become very important ji thank you were doing solo and He has spoken out and this is happening in every way The dead person has become so, he said this It is a case, it will not affect you, read I don’t want any action related to corruption And obviously you see that this is a One basic thing is that if there is a legal requirement are completed and things like these or The way this decision has come, inside it So his own people were saying as an example Faisal Vada sahab who is not with him today But they say that a voice came from there If she comes, I will go and talk to you I will listen but they say I will tell you myself It was given that this is an open ended shed case in this The decision will come for the rest of the people at that time He was part of the cabinet and he was saying that If it is not appropriate then Azam Nazir Taar at this time Sir ji, Vifa’s minister is present with us Law and justice, thank you very much Azam Nazir Mr. Tar, the decision has come at this time. Tar sahab was present with us, he was saying that the justice of the law prevails What is your reaction, what are your thoughts? no this is correct look at us No, everything has been linked to politics There is a criminal case which is being investigated After the investigation is done you can In a reference sent to him by a court, I have tried this for more than a year now It was off shoots i.e. rate is accepted or The issue of jurisdiction is before the High Court Some things were dealt with by the Supreme Court that after all this has happened, everything It is very unfair to link this thing with politics It is appropriate that the governance of countries should be based on one law The police work under the law This is a criminal case in that regard We also understood that it was a criminal case that the regimes of governance, the governments which Obviously you are also a ruler If it is a part then it is under a whole job let’s go that means hack panky is inside it it doesn’t happen this way but who is this in the cabinet the sealed unfolded was presented in a proper manner then his It was approved, then it was all rejected right there The matter started like this in the cabinet Something may not be approved at all There should be and this is perhaps a sign of one’s intentions There is a unique case in which a sealed envelope contains a The document was brought and then it was presented to the cabinet It was said on behalf of Wazir Azam Sahib and his who was the special move of that time Shahzad Akbar Sir said that this is a confidentiality It is an agreement, it is a secret thing which Which has to be authorized by the Government of Pakistan If we do this Maida then it will be 190 million The amount of pounds that money earning proceeds from The NCA has consolidated them as If there has been a settlement, then this amount will be refunded again This is written in the Government of Pakistan Pakistan will get this amount in minutes You will be killed if you are from Pakistan Want to get 190 million pounds for the government If it is there then they would have approved it quickly Approval was taken knowing that this amount The government is not coming to Pakistan but to that country Shahzad Akbar before the Confidence Agreement Sir had already entered and he was doing Mahida We were with NCA under which this 190 It was said that the amount was a million pounds and I I understand that it was not their mistake This is the account of the Supreme Court as stated Because the government had to tell that In which account do they want it It was said that this is the account of the Supreme Court now for all more reason to the next agency then we cannot be accused, he understood that the The government is saying it is right but It is not known whether this is actually a penalty There is an account of Malik Riyas Sahab Settlement of land of Bahria Town Karachi It was good 400 rupees per billion When his installment was fixed in Mume This amount is for the payment of those installments which It was used and the biggest proof of this is that it was ordered here by mistake that when the loyalty of the same Supreme Court came to notice the Government of brought this matter when the Government transformed and when this theft was discovered then loyalty The cabinet decided that this should be investigated and the matter was referred to NAB Also in that cabinet meeting it was It was decided that this was because Pakistan Is it the public’s money to pay the fine to someone? If this money is not sent to tax should be imposed on the people of Pakistan and a The petition was filed in the Supreme Court That request was accepted as loyalty to Pakistan And the Supreme Court returned that money to that account. by taking out all these details from Now when Azam Naj Tar Sahab is saying this Are we the people of Pakistan Tehreek Insaaf that we are We will challenge this decision in the High Court So you think this case is so interesting that despite the challenge, it still worked out like this It will come or else some other decision may come As a student of law from higher court I have read the case and I am in the cabinet It was at that time when this whole case was discussed and Then I also put the reference on top of a stage I have read it in your daily TV as well as in the newspaper. There has been reporting on what witnesses said given statements this is an open and shut case and I don’t think there is much in this Anything more technical or it’s mush kafiya I am not going to comment though because Under our constitutional dispensation These domains are the property of the courts under Article 175. If yes, then they should definitely appeal to this They have the right to go for appeal, this is just my I definitely have a wish that I wish in Pakistan There should be such a system of justice in which there is more justice than Akbar From Bashir to Anwar to Bute to Imran Khan Shahbaz Sharif should be treated equally like everyone else Whatever the treatment here is for five years Appeals are pending and people are in jail People are in the Supreme Court since 2121 years I am waiting for my decisions, if sir refuses then After you have done so much, it is better for him Will this decision today shock him? I don’t think this is a legal thing The issue was good and in my opinion Pakistan So much politics in Tehreek Insaf the Pukhtun leadership is respected then how can they Look, it will come out, then I don’t care about it The government will be in a position to make a 14 issue an order after one year of sentence that he Yes, give this authority to a person and that is the case of the prisoner and If Imran Khan sahab during the whole matter If Imran Khan sahab files mercy petition If you do that, contact Sardar Asaf Ali Zardari saheb. They can do this, I am a law abiding citizen I am a seeker of knowledge more than this I will not comment or if they appeal Do People’s Party with Pakistan then you I am saying that there is no scope for it, it is written on it Isn’t it true that Article 45 has all the rights? The person who is the chief has this authority and in this There are also court rulings that if someone He appeals to them for mercy and they feel that this person is worthy of mercy, then he could have done this Thank you very much and we will talk about it Senator Faisal Bada will join us Was Faisal Vader sahab sure that this case I will be punished and Kerr is quite satisfied with this Faisal had been chatting for a long time Mr Bader, the decision has come and the anticipation The punishment was being done and it has been 14 years year and fine so what do you say about this decision Look at it from the perspective of this it is a great misfortune that Imran Khan sahab stood forward on this issue Where he had never seen any such case before 2018 didn’t work and I told you In fact even yesterday I told you to decorate your show Both of them will have back diplomacy and it was said If it is running then one will get it and not the other It will happen, I said both of them will because it is open And it was a shut case from day one the day it arrived Inside the malus approval cabinet I saw that Din had also told Khan sahab and Khan sahab After saying this I also went to their house and told them who had come to collect the first prize of this crime Where there is a story, open it when the prince by nominating Akbar to form the Government of Sent to negotiate from Pakistan side Even then there was no cabinet approval Well no we knew that it was without approval Mother, if I tell you a crime today, you are gone If I tell the story then the principle is if someone from Pakistan On what basis is he going to behave? Negotiate So the cabinet will give its approval too, right? He was neither elected nor a minister nor anything tha number one number two that the NCA had said This is Pakistan’s money, the third thing is that Transparency International, which is based in the UK, I objected to this and said it was wrong we said this is going wrong and this 46 billion had to be paid to the Supreme Court Suppose if there were 100 billion more then it would have been 56 This was increased to 36 for Pakistan when If it is done justly then there will be an example profit of 100 billion and if you take 10 billion from him then Germany Otherwise, what is the point of us and you making such a decision We have never done this in our life till date got a chance But there is no problem in it or you who are very It is very sad that religious card I brought religion into the picture, I can’t tell the Maulvi If I am a Muslim, there is no heaven or hell And not this drama that you are doing and I regret it that this work is being done by a face which is against the party I was one of the sincere men inside but Fail sahab please tell me when at that time the cabinet were a part of and you also talked about it later when If everything was being reported with so much secrecy then At that time, did you discuss this in the cabinet or At that time you tried to explain it to me because You were also listened to at that time, nothing happened at that time nothing happened at that time and after Witness That day’s headlines are there as well as the cabinet And I explained it to them a lot, they resisted a lot and we were surrounded by three ministers Started first, see which one is good Even when it came into the agenda, it was part of the agenda Was not a part of it by using special power I called you suddenly the agenda came which documents were given to us then the envelope came Then the envelope was not opened and it was said It seemed that the contract was done and no one would do anything about it. There is no discussion going on about the way the approval process is being done. There was a big case too and let me tell you that all these people sitting here today who are saying Which of these is a big mistake The minister was there and he too went there silently and looked have come your Where is my story and this saab in the nab Write your statement and tell me your name The more majority you have, the more ministers you have He was good at that time, compared to other people That means they all have gone and said the same thing We request that our name not be used Ok, but this thing is for Pakistani nation Do you know what this F sir says, whatever you proclaim The rest of the names of the offenders are as follows: did not even get involved in the investigation Now see what will happen to them in this case It is Pakistan’s misfortune that someone We cannot catch him because he creates terror. But he is the chief minister of Gandapur I am talking to some prime minister It is old, forgive it under active order Some Prime Minister should be given to the country and then from time to time If any Prime Minister comes back then he is present Some TM, some BM, some setter, some minister This drama keeps going on in Pakistan because he is out of the country Part Before today till yesterday we were watching Hamid Raza sahab and other PTI members were very happy They were saying that now Bani is going to come out Some meetings were also being cited Then it was being said by executive order Whatever it is, it is possible Then he also presented his written complaint There was a different presentation going on you will remember this tomorrow you will remember this tomorrow Story made up prop propaganda done that we had a wonderful meeting with the Army Chief It happened and one on one happened, both were lies I told him that I was in trouble and difficulty There is a difference of three and a half hours and if he comes then this they propagate they propagate They do drama but they are very fast in it Now you are busy creating lies and deceit Kushan was praising the cheese yesterday and was saying Now you will join that same army in the coming days I should write it down right now that from today onwards we will go after them Tolling will start, so what am I talking about? Manu did not believe in 9 May They used to say that we didn’t do it, it was made on us It’s a drama and it comes on your own channel Gandapur saheb a shirt on Wasi Badami’s show Let’s pretend that my men were not there in the earth I turn them on they crossed the line or else give them this punishment after this Now what do you do, how many open ends after this We have set things, now what does the future look like? Tell me the future of Mujra and Mukra Then I told you that you guys I told all the channels that I am not This must be a joke, this is a drama From today onwards the Mujra will stop, after 20 the trams will stop When you feel dejected about the card then come forward In the coming days, he will do it late at that time The government will do this I am waiting absolutely waiting Both parties are waiting and but You should be very clear, what is the limit The governments of both are negotiating And PTI negotiated jokingly at night The limit for both is that both want that Inside Those who are from PTI also want him to go to jail PCI people are here today who are praying tomorrow were going to announce the decision today and thank you We will fall inside, we will stay in Idar too We will also enjoy the money and I have told you guys I had told him a long time ago that he understood this He can get relief if he goes to higher court will challenge and what they are saying So they should hurry to hear the decision Look, the higher court listened to me I told you a long time ago that You are great, I will talk to you only after 26th November I said and I’m still telling you that It is an open and shut case in higher court There is more secret and open case in any Even a blind person doesn’t need it We are defeated but why are our people I would like him to stay in Bani PTI than what is their benefit this is their benefit that if Bani comes out today then any one of these There will be no doubt that half of these people are him who by holding a press conference against these Khans Even today sitting on chairs and on E90 All those ministers who were with me during that time Nab has come to testify against Imran Khan and other places and in which there is a clause that you will not disclose their names okay and now pti do you understand What will happen next from the side of practical wisdom Because he has great expectations from Muja He had also added hopes from 20 January they have got quite a lot of stuff in that It’s going to be a time of very, very troublesome good for them and I think they Now some things should be done with intelligence and eyes A bandage should be tied and Imran before 2018 If Khan sahab was a thief then when he When I bid farewell to my jamaaya sahiba, at that time He could have gotten millions of dollars no, this means who is this person He came into my life because of whom everything went wrong work hard theft alkad trust money rodrick And Tikkar, a lot of things are open right now there is nothing left besides that then do this when And Begum Sahiba and her children will also benefit from this What happened to Iran Khan sahab’s children But why the sign off from Imran Khan Sahab Did It was Imran Khan sahab’s, so I got trapped, and it went a long way Thank you Senator Faisal D for being with us. Vifa Vajra was present at this time and Azam Nazir is present Mr. Tar had just finished talking to us. And Mr. Telegraph is going to discuss this had brought forward the point that in Britain money Asset reported some investigation citing Laring had started Which also includes the property of Hussain Nawaz Sahab I want to say this openly, but He was cleared after the inquiry investigation were done and when the matter proceeded further The matter reached Bahria Town Malik Riyas Sahab about the family and then there Ultimately that was £190 million Laws that became part of the settlement set in the case that even when the weaving is done then this This is a matter of confidential amounts And there has also been this tradition in the country that this Fatf’s Practices Are the Laws of Money Learning There was also a concept in this that the world Spades surface against the kind of money You remember trying to combat Once upon a time, the banks of Switzerland It was said that he was involved in money laundering There are many havens and many destinations in the world I am in this mamalakandam Is it not the public’s money which is paid as tax? Earning from Aven or through some other means If it is taken out, it should be prevented If you want this 190 million pounds, it was We were to get back the rule of loyalty to the state Account number one in the Bank of Pakistan You say you’ve heard all this The story goes that in a cabinet session I brought a sealed envelope and said that this The prince went on behalf of Akbar Sahib and the minister Azam was on Imran Khan’s side at that time The National Crime Agency in Batania The 190 million pounds is seized And that government is written in Pakistan that it has to be transferred to the ruling party So if we make this a confidential agreement A secret agent will reveal its details If I don’t go then this money will be easily will be transferred and this pre tax pay A decision was taken by the cabinet, although it A few days ago Shahzad Akbar sahab was Agent of Government of Pakistan is there He had already done Mahida and that money Unfortunately, the conversion at that time According to the report, the huge amount is around 59 billion That money belongs to the Supreme Court of Pakistan Through a decision which Malik Riyas Sahib had taken The people of Sindh were paid compensation in the settlement to that account i.e. in that penalty account If it was deposited, then it was Second confirmation again after Supreme Court order When the cabinet decision is taken, When this was seen in the Prime Minister Shahbaz Sahib ordered beyond that The matter was referred to the NAB And also instructions were given to the Attorney General’s Office that he will appear in the Supreme Court on behalf of Wafa file an application for money in that case Is this some settlement of the people of Pakistan Money will not be spent on payment of fines or any such work then beyond that The Supreme Court of Pakistan awarded that amount This is the order after this case is registered And that money, whatever came, was wasted It happened in Wafa’s Pakistan account so that he could serve the people of Pakistan It seems this case is pending for more than a year now. It is run for this, martyrdom was recorded in it Yes Bani Tehreek Insaaf had this right that he would give evidence in his defense All who have just chatted here And he was part of that cabinet on media it would have been better to face it instead He goes to court as a witness The government lawyers who appeared would cross-examine them. So that if he is truthful then it can be proved it would have happened if it was not correct then other The court takes wise e fare but it is their His choice was to give evidence in his explanation As far as I remember, an investigating officer It seems that 30 or 31 times the chances were given that A complete policy is being made on that now has the right to file an appeal and I maintain that the appeal is likely to be This is my experience as a Pakistani citizen in Surat But I wish that our system is just it must have a leg in it There should be consistency like Akbar’s Anwar’s Bashir The timelines in the cases of Ke Booth The policy of first in first out is The same should happen in cases that lawsuits If filed, he should take up his number They should be decided on merit go and besides that I think I have nothing further to comment I would only like to request that in this case because it is Pakistan’s Biggest case of bribery and mega corruption till date It was a big case which was the defense council He fought the case politically He based his case on evidence over merit No, and the judgement also says the same thing The lawyer who was defending the case was neither a proof of innocence nor a proof of innocence. could not produce evidence on behalf of the prosecution Evidence was presented of this bribe and I could not answer the question of corruption This was fought on the political basis of the media But the fight continues even today using the religion card It’s been happening for the past three or four days An unsuccessful attempt is being made to expose this disgusting Hiding crime behind the religion card Now tell me this can be hidden, you are the kingdom They used to take the name of Medina, what kind of justice is this that you had collected a confiscated amount of money which was in Britain given to you by the crime agency from which it was confiscated that you returned it to him and got Rs. 25 Zaman Park’s house worth crores was bought by 5 Took carat rings and 200 kanal land And this husband and wife created a sham trust It was not Edhi’s trust but Chipa’s trust This was not a trust of any selfish institution This trust which is black money did not exist Bribe was taken to make it white It was built to hide for now where can I go It is for Sirat we did this work Please stop this heinous crime Don’t portray corruption as bribery in this way Did you do this for character or religion? You carry the religion card everywhere you go They come and take the name of the state of Madinah but Don’t accept bribe and corruption with patience Add Naz Billah I think this is from him This trend on social media is a big crime It is being said that this happened because of character you are the character, the religion, the Islam, once Keep it aside and answer legally, this is any Not the way to get caught red handed May your crime be proven, may the sealed envelope be proven Let it be proved that he also took bribe There has been corruption as well, a sealed envelope has also arrived You have also confiscated the money which was yours to give This was the trust of the people of Pakistan That money was a trust of the country, you saved it in such a way handed it over to the person from whom it was confiscated Had to catch a fine as a penalty paid the second fine and his After you took the money, I understand that that today justice has become very important Pakistan’s appeal date is a big decision He said that they have achieved it but they have to fight the case legally It will have to be proved that the NCA has The money that was given to the government of Pakistan Pakistan had come to power to prove to you It will have to be done that Pakistan should not rule You have to prove that you’re off I did not take you to the cabinet with the envelope You will have to prove that you have established a sham trust I didn’t make you prove it You must have invested 2 crore rupees in Lahore Taking money from the same property tycoon, Was not made not a five carat ring 200 kanal land was demanded but was not given here Now you have to prove all these things If you also go for appeal then I I understand that religion should not be brought into the picture and Religion considers its heinous crimes as dark acts Do not use this open to hide End Shirt Case Was Open End Shirt From Day One The case was, corruption was proved and along with that Bribery is proven along with its misuse Power misuse of authority is proved by you one by one If you look at the steps of this case then you will find It will be clear cut that legal proceedings will be successful while completing the sentence which has been pronounced, It is completely according to the law, it is on merit it is according to the evidence and you Today we have failed to prove our innocence After that there is so much mega corruption in Pakistan Someone will think 100 times while doing it because you You also delayed ending the case You tried, you made excuses, you made political excuses also gave statements but today it is legal There is a decision and I am hearing it all over the country I am all the leading lawyers in this Regarding the decision, they are saying that this law and these were the judge’s cuts and these If things were proven then the judge gave this decision I am listening to neutral observers I am listening to the analysts, everyone says the same thing If you are doing this then it is mega corruption of bribery The £190 million case is a robbery This is the biggest robbery in Pakistan till date This cannot be hidden by playing the religion card You play the religion card, you play the Brunei card play inside card play whichever card you want This bribery corruption robbery will be proved Now there is no escape from this so be kind and answer it The answer to this question is not religion but merits and Nor is the answer to this that it is because of character We asked you this question, this is the law, you and Let me answer the first two or three questions I will have another meeting after the namaz If I have to go then Ata sahab will be with you Okay, tell me this, you are the minister of law, PTI People are saying that this case is in Islamabad The High Court is a burden of three muscles and this Earlier also in the case of cipher, the government has If the Proter Journal is unable to produce evidence then Do you think that now Imran Khan’s he will get bail and will be released Principles of bail after conviction of case As far as I remember, the sentence is 14 years. Bail is not available as a matter of right The second thing is that after one application for bail A Basic Principal for Conviction Bail The Supreme Court of Pakistan has done it that he says that you have proved the merits of the case No go just floating on the record If there is a very big thing floating right on top If he sees a major legal mistake, he I want to see it and I will not comment more than that I will do it in my opinion this law The decision on the case has come today in three days If there is someone more important than the journalist The decision is already taken after sitting on the tee If you have announced it then it is in your legal capacity How do you see that a decision has already been made He has come and Ula Saheb, I have this question for you because you are fooling the media Will the camera handle this type of action? That’s why I always take precautions I have held on to it and I am still saying it today that when the Islamabad High Court heard the case If they want to see it, they have to decide I am not even sure about what you said A very sweeping statement has been made that The decision was announced and it was Did anybody sit down and tell him how many There is a lump sum on Safat and did anyone say In which fences will this punishment be given? It is speckle, you people have made this speckle I hope you understand the punishment in this case If I tell the law minister that the punishment If it’s not there then you’ll scold me I love the streets Whatever decision comes, keep it in our court and The court is present, you people also said Nawaz Sharif to face all kinds of problems at the time I went to jail and was burnt The basic question is what it is a teacher Idarpalli will not be damaged, court said As much as I have learned in this short time that the court has said that in that case I will take the government, be it Subaai or Markaz, whichever if provincial and central governments will come into it Hundreds of universities are running in the country if yes then why are kids studying there I can’t run it but whatever I did The troublesome thing about this is that in this way the sacred work of training and teaching in this I shouldn’t have linked it like this I am talking about if the government is so There is opposition to his personality till today For Shaukat Khan’s imprisonment or his case Why it did not open, till date no news has been received where there is a color there is a remedy But if there is a crime and action is taken then this When the government later realized that this The money has been diverted in the wrong way and when the revenue records were checked So in those very dates 243 kanal of land which is that which was given to Fara Gogi Sahiba by him Returns as per Income Tax were worth it According to her, she was not so old that she could turn 60 That land worth 50 crores or 43 crores She could buy it so she gave it in return That land was not mentioned in those days This trust was formed in the trust first two There were other trustees, he left and then he Layering was done to land of Zulfi Bukhari sahab It was first transferred from there to the trust and then there is the cost of all the repair work That too was given by Baria town fixtures computers chairs and that too Bairia town gave me a great job but before that the 59 billion rupees went into account which then went to Supreme Court sent it back, these two are connected things among themselves and in the over velminic court was presented and the manner in which the case was dealt with It was done in the cabinet so with this reference I I do not understand as Atta Tar sahab said That is the relation of education and teaching with religion The decision of this case has no bearing on every The case is heard on its merits and its decision based on the merits of the evidence that has come Gawa Han just like I did in the beginning I had the great opportunity to have many of my friends Those who have just talked should go as a witness to the clarification that yes we We were in the cabinet, I read every word Sitting in the cabinet myself, my colleague is with me we are standing, we are trying to solve many issues I am on record that someone else would rule I wanted to decide there This is not legally possible in Convincible If it is not there and our word is accepted then it even if he had said these things there And he thought it was a very good decision This was a joke, it was against the law The country was in my favor, if this was what was supposed to happen then Why don’t you go to court and testify there? His not going to present his defence was also a The prisoners are such that they have nothing to say Tha bur cuff because the case also has to go to the epaulet It was a very complicated matter in the court With Mulk, if you look at the volume I think in about 60 you will find this Arab figures will not be seen anywhere which Ackley is there not saying it in the air This was given to him for Rs. 16 billion It was done and a case was made against Ayane 0 Applicants have applied for Rs. 1 lakh,000 0 lakh rupees to allot the house there or 6 crore rupees deposited and that too government It was said that thousands were lying in the account Shahbaz Sharif who is robbing people of their billions of rupees He ruined the government, that’s on record I am doing court with tha court papers so That money was present in it when he was caught When he went, the Supreme Court transferred him So let’s see what applet will be available in future what decisions do they make as a law as an understander or as a measure of the law But as far as I have read this is an open end shut case very sh a new I want to bring something new to your notice hmm the important thing was the asset recovery unit of Shahzad Akbar saheb which he headed We have got hold of the documents of Inside it is written as recovered amount. This is an asset worth 1990 million pounds The recovery unit has recorded this in the official records. Recovery is shown by Asset Recovery Unit Shad Akbar sahab became the prime minister inside the office of for this thing that corruption should be stopped, corruption should be eradicated and corruption money bribe money It should be recovered now and deposited in the treasury Now he should go to Shad Akbar’s office This 190 million pound is inside the document is shown as the recovered amount The amount of corruption that is in Pakistan Tired of going to government treasury Demands have come up in reference to the Nal Commission if it is not made today but we know your opinion I want to do it but it got rejected I am not a part of that demand Our senior colleague from the committee used to sit there but like I was talking about earlier that there are some things that are only legal within the mechanism itself You can do this while staying inside on May 9th Quoting him he said that on 9 May a Such a commission should be formed to see that the incident How did it happen and how did people reach there and then who did all this The case is pending and is at an advanced stage even if punishments have been given then sub judice There are no fact-finding commissions in matters They are now at an advanced stage in the courts there are some other demands like this which are It is not legally possible to say this now that the courts should release the people Releasing is just another way of releasing and he is the President under Article 45 has the authority that if someone comes to them with mercy We should make an appeal which we call mercy petition If there is any possibility of pardon in anyone’s punishment, finish it completely or completely Besides that I can think of Our legal framework is dispensation in that, anyone other than the court’s decision Rahai is not possible, thank you very much Tired, I was looking into this matter and the He also went and chatted with us in a manner Azam Nazir Tar sahab so he said that this The ball is there, if there is an appeal for mercy later There can’t be an executive order, but If there is an appeal for mercy then Article 45 Under him Sadar-e-Pakistan Sadar-e-Mamlakat this can you please consider the matter if you can pardon the punishment So anyway this decision was given The document is in front of you which is You can see it on the television screen This is the brief decision if I am not mistaken And inside this, sir, write the decision in detail. The verdict will be issued later and the sentence will be 14 years. Bani was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment along with her wife has been sentenced and Al Qadir The university should take that into consideration as well. The order has come from the court Tehreek Insaaf says we are going to Islamabad High Court We will go to court and challenge this decision And it is also said that now this We will decide to take all possible action against the decision. Now we have to see when people like Azam Nazi will do it Tar sahab was saying that if this appeal If they go, they will have to prove it and many more Ata Tarr also said that he has to prove something that it is corruption and to prove innocence I failed in this and all the lawyers are saying According to Ata Taar’s decision today It has been made on merit, sir, so this decision has come It is done and basically its document Those who were with us were saying that not even one Both will be punished Both will be punished Both will be punished and both have been punished Then in the same spirit he is saying this further too Now we are just waiting for 20 January but even from the later situation he no point will include news headlines here 14 years sentence was given to Bani PTI This was a case of 190 million pounds The decision is a shameful decision The political bugle has been orphaned The decision was made in reference to £190 million PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and ₹ lakh fine Basha Biwi was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment ₹ Punishment of fine of up to one lakh rupees for not paying the fine But PTI was made to buy land after 6 months and its owner was his wife Majeed will have to serve 3 months imprisonment in Tisab court Alka University brought under government control Judge Nasir Javed Rana gave the order to take the case Adiya gave the verdict to Bush’s wife 190 million was seized from the court Pound reference decision on December 18 The court had postponed the date thrice but judgement was not given Today is a sad day for that person, that’s why He made this university a Nam university 47 The government dislikes it because If these people have committed corruption then ask questions Brother you want this money from Hassan Nawaz which way PTI’s £190 million gone for reference Omar Ayub announced to challenge the decision It is said in the court date of Pakistan Today is a dark day, the decision has to be made only Shibli is there to target PTI Faraz said there is a need for law and order in the country There is no violence, thieves are free and innocent people are imprisoned There are many cases against Bani PTI We are political, we are rulers of law and order want lawyer Faisal Chaudhary said 190 No evidence in the million pound reference Was it not a rape, the investigation has become a fraud The world will go to every stage against the decision will present a solidarity agreement across the This is a criminal case which is being investigated The court heard the case for more than a year It is not appropriate to link everything to politics Law Minister Azam Nazir Tad says knowingly The government of Pakistan will not get the money again Approval was also taken from the cabinet Minister Talat Ata Taar said it was an open and shut case, justice will be done today This is the dominance of Pakistan’s history This is the biggest mega corruption scandal Hands were stained with corruption, impact of the decision Leader Talal Chaudhary said that Mujah will take action It was difficult for him to survive in this case PTI People also knew what the decision would be Hai Muzzam said what Bani PTI and Bushra The wife will be punished in this case by religious Senator tried to play the card of shame Faisal Wada says that even after going to Ala Adaliya This decision will not end the government and PTI Both of them want Bani of PTI jail Stay inside, from today this fun will stop Drama and fun are expected from January 20 They feel disappointed on applying It must have been a very long time How many taxes have been imposed on this and How much have we put into it There is a shortage of PTI in the assembly of the Senate Arkan’s protest for the release of Bani PTI Slogans raised by PTI members in National Assembly People’s Party tore copies of the agenda Rukun Shazia Marri said in Awan Bani The country is crying about PTI The speaker is not talking about the issues Said PTI members adopt a serious attitude The Senate does not adjourn the session until the end Even in the court of Peer till 4:00 p.m. put it on hold He is referring to the meeting in Gaya Security of Khyber Pakhtoon Khan is in his hands There is a meeting called, I have full authority I am saying on the basis of that meeting In Barrister Ali Gauhar Sahib Gandapur Sir has tried to keep his political views Or political demands should be presented and those We had a discussion but I turned them down It has been said that this is in reference to security This meeting has nothing to do with politics Barrister Gauhar has no connection with Tasur Dia is having conversation at front or back door Hey barrister Gauhar which string should I play on We want to go away from that committee only We will talk about those who were established under the leadership of Omar Ayub The government has been formed as per the translation of the Muzakr Committee Senator Irfan Siddiqui of PTI says We have made the Charter of Demands strict. There is no demand for it to be made A committee has been formed, says Ijazul Haq There is no special mention on either side Want Supreme Court to form Judicial Commission Only a request can be made to the court The government and the opposition cannot decide that Makh Suss judge should be brought into the commission The crime of 9 May has been committed in the court verdict Clean chit was not given, the question is that Where will the trial take place as stated in the 21st amendment Cases of political era in army court Justice Jamal Madu will not play the game Remarks by Vizarat Defai Khwaja Harris Said there is a limit to political activism Attack on princely state is not political activity Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi said police are It is a crime here to tear the uniform of a Corps Commander Lahore house burnt down Askari camp Justice Jamal said there were attacks on his office If the parliament is attacked then the military Why the trial did not take place? Parliament is the most Is the parliament supreme? Is it an attack on itself? Justice Hasan said she does not consider it an insult There was an attack on the Supreme Court as well and that too was a serious one The Supreme Court should also be included in the postponed till the end Khyber prisoners sentenced by military court 27 criminals from Pakhtoon Khawa court of Qazi Anwar filed an appeal in the appeal Advocate and barrister Server Muzaffar presented the occasion The accused was not given a chance to explain himself fully The legal requirements of the trial were not met Appeal made to Kur Andaga during trial Military was deprived of basic rights It is illegal to conduct trial of a civilian in court The accusation against Malj Mann is illegal and unlawful acquitted from defeat Go and prepare Sparko first Electro-optical satellite launched into space has been done, says Chinese media The satellite was launched from China’s launching center Electro-optical satellite launched in Produced locally in Pakistan which was used for making masks can go The caretaker is available within nine months of setup The site did not work, said the chief of that time Minister sahab, can’t he see it? that university road khuda that month This is how we wasted those 10-12 days we started working again Sindh’s Wazir Transport redlined Tahir’s responsibility in BRT is [ __ ] Sharjeel Memon put the onus on the government, said 9 The work remained closed for a month at that time the high minister did not notice that University Road is the only road It has happened now the car showroom people are saying bridge Make them the Asian Trilateral Travel Bank I have lodged a complaint on the portal saying it is worth two and a half billion Build bridges only for car showroom owners The Red Line will be completed in 2026 but If there is a clash, the reason will not be the government The accused wants the extreme of yellow colour Khan alias Abdullah Mehsud from Karachi Arrested, arms and ammunition recovered According to the translation of Rangers, the accused Taluk Fina was arrested from Ithad Town Khawarij Mufti Noor Wali alias Abu Asim The accused is from the group and further legal action is to be taken was handed over to the police for V Faki cabinet right sizing the institution approved the second stage of any Idar has more than three years of service Stopped from upgrading Idar Inzamam’s opinion on translation and different institutions Approval of third party audit is also given. For this we have good reputation of being a consultant. received service Another good news for Pakistani Mashhad News July to December current account 1 billion 21 Gujarat’s Mali is thriving with millions of dollars Current account in the first six months of 2017-18 increased by Rs 1 billion to Rs 2.5 billion. The entire amount of 7 crore dollar was continuously in the fifth Current account 58 even in the month of December 20224 November 2024: Surplus of 20 million dollars Current account is 68 crore 40 lakh dollars There was a surplus A severe cold wave struck the country and The cheeks of snow falling from the sky in melted The weather made Gilgit Baltistan and Extreme cold in Skardu in Balochistan The status of heat is forbidden and the visit is forbidden as seven Manfi six in Quetta and five in Gilgit Cold winds recorded in Karachi The intensity of cold increased due to walking, including Lahore With cold in the plains of Punjab The fog has settled in the limits of vision The bias motorway has been closed from different locations Did Gaya and Pakistan West Indies first test match The game of the first session will start late, bad The weather has an eye on three in the national team Specialist spinner included, young batsman Mohammad Huraira will make his Test debut Wahid fast bowler Khuram Shahzad included in The series was played on A Sports B is shown You know the headlines from the news right now This much This grease is frozen, it’s greasy, look The kadhai and the pot demanded a lot of rubbing You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it without rubbing Max Liquid is three times more Cleaning and to a that my paint cost ₹ lakh and my 4 lakh but how come I bought it for paint He gave the money and bought the paint along with the Tokens If you pay only for the paint then you will save money Master paint will be applied and tokens will be increased Get rid of the expense Pay for paint No Tokens Master Paints No Tokens Jhalak Hand Paints & Foot Beauty Cream for your hands and feet Get perfect glow and smooth softness Jhalak Hand & Foot Beauty cream say it with fingers say it with cut bury Mini Fingers Your Catberry Now With Urgent Beauty Cream for all skin types Give a fresh glow and fair complexion urgently May the beauty cream dissolve in your heart How can this magic be felt did o just take my heart o just chocolate for the dildo O! just tell you welcome back that 190 million 14 years for Bani PTI in pound reference Sentenced to imprisonment and fine of Rs 10 lakh Yes sir, the court has formed PTI Ahliya Bushra Bibi sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and ₹ lakh sentenced to a fine; fine not paid If this is done then Bani PTI will have to undergo another six months. Bushra Bibi sentenced to three months imprisonment Bushra Bibi will get a room from the court Ehat sahab has been arrested by the court Al Qader University brought under government control Eht sahib the court has also given the order to take it The decision states that Bani PTI Found involved in corruption and corrupt practices Bushra Bibi has gone to corruption and corrupt PTI’s Mawat was made in the practices Bani PTI and Bushra Bibi against the decision If an appeal can be filed on the related issue then PTI was bought for £190 million sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and ₹ lakh fine has been heard and the verdict has been announced today Now Bushra Bibi also appeared besides this Chairman PTI Barrister Gauhar was also there were present and now the verdict has been given and That Bani PTI has been sentenced to 14 years imprisonment While his wife Bushra Bibi was sentenced to 7 years imprisonment and sentenced to a fine of Rs. lakh and If this fine is not paid Bani PTI to undergo six months imprisonment And Bushra Bibi gets another 3 months imprisonment Now Bushra Bibi will also get a room from the court Arrested now Eht sahab court gave Al-Qadir University under government control I have ordered to take it, Eht sahab The court’s decision stated that Bani PTI Corruption and Corrupt Practices Mullas have been found in Bushra Bibi’s corruption and PTI’s corrupt practices It is of move and due to this reason, she is now PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and ₹1 lakh fine They will also have to pay a fine while their Ahalya who is Bushra Bibi has been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment and sentenced to a fine of 5 lakh rupees She has been blown away, Ijaz is with us, blown away cautioned Do a £190 million reference today The verdict has been given to PTI has been sentenced and with and pay the fine ok farooq i am trying to contact you Your voice will not reach us I am telling your audience that 190 million pound reference whose verdict was heard Now Bani PTI has been given 14 years of age The sentence has been pronounced while his wife Bushra The wife has been sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment has been narrated and besides this Buthra Biwi A fine of Rs. lakh has also been imposed and Bani PTI sentenced to 10 lakh fine has been pronounced and if the fine is not paid If this is done then Bani PTI will be given 6 months imprisonment will be kept and Bushra Bibi will be kept in Majeed 3 Now Bushra Bibi will be sentenced to one month imprisonment The room has now been arrested from the court While PTI has given 190 million pounds Announcement to challenge the decision of reference It came to light that this was said on behalf of Omar Ayub that today in the court date of Pakistan The decision is due to happen today only for Bani PTI This has been done to target and Shibli Faraz said that there is law and order in the country of Baladev people are imprisoned against Bani PTI All cases are political, we are of law and order Hook wants to refuse while his lawyer Faisal It was said on behalf of Chaudhary that 190 million There was not a single proof in the pound reference nab The investigation is done by Ala, the verdict is fraud If we go to every forum against it then we will get 190 billion Bani PTI and Mushra Biwi in pound case The punishment has been pronounced to Faraq Ejaz once Then tell us who is present with us today what is the court report Yes, today there is an extraordinary security PTI was also in a bad condition and that too here Neither PTI nor the other was present in the court room Bushra Bibi is also present in the court room the court pronounced approximately when it started then after that After the recitation, the verdict was announced Reading of the brief judgment by the judge The verdict given by the court It was said that the prosecution would present its case Bani has been successful in proving PTI And Bushra Bibi was found dead after practice PTI has been sent the NAB ordinance 14 years imprisonment and 10 lakh fine under section 10A is sentenced to a fine and if If the fine is not paid then six months’ imprisonment Bachhra Bibi will also have to serve prison term like this Ten years imprisonment under section 10A of the ordinance and sentenced to a fine of Rs 5 lakhs and If Bushra Biwi does not pay the fine then He will have to serve the additional three months of imprisonment from the side of the court as well as Superintendent Ayala is in jail, he is also afraid ok Farooq stay with us Mahire Lawyer Khalid Ranja sahab joined us Thank you very much your speaker Khalid sahab Bani PTI was imprisoned for 14 years and Bushra Bibi has now been sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment Please tell me what is being said by PTI What do you say that you will challenge the punishment Look at this context as far as the punishment is concerned If it comes to challenge then it is their legal There is a right and appeal is provided within the ordinance and in any case our The criminal law allows The appeal form is available and the appeal right anytime that any state or anybody who Wherever there is justice and law, cannot be withdrawn it is the basic and the fundamental right of the accused in so far as If we talk about their case and even now Some channel had asked me about relief Let us talk about this that from there they can go to the appellate court can one get relief from this or not kindly look at my name khalid ranja aa He is Khalid Ranja not Raja Khalid Mahmud This is Khalid Raja sahab’s picture coming this Please fix it, I am sorry sir, I am sorry for this GP Khalid Raja is doing fine right now Sir, they put up his picture from Lahore well the second thing is if its If you see National Crime running in the background An investigating agency of Joe Batania The agency has raised £190 million, which Bataniya from Pakistan through money laundering He was murdered for that amount It was frozen there and that amount went to Pakistan that is, their law says that the money which Any amount was seized there through lending She should have been returned to that country it is in the account of the government of that country He has to go but Imran Khan sahab Just the prime minister taking advantage of it This is what I did because I was accused of misuse of authority It is said in the Jamra that the amount is from Malik Riaz Sahab They benefit by colluding with facilitate them while delivering To do this, he filed a case against the Supreme Court of Pakistan had imposed a fine of 460 billion there I got that amount canceled and transferred it there and the government which is on Pakistan’s account The money was to come to the Supreme Court It went into Pakistan’s account, said here But it is totally confused that If yes, then that money is in Pakistan only, right? Pakistan Supreme Court which fined That was separate, they had to pay that separately and this £190 million is the government This should have gone to Pakistan’s account The amount was different from what he was fined Lisa He had to pay the fine amount separately But Malik Riaz sahab told them I requested that this amount of mine be deposited here The money was brought through landing which got confused The rule which is being returned to Pakistan This amount should be adjusted there. in the item of fine and it is said that Yes, what benefit did they get from the university The question that they created arises that His Elia Madam, in which capacity is she became its trustee and Imran Khan sahab Imran Khan sahab prime minister of not as Pakistan but as a Become its trustee in the capacity of an individual And becoming a trustee means that your Ownership is visible there, it is your property it becomes apparent to you in return for that What did we get? It was 458 kanal of land The state of the university is such that there But today in four years there are more than 200 students none of his very big ones could go The positive outcome was not visible to the community and Then you see that Fara Gogi Sahiba who is Bushra Bibi’s close friend and Imran Khan sahab’s name is also his It is quoted in many places He was made the 248-kanal conscience of Gala Appearance of crores of rupees cash allotted Bushra Bibi also gave away her jewellery In Surat you have heard the details that Diamond Jwara and that necklace and bangles and These rings, all these details come before the community In this context, if PTI is the king then Khalid saheb is saying that Ahliya who Badni is PTI’s wife, that is some rule She did not hold any position, she was only a trustee Then why was he given such a punishment? Yes, this is important, I will answer this I will give you the section no. A1 and A2 She says that if any individual who Is he a public office holder or someone else? Fard means if a public office holder Imran Khan sahab will be in his ad If anyone is in league with them in help A private person can also join that proceeding commits illegal proceedings or offence participates in what is liable to be Procu under the revent province of lot e ok you are with us in section no a Stay tuned, we will discuss this issue further Waqt Sheikh Waqas Am press conference Tax Service’s Judicial Powers R Win it is directed to another judicial officer be posted in this place Case 1: Rahul Pindi’s case: Suo moto case Number One of 2004 decided on 26 October, in it he writes that Magistrate Magistrate in Circumstances had libre miss conducted himself and Past illegal orders handed over to a senior lawyer in police custody e atmosphere and in A manner on the other side Daniel Chaudhary conversation They are trying to gain popularity and this is what politics is all about gave the frogo I think it should be added for another 6 months from both sides Today, the number of supporters of PTI or Leadership is the first message to them that You don’t have to panic even on 9th May Decisions are to come on the cases of 9 May too will reach a logical conclusion which will be a punishment What happened to this country on this com of the injustice that was done to this country their ajala one by one inshaallah this is complete The community will do calculations and also settle accounts today The first time you saw this Like everyone is a lie Fraud and the way it gives a religious touch to politics was given the fog and in every thing in every thing If we bring this religion then today Al Qadar one of the university He was made a Baniya so that he could read Seerat Nabi there It is taught and perhaps some religious education is given Caste is Al Qader Trust University or Al Qader Alhamdulillah to the university today has been handed over to the government and the government Inshallah she will take him under her fold as well Because this was a sham trust, they had no one There was a source of income and it was a miss for caste mafa Using the authority of Tema and Bringing the Conflict of Interest to a close What he said in an envelope sealed in the cabinet He is in front of you for approval and today Alhamdulillah by the power of Allah He has done justice to his character and delivered both the characters and I It would also be pertinent to say here because their There are various groupings in the party He wanted both of them to be punished and This is according to his wishes and prayers. The blessings of Allah are also due to Him accepted and listened because now Aalima Sahiba had also said that my I wish and pray that Imran Khan sahab should be punished and Bushra Bibi should be punished and Like they have to fulfill all the requirements of law He was punished for doing this, which is irrefutable There was evidence which was according to the law and the law There was evidence which was the dead body which was the documentary Was there any evidence or any other dead body among them a piece of edens pyu disprove it could not prosecute all the cases On top of that even a little bit from these sides to him Had to counter it or do something against it He had to prove himself but he couldn’t do it The prosecutor could not prove his innocence He proved his case completely And to prove it with the law and regulations According to this, they were sentenced to 14 years and 7 years respectively. I have made the entire Pakistani nation listen to me Today I offer my many congratulations to you Thank you Ikhtiyar Wali sahab for this will shed some light Bismillah Rehman Rahim very Thank you first of all I told my friend to add some salt and get the cardamom sowed by the people behind so that May their throats feel fresh, their throats have become sore And congratulations to my community, Pakistani community Congratulations, today it has been proved that it was theft No receipt for goods There is no receipt for stolen goods There would be no use of the goods of corruption that’s not proof of it Whatever happened, he came to Pakistan from London It is the property of the Pakistani nation and is the property of the people of Pakistan and it Malik took the money and put it in Riaz’s account Hundreds of kanal land given to Malik Riaz again taken as a bribe and then a very valuable I don’t know how many carat the rings were No one was willing to take Kerat’s work D Those who collect the goods of Ramas and De Beers Those who used to call others thieves, today they themselves I say that stolen certificates are being received yes today is a day of congratulations to muslim league To the workers also and Mian Nawaz Sharif who said that I will make my decision I leave this time with them to Allah Imran is doing justice Khan, you should see what is Makafat Amal whatever is happening to you today Makafat is amal and Shahbaz Sharif gets clean water Today they used to call me and make me sit in dirty water what is your status where are you Stand up and let the history of Pakistan be written that the person who is most against corruption He used to walk carrying a big flag and used to say His throat would have torn and he himself turned out to be a thief And congratulations to you too Saqib Nisar congratulations to your generations too when you A thief and robber is called Sadiq and Ameen You gave me the title Saqib Nisar The decision will be staring you in the face today Have you ever considered a thief, a robber as honest and The man who gave the title of Amin He messed with Pakistan’s Assas The person who used to tell lies every morning and evening is called Sadiq And Amin used to say Umar Ata Bandiya today Your decisions also make you laugh They must have existed if conscience was alive somewhere But if you had made decisions, then today you would have also Your conscience will not let you sleep but if Press Trust of India holding a conference and busting Akil Janib was told that the court did justice And both the characters are linked to the Kaifer character The court has delivered all the demands of justice We have completed them and currently we are working on the cases of 9th May Decisions are also to come, a message for PTI people You just don’t have to panic and remain calm PTI gave impetus to the politics of plunder If yes, then they have got punishment for that today 190 Bani PTI gets 14 crores in million pound case Sal and Bus Bibi sentenced to 7 years imprisonment It has been narrated and in the dens of Rawalpindi £190 million reference expired Judge Nasir Javed of Asaf Court Islamabad Rana held a meeting and gave his verdict The court awarded ₹10 lakh more to Bani PTI Bibi was also sentenced to a fine of ₹ lakh and the court also said today that the fine For not paying the fine, Bani PTI will get another six months’ imprisonment Jailed and sentenced to nine months imprisonment for Bua Bibi There will be police presence and security on this occasion There was a lot of tension and pressure of security too. Strict arrangements were made for the reference The decision has been postponed thrice and the court The decision was secured last year on 18 December and MKM Rahnama by Mustafa Kamal sahab Join us and let’s chat Sir today the issue of 190 million pounds reference The result came in which PTI was made 14 years old He has been sentenced to imprisonment while his wife Bushra Bibi has been sentenced to seven years imprisonment what is punishment comment We will see when Imran Khan sahab ends his rule So his first press I remember the conference very well He held his first press conference After the removal from power, people were realizing that He will tell his reasons, he will tell all his Tell him about the development projects for four years The economy will tell After he came the whole press Only Fara Gogi was defended in the conference What happened to Gogi Bachari, he is innocent and then after that what we saw on tv On TV, they showed that brother, what In a way Bushra Bibi Sahiba is our She is scolding the staff for the gifts that have arrived why have their photos been taken which are their Why are records kept? Then we saw that That Fara Gogi Sahaba, how did Bushra Together with his wife, he earned all the precious things go and see whoever is in Dubai ITV sold all those things to the businessman But all his proofs came out after that Then it comes to this Al Qadir Trust This is the case where you have the right to a principality The money deposited in the Ka Ke was transferred to the state capital I had to provide the number of a bank account there But this account of the Supreme Court that you have I gave it to you and I will complete this work if you conclusion to this Those who know Imran Khan sahab those people who are his and I tell them his point that maybe I should also do this, they say that Imran Khan sahab is not corrupt, he has money Even if we accept his point in the case of If it goes, I think it will be more Imran Khan is very unlucky for the Bushra Bibi to whom he think that instead of Allah there is probably someone who That Bushra Bibi has given him the title of Uzma Because of the thefts of the same Bushra Bibi, today He has been caught red handed but must Kamal sahab, PTI says that We are being targeted politically We are now challenging this politically We will do revenge, we are being targeted From the government’s side, this is not a big deal for us open and shut i wish it were like this because of millions of people who Those hopes are attached to Imran Khan sahab I wish they would listen to what PTI is saying I wish he could go and prove it There is no shut case in the courts nor in that inside this there is someone who is called that It is not a lacuna as far as it is whatever things have become apparent well then Let them go and prove it, it’s a great thing He will challenge it in the High Court Definitely go and challenge him and prove it That brother, all these things are political There is no evidence of this being victimization If there is any proof then I will give you full details. I am telling you sequencing from the watch brother from and and all from Tahayi to and all from things to this point I It is convincing a system of nature that where But you probably thought that some lady those who have been blessed by the great Allah I have given you status, I have given you closeness, to give rule into their hands and to take power from them Allah has to bring out the Taala of that same lady through this I am telling you that your party the disgrace of the party and your Whatever is in the government is a drain seed and There is a charge of corruption against you which you might not have noticed you may have done it or you yourself but that you were with him which she wanted to do in everything, you had everything You are included in everything So today you will know everything that Allah is Showing you how to provide them with the means God is making you what you are today in this disgrace And you are facing this decision This is the very Archnet and what is being denied Do you understand the impact this decision will have on him? There will be a fight between the government and PTI Fun night, take pity on PTI friends We need our friends from PTI He cannot come and say this jokingly apart from that for the release of brother Imran Khan talk about anything else and they might If there was an option to shut down everyone, brother Do it, leave Imran Khan alone, then he will Maybe we can agree on this as well? Is this possible? The answer is that it is not possible. This is not possible so whatever has to happen It has to be done through court and if this is not possible If this is his point then what kind of jokes are these? night and how they joked at night someone else They can’t talk about anything else isn’t he in a position that anyone else your thing on something else your things on something else Imran Khan sahab should get it decided I will expel you from the party if If such a thing happens then I don’t think that Muja There has to be some result or solution but Mustafa sahab blames PTI government She feels that she is threatening us with political revenge They are targeting from the same government If you will mock then I will mock What else will happen or will PTI back off? Tax I understand that whatever I have seen, which is for political optus and PTI has tried its best and He couldn’t kill me with street power could not convince the government or if he cannot instill much fear then he Definitely it is a procedure of joke It has started from both sides, probably both This thing suited both the parties to the opposition to the government but if you ask this I think this will yield results will not yield any result at all because Their only demand is to release Imran Khan How can the government leave the government in Kath What will happen if Imran Khan leaves the government? When there is nothing else apart from that thing if it is there then how can it be a joke and who it’s a joke ok thank you very much Conversation with Mustafa Kamal Sahib will be back after a break stay together How can my hair be as thick and strong as yours? You should apply onion to your hair like me You will have to put in a lot of effort, yes, but Its New Life Boy Naturally Strong Shampoo It contains onion which goes deep into the hair roots And gives thicker and stronger hair up to five times 10 Group one shot and full shot in the saash too Abundant production of herbs This is the real reason for taking tea hydration I use Ban Skin Institute Super light chanting with ranic acid which is inside Hydrate your skin with 200 gms to get Water Fresh Glow Miracles Another historical institution of Sindh government A new journey, a new beginning for the people of Sub Sindh Great news, Phase 1 of Rae Bhutto’s announcement 91 km long city chairman Bilawal Bhutto From Quy Mabad to Shah Faisal under the leadership of Ifta has been done, Bhutto is doing the same Your destination is easy, fast and safe in Karachi Travel on busy roads or across Sindh This 39 km long four lane road is suitable for trade This road will bring hustle bustle in Karachi’s busy life Convenience created through KPT interchange The journey to the M9 motorway is just 25 minutes to important makama through the six interchanges decided in Easy recipes that are opening new avenues of progress Routes from Korangi Creek Avenue to Super Faster travel on the highway, traffic jam and fuel The lack of standards is evident in life Improvement is certain, new and strong Infrastructure Kamil Sharay Bhutto’s journey It will take you to a new era where time It saves money and also provides a comfortable travel facility sharai bhutto’s takkal sharai bhutto where every The path brings you closer to your destination has been at the forefront in service Sindh of those who have L Chocolate Bus I’m new to coal gut strong teeth I will buy it but grandma what will you do with it Hey, this is what gives my bite the nutrition The machine gets only this calcium boost Give nutrition to your teeth with this Str Paste It is not only nutrition Welcome back Tehreek Insaaf’s lawyer Faisal Chaudhry They say that they support today’s decision and today is the darkest day will go everywhere against the decision and will present the first condemnation agreement against There is a case that someone was punished for giving benefits questioned Hassan Nawaz who bought the property Where did he get 9 billion for that and then 18 billion You will have to answer why you sold it for rupees Today is the best day for Imran Khan political considered another means of targeting I try to support this decision We will go everywhere to protest against the decision There is also a protest against it in the world Will present the first case in which you will get benefit This punishment was given and this money was deposited in State Bank Account There is a profit of more than 20 billion rupees in What Nawaz Sharif’s son earned Property worth billion rupees was purchased This question has not been asked to Nawaz Sharif till date that these 9 billion rupees are with his son Hasan Where will you get this answer from? You will have to answer this. Create a feed and loot the country’s money go and after that you come back after dealing with it and your get the case pardoned and reduce the cost of this money Sat today is a dark day in the history of Pakistan Position leader Umar Ayub says decision Just to target Bani PTI If there is a question then it should be asked about Hassan Nawaz Senator Shibli Faraz says in this country There is no law There is a dark day ahead, that’s why that person is being targeted He built a university 47 The government feels bad because these If people have questioned corruption then ask I want this money from Hassan Nawaz brother. How did we take this thing to Kandan Let’s do it in the superior court People will challenge the thief to go out there is kader university in which The government has suffered a huge loss, right Imran? Khan and Bushra Bibi benefited by a penny What happened is that he is being punished for this Aalima Khanum: Anyone can commit a big crime She says she will challenge the decision in the High Court We knew for a month that they would do it A person like Bani PTI needs to be punished I felt pained by the punishment; I am very sad about this system Bani said what happened today happened earlier in the date It has also been punished because Why was a university established in the High Court? We knew for months that there would be a challenge I have to punish you today, I am very sad for sure I felt very sad about this system when I heard the sentence A personality like Imran Khan was ruling over him I also felt very sad because of what Imran Khan said today What is happening tomorrow should be earlier in the date has been punished because you Why was a university created? This is also a punishment It includes taking over the university What was Imran Khan’s dream is unfortunate It is because Bani PTI is standing at this crossroads have gone, yesterday also Bani PTI and Bushra said this Senator Faisal promises his wife will be punished It is said that NCA had said this money Pakistan has a religious card in this matter A shameful attempt was made to play the government and Both PTI people want Bani PTI He stayed in jail and also went to the High Court This decision will not end from today Mujah Kirat This drama and joke will stop on 20th January did not get the trump card despite hoping They are disappointed It was said that both will be punished Because the cabinet was an open and shut case That day too I had told Khan saheb inside Even when it came into the agenda, it was part of the agenda I was not a part of it, suddenly the agenda came up The envelope was not opened it was said The contract has been done and there is nothing more to it It is very sad that it is happening If this drama brings in the religious card then religion It keeps happening in Pakistan, I had told you that it won’t be fun this is a joke Drama is happening, Muja will stop from today what the government is negotiating and what PTI negotiated a joke at night The thing about both of them is that both of them want that Stay inside Bani PTI and Bada Bibi’s 190 million pound reference jail against The trial was completed in one year, this reference The decision has been made thrice Tajab court will give its verdict on 18 December 2024 had reserved before giving the verdict 23 December, then 6 January, then 13 NAB gave the date of January 13 November £190 billion by 2023 in terms of NAB arrests 17 PTI workers Till the day, the PTI made a lot of investigation NAB has announced a loan of Rs 190 million in December 2023 Pound reference filed in Tisab court More than 100 ended and from the side of Nav 59 Witness Ferris presented in reference In total 35 witnesses’ statements were kept pending and Previous Principles in the Reference Filed Under Secretary Azam Khan Former Chief Minister of KP Parvez Ghatak was among the witnesses in the court Zulfi Bukhari Farhad Shahzadi Mirza Shahzad Akbar Ziaul Mustafa Naseem and six other accused was declared a case against and His property and bank account Munjampalli The question is that no chit was given Where will the trial take place? Said in the 21st amendment It has been said that the cases of political era are against the army Justice Samal Mant will not appear in court Military trial cases of civilians in sports Remarks in the Vizarat of Di Vakil Khawaja Harris said there is a limit to political activism The state’s staff is attacked by the state’s staff Breaking security is not political activity Justice Hassan Azhar Rizvi said police is a police officer Tearing a person’s uniform is a crime here Commander Lahore’s house burnt at Akri Camp Justice Hassan Azar Rizvi said the Supreme There was an attack on the court as well and that too was serious Khwaja should also include the Supreme Court Harris replied here it is about 21 d1 Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar said crime If the crime is written in the law book If he fits in the Army Act then he will be tried The decision will be made in a military court The case has been written quoting the Attorney General 9th May we will see the accused in the drama Right to appeal conviction in military trial The government refused to give justice Samal Mando Kel resigned from Khawaja Harris that you Which decision of the military trial do you agree with? Khwaja Harris said I am not going to do anything The military does not agree with the decision Supreme Court’s decision regarding the trial Liaquat Hussain case decision of nine judges Are you concerned about your meeting with the Army Chief? What does the government say on the question of Safi Translation of Muzakr Committee by Senator Irfan Siddiqui says barrister Gauhar and Ali Amin Gandapur meets in Pisha There was a discussion on the security situation In a conversation with Eve News he said that PTI demands charter not be presented A committee has been formed to respond to the demand Majeed knows it has been done by Azhar Farooq And tell me what do you know about other things A security related meeting has taken place there is pisha inside them they claim that We had a conversation with one of our muja The series has been started by Ali Gaur sahab Where is the back door, there is a front door, now these are two If they have kept the door open then they should blow it which of these doors does he want to go to if they prefer the back door Then what is the importance of this committee? He has set up a mob committee, that is the same which is in front of us is Imran Khan sahab She is sitting there naming the one whose age is long Ayub Khan sahab is talking to him We are running a charter of demands which The language is very tough, it’s only four seats We have definitely given a little reaction No one cancelled it, we just formed a committee Yes Majeed, a committee has been formed for the whole world He has prepared a response to that After that, they will go to their respective leadership We will go and talk to someone 27 criminals from Khyber Pakhtoon Khan attacked the military In the Court of Appeal against the court sentence Appeal filed Appeal Qazi Anwar Advocate and the colony of Barrister Server Muzaffar Shah have been filed from which the occasion was adopted There is an appeal in the case to condemn the arrest and his trial was conducted in a military court On January 4, the military court sentenced them The accused was not given a chance to give a full explanation The legal requirements of the trial were not met Civilian’s trial in military court Conducting a trial is illegal and unlawful The appeal was condemned during the trial deprived of basic rights Gaya Islamabad High Court formed PTI A look at the prison facilities The High Court removed the objection on the request The registrar’s office had raised objections The court directed the Registrar Office Peer Schedule the request for completion Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Amir Farooq concluded That’s it for now, more news and Keep watching AR for updates News don’t ask from you, ask from you only Siya Gold Beauty Cream tells you that your face is so fair Sia Gold Beauty Cream is available in clear It blooms step by step, it is at the forefront To all Laugh simple happiness above I love simple happiness Pai says a lot Walon’s Chocolate O! Just what you need for shiny hair Sun Sulph Black Shine contains five natural oils With super mix of Vitamin E which will give you Hair up to 24 hours shine on the balcony Shine All The Time with Sun Silk Black Shine This grease is frozen, it’s greasy, look The kadhai and the pot demanded a lot of rubbing You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it No-Rubbing, No-Fuss Max Liquid Three Mahi you love me more than ever That’s a lot, oh no crazy girl I have a lot of data Enjoy the Social Extreme offer of Haiy F 4G get 25gb data and 100 onet minutes because YF 4G has lots of data Mahi, you love me a lot, right? I have lot of data or 4G social Enjoy 25GB data with extreme offer 100 off net minutes because yf has 4g very stubborn Lemon Max bar is a comparison of two bars It dissolves less and hence lasts longer and Cleans lots of utensils, wow now cheating I will not eat it, I will only bring Lemon Max bar Lemon Max Bar dissolves less and lasts longer Only those who are not afraid of increasing age are Insurance that drives away illness and weakness Keep you fit and active, it contains essential oils The vitamins and minerals that make it a Complete and complete bajan gaja with 50 years of Global Experience Across More Than 85 Countries Insure the Number One Nutritional Supplement Drink in the World It Hair Removal Cream Just Apply Leave on and remove to get silky smooth skin Skin Nisa Hair Removal Cream says a lot let’s go Say It With Fingers Say It With Catberry Mini Fingers your catberry now with Biscuit Bunty is your soap slow New Life B Super Fast Hand Wash Now J De Mango Soap with Vitamins 100% stronger protection than Zaraasi Use Ajuba Beauty Cream in just 10 seconds New Magical Formula Be New Ra White For Ultimate Fairness Now Go Beyond Glow with new ajuba beauty cream seedhi sadhi Happiness d sap is simple Khushi How can my hair be thick and strong like yours? You should apply onion to your hair like me You will have to put in a lot of effort, yes, but Its New Life Boy Naturally Strong Shampoo It contains onion which goes deep into the hair roots And gives thicker and five times stronger hair 0 in the sash of o those with hearts Chocolate is not for you, ask it from you only Gold Beauty Cream tells you that your face is so fair Clearly Sia Gold Beauty Cream is available in every The simple joy of time is super The golden color of the morning is in the cup of sacrifice of life with Love is a slavery which is from Juba Laugh simple happiness above But two waves of super laughter arose from the friends wave super evenings ka hasta saath Your talk in super nights Super meets step by step, blooms step by step top of the step on the front simple happiness simple happiness Haite see you smiling All these moments mixing the colors of life in hands Drink Vital tea to increase your life How to live deep and strong like me You should apply onion to your hair like me You will have to put in a lot of effort, yes, but Its New Life Boy Naturally Strong Shampoo It contains onion which goes deep into the hair roots And gives thicker and five times stronger hair ₹ 10 in the sash of also o questions Chocolate Bus Create Bonus Tri Star and remove more foam Wash clothes with more stains the most wow what about the bonus when will this paint come off Master is there, Master Weather will last long Restorative paint that keeps your home’s interior clean protects the walls from all effects of storm and cold Mahfooz Master Weather Resistant will last long If PTI thinks that some people will gather together We will make a big crowd of state employees She will not let both of them gather together I am worthless, we never refuse dialogue we can’t do it, the dialogue is we are people Can I deliver it then not sir, this happens every day The protests will not be allowed when They attacked the state, so now If the TI answers the question, then the truth is true Wasim is no more, I don’t look like a mess I’ll catch you in this fire and then Watch the chant on 11th Birta Jumerat at 11:3 PM only ava new Per Spicy Chicken This is the donut that knocks everybody out says the specialist move sabroso Spicy Chicken Donut that of the Ring War Weather Rest Put that will keep your home’s bare walls clean Master is safe from all effects of cold Weather Resistant Tall My choice will always be favorable and successful Because of my right decisions, I am proud of my beauty My verdict for Dew Beauty Cream To reach my goal and win I need was the best health and fitness marhaba honey number the purity of becoming a forest Mithai 12 group one shot and full shot jada Abundant harvest of herbs Uncle, think about it, yes I have thought about it but it is a pant It is not expensive and is light on the pocket for many years If the paint got applied then it got applied Paint Asia Number One Paint Brand Jas Maree Super Power this alley click i but to you by as me Super 14 years sentence was given to PTI It is granted that this was a million pound case The decision is a shameful decision Decision taken on political bugbear orphan is worth £190 million PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and Rs 10 lakh fine Barsha Bibi was sentenced to seven years in prison Imprisonment, fine of Rs 5 lakh, fine paid If they do not comply, Bani PTI will have to face another 6 months of hard labour. The wife will have to serve three more months’ imprisonment Bushra found guilty of PTI corruption The court convicted the wife for the crime Al Qaid University placed under government control Judge Nasir Javed Rana gave the order to take it judgement in Ayala prison mush wife was arrested from Kamara Court £190 million decision reference 18 The court had reserved the case on December 3 The date was given again but the verdict was not announced Was When the verdict was announced to Khan Saheb, Khan Saheb I laughed, we could see the writing on the wall Neither Khan sahab is disappointed nor am I disappointed Vidan Will file an appeal in the High Court for a few days Etemad Inshallah Tala Khan Sahab Surah Ru Tehreek Insaaf will have 190 million pounds Announcement to challenge the reference decision Barrister Gauhar said today’s decision has given us relief It was no surprise when the verdict was announced Bani PTI laughed against the decision soon Lima Khanam says we will go to the High Court He already knew he was going to punish him Today Umar Ayub felt very sad about this system It is said that today is the court date in Pakistan It is a dark day, the decision is only for Bani PTI Shibli Faraz says this is to target Law and order have a strong hold in the country No, thieves are free and innocent people are imprisoned Bani All the cases against PTI are political. want rulers of law and order This is a criminal case which is being investigated The court heard the case for more than a year It is not appropriate to link everything to politics Law Minister Azam Nazir Dar says he knows this The Government of Pakistan will not get the money Yet the cabinet gave approval to the minister Ata Tar said it was an open and shut case today This is Pakistan’s reign of justice The biggest mega corruption scandal to date their hands were stained with corruption The decision should not affect Muzaki Talal Chaudhary said that he will survive in this case It was difficult, even PTI people knew it what decision come yesterday also I told you on your show that we should decorate it Both would have to because it was an open and shut case That day too I saw Khan saheb inside the cabinet who was told when this came on the agenda It was not part of the agenda all of a sudden The agenda arrived but the envelope was not opened It seemed that the contract was done and no one would do anything about it. it doesn’t matter Yesterday also I had said that Bani PTI and Vishra Senator Faisal promises his wife will be punished It is said that NCA had said this money Pakistan has played religious card in this matter A shameful attempt was made to play Ala Adliya This decision will not end even after going to Both the government and PTI want it Bani PTI remained in jail from today Muza Karrai This is a drama and a joke, we will go on 20th January Trump card will not come, they will be disappointed It must have been a very long time How many taxes have been imposed on this and How much have we put into it PTI is in the National Assembly and Senate Arkan’s objection barred the release of PTI Slogans raised by PTI members in National Assembly People’s Party tore copies of the agenda Rukun Shazia Marri said in Awan Bani The country is crying about PTI The speaker is not talking about the issues Said PTI members adopt a serious attitude The Senate does not adjourn the session until the end The hearing has also been postponed till 4 p.m. on Thursday. Gave They go on claiming that our There has been a discussion about our Muja starting one Ali Gaur sahab said that one back has been taken there is a door there is a front door now these two doors if If they have opened it then they should say that Which of these tors does he want to go to? Imran Khan sahab’s nomination is pending and Which is being headed by Umar Ayub Khan We are in talks with him, barrister Gauhar gave Tasur on front or back door Talks are going on with Barrister Gauhar Waje Which door do we want to go to? We will talk to this committee which is headed by Maryu settled in Senator, Translation of Hukum Muzakr Committee Irfan Siddiqui says PTI’s charter of The tongue of demand is strong, we have no demands A committee was formed to ensure that the matter was not justified Ijazul Haq has given it, says both sides Some Nasir Mujahi do not want judicial commission To make the Supreme Court only Government and opposition can make a request It cannot decide whether to appoint a judge for commission be brought into Nomai’s punishment has been proved in the court’s decision Clean chit was not given, the question is that Where will the trial take place as stated in the 21st amendment Cases of political era in army court Justice Jamal Mando will not work against Khali Remarks Vizarat There is a limit to the activity in the princely area The attack was not a political activism, Justice Hassan Asas Rizvi said police personnel’s uniforms were torn It is a crime here that the house of Corps Commander Lahore was burnt Askari Camp Office was attacked Justice Jamal called it an attack on Parliament If it happened then why was there no military trial Is the parliament the most supreme? Parliament itself is not an attack or an insult Justice Hasan said that the Supreme Court There was an attack on him too and that too was serious Include the court also till the end postponed and Pakistan against West Indies Batting continues in the first test in Multan First session played due to bad weather It was not possible to have three in the national team Specialist spinners and a fast bowler included Test of young batsman Mohammad Huraira Barah on sports from debut test series is showing the way Here are the headlines, did you know 190 million pounds In the reference, Bani PTI was sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and A penalty of 10 lakh rupees has been awarded to Tasa The court sentenced Bushra Bibi to 7 years imprisonment and ₹ Sentenced to a fine of one lakh rupees For not paying the fine, Bani PTI will get another six months’ imprisonment And Bushra Bibi was sentenced to nine months’ imprisonment. Basha Bibi will be arrested from the room court This was done thus by the court To take the university under government control The court ruled in its judgment that Tisab It has been said that PTI is corrupt and corrupt Bushra has been found to be a mongrel in her practices BB on corruption and corrupt practices of Bani PTI and of Bani PTI and forum for dispute against the decision of the wife and the elder brother But if you can file an appeal then Bani PTI 190 million pounds against Bush BB Reference’s jail trial completed in one year Hafiz Ehsan saheb has become an expert in law Thank you very much for being with us Time’s 190 million pound case is in the works 14 years for PTI and 7 years for Bua Bibi The jail sentence has been pronounced, says PTI that she will challenge this what do you say about this Quoted from Bismillah Rehman Rahim Pakistan’s criminal justice system if there is any court within it that If punishment is given then it is for the accused or now it is for one conviviality and go and say inside that thing that The lower court did not make the right decision And what about Pakistan and the world all the accused or those who come later It is convincing to appeal and Ultimately if it is difficult even inside the High Court If he was not inside the bench then Pakistan That Supreme Court form is also available Thereafter the Supreme Court of Pakistan The review form is also available but The basic point is that the case Today the Accountability Court has decided that I have decided that those four or five things are big It is important and this is what forms the foundation At this time, the decision which has come today, which section Pakistan’s accountability below nine Whatever the court has said is corrupt or not. Section 9A1 and 9A1 of Practices 2 did exercise is this section 10 or Then section 15 comes under it which Some things automatically trigger that dis Qualification also comes under it if Yours If it comes, you can avail any loan for 10 years. Disqualified to hold public office If what is there is considered then this is a there are things on the basis of which this It can be said that the things that have come today The way inside this trial court, Prime Minister This was a challenge for Minister Former A challenge can come in the court as well when you have something in front of you that The admitted position is that money is earning money The one who was there had gone from Pakistan The law of Britain Crime of Seed Act It is 2002 and he was made four feet below it after four feeds which is one with the understanding that Pakistan’s It will not come under the State of Accounts Came inside the Supreme Court of Pakistan which was a civil liability of Baria town 460 billion in that amount An attempt was made to adjust and Britain had made its entire process Under the Proceeds of Crime Act, Include them in the investigation 2000 rupees of their accounts have been frozen By December 2017, from approximately 10 accounts and Berea Town gave away what was there The option was of a civil liability if If you accept this thing then Your money will be returned to you inside the country and if you contest it If you do this, not only will you get your money back Rather the punishment you will get is that of Bitaniya if it can be done according to the law then when all Things were admitted that money was being laundered from Pakistan Baria Town had him or Malik Riaz Sir or his family accepted him and the money that was deposited in Pakistan’s account he should have come inside who at that time was a Civil liability was the supreme law of Pakistan 460 billion rupees worth of his property inside the court not only against getting it adjusted An attempt was made but the money was transferred from that account Whoever is inside came and went to Pakistan Supreme Court’s account misused It was revealed that the one that had a penny inside it was white I had to get inside Mani’s face, there was Mani inside him The learning money was received and adjustment was made to it was done inside the thing which was later The Supreme Court of Pakistan said that Money Learning money is not in our account It must go to the same place it could come The law of Britain is that the State of should go inside the accounts and that money what was there was provincial government and federal came under the government and Simal Nius Lee is in this process when the trust agent if he was not doing it then one of the cabinet members The name above the minister is Malik Riaz Saheb’s sons own 458 kanal of land transfer and the Government of Pakistan is in those negotiations The asset recovery unit goes to whose cabinet did not even give them the authority to They should go and take action on these things and this And due to all these aspects they were punished Thank you very much Hafiz Ehsan sahab To chat with Ava New, it costs 190 Bani PTI gets 14 crores in million pound case Father-in-law and wife sentenced to 7 years imprisonment was given Prime Minister Rifa Khawaja will take Sialkot Asif don’t do a news conference, don’t lie in the charge So the robbery was going on at that time It was worth £190 million at that time. committing an offence it was not a question not that it is All the money has come out in the case When he was shouting slogans against thief and dacoit we of the people Against this, there is Rs 190 million in the government account The pound which was to be credited was a national crime The agency had seized it from Britannia He sent it and put it in Malik Riyaz’s account It is a very simple case that money is what it is of Pakistani government and Pakistani people and there is a loan account of Malik Riyas he was fined and fined which has been converted into loan This was the judgement of the Supreme Court During the regime, the Sakan Sar and the Account The account that was opened is still in default today In In that, my loan is one or two installments or Rs. 190 million pounds this credit was done which was reverse Done It is a very simple thing, for some it is a puzzle or I don’t know if that money is from Pakistani 190 million pounds belonged to the public which Malik Riyaz this fact went into the account of or this Nobody cares about the reality it may be that it was the money of the national treasury and that Malak went to Riaz’s account and it was passed by the Supreme Court also in which other people like Sak Saad sat happened Whatever tours he had, he was supreme all this in the court Did you calculate what happened against Nawaz Sharif? The case could not be proved inside the court been imprisoned and this is against what Shaukat Khanum said His party is accused of embezzling money I have installed it myself, I have installed it It has $3 million on its balance sheet thrown out of real estate project In and there is no university This is something the media should highlight Kader University is not a university it does not have any charter it is HEC Approval from Higher Education Commission etc. any there application There has been no application till date For the University No, there is no spirituality in it There are two departments in the caste and 300 There are about 350 or so kids there reading and there is 400 acres of land and the trustee which is the lady who is Alia is Imran Khan’s wife and Imran himself khan sahab his trustees first he is gogi She has gone out, I don’t know how long If there is any fight among the people after collecting the goods goods because she has gone away with the goods it here It has been 4 years since this fake university which is known as University Al Qadr University said its been 4 years I went there and found 300 or 400 left at the most. I don’t have much authority, but hundreds I have more than 400 children, you don’t have any seen on tv you should take your child to university There is a rush of children and there is excitement there are two children sitting there Whoever sits there, feels four crows There was no one left to give, no one to give their computer that all the kids used to tell me again and again Are you getting a computer degree? or someone he has dated Having more On top of that, this web is being set up and all It is said that Hassan Nawaz also has no All transactions were done by NCA Investigation was done and Hassan Nawaz was given a clean chit chit was given there was no charge against him If there is any allegation then tell me, there are roads But those who keep running after vehicles PTI people should be held responsible for this Don’t tell me which one is against As Nawaz Co case the way his money came here So their money came here It has never happened in Pakistan that The amount of the estate which is someone’s personal should be put into the account and then it is Four or five ministers have given statements on TV There are four or five ministers in different capacities There are four or five bawda sahabs in me, Fawad Chaudhary Sir we were not told anything The entrance is to the sealed envelope which is why was the sealed envelope brought why was the sealed envelope brought why was it an agenda item if so Item: When the cabinet meeting was being wrapped up It was getting over, brother this too is a It’s an item, people asked what’s in it I did not say give approval give approval Give because an incident is happening The plan was to grab the stolen goods At that time the incident was taking place and his cabinet Took approval from Cho ever in Pakistan The approval of the incident is given by the cabinet No one needed to take anything from Imran Khan also did this which made the whole world a thief says Now I heard it on TV The university which is under government control is going or so called university university then If it is not there then it can lead to some misunderstanding can’t stay It should be a university Or is this money in some government account I went to Sarkar Malik Riaz sahab so forgive me That’s why he doesn’t come to Pakistan Malak Sir, he has got the benefit and his They have defaulted on the account action should be taken against them His recovery so that whatever they did the Supreme Court the amount that has been placed under their responsibility Recovered Let this series of lies in false politics go away Lies must end to make it true It still happens today, it’s a lie 100 years from now still a lie after The ruling class which is called Pakistan’s The public kills them and sends them away or to someone through which they become rulers is it not enough that Allah has I am honored that you have arrived here then you start stealing Start putting your hands in people’s pockets start putting in the throws of pickpockets Do the movements So this is for the whole country for 25 crore people who There is shame and this is the destination And there are countless people who are his voters for those who sing his praises point of thinking that this government money is yours, ours, everyone’s Why is the money in Malik Riaz’s account? one question only one question that malak riyaz’s Why in the account tried to ask some long questions There is no need for just Che’s Malik Riaz Why did it go to the account The money was government’s money and I put my money into it the letter is present and when the letter is there They did not know that this incident was This incident is bound to happen with the money I will repeatedly tell this to the media people as well I will tell everyone that wherever you are there is no debate it happens that he is in the palace of Malag Riyas Why was this government money spent and please explain is it a university or not a university No how much is it not two two two just There is no department there and neither are 400 children He studies there, it has been four years since he going to the university and somewhere else He has taken leave from the university It’s such a big fraud If it goes then they say yak na budh yak On fraud in the name of Natai religion fraud and whatever you do with your opponent What he did is in front of you Mayan Aash now says now he cries strangely that us in prison this is us in prison His mother Maryam Nawaz has died Mian Nawaz Sharif kept telling me that he will be my Someone please make me talk to my wife Di, these are not old things, these are five Four or five years old things This person has committed atrocities He is the best amongst the Pakistani people that The oppression that is happening with the Pakistani people is The person has done this and even today many people are doing this This nation of India is mired in deception this is nausar baaz fadia here fadia And it is a matter of sorrow for us and for 25 crore people. talk that such people reach the position of ruler There are women of the law here in this country There should be a hand of Pakistani people who This decision should be the final decision to be respected by him This sequence must stop We need people like Imran Khan The thieves enter the place through the door and then someone starts looting Some are intelligent, some are gogi, some are strange It is a strange name and the name itself is Sharifa Wale no the name is goga gogi of crime broken ears If not then I request you to come here But my problem is that you are not bothered about anything else If you wish to ask a question then my lord Today’s HIB court decision came after this This is what started as a dialogue will it continue or will it end and Along with this I want ten times that this came It is possible during dialogue order First of all the punishment will be changed There is no issue of active order etc. This is their demand of PTI The prisoner who is under the Mujrak is staying here go but it’s not They must have been punished by the courts I can give them relief if relief is possible So one of them is this The second time you went you met me I am big in the series of Karrai Muja Karta If I am infamous then I should not become more infamous How can I refuse to ask this question? Le Maryam Nawaz and especially on you But don’t let yourself be denied by applying your faith in it did someone tell me i am a duck I am in the team of Muza karti ba shool Rana sunala I am also like the Azam Nazir tar of the respected sir Speaker sahab is a part of that team Someone please tell me that I stopped him from going to Mazara did you do it or did you meet me in some party meeting that which is opposed that I am just saying that these thieves and robbers If something could come out of the mujra that I have Pavlo’s first seizure you are having fun with these people right I am the biggest supporter among political dogs I am a shy dog, but I am a shy dog I keep saying again and again that I will make fun of them Spread these and also those who are dependent There are other forces in Pakistan too bring it in the middle so that it is only once a solution to the whole problem should be found instead Who would deny this dance but I would meet you and then I would go to you that my We did not meet, I told you this only yesterday or the day before He will not meet me later I got to know that we had met, someone was meeting us Greetings! meeting long story sunari gal G pocket shaft for boost if yes then this is me he himself said it PTI people protested against the decision of Mujahideen It will not have any effect on Mujah, may Allah bless him I am happy with who I am and who I am for caste anarchy, for this country, for this For the people of this country do something for interest so that the country obstacles in improving the situation in They are protesting against those who are outside Their people are sitting there doing propaganda Inflation is going down at your place Your debts are getting reduced, inflation is what it is 37 38 it has come down to four three four Your remittance is your civil disobedience I told people that there was no money at home send me what happened four billion dollars which is more Came Fasla I think that technically this The cabinet does not take a decision because The cabinet hasn’t even seen it I am talking about some technicalities I don’t want to tell you anything, just do it like this It was taken that the approval has been done has been done and the second is that the cabinet is Cannot give approval for illegal work If she gives it then the value of that approval There is no one doing any illegal work There is no value of anything except cabinet Whatever authority there is, if it endorses it She does it, it has no value bha sahib Whatever corruption has happened, every single thing of Fara Gogi The name has come in the place, it will come in the coming days Fara Gogi can also be arrested and brought Is I don’t want it, it’s Masru’s property Recovered This whole market should go and ask saheb also and silence is required I went, I don’t know ga maal nakrae la ke to In this case, Gamal is the real culprit There is money in the account, today he is in Dubai There is a plan there in collaboration with the government Whatever he is doing, he is doing that for his building. if it is there then will that also be brought back and this The money will be taken back, I will take it from the media People ask why don’t you take his name First of all, media people should answer I took your name, no, no After that, I did not respond and it appeared on the screen Jio users no one looks like goods after boll harvest did you see the future of any party Whatever the situation, the people of Pakistan decide it. and we are the people of Pakistan Imran Khan is trying to understand what PTI is What is Khan and what are the people around him? There are such people who should be expelled from the party It has been given and he is still doing Kawali There is a gentleman who is earning 190 million tomorrow What’s above the pound is what I’m talking about I am doing what I was doing today for the party very large hud how is it that you know You will go away in such a wrong way 201 of After doing the badra it started and now this series Before them there was no ism What do you think, whoever comes under the influence of Satan Do you care, can you tell me who Nawaz Sharif is? There was an allegation against him for which the Supreme Court he had punished her, right Tell me if any allegation was made against him Yes if someone tells me all these stories then it would be good that what he did There is a network of roads laid across this country Happened she has a daughter who is in the hands of your children instead of teaching them abuses i am what i am Instead of that, whatever he has, no one should give it to him. Teach them to embrace what is in their hands yes she is giving them scholarship giving laptop so that he can go to any maktaba He is the master of any thought without worry The urban people of Pakistan are useful Only Shabaz Sharif can become a responsible citizen has been doing this and is doing your turn even today He has driven around in an economy car she was falling in the ditch, shahbaz sharif told her I reversed it and put it on the road again put on the road to progress He told me that he is the one who is self-made PTI reported from inside that the efforts are being managed. He himself praised the rule of Shabaz Sharif of What can be a bigger certificate than this? This is very kind thank you very much Vajra Dafa Khawaja Asif News Conference and he quoted the decision as saying that during the period of Chaudhary Saki Visar 190 The Million Pound Affair and Shaukat Khanum by removing $3 billion from the balance sheet of Media should highlight real estate should do al-qad university Not a University is Pakistan’s Electro Optical The satellite has been launched into space Chinese media says the satellite was developed by China KG Chavan from Satellite Launch Centre in Khala Long March was sent to the satellite D Carrier Rocket Launched From Joe Madar Eon successfully entered in Pakistan’s first self-created satellite which can be used for such purposes in which the female surveillance may be a bit Sparks says Satellite launch in Pakistan’s offshore journey An important item is stool There is more news but it is time for one Brake what does one get at every step and it blooms at every step at the forefront of the simple happiness above super simple happiness This grease is super frozen, look it’s greasy The kadhai and the pot demanded a lot of rubbing You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it No-Rubbing, No-Fuss Max Liquid Three Cleanliness increases and tea becomes even more enjoyable Thakar is now present inside the ₹ Tej Dam get the code by sending it to star 806 star K 100 AB exactly Free my choice is always free, success is inevitable Because of my right decisions, I am proud of my beauty My Verdict for Dew Beauty Cream Say It With Fingers Say It With Catberry Mini Fingers your catberry now with biscuit of the morning listen belly of the cup of life with Speed in the open moment friend it is a story from Juba There’s simple happiness above Super meets step by step, blooms step by step at the forefront of the steps There is simple happiness above It’s simple happiness UP 129 Quality Tests & Checks and DNA Gal Standard for Trust in Barcoding Now no rattle from quality Karshi Tathia only Smile, just the chocolate of the hearted o a lot goes This is another historic new achievement of the Sindh government New thought, new journey, new beginning, people of province Sindh Great news for Rae Bhutto’s Phase One up to 91 km long city chairman Bilawal Shah from Quu Abad under Bhutto’s leadership Sharay Bhutto says Faisal’s Ifta has been done Making your destination easy, fast and safe Be it travelling on the busy roads of Karachi or the This 39 km long area is good for trade in Sindh Lane road in the busy life of Karachi KPT will create ease through this the way from the interchange to the motorway m9 Through six interchanges, covered in just 25 minutes Easy access to important sites which are opening New avenues of progress Korangi Creek Avenue Fast travel from super highway to traffic jam and the visible decrease in fuel consumption Betterment in life is certain, new and strong Hamid Sharai Bhutto’s vision of infrastructure The journey will take you to a new era where It saves time and gives a comfortable travel experience also sharai bhutto’s takkal sharai bhutto where Every path takes you closer to your destination Sindh is leading in providing service Jhalak Hand & Foot Beauty Cream in your hands And your feet get a perfect glow and smoothness Softness Glance Hand and Foot Beauty Cream Sensation rapid action in just 60 seconds It gives relief, I recommend it Daily dosage of Sensodyne Rapid Action Patients who use it come back and tell It Works O Bas Dil Walon Ki Chocolate OOOOO Just add one cup of tapal to it and add another cup of it to it. Tea is a simple pleasure for us every moment The golden color of the super subhaa after the first cup With of life Speed in the open moments, love is a slavery that is from Juba There’s simple happiness above The afternoon was filled with super laughter with friends wave super evenings ka hasta saath Super Come, tell me your story at night Super meets step by step, blooms step by step at the forefront of the steps There’s simple happiness above super simple marriage happiness is golden These moments are very special Let’s add colors to life in all these moments Drink Vital tea, live life with sense Rapid action provides relief in just 60 seconds yes i recommend sensation rapid Daily use of the action is a must for the patient come back and tell me it works Welcome Back Kabina Right Sizing Idar has approved the second stage of Alim Malik is present with us, more than him You will know Alim and Faqi cabinet did right sizing This is phase two, the second stage, please approve it Idar has given the second phase in this Various players including upgradation and Inzamam Your mother is also approved in this One important development is that the cabinet of Wafa The third party audit of various departments has given its approval and it has been decided It has been found that third party audit is a good option Received the services of Aamil Consultants of Fame and to those consultants who are public Private Partnership Authority is through it It will be taken along with this decision also It has been said that the Committee for Rightsizing is for third party consultants who are she will also face the market of Later PO RAS will be decided along with this It has been decided that Pakistan Industrial Technical Assistant Centre His fate was decided a year later It will be seen after one year that this institution what should we do with this should we end this do I have to do right sizing in this also or What will be its future along with this All of Pakistan has been warned To Industrial Technical Assist Center He should himself create a son-in-law for the principles of Kafa Along with this the cabinet also decided that the right sizing committee of the cabinet there is his jelly committee which is involved in all this Review of the implementation of the process It’ll be ok, thank you very much The United Arab Emirates further extended the one-year Confirmation to roll over two billion dollars for State Bank says UE has given Rs 2 billion Dollars are kept in the State Bank of Pakistan The maturity period of these deposits is January 2025 is coming to an end There was another good news for Pakistani Mashhad July to December current account 1 billion 21 Gujarat’s financial year was a billion dollar surplus Current account in the first six months of 2019 stood at Rs 1 billion 39 lakh crore. The entire amount of 7 crore dollar was continuously in the fifth Current account 58 even in the month of December 20224 November 2024: Surplus of 20 million dollars Current account is 68 crore 40 lakh dollars Surplus 1225 from ADB and All India Bank Shoaib is a victim of a billion dollar conspiracy Nizami is present with us, more than him You will know Shoaib ji from ADB and those from World Bank There is funding for different projects A lot of effort is made but when When our turn for Amal Ramat comes, we have the capacity but it is not capable of that Whatever they have properly, it is all Funds can be used for five years Inside, there are about 15 million dollars worth of Financing has been done so far, a lot of it The project which has a budget of 15 crore dollars Project Emergency Assistant Project was ADB’s For him, he has not been able to do anything in two years Physical progress has not been made by Alamy Bank for the Khyber Pass Economic Corridor with 46 billion dollar project signed in 2019 was signed and so far only on top of it One percent of physical progress has been seen While financial progress is not yet visible On one side we are talking about the amount of funding On the other side we do what The implementation is so slow that the funds I am not able to utilize it completely, ok hey thanks a lot You have more news but it’s time to come here have a break O on the chocolate for the people with heart oh i mean for sure this is the same color no yes yes One thing is for sure that this color will be applied once If you go, wait for years for leave Light on the pocket, Nippon pants last for years When I went, Nippon Paint became Asia’s number one paint brand simple happiness simple happiness Hape As if it was a cadre fix stubborn stains aunty surf excel is it new Surf Excel’s Stain Lifter Technology Removes all kinds of stubborn stains Why be afraid of stains, it’s all single and not a glimpse Glimpse for Wining Serum Extra Results Or mix it in any cream and see 10x More Glow Glimpse Whitening Serum Glow do it Jhamke Paw Skin Institute’s new Paw Bright Beauty Face Wash with New Cinemale Give it 4x brightness so you get Ultimate Bright Skin Point Miracles Happen Sensation Rapid Action Just 60 Seconds I relax and after that you can do your I can enjoy my favorite food and drink I recommend Sensation Rapid Action use it daily because it It has an immediate effect, patients come back and tell how it works this grease is frozen He is Greek, look he is studying and asking for a pot I rubbed it a lot, I rubbed it a lot, now I clean it It will be easily removed without any hassle and without any rubbing. Liquid will clean you three times more, Mahi I love you very much oh no crazy girl There is too much data and this is the social extreme of 4G Enjoy 25GB data and Rs 100 off net with this offer Minutes because yf 4g has lot of data Is The golden color of the morning is in the cup of sacrifice with the slogan of life Speed, love in open moments, a story which is from Juba There is simple happiness above It is found at every step and blooms at every step the foremost most There’s simple happiness above sapna is simple happiness sapna Say It With Fingers Say It With Cat Bury Mini Fingers bury your cut now with biscuit sense Rapid action, relief in just 60 seconds and after that you can do whatever you want And you can enjoy the food, I recommend I use Sensan Rapid Action daily Use it carefully as it gives instant effect The patient comes back and tells it Works Welcome Back Wazir Ala Punjab Maryam Check out the Nawaz Scholar Program’s speech You are watching the scene, it is being divided High Minister of Punjab Maryam Nawaz in Talwa Checks are issued under the scholarship program Mizpah Zulfikh Sawal Medical College I request you to come on stage and give your check recovered do so the wait is finally over students You will listen to a mother today. by calling on stage Earlier this and that mother, till today everybody has said Will they give us scholarships? Nobody gave us any By providing scholarships we get access to education Chief after giving merit and training Clapping for the minister from every corner to be should madam i can have you on the stage speech please bismillah rahman Rahim Nare Bal Parliamentarians MNS MPA ministers go astray Karam and my today The Chief Guests of my promising one Children my sons and daughters you on my side Assalam Walekum Walekum to everyone Alarm to you all First of all I am thankful to Allah I thank you that we are gathered here today and To celebrate such a beautiful achievement we are all gathered here and after that I will tell you all the depths of the heart more promising than Congratulations on winning the scholarship Many many congratulations to you and I am yours I congratulate the parents of your house I congratulate those who have such a big achievement that I want to say The boys and kids are sitting a little behind me The sound is coming no and these special children are also sitting It is very nice to see you I liked it You are as happy today as your parents are. I am happy kids Honestly, from the depths of my heart, maybe I am happier than you are today The biggest to date for Pakistan program this is a scholarship program and We chose it and named it promising because in Punjab I knew that There is no dearth of talented kids, so today I very happy right now this girl was sitting here and she told me whispered in my ear we weren’t sure you would When you come to the small town of Okada, I It is said that Okada is not a small town Okada is such a beautiful city and it belongs to my heart and very close to the heart of Nawaz Sharif sahab No person is big or small Things are neither small nor big, now look at this So many Mashallahs in Okada for the promising ones Achievers are sitting here and there Mashallah and now I Who is your education minister Rana Sikandar I also want to congratulate them And Their Rana, you have become a hero Mashallah I like the way it is Rana like my younger brothers for the first time He has become an MP and has become a minister for the first time But he has told that the students of Punjab There is a thirst for money, there is a thirst for money in their hearts Maqam has made a place for itself because it see you look at this Children, I want to share some heartfelt things with you today. I have come to talk about your heart came to hear things I am a minister who is always on the chair Guests always sit on high chairs like of honor but you look at that since We have come here to protect your Rana The education minister is standing behind me He hasn’t sat down for a minute and it looks like he is one of you and you are one of them And I am a child of good morals Sometimes I get frustrated that this work Why didn’t it happen sooner? Even if I scold you, you do it like a good child He keeps quiet and takes the scolding but he works hard works from Hey kids, I made a decision I thought I could have been Rana She tells Sikandar that in all the universities in colleges where this laptop sorry this which There are scholarships, they are going there Give these cheques to the children so that they The fee is payable but I thought that This is how I tell my children who have so many those who have made great achievements who have worked so hard day and night This position has been achieved by hard work He is eligible for scholarship, I tell him I will be deprived of seeing them, of meeting them remain deprived I will go but I have to leave my children, my sons and Girls, I did not know that Honestly he says its too good to be True I didn’t know I would be like this when I will come to you with so much love You will welcome me with so much love and you will establish that relationship with me which a never ending relationship yesterday when I was in Faisalabad a child He said that we had heard that the state is like a mother and today as our Chief Minister We have also seen in the state that mother would be like I have three kids Mehr Nisa and Junaid and I am as proud of his achievements as I am of them. I am as happy as I am with their achievements I celebrate for her as much as I do for them I think I would work as hard for them I’m sure he’s happier than that Yours Good I think about you more than that and this relationship that I have with you This relationship which is between us, our hearts This thing has been decided in the meantime on oath I say this is the most precious thing in my life Sarmaya and I have traveled a lot in the world Scholarships given Mashallah in DG Khan This is my last visit to him on Monday after the scholarships which this one which this one This is the stage when its division will be complete My heart was saddened because it was all I did not sit in the office during the month of January I would have never been with children in a city I would have never been with kids in some city I am and I think I think in 10-11 months this will be mine This love that I have received is my greatest love The biggest achievement is the biggest Achievement but I will not weaken this relationship being I will not give these relationships everyday Inshallah I am becoming a lock with laptops now near you I will come And I have told Rana Sikandar that whatever There are meritorious students and laptops I don’t have the means to buy them all Providing laptops without any hassle is our goal Responsibility Having more Kids I have top of the line laptop which I have selected it for you myself. Rana to Rana please tell someone about that laptop We will bring it and very soon your first shipment will be Laptops are here I think you stay tuned to all laptops And I will come myself and give you laptops, Insha Allah I will thank you look this is a laptop which you will get it right now is this look sit down sit down Please this is the latest laptop from Core i hai inshallah this laptop will be launched very soon will also be in your hands and you can Assignments If you need research I can do it I encourage all of you to do research You should search for the truth and answer your questions The best use of it is studies I should use the laptop, inshallah I will bring the children to wherever I go To travel to and from the university, visit your college Where e-bikes are needed for commuting If yes then insha allah next year Absolutely free 100000 one lakh e bikes which We will give that to our students, Inshallah So that you can also get scholarship from your parents on top of that your just now that girl said that four I have sisters and brothers for my parents It was difficult to bear their burden so I tell you this I want to tell this to your parents too I want to say that Inshallah now this You don’t have to bear the burden because now it’s The responsibility is of your mother Maryam Nawaz Sharif I just received a request from you There is an under pass and boarding If the facility is not available here then I will come to you today. I am going with you with the promise that Insha may allah taala as soon as it is possible this under pass I will get it completed under my supervision And you will see that inshallah lock boarding Facility will also be available very soon at Okada University will be ready inshallah This morning I was having a meeting which was under Construction is our whole intention in which Our Roads program also includes Nearly 700 roads are being built in Punjab At this moment, Mashallah, when I am watching that Was So when I became the Chief Minister, So initially I went to Safe City Lahore I saw there were many young girls She was working and Big When it came to meticulousness, you would have gone and talked about it If you interact, you will get to know The people sitting on the chairs have no relation with the public should be connected in such a way that The message doesn’t reach them because it gets filtered Whatever is there, it should reach them directly Direct contact with the public If I wanted I saw today that they The girls told me that we have no There is no boarding facility, what is this bring bring bring boarding facility If not, I promised him today and The boarding works which began next month It is done and now it is on the verge of completion Alhamdulillah similar facility is available here but we are in ukra university I will make it and want to make another announcement for the children of Kara that we will soon Inshallah Tala Okada Medical in 2025 Inshallah we will give you college also So that the children of Okada can get admission in medical college I don’t have to go far for this, what is this son, take it come bring it take it come on come on You all love my photos so much, you too come come come come sleep sweet naa you are so sweet look here i got a picture Choti is shaking hands with Nawaz Sharif sahab She is big now, Mashallah look at this how Nice to be your loser I got it by the way thank you Oh thank you, you made this yourself, very nice How long did you take to make it, you spent the entire night I have made it, thank you so much, where are you from son? Got more scholarship from Okar today Mashala because okay okay let’s apply I will get it inshallah thank you thank you so much please take this thank you you small Children, thank you so much, son, thank you thank you children please help them don’t fall Come on kids I want to tell you that Mashallah thousands of children are sitting here A child cannot stand up and tell me this That He did not get any scholarship on merit The kid can’t stand up and tell me that While giving scholarship, any minister’s was it recommended by any MNAC MPA or You were asked which political party you belong to and if you belong to PMLN If you belong to then you will get scholarship will get it and if not associated with PMLN If you keep this, you will not get any scholarship from anyone did not question Went Because whichever party you belong to Whatever your political philosophy is You belong to the family but you don’t rule You are my responsibility for Punjab responsibility and that responsibility to me Feeling I have heard so many emotional stories and yesterday the children told me one of them said that My mother had a tumor and that tumor When it resurfaced, my father said that Either you get yourself treated or I get your mother treated If I can continue your training Then he got a scholarship and then a child told me yesterday about the condition of our house I was bad so I had to postpone my training for a year had to suspend his degree I got a scholarship next year so I I am so happy and today the child who said that It was the last animal and my father sold it If my fees were paid I would take the child to the place where he is also sitting here i want to tell him this Now you don’t need to sell your animal It will happen inshallah Tala and I are in the news in front of Allah Tala I am and the boys and kids are listening to me did not listen no no I don’t have any voice Let any child of mine come, let him come My son or my daughter is sitting here. Yes sir I meet hmm thank you thank you oh so sweet one more hey thank you so much thank you I call you I am a trouble son I am here right now I will talk to you again ok ok son sit down i don’t forget No Sit down kids I want to tell you this Everyone may face a shortage of jobs The professions are not the same but the education is He is the biggest social equalizer, have you heard? It may be that someone’s origin is very humble He comes from a very humble background in the background and he stands for a great deal What was the reason if the reason was education then now This promising scholarship is for you My heart is the beginning of the interpretation of dreams wants that even if you don’t have a job and the child who is having an occupation, if he One can go to Lums University fast I can go to hell so now even a child who does not have that kind of occupation can go fast can go in lams can go to waste and without the worry that his Who will pay the fee and who will pay it for his parents If it will be a burden then I want you now that your attention Focus 100% on building your career for my higher education and for my in making the life you have better I will help you to improve your prospects I have dreamt, all children dream All daughters dream, all sons dream and they dream that we We too have reached a better place in life If someone says that this person is successful in life then You all dream, work hard, I will help you I have come with a promise to fulfill your dreams inshallah And you said this scholarship, I thank you. I tell you over and over again, my children don’t say thank you this is what scholarship is I have no God, no favors is this scholarship you have worked hard day and night Through your hard work, through your dedication, through your studies, With your courage, you can create a pile of business You won this scholarship despite being This is your hard earned money from day and night whom I just honored and I want you to raise your head and Take the scholarship by holding your head high among the people Go, I have earned this by my hard work Won a scholarship and these scholarships help you Many children should have been found long ago There are those who remained deprived of education or those whose education remained incomplete or He had to leave his education because he had no business If they were not there, it would mean a lot of loss A lot of loss has been done to me Going from city to city, she is mourning that loss The damage I didn’t do but be I am done with having kids so I have a lot of fun There was a demand that only first year students Why only them, second year children also Scholarships should be available for third year Children should also get scholarships I have decided that this year we Scholarships given to 300 children of Punjab this coming June next year we These scholarships are given to 50000 children Inshallah we will give you second chance and very soon I am also for year and third year children I am bringing some scholarships don’t miss out on education What you guys need right now The song was prepared for me, children performed by these are his words these were who is this who we Staying inside and burning our house I want to tell you this and my No, it’s not a political matter at all Understand that I am like a mother to you for your future, for your condition, for your For the present, I am concerned for you Like a mother to her children There is concern like a state has about its There should be concern for children like a To the Chief Minister for his children There should be concern and every son and daughter of Punjab I am concerned for my daughter you are my side, you are my strength I have my courage, I have my courage and because and why am I saying this yes i am saying this that at 65 now Look at their population in Japan and China. Whatever it is, she is doing it as opposed to that Our youth in Pakistan is 65 The end of the population is 65 Growing so what is this decision of Pakistan This is the flag of Pakistan in my hand No, it’s in your hands to decide You have to raise this flag high, to do so i think you i can’t Function without you I am the only chief minister Sitting in the House chair or in your office Sitting in this I am the 15 crore citizen of this state what is the matter i can’t decide I need your support in this I need your strength, you are my core strength and I want you guys to You all become my stakeholders become my arm, become my strength I need the service of this state at this time to bring progress in this province Of For And you guys, Mashallah, are hardworking and intelligent. You have intelligence, you have knowledge, you are educated Mashallah your thinking, your ability, yours Your enthusiasm, your passion, is my biggest encouragement and this is no longer my courage, now this It’s become my hope It’s the promise that you make I did it to you and you did it to me and I look at you you guys The Architects of Pakistan Be the architects of the future of Pakistan This flag of Pakistan is in your hands It’s invisible but you can feel it of this thing that it’s in your hands is mine My favourite is Milli Nagma I go everywhere and see this I say this country is yours, you are near There are two or three cities for this Children in two or three cities said this He said that you said that this is the country It is yours, you are near it The song he sang for me in response to this I had prepared his words, these were these The country is ours and we are near it It is said that the country is the mother earth Have you heard the word mother or mother earth? It means that this earth is your mother. There is a huge reward for being loyal to your mother It is a huge success, a huge reward is ours just as our affiliation is ours We are with our parents to persuade them we keep on serving them I feel happy and this is my message to all of you as a mother This is an advice, I have seen this in my life that the child who served his parents that and his parents would have agreed with him A child never lacks anything in life into something Today as I stand before you, I am Allah After the grace and kindness of Tala, I am in my Because of the prayers of parents, today he is the Chief sitting in the minister’s chair Even today, when I leave the house, my My mother is not in this world, I am in jail When my mother died she had cancer Now they have to care for my mother and my father he is my father so I am as much as you can be Whether I’m late or in a hurry yes, even today every day before I leave the house Before going to work, I go to my father’s I go near them, I salute them and pray for them leaving the house again and the same way when I get back home I go, no matter how tired I am Also I have some important work when I return home When she enters I go to my room I go to my father’s room before I salute them, take their prayers and then when we sit down to eat at night I always eat with them, I No one keeps my dinners outside Socializing isn’t my everything My father has it and I sit with him When I eat food he asks me that what did you do all day today and you You know, these are the videos of your functions This is my father who is responsible for the functions of the promising ones Sitting at the dining table, he and those who There are videos, enlarge them and zoom in let’s try it and then say The kids loved you so much The more you do for them the less it is Whatever this country is like right now my children There are many flaws in it and it is our dog It is because of them that this country is the way it is We have to fix this, we have to fix it we haven’t spoiled it, we haven’t spoiled it I have to groom myself and now look I am listening to the news Was that they were smuggling on their way to Spain People and boats capsized and many lives were lost went into it 90% of them are from Pakistan I was so sorry to see this and I am so sorry to hear this news Wherever we go my children we are on our own represent the country and this country if we do not take care of the honor of this Nobody has done any good to the country by coming from outside and this country doesn’t need hatred The nation needs unity This country doesn’t need tension, this country needs peace This country doesn’t need any trouble, my Children, this country needs progress This country doesn’t need bad culture, it needs culture We need a community that knows how to talk yes you may have political differences but it must be accompanied by reasoning It should be done with civility if it is for civility and the matter has gone beyond the scope of the argument It went beyond the bounds of logic for me So it’s very easy I’ll stand here and you I should teach everyone to pick up sticks with nails in them Go out and burn everything to ashes Attack your own country and tell lies People’s crazy crazy people, throw them in the gatherings I stand before you and I I’ll tell you my story if you like. If he doesn’t come then you can disregard it but Listen to me and put it in front of you, you will get food It is my responsibility to give thought It’s right, I don’t like what you say Regard me but this is my story Very and now let me inform you that the Court has PTI was bought for £190 million Sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakh I have sentenced my wife to 10 years imprisonment and 5 Al Kade was sentenced to a fine of Rs 1 lakh There is a plan to take the trust under government control as well The order was given on the order of the court Bushra Bibi has been arrested Bani PTI in court to hear verdict Present He was sentenced to 14 years in prison, PTI was told This was a case of 190 million pounds The decision is a shameful decision Political bug is a decision made by an orphan We knew for months that he was going to punish us If the verdict is given to Khan sahab then Khan Sir laughed 190 million pounds reference I have created Tehreek Insaaf with bad name and corrupt Mulas Karar Mushra Bibi also in practices The culprit has been proven for the crime, Aite Sahib Court judge Nasir Javed Rana said that Al Qadr By reading the safe decision related to the trust PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and 10 Bushra Bibi sentenced to a fine of Rs 1 lakh Sentenced to 16 years imprisonment and 5 lakh fine PTI banned for not paying the fine for 6 months and for Bushra Bibi for 3 months Bushra Bibi will have to serve a month’s imprisonment in a room arrested from court Gaya et Saab court ordered Al Qadr University ordered to take it under government custody According to the Tafsi judgment, the prosecution against Bani PTI and Buchra Biwi Your case based on documentary evidence Proved capable of trust against the accused Marbupalli Despite getting the opportunity, there was no concrete answer failed to present a plea Rahe Wani PTI and Bachra Biwi Naib Sentenced under section 10A of the Act Both have the right to appeal against the decision PTI files 190 million pound case Announced to challenge in High Court Diya Chairman PTI Barrister Gauhar says When the verdict was announced Bani laughed not at all disappointed he says this Muzaqr will continue despite the verdict but If the commission is not presented within 7 days then no muzak will be in Al Qader University Trust case The verdict is given when Khan saheb gets the verdict When this was narrated to us, Khan sahab laughed. You could see it on the wall, right Khan sahab? I am sad, I am sad for Khan sahab The message is that despondency is a crime for people Don’t be disheartened, Inshallah taala with these few Etamad will file an appeal in Delhi High Court inshallah tala khan saheb surah ru everyone will be Despite all this, Khan sahab has said today The jokes will continue for seven days if presented There is no commission on this again, Muja Sir’s spirits are high, not because of convention There is faith in the fearful and I am sure that InshaAllah Like a lock, three punishments in five days He was sentenced to 30 years inshallah This punishment also ends in the same way Hoga opposition leader Umar Ayub says today It is the 12th day of Pakistan’s history will appeal to the top court against the verdict He also said that the decision was just If the question is to target PTI then Asking Hassan Nawaz one day that body should be put to test because He made 47 governments a damp university I feel bad because these people If the question is about corruption then you should ask Hasan Nawaz sei, by whom did you take this money we do this thing in pig court We will go and leave, he is a thief roaming around there is Al Qader University in which The government has suffered a huge loss, right Imran? Khan and Bushra Bibi benefited by a penny What happened is that he is being punished for this Aalima Khanum: Anyone can commit a big crime She says she will challenge the decision in the High Court I knew a month ago that I would be sentenced A person like Bani PTI will be punished I felt bad today, I am very sad about this system Bani said what happened today has happened before in history too The punishment has been given because Created a University Why will we have to challenge this in the High Court I knew since months that he has to give punishment today I am definitely very saddened by this situation I felt sad when Imran Khan was pronouncing the sentence A lot of trouble for a person like him Imran Khan said that whatever happens today, happens tomorrow He has already been punished on the previous date This is why you created this university Why is this also included in the punishment that this The university should be taken over a dream of imran khan Talal Chaudhary was the leader of Muslim League Noon says Bani PTI will be punished with NRO the custom of giving has been ended During its conclusion, Bani PTI again Expressed confidence in the court and the judge PTI people also knew what the decision was PTI had said that the impact of the decision is yet to come Mujkuwa is the biggest tavern in Pakistan There were so many martyrs from his home to his Even the members of the cabinet were aware of their survival It was impossible during the Samaat by Bani PTI Twice on this judge and on the court as a whole He has expressed confidence that his team too, which she was saying that muja Even if I am punished, we will continue the joke Because they could see it after the punishment A taser that was being given by PTI An atmosphere was being created from the side that we I don’t know if someone has taken NRO today Let it end, today justice has become prevalent PTI could not prove the minister innocent Lawyer Azam Nazir Tad says the country’s A disgusting thing happened with me, it was an open and shut case PTI now only has the right to appeal Vifa’s minister Talat Ata Tar said after today There is no such big corruption in Pakistan 100 times before doing it He will think that justice had this right He would give evidence in his defense should have gone as a witness to the clarification that His not going is also a prison that his They had nothing to say now right to file an appeal The timelines are first in first out which The policy should be the same in these cases as well If they are so opposed to the government Till date, Shaukat Khanum’s personality is well known For bandish or why his case is not open What happened in the future is applet forums what decisions do you make i have read this is an open end chat case You failed to prove your innocence I have been open ended shirt case since day one today After that there is so much mega corruption in Pakistan While doing this he will think 100 times that he was a lawyer for clarification He could not present any proof of his innocence The evidence presented by Na Prosan Was there any EB who could give him an answer There was no trust of Shapa there was no trust of Shapa Black money was taken as bribe and he was made white was made to hide The appeal said that they have got it but it is a legal case Fighting We will have to go to Karachi where Sharjeel Ina Memon at this time news conference are doing wearing a cloak wearing a mask of truth the people of pakistan it rained for being a fool was throwing dust in the eyes of the people the people of pakistan was trying to tell him that he was a He is an honest man, he is a wise man and In comparison to that, there are as many They are all thieves and robbers the ways in which from PTI leader Imran Khan For years he has been raining down on all his opponents, thieves and Trying to create a narrative by calling him a dacoit Pakistanis were telling the whole public were that Yes he is the only honest person in that country is a person who is involved in some corruption That thing which is not fundamental in Parvari is once Then it became clear to the public that this man is a hawk this person is a liar and this person Throwing dust in the eyes of the public Is The decision which the court gave today regarding NAB Imran Khan and his wife in the case who was sentenced to These are all the things that Imran Khan himself did Chosen Imran Khan himself was in praise of this Nav He used to keep on reciting Tasbi and all his opponents They arrested him through the Nab got all his opponents killed He carried this much caravan through the Nab targeted and to this extent their tolerance the situation was such that when even when Any person on any TV or any media Imran Khan at some rally or procession But did anyone accuse him or oppose him? does if that person had known about it the next day then notices came And the thinking behind this is that not only Siyasi He made the leaders the target of revenge but along with that those political It has also affected the families and clans of the leaders target of revenge Imran Khan was made at the behest of Imran Khan that time’s Namaaz on his stage addressed the leadership of Pakistan Peoples Party In prison Respected Asif Ali Zardari sahab was put in jail I put in Mohtarma Faryal Talpur Sahiba put in jail without any punishment In the same manner as the crime was proven, Pamela N He also put the leadership of and his purpose was that he could see through the nub Rule over this country do this to justice javed iqbal The chairman blackmails them and takes decisions as per his wish Imran Khan’s favorite actions Hawayo Imran Khan today spoke out against his opponent is getting punished for his own mistakes You are getting punishment for your wrongdoings In the decision that has come today, this is It proved to what extent this was bad intention. the person was I would say he was a smart man as well and In international norms it is said that Corporate Criminal This Corporate Criminal through which it enjoyed eating tosha watches stolen in the incident sold watches and lied to people that I lived this moment in Pakistan I found out that the watch was sold to someone else in the country Someone of ours who is a Pakistani Purchased Then he said that with that money I built roads These were blatant lies which then came to light The way Punjab is being affected in the presence of Imran Khan that Fara Gogi saheb was running the government who is there to get money on transfer posting The market of corruption was hot on the basis of which In this way, sitting with Bunny Gala, Punjab Which women used to do the transfer posting Whose friend was she and where is that lady today? It is like Tehreek in Imran Khan’s rule When she came, first of all Fara Gogi was taken out of the country I chased him out so that he could not be caught and then said You even defended him on TV, so what a shame That poor thing didn’t have anyone in her life Whatever she is doing, the case doesn’t stand it was valid and legitimate, then if it was not in reality whatever do it he should go was with him I am going to say something very important today All of you every Pakistani should understand that thing the need of Today Imran Khan has been sentenced to 14 years in prison There was only one person in the whole of Pakistan Went for Aitzaz is there any one person who has done some mockery Is there any public reaction from you that is natural? If it is written then Imran Khan will be punished Despite this, there is one person in the whole of Pakistan He was sentenced to 14 years in prison, no one said anything Khyber Pakht is on the road across Pakistan No one including me came out on the road but in no When he was arrested, the manner in which The terrorism that is spreading across Pakistan The manner in which the Corps Commander’s House was attacked The way it happened that I had to go inside GS They tried to attack there karachi in a fun way Bus burnt in Damage to people’s Imala the manner in which it was delivered Radio Pakistan gets attention in Khyber Pakht The way it was done there Edhi The manner in which the ambulance was seen being cleaned terrorism, this proves that the Imran Khan himself was the mastermind of the whole thing. The reaction that came at that time was just The arrest was minor; the arrest was minor The manner in which the whole of Pakistan reacted to the arrest if terrorism is committed then it Today, people who say that Imran Khan has a mindset I didn’t know that he was poor and he didn’t know anything I did not know about this thing, today it is natural Where did the reaction go? It’s been four or five hours. why is there a man somewhere who has come for punishment The same person who was the leader of PTI did not turn out We entered here too, opening our collars We will go there too and close this road too We will burn this house too today where did you go because you had to give them directions If the person himself is in jail then this thing also today it has become absolutely fine in the nine minutes The only person responsible for this is the convenience of the The one who was his brain child was Imran Khan And that was Imran Khan who ruled the state since 20188 A war has been started against the principality There has been a war against Pakistan since 2018 and that war which is there is different That war is being fought on the social platform Social media is also being fought over media But our stand is against the dignity of our country Main opposition against different governments The way in which one fights against the leader She is hiding from someone on social media it has not happened and after that international The way in which these are facilitated on forums juice of Lobby Israel, the Israel which openly opposed them Israel gave statements in their favor, which openly that his Israel Jerusalem Post in which Articles appeared in their support and then In big meetings at international forums The way in which PTI has made a well thought out move To target Pakistan as part of a conspiracy Tried to do the same against the principality They have started a war, that very war He also tried to fight with the IMF that by sitting with the IMF, Pakistan The debt should be stopped if God shows mercy God forbid if Pakistan defaults People in Pakistan do not get salary Khudan Khasta turned out to be a fan of Pakistan The Fard who started the war against the state This has happened only and only for the benefit of his caste The 120-26 day long dharna is also for this was part of the war against that kingdom in which He blackmailed the state that if I If you are given the order then you people are from Pakistan You people should not pay electricity bills in Pakistan What I am doing is Money Laundering Do not earn money in Pakistan through legal means Send money from Pakistan, do not withdraw money from people It was told that the money was transferred through hawala hundi Send things abroad and through hawala bills Do all this for the war against that kingdom Was part of the war against that same kingdom While issuing it he also said, If an atomic bomb explodes on the Pakistani nation This person was arrested from Pakistan by Pakistanis No one from our community or our people There is no love or affection of any kind even today This person is fighting against the state of Pakistan He is fighting only for his one and only son is for relief and He is seen distributing ikdarm and sweets If so, then this whole thing is proof of that that this person is not sincere with Pakistan Having more Its of 2018 This was a disgusting joke with Pakistan The way in which a thief hides himself from the door Political and Democratic leaders say The way in which this came through the back door person I have been harmed by this evil I ask that some one feat be told about this Whatever he did for Pakistan In the midst of the storms we remember that Parliament was attacked on the same grounds Meanwhile, we remember that Pakistan When the television was attacked, the person who This is being spread in a bright manner on every department of Pakistan. It is not that this is only against one organisation To harm every institution of Pakistan Try to that it has Pakistan trying to harm everyone How come this man is loyal to Pakistan It is possible that this is a corporate criminal and its The whole history is full, this is just one There has been a conviction in the case against him just now There are many such cases which perhaps I didn’t even start what I was going to say when this Punjab police on the eve of court When the time for arrest passed, then it reached its own home Petrol bombs were used from inside the all over the world on our police Someone call me a political leader Tell me whom to arrest at any time The police went and they attacked with petrol bombs. What is the whole Pakistan about its forces? Give me an example from around the world And if someone attacks him, what will happen to him? It is said that if someone is going to arrest you Come, you have to face the courts for bail Leni Hai did not refuse the court’s work I tried to arrest you You attacked that police with petrol bombs And you say that you are a public leader and you You say that you are talking about which public? This crime was forgiven in the world then it goes in the same way that foreign funding case in which according to them if these were okay then good If he was honest then he was in foreign funding case Why were these high officials seeking stay after stay? If his name was clean from the courts then stay should be granted But why were you taking stay from the courts that We should be given a stay and they should not pursue the cases go because you will find a straw in the thief’s beard I knew you did something wrong and you lost some 20 2 The accounts you have are not even declared did the work in Election Commission of Pakistan You have been taking foreign funding and that foreign Funding You are living from India and Israel You will get foreign funding from India and Israel You are waiting in your country, spread the wait You spread terrorism in your country You should tell your youth that they have fallen from morality Teach your youth to behave socially Teach your youth about terrorism through media You can tell them how to use social media People are trolling Idar from this how people are defamed and to Sarra of Idar and to the rest of the people in their Which family is targeted? The leader of the country gives so much strength to his youth the disgusting and filthy things it teaches All these things are proof of this That was the case in the foreign funding case as well The judgement had come but a case was filed against them should have gone on till now in that princely state Pakistan did not and then the way in which Al Qadir Trust for which you were sentenced what did you always do that honestly wearing a mask of You told the public that you are very big You are a social worker, you are a very big social worker. You are an activist, you only talk about goodness you do it for the good that you You have met Shaukat Khanam The hospital which we consider to be a noble The cause was in that Shaukat Khanum Hospital which you You made a board, in that board you and your father Sir, your sister and your entire family are on board he is sitting and then the matter also came up that Shaukat How did you manage to fund Khanum’s work? Invest in various private projects Invested in rail state projects You gambled with him, you made him answer People played this game for cancer patients did you give money or in real estate gave it to you for investment or he gave it away for gambling Money is your character and it is proved from there also Then only this one case of Navbharat happens No, there was a case against Malam Jabba also. of the nub The case was also about KPK’s BRT In the BRT of which under your own rule The Chief Minister Inspection Team present there said That billion rupees worth of kickbacks only and only If you are going then what do you think about Prime Minister, if you speak with your chest puffed up Has there been any kickback during my rule If there is corruption in any project then it court nab f ia everyone please prop him which was the Pesha High Court of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa the judge there This was the judgement of Justice Waqar Sachi Sahib that this should be nabbed and FIA should investigate KP You have taken BIT to the Supreme Court I took a stay order against you No case should be filed and FIA news of KP If you do not even put your hand inside the BRT then you will be so You were an honest man, you were such a wealthy man and But all your other parties can be stolen only from this Why are you honest in the country? Justice Banyal took you and gave stay order I gave it and kept getting stay orders on stay orders so why did you take the stay order? You are honest, you speak, let me inquire Who is a person if he is honest and knowledgeable He will tell some investigation department You cannot look for me and take the car If I go anywhere, a policeman stops me if yes then you will say that I will not search If you say you will not allow a search then what will happen to you? will do In this way you have got rid of every corruption. You took a stay order in the case and that The purpose of getting a stay order means that you do not want to be searched and do not want to be searched the idea is that you are a thief His motive is that you have bad intentions then you can’t fool the public By fooling people in this way, You love the garb of honesty that you are wearing now your day is getting worse All the cases are a very big deal against you it is a cheat I understand I believe that the people of Pakistan should know all this It should mix the fabric of things Don’t see if the opposition is talking he is just wrong Will PTI leader Fara Gogi be killed today? in position to defend Is it the way KP’s BRT or Malam Jabba like lawsuit or foreign funding Like in the case that has come up, Pakistan The public is in this position which is of PTI What is the leader and what is he doing in this position? Defend it Any one can defend on any channel can i do that yes that’s why we placed the order or the way in which you keep yourself honest And the way in which donors say of Toshakhana Those who sell Taif and then lie, this he is in a position to defend exactly like this not in position I think the public needs to open their eyes The public should see that the impersonator The man who is an impersonator has been raining on them for years He is coming fooling his cafeteria reaching the character and The doors of the courts are open for those superiors I will go to court and appeal But the attempt to fool the public The drama that is going on, Aurang, will not continue further If I could I understand it Whatever Imran Khan dug pits for others Tried to defame Allah today That person is disgracing himself in court and who He also has a course in law and he will do his work The court will do its job, they should appeal You should appeal but don’t fool the public Make a Turk card in the playing cards This trump card has great importance every Pauline has a trump card or a trump card It is necessary to keep the card at this time when Khan sahab Khan sahab’s trump card has been punished Or it will not work, see the full story of PTI try this is of In some way or the other, he will target Imran Khan Taken out and Imran Khan Sahaul is asking to get out who is demanding facilities even inside the jail Sahul can still hear Imran Khan from inside the jail He has not supported any politician till date You all have found one thing, tell me Tell him that you have seen the leader’s words, sir I also saw Asif Ali Zardari sahab in jail Oh Madam Fariyal, have you seen Talpur Sahib imprisoned? Look, the PMLN leader is also in jail Have you ever seen anyone inside a jail I am running the whole party from you all I ask you, have you ever seen anyone go to jail? He also looked like a chief minister sitting inside the you are setting up the cabinet too muja I am sorry that he is the darling of many places He is still getting VIP treatment Is And I understand that what you are saying is Their attempt is to play a trump card or such and such card It is complete, it may come in handy as a trump card But I think that Pakistan Courts and laws of Pakistan Will anyone do as per the orders of Pakistanis Trump did not listen to Card This party is PTI, it is punished By the way she kept talking about Mukra and still does Bani will come to Mujra after PTI’s punishment This statement is issued by the government and the party is participating in it. I have seen that Muja’s People’s Party is always in support We want there to be a dialogue should never be closed but The law is there and its implementation continues as well Raheny should thank you On the other hand Vifa’s minister S News conference is being held, 64 billion wasted There are at least six banners from this 64 billion rupees Akwaaba rupees to thousands inside the country Schools could have been established with this Rs 64 billion There are many dispensers and can be a hospital With this Rs 64 billion, thousands of youngsters have been given excellent opportunities. Scholarships for education could be available Pakistan’s money is Pakistani community’s money has been blown up and if it is accused of this theft If caught, punishment is given along with this This is the only time I spend away from the news studio Keep watching ARVA for news and updates New It is found at every step and blooms at every step the foremost most There is simple happiness above pai straight granny happiness is up This grease is frozen, it’s greasy, look The pan and the pot demand a lot of money You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it No-Rubbing, No-Fuss Max Liquid Three times more Cleaning a cup and tuber granular you in another cup The golden color of the morning tea after the first cup with the slogan of life Love is a slavery in the speed of moments is from Juba There’s simple happiness above Soup is available step by step, it blooms step by step at the forefront of the There’s simple happiness above super simple happiness When Hap was leaving the house, Aunt angrily said He said listen, sit at home and eat onions cut it but I didn’t just cut my onion The parlor is also open, they are breaking and cutting two onions Onion will not break your hair, let it grow friend New Sun Sulp Onion Shampoo is made from onion Reduces hair breakage by 90% from the first wash wonderful nice no break only sun became this time I can’t follow the match It’s the same every time Magic happens only when everyone is together yes coca cola is sure to win when we meet it opens up If you crave for something sweet, the cafe opens Glimpse Watney Serum for Extra Results Mix it in Jhalak or any cream and Look 10x More Glow Luck Whitening Serum Glow Up The flashes are frozen, it’s greasy, look The kadhai and the pot demanded a lot of rubbing You rubbed it a lot, now it will be easy to clean it No-Rubbing, No-Fuss Max Liquid Three multiple cleaning Hello everyone and thank you for being here Today, I am entitled to as much as I want on this scholarship The same is the friendship of my two special friends. Candy is made for this sweetness which contains Special brown and white sugar and caramel Sweetness is that special sweetness in candy which is very sweet And I am not asking you, ask yourself Saya Gold Beauty Cream said that the face is so fair Clearly Sya Gold Beauty Cream Coke Pick Up Scan and find the code under the button gap call me with code 032 cocacola fee A chance to win match tickets or Coke prizes Get this offer on Sprite as well as Coca Cola The new A Beauty Cream is a victory of faith Magical Formula New Ra wi fur Almet Now go ahead and glow with this new wonder Beauty Cream sir what all have I done in the name of my country One piece of paper is enough to illuminate If you win then Pakistan will win go and show it your strength for the pride of your country The one who becomes strong waves the green flag Makes everyone in the world proud The field becomes the identity of the community, my strength This became my identity which strengthened Pakistan That steel grade 6 bar has a higher strength Tareen Mayar Only then do we win with strength and Every strong part makes the feet stronger Pakistan is our Intro Hello Everyone and Thank You for Being Here today, as much as I am entitled to on this scholarship It is as much the friendship between my two special friends Candy is made for this sweetness in which It is special for brown and white sugar and camel Sweetness is that special sweetness in candy which is very sweet And where will this Jhua (mind) dissolve in my heart? How is this magic did the opus take my heart O I took the chocolate of the dil people just says a lot hain naya gluta bright beauty cream Unlock your beauty, include it in Gluta Thiane With Halic Acid And Amino Peptides that penetrate deep into the skin to brighten it and smooth Skin Beautiful of the osals Chocolate Bus Keep me glowing in the sunshine keep glow end Lovely Serum Cream Its Multi Vitamin Serum Goes deep and reduces blemishes three times Bright Glow Glow & Lovely Serum Cream I mean for sure this is the color no yes yes One thing is for sure that this color will be applied once I went on leave for years Wait, it is light on the pocket, Nipan lasts for years When the paint was applied then it became Asia number one Paint Brand Spicy Chicken This is the donut that knocks everybody out says The Specialist Mood Sabroso Spicy Chicken Doner King of the Ring Say It With Fingers Say It With Cadbury Mini Fingers your catberry now with biscuits Don’t ask me from her, ask me yourself Saya Gold Beauty The cream makes the face so transparent that it is clear Gold Beauty Cream Master Weather Resistant paint that will keep your home clean protecting the British walls from all effects of winter Mahfooz Master Weather Resistant will last long Jhalak Hand & Foot Beauty Cream in your hands And your feet get a perfect glow and smoothness Softness Glance Hand and Foot Beauty Cream My choice is always unique, every success is mine For your beauty with the right decisions My verdict Dew Beauty Cream Original Marhaba Jasha made according to the formula so that Live your life openly, openly, Gie Urgent Beauty Cream of all types Give fresh glow and fair complexion to the skin That’s why I am so beautiful and fair skinned Secret Urgent Beauty Cream It Hair Removal cream just apply, leave and remove And get silky smooth skin n hair removal Cream Naya Gluta Bright Beauty Cream Unlock your beauty, include it in Gluta Than with Hyalur Acid and Amino Peptides that penetrate deep into the skin to brighten it and smooth skin And uncle think about it, yes think, Ryan paints everything It is not expensive and is light on the pocket for years If the paint got applied then it got applied Paint Asia Number One Paint Brand Hail Mary Super Power this ally click i but to you by js mary super Power sentenced to 14 years in prison for PTI This was a case of 190 million pounds The decision is a shameful decision The decision has been taken by the political bug to orphan us I knew for months that he had to punish Khan When the decision was announced to Sahib, Khan Sahib laughed 190 million pounds were spent in reference PTI sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and a fine of Rs 10 lakh Bushra Bibi was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment Punishment of a fine of Rs. lakhs for not paying the fine For doing this, Bani PTI got additional 6 months imprisonment from Bushra The wife will have to serve 3 months more imprisonment Musra Bibi found guilty of PTI corruption I made a request to the court in advance Al-Qadh University brought under government control Judge Nasir Javed gave the order to take it Rana announced the decision in Addala Jail Bibi was arrested from the court room 190 million pound reference decision 18 The court had reserved the case on December 3 gave date but no decision I heard that the verdict was announced to Khan Saheb, then Khan Sir laughed, we could see the writing on the wall I was feeling sad, Khan sahab, neither am I sad I have won a few days and filed an appeal in the High Court Will do mad insha Allah Tala Khan sahab tune honge re saaf 90 million pound reference chairman announces to challenge the decision of PTI Bust Gohar said today’s decision There was no surprise when the verdict was announced Bani laughed and she was not sad at all He says despite this decision Muja will remain in jail but if commission within 7 days But if there is no rift then I felt very sad on account of Bani saying that today Punishment has already been given on date given that why the university today is a sad day that’s why Targeted he made a damp university 47 The government dislikes it because If these people have committed corruption then ask questions I want this money from Hassan Nawaz brother. taking Went to a court hearing in Pakistan Only PTI accepted the decision of dark day Opposition leader Omar is to be targeted Ayub says if you have any question then ask Hassan Nawaz Shibli Faraz says it is needed in the country The thief is free, not the power of law and order And innocent people are imprisoned, meaning PTI All the cases against us are political, we are against the law and Sheikh Makkas wants to follow the rule of law Akram says to the head of the biggest group This high court sentenced him for doing a wrong deed ending at the first court appearance The case is about Rana Sanala’s press conference After this I see no hope Now religious and You will be given both worldly education Wazir Aala will not be taught magic amulets Punjab Maryam Nawaz’s funeral in Okara Title: Girls of Al-Qaeda University Maryam Nawaz says come to us tomorrow too Saw his video today at Al Qaid University Al Qaid University came under my control The first minister took the land as a bribe Azam is the one who was expelled for taking bribe Gaya Tehreek Insaaf had the right to They had to go to give evidence in their defense His name was needed as a witness in defence It is also known that this pressman has nothing to say had nothing, now they have this right that that appeal file Let justice become prevalent today Vifa could not prove PTI’s innocence that Law Minister Azam Nazir Tarr says This open ended relationship with the country did not work PTI had a chat case, now it is just an appeal The minister has the right, this much is what Ata Tar says today After this no one in Pakistan has been as big as this He will think 100 times before doing corruption The biggest corruption scandal of the country till date their hands are stained with corruption The impact of the verdict on Muja Karray spirituality is not taught to the envelope which was once stolen in Pakistan the approval of the incident which is from someone in the cabinet Imran Khan did not need to take this this nausar baaz did the same hai fadiya Minister of Defense declared PTI a free country Diya said to grab the stolen goods PTI’s demand was approved by the cabinet The prisoners should be released through execution order The courts have given the punishment, only the courts can give relief can It’s my fault, Dalal Chaudhary He said it was difficult for him to survive in this case PTI people also knew what the decision was The punishment for giving NRO to PTI is to come Tasur should also end I went to your show yesterday too and told you to decorate both of them because it was an open and shut case That day too I saw Khan saheb inside the cabinet even when this came up on the agenda Was not a part of the agenda, suddenly the agenda came The envelope was not opened it was said that The contract is done and there is no issue with it yes PTI and Bushra Bibi were also said yesterday will be punished, says Senator Faisal Bawda NCA had said that this money belongs to Pakistan There is a need to play religious card in this matter A shameful attempt was made even in the highest court This decision will not end the rule and Both PTI people want water PTI He remained in jail, from today he will be pardoned Trump on January 20 is a drama and a joke They will be disappointed if their card does not arrive Today’s decision proves that PTI is a To what extent does Bani PTI have bad intentions No person is out despite being sentenced Wazir turned out to be the son of Sharjeel Memon, says Bani PTI took revenge on the opposition Bani was targeted by the actions PTI has control over the country through the NAB wanted Punjab rule in his presence Fara Gogi was running PTI with a deliberate intention Attempt to target N under conspiracy that he had canceled his first press conference
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
The article examines why autocratic leaders, despite undermining democratic principles, often retain popular support. The author argues that voters prioritize tangible economic benefits, like increased wages or pensions, over abstract concepts such as democratic governance. This prioritization is exacerbated by autocrats’ manipulation of media and the use of scapegoating narratives to deflect blame for economic hardships. Furthermore, the article highlights how appeals to national identity and the cultivation of fear and resentment can further solidify support for such leaders, even among those who recognize the erosion of democracy. Finally, the piece suggests that progressive actors must address both the emotional appeals of autocrats and the need for concrete economic improvements to counter this trend.
FAQ: The Allure of Autocrats in Democratic Societies
1. Why do voters choose leaders who undermine democracy, even if they value democratic principles?
This seemingly paradoxical behavior stems from voters prioritizing concrete interests over abstract principles. While many citizens theoretically appreciate democracy, they often prioritize immediate, tangible benefits like economic improvements or targeted social programs. Autocratic leaders, understanding this, strategically implement policies that directly benefit specific groups, securing their support despite their undemocratic actions.
2. How do autocrats manipulate voters’ perception of the economy?
Even in struggling economies, autocrats can deflect blame by controlling key media outlets and constructing scapegoating narratives. They often introduce popular economic policies close to elections, associating those benefits with their leadership. Additionally, voters’ perceptions of economic conditions often align with their party affiliation, leading supporters to view the economy more favorably under their chosen leader.
3. Beyond economic incentives, how else do autocrats gain and maintain power?
Autocrats effectively exploit fear and resentment within society. They manufacture a sense of threat, often by targeting external groups like immigrants or internal “enemies” such as liberal elites or minorities. This strategy allows them to frame democratic norms and institutions as obstacles to national security and justify their dismantling.
4. How do autocrats convince voters to tolerate the erosion of democratic institutions?
By framing their actions as essential for protecting the “endangered nation,” autocrats can persuade even democratically-minded citizens to accept the weakening of democratic safeguards. This fear-based appeal often overrides concerns about abstract principles like the rule of law or freedom of the press.
5. Can you provide an example of this dynamic in action?
The re-election of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Turkey illustrates this phenomenon. Despite a severely weakened economy and demonstrably authoritarian actions, Erdoğan retained significant support. He appealed to nationalist sentiments and portrayed himself as the defender of Turkey against internal and external threats, successfully diverting attention from his dismantling of democratic institutions.
6. What is “clientelism” and how does it contribute to autocratic power?
Clientelism refers to the exchange of goods and services for political support. Autocrats use state resources to reward loyal followers with jobs, benefits, or direct cash payments in exchange for their votes. This creates a system of patronage that reinforces their power base.
7. Why do some voters prioritize a leader’s stance on specific issues over the health of democratic institutions?
Voters may prioritize a specific issue, like abortion rights or immigration, over broader concerns about democratic erosion if they believe that issue directly and profoundly impacts their lives or values. They may accept a leader’s undemocratic actions if they perceive those actions as necessary to achieve their desired outcome on that specific issue.
8. How can we counter the allure of autocrats in democratic societies?
Countering autocratic tendencies requires:
Recognizing the power of emotions like fear and resentment: We must acknowledge and address the emotional drivers behind support for autocrats and effectively counter their divisive narratives.
Focusing on tangible improvements in people’s lives: Advocating for policies that address concrete needs and improve living standards can diminish the appeal of autocrats who exploit economic hardship.
Defending democratic institutions and principles: We must actively defend and promote democratic values, emphasizing their importance for individual rights and societal well-being.
Understanding the Appeal of Autocrats in Democratic Societies
Short Answer Quiz
According to the article, why might voters choose to support a politician with authoritarian tendencies?
What does the author mean by “concrete” versus “abstract” interests? Provide an example of each.
Explain how autocrats exploit economic policies to garner support from voters.
How do autocrats utilize “scapegoating” as a political strategy?
Describe the methods autocrats use to undermine democracy in a subtle way.
Why might some voters tolerate the subversion of democratic norms by an autocratic leader?
What role do fear and resentment play in the success of autocratic leaders?
How do autocrats manipulate the concept of “national identity” to their advantage?
What strategies does the author suggest progressive actors employ to counter the appeal of autocrats?
Based on the article, what is the “Lex Tusk” and how does it relate to the author’s argument?
Answer Key
Voters may prioritize concrete, tangible benefits over abstract democratic principles, leading them to support authoritarian leaders who promise economic improvements or cater to their specific needs.
“Concrete” interests refer to immediate, tangible benefits individuals experience, such as salary increases or tax breaks. “Abstract” interests are broader principles or values, like democracy or rule of law, whose impact on individuals may be less direct.
Autocrats strategically implement policies like minimum wage increases or tax cuts before elections to create a sense of economic well-being associated with their rule, influencing voters to support them.
Autocrats use scapegoating by blaming external or internal enemies, such as immigrants or political opponents, for societal problems, diverting attention from their own failings and consolidating support.
They subtly erode democratic institutions by manipulating judicial appointments, controlling media narratives, and suppressing dissent in legislative bodies, making it difficult for citizens to recognize the gradual erosion of their freedoms.
Some voters might tolerate democratic backsliding if they believe it’s necessary to protect the “endangered nation” from perceived threats, prioritizing security and stability over democratic processes.
Autocrats exploit pre-existing fears and resentments within society, targeting groups like minorities or “elites” as scapegoats, and presenting themselves as strong leaders who can protect the nation from these perceived threats.
Autocrats manipulate national identity by framing themselves as defenders of traditional values and cultural homogeneity, often against perceived external or internal threats, thereby justifying their authoritarian actions.
The author suggests progressive actors acknowledge the emotional appeal of fear and resentment in politics while focusing on delivering concrete improvements to citizens’ lives, offering tangible benefits alongside democratic values.
While the article doesn’t explicitly explain the “Lex Tusk,” it uses it as an example of manipulating public sentiment against a political opponent. The law likely aimed to discredit and undermine former Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, demonstrating how autocrats use legal maneuvers for political gain.
Essay Questions
Analyze the role of economic factors in shaping voter behavior and explain how autocrats leverage this to maintain power.
Discuss the strategies autocrats use to erode democratic norms and institutions while maintaining a facade of democratic legitimacy.
Evaluate the effectiveness of appealing to national identity and fear as political tools for consolidating power.
How can progressive forces effectively counter the appeal of autocratic leaders who offer concrete benefits while undermining democratic principles?
Discuss the ethical implications of prioritizing concrete personal interests over abstract democratic values in a democratic society.
Glossary of Key Terms
Autocrat: A ruler who possesses absolute power and authority, often governing without regard for democratic principles or the rule of law.
Clientelism: A system of political patronage where goods and services are exchanged for political support, often involving the use of state resources for personal gain.
Concrete Interests: Tangible and immediate benefits that directly impact individuals, such as economic improvements or access to specific services.
Abstract Interests: Broader principles, values, or ideals that may not have immediate, tangible effects on individuals, such as democracy, freedom of speech, or rule of law.
Scapegoating: Blaming an individual or group for societal problems or failures, often unjustly, to deflect responsibility or garner support by exploiting prejudice and fear.
Subversion of Democracy: Actions taken to undermine or weaken democratic institutions, processes, or values, often gradually and subtly, leading to a decline in democratic freedoms and governance.
National Identity: A shared sense of belonging to a particular nation, often based on factors like culture, language, history, or ethnicity, which can be manipulated for political purposes.
Progressive Actors: Individuals or groups advocating for social, political, or economic reforms aimed at promoting equality, justice, and democratic values.
Understanding Autocrats’ Electoral Success: A Deep Dive
Source 1: Excerpts from “Undemocratic, but still successful with voters – Democracy and society | IPS Journal” by Filip Milačić
I. The Paradox of Authoritarian Support: This section introduces the puzzling phenomenon of voters supporting autocratic leaders despite their undermining of democratic principles and institutions, using the example of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s re-election in Turkey amidst economic hardship and democratic backsliding.
II. Prioritizing the Concrete: This section explains that voters often prioritize concrete, tangible benefits over abstract democratic principles. Autocrats exploit this by implementing policies like minimum wage increases or tax breaks, especially before elections, to directly appeal to voters’ immediate needs.
III. Clientelism and the Illusion of Benefit: This section explores how autocrats utilize clientelism, the exchange of goods and services for political support, to secure loyalty by providing jobs and benefits to supporters, further solidifying their base despite their undemocratic practices.
IV. The Abstraction of Democratic Erosion: This section argues that the gradual subversion of democratic institutions, such as judicial independence and freedom of the press, is often perceived as abstract and less impactful by voters, allowing autocrats to erode democracy without significant public backlash.
V. Weaponizing Fear and Resentment: This section examines how autocrats manipulate fear and resentment by creating narratives of “endangered nations” threatened by external or internal enemies. This allows them to frame democratic norms as obstacles to national security and justify their authoritarian actions.
VI. The “Endangered Nation” Trope: This section highlights how the narrative of protecting the “endangered nation” transcends national boundaries, as seen in the support for Donald Trump despite his attacks on the rule of law, driven by anxieties surrounding national identity and cultural change.
VII. Countering Autocratic Strategies: The concluding section suggests that progressive actors must address the emotional appeal of fear and resentment while also focusing on concrete improvements to citizens’ lives. Ignoring these factors allows autocrats to exploit public anxieties and maintain their hold on power.
Briefing Doc: The Appeal of Autocrats in Democratic Societies
The Paradox of Voter Choice: Even in the face of democratic erosion and economic hardship, voters often re-elect autocratic leaders.
Prioritizing Concrete over Abstract Interests: Voters frequently prioritize tangible benefits over abstract concepts like democratic principles.
The Power of Fear and Resentment: Autocrats successfully exploit fear and resentment towards perceived enemies to justify their actions and solidify their support base.
Key Ideas and Facts:
Concrete Benefits Trump Abstract Principles: Autocrats understand that many voters prioritize immediate, tangible benefits over long-term, abstract concerns. This explains why policies like minimum wage increases, tax breaks, or targeted social benefits can outweigh concerns about democratic backsliding. Milačić argues that “many voters choose concrete interests over abstract ones.”
Economic Hardship Doesn’t Guarantee Electoral Defeat: While economic struggles can hurt incumbents, autocrats can often manipulate public perception through controlled media, scapegoating, and strategic economic policies implemented before elections.
The “Endangered Nation” Narrative: Autocrats skillfully create narratives of an “endangered nation” threatened by internal or external forces. This allows them to frame the suppression of democratic norms as necessary to protect the nation, making voters more tolerant of their actions. “If they are told that this has been done in the name of protecting the ‘endangered nation’, even democratically conscious voters become more tolerant to such behavior,” writes Milačić.
Exploiting Fear and Resentment: By identifying clear enemies—whether foreign powers, immigrants, or domestic groups—autocrats tap into existing anxieties and resentments. This allows them to position themselves as protectors, further solidifying their support.
Lessons for Progressives: Milačić concludes that progressives must acknowledge the power of emotions like fear and resentment in politics and focus on concrete improvements to citizens’ lives. Ignoring these factors makes it “far too easy for the autocrats.”
Key Quotes:
“What the new autocrats around the world understood very well is this: many voters choose concrete interests over abstract ones.”
“Those who do recognise how subverting democracy damages their interest, too, can be swayed. If they are told that this has been done in the name of protecting the ‘endangered nation’, even democratically conscious voters become more tolerant to such behaviour.”
“The protection of the ‘endangered nation’ thus becomes a primary goal that everything else is subordinated to – even in established democracies.”
Implications:
This analysis sheds light on the complex factors contributing to the continued success of autocratic leaders in democratic societies. It highlights the need for pro-democracy forces to address not only economic concerns but also the emotional anxieties and narratives that fuel support for authoritarianism.
Autocrats succeed because they appeal to voters’ concrete interests rather than abstract ones like democratic principles [1]. They often implement policies that improve voters’ living standards right before elections [2]. Some examples include minimum wage increases, pay raises for government employees, pension increases, child allowance increases, and tax breaks for the wealthy [2]. In addition to appealing to the economic interests of voters, autocrats succeed because they create a sense of fear and resentment by manufacturing a clear enemy of the nation [3]. Autocrats then present themselves as the protectors of the nation’s interests, arguing that democratic principles are obstacles that need to be eliminated [3]. This can appeal to voters who prioritize the protection of national identity over democratic principles [4]. For example, many Americans supported Donald Trump even though he undermined the rule of law, because they saw him as protecting national identity [4].
Voters engage in trade-offs when deciding which candidate to support in an election [1]. It is rare for one candidate to meet all of a voter’s preferences [1]. Voters often choose concrete interests over abstract interests [1]. For example, voters may focus on policies that will improve their living standards, like a tax break, rather than the subversion of democracy which can feel too abstract to be perceived as a threat to their personal interests [2, 3].
However, even voters who recognize that the subversion of democracy damages their interests can be swayed by arguments that focus on the protection of the nation [3]. This is because autocrats often portray themselves as protectors of the nation and manufacture threats, such as:
External enemies, like the West or immigrants [4].
Internal enemies, like liberal elites and minority groups [4].
Autocrats then argue that democratic principles are obstacles to protecting the nation and must be removed [4]. In this context, voters may prioritize national identity over democratic principles, even if it means overlooking actions that undermine the rule of law [5]. For example, some Americans supported Donald Trump, despite his disregard for the rule of law, because they believed he was protecting national identity by securing a conservative majority in the Supreme Court [5].
The erosion of democracy happens when voters prioritize concrete interests like economic benefits over abstract principles like the rule of law. [1] Autocrats exploit this by implementing policies that improve living standards right before elections. [2] They offer things like minimum wage increases, pay raises for government employees, and tax breaks. [2]
Autocrats also erode democracy by framing its principles as obstacles to protecting the nation from perceived threats. [3] They often manufacture these threats by creating enemies, both foreign and domestic. [3] Examples include immigrants, “the West,” liberal elites, and minorities. [3]
When voters perceive a threat to the nation, they may tolerate the subversion of democracy in the name of security. [3, 4] This is exemplified by voters who overlooked Donald Trump’s undermining of the rule of law because they believed he was protecting American national identity. [5] This pattern is also evident in countries like Hungary, Turkey, Serbia, and Poland. [5]
Autocrats often exploit fear and resentment to erode democratic principles. They achieve this by:
Creating a clear enemy of the nation. This enemy can be external, such as immigrants or “the West,” or internal, such as liberal elites or minority groups [1].
Positioning themselves as protectors of the nation’s interests. Autocrats claim that they are the only ones who can effectively deal with the perceived threat [1].
Presenting democratic norms and principles as obstacles to national security. They argue that these principles must be eliminated to protect the nation from the manufactured threat [1].
This strategy can be effective in swaying even democratically-minded voters. When people feel threatened, they may be willing to sacrifice abstract principles like the rule of law in exchange for the concrete promise of security. For example, some Americans were willing to overlook Donald Trump’s undermining of the rule of law because they believed he was protecting American national identity by securing a conservative majority in the Supreme Court [2]. The same logic has played out in countries like Hungary, Turkey, Serbia, and Poland [2].
Therefore, the successful activation of fear and resentment is a key pillar of autocratic success.
Voters often make decisions based on a trade-off between concrete and abstract interests, and autocrats have successfully exploited this dynamic [1].
Concrete interests are tangible and directly affect voters’ lives. Examples include economic policies that improve living standards, such as minimum wage increases, pay raises, and tax breaks [1, 2]. Voters concretely feel the positive impact of these policies [2].
Abstract interests, like democracy and the rule of law, are less tangible and can feel too abstract for voters to perceive as a direct threat to their personal interests [1, 3].
Autocrats often implement policies that cater to voters’ concrete interests shortly before elections to associate those policies with themselves [2]. They may also misuse state resources to reward loyal voters with jobs and benefits in exchange for votes [2]. At the same time, they downplay or obscure the erosion of democratic principles, making it seem less important than the immediate benefits they offer [1, 3].
Voters who recognize the damage caused by the erosion of democracy can still be swayed by appeals to the protection of the nation [3]. Autocrats exploit this by creating a sense of fear and resentment by manufacturing threats in the form of external or internal enemies [4]. They then present themselves as protectors of the nation and argue that democratic principles are obstacles to national security that need to be removed [4].
This strategy can be effective because it triggers an emotional response that can override concerns about abstract principles [4]. When voters feel threatened, they may prioritize national identity and security over the rule of law, even if it means overlooking actions that undermine democracy [5].
Autocrats maintain voter support despite undermining democracy by exploiting the tension between voters’ concrete and abstract interests. They appeal to voters’ immediate, tangible needs and desires, while simultaneously downplaying or obscuring the erosion of democratic principles, making it seem less consequential than the concrete benefits they deliver [1].
Autocrats achieve this through several strategies:
Economic Incentives: Autocrats often implement policies that improve living standards right before elections, such as minimum wage increases, pay raises for government employees, pension increases, and tax breaks [2]. These policies create a concrete, positive impact that voters can directly feel, associating the autocrat with economic well-being.
Clientelism: Autocrats also engage in clientelism, using state resources to provide jobs and benefits to loyal voters in exchange for their support [2]. This creates a direct link between supporting the autocrat and receiving tangible rewards, further reinforcing the focus on concrete gains.
Manufacturing Threats and Appealing to National Identity: Autocrats exploit fear and resentment by creating a sense of threat, often by manufacturing external or internal enemies. They might target immigrants, “the West,” liberal elites, or minority groups [3]. By positioning themselves as protectors of the nation against these perceived threats, they appeal to voters’ desire for security and national identity, which can override concerns about abstract principles like the rule of law [3-5]. They argue that democratic norms and principles are obstacles to effectively addressing these threats and must be eliminated [3].
Controlling the Narrative: Autocrats often control key media outlets, allowing them to shape the narrative and downplay or justify their actions [1]. They can use these platforms to promote their achievements, demonize opponents, and spread disinformation, further obscuring the erosion of democracy.
Ultimately, autocrats succeed because they understand that many voters prioritize concrete interests over abstract principles [1]. By delivering tangible benefits, appealing to emotions like fear and resentment, and controlling the narrative, they can maintain support even as they undermine democratic institutions.
Autocrats effectively utilize concrete benefits to sway voters by strategically implementing policies that directly improve their living standards, particularly before elections. This tactic serves to create a tangible, positive impact that voters can readily experience and associate with the autocratic leader.
Here are some key ways autocrats use concrete benefits:
Pre-Election Policy Implementation: Autocrats often time the implementation of economically favorable policies, like minimum wage increases, pay raises for government employees, pension increases, and tax cuts, to occur just before elections. This creates a clear association between the positive economic impact and the autocrat’s leadership in the minds of voters [1].
Direct Association with Improved Living Standards: Voters “concretely feel” the benefits of these policies, such as having more money in their pockets [1, 2]. This tangible experience outweighs the abstract concerns about the erosion of democratic principles, which may feel distant or less directly impactful [2].
Misuse of State Resources: Autocrats may go beyond policy implementation and engage in clientelism, using state resources to directly benefit loyal voters. This can include offering jobs, state benefits, and even cash handouts in exchange for votes [1]. This strategy creates a strong incentive for voters to support the autocrat, linking their personal gain to the continuation of the regime.
By focusing on delivering tangible, immediate rewards, autocrats shift voters’ attention away from the potentially negative long-term consequences of their actions, such as the erosion of democratic institutions and the rule of law. They successfully exploit the common tendency for individuals to prioritize concrete, easily understood benefits over abstract principles, solidifying their hold on power despite their undemocratic practices.
Autocrats effectively exploit fear and resentment to maintain their grip on power, even as they undermine democratic principles. They achieve this by strategically manipulating public perception and creating a climate of anxiety that allows them to position themselves as indispensable protectors of the nation. Here’s how they do it:
Manufacturing Threats: Autocrats deliberately construct a sense of threat, often by fabricating or exaggerating dangers from external or internal enemies. They might target immigrants, portray “the West” as hostile, or demonize liberal elites and minority groups. This manufactured threat creates an atmosphere of fear and insecurity, priming the public to accept authoritarian measures as necessary for protection. [1, 2]
Positioning Themselves as Protectors: Having created a sense of fear, autocrats present themselves as the sole guardians capable of safeguarding the nation from these perceived threats. They cultivate an image of strength and decisiveness, claiming that they alone possess the will and the means to protect the people. This strategy effectively shifts public attention away from their undemocratic actions and towards the promise of security. [1, 2]
Framing Democratic Principles as Obstacles: Autocrats cleverly portray democratic norms and principles, such as the rule of law, checks and balances, and freedom of the press, as obstacles to national security. They argue that these principles hinder their ability to effectively combat the manufactured threats and must be curtailed or eliminated for the sake of the nation’s survival. This framing allows them to justify their authoritarian actions and erode democratic institutions while appearing to act in the best interests of the people. [2]
Exploiting Existing Social Divisions: Autocrats often exploit existing social divisions, such as ethnic or religious tensions, to further amplify fear and resentment. They may scapegoat minority groups, blaming them for economic woes or societal problems. This tactic not only distracts from their own failings but also rallies support from those who feel aggrieved or threatened, consolidating their power base. [2, 3]
By masterfully manipulating fear and resentment, autocrats create a political climate where the public is willing to tolerate, or even endorse, authoritarian measures in exchange for the perceived promise of security and stability. This allows them to maintain power and erode democratic institutions, even in the face of widespread dissatisfaction or opposition.
Voters often prioritize concrete interests over abstract interests, and autocrats have successfully exploited this dynamic to maintain power even while undermining democracy [1].
Concrete interests are tangible benefits that directly and immediately impact voters’ lives, such as:
Economic policies that improve living standards, including minimum wage increases, pay raises for government employees, and tax breaks [2]. Voters feel these effects concretely, associating them with the incumbent leader.
Abstract interests are principles and values that are less tangible and may feel less directly relevant to voters’ daily lives [1, 3]. These include:
Democratic principles and the rule of law, which can be too abstract for voters to perceive as directly impacting them.
When faced with a choice, voters may be more likely to choose a leader who offers concrete benefits, even if that leader is eroding democratic principles. This is because the benefits are immediate and tangible, while the negative consequences of democratic erosion may seem distant or uncertain [1].
Autocrats understand this dynamic and exploit it by:
Implementing policies that improve living standards shortly before elections [2].
Misusing state resources to provide jobs and benefits to loyal voters [2].
Downplaying or obscuring their erosion of democratic principles [1, 3].
They also frame the protection of the “endangered nation” as a concrete interest, creating a sense of fear and resentment by targeting external and internal enemies [3, 4]. This allows them to present democratic norms as obstacles to national security, justifying their actions and swaying even democratically-minded voters [3-5].
Autocrats skillfully manipulate voters’ perceptions of economic hardship to deflect blame and maintain their hold on power. They achieve this by employing several strategies:
1. Controlling the Narrative: Autocrats often maintain control over key media outlets, which allows them to shape the narrative surrounding economic issues [1]. They can downplay the severity of economic struggles, highlight positive economic indicators while ignoring negative ones, and blame external factors or scapegoats for any hardship. By controlling the information voters receive, autocrats can influence how they perceive the state of the economy and deflect responsibility for any shortcomings.
2. Scapegoating: When economic hardship occurs, autocrats often employ a scapegoating narrative, blaming external forces or specific groups for the problems [1]. This could involve targeting “the West,” immigrants, or other convenient enemies to shift blame away from their own policies or mismanagement. By providing a simple explanation for complex economic issues, they offer voters a sense of understanding and a target for their frustration, effectively diverting anger away from the regime.
3. Emphasizing Concrete Benefits: Even in the face of economic hardship, autocrats can strategically implement policies that provide concrete, tangible benefits to voters, particularly in the lead-up to elections [2]. This could include minimum wage increases, pay raises for government employees, pension increases, or tax breaks. These measures create a direct, positive impact that voters can easily associate with the autocrat’s leadership, even if the overall economic situation remains challenging.
4. Exploiting Partisan Bias: Even in countries with a free press, voters’ perceptions of the economy can be influenced by their partisan affiliations [1]. People tend to view the economic situation more favorably when their preferred party is in power, even if objective indicators suggest otherwise. Autocrats can leverage this bias by highlighting any positive economic developments, no matter how small, and framing them as evidence of their competent leadership. They can also appeal to voters’ loyalty and shared identity, reinforcing the perception that they are working in their best interests, even during times of economic hardship.
Voters frequently prioritize concrete interests, which are tangible and immediate benefits, over abstract interests, such as democratic principles, which can feel distant or less impactful on their daily lives [1]. This dynamic allows autocratic leaders to maintain power even while undermining democracy [1, 2].
Autocrats exploit this tendency by strategically focusing on concrete benefits such as:
Economic policies that improve living standards before elections, like minimum wage increases, pay raises for government employees, and tax breaks [3]. These policies provide voters with tangible, positive experiences that they directly associate with the autocrat’s leadership [1, 3].
Clientelism, where state resources are used to provide jobs and benefits to loyal voters in exchange for their support [3]. This creates a strong incentive for voters to prioritize their personal gain over abstract principles [3].
Simultaneously, autocrats downplay or obscure the erosion of democratic principles, making them seem less consequential than the concrete benefits they deliver [1, 4]. They also present the protection of the “endangered nation” as a concrete interest, exploiting fear and resentment by targeting external and internal enemies [4-6]. This allows them to portray democratic norms as obstacles to national security and justify their actions, even to democratically-minded voters [4-6].
For example, the article mentions how some Americans overlooked Donald Trump’s undermining of the rule of law because they saw him as the protector of national identity, who secured a conservative majority in the Supreme Court [6]. This demonstrates how fear and resentment, often rooted in concrete concerns about national identity, can override abstract concerns about democratic principles [6].
In essence, autocrats succeed because they understand that many voters prioritize what they can feel and see immediately over abstract principles that may feel less relevant to their daily lives. By delivering tangible benefits and exploiting anxieties, they can maintain support even while eroding democratic institutions.
Voters might prioritize national identity over democratic principles when they perceive a threat to their understanding of the nation’s values, culture, or way of life. This perception can be manipulated by autocratic leaders who exploit fear and resentment to consolidate their power. Here’s why this dynamic occurs:
Concrete vs. Abstract Interests: As discussed previously, voters often prioritize concrete, tangible benefits over abstract principles like the rule of law or democratic processes [1]. National identity, especially when framed as being under threat, can feel more concrete and personally relevant than abstract democratic principles.
Fear and Resentment: Autocrats effectively utilize fear and resentment by creating a sense of threat from perceived enemies, such as immigrants, “the West,” or liberal elites [2]. This manufactured threat can trigger a defensive response, leading people to prioritize protecting their understanding of national identity over democratic principles that might be portrayed as hindering that protection.
Framing Democratic Principles as Obstacles: Autocrats skillfully portray democratic norms and principles as obstacles to national security, arguing that they hinder their ability to effectively combat the manufactured threats [2]. This framing allows them to justify their actions and erode democratic institutions while appearing to act in the best interests of the people and their national identity.
The Promise of Security: By positioning themselves as the sole guardians capable of safeguarding the nation from these perceived threats, autocrats offer voters a sense of security in exchange for accepting their erosion of democratic principles [2]. In the face of a perceived existential threat, voters may be willing to compromise on democratic values for the promise of stability and protection of their national identity.
The example of Donald Trump’s support in the United States, despite his undermining of the rule of law, illustrates this point [3]. Some Americans prioritized his perceived protection of national identity, particularly his actions on issues like abortion and the Supreme Court, over concerns about democratic principles. This demonstrates how potent the appeal to national identity can be, even in established democracies, and how it can overshadow concerns about autocratic behavior.
Autocrats effectively utilize fear to justify their undermining of democratic principles by creating a sense of urgency and threat that makes their actions seem necessary for the protection of the nation. They achieve this by:
Manufacturing or exaggerating threats, often from external or internal enemies. These enemies could be immigrants, “the West,” liberal elites, or minority groups. This manufactured threat creates an atmosphere of fear and insecurity, making the public more receptive to authoritarian measures. [1-3]
Presenting themselves as the sole protectors capable of safeguarding the nation from these perceived threats. They cultivate an image of strength and decisiveness, claiming that they alone possess the will and means to protect the people. This allows them to frame their actions, even those that erode democratic institutions, as necessary for the nation’s survival. [3]
Portraying democratic norms and principles as obstacles to national security. They argue that these principles, such as the rule of law, checks and balances, and freedom of the press, hinder their ability to effectively combat the manufactured threats and must be curtailed for the sake of the nation. [3]
Exploiting existing social divisions, such as ethnic or religious tensions, to further amplify fear and resentment. They may scapegoat minority groups, blaming them for economic woes or societal problems, which distracts from their own failings and consolidates their power base by rallying support from those who feel aggrieved or threatened. [3]
By appealing to fear, autocrats create a climate where the public is willing to tolerate, or even endorse, their undermining of democracy in exchange for the perceived promise of security and stability. This allows them to maintain power and erode democratic institutions while appearing to act in the best interests of the people. [4]
Some voters prioritize national identity over democratic principles when they perceive a threat to their understanding of the nation’s values, culture, or way of life [1, 2]. This perception can be manipulated by autocratic leaders who exploit anxieties to consolidate their power. They frame the protection of the “endangered nation” as a concrete interest that supersedes abstract principles like the rule of law [1, 3].
Here’s why this dynamic takes place:
Concrete vs. Abstract: Voters often prioritize concrete, tangible interests over abstract principles. National identity, especially when framed as being under threat, feels more concrete and personally relevant than democratic principles, which can feel distant or less impactful [1, 4].
Fear as a Tool: Autocrats exploit fear and resentment by portraying democratic norms as obstacles to national security [2]. They create a sense of urgency and threat by manufacturing enemies, such as immigrants, “the West,” or internal groups like liberal elites or minorities [2]. This makes their actions, even those that erode democratic institutions, seem necessary to protect the nation [2].
The Promise of Security: By positioning themselves as the sole protectors capable of safeguarding the nation from these perceived threats, autocrats offer voters a sense of security in exchange for accepting their erosion of democratic principles [2, 3]. In the face of a perceived existential threat, voters may be willing to compromise democratic values for the promise of stability and protection of their national identity [3].
For example, the article mentions how some Americans overlooked Donald Trump’s undermining of the rule of law because they viewed him as the protector of national identity, particularly through his actions on issues like abortion and the Supreme Court [3]. This illustrates how the appeal to national identity, especially when tied to concrete concerns or anxieties, can overshadow concerns about autocratic behavior, even in established democracies.
Autocrats employ several tactics to cultivate fear and resentment among voters, ultimately manipulating these emotions to justify their undermining of democratic principles and consolidate their power. Here are some key strategies:
Manufacturing or Exaggerating Threats: Autocrats often create a sense of fear and urgency by identifying or fabricating threats to the nation, which could come from external or internal enemies. These enemies can be real or imagined, and their threat level is frequently amplified for political gain. [1, 2]
External Enemies: Autocrats may point to threats from other countries, international organizations, or global trends that challenge their vision of national identity or security. Examples include blaming “the West” for economic woes, cultural shifts, or political interference. [2] The article specifically mentions “Brussels,” as a target of this tactic. [2]
Internal Enemies: Autocrats often identify enemies within their own societies, targeting groups that can be easily scapegoated or portrayed as threats to the dominant culture or way of life. [2] These internal enemies can include:
Liberal Elites: Autocrats frequently demonize intellectuals, academics, journalists, or artists who promote critical thinking, dissent, or alternative viewpoints. They may accuse these groups of being out of touch with the “real people” or of promoting ideas that undermine national unity.
Minority Groups: Ethnic, religious, or sexual minorities are often targeted as scapegoats, blamed for societal problems, economic challenges, or threats to traditional values. This tactic exploits existing social divisions and prejudices to foster resentment and fear among the majority population. [2] The article specifically mentions immigrants from Muslim countries as a frequent target. [2]
Controlling the Narrative: Autocrats often maintain strict control over media outlets, particularly state-run media, to shape the information disseminated to the public. [3] They use this control to:
Amplify the Perceived Threat: Media outlets under autocratic control will consistently highlight the dangers posed by the identified enemies, exaggerating their power, influence, or malicious intentions.
Suppress Dissenting Voices: Critical voices that challenge the autocrat’s narrative or attempt to provide a more balanced perspective are silenced, censored, or discredited. Journalists, academics, or opposition figures who dare to speak out may face intimidation, harassment, imprisonment, or even violence. [4]
Promote Propaganda: State-controlled media often engages in propaganda efforts, disseminating biased information, disinformation, and conspiracy theories designed to reinforce the narrative of fear and demonize the chosen enemies.
Appealing to Nostalgia and Grievances: Autocrats often tap into feelings of nostalgia for a perceived “better past” when the nation was supposedly stronger, more unified, or culturally homogenous. They exploit grievances, real or perceived, related to social or economic changes, blaming these changes on the identified enemies.
Loss of Status or Power: This tactic is particularly effective in societies that have undergone significant transformations, such as the decline of traditional industries, shifts in global power dynamics, or increased diversity due to immigration. Autocrats appeal to those who feel they have lost status, power, or economic security due to these changes.
Cultural Anxiety: They may also exploit anxieties related to cultural change, framing the perceived enemies as threats to traditional values, religious beliefs, or national identity. This is particularly effective in societies with strong attachments to traditional norms or a history of cultural homogeneity.
By skillfully combining these tactics, autocrats can create a climate of fear and resentment that allows them to justify their actions, even those that undermine democratic institutions. This manipulation of emotions can lead to public acceptance, or even support, for the erosion of democratic norms in exchange for the perceived promise of security and a return to a more idealized past.
Voters might overlook democratic backsliding, even when they value democracy, for several reasons, primarily because autocratic leaders skillfully manipulate their perceptions and priorities:
Prioritizing Concrete Needs over Abstract Principles: Voters often prioritize tangible, immediate benefits like economic improvements or perceived security over abstract democratic principles like the rule of law or freedom of the press. [1] Autocrats exploit this tendency by providing concrete benefits, such as minimum wage increases, tax breaks, or direct handouts to loyalists, especially before elections. [2] These actions create a tangible link between the autocrat’s rule and improved living standards, making voters less likely to focus on democratic erosion.
Fear and Resentment as Powerful Motivators: As discussed, autocrats effectively cultivate fear and resentment by: [3]
Creating a sense of threat from manufactured enemies, often targeting external groups like immigrants, “the West,” or international organizations. [3]
Scapegoating internal enemies like liberal elites or minority groups, blaming them for societal problems or economic woes. [3]
This manufactured threat makes voters more receptive to authoritarian measures presented as necessary for protection. The “protection of the ‘endangered nation’” becomes paramount, overriding concerns about democratic principles. [4, 5]
Framing Democratic Norms as Obstacles: Autocrats portray democratic principles like judicial independence or a free press as hindering their ability to effectively combat the manufactured threats. [3] They argue that these principles must be curtailed for the sake of national security and the protection of the nation, making their erosion seem justified to voters concerned about these threats.
Ignoring Subversion as Too Abstract: The subtle, gradual nature of democratic backsliding often makes it difficult for voters to perceive it as a direct threat to their personal interests. [4] Actions like purging the judiciary or controlling the media can seem abstract and distant, especially when contrasted with the concrete benefits provided by the autocrat. This makes it easier for voters to overlook these actions or rationalize them as necessary evils.
National Identity as a Powerful Force: When national identity is framed as being under threat, it can feel more concrete and personally relevant than abstract democratic principles. [5] This is particularly true when autocrats tie national identity to specific anxieties, such as economic insecurity, cultural change, or perceived threats to traditional values. As seen in the example of Donald Trump’s support in the United States, concerns about national identity, especially when linked to concrete policy outcomes like abortion or the Supreme Court, can overshadow concerns about democratic erosion. [5]
In essence, autocrats exploit the gap between abstract principles and concrete realities to maintain support while eroding democracy. By providing tangible benefits, stoking fear and resentment, and framing their actions as necessary for protecting the nation, they convince voters to overlook democratic backsliding, prioritizing immediate concerns and a sense of security over the long-term health of democratic institutions.
Autocrats employ a range of strategies to maintain power even as they erode democratic institutions. These tactics often involve appealing to voters’ concrete interests and anxieties, while simultaneously undermining the systems that could hold them accountable.
Here are some key strategies autocrats use to maintain power despite democratic erosion:
Appealing to Concrete Interests Over Abstract Principles: Autocrats recognize that many voters prioritize concrete, tangible benefits over abstract democratic principles. They exploit this tendency by:
Providing Economic Incentives: Autocrats often implement policies that provide direct economic benefits to specific groups of voters, particularly before elections. These can include minimum wage increases, pension increases, tax breaks, or targeted social welfare programs. These policies create a sense of tangible improvement associated with the autocrat’s rule, even if the overall economic situation is deteriorating. [1]
Engaging in Clientelism: This involves using state resources to reward loyal supporters with jobs, contracts, or other benefits in exchange for their votes. This creates a system of patronage that directly ties the well-being of individuals to the autocrat’s continued power. [2]
Manipulating Fear and Resentment: Autocrats skillfully cultivate fear and resentment among voters, creating a climate of anxiety that makes their actions seem necessary for the protection of the nation. This manipulation involves:
Creating a Threat Narrative: Autocrats manufacture or exaggerate threats, often from external or internal enemies, to generate a sense of fear and insecurity. These enemies can be other countries, international organizations, “the West,” or internal groups like liberal elites or minorities. [3, 4]
Positioning Themselves as Protectors: Autocrats portray themselves as the sole guardians capable of safeguarding the nation from these perceived threats. This creates a sense of dependence and reinforces the idea that their leadership is essential for survival. [2, 4]
Framing Democratic Principles as Obstacles: Autocrats argue that democratic norms and principles, such as the rule of law, checks and balances, and freedom of the press, hinder their ability to effectively combat the manufactured threats. This allows them to justify their erosion of these institutions as necessary for national security. [2, 4]
Controlling Information and Suppressing Dissent: Autocrats seek to control the flow of information and suppress dissenting voices to maintain their grip on power. This involves:
Controlling Media Outlets: Autocrats often maintain strict control over media outlets, especially state-run media, to shape the information disseminated to the public. They use this control to amplify the perceived threat, suppress critical voices, and promote propaganda that reinforces their narrative. [3]
Silencing Opposition: Autocrats target journalists, academics, opposition figures, and anyone who challenges their authority or narrative. They may use intimidation, harassment, imprisonment, or violence to silence dissent and discourage criticism. [5]
Undermining Judicial Independence: Autocrats often weaken the judiciary by packing courts with loyalists, purging independent judges, or ignoring court rulings that challenge their actions. This removes a crucial check on their power and allows them to operate with impunity. [5]
Exploiting National Identity: Autocrats often appeal to national identity, particularly when they can frame it as being under threat. They use this tactic to:
Unify and Mobilize Supporters: Appealing to national identity can create a sense of shared purpose and unity among voters. This allows autocrats to rally support for their policies and actions, even those that are undemocratic. [2, 4]
Justify Eroding Democratic Norms: The protection of the “endangered nation” becomes a primary goal that supersedes other concerns, including democratic principles. Autocrats argue that these principles must be sacrificed to ensure the survival and well-being of the nation. [6]
Target Out-Groups: Autocrats often define national identity in exclusive terms, identifying certain groups as “outsiders” or threats to the nation. This can include immigrants, ethnic or religious minorities, or political opponents. This tactic fosters division and resentment, creating scapegoats for societal problems and rallying support for the autocrat’s agenda. [4]
By skillfully combining these strategies, autocrats can maintain power despite eroding democratic institutions. They create a system where their rule appears essential for security and prosperity, while simultaneously silencing those who could challenge their authority.
Voters often prioritize concrete interests over abstract principles due to the following factors:
Tangibility and Immediacy: Concrete interests, like economic benefits or personal security, are tangible and have an immediate impact on people’s lives. These benefits are easily perceived and felt, making them more salient in voters’ minds [1]. Abstract principles, such as the rule of law or democratic norms, are often seen as more distant and less directly connected to their daily lives.
Complexity and Uncertainty: Understanding the complexities of democratic principles and their long-term implications requires a certain level of political knowledge and engagement [2]. Many voters may not have the time, resources, or inclination to fully grasp these complexities, making it easier to focus on immediate, tangible concerns.
Emotional Appeal: Concrete interests, particularly those related to economic well-being or security, tap into powerful emotions like fear and hope [1, 3]. Autocrats effectively exploit these emotions by framing their policies as directly addressing these concerns, making them more appealing to voters than abstract principles that may seem less emotionally resonant.
Short-Term Thinking: Voters often prioritize their immediate needs and concerns over long-term considerations. Concrete benefits, especially when delivered shortly before elections, can sway voters even if they come at the expense of long-term democratic stability [4]. The abstract, gradual nature of democratic backsliding makes it less noticeable and less urgent than immediate economic gains or perceived security threats.
In essence, the tangibility, emotional resonance, and immediacy of concrete interests make them more powerful motivators for many voters than abstract principles, especially when autocrats skillfully manipulate these factors to their advantage.
Autocrats employ various strategies to maintain power despite eroding democratic institutions, often by appealing to voters’ concrete needs and fears while undermining systems of accountability. [1, 2] Here are some key tactics:
Prioritizing Concrete Interests Over Abstract Principles: Autocrats recognize that many voters focus on tangible benefits over abstract democratic ideas. They exploit this by: [2]
Providing direct economic benefits: This might involve actions like raising the minimum wage, increasing pensions, offering tax breaks, or implementing social welfare programs, especially before elections. These policies link the autocrat’s rule to tangible improvements, even if the overall economy is struggling. [2, 3] For example, in Turkey, President Erdoğan implemented minimum wage increases and pay raises for government employees. [3] Other examples include pension increases in Serbia, child allowance increases in Poland, and tax breaks for the wealthy in the US. [3]
Engaging in Clientelism: This strategy uses state resources to reward loyal supporters with jobs, contracts, or other benefits in exchange for their votes. This creates a system where individuals’ well-being is directly tied to the autocrat’s continued power. [3, 4]
Manipulating Fear and Resentment: Autocrats create a climate of anxiety that makes their actions seem necessary for national protection. [5] This involves:
Creating a Threat Narrative: Autocrats manufacture or exaggerate threats, often from external or internal enemies, to generate fear and insecurity. These enemies can be other countries, international organizations, “the West,” or internal groups like liberal elites or minorities. [5]
Positioning Themselves as Protectors: Autocrats present themselves as the only ones capable of safeguarding the nation from these perceived threats. [5] This fosters a sense of dependence and reinforces the idea that their leadership is essential for survival.
Framing Democratic Principles as Obstacles: Autocrats argue that democratic norms like the rule of law or a free press hinder their ability to combat the manufactured threats. [5] This allows them to justify their erosion of these institutions as necessary for national security.
Exploiting National Identity: Autocrats appeal to national identity, especially when it can be framed as under threat. They use this to: [4, 5]
Unify and Mobilize Supporters: Appealing to national identity can create a sense of shared purpose and unity among voters. This allows autocrats to rally support for their policies, even undemocratic ones. [6]
Justify Eroding Democratic Norms: Protecting the “endangered nation” becomes a priority that overrides concerns about democratic principles. [4, 6] Autocrats argue that these principles must be sacrificed for national survival and well-being. A prime example of this is Donald Trump’s supporters in the US who prioritized concerns about national identity over his undermining of the rule of law. [6]
Target Out-Groups: Autocrats often define national identity in exclusive terms, identifying certain groups as “outsiders” or threats. [5] This can include immigrants, ethnic or religious minorities, or political opponents. This tactic fosters division and resentment, creating scapegoats for societal problems and rallying support for the autocrat’s agenda.
In essence, autocrats maintain power by exploiting the tension between abstract principles and concrete realities. They convince voters to prioritize immediate concerns and security over the long-term health of democratic institutions. [2]
Progressive movements face a significant challenge in countering autocratic manipulation of voters, which often relies on exploiting the gap between concrete interests and abstract principles. However, by understanding these tactics, progressives can develop strategies to effectively engage voters and advocate for democratic values. Here are some potential approaches:
1. Highlighting the Concrete Impacts of Democratic Erosion:
Progressives need to demonstrate the tangible, real-world consequences of democratic backsliding for ordinary people. Instead of focusing solely on abstract principles, they should connect these principles to concrete outcomes that voters care about, such as economic fairness, access to healthcare, quality education, environmental protection, and personal security.
For example, they could show how corruption enabled by weak rule of law leads to higher prices and fewer job opportunities, or how a suppressed free press limits access to information needed to make informed decisions about healthcare or education. [1, 2]
By making the connection between democratic principles and concrete benefits clearer, progressives can make a stronger case for their importance in improving people’s lives.
2. Countering Fear and Resentment with Hope and Inclusion:
Autocrats thrive on fear, division, and resentment. They exploit existing anxieties and prejudices to create scapegoats and justify their authoritarian measures. [3, 4]
Progressives need to offer an alternative vision based on hope, inclusion, and shared prosperity. They should challenge divisive narratives and promote messages that emphasize common ground, shared values, and the benefits of a diverse and inclusive society.
This involves directly addressing the legitimate concerns of voters who may be drawn to autocratic appeals, while offering solutions that strengthen democratic institutions and promote fairness and justice for all.
3. Focusing on Concrete Improvements in People’s Lives:
One of the most effective ways autocrats maintain support is by providing tangible economic benefits, often targeted at specific groups. [1, 5]
Progressives need to compete on this terrain by offering realistic and achievable policy proposals that address people’s economic needs and anxieties. This could include policies focused on job creation, wage growth, affordable housing, accessible healthcare, and quality education.
While emphasizing the importance of democratic principles, progressives must also demonstrate their commitment to improving people’s material conditions and providing concrete solutions to the challenges they face.
4. Exposing Autocratic Manipulation and Promoting Media Literacy:
Autocrats often manipulate information, control media outlets, and suppress dissenting voices to maintain their narrative and control. [2, 5]
Progressives need to actively expose these tactics and promote media literacy among voters. This involves educating people about how to identify misinformation, propaganda, and biased reporting.
It also requires supporting independent media outlets, fact-checking initiatives, and organizations that promote transparency and accountability in government.
5. Mobilizing and Engaging Citizens:
Countering autocratic manipulation requires an active and engaged citizenry. [6] Progressives need to mobilize and empower people to participate in the democratic process, hold their leaders accountable, and defend democratic institutions.
This involves building strong grassroots organizations, supporting civic education initiatives, and facilitating dialogue and engagement across different communities.
By adopting these strategies, progressive movements can more effectively counter autocratic manipulation of voters and build a more resilient and inclusive democracy. The key is to combine a strong defense of democratic principles with a concrete commitment to improving people’s lives, fostering hope and unity, and empowering citizens to participate in shaping their future.
Autocrats utilize a combination of strategies to retain power even as they undermine democratic institutions. These tactics often involve appealing to voters’ concrete interests and anxieties, while simultaneously weakening systems of accountability [1, 2].
One key strategy is emphasizing concrete interests over abstract principles [2]. Autocrats understand that many voters prioritize tangible benefits over democratic ideals [2]. They exploit this by:
Providing economic incentives, such as minimum wage increases, pension boosts, or tax breaks, particularly before elections [3]. This creates a tangible sense of improvement associated with the autocrat’s rule, even if the overall economic situation is deteriorating [3].
Engaging in clientelism, using state resources to reward loyal supporters with jobs, contracts, or other benefits in exchange for their votes [3]. This system of patronage directly links individuals’ well-being to the autocrat’s continued power [3].
Autocrats also skillfully manipulate fear and resentment to create a climate of anxiety that makes their actions seem necessary for national protection [4, 5]. This manipulation involves:
Constructing a threat narrative by manufacturing or exaggerating threats from external or internal enemies, often targeting groups like immigrants, minorities, or “liberal elites” [5]. This fosters a sense of fear and insecurity among the population [5].
Positioning themselves as protectors who can safeguard the nation from these perceived threats [5]. This creates a sense of dependence on the autocrat’s leadership for survival [5].
Framing democratic principles as obstacles that hinder their ability to combat the manufactured threats [5]. This allows them to justify the erosion of democratic institutions, such as an independent judiciary or a free press, as necessary for national security [5].
Another effective tactic is exploiting national identity, particularly when it can be framed as being under threat [6]. Autocrats use this appeal to:
Unify and mobilize supporters by creating a sense of shared purpose and unity, rallying support for their policies even if they are undemocratic [6].
Justify eroding democratic norms by arguing that protecting the “endangered nation” supersedes concerns about democratic principles [6]. For example, some Americans chose to overlook Donald Trump’s undermining of the rule of law because they believed he would protect conservative values and national identity, as evidenced by his appointment of conservative judges to the Supreme Court [6].
Target out-groups by defining national identity in exclusive terms, identifying specific groups as “outsiders” or threats to the nation [5]. This fosters division and resentment within society, creating scapegoats for societal problems and rallying support for the autocrat’s agenda [5].
In conclusion, autocrats effectively maintain power despite democratic erosion by strategically appealing to voters’ concrete interests and fears while simultaneously undermining the systems that could hold them accountable. They create a system where their rule appears essential for security and prosperity, while silencing dissenting voices. [1, 2]
Autocrats maintain their grip on power even as they erode democratic norms by shrewdly appealing to voters’ concrete interests and anxieties, while simultaneously weakening institutions meant to ensure accountability [1, 2]. They exploit the inherent tension between abstract democratic principles and the tangible realities of daily life [2].
Here are some key tactics autocrats use, illustrated with examples from the sources:
Prioritizing Concrete Over Abstract: Autocrats recognize that voters often prioritize immediate, tangible benefits over abstract notions of democracy [2]. They leverage this by offering concrete economic incentives like minimum wage hikes, pension increases, or tax breaks, especially in the lead-up to elections [3]. These measures create a perception of improvement directly tied to the autocrat’s rule, even if the broader economy is faltering [2, 3]. Turkish President Erdoğan’s minimum wage increases and pay raises for government employees exemplify this tactic [3]. Similarly, pension increases in Serbia, child allowance boosts in Poland, and tax breaks for the wealthy in the US all serve to link the ruling party or leader with tangible benefits for specific groups [3].
Clientelism: This strategy involves using state resources as rewards for loyal supporters [3, 4]. Jobs, contracts, and other benefits are exchanged for votes, creating a system where individual well-being is directly dependent on the autocrat’s continued power [3, 4].
Weaponizing Fear and Resentment: Autocrats excel at cultivating an atmosphere of anxiety, making their actions seem indispensable for national security [4, 5]. They achieve this by:
Manufacturing Threats: Autocrats either invent or exaggerate threats, often targeting external entities like the “West” or Brussels, or internal groups like immigrants, minorities, or “liberal elites” [5]. This creates a climate of fear and insecurity [5].
Positioning Themselves as Saviors: Autocrats present themselves as the sole guardians capable of shielding the nation from these perceived threats [5]. This fosters a sense of reliance on the autocrat for protection [5].
Obstructing Democratic Norms: Democratic principles like the rule of law or a free press are portrayed as impediments to effectively combating these manufactured threats [5]. This justification allows them to erode these vital institutions under the guise of national security [5].
Exploiting National Identity: Autocrats strategically invoke national identity, particularly when it can be framed as endangered [4, 6]. This serves to:
Rally Support: Appeals to national identity can forge a sense of shared purpose and unity, mobilizing voters behind the autocrat’s policies, even those that undermine democratic processes [6].
Subvert Democratic Principles: Safeguarding the “endangered nation” becomes paramount, overriding concerns about democratic principles [6]. Voters, even those who value democracy, become more tolerant of autocratic behavior if it’s framed as protecting the nation [4]. This explains, for instance, why some Americans overlooked Donald Trump’s erosion of the rule of law: they prioritized concerns about national identity, believing he would protect it through actions like securing a conservative Supreme Court majority [6].
Targeting Out-Groups: National identity is often defined in exclusionary terms, designating certain groups as “outsiders” or threats [5]. This tactic foments division and resentment, creating scapegoats for societal problems and bolstering support for the autocrat’s agenda [5].
In essence, autocrats thrive by exploiting the disconnect between abstract ideals and concrete realities. They persuade voters to prioritize immediate concerns and perceived security over the long-term health of democratic institutions [2, 6].
Summary: Even when leaders weaken democratic institutions and the economy suffers, they can still win elections because voters often prioritize immediate benefits over abstract democratic principles.
Explanation: This passage explores why authoritarian leaders who harm democratic processes and oversee economic struggles can still get re-elected. It argues that voters often prioritize tangible improvements to their personal situation, like increased wages or tax breaks, over abstract concerns like the erosion of democratic norms. Authoritarian leaders exploit this by implementing popular economic policies before elections, effectively buying votes through targeted benefits. Even when voters understand the long-term damage to democracy, these immediate benefits can sway their voting decisions. The control of media also allows leaders to manipulate public perception of the economy and shift blame for economic hardship. This phenomenon isn’t unique to one country; it’s a global trend.
Even in countries with free press, voters’ views on the economy are often influenced by their political affiliations. Many voters find the overall state of the economy too complex to understand fully and are more responsive to policies directly impacting them. This allows autocratic leaders to manipulate the system to their advantage.
Key terms:
Subverting democracy: Undermining democratic institutions and processes, like free and fair elections or an independent judiciary.
Incumbent: The current holder of a political office.
Scapegoating narrative: A story that blames a person or group for problems, often unfairly, to distract from the real causes.
Partisan lines: Following the beliefs or interests of a particular political party.
Autocrats: Rulers with absolute power, often obtained and maintained undemocratically.
Summary: Autocrats maintain power not just through direct favors (clientelism), but also by subtly undermining democratic institutions and stoking fear and resentment towards perceived enemies, framing these actions as necessary to protect the nation. This allows them to erode democratic norms with the support of voters who prioritize national identity over abstract democratic principles.
Explanation: Autocrats, or rulers with absolute power, gain and keep control in two key ways. Beyond offering direct benefits to supporters, they manipulate democratic systems. They might pressure judges, control the media, and limit open discussion in government. These actions are often hard for everyday people to see as direct threats to their own lives. Even when people do recognize the damage, autocrats exploit fear and resentment to maintain support. They create a sense of threat, identifying internal or external enemies like immigrants or political rivals. The autocrat then positions themselves as the sole protector of the nation against these threats. This justifies their undermining of democratic processes, which are framed as obstacles to national security. As a result, even in established democracies, voters might overlook the erosion of democratic principles if they believe their national identity is at risk. This explains, for instance, why some voters might disregard a leader’s questionable actions if they believe that leader is protecting their values or way of life.
Key terms:
Clientelism: A system where political support is exchanged for favors or benefits.
Subversion of democracy: The undermining of democratic institutions and principles.
Autocrat: A ruler who has absolute power.
Rule of law: The principle that everyone, including those in power, is subject to and accountable under the law.
Hush-money payment: Money paid to someone to prevent them from disclosing embarrassing or damaging information.
Summary: Autocrats sometimes strengthen their power by addressing immediate citizen needs while simultaneously eroding democratic principles. Progressives must counter this by acknowledging the emotional forces driving politics and focusing on tangible improvements in people’s lives beyond simple economic growth.
Explanation: This passage argues that autocratic leaders often employ a deceptive strategy: they deliver on concrete issues important to their citizens, like improving infrastructure or lowering certain taxes, to gain popular support. This allows them to subtly undermine democratic institutions and norms without significant public outcry, as people are appeased by the immediate benefits. The author suggests that progressives, those who advocate for democratic values and social justice, need to understand and counteract this strategy. They must recognize the role of emotions, like fear and resentment, in shaping political opinions. Additionally, they must prioritize improving citizens’ quality of life in tangible ways that go beyond just focusing on economic growth indicators like GDP. If progressives focus solely on GDP growth and ignore the emotional landscape, they risk making it easier for autocrats to solidify power while dismantling democracy.
Key terms:
Autocrats: Rulers with absolute power, often obtained and maintained through undemocratic means.
Progressive actors: Individuals or groups advocating for social reform and advancement of democratic values.
Subverting democracy: Undermining or weakening democratic systems and principles.
GDP growth: Gross Domestic Product growth, a common indicator of economic expansion.
Concrete improvements: Tangible, measurable changes that positively impact people’s daily lives, such as access to healthcare, affordable housing, or quality education.
This article examines the strategies autocrats employ to maintain power despite eroding democratic norms. It argues that these leaders exploit the tension between abstract democratic ideals and the concrete needs of voters.
Here are the key strategies autocrats use to maintain power:
Prioritizing Concrete Over Abstract: Autocrats recognize that voters often prioritize tangible, immediate benefits over abstract democratic principles. They offer concrete economic incentives, like minimum wage increases, pension boosts, or tax breaks, especially before elections [1, 2]. These policies create a perception of improvement linked directly to the autocrat, even if the overall economy is struggling [1, 3].
Clientelism: This strategy involves using state resources to reward loyal supporters [2, 4]. Jobs, contracts, and other benefits are exchanged for votes, creating a system where individual well-being depends on supporting the autocrat.
Weaponizing Fear and Resentment: Autocrats cultivate a climate of anxiety by manufacturing or exaggerating threats, often targeting external groups like “the West” or immigrants or internal groups like minorities or “liberal elites” [5]. By positioning themselves as protectors against these threats, they foster reliance and justify the dismantling of democratic institutions, like an independent judiciary or a free press, by framing them as obstacles to security [4, 5].
Exploiting National Identity: Autocrats strategically invoke national identity, especially when it can be portrayed as endangered [4-6]. They rally support by creating a sense of unity against perceived threats. This allows them to undermine democratic principles by framing their actions as necessary to protect the nation. Voters, even those who value democracy, may tolerate autocratic behavior if they believe it safeguards the nation [6]. This explains why some Americans overlooked Donald Trump’s undermining of the rule of law – they prioritized concerns about national identity, believing he would protect it, for example, by appointing conservative judges [6].
The author argues that progressives must counter these tactics by:
Recognizing the Power of Emotions: Understanding the role of fear and resentment in political decision-making.
Focusing on Concrete Improvements: Prioritizing tangible improvements in people’s lives that go beyond simple economic growth [7].
By addressing people’s concrete needs and emotional concerns, progressives can compete with autocrats and protect democratic values.
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
A proposed constitutional amendment in Pakistan alters the appointment process of the Chief Justice, shifting power from the judiciary to a parliamentary committee. Strong opposition, particularly from the PTI party, criticizes this change as undermining judicial independence and potentially leading to government influence over judicial decisions. A commentary argues that this amendment prioritizes parliamentary supremacy, asserting the parliament’s authority over other institutions and advocating for greater public awareness regarding democratic principles. The author emphasizes the importance of parliamentary authority and condemns judicial overreach. The amendment is lauded by some as potentially improving efficiency and resolving longstanding cases.
26th Amendment FAQ
What is the main purpose of the 26th Amendment to the Constitution?
The 26th Amendment aims to reform the process of appointing the Chief Justice, shifting the basis from senatorship to merit. This is intended to enhance the independence and impartiality of the judiciary.
How will the Chief Justice be appointed under the 26th Amendment?
A 12-member parliamentary committee, with proportional representation from the National Assembly and the Senate, will recommend candidates to the Prime Minister. The committee must reach a two-third majority for a recommendation to be valid.
What changes are being made to the structure and powers of the judiciary?
Constitutional benches: These specialized benches will be established in the Supreme Court and High Court to handle constitutional matters.
Judicial Commission’s role: The Judicial Commission will be responsible for appointing judges to the Supreme Court and forming the constitutional benches.
Limited authority: The judiciary’s power to interpret constitutional matters will be limited to the appeals process, curbing judicial activism.
What are the key criticisms of the 26th Amendment?
The opposition party, PTI, criticizes the amendment as a move toward government control over the judiciary. They argue that:
Judges will be beholden to the government for their appointments, compromising judicial independence.
The limitations on judicial authority undermine the judiciary’s ability to act as a check on executive power.
Who is being praised for supporting the 26th Amendment?
The author praises several individuals and groups for their support of the amendment, including:
Bilawal Bhutto: For his leadership in advocating for the amendment.
Maulana Fazlur Rehman: For his political maneuvering and persuasion skills in building support.
Aimal Wali Khan: For his compelling speech in favor of the amendment.
Nawaz Sharif: For his eloquent articulation of the struggles faced by those advocating for democratic principles.
What is the significance of comparing Parliament to the “voice of God”?
The author emphasizes the supremacy of Parliament as the embodiment of the people’s will. By comparing Parliament to the “voice of God,” they stress the absolute authority of the elected representatives and argue that all other institutions, including the judiciary, should be subservient to it.
What is meant by the term “judicial dictatorship”?
The author uses this term to denounce what they perceive as an overreach of judicial power. They cite instances where the Supreme Court intervened in political matters, such as dismissing elected Prime Ministers, as examples of the judiciary exceeding its constitutional mandate.
What is the author’s proposed solution to prevent “judicial dictatorship”?
The author suggests renaming the “Supreme Court” to “Federal Court” to symbolize a shift in power dynamics. They also advocate for the separation of constitutional benches to streamline the judicial process and prevent undue delays in resolving public cases.
Pakistan’s 26th Amendment: A Deep Dive
Glossary of Key Terms
26th Amendment: A constitutional amendment in Pakistan aimed at reforming the judicial system, particularly the process of appointing the Chief Justice and the formation of constitutional benches.
Chief Justice: The highest-ranking judge in the Supreme Court of Pakistan.
Parliamentary Committee: A group of members from the National Assembly and the Senate, responsible for proposing recommendations related to the appointment of the Chief Justice.
National Assembly: The lower house of the Parliament of Pakistan.
Senate: The upper house of the Parliament of Pakistan.
Government Allies: Political parties that support the ruling party in the Parliament.
Opposition: Political parties that oppose the ruling party in the Parliament.
Two-Third Majority: A voting requirement where at least two-thirds of the members must vote in favor of a proposal for it to pass.
Supreme Court: The highest court in the judicial system of Pakistan.
High Court: A provincial level court in the judicial system of Pakistan.
Constitutional Benches: Specialized benches within the Supreme Court and High Courts responsible for hearing cases related to constitutional matters.
Judicial Commission: A body responsible for the appointment of judges to the higher judiciary in Pakistan.
Suo Moto: A Latin term meaning “on its own motion”, referring to the power of a court to initiate legal proceedings without a formal complaint.
PTI (Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf): A major political party in Pakistan, currently in opposition.
Judicial Activism: A judicial philosophy where judges are seen as taking a more active role in shaping public policy through their decisions.
Federal Court: A proposed name to replace “Supreme Court” in Pakistan, reflecting a desire for a less powerful judiciary.
Short Answer Questions
What is the main purpose of the 26th Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan?
How is the appointment of the Chief Justice handled under the 26th Amendment? Explain the role of the parliamentary committee.
What are constitutional benches, and how are they formed under the new amendment?
How does the 26th Amendment affect the Supreme Court’s authority in interpreting constitutional matters?
Why is the PTI critical of the 26th Amendment? What are their main concerns?
According to the author, who are the true “heirs” of the country and the source of power?
What is the author’s view on the relationship between Parliament and the Judiciary?
What criticism does the author level against the Supreme Court’s past actions towards elected Prime Ministers?
Why does the author suggest changing the name “Supreme Court” to “Federal Court”?
What positive outcomes does the author hope to see as a result of the 26th Amendment?
Short Answer Key
The main purpose of the 26th Amendment is to reform the judicial system, particularly the process of appointing the Chief Justice and the formation of constitutional benches, aiming to limit judicial power.
The appointment of the Chief Justice is now based on merit, assessed by a 12-member parliamentary committee. This committee sends recommendations to the Prime Minister, requiring a two-thirds majority vote for approval.
Constitutional benches are specialized judicial panels within the Supreme Court and High Courts that handle constitutional matters. The Judicial Commission appoints judges to these benches, and the suo moto powers regarding these benches are shifted from the Chief Justice to the Commission.
The amendment limits the Supreme Court’s authority to interpret constitutional matters beyond the initial appeal level.
The PTI criticizes the 26th Amendment, arguing that it weakens the judiciary and allows the government undue influence over judicial appointments and decisions. They see it as a threat to judicial independence.
The author believes that the common people are the true “heirs” of the country and that their collective power, exercised through Parliament, is the legitimate source of authority.
The author believes that Parliament should be supreme, and all other institutions, including the judiciary, should be subordinate to it. They criticize any attempts to elevate the judiciary above the elected representatives of the people.
The author criticizes the Supreme Court for what they perceive as overreach and interference in the executive branch’s functioning, citing examples of past actions against elected Prime Ministers.
The author suggests changing the name “Supreme Court” to “Federal Court” to symbolize a reduction in the judiciary’s power and to emphasize its position as one institution among others, accountable to Parliament.
The author hopes the 26th Amendment will lead to faster processing of public cases, reduced judicial activism in political matters, and a greater respect for Parliament’s authority from the Chief Justice and the judiciary as a whole.
Essay Questions
Analyze the author’s perspective on the concept of “judicial activism.” What are the author’s main arguments against judicial activism, and how do these arguments relate to the 26th Amendment?
Discuss the potential implications of the 26th Amendment for the balance of power between the different branches of government in Pakistan.
Critically evaluate the author’s argument that the Parliament should be considered supreme over all other institutions in Pakistan. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this argument?
How does the author use historical examples to support their argument for the need to limit the power of the judiciary in Pakistan? Are these examples used effectively?
Compare and contrast the potential benefits and drawbacks of the 26th Amendment as outlined in the text. Consider the perspectives of different stakeholders, including the government, the opposition, and the judiciary.
Navigating Judicial Reform: A Deep Dive into Pakistan’s 26th Amendment
Source: Excerpts from “Pasted Text”
I. The Genesis of the 26th Amendment (Paragraph 1)
This section details the key provisions of the 26th Amendment, focusing on the establishment of a merit-based system for appointing the Chief Justice.
It outlines the composition and function of the 12-member parliamentary committee tasked with recommending candidates, emphasizing the requirement of a two-thirds majority.
Key elements like the Chief Justice’s term, the establishment of constitutional benches, and the role of the Judicial Commission are also highlighted.
II. A Critique of Judicial Overreach and the Erosion of Parliamentary Supremacy (Paragraphs 2-6)
This section critiques the judiciary’s perceived overstepping of its boundaries, particularly concerning constitutional matters.
The author argues for the supremacy of Parliament, drawing on the concept of popular sovereignty and framing the elected body as the true voice of the people.
Examples of alleged judicial activism, such as the dismissal of elected Prime Ministers, are cited to illustrate the perceived imbalance of power.
III. Advocating for a Balanced Judicial System (Paragraphs 7-8)
This section proposes solutions to address the perceived issues within the judicial system, advocating for a more balanced relationship between the judiciary and parliament.
The author suggests renaming the Supreme Court to the Federal Court and emphasizes the potential benefits of separating constitutional benches to expedite case resolution.
It also expresses hope for a future where the judiciary respects the authority of parliament, citing Justice Qazi Faiz Isa as a positive example.
IV. Recognizing Key Players in the Amendment’s Passage (Paragraph 9)
This section commends the efforts of individuals who played a crucial role in the passage of the 26th Amendment.
Bilawal Bhutto is praised for his leadership, particularly his efforts to foster unity and his adoption of a more mature political approach.
Maulana Fazlur Rehman is recognized for his political acumen and ability to bridge ideological divides, while Aimal Wali Khan and Nawaz Sharif are also acknowledged for their contributions.
V. A Poetic Reflection on Resilience and Political Struggle (Paragraph 10)
The final section concludes with a poignant verse, encapsulating the challenges and perseverance inherent in the political landscape.
The poem evokes themes of facing adversity, enduring hardships, and the unwavering determination to survive and fight for justice.
The 26th Amendment to the Constitution was recently approved. [1] This amendment changes how the Chief Justice is appointed. [1] A 12-member parliamentary committee with proportional representation from the National Assembly and the Senate will now recommend the Chief Justice to the Prime Minister. [1] **This committee must have a two-thirds majority for the recommendation, not a simple majority. [1] The Chief Justice will have a term of three years or until they reach the age of 65. [1] **The Judicial Commission will appoint constitutional benches and judges to the Supreme Court. [1] The judiciary will no longer be able to order or interpret any constitutional matter beyond the appeal. [1]
Some people view the amendment as a way to control the judiciary. [1] They argue that the government will now be able to make decisions about which judges are appointed and that the judiciary will be beholden to the government. [1] For example, Justice Mansoor of the Supreme Court believes this amendment will lead to questions about whether cases should be heard by a general bench or a constitutional bench. [1] Others view the amendment as necessary to prevent judicial dictatorship. [2] They argue that the judiciary has become too powerful and that it has overstepped its bounds. [2] One example given is the firing of a three-time elected prime minister for not taking a salary from his son and for not writing a letter against his party leader. [2] This was seen as 17 people dominating 25 crore national representatives. [2]
The amendment has caused strong reactions from different groups. [1] The opposition party, PTI, criticized the amendment and declared it a black day in the history of the judiciary. [1] They see this as a revision that weakens the judiciary. [1] Maulana Fazlur Rehman, on the other hand, said that “we have broken the teeth of the black cobra.” [1]
The 26th Amendment to the Constitution was recently approved. [1] This amendment changes how the Chief Justice is appointed. [1] Instead of being based on senatorship, the appointment will now be based on merit. [1]
Here are some key details of the amendment:
A 12-member parliamentary committee with proportional representation from the National Assembly and the Senate was created to recommend potential Chief Justices to the Prime Minister. [1]
This committee must send recommendations to the Prime Minister with a two-thirds majority, not a simple majority. [1]
The Chief Justice will have a three-year term or an age limit of 65 years. [1]
The Supreme Court and High Court will have constitutional benches. [1]
The Judicial Commission, not the Chief Justice, will appoint constitutional benches and judges in the Supreme Court. [1]
The judiciary will no longer be able to order or interpret any constitutional matter beyond the appeal. [1]
The amendment has sparked controversy. The opposition party, PTI, has strongly criticized it, calling it a “black day in the history of judiciary.” [1] They believe that judges will be beholden to the government for appointments, and that this amendment signifies the “funeral of Azad Judiciary.” [1]
The recent constitutional amendment discussed in the sources can be seen as an attempt at judicial reform. [1] It aims to address concerns about judicial activism and overreach by curtailing the judiciary’s power in several ways:
Limiting the judiciary’s authority on constitutional matters: The amendment states that the judiciary will no longer have the power to order or interpret any constitutional matter beyond the appeal level. [1] This aims to prevent the judiciary from making decisions that some perceive as encroaching on the legislature’s domain. [2]
Shifting power to appoint judges and form constitutional benches: The amendment transfers the authority to appoint judges to the Supreme Court and form constitutional benches from the Chief Justice to the Judicial Commission. [1] This could potentially reduce the Chief Justice’s influence and make the process more transparent and accountable. [1]
Changing the Chief Justice appointment process: The amendment changes the appointment of the Chief Justice from a seniority-based system to a merit-based one. [1] This aims to ensure that the most qualified individual is chosen for the position, rather than simply the most senior judge. [1]
These changes are intended to address concerns that the judiciary has become too powerful and is interfering in the political process. [2] The amendment’s supporters argue that it will restore balance between the different branches of government and strengthen democracy. [3, 4]
However, critics of the amendment, such as the PTI party, view it as an attack on judicial independence. [1] They argue that by limiting the judiciary’s power and giving the government more control over appointments, the amendment will make judges beholden to the government and undermine the rule of law. [1, 2]
The long-term impact of these reforms remains to be seen. It is possible that the changes will lead to a more efficient and accountable judiciary. However, there is also a risk that they could weaken the judiciary’s ability to act as a check on executive power and protect fundamental rights. [2]
The sources argue that parliamentary supremacy is a crucial aspect of democracy and that all other institutions, including the judiciary, should be subordinate to it. [1, 2] The author of the source material, referred to as “Author,” contends that the people are the true source of power, and their elected representatives in parliament embody this power. [1] Therefore, all other institutions, whether “dusty or black,” are essentially public servants who should operate under the authority of the elected parliament. [1]
Author emphasizes that comparing parliament to any other institution is a “great sin and disbelief.” [2] They argue that the parliament is the “spokesman of public aspirations,” the “mother of the constitution,” and the “trustee and protector of human greatness.” [2] Any challenge to its authority is seen as an affront to “humanity or human dignity,” tantamount to “denial of the constitution, democracy, and human dignity.” [2]
Author criticizes what they perceive as past judicial overreach, arguing that the judiciary has acted as a “monster” by repeatedly targeting elected prime ministers. [3, 4] They cite examples such as the dismissal of Prime Ministers Gillani and Nawaz Sharif, which they view as instances of “judicial dictatorship” and contempt for the will of the people. [4]
Author suggests that the recent constitutional amendment, which limits the judiciary’s power and alters the process for appointing judges, is a step towards curbing this perceived judicial overreach and restoring parliamentary supremacy. [5] They believe that parliament has the ultimate authority to define the powers of other institutions, even suggesting that the Supreme Court could be renamed the “Federal Court” to emphasize its subordinate position. [5]
The sources express hope that this shift in power will lead to a more balanced and democratic system where the will of the people, as expressed through their elected representatives, is paramount. [6]
The sources present a strong critique of judicial activism, portraying it as a threat to parliamentary supremacy and democratic principles. “Author ,” the author, argues that the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, has overstepped its bounds and engaged in actions that undermine the authority of the elected parliament.
Here are some key points about how the sources discuss judicial activism:
Seen as exceeding judicial authority: The sources condemn instances where the judiciary has interfered in matters that are perceived as falling under the purview of the legislature or the executive. They cite the dismissal of elected Prime Ministers Gillani and Nawaz Sharif as examples of judicial overreach, arguing that these actions amounted to a “judicial dictatorship.” [1, 2]
Described as biased against elected leaders: Author criticizes the judiciary for allegedly showing deference to military dictators while adopting a hostile stance towards democratically elected leaders. They accuse the judiciary of “prostrating” before military rulers while acting like “kings” in front of elected representatives. [2]
Blamed for prioritizing certain cases: The sources accuse judges of prioritizing “political and interest cases” to gain media attention, neglecting “thousands of public cases” that remain pending for years. This, according to the sources, represents a “blood of justice.” [3]
Framed as a threat to democracy: The sources view judicial activism as a challenge to the core principles of democracy, particularly the principle of parliamentary supremacy. They argue that the judiciary should be subordinate to the parliament, which represents the will of the people. [1, 2, 4, 5]
The sources suggest that the recent constitutional amendment, which limits the judiciary’s power and changes the process for appointing judges, is a necessary step to curb judicial activism and restore the balance of power between different branches of government. [2, 3, 6]
The sources highlight the concept of political power as emanating from the people and being channeled through their elected representatives in parliament. “Author ” argues that “our collective public power is the source of power,” and therefore, the right to rule belongs to those representatives chosen by the people and sent to parliament [1].
Here are some key points about political power as discussed in the sources:
Parliamentary Supremacy: The sources emphasize the idea of parliamentary supremacy, meaning that the elected parliament holds the highest authority in the political system. All other institutions, including the judiciary, are considered subordinate to parliament and should operate within the bounds set by it [1-4].
The People as the Source of Power: The sources stress that ultimate political power resides in the people. They elect their representatives to parliament, which acts as their voice and the embodiment of their collective will. This concept is central to democratic principles, where the government derives its legitimacy from the consent of the governed [1].
Concerns about Judicial Overreach: The sources express concern about instances where the judiciary has been perceived as overstepping its boundaries and encroaching on the political power of the parliament. They cite examples of judicial interventions in political matters, such as the dismissal of elected prime ministers, which are seen as undermining parliamentary supremacy and the will of the people [3, 4].
Constitutional Amendment as a Rebalancing Act: The recent constitutional amendment, which aims to limit judicial power and change the process of judicial appointments, is presented as a way to reassert parliamentary supremacy and address concerns about judicial activism. The sources suggest that this amendment is a step towards restoring the balance of power between different branches of government and ensuring that political power ultimately rests with the people’s elected representatives [4-6].
The sources advocate for a system where political power flows from the people to the parliament, which is seen as the rightful holder and executor of that power. They view any attempt to challenge or diminish parliamentary supremacy, particularly through judicial activism, as a threat to the democratic principles upon which the political system is founded.
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
This text is a transcript of a political interview with Rohan, discussing Imran Khan’s political career and actions, particularly focusing on the events of May 9th. The interview critiques Khan’s leadership style, labeling him hypocritical and inconsistent, and analyzes his actions in the context of Pakistani democracy and law. The speaker contrasts Khan’s approach with that of other political figures, drawing parallels to historical dictators. Finally, the conversation concludes by reflecting on the implications of Khan’s actions for Pakistan’s stability and future.
FAQ: Analyzing Imran Khan’s Political Journey
1. What is the main criticism leveled against Imran Khan in this analysis?
Rohan argues that Imran Khan’s downfall stems from his hypocrisy and dictatorial tendencies. While publicly advocating for democracy and the rule of law, Khan allegedly engaged in backroom dealings and manipulated institutions to maintain power. His intolerance of dissent and labeling of those not supporting him as “animals” further highlights this hypocrisy. Rohan criticizes Khan’s refusal to accept defeat gracefully and his attempts to undermine democratic processes, culminating in the events of May 9th.
2. How does Rohan compare Imran Khan to historical figures like Hitler?
Rohan uses the comparison to Hitler to emphasize Khan’s perceived authoritarianism and disregard for democratic norms. He suggests that Khan, even in civilian clothes, exhibited a “Hitler-like” mentality, prioritizing his own power above the interests of the nation and its institutions. This comparison underscores the danger Rohan sees in Khan’s approach to politics.
3. What is the significance of the “diaper” analogy used in the analysis?
The “diaper” analogy paints a picture of Imran Khan as being politically immature and reliant on external forces for his rise to power. He initially enjoyed support and “pampering” but, upon losing that backing, became incapable of navigating the political landscape independently. This analogy suggests Khan’s lack of political acumen and unpreparedness for the challenges of leadership.
4. What specific events are highlighted as evidence of Khan’s alleged hypocrisy?
Several events are cited as evidence of Khan’s hypocrisy:
Secret meetings and promises: Rohan points to Khan’s alleged pursuit of power through backroom deals, contrasting it with his public image as a man of the people.
May 9th incidents: The violent protests following Khan’s arrest are presented as a consequence of his incitement and a demonstration of his willingness to use undemocratic means.
Attacks on institutions: Khan’s criticisms of the judiciary and military are viewed as attempts to undermine these institutions when they did not support him.
5. What is Rohan’s perspective on the allegations of election rigging made by Khan?
Rohan challenges the notion of widespread election rigging in Khan’s favor by pointing to PTI’s success in KP and Punjab. He argues that if rigging occurred, it would likely have benefitted PTI, not harmed them. Rohan suggests that Khan’s claims of rigging are a way to deflect responsibility for his electoral losses.
6. What alternative path does Rohan suggest Khan should have taken?
Rohan believes Khan should have engaged in constructive parliamentary politics instead of resorting to disruptive tactics. He criticizes Khan’s refusal to participate in the National Assembly and his calls for fresh elections, arguing that these actions undermined the democratic process.
7. How does Rohan view the role of the “establishment” in Khan’s political journey?
Rohan implies that Khan initially benefited from the support of the “establishment” (likely referring to the military and powerful figures), which helped him rise to power. However, he suggests that Khan lost this support due to his actions and overreach, leading to his eventual downfall.
8. What is the ultimate message Rohan conveys about Khan’s political trajectory?
Rohan presents Khan’s political journey as a cautionary tale, highlighting the dangers of hypocrisy, authoritarian tendencies, and disregard for democratic principles. He suggests that Khan’s fall from grace serves as a lesson for future leaders and emphasizes the importance of respecting institutions and engaging in politics with integrity.
Understanding Pakistani Political Discourse: A Study Guide
Glossary of Key Terms
Bismillah Ra Rahman Rahim: An Arabic phrase meaning “In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful” often used at the beginning of Islamic texts or speeches.
Assalam Walekum: An Arabic greeting meaning “Peace be upon you.”
Saheb/Sahib: A title of respect used in South Asia, similar to “Mr.” or “Sir.”
Khairiyat Patra: A letter or message inquiring about someone’s well-being.
Taj (tahj): Refers to the recitation of the Quran, specifically the ability to recite it beautifully and with proper pronunciation.
9th May: Likely refers to a significant political event in Pakistan that involved protests and possibly violence.
Ivane: Context unclear, likely a proper noun or a mispronounced term.
Vane Sadar: Unclear in this context, potentially a misspelling or slang term.
Hippocritus: Likely a reference to Hippocrates, an ancient Greek physician considered the father of medicine, used here to denote hypocrisy.
Referendum: A general vote by the electorate on a single political question referred to them for a direct decision.
Wazir Azam: Urdu term for Prime Minister.
Sakhiya: An Urdu word for generosity, possibly used here sarcastically.
No Confidence Motion: A formal vote in a legislative body to determine whether a person in a position of responsibility (like a Prime Minister) still has the support of the majority.
Mirroring the Rights of the People: Likely referring to actions taken in accordance with democratic principles and the will of the people.
Gas Leak and Treatment Being Done to the Punjab Assembly: Context unclear, likely referring to a specific political incident or scandal involving the Punjab Assembly.
Chaz Groups: Context unclear, possibly a slang term or local reference.
Awaam: Urdu word for “the people,” often used in political contexts.
Institution of Army: Refers to the Pakistani military as an organized and powerful entity.
Shahbaz Gill: Likely a Pakistani politician or public figure.
Red Line: A boundary or limit that should not be crossed.
Laad Paan: Context unclear, potentially slang or a local phrase.
Jamaat-e-Islami: A prominent Islamic political party in Pakistan.
Noon League: Likely refers to the Pakistan Muslim League (N), a major political party in Pakistan.
PP: Likely refers to the Pakistan Peoples Party, another major political party in Pakistan.
KP: Abbreviation for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a province in Pakistan.
Modi: Refers to Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India.
Taji: Context unclear, possibly a misspelling or slang term.
Shiba Sharif: Likely refers to Shehbaz Sharif, the current Prime Minister of Pakistan.
NRO: Likely stands for National Reconciliation Ordinance, a controversial amnesty law passed in Pakistan in 2007.
Gausia University: A specific university in Pakistan, likely referenced due to a potential scandal or connection to a political figure.
Tosh Khana: A government department in Pakistan responsible for managing gifts received by government officials.
Dilip Barham: Unclear in this context, potentially a mispronounced name or an unknown reference.
Rooj and Jawal: Symbolic terms for “rise” and “fall,” likely used to analyze political trajectories.
Bhutto: Likely refers to Zulfikar Bhutto, a former Prime Minister of Pakistan.
Hitler: A reference to Adolf Hitler, the dictator of Nazi Germany, used to denote authoritarian tendencies.
Hajre Awad: Likely refers to the Black Stone, a sacred Islamic relic located in the Kaaba in Mecca.
Quiz
Instructions: Please answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.
What is the speaker’s main criticism of Imran Khan’s political behavior?
According to the speaker, how did Imran Khan’s actions on 9th May impact his legitimacy?
What is the significance of the speaker’s repeated references to Parliament and the democratic process?
How does the speaker compare Imran Khan’s political approach to that of Shehbaz Sharif and Nawaz Sharif?
What does the speaker suggest as a more appropriate course of action for Imran Khan and his supporters?
What historical analogies does the speaker use to explain Imran Khan’s political trajectory?
How does the speaker use the concepts of “Rooj” and “Jawal” to analyze political success and failure?
According to the speaker, what role does social media play in shaping public opinion and political movements?
What specific examples of alleged corruption or misconduct does the speaker mention in relation to Imran Khan?
What message does the speaker convey in his closing remarks regarding respect, humility, and the pursuit of justice?
Answer Key
The speaker criticizes Imran Khan for hypocrisy, claiming he acts one way in public and another in private. The speaker argues Khan manipulates the public, incites unrest, and refuses to accept the democratic process.
The speaker suggests Khan’s actions on 9th May, involving violence and attacks on state institutions, undermined his claims of being a peaceful, democratic leader and alienated him from the people.
By emphasizing Parliament and the democratic process, the speaker highlights the importance of following legal and constitutional procedures for expressing dissent and seeking political change. He frames Khan’s actions as undermining these principles.
While critical of the Sharif brothers, the speaker acknowledges their acceptance of democratic norms and their ability to form alliances and govern effectively within the existing political system. He contrasts this with Khan’s rejection of these norms.
The speaker suggests Khan should engage in politics through Parliament, respect democratic institutions, apologize for his past actions, and pursue justice through legal means rather than inciting public unrest.
The speaker draws parallels between Khan’s trajectory and that of Zulfikar Bhutto, suggesting both leaders initially enjoyed popular support but ultimately faced downfall due to their authoritarian tendencies.
The speaker utilizes “Rooj” (rise) and “Jawal” (fall) to illustrate the cyclical nature of political power. He argues Khan’s initial rise was fueled by populist rhetoric but his fall resulted from actions contrary to democratic principles.
The speaker acknowledges the power of social media in mobilizing support but argues it can create an echo chamber and distort the perception of public sentiment, suggesting Khan’s online popularity did not translate into real-world support.
The speaker mentions Khan’s alleged misuse of funds related to Gausia University, his handling of gifts received through Tosh Khana, and financial dealings with individuals like Dilip Barham as examples of corruption.
The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of mutual respect, humility, and adherence to the rule of law in political discourse. He suggests true leadership involves acknowledging mistakes, seeking forgiveness, and working within the established system for positive change.
Essay Questions
Analyze the speaker’s use of religious language and imagery in his critique of Imran Khan. What rhetorical effect does this language create?
To what extent does the speaker’s critique of Imran Khan reflect broader tensions and divisions within Pakistani society and politics?
Evaluate the speaker’s arguments regarding the role of Parliament and the democratic process in Pakistan. Are his perspectives convincing? Why or why not?
How does the speaker’s analysis of Imran Khan’s political trajectory compare and contrast with other interpretations of Khan’s rise and fall from power?
Consider the speaker’s closing remarks about the importance of respect, humility, and the pursuit of justice. What implications do these ideas hold for the future of Pakistani politics and society?
A Conversation with Rohan: Analyzing Imran Khan’s Political Trajectory
Source: Youtube interview of Rohan by Waqas Malana for 360 Digital
I. Introduction & Framing the Discussion (0:00-2:10)
Waqas Malana introduces Rohan and sets the stage for the discussion: exploring the reasons behind liberal opposition to Imran Khan and comparing his political approach to that of figures like Hafiz Saeed and Shahbaz Sharif.
II. Deconstructing Imran Khan’s Character and Political Style (2:10-7:55)
Imran Khan’s Rise to Popularity: Rohan questions the legitimacy of Khan’s popularity and criticizes his actions on May 9th. He argues Khan’s political ascent was fueled by external forces, and his behavior since losing power contradicts his claims of being a “man of the people.”
Hypocrisy and Contradictions: Rohan uses his past interviews with Khan to highlight contradictions in his personality and political stances. He calls out Khan’s hypocrisy in publicly attacking those he privately lobbies for support.
A “Clumsy Player” in Politics: Rohan labels Khan a “clumsy player” in politics, pointing to his early political ambitions during Musharraf’s referendum and his shifting allegiances. He argues Khan lacks political integrity and has “dirty hands,” disqualifying him from seeking justice.
III. The Fall from Grace: Examining Khan’s Ouster and Subsequent Actions (7:55-15:30)
Parliamentary Process and the No-Confidence Motion: Rohan emphasizes the supremacy of parliament in a democracy and criticizes Khan’s efforts to subvert the no-confidence motion. He denounces Khan’s actions as illegal and undemocratic, including dissolving the assembly.
The May 9th Incident and its Aftermath: Rohan criticizes Khan for inciting violence on May 9th, questioning his claims of widespread popular support. He condemns the attacks on state institutions and suggests they were part of a larger, dangerous plan to destabilize Pakistan.
Allegations of Rigging and Political Miscalculations: Rohan addresses allegations of election rigging by Khan, highlighting contradictions in his claims by pointing to PTI’s victories in KP and Punjab. He criticizes Khan’s inability to form political alliances, contrasting it with Modi’s approach in India.
IV. Khan’s Current Predicament and the Future of Pakistani Politics (15:30-24:15)
The “Diaper Changing” Analogy: Rohan uses a metaphor of a child needing their diaper changed to describe Khan’s dependence on external forces and his unwillingness to accept responsibility for his actions. He argues Khan is stuck in a state of immaturity and seeks a return to a time when he was “pampered” by powerful entities.
The Importance of Parliamentary Politics: Rohan stresses the significance of engaging in politics through parliamentary processes. He criticizes Khan’s dismissive attitude towards parliament and his reliance on disruptive tactics, advocating for a strong and vocal opposition within the system.
Hope for Redemption and a Call for Accountability: Rohan suggests that Khan should seek forgiveness for his actions and face legal consequences for alleged corruption. He emphasizes the importance of upholding the law and holding leaders accountable for their actions.
V. Concluding Reflections: Rooj vs. Jawal and the Lessons for Pakistan (24:15-25:30)
The Dichotomy of Rooj and Jawal: Malana summarizes Rohan’s analysis, framing it within the concepts of “Rooj” (ascent) and “Jawal” (descent) in political leadership. He draws parallels between Khan and Bhutto, suggesting they both experienced a fall from grace due to their authoritarian tendencies.
The Importance of Stability and Security: Malana concludes by emphasizing the need for stability and security in Pakistan. He suggests that the rise and fall of leaders like Khan offer valuable lessons for the future of Pakistani democracy.
Political Analysis: The Rise and Fall of Imran Khan
This briefing document analyzes a political commentary by Rohan Saheb on the political career of Imran Khan. The commentary criticizes Khan’s actions and motives, comparing him unfavorably to other Pakistani leaders and highlighting his alleged hypocrisy, incompetence, and undemocratic behavior.
Key Themes:
Imran Khan’s hypocrisy: Rohan Saheb accuses Khan of double standards, claiming he seeks favor from the same institutions he publicly criticizes. He highlights Khan’s alleged pleas to powerful figures despite his public stance of independence and reliance on “the power of the people”.
“You are spreading filth and going inside and begging them to meet me… are you luring them that as long as I will stay, you are the only one? I will continue to give extension to you… what is this hypocrisy?”
Imran Khan’s political ineptitude: Rohan Saheb criticizes Khan’s political maneuvering, particularly his handling of the no-confidence motion and his decision to dissolve the assembly. He argues these actions demonstrate a lack of understanding of democratic processes and political strategy.
“If you had political wisdom then you would not have broken the PP, don’t think if you would have brought the PP with you, then you yourself would have formed the Noon League brother, alliances are also formed in democracy…”
Questioning Khan’s popularity: Rohan Saheb challenges Khan’s claims of representing the majority of Pakistanis, pointing to the relatively small size of his rallies compared to historical demonstrations. He suggests Khan’s popularity is inflated by social media and a dedicated but limited base.
“It is maintained that I am the representative of 90 per cent of the people, how many people should come with 90 per cent of the 90 per cent of the register… Well, then they are coming out for you, 2000 00 groups are coming out.”
Condemnation of May 9th incidents: The commentary strongly condemns the violence that occurred on May 9th, attributing it to Khan’s incitement and suggesting a deliberate plan to destabilize the country. Rohan Saheb argues that a truly popular leader would not have resorted to such tactics.
“Their crimes were very dangerous and they were thinking that what Pakistan was doing was There is a strong bond of security which has tied them together in such a way that they have to be kept in that base and within them they become so playful that they break each other’s heads and stand up against each other…”
Important Ideas & Facts:
Emphasis on the supremacy of Parliament: Rohan Saheb stresses the importance of democratic institutions, particularly Parliament, as the true representatives of the people. He criticizes Khan for undermining these institutions through his actions and rhetoric.
Favorable comparison to other leaders: While critical of other politicians like Shahbaz Sharif, Rohan Saheb presents them as more pragmatic and politically savvy compared to Khan. He cites their ability to form alliances and navigate the political landscape effectively.
Historical parallels: Rohan Saheb draws comparisons between Khan and previous Pakistani leaders, including Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, suggesting a pattern of charismatic leaders succumbing to authoritarian tendencies and ultimately failing.
Conclusion:
Rohan Saheb’s commentary provides a scathing critique of Imran Khan’s political career. It accuses him of hypocrisy, political ineptitude, and a dangerous disregard for democratic norms. Rohan Saheb advocates for respect for institutions and adherence to the rule of law, implicitly suggesting Khan’s actions threaten Pakistan’s stability and future.
It is important to note that this commentary represents a single perspective and may not reflect the views of all Pakistani citizens. Further research and analysis of diverse opinions are necessary to form a comprehensive understanding of Pakistani politics and Imran Khan’s legacy.
Imran Khan’s Actions: A Critical Perspective
Here is a discussion of Imran Khan’s actions, based on the provided sources:
Imran Khan’s actions on May 9th are considered indefensible. While the sources do not explicitly state what occurred on this date, they heavily imply that Khan’s actions were unacceptable.
Khan is criticized for contradictory behavior, publicly condemning individuals and groups while privately seeking their support. He is accused of hypocrisy for criticizing those who remain neutral while simultaneously pleading for their support.
The sources describe Khan as a “clumsy person in politics” who lacked understanding and relied on manipulative tactics. His pursuit of power is highlighted, with references to his alleged attempts to secure the position of Prime Minister through deals and secret meetings.
Khan’s handling of the no-confidence motion is criticized. He is accused of acting against the law by delaying the process and attempting to dissolve the assembly. His actions are seen as disrespectful to the Parliament and its authority.
The sources question Khan’s claims of popular support. They point to the relatively small number of his supporters who participated in protests and rallies, contrasting it with the massive public response seen in other countries like Bangladesh.
Khan is accused of making dangerous accusations and spreading misinformation. His rhetoric about a “strong bond of security” and a “mean thinking” within Pakistan is perceived as an attempt to incite division and violence.
Khan’s criticism of the army is condemned, particularly his suggestion that individuals within the institution should disobey their superiors. This is seen as a dangerous and selfish attempt to sow discord.
The sources point to Khan’s history of violating laws and receiving preferential treatment. They argue that he has been forgiven for actions that ordinary citizens would be punished for.
Khan’s calls for accountability and justice are seen as hypocritical, given his own alleged corrupt practices. The sources mention accusations of misusing funds and improperly benefiting from gifts received as Prime Minister.
The sources question Khan’s political strategy, arguing that he failed to build alliances and understand the dynamics of democratic politics. They contrast his approach with that of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who successfully formed a coalition government.
Khan is portrayed as immature and incapable of accepting responsibility. The analogy of a child who refuses to stop using diapers is used to illustrate his perceived dependence on others and his inability to stand on his own.
Khan’s frequent shifts in strategy and contradictory statements are highlighted, suggesting a lack of clear direction and a tendency to act impulsively.
Khan is urged to accept the current political reality, respect the law, and engage in parliamentary processes. He is criticized for his dismissive attitude towards the Parliament and his preference for disruptive tactics.
Overall, the sources paint a highly critical picture of Imran Khan’s actions, emphasizing his perceived hypocrisy, political ineptitude, and dangerous rhetoric.
Understanding Pakistani Politics: Insights from a Critical Commentary
The sources offer a sharp critique of Pakistani politics through their assessment of Imran Khan’s actions. Here’s what we can understand about the country’s political landscape from these insights:
Parliamentary System and Democratic Values: The sources stress the importance of the Parliament in Pakistan’s system of governance, emphasizing that it is the supreme legal authority representing the voice of the people. This highlights the country’s commitment, at least in principle, to democratic values where elected representatives hold power.
Challenges to Democratic Norms: Despite the emphasis on parliamentary authority, the sources also reveal behaviors and actions that undermine democratic norms. Khan’s alleged attempts to circumvent the no-confidence motion process, his disrespect for the Parliament, and his criticism of the judiciary all point to a disregard for established democratic procedures.
Power Struggles and Allegations of Manipulation: The sources suggest that Pakistani politics is marked by intense power struggles, with accusations of manipulation and backroom deals. Khan is accused of seeking personal gain through secret meetings and maneuvering for power. The sources also hint at a potentially tense relationship between political leaders and the army, with Khan’s comments about disobedience being met with strong disapproval.
Role of Public Opinion and Popular Support: The sources highlight the importance of public perception in Pakistani politics. Khan’s claims of representing the majority of the population are challenged by pointing to the limited turnout at his rallies. This suggests that politicians’ legitimacy and ability to retain power are linked to their perceived popularity and public support.
Importance of Alliances and Political Strategy: The sources criticize Khan’s political strategy, highlighting his failure to build alliances and navigate the complexities of coalition politics. This indicates that success in Pakistani politics likely requires the ability to form strategic partnerships and negotiate with other political groups.
Prevalence of Corruption Allegations: The sources make several allegations of corruption against Khan, including misuse of funds and improper handling of gifts. These accusations, if true, reflect a potential problem of corruption within the political system.
Emphasis on Accountability and Justice: Despite the negativity surrounding Khan’s actions, the sources advocate for accountability and justice, regardless of an individual’s position or power. They call for Khan to face legal consequences for his alleged wrongdoings, emphasizing the need for a fair and impartial legal system that applies to everyone.
While focusing on Imran Khan, the sources provide a window into the larger political landscape of Pakistan. They reveal a system where democratic ideals coexist with challenges to those norms, where power struggles and allegations of corruption are prominent, and where public opinion plays a significant role.
Examining Principles of Democracy through Pakistani Politics
While the sources don’t directly list the principles of democracy, they provide a case study of Pakistani politics, particularly through a critical lens on Imran Khan’s actions. Examining this critique helps understand how democratic principles are understood and sometimes challenged in practice.
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Rule of Law: The sources repeatedly emphasize the importance of the Parliament as the highest law-making body, reflecting the core democratic principle of popular sovereignty where power resides in the people and is exercised through their elected representatives. The sources stress that the Parliament is “the translation of the people” and “the voice of the whole crore people”. Upholding the rule of law is central, meaning everyone is subject to the law and no one is above it. Khan’s alleged attempts to bypass legal processes and disregard parliamentary procedures are heavily criticized for violating this principle.
Free and Fair Elections: Although not explicitly stated, the concept of free and fair elections is implied as foundational to a functioning democracy. The sources mention accusations of rigging, implying that a fair electoral process is expected. The very fact that elections take place and transitions of power are (ideally) determined by the electorate speaks to this principle.
Accountability and Transparency: Democratic principles demand that leaders are accountable to the people they govern. The sources repeatedly call for Khan to be held accountable for his actions, highlighting the expectation of transparency and responsibility from those in power. The demand for investigations into alleged corruption and misuse of funds further underlines this principle.
Respect for Democratic Institutions: The sources emphasize the importance of respecting democratic institutions like the Parliament, the judiciary, and even the electoral process itself. Criticism of Khan often stems from his perceived disrespect for these institutions, including his comments on the army, which is considered a crucial institution in Pakistan. The sources suggest that healthy democratic function relies on the proper functioning and mutual respect among these institutions.
Freedom of Speech and Assembly: While not directly addressed, Khan’s ability to hold rallies and voice his opinions, even if controversial, points to an underlying assumption of freedom of speech and assembly. However, the sources also warn against using these freedoms to spread misinformation or incite violence, suggesting a nuanced understanding of these rights.
Peaceful Transitions of Power: Implicit in the discussion of no-confidence motions and electoral processes is the democratic principle of peaceful transitions of power based on the will of the people. The sources critique Khan’s attempts to cling to power despite losing a vote of no confidence, highlighting the importance of accepting democratic outcomes.
It’s important to note that while these principles are central to a democratic system, the sources reveal the complexities and challenges of upholding them in practice. Accusations of corruption, power struggles, attempts to circumvent the law, and inflammatory rhetoric all point to the fragility of democratic norms and the constant need for vigilance in safeguarding them.
Unveiling Political Hypocrisy: A Case Study from Pakistani Politics
The sources offer a compelling exploration of political hypocrisy through their examination of Imran Khan’s actions and statements. Khan is repeatedly accused of engaging in hypocritical behavior, particularly regarding his public pronouncements versus his private actions.
Condemnation vs. Supplication: The sources point out a stark contrast between Khan’s public criticism of certain groups and his private attempts to secure their support. He denounces those who remain neutral in political conflicts, labeling them as “animals,” yet he simultaneously seeks their backing behind closed doors. This double standard exposes a blatant hypocrisy, revealing a willingness to compromise principles for political expediency.
Champion of Democracy vs. Disrespect for Institutions: Khan frequently proclaims his commitment to democratic values and the rule of law. However, his actions often contradict these pronouncements. He is accused of attempting to subvert the no-confidence motion process, undermining the authority of the Parliament, and criticizing the judiciary. This dissonance between words and actions reveals a hypocritical stance, suggesting a selective adherence to democratic principles that serves his own interests.
Accusations of Corruption While Engaging in Questionable Practices: Khan positions himself as a crusader against corruption, yet he faces allegations of misusing funds, benefiting improperly from gifts as Prime Minister, and engaging in financial misconduct. This discrepancy between his anti-corruption rhetoric and the accusations leveled against him raises serious questions about his sincerity and points to potential hypocrisy in his stance.
Demands for Accountability While Resisting Scrutiny: Khan vehemently demands accountability from his political opponents, but he seems reluctant to face similar scrutiny himself. He avoids engaging in parliamentary processes that would hold him accountable and instead resorts to disruptive tactics and fiery rhetoric. This unwillingness to subject himself to the same standards he demands of others further reinforces the perception of hypocrisy.
The sources utilize a powerful analogy to illustrate Khan’s hypocrisy, comparing him to a child who demands to have his diaper changed despite being capable of doing it himself. This imagery effectively portrays Khan’s perceived immaturity and his refusal to take responsibility for his actions, preferring to rely on others to clean up his messes while simultaneously presenting himself as a strong and independent leader.
The critique of Khan’s actions serves as a broader commentary on the nature of political hypocrisy. The sources suggest that hypocrisy is a common feature of the political landscape, where individuals often prioritize personal gain and power over principles and consistency. This behavior erodes public trust, undermines democratic processes, and perpetuates a cynical view of politics.
Analyzing National Security through the Lens of Pakistani Politics
The sources, while primarily focused on Imran Khan’s political actions and alleged hypocrisy, offer insights into how national security is perceived and potentially impacted within the Pakistani context. The conversation about Khan’s actions, particularly his relationship with the army and his controversial rhetoric, sheds light on some key concerns surrounding national security.
The Military’s Role in National Security: While not explicitly discussed, the sources allude to the significant role of the army in Pakistan’s national security apparatus. The strong disapproval of Khan’s comments urging disobedience within the army ranks highlights the sensitivity surrounding this institution and its importance in maintaining stability and security. The very fact that Khan’s comments are considered problematic speaks volumes about the perceived power and influence of the military in matters of national security.
Threats to Security from Internal Divisions: The sources express concern over Khan’s actions potentially creating divisions within Pakistani society and weakening national security. His inflammatory rhetoric, targeting those who hold different political views, is seen as contributing to societal fragmentation. This divisiveness is presented as a threat to national security, as a united front is generally considered crucial in facing external threats and maintaining internal stability.
The Dangers of Undermining Democratic Institutions: The sources repeatedly criticize Khan for disrespecting democratic institutions like the Parliament and the judiciary. This behavior is portrayed not only as undemocratic but also as potentially damaging to national security. A weakened or dysfunctional democratic system is presented as vulnerable to instability and more susceptible to internal and external threats.
The Importance of Responsible Leadership for National Security: The sources strongly imply that responsible and ethical leadership is crucial for safeguarding national security. Khan’s alleged hypocrisy, his attempts to circumvent legal processes, and his disregard for democratic norms are portrayed as detrimental to national security. This critique suggests that leaders who act irresponsibly, prioritize personal gain over national interest, and undermine democratic institutions ultimately weaken the country’s security.
It’s worth noting that the sources present a particular perspective on Pakistani politics and national security, primarily through a critical assessment of Imran Khan. While insightful, this perspective may not represent the full spectrum of views on these complex issues.
Dissecting Imran Khan’s Political Strategies and Their Fallout: A Critical Examination
The sources provide a scathing critique of Imran Khan’s political strategies, highlighting how his actions have led to negative consequences for both his political career and, arguably, Pakistani democracy.
Populism and Emotional Appeals: Khan’s political strategy has relied heavily on populist rhetoric, appealing directly to the emotions of the public, particularly by positioning himself as a champion of the people against a corrupt elite. He frequently uses charged language, denounces his opponents as morally compromised, and paints himself as a lone warrior fighting for justice. This strategy has proven successful in mobilizing support, particularly among younger voters disillusioned with traditional political parties. However, this emotionally driven approach often lacks substantive policy proposals and relies on simplistic solutions to complex problems.
Undermining Democratic Processes: One of the most concerning consequences of Khan’s strategies has been his willingness to undermine democratic processes and institutions when they don’t favor him. His rejection of the no-confidence motion, his criticism of the judiciary, and his attempts to dissolve the Parliament are all cited as examples of his disregard for democratic norms. This behavior is seen as eroding public trust in institutions and setting dangerous precedents for future political leaders.
Accusations of Hypocrisy and Inconsistency: Khan’s actions and statements often clash, leading to accusations of hypocrisy. He denounces corruption while facing allegations of financial impropriety. He champions democracy while simultaneously trying to subvert democratic processes. This inconsistency undermines his credibility and fuels public distrust. The sources use a poignant analogy, comparing Khan to a child demanding a diaper change despite being capable of doing it himself, to illustrate his perceived lack of maturity and responsibility.
Cultivating a Divisive Political Environment: Khan’s rhetoric often creates divisions within society, pitting groups against each other and exacerbating existing tensions. His labeling of those who don’t support him as “animals” and his attacks on the “neutral” further contribute to polarization. This divisive approach undermines national unity and could potentially harm social cohesion and stability in the long run.
Damage to Personal Credibility and Political Future: Khan’s strategies have ultimately backfired, leading to a loss of political power and a tarnished reputation. His attempts to cling to power despite losing a vote of no confidence were unsuccessful and further alienated him from political allies. His incendiary rhetoric has damaged his image and made it difficult to build bridges with those who oppose him.
Consequences Beyond Khan: The sources suggest that the consequences of Khan’s political strategies extend beyond his personal political fortunes. His actions raise concerns about the future of democracy in Pakistan, demonstrating how populist tactics can be used to erode democratic norms and institutions. His willingness to exploit divisions within society for political gain poses a threat to social stability and national unity.
The sources present a critical perspective on Imran Khan and his political strategies. While acknowledging his initial popularity and success in mobilizing support, they ultimately argue that his actions have had negative consequences for both his political career and the broader political landscape in Pakistan.
Imran Khan: A Portrait of Hypocrisy and Political Recklessness
The speaker in the provided source paints a highly critical picture of Imran Khan’s political behavior, emphasizing his hypocrisy, disregard for democratic norms, and damaging political strategies.
A Master of Double Standards: The speaker repeatedly accuses Khan of hypocrisy, highlighting the stark contrast between his public pronouncements and his private actions. While publicly condemning certain groups, he privately seeks their support. He claims to champion democracy while actively working to undermine democratic processes. This double standard is seen as a blatant attempt to manipulate public perception for personal gain.
A Disrespect for Democratic Institutions and Processes: Khan’s political behavior is characterized by a disregard for democratic institutions and norms. He is accused of attempting to circumvent the no-confidence motion process, disrespecting the Parliament, and criticizing the judiciary. His rejection of democratic processes when they don’t favor him is presented as evidence of his authoritarian tendencies and his belief that he is above the law.
A Propensity for Divisive Rhetoric and Tactics: The speaker argues that Khan intentionally uses divisive rhetoric to polarize society and consolidate his power. He labels those who oppose him as enemies of the people, fuels distrust in institutions, and creates an “us vs. them” mentality. This strategy, while effective in rallying his base, is seen as detrimental to national unity and social harmony.
Immaturity and a Refusal to Take Responsibility: The speaker utilizes a striking analogy to portray Khan’s political behavior, comparing him to a child who demands to have his diaper changed despite being fully capable of doing it himself. This imagery highlights Khan’s perceived immaturity, his refusal to accept responsibility for his actions, and his expectation that others will clean up his messes.
Destructive Political Strategies with Lasting Consequences: The speaker contends that Khan’s political strategies, while initially successful in garnering support, have ultimately backfired and resulted in significant damage. His populist rhetoric, reliance on emotional appeals, and willingness to undermine democratic processes have eroded public trust, polarized society, and weakened democratic institutions. The speaker suggests that Khan’s actions have not only harmed his own political career but have also left a lasting negative impact on Pakistani politics.
In essence, the speaker portrays Imran Khan as a politician driven by self-interest and a lust for power. His actions are characterized by hypocrisy, a disregard for democratic principles, a willingness to sow division, and a lack of political maturity. The speaker’s critique goes beyond a simple assessment of Khan’s actions; it serves as a warning about the dangers of populism and the fragility of democratic institutions when confronted with leaders who prioritize personal gain over the common good.
Contrasting Imran Khan with Hafiz Saeed: A Lack of Direct Comparison
While the sources heavily criticize Imran Khan’s political behavior and strategies, they do not offer a direct comparison between Imran Khan and Hafiz Saeed.
Focus on Khan’s Political Conduct: The speaker’s primary concern is analyzing Khan’s political actions, highlighting his perceived hypocrisy, manipulation of democratic processes, and divisive rhetoric. The critique centers on Khan’s conduct as a political leader and its impact on Pakistani democracy.
Hafiz Saeed Mentioned Briefly: Hafiz Saeed is mentioned only in passing at the beginning of the conversation. The question posed to the speaker asks why a “liberal person” like Imran Khan is opposed by someone like Hafiz Saeed, who is seen as more favorable in comparison. However, the speaker doesn’t elaborate on this comparison or delve into Hafiz Saeed’s actions or ideology.
No Substantive Analysis of Saeed: The sources do not provide information about Hafiz Saeed’s political strategies or his views on national security. Consequently, it’s not possible to draw a meaningful contrast between the two figures based on the provided sources.
In summary, the sources primarily focus on critiquing Imran Khan, without offering a comparative analysis that includes Hafiz Saeed. To understand how the speaker might contrast the two figures, additional information about Hafiz Saeed’s political stance and actions would be necessary.
Imran Khan’s Political Actions: A Tapestry of Hypocrisy, Disregard for Democracy, and Divisive Tactics
The speaker in the sources weaves a highly critical narrative of Imran Khan’s political actions, emphasizing his perceived hypocrisy, his blatant disregard for democratic norms and processes, and his penchant for employing divisive rhetoric and tactics to achieve his political objectives.
Hypocrisy as a Hallmark: A recurring theme in the speaker’s critique is the accusation of hypocrisy that pervades Khan’s political behavior. The speaker repeatedly points out the stark contradictions between Khan’s public pronouncements and his private actions. For instance, while Khan publicly denounces certain groups or individuals, he is accused of privately seeking their support, exposing a calculated attempt to manipulate public perception for personal gain. This hypocrisy extends to his stance on democracy; despite championing democratic ideals, Khan is accused of actively working to subvert democratic processes when they don’t align with his goals.
Disrespecting the Pillars of Democracy: The speaker’s condemnation extends to Khan’s evident disregard for democratic institutions and processes. He is criticized for his attempts to circumvent the no-confidence motion, his disrespectful treatment of the Parliament, and his critical remarks directed at the judiciary. These actions are presented as clear signs of Khan’s authoritarian tendencies, suggesting a belief that he is above the law and not bound by the principles he claims to uphold. The speaker underscores this point by highlighting Khan’s violation of legal boundaries, even citing instances where he allegedly received preferential treatment from law enforcement compared to an ordinary citizen.
Sowing Seeds of Discord: The speaker argues that Khan deliberately employs divisive rhetoric and tactics to polarize Pakistani society and consolidate his grip on power. He resorts to labeling those who oppose him as “animals” and targets those who remain neutral, further fueling existing tensions and distrust. This strategy, while potentially effective in galvanizing his base, is seen as a dangerous game that undermines national unity and social cohesion. The speaker expresses concern that Khan’s divisive approach could have long-lasting negative consequences for Pakistani society, fostering animosity and hindering collaborative efforts towards progress.
Immaturity and Shirking Responsibility: The speaker employs a striking analogy to depict Khan’s political behavior, comparing him to a child demanding a diaper change despite possessing the ability to do it himself. This vivid imagery effectively portrays Khan’s perceived immaturity, his unwillingness to accept accountability for his actions, and his expectation that others will bear the burden of rectifying his mistakes. This analogy serves as a powerful indictment of Khan’s leadership, suggesting a lack of the responsibility and maturity expected of a national leader.
Political Strategies that Ultimately Backfire: The speaker contends that while Khan’s political strategies, particularly his populist rhetoric and emotional appeals, initially garnered significant support, they ultimately backfired and caused considerable damage. His relentless pursuit of power, even after losing a vote of no confidence, further alienated him from potential allies and tarnished his reputation. The speaker argues that Khan’s actions have not only harmed his political prospects but have also inflicted lasting damage on Pakistani politics, eroding public trust and weakening democratic institutions.
In essence, the speaker portrays Imran Khan as a political figure driven by self-interest and an insatiable thirst for power. His political actions are characterized by hypocrisy, a blatant disregard for democratic principles, a willingness to sow division within society, and a lack of the maturity and responsibility expected of a leader entrusted with a nation’s well-being. The speaker’s critique transcends a mere assessment of Khan’s actions; it serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of populism and the vulnerability of democratic institutions when confronted with leaders who prioritize personal gain above the collective good.
Imran Khan’s Actions Under Fire: A Detailed Examination of the Speaker’s Criticisms
The sources offer a scathing critique of Imran Khan’s political actions, painting a picture of a leader driven by self-interest and a willingness to undermine democratic processes for personal gain. Let’s break down the specific actions that draw the speaker’s ire:
Circumventing the No-Confidence Motion: The speaker condemns Khan’s actions during the no-confidence motion process, accusing him of attempting to delay and ultimately thwart the democratic procedure. He criticizes Khan for going against the established law and for his role in the “changing of stones” that occurred overnight, implying underhanded tactics to cling to power. Khan’s decision to dissolve the assembly, despite a pending motion, is deemed a blatant violation of democratic norms.
Disrespecting Parliament and the Judiciary: Khan’s conduct towards key democratic institutions is heavily criticized. His refusal to participate in parliamentary proceedings after the no-confidence motion is seen as a rejection of democratic engagement. Additionally, his attacks against the Supreme Judiciary are condemned as attempts to undermine the rule of law and intimidate those who challenge his authority.
Inciting Violence and Disrupting Public Order: The speaker directly implicates Khan in the events of May 9th, suggesting that he either orchestrated or, at the very least, failed to prevent the violence and destruction that took place. Khan’s rhetoric, encouraging his supporters to cross “red lines” and challenge authority, is seen as directly contributing to the unrest. The speaker questions the size of Khan’s support base, highlighting the discrepancy between his claims of representing 90% of the population and the limited turnout at protests.
Hypocrisy and Manipulation: Khan is repeatedly accused of hypocrisy, with the speaker highlighting the contradictions between his public persona and his behind-the-scenes maneuvering. He is accused of publicly condemning certain groups while privately seeking their support. He is also condemned for using public platforms to spread false narratives and deflect blame onto others.
Breaking Political Alliances and Misjudging Opponents: The speaker criticizes Khan’s political strategy of breaking alliances, particularly with the PP (Pakistan Peoples Party), arguing that this move weakened his position and ultimately benefited his rivals, the Noon League. He suggests that Khan’s political miscalculations and his failure to understand the dynamics of Pakistani politics contributed to his downfall.
Refusal to Accept Defeat and Take Responsibility: The speaker highlights Khan’s persistent refusal to accept the outcome of the no-confidence motion and his subsequent removal from office. Instead of acknowledging his political defeat, Khan resorts to blaming external forces and making excuses for his failures. He is portrayed as clinging to a narrative of victimhood and refusing to take responsibility for his actions.
These specific actions, as described by the speaker, paint a damning picture of Khan’s political conduct. He is presented as a leader who prioritizes personal ambition over democratic principles and national unity. The speaker’s criticisms suggest that Khan’s actions have not only damaged his own political career but have also had a detrimental impact on Pakistan’s political landscape.
From Diaper Changes to Political Defeat: The Analogy of a Child’s Regression
The sources employ a striking analogy to illustrate Imran Khan’s political trajectory, comparing him to a child who regresses in his development. Initially, the child progresses, learning to stand and walk, symbolizing Khan’s rise to political prominence. However, instead of continuing this forward momentum, the child demands to have his diaper changed again, demonstrating a reluctance to embrace responsibility and a yearning for the comfort of being cared for.
This analogy poignantly captures several key aspects of Khan’s political journey as perceived by the speaker:
Early Promise Followed by Regression: The child’s initial steps represent Khan’s early popularity and his promises of a “Naya Pakistan” (New Pakistan). However, his subsequent actions, characterized by hypocrisy, disregard for democratic norms, and divisive rhetoric, are seen as a regression from these initial ideals, mirroring the child’s return to dependency.
Unwillingness to Accept Responsibility: The child’s demand for a diaper change, despite being capable of self-care, symbolizes Khan’s refusal to take responsibility for his actions and his expectation that others, perhaps powerful entities or the “establishment,” will step in to resolve his problems. This unwillingness to acknowledge his own role in his political downfall is a central theme in the speaker’s criticism.
Yearning for Past Support and “NEPIA”: The analogy also highlights Khan’s perceived longing for the support he once enjoyed, potentially alluding to the backing he allegedly received from certain quarters in his rise to power. The “NEPIA” (diaper) represents this past support, which he now finds lacking. The speaker suggests that Khan fails to recognize that the political landscape has changed, and those who may have previously assisted him have adopted a neutral stance.
Immaturity and Lack of Political Acumen: By likening Khan to a child, the speaker implicitly criticizes his perceived political immaturity and lack of strategic thinking. The child’s inability to understand the consequences of his actions mirrors Khan’s miscalculations and his failure to adapt to changing political circumstances.
In essence, the analogy of the child’s regression effectively encapsulates the speaker’s critique of Imran Khan’s political trajectory. It suggests that while Khan initially held promise, his actions ultimately revealed a lack of maturity, a refusal to embrace accountability, and a misplaced reliance on past support systems. This powerful imagery underscores the speaker’s disappointment in Khan’s leadership, depicting him as a figure who failed to live up to his initial potential and instead regressed into a state of political dependency and blame-shifting.
Criticisms of Imran Khan’s Leadership: A Multifaceted Critique
The sources offer a comprehensive and pointed critique of Imran Khan’s leadership, highlighting several key flaws that contributed to his political downfall. The criticisms extend beyond mere policy disagreements, focusing instead on his character, his approach to governance, and his political strategies.
Authoritarian Tendencies Masquerading as Democracy: While Khan often presented himself as a champion of democracy, his actions revealed a concerning disregard for democratic principles and institutions. The speaker criticizes his attempts to circumvent the no-confidence motion, his dissolution of the assembly despite a pending motion, and his attacks on the Supreme Judiciary. These actions are seen as indicative of an authoritarian mindset, where personal power takes precedence over the rule of law and the will of the people. The speaker emphasizes that Khan, despite his claims of representing the people, ultimately rejected democratic processes when they threatened his hold on power.
Hypocrisy and Calculated Manipulation: The speaker repeatedly accuses Khan of hypocrisy, highlighting a pattern of discrepancy between his public pronouncements and his private actions. He criticizes Khan for publicly denouncing individuals and groups while simultaneously seeking their support behind closed doors. This behavior is interpreted as a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception and gain political advantage through deceptive means. The speaker suggests that Khan’s actions were driven by self-interest rather than a genuine commitment to the principles he espoused.
Divisiveness and Incitement of Unrest: A major criticism leveled against Khan’s leadership is his use of divisive rhetoric and tactics to polarize society and consolidate his support base. He is accused of resorting to inflammatory language, labeling his opponents as “animals” and targeting those who remain neutral. The speaker expresses concern that Khan’s approach fostered animosity and distrust within Pakistani society, potentially undermining national unity and hindering collaborative efforts toward progress. His rhetoric is seen as contributing to the unrest and violence that marred his final days in office, particularly the events of May 9th.
Immaturity and Lack of Accountability: The sources utilize a potent analogy to depict Khan’s political behavior, comparing him to a child who regresses in his development. The analogy highlights Khan’s perceived immaturity, his unwillingness to accept responsibility for his actions, and his expectation that others will step in to rectify his mistakes. The speaker contends that Khan, despite his age and experience, displayed a lack of political maturity and a tendency to shirk accountability. He is portrayed as clinging to a narrative of victimhood rather than acknowledging his role in his own political downfall.
Flawed Political Strategy and Misplaced Reliance: The speaker criticizes Khan’s strategic decisions, arguing that they ultimately backfired and contributed to his loss of power. He points to Khan’s decision to break political alliances, particularly with the PP, as a miscalculation that strengthened his rivals. Additionally, the speaker suggests that Khan’s reliance on past support systems, perhaps alluding to alleged backing from powerful entities, proved misplaced as the political landscape shifted.
In conclusion, the criticisms presented in the sources paint a highly critical picture of Imran Khan’s leadership style. He is portrayed as a figure who, while initially promising, ultimately succumbed to his own flaws, undermining democratic norms, sowing division, and displaying a lack of maturity and accountability. The speaker’s critique serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of populism and the fragility of democratic institutions when confronted with leaders who prioritize personal gain over the collective good.
Imran Khan’s Missteps: A Catalogue of Criticisms
The speaker in the sources presents a pointed critique of Imran Khan’s leadership, outlining specific events and actions that he perceives as major failings. These criticisms highlight Khan’s alleged disregard for democratic processes, his tendency towards hypocrisy and manipulation, and his role in exacerbating political divisions and instability in Pakistan.
Mishandling the No-Confidence Motion: The speaker condemns Khan’s response to the no-confidence motion brought against him, arguing that he attempted to circumvent the democratic process through various means. Khan is accused of:
Delaying the Vote: He is criticized for intentionally delaying the vote on the no-confidence motion, contravening established legal procedures.
Dissolving the Assembly: Khan’s decision to dissolve the assembly before the vote could take place is condemned as a blatant attempt to cling to power and avoid facing the consequences of the motion. This action is seen as a violation of the democratic principle that a leader must submit to the will of the parliament.
Engaging in Suspicious “Stone Changing”: The speaker alludes to mysterious “stones being changed” overnight during the no-confidence process, implying underhanded tactics and potentially corrupt dealings to influence the outcome.
Attacks on Democratic Institutions and Principles: The speaker expresses deep concern over Khan’s actions and rhetoric towards key pillars of Pakistani democracy:
Disrespecting Parliament: Khan’s refusal to engage with parliamentary proceedings after the no-confidence motion is seen as a rejection of democratic norms and a sign of disrespect for the institution.
Undermining the Judiciary: His attacks on the Supreme Judiciary are condemned as an attempt to intimidate and silence those who challenge his authority. This behavior is viewed as an assault on the rule of law and a dangerous precedent for a leader to set.
Encouraging Military Insubordination: The speaker references comments made by Shahbaz Gill, a close associate of Khan, that seemingly encouraged disobedience within the military. This is presented as a highly irresponsible and potentially dangerous action that could undermine the chain of command and national security.
Inciting Violence and Exploiting Public Sentiment: Khan is accused of playing a direct role in the escalation of political tensions and the outbreak of violence, particularly surrounding the events of May 9th:
Crossing “Red Lines” and Encouraging Unrest: The speaker points to Khan’s use of inflammatory language, urging his supporters to cross “red lines” and challenge authority, as directly contributing to the unrest and violence that ensued.
Orchestrating or Failing to Prevent May 9th Violence: The speaker directly implicates Khan in the violence and destruction that occurred on May 9th, suggesting he either orchestrated the events or, at the very least, failed to take adequate measures to prevent them. This raises serious questions about Khan’s judgment and his commitment to peaceful political processes.
Inflated Claims of Public Support: The speaker challenges Khan’s assertion of representing 90% of the population, pointing to the relatively small turnout at his rallies as evidence that his support base was not as widespread as he claimed. This discrepancy is used to undermine Khan’s claims of popular legitimacy and suggest that he was out of touch with the true sentiments of the Pakistani people.
Seeking Undue Favors and Evading Accountability: The speaker criticizes Khan for allegedly seeking special treatment and attempting to avoid facing the legal consequences of his actions:
Seeking “NEPIA” (Diaper Changes) from Powerful Entities: The speaker utilizes the analogy of a child demanding a diaper change to illustrate Khan’s perceived reliance on external forces to resolve his problems. This suggests that Khan expected powerful entities, perhaps those who previously supported his rise to power, to intervene on his behalf and shield him from accountability.
Exploring “Backdoor” Deals for Clemency: The speaker mentions Khan’s visit to Jeddah and suggests that it may have been an attempt to secure a favorable deal or “NRO” (National Reconciliation Ordinance) to evade prosecution for alleged corruption and financial improprieties. This reinforces the image of Khan as a leader who seeks to operate outside the bounds of law and accountability.
The speaker’s detailed account of these specific events aims to present a comprehensive picture of Imran Khan’s leadership failings. He portrays Khan as a figure who prioritized personal ambition over democratic principles, manipulated public sentiment for political gain, and ultimately left a legacy of instability and division. The criticisms, while undoubtedly coming from a particular perspective, offer a valuable insight into the complex political landscape of Pakistan and the challenges faced by leaders who navigate its turbulent waters.
Parallels and Contrasts: Imran Khan in the Context of Other Leaders
The sources draw implicit and explicit comparisons between Imran Khan and other political figures, both historical and contemporary, to highlight his perceived failings and contextualize his actions within broader political trends. These comparisons serve to illuminate the speaker’s view of Khan’s leadership style and his assessment of Khan’s place within Pakistani political history.
Imran Khan and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto: A Shared Trajectory of Authoritarianism: The speaker suggests a parallel between Imran Khan and former Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, both of whom are characterized as initially popular leaders who ultimately embraced authoritarian tendencies. The speaker argues that both figures, despite their initial democratic credentials, developed a mindset that prioritized personal power over the principles of democratic governance. He points to their shared unwillingness to accept challenges to their authority and their tendency to suppress dissent as evidence of their authoritarian leanings. The speaker’s comparison suggests that Khan, like Bhutto, ultimately failed to live up to the democratic ideals he espoused, succumbing instead to the allure of unchecked power.
Imran Khan and Nawaz Sharif: A Contrast in Political Strategy and Public Perception: The speaker implicitly contrasts Imran Khan’s approach to politics with that of Nawaz Sharif, highlighting key differences in their political strategies and their relationships with the public. While Khan is criticized for his confrontational style, his tendency to break alliances, and his reliance on populist rhetoric, Sharif is presented as a more pragmatic figure who understands the importance of building coalitions and maintaining stability. The speaker suggests that Sharif’s ability to navigate the complexities of Pakistani politics and secure alliances, even when lacking a simple majority, demonstrates a level of political acumen that Khan lacked.
Imran Khan and Narendra Modi: A Cautionary Tale of Populism and Division: The speaker draws a comparison between Imran Khan and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, both of whom are seen as examples of populist leaders who have utilized divisive rhetoric and tactics to consolidate their power. The speaker expresses concern that Khan, like Modi, has exploited societal divisions and fueled polarization for political gain. The comparison serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the potential dangers of populist leadership and the long-term consequences of eroding social cohesion for short-term political expediency.
Imran Khan and Adolf Hitler: An Extreme Analogy Highlighting Authoritarian Mindsets: The speaker utilizes a hyperbolic comparison between Imran Khan and Adolf Hitler, albeit in a limited context, to emphasize his view of Khan’s authoritarian tendencies. The speaker argues that Khan, like Hitler, exhibited a disregard for democratic norms and a willingness to suppress opposition. While acknowledging the extreme nature of this analogy, the speaker uses it to underscore his belief that Khan’s mindset and actions posed a threat to democratic institutions and values in Pakistan.
By drawing these comparisons, the speaker provides a broader context for understanding Imran Khan’s leadership and its impact on Pakistani politics. The parallels and contrasts he draws highlight the complexities of leadership, the challenges of balancing democratic ideals with political realities, and the potential pitfalls of populism and authoritarianism. The speaker’s analysis encourages reflection on the lessons to be learned from the past and the importance of safeguarding democratic institutions against the erosion of values and principles.
Targeting the “Imranistas”: Criticisms of Khan’s Supporters
The speaker not only criticizes Imran Khan directly but also takes aim at his supporters, questioning their motives, judgment, and actions. These criticisms shed light on the speaker’s perception of the broader political dynamics surrounding Khan’s movement and the role his supporters played in both his rise and fall.
Blind Loyalty and Unquestioning Support: The speaker suggests that many of Khan’s supporters exhibit blind loyalty, accepting his claims and narratives without critical scrutiny. He points to their acceptance of Khan’s assertions about representing 90% of the population, despite evidence suggesting otherwise, as an example of this unquestioning support. This unwavering loyalty is framed as a weakness, preventing Khan’s followers from recognizing his flaws and holding him accountable for his actions.
Susceptibility to Manipulation and Propaganda: The speaker argues that Khan’s supporters have been manipulated by his populist rhetoric and social media campaigns. He contends that the enthusiasm and energy of some, particularly young people, have been misdirected and exploited for Khan’s political gain. This manipulation, according to the speaker, has blinded them to the reality of Khan’s leadership and the potential harm caused by his divisive tactics.
Violence and Disregard for the Rule of Law: The speaker directly condemns the actions of Khan’s supporters who engaged in violence and destruction, particularly during the events of May 9th. He attributes this behavior to the inflammatory rhetoric and encouragement of Khan, who urged his followers to cross “red lines” and challenge authority. The speaker sees this violence as a direct consequence of Khan’s leadership and a testament to the negative influence he has exerted on his supporters.
Lack of Genuine Popular Support: The speaker challenges the notion of widespread popular support for Khan, pointing to the relatively small turnout at his rallies as evidence that his base was not as broad as he claimed. This observation serves to undermine the legitimacy of Khan’s movement and suggest that his supporters were a vocal but ultimately limited segment of the population.
Immaturity and Unrealistic Expectations: The speaker employs the analogy of a child demanding a diaper change to describe the mindset of some of Khan’s supporters. This comparison implies that they have been coddled and shielded from responsibility, leading to unrealistic expectations and an inability to cope with the complexities of political reality. The speaker suggests that they are unwilling to accept that Khan is no longer in a position of power and are clinging to the hope of a return to the past.
The speaker’s criticisms of Khan’s supporters reveal a deeper concern about the broader political climate in Pakistan. He sees the blind loyalty, susceptibility to manipulation, and propensity for violence exhibited by some as warning signs of a society vulnerable to demagoguery and instability. By highlighting these concerns, the speaker aims to encourage critical thinking, responsible political engagement, and a rejection of divisive rhetoric and tactics.
From Political Darling to “Diaper-Changer” Dependent: The Analogy of a Child’s Maturation
The speaker in the sources uses a striking and extended analogy to characterize Imran Khan’s political career, likening it to the developmental stages of a child. This comparison serves not only to highlight Khan’s perceived political immaturity and dependence on external forces but also to explain his current struggles and disillusionment.
Early Stages: Pampered and Protected: The analogy begins by depicting Khan’s initial rise to power as akin to a child being cared for by doting parents. The speaker describes how Khan was initially “pampered,” supported, and seemingly destined for success, implying that he benefited from powerful backers who facilitated his ascent. This period is characterized by a sense of ease and effortless achievement, much like a child who has their needs met without having to exert much effort.
Demands and Expectations: As the child grows, so do their expectations and demands. Similarly, the speaker suggests that Khan, once in power, developed a sense of entitlement and an unwillingness to accept limitations or challenges to his authority. This stage is marked by a shift from passive reliance to active demands, mirroring a child’s growing awareness of their own desires and their ability to assert them.
Confrontation and Disillusionment: The pivotal moment in the analogy arrives when the child, accustomed to having their needs met, demands a “diaper change” but is met with refusal. This refusal represents Khan’s removal from power and the withdrawal of support from those who previously enabled him. The speaker suggests that Khan, like a frustrated child, is struggling to comprehend this change in circumstances and is lashing out in anger and confusion.
Unprepared for Independence: The analogy concludes by highlighting the child’s inability to function independently. The speaker argues that Khan, having grown accustomed to being “pampered,” lacks the political maturity and skills necessary to navigate the challenges of being in opposition or rebuilding his movement without the support he once enjoyed. He is portrayed as clinging to the hope that his previous benefactors will return, unable to adapt to the new reality of his situation.
By comparing Khan’s political trajectory to a child’s development, the speaker effectively conveys his assessment of Khan’s shortcomings as a leader. The analogy paints a picture of a figure who was initially elevated to a position of power without necessarily possessing the maturity, resilience, and independence required to sustain it. The speaker implies that Khan’s struggles stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of political realities and an inability to adapt to changing circumstances.
Doubting the “Awam”: The Speaker’s Skepticism of Khan’s Popularity
The speaker in the sources expresses significant doubt about Imran Khan’s claims of representing the will of the people and enjoying widespread popular support. He utilizes multiple lines of reasoning and evidence to challenge this narrative, presenting a counter-argument that portrays Khan’s support as both limited and manufactured.
Low Rally Turnout: The speaker directly challenges Khan’s assertion of representing 90% of the population by pointing to the relatively small crowds attending his rallies. He argues that if Khan genuinely commanded such widespread support, his rallies would be overflowing with people. Instead, the speaker observes that the turnout has been modest, consisting of only a few thousand individuals. This discrepancy between Khan’s claims and the observable reality forms the basis of the speaker’s skepticism.
Social Media Hype vs. Ground Reality: The speaker contends that much of the perceived support for Khan is a product of social media hype and online activism rather than genuine grassroots enthusiasm. He criticizes the tendency to conflate online engagement with real-world political power, arguing that the vocal presence of Khan’s supporters on social media does not necessarily translate into widespread popular support. The speaker suggests that this disconnect between the virtual and the real has inflated Khan’s perception of his own popularity.
Manipulated Youth and Misguided Enthusiasm: The speaker expresses concern that young people, in particular, have been manipulated by Khan’s populist rhetoric and social media campaigns. He suggests that their enthusiasm and energy have been misdirected and exploited for Khan’s political gain. While acknowledging the sincerity of their beliefs, the speaker argues that their lack of experience and susceptibility to emotional appeals have led them to support a leader who ultimately does not have their best interests at heart.
The “Pressure Group” Phenomenon: The speaker dismisses Khan’s claims of being a “popular leader” by suggesting that his support base is largely comprised of a “pressure group” consisting of loyalists and beneficiaries of his patronage. He implies that this group is motivated more by personal gain and allegiance to Khan than by genuine belief in his policies or vision for the country. This characterization seeks to undermine the legitimacy of Khan’s support by suggesting that it is driven by narrow interests rather than broad-based popular appeal.
Inability to Mobilize Mass Support: The speaker further undermines Khan’s claims of popularity by highlighting his inability to mobilize mass support when it mattered most. He points to the lack of widespread protests and demonstrations following Khan’s removal from power as evidence that his support base is not as deep or committed as he claims. The speaker argues that if Khan truly represented the will of the people, there would have been a much stronger public reaction to his ouster.
Through these arguments and observations, the speaker constructs a narrative that challenges the dominant portrayal of Imran Khan as a leader with overwhelming popular support. He encourages listeners to look beyond the surface-level enthusiasm and social media hype to consider the actual evidence of Khan’s popularity, which he argues is far more limited and manufactured than Khan and his supporters would have people believe.
The Speaker’s Scathing Critique of Imran Khan’s Leadership
The speaker in the sources presents a highly critical view of Imran Khan’s leadership style, portraying him as a deeply flawed figure characterized by hypocrisy, immaturity, and a dangerous disregard for democratic norms and the rule of law. Throughout their analysis, the speaker utilizes a variety of rhetorical techniques, including pointed comparisons, historical parallels, and biting sarcasm, to underscore their negative assessment of Khan’s leadership.
Hypocrisy and Duplicity: The speaker repeatedly accuses Khan of hypocrisy, highlighting the disconnect between his public pronouncements and his private actions. They point to Khan’s appeals to the “power of the people” while simultaneously engaging in backroom deals and seeking support from powerful institutions as evidence of this duplicity. The speaker further criticizes Khan’s tendency to publicly condemn individuals and institutions while privately seeking their favor, accusing him of engaging in “filth” and “luring” those he claims to oppose. This inconsistency, according to the speaker, reveals a lack of integrity and a willingness to manipulate others for personal gain.
Immaturity and Lack of Political Acumen: The speaker utilizes the analogy of a child demanding a diaper change to emphasize Khan’s political immaturity and inability to cope with the complexities of governing. They suggest that Khan, accustomed to being “pampered” and supported by powerful backers, lacks the resilience and adaptability necessary to navigate the challenges of political leadership. The speaker criticizes Khan’s tendency to lash out and make impulsive decisions when faced with setbacks, arguing that this behavior demonstrates a lack of strategic thinking and an inability to learn from his mistakes.
Disregard for Democratic Norms and Institutions: The speaker condemns Khan’s actions in undermining democratic processes and institutions, particularly his attempts to circumvent parliamentary procedures and challenge the authority of the judiciary. They highlight Khan’s decision to dissolve the assembly and his attacks on the Supreme Court as examples of his willingness to violate the rule of law to maintain his grip on power. The speaker argues that this behavior sets a dangerous precedent and threatens the stability of Pakistan’s democratic system.
Inciting Violence and Divisiveness: The speaker holds Khan directly responsible for the violence and unrest that erupted following his removal from power, specifically referencing the events of May 9th. They accuse Khan of inciting his supporters to cross “red lines” and challenge authority, leading to attacks on state institutions and personnel. The speaker views this violence as a direct consequence of Khan’s inflammatory rhetoric and his willingness to exploit the passions of his followers for political ends.
Appealing to Extremism and “Hitlerian” Tendencies: The speaker employs particularly strong language to condemn Khan’s leadership, drawing parallels to historical figures known for authoritarianism and extremism. They accuse Khan of harboring “Hitlerian” tendencies, suggesting that his desire for absolute power and his disregard for democratic norms pose a threat to Pakistan’s future. This comparison serves to highlight the speaker’s deep concern about the direction of Khan’s leadership and the potential consequences of his actions.
The speaker’s analysis of Imran Khan’s leadership paints a bleak picture of a figure who is driven by self-interest, lacking in political maturity, and willing to undermine democratic institutions to achieve his goals. The speaker utilizes a variety of rhetorical strategies to underscore the dangers posed by Khan’s leadership style, urging listeners to reject his divisive tactics and support a more responsible and democratic approach to governance.
Skeptical of the Hype: Assessing Imran Khan’s Popularity
The speaker in the sources expresses strong skepticism regarding Imran Khan’s claims of widespread popular support, arguing that the perception of Khan’s popularity is largely manufactured and inflated. They challenge the notion that Khan represents the will of the majority, suggesting that his support base is narrower and more strategically cultivated than his rhetoric suggests.
Questioning the Numbers: The speaker directly challenges Khan’s assertions of representing a vast majority of the Pakistani population by highlighting the relatively small turnout at his rallies. They contrast the image of massive, overwhelming support projected by Khan with the reality of modest gatherings, implying that the actual level of grassroots enthusiasm for Khan falls far short of his claims.
Social Media Illusion vs. Real-World Support: The speaker draws a sharp distinction between the online fervor surrounding Khan and the tangible evidence of his popularity on the ground. They argue that much of the perceived support for Khan stems from a vocal online presence, amplified by social media algorithms and echo chambers. However, the speaker contends that this virtual support does not accurately reflect the broader sentiment of the Pakistani population.
Manufactured Enthusiasm and the Youth Factor: The speaker expresses concern that a significant portion of Khan’s support, particularly among young people, is a product of calculated manipulation and exploitation. They suggest that Khan and his allies have effectively leveraged social media to cultivate a sense of excitement and devotion among a demographic that is particularly susceptible to emotional appeals and charismatic leadership. While acknowledging the genuine enthusiasm of many young Khan supporters, the speaker implies that this fervor is often misdirected and based on a superficial understanding of complex political realities.
The “Pressure Group” Dynamic: The speaker seeks to deconstruct the image of Khan as a universally beloved leader by suggesting that his support is largely confined to a dedicated “pressure group” composed of loyalists and individuals who have benefited directly from his patronage. This framing implies that Khan’s support is driven more by self-interest and allegiance to a personality than by genuine belief in his policies or vision.
Absence of Mass Mobilization: The speaker points to the lack of widespread public outcry following Khan’s removal from power as further evidence that his popularity is not as pervasive as he claims. They argue that if Khan truly enjoyed the support of a vast majority, his ouster would have triggered mass protests and demonstrations across the country. The relative absence of such a response suggests that Khan’s support base is less substantial and less motivated to act on his behalf than his rhetoric would lead one to believe.
In essence, the speaker encourages listeners to adopt a more critical and discerning perspective when evaluating Imran Khan’s claims of widespread popularity. They suggest that the image of Khan as a universally beloved leader is carefully constructed and strategically amplified through various means, including social media manipulation and appeals to emotion. The speaker emphasizes the importance of looking beyond the surface-level hype and considering the tangible evidence of Khan’s support, which they argue is far more limited than he portrays.
Questioning the Legitimacy of Power: A Multifaceted Critique of Imran Khan
The sources present a sustained and multifaceted critique of the legitimacy of Imran Khan’s political power, challenging both the basis of his support and the nature of his leadership. The speaker weaves together a tapestry of arguments, drawing on historical parallels, political analysis, and sharp observations of Khan’s behavior to undermine the foundations of his political authority.
Challenging the Narrative of Popular Support: The speaker’s critique begins by questioning the very premise of Khan’s legitimacy: his claim to represent the will of the people. While Khan asserts widespread popular support, the speaker counters this narrative by highlighting the disparity between Khan’s rhetoric and the observable evidence.
Low rally attendance is cited as a key indicator that Khan’s support is not as extensive as he claims. The speaker argues that if Khan truly enjoyed the backing of a vast majority, his rallies would be overflowing, not populated by modest crowds. This discrepancy fuels the speaker’s skepticism and suggests that Khan’s perception of his popularity may be inflated.
Social media is identified as another factor contributing to the distorted image of Khan’s support. The speaker contends that online platforms create an echo chamber where Khan’s supporters can amplify their voices, creating a false impression of widespread approval. The speaker cautions against conflating online engagement with genuine political power, implying that Khan’s support base may be more virtual than real.
Unmasking a Flawed Leader: Beyond questioning the extent of Khan’s support, the speaker goes further to dissect his leadership style, exposing what they perceive as deep flaws and dangerous tendencies. The speaker employs a range of rhetorical techniques to portray Khan as a leader who is fundamentally unfit for the position he held.
The analogy of a child’s development is used to illustrate Khan’s political immaturity and dependence on external forces. Initially, Khan is depicted as a pampered child, enjoying the support and protection of powerful backers who facilitated his rise to power. However, as he matured politically, his demands and expectations grew, leading to a sense of entitlement and an inability to cope with challenges or setbacks. When this support was withdrawn, Khan is shown to regress, lashing out in anger and confusion, much like a child denied a diaper change.
Khan’s hypocrisy and duplicity are repeatedly emphasized, highlighting the disconnect between his public image and private actions. The speaker criticizes Khan for publicly championing the “power of the people” while simultaneously seeking favor from powerful institutions and engaging in backroom deals. This inconsistency, according to the speaker, reveals a lack of integrity and a willingness to manipulate others for personal gain.
Khan’s disregard for democratic norms and institutions is condemned as a particularly dangerous aspect of his leadership. The speaker points to Khan’s attempts to dissolve the assembly and his attacks on the Supreme Court as evidence of his willingness to subvert the rule of law to maintain power. These actions, the speaker argues, set a dangerous precedent and threaten the stability of Pakistan’s democratic system.
Drawing a Troubling Historical Parallel: The speaker’s critique culminates in a chilling comparison that underscores their deep concern about the trajectory of Khan’s leadership. They draw a parallel between Khan’s style of governance and that of authoritarian figures like Hitler, suggesting that Khan’s desire for absolute power and his disregard for democratic principles pose a grave threat to Pakistan’s future. This historical parallel serves as a stark warning, urging listeners to recognize the potential consequences of Khan’s unchecked ambition.
The Case Against Legitimacy: The speaker effectively constructs a case against the legitimacy of Imran Khan’s political power by:
Undermining the foundation of his popular support.
Exposing the flaws in his leadership style.
Drawing alarming parallels to historical figures associated with authoritarianism.
This comprehensive critique serves to challenge the prevailing narrative surrounding Khan’s political authority, prompting a reassessment of his role in Pakistan’s political landscape.
From Pampered Child to Frustrated “Diaper Changer”: Imran Khan and the Analogy of Regression
The sources employ a striking analogy to illuminate their assessment of Imran Khan’s political trajectory, comparing him to a child who regresses in behavior after being denied the special treatment he has grown accustomed to. This analogy serves to illustrate what the speaker perceives as Khan’s political immaturity, sense of entitlement, and inability to cope with the loss of power.
The Pampered Child: Initially, Khan is portrayed as a child who enjoys the constant care and attention of his parents, symbolizing the powerful forces that propelled him to political prominence. This period of “pampering” represents Khan’s early years in politics, when he benefited from the support of influential figures who nurtured his ambitions and shielded him from criticism.
The Shift in Expectations: As the child grows older, the parents naturally expect him to become more independent and responsible, just as Khan’s backers anticipated his political maturation. However, the analogy suggests that Khan, like the child, failed to develop the necessary skills and resilience to stand on his own.
The Tantrum: When the child’s demands for constant attention and assistance are not met, he throws a tantrum, unable to comprehend or accept the change in dynamics. This mirrors Khan’s reaction to the loss of power, according to the speaker. He is depicted as lashing out at his opponents, engaging in reckless behavior, and refusing to accept responsibility for his actions.
The Unwillingness to Grow Up: The analogy culminates in the image of a child who, even after experiencing the consequences of his actions, still longs for the days when his every need was met. This symbolizes Khan’s persistent belief that he deserves to be in power and his inability to adapt to the realities of political life.
This analogy is further strengthened by the speaker’s assertion that Khan’s supporters are also complicit in perpetuating this cycle of immaturity. By echoing his grievances and encouraging his defiance, they act like enablers, preventing Khan from confronting his own shortcomings and accepting the need for growth.
Beyond the Analogy: Historical Parallels
While the analogy of the child provides a vivid illustration of Khan’s perceived character flaws, the sources go further by drawing explicit comparisons between Khan and historical figures associated with authoritarianism. The speaker suggests that Khan’s actions and rhetoric align with those of leaders who sought to consolidate power, suppress dissent, and undermine democratic norms.
The “Hitler” Comparison: The most direct and controversial parallel drawn is the comparison to Adolf Hitler, the dictator of Nazi Germany. The speaker suggests that Khan shares Hitler’s disregard for democratic principles, desire for absolute control, and willingness to exploit public fears and prejudices to achieve his goals.
The “Dictator in Civilian Clothes” Label: This phrase encapsulates the speaker’s broader critique of Khan’s leadership style. They argue that while Khan may present himself as a champion of democracy, his actions betray a deeply authoritarian mindset. His attempts to dissolve the assembly, his attacks on the judiciary, and his rhetoric demonizing opponents are all cited as evidence of this tendency.
The Significance of Historical Comparisons:
The speaker’s use of historical comparisons serves several purposes:
Raising the Stakes: By invoking the specter of authoritarian figures like Hitler, the speaker seeks to heighten the sense of urgency and alarm surrounding Khan’s leadership. The implication is that Khan’s actions, if left unchecked, could lead Pakistan down a dangerous path toward tyranny.
Exposing Underlying Motivations: The historical comparisons aim to strip away the veneer of Khan’s populist rhetoric and reveal what the speaker believes are his true motivations: a thirst for power and a disdain for democratic processes.
Challenging Perceptions: By juxtaposing Khan with figures widely recognized as villains, the speaker challenges the positive perceptions that many hold of Khan. They force the audience to confront the possibility that Khan, despite his charisma and popularity, may harbor dangerous authoritarian impulses.
The sources’ use of historical analogies and comparisons serves to paint a deeply critical portrait of Imran Khan, casting him as a figure who combines political immaturity with potentially dangerous authoritarian tendencies.
Disdain and Disengagement: Imran Khan’s Antagonistic Relationship with Parliament
The sources portray Imran Khan’s relationship with the Pakistani Parliament as one marked by disdain and disengagement, characterized by his refusal to participate in parliamentary processes and his open contempt for the institution’s authority. The speaker argues that Khan’s actions demonstrate a fundamental lack of respect for democratic norms and a willingness to subvert the rule of law to achieve his political objectives.
Rejection of Parliamentary Politics: The speaker criticizes Khan’s decision to withdraw from Parliament, opting instead to mobilize his supporters through rallies and public appearances. This boycott is framed as a deliberate rejection of the established channels of political discourse and a sign of Khan’s unwillingness to engage in constructive debate or compromise. The speaker emphasizes that a strong and effective opposition participates in parliamentary proceedings, holding the government accountable through scrutiny and debate. By choosing to operate outside the parliamentary framework, Khan undermines the very principles of democratic representation he claims to uphold.
Undermining Parliamentary Authority: The speaker points to Khan’s actions, such as dissolving the assembly and challenging the Supreme Court’s rulings, as blatant attempts to circumvent parliamentary authority. These actions are presented as evidence of Khan’s belief that he is above the law and his willingness to disregard established procedures to retain power. The speaker argues that such behavior not only weakens democratic institutions but also sets a dangerous precedent for future leaders who may seek to circumvent the rule of law.
Hypocrisy and Double Standards: The speaker highlights the hypocrisy in Khan’s rhetoric, accusing him of championing the “power of the people” while simultaneously demonstrating contempt for the institution that is meant to embody that power – the Parliament. Khan’s calls for public mobilization are juxtaposed with his refusal to engage with elected representatives, suggesting that his commitment to popular sovereignty is selective and self-serving. The speaker suggests that Khan only respects the will of the people when it aligns with his own ambitions, revealing a cynical manipulation of democratic ideals for personal gain.
Immaturity and Entitlement: Drawing on the analogy of a child who refuses to take responsibility for his actions, the speaker suggests that Khan’s approach to Parliament reflects a lack of political maturity and a sense of entitlement. The speaker argues that Khan’s expectation of constant support and his inability to cope with setbacks reveal a flawed understanding of the complexities of democratic governance. His unwillingness to accept the outcome of the no-confidence vote and his subsequent attempts to undermine the new government are presented as further evidence of his immaturity and his refusal to accept the legitimacy of the parliamentary process.
The sources present a scathing indictment of Imran Khan’s relationship with the Pakistani Parliament, depicting him as a leader who is disrespectful of democratic institutions, dismissive of parliamentary processes, and ultimately more interested in personal power than in serving the interests of the nation.
Imran Khan and the Shadow of Authoritarianism: Historical Parallels and the Critique of Leadership
The speaker in the sources draws stark historical parallels to critique Imran Khan’s leadership, positioning him as a figure who exhibits alarming similarities to authoritarian leaders, particularly Adolf Hitler. These comparisons are strategically deployed to expose what the speaker perceives as Khan’s dangerous disregard for democratic principles and his underlying desire for unchecked power.
The “Hitler” Analogy: This direct and highly charged comparison is central to the speaker’s argument. They suggest that Khan mirrors Hitler’s:
Disregard for Democratic Processes: Both Khan’s attempts to dissolve the assembly and his challenges to the Supreme Court’s rulings are presented as evidence of his willingness to circumvent established democratic procedures. This echoes Hitler’s own rise to power, marked by the erosion of democratic institutions and the concentration of authority in his hands.
Desire for Absolute Control: Khan’s actions are interpreted as a drive for absolute control, similar to Hitler’s ambition for total dominance. His intolerance of opposition, as seen in his rhetoric and actions against his political rivals, is presented as a key indicator of this authoritarian tendency.
Exploitation of Public Fears and Prejudices: The speaker suggests that Khan, like Hitler, leverages public fears and anxieties to consolidate his power. While the sources do not explicitly identify the specific fears being exploited, they imply that Khan manipulates public sentiment to create an “us vs. them” dynamic that paints him as the savior and his opponents as enemies of the people.
Beyond Hitler: The Broader “Dictator” Critique: The speaker goes beyond the specific comparison to Hitler, framing Khan as a “dictator in civilian clothes,” signifying that Khan embodies the essence of authoritarianism despite operating within a nominally democratic system. This broader critique is supported by several observations:
Contempt for Parliament: Khan’s consistent efforts to bypass or undermine the Pakistani Parliament are cited as a core element of his authoritarian tendencies. His withdrawal from parliament, his criticism of its legitimacy, and his attempts to circumvent its authority all suggest a fundamental rejection of democratic norms and a preference for unchallenged rule.
Suppression of Dissent: The sources suggest that Khan, like many dictators, seeks to silence opposition voices and stifle dissent. While the sources do not provide specific examples of this suppression, they highlight his inflammatory rhetoric and his demonization of opponents, creating an environment that discourages criticism and fosters fear.
Cult of Personality: The speaker alludes to a “cult of personality” surrounding Khan, suggesting that he cultivates an image of infallibility and encourages unwavering loyalty among his followers. This is often a hallmark of authoritarian leaders who seek to place themselves above scrutiny and accountability.
The Strategic Significance of Historical Parallels
The speaker’s use of historical parallels, particularly the Hitler analogy, serves several strategic purposes:
Amplifying the Threat: By invoking the specter of one of history’s most notorious dictators, the speaker dramatically heightens the perceived threat posed by Khan. The comparison is intended to shock the audience and galvanize them into recognizing the potential danger of Khan’s leadership.
Delegitimatizing Khan’s Leadership: The historical parallels are meant to strip away any remaining legitimacy Khan might hold. By aligning him with figures universally condemned as tyrants, the speaker seeks to dismantle any positive perceptions of Khan and portray him as unfit to lead.
Predicting a Dangerous Trajectory: The speaker uses historical comparisons to suggest that Khan, if unchecked, could lead Pakistan down a path similar to that of other nations that have fallen under authoritarian rule. The implication is that Khan’s actions, if not confronted, could have disastrous consequences for the country’s democratic future.
It’s important to note that these historical comparisons are presented from a particular perspective and are highly contested by Khan and his supporters. The speaker’s interpretation of Khan’s actions and motivations is not universally accepted.
Summary: This passage is a critique of Imran Khan, a Pakistani politician. The speaker argues that Khan is hypocritical and power-hungry, pointing to his actions and statements as evidence.
Explanation: The speaker criticizes Imran Khan for his actions and words, calling him a hypocrite. He questions Khan’s claims of being a “man of the people” while simultaneously insulting and alienating those who don’t support him. The speaker points out Khan’s attempts to gain power, including alleged secret meetings and a desire to become Prime Minister. He criticizes Khan’s response to the no-confidence motion against him, highlighting actions that went against parliamentary procedures and the rule of law. The speaker uses strong language to denounce Khan’s character, referring to him as “clumsy,” “fallen,” and having “dirty hands.” The passage concludes by emphasizing the importance of Parliament and the rule of law in a democracy.
Key terms:
Wazir Azam: Prime Minister
No Confidence Motion: A parliamentary procedure where a vote is taken to determine if the head of government (in this case, Imran Khan) still has the support of the majority.
Assembly: Refers to the legislative body, similar to Parliament.
Hypocrite: A person who claims to have certain moral beliefs or principles but acts in a way that contradicts those beliefs.
Maxim of the Law: A well-established principle or rule in legal systems.
Summary: This passage criticizes the actions of a political leader, likely in Pakistan, arguing that they are undemocratic and harmful to the country. The leader is accused of manipulating legal processes, suppressing dissent, and potentially inciting violence.
Explanation: The passage expresses strong disapproval of a political leader’s actions. It accuses the leader of bypassing democratic processes, referencing a “no confidence motion” and suggesting that the leader improperly dissolved an assembly. The passage condemns the leader’s potential role in violence and unrest, pointing to an incident on May 9th and alleging that the leader’s supporters engaged in destructive behavior. The speaker challenges the leader’s claim of representing 90% of the people, highlighting the relatively small number of supporters who actually participated in protests. The passage concludes by suggesting that the leader’s actions are even more harmful than those of the country’s enemies.
Key terms:
No confidence motion: A formal parliamentary procedure used to express a lack of confidence in a government or leader.
Assembly: In this context, likely refers to a legislative body, similar to a parliament or congress.
Mace: A ceremonial object symbolizing authority, often used in legislative settings. The removal or disrespect of the mace indicates a disruption of order.
Awaam: Urdu word meaning “the people.”
Shahbaz Gill: Likely a political figure or commentator.
Summary: The passage criticizes a political leader and their supporters for their actions and claims of election rigging, highlighting their hypocrisy and lack of public support.
Explanation: The author criticizes a political leader who claims to represent the majority while questioning the validity of their support. The author points out the hypocrisy of the leader and their supporters by mentioning past incidents where they violated laws and escaped accountability. The passage also challenges the leader’s claims of election rigging by pointing out the inconsistencies in their arguments. If the elections were rigged against them, how did they manage to win a significant number of seats in certain regions? The author further argues that if the leader genuinely enjoyed widespread public support, people would have protested against their perceived mistreatment. The absence of such protests indicates a lack of genuine support and exposes the leader’s claims as hollow. The author concludes by dismissing the leader’s accusations of rigging as baseless and emphasizes the lack of evidence supporting such allegations.
Key terms:
Rigged elections: Elections that are manipulated to ensure a specific outcome, often through fraudulent practices.
Hypocrisy: Behaving in a way that contradicts one’s stated beliefs or values.
Pressure group: A group that attempts to influence public policy or decisions, often by lobbying government officials.
Constituency: A body of voters who elect a representative.
Accountability: The obligation to explain or justify one’s actions.
Summary: The speaker is analyzing Pakistani politics, arguing that former Prime Minister Imran Khan lost power because he refused to compromise and form alliances, unlike other successful leaders.
Explanation: The passage criticizes Imran Khan’s approach to politics, comparing him unfavorably to other leaders who formed coalitions to maintain power. The speaker argues that Khan’s stubbornness and refusal to engage in democratic processes like forming alliances ultimately led to his downfall. He suggests that Khan’s insistence on being the sole decision-maker alienated potential allies and made him appear dictatorial, resulting in his political demise. The speaker uses historical examples and metaphors, like the “Napiya” (diaper) analogy, to illustrate Khan’s political immaturity and dependence on others to change his situation. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of respecting democratic norms, forming alliances, and engaging in parliamentary processes for political success and stability in Pakistan.
Key Terms:
Noon League: Refers to the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), a major political party in Pakistan.
PP: Refers to the Pakistan Peoples Party, another prominent political party in Pakistan.
KP: Abbreviation for Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, a province in Pakistan.
Tosh Khana: A government repository in Pakistan where gifts received by officials are kept.
Muja Kart: Refers to protesting or resisting.
This text is an interview and commentary on Pakistani politics, focusing heavily on critiquing the actions and character of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. The speaker argues that Khan’s behavior demonstrates hypocrisy, a lust for power, and a disregard for democratic norms.
The speaker criticizes Khan for claiming to be a “man of the people” while simultaneously resorting to underhanded tactics and insulting those who don’t align with him. He questions Khan’s legitimacy by pointing to his alleged past actions, such as secret meetings and a thirst for power that contradict his current stance. Khan’s response to the no-confidence motion brought against him is heavily scrutinized, with the speaker accusing him of disrespecting parliamentary procedures and attempting to cling to power illegitimately.
The speaker uses strong, negative language to describe Khan, calling him “clumsy,” “fallen,” and a “hypocrite”. He suggests that Khan’s actions are driven by self-interest and a desire to manipulate the system for his own benefit. The events of May 9th are cited as a prime example of Khan’s dangerous rhetoric and potential incitement of violence. The speaker challenges Khan’s claims of widespread public support by pointing out the relatively small number of protesters who turned out in his defense. He further argues that Khan’s inability to secure alliances and work within the existing political framework ultimately led to his downfall.
The speaker compares Khan’s approach to politics unfavorably to leaders like Narendra Modi in India, who successfully formed coalitions to maintain power. He uses a metaphor of a child needing a diaper change to illustrate Khan’s political immaturity and dependence on external forces to resolve his situations.
The speaker concludes by emphasizing the importance of adhering to democratic principles, respecting the rule of law, and engaging in parliamentary processes for the stability and progress of Pakistan. He suggests that Khan’s failure to do so ultimately resulted in his removal from power and serves as a cautionary tale for future leaders.
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!
