Category: Pragmatic Approach

  • Truth, Martyrdom, and Survival

    Truth, Martyrdom, and Survival

    The text explores the tension between unwavering adherence to truth and the pragmatic need for self-preservation, particularly for leaders and idealists. It examines historical figures who prioritized truth and ideals, even at the cost of their lives, questioning whether compromise would have been a wiser choice. The author contemplates the value of martyrdom versus survival, suggesting that while unwavering commitment is admirable, preserving oneself to continue fighting for one’s ideals may be equally important. The piece ultimately advocates for a balanced approach, combining dedication with strategic self-preservation. This approach emphasizes the importance of continuing one’s mission and advocating for one’s beliefs.

    01
    Amazon Prime FREE Membership

    The Realist’s Dilemma: Truth, Martyrdom, and Survival

    Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

    1. What is the author’s main concern regarding the pursuit of “hundred percent truth”?
    2. How does the author describe the relationship between truth and martyrdom?
    3. What is the “message from Darvesh to his new generations” regarding martyrdom?
    4. According to the author, what is the Sufi perspective on death compared to the perspective of those who celebrate it as “Urs”?
    5. How does the author connect the fear of death with the idea of being a believer?
    6. What is the author’s reaction to the deaths of historical figures like Abraham Lincoln and Mahatma Gandhi?
    7. What does the author suggest these historical figures could have done differently to potentially avoid their fates?
    8. How does the author characterize the leaders Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat in relation to their pursuit of truth?
    9. What advice does the author offer regarding the balance between bravery and wisdom in pursuing one’s ideals?
    10. What is the author’s interpretation of the relationship between love and patience?

    Quiz Answer Key

    1. The author worries that pursuing “hundred percent truth” can be dangerous, leading to being “cornered or disappeared.” He suggests that truth needs to be digestible and that speaking it without considering the consequences can be detrimental.
    2. The author suggests that speaking absolute truth, even if it results in martyrdom, is a lofty and admirable goal but acknowledges that deviating from the absolute truth to achieve reconciliation is sometimes necessary. Speaking the whole truth can lead to martyrdom, which the author believes should not be glorified.
    3. Darvesh advises future generations to avoid seeking martyrdom, emphasizing the importance of survival and love of life. Despite a theory of love that embraces sacrifice, Darvesh believes in finding ways to survive and live out one’s ideals.
    4. The Sufi perspective, according to the author, is one that loves life and therefore views death with horror as a separation from loved ones, not as a welcome reunion. Those who celebrate death as “Urs” view it as a connection to the beloved, which is contrary to the Sufi view that cherishes life.
    5. The author suggests that even those deeply devoted to their faith or ideals may fear death, which is seen as a “witch.” Acknowledging this fear does not diminish one’s faith, and it’s genuine and natural to want to avoid death.
    6. The author laments their deaths and wishes they had avoided the circumstances that led to their assassinations. He seems to think that they should have chosen a path of reconciliation.
    7. The author speculates that these figures could have adopted more moderate approaches, such as being more cautious with their security or compromising in their political actions, to avoid the extreme consequences. The author emphasizes avoiding the “hundred percent truth” to stay alive.
    8. Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat are portrayed as leaders who went too far in their pursuit of truth, honesty, and peace, which led to their violent deaths. They serve as examples of the dangers of extreme commitment to an ideal.
    9. The author suggests that while bravery and enthusiasm are valuable, wisdom and strategy are essential for pursuing ideals effectively. It emphasizes that staying alive and persevering in one’s mission is ultimately more effective than martyrdom.
    10. The author contrasts patience, which is necessary for love, with the impatience of desire. He implies that love requires a thoughtful, enduring approach, whereas desire can be quick and reckless.

    Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the author’s argument regarding the tension between adherence to truth and the practical considerations of political action, using specific historical examples from the text.
    2. Explore the author’s characterization of martyrdom and the different perspectives surrounding it, considering the motivations and consequences associated with both seeking and avoiding such a fate.
    3. Discuss the author’s critique of “hundred percent truth” and the implications of this critique on the role of idealism in personal and societal change.
    4. Examine the author’s perspective on the relationship between life and death, particularly concerning the Sufi view of avoiding death in contrast to the romantic or celebratory view.
    5. Evaluate the author’s advice on striking a balance between bravery, wisdom, and caution in the pursuit of ideals, considering the specific examples of the leaders discussed in the text.

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • Realism/Factualism: The idea of adhering strictly to facts and truth, even when they may be difficult or dangerous to express.
    • Martyrdom: The act of dying for a cause or belief, often seen as noble, but the author suggests it can be avoided.
    • Urs: A celebration of death in some traditions, viewed as a joyous reunion with the divine or a beloved.
    • Sufi: A mystical branch of Islam, the text portrays them as valuing life deeply and fearing the separation caused by death.
    • Darvesh: A term used here to indicate the author or a person espousing a contemplative, possibly mystical, perspective.
    • Hundred Percent Truth: The author’s phrase for absolute, uncompromised honesty and its potentially dangerous consequences.
    • Reconciliation: The act of finding middle ground or compromise rather than seeking absolute adherence to an ideal or belief.
    • Honi: A fatalistic term implying that an event is inevitable or meant to happen.
    • Wisdom with Truth: The idea of using strategic thinking with truth, advocating for a balance of bravery and thoughtful action.
    • Divine Masterpiece: The phrase the author uses for the human form.

    convert_to_textConvert to sourceNotebookLM can be inaccurate, please double check its responses.

    Truth, Martyrdom, and the Value of Life

    Okay, here’s a briefing document analyzing the provided text, focusing on its main themes and ideas:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” Excerpts

    Date: October 26, 2023

    Subject: Exploration of Truth, Martyrdom, and the Value of Life within the provided text.

    Introduction:

    This document analyzes the themes presented in the provided text, which appears to be a philosophical reflection on truth, martyrdom, and the pragmatic choices one must make while pursuing ideals. The author, possibly speaking through the persona of “Darwish,” grapples with the tension between unwavering commitment to truth and the need for self-preservation and strategic action. The text uses historical examples and personal reflections to illustrate its points.

    Key Themes and Ideas:

    1. The Paradox of Truth:
    • The text acknowledges that absolute truth (“hundred percent truth”) is a “lofty thing” and desirable, yet also potentially dangerous.
    • Quote: “Realism or factualism is such a lofty thing, I wish it was adopted completely, but what to do, it is compulsory that the truth can also be spoken as much as it is digested, otherwise you will be cornered or disappeared.”
    • This suggests that the unvarnished truth can be too difficult for society to accept or for an individual to bear. The author implies the need for a pragmatic approach to truth-telling, where the timing and method of delivery are as important as the truth itself.
    • The author questions whether total devotion to truth justifies martyrdom. “If you speak hundred percent truth even in the morning, then this rank will be at your feet.” Here, “rank” refers to “martyrdom”
    1. Rejection of Martyrdom as a Primary Goal:
    • While recognizing the sacrifice made by martyrs, the author explicitly advises against actively seeking martyrdom.
    • Quote: “Despite this theory of love, this message from Darvesh to his new generations is that do not have the interest of martyrdom. Even great personalities have sought refuge from trials or tests.”
    • The text uses the phrase “play the drum while hugging,” emphasizing the importance of enjoying life and its experiences while working towards one’s aims rather than succumbing to the pressure of death for ideals.
    • The author highlights that a premature death, even in pursuit of ideals, can be the “death of his mission.” In this case, they encourage strategic thinking and the prioritization of life.
    • This idea contrasts with a seemingly more fatalistic view of death, where it is seen as a release from suffering and a connection with the divine. The text challenges this perspective.
    1. The Value of Life and the Need for Survival:
    • The author emphasizes the importance of “loving life,” learning to survive, and avoiding self-destructive behavior.
    • Quote: “They always hum. Oh my heart! If you swear, don’t give up… If you are yours, call them… Don’t hide your face and don’t live with your head down, even if the time of sorrows comes, live with a smile.”
    • The text directly counters the notion of embracing death, particularly suicide, which it calls a “curse.” The focus is on perseverance and resilience rather than seeking an easy escape through death.
    • There’s an explicit fear of death, seen as a “witch” that snatches away loved ones, even from those who are believers.
    • Quote: “People say that a believer never fears death, but The truth is that despite the fact that the person is afraid of this witch of all Darveshi, should it be considered that he is not a believer…deep inside I also want this witch to stay away, stay away.”
    1. Strategic Action and the “Alternate Route”:
    • The text promotes the idea of “carving an alternate route” when faced with obstacles. This signifies the need to be strategic and adaptable in the pursuit of one’s goals.
    • Quote: “Lette if you see a roadway being closed you find or carve an alternate route immediately.” This reinforces the idea that one should navigate life with cleverness and creativity, rather than rigidly following a path that may lead to ruin.
    • This strategic approach extends to political and social action, where the author suggests that choosing life over martyrdom can ultimately be more effective.
    1. Historical Examples:
    • The text uses historical figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Yitzhak Rabin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto, to illustrate the consequences of taking extreme stands on truth.
    • These examples often point to leaders who, while admirable, perhaps made themselves vulnerable through their uncompromising stances and were killed as a result.
    • The text suggests that these figures may have been able to accomplish more for their ideals had they considered personal security and adopted a more strategic approach.
    1. The Wisdom of Patience and Strategy:
    • The text contrasts “enthusiasm and stupidity” with “wisdom and truth.”
    • Quote: “There is no distance, similarly you can call wisdom cowardice but wisdom with truth is that a man should prefer life over death for the sake of his ideals and for his loved ones.”
    • The analogy of a cricket match (“stay on the crease with strategy, then you will be able to score for the nation”) emphasizes that long-term effectiveness depends on patience and thoughtful action, not just impulsive bravery.
    • The concluding line, “Love requires patience and desire impatient”, encapsulates this idea that achieving meaningful change requires a sustained, patient approach.

    Conclusion:

    The text presents a nuanced perspective on the pursuit of truth and ideals. It challenges the romantic notion of martyrdom as the ultimate expression of devotion and instead advocates for a more pragmatic and life-affirming approach. The author stresses the importance of strategic action, adaptability, and a deep appreciation for life, even in the face of adversity. The core message is that one can best serve their ideals by staying alive and fighting for them strategically, rather than sacrificing oneself prematurely on the altar of martyrdom.convert_to_textConvert to source

    Truth, Action, and Strategic Survival

    Frequently Asked Questions

    • What is the central conflict explored in the text regarding truth and action? The text grapples with the tension between absolute adherence to truth and the pragmatic need for survival and achieving long-term goals. The author suggests that while truth is paramount, unwavering commitment to it can lead to martyrdom and hinder one’s ability to effect change. There’s an ongoing contemplation about whether compromising, or finding an “alternate route,” could be more effective than absolute truth-telling in certain circumstances.
    • How does the author view the concept of martyrdom? While acknowledging the “glory” of sacrificing oneself for ideals, the author cautions against seeking martyrdom. The text emphasizes the importance of valuing life and finding ways to survive and continue working towards one’s goals, rather than prematurely ending one’s mission through death. The idea is that those who live longer can do more for the causes they champion.
    • What is the author’s perspective on the fear of death? The author reveals a personal fear of death, even in the context of spiritual or mystical beliefs. While some traditions see death as a welcome reunion with the divine, the author, along with a Sufi perspective, sees death as something to be avoided because it is a separation from loved ones and the pursuit of ideals. The author distinguishes between the idea of death as a “connection” and the more human fear of its finality.
    • How does the author view figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, and other leaders who faced violence? The author admires these historical figures for their commitment to ideals, but also questions whether they could have achieved more by being more strategic and cautious. The text suggests that even the greatest leaders made choices that might have been different had they considered survival and the long-term impact of their actions. The author considers it tragic that the directness of these leaders led to their untimely deaths.
    • Why does the author question the idea of “100% truth”? The author argues that while truth is a “lofty thing,” absolute adherence to it can be dangerous and counterproductive. There are times when speaking the whole truth immediately may lead to being “cornered or disappeared.” The author advocates for a more nuanced approach, where truth is balanced with the need for strategy and the goal of staying alive to continue one’s mission.
    • What is the author’s comparison of “enthusiasm” and “wisdom”? The author equates enthusiasm without strategy to stupidity, and conversely, without truth to cowardice. True wisdom, in their eyes, lies in striking a balance between these two extremes. It’s about living a life that not only seeks to achieve ideals, but also values life and finds a way to continue doing good work by taking a patient, strategic approach. This may mean avoiding direct conflict at times in order to have a long term impact.
    • What does the text imply about patience in achieving goals? The text emphasizes the importance of patience, likening it to a long and challenging cricket match. It suggests that it is easy to be rash and lose one’s life for ideals, but true success involves perseverance. It suggests that real victory will come through surviving difficult times and continuing to work towards goals. This includes learning how to live through struggles and staying true to ideals.
    • What is the author’s concluding message? The author’s overall message is a call for balance and strategic action in pursuit of ideals. While valuing truth and commitment, the text underscores the importance of preserving life and finding ways to continue working towards goals, even when faced with adversity. It’s a message that emphasizes both the strength of conviction and the wisdom of strategic survival.

    The Price of Truth: Martyrdom and Idealism

    Okay, here is a timeline and cast of characters based on the provided text:

    Timeline of Events and Reflections:

    • General Observation: The text is primarily a meditation on the dangers of absolute truth and the sacrifices people make for their ideals. It’s not a traditional historical narrative but a reflection on historical figures.
    • Recurring Theme of Martyrdom: The writer frequently contemplates the martyrdom and deaths of significant figures, including those in their own life and throughout history, and questions if their deaths could have been avoided through compromise.
    • Philosophical Reflection: The author discusses the importance of realism and survival alongside the commitment to truth and ideals. They advocate for a path that prioritizes living and advancing ideals rather than martyrdom.
    • Discussion of “Urs”: The author contrasts the celebration of death in some traditions (Urs) with a perspective that values life and continued engagement with ideals.
    • Baba Ji’s Statement: The author recounts a statement from “Baba Ji” expressing a fear of death, even amongst mystics, despite the common belief that believers do not fear it.
    • Historical Examples of Martyrdom: The author reflects upon deaths of Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Yitzhak Rabin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto, arguing that while these figures fought for truth and ideals they could have avoided their violent ends with more caution and pragmatism.
    • Discussion with Journalist: The author recalls a conversation with a journalist about the approaches of two Pakistani Prime Ministers, Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, and how the author advocated a patient and strategic approach over bold action.
    • Closing Thought: The author concludes with a reflection on the tension between patience (required for love) and impatience (born of desire).

    Cast of Characters and Brief Bios:

    • Darwish: The author of the text. A person deeply concerned with the nature of truth, martyrdom, and the best ways to advance ideals. They seem to have a Sufi or mystic background, and have had many personal losses. They are now advising their own generation against seeking martyrdom.
    • Baba Ji: A spiritual figure or elder, likely within a Sufi tradition, who reveals a surprising fear of death. They act as a source of wisdom for the author and others.
    • Ashfaq Ahmed: Someone to whom Baba Ji is speaking, suggesting a close relationship or audience.
    • Olul-Azam: A reference to a “great personality” who “ended human slavery,” an indirect reference to Abraham Lincoln.
    • Abraham Lincoln: (1809-1865) The 16th President of the United States. He led the Union through the American Civil War and issued the Emancipation Proclamation which helped abolish slavery. He was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth at a theatre.
    • Mahatma Gandhi: (1869-1948) An Indian lawyer, anti-colonial nationalist, and political ethicist, who employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India’s independence from British rule, and was assassinated for his beliefs.
    • Yitzhak Rabin: (1922-1995) The Prime Minister of Israel who was assassinated by a Jewish extremist for his peace efforts with Palestinians.
    • Anwar Sadat: (1918-1981) The President of Egypt who was assassinated by Islamic extremists for signing a peace treaty with Israel.
    • Indira Gandhi: (1917-1984) The Prime Minister of India, assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards in retaliation for military action against separatists.
    • Benazir Bhutto: (1953-2007) The Prime Minister of Pakistan, who was assassinated after leading a rally.
    • Bhutto: Likely referencing Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (1928-1979), the former President and Prime Minister of Pakistan. This may also be a reference to Benazir Bhutto above. The text refers to the former and the other being more like the latter, which suggest this was about Zulfiqar Ali.
    • Nawaz Sharif: A Pakistani politician who has served as the Prime Minister of Pakistan three times. The author contrasts his approach with that of Bhutto.
    • Unnamed Journalist: A friend of the author who they have discussed the approaches of various political figures with.

    This structure should provide a good overview of the text’s content and the people it mentions. The key takeaway from this text is the author’s contemplation of truth, martyrdom, and the value of life and strategic engagement with difficult circumstances.convert_to_textConvert to source

    Truth, Survival, and Strategy

    The sources discuss a tension between adhering to absolute truth and ensuring survival, suggesting that while truth is a noble goal, it can be dangerous and may need to be tempered for the sake of achieving greater ideals or protecting oneself and others [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of the key ideas:

    • The Peril of Absolute Truth: The sources argue that speaking the “hundred percent truth” can lead to being “cornered or disappeared” [1]. The text uses examples of historical figures who were killed because of their commitment to their ideals [2]. These figures include Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadats, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto [2, 3]. It suggests that they might have survived if they had been more careful or had found a middle path [2, 3].
    • Reconciliation and Compromise: The text suggests that sometimes it’s necessary to deviate “a little from the absolute truth” and seek reconciliation or compromise in order to survive and continue to work towards one’s goals [4]. The analogy of finding an alternate route when a road is closed is used [4].
    • The Value of Life: Despite admiration for martyrdom, the text emphasizes the importance of valuing life and learning ways to survive [5]. It argues that great personalities have sought refuge from trials and tests, and that one should always love life [5]. Suicide is deemed “a curse” by the “lovers of life” [5].
    • The Mission vs. Death: The text discusses how dying for a mission or ideal can lead to the “death of his mission” [4]. It argues that it is better to survive and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [3]. The text says that it’s not hard to achieve martyrdom, but it is more difficult to stay in the game with strategy [3].
    • Wisdom and Strategy: The text contrasts bravery and wisdom, and suggests that wisdom with truth involves preferring life over death for the sake of ideals and loved ones [3]. This means using strategy to stay in the “crease” and “score for the nation” [3].
    • Love for life and a rejection of death: The sources indicate that some see death as beloved and a “remover of sorrows”, however others, particularly those in the Sufi tradition see death as a horror that snatches away loved ones and dream gatherings. They choose instead to live life to the fullest with loved ones [6]. The sources suggest that one should face sorrows with a smile rather than give up [5].
    • The Nature of Love: The source contrasts love and desire, stating that “Love requires patience and desire impatient” [7].

    In conclusion, the sources suggest that while truth is an important principle, it is not always practical or safe to pursue it without considering the consequences. The text advocates for a balanced approach that values both truth and survival, emphasizing the need for strategy, wisdom, and a love for life in order to achieve one’s goals and protect oneself and others [3, 5].

    Martyrdom and the Pursuit of Ideals

    The sources discuss martyrdom in the context of pursuing ideals, highlighting a tension between the perceived glory of martyrdom and the practical need for survival to achieve those ideals. Here’s a breakdown of the key ideas:

    • Martyrdom as a Potential Outcome: The sources acknowledge that speaking the absolute truth or pursuing lofty ideals can lead to martyrdom, suggesting that it can be a consequence of uncompromising dedication to one’s beliefs [1]. The text notes that if someone speaks the “hundred percent truth,” they may be “cornered or disappeared” [1].
    • The Questionable Value of Martyrdom: While martyrdom is sometimes seen as a noble sacrifice, the sources question its value, arguing that it can lead to the “death of his mission” [2]. It suggests that it is better to survive and continue working toward one’s ideals than to die for them. The text explains that achieving martyrdom is not difficult, but it is harder to stay in the game with strategy [3].
    • Examples of Martyrs: The text gives examples of historical figures who were martyred for their ideals, such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadats, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto [3, 4]. It is suggested that these individuals might have survived if they had been more careful or had found a middle path [4].
    • A Rejection of Martyrdom: Despite the admiration for martyrs, the text conveys a message to new generations to not have the “interest of martyrdom” [5]. It emphasizes the importance of valuing life and learning ways to survive. The text notes that great personalities have sought refuge from trials and tests, and that one should always love life [5]. The source notes that suicide is considered a curse because those who love life do not allow that negative thought to come near them [5].
    • Strategic Survival: The sources advocate for a strategic approach to pursuing ideals, suggesting that one should prefer life over death for the sake of those ideals and loved ones [3]. This involves using wisdom and strategy to stay in the game and work towards one’s goals, rather than seeking martyrdom [3]. It also suggests that one should be patient, because “love requires patience” [6].
    • Conflicting Views of Death: The text discusses how some people view death as “beloved” and a “remover of sorrows” [7]. However, others, particularly those in the Sufi tradition, view death as a horror that snatches away loved ones and the gatherings of dreams [7]. The source suggests that it is important to live life to the fullest, with a love of life, and to face sorrows with a smile [5, 7].

    In conclusion, the sources present a nuanced view of martyrdom, recognizing its potential nobility while emphasizing the importance of survival and strategic action in order to achieve one’s ideals. The text encourages a love for life, and suggests that it is better to live and work towards one’s ideals, rather than die for them.

    Truth, Safety, and Strategic Survival

    The sources explore the complex relationship between truth and safety, suggesting that a constant balancing act is required when pursuing ideals and navigating life. Here’s an overview of how the sources address this balance:

    • Truth as a Danger: The sources make it clear that adhering to absolute truth can be dangerous [1, 2]. Speaking the “hundred percent truth” can lead to being “cornered or disappeared” [1]. The text references historical figures such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, and Anwar Sadats, who were killed because of their commitment to their ideals, suggesting that their dedication to truth put them in harm’s way [2].
    • The Need for Reconciliation: To avoid danger, the sources propose deviating “a little from the absolute truth” and seeking reconciliation or compromise as a way to survive and continue working towards one’s goals [3]. This is illustrated by the analogy of finding an alternate route when a road is closed [3]. This suggests that sometimes a compromise on truth is necessary for safety and achieving goals.
    • Strategic Survival: The text emphasizes that it is better to survive and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [3, 4]. It suggests that achieving martyrdom is not difficult, but it is harder to stay in the game with strategy [5]. This involves using wisdom to navigate difficult situations and prioritize life, not just truth.
    • Valuing Life: The sources strongly advocate for valuing life and learning ways to survive [4]. Even while acknowledging the potential nobility of martyrdom, the text advises against seeking it and emphasizes the importance of loving life [4]. The text notes that great personalities have sought refuge from trials and tests, and one should always love life.
    • Wisdom and Strategy: The text argues that “wisdom with truth” involves preferring life over death for the sake of ideals and loved ones [5]. This means using strategy to stay in the “crease” and “score for the nation” [5]. This also suggests that pursuing truth without caution is not wise.
    • Finding a Middle Path: The sources imply that it is important to find a middle path between absolute truth and safety. This is presented by the assertion that figures like Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto might have survived if they had been more careful and not gone “so far in truth” or been “careless about their security” [2, 5].
    • Patience: The source states “Love requires patience and desire impatient” [6]. In the context of a discussion about truth and safety, this might mean being patient and strategic when pursuing ideals rather than being reckless and impulsive.

    In conclusion, the sources suggest that balancing truth and safety is a complex process that requires careful consideration. While truth is presented as a noble goal, it must be tempered with wisdom and a desire for survival to achieve one’s goals. The text advocates for a strategic approach that values life and finds a middle path between absolute truth and the need for safety. The sources suggest that one should pursue truth with caution and patience.

    Love, Life, and Ideals

    The sources present a strong connection between love and life, emphasizing the importance of valuing life and living it fully, especially when pursuing ideals. Here’s a breakdown of the key ideas regarding love and life as presented in the sources:

    • Love of Life: The sources repeatedly stress the importance of loving life. It is suggested that even when faced with challenges or the pursuit of difficult goals, one should “always love life” [1]. This love of life is presented as a fundamental principle, which is linked to the desire to avoid death and to continue to pursue one’s ideals. The text explains that “lovers of life” reject suicide [1].
    • Life as a Priority: The text suggests that life should be prioritized over martyrdom [2, 3]. It is argued that while martyrdom may seem like a noble sacrifice, it can lead to the “death of his mission” [2]. The sources suggest it’s more beneficial to survive and continue working towards one’s ideals. A strategic approach is advised, where one “should prefer life over death for the sake of his ideals and for his loved ones” [3].
    • Love and Patience: The sources make a distinction between love and desire, stating that “Love requires patience and desire impatient” [4]. This suggests that true love, especially when connected to ideals, requires a long-term commitment and strategic thinking rather than impulsive action [3, 4]. This patience would be necessary to balance the pursuit of truth and safety.
    • Life’s Challenges: The sources acknowledge that life is full of challenges and that “the time of sorrows comes” [1]. However, they advocate for facing these challenges with a positive attitude, encouraging people to “live with a smile” [1]. This emphasizes the importance of resilience and maintaining hope even in difficult times.
    • Rejection of Death: While some may view death as a welcome release or a way to connect with the beloved, the sources emphasize a different perspective, particularly from the Sufi tradition. They view death as “a horror” and a “witch” that snatches away loved ones [5]. This perspective underscores the importance of cherishing life and the relationships one has, therefore advocating for survival and connection.
    • Love for Others: The sources also discuss the importance of love for others and their connection to life. The source says that a “Moderate sect, Suf, is a divine masterpiece, that is humanity” and they “have so much love that he wants to live with his loved ones, so he loves his life to the fullest that he does not want separation or separation from the spread of his beloved ideals like his dear loved ones and friends.” [5] This love for others inspires the desire to live life to the fullest.
    • Strategic Living: The idea of living strategically also ties into the concept of love and life [3]. The source says that to “stay on the crease with strategy” means that you can work to “score for the nation.” [3] This suggests that loving life means taking the actions necessary to ensure that one’s life is meaningful and contributes to a larger purpose.

    In conclusion, the sources present a perspective that prioritizes love of life as an important part of pursuing ideals and working toward a larger purpose. The sources suggest that love is linked to patience and strategy, that one should love life and face challenges with a smile, and that it is better to live and fight for ideals than to die for them.convert_to_textConvert to source

    Martyrdom vs. Legacy: A Strategic Approach to Life’s Purpose

    The sources present a complex perspective on death and legacy, highlighting a tension between the potential glory of martyrdom and the more lasting impact of a life lived in pursuit of ideals [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of how the sources address death and legacy:

    • Martyrdom vs. Legacy: The sources acknowledge that martyrdom is a possible outcome for those who pursue truth and ideals, but it questions whether this is the best way to create a lasting legacy [1, 3]. While martyrdom might bring immediate recognition, the sources suggest it can also lead to the “death of his mission” [1]. This implies that a legacy built through sustained effort and strategic action may be more effective than one achieved through sacrifice alone. The sources state that if one dies for their ideals, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [1].
    • The Questionable Value of Death: Some people view death as a welcome release, a “remover of sorrows”, and a way to connect with the beloved [4]. However, the sources also present a contrasting viewpoint, especially from the Sufi tradition, which sees death as a “horror” that “snatches the loving touch of loved ones” [4]. This suggests that death may not be a desirable end, and that a legacy of life and love may be more valuable than a legacy of death [4].
    • Living for a Mission: The sources imply that a more impactful legacy is created by continuing to live and work towards one’s goals. The text states that “if you stay on the crease with strategy, then you will be able to score for the nation” [5]. This suggests that a person’s legacy should be measured by their ongoing contributions and the impact they have on society, rather than simply by their death. The sources suggest that it is better to live and work towards one’s ideals than to die for them [1, 2].
    • Examples of Martyrs: The sources give examples of historical figures who were martyred for their ideals, such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadats, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto [5, 6]. However, it is also suggested that these individuals might have had a greater and more positive legacy if they had been more careful, survived, and continued their work. The text notes, “if he would not have gone so far in supporting Muslims, he would not have made his Hindu majority extremists angry and angry with him,” suggesting a more strategic path may have allowed him to have a larger impact [6].
    • Strategic Survival and Legacy: The sources advocate for a strategic approach to pursuing ideals, suggesting that one should prefer life over death for the sake of their mission and their loved ones [5]. By valuing life and finding ways to survive, one can continue to contribute to society and build a more lasting legacy. This is also tied to the idea of patience, because “love requires patience and desire impatient” [7]. A lasting legacy is often built over time through sustained action.
    • Love as a Legacy: The source suggests that love is also an important part of legacy. A “Moderate sect, Suf, is a divine masterpiece, that is humanity” [4]. They “have so much love that he wants to live with his loved ones, so he loves his life to the fullest that he does not want separation or separation from the spread of his beloved ideals like his dear loved ones and friends” [4]. This suggests that the way one lives and loves becomes an important part of their legacy.

    In conclusion, the sources suggest that a lasting legacy is best achieved not through martyrdom, but through a life lived strategically and with purpose, marked by love and continued work toward one’s ideals [1, 2, 4]. While death is an inevitable part of life, the emphasis is on valuing life and creating a legacy through positive contributions to society [4, 5].convert_to_textConvert to source

    Truth, Strategy, and Survival

    The author views the balance between truth and self-preservation as a complex and delicate act, emphasizing that while truth is a noble goal, it should be tempered with a strategic approach that prioritizes life and safety [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of the author’s perspective:

    • Truth can be Dangerous: The author acknowledges that adhering to absolute truth can be dangerous and can lead to negative consequences [1, 4]. The phrase “if you speak hundred percent truth even in the morning, then this rank will be at your feet,” suggests that while speaking the truth is desirable, it can also be risky. The author points to historical figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, and others, whose dedication to their ideals led to their deaths, suggesting that a commitment to truth without caution can put one in harm’s way [4].
    • The Need for Compromise: The author proposes that deviating “a little from the absolute truth” and seeking reconciliation is sometimes necessary for self-preservation [2]. This implies that a pragmatic approach is needed where one might have to make compromises to survive and continue working towards one’s goals. The analogy of finding an alternate route when a road is closed further emphasizes the need to find ways around obstacles, rather than directly confronting them [2].
    • Strategic Survival is Key: The author emphasizes the importance of strategic survival, suggesting it’s better to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [2, 5]. The text suggests that achieving martyrdom is not difficult, but it is harder to stay in the game with strategy, and that one “should prefer life over death for the sake of his ideals and for his loved ones” [2, 5].
    • Valuing Life: The author stresses the importance of valuing life and learning ways to survive [3, 6]. The author argues that “lovers of life” reject suicide, and that even great personalities have sought refuge from trials and tests, indicating that protecting one’s life is a natural and wise course of action [3].
    • Wisdom with Truth: The author advocates for “wisdom with truth,” which involves prioritizing life while still working towards one’s goals [5]. This means strategically navigating difficult situations to stay alive and continue contributing. The author suggests that one needs to be patient and wise when pursuing truth and safety, because “love requires patience and desire impatient” [7].
    • Middle Path: The author implies the need to find a middle path between absolute truth and safety, suggesting that being careless about one’s security can have dire consequences [4, 5]. The author notes that figures such as Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto may have survived and continued their work if they had been more careful.
    • Legacy: The author believes that a more lasting and positive legacy is built through continued effort, love, and strategic action, rather than through martyrdom [2, 3]. The author suggests that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” and this implies that one’s impact on society is more important than the manner of their death [5].

    In conclusion, the author’s view is that while truth is important, it should be pursued with caution and strategy [1, 2, 5]. The author advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes self-preservation and continued engagement in working toward one’s goals [2, 3]. This involves being willing to make compromises, valuing life, and being patient and strategic in the pursuit of one’s ideals [2, 5, 7]. The author does not advocate for abandoning truth, but rather for finding a way to live it with wisdom and strategy [5].

    Truth, Survival, and Leadership

    The sources use several historical figures to illustrate the central conflict between adhering to absolute truth and the need for self-preservation. These examples highlight the risks of pursuing ideals without considering personal safety and the potential for a greater legacy through strategic survival [1, 2]. Here are some of the key figures mentioned and how they relate to the text’s themes:

    • Abraham Lincoln: The source states that Lincoln, a “great personality who actually ended human slavery,” was “brutally killed” [1]. The author contemplates that Lincoln might have survived if he had not gone to the theater that night, but concedes that he may have been targeted regardless due to the political climate of the time [1]. This example shows the risk that leaders who take strong stances on important issues face. It also suggests a tension between acting on principle and the very real dangers that can result.
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The author reflects that if Gandhi had not gone “so far in supporting Muslims,” he might not have angered Hindu extremists [1]. The text also notes that he went “far in truth” even though he was aware that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [1]. This example illustrates the idea that sometimes a more strategic path may lead to greater impact and less personal danger. It emphasizes that while truth is important, it may need to be pursued with caution. The author questions why he did not “think something for his ideals,” implying that a more measured approach may have led to a longer life and more positive outcome for his mission [1].
    • Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat: These two leaders, who pursued “truth, honesty, peace and security,” became targets of violence within their own nations [1]. Like the others, this example demonstrates how pursuing one’s ideals can make a person a target [1]. The author suggests that they “should have found a seed path” [1]. This highlights the author’s belief that a more strategic approach might have been beneficial, suggesting that their deaths, while perhaps noble, may have been avoidable.
    • Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto: These leaders “sacrificed themselves for their national goals or lofty ideals” [2]. The author suggests that both “should have been careful about their security” and were “punished by direct terror,” noting that they “acted fairly careless” [2]. This emphasizes the need for leaders to be mindful of their safety while pursuing their goals, suggesting that being careless about one’s security can have dire consequences.

    These examples underscore the central tension explored in the text: while truth and ideals are important, they should be pursued with an understanding of the potential risks. The author seems to suggest that a strategic approach that values self-preservation and allows for continued work towards one’s goals is often more effective than a path that leads to martyrdom. By using these specific examples, the author highlights that great leaders and thinkers are not immune to this tension and that their actions have important lessons for those who aspire to lead or to make a difference in the world.

    Truth, Self-Preservation, and Strategic Living

    The author reconciles the pursuit of truth with self-preservation by advocating for a strategic and balanced approach, where truth is not abandoned but pursued with wisdom and caution. The author does not see truth and self-preservation as mutually exclusive but rather as interconnected aspects of a meaningful life. Here’s a breakdown of how the author reconciles these concepts:

    • Truth as a High Ideal but not an Absolute Mandate: The author acknowledges the importance of truth, calling “Realism or factualism” a “lofty thing” [1]. However, the author also recognizes that speaking “hundred percent truth” can be dangerous [1, 2]. This suggests that while truth is a valued goal, it is not something that should be pursued at all costs, particularly when it puts one’s life in danger.
    • Strategic Compromise: The author proposes that deviating “a little from the absolute truth” and seeking “some reconciliation” can be necessary for self-preservation [3]. This indicates a pragmatic approach, where one might need to make compromises to survive and continue working towards their ideals. This is further emphasized by the analogy of finding an alternate route when a road is closed [3]. The sources suggest that it’s sometimes necessary to navigate around obstacles strategically, rather than directly confronting them.
    • Living for the Mission: The author stresses the importance of valuing life and suggests that it’s better to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [3, 4]. The text implies that “if you stay on the crease with strategy, then you will be able to score for the nation” [4]. This emphasizes that a person’s legacy should be measured by their continued contributions and impact on society, rather than by a single act of martyrdom.
    • Wisdom and Patience: The author advocates for “wisdom with truth,” which involves prioritizing life while still working towards one’s goals [4]. This approach involves being patient and strategic in pursuing truth and safety, because “love requires patience and desire impatient” [5]. This implies that achieving a lasting impact often requires time, careful planning, and a strategic approach to both truth and self-preservation.
    • Learning from Historical Examples: The author uses examples of historical figures who died for their ideals, such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto, to illustrate the risks of pursuing truth without caution [2, 4]. These examples emphasize that while their actions may have been noble, a more strategic approach that prioritized their safety could have led to even more significant positive outcomes [2, 4]. The author questions why Gandhi did not “think something for his ideals,” implying a more measured path might have allowed him to achieve more [2].
    • Valuing Life: The author emphasizes that even “great personalities have sought refuge from trials or tests” [6]. The author also points out that “lovers of life never allow such a negative approach to come near them” [6]. This suggests that protecting one’s life is a natural and wise course of action.
    • Avoiding Martyrdom: The author’s message to “new generations” is “do not have the interest of martyrdom” [6]. This is because “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [3]. The text emphasizes the importance of focusing on continuing a mission, and not ending it prematurely, by avoiding martyrdom and choosing to survive.
    • Love as a Driving Force: The author’s perspective is informed by the Sufi tradition, which values love and life. They “have so much love that he wants to live with his loved ones, so he loves his life to the fullest that he does not want separation or separation from the spread of his beloved ideals like his dear loved ones and friends” [7].

    In conclusion, the author reconciles the pursuit of truth with self-preservation by suggesting that they are not opposing concepts. Instead, the author proposes that truth should be pursued with wisdom, strategy, and a focus on long-term impact, rather than through reckless acts of martyrdom. The author advocates for a path that values life and love, while still making meaningful contributions to society and adhering to one’s ideals. The author sees a greater value in living for a cause than dying for one.

    Truth, Ideals, and Self-Preservation

    The author provides several examples of historical figures who, in their view, prioritized truth and their ideals over self-preservation, often leading to their deaths [1-4]. These examples serve to illustrate the central conflict of the text and to support the author’s argument for a more strategic approach to pursuing truth [2, 3]. Here are the historical figures the author discusses in this context:

    • Abraham Lincoln: The author mentions that Lincoln, who “ended human slavery,” was “brutally killed” [3]. The author contemplates that perhaps Lincoln could have avoided his assassination if he had not gone to the theater. However, the author also notes that the political climate of the time may have made him a target regardless [3]. This example demonstrates the dangers faced by leaders who champion strong ideals [3].
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The author suggests that Gandhi’s unwavering support for Muslims may have angered Hindu extremists, ultimately leading to his death [3]. The author reflects that Gandhi went “far in truth” despite knowing that “hundred percent truth is dangerous”. The text questions why Gandhi did not “think something for his ideals,” implying that perhaps a more cautious approach might have allowed him to achieve his goals while avoiding assassination [3]. This example is used to emphasize that sometimes a more strategic and less confrontational approach may be necessary for self-preservation [2, 3].
    • Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat: These two leaders pursued “truth, honesty, peace and security,” but became targets of violence within their own nations [3]. Their deaths are presented as examples of the risks involved in pursuing truth without considering personal safety [3]. The author suggests that they “should have found a seed path,” implying that perhaps they could have been more strategic in their pursuit of peace and security [3].
    • Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto: These leaders “sacrificed themselves for their national goals or lofty ideals” [4]. The author notes that both “should have been careful about their security” and were “punished by direct terror,” indicating that their deaths could have been avoided if they had been more cautious [4]. This highlights the need for leaders to be mindful of their safety while pursuing their goals [4].

    These examples illustrate the author’s central argument that while truth and ideals are important, they should be pursued strategically, with an awareness of the potential risks and with an effort to preserve one’s life [1-4]. The author does not see martyrdom as the goal, but rather a continued effort towards one’s mission as the most important thing [2, 4, 5]. The author also implies that these figures might have had a more significant and lasting impact if they had prioritized self-preservation along with their commitment to truth [2-5].

    Idealism and Self-Preservation: A Strategic Approach

    The text discusses several historical figures who faced the dilemma of choosing between adhering to their ideals and ensuring their self-preservation [1, 2]. These figures serve as examples of the risks involved in prioritizing truth and ideals above all else and highlight the author’s argument for a more strategic approach. Here are the historical figures discussed:

    • Abraham Lincoln: The author reflects on Lincoln’s assassination and suggests that his death might have been avoided had he not gone to the theater that night [3]. However, the author also notes that the political climate of the time made him a target, regardless [3]. This example illustrates the dangers that leaders who take strong stances on important issues can face.
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The author suggests that Gandhi’s strong support for Muslims may have contributed to his assassination by Hindu extremists [3]. The author notes that Gandhi went “far in truth,” despite knowing that “hundred percent truth is dangerous,” and questions why he did not “think something for his ideals” [3]. This example illustrates the idea that sometimes a more strategic path may lead to greater impact and less personal danger.
    • Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat: The author states that these leaders, who pursued “truth, honesty, peace, and security,” were targeted and killed by violent factions within their own nations [3]. The text suggests that these leaders “should have found a seed path,” indicating a belief that a more cautious approach might have been beneficial [3].
    • Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto: These leaders “sacrificed themselves for their national goals or lofty ideals” [4]. The author suggests that both “should have been careful about their security” and were “punished by direct terror,” noting that they “acted fairly careless” [4]. This example demonstrates the importance of leaders being mindful of their safety while pursuing their goals.

    These historical figures are presented to support the author’s argument that while truth and ideals are important, they should be pursued strategically, with an awareness of the potential risks and with an effort to preserve one’s life [3, 4]. The author emphasizes that a continued effort towards one’s mission is more important than martyrdom [2, 5].

    The Strategic Pursuit of Ideals

    The author does not view martyrdom as a desirable goal, but rather as a potential outcome to be avoided through strategic action and self-preservation [1]. The author believes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of the author’s perspective on martyrdom:

    • Martyrdom as a Loss of Mission: The author argues that “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [1, 2]. This highlights that martyrdom prematurely ends a person’s ability to contribute to their cause, making it a negative outcome [2]. The focus should be on the continued pursuit of a mission, not on achieving martyrdom [1, 2].
    • Rejection of Martyrdom as a Goal: The author explicitly states that “this message from Darvesh to his new generations is that do not have the interest of martyrdom” [1]. This shows that the author actively discourages seeking martyrdom.
    • Emphasis on Survival: The author stresses that “you always love life” and emphasizes the need to “learn ways to survive” [1]. The author suggests that even great personalities have sought to avoid trials [1]. Additionally, the author notes that “lovers of life never allow such a negative approach to come near them” [1]. This implies a natural inclination towards self-preservation and suggests that it is a wise path to take, as opposed to the “negative approach” of martyrdom [1].
    • Strategic Action over Martyrdom: The author advocates for a strategic approach to pursuing one’s ideals, suggesting that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” [3]. This implies that continuous efforts and contributions are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom.
    • Historical Examples: The author uses historical examples of figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate how prioritizing truth over self-preservation can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of their mission [3, 4]. The author suggests that these figures may have had a more lasting impact had they been more strategic in their approach to personal safety [3, 4].
    • Value of Life and Love: The author’s Sufi perspective emphasizes love and life. The author believes in living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals, rather than choosing separation or death. Death is viewed as a “witch” that snatches away loved ones, and the author acknowledges that he also wants to avoid this “witch” [5]. This viewpoint contrasts with those who “welcome death” as a way to connect with the divine [5]. The author wants to remain and spread love in life.

    In summary, the author’s view on martyrdom is that it is not a desirable goal and should be avoided through strategic action and a focus on self-preservation. The author believes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s mission than to die for it.

    Strategic Survival: A Philosophy of Action

    Darvesh advises that one should prioritize survival and strategic action in the pursuit of their ideals, rather than seeking martyrdom [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of the advice offered:

    • Avoid Martyrdom: Darvesh explicitly advises against having an “interest of martyrdom” [3]. The author suggests that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s mission than to die for it [2, 3]. Martyrdom is viewed as the end of a mission, not its culmination [2].
    • Prioritize Survival: The author emphasizes the importance of loving life and learning “ways to survive” [3]. The text suggests that even great personalities have sought refuge from trials, implying that self-preservation is a natural and wise approach [3].
    • Strategic Action: Darvesh advocates for a strategic approach to pursuing ideals. The author suggests that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation,” implying that continuous effort and contribution are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom [4].
    • Reconciliation and Compromise: The author contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [2]. This suggests that sometimes, compromise and finding an alternate route is a better approach to achieve one’s mission [2].
    • Patience and Perseverance: The author notes that “love requires patience and desire impatient” [5]. The text encourages patience, highlighting that remaining “on the crease with strategy” is a test of patience that ultimately allows one to achieve more for their cause [4].
    • Value of Life: The author emphasizes the importance of living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals [6]. The author sees death as a “witch” that takes away loved ones, expressing a desire to avoid this separation [6]. This perspective contrasts with those who might welcome death for ideological reasons [6].
    • The Danger of Absolute Truth: The text suggests that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [1, 7]. The author reflects on how figures like Mahatma Gandhi may have been targeted because of their unwavering commitment to their beliefs [7]. This suggests that sometimes a more cautious, nuanced approach is necessary to survive and continue working towards one’s mission [1, 7].

    In summary, Darvesh advises a path of strategic survival, patience, and a balanced approach to truth and ideals, rather than seeking martyrdom. The goal is to live and continue working towards one’s mission, finding alternate routes when necessary and valuing the opportunity to continue contributing to one’s cause [1-5, 7].convert_to_textConvert to source

    Darvesh on Martyrdom and Self-Preservation

    Darvesh does not view martyrdom as a desirable goal but rather as an outcome to be avoided through strategic action and self-preservation [1, 2]. The author believes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [1, 3]. Here’s a more detailed look at Darvesh’s perspective:

    • Martyrdom as a Loss of Mission: The author states, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [3]. This highlights that martyrdom prematurely ends a person’s ability to contribute to their cause, making it a negative outcome [1, 3]. The focus should be on the continued pursuit of a mission, not on achieving martyrdom [2, 3].
    • Rejection of Martyrdom as a Goal: Darvesh explicitly states, “this message from Darvesh to his new generations is that do not have the interest of martyrdom” [1]. This shows that the author actively discourages seeking martyrdom [1].
    • Emphasis on Survival: The author stresses that “you always love life” and emphasizes the need to “learn ways to survive” [1]. Darvesh suggests that even great personalities have sought to avoid trials [1]. Additionally, the author notes that “lovers of life never allow such a negative approach to come near them,” suggesting a natural inclination towards self-preservation [1].
    • Strategic Action over Martyrdom: The author advocates for a strategic approach to pursuing one’s ideals, suggesting that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” [2]. This implies that continuous efforts and contributions are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom [2].
    • Historical Examples: The author uses historical examples of figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate how prioritizing truth over self-preservation can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of their mission [2, 4]. The author suggests that these figures may have had a more lasting impact had they been more strategic in their approach to personal safety [2, 4].
    • Value of Life and Love: From a Sufi perspective, the author emphasizes love and life, believing in living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals, rather than choosing separation or death [5]. Death is viewed as a “witch” that snatches away loved ones, and the author acknowledges that he also wants to avoid this “witch” [5]. This viewpoint contrasts with those who “welcome death” as a way to connect with the divine [5]. The author wants to remain and spread love in life [5].

    In summary, Darvesh believes that martyrdom is not a desirable goal and should be avoided through strategic action and a focus on self-preservation [1, 2]. The author emphasizes that a continued effort towards one’s mission is more important than martyrdom [1, 3]. The goal is to live and continue working towards one’s mission, finding alternate routes when necessary and valuing the opportunity to continue contributing to one’s cause [2, 3].convert_to_textConvert to source

    Strategic Survival: A Critique of Martyrdom

    Several historical figures are discussed in the text as examples that support Darvesh’s arguments against martyrdom and in favor of strategic action and self-preservation [1, 2]. These figures serve as cautionary tales, illustrating the potential consequences of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over personal safety. Here are the figures and how they relate to Darvesh’s arguments:

    • Abraham Lincoln: Darvesh reflects on Lincoln’s assassination, suggesting that it might have been avoided if Lincoln had not gone to the theater that night [1]. This example highlights how even leaders who are committed to important causes can become targets, and that sometimes a change of behavior or circumstance might have led to a longer life and more impact [1].
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The author suggests that Gandhi’s strong support for Muslims might have contributed to his assassination by Hindu extremists [1]. Darvesh questions why Gandhi went “so far in truth” when he knew “hundred percent truth is dangerous,” suggesting that a more strategic approach could have been more effective and less dangerous [1].
    • Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat: These leaders are presented as examples of individuals who pursued “truth, honesty, peace and security” but were killed by violent factions within their own nations [1]. The author notes that they “should have found a seed path,” implying that a more cautious approach could have led to their continued work and avoided their martyrdom [1].
    • Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto: These leaders “sacrificed themselves for their national goals or lofty ideals” [2]. Darvesh suggests that they “should have been careful about their security” and were “punished by direct terror,” showing that being reckless about personal safety can undermine one’s goals [2].

    These figures exemplify Darvesh’s argument that while truth and ideals are important, they must be pursued strategically, with awareness of the potential risks, and with an effort to preserve one’s life [1, 2]. Darvesh emphasizes that a continued effort towards one’s mission is more valuable than martyrdom [3, 4]. These examples highlight Darvesh’s belief that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them, and that strategic thinking and a focus on survival are essential for achieving a lasting impact [2-4].convert_to_textConvert to source

    Against Martyrdom: A Strategic Approach to Idealism

    Darvesh’s central message regarding martyrdom is that it is not a desirable goal and should be avoided through strategic action and a focus on self-preservation [1-3]. The author emphasizes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [1-3].

    Here’s a more detailed breakdown of Darvesh’s central message:

    • Martyrdom as the End of a Mission: Darvesh believes that martyrdom is not a noble end but rather the termination of one’s mission [2, 3]. The author states, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [2]. This highlights that martyrdom prematurely ends a person’s ability to contribute to their cause, making it a negative outcome [2].
    • Rejection of Seeking Martyrdom: Darvesh explicitly advises against having an “interest of martyrdom” [3]. This demonstrates a clear discouragement of actively seeking a martyr’s death [3].
    • Emphasis on Survival: The author stresses the importance of loving life and learning “ways to survive” [3]. The author also notes that even great personalities have sought refuge from trials, implying that self-preservation is a natural and wise approach [3].
    • Strategic Action and Patience: Darvesh advocates for a strategic approach to pursuing one’s ideals, suggesting that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” [4]. This implies that continuous efforts and contributions are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom [4]. The author also notes that “love requires patience and desire impatient” [5].
    • Historical Examples as Cautionary Tales: The author uses historical examples of figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate how prioritizing truth over self-preservation can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of their mission [4, 6]. The author suggests that these figures may have had a more lasting impact had they been more strategic in their approach to personal safety [4, 6].
    • Value of Life and Love: From a Sufi perspective, the author emphasizes love and life, believing in living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals, rather than choosing separation or death [7]. The author sees death as a “witch” that takes away loved ones [7].

    In essence, Darvesh’s central message is a call for a strategic, life-affirming approach to pursuing one’s ideals. The goal is to live and continue working towards one’s mission, finding alternate routes when necessary, and valuing the opportunity to continue contributing to one’s cause rather than seeking martyrdom [2, 4].

    Truth, Strategy, and Survival

    Darvesh views the relationship between truth and survival as complex, suggesting that while truth is a “lofty thing,” it must be approached strategically, with an understanding of the potential dangers of absolute adherence to it [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of Darvesh’s perspective:

    • Truth is Valuable but Can be Dangerous: Darvesh acknowledges the importance of truth, referring to it as a “great thing” [2]. However, the author also cautions that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [2]. This implies that while truth is an ideal, its pursuit must be tempered with practicality and an awareness of the potential consequences.
    • The Need for Strategic Communication of Truth: The text states, “the truth can also be spoken as much as it is digested, otherwise you will be cornered or disappeared” [1]. This highlights that the way truth is communicated is as important as the truth itself, suggesting that one should tailor the delivery of truth to ensure it can be received and accepted without causing harm or endangering oneself. It emphasizes the importance of timing and audience, suggesting that not every truth can be accepted at every moment or by every person.
    • Reconciliation and Compromise: Darvesh contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [3]. This implies that in some situations, it is necessary to make compromises or find alternate routes to achieve one’s mission [3]. This suggests that sometimes a strategic retreat from absolute truth, or a more nuanced approach, can be a wiser path to long-term impact.
    • Survival as a Prerequisite for Achieving Ideals: Darvesh believes that survival is essential to continue working towards one’s ideals [4]. The author emphasizes that one should “learn ways to survive” and love life, as a continued life allows for a continued pursuit of one’s mission [4]. This perspective contrasts with seeking martyrdom, which is seen as the end of one’s mission [3]. The author argues that if one dies in the pursuit of absolute truth, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission.” [3]
    • Historical Examples of the Perils of Absolute Truth: Darvesh uses the examples of figures like Mahatma Gandhi, who “went so far in truth”, to illustrate the dangers of unwavering commitment to truth [2]. These examples serve as cautionary tales, showing how prioritizing absolute truth over self-preservation can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of one’s mission [2]. Darvesh also considers the examples of Abraham Lincoln, Izhaq Robin, and Anwar Sadat [2].
    • Wisdom in Balancing Truth and Self-Preservation: Darvesh discusses how one may call wisdom cowardice, but that “wisdom with truth” suggests that a person should value life over death in order to achieve their ideals [5]. The author contrasts the wisdom of prioritizing life with the “enthusiasm and stupidity” of recklessly pursuing a path that can lead to death [5].
    • Patience as a Virtue: Darvesh notes that “love requires patience and desire impatient” [6]. The author suggests that “stay[ing] on the crease with strategy” is a test of patience that allows one to contribute to their cause in the long term [5].

    In summary, Darvesh believes that while truth is a fundamental ideal, it must be balanced with strategic thinking and self-preservation. The author suggests that sometimes compromising or finding an alternate route is the better approach to achieve one’s mission. The central message is to prioritize survival and continuous effort towards one’s ideals, recognizing that adhering to absolute truth without consideration of its consequences can be counterproductive.

    Strategic Idealism: Balancing Action and Self-Preservation

    Darvesh advises his followers to balance idealism and self-preservation by prioritizing strategic action, self-preservation, and a nuanced approach to truth, rather than pursuing martyrdom [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of how Darvesh suggests achieving this balance:

    • Strategic Action over Martyrdom: Darvesh emphasizes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [2, 3]. The author explicitly discourages seeking martyrdom, stating “do not have the interest of martyrdom” [3]. The focus should be on the continued pursuit of a mission, not on achieving martyrdom [2].
    • Emphasis on Survival: Darvesh stresses the need to “learn ways to survive” and to love life [3]. The author believes that self-preservation is essential to continue working towards one’s goals and that “lovers of life never allow such a negative approach to come near them” [3]. This suggests a natural inclination towards self-preservation.
    • Nuanced Approach to Truth: Darvesh believes that while truth is a “great thing,” “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [1, 4]. The author advises that “the truth can also be spoken as much as it is digested, otherwise you will be cornered or disappeared” [1]. This suggests a strategic approach to sharing truth, tailoring it to the audience and circumstances to avoid endangering oneself or one’s mission.
    • Reconciliation and Compromise: The author contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [2]. This implies that in some situations, it is necessary to make compromises or find alternate routes to achieve one’s mission [2, 4].
    • Patience and Long-Term Impact: Darvesh suggests that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” [5]. This implies that continuous efforts and contributions are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom, emphasizing the importance of a patient, long-term approach. The author also notes that “love requires patience and desire impatient”, implying that achieving ideals requires consistent work and patience rather than a singular, impatient pursuit that could end in martyrdom [6].
    • Historical Examples as Lessons: Darvesh uses the examples of figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate the potential dangers of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over personal safety [4, 5]. These examples highlight how a lack of strategic thinking and self-preservation can lead to the premature end of one’s mission [4].
    • Value of Life and Love: Darvesh believes in living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals, rather than choosing separation or death [7]. The author sees death as a “witch” that takes away loved ones [7]. This contrasts with those who “welcome death” as a way to connect with the divine, and suggests that the author wants to remain in life and spread love [7].

    In summary, Darvesh advises his followers to pursue their ideals with a strategic approach that prioritizes survival and long-term impact over martyrdom. This involves being thoughtful about when and how to express the truth, being willing to compromise or find alternative routes when necessary, and understanding that self-preservation is not selfish, but a means of continuing one’s mission and contributing to the world [1-4].

    Truth, Survival, and Strategic Compromise

    The text portrays the tension between truth and survival as a central conflict, suggesting that while truth is a noble ideal, its pursuit must be balanced with strategic thinking and self-preservation [1, 2]. Here’s how the text explores this tension:

    • Truth as a Double-Edged Sword: The text acknowledges the importance of truth, describing it as a “lofty thing” [1] and a “great thing” [2]. However, it also warns that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [2]. This indicates that while truth is valued, its unyielding pursuit can lead to negative consequences, including death [1].
    • The Practicality of Communicating Truth: The text suggests that truth should be spoken “as much as it is digested” [1]. This highlights the importance of considering the audience and the context when communicating truth, rather than sharing it indiscriminately. The text implies that speaking truth without regard for its reception can lead to being “cornered or disappeared” [1], emphasizing the need for a strategic approach.
    • Compromise and Reconciliation: The author contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [3]. This suggests that sometimes it is necessary to compromise or find alternate routes to achieve one’s mission, rather than rigidly adhering to absolute truth.
    • Survival as a Prerequisite for Mission: The text emphasizes that survival is essential to continue working towards one’s ideals. The author notes that if one dies in the pursuit of absolute truth, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [3]. This highlights the idea that one cannot effectively pursue their ideals if they are dead, emphasizing the need to prioritize self-preservation.
    • Martyrdom as a Negative Outcome: The text discourages seeking martyrdom, stating “do not have the interest of martyrdom” [4]. Martyrdom is portrayed as the end of one’s mission, rather than a noble goal [3]. This perspective is rooted in the idea that continuing to live allows one to continue working towards their ideals, and that martyrdom prematurely ends this process.
    • Historical Examples: The text uses historical figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto, to illustrate the dangers of prioritizing absolute truth over self-preservation [2, 5]. These examples serve as cautionary tales of how a commitment to absolute truth can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of their mission. The author suggests that these individuals might have been more successful had they been more strategic in their approach to personal safety [2, 5].
    • Wisdom vs. Enthusiasm: The text contrasts “wisdom with truth” with the “enthusiasm and stupidity” of recklessly pursuing a path that can lead to death [5]. This highlights the idea that while enthusiasm and commitment are important, they should be tempered with wisdom and a strategic approach to ensure long-term success, and ultimately survival. The text also suggests that “love requires patience and desire impatient” [6], highlighting the need for a long term strategy.

    In summary, the text portrays the tension between truth and survival as a complex balancing act. While truth is presented as a valuable ideal, the text argues that it must be approached strategically, with an understanding of the potential dangers of absolute adherence to it. The text ultimately suggests that survival is essential to continue working towards one’s mission and that a nuanced approach to truth, that sometimes includes compromise, is the wiser path.

    Truth, Survival, and Ideals

    The text cites several historical figures as examples to illustrate the complex relationship between truth, survival, and the pursuit of ideals [1, 2]. Here are the figures mentioned:

    • Abraham Lincoln: The text contemplates whether Lincoln might have avoided his assassination if he had not gone to the theater that night [1]. The author suggests that his commitment to his ideals and the tense political climate of the time may have made his death inevitable, though the author still wishes Lincoln had not been in the theater [1].
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The text reflects on how Gandhi’s unwavering support for Muslims may have angered Hindu extremists, leading to his assassination [1]. The author uses Gandhi as an example of someone who went too far in the pursuit of truth, suggesting that a more moderate approach might have allowed him to live longer and continue his mission [1].
    • Izhaq Robin: The text mentions Izhaq Robin, former Prime Minister of Israel, as an example of someone who was targeted for their pursuit of truth, honesty, peace, and security [1].
    • Anwar Sadat: The text cites Anwar Sadat, former President of Egypt, as another example of a leader who was assassinated for his commitment to truth, honesty, peace, and security [1].
    • Indira Gandhi: The text suggests that Indira Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India, should have been more careful about her security. She is presented as an example of a great personality who sacrificed herself for national goals [2].
    • Benazir Bhutto: The text also uses Benazir Bhutto, former Prime Minister of Pakistan, as an example of a leader who sacrificed herself for her national goals and should have taken more precautions for her own safety [2].
    • Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif: The text refers to a discussion about two Prime Ministers, Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, one of whom was known for bravery and the other for wisdom [2]. The author’s view is that wisdom is preferable to bravery, and that wisdom with truth means that a person should prefer life over death for the sake of their ideals [2].

    These examples are used to highlight the dangers of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over personal safety, and serve as cautionary tales for Darvesh’s followers [1, 2]. The author suggests that these leaders, while pursuing noble goals, might have achieved more if they had been more strategic in their approach and focused on their own self-preservation [1, 2].

    Strategic Compromise: Truth, Survival, and Mission

    The author’s thoughts on compromise are that it is sometimes a necessary and strategic approach to achieve one’s mission, rather than rigidly adhering to absolute truth [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of the author’s perspective on compromise:

    • Compromise as a Deviation from Absolute Truth: The author contemplates whether historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [1]. This suggests that the author sees compromise as a departure from absolute truth, but potentially a beneficial one in certain circumstances.
    • Compromise as a Strategic Tool: The text implies that compromise can be a strategic tool for survival and for the continuation of one’s mission [1, 3]. The author notes that “wisdom with truth is that a man should prefer life over death for the sake of his ideals and for his loved ones” [3]. This implies that a strategic compromise may be necessary to ensure one’s survival, which is seen as essential for achieving long-term goals.
    • Compromise as an Alternate Route: The author uses the metaphor of finding an alternate route when a roadway is blocked [1]. This illustrates that compromise can be a way to navigate obstacles, implying that if a direct approach is not possible, one should be willing to find another way.
    • Compromise in the face of danger: The author uses the examples of historical figures, such as Mahatma Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate the dangers of not compromising [2, 3]. The author suggests that Gandhi’s support of Muslims led to his assassination and that Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto should have been more careful about their security. These examples suggest that not compromising and sticking to ideals without concern for safety can lead to negative outcomes.
    • Compromise as a Nuanced Approach: The author’s perspective on compromise is connected to the idea that truth should be spoken “as much as it is digested” [4]. This implies that one should be willing to tailor their communication of truth to their audience, and to make compromises to ensure the message is received, and that the speaker does not put themselves in danger.

    In summary, the author views compromise as a practical strategy for navigating complex situations, and a way to ensure one’s survival and the continuation of one’s mission [1, 3]. The author suggests that it is sometimes necessary to deviate from absolute truth and find alternate routes, emphasizing that compromise is a valuable tool when pursuing ideals and avoiding martyrdom [1, 2].

    Truth, Survival, and Strategic Compromise

    The author views the balance between truth and self-preservation as a complex and crucial consideration, arguing that while truth is a noble ideal, it should not be pursued at the expense of one’s life or mission [1]. Here’s a breakdown of the author’s perspective:

    • Truth as a Double-Edged Sword: The author recognizes the value of truth, describing it as “a lofty thing” and a “great thing”, but also warns that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [1, 2]. This indicates that while truth is important, its unyielding pursuit can lead to negative consequences, including death. The text suggests that truth should be spoken “as much as it is digested”, implying that the communication of truth should be strategic, taking into account the audience and context, rather than shared indiscriminately [1].
    • Survival as Essential for Mission: The author emphasizes that survival is a prerequisite for the continuation of one’s mission [3, 4]. The author states that if one dies in the pursuit of absolute truth, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [3]. This highlights that one cannot effectively pursue ideals if they are dead, thus prioritizing self-preservation is critical for long-term impact.
    • Compromise as a Strategic Tool: The author contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [3]. This suggests that compromise is sometimes a necessary and strategic approach to achieve one’s mission, rather than rigidly adhering to absolute truth. The author uses the metaphor of finding an alternate route when a road is closed, illustrating that compromise can be a way to navigate obstacles [3].
    • Martyrdom as a Negative Outcome: The author discourages seeking martyrdom, stating “do not have the interest of martyrdom” [4]. Martyrdom is portrayed as the end of one’s mission, rather than a noble goal. This perspective emphasizes that continuing to live allows one to continue working towards their ideals, and that martyrdom prematurely ends this process.
    • Historical Examples: The author uses historical figures such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate the dangers of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over self-preservation [2, 5]. These figures are used to exemplify how a commitment to absolute truth, without regard for personal safety, can lead to negative outcomes, including assassination. The author suggests that these individuals might have been more successful if they had been more strategic in their approach and focused on their own self-preservation. The author also refers to a discussion of Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, suggesting that “wisdom with truth” means one should prioritize life in order to achieve one’s ideals [5].
    • Wisdom vs. Enthusiasm: The author contrasts “wisdom with truth” with the “enthusiasm and stupidity” of recklessly pursuing a path that can lead to death. This emphasizes the idea that while commitment is important, it should be tempered with wisdom and a strategic approach [5]. The text also suggests that “love requires patience and desire impatient”, highlighting the need for a long-term strategy [6].

    In summary, the author views the balance between truth and self-preservation as a nuanced issue, arguing that while truth is essential, it must be pursued with a strategic mindset that prioritizes survival. The author emphasizes the idea that one must survive in order to continue working towards their ideals, and that a willingness to compromise, when necessary, is a sign of wisdom, not cowardice. The author uses historical examples to demonstrate the dangers of adhering to absolute truth without regard for one’s own safety.

    Ethical Dilemmas of Idealism

    The ethical dilemmas inherent in pursuing lofty ideals, as explored in the text, revolve around the tension between unwavering commitment to truth and the practical need for self-preservation, and the potential for compromise to achieve long-term goals. Here’s a breakdown of these dilemmas:

    • The Risk of Martyrdom vs. Continued Impact: The text highlights the dilemma of whether to pursue an ideal to the point of martyrdom or to prioritize survival in order to continue working towards that ideal. The author explicitly advises against seeking martyrdom [1], arguing that “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [2]. This implies that a commitment to an ideal should not come at the cost of one’s life, if that life is necessary for the long term realization of those ideals [2].
    • The Conflict Between Absolute Truth and Practicality: The text presents a conflict between adhering to “hundred percent truth” and the practical need to tailor the communication of that truth to the situation [3]. The author suggests that truth should be spoken “as much as it is digested” [3]. This implies that a strategic approach is necessary, and that sometimes one may need to compromise or temper one’s message in order to be effective and to stay alive [2].
    • The Dilemma of Compromise: The text explores whether deviating “a little from the absolute truth and use some reconciliation” might be a more effective approach [2]. The author uses the metaphor of finding an alternate route when a roadway is closed, to suggest that compromise can be a way to navigate obstacles in the pursuit of one’s ideals [2]. This raises the ethical question of whether compromising one’s ideals is acceptable, and when.
    • Balancing Personal Safety and Dedication: The text uses several historical figures to illustrate the risks of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over self-preservation. Figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, and Anwar Sadat are presented as examples of individuals who were assassinated due to their commitment to their ideals, which the author suggests might have been avoided with a more strategic approach [4]. Similarly, Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto are mentioned as examples of leaders who were careless about their security, raising the ethical consideration of whether leaders have a responsibility to prioritize their own safety for the sake of their continued mission [5].
    • The Nature of Wisdom vs. Bravery: The author discusses the qualities of bravery and wisdom, arguing that “wisdom with truth” means that one should value life over death, so that they can continue to work for the benefit of others [5]. This implies that a truly ethical approach to pursuing ideals requires a pragmatic and long-term perspective, rather than reckless displays of courage.
    • The Danger of Unyielding Beliefs: The author cites the example of Gandhi who went “too far in truth” in supporting Muslims, which led to his assassination by Hindu extremists [4]. This example highlights the ethical dilemma of how far one should go in advocating for one’s beliefs, especially when it may put oneself or others at risk [4].
    • The Fine Line Between Courage and Recklessness: The text indicates that while bravery is often seen as a desirable trait, it can be indistinguishable from “enthusiasm and stupidity” [5]. The author suggests that a more balanced approach, combining wisdom and courage, is needed to effectively pursue and realize lofty ideals.

    In conclusion, the ethical dilemmas inherent in pursuing lofty ideals involve the difficult choices between absolute truth and pragmatic compromise, between martyrdom and continued influence, and between personal safety and unwavering commitment. The author emphasizes the need for a strategic and nuanced approach, balancing the pursuit of ideals with the practical considerations of survival and long-term impact. The text suggests that wisdom, which involves knowing when to compromise and when to stand firm, is essential for achieving lasting change [5].

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • iPhone 14 User Guide

    iPhone 14 User Guide

    This is a user guide for the iPhone 14, providing a step-by-step guide to mastering its features. It covers setup, basic usage, and new iOS 16 features, including the Dynamic Island, satellite connectivity, and crash detection. The guide also explains how to use Apple Pay, master the iPhone 14 Pro camera, boost battery life, and even offers advice on selling or trading your old iPhone. Pricing information and compatibility with older iOS versions are included. Finally, it offers tips and troubleshooting for various issues.

    iPhone 14 User Guide Study Guide

    Short Answer Quiz

    1. What are the four different iPhone 14 models released in 2022?
    2. What is the “Dynamic Island” on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max and what is its functionality?
    3. What two new emergency safety features does the iPhone 14 series include?
    4. How do you force restart an iPhone 14 model?
    5. What is the purpose of the Apple Pay feature, and how is it activated on an iPhone 14?
    6. What are two ways you can take a screenshot on an iPhone 14?
    7. Describe how the “Crash Detection” feature works and what types of crashes it detects.
    8. What is the most significant camera upgrade on the iPhone 14 Pro?
    9. What is “Always-on display” and on which iPhone 14 models can it be found?
    10. Name three ways to help optimize battery life on the iPhone 14.

    Answer Key

    1. The four different iPhone 14 models released are the iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Plus, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max.
    2. The “Dynamic Island” is a pill-shaped area on the front of the phone that houses the camera and FaceID sensors on the Pro models. It can expand and contract to show alerts, notifications, and other interactive features.
    3. The two new emergency safety features on the iPhone 14 include Emergency SOS via satellite and Crash Detection.
    4. To force restart an iPhone 14, you need to quickly press and release the volume up button, then quickly press and release the volume down button, and then press and hold the side button until the Apple logo appears.
    5. Apple Pay allows users to make contactless payments with a debit or credit card on their phone, and it is activated by adding a card to the Wallet app.
    6. Two ways to take a screenshot are by simultaneously pressing the side button and the volume up button, or by using Assistive Touch.
    7. The “Crash Detection” feature uses motion sensors like a high dynamic range gyroscope and g-force accelerometer to detect when the user may be involved in a car crash and automatically calls emergency services if the user doesn’t respond to alerts.
    8. The most significant camera upgrade on the iPhone 14 Pro is a 48MP wide-angle main camera that allows for better low-light performance.
    9. Always-on display means the display is constantly illuminated, showing time, widgets, and notifications even when the screen is locked, and it can only be found on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models.
    10. Three ways to optimize battery life include turning off always-on display, disabling keyboard haptics, and enabling auto-brightness.

    Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the design and technology changes that differentiate the standard iPhone 14 models from the iPhone 14 Pro models. How do these differences cater to various user needs and preferences?
    2. Discuss the significance of the new safety features (Emergency SOS via satellite and Crash Detection) included in the iPhone 14, considering their potential impact on user safety and real-world applications.
    3. Evaluate the software features and improvements introduced with iOS 16 as it relates to both older and new iPhone 14 models. How do these new features enhance the user experience?
    4. Compare and contrast the battery performance and charging options available for different iPhone 14 models. How do these factors influence a user’s choice when selecting a model?
    5. Explore the environmental and economic factors Apple considered when deciding to no longer include a charger in the box of the iPhone 14, offering some alternatives on how to obtain a charger, and whether these new changes are beneficial to the environment and customers.

    Glossary of Key Terms

    Assistive Touch: An accessibility feature that allows users to perform actions by tapping a virtual button, including taking screenshots.

    Always-on Display: A feature that keeps the lock screen display active, showing time and notifications at a lower brightness, available on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models.

    Crash Detection: A safety feature that uses motion sensors to detect severe car crashes and automatically alerts emergency services.

    Dynamic Island: A new user interface feature on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max that expands and contracts around the front-facing camera to display alerts and notifications.

    Emergency SOS via satellite: A safety feature that allows users to connect to emergency services via satellite communication when cellular and Wi-Fi are not available.

    eSIM: An embedded SIM card that allows users to activate a cellular plan without using a physical SIM card.

    FaceID: Apple’s facial recognition system used for unlocking devices and verifying identity.

    Haptic Feedback: A tactile feedback from the iPhone to communicate a user interaction, such as a light vibration when tapping on the keyboard.

    iOS 16: The new version of Apple’s mobile operating system that comes installed on iPhone 14 models.

    MagSafe: Apple’s magnetic charging system for iPhones.

    ProMotion: Apple’s adaptive refresh rate technology, available only on the iPhone 14 Pro models, for smoother visuals.

    Quick Take: The ability to hold the shutter button to quickly snap photos and video.

    Siri: Apple’s voice assistant.

    True Tone Flash: iPhone flash that has 9 LEDs and can change in pattern and intensity, depending on the focal length and composition you choose.

    iPhone 14 User Guide Summary

    Okay, here is a detailed briefing document summarizing the key themes, ideas, and facts from the provided “iPhone 14 User Guide” excerpts.

    Briefing Document: iPhone 14 User Guide

    Introduction

    This document summarizes key information from the “iPhone 14 User Guide” by Ethan Copson, which provides an easy, step-by-step guide to mastering the use of the iPhone 14. The guide focuses on the iPhone 14 series, including the iPhone 14, 14 Plus, 14 Pro, and 14 Pro Max, emphasizing new features, iOS 16 (and iOS 17), and helpful tips for users of all levels. The document includes information regarding price, design adjustments, and key new features, as well as instructions for basic and advanced functions.

    Key Themes & Ideas

    1. iPhone 14 Model Lineup & Pricing:
    • The iPhone 14 lineup includes four models: iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Plus, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max.
    • The guide provides a detailed price list for various storage capacities of each model, with prices ranging from $799 to over $2700.
    • The iPhone 14 and 14 Plus have a 6.1 and 6.7-inch screen respectively, whereas the Pro models offer the same screen sizes with significant upgrades.
    1. Design Adjustments & Upgrades:
    • The iPhone 14 is similar in design to the iPhone 13, but the Pro models have undergone major design changes, particularly with the introduction of the Dynamic Island.
    • The two smaller floating apertures for the front-facing sensors replaces the “notch” on the Pro versions.
    • The camera modules on the back of the new Pro models are larger than the previous generation.
    • Color options are described.
    1. Dynamic Island (iPhone 14 Pro):
    • The “notch” is replaced by the “Dynamic Island,” a pill-shaped area that serves as a hub for alerts, notifications, and app shortcuts.
    • It expands to show additional information, adapts to the environment of the phone, and can be interacted with by tapping.
    • Functions include controlling music, navigating with maps, showing the status of ride-share services, indicating when Face ID is in use, and more.
    • Dynamic Island is exclusive to iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max.
    • “It wouldn’t be correct to refer to it as a rebuilt notch, but it is a fresh and inventive use of the area.”
    1. Camera Upgrades:
    • Non-Pro models have improved cameras with 12MP wide and ultra-wide lenses and better low-light performance.
    • Pro models feature a 48MP wide-angle main camera, a 65% bigger sensor, with greater low-light performance, and the new “Photonic Engine.”
    • New features include the Action Mode intended to enhance video stabilization and a 2x telephoto option.
    1. Safety Features:
    • Emergency SOS via Satellite: This allows users to contact emergency services when out of cellular range and is initially available in the US and Canada. “Emergency SOS via satellite is a function that enables you to contact emergency services while you are outside of cellular coverage via satellite communication.” The service is free for two years.
    • Crash Detection: Utilizes a high dynamic range gyroscope and “high-g” accelerometer to detect car crashes and automatically contact emergency services if the user is unresponsive. It can detect rollovers, rear-end accidents, side hits, and front impacts. “The function is based on information acquired by onboard sensors, such as unexpected changes in speed and direction, load noise levels, and variations in cabin pressure brought on by airbag deployment.”
    1. A16 and A15 Bionic Processors:
    • The Pro models feature the A16 Bionic chip, while the non-Pro models use the A15 chip, modified from previous versions.
    • Apple claims the A16 chip is 40% faster than the closest rival and includes “a second GPU core (similar to the one in the 13 Pro from last year)”.
    1. eSIM & No Physical SIM Slot:
    • US models of the iPhone 14 no longer include a physical SIM card slot and rely on eSIM technology, allowing for switching carriers in Settings. “The choice to eliminate the SIM card slot reduces the number of points of entry that need to be considered for water and dust protection, which should speed the adoption of eSIM by cellular operators throughout the globe.”
    1. Battery Life:
    • Battery life is improved across the board, with the iPhone 14 Plus boasting the greatest increase, up to 26 hours of video playback.
    • Estimated battery life for various models is mentioned.
    1. Always-On Display (iPhone 14 Pro):
    • The Pro models have an Always-On display, which shows information even when the screen is dimmed.
    • The display dynamically reduces refresh rate to 1Hz to conserve power. “Apple has not said if the feature can be completely turned off or not.”
    1. iOS 16 & iOS 17:
    • The guide mentions the launch of iOS 16 with the iPhone 14 series and highlights its features including widgets on lock screens, haptic feedback for the keyboard, and ability to cut out objects from photos, among others.
    • It also briefly mentions the upcoming iOS 17. “There’s still something for you if you’re not buying anything from the iPhone 14 selection that was shown on stage at the Apple event last week. iOS 16 from Apple is now available. The familiar lock screen is no longer as familiar, which instantly changes how it appears.”
    1. Setting Up Your iPhone 14:
    • The guide provides a step-by-step process for setting up a new iPhone 14, including updating the current iPhone, backing up the current iPhone, and transferring data to the new phone.
    • Recommends “Do not download iOS 16 to an old iPhone” because of “complaints about being ‘extremely’ problematic, especially with regard to Messages and FaceTime.”
    1. Using Siri:
    • Provides instructions for activating and configuring Siri, including voice preferences and response settings. “It’s crucial to enable the ‘Hey Siri’ Function so you may activate Siri even while your iPhone is locked in order to offer a totally hands-free experience.”
    1. Closing/Clearing Apps:
    • Explains how to close open apps using the App Switcher. “The process of clearing or shutting the applications is extremely simple yet crucial. It allows you to keep RAM clean and makes your device perform quicker and more smoothly.”
    1. Force Restarting:
    • Provides instructions for forcing a restart of the iPhone 14, an essential procedure when the device is unresponsive. “If you were one of the early adopters who get their hands on the new model, you should be knowledgeable on how to force restart your phone.”
    1. Activating iMessage:
    • The guide explains how to enable and activate iMessage via the Settings app, which allows you to “instantly exchange messages, voice memos, and media with your contacts using the iMessage service.”
    1. Taking Screenshots:
    • The guide provides instructions on taking screenshots using both physical buttons and assistive touch. “On the iPhone 14, screenshotting is straightforward and uncomplicated, as it should be.”
    1. Apple Pay:
    • Provides information on setting up Apple Pay, using Apple Pay on other devices, and sending money with Messages. “The simplest method to begin using contactless payments on an iPhone is using Apple Pay.” It also notes, “Apple Pay needs two-factor authentication by default, which is why you need a smartphone with Touch ID or Face ID compatibility or to activate a passcode on your Watch.”
    1. Mastering the iPhone 14 Pro & Pro Max Camera:
    • Includes tips on taking pictures with volume buttons, using QuickTake, adjusting bonus controls, and video recording options, including Cinematic and Action modes.
    1. Tricks to Boost Battery Life:
    • Offers several tips to optimize battery life, including turning off the always-on display, haptic feedback on the keyboard, limiting promotion frame rate, remembering battery health, stopping charging when the phone is hot, and using a larger power charger.
    1. Ways to Sell or Trade in Your Old iPhone:
    • The guide outlines different methods of selling an old iPhone, such as trading in with Apple, or using services such as Swappa, Gazelle, uSell, Best Buy, Carrier programs, and eBay.
    • Tips for obtaining a higher resale value are provided.
    • iPhone Maintenance:Provides instructions for keeping the iPhone running well, including using a protective case, cleaning the charging port, deleting unused apps, and consistently updating the device.

    Quotes from the Source:

    • “The camera module in the iPhone 14 Pro is larger than ever, but this is justified by an improved feature and spec list.”
    • “Although the term ‘new’ is dubious, there has been some development in the processor area.”
    • “Crash detection is similar to the earlier Full Detection function in that it utilizes an updated gyroscope and accelerometer to identify whether you are inside a car that is colliding.”
    • “A text-only strategy presented Apple with even another challenge. Some emergency receivers only take voice calls; others only accept text messages. It sounds like a manned version of Emergency SOS through Siri on the Apple Watch, but Apple created infrastructure to send messages via ’emergency relay centers with Apple-trained professionals who call for aid on your behalf.’”
    • “Unbelievably, your iPhone 14 content download isn’t complete if you use iCloud to transfer your info. When your iPhone 14 resumes, all the content you had stored on your old iPhone (apps, images, videos, music, etc.) is busy downloading while you set up FaceID and your financial information.”
    • “With the release of iOS 16, the lock screen has undergone a significant overhaul. You can now add your own widgets to it, and you may store several lock screen setups and switch between them as needed. To manage your lock screens and customize the wallpaper and various widget combinations shown on each one, press and hold on to the display when the lock screen is active. Then choose Customize.”

    Conclusion

    This user guide is a comprehensive manual for understanding and utilizing the features of the iPhone 14 series. It offers detailed instructions, explanations, and tips to enhance user experience. The guide covers both the new hardware and software changes, and emphasizes key features such as the Dynamic Island, improved camera systems, safety features like satellite communication and crash detection, and tips for battery life and maintenance. It also details specific instructions on common tasks such as setting up and using new features.

    This information provides a thorough understanding of the material for a quick review of the user guide.

    iPhone 14: Features and FAQs

    What are the key differences between the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Pro models?

    The iPhone 14 and 14 Plus have similar designs to the previous generation, including a notch at the top, with camera upgrades including a 12MP main and wide-angle. In contrast, the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models feature a redesigned “Dynamic Island” replacing the notch, and also boast a 48MP main camera along with other advanced camera features, and an always-on display. The Pro models also have a more powerful processor, the A16 Bionic chip.

    What is the Dynamic Island and how does it work?

    The Dynamic Island is a pill-shaped cutout on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models that replaces the traditional notch. It is interactive and adapts to show alerts, notifications, and live activities. It can display information like music playback controls, directions from maps, and the status of background tasks. The island expands and contracts dynamically as you interact with it and as different applications need to display notifications.

    How does the new Emergency SOS via Satellite feature work?

    The iPhone 14 and 14 Pro models include an “Emergency SOS via Satellite” feature that allows users to connect to emergency services even when they are outside of cellular or Wi-Fi range. It enables text communication by directing the phone towards a satellite in the sky, with the phone showing how to aim it to maintain a connection. This feature is mainly designed for emergency situations to send text messages and location information to aid responders. It is free for the first two years.

    What is Crash Detection and how does it work?

    Crash Detection is a safety feature that uses sensors (including a high-dynamic-range gyroscope and accelerometer) in the iPhone 14 and Apple Watches to detect severe car accidents. If a crash is detected, it will first notify the user with an alarm, and if the user does not respond, the device will call emergency services and share the user’s location. This feature is enabled by default, but can be turned off in Settings.

    How can I customize the lock screen in iOS 16?

    iOS 16 allows users to create multiple customizable lock screens. These can include various widgets for things like the weather and calendar events, custom colors, fonts, and even depth effects on photos used as the background. Lock screens can also be linked to Focus modes, providing different levels of distraction depending on which mode is active.

    What are the steps to take a screenshot on the iPhone 14?

    There are multiple ways to take a screenshot on iPhone 14. The most common method is to simultaneously press the “Lock/Side” button and the “Volume Up” button. An alternative is using the “Assistive Touch” feature which involves setting up a custom action on that menu and then pressing that action for a screenshot.

    What are the key improvements to the iPhone 14 Pro’s camera?

    The iPhone 14 Pro camera includes a 48MP main wide-angle lens, a 12MP ultrawide, and a telephoto lens. New features are included to improve low light photography and video stabilization, along with an improved Photonic Engine. In addition the camera also has a new “Action Mode” for smooth, handheld videos, and is able to record videos in 4K at 24 or 30 frames per second (previously only 1080p.)

    What tips can I follow to boost the battery life of my iPhone 14?

    There are several steps that can be taken to boost the battery life of the iPhone 14. These include turning off the always-on display, which is only available for the Pro models. Turning off keyboard haptics, enabling auto-brightness, limiting the Promotion Frame Rate, and also regularly checking which apps are draining the battery are all important steps to take. Also, it is recommended to keep the phone charged between 40% and 80% for optimal battery longevity.

    iPhone 14 Setup Guide

    The iPhone 14 setup process involves several steps, including updating your current iPhone, backing it up, activating your new phone, transferring data, completing downloads, and updating the new device [1-5].

    Here are the key steps to setting up an iPhone 14:

    • Update your current iPhone to the most recent iOS version [1].
    • Back up your current iPhone using iCloud or your computer [1, 2]. Backing up to iCloud may take 5-10 minutes, while backing up to a computer may take longer [2]. You can encrypt the backup with a password, and should you choose not to encrypt it, sensitive data will not be included in the backup [2].
    • Activate your new iPhone 14 by turning it on and following the prompts for language selection [2].
    • Transfer data to your new iPhone from another iPhone via Quick Start, iCloud, or a computer [2-4]. Transferring data from iCloud may take longer than transferring data from a computer [3]. If you use an iCloud backup, the majority of data transfer will happen in the background, and you can begin using the new iPhone after about 15 minutes [3]. However, the content download may take an hour or longer [4, 5].
    • Complete downloads and finalize transferring of your data [4, 5]. You may use your new gadget while this process is running [5].
    • Update your iPhone 14 to iOS 16.0.1 to fix some initial issues [5]. This update may require you to re-enter passwords for email, internet accounts and subscriptions [5]. You may also be prompted to sync your new iPhone with your Apple Watch [5].
    • Customize your iPhone 14 by changing your lock screen wallpaper, font, color, and widgets [6].

    During setup, you may also be prompted to:

    • Transfer your existing phone number [3]. You can do this by replacing a physical SIM card with an electronic SIM, or eSIM [3].
    • Enter security codes for registered credit cards or Apple Cash accounts [4].
    • Turn on the Emergency SOS feature [4].
    • Set up FaceID [4].

    The iPhone 14 comes with iOS 16 pre-installed [1]. It’s important to note that the initial release of iOS 16 had issues with Messages and FaceTime [1]. The iOS 16.0.1 update is available to fix these issues [5].

    iOS 16: New Features and Updates

    The iPhone 14 comes with iOS 16 pre-installed [1, 2]. Some of the new features of iOS 16 include the ability to add widgets to multiple lock screens, change how lock screen notifications are shown, edit and unsend messages, restore deleted texts, set up filters in focus mode, schedule sending emails, lock down your iPhone, share tab groups in Safari, see the battery level percentage, plan routes with multiple stops in Apple Maps, track your fitness without an Apple Watch, and run a safety check [3, 4].

    Other iOS 16 features include:

    • Customizable lock screens: You can customize the lock screen’s colors, fonts, and widgets, and also switch between different lock screens [5-8]. You can also add a photo to your lock screen, add widgets, and create a custom home screen [5, 8-10].
    • Notifications: You can change how lock screen notifications are shown [3, 11]. You can also make notifications into a list [8].
    • Messages: You can now edit and unsend messages [3, 11]. The Messages app also offers the option to restore conversations that have been erased within the past 30 days [11]. In addition, the Messages app can be used to send money to others [12].
    • Focus Mode: You can set up filters in Focus mode and set a Focus to your lock screen [3, 10, 13].
    • Mail: You can schedule sending emails [3, 13].
    • Safari: You can share tab groups with other users [3, 14]. You can also pin your preferred tabs [15].
    • Battery: You can see the battery level percentage [3, 14].
    • Maps: You can plan routes with multiple stops [3, 14].
    • Fitness: You can track your fitness without an Apple Watch [3, 16, 17].
    • Safety Check: There is a new tool called Safety Check for individuals in abusive situations that allows them to manage who has access to their data [3, 16, 18].
    • Medications: You can track your medications in the Health app, which will send reminders and monitor for drug interactions [5, 19-22]. There is also a medication app for the Apple Watch [23]. You can also share your health data with others [24].
    • Haptic Feedback: The native iPhone keyboard receives haptic feedback [5, 25].
    • Cut out objects from photos: You can isolate the subject of a photo from its background [5, 16].
    • Share photos more easily: A new feature called iCloud Shared Photo Library will be available soon [25].
    • Dictation: Siri’s dictation abilities have been improved, and can now automatically add emojis and handles punctuation [2, 18].
    • Lock Down: There is a new “lock down” mode that severely reduces the areas that hackers may target [13].
    • Pair Nintendo Switch Joy-Cons: You can connect third party controllers to the iPhone to play mobile games [26].
    • View and exchange stored Wi-Fi passwords: You can now share a Wi-Fi password with someone [27].
    • Locate and eliminate duplicate images and videos: You can search through your photo library to eliminate duplicate photos and videos [27].
    • Picture and video adjustments: You can copy and paste edits you made to a photo or video [28].
    • New always-on display: The iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max have a new always-on display that dims when the device is inactive [29].
    • Emergency SOS via satellite: This feature allows you to contact emergency services via satellite in areas without cellular service [30, 31]. This service is free for two years [30].
    • Crash Detection: The iPhone 14 can detect when you are in a car crash and automatically contact emergency services [32, 33].
    • Improved Camera: The iPhone 14 Pro has a 48MP wide-angle camera [34, 35]. The iPhone 14 Pro also has a new Action Mode for video [36].
    • eSIM: The iPhone 14 has an eSIM, and no longer has a physical SIM card slot [30].

    The initial release of iOS 16 had issues with Messages and FaceTime [1]. The iOS 16.0.1 update is available to fix these issues [37].

    iPhone 14 Tricks & Tips

    The iPhone 14 has several features and capabilities that can be considered “tricks” that may enhance user experience, including those related to the new iOS 16, the camera, and general phone usage.

    Some tricks and tips for the iPhone 14 include:

    • Customizing the lock screen: You can change your lock screen’s wallpaper, font, color, and widgets, and also switch between different lock screens [1, 2]. You can add a photo to your lock screen, add widgets, and create a custom home screen [1-3].
    • Using Focus mode: You can set up filters in Focus mode and attach a Focus to your lock screen [1, 3, 4].
    • Managing notifications: You can change how lock screen notifications are shown, and you can also make notifications into a list [5-7].
    • Using Messages: You can now edit and unsend messages [6]. The Messages app also offers the option to restore conversations that have been erased within the past 30 days [6]. You can also send money using Messages [8].
    • Scheduling emails: You can schedule sending emails in the Mail app [4].
    • Sharing tab groups: You can share tab groups with other users in Safari [9]. You can also pin your preferred tabs [10].
    • Viewing battery percentage: You can view the battery level percentage [9].
    • Planning routes with multiple stops: You can plan routes with multiple stops in Apple Maps [9].
    • Tracking fitness without an Apple Watch: You can track your fitness without an Apple Watch [11]. You can also share your fitness activities with others [12].
    • Using Safety Check: There is a new tool called Safety Check for individuals in abusive situations that allows them to manage who has access to their data [11, 13].
    • Tracking medications: You can track your medications in the Health app, which will send reminders and monitor for drug interactions [14, 15].
    • Using haptic feedback: The native iPhone keyboard receives haptic feedback [16, 17].
    • Cutting out objects from photos: You can isolate the subject of a photo from its background [1, 11].
    • Sharing photos more easily: A new feature called iCloud Shared Photo Library will be available soon [1, 16].
    • Dictating text: Siri’s dictation abilities have been improved, and can now automatically add emojis and handles punctuation [13, 18].
    • Locking down your phone: There is a new “lock down” mode that severely reduces the areas that hackers may target [4].
    • Pairing Nintendo Switch Joy-Cons: You can connect third party controllers to the iPhone to play mobile games [19].
    • Sharing Wi-Fi passwords: You can now share a Wi-Fi password with someone [20].
    • Eliminating duplicate media: You can search through your photo library to eliminate duplicate photos and videos [20].
    • Copying and pasting picture and video adjustments: You can copy and paste edits you made to a photo or video [21].
    • Using the always-on display: The iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max have a new always-on display that dims when the device is inactive [22-24].
    • Using Emergency SOS via satellite: This feature allows you to contact emergency services via satellite in areas without cellular service [25]. This service is free for two years [25, 26].
    • Utilizing Crash Detection: The iPhone 14 can detect when you are in a car crash and automatically contact emergency services [27-30].
    • Taking a screenshot: To take a screenshot, press the “Lock/Side” and “Volume Up” buttons simultaneously, or use Assistive Touch [31, 32].
    • Using the Dynamic Island: The Dynamic Island is an interactive area that appears on the front of the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max, which can be tapped to expand and show more information about alerts, notifications, and activities [33, 34]. The Dynamic Island can be used to control phone calls, music, travel alerts, and show AirDrop notifications and the status of ride-share services [35-37].
    • Using Apple Pay from the lock screen: You can access Apple Pay from the lock screen by double clicking the side button [38, 39].
    • Using the camera: The iPhone 14 Pro has a 48MP wide-angle camera [27, 40, 41]. The iPhone 14 Pro also has a new Action Mode for video and can record video in 4K [41-43]. The volume buttons can be used as shutter controls [44].
    • Force restarting the iPhone: If your phone is not responding, you may need to force restart it. This is done using a button sequence specific to iPhones without a home button [45].
    • Extending battery life: You can extend your battery life by turning off the always-on display and keyboard haptics, enabling the auto-brightness feature, limiting the promotion frame rate, using Dark Mode, and enabling optimized battery charging [17, 24, 46, 47].

    The iPhone 14 also has an eSIM, and no longer has a physical SIM card slot [25].

    iPhone 14 Pro Dynamic Island

    The Dynamic Island is a new feature on the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max that replaces the traditional notch at the top of the iPhone screen [1, 2]. It is an interactive area that can expand and change shape to show alerts, notifications, and activities [1, 2].

    Here are some key aspects of the Dynamic Island:

    • Appearance: The Dynamic Island is a black bar that is connected to an island-like area on the display [3]. It is designed to look like a single, narrow lozenge [3].
    • Function: The Dynamic Island is designed to be interactive and can display essential information and notifications [1, 4]. It can also act as a hub for alerts, notifications and app shortcuts [1].
    • Interactivity: Users can tap on the Dynamic Island to expand it and access additional controls or information [1].
    • Compatibility: The Dynamic Island is exclusive to the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max models [1, 2]. It is enabled by the A16 Bionic chip in those models [1].
    • Display: The Dynamic Island is made possible by hardware modifications to the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max [5]. The design of the display itself was altered [5].
    • Notifications: Instead of displaying standalone notifications, the Dynamic Island centralizes them [4].

    The Dynamic Island can be used for a variety of functions, including:

    • Phone Calls: The Dynamic Island can display the option to pick up or hang up calls [4].
    • Music: While music is playing, album art appears on the Dynamic Island and the user may touch the Dynamic Island to access music controls like play/pause/previous/next [4].
    • Travel Alerts: The Dynamic Island displays useful travel information like flight numbers and baggage claim details [6].
    • Turn-by-Turn Directions: The Dynamic Island gives notifications for driving directions [6].
    • AirDrop: The Dynamic Island displays the status of AirDrop transfers [6].
    • Ride-Share Services: The Dynamic Island displays information about ride-share services [6].
    • Face ID: When Face ID is being used, the Face ID animation stretches from the Dynamic Island [2].
    • Charging: The Dynamic Island displays when your phone is charging [5].
    • Lock/Unlock: The Dynamic Island provides an animation when the phone is locked or unlocked [5].
    • Other functions: Other capabilities include connection for headphones, Do Not Disturb mode, quiet mode, charge status, and sporting results [5].

    The Dynamic Island is intended to be a more intuitive and integrated way of displaying information and interacting with the iPhone [1, 4, 6].

    iPhone 14 Battery Life Optimization

    To maximize battery life on your iPhone 14, there are several settings and usage habits you can adjust [1].

    Here are some ways to boost battery life on the iPhone 14:

    • Turn off the always-on display: The always-on display on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max allows the screen to remain visible even when the phone is not in use, which consumes power [1, 2]. To turn it off, go to Settings > Display & Brightness, and deactivate it [1].
    • Disable keyboard haptics: The keyboard’s haptic feedback uses energy [3]. To turn it off, go to Settings > Sounds & Haptics > Keyboard Feedback and toggle off the options for sound and haptics [3].
    • Enable auto-brightness: Auto-brightness automatically adjusts screen brightness based on ambient lighting conditions, reducing energy consumption [4]. This setting can be located in the Accessibility menu within the Display & Text Size settings [4].
    • Limit promotion frame rate: The ProMotion feature on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max can be set to a lower refresh rate which will save battery [4]. This can be done in the Accessibility menu [4].
    • Use Dark Mode: Using Dark Mode will reduce the energy used by the OLED display [4].
    • Enable Optimized Battery Charging: This function slows down battery aging by studying your daily routine, and finishes charging the phone before your morning alarm goes off [5].
    • Charge your iPhone before it gets too hot: The iPhone has a safety feature that will stop charging when the phone gets too hot [6]. This feature helps preserve battery health and lengthen battery life [6]. You may want to take actions such as taking the phone out of the sun or using less energy-hungry apps while charging [6].
    • Get the right charger for your iPhone: The iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max can charge at 23W and 27W, respectively, while the iPhone 14 and 14 Plus can charge at 20W [6, 7]. You may want to choose a larger charger to increase charging speed [6]. Apple also offers a MagSafe charger that will wirelessly charge your phone at 15W [8].
    • Maintain your iPhone’s battery health: The Battery Health options, found in the battery menu, allow you to maintain the health of your battery [5]. The function Optimized Battery Charging must be activated [5].
    • Keep your iPhone charged: It’s advised to maintain your phone charge between 40% and 80% [9]. A phone battery will discharge faster when being used [9].

    iPhone 14 Repair Manual

    iPhone Introduction
    This manual includes technical instructions for replacing genuine Apple parts in iPhone and is intended for individual technicians with the knowledge, experience, and tools required to repair electronic devices.

    Important
    Read the entire manual first. If you’re not comfortable performing the repairs as instructed in this manual, don’t proceed.

    Always use the latest version of this manual available at support.apple.com/en-us/docs/iphone.

      Warning
    Failure to follow the repair instructions or to use genuine Apple parts or proper tools may cause fire or other safety issues and lead to personal injury or death.

    Caution
    Failure to follow the repair instructions or to use genuine Apple parts or proper tools may damage the iPhone, parts, or other property, or compromise the device’s functionality or water resistance.

    Warranty information
    Damage caused by repairs performed outside of Apple or the Apple Authorized Service Provider network is not covered by Apple’s product warranty or AppleCare plans. Such damage may cause future repairs to be subject to out-of-warranty costs or render the device ineligible for future repairs by Apple or Apple Authorized Service Providers.

    Tools and parts
    Hardware tools

    Apple tools are designed to apply the appropriate heat, force, and torque during repairs, and to withstand high-volume professional use.

    The heated display removal fixture softens adhesive to allow separation of the display from the enclosure. The fixture is used with a heated display pocket designed for the device’s specific dimensions.

    The display press applies the appropriate amount of pressure to secure new adhesive during display installation. The display press is used with a repair tray and display adhesive press plate designed for the device’s specific dimensions.

    The battery press applies the appropriate amount of pressure to secure new adhesive during battery installation. The battery press is used with a repair tray designed for the device’s specific dimensions.

    Ordering tools and parts

    You can learn how to order genuine Apple parts and tools at support.apple.com/self-service-repair. During the purchase process, enter the manual ID located at the bottom of the Contents page to indicate that you’ve read this manual in its entirety and agree that you have the knowledge and experience to perform your intended repair.

    Software tools

    Repair Assistant is a post-repair software tool that finishes the repair for select new and used genuine Apple parts. Repair Assistant may be recommended at the end of your repair depending on the part replaced.

    What Repair Assistant does

    Why it’s important

    Transfers factory calibration values

    Certain parts like displays, cameras, and ambient light sensors have calibration values that are customized to each individual part during manufacturing. Downloading these values ensures maximum performance and quality after a repair.

    Links Secure Enclave and biometric authentication parts

    After repair of a logic board or a biometric authentication part (Touch ID or Face ID ), linking the biometric sensors to the Secure Enclave on the logic board is required to ensure device security.

    Checks for Activation Lock

    Certain parts are protected by Activation Lock. Repair Assistant checks to ensure that the part being installed does not have Activation Lock enabled.

    Assigns wireless region

    To comply with regional communications regulations, a wireless region must be assigned to your logic board.

    Updates firmware

    Keeping firmware up to date ensures that the device has all the latest security and performance features.

    How to initiate Repair Assistant

    Ensure the following minimum requirements are met:

    The latest version of iOS—not a beta version—on the iPhone

    A strong Wi-Fi network capable of 1.0 Mbps download and upload speeds, with less than 400 ms latency and less than 2% packet loss. Estimated data usage to run Repair Assistant is 6–22 MB.

    If you’re repairing someone else’s device, put the device into diagnostics mode, then follow the onscreen prompts.

    If you’re repairing your own device, learn more about Repair Assistant.

    Alerts
    Failure to follow alerts could result in fire, injury, data loss, or damage to the device, parts, or other property.

    Warning

    Instructions for reducing risk of personal injury

    Caution

    Instructions for reducing risk of data loss or device hardware damage

    Important

    Supplemental information for successfully completing procedures; neither a Warning nor a Caution

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • The Straight Path: A Discourse on Islamic Sects

    The Straight Path: A Discourse on Islamic Sects

    This text is a transcription of a lecture discussing the internal conflict within the Tablighi Jamaat, a large Islamic missionary movement. The speaker details the history of the Jamaat, highlighting key figures and events leading to a schism in 2016. He explores the underlying causes of the division, including succession disputes and differing interpretations of religious practices. The lecture further examines the broader context of sectarianism in Islam, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the Quran and Sunnah while advocating for tolerance and unity among diverse Muslim groups. Finally, the speaker urges a return to core Islamic principles to resolve the conflict and prevent further division within the Muslim community.

    01
    Amazon Prime FREE Membership

    Tablighi Jamaat and Sectarianism: A Study Guide

    Quiz

    Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

    1. What are the two factions that have formed within the Tablighi Jamaat in recent years and what is the primary point of conflict between them?
    2. What are the three main centers of the Tablighi Jamaat’s annual gatherings, and where are they located?
    3. What are the titles of the two books used by the Tablighi Jamaat that have recently become a source of controversy, and why are they controversial?
    4. What is the historical context of the Deobandi and Barelvi conflict, and what is the central issue of contention?
    5. Who was Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi and what is his significance to the Tablighi Jamaat?
    6. According to the speaker, what is the primary issue that caused the split in the Tablighi Jamaat after the death of Maulana Inamul Hasan?
    7. What is the speaker’s view on sectarianism within Islam and what does he argue is the source of division?
    8. According to the speaker, what is the importance of the Quran and Sunnah, and how should Muslims approach the interpretation of these sources?
    9. How does the speaker analyze the hadith of the 73 sects in relation to sectarianism?
    10. What is the speaker’s perspective on the role of the Imams in Islamic jurisprudence, and what is his specific objection to the way they are followed by some Muslims?

    Quiz Answer Key

    1. The two factions within the Tablighi Jamaat are the “building group,” which focuses on infrastructure and organization, and the “Shura group,” which adheres to a council-based leadership structure. The primary conflict is over leadership and authority, stemming from a dispute regarding the appointment of an amir (leader).
    2. The three main centers of the Tablighi Jamaat’s annual gatherings are in Tongi (Bangladesh), near Lahore (Pakistan), and the Nizamuddin center in Delhi (India). These gatherings draw huge numbers of participants and are significant events in the Tablighi Jamaat calendar.
    3. The two books are “Virtues of Deeds” and “Virtues of Charity.” They are controversial because they contain accounts of outlandish Sufi events and stories, which some find to be inconsistent with a strict adherence to the Qur’an and Sunnah.
    4. The conflict between the Deobandi and Barelvi sects began after the establishment of the Deoband Madrasah and is rooted in differing views on Sufi practices and the authority of Hadith. Each group holds the other as not being a true Muslim, even though they both come from the Sunni and Hanafi schools of thought.
    5. Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi was the founder of the Tablighi Jamaat, who started the movement in 1926 as an effort to educate Muslims at the basic level of the religion. He focused on teaching Muslims about ablutions and prayers, expanding the movement to various villages.
    6. According to the speaker, the primary cause of the split in the Tablighi Jamaat was the failure to reestablish the Shoori (council) after the death of Maulana Inamul Hasan and a power struggle, resulting in the appointment of Maulana Saad Kandhalvi without the proper consultation.
    7. The speaker views sectarianism as a curse and believes the primary source of division within the Islamic community is the creation of factions and the adherence to traditions and teachings outside of the Qur’an and Sunnah. He advocates for unity based on the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah.
    8. The speaker emphasizes that the Qur’an and Sunnah are the supreme and fundamental sources of guidance in Islam. He advises that Muslims approach the interpretation of these sources by referencing Hadith and avoiding opinions or traditions that deviate from their teachings.
    9. The speaker argues that the hadith of the 73 sects does not command Muslims to create sects. Rather, it is a prediction of what will happen. He states that the Qur’an orders Muslims not to create sects and to reject interpretations of Hadith that justify divisiveness.
    10. The speaker believes that the Imams should be respected but that their sayings should not supersede the Qur’an and Sunnah. He objects to how some Muslims follow Imams dogmatically rather than directly studying the Qur’an and Hadith, specifically referencing the act of kissing the thumb.

    Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the historical development of the Tablighi Jamaat, including its origins, growth, and the internal conflicts that have led to its current state of division. How has the legacy of Ilyas Kandhalvi shaped the trajectory of the movement?
    2. Discuss the role of religious texts in the Tablighi Jamaat, focusing on the controversial books “Virtues of Deeds” and “Virtues of Charity,” and the impact of these books on the schism within the Jamaat. How do they compare to more canonical texts of the Qur’an and Sunnah?
    3. Examine the issue of sectarianism within Islam as described by the speaker. What are the core issues that contribute to sectarian divisions, and how does he suggest overcoming them? What are the obstacles to creating unity within Islam, as identified by the speaker?
    4. Compare and contrast the speaker’s approach to understanding Islam with the practices of the Tablighi Jamaat and its various factions. In what ways does the speaker attempt to be a neutral observer while also providing an analysis of the movement’s theological underpinnings?
    5. Discuss the speaker’s emphasis on the Qur’an and Sunnah as the primary sources of guidance in Islam. How does this compare with the speaker’s understanding of the role of the Imams and the traditional schools of thought?

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • Tablighi Jamaat: A transnational Islamic missionary movement that encourages Muslims to return to a strict adherence to Sunni Islam.
    • Deobandi: A Sunni Islamic reform movement that emphasizes a strict interpretation of the Qur’an and Hadith, with a focus on education and missionary work.
    • Barelvi: A Sunni Islamic movement that emphasizes love and devotion to the Prophet Muhammad and includes practices that some consider Sufi, often in opposition to the Deobandi view.
    • Ahl al-Hadith: A movement within Sunni Islam that emphasizes the importance of direct study of the Hadith, and often opposes Sufi practices or traditions not directly found in the texts.
    • Shura: A consultative council used in Islamic decision-making. In this context, it refers to the leadership council within the Tablighi Jamaat.
    • Amir: A leader or commander, often used to denote the head of a religious group or organization. In this context, it is the disputed leadership position within the Tablighi Jamaat.
    • Nizamuddin Center: The original headquarters of the Tablighi Jamaat in Delhi, India.
    • Raiwand Center: A major center of the Tablighi Jamaat located in Pakistan.
    • Tongi (Bangladesh): A town near Dhaka, Bangladesh, known for hosting one of the largest annual Tablighi Jamaat gatherings.
    • Virtues of Deeds/Virtues of Charity: Two books written by Shaykh Zakaria Kandhalvi used by the Tablighi Jamaat that have become controversial for containing outlandish Sufi stories and accounts.
    • Hayat al-Sahaba: A book written by Yusuf Kandhalvi about the lives of the companions of the Prophet, used within the Tablighi Jamaat.
    • Ijtihad: The process of making a legal decision based on the Islamic legal tradition. The term refers to reasoned interpretation of Islamic law by qualified scholars.
    • Sunnah: The practice and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, serving as a secondary source of guidance for Muslims after the Qur’an.
    • Hadith: The recorded sayings, actions, and approvals of the Prophet Muhammad, which are used to guide Muslims in their religious practice and understanding.
    • Qur’an: The holy scripture of Islam, considered by Muslims to be the word of God as revealed to the Prophet Muhammad.
    • Ahl al-Bayt: The family of the Prophet Muhammad, including his descendants, wives, and other close relatives.
    • Tawheed: The concept of the oneness of God in Islam, which emphasizes that there is no other god but Allah.
    • Ghadir Khum: A specific location where the Prophet Muhammad is said to have delivered a sermon about the importance of Ahl al-Bayt.
    • Rifa al-Ideen: The practice of raising hands during prayer, specifically when going into and rising from the bowing position (Ruku’). This is a point of contention for some Sunni Muslims.
    • Ijma: The consensus of the Muslim scholars on a particular issue of law or practice.
    • Fard: A religious obligation in Islam that is considered a duty for all Muslims.
    • Mujaddid: A renewer of the faith, who is seen as coming at the turn of each century in the Islamic calendar to restore Islamic practice back to the traditions of the Prophet and his companions.
    • Nasbiy: A derogatory term given to individuals who show animosity toward the family of the Prophet Muhammad.
    • Kharijites: An early sect of Islam who broke away from mainstream Islam over political and religious disputes.
    • Wahhabi Movement: An Islamic revivalist movement that promotes a strict adherence to Islamic doctrine and often views other Muslims as apostate.
    • Shia: A sect of Islam that believe Ali ibn Abi Talib was the rightful successor to the Prophet Muhammad.
    • Qadiani: A group that stems from the Ahmadiyya movement that was founded in 1889. Orthodox Muslims don’t consider them to be proper Muslims.

    Tablighi Jamaat Schism and Islamic Unity

    Okay, here is a detailed briefing document analyzing the provided text:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of Discourse on the Tablighi Jamaat and Sectarianism within Islam

    Date: October 22, 2024 (based on the text’s context)

    Source: Excerpts from a transcript of a public session (number 179) held on December 29, 2024

    Overview:

    This briefing document summarizes a lengthy and complex discourse that primarily centers on the Tablighi Jamaat, a large Islamic organization, and its recent internal divisions. The speaker, who identifies as an engineer and a scholar of the Quran and Sunnah, provides a critical historical overview of the group, its origins, and its current conflict. The speaker also uses this specific conflict as a springboard to discuss broader issues within Islam, such as sectarianism, the importance of adhering directly to the Quran and Sunnah, and the dangers of blind following of tradition. The tone is critical yet somewhat sympathetic, seeking to inform and to advocate for a more unified and Quran-centered approach to Islam.

    Key Themes and Ideas:

    1. The Tablighi Jamaat and Its Internal Strife:
    • Origins and Growth: The Tablighi Jamaat was founded by Ilyas Kandhalvi in 1926 with the aim of teaching basic religious practices to Muslims. The speaker acknowledges their hard work and dedication to going “from village to village to town to town to the mosque” and expresses personal “love for the people of Tablighi Jamaat” for their self-sacrifice.
    • Current Division: For the past nine years, the Tablighi Jamaat has been split into two factions: one focused on the “building system” and the other on the “Shuri” (consultative council). The text specifies that the schism became public in 2015. This conflict recently resulted in violence at their annual gathering in Bangladesh on December 18, 2024, with “five people were martyred and more than a hundred were injured.”
    • Accusations and Rhetoric: Each group accuses the other of various offenses, including calling the opposing group “Saadiani” which is intentionally close to “Qadiani” in sound, suggesting they are heretical, and that one side is an “Indian agent” while other “is pro-Pakistan.”
    • Leadership Dispute: The dispute over leadership can be traced to the death of Inamul Hasan in 1995 and the failure to name a successor, resulting in a power vacuum and ultimately, the schism between Maulana Saad Kandhalvi and the Shura based in Raiwand. The speaker argues that the Tablighi Jamaat, which is generally averse to public sectarianism, is publicly showcasing its division.
    1. Sectarianism Within Islam:
    • Historical Context: The speaker traces the historical roots of sectarianism in Islam, highlighting the Deobandi-Barelvi divide, which emerged in the early 20th century. They note that before the Deoband madrasa, distinctions between Muslims were not as significant, focusing instead on legal schools of thought.
    • Critique of Sectarianism: The speaker argues that sectarianism is a “curse” and a deviation from the true teachings of Islam. The speaker emphasizes the need to avoid sectarian labels. They believe that sectarianism and the lack of tolerance prevents Muslim unity.
    • Critique of Following Elders: The speaker takes issue with the practice of following elders in a tradition, that results in the failure to adhere to and interpret the Qur’an and Sunnah directly.
    • Call for Unity through Diversity: The speaker advocates for a form of unity that acknowledges diversity and encourages scholarly debate while emphasizing common ground in the Qur’an and Sunnah.
    1. Importance of the Quran and Sunnah:
    • Primary Sources: The speaker insists that the Quran and the Sunnah (the teachings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad) are the primary sources of guidance in Islam.
    • Rejection of Sectarian Interpretations: They are critical of sectarian interpretations of the Quran and Sunnah, particularly in the area of worship. They find that traditions based on the sayings of elders result in a loss of adherence to the true practices described in Hadith (collections of the sayings and actions of the Prophet).
    • Emphasis on Understanding: The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding the meaning of the Quran, rather than simply reciting it without comprehension. The speaker strongly criticizes the Tablighi Jamaat for relying more on books of virtue than on the text of the Qur’an itself. They cite the example of the practice of Rafa ul-Yadayn (raising hands during prayer), which they see as a clear example of adherence to Sunnah over sectarian custom. The speaker states that “The entire religion of the whole stands on it.” in regards to following the recorded traditions of how the Prophet practiced Islam.
    1. Critique of Traditional Islamic Practices:
    • Sufi Influences: The speaker is critical of certain Sufi practices and beliefs, particularly those found in books such as “Virtues of Deeds”, used by the Tablighi Jamaat before being removed by Maulana Saad Kandalvi. They reject stories in these books that conflict with the Quran and Sunnah.
    • Rejection of Imitation of Religious Leaders: The speaker states “we don’t believe any sage, we don’t believe traitors, yes, we believe those who are loyal to the Messenger of Allah”. They reject the practice of following particular religious leaders and state that the “Imams are not at fault” and “we are not saying anything to Imam Hanifa, Imam Shafi’i, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Imam Malik, to his followers”, but reject religious leaders’ ideas that do not follow Quran and Sunnah.
    1. The Concept of “The Straight Path” (Sirat al-Mustaqim):
    • Emphasis on following the straight path. The speaker quotes a hadith about the Prophet drawing a straight line, representing the true path, and many crooked lines, representing the paths of deviation, and urges adherence to the Quran and Sunnah in an effort to avoid “paths of the devil”.
    • Call to adhere to the way of the blessed The speaker concludes by stating that “They have not made their own paths and whoever has deviated from their path is the wrongdoer.” The speaker makes this statement in the context of the Prophet’s path and those who have followed the same path.

    Quotes of Significance:

    • “It is a very big international news for Muslims. Therefore, it is not only a cause of pain and suffering, but also a cause of shame.” – On the Tablighi Jamaat conflict.
    • “No Muslim in the world called himself a Deobandi before the Hanafis There was a difference between the Shafi’is and the Sunnis, but the difference was not that these Deobandis were Muslims…” – On the historical context of sectarianism.
    • “I think sectarianism is a curse and we should avoid it.” – On the speaker’s stance on sectarianism.
    • “The whole issue of sectarianism is going on and then we started the work of a separate invitation, not to form a congregation…” – On the speaker’s organization.
    • “…the Quran and the Sunnah of His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). The Qur’an Who wants to believe that the Qur’an and the Sunnah are one and the same, these are not optional things in this regard, there are two sources in parallel, the one who denies the Sunnah is not misguided, brother, he is a disbeliever…” – On the importance of following the Sunnah.
    • “This book is meant to end the differences between Jews and Christians. The book made the Companions and now Rizwan out of misguidance and made them the imam of the whole humanity and you are saying that differences will arise…” – On the unifying effect of the Qur’an.
    • “…after the departure of the Messenger of Allah, the Qur’an is the supreme caliph on this planet earth…” – On the final authority of the Quran after the Prophet.
    • “These are crooked lines, isn’t there a devil sitting on top of each line, who is calling you to him, and in the center of which I have drawn a straight line.” He placed his finger on it and said, “I recited the verse of the Qur’an, ‘The straight path,’ and this is my path, which is the straight path, so follow it…” – On the importance of following the straight path.

    Analysis:

    The speaker’s analysis is comprehensive, historically informed, and critical of the status quo within many Islamic communities. They advocate for a return to the primary sources of Islam (Quran and Sunnah) while rejecting sectarianism, blind following of tradition, and innovations that go against the Prophet’s teachings. The speaker uses the current conflict within the Tablighi Jamaat as a case study to illustrate the harmful effects of sectarianism and the importance of following the straight path. They highlight the significance of adherence to the way of the blessed in following the straight path.

    Potential Implications:

    This discourse has the potential to provoke discussion and debate within Muslim communities. It is a call for a critical engagement with religious traditions, pushing for a more Quran and Sunnah focused practice of Islam, and it might encourage Muslims to look beyond traditional sectarian divisions. However, the speaker’s criticism of established practices and leadership may be met with resistance from those within those traditional systems. The speaker intends to encourage followers of these paths to reevaluate some of their beliefs and practices, but also to treat other Muslims with respect regardless of their sect.

    Conclusion:

    This public session provides a detailed and nuanced commentary on a specific conflict within the Tablighi Jamaat while touching on wider issues of sectarianism and correct Islamic practice. The speaker advocates for reform, tolerance, and a return to the primary sources of Islam in the interest of creating a unified and more tolerant Muslim community. The message is powerful, but is likely to be controversial.

    The Tablighi Jamaat: Division and Disunity

    Frequently Asked Questions

    • What is the Tablighi Jamaat and what are its main activities?
    • The Tablighi Jamaat is a large, international Islamic organization that originated in India around 1926. It focuses on encouraging Muslims to adhere to basic Islamic practices like prayer, ablution, and reading the Quran. They are known for their door-to-door preaching efforts, often traveling from village to village, mosque to mosque, promoting these fundamentals. The organization emphasizes personal sacrifice and religious devotion among its members, who often fund their missionary activities from their own pockets. It is also noteworthy for its large gatherings, particularly in Tongi, Bangladesh, near Lahore, Pakistan, and at Nizamuddin, in Delhi, India. They have centers established in roughly 170 countries and are considered to be the largest organization in the Muslim world.
    • Why has the Tablighi Jamaat recently been in the news?
    • The Tablighi Jamaat has experienced significant internal conflict and division in recent years, stemming from disagreements over leadership and the methodology of preaching. This has led to the formation of two main factions: one aligned with the “building system” (construction and management of centers), and the other focused on the “Shura” (consultative council). These divisions have manifested in clashes, most notably at their annual gathering in Bangladesh on December 18, 2024, resulting in deaths and injuries. The accusations flying between the factions are also a factor in the media coverage, with each side accusing the other of various wrongdoings.
    • What are the main points of contention between the two factions within the Tablighi Jamaat?
    • The core of the conflict involves disputes over leadership succession following the death of previous leaders. This culminated in Maulana Saad Kandhalvi unilaterally declaring himself Amir (leader) in 2016, leading to a split from the Shura council, the original group. The original Shura group felt that the 10 member Shura should have selected a new amir as decided in 1993. This resulted in each faction declaring the other’s mosques to be illegitimate, while accusations of betrayal and even foreign influence (Indian Agent), are common in the videos uploaded by the different factions. The factions differ also on the usage of specific books, for instance, Maulana Saad Kandhalvi’s faction no longer endorses “Virtues of Deeds” and “Virtues of Charity,” which have been sources of controversy.
    • What is the significance of the books “Virtues of Deeds” and “Virtues of Charity” and why are they now controversial?
    • These books, authored by Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi, have historically been a part of the Tablighi Jamaat’s curriculum. However, they have come under criticism for containing narratives and stories perceived as fantastical, and for promoting ideas associated with Sufi practices and beliefs. Some critics, including Maulana Tariq Jameel, have argued that these narratives are not grounded in the Qur’an or the Sunnah. It’s also important to note that the authorship of these texts has been a factor, as the books are from the father of Maulana Saad Kanlavi, who was in the party of Sufism and Peri Muridi. This is why Saad Kandhalvi banned the books.
    • How does the Tablighi Jamaat relate to the broader historical conflict between the Deobandi and Barelvi schools of thought?
    • The Tablighi Jamaat is rooted in the Deobandi school of thought, which emerged as a reaction against certain Sufi practices and beliefs. The Deobandi school originated with the establishment of the Deoband Madrasa. This madrasa was formed because its scholars began to differ from Sufi thought, specifically taking aspects from the Ahl al-Hadith school. The Barelvi school of thought, in response, arose in 1904 in opposition to the Deobandi school and their deviations from Sufi thought. This led to a long-standing theological and cultural conflict between these two schools, with each side accusing the other of being outside the fold of Islam. This history of sectarianism affects how each faction within the Tablighi Jamaat views the other.
    • How does the speaker view the role of sectarianism in Islam?
    • The speaker views sectarianism as a detrimental force in Islam, believing it to be a curse. He argues that divisions and sects are a violation of the Qur’anic injunction to “hold fast to the rope of Allah and do not be divided into sects”. He believes the constant infighting and accusations of disbelief that each sect throws at each other creates disunity. He stresses that Muslims should primarily adhere to the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad and avoid creating sects. He further asserts that each group thinks that their way is right, and because of that, it is easy for that group to deem all other groups are on the path to hell. He supports a more tolerant approach to differences in practice, where groups should focus on constructive scholarly criticism rather than outright denouncement.
    • What is the speaker’s position on following the Qur’an and the Sunnah?
    • The speaker strongly emphasizes that the Qur’an and the Sunnah are the primary sources of guidance for Muslims. He maintains that the method for the prayer was not described in the Quran, and therefore must come from the Sunnah and its related Hadiths. He argues that adherence to these sources will prevent Muslims from going astray, as the Prophet’s final instructions centered around these two things. He also stresses the importance of understanding the Qur’an rather than simply reciting it without comprehension. He highlights a hadith in which the Prophet (PBUH) states the best book of Allah is the Book of Allah, and the best path is that of Muhammad, and that any new actions in religion are considered heresies and will lead to hell.
    • What is the significance of the Hadith of Ghadeer Khum, and what does it tell us about the two things the Prophet left behind?

    The speaker considers the Hadith of Ghadeer Khum to be of the highest importance. It details the Prophet, peace be upon him, declaring that he was leaving behind two weighty things for his followers: the Qur’an and his Ahl al-Bayt (his family). This is considered an important hadith because the Quran is not just a book, but rather “The Rope of Allah”, that if followed closely, will keep one from going astray. The Hadith goes on to say that the Prophet (PBUH) implores his followers to treat the Ahl al-Bayt well. The speaker believes that this hadith shows the significance of the Qur’an and also the importance of respecting the Prophet’s family. He argues that the Muslim Ummah has failed to uphold either of these.

    The Tablighi Jamaat Schism

    Okay, here’s the timeline and cast of characters based on the provided text:

    Timeline of Events

    • 1904: Madrasah Manzarul Islam Barelwi is built, marking the formal establishment of the Barelvi sect.
    • 1905:Five Fatwas of infidelity (Hussam al-Haramayin) are issued against Deobandi scholars by Barelvi scholars.
    • Einstein publishes his Special Theory of Relativity, while the Deobandi-Barelvi conflict escalates.
    • Deobandi scholars write Al-Muhand Ali Al-Mufand in response to accusations of infidelity, but these are not accepted by the Barelvis.
    • 1926: Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi starts the work of Tablighi Jamaat in Mewat, initially focused on educating Muslims.
    • 1944: Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi dies.
    • 1965: Maulana Yusuf Kandhalvi, Ilyas’s son, dies at the age of 48 after serving as Amir for 21 years; he wrote Hayat al-Sahaba.
    • 1965: Instead of Yusuf’s son, Haroon, Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi appoints his son-in-law, Maulana Inamul Hasan Kandhalvi, as the Amir of Tablighi Jamaat.
    • 1981: Dawat-e-Islami is formed by Barelvi scholars, with access to existing Barelvi mosques.
    • 1993: Maulana Inamul Hasan Kandhalvi forms a ten-member council to choose a successor as Amir.
    • 1995: Maulana Inamul Hasan Kandhalvi dies; the ten-member council fails to choose a new Amir, and the leadership falls to the council.
    • 2007: The speaker of the text attends the Tablighi Jamaat gathering at Raiwind on 2nd November.
    • 2008: The speaker moves towards Ahl al-Hadith beliefs.
    • 2009: The speaker starts to understand issues of sectarianism
    • 2010: The speaker starts regular video recordings of Quran classes in October.
    • March 2014: Maulana Zubair Al Hasan, a member of the Shura council, dies.
    • November 2015:Meeting of the Tablighi Jamaat in Raiwand.
    • Haji Abdul Wahab adds 11 new members to the shura, making a total of 13, and Maulana Saad Kandhalvi is named as one of the two most senior.
    • Maulana Saad Kandhalvi refuses to sign the document with the 13 members.
    • June 2016: Maulana Saad Kandhalvi declares himself the Amir of the Tablighi Jamaat, sparking a split within the organization. He expelled members of the other side from the Nizamuddin mosque in Delhi.
    • December 1, 2018: A clash occurs between the two factions of the Tablighi Jamaat in Bangladesh.
    • November 18, 2018: Haji Abdul Wahab dies.
    • December 18, 2024: Violent clashes in Bangladesh between the two Tablighi Jamaat groups result in 5 deaths and over 100 injuries. This event causes the speaker of the text to discuss the history of Tablighi Jamaat in public.
    • December 29, 2024: The speaker gives public session number 179, discussing these events.

    Cast of Characters

    • Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi: Founder of the Tablighi Jamaat in 1926. He focused on educating Muslims and his work spread quickly. He died in 1944.
    • Maulana Yusuf Kandhalvi: Son of Ilyas Kandhalvi; the second Amir of Tablighi Jamaat. Served for 21 years, wrote Hayat al-Sahaba. Died at the age of 48 in 1965.
    • Maulana Haroon Kandhalvi: Son of Yusuf Kandhalvi, not chosen as the next Amir of Tablighi Jamaat after his father’s death.
    • Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi: Nephew of Ilyas Kandhalvi and cousin of Yusuf Kandhalvi. Chose his son-in-law as Amir instead of Yusuf’s son. Wrote Virtues of Actions, Virtues of Hajj, Virtues of Durood and Virtues of Charity.
    • Maulana Inamul Hasan Kandhalvi: Son-in-law of Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi; the third Amir of Tablighi Jamaat, serving for 30 years (1965-1995). Established the ten-member council.
    • Maulana Saad Kandhalvi: A descendant of Ilyas Kandhalvi who declared himself the Amir in 2016, leading to the current split within the Tablighi Jamaat. He leads the faction based at the Nizamuddin center in India and has banned some Tablighi books.
    • Haji Abdul Wahab: A senior member of the Tablighi Jamaat Shura (council) and teacher. He was with Ilyas Kandhalvi in 1926. Attempted to make peace between the groups in 2016 before passing away in 2018.
    • Maulana Zubair Al Hasan: Member of the ten-member Shura, who died in March 2014.
    • Rashid Ahmed Gangui, Ashraf Ali Thanvi, and Ismail Ambeti: Deobandi scholars who were targets of the Fatwas of infidelity from the Barelvis in 1905.
    • Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri: Deobandi scholar who wrote Al-Muhand Ali Al-Mufand in response to accusations of infidelity from the Barelvis in 1905.
    • Imam Nabawi: Author of Riyad al-Saliheen, a widely read hadith book.
    • Maulana Tariq Jameel: A contemporary religious scholar who has criticized some of the traditional stories found in Tablighi books.
    • Imam Ahmed Barelvi: Founder of the Barelvi sect.
    • Ibn Abidin al-Shami: A scholar from 1252 A.H. who gave a blasphemous fatwa about Surah Al-Fatiha. Deobandi scholars cite him with respect.
    • Imam Abu Hanifa: Founder of the Hanafi school of law, whose opinions are followed by both Deobandis and Barelvis.
    • Sheikh Ahmad Sarandi (Mujaddid al-Thani): Declared himself a Mujaddid and claimed that if a prophet was to come to the Ummah, he would follow Hanafi law.
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani: A respected Sufi figure. Author of Ghaniya Talibeen.
    • Imam al-Ghazali: A respected Sufi figure who lived from 505 – 506 Hijri.
    • Maulana Ilyas Qadri: Leader of the Dawat-e-Islami movement.
    • Maulana Ilyas: Leader of a small Tablighi Jamaat of Ahl al-Hadith.
    • Engineer (Speaker of the text): The speaker of the text who describes the history of the Tablighi Jamaat and Islamic sectarianism. He considers all the sects to be Muslim.
    • Qazi Shur: A judge of Kufa who wrote a letter to Hazrat Umar about issues of Ijtihad.
    • Imam Ibn Al-Mazar: Author of Kitab al-Ijma, a book on the consensus of Islamic scholars.
    • Zayd Ibn Arqam: Narrator of the hadith of Ghadeer Khum.
    • Hazrat Umar: Companion of the Prophet, second Caliph.
    • Hazrat Abu Bakr: Companion of the Prophet, first Caliph.
    • Mufti Amjad Ali: Author of Bhar Shariat.
    • Syed Farman Ali Shah: Whose translation is used for the Deobandis.
    • Gulam Ahmad Qadiani: The person who formed the Qadiani movement.

    This detailed breakdown should provide a solid understanding of the key events and figures discussed in the text. Let me know if you have any other questions!

    The Tablighi Jamaat Schism

    The Tablighi Jamaat, a Deobandi sect, has experienced a significant split in recent years, leading to internal conflict and division [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of this schism based on the provided sources:

    Origins and Early Growth:

    • The Tablighi Jamaat was started by Ilyas Kandhalvi, with the goal of teaching basic Islamic practices [1, 3].
    • It became a large organization with centers established in 170 countries [3].
    • The Jamaat is known for its commitment to preaching and personal sacrifice, with members often using their own money to travel and spread their message [3].
    • They focus on teaching basic practices like ablution and prayer, and their work is considered effective [3].

    The Split:

    • Internal Division: Over the last nine years, the Tablighi Jamaat has been divided into two groups: one focused on the building system and the other on the Shura (council) [1].
    • Public Disagreement: This division became very public in December 2024 during the annual gathering in Tongi, Bangladesh, when clashes between the two factions resulted in casualties [1, 4].
    • Accusations: The two groups have engaged in mutual accusations. The Shura group, based in Raiwind (Pakistan), has accused Maulana Saad Kandhalvi’s group of being Indian agents [4]. Maulana Saad Kandhalvi’s group is referred to as “Saadiani” by the other group, which is a derogatory term that sounds similar to “Qadiani,” a group considered heretical by many Muslims [2].
    • Centers of Division: The split is evident in different centers globally. The main centers are in Tongi (Bangladesh), Raiwind (Pakistan), and Nizamuddin (India), with the Nizamuddin center being associated with Maulana Saad Kandhalvi [1, 4].
    • Leadership Dispute: The conflict is rooted in a disagreement over leadership succession following the death of Maulana Inamul Hasan in 1995. A ten-member council was supposed to choose a new leader, but this did not happen [5, 6]. In 2016, Maulana Saad Kandhalvi declared himself the Amir (leader), which was not accepted by the Shura [6].

    Key Figures and Their Roles:

    • Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi: Founder of Tablighi Jamaat [1, 7]. He passed away in 1944 [7].
    • Yusuf Kandhalvi: Son of Ilyas Kandhalvi, who served as Amir for 21 years and died in 1965 [8].
    • Maulana Haroon Kandhalvi: Son of Yusuf Kandhalvi, who was not chosen as the next Amir [5, 8].
    • Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi: A nephew of Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi and cousin of Yusuf Kandhalvi. He chose his son-in-law, Maulana Inamul Hasan, as Amir instead of Maulana Haroon Kandhalvi [5]. He wrote the book Virtues of Deeds, which is now not read by the group led by Maulana Saad Kandhalvi [3, 9].
    • Maulana Inamul Hasan: Son-in-law of Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi, who served as Amir for 30 years (1965-1995) [5].
    • Maulana Saad Kandhalvi: A descendant of Ilyas Kandhalvi and the leader of one of the two factions. He is in charge of the Nizamuddin center in India [10].
    • Haji Abdul Wahab: A senior member of the Shura who opposed Maulana Saad Kandhalvi’s claim to leadership [6, 10]. He died in 2018 [10].

    Impact of the Split:

    • Clashes and Casualties: The dispute has resulted in physical clashes and casualties [4, 11].
    • Division of Followers: The majority of the Tablighi Jamaat is with the Shura group centered in Raiwind [10]. The common members of the Tablighi Jamaat are not fully aware of the split [12].
    • Accusations of Sectarianism: The conflict is seen as part of a broader issue of sectarianism within Islam [11].

    Underlying Issues:

    • Sectarian Tensions: The split is partly due to long-standing tensions between Deobandi and Barelvi sects. The speaker mentions that he hated the Tablighi Jamaat when he was younger because they belonged to the Deobandi sect [2].
    • Controversial Books: The group led by Maulana Saad Kandhalvi no longer uses books like Virtues of Deeds, which is considered controversial [3, 9].
    • Leadership Disputes: A major issue is the lack of clear succession process within the Tablighi Jamaat [5].

    In conclusion, the Tablighi Jamaat’s split is a complex issue involving leadership disputes, sectarian tensions, and disagreements over practices. The division has led to physical conflict and has caused concern among Muslims [3, 4].

    Sectarianism in Islam

    Sectarianism within Islam is a significant issue, characterized by divisions and conflicts among different groups [1, 2]. The sources highlight several aspects of this problem, including its historical roots, its impact on Muslim communities, and the different perspectives on it [3-5].

    Historical Roots of Sectarianism

    • Early Divisions: The sources suggest that the seeds of sectarianism were sown early in Islamic history [6].
    • After the death of the Prophet Muhammad, political disagreements led to the emergence of the Sunni and Shia sects [6].
    • The rise of different schools of thought (madhhabs) also contributed to the divisions, although they initially did not cause as much conflict [3].
    • Deobandi and Barelvi: A major split occurred with the emergence of the Deobandi and Barelvi sects in the Indian subcontinent. These two groups, both Sunni and Hanafi, developed from differing views on Sufi thought and Ahl al-Hadith teachings [3, 4].
    • The establishment of the Deoband Madrasa and the Barelvi Madrasa further solidified this division [3].
    • These groups have a long history of disagreement and conflict, with each not accepting the other as true Muslims [3].

    Manifestations of Sectarianism

    • Mutual Condemnation: The different sects often accuse each other of being misguided or even outside the fold of Islam [3, 7].
    • The Barelvi’s issued fatwas of infidelity against Deobandi scholars [4].
    • The Deobandis and Barelvis are not ready to accept the other as Muslim [3].
    • Accusations and derogatory terms are used against each other, such as “Saadiani” to describe followers of Maulana Saad Kandhalvi, which is a word that is meant to sound like “Qadiani,” a group considered heretical [3, 8].
    • Physical Conflict: Sectarian tensions have sometimes resulted in physical violence, as seen in the clashes within the Tablighi Jamaat [2, 8].
    • Members of one group of Tablighi Jamaat attacked members of another group, resulting in deaths and injuries [8].
    • Mosques are sometimes declared as “Masjid Darar,” (a mosque of the hypocrites) by opposing groups [9].
    • Intolerance: The sources suggest that sectarianism leads to intolerance and a lack of respect for different views within the Muslim community [7, 10].
    • Sectarian groups are more focused on defending their own positions and attacking others [7].
    • This is demonstrated by the practice of some groups of throwing away prayer rugs of other groups in mosques [2, 9].

    Different Perspectives on Sectarianism

    • Sectarian Identity: Each sect often views itself as the sole possessor of truth, with the other groups being misguided [7].
    • Ahl al-Hadith consider themselves to be on the path of tawheed (oneness of God) [7].
    • Barelvis see themselves as the “contractors of Ishq Rasool” (love of the Prophet) [7].
    • Deobandis claim to defend the Companions of the Prophet, although they will not discuss aspects of their history that do not support their point of view [7].
    • The Quran’s View: The sources emphasize that the Quran condemns sectarianism and division [5].
    • The Quran urges Muslims to hold fast to the “rope of Allah” and not to divide into sects [5].
    • The Quran states that those who create sects have nothing to do with the Messenger of Allah [5].
    • Critique of Sectarianism: The speaker in the sources critiques sectarianism, arguing that it is a curse and that all sects should be considered as Muslims [2].
    • He suggests that unity should be based on scholarly discussion, rather than on forming exclusive groups [10].
    • He also believes that groups often focus on their own particularities, while ignoring the foundational values of Islam. [7]
    • The speaker says that the Imams did not spread sectarianism; it is the fault of the followers of the Imams [6].

    The Role of the Quran and Sunnah

    • The Straight Path: The sources highlight the importance of following the Quran and the Sunnah (Prophet’s practices) as the “straight path” [11, 12].
    • This path is contrasted with the “crooked lines” of sectarianism and division [11].
    • The sources argue that the Quran and the Sunnah are the core sources of guidance [13, 14].
    • Interpretation: Differences often arise from the interpretation of the Quran and Sunnah, which are used to justify sectarian differences. [15]
    • Each sect has its own translation of the Quran, leading to varying understandings [16].
    • Some groups emphasize adherence to specific interpretations of religious texts and actions, often based on the teachings of their own scholars, rather than focusing on the core teachings of Islam [15].

    Conclusion Sectarianism in Islam is a complex and multifaceted issue with historical, theological, and social dimensions [5]. The sources highlight that sectarianism leads to division, conflict, and intolerance within the Muslim community [1, 2, 7]. They call for a return to the core principles of Islam, as found in the Quran and Sunnah, and for mutual respect and tolerance among all Muslims [5, 10, 11]. The sources emphasize that the Quran condemns sectarianism and that the true path is one of unity based on shared faith and not sectarian identity [5, 11, 12].

    Islamic Jurisprudence: Sources, Schools, and Sectarianism

    Islamic jurisprudence, or fiqh, is a complex system of legal and ethical principles derived from the Quran and the Sunnah (the teachings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad). The sources discuss several key aspects of Islamic jurisprudence, particularly how it relates to different interpretations and practices within Islam.

    Core Sources of Islamic Jurisprudence:

    • The Quran is considered the primary source of guidance and law [1, 2].
    • It is regarded as the direct word of God and is the ultimate authority in Islam.
    • Muslims are urged to hold fast to the Quran as a source of unity and guidance [3].
    • The Sunnah, which encompasses the sayings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad, is the second most important source [2, 4, 5].
    • The Sunnah provides practical examples of how to implement the teachings of the Quran [2].
    • It is transmitted through hadiths, which are reports of the Prophet’s words and actions [2, 4].
    • Ijma (consensus of the Muslim scholars) is another source of Islamic jurisprudence [6].
    • It represents the collective understanding of Islamic law by qualified scholars.
    • The sources mention that the ummah will never agree on misguidance [6].
    • Ijtihad (independent legal reasoning) is the process by which qualified scholars derive new laws based on the Quran and the Sunnah when there is no clear guidance in the primary sources [6].
    • Ijtihad allows for the application of Islamic principles to new situations and circumstances [6].
    • The sources point out that the door of ijtihad is open until the Day of Resurrection [1].

    Schools of Thought (Madhhabs):

    • The sources mention different schools of thought, or madhhabs, within Sunni Islam, including the Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki and Hanbali schools [7, 8].
    • These schools developed as scholars interpreted and applied the Quran and Sunnah differently.
    • The speaker indicates that these different Imams did not spread sectarianism, but their followers did [8, 9].
    • The Hanafi school is particularly mentioned, as it is the school of jurisprudence followed by Deobandis, Barelvis, and even Qadianis [7, 10].
    • The sources note that there is no mention in the Quran or Sunnah that Muslims must follow one of these particular schools of thought [8, 11].
    • It is said that the four imams had their own expert opinions [8].
    • The Imams themselves said that if they say anything that is against the Quran and Sunnah, then their words should be left [9].

    Points of Jurisprudential Disagreement:

    • The sources discuss disagreements over specific practices, like Rafa al-Yadain (raising the hands during prayer), which is practiced by those who follow the hadiths from Bukhari and Muslim, but not by Hanafis [12].
    • The speaker in the source says that he follows the method of prayer from Bukhari and Muslim [10].
    • Hanafis, in contrast, do not perform Rafa al-Yadain [10, 12].
    • The sources indicate that different groups within Islam have varying interpretations of what constitutes proper Islamic practice [12].
    • For instance, some groups emphasize the importance of specific rituals, while others focus on different aspects of faith [13].
    • The source suggests that sectarianism arises because each sect has its own interpretation of the Quran and Sunnah [5].
    • Differences in jurisprudence are often related to different understandings of what is considered Sunnah [12].
    • The speaker points out that there are different types of Sunnah [12].
    • The practice of kissing the thumbs is also a point of difference. The Barelvis kiss their thumbs, while the Deobandis do not. The source explains that this is a point of disagreement even within Hanafi jurisprudence [14].
    • The speaker also says that both are incorrect in light of the Quran and Sunnah [14].

    Ijtihad and Modern Issues

    • The source states that the door of Ijtihad remains open until the Day of Judgment and that it is a beauty of Islam that allows people in different locations to address issues that are not directly covered in the Quran and Sunnah [1].
    • Ijtihad is considered necessary to address contemporary issues that did not exist at the time of the Prophet, such as those related to technology or modern life [1, 6].
    • Examples include issues of blood donation, praying in airplanes, and other contemporary matters [6].
    • The need for ijtihad allows the religion to remain relevant across time and cultures.
    • The sources mention that the scope of Ijtihad is limited to issues on which there is no consensus, and it does not contradict the Quran or Sunnah [1, 6].
    • The source says that Ijtihad should be performed by a wise person who is familiar with the proper process [6].

    Emphasis on the Quran and Sunnah

    • The sources consistently emphasize the importance of the Quran and Sunnah as the primary sources for guidance [1, 2, 5].
    • It states that all actions must be in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah [1].
    • The Prophet emphasized the importance of holding fast to the Quran and Sunnah [2].
    • The source indicates that the Quran and Sunnah should be considered the main source of information about religion [11].
    • The speaker indicates that the Sunnah is essential for understanding and practicing Islam. The method of prayer is not described in the Quran, but comes from the Sunnah [2].

    The Problem of Sectarianism and Jurisprudence

    • The source also suggests that sectarianism is a result of differences in jurisprudential interpretations and an over-emphasis on the opinions of specific scholars and imams [9, 13].
    • The speaker emphasizes that sectarianism is a curse and that Muslims should avoid it [3, 7].
    • He stresses the importance of focusing on the core values of the Quran and Sunnah.
    • He also suggests that each group should engage in intellectual discussion and not condemn others [3, 13].
    • He states that the Imams did not spread sectarianism; the fault is with their followers [8, 9].

    In summary, Islamic jurisprudence is a rich and complex system based on the Quran and the Sunnah, which is interpreted and applied through Ijma and Ijtihad. The sources show how this process has led to different schools of thought and varying interpretations of Islamic law and practice. While there is space for scholarly disagreement and the need to address contemporary issues, the sources also emphasize the need to avoid sectarianism and adhere to the core principles of the Quran and Sunnah.

    Quranic Interpretation and Sectarianism

    Quranic interpretation, or tafsir, is a crucial aspect of Islamic scholarship, involving the explanation and understanding of the Quran’s verses [1]. The sources discuss how different approaches to Quranic interpretation have contributed to sectarianism and varying understandings of Islam.

    Importance of the Quran:

    • The Quran is considered the direct word of God and the primary source of guidance in Islam [2, 3].
    • The sources emphasize the Quran as a source of unity, urging Muslims to hold fast to it [4].
    • It is considered a complete guide for humanity [5].
    • The Quran is the ultimate authority, and the Sunnah explains how to implement the Quranic teachings [3].

    Challenges in Quranic Interpretation:

    • The sources point out that differences in interpretation of the Quran are a major source of sectarianism [1, 5].
    • Each sect often has its own translation of the Quran, leading to varying understandings and disputes [1].
    • Some groups emphasize the literal reading of the Quran and Sunnah, while others focus on more metaphorical or contextual interpretations [1, 6, 7].
    • The Quran was meant to end differences between people, not create them. [1].

    The Role of the Sunnah:

    • The Sunnah, which encompasses the sayings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad, is essential for understanding and practicing Islam [3].
    • The method of prayer, for example, is not fully described in the Quran, but comes from the Sunnah [3].
    • The sources emphasize that the Sunnah is a necessary complement to the Quran, clarifying and elaborating on its teachings [3].
    • Both the Quran and the Sunnah should be followed as sources of guidance [3].

    The Problem of Sectarian Interpretations

    • The sources criticize the tendency of some groups to prioritize their own interpretations and traditions over the core message of the Quran [8].
    • Sectarian groups often consider their own interpretations as the only correct ones.
    • The speaker in the source notes that many Muslims read the Quran in Arabic without understanding its meaning, leading to misinterpretations and manipulations by religious leaders [1, 5].
    • Some groups emphasize the teachings of their own scholars and imams, while ignoring the core teachings of Islam from the Quran and Sunnah [8-10].
    • The source suggests that the Imams did not spread sectarianism; it is the fault of their followers [2, 11].
    • Sectarian interpretations of the Quran are seen as a deviation from the intended purpose of the scripture. [9]
    • Some groups reject valid hadith and only accept the teachings of their own imams, even when the imams’ teachings are not based on the Quran and Sunnah [12].

    The Correct Approach to Interpretation

    • The speaker emphasizes the importance of directly engaging with the Quran and Sunnah rather than relying on interpretations of religious clerics or scholars [10].
    • The sources suggest that the Quran is meant to be understood, not just recited without comprehension [1, 5].
    • There is a call for a return to the core principles of the Quran and Sunnah, without sectarian biases [3].
    • The sources suggest that scholarly discussion and intellectual engagement, rather than dogmatic adherence to specific interpretations, are necessary for proper understanding [9].
    • The sources refer to a hadith that calls for the community to refer to the Quran and Sunnah when there is a dispute [3, 13].
    • The speaker believes that the Quran is meant to unite people, not divide them [1].

    Historical Context and the Quran

    • The sources also suggest that the Quran must be understood in its historical context.
    • The speaker explains that the Quran was meant to be a guide for all people and that Muslims should not be like those who recite it without understanding [1].

    Ijtihad and Interpretation

    • The sources also touch on the role of ijtihad, or independent reasoning, in interpreting the Quran.
    • Ijtihad is used to interpret Islamic law when there is no direct guidance in the Quran or Sunnah [14].
    • The door of ijtihad is open until the Day of Judgment to address contemporary issues that did not exist at the time of the Prophet [15].
    • Ijtihad should be performed by a qualified scholar and should not contradict the Quran or Sunnah [14].

    In summary, Quranic interpretation is a critical aspect of Islamic practice, but it is also a source of sectarianism due to differences in how the text is understood. The sources call for a return to the Quran and Sunnah, and for direct engagement with the scripture, as well as an understanding of its original historical context. The sources emphasize the importance of using both the Quran and the Sunnah as guides and stress that the Quran is meant to be understood and not simply recited, while discouraging reliance on specific interpretations of religious clerics and scholars, in order to avoid sectarianism.

    Islamic Unity: Challenges and Pathways

    Religious unity is a significant theme in the sources, particularly in the context of Islam, where sectarianism and division are identified as major challenges. The sources emphasize the importance of the Quran and Sunnah as unifying forces, while also discussing the obstacles to achieving true unity among Muslims.

    Core Principles for Unity

    • The Quran is presented as the primary source of unity [1]. It is considered the direct word of God and the ultimate authority in Islam [2, 3].
    • Muslims are urged to hold fast to the Quran as a source of guidance and unity [1].
    • The Quran is meant to end differences between people, not create them [4].
    • The Sunnah, the teachings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad, is also crucial for unity [3].
    • The Sunnah is a necessary complement to the Quran, clarifying and elaborating on its teachings [3].
    • Both the Quran and the Sunnah should be followed as sources of guidance [3].
    • The concept of Ijma (consensus of Muslim scholars) is also mentioned as a source of unity, representing the collective understanding of Islamic law [5].
    • The sources state that the ummah will never agree on misguidance [5].
    • The sources emphasize that all Muslims are brothers and sisters and that they should respect each other [1, 6].

    Obstacles to Unity

    • Sectarianism is identified as a major obstacle to religious unity [1].
    • The sources note that sectarianism arises from differences in interpretations of the Quran and Sunnah, as well as from the overemphasis on the opinions of specific scholars [1, 7].
    • Each sect often has its own translation of the Quran, leading to varying understandings and disputes [4].
    • The sources criticize the tendency of some groups to prioritize their own interpretations and traditions over the core message of the Quran [8].
    • The speaker emphasizes that sectarianism is a curse and that Muslims should avoid it [1, 6].
    • The sources suggest that many Muslims read the Quran in Arabic without understanding its meaning, leading to misinterpretations and manipulations by religious leaders [4, 9].
    • Blind adherence to the opinions of religious clerics and scholars is also seen as a cause of disunity [4, 10].
    • The source suggests that the Imams did not spread sectarianism; it is the fault of their followers [1, 7, 11-13].
    • Internal conflicts and disputes within religious groups further exacerbate the problem [14].
    • The sources describe how disagreements within the Tablighi Jamaat led to its division into two factions, resulting in violence and animosity [2, 6, 12, 14, 15].
    • The sources also mention historical events, such as the conflict between the Deobandis and Barelvis and the Sunni and Shia split, as examples of how political and theological disagreements can lead to division [11, 16, 17].

    Pathways to Unity

    • The sources stress the importance of focusing on the core values of the Quran and Sunnah, rather than getting caught up in sectarian differences [1, 3, 5, 18].
    • Muslims should engage directly with the Quran and Sunnah, rather than relying on interpretations of religious clerics or scholars [4, 10].
    • Intellectual discussion and engagement, rather than condemnation of others, are necessary for proper understanding [8, 12].
    • The source suggests that each group should engage in intellectual discussion and not condemn others [12].
    • The sources emphasize the importance of tolerance and mutual respect among different groups [8, 11, 14].
    • Muslims should avoid labeling others as “hell-bound” [8].
    • The sources suggest that a recognition of the diversity of interpretations is necessary [8, 12].
    • The source states that the ummah cannot come together on one platform and that it should give space to everyone [12].
    • The sources point to the need for Ijtihad to address contemporary issues, which may contribute to a sense of shared understanding and engagement with faith in modern contexts [5, 19].
    • The source notes that the door of ijtihad is open until the Day of Judgment and that it is a beauty of Islam that allows people in different locations to address issues that are not directly covered in the Quran and Sunnah [5, 19].

    Emphasis on Shared Humanity

    • The sources highlight the importance of recognizing the shared humanity of all people and avoiding sectarianism and prejudice.
    • The source states that there is no prophet after the Prophet Muhammad and that Muslims should focus on the Quran and Sunnah [12].
    • The speaker emphasizes that despite differences in interpretation, all sects of Islam are considered Muslim [8].
    • The goal should be to foster unity based on the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah, while respecting the diversity of perspectives [12].

    In conclusion, the sources present a complex view of religious unity, acknowledging both the unifying potential of the Quran and Sunnah, and the divisive forces of sectarianism and misinterpretations. The path to unity, according to the sources, lies in a return to the core principles of Islam, fostering intellectual engagement, and promoting tolerance and mutual respect, while avoiding sectarianism and prejudice.

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • iPhone 14 User Guide

    iPhone 14 User Guide

    This is a user guide for the iPhone 14, providing a step-by-step guide to mastering its features. It covers setup, basic usage, and new iOS 16 features, including the Dynamic Island, satellite connectivity, and crash detection. The guide also explains how to use Apple Pay, master the iPhone 14 Pro camera, boost battery life, and even offers advice on selling or trading your old iPhone. Pricing information and compatibility with older iOS versions are included. Finally, it offers tips and troubleshooting for various issues.

    iPhone 14 User Guide Study Guide

    Short Answer Quiz

    1. What are the four different iPhone 14 models released in 2022?
    2. What is the “Dynamic Island” on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max and what is its functionality?
    3. What two new emergency safety features does the iPhone 14 series include?
    4. How do you force restart an iPhone 14 model?
    5. What is the purpose of the Apple Pay feature, and how is it activated on an iPhone 14?
    6. What are two ways you can take a screenshot on an iPhone 14?
    7. Describe how the “Crash Detection” feature works and what types of crashes it detects.
    8. What is the most significant camera upgrade on the iPhone 14 Pro?
    9. What is “Always-on display” and on which iPhone 14 models can it be found?
    10. Name three ways to help optimize battery life on the iPhone 14.

    Answer Key

    1. The four different iPhone 14 models released are the iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Plus, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max.
    2. The “Dynamic Island” is a pill-shaped area on the front of the phone that houses the camera and FaceID sensors on the Pro models. It can expand and contract to show alerts, notifications, and other interactive features.
    3. The two new emergency safety features on the iPhone 14 include Emergency SOS via satellite and Crash Detection.
    4. To force restart an iPhone 14, you need to quickly press and release the volume up button, then quickly press and release the volume down button, and then press and hold the side button until the Apple logo appears.
    5. Apple Pay allows users to make contactless payments with a debit or credit card on their phone, and it is activated by adding a card to the Wallet app.
    6. Two ways to take a screenshot are by simultaneously pressing the side button and the volume up button, or by using Assistive Touch.
    7. The “Crash Detection” feature uses motion sensors like a high dynamic range gyroscope and g-force accelerometer to detect when the user may be involved in a car crash and automatically calls emergency services if the user doesn’t respond to alerts.
    8. The most significant camera upgrade on the iPhone 14 Pro is a 48MP wide-angle main camera that allows for better low-light performance.
    9. Always-on display means the display is constantly illuminated, showing time, widgets, and notifications even when the screen is locked, and it can only be found on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models.
    10. Three ways to optimize battery life include turning off always-on display, disabling keyboard haptics, and enabling auto-brightness.

    Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the design and technology changes that differentiate the standard iPhone 14 models from the iPhone 14 Pro models. How do these differences cater to various user needs and preferences?
    2. Discuss the significance of the new safety features (Emergency SOS via satellite and Crash Detection) included in the iPhone 14, considering their potential impact on user safety and real-world applications.
    3. Evaluate the software features and improvements introduced with iOS 16 as it relates to both older and new iPhone 14 models. How do these new features enhance the user experience?
    4. Compare and contrast the battery performance and charging options available for different iPhone 14 models. How do these factors influence a user’s choice when selecting a model?
    5. Explore the environmental and economic factors Apple considered when deciding to no longer include a charger in the box of the iPhone 14, offering some alternatives on how to obtain a charger, and whether these new changes are beneficial to the environment and customers.

    Glossary of Key Terms

    Assistive Touch: An accessibility feature that allows users to perform actions by tapping a virtual button, including taking screenshots.

    Always-on Display: A feature that keeps the lock screen display active, showing time and notifications at a lower brightness, available on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models.

    Crash Detection: A safety feature that uses motion sensors to detect severe car crashes and automatically alerts emergency services.

    Dynamic Island: A new user interface feature on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max that expands and contracts around the front-facing camera to display alerts and notifications.

    Emergency SOS via satellite: A safety feature that allows users to connect to emergency services via satellite communication when cellular and Wi-Fi are not available.

    eSIM: An embedded SIM card that allows users to activate a cellular plan without using a physical SIM card.

    FaceID: Apple’s facial recognition system used for unlocking devices and verifying identity.

    Haptic Feedback: A tactile feedback from the iPhone to communicate a user interaction, such as a light vibration when tapping on the keyboard.

    iOS 16: The new version of Apple’s mobile operating system that comes installed on iPhone 14 models.

    MagSafe: Apple’s magnetic charging system for iPhones.

    ProMotion: Apple’s adaptive refresh rate technology, available only on the iPhone 14 Pro models, for smoother visuals.

    Quick Take: The ability to hold the shutter button to quickly snap photos and video.

    Siri: Apple’s voice assistant.

    True Tone Flash: iPhone flash that has 9 LEDs and can change in pattern and intensity, depending on the focal length and composition you choose.

    iPhone 14 User Guide Summary

    Okay, here is a detailed briefing document summarizing the key themes, ideas, and facts from the provided “iPhone 14 User Guide” excerpts.

    Briefing Document: iPhone 14 User Guide

    Introduction

    This document summarizes key information from the “iPhone 14 User Guide” by Ethan Copson, which provides an easy, step-by-step guide to mastering the use of the iPhone 14. The guide focuses on the iPhone 14 series, including the iPhone 14, 14 Plus, 14 Pro, and 14 Pro Max, emphasizing new features, iOS 16 (and iOS 17), and helpful tips for users of all levels. The document includes information regarding price, design adjustments, and key new features, as well as instructions for basic and advanced functions.

    Key Themes & Ideas

    1. iPhone 14 Model Lineup & Pricing:
    • The iPhone 14 lineup includes four models: iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Plus, iPhone 14 Pro, and iPhone 14 Pro Max.
    • The guide provides a detailed price list for various storage capacities of each model, with prices ranging from $799 to over $2700.
    • The iPhone 14 and 14 Plus have a 6.1 and 6.7-inch screen respectively, whereas the Pro models offer the same screen sizes with significant upgrades.
    1. Design Adjustments & Upgrades:
    • The iPhone 14 is similar in design to the iPhone 13, but the Pro models have undergone major design changes, particularly with the introduction of the Dynamic Island.
    • The two smaller floating apertures for the front-facing sensors replaces the “notch” on the Pro versions.
    • The camera modules on the back of the new Pro models are larger than the previous generation.
    • Color options are described.
    1. Dynamic Island (iPhone 14 Pro):
    • The “notch” is replaced by the “Dynamic Island,” a pill-shaped area that serves as a hub for alerts, notifications, and app shortcuts.
    • It expands to show additional information, adapts to the environment of the phone, and can be interacted with by tapping.
    • Functions include controlling music, navigating with maps, showing the status of ride-share services, indicating when Face ID is in use, and more.
    • Dynamic Island is exclusive to iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max.
    • “It wouldn’t be correct to refer to it as a rebuilt notch, but it is a fresh and inventive use of the area.”
    1. Camera Upgrades:
    • Non-Pro models have improved cameras with 12MP wide and ultra-wide lenses and better low-light performance.
    • Pro models feature a 48MP wide-angle main camera, a 65% bigger sensor, with greater low-light performance, and the new “Photonic Engine.”
    • New features include the Action Mode intended to enhance video stabilization and a 2x telephoto option.
    1. Safety Features:
    • Emergency SOS via Satellite: This allows users to contact emergency services when out of cellular range and is initially available in the US and Canada. “Emergency SOS via satellite is a function that enables you to contact emergency services while you are outside of cellular coverage via satellite communication.” The service is free for two years.
    • Crash Detection: Utilizes a high dynamic range gyroscope and “high-g” accelerometer to detect car crashes and automatically contact emergency services if the user is unresponsive. It can detect rollovers, rear-end accidents, side hits, and front impacts. “The function is based on information acquired by onboard sensors, such as unexpected changes in speed and direction, load noise levels, and variations in cabin pressure brought on by airbag deployment.”
    1. A16 and A15 Bionic Processors:
    • The Pro models feature the A16 Bionic chip, while the non-Pro models use the A15 chip, modified from previous versions.
    • Apple claims the A16 chip is 40% faster than the closest rival and includes “a second GPU core (similar to the one in the 13 Pro from last year)”.
    1. eSIM & No Physical SIM Slot:
    • US models of the iPhone 14 no longer include a physical SIM card slot and rely on eSIM technology, allowing for switching carriers in Settings. “The choice to eliminate the SIM card slot reduces the number of points of entry that need to be considered for water and dust protection, which should speed the adoption of eSIM by cellular operators throughout the globe.”
    1. Battery Life:
    • Battery life is improved across the board, with the iPhone 14 Plus boasting the greatest increase, up to 26 hours of video playback.
    • Estimated battery life for various models is mentioned.
    1. Always-On Display (iPhone 14 Pro):
    • The Pro models have an Always-On display, which shows information even when the screen is dimmed.
    • The display dynamically reduces refresh rate to 1Hz to conserve power. “Apple has not said if the feature can be completely turned off or not.”
    1. iOS 16 & iOS 17:
    • The guide mentions the launch of iOS 16 with the iPhone 14 series and highlights its features including widgets on lock screens, haptic feedback for the keyboard, and ability to cut out objects from photos, among others.
    • It also briefly mentions the upcoming iOS 17. “There’s still something for you if you’re not buying anything from the iPhone 14 selection that was shown on stage at the Apple event last week. iOS 16 from Apple is now available. The familiar lock screen is no longer as familiar, which instantly changes how it appears.”
    1. Setting Up Your iPhone 14:
    • The guide provides a step-by-step process for setting up a new iPhone 14, including updating the current iPhone, backing up the current iPhone, and transferring data to the new phone.
    • Recommends “Do not download iOS 16 to an old iPhone” because of “complaints about being ‘extremely’ problematic, especially with regard to Messages and FaceTime.”
    1. Using Siri:
    • Provides instructions for activating and configuring Siri, including voice preferences and response settings. “It’s crucial to enable the ‘Hey Siri’ Function so you may activate Siri even while your iPhone is locked in order to offer a totally hands-free experience.”
    1. Closing/Clearing Apps:
    • Explains how to close open apps using the App Switcher. “The process of clearing or shutting the applications is extremely simple yet crucial. It allows you to keep RAM clean and makes your device perform quicker and more smoothly.”
    1. Force Restarting:
    • Provides instructions for forcing a restart of the iPhone 14, an essential procedure when the device is unresponsive. “If you were one of the early adopters who get their hands on the new model, you should be knowledgeable on how to force restart your phone.”
    1. Activating iMessage:
    • The guide explains how to enable and activate iMessage via the Settings app, which allows you to “instantly exchange messages, voice memos, and media with your contacts using the iMessage service.”
    1. Taking Screenshots:
    • The guide provides instructions on taking screenshots using both physical buttons and assistive touch. “On the iPhone 14, screenshotting is straightforward and uncomplicated, as it should be.”
    1. Apple Pay:
    • Provides information on setting up Apple Pay, using Apple Pay on other devices, and sending money with Messages. “The simplest method to begin using contactless payments on an iPhone is using Apple Pay.” It also notes, “Apple Pay needs two-factor authentication by default, which is why you need a smartphone with Touch ID or Face ID compatibility or to activate a passcode on your Watch.”
    1. Mastering the iPhone 14 Pro & Pro Max Camera:
    • Includes tips on taking pictures with volume buttons, using QuickTake, adjusting bonus controls, and video recording options, including Cinematic and Action modes.
    1. Tricks to Boost Battery Life:
    • Offers several tips to optimize battery life, including turning off the always-on display, haptic feedback on the keyboard, limiting promotion frame rate, remembering battery health, stopping charging when the phone is hot, and using a larger power charger.
    1. Ways to Sell or Trade in Your Old iPhone:
    • The guide outlines different methods of selling an old iPhone, such as trading in with Apple, or using services such as Swappa, Gazelle, uSell, Best Buy, Carrier programs, and eBay.
    • Tips for obtaining a higher resale value are provided.
    • iPhone Maintenance:Provides instructions for keeping the iPhone running well, including using a protective case, cleaning the charging port, deleting unused apps, and consistently updating the device.

    Quotes from the Source:

    • “The camera module in the iPhone 14 Pro is larger than ever, but this is justified by an improved feature and spec list.”
    • “Although the term ‘new’ is dubious, there has been some development in the processor area.”
    • “Crash detection is similar to the earlier Full Detection function in that it utilizes an updated gyroscope and accelerometer to identify whether you are inside a car that is colliding.”
    • “A text-only strategy presented Apple with even another challenge. Some emergency receivers only take voice calls; others only accept text messages. It sounds like a manned version of Emergency SOS through Siri on the Apple Watch, but Apple created infrastructure to send messages via ’emergency relay centers with Apple-trained professionals who call for aid on your behalf.’”
    • “Unbelievably, your iPhone 14 content download isn’t complete if you use iCloud to transfer your info. When your iPhone 14 resumes, all the content you had stored on your old iPhone (apps, images, videos, music, etc.) is busy downloading while you set up FaceID and your financial information.”
    • “With the release of iOS 16, the lock screen has undergone a significant overhaul. You can now add your own widgets to it, and you may store several lock screen setups and switch between them as needed. To manage your lock screens and customize the wallpaper and various widget combinations shown on each one, press and hold on to the display when the lock screen is active. Then choose Customize.”

    Conclusion

    This user guide is a comprehensive manual for understanding and utilizing the features of the iPhone 14 series. It offers detailed instructions, explanations, and tips to enhance user experience. The guide covers both the new hardware and software changes, and emphasizes key features such as the Dynamic Island, improved camera systems, safety features like satellite communication and crash detection, and tips for battery life and maintenance. It also details specific instructions on common tasks such as setting up and using new features.

    This information provides a thorough understanding of the material for a quick review of the user guide.

    iPhone 14: Features and FAQs

    What are the key differences between the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Pro models?

    The iPhone 14 and 14 Plus have similar designs to the previous generation, including a notch at the top, with camera upgrades including a 12MP main and wide-angle. In contrast, the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models feature a redesigned “Dynamic Island” replacing the notch, and also boast a 48MP main camera along with other advanced camera features, and an always-on display. The Pro models also have a more powerful processor, the A16 Bionic chip.

    What is the Dynamic Island and how does it work?

    The Dynamic Island is a pill-shaped cutout on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models that replaces the traditional notch. It is interactive and adapts to show alerts, notifications, and live activities. It can display information like music playback controls, directions from maps, and the status of background tasks. The island expands and contracts dynamically as you interact with it and as different applications need to display notifications.

    How does the new Emergency SOS via Satellite feature work?

    The iPhone 14 and 14 Pro models include an “Emergency SOS via Satellite” feature that allows users to connect to emergency services even when they are outside of cellular or Wi-Fi range. It enables text communication by directing the phone towards a satellite in the sky, with the phone showing how to aim it to maintain a connection. This feature is mainly designed for emergency situations to send text messages and location information to aid responders. It is free for the first two years.

    What is Crash Detection and how does it work?

    Crash Detection is a safety feature that uses sensors (including a high-dynamic-range gyroscope and accelerometer) in the iPhone 14 and Apple Watches to detect severe car accidents. If a crash is detected, it will first notify the user with an alarm, and if the user does not respond, the device will call emergency services and share the user’s location. This feature is enabled by default, but can be turned off in Settings.

    How can I customize the lock screen in iOS 16?

    iOS 16 allows users to create multiple customizable lock screens. These can include various widgets for things like the weather and calendar events, custom colors, fonts, and even depth effects on photos used as the background. Lock screens can also be linked to Focus modes, providing different levels of distraction depending on which mode is active.

    What are the steps to take a screenshot on the iPhone 14?

    There are multiple ways to take a screenshot on iPhone 14. The most common method is to simultaneously press the “Lock/Side” button and the “Volume Up” button. An alternative is using the “Assistive Touch” feature which involves setting up a custom action on that menu and then pressing that action for a screenshot.

    What are the key improvements to the iPhone 14 Pro’s camera?

    The iPhone 14 Pro camera includes a 48MP main wide-angle lens, a 12MP ultrawide, and a telephoto lens. New features are included to improve low light photography and video stabilization, along with an improved Photonic Engine. In addition the camera also has a new “Action Mode” for smooth, handheld videos, and is able to record videos in 4K at 24 or 30 frames per second (previously only 1080p.)

    What tips can I follow to boost the battery life of my iPhone 14?

    There are several steps that can be taken to boost the battery life of the iPhone 14. These include turning off the always-on display, which is only available for the Pro models. Turning off keyboard haptics, enabling auto-brightness, limiting the Promotion Frame Rate, and also regularly checking which apps are draining the battery are all important steps to take. Also, it is recommended to keep the phone charged between 40% and 80% for optimal battery longevity.

    iPhone 14 Setup Guide

    The iPhone 14 setup process involves several steps, including updating your current iPhone, backing it up, activating your new phone, transferring data, completing downloads, and updating the new device [1-5].

    Here are the key steps to setting up an iPhone 14:

    • Update your current iPhone to the most recent iOS version [1].
    • Back up your current iPhone using iCloud or your computer [1, 2]. Backing up to iCloud may take 5-10 minutes, while backing up to a computer may take longer [2]. You can encrypt the backup with a password, and should you choose not to encrypt it, sensitive data will not be included in the backup [2].
    • Activate your new iPhone 14 by turning it on and following the prompts for language selection [2].
    • Transfer data to your new iPhone from another iPhone via Quick Start, iCloud, or a computer [2-4]. Transferring data from iCloud may take longer than transferring data from a computer [3]. If you use an iCloud backup, the majority of data transfer will happen in the background, and you can begin using the new iPhone after about 15 minutes [3]. However, the content download may take an hour or longer [4, 5].
    • Complete downloads and finalize transferring of your data [4, 5]. You may use your new gadget while this process is running [5].
    • Update your iPhone 14 to iOS 16.0.1 to fix some initial issues [5]. This update may require you to re-enter passwords for email, internet accounts and subscriptions [5]. You may also be prompted to sync your new iPhone with your Apple Watch [5].
    • Customize your iPhone 14 by changing your lock screen wallpaper, font, color, and widgets [6].

    During setup, you may also be prompted to:

    • Transfer your existing phone number [3]. You can do this by replacing a physical SIM card with an electronic SIM, or eSIM [3].
    • Enter security codes for registered credit cards or Apple Cash accounts [4].
    • Turn on the Emergency SOS feature [4].
    • Set up FaceID [4].

    The iPhone 14 comes with iOS 16 pre-installed [1]. It’s important to note that the initial release of iOS 16 had issues with Messages and FaceTime [1]. The iOS 16.0.1 update is available to fix these issues [5].

    iOS 16: New Features and Updates

    The iPhone 14 comes with iOS 16 pre-installed [1, 2]. Some of the new features of iOS 16 include the ability to add widgets to multiple lock screens, change how lock screen notifications are shown, edit and unsend messages, restore deleted texts, set up filters in focus mode, schedule sending emails, lock down your iPhone, share tab groups in Safari, see the battery level percentage, plan routes with multiple stops in Apple Maps, track your fitness without an Apple Watch, and run a safety check [3, 4].

    Other iOS 16 features include:

    • Customizable lock screens: You can customize the lock screen’s colors, fonts, and widgets, and also switch between different lock screens [5-8]. You can also add a photo to your lock screen, add widgets, and create a custom home screen [5, 8-10].
    • Notifications: You can change how lock screen notifications are shown [3, 11]. You can also make notifications into a list [8].
    • Messages: You can now edit and unsend messages [3, 11]. The Messages app also offers the option to restore conversations that have been erased within the past 30 days [11]. In addition, the Messages app can be used to send money to others [12].
    • Focus Mode: You can set up filters in Focus mode and set a Focus to your lock screen [3, 10, 13].
    • Mail: You can schedule sending emails [3, 13].
    • Safari: You can share tab groups with other users [3, 14]. You can also pin your preferred tabs [15].
    • Battery: You can see the battery level percentage [3, 14].
    • Maps: You can plan routes with multiple stops [3, 14].
    • Fitness: You can track your fitness without an Apple Watch [3, 16, 17].
    • Safety Check: There is a new tool called Safety Check for individuals in abusive situations that allows them to manage who has access to their data [3, 16, 18].
    • Medications: You can track your medications in the Health app, which will send reminders and monitor for drug interactions [5, 19-22]. There is also a medication app for the Apple Watch [23]. You can also share your health data with others [24].
    • Haptic Feedback: The native iPhone keyboard receives haptic feedback [5, 25].
    • Cut out objects from photos: You can isolate the subject of a photo from its background [5, 16].
    • Share photos more easily: A new feature called iCloud Shared Photo Library will be available soon [25].
    • Dictation: Siri’s dictation abilities have been improved, and can now automatically add emojis and handles punctuation [2, 18].
    • Lock Down: There is a new “lock down” mode that severely reduces the areas that hackers may target [13].
    • Pair Nintendo Switch Joy-Cons: You can connect third party controllers to the iPhone to play mobile games [26].
    • View and exchange stored Wi-Fi passwords: You can now share a Wi-Fi password with someone [27].
    • Locate and eliminate duplicate images and videos: You can search through your photo library to eliminate duplicate photos and videos [27].
    • Picture and video adjustments: You can copy and paste edits you made to a photo or video [28].
    • New always-on display: The iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max have a new always-on display that dims when the device is inactive [29].
    • Emergency SOS via satellite: This feature allows you to contact emergency services via satellite in areas without cellular service [30, 31]. This service is free for two years [30].
    • Crash Detection: The iPhone 14 can detect when you are in a car crash and automatically contact emergency services [32, 33].
    • Improved Camera: The iPhone 14 Pro has a 48MP wide-angle camera [34, 35]. The iPhone 14 Pro also has a new Action Mode for video [36].
    • eSIM: The iPhone 14 has an eSIM, and no longer has a physical SIM card slot [30].

    The initial release of iOS 16 had issues with Messages and FaceTime [1]. The iOS 16.0.1 update is available to fix these issues [37].

    iPhone 14 Tricks & Tips

    The iPhone 14 has several features and capabilities that can be considered “tricks” that may enhance user experience, including those related to the new iOS 16, the camera, and general phone usage.

    Some tricks and tips for the iPhone 14 include:

    • Customizing the lock screen: You can change your lock screen’s wallpaper, font, color, and widgets, and also switch between different lock screens [1, 2]. You can add a photo to your lock screen, add widgets, and create a custom home screen [1-3].
    • Using Focus mode: You can set up filters in Focus mode and attach a Focus to your lock screen [1, 3, 4].
    • Managing notifications: You can change how lock screen notifications are shown, and you can also make notifications into a list [5-7].
    • Using Messages: You can now edit and unsend messages [6]. The Messages app also offers the option to restore conversations that have been erased within the past 30 days [6]. You can also send money using Messages [8].
    • Scheduling emails: You can schedule sending emails in the Mail app [4].
    • Sharing tab groups: You can share tab groups with other users in Safari [9]. You can also pin your preferred tabs [10].
    • Viewing battery percentage: You can view the battery level percentage [9].
    • Planning routes with multiple stops: You can plan routes with multiple stops in Apple Maps [9].
    • Tracking fitness without an Apple Watch: You can track your fitness without an Apple Watch [11]. You can also share your fitness activities with others [12].
    • Using Safety Check: There is a new tool called Safety Check for individuals in abusive situations that allows them to manage who has access to their data [11, 13].
    • Tracking medications: You can track your medications in the Health app, which will send reminders and monitor for drug interactions [14, 15].
    • Using haptic feedback: The native iPhone keyboard receives haptic feedback [16, 17].
    • Cutting out objects from photos: You can isolate the subject of a photo from its background [1, 11].
    • Sharing photos more easily: A new feature called iCloud Shared Photo Library will be available soon [1, 16].
    • Dictating text: Siri’s dictation abilities have been improved, and can now automatically add emojis and handles punctuation [13, 18].
    • Locking down your phone: There is a new “lock down” mode that severely reduces the areas that hackers may target [4].
    • Pairing Nintendo Switch Joy-Cons: You can connect third party controllers to the iPhone to play mobile games [19].
    • Sharing Wi-Fi passwords: You can now share a Wi-Fi password with someone [20].
    • Eliminating duplicate media: You can search through your photo library to eliminate duplicate photos and videos [20].
    • Copying and pasting picture and video adjustments: You can copy and paste edits you made to a photo or video [21].
    • Using the always-on display: The iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max have a new always-on display that dims when the device is inactive [22-24].
    • Using Emergency SOS via satellite: This feature allows you to contact emergency services via satellite in areas without cellular service [25]. This service is free for two years [25, 26].
    • Utilizing Crash Detection: The iPhone 14 can detect when you are in a car crash and automatically contact emergency services [27-30].
    • Taking a screenshot: To take a screenshot, press the “Lock/Side” and “Volume Up” buttons simultaneously, or use Assistive Touch [31, 32].
    • Using the Dynamic Island: The Dynamic Island is an interactive area that appears on the front of the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max, which can be tapped to expand and show more information about alerts, notifications, and activities [33, 34]. The Dynamic Island can be used to control phone calls, music, travel alerts, and show AirDrop notifications and the status of ride-share services [35-37].
    • Using Apple Pay from the lock screen: You can access Apple Pay from the lock screen by double clicking the side button [38, 39].
    • Using the camera: The iPhone 14 Pro has a 48MP wide-angle camera [27, 40, 41]. The iPhone 14 Pro also has a new Action Mode for video and can record video in 4K [41-43]. The volume buttons can be used as shutter controls [44].
    • Force restarting the iPhone: If your phone is not responding, you may need to force restart it. This is done using a button sequence specific to iPhones without a home button [45].
    • Extending battery life: You can extend your battery life by turning off the always-on display and keyboard haptics, enabling the auto-brightness feature, limiting the promotion frame rate, using Dark Mode, and enabling optimized battery charging [17, 24, 46, 47].

    The iPhone 14 also has an eSIM, and no longer has a physical SIM card slot [25].

    iPhone 14 Pro Dynamic Island

    The Dynamic Island is a new feature on the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max that replaces the traditional notch at the top of the iPhone screen [1, 2]. It is an interactive area that can expand and change shape to show alerts, notifications, and activities [1, 2].

    Here are some key aspects of the Dynamic Island:

    • Appearance: The Dynamic Island is a black bar that is connected to an island-like area on the display [3]. It is designed to look like a single, narrow lozenge [3].
    • Function: The Dynamic Island is designed to be interactive and can display essential information and notifications [1, 4]. It can also act as a hub for alerts, notifications and app shortcuts [1].
    • Interactivity: Users can tap on the Dynamic Island to expand it and access additional controls or information [1].
    • Compatibility: The Dynamic Island is exclusive to the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max models [1, 2]. It is enabled by the A16 Bionic chip in those models [1].
    • Display: The Dynamic Island is made possible by hardware modifications to the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max [5]. The design of the display itself was altered [5].
    • Notifications: Instead of displaying standalone notifications, the Dynamic Island centralizes them [4].

    The Dynamic Island can be used for a variety of functions, including:

    • Phone Calls: The Dynamic Island can display the option to pick up or hang up calls [4].
    • Music: While music is playing, album art appears on the Dynamic Island and the user may touch the Dynamic Island to access music controls like play/pause/previous/next [4].
    • Travel Alerts: The Dynamic Island displays useful travel information like flight numbers and baggage claim details [6].
    • Turn-by-Turn Directions: The Dynamic Island gives notifications for driving directions [6].
    • AirDrop: The Dynamic Island displays the status of AirDrop transfers [6].
    • Ride-Share Services: The Dynamic Island displays information about ride-share services [6].
    • Face ID: When Face ID is being used, the Face ID animation stretches from the Dynamic Island [2].
    • Charging: The Dynamic Island displays when your phone is charging [5].
    • Lock/Unlock: The Dynamic Island provides an animation when the phone is locked or unlocked [5].
    • Other functions: Other capabilities include connection for headphones, Do Not Disturb mode, quiet mode, charge status, and sporting results [5].

    The Dynamic Island is intended to be a more intuitive and integrated way of displaying information and interacting with the iPhone [1, 4, 6].

    iPhone 14 Battery Life Optimization

    To maximize battery life on your iPhone 14, there are several settings and usage habits you can adjust [1].

    Here are some ways to boost battery life on the iPhone 14:

    • Turn off the always-on display: The always-on display on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max allows the screen to remain visible even when the phone is not in use, which consumes power [1, 2]. To turn it off, go to Settings > Display & Brightness, and deactivate it [1].
    • Disable keyboard haptics: The keyboard’s haptic feedback uses energy [3]. To turn it off, go to Settings > Sounds & Haptics > Keyboard Feedback and toggle off the options for sound and haptics [3].
    • Enable auto-brightness: Auto-brightness automatically adjusts screen brightness based on ambient lighting conditions, reducing energy consumption [4]. This setting can be located in the Accessibility menu within the Display & Text Size settings [4].
    • Limit promotion frame rate: The ProMotion feature on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max can be set to a lower refresh rate which will save battery [4]. This can be done in the Accessibility menu [4].
    • Use Dark Mode: Using Dark Mode will reduce the energy used by the OLED display [4].
    • Enable Optimized Battery Charging: This function slows down battery aging by studying your daily routine, and finishes charging the phone before your morning alarm goes off [5].
    • Charge your iPhone before it gets too hot: The iPhone has a safety feature that will stop charging when the phone gets too hot [6]. This feature helps preserve battery health and lengthen battery life [6]. You may want to take actions such as taking the phone out of the sun or using less energy-hungry apps while charging [6].
    • Get the right charger for your iPhone: The iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max can charge at 23W and 27W, respectively, while the iPhone 14 and 14 Plus can charge at 20W [6, 7]. You may want to choose a larger charger to increase charging speed [6]. Apple also offers a MagSafe charger that will wirelessly charge your phone at 15W [8].
    • Maintain your iPhone’s battery health: The Battery Health options, found in the battery menu, allow you to maintain the health of your battery [5]. The function Optimized Battery Charging must be activated [5].
    • Keep your iPhone charged: It’s advised to maintain your phone charge between 40% and 80% [9]. A phone battery will discharge faster when being used [9].

    iPhone 14 Repair Manual

    iPhone Introduction
    This manual includes technical instructions for replacing genuine Apple parts in iPhone and is intended for individual technicians with the knowledge, experience, and tools required to repair electronic devices.

    Important
    Read the entire manual first. If you’re not comfortable performing the repairs as instructed in this manual, don’t proceed.

    Always use the latest version of this manual available at support.apple.com/en-us/docs/iphone.

      Warning
    Failure to follow the repair instructions or to use genuine Apple parts or proper tools may cause fire or other safety issues and lead to personal injury or death.

    Caution
    Failure to follow the repair instructions or to use genuine Apple parts or proper tools may damage the iPhone, parts, or other property, or compromise the device’s functionality or water resistance.

    Warranty information
    Damage caused by repairs performed outside of Apple or the Apple Authorized Service Provider network is not covered by Apple’s product warranty or AppleCare plans. Such damage may cause future repairs to be subject to out-of-warranty costs or render the device ineligible for future repairs by Apple or Apple Authorized Service Providers.

    Tools and parts
    Hardware tools

    Apple tools are designed to apply the appropriate heat, force, and torque during repairs, and to withstand high-volume professional use.

    The heated display removal fixture softens adhesive to allow separation of the display from the enclosure. The fixture is used with a heated display pocket designed for the device’s specific dimensions.

    The display press applies the appropriate amount of pressure to secure new adhesive during display installation. The display press is used with a repair tray and display adhesive press plate designed for the device’s specific dimensions.

    The battery press applies the appropriate amount of pressure to secure new adhesive during battery installation. The battery press is used with a repair tray designed for the device’s specific dimensions.

    Ordering tools and parts

    You can learn how to order genuine Apple parts and tools at support.apple.com/self-service-repair. During the purchase process, enter the manual ID located at the bottom of the Contents page to indicate that you’ve read this manual in its entirety and agree that you have the knowledge and experience to perform your intended repair.

    Software tools

    Repair Assistant is a post-repair software tool that finishes the repair for select new and used genuine Apple parts. Repair Assistant may be recommended at the end of your repair depending on the part replaced.

    What Repair Assistant does

    Why it’s important

    Transfers factory calibration values

    Certain parts like displays, cameras, and ambient light sensors have calibration values that are customized to each individual part during manufacturing. Downloading these values ensures maximum performance and quality after a repair.

    Links Secure Enclave and biometric authentication parts

    After repair of a logic board or a biometric authentication part (Touch ID or Face ID ), linking the biometric sensors to the Secure Enclave on the logic board is required to ensure device security.

    Checks for Activation Lock

    Certain parts are protected by Activation Lock. Repair Assistant checks to ensure that the part being installed does not have Activation Lock enabled.

    Assigns wireless region

    To comply with regional communications regulations, a wireless region must be assigned to your logic board.

    Updates firmware

    Keeping firmware up to date ensures that the device has all the latest security and performance features.

    How to initiate Repair Assistant

    Ensure the following minimum requirements are met:

    The latest version of iOS—not a beta version—on the iPhone

    A strong Wi-Fi network capable of 1.0 Mbps download and upload speeds, with less than 400 ms latency and less than 2% packet loss. Estimated data usage to run Repair Assistant is 6–22 MB.

    If you’re repairing someone else’s device, put the device into diagnostics mode, then follow the onscreen prompts.

    If you’re repairing your own device, learn more about Repair Assistant.

    Alerts
    Failure to follow alerts could result in fire, injury, data loss, or damage to the device, parts, or other property.

    Warning

    Instructions for reducing risk of personal injury

    Caution

    Instructions for reducing risk of data loss or device hardware damage

    Important

    Supplemental information for successfully completing procedures; neither a Warning nor a Caution

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • The Straight Path: A Discourse on Islamic Sects

    The Straight Path: A Discourse on Islamic Sects

    This text is a transcription of a lecture discussing the internal conflict within the Tablighi Jamaat, a large Islamic missionary movement. The speaker details the history of the Jamaat, highlighting key figures and events leading to a schism in 2016. He explores the underlying causes of the division, including succession disputes and differing interpretations of religious practices. The lecture further examines the broader context of sectarianism in Islam, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the Quran and Sunnah while advocating for tolerance and unity among diverse Muslim groups. Finally, the speaker urges a return to core Islamic principles to resolve the conflict and prevent further division within the Muslim community.

    Tablighi Jamaat and Sectarianism: A Study Guide

    Quiz

    Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

    1. What are the two factions that have formed within the Tablighi Jamaat in recent years and what is the primary point of conflict between them?
    2. What are the three main centers of the Tablighi Jamaat’s annual gatherings, and where are they located?
    3. What are the titles of the two books used by the Tablighi Jamaat that have recently become a source of controversy, and why are they controversial?
    4. What is the historical context of the Deobandi and Barelvi conflict, and what is the central issue of contention?
    5. Who was Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi and what is his significance to the Tablighi Jamaat?
    6. According to the speaker, what is the primary issue that caused the split in the Tablighi Jamaat after the death of Maulana Inamul Hasan?
    7. What is the speaker’s view on sectarianism within Islam and what does he argue is the source of division?
    8. According to the speaker, what is the importance of the Quran and Sunnah, and how should Muslims approach the interpretation of these sources?
    9. How does the speaker analyze the hadith of the 73 sects in relation to sectarianism?
    10. What is the speaker’s perspective on the role of the Imams in Islamic jurisprudence, and what is his specific objection to the way they are followed by some Muslims?

    Quiz Answer Key

    1. The two factions within the Tablighi Jamaat are the “building group,” which focuses on infrastructure and organization, and the “Shura group,” which adheres to a council-based leadership structure. The primary conflict is over leadership and authority, stemming from a dispute regarding the appointment of an amir (leader).
    2. The three main centers of the Tablighi Jamaat’s annual gatherings are in Tongi (Bangladesh), near Lahore (Pakistan), and the Nizamuddin center in Delhi (India). These gatherings draw huge numbers of participants and are significant events in the Tablighi Jamaat calendar.
    3. The two books are “Virtues of Deeds” and “Virtues of Charity.” They are controversial because they contain accounts of outlandish Sufi events and stories, which some find to be inconsistent with a strict adherence to the Qur’an and Sunnah.
    4. The conflict between the Deobandi and Barelvi sects began after the establishment of the Deoband Madrasah and is rooted in differing views on Sufi practices and the authority of Hadith. Each group holds the other as not being a true Muslim, even though they both come from the Sunni and Hanafi schools of thought.
    5. Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi was the founder of the Tablighi Jamaat, who started the movement in 1926 as an effort to educate Muslims at the basic level of the religion. He focused on teaching Muslims about ablutions and prayers, expanding the movement to various villages.
    6. According to the speaker, the primary cause of the split in the Tablighi Jamaat was the failure to reestablish the Shoori (council) after the death of Maulana Inamul Hasan and a power struggle, resulting in the appointment of Maulana Saad Kandhalvi without the proper consultation.
    7. The speaker views sectarianism as a curse and believes the primary source of division within the Islamic community is the creation of factions and the adherence to traditions and teachings outside of the Qur’an and Sunnah. He advocates for unity based on the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah.
    8. The speaker emphasizes that the Qur’an and Sunnah are the supreme and fundamental sources of guidance in Islam. He advises that Muslims approach the interpretation of these sources by referencing Hadith and avoiding opinions or traditions that deviate from their teachings.
    9. The speaker argues that the hadith of the 73 sects does not command Muslims to create sects. Rather, it is a prediction of what will happen. He states that the Qur’an orders Muslims not to create sects and to reject interpretations of Hadith that justify divisiveness.
    10. The speaker believes that the Imams should be respected but that their sayings should not supersede the Qur’an and Sunnah. He objects to how some Muslims follow Imams dogmatically rather than directly studying the Qur’an and Hadith, specifically referencing the act of kissing the thumb.

    Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the historical development of the Tablighi Jamaat, including its origins, growth, and the internal conflicts that have led to its current state of division. How has the legacy of Ilyas Kandhalvi shaped the trajectory of the movement?
    2. Discuss the role of religious texts in the Tablighi Jamaat, focusing on the controversial books “Virtues of Deeds” and “Virtues of Charity,” and the impact of these books on the schism within the Jamaat. How do they compare to more canonical texts of the Qur’an and Sunnah?
    3. Examine the issue of sectarianism within Islam as described by the speaker. What are the core issues that contribute to sectarian divisions, and how does he suggest overcoming them? What are the obstacles to creating unity within Islam, as identified by the speaker?
    4. Compare and contrast the speaker’s approach to understanding Islam with the practices of the Tablighi Jamaat and its various factions. In what ways does the speaker attempt to be a neutral observer while also providing an analysis of the movement’s theological underpinnings?
    5. Discuss the speaker’s emphasis on the Qur’an and Sunnah as the primary sources of guidance in Islam. How does this compare with the speaker’s understanding of the role of the Imams and the traditional schools of thought?

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • Tablighi Jamaat: A transnational Islamic missionary movement that encourages Muslims to return to a strict adherence to Sunni Islam.
    • Deobandi: A Sunni Islamic reform movement that emphasizes a strict interpretation of the Qur’an and Hadith, with a focus on education and missionary work.
    • Barelvi: A Sunni Islamic movement that emphasizes love and devotion to the Prophet Muhammad and includes practices that some consider Sufi, often in opposition to the Deobandi view.
    • Ahl al-Hadith: A movement within Sunni Islam that emphasizes the importance of direct study of the Hadith, and often opposes Sufi practices or traditions not directly found in the texts.
    • Shura: A consultative council used in Islamic decision-making. In this context, it refers to the leadership council within the Tablighi Jamaat.
    • Amir: A leader or commander, often used to denote the head of a religious group or organization. In this context, it is the disputed leadership position within the Tablighi Jamaat.
    • Nizamuddin Center: The original headquarters of the Tablighi Jamaat in Delhi, India.
    • Raiwand Center: A major center of the Tablighi Jamaat located in Pakistan.
    • Tongi (Bangladesh): A town near Dhaka, Bangladesh, known for hosting one of the largest annual Tablighi Jamaat gatherings.
    • Virtues of Deeds/Virtues of Charity: Two books written by Shaykh Zakaria Kandhalvi used by the Tablighi Jamaat that have become controversial for containing outlandish Sufi stories and accounts.
    • Hayat al-Sahaba: A book written by Yusuf Kandhalvi about the lives of the companions of the Prophet, used within the Tablighi Jamaat.
    • Ijtihad: The process of making a legal decision based on the Islamic legal tradition. The term refers to reasoned interpretation of Islamic law by qualified scholars.
    • Sunnah: The practice and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, serving as a secondary source of guidance for Muslims after the Qur’an.
    • Hadith: The recorded sayings, actions, and approvals of the Prophet Muhammad, which are used to guide Muslims in their religious practice and understanding.
    • Qur’an: The holy scripture of Islam, considered by Muslims to be the word of God as revealed to the Prophet Muhammad.
    • Ahl al-Bayt: The family of the Prophet Muhammad, including his descendants, wives, and other close relatives.
    • Tawheed: The concept of the oneness of God in Islam, which emphasizes that there is no other god but Allah.
    • Ghadir Khum: A specific location where the Prophet Muhammad is said to have delivered a sermon about the importance of Ahl al-Bayt.
    • Rifa al-Ideen: The practice of raising hands during prayer, specifically when going into and rising from the bowing position (Ruku’). This is a point of contention for some Sunni Muslims.
    • Ijma: The consensus of the Muslim scholars on a particular issue of law or practice.
    • Fard: A religious obligation in Islam that is considered a duty for all Muslims.
    • Mujaddid: A renewer of the faith, who is seen as coming at the turn of each century in the Islamic calendar to restore Islamic practice back to the traditions of the Prophet and his companions.
    • Nasbiy: A derogatory term given to individuals who show animosity toward the family of the Prophet Muhammad.
    • Kharijites: An early sect of Islam who broke away from mainstream Islam over political and religious disputes.
    • Wahhabi Movement: An Islamic revivalist movement that promotes a strict adherence to Islamic doctrine and often views other Muslims as apostate.
    • Shia: A sect of Islam that believe Ali ibn Abi Talib was the rightful successor to the Prophet Muhammad.
    • Qadiani: A group that stems from the Ahmadiyya movement that was founded in 1889. Orthodox Muslims don’t consider them to be proper Muslims.

    Tablighi Jamaat Schism and Islamic Unity

    Okay, here is a detailed briefing document analyzing the provided text:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of Discourse on the Tablighi Jamaat and Sectarianism within Islam

    Date: October 22, 2024 (based on the text’s context)

    Source: Excerpts from a transcript of a public session (number 179) held on December 29, 2024

    Overview:

    This briefing document summarizes a lengthy and complex discourse that primarily centers on the Tablighi Jamaat, a large Islamic organization, and its recent internal divisions. The speaker, who identifies as an engineer and a scholar of the Quran and Sunnah, provides a critical historical overview of the group, its origins, and its current conflict. The speaker also uses this specific conflict as a springboard to discuss broader issues within Islam, such as sectarianism, the importance of adhering directly to the Quran and Sunnah, and the dangers of blind following of tradition. The tone is critical yet somewhat sympathetic, seeking to inform and to advocate for a more unified and Quran-centered approach to Islam.

    Key Themes and Ideas:

    1. The Tablighi Jamaat and Its Internal Strife:
    • Origins and Growth: The Tablighi Jamaat was founded by Ilyas Kandhalvi in 1926 with the aim of teaching basic religious practices to Muslims. The speaker acknowledges their hard work and dedication to going “from village to village to town to town to the mosque” and expresses personal “love for the people of Tablighi Jamaat” for their self-sacrifice.
    • Current Division: For the past nine years, the Tablighi Jamaat has been split into two factions: one focused on the “building system” and the other on the “Shuri” (consultative council). The text specifies that the schism became public in 2015. This conflict recently resulted in violence at their annual gathering in Bangladesh on December 18, 2024, with “five people were martyred and more than a hundred were injured.”
    • Accusations and Rhetoric: Each group accuses the other of various offenses, including calling the opposing group “Saadiani” which is intentionally close to “Qadiani” in sound, suggesting they are heretical, and that one side is an “Indian agent” while other “is pro-Pakistan.”
    • Leadership Dispute: The dispute over leadership can be traced to the death of Inamul Hasan in 1995 and the failure to name a successor, resulting in a power vacuum and ultimately, the schism between Maulana Saad Kandhalvi and the Shura based in Raiwand. The speaker argues that the Tablighi Jamaat, which is generally averse to public sectarianism, is publicly showcasing its division.
    1. Sectarianism Within Islam:
    • Historical Context: The speaker traces the historical roots of sectarianism in Islam, highlighting the Deobandi-Barelvi divide, which emerged in the early 20th century. They note that before the Deoband madrasa, distinctions between Muslims were not as significant, focusing instead on legal schools of thought.
    • Critique of Sectarianism: The speaker argues that sectarianism is a “curse” and a deviation from the true teachings of Islam. The speaker emphasizes the need to avoid sectarian labels. They believe that sectarianism and the lack of tolerance prevents Muslim unity.
    • Critique of Following Elders: The speaker takes issue with the practice of following elders in a tradition, that results in the failure to adhere to and interpret the Qur’an and Sunnah directly.
    • Call for Unity through Diversity: The speaker advocates for a form of unity that acknowledges diversity and encourages scholarly debate while emphasizing common ground in the Qur’an and Sunnah.
    1. Importance of the Quran and Sunnah:
    • Primary Sources: The speaker insists that the Quran and the Sunnah (the teachings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad) are the primary sources of guidance in Islam.
    • Rejection of Sectarian Interpretations: They are critical of sectarian interpretations of the Quran and Sunnah, particularly in the area of worship. They find that traditions based on the sayings of elders result in a loss of adherence to the true practices described in Hadith (collections of the sayings and actions of the Prophet).
    • Emphasis on Understanding: The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding the meaning of the Quran, rather than simply reciting it without comprehension. The speaker strongly criticizes the Tablighi Jamaat for relying more on books of virtue than on the text of the Qur’an itself. They cite the example of the practice of Rafa ul-Yadayn (raising hands during prayer), which they see as a clear example of adherence to Sunnah over sectarian custom. The speaker states that “The entire religion of the whole stands on it.” in regards to following the recorded traditions of how the Prophet practiced Islam.
    1. Critique of Traditional Islamic Practices:
    • Sufi Influences: The speaker is critical of certain Sufi practices and beliefs, particularly those found in books such as “Virtues of Deeds”, used by the Tablighi Jamaat before being removed by Maulana Saad Kandalvi. They reject stories in these books that conflict with the Quran and Sunnah.
    • Rejection of Imitation of Religious Leaders: The speaker states “we don’t believe any sage, we don’t believe traitors, yes, we believe those who are loyal to the Messenger of Allah”. They reject the practice of following particular religious leaders and state that the “Imams are not at fault” and “we are not saying anything to Imam Hanifa, Imam Shafi’i, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Imam Malik, to his followers”, but reject religious leaders’ ideas that do not follow Quran and Sunnah.
    1. The Concept of “The Straight Path” (Sirat al-Mustaqim):
    • Emphasis on following the straight path. The speaker quotes a hadith about the Prophet drawing a straight line, representing the true path, and many crooked lines, representing the paths of deviation, and urges adherence to the Quran and Sunnah in an effort to avoid “paths of the devil”.
    • Call to adhere to the way of the blessed The speaker concludes by stating that “They have not made their own paths and whoever has deviated from their path is the wrongdoer.” The speaker makes this statement in the context of the Prophet’s path and those who have followed the same path.

    Quotes of Significance:

    • “It is a very big international news for Muslims. Therefore, it is not only a cause of pain and suffering, but also a cause of shame.” – On the Tablighi Jamaat conflict.
    • “No Muslim in the world called himself a Deobandi before the Hanafis There was a difference between the Shafi’is and the Sunnis, but the difference was not that these Deobandis were Muslims…” – On the historical context of sectarianism.
    • “I think sectarianism is a curse and we should avoid it.” – On the speaker’s stance on sectarianism.
    • “The whole issue of sectarianism is going on and then we started the work of a separate invitation, not to form a congregation…” – On the speaker’s organization.
    • “…the Quran and the Sunnah of His Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). The Qur’an Who wants to believe that the Qur’an and the Sunnah are one and the same, these are not optional things in this regard, there are two sources in parallel, the one who denies the Sunnah is not misguided, brother, he is a disbeliever…” – On the importance of following the Sunnah.
    • “This book is meant to end the differences between Jews and Christians. The book made the Companions and now Rizwan out of misguidance and made them the imam of the whole humanity and you are saying that differences will arise…” – On the unifying effect of the Qur’an.
    • “…after the departure of the Messenger of Allah, the Qur’an is the supreme caliph on this planet earth…” – On the final authority of the Quran after the Prophet.
    • “These are crooked lines, isn’t there a devil sitting on top of each line, who is calling you to him, and in the center of which I have drawn a straight line.” He placed his finger on it and said, “I recited the verse of the Qur’an, ‘The straight path,’ and this is my path, which is the straight path, so follow it…” – On the importance of following the straight path.

    Analysis:

    The speaker’s analysis is comprehensive, historically informed, and critical of the status quo within many Islamic communities. They advocate for a return to the primary sources of Islam (Quran and Sunnah) while rejecting sectarianism, blind following of tradition, and innovations that go against the Prophet’s teachings. The speaker uses the current conflict within the Tablighi Jamaat as a case study to illustrate the harmful effects of sectarianism and the importance of following the straight path. They highlight the significance of adherence to the way of the blessed in following the straight path.

    Potential Implications:

    This discourse has the potential to provoke discussion and debate within Muslim communities. It is a call for a critical engagement with religious traditions, pushing for a more Quran and Sunnah focused practice of Islam, and it might encourage Muslims to look beyond traditional sectarian divisions. However, the speaker’s criticism of established practices and leadership may be met with resistance from those within those traditional systems. The speaker intends to encourage followers of these paths to reevaluate some of their beliefs and practices, but also to treat other Muslims with respect regardless of their sect.

    Conclusion:

    This public session provides a detailed and nuanced commentary on a specific conflict within the Tablighi Jamaat while touching on wider issues of sectarianism and correct Islamic practice. The speaker advocates for reform, tolerance, and a return to the primary sources of Islam in the interest of creating a unified and more tolerant Muslim community. The message is powerful, but is likely to be controversial.

    The Tablighi Jamaat: Division and Disunity

    Frequently Asked Questions

    • What is the Tablighi Jamaat and what are its main activities?
    • The Tablighi Jamaat is a large, international Islamic organization that originated in India around 1926. It focuses on encouraging Muslims to adhere to basic Islamic practices like prayer, ablution, and reading the Quran. They are known for their door-to-door preaching efforts, often traveling from village to village, mosque to mosque, promoting these fundamentals. The organization emphasizes personal sacrifice and religious devotion among its members, who often fund their missionary activities from their own pockets. It is also noteworthy for its large gatherings, particularly in Tongi, Bangladesh, near Lahore, Pakistan, and at Nizamuddin, in Delhi, India. They have centers established in roughly 170 countries and are considered to be the largest organization in the Muslim world.
    • Why has the Tablighi Jamaat recently been in the news?
    • The Tablighi Jamaat has experienced significant internal conflict and division in recent years, stemming from disagreements over leadership and the methodology of preaching. This has led to the formation of two main factions: one aligned with the “building system” (construction and management of centers), and the other focused on the “Shura” (consultative council). These divisions have manifested in clashes, most notably at their annual gathering in Bangladesh on December 18, 2024, resulting in deaths and injuries. The accusations flying between the factions are also a factor in the media coverage, with each side accusing the other of various wrongdoings.
    • What are the main points of contention between the two factions within the Tablighi Jamaat?
    • The core of the conflict involves disputes over leadership succession following the death of previous leaders. This culminated in Maulana Saad Kandhalvi unilaterally declaring himself Amir (leader) in 2016, leading to a split from the Shura council, the original group. The original Shura group felt that the 10 member Shura should have selected a new amir as decided in 1993. This resulted in each faction declaring the other’s mosques to be illegitimate, while accusations of betrayal and even foreign influence (Indian Agent), are common in the videos uploaded by the different factions. The factions differ also on the usage of specific books, for instance, Maulana Saad Kandhalvi’s faction no longer endorses “Virtues of Deeds” and “Virtues of Charity,” which have been sources of controversy.
    • What is the significance of the books “Virtues of Deeds” and “Virtues of Charity” and why are they now controversial?
    • These books, authored by Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi, have historically been a part of the Tablighi Jamaat’s curriculum. However, they have come under criticism for containing narratives and stories perceived as fantastical, and for promoting ideas associated with Sufi practices and beliefs. Some critics, including Maulana Tariq Jameel, have argued that these narratives are not grounded in the Qur’an or the Sunnah. It’s also important to note that the authorship of these texts has been a factor, as the books are from the father of Maulana Saad Kanlavi, who was in the party of Sufism and Peri Muridi. This is why Saad Kandhalvi banned the books.
    • How does the Tablighi Jamaat relate to the broader historical conflict between the Deobandi and Barelvi schools of thought?
    • The Tablighi Jamaat is rooted in the Deobandi school of thought, which emerged as a reaction against certain Sufi practices and beliefs. The Deobandi school originated with the establishment of the Deoband Madrasa. This madrasa was formed because its scholars began to differ from Sufi thought, specifically taking aspects from the Ahl al-Hadith school. The Barelvi school of thought, in response, arose in 1904 in opposition to the Deobandi school and their deviations from Sufi thought. This led to a long-standing theological and cultural conflict between these two schools, with each side accusing the other of being outside the fold of Islam. This history of sectarianism affects how each faction within the Tablighi Jamaat views the other.
    • How does the speaker view the role of sectarianism in Islam?
    • The speaker views sectarianism as a detrimental force in Islam, believing it to be a curse. He argues that divisions and sects are a violation of the Qur’anic injunction to “hold fast to the rope of Allah and do not be divided into sects”. He believes the constant infighting and accusations of disbelief that each sect throws at each other creates disunity. He stresses that Muslims should primarily adhere to the Qur’an and the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad and avoid creating sects. He further asserts that each group thinks that their way is right, and because of that, it is easy for that group to deem all other groups are on the path to hell. He supports a more tolerant approach to differences in practice, where groups should focus on constructive scholarly criticism rather than outright denouncement.
    • What is the speaker’s position on following the Qur’an and the Sunnah?
    • The speaker strongly emphasizes that the Qur’an and the Sunnah are the primary sources of guidance for Muslims. He maintains that the method for the prayer was not described in the Quran, and therefore must come from the Sunnah and its related Hadiths. He argues that adherence to these sources will prevent Muslims from going astray, as the Prophet’s final instructions centered around these two things. He also stresses the importance of understanding the Qur’an rather than simply reciting it without comprehension. He highlights a hadith in which the Prophet (PBUH) states the best book of Allah is the Book of Allah, and the best path is that of Muhammad, and that any new actions in religion are considered heresies and will lead to hell.
    • What is the significance of the Hadith of Ghadeer Khum, and what does it tell us about the two things the Prophet left behind?

    The speaker considers the Hadith of Ghadeer Khum to be of the highest importance. It details the Prophet, peace be upon him, declaring that he was leaving behind two weighty things for his followers: the Qur’an and his Ahl al-Bayt (his family). This is considered an important hadith because the Quran is not just a book, but rather “The Rope of Allah”, that if followed closely, will keep one from going astray. The Hadith goes on to say that the Prophet (PBUH) implores his followers to treat the Ahl al-Bayt well. The speaker believes that this hadith shows the significance of the Qur’an and also the importance of respecting the Prophet’s family. He argues that the Muslim Ummah has failed to uphold either of these.

    The Tablighi Jamaat Schism

    Okay, here’s the timeline and cast of characters based on the provided text:

    Timeline of Events

    • 1904: Madrasah Manzarul Islam Barelwi is built, marking the formal establishment of the Barelvi sect.
    • 1905:Five Fatwas of infidelity (Hussam al-Haramayin) are issued against Deobandi scholars by Barelvi scholars.
    • Einstein publishes his Special Theory of Relativity, while the Deobandi-Barelvi conflict escalates.
    • Deobandi scholars write Al-Muhand Ali Al-Mufand in response to accusations of infidelity, but these are not accepted by the Barelvis.
    • 1926: Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi starts the work of Tablighi Jamaat in Mewat, initially focused on educating Muslims.
    • 1944: Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi dies.
    • 1965: Maulana Yusuf Kandhalvi, Ilyas’s son, dies at the age of 48 after serving as Amir for 21 years; he wrote Hayat al-Sahaba.
    • 1965: Instead of Yusuf’s son, Haroon, Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi appoints his son-in-law, Maulana Inamul Hasan Kandhalvi, as the Amir of Tablighi Jamaat.
    • 1981: Dawat-e-Islami is formed by Barelvi scholars, with access to existing Barelvi mosques.
    • 1993: Maulana Inamul Hasan Kandhalvi forms a ten-member council to choose a successor as Amir.
    • 1995: Maulana Inamul Hasan Kandhalvi dies; the ten-member council fails to choose a new Amir, and the leadership falls to the council.
    • 2007: The speaker of the text attends the Tablighi Jamaat gathering at Raiwind on 2nd November.
    • 2008: The speaker moves towards Ahl al-Hadith beliefs.
    • 2009: The speaker starts to understand issues of sectarianism
    • 2010: The speaker starts regular video recordings of Quran classes in October.
    • March 2014: Maulana Zubair Al Hasan, a member of the Shura council, dies.
    • November 2015:Meeting of the Tablighi Jamaat in Raiwand.
    • Haji Abdul Wahab adds 11 new members to the shura, making a total of 13, and Maulana Saad Kandhalvi is named as one of the two most senior.
    • Maulana Saad Kandhalvi refuses to sign the document with the 13 members.
    • June 2016: Maulana Saad Kandhalvi declares himself the Amir of the Tablighi Jamaat, sparking a split within the organization. He expelled members of the other side from the Nizamuddin mosque in Delhi.
    • December 1, 2018: A clash occurs between the two factions of the Tablighi Jamaat in Bangladesh.
    • November 18, 2018: Haji Abdul Wahab dies.
    • December 18, 2024: Violent clashes in Bangladesh between the two Tablighi Jamaat groups result in 5 deaths and over 100 injuries. This event causes the speaker of the text to discuss the history of Tablighi Jamaat in public.
    • December 29, 2024: The speaker gives public session number 179, discussing these events.

    Cast of Characters

    • Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi: Founder of the Tablighi Jamaat in 1926. He focused on educating Muslims and his work spread quickly. He died in 1944.
    • Maulana Yusuf Kandhalvi: Son of Ilyas Kandhalvi; the second Amir of Tablighi Jamaat. Served for 21 years, wrote Hayat al-Sahaba. Died at the age of 48 in 1965.
    • Maulana Haroon Kandhalvi: Son of Yusuf Kandhalvi, not chosen as the next Amir of Tablighi Jamaat after his father’s death.
    • Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi: Nephew of Ilyas Kandhalvi and cousin of Yusuf Kandhalvi. Chose his son-in-law as Amir instead of Yusuf’s son. Wrote Virtues of Actions, Virtues of Hajj, Virtues of Durood and Virtues of Charity.
    • Maulana Inamul Hasan Kandhalvi: Son-in-law of Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi; the third Amir of Tablighi Jamaat, serving for 30 years (1965-1995). Established the ten-member council.
    • Maulana Saad Kandhalvi: A descendant of Ilyas Kandhalvi who declared himself the Amir in 2016, leading to the current split within the Tablighi Jamaat. He leads the faction based at the Nizamuddin center in India and has banned some Tablighi books.
    • Haji Abdul Wahab: A senior member of the Tablighi Jamaat Shura (council) and teacher. He was with Ilyas Kandhalvi in 1926. Attempted to make peace between the groups in 2016 before passing away in 2018.
    • Maulana Zubair Al Hasan: Member of the ten-member Shura, who died in March 2014.
    • Rashid Ahmed Gangui, Ashraf Ali Thanvi, and Ismail Ambeti: Deobandi scholars who were targets of the Fatwas of infidelity from the Barelvis in 1905.
    • Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri: Deobandi scholar who wrote Al-Muhand Ali Al-Mufand in response to accusations of infidelity from the Barelvis in 1905.
    • Imam Nabawi: Author of Riyad al-Saliheen, a widely read hadith book.
    • Maulana Tariq Jameel: A contemporary religious scholar who has criticized some of the traditional stories found in Tablighi books.
    • Imam Ahmed Barelvi: Founder of the Barelvi sect.
    • Ibn Abidin al-Shami: A scholar from 1252 A.H. who gave a blasphemous fatwa about Surah Al-Fatiha. Deobandi scholars cite him with respect.
    • Imam Abu Hanifa: Founder of the Hanafi school of law, whose opinions are followed by both Deobandis and Barelvis.
    • Sheikh Ahmad Sarandi (Mujaddid al-Thani): Declared himself a Mujaddid and claimed that if a prophet was to come to the Ummah, he would follow Hanafi law.
    • Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani: A respected Sufi figure. Author of Ghaniya Talibeen.
    • Imam al-Ghazali: A respected Sufi figure who lived from 505 – 506 Hijri.
    • Maulana Ilyas Qadri: Leader of the Dawat-e-Islami movement.
    • Maulana Ilyas: Leader of a small Tablighi Jamaat of Ahl al-Hadith.
    • Engineer (Speaker of the text): The speaker of the text who describes the history of the Tablighi Jamaat and Islamic sectarianism. He considers all the sects to be Muslim.
    • Qazi Shur: A judge of Kufa who wrote a letter to Hazrat Umar about issues of Ijtihad.
    • Imam Ibn Al-Mazar: Author of Kitab al-Ijma, a book on the consensus of Islamic scholars.
    • Zayd Ibn Arqam: Narrator of the hadith of Ghadeer Khum.
    • Hazrat Umar: Companion of the Prophet, second Caliph.
    • Hazrat Abu Bakr: Companion of the Prophet, first Caliph.
    • Mufti Amjad Ali: Author of Bhar Shariat.
    • Syed Farman Ali Shah: Whose translation is used for the Deobandis.
    • Gulam Ahmad Qadiani: The person who formed the Qadiani movement.

    This detailed breakdown should provide a solid understanding of the key events and figures discussed in the text. Let me know if you have any other questions!

    The Tablighi Jamaat Schism

    The Tablighi Jamaat, a Deobandi sect, has experienced a significant split in recent years, leading to internal conflict and division [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of this schism based on the provided sources:

    Origins and Early Growth:

    • The Tablighi Jamaat was started by Ilyas Kandhalvi, with the goal of teaching basic Islamic practices [1, 3].
    • It became a large organization with centers established in 170 countries [3].
    • The Jamaat is known for its commitment to preaching and personal sacrifice, with members often using their own money to travel and spread their message [3].
    • They focus on teaching basic practices like ablution and prayer, and their work is considered effective [3].

    The Split:

    • Internal Division: Over the last nine years, the Tablighi Jamaat has been divided into two groups: one focused on the building system and the other on the Shura (council) [1].
    • Public Disagreement: This division became very public in December 2024 during the annual gathering in Tongi, Bangladesh, when clashes between the two factions resulted in casualties [1, 4].
    • Accusations: The two groups have engaged in mutual accusations. The Shura group, based in Raiwind (Pakistan), has accused Maulana Saad Kandhalvi’s group of being Indian agents [4]. Maulana Saad Kandhalvi’s group is referred to as “Saadiani” by the other group, which is a derogatory term that sounds similar to “Qadiani,” a group considered heretical by many Muslims [2].
    • Centers of Division: The split is evident in different centers globally. The main centers are in Tongi (Bangladesh), Raiwind (Pakistan), and Nizamuddin (India), with the Nizamuddin center being associated with Maulana Saad Kandhalvi [1, 4].
    • Leadership Dispute: The conflict is rooted in a disagreement over leadership succession following the death of Maulana Inamul Hasan in 1995. A ten-member council was supposed to choose a new leader, but this did not happen [5, 6]. In 2016, Maulana Saad Kandhalvi declared himself the Amir (leader), which was not accepted by the Shura [6].

    Key Figures and Their Roles:

    • Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi: Founder of Tablighi Jamaat [1, 7]. He passed away in 1944 [7].
    • Yusuf Kandhalvi: Son of Ilyas Kandhalvi, who served as Amir for 21 years and died in 1965 [8].
    • Maulana Haroon Kandhalvi: Son of Yusuf Kandhalvi, who was not chosen as the next Amir [5, 8].
    • Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi: A nephew of Maulana Ilyas Kandhalvi and cousin of Yusuf Kandhalvi. He chose his son-in-law, Maulana Inamul Hasan, as Amir instead of Maulana Haroon Kandhalvi [5]. He wrote the book Virtues of Deeds, which is now not read by the group led by Maulana Saad Kandhalvi [3, 9].
    • Maulana Inamul Hasan: Son-in-law of Sheikh Zakaria Kandhalvi, who served as Amir for 30 years (1965-1995) [5].
    • Maulana Saad Kandhalvi: A descendant of Ilyas Kandhalvi and the leader of one of the two factions. He is in charge of the Nizamuddin center in India [10].
    • Haji Abdul Wahab: A senior member of the Shura who opposed Maulana Saad Kandhalvi’s claim to leadership [6, 10]. He died in 2018 [10].

    Impact of the Split:

    • Clashes and Casualties: The dispute has resulted in physical clashes and casualties [4, 11].
    • Division of Followers: The majority of the Tablighi Jamaat is with the Shura group centered in Raiwind [10]. The common members of the Tablighi Jamaat are not fully aware of the split [12].
    • Accusations of Sectarianism: The conflict is seen as part of a broader issue of sectarianism within Islam [11].

    Underlying Issues:

    • Sectarian Tensions: The split is partly due to long-standing tensions between Deobandi and Barelvi sects. The speaker mentions that he hated the Tablighi Jamaat when he was younger because they belonged to the Deobandi sect [2].
    • Controversial Books: The group led by Maulana Saad Kandhalvi no longer uses books like Virtues of Deeds, which is considered controversial [3, 9].
    • Leadership Disputes: A major issue is the lack of clear succession process within the Tablighi Jamaat [5].

    In conclusion, the Tablighi Jamaat’s split is a complex issue involving leadership disputes, sectarian tensions, and disagreements over practices. The division has led to physical conflict and has caused concern among Muslims [3, 4].

    Sectarianism in Islam

    Sectarianism within Islam is a significant issue, characterized by divisions and conflicts among different groups [1, 2]. The sources highlight several aspects of this problem, including its historical roots, its impact on Muslim communities, and the different perspectives on it [3-5].

    Historical Roots of Sectarianism

    • Early Divisions: The sources suggest that the seeds of sectarianism were sown early in Islamic history [6].
    • After the death of the Prophet Muhammad, political disagreements led to the emergence of the Sunni and Shia sects [6].
    • The rise of different schools of thought (madhhabs) also contributed to the divisions, although they initially did not cause as much conflict [3].
    • Deobandi and Barelvi: A major split occurred with the emergence of the Deobandi and Barelvi sects in the Indian subcontinent. These two groups, both Sunni and Hanafi, developed from differing views on Sufi thought and Ahl al-Hadith teachings [3, 4].
    • The establishment of the Deoband Madrasa and the Barelvi Madrasa further solidified this division [3].
    • These groups have a long history of disagreement and conflict, with each not accepting the other as true Muslims [3].

    Manifestations of Sectarianism

    • Mutual Condemnation: The different sects often accuse each other of being misguided or even outside the fold of Islam [3, 7].
    • The Barelvi’s issued fatwas of infidelity against Deobandi scholars [4].
    • The Deobandis and Barelvis are not ready to accept the other as Muslim [3].
    • Accusations and derogatory terms are used against each other, such as “Saadiani” to describe followers of Maulana Saad Kandhalvi, which is a word that is meant to sound like “Qadiani,” a group considered heretical [3, 8].
    • Physical Conflict: Sectarian tensions have sometimes resulted in physical violence, as seen in the clashes within the Tablighi Jamaat [2, 8].
    • Members of one group of Tablighi Jamaat attacked members of another group, resulting in deaths and injuries [8].
    • Mosques are sometimes declared as “Masjid Darar,” (a mosque of the hypocrites) by opposing groups [9].
    • Intolerance: The sources suggest that sectarianism leads to intolerance and a lack of respect for different views within the Muslim community [7, 10].
    • Sectarian groups are more focused on defending their own positions and attacking others [7].
    • This is demonstrated by the practice of some groups of throwing away prayer rugs of other groups in mosques [2, 9].

    Different Perspectives on Sectarianism

    • Sectarian Identity: Each sect often views itself as the sole possessor of truth, with the other groups being misguided [7].
    • Ahl al-Hadith consider themselves to be on the path of tawheed (oneness of God) [7].
    • Barelvis see themselves as the “contractors of Ishq Rasool” (love of the Prophet) [7].
    • Deobandis claim to defend the Companions of the Prophet, although they will not discuss aspects of their history that do not support their point of view [7].
    • The Quran’s View: The sources emphasize that the Quran condemns sectarianism and division [5].
    • The Quran urges Muslims to hold fast to the “rope of Allah” and not to divide into sects [5].
    • The Quran states that those who create sects have nothing to do with the Messenger of Allah [5].
    • Critique of Sectarianism: The speaker in the sources critiques sectarianism, arguing that it is a curse and that all sects should be considered as Muslims [2].
    • He suggests that unity should be based on scholarly discussion, rather than on forming exclusive groups [10].
    • He also believes that groups often focus on their own particularities, while ignoring the foundational values of Islam. [7]
    • The speaker says that the Imams did not spread sectarianism; it is the fault of the followers of the Imams [6].

    The Role of the Quran and Sunnah

    • The Straight Path: The sources highlight the importance of following the Quran and the Sunnah (Prophet’s practices) as the “straight path” [11, 12].
    • This path is contrasted with the “crooked lines” of sectarianism and division [11].
    • The sources argue that the Quran and the Sunnah are the core sources of guidance [13, 14].
    • Interpretation: Differences often arise from the interpretation of the Quran and Sunnah, which are used to justify sectarian differences. [15]
    • Each sect has its own translation of the Quran, leading to varying understandings [16].
    • Some groups emphasize adherence to specific interpretations of religious texts and actions, often based on the teachings of their own scholars, rather than focusing on the core teachings of Islam [15].

    Conclusion Sectarianism in Islam is a complex and multifaceted issue with historical, theological, and social dimensions [5]. The sources highlight that sectarianism leads to division, conflict, and intolerance within the Muslim community [1, 2, 7]. They call for a return to the core principles of Islam, as found in the Quran and Sunnah, and for mutual respect and tolerance among all Muslims [5, 10, 11]. The sources emphasize that the Quran condemns sectarianism and that the true path is one of unity based on shared faith and not sectarian identity [5, 11, 12].

    Islamic Jurisprudence: Sources, Schools, and Sectarianism

    Islamic jurisprudence, or fiqh, is a complex system of legal and ethical principles derived from the Quran and the Sunnah (the teachings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad). The sources discuss several key aspects of Islamic jurisprudence, particularly how it relates to different interpretations and practices within Islam.

    Core Sources of Islamic Jurisprudence:

    • The Quran is considered the primary source of guidance and law [1, 2].
    • It is regarded as the direct word of God and is the ultimate authority in Islam.
    • Muslims are urged to hold fast to the Quran as a source of unity and guidance [3].
    • The Sunnah, which encompasses the sayings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad, is the second most important source [2, 4, 5].
    • The Sunnah provides practical examples of how to implement the teachings of the Quran [2].
    • It is transmitted through hadiths, which are reports of the Prophet’s words and actions [2, 4].
    • Ijma (consensus of the Muslim scholars) is another source of Islamic jurisprudence [6].
    • It represents the collective understanding of Islamic law by qualified scholars.
    • The sources mention that the ummah will never agree on misguidance [6].
    • Ijtihad (independent legal reasoning) is the process by which qualified scholars derive new laws based on the Quran and the Sunnah when there is no clear guidance in the primary sources [6].
    • Ijtihad allows for the application of Islamic principles to new situations and circumstances [6].
    • The sources point out that the door of ijtihad is open until the Day of Resurrection [1].

    Schools of Thought (Madhhabs):

    • The sources mention different schools of thought, or madhhabs, within Sunni Islam, including the Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki and Hanbali schools [7, 8].
    • These schools developed as scholars interpreted and applied the Quran and Sunnah differently.
    • The speaker indicates that these different Imams did not spread sectarianism, but their followers did [8, 9].
    • The Hanafi school is particularly mentioned, as it is the school of jurisprudence followed by Deobandis, Barelvis, and even Qadianis [7, 10].
    • The sources note that there is no mention in the Quran or Sunnah that Muslims must follow one of these particular schools of thought [8, 11].
    • It is said that the four imams had their own expert opinions [8].
    • The Imams themselves said that if they say anything that is against the Quran and Sunnah, then their words should be left [9].

    Points of Jurisprudential Disagreement:

    • The sources discuss disagreements over specific practices, like Rafa al-Yadain (raising the hands during prayer), which is practiced by those who follow the hadiths from Bukhari and Muslim, but not by Hanafis [12].
    • The speaker in the source says that he follows the method of prayer from Bukhari and Muslim [10].
    • Hanafis, in contrast, do not perform Rafa al-Yadain [10, 12].
    • The sources indicate that different groups within Islam have varying interpretations of what constitutes proper Islamic practice [12].
    • For instance, some groups emphasize the importance of specific rituals, while others focus on different aspects of faith [13].
    • The source suggests that sectarianism arises because each sect has its own interpretation of the Quran and Sunnah [5].
    • Differences in jurisprudence are often related to different understandings of what is considered Sunnah [12].
    • The speaker points out that there are different types of Sunnah [12].
    • The practice of kissing the thumbs is also a point of difference. The Barelvis kiss their thumbs, while the Deobandis do not. The source explains that this is a point of disagreement even within Hanafi jurisprudence [14].
    • The speaker also says that both are incorrect in light of the Quran and Sunnah [14].

    Ijtihad and Modern Issues

    • The source states that the door of Ijtihad remains open until the Day of Judgment and that it is a beauty of Islam that allows people in different locations to address issues that are not directly covered in the Quran and Sunnah [1].
    • Ijtihad is considered necessary to address contemporary issues that did not exist at the time of the Prophet, such as those related to technology or modern life [1, 6].
    • Examples include issues of blood donation, praying in airplanes, and other contemporary matters [6].
    • The need for ijtihad allows the religion to remain relevant across time and cultures.
    • The sources mention that the scope of Ijtihad is limited to issues on which there is no consensus, and it does not contradict the Quran or Sunnah [1, 6].
    • The source says that Ijtihad should be performed by a wise person who is familiar with the proper process [6].

    Emphasis on the Quran and Sunnah

    • The sources consistently emphasize the importance of the Quran and Sunnah as the primary sources for guidance [1, 2, 5].
    • It states that all actions must be in accordance with the Quran and Sunnah [1].
    • The Prophet emphasized the importance of holding fast to the Quran and Sunnah [2].
    • The source indicates that the Quran and Sunnah should be considered the main source of information about religion [11].
    • The speaker indicates that the Sunnah is essential for understanding and practicing Islam. The method of prayer is not described in the Quran, but comes from the Sunnah [2].

    The Problem of Sectarianism and Jurisprudence

    • The source also suggests that sectarianism is a result of differences in jurisprudential interpretations and an over-emphasis on the opinions of specific scholars and imams [9, 13].
    • The speaker emphasizes that sectarianism is a curse and that Muslims should avoid it [3, 7].
    • He stresses the importance of focusing on the core values of the Quran and Sunnah.
    • He also suggests that each group should engage in intellectual discussion and not condemn others [3, 13].
    • He states that the Imams did not spread sectarianism; the fault is with their followers [8, 9].

    In summary, Islamic jurisprudence is a rich and complex system based on the Quran and the Sunnah, which is interpreted and applied through Ijma and Ijtihad. The sources show how this process has led to different schools of thought and varying interpretations of Islamic law and practice. While there is space for scholarly disagreement and the need to address contemporary issues, the sources also emphasize the need to avoid sectarianism and adhere to the core principles of the Quran and Sunnah.

    Quranic Interpretation and Sectarianism

    Quranic interpretation, or tafsir, is a crucial aspect of Islamic scholarship, involving the explanation and understanding of the Quran’s verses [1]. The sources discuss how different approaches to Quranic interpretation have contributed to sectarianism and varying understandings of Islam.

    Importance of the Quran:

    • The Quran is considered the direct word of God and the primary source of guidance in Islam [2, 3].
    • The sources emphasize the Quran as a source of unity, urging Muslims to hold fast to it [4].
    • It is considered a complete guide for humanity [5].
    • The Quran is the ultimate authority, and the Sunnah explains how to implement the Quranic teachings [3].

    Challenges in Quranic Interpretation:

    • The sources point out that differences in interpretation of the Quran are a major source of sectarianism [1, 5].
    • Each sect often has its own translation of the Quran, leading to varying understandings and disputes [1].
    • Some groups emphasize the literal reading of the Quran and Sunnah, while others focus on more metaphorical or contextual interpretations [1, 6, 7].
    • The Quran was meant to end differences between people, not create them. [1].

    The Role of the Sunnah:

    • The Sunnah, which encompasses the sayings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad, is essential for understanding and practicing Islam [3].
    • The method of prayer, for example, is not fully described in the Quran, but comes from the Sunnah [3].
    • The sources emphasize that the Sunnah is a necessary complement to the Quran, clarifying and elaborating on its teachings [3].
    • Both the Quran and the Sunnah should be followed as sources of guidance [3].

    The Problem of Sectarian Interpretations

    • The sources criticize the tendency of some groups to prioritize their own interpretations and traditions over the core message of the Quran [8].
    • Sectarian groups often consider their own interpretations as the only correct ones.
    • The speaker in the source notes that many Muslims read the Quran in Arabic without understanding its meaning, leading to misinterpretations and manipulations by religious leaders [1, 5].
    • Some groups emphasize the teachings of their own scholars and imams, while ignoring the core teachings of Islam from the Quran and Sunnah [8-10].
    • The source suggests that the Imams did not spread sectarianism; it is the fault of their followers [2, 11].
    • Sectarian interpretations of the Quran are seen as a deviation from the intended purpose of the scripture. [9]
    • Some groups reject valid hadith and only accept the teachings of their own imams, even when the imams’ teachings are not based on the Quran and Sunnah [12].

    The Correct Approach to Interpretation

    • The speaker emphasizes the importance of directly engaging with the Quran and Sunnah rather than relying on interpretations of religious clerics or scholars [10].
    • The sources suggest that the Quran is meant to be understood, not just recited without comprehension [1, 5].
    • There is a call for a return to the core principles of the Quran and Sunnah, without sectarian biases [3].
    • The sources suggest that scholarly discussion and intellectual engagement, rather than dogmatic adherence to specific interpretations, are necessary for proper understanding [9].
    • The sources refer to a hadith that calls for the community to refer to the Quran and Sunnah when there is a dispute [3, 13].
    • The speaker believes that the Quran is meant to unite people, not divide them [1].

    Historical Context and the Quran

    • The sources also suggest that the Quran must be understood in its historical context.
    • The speaker explains that the Quran was meant to be a guide for all people and that Muslims should not be like those who recite it without understanding [1].

    Ijtihad and Interpretation

    • The sources also touch on the role of ijtihad, or independent reasoning, in interpreting the Quran.
    • Ijtihad is used to interpret Islamic law when there is no direct guidance in the Quran or Sunnah [14].
    • The door of ijtihad is open until the Day of Judgment to address contemporary issues that did not exist at the time of the Prophet [15].
    • Ijtihad should be performed by a qualified scholar and should not contradict the Quran or Sunnah [14].

    In summary, Quranic interpretation is a critical aspect of Islamic practice, but it is also a source of sectarianism due to differences in how the text is understood. The sources call for a return to the Quran and Sunnah, and for direct engagement with the scripture, as well as an understanding of its original historical context. The sources emphasize the importance of using both the Quran and the Sunnah as guides and stress that the Quran is meant to be understood and not simply recited, while discouraging reliance on specific interpretations of religious clerics and scholars, in order to avoid sectarianism.

    Islamic Unity: Challenges and Pathways

    Religious unity is a significant theme in the sources, particularly in the context of Islam, where sectarianism and division are identified as major challenges. The sources emphasize the importance of the Quran and Sunnah as unifying forces, while also discussing the obstacles to achieving true unity among Muslims.

    Core Principles for Unity

    • The Quran is presented as the primary source of unity [1]. It is considered the direct word of God and the ultimate authority in Islam [2, 3].
    • Muslims are urged to hold fast to the Quran as a source of guidance and unity [1].
    • The Quran is meant to end differences between people, not create them [4].
    • The Sunnah, the teachings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad, is also crucial for unity [3].
    • The Sunnah is a necessary complement to the Quran, clarifying and elaborating on its teachings [3].
    • Both the Quran and the Sunnah should be followed as sources of guidance [3].
    • The concept of Ijma (consensus of Muslim scholars) is also mentioned as a source of unity, representing the collective understanding of Islamic law [5].
    • The sources state that the ummah will never agree on misguidance [5].
    • The sources emphasize that all Muslims are brothers and sisters and that they should respect each other [1, 6].

    Obstacles to Unity

    • Sectarianism is identified as a major obstacle to religious unity [1].
    • The sources note that sectarianism arises from differences in interpretations of the Quran and Sunnah, as well as from the overemphasis on the opinions of specific scholars [1, 7].
    • Each sect often has its own translation of the Quran, leading to varying understandings and disputes [4].
    • The sources criticize the tendency of some groups to prioritize their own interpretations and traditions over the core message of the Quran [8].
    • The speaker emphasizes that sectarianism is a curse and that Muslims should avoid it [1, 6].
    • The sources suggest that many Muslims read the Quran in Arabic without understanding its meaning, leading to misinterpretations and manipulations by religious leaders [4, 9].
    • Blind adherence to the opinions of religious clerics and scholars is also seen as a cause of disunity [4, 10].
    • The source suggests that the Imams did not spread sectarianism; it is the fault of their followers [1, 7, 11-13].
    • Internal conflicts and disputes within religious groups further exacerbate the problem [14].
    • The sources describe how disagreements within the Tablighi Jamaat led to its division into two factions, resulting in violence and animosity [2, 6, 12, 14, 15].
    • The sources also mention historical events, such as the conflict between the Deobandis and Barelvis and the Sunni and Shia split, as examples of how political and theological disagreements can lead to division [11, 16, 17].

    Pathways to Unity

    • The sources stress the importance of focusing on the core values of the Quran and Sunnah, rather than getting caught up in sectarian differences [1, 3, 5, 18].
    • Muslims should engage directly with the Quran and Sunnah, rather than relying on interpretations of religious clerics or scholars [4, 10].
    • Intellectual discussion and engagement, rather than condemnation of others, are necessary for proper understanding [8, 12].
    • The source suggests that each group should engage in intellectual discussion and not condemn others [12].
    • The sources emphasize the importance of tolerance and mutual respect among different groups [8, 11, 14].
    • Muslims should avoid labeling others as “hell-bound” [8].
    • The sources suggest that a recognition of the diversity of interpretations is necessary [8, 12].
    • The source states that the ummah cannot come together on one platform and that it should give space to everyone [12].
    • The sources point to the need for Ijtihad to address contemporary issues, which may contribute to a sense of shared understanding and engagement with faith in modern contexts [5, 19].
    • The source notes that the door of ijtihad is open until the Day of Judgment and that it is a beauty of Islam that allows people in different locations to address issues that are not directly covered in the Quran and Sunnah [5, 19].

    Emphasis on Shared Humanity

    • The sources highlight the importance of recognizing the shared humanity of all people and avoiding sectarianism and prejudice.
    • The source states that there is no prophet after the Prophet Muhammad and that Muslims should focus on the Quran and Sunnah [12].
    • The speaker emphasizes that despite differences in interpretation, all sects of Islam are considered Muslim [8].
    • The goal should be to foster unity based on the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah, while respecting the diversity of perspectives [12].

    In conclusion, the sources present a complex view of religious unity, acknowledging both the unifying potential of the Quran and Sunnah, and the divisive forces of sectarianism and misinterpretations. The path to unity, according to the sources, lies in a return to the core principles of Islam, fostering intellectual engagement, and promoting tolerance and mutual respect, while avoiding sectarianism and prejudice.

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • Truth, Martyrdom, and Survival

    Truth, Martyrdom, and Survival

    The text explores the tension between unwavering adherence to truth and the pragmatic need for self-preservation, particularly for leaders and idealists. It examines historical figures who prioritized truth and ideals, even at the cost of their lives, questioning whether compromise would have been a wiser choice. The author contemplates the value of martyrdom versus survival, suggesting that while unwavering commitment is admirable, preserving oneself to continue fighting for one’s ideals may be equally important. The piece ultimately advocates for a balanced approach, combining dedication with strategic self-preservation. This approach emphasizes the importance of continuing one’s mission and advocating for one’s beliefs.keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc

    The Realist’s Dilemma: Truth, Martyrdom, and Survival

    Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

    1. What is the author’s main concern regarding the pursuit of “hundred percent truth”?
    2. How does the author describe the relationship between truth and martyrdom?
    3. What is the “message from Darvesh to his new generations” regarding martyrdom?
    4. According to the author, what is the Sufi perspective on death compared to the perspective of those who celebrate it as “Urs”?
    5. How does the author connect the fear of death with the idea of being a believer?
    6. What is the author’s reaction to the deaths of historical figures like Abraham Lincoln and Mahatma Gandhi?
    7. What does the author suggest these historical figures could have done differently to potentially avoid their fates?
    8. How does the author characterize the leaders Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat in relation to their pursuit of truth?
    9. What advice does the author offer regarding the balance between bravery and wisdom in pursuing one’s ideals?
    10. What is the author’s interpretation of the relationship between love and patience?

    Quiz Answer Key

    1. The author worries that pursuing “hundred percent truth” can be dangerous, leading to being “cornered or disappeared.” He suggests that truth needs to be digestible and that speaking it without considering the consequences can be detrimental.
    2. The author suggests that speaking absolute truth, even if it results in martyrdom, is a lofty and admirable goal but acknowledges that deviating from the absolute truth to achieve reconciliation is sometimes necessary. Speaking the whole truth can lead to martyrdom, which the author believes should not be glorified.
    3. Darvesh advises future generations to avoid seeking martyrdom, emphasizing the importance of survival and love of life. Despite a theory of love that embraces sacrifice, Darvesh believes in finding ways to survive and live out one’s ideals.
    4. The Sufi perspective, according to the author, is one that loves life and therefore views death with horror as a separation from loved ones, not as a welcome reunion. Those who celebrate death as “Urs” view it as a connection to the beloved, which is contrary to the Sufi view that cherishes life.
    5. The author suggests that even those deeply devoted to their faith or ideals may fear death, which is seen as a “witch.” Acknowledging this fear does not diminish one’s faith, and it’s genuine and natural to want to avoid death.
    6. The author laments their deaths and wishes they had avoided the circumstances that led to their assassinations. He seems to think that they should have chosen a path of reconciliation.
    7. The author speculates that these figures could have adopted more moderate approaches, such as being more cautious with their security or compromising in their political actions, to avoid the extreme consequences. The author emphasizes avoiding the “hundred percent truth” to stay alive.
    8. Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat are portrayed as leaders who went too far in their pursuit of truth, honesty, and peace, which led to their violent deaths. They serve as examples of the dangers of extreme commitment to an ideal.
    9. The author suggests that while bravery and enthusiasm are valuable, wisdom and strategy are essential for pursuing ideals effectively. It emphasizes that staying alive and persevering in one’s mission is ultimately more effective than martyrdom.
    10. The author contrasts patience, which is necessary for love, with the impatience of desire. He implies that love requires a thoughtful, enduring approach, whereas desire can be quick and reckless.

    Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the author’s argument regarding the tension between adherence to truth and the practical considerations of political action, using specific historical examples from the text.
    2. Explore the author’s characterization of martyrdom and the different perspectives surrounding it, considering the motivations and consequences associated with both seeking and avoiding such a fate.
    3. Discuss the author’s critique of “hundred percent truth” and the implications of this critique on the role of idealism in personal and societal change.
    4. Examine the author’s perspective on the relationship between life and death, particularly concerning the Sufi view of avoiding death in contrast to the romantic or celebratory view.
    5. Evaluate the author’s advice on striking a balance between bravery, wisdom, and caution in the pursuit of ideals, considering the specific examples of the leaders discussed in the text.

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • Realism/Factualism: The idea of adhering strictly to facts and truth, even when they may be difficult or dangerous to express.
    • Martyrdom: The act of dying for a cause or belief, often seen as noble, but the author suggests it can be avoided.
    • Urs: A celebration of death in some traditions, viewed as a joyous reunion with the divine or a beloved.
    • Sufi: A mystical branch of Islam, the text portrays them as valuing life deeply and fearing the separation caused by death.
    • Darvesh: A term used here to indicate the author or a person espousing a contemplative, possibly mystical, perspective.
    • Hundred Percent Truth: The author’s phrase for absolute, uncompromised honesty and its potentially dangerous consequences.
    • Reconciliation: The act of finding middle ground or compromise rather than seeking absolute adherence to an ideal or belief.
    • Honi: A fatalistic term implying that an event is inevitable or meant to happen.
    • Wisdom with Truth: The idea of using strategic thinking with truth, advocating for a balance of bravery and thoughtful action.
    • Divine Masterpiece: The phrase the author uses for the human form.

    convert_to_textConvert to sourceNotebookLM can be inaccurate, please double check its responses.

    Truth, Martyrdom, and the Value of Life

    Okay, here’s a briefing document analyzing the provided text, focusing on its main themes and ideas:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” Excerpts

    Date: October 26, 2023

    Subject: Exploration of Truth, Martyrdom, and the Value of Life within the provided text.

    Introduction:

    This document analyzes the themes presented in the provided text, which appears to be a philosophical reflection on truth, martyrdom, and the pragmatic choices one must make while pursuing ideals. The author, possibly speaking through the persona of “Darwish,” grapples with the tension between unwavering commitment to truth and the need for self-preservation and strategic action. The text uses historical examples and personal reflections to illustrate its points.

    Key Themes and Ideas:

    1. The Paradox of Truth:
    • The text acknowledges that absolute truth (“hundred percent truth”) is a “lofty thing” and desirable, yet also potentially dangerous.
    • Quote: “Realism or factualism is such a lofty thing, I wish it was adopted completely, but what to do, it is compulsory that the truth can also be spoken as much as it is digested, otherwise you will be cornered or disappeared.”
    • This suggests that the unvarnished truth can be too difficult for society to accept or for an individual to bear. The author implies the need for a pragmatic approach to truth-telling, where the timing and method of delivery are as important as the truth itself.
    • The author questions whether total devotion to truth justifies martyrdom. “If you speak hundred percent truth even in the morning, then this rank will be at your feet.” Here, “rank” refers to “martyrdom”
    1. Rejection of Martyrdom as a Primary Goal:
    • While recognizing the sacrifice made by martyrs, the author explicitly advises against actively seeking martyrdom.
    • Quote: “Despite this theory of love, this message from Darvesh to his new generations is that do not have the interest of martyrdom. Even great personalities have sought refuge from trials or tests.”
    • The text uses the phrase “play the drum while hugging,” emphasizing the importance of enjoying life and its experiences while working towards one’s aims rather than succumbing to the pressure of death for ideals.
    • The author highlights that a premature death, even in pursuit of ideals, can be the “death of his mission.” In this case, they encourage strategic thinking and the prioritization of life.
    • This idea contrasts with a seemingly more fatalistic view of death, where it is seen as a release from suffering and a connection with the divine. The text challenges this perspective.
    1. The Value of Life and the Need for Survival:
    • The author emphasizes the importance of “loving life,” learning to survive, and avoiding self-destructive behavior.
    • Quote: “They always hum. Oh my heart! If you swear, don’t give up… If you are yours, call them… Don’t hide your face and don’t live with your head down, even if the time of sorrows comes, live with a smile.”
    • The text directly counters the notion of embracing death, particularly suicide, which it calls a “curse.” The focus is on perseverance and resilience rather than seeking an easy escape through death.
    • There’s an explicit fear of death, seen as a “witch” that snatches away loved ones, even from those who are believers.
    • Quote: “People say that a believer never fears death, but The truth is that despite the fact that the person is afraid of this witch of all Darveshi, should it be considered that he is not a believer…deep inside I also want this witch to stay away, stay away.”
    1. Strategic Action and the “Alternate Route”:
    • The text promotes the idea of “carving an alternate route” when faced with obstacles. This signifies the need to be strategic and adaptable in the pursuit of one’s goals.
    • Quote: “Lette if you see a roadway being closed you find or carve an alternate route immediately.” This reinforces the idea that one should navigate life with cleverness and creativity, rather than rigidly following a path that may lead to ruin.
    • This strategic approach extends to political and social action, where the author suggests that choosing life over martyrdom can ultimately be more effective.
    1. Historical Examples:
    • The text uses historical figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Yitzhak Rabin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto, to illustrate the consequences of taking extreme stands on truth.
    • These examples often point to leaders who, while admirable, perhaps made themselves vulnerable through their uncompromising stances and were killed as a result.
    • The text suggests that these figures may have been able to accomplish more for their ideals had they considered personal security and adopted a more strategic approach.
    1. The Wisdom of Patience and Strategy:
    • The text contrasts “enthusiasm and stupidity” with “wisdom and truth.”
    • Quote: “There is no distance, similarly you can call wisdom cowardice but wisdom with truth is that a man should prefer life over death for the sake of his ideals and for his loved ones.”
    • The analogy of a cricket match (“stay on the crease with strategy, then you will be able to score for the nation”) emphasizes that long-term effectiveness depends on patience and thoughtful action, not just impulsive bravery.
    • The concluding line, “Love requires patience and desire impatient”, encapsulates this idea that achieving meaningful change requires a sustained, patient approach.

    Conclusion:

    The text presents a nuanced perspective on the pursuit of truth and ideals. It challenges the romantic notion of martyrdom as the ultimate expression of devotion and instead advocates for a more pragmatic and life-affirming approach. The author stresses the importance of strategic action, adaptability, and a deep appreciation for life, even in the face of adversity. The core message is that one can best serve their ideals by staying alive and fighting for them strategically, rather than sacrificing oneself prematurely on the altar of martyrdom.convert_to_textConvert to source

    Truth, Action, and Strategic Survival

    Frequently Asked Questions

    • What is the central conflict explored in the text regarding truth and action? The text grapples with the tension between absolute adherence to truth and the pragmatic need for survival and achieving long-term goals. The author suggests that while truth is paramount, unwavering commitment to it can lead to martyrdom and hinder one’s ability to effect change. There’s an ongoing contemplation about whether compromising, or finding an “alternate route,” could be more effective than absolute truth-telling in certain circumstances.
    • How does the author view the concept of martyrdom? While acknowledging the “glory” of sacrificing oneself for ideals, the author cautions against seeking martyrdom. The text emphasizes the importance of valuing life and finding ways to survive and continue working towards one’s goals, rather than prematurely ending one’s mission through death. The idea is that those who live longer can do more for the causes they champion.
    • What is the author’s perspective on the fear of death? The author reveals a personal fear of death, even in the context of spiritual or mystical beliefs. While some traditions see death as a welcome reunion with the divine, the author, along with a Sufi perspective, sees death as something to be avoided because it is a separation from loved ones and the pursuit of ideals. The author distinguishes between the idea of death as a “connection” and the more human fear of its finality.
    • How does the author view figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, and other leaders who faced violence? The author admires these historical figures for their commitment to ideals, but also questions whether they could have achieved more by being more strategic and cautious. The text suggests that even the greatest leaders made choices that might have been different had they considered survival and the long-term impact of their actions. The author considers it tragic that the directness of these leaders led to their untimely deaths.
    • Why does the author question the idea of “100% truth”? The author argues that while truth is a “lofty thing,” absolute adherence to it can be dangerous and counterproductive. There are times when speaking the whole truth immediately may lead to being “cornered or disappeared.” The author advocates for a more nuanced approach, where truth is balanced with the need for strategy and the goal of staying alive to continue one’s mission.
    • What is the author’s comparison of “enthusiasm” and “wisdom”? The author equates enthusiasm without strategy to stupidity, and conversely, without truth to cowardice. True wisdom, in their eyes, lies in striking a balance between these two extremes. It’s about living a life that not only seeks to achieve ideals, but also values life and finds a way to continue doing good work by taking a patient, strategic approach. This may mean avoiding direct conflict at times in order to have a long term impact.
    • What does the text imply about patience in achieving goals? The text emphasizes the importance of patience, likening it to a long and challenging cricket match. It suggests that it is easy to be rash and lose one’s life for ideals, but true success involves perseverance. It suggests that real victory will come through surviving difficult times and continuing to work towards goals. This includes learning how to live through struggles and staying true to ideals.
    • What is the author’s concluding message? The author’s overall message is a call for balance and strategic action in pursuit of ideals. While valuing truth and commitment, the text underscores the importance of preserving life and finding ways to continue working towards goals, even when faced with adversity. It’s a message that emphasizes both the strength of conviction and the wisdom of strategic survival.

    The Price of Truth: Martyrdom and Idealism

    Okay, here is a timeline and cast of characters based on the provided text:

    Timeline of Events and Reflections:

    • General Observation: The text is primarily a meditation on the dangers of absolute truth and the sacrifices people make for their ideals. It’s not a traditional historical narrative but a reflection on historical figures.
    • Recurring Theme of Martyrdom: The writer frequently contemplates the martyrdom and deaths of significant figures, including those in their own life and throughout history, and questions if their deaths could have been avoided through compromise.
    • Philosophical Reflection: The author discusses the importance of realism and survival alongside the commitment to truth and ideals. They advocate for a path that prioritizes living and advancing ideals rather than martyrdom.
    • Discussion of “Urs”: The author contrasts the celebration of death in some traditions (Urs) with a perspective that values life and continued engagement with ideals.
    • Baba Ji’s Statement: The author recounts a statement from “Baba Ji” expressing a fear of death, even amongst mystics, despite the common belief that believers do not fear it.
    • Historical Examples of Martyrdom: The author reflects upon deaths of Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Yitzhak Rabin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto, arguing that while these figures fought for truth and ideals they could have avoided their violent ends with more caution and pragmatism.
    • Discussion with Journalist: The author recalls a conversation with a journalist about the approaches of two Pakistani Prime Ministers, Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, and how the author advocated a patient and strategic approach over bold action.
    • Closing Thought: The author concludes with a reflection on the tension between patience (required for love) and impatience (born of desire).

    Cast of Characters and Brief Bios:

    • Darwish: The author of the text. A person deeply concerned with the nature of truth, martyrdom, and the best ways to advance ideals. They seem to have a Sufi or mystic background, and have had many personal losses. They are now advising their own generation against seeking martyrdom.
    • Baba Ji: A spiritual figure or elder, likely within a Sufi tradition, who reveals a surprising fear of death. They act as a source of wisdom for the author and others.
    • Ashfaq Ahmed: Someone to whom Baba Ji is speaking, suggesting a close relationship or audience.
    • Olul-Azam: A reference to a “great personality” who “ended human slavery,” an indirect reference to Abraham Lincoln.
    • Abraham Lincoln: (1809-1865) The 16th President of the United States. He led the Union through the American Civil War and issued the Emancipation Proclamation which helped abolish slavery. He was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth at a theatre.
    • Mahatma Gandhi: (1869-1948) An Indian lawyer, anti-colonial nationalist, and political ethicist, who employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India’s independence from British rule, and was assassinated for his beliefs.
    • Yitzhak Rabin: (1922-1995) The Prime Minister of Israel who was assassinated by a Jewish extremist for his peace efforts with Palestinians.
    • Anwar Sadat: (1918-1981) The President of Egypt who was assassinated by Islamic extremists for signing a peace treaty with Israel.
    • Indira Gandhi: (1917-1984) The Prime Minister of India, assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards in retaliation for military action against separatists.
    • Benazir Bhutto: (1953-2007) The Prime Minister of Pakistan, who was assassinated after leading a rally.
    • Bhutto: Likely referencing Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (1928-1979), the former President and Prime Minister of Pakistan. This may also be a reference to Benazir Bhutto above. The text refers to the former and the other being more like the latter, which suggest this was about Zulfiqar Ali.
    • Nawaz Sharif: A Pakistani politician who has served as the Prime Minister of Pakistan three times. The author contrasts his approach with that of Bhutto.
    • Unnamed Journalist: A friend of the author who they have discussed the approaches of various political figures with.

    This structure should provide a good overview of the text’s content and the people it mentions. The key takeaway from this text is the author’s contemplation of truth, martyrdom, and the value of life and strategic engagement with difficult circumstances.convert_to_textConvert to source

    Truth, Survival, and Strategy

    The sources discuss a tension between adhering to absolute truth and ensuring survival, suggesting that while truth is a noble goal, it can be dangerous and may need to be tempered for the sake of achieving greater ideals or protecting oneself and others [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of the key ideas:

    • The Peril of Absolute Truth: The sources argue that speaking the “hundred percent truth” can lead to being “cornered or disappeared” [1]. The text uses examples of historical figures who were killed because of their commitment to their ideals [2]. These figures include Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadats, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto [2, 3]. It suggests that they might have survived if they had been more careful or had found a middle path [2, 3].
    • Reconciliation and Compromise: The text suggests that sometimes it’s necessary to deviate “a little from the absolute truth” and seek reconciliation or compromise in order to survive and continue to work towards one’s goals [4]. The analogy of finding an alternate route when a road is closed is used [4].
    • The Value of Life: Despite admiration for martyrdom, the text emphasizes the importance of valuing life and learning ways to survive [5]. It argues that great personalities have sought refuge from trials and tests, and that one should always love life [5]. Suicide is deemed “a curse” by the “lovers of life” [5].
    • The Mission vs. Death: The text discusses how dying for a mission or ideal can lead to the “death of his mission” [4]. It argues that it is better to survive and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [3]. The text says that it’s not hard to achieve martyrdom, but it is more difficult to stay in the game with strategy [3].
    • Wisdom and Strategy: The text contrasts bravery and wisdom, and suggests that wisdom with truth involves preferring life over death for the sake of ideals and loved ones [3]. This means using strategy to stay in the “crease” and “score for the nation” [3].
    • Love for life and a rejection of death: The sources indicate that some see death as beloved and a “remover of sorrows”, however others, particularly those in the Sufi tradition see death as a horror that snatches away loved ones and dream gatherings. They choose instead to live life to the fullest with loved ones [6]. The sources suggest that one should face sorrows with a smile rather than give up [5].
    • The Nature of Love: The source contrasts love and desire, stating that “Love requires patience and desire impatient” [7].

    In conclusion, the sources suggest that while truth is an important principle, it is not always practical or safe to pursue it without considering the consequences. The text advocates for a balanced approach that values both truth and survival, emphasizing the need for strategy, wisdom, and a love for life in order to achieve one’s goals and protect oneself and others [3, 5].

    Martyrdom and the Pursuit of Ideals

    The sources discuss martyrdom in the context of pursuing ideals, highlighting a tension between the perceived glory of martyrdom and the practical need for survival to achieve those ideals. Here’s a breakdown of the key ideas:

    • Martyrdom as a Potential Outcome: The sources acknowledge that speaking the absolute truth or pursuing lofty ideals can lead to martyrdom, suggesting that it can be a consequence of uncompromising dedication to one’s beliefs [1]. The text notes that if someone speaks the “hundred percent truth,” they may be “cornered or disappeared” [1].
    • The Questionable Value of Martyrdom: While martyrdom is sometimes seen as a noble sacrifice, the sources question its value, arguing that it can lead to the “death of his mission” [2]. It suggests that it is better to survive and continue working toward one’s ideals than to die for them. The text explains that achieving martyrdom is not difficult, but it is harder to stay in the game with strategy [3].
    • Examples of Martyrs: The text gives examples of historical figures who were martyred for their ideals, such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadats, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto [3, 4]. It is suggested that these individuals might have survived if they had been more careful or had found a middle path [4].
    • A Rejection of Martyrdom: Despite the admiration for martyrs, the text conveys a message to new generations to not have the “interest of martyrdom” [5]. It emphasizes the importance of valuing life and learning ways to survive. The text notes that great personalities have sought refuge from trials and tests, and that one should always love life [5]. The source notes that suicide is considered a curse because those who love life do not allow that negative thought to come near them [5].
    • Strategic Survival: The sources advocate for a strategic approach to pursuing ideals, suggesting that one should prefer life over death for the sake of those ideals and loved ones [3]. This involves using wisdom and strategy to stay in the game and work towards one’s goals, rather than seeking martyrdom [3]. It also suggests that one should be patient, because “love requires patience” [6].
    • Conflicting Views of Death: The text discusses how some people view death as “beloved” and a “remover of sorrows” [7]. However, others, particularly those in the Sufi tradition, view death as a horror that snatches away loved ones and the gatherings of dreams [7]. The source suggests that it is important to live life to the fullest, with a love of life, and to face sorrows with a smile [5, 7].

    In conclusion, the sources present a nuanced view of martyrdom, recognizing its potential nobility while emphasizing the importance of survival and strategic action in order to achieve one’s ideals. The text encourages a love for life, and suggests that it is better to live and work towards one’s ideals, rather than die for them.

    Truth, Safety, and Strategic Survival

    The sources explore the complex relationship between truth and safety, suggesting that a constant balancing act is required when pursuing ideals and navigating life. Here’s an overview of how the sources address this balance:

    • Truth as a Danger: The sources make it clear that adhering to absolute truth can be dangerous [1, 2]. Speaking the “hundred percent truth” can lead to being “cornered or disappeared” [1]. The text references historical figures such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, and Anwar Sadats, who were killed because of their commitment to their ideals, suggesting that their dedication to truth put them in harm’s way [2].
    • The Need for Reconciliation: To avoid danger, the sources propose deviating “a little from the absolute truth” and seeking reconciliation or compromise as a way to survive and continue working towards one’s goals [3]. This is illustrated by the analogy of finding an alternate route when a road is closed [3]. This suggests that sometimes a compromise on truth is necessary for safety and achieving goals.
    • Strategic Survival: The text emphasizes that it is better to survive and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [3, 4]. It suggests that achieving martyrdom is not difficult, but it is harder to stay in the game with strategy [5]. This involves using wisdom to navigate difficult situations and prioritize life, not just truth.
    • Valuing Life: The sources strongly advocate for valuing life and learning ways to survive [4]. Even while acknowledging the potential nobility of martyrdom, the text advises against seeking it and emphasizes the importance of loving life [4]. The text notes that great personalities have sought refuge from trials and tests, and one should always love life.
    • Wisdom and Strategy: The text argues that “wisdom with truth” involves preferring life over death for the sake of ideals and loved ones [5]. This means using strategy to stay in the “crease” and “score for the nation” [5]. This also suggests that pursuing truth without caution is not wise.
    • Finding a Middle Path: The sources imply that it is important to find a middle path between absolute truth and safety. This is presented by the assertion that figures like Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto might have survived if they had been more careful and not gone “so far in truth” or been “careless about their security” [2, 5].
    • Patience: The source states “Love requires patience and desire impatient” [6]. In the context of a discussion about truth and safety, this might mean being patient and strategic when pursuing ideals rather than being reckless and impulsive.

    In conclusion, the sources suggest that balancing truth and safety is a complex process that requires careful consideration. While truth is presented as a noble goal, it must be tempered with wisdom and a desire for survival to achieve one’s goals. The text advocates for a strategic approach that values life and finds a middle path between absolute truth and the need for safety. The sources suggest that one should pursue truth with caution and patience.

    Love, Life, and Ideals

    The sources present a strong connection between love and life, emphasizing the importance of valuing life and living it fully, especially when pursuing ideals. Here’s a breakdown of the key ideas regarding love and life as presented in the sources:

    • Love of Life: The sources repeatedly stress the importance of loving life. It is suggested that even when faced with challenges or the pursuit of difficult goals, one should “always love life” [1]. This love of life is presented as a fundamental principle, which is linked to the desire to avoid death and to continue to pursue one’s ideals. The text explains that “lovers of life” reject suicide [1].
    • Life as a Priority: The text suggests that life should be prioritized over martyrdom [2, 3]. It is argued that while martyrdom may seem like a noble sacrifice, it can lead to the “death of his mission” [2]. The sources suggest it’s more beneficial to survive and continue working towards one’s ideals. A strategic approach is advised, where one “should prefer life over death for the sake of his ideals and for his loved ones” [3].
    • Love and Patience: The sources make a distinction between love and desire, stating that “Love requires patience and desire impatient” [4]. This suggests that true love, especially when connected to ideals, requires a long-term commitment and strategic thinking rather than impulsive action [3, 4]. This patience would be necessary to balance the pursuit of truth and safety.
    • Life’s Challenges: The sources acknowledge that life is full of challenges and that “the time of sorrows comes” [1]. However, they advocate for facing these challenges with a positive attitude, encouraging people to “live with a smile” [1]. This emphasizes the importance of resilience and maintaining hope even in difficult times.
    • Rejection of Death: While some may view death as a welcome release or a way to connect with the beloved, the sources emphasize a different perspective, particularly from the Sufi tradition. They view death as “a horror” and a “witch” that snatches away loved ones [5]. This perspective underscores the importance of cherishing life and the relationships one has, therefore advocating for survival and connection.
    • Love for Others: The sources also discuss the importance of love for others and their connection to life. The source says that a “Moderate sect, Suf, is a divine masterpiece, that is humanity” and they “have so much love that he wants to live with his loved ones, so he loves his life to the fullest that he does not want separation or separation from the spread of his beloved ideals like his dear loved ones and friends.” [5] This love for others inspires the desire to live life to the fullest.
    • Strategic Living: The idea of living strategically also ties into the concept of love and life [3]. The source says that to “stay on the crease with strategy” means that you can work to “score for the nation.” [3] This suggests that loving life means taking the actions necessary to ensure that one’s life is meaningful and contributes to a larger purpose.

    In conclusion, the sources present a perspective that prioritizes love of life as an important part of pursuing ideals and working toward a larger purpose. The sources suggest that love is linked to patience and strategy, that one should love life and face challenges with a smile, and that it is better to live and fight for ideals than to die for them.convert_to_textConvert to source

    Martyrdom vs. Legacy: A Strategic Approach to Life’s Purpose

    The sources present a complex perspective on death and legacy, highlighting a tension between the potential glory of martyrdom and the more lasting impact of a life lived in pursuit of ideals [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of how the sources address death and legacy:

    • Martyrdom vs. Legacy: The sources acknowledge that martyrdom is a possible outcome for those who pursue truth and ideals, but it questions whether this is the best way to create a lasting legacy [1, 3]. While martyrdom might bring immediate recognition, the sources suggest it can also lead to the “death of his mission” [1]. This implies that a legacy built through sustained effort and strategic action may be more effective than one achieved through sacrifice alone. The sources state that if one dies for their ideals, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [1].
    • The Questionable Value of Death: Some people view death as a welcome release, a “remover of sorrows”, and a way to connect with the beloved [4]. However, the sources also present a contrasting viewpoint, especially from the Sufi tradition, which sees death as a “horror” that “snatches the loving touch of loved ones” [4]. This suggests that death may not be a desirable end, and that a legacy of life and love may be more valuable than a legacy of death [4].
    • Living for a Mission: The sources imply that a more impactful legacy is created by continuing to live and work towards one’s goals. The text states that “if you stay on the crease with strategy, then you will be able to score for the nation” [5]. This suggests that a person’s legacy should be measured by their ongoing contributions and the impact they have on society, rather than simply by their death. The sources suggest that it is better to live and work towards one’s ideals than to die for them [1, 2].
    • Examples of Martyrs: The sources give examples of historical figures who were martyred for their ideals, such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadats, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto [5, 6]. However, it is also suggested that these individuals might have had a greater and more positive legacy if they had been more careful, survived, and continued their work. The text notes, “if he would not have gone so far in supporting Muslims, he would not have made his Hindu majority extremists angry and angry with him,” suggesting a more strategic path may have allowed him to have a larger impact [6].
    • Strategic Survival and Legacy: The sources advocate for a strategic approach to pursuing ideals, suggesting that one should prefer life over death for the sake of their mission and their loved ones [5]. By valuing life and finding ways to survive, one can continue to contribute to society and build a more lasting legacy. This is also tied to the idea of patience, because “love requires patience and desire impatient” [7]. A lasting legacy is often built over time through sustained action.
    • Love as a Legacy: The source suggests that love is also an important part of legacy. A “Moderate sect, Suf, is a divine masterpiece, that is humanity” [4]. They “have so much love that he wants to live with his loved ones, so he loves his life to the fullest that he does not want separation or separation from the spread of his beloved ideals like his dear loved ones and friends” [4]. This suggests that the way one lives and loves becomes an important part of their legacy.

    In conclusion, the sources suggest that a lasting legacy is best achieved not through martyrdom, but through a life lived strategically and with purpose, marked by love and continued work toward one’s ideals [1, 2, 4]. While death is an inevitable part of life, the emphasis is on valuing life and creating a legacy through positive contributions to society [4, 5].convert_to_textConvert to source

    Truth, Strategy, and Survival

    The author views the balance between truth and self-preservation as a complex and delicate act, emphasizing that while truth is a noble goal, it should be tempered with a strategic approach that prioritizes life and safety [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of the author’s perspective:

    • Truth can be Dangerous: The author acknowledges that adhering to absolute truth can be dangerous and can lead to negative consequences [1, 4]. The phrase “if you speak hundred percent truth even in the morning, then this rank will be at your feet,” suggests that while speaking the truth is desirable, it can also be risky. The author points to historical figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, and others, whose dedication to their ideals led to their deaths, suggesting that a commitment to truth without caution can put one in harm’s way [4].
    • The Need for Compromise: The author proposes that deviating “a little from the absolute truth” and seeking reconciliation is sometimes necessary for self-preservation [2]. This implies that a pragmatic approach is needed where one might have to make compromises to survive and continue working towards one’s goals. The analogy of finding an alternate route when a road is closed further emphasizes the need to find ways around obstacles, rather than directly confronting them [2].
    • Strategic Survival is Key: The author emphasizes the importance of strategic survival, suggesting it’s better to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [2, 5]. The text suggests that achieving martyrdom is not difficult, but it is harder to stay in the game with strategy, and that one “should prefer life over death for the sake of his ideals and for his loved ones” [2, 5].
    • Valuing Life: The author stresses the importance of valuing life and learning ways to survive [3, 6]. The author argues that “lovers of life” reject suicide, and that even great personalities have sought refuge from trials and tests, indicating that protecting one’s life is a natural and wise course of action [3].
    • Wisdom with Truth: The author advocates for “wisdom with truth,” which involves prioritizing life while still working towards one’s goals [5]. This means strategically navigating difficult situations to stay alive and continue contributing. The author suggests that one needs to be patient and wise when pursuing truth and safety, because “love requires patience and desire impatient” [7].
    • Middle Path: The author implies the need to find a middle path between absolute truth and safety, suggesting that being careless about one’s security can have dire consequences [4, 5]. The author notes that figures such as Mahatma Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto may have survived and continued their work if they had been more careful.
    • Legacy: The author believes that a more lasting and positive legacy is built through continued effort, love, and strategic action, rather than through martyrdom [2, 3]. The author suggests that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” and this implies that one’s impact on society is more important than the manner of their death [5].

    In conclusion, the author’s view is that while truth is important, it should be pursued with caution and strategy [1, 2, 5]. The author advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes self-preservation and continued engagement in working toward one’s goals [2, 3]. This involves being willing to make compromises, valuing life, and being patient and strategic in the pursuit of one’s ideals [2, 5, 7]. The author does not advocate for abandoning truth, but rather for finding a way to live it with wisdom and strategy [5].

    Truth, Survival, and Leadership

    The sources use several historical figures to illustrate the central conflict between adhering to absolute truth and the need for self-preservation. These examples highlight the risks of pursuing ideals without considering personal safety and the potential for a greater legacy through strategic survival [1, 2]. Here are some of the key figures mentioned and how they relate to the text’s themes:

    • Abraham Lincoln: The source states that Lincoln, a “great personality who actually ended human slavery,” was “brutally killed” [1]. The author contemplates that Lincoln might have survived if he had not gone to the theater that night, but concedes that he may have been targeted regardless due to the political climate of the time [1]. This example shows the risk that leaders who take strong stances on important issues face. It also suggests a tension between acting on principle and the very real dangers that can result.
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The author reflects that if Gandhi had not gone “so far in supporting Muslims,” he might not have angered Hindu extremists [1]. The text also notes that he went “far in truth” even though he was aware that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [1]. This example illustrates the idea that sometimes a more strategic path may lead to greater impact and less personal danger. It emphasizes that while truth is important, it may need to be pursued with caution. The author questions why he did not “think something for his ideals,” implying that a more measured approach may have led to a longer life and more positive outcome for his mission [1].
    • Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat: These two leaders, who pursued “truth, honesty, peace and security,” became targets of violence within their own nations [1]. Like the others, this example demonstrates how pursuing one’s ideals can make a person a target [1]. The author suggests that they “should have found a seed path” [1]. This highlights the author’s belief that a more strategic approach might have been beneficial, suggesting that their deaths, while perhaps noble, may have been avoidable.
    • Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto: These leaders “sacrificed themselves for their national goals or lofty ideals” [2]. The author suggests that both “should have been careful about their security” and were “punished by direct terror,” noting that they “acted fairly careless” [2]. This emphasizes the need for leaders to be mindful of their safety while pursuing their goals, suggesting that being careless about one’s security can have dire consequences.

    These examples underscore the central tension explored in the text: while truth and ideals are important, they should be pursued with an understanding of the potential risks. The author seems to suggest that a strategic approach that values self-preservation and allows for continued work towards one’s goals is often more effective than a path that leads to martyrdom. By using these specific examples, the author highlights that great leaders and thinkers are not immune to this tension and that their actions have important lessons for those who aspire to lead or to make a difference in the world.

    Truth, Self-Preservation, and Strategic Living

    The author reconciles the pursuit of truth with self-preservation by advocating for a strategic and balanced approach, where truth is not abandoned but pursued with wisdom and caution. The author does not see truth and self-preservation as mutually exclusive but rather as interconnected aspects of a meaningful life. Here’s a breakdown of how the author reconciles these concepts:

    • Truth as a High Ideal but not an Absolute Mandate: The author acknowledges the importance of truth, calling “Realism or factualism” a “lofty thing” [1]. However, the author also recognizes that speaking “hundred percent truth” can be dangerous [1, 2]. This suggests that while truth is a valued goal, it is not something that should be pursued at all costs, particularly when it puts one’s life in danger.
    • Strategic Compromise: The author proposes that deviating “a little from the absolute truth” and seeking “some reconciliation” can be necessary for self-preservation [3]. This indicates a pragmatic approach, where one might need to make compromises to survive and continue working towards their ideals. This is further emphasized by the analogy of finding an alternate route when a road is closed [3]. The sources suggest that it’s sometimes necessary to navigate around obstacles strategically, rather than directly confronting them.
    • Living for the Mission: The author stresses the importance of valuing life and suggests that it’s better to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [3, 4]. The text implies that “if you stay on the crease with strategy, then you will be able to score for the nation” [4]. This emphasizes that a person’s legacy should be measured by their continued contributions and impact on society, rather than by a single act of martyrdom.
    • Wisdom and Patience: The author advocates for “wisdom with truth,” which involves prioritizing life while still working towards one’s goals [4]. This approach involves being patient and strategic in pursuing truth and safety, because “love requires patience and desire impatient” [5]. This implies that achieving a lasting impact often requires time, careful planning, and a strategic approach to both truth and self-preservation.
    • Learning from Historical Examples: The author uses examples of historical figures who died for their ideals, such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto, to illustrate the risks of pursuing truth without caution [2, 4]. These examples emphasize that while their actions may have been noble, a more strategic approach that prioritized their safety could have led to even more significant positive outcomes [2, 4]. The author questions why Gandhi did not “think something for his ideals,” implying a more measured path might have allowed him to achieve more [2].
    • Valuing Life: The author emphasizes that even “great personalities have sought refuge from trials or tests” [6]. The author also points out that “lovers of life never allow such a negative approach to come near them” [6]. This suggests that protecting one’s life is a natural and wise course of action.
    • Avoiding Martyrdom: The author’s message to “new generations” is “do not have the interest of martyrdom” [6]. This is because “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [3]. The text emphasizes the importance of focusing on continuing a mission, and not ending it prematurely, by avoiding martyrdom and choosing to survive.
    • Love as a Driving Force: The author’s perspective is informed by the Sufi tradition, which values love and life. They “have so much love that he wants to live with his loved ones, so he loves his life to the fullest that he does not want separation or separation from the spread of his beloved ideals like his dear loved ones and friends” [7].

    In conclusion, the author reconciles the pursuit of truth with self-preservation by suggesting that they are not opposing concepts. Instead, the author proposes that truth should be pursued with wisdom, strategy, and a focus on long-term impact, rather than through reckless acts of martyrdom. The author advocates for a path that values life and love, while still making meaningful contributions to society and adhering to one’s ideals. The author sees a greater value in living for a cause than dying for one.

    Truth, Ideals, and Self-Preservation

    The author provides several examples of historical figures who, in their view, prioritized truth and their ideals over self-preservation, often leading to their deaths [1-4]. These examples serve to illustrate the central conflict of the text and to support the author’s argument for a more strategic approach to pursuing truth [2, 3]. Here are the historical figures the author discusses in this context:

    • Abraham Lincoln: The author mentions that Lincoln, who “ended human slavery,” was “brutally killed” [3]. The author contemplates that perhaps Lincoln could have avoided his assassination if he had not gone to the theater. However, the author also notes that the political climate of the time may have made him a target regardless [3]. This example demonstrates the dangers faced by leaders who champion strong ideals [3].
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The author suggests that Gandhi’s unwavering support for Muslims may have angered Hindu extremists, ultimately leading to his death [3]. The author reflects that Gandhi went “far in truth” despite knowing that “hundred percent truth is dangerous”. The text questions why Gandhi did not “think something for his ideals,” implying that perhaps a more cautious approach might have allowed him to achieve his goals while avoiding assassination [3]. This example is used to emphasize that sometimes a more strategic and less confrontational approach may be necessary for self-preservation [2, 3].
    • Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat: These two leaders pursued “truth, honesty, peace and security,” but became targets of violence within their own nations [3]. Their deaths are presented as examples of the risks involved in pursuing truth without considering personal safety [3]. The author suggests that they “should have found a seed path,” implying that perhaps they could have been more strategic in their pursuit of peace and security [3].
    • Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto: These leaders “sacrificed themselves for their national goals or lofty ideals” [4]. The author notes that both “should have been careful about their security” and were “punished by direct terror,” indicating that their deaths could have been avoided if they had been more cautious [4]. This highlights the need for leaders to be mindful of their safety while pursuing their goals [4].

    These examples illustrate the author’s central argument that while truth and ideals are important, they should be pursued strategically, with an awareness of the potential risks and with an effort to preserve one’s life [1-4]. The author does not see martyrdom as the goal, but rather a continued effort towards one’s mission as the most important thing [2, 4, 5]. The author also implies that these figures might have had a more significant and lasting impact if they had prioritized self-preservation along with their commitment to truth [2-5].

    Idealism and Self-Preservation: A Strategic Approach

    The text discusses several historical figures who faced the dilemma of choosing between adhering to their ideals and ensuring their self-preservation [1, 2]. These figures serve as examples of the risks involved in prioritizing truth and ideals above all else and highlight the author’s argument for a more strategic approach. Here are the historical figures discussed:

    • Abraham Lincoln: The author reflects on Lincoln’s assassination and suggests that his death might have been avoided had he not gone to the theater that night [3]. However, the author also notes that the political climate of the time made him a target, regardless [3]. This example illustrates the dangers that leaders who take strong stances on important issues can face.
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The author suggests that Gandhi’s strong support for Muslims may have contributed to his assassination by Hindu extremists [3]. The author notes that Gandhi went “far in truth,” despite knowing that “hundred percent truth is dangerous,” and questions why he did not “think something for his ideals” [3]. This example illustrates the idea that sometimes a more strategic path may lead to greater impact and less personal danger.
    • Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat: The author states that these leaders, who pursued “truth, honesty, peace, and security,” were targeted and killed by violent factions within their own nations [3]. The text suggests that these leaders “should have found a seed path,” indicating a belief that a more cautious approach might have been beneficial [3].
    • Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto: These leaders “sacrificed themselves for their national goals or lofty ideals” [4]. The author suggests that both “should have been careful about their security” and were “punished by direct terror,” noting that they “acted fairly careless” [4]. This example demonstrates the importance of leaders being mindful of their safety while pursuing their goals.

    These historical figures are presented to support the author’s argument that while truth and ideals are important, they should be pursued strategically, with an awareness of the potential risks and with an effort to preserve one’s life [3, 4]. The author emphasizes that a continued effort towards one’s mission is more important than martyrdom [2, 5].

    The Strategic Pursuit of Ideals

    The author does not view martyrdom as a desirable goal, but rather as a potential outcome to be avoided through strategic action and self-preservation [1]. The author believes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of the author’s perspective on martyrdom:

    • Martyrdom as a Loss of Mission: The author argues that “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [1, 2]. This highlights that martyrdom prematurely ends a person’s ability to contribute to their cause, making it a negative outcome [2]. The focus should be on the continued pursuit of a mission, not on achieving martyrdom [1, 2].
    • Rejection of Martyrdom as a Goal: The author explicitly states that “this message from Darvesh to his new generations is that do not have the interest of martyrdom” [1]. This shows that the author actively discourages seeking martyrdom.
    • Emphasis on Survival: The author stresses that “you always love life” and emphasizes the need to “learn ways to survive” [1]. The author suggests that even great personalities have sought to avoid trials [1]. Additionally, the author notes that “lovers of life never allow such a negative approach to come near them” [1]. This implies a natural inclination towards self-preservation and suggests that it is a wise path to take, as opposed to the “negative approach” of martyrdom [1].
    • Strategic Action over Martyrdom: The author advocates for a strategic approach to pursuing one’s ideals, suggesting that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” [3]. This implies that continuous efforts and contributions are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom.
    • Historical Examples: The author uses historical examples of figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate how prioritizing truth over self-preservation can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of their mission [3, 4]. The author suggests that these figures may have had a more lasting impact had they been more strategic in their approach to personal safety [3, 4].
    • Value of Life and Love: The author’s Sufi perspective emphasizes love and life. The author believes in living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals, rather than choosing separation or death. Death is viewed as a “witch” that snatches away loved ones, and the author acknowledges that he also wants to avoid this “witch” [5]. This viewpoint contrasts with those who “welcome death” as a way to connect with the divine [5]. The author wants to remain and spread love in life.

    In summary, the author’s view on martyrdom is that it is not a desirable goal and should be avoided through strategic action and a focus on self-preservation. The author believes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s mission than to die for it.

    Strategic Survival: A Philosophy of Action

    Darvesh advises that one should prioritize survival and strategic action in the pursuit of their ideals, rather than seeking martyrdom [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of the advice offered:

    • Avoid Martyrdom: Darvesh explicitly advises against having an “interest of martyrdom” [3]. The author suggests that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s mission than to die for it [2, 3]. Martyrdom is viewed as the end of a mission, not its culmination [2].
    • Prioritize Survival: The author emphasizes the importance of loving life and learning “ways to survive” [3]. The text suggests that even great personalities have sought refuge from trials, implying that self-preservation is a natural and wise approach [3].
    • Strategic Action: Darvesh advocates for a strategic approach to pursuing ideals. The author suggests that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation,” implying that continuous effort and contribution are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom [4].
    • Reconciliation and Compromise: The author contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [2]. This suggests that sometimes, compromise and finding an alternate route is a better approach to achieve one’s mission [2].
    • Patience and Perseverance: The author notes that “love requires patience and desire impatient” [5]. The text encourages patience, highlighting that remaining “on the crease with strategy” is a test of patience that ultimately allows one to achieve more for their cause [4].
    • Value of Life: The author emphasizes the importance of living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals [6]. The author sees death as a “witch” that takes away loved ones, expressing a desire to avoid this separation [6]. This perspective contrasts with those who might welcome death for ideological reasons [6].
    • The Danger of Absolute Truth: The text suggests that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [1, 7]. The author reflects on how figures like Mahatma Gandhi may have been targeted because of their unwavering commitment to their beliefs [7]. This suggests that sometimes a more cautious, nuanced approach is necessary to survive and continue working towards one’s mission [1, 7].

    In summary, Darvesh advises a path of strategic survival, patience, and a balanced approach to truth and ideals, rather than seeking martyrdom. The goal is to live and continue working towards one’s mission, finding alternate routes when necessary and valuing the opportunity to continue contributing to one’s cause [1-5, 7].convert_to_textConvert to source

    Darvesh on Martyrdom and Self-Preservation

    Darvesh does not view martyrdom as a desirable goal but rather as an outcome to be avoided through strategic action and self-preservation [1, 2]. The author believes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [1, 3]. Here’s a more detailed look at Darvesh’s perspective:

    • Martyrdom as a Loss of Mission: The author states, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [3]. This highlights that martyrdom prematurely ends a person’s ability to contribute to their cause, making it a negative outcome [1, 3]. The focus should be on the continued pursuit of a mission, not on achieving martyrdom [2, 3].
    • Rejection of Martyrdom as a Goal: Darvesh explicitly states, “this message from Darvesh to his new generations is that do not have the interest of martyrdom” [1]. This shows that the author actively discourages seeking martyrdom [1].
    • Emphasis on Survival: The author stresses that “you always love life” and emphasizes the need to “learn ways to survive” [1]. Darvesh suggests that even great personalities have sought to avoid trials [1]. Additionally, the author notes that “lovers of life never allow such a negative approach to come near them,” suggesting a natural inclination towards self-preservation [1].
    • Strategic Action over Martyrdom: The author advocates for a strategic approach to pursuing one’s ideals, suggesting that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” [2]. This implies that continuous efforts and contributions are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom [2].
    • Historical Examples: The author uses historical examples of figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate how prioritizing truth over self-preservation can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of their mission [2, 4]. The author suggests that these figures may have had a more lasting impact had they been more strategic in their approach to personal safety [2, 4].
    • Value of Life and Love: From a Sufi perspective, the author emphasizes love and life, believing in living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals, rather than choosing separation or death [5]. Death is viewed as a “witch” that snatches away loved ones, and the author acknowledges that he also wants to avoid this “witch” [5]. This viewpoint contrasts with those who “welcome death” as a way to connect with the divine [5]. The author wants to remain and spread love in life [5].

    In summary, Darvesh believes that martyrdom is not a desirable goal and should be avoided through strategic action and a focus on self-preservation [1, 2]. The author emphasizes that a continued effort towards one’s mission is more important than martyrdom [1, 3]. The goal is to live and continue working towards one’s mission, finding alternate routes when necessary and valuing the opportunity to continue contributing to one’s cause [2, 3].convert_to_textConvert to source

    Strategic Survival: A Critique of Martyrdom

    Several historical figures are discussed in the text as examples that support Darvesh’s arguments against martyrdom and in favor of strategic action and self-preservation [1, 2]. These figures serve as cautionary tales, illustrating the potential consequences of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over personal safety. Here are the figures and how they relate to Darvesh’s arguments:

    • Abraham Lincoln: Darvesh reflects on Lincoln’s assassination, suggesting that it might have been avoided if Lincoln had not gone to the theater that night [1]. This example highlights how even leaders who are committed to important causes can become targets, and that sometimes a change of behavior or circumstance might have led to a longer life and more impact [1].
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The author suggests that Gandhi’s strong support for Muslims might have contributed to his assassination by Hindu extremists [1]. Darvesh questions why Gandhi went “so far in truth” when he knew “hundred percent truth is dangerous,” suggesting that a more strategic approach could have been more effective and less dangerous [1].
    • Izhaq Robin and Anwar Sadat: These leaders are presented as examples of individuals who pursued “truth, honesty, peace and security” but were killed by violent factions within their own nations [1]. The author notes that they “should have found a seed path,” implying that a more cautious approach could have led to their continued work and avoided their martyrdom [1].
    • Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto: These leaders “sacrificed themselves for their national goals or lofty ideals” [2]. Darvesh suggests that they “should have been careful about their security” and were “punished by direct terror,” showing that being reckless about personal safety can undermine one’s goals [2].

    These figures exemplify Darvesh’s argument that while truth and ideals are important, they must be pursued strategically, with awareness of the potential risks, and with an effort to preserve one’s life [1, 2]. Darvesh emphasizes that a continued effort towards one’s mission is more valuable than martyrdom [3, 4]. These examples highlight Darvesh’s belief that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them, and that strategic thinking and a focus on survival are essential for achieving a lasting impact [2-4].convert_to_textConvert to source

    Against Martyrdom: A Strategic Approach to Idealism

    Darvesh’s central message regarding martyrdom is that it is not a desirable goal and should be avoided through strategic action and a focus on self-preservation [1-3]. The author emphasizes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [1-3].

    Here’s a more detailed breakdown of Darvesh’s central message:

    • Martyrdom as the End of a Mission: Darvesh believes that martyrdom is not a noble end but rather the termination of one’s mission [2, 3]. The author states, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [2]. This highlights that martyrdom prematurely ends a person’s ability to contribute to their cause, making it a negative outcome [2].
    • Rejection of Seeking Martyrdom: Darvesh explicitly advises against having an “interest of martyrdom” [3]. This demonstrates a clear discouragement of actively seeking a martyr’s death [3].
    • Emphasis on Survival: The author stresses the importance of loving life and learning “ways to survive” [3]. The author also notes that even great personalities have sought refuge from trials, implying that self-preservation is a natural and wise approach [3].
    • Strategic Action and Patience: Darvesh advocates for a strategic approach to pursuing one’s ideals, suggesting that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” [4]. This implies that continuous efforts and contributions are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom [4]. The author also notes that “love requires patience and desire impatient” [5].
    • Historical Examples as Cautionary Tales: The author uses historical examples of figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate how prioritizing truth over self-preservation can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of their mission [4, 6]. The author suggests that these figures may have had a more lasting impact had they been more strategic in their approach to personal safety [4, 6].
    • Value of Life and Love: From a Sufi perspective, the author emphasizes love and life, believing in living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals, rather than choosing separation or death [7]. The author sees death as a “witch” that takes away loved ones [7].

    In essence, Darvesh’s central message is a call for a strategic, life-affirming approach to pursuing one’s ideals. The goal is to live and continue working towards one’s mission, finding alternate routes when necessary, and valuing the opportunity to continue contributing to one’s cause rather than seeking martyrdom [2, 4].

    Truth, Strategy, and Survival

    Darvesh views the relationship between truth and survival as complex, suggesting that while truth is a “lofty thing,” it must be approached strategically, with an understanding of the potential dangers of absolute adherence to it [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of Darvesh’s perspective:

    • Truth is Valuable but Can be Dangerous: Darvesh acknowledges the importance of truth, referring to it as a “great thing” [2]. However, the author also cautions that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [2]. This implies that while truth is an ideal, its pursuit must be tempered with practicality and an awareness of the potential consequences.
    • The Need for Strategic Communication of Truth: The text states, “the truth can also be spoken as much as it is digested, otherwise you will be cornered or disappeared” [1]. This highlights that the way truth is communicated is as important as the truth itself, suggesting that one should tailor the delivery of truth to ensure it can be received and accepted without causing harm or endangering oneself. It emphasizes the importance of timing and audience, suggesting that not every truth can be accepted at every moment or by every person.
    • Reconciliation and Compromise: Darvesh contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [3]. This implies that in some situations, it is necessary to make compromises or find alternate routes to achieve one’s mission [3]. This suggests that sometimes a strategic retreat from absolute truth, or a more nuanced approach, can be a wiser path to long-term impact.
    • Survival as a Prerequisite for Achieving Ideals: Darvesh believes that survival is essential to continue working towards one’s ideals [4]. The author emphasizes that one should “learn ways to survive” and love life, as a continued life allows for a continued pursuit of one’s mission [4]. This perspective contrasts with seeking martyrdom, which is seen as the end of one’s mission [3]. The author argues that if one dies in the pursuit of absolute truth, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission.” [3]
    • Historical Examples of the Perils of Absolute Truth: Darvesh uses the examples of figures like Mahatma Gandhi, who “went so far in truth”, to illustrate the dangers of unwavering commitment to truth [2]. These examples serve as cautionary tales, showing how prioritizing absolute truth over self-preservation can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of one’s mission [2]. Darvesh also considers the examples of Abraham Lincoln, Izhaq Robin, and Anwar Sadat [2].
    • Wisdom in Balancing Truth and Self-Preservation: Darvesh discusses how one may call wisdom cowardice, but that “wisdom with truth” suggests that a person should value life over death in order to achieve their ideals [5]. The author contrasts the wisdom of prioritizing life with the “enthusiasm and stupidity” of recklessly pursuing a path that can lead to death [5].
    • Patience as a Virtue: Darvesh notes that “love requires patience and desire impatient” [6]. The author suggests that “stay[ing] on the crease with strategy” is a test of patience that allows one to contribute to their cause in the long term [5].

    In summary, Darvesh believes that while truth is a fundamental ideal, it must be balanced with strategic thinking and self-preservation. The author suggests that sometimes compromising or finding an alternate route is the better approach to achieve one’s mission. The central message is to prioritize survival and continuous effort towards one’s ideals, recognizing that adhering to absolute truth without consideration of its consequences can be counterproductive.

    Strategic Idealism: Balancing Action and Self-Preservation

    Darvesh advises his followers to balance idealism and self-preservation by prioritizing strategic action, self-preservation, and a nuanced approach to truth, rather than pursuing martyrdom [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of how Darvesh suggests achieving this balance:

    • Strategic Action over Martyrdom: Darvesh emphasizes that it is more important to live and continue working towards one’s ideals than to die for them [2, 3]. The author explicitly discourages seeking martyrdom, stating “do not have the interest of martyrdom” [3]. The focus should be on the continued pursuit of a mission, not on achieving martyrdom [2].
    • Emphasis on Survival: Darvesh stresses the need to “learn ways to survive” and to love life [3]. The author believes that self-preservation is essential to continue working towards one’s goals and that “lovers of life never allow such a negative approach to come near them” [3]. This suggests a natural inclination towards self-preservation.
    • Nuanced Approach to Truth: Darvesh believes that while truth is a “great thing,” “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [1, 4]. The author advises that “the truth can also be spoken as much as it is digested, otherwise you will be cornered or disappeared” [1]. This suggests a strategic approach to sharing truth, tailoring it to the audience and circumstances to avoid endangering oneself or one’s mission.
    • Reconciliation and Compromise: The author contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [2]. This implies that in some situations, it is necessary to make compromises or find alternate routes to achieve one’s mission [2, 4].
    • Patience and Long-Term Impact: Darvesh suggests that one should “stay on the crease with strategy” to “score for the nation” [5]. This implies that continuous efforts and contributions are more valuable than a single act of martyrdom, emphasizing the importance of a patient, long-term approach. The author also notes that “love requires patience and desire impatient”, implying that achieving ideals requires consistent work and patience rather than a singular, impatient pursuit that could end in martyrdom [6].
    • Historical Examples as Lessons: Darvesh uses the examples of figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate the potential dangers of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over personal safety [4, 5]. These examples highlight how a lack of strategic thinking and self-preservation can lead to the premature end of one’s mission [4].
    • Value of Life and Love: Darvesh believes in living life fully with loved ones and continuing to spread ideals, rather than choosing separation or death [7]. The author sees death as a “witch” that takes away loved ones [7]. This contrasts with those who “welcome death” as a way to connect with the divine, and suggests that the author wants to remain in life and spread love [7].

    In summary, Darvesh advises his followers to pursue their ideals with a strategic approach that prioritizes survival and long-term impact over martyrdom. This involves being thoughtful about when and how to express the truth, being willing to compromise or find alternative routes when necessary, and understanding that self-preservation is not selfish, but a means of continuing one’s mission and contributing to the world [1-4].

    Truth, Survival, and Strategic Compromise

    The text portrays the tension between truth and survival as a central conflict, suggesting that while truth is a noble ideal, its pursuit must be balanced with strategic thinking and self-preservation [1, 2]. Here’s how the text explores this tension:

    • Truth as a Double-Edged Sword: The text acknowledges the importance of truth, describing it as a “lofty thing” [1] and a “great thing” [2]. However, it also warns that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [2]. This indicates that while truth is valued, its unyielding pursuit can lead to negative consequences, including death [1].
    • The Practicality of Communicating Truth: The text suggests that truth should be spoken “as much as it is digested” [1]. This highlights the importance of considering the audience and the context when communicating truth, rather than sharing it indiscriminately. The text implies that speaking truth without regard for its reception can lead to being “cornered or disappeared” [1], emphasizing the need for a strategic approach.
    • Compromise and Reconciliation: The author contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [3]. This suggests that sometimes it is necessary to compromise or find alternate routes to achieve one’s mission, rather than rigidly adhering to absolute truth.
    • Survival as a Prerequisite for Mission: The text emphasizes that survival is essential to continue working towards one’s ideals. The author notes that if one dies in the pursuit of absolute truth, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [3]. This highlights the idea that one cannot effectively pursue their ideals if they are dead, emphasizing the need to prioritize self-preservation.
    • Martyrdom as a Negative Outcome: The text discourages seeking martyrdom, stating “do not have the interest of martyrdom” [4]. Martyrdom is portrayed as the end of one’s mission, rather than a noble goal [3]. This perspective is rooted in the idea that continuing to live allows one to continue working towards their ideals, and that martyrdom prematurely ends this process.
    • Historical Examples: The text uses historical figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto, to illustrate the dangers of prioritizing absolute truth over self-preservation [2, 5]. These examples serve as cautionary tales of how a commitment to absolute truth can lead to martyrdom and the premature end of their mission. The author suggests that these individuals might have been more successful had they been more strategic in their approach to personal safety [2, 5].
    • Wisdom vs. Enthusiasm: The text contrasts “wisdom with truth” with the “enthusiasm and stupidity” of recklessly pursuing a path that can lead to death [5]. This highlights the idea that while enthusiasm and commitment are important, they should be tempered with wisdom and a strategic approach to ensure long-term success, and ultimately survival. The text also suggests that “love requires patience and desire impatient” [6], highlighting the need for a long term strategy.

    In summary, the text portrays the tension between truth and survival as a complex balancing act. While truth is presented as a valuable ideal, the text argues that it must be approached strategically, with an understanding of the potential dangers of absolute adherence to it. The text ultimately suggests that survival is essential to continue working towards one’s mission and that a nuanced approach to truth, that sometimes includes compromise, is the wiser path.

    Truth, Survival, and Ideals

    The text cites several historical figures as examples to illustrate the complex relationship between truth, survival, and the pursuit of ideals [1, 2]. Here are the figures mentioned:

    • Abraham Lincoln: The text contemplates whether Lincoln might have avoided his assassination if he had not gone to the theater that night [1]. The author suggests that his commitment to his ideals and the tense political climate of the time may have made his death inevitable, though the author still wishes Lincoln had not been in the theater [1].
    • Mahatma Gandhi: The text reflects on how Gandhi’s unwavering support for Muslims may have angered Hindu extremists, leading to his assassination [1]. The author uses Gandhi as an example of someone who went too far in the pursuit of truth, suggesting that a more moderate approach might have allowed him to live longer and continue his mission [1].
    • Izhaq Robin: The text mentions Izhaq Robin, former Prime Minister of Israel, as an example of someone who was targeted for their pursuit of truth, honesty, peace, and security [1].
    • Anwar Sadat: The text cites Anwar Sadat, former President of Egypt, as another example of a leader who was assassinated for his commitment to truth, honesty, peace, and security [1].
    • Indira Gandhi: The text suggests that Indira Gandhi, former Prime Minister of India, should have been more careful about her security. She is presented as an example of a great personality who sacrificed herself for national goals [2].
    • Benazir Bhutto: The text also uses Benazir Bhutto, former Prime Minister of Pakistan, as an example of a leader who sacrificed herself for her national goals and should have taken more precautions for her own safety [2].
    • Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif: The text refers to a discussion about two Prime Ministers, Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, one of whom was known for bravery and the other for wisdom [2]. The author’s view is that wisdom is preferable to bravery, and that wisdom with truth means that a person should prefer life over death for the sake of their ideals [2].

    These examples are used to highlight the dangers of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over personal safety, and serve as cautionary tales for Darvesh’s followers [1, 2]. The author suggests that these leaders, while pursuing noble goals, might have achieved more if they had been more strategic in their approach and focused on their own self-preservation [1, 2].

    Strategic Compromise: Truth, Survival, and Mission

    The author’s thoughts on compromise are that it is sometimes a necessary and strategic approach to achieve one’s mission, rather than rigidly adhering to absolute truth [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of the author’s perspective on compromise:

    • Compromise as a Deviation from Absolute Truth: The author contemplates whether historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [1]. This suggests that the author sees compromise as a departure from absolute truth, but potentially a beneficial one in certain circumstances.
    • Compromise as a Strategic Tool: The text implies that compromise can be a strategic tool for survival and for the continuation of one’s mission [1, 3]. The author notes that “wisdom with truth is that a man should prefer life over death for the sake of his ideals and for his loved ones” [3]. This implies that a strategic compromise may be necessary to ensure one’s survival, which is seen as essential for achieving long-term goals.
    • Compromise as an Alternate Route: The author uses the metaphor of finding an alternate route when a roadway is blocked [1]. This illustrates that compromise can be a way to navigate obstacles, implying that if a direct approach is not possible, one should be willing to find another way.
    • Compromise in the face of danger: The author uses the examples of historical figures, such as Mahatma Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate the dangers of not compromising [2, 3]. The author suggests that Gandhi’s support of Muslims led to his assassination and that Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto should have been more careful about their security. These examples suggest that not compromising and sticking to ideals without concern for safety can lead to negative outcomes.
    • Compromise as a Nuanced Approach: The author’s perspective on compromise is connected to the idea that truth should be spoken “as much as it is digested” [4]. This implies that one should be willing to tailor their communication of truth to their audience, and to make compromises to ensure the message is received, and that the speaker does not put themselves in danger.

    In summary, the author views compromise as a practical strategy for navigating complex situations, and a way to ensure one’s survival and the continuation of one’s mission [1, 3]. The author suggests that it is sometimes necessary to deviate from absolute truth and find alternate routes, emphasizing that compromise is a valuable tool when pursuing ideals and avoiding martyrdom [1, 2].

    Truth, Survival, and Strategic Compromise

    The author views the balance between truth and self-preservation as a complex and crucial consideration, arguing that while truth is a noble ideal, it should not be pursued at the expense of one’s life or mission [1]. Here’s a breakdown of the author’s perspective:

    • Truth as a Double-Edged Sword: The author recognizes the value of truth, describing it as “a lofty thing” and a “great thing”, but also warns that “hundred percent truth is dangerous” [1, 2]. This indicates that while truth is important, its unyielding pursuit can lead to negative consequences, including death. The text suggests that truth should be spoken “as much as it is digested”, implying that the communication of truth should be strategic, taking into account the audience and context, rather than shared indiscriminately [1].
    • Survival as Essential for Mission: The author emphasizes that survival is a prerequisite for the continuation of one’s mission [3, 4]. The author states that if one dies in the pursuit of absolute truth, “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [3]. This highlights that one cannot effectively pursue ideals if they are dead, thus prioritizing self-preservation is critical for long-term impact.
    • Compromise as a Strategic Tool: The author contemplates whether some historical figures might have been more successful if they had “deviated a little from the absolute truth and used some reconciliation” [3]. This suggests that compromise is sometimes a necessary and strategic approach to achieve one’s mission, rather than rigidly adhering to absolute truth. The author uses the metaphor of finding an alternate route when a road is closed, illustrating that compromise can be a way to navigate obstacles [3].
    • Martyrdom as a Negative Outcome: The author discourages seeking martyrdom, stating “do not have the interest of martyrdom” [4]. Martyrdom is portrayed as the end of one’s mission, rather than a noble goal. This perspective emphasizes that continuing to live allows one to continue working towards their ideals, and that martyrdom prematurely ends this process.
    • Historical Examples: The author uses historical figures such as Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, Anwar Sadat, Indira Gandhi, and Benazir Bhutto to illustrate the dangers of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over self-preservation [2, 5]. These figures are used to exemplify how a commitment to absolute truth, without regard for personal safety, can lead to negative outcomes, including assassination. The author suggests that these individuals might have been more successful if they had been more strategic in their approach and focused on their own self-preservation. The author also refers to a discussion of Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif, suggesting that “wisdom with truth” means one should prioritize life in order to achieve one’s ideals [5].
    • Wisdom vs. Enthusiasm: The author contrasts “wisdom with truth” with the “enthusiasm and stupidity” of recklessly pursuing a path that can lead to death. This emphasizes the idea that while commitment is important, it should be tempered with wisdom and a strategic approach [5]. The text also suggests that “love requires patience and desire impatient”, highlighting the need for a long-term strategy [6].

    In summary, the author views the balance between truth and self-preservation as a nuanced issue, arguing that while truth is essential, it must be pursued with a strategic mindset that prioritizes survival. The author emphasizes the idea that one must survive in order to continue working towards their ideals, and that a willingness to compromise, when necessary, is a sign of wisdom, not cowardice. The author uses historical examples to demonstrate the dangers of adhering to absolute truth without regard for one’s own safety.

    Ethical Dilemmas of Idealism

    The ethical dilemmas inherent in pursuing lofty ideals, as explored in the text, revolve around the tension between unwavering commitment to truth and the practical need for self-preservation, and the potential for compromise to achieve long-term goals. Here’s a breakdown of these dilemmas:

    • The Risk of Martyrdom vs. Continued Impact: The text highlights the dilemma of whether to pursue an ideal to the point of martyrdom or to prioritize survival in order to continue working towards that ideal. The author explicitly advises against seeking martyrdom [1], arguing that “it was not the death of the man, it was the death of his mission” [2]. This implies that a commitment to an ideal should not come at the cost of one’s life, if that life is necessary for the long term realization of those ideals [2].
    • The Conflict Between Absolute Truth and Practicality: The text presents a conflict between adhering to “hundred percent truth” and the practical need to tailor the communication of that truth to the situation [3]. The author suggests that truth should be spoken “as much as it is digested” [3]. This implies that a strategic approach is necessary, and that sometimes one may need to compromise or temper one’s message in order to be effective and to stay alive [2].
    • The Dilemma of Compromise: The text explores whether deviating “a little from the absolute truth and use some reconciliation” might be a more effective approach [2]. The author uses the metaphor of finding an alternate route when a roadway is closed, to suggest that compromise can be a way to navigate obstacles in the pursuit of one’s ideals [2]. This raises the ethical question of whether compromising one’s ideals is acceptable, and when.
    • Balancing Personal Safety and Dedication: The text uses several historical figures to illustrate the risks of prioritizing absolute truth and ideals over self-preservation. Figures like Abraham Lincoln, Mahatma Gandhi, Izhaq Robin, and Anwar Sadat are presented as examples of individuals who were assassinated due to their commitment to their ideals, which the author suggests might have been avoided with a more strategic approach [4]. Similarly, Indira Gandhi and Benazir Bhutto are mentioned as examples of leaders who were careless about their security, raising the ethical consideration of whether leaders have a responsibility to prioritize their own safety for the sake of their continued mission [5].
    • The Nature of Wisdom vs. Bravery: The author discusses the qualities of bravery and wisdom, arguing that “wisdom with truth” means that one should value life over death, so that they can continue to work for the benefit of others [5]. This implies that a truly ethical approach to pursuing ideals requires a pragmatic and long-term perspective, rather than reckless displays of courage.
    • The Danger of Unyielding Beliefs: The author cites the example of Gandhi who went “too far in truth” in supporting Muslims, which led to his assassination by Hindu extremists [4]. This example highlights the ethical dilemma of how far one should go in advocating for one’s beliefs, especially when it may put oneself or others at risk [4].
    • The Fine Line Between Courage and Recklessness: The text indicates that while bravery is often seen as a desirable trait, it can be indistinguishable from “enthusiasm and stupidity” [5]. The author suggests that a more balanced approach, combining wisdom and courage, is needed to effectively pursue and realize lofty ideals.

    In conclusion, the ethical dilemmas inherent in pursuing lofty ideals involve the difficult choices between absolute truth and pragmatic compromise, between martyrdom and continued influence, and between personal safety and unwavering commitment. The author emphasizes the need for a strategic and nuanced approach, balancing the pursuit of ideals with the practical considerations of survival and long-term impact. The text suggests that wisdom, which involves knowing when to compromise and when to stand firm, is essential for achieving lasting change [5].

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog