Category: Gen. Pervez Musharraf

  • Bush and Musharraf: A US-Pakistan Dialogue

    Bush and Musharraf: A US-Pakistan Dialogue

    President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan held a joint press conference, discussing the strong relationship between their countries. Bush praised Musharraf’s courage in the face of extremism and highlighted their cooperation in fighting terrorism. The leaders addressed intelligence sharing, economic development, and Pakistan’s commitment to democracy. They also spoke about regional issues, such as relations with India and the situation in Afghanistan. Musharraf emphasized the desire for a long-term strategic partnership with the U.S. and explained Pakistan’s efforts to combat the Taliban. Both leaders expressed confidence in their ability to work together to achieve peace and security.

    A Meeting of Minds: Bush and Musharraf, 2006

    Study Guide

    I. Quiz: Short Answer Questions (2-3 Sentences Each)

    1. What specific accomplishment regarding intelligence cooperation between the US and Pakistan did President Bush highlight during the press conference?
    2. What commitment did President Musharraf renew regarding elections in Pakistan? Why was this commitment considered important in the context of combating radicalism?
    3. According to President Musharraf, what were the three “bottom lines” of the peace treaty signed with tribal elders in North Waziristan?
    4. How did President Bush respond to the question about whether the US needed permission to strike inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden was located?
    5. What issue did the reporter Zafar Jung raise concerning the United States’ policy toward Pakistan’s access to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes?
    6. What did Bush say the United States could do to facilitate an agreement between Pakistan and India regarding Kashmir?
    7. What was President Bush’s view on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and what role did he see the United States playing in resolving it?
    8. How did President Bush respond to claims that the United States is waging a war on Islam?
    9. What was the basis of the relationship between President Bush and President Musharraf, as described by President Musharraf?
    10. What did President Bush and President Musharraf emphasize as crucial for achieving lasting peace in regions of conflict?

    II. Quiz Answer Key

    1. President Bush highlighted the cooperation between US and Pakistani intelligence forces that helped prevent the loss of innocent life in the United Kingdom. This cooperation was seen as necessary in a world where extremists are willing to kill to achieve political objectives.
    2. President Musharraf renewed his commitment to holding free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007. This commitment was seen as important because giving people a chance to participate in the political process was considered the best way to defeat radicalism and extremism.
    3. The three “bottom lines” of the peace treaty were: no al-Qaeda activity in tribal agencies or across the border in Afghanistan, no Taliban activity in those areas or across the border, and no Talibanization or obscurantist way of life allowed. These were agreed to by the tribal elders.
    4. President Bush emphasized that the US and Pakistan were “on the hunt together” and that they would “deal with” the situation when Osama bin Laden was found, without getting into the specifics of tactics. He focused on the shared goal of bringing al-Qaeda to justice.
    5. Zafar Jung raised the issue of a discriminatory regime regarding the fear of nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, as Pakistan needed energy but was being denied access. He asked if this discrimination would end after the meeting between the two presidents.
    6. Bush stated that the United States could offer assistance in creating conditions for peace, laying out a vision, and providing aid for institutional building to foster democracy. Ultimately, the resolution of the Kashmir issue would depend on the will of the leaders involved to get the past behind them and move forward.
    7. President Bush supported a two-state solution with a democratic Palestinian state living side by side with Israel. The U.S. would give aid to those suffering, help create the conditions for peace to occur, lay out a vision, talk to world leaders, and provide aid to help institutional buildings so that a democracy can flourish.
    8. President Bush refuted claims of a war against Islam, calling them “false.” He emphasized the importance of rejecting extremist propaganda, noting that the US respects Islam and that many Muslims live peacefully in the United States.
    9. President Musharraf described the basis of their relationship as trust and confidence. He stated that without this trust, a productive relationship is impossible.
    10. President Bush and President Musharraf emphasized the importance of leadership will and mutual trust for achieving lasting peace in regions of conflict. This included the need for leaders to put the past behind them and work together toward a better future.

    III. Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the strategic importance of Pakistan to the United States in the context of the “War on Terror” following 9/11, as reflected in the statements made by Presidents Bush and Musharraf.
    2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the tribal deal in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) as a counterterrorism strategy, considering President Musharraf’s explanation of the deal and potential criticisms of its long-term impact.
    3. Discuss the challenges and opportunities for promoting interfaith harmony between the West and the Islamic world, drawing upon President Bush and President Musharraf’s comments on the issue.
    4. Compare and contrast the perspectives of President Bush and President Musharraf on the role of the United States in resolving conflicts in Kashmir and Palestine.
    5. Assess the significance of economic development and educational reform as tools for combating extremism in Pakistan, based on the points raised by Presidents Bush and Musharraf.

    IV. Glossary of Key Terms

    • Extremism: Holding extreme political or religious views; often associated with intolerance, radicalism, and violence.
    • Radicalism: Belief in or support for fundamental or revolutionary changes in the established order.
    • Terrorism: The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
    • Talibanization: The process by which a region or society adopts the strict religious laws and customs associated with the Taliban.
    • Al-Qaeda: A militant Sunni Islamist multi-national organization founded in 1988 by Osama bin Laden, Abdullah Azzam and several other Arab volunteers during the Soviet–Afghan War.
    • Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA): A semi-autonomous tribal region in northwestern Pakistan, bordering Afghanistan.
    • Kashmir: A disputed territory between India and Pakistan, with ongoing conflict and political tensions.
    • Two-State Solution: A proposed resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict involving the establishment of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.
    • Proliferation: The spread of nuclear weapons, fissile material, or the technology and information necessary to manufacture them.
    • Interfaith Harmony: Promoting understanding, respect, and cooperation among different religions.

    Okay, here is a briefing document summarizing the key themes and ideas from the provided transcript of a meeting between President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf.

    Briefing Document: Meeting between President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf

    Date: [Date not specified in document, but context suggests 2006]

    Location: Washington D.C., White House

    Attendees:

    • President George W. Bush (United States)
    • President Pervez Musharraf (Islamic Republic of Pakistan)
    • Various members of their respective administrations

    Executive Summary:

    The meeting focused on reinforcing the strategic relationship between the United States and Pakistan, with a strong emphasis on counterterrorism cooperation, regional stability (particularly in Afghanistan and regarding India-Pakistan relations), and Pakistan’s internal development (economic, educational, and political). Both leaders expressed mutual trust and confidence. Key themes include combating extremism, promoting moderation, fostering economic development, and resolving regional conflicts. The discussion also addressed concerns about Pakistan’s nuclear program and the need for peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian and Kashmir disputes.

    Key Themes and Discussion Points:

    1. Counterterrorism and Extremism:
    • Shared Struggle: Both presidents emphasized the shared threat posed by extremists and terrorists. Bush stated, “He understands that we are in a struggle against extremists who will use terror as a weapon… I admire your leadership. I admire your courage, and I thank you very much for working on common strategies to protect our respective peoples.”
    • Intelligence Cooperation: Highlighted as crucial for preventing attacks, with specific mention of collaboration that helped prevent loss of life in the United Kingdom. “I want to remind the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because of the good work of our intelligence forces and Pakistani intelligence forces as we helped people in the United Kingdom we prevented the loss of innocent life that kind of cooperation is necessary.”
    • Pakistan’s Role: Bush acknowledged Musharraf’s role as a “strong defender of freedom” and a target of extremists.
    • Tribal Areas Strategy: Musharraf briefed Bush on the strategy in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), emphasizing a “holistic approach” involving military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements. He clarified that recent peace deals were “not to deal with the Taliban,” but rather “to fight the Taliban.” Specifically, he described the agreement with tribal elders that prohibited Al-Qaeda activity, Taliban activity, and Talibanization of the tribal agencies. Bush indicated satisfaction with this deal.
    • Osama Bin Laden: In response to a question about striking inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden were located there, Bush emphasized trust and collaboration. He expressed confidence that Musharraf would bring Bin Laden to justice if found. Musharraf affirmed total coordination at all levels of intelligence and operations.
    1. US-Pakistan Relationship:
    • Strategic Partnership: Both leaders affirmed the desire for a long-term, broad-based, and strategic relationship. Musharraf stated that the meeting reinforced their “trust and confidence in each other.”
    • Economic and Social Development: Discussions included economic assistance, trade and investment opportunities, and support for education and health sectors in Pakistan. Bush mentioned the need to move forward on a Reconstruction Opportunity Zone and a bilateral investment treaty.
    • Defense: The f16 deal was discussed.
    • Democracy in Pakistan: Bush reiterated Musharraf’s commitment to free and fair elections in 2007. “The last time I was with the president he assured me and assured the people that were listening to news commerce that there would be free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007 he renewed that commitment.”
    1. Regional Stability:
    • Afghanistan: The leaders discussed the situation in Afghanistan, with plans for a trilateral meeting involving Presidents Bush, Musharraf, and Karzai. Bush stressed the importance of Afghanistan’s success for regional peace.
    • India-Pakistan Relations: Bush expressed pleasure at the progress in relations between Pakistan and India and encouraged the peaceful resolution of the Kashmir issue. “I think it’s very important that the that the issue of Kashmir mu forward and be resolved peacefully and I appreciate your efforts mr. president.” Musharraf noted his “excellent meeting” with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Havana, calling it “a step forward towards resolution of disputes between India and Pakistan.”
    1. Interfaith Harmony and Moderation:
    • Combating Propaganda: Bush emphasized the need to counter extremist propaganda and promote understanding between the West and the Islamic world. “All of us need to step up and talk about a world in which we respect each other’s religions matter of fact is very important for Muslims around the world to know there’s a lot of Muslims living at peace here in the United States.”
    • Respect for Islam: Bush asserted that America respects Islam and highlighted the presence of peaceful Muslims in the United States.
    • Interfaith Harmony Initiative: Responding to a question, Bush praised Musharraf’s call for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony.
    1. Nuclear Issues and Energy:
    • Non-Proliferation Concerns: In response to a question about discriminatory practices related to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, Bush stated that they “talked about energy and we talked about our need to work through the recent history of that we’ve had together on dealing with proliferation matters.” This suggests ongoing concerns and discussions related to Pakistan’s nuclear program.
    1. Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and Kashmir:
    • Peace Process: Both leaders acknowledged the importance of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Bush reiterated his commitment to a two-state solution, emphasizing the need for both sides to recognize each other’s right to exist.
    • Kashmir Resolution: Bush stated that the Kashmir issue will be solved when the leaders of Pakistan and India decide to solve it and offered US assistance to facilitate an agreement if desired. “Kashmir issue will be solved when two leaders decide to solve it and we want to help the United States can’t force nations to to reach an agreement.”

    Points of Note:

    • Armitage Quote: Bush denied knowledge of reported threats from Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage to bomb Pakistan “back to the Stone Age” if it did not cooperate after 9/11. He maintained that Pakistan, under Musharraf’s leadership, was one of the first to offer support.
    • Trust and Confidence: The constant refrain of “trust and confidence” underscores the effort to portray a strong and reliable partnership despite underlying complexities and potential disagreements.
    • Focus on Personal Relationship: The meeting highlighted the personal relationship between Bush and Musharraf as a key factor in the strength of the US-Pakistan alliance.

    This briefing document provides a concise overview of the key discussions and themes from the meeting. It reflects the priorities and perspectives of both leaders at the time.

    US-Pakistan Relations: Counter-Terrorism, Trade, and Regional Security

    • Why was President Musharraf in Washington D.C. meeting with President Bush? The meeting was to reinforce the strong, long-term strategic relationship between the United States and Pakistan, focusing on a wide range of issues including cooperation in the fight against terrorism, economic development, trade, investment, education, health, defense, regional issues like the Palestinian dispute, and progress between Pakistan and India, including the Kashmir issue and Afghanistan. Both presidents emphasized mutual trust and a desire for peace and security in the region.
    • What role did the fight against terrorism play in the relationship between the US and Pakistan? Fighting terrorism was a central and critical aspect of the US-Pakistan relationship. President Bush lauded Musharraf’s commitment to combating extremism, noting Musharraf’s own personal risks and the need for intelligence cooperation. Musharraf detailed Pakistan’s holistic approach, including military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements to counter terrorism in its tribal agencies.
    • What is the “tribal deal” President Musharraf described, and what was its purpose? The tribal deal was an agreement signed with tribal elders in Pakistan’s North Waziristan Agency, aimed not at cooperating with the Taliban, but at fighting them. The core principles of the deal include preventing Al-Qaeda and Taliban activity in the tribal agencies and across the border into Afghanistan, as well as preventing “Talibanization” and obscurantist ideologies in the region. The tribal elders are obligated to enforce this agreement and act against those who violate it.
    • How did President Bush respond to questions about potential US military action within Pakistan to capture Osama bin Laden? President Bush emphasized the trust and collaboration between the US and Pakistan in the hunt for Al-Qaeda. Both leaders said they were working together in all areas, such as intelligence, operational, strategic, and tactical coordination. Bush deferred to the moment when such a situation arises and when the right decision will be taken to strike in such coordination.
    • What were the key issues discussed regarding the broader relationship between the US and the Islamic world? The discussion focused on promoting interfaith harmony and countering extremist propaganda. President Bush emphasized that America respects Islam and rejects the notion that the “war on terror” is a war against Islam. He stressed the importance of distinguishing between the peaceful Muslim faith and the actions of extremists and terrorists. The importance of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as well as supporting peaceful resolution of disputes like Kashmir was also discussed.
    • What specific economic development and trade initiatives were discussed? The focus was on creating Reconstruction Opportunity Zones to spur growth in Pakistan, along with a bilateral investment treaty. President Musharraf emphasized Pakistan’s need for assistance, particularly in trade and investment, as well as in education and health.
    • What was President Bush’s perspective on resolving the Kashmir dispute? President Bush believed that lasting agreements must be reached by the leaders of nations. He was encouraged by the discussions between President Musharraf and the Indian Prime Minister. He mentioned he is willing to help facilitate an agreement, and emphasized that the United States could not impose peace, but can create conditions where peace can flourish.
    • What did President Musharraf want from the meeting and the U.S. in general?
    • Musharraf sought a long-term, broad-based, strategic relationship with the United States. He emphasized Pakistan’s need for assistance in trade, investment, education, and health sectors. He pushed for a resolution to the Palestinian and Kashmir issues, and highlighted Pakistan’s commitment to fighting terrorism. Ultimately, he aimed to reinforce mutual trust and confidence between the two nations.

    Pakistan-United States Relations: Counter-terrorism, Economy, Democracy, and Regional Issues

    Pakistan and the United States have a relationship based on trust and a shared desire for security and peace. Both countries have common strategies to protect their people. The US president stated that the US desires the best for Pakistan and the region.

    Key aspects of the Pakistan-US relationship include:

    • Counter-terrorism cooperation Both countries recognize the importance of intelligence sharing to prevent terrorist attacks. Pakistan is taking a holistic approach to fighting terrorism using military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    • Economic Development The US recognizes that economic prosperity can help people improve their lives and is working with Pakistan on reconstruction opportunity zones and a bilateral investment treaty. The US has provided assistance to Pakistan in education and health.
    • Democracy and Education President Musharraf has committed to free and fair elections in Pakistan. He is also focused on improving Pakistan’s education system to prepare students for the global economy.
    • Regional Issues President Bush was encouraged by President Musharraf’s meetings with the Indian Prime Minister regarding the Kashmir issue. Both presidents discussed the situation in Afghanistan and the tribal agencies. The US President, along with President Musharraf and President Karzai, planned to have discussions regarding avenues for peace in Afghanistan.
    • Interfaith Harmony President Musharraf has called for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony between the West and the Islamic world. The US President spoke out against propaganda that tries to inflame passion and create conditions where terror is justified. He stated that the US respects Islam and that there are many Muslims living peacefully in the United States.

    US and Pakistan Cooperation Against Terrorism

    Pakistan and the United States are cooperating in the fight against terrorism. Both countries recognize the importance of intelligence sharing to prevent terrorist attacks.

    Key points include:

    • Common Strategies: Both countries share common strategies to protect their people from extremists who use terror as a weapon.
    • Intelligence Cooperation: The good work of US and Pakistani intelligence forces helped prevent the loss of innocent life in the United Kingdom.
    • Holistic Approach: Pakistan is taking a holistic approach to fighting terrorism, using military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements.
    • Tribal Deal: A peace treaty signed through a grand assembly of elders aims to fight the Taliban. The deal has three bottom lines: no al-Qaeda activity, no Taliban activity, and no Talibanization. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    • Mutual Interest: It’s in the interest of both the US and Pakistan that al-Qaeda be brought to justice. Both countries collaborate and strategize on how best to do this.

    US and Pakistan Presidents on Kashmir and Palestine

    The US and Pakistani presidents have discussed the issues of Kashmir and Palestine, agreeing that leadership from involved nations is key to resolving these conflicts.

    Key points from the discussion include:

    • Kashmir:President Bush was encouraged by President Musharraf’s meetings with the Indian Prime Minister, indicating a desire at the leadership level to solve this long-standing problem.
    • The US is willing to assist but cannot force nations to reach an agreement. Lasting agreements occur when leaders decide to put the past behind them and move forward.
    • The US can help create conditions for peace, lay out a vision, talk to world leaders, and provide aid to help institutional building so that democracy can flourish.
    • President Bush asked both leaders what the United States could do to facilitate an agreement.
    • Palestine:President Musharraf emphasized the need to resolve the Palestinian dispute, calling it the core of all problems, even terrorism and extremism.
    • President Bush expressed his desire and will to resolve the Palestinian dispute.
    • President Bush is the first president to have articulated a two-state solution, believing a Palestinian state as a democracy living side by side with Israel will yield peace.
    • For peace to occur and for a Palestinian state to exist, people have to recognize Israel’s right to exist.

    US-Pakistan Talks on Afghanistan Stability and Tribal Deal

    Afghanistan’s stability was discussed between the US and Pakistani presidents, with planned trilateral discussions involving the president of Afghanistan.

    Key points from the discussion include:

    • Mutual Interest: It is in the mutual interest of the US, Pakistan and Afghanistan for Afghanistan to succeed.
    • Avenues for Peace: Discussions were planned to find avenues for peace, considering Afghanistan has been devastated by war.
    • Tribal Deal: President Musharraf explained to President Bush what was happening in Afghanistan and the tribal agencies. He clarified that the peace treaty was signed through a grand assembly of elders, and it is intended to fight the Taliban. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    George W. Bush: The American Presidency Project

    The Original Text

    ladies and gentlemen the President of the United States and the president of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan thank you very much please be seated Laura and I appreciate the opportunity to welcome president mr. Musharraf here to Washington we remember finally mr. president to your great hospitality in Pakistan and and we remember that the importance of that visit it reconfirmed our friendship gave you and me a chance to discuss important issues and there’s no more important issue than defending our peoples this president is a strong defender of freedom and the people of Pakistan and I appreciate your leadership he understands that we are in a struggle against extremists who will use terror as a weapon he understands it just about as bit as good as anybody in the world after all they’ve tried to take his life they’ve these extremists who can’t stand the thought of a moderate leader leading an important country like Pakistan want to kill the president let’s just say things to none of the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because he has been a strong forceful leader he has become a target of those who can’t stand the thought of moderation prevailing I admire your leadership I admire your courage and I thank you very much for working on common strategies to protect our respective peoples we had a good discussion here today we talked about how our intelligence cooperation can continue I want to remind the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because of the good work of our intelligence forces and Pakistani intelligence forces as we helped people in the United Kingdom we prevented the loss of innocent life that kind of cooperation is necessary in a world in which extremists and radicals are willing to kill to try to achieve political objectives we talked about the earthquake recovery and our nation was proud to support you mister brethren because we care when we see people suffering in you I was briefed by you and your administration when I was there and I was impressed by the great organization and compassion shown for the Pakistani people by your government I hope all is going well particularly for those who suffered mightily now we talked about economic development and the need to move forward on a reconstruction Opportunity Zones as well as a bilateral and investment treaty was our relationship is more than just helping to secure our respective homelands ours is a relationship that recognizes that through economic prosperity people can can embedder themselves we had a very interesting briefing on the federally administered tribal areas the governor the areas are with us here and he briefed me and members of my national security team on the strategy to strengthen governance and to promote economic development we talked about education first time I ever met President Musharraf he talked about the need to make sure the school systems in Pakistan worked well I was impressed then I’m impressed now by your commitment to an education system that prepares students for the and gives students the skills necessary to compete in a in a global economy we talked about democracy the last time I was with the president he assured me and assured the people that were listening to news commerce that there would be free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007 he renewed that commitment because he understands that the best way to defeat radicalism and extremism is to give people a chance to participate in the political process of a nation we talked about we talked about India in relations and the president’s relations with India I was pleased to see it in Havana Prime Minister Singh and President Musharraf had another discussion I think it’s very important that the that the issue of Kashmir mu forward and be resolved peacefully and I appreciate your efforts mr. president we talked of course about Afghanistan and a president musharraf and President Karzai Karzai and I will have dinner right here in the White House next week and it’s going to be an important discussion it’s going to be important discussion because one of the most important avenues for peace is for Afghanistan’s to succeed and it’s in our mutual interest that we work together to help that a country that’s been devastated by war succeed and so I look forward to our trilateral discussion mr. president it’s going to be a good one it’s going to be an interesting one and it’s an important discussion all in all we’ve had yet another good meeting between people who are able to speak frankly with each other and people who share the common desire for people to live in security and peace welcome miss Miller go andreen I would like to first of all express my gratitude and also on behalf of my entire delegation for the warmth and hospitality that we have received and many courtesies that we are being extended to us since our arrival in the United States I had an excellent meeting with President Bush we first of all reinforced our trust and confidence in each other I trust President Bush and I have total confidence in him that he desires well for Pakistan and for our region and I trust him also that he’s trying to do his best for bringing peace to the world and I trust him also that he’s trying to resolve the core issue of the Palestinian dispute we discussed the entire gambit of relations bilaterally between United States and Pakistan and also in our region and on international issues bilaterally we reinforced our desire to have this relationship on a long-term basis broad-based and a strategic relationship when we are talking of broad-based whatever the president has said it involves all aspects which we discussed it has its political and diplomatic aspects which we reinforced and then our desire to fight terrorism and succeed against terrorism other than that issue in the social sector on the economy how whatever assistance is being given to us whatever assistance we require our requests on that especially in the field of Trade and Investment which are the main areas which we require assistance in otherwise on a broad-based level assistance in the education and health sector on the defense side the f16 deals all this was discussed on the regional issues on the international plane we did discuss the core issue of the Palestinian dispute which needs to be resolved and being at the core and I am extremely glad that the president has a desire and a will to resolve this Palestinian dispute I wish him very well because that lies at the heart of all problems even at the heart of terrorism and extremism on the regional side in our region we also discussed the reproach going on between Pakistan and India and I proudly told the president that we had I had an excellent meeting with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Havana and it was a step forward towards resolution of disputes between India and Pakistan I did tell him on the way forward that we are moving on the Kashmiri dispute special coming on the other side we had any in-depth discussion on what is happening in Afghanistan and our tribal agency they are I explained to him whatever we are doing in the form of the peace treaty that we have just signed through a grand Georgia which is an assembly of elders this treaty is not to deal with the Taliban it is actually to fight the Taliban the misperception in the media I did clarify to the president and may I very briefly say and what I explained to the president that this is a holistic approach that we are taking to fighting terrorism in Pakistan in the tribal agency tribal agencies of Pakistan this is a political side of the holistic strategy the holistic strategy being the military arm being used a political element and administrative element and a reconstruction element so we want to move on all these aspects forward confining myself to this deal this deal is not at all with the Taliban as I said this is against the Taliban actually this deal is with the tribal elders of North Waziristan agency and the deal has three bottom lines which we fix for ourselves and this is very important which I explained to the peloton number one there will be no al-qaeda activity in our tribal agencies or across the border in Afghanistan there will be no Taliban activity in our tribal agencies or across in Afghanistan there will be no Taliban ization which is a obscurantist thoughts or way of life Nothe liberalization so all these three have been agreed by the tribal elders who signed that deal and when they sign the deal they are honorbound and they have a very strict on a code to not only abide by it but also that whoever violates it they move against them so this is in brief the deal which I explained to the president and I I know that he is satisfied with that deal and maybe this shows the light or the way forward for bringing peace to the region so this is what we discussed holistically that I would like to conclude by saying we have we had a total understanding of views between President Bush and myself and as I said we reinforced our trust and confidence in either in each other thank you very much that you have two questions have pasted them after 9/11 would the United States have actually attacked Pakistan if President Musharraf had not agreed to cooperate with the war on terrorism he says that the United States was threatening to bomb his country back into the Stone Age and President Musharraf would Pakistan have given up its backing of the Taliban if this threat had not come from Armitage first let me let me let me that he’s asking about the our mother’s thing I am you know the first I heard of this is when I read it in the newspaper today III you know I was I guess I was taken aback by the harshness of the of the words all I can say is is that shortly after 9/11 secretary Colin Powell came in and said President Musharraf understands the stakes and he wants to join and help route out an enemy that has come and it killed 3,000 of our citizens matter of fact my recollection was that one of the first leaders to step up and say that the stakes have changed that attack on America that killed 3,000 the citizens needs to be dealt with firmly was the President and if I’m not mistaken : told us that if not the night of September the 11th shortly thereafter now I need to make sure I get my facts straight but it was soon I don’t know of any conversation that was reported in the newspaper like I just don’t know about it I would like to I’m launching my book on the 25th and I am honorbound to Simon & Schuster not to comment on the book before that Dave in other words by the book is what he’s saying my question is about the US president yes excellency president musharraf has issued a call for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony between the west and the Islamic world which is in the upheaval and in complete turmoil so your comments of Islamic fascist and then the comments of the Pope and in flipped and inflammation Islamic world and my question is that would you take the leading role along with President Musharraf to build these bridges and promote interfaith harmony to avert any wrong notion of clash of civilizations I appreciate the president’s leadership in promoting harmony there is unbelievable propaganda in the Middle East these days that try to inflame passion the the propagandists are attempting to create conditions where terror is justified and so at my speech at the United Nations I stood up and said loud and clear America respects Islam and we do we don’t respect people who kill in the name of Islam to achieve political objectives like the terrorists whose matter of fact I these extremists exploit propaganda in order justify their behavior all of us need to step up and talk about a world in which we respect each other’s religions matter of fact is very important for Muslims around the world to know there’s a lot of Muslims living at peace here in the United States they are proud Americans and they’re equal to me as a citizen we respect their religions I repeat to you however that the free world in the moderate world must stand up to these extremists and not let them spread their hateful propaganda now let them try to incite the incite people to acts of violence because these extremists are not only against Western people they’re also against moderate people and the president’s reaching out to help understand the world understand that the Muslim religion is a peaceful religion is very important and we can help and we will help one way we can help is to is to work with the Palestinians and the Israelis to achieve peace I’m the first president ever to have articulated a two-state solution I believe a Palestinian state as a democracy living side by side with Israel will yield the peace what’s important is for people to understand that in order to have that peace in that Palestinian state people have got to recognize Israel’s right to exist in order for this to happen you can’t ask people to negotiate with people who say you shouldn’t exist we will continue to give aid to people who suffer we didn’t ask the question whether you know what was the nature of the religion of the people who suffered in Pakistan when we spent a half a billion dollars to help this president we said they’re suffering and we want to help and so we will continue to outreach it’s important however for people in the Middle East to reject the extremist propaganda that is spreading in many cases absolute lies about the intentions of the United States they’d love to say this is a war against Islam I can’t think of anything more false these are moderate reasonable people who reject extremism in order for there to be peace so I work hard to do my part thank you for that question Steve thank you sir there’s been a back-and-forth this week over whether the US needs permission to strike inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden is located could each of you give your position on that and you did you are you satisfied with his assurances on the tribal deal well first of all I appreciate the briefing on the tribal deal when the president looks him in the eye and says the tribal deal is intended to reject the Taliban ization of the people and that there won’t be a Taliban and won’t be al Qaeda I believe you know I mean it that this is a person with whom I’ve now had close working relationships for five and a half years and when he says if we find or when we find Osama bin Laden he will be brought to justice I believe in and we’ll let the tactic speak for themselves after it happens we’re on the hunt together it’s in the president’s interest that al Qaeda be brought to justice and it’s in our interest and we collaborate and we strategize and we talk a lot about how best to do this all I can tell you is is that when Osama bin Laden is found he will be brought to justice and that’s what we’ve continually discussed later I think as the president said we are in the hunt together against these people now why are we bothering of how to the semantics of the tactics of how to deal with the situation you’ll deal with it we are in the hunt together you want the person if at all we confront him if at all we find out his location we are quite clear what to do so let’s not get involved in how it ought to be done by whom it ought to be done there is total coordination at the intelligence level between the two forces there is coordination at the operational level at the strategic level even at the tactical level so therefore we are working together and when the situation arises we need to take the right decision to strike that’s how I don’t want let me I what we’re thinking about anyway doing and missing may I also say that we need to have ladies and gentlemen here we have the basis of a relationship is trust and confidence if we don’t have that trust and confidence in each other and we think that we are bluffing each other I don’t think that’s a good way of moving forward anyway okay I’m sorry Zafar Jung group of the newspapers mr. president I have two-part question and first I must rejoice the remarks which you gave the outset about President Musharraf and second is mr. president in Pakistan we cherish the idea of having strategic and long partnership with United States of America but we found that there is a discriminatory regime is being forward by your great country pertaining to the fear of the nuclear technology for the peaceful purpose Pakistan leaves of energy and we have been denied of that could you insure us that this discrimination will come to an end after your disgrace waiting with President Musharraf and the second part of my question mr. president that President Musharraf has been asking resolution of the problem of Palestine and cash weed for the sustainable peace in the world especially in this part of the world are you going to contemplate are you contemplating some step to take some initiative to resolve these two problems and question for mr. president is how far free life how is a song about your relations with President Bush and the agenda the item for which you are going to take up with the president how far you have been successful in persuading thank you sir you represented the entire press corps there that’s good we talked about energy and we talked about our need to work through the recent history of that we’ve had together on dealing with proliferation matters secondly in terms of Kashmir and Palestine Kashmir issue will be solved when two leaders decide to solve it and we want to help the United States can’t force nations to to reach an agreement it’s because we want there to be an agreement lasting agreements occur when leaders of nations say let’s get the past behind us and let’s move forward I am I’m encouraged by the meetings that the president and the Prime Minister of India had it is an indication that there is desire at the leadership level to solve this long-standing problem leadership is also going to be required between Israel and Palestine we of course can help and will help but it’s important for you to understand that we cannot impose peace we can help create the conditions for peace to occur we can lay out vision we can talk to world leaders and we do we can provide aid to help institutional buildings so that a democracy can flourish but ultimately peace long standing peace depends upon the will of leaders I’m impressed by this president’s will to get something done in Kashmir he and I have talked about this issue in the past he is said he was going to reach out to the Prime Minister’s of India and he has and our hope is that this process continues forward I asked the president just like I would ask the Prime Minister of India what can we do to help what would you like the United States to do to facilitate an agreement would you like us to get out of the way would you like us not to show up would you like us to be actively involved how can we help you if you so desire achieve peace and that’s that’s the role of the United States as far as I’m concerned thank you I think the I’ve already answered we’ve had far-reaching discussion encompassing bilateral issues regional and international I think we have general consensus on all issues Thank You mr. brother good job by the board thank you thank you very much thank you all

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • Bush and Musharraf: A US-Pakistan Dialogue

    Bush and Musharraf: A US-Pakistan Dialogue

    President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan held a joint press conference, discussing the strong relationship between their countries. Bush praised Musharraf’s courage in the face of extremism and highlighted their cooperation in fighting terrorism. The leaders addressed intelligence sharing, economic development, and Pakistan’s commitment to democracy. They also spoke about regional issues, such as relations with India and the situation in Afghanistan. Musharraf emphasized the desire for a long-term strategic partnership with the U.S. and explained Pakistan’s efforts to combat the Taliban. Both leaders expressed confidence in their ability to work together to achieve peace and security.

    01
    Rainbow Dreams: A Coloring Journey for Kids Paperback – October 11, 2025

    A Meeting of Minds: Bush and Musharraf, 2006

    Study Guide

    I. Quiz: Short Answer Questions (2-3 Sentences Each)

    1. What specific accomplishment regarding intelligence cooperation between the US and Pakistan did President Bush highlight during the press conference?
    2. What commitment did President Musharraf renew regarding elections in Pakistan? Why was this commitment considered important in the context of combating radicalism?
    3. According to President Musharraf, what were the three “bottom lines” of the peace treaty signed with tribal elders in North Waziristan?
    4. How did President Bush respond to the question about whether the US needed permission to strike inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden was located?
    5. What issue did the reporter Zafar Jung raise concerning the United States’ policy toward Pakistan’s access to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes?
    6. What did Bush say the United States could do to facilitate an agreement between Pakistan and India regarding Kashmir?
    7. What was President Bush’s view on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and what role did he see the United States playing in resolving it?
    8. How did President Bush respond to claims that the United States is waging a war on Islam?
    9. What was the basis of the relationship between President Bush and President Musharraf, as described by President Musharraf?
    10. What did President Bush and President Musharraf emphasize as crucial for achieving lasting peace in regions of conflict?

    II. Quiz Answer Key

    1. President Bush highlighted the cooperation between US and Pakistani intelligence forces that helped prevent the loss of innocent life in the United Kingdom. This cooperation was seen as necessary in a world where extremists are willing to kill to achieve political objectives.
    2. President Musharraf renewed his commitment to holding free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007. This commitment was seen as important because giving people a chance to participate in the political process was considered the best way to defeat radicalism and extremism.
    3. The three “bottom lines” of the peace treaty were: no al-Qaeda activity in tribal agencies or across the border in Afghanistan, no Taliban activity in those areas or across the border, and no Talibanization or obscurantist way of life allowed. These were agreed to by the tribal elders.
    4. President Bush emphasized that the US and Pakistan were “on the hunt together” and that they would “deal with” the situation when Osama bin Laden was found, without getting into the specifics of tactics. He focused on the shared goal of bringing al-Qaeda to justice.
    5. Zafar Jung raised the issue of a discriminatory regime regarding the fear of nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, as Pakistan needed energy but was being denied access. He asked if this discrimination would end after the meeting between the two presidents.
    6. Bush stated that the United States could offer assistance in creating conditions for peace, laying out a vision, and providing aid for institutional building to foster democracy. Ultimately, the resolution of the Kashmir issue would depend on the will of the leaders involved to get the past behind them and move forward.
    7. President Bush supported a two-state solution with a democratic Palestinian state living side by side with Israel. The U.S. would give aid to those suffering, help create the conditions for peace to occur, lay out a vision, talk to world leaders, and provide aid to help institutional buildings so that a democracy can flourish.
    8. President Bush refuted claims of a war against Islam, calling them “false.” He emphasized the importance of rejecting extremist propaganda, noting that the US respects Islam and that many Muslims live peacefully in the United States.
    9. President Musharraf described the basis of their relationship as trust and confidence. He stated that without this trust, a productive relationship is impossible.
    10. President Bush and President Musharraf emphasized the importance of leadership will and mutual trust for achieving lasting peace in regions of conflict. This included the need for leaders to put the past behind them and work together toward a better future.

    III. Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the strategic importance of Pakistan to the United States in the context of the “War on Terror” following 9/11, as reflected in the statements made by Presidents Bush and Musharraf.
    2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the tribal deal in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) as a counterterrorism strategy, considering President Musharraf’s explanation of the deal and potential criticisms of its long-term impact.
    3. Discuss the challenges and opportunities for promoting interfaith harmony between the West and the Islamic world, drawing upon President Bush and President Musharraf’s comments on the issue.
    4. Compare and contrast the perspectives of President Bush and President Musharraf on the role of the United States in resolving conflicts in Kashmir and Palestine.
    5. Assess the significance of economic development and educational reform as tools for combating extremism in Pakistan, based on the points raised by Presidents Bush and Musharraf.

    IV. Glossary of Key Terms

    • Extremism: Holding extreme political or religious views; often associated with intolerance, radicalism, and violence.
    • Radicalism: Belief in or support for fundamental or revolutionary changes in the established order.
    • Terrorism: The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
    • Talibanization: The process by which a region or society adopts the strict religious laws and customs associated with the Taliban.
    • Al-Qaeda: A militant Sunni Islamist multi-national organization founded in 1988 by Osama bin Laden, Abdullah Azzam and several other Arab volunteers during the Soviet–Afghan War.
    • Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA): A semi-autonomous tribal region in northwestern Pakistan, bordering Afghanistan.
    • Kashmir: A disputed territory between India and Pakistan, with ongoing conflict and political tensions.
    • Two-State Solution: A proposed resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict involving the establishment of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.
    • Proliferation: The spread of nuclear weapons, fissile material, or the technology and information necessary to manufacture them.
    • Interfaith Harmony: Promoting understanding, respect, and cooperation among different religions.

    Okay, here is a briefing document summarizing the key themes and ideas from the provided transcript of a meeting between President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf.

    Briefing Document: Meeting between President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf

    Date: [Date not specified in document, but context suggests 2006]

    Location: Washington D.C., White House

    Attendees:

    • President George W. Bush (United States)
    • President Pervez Musharraf (Islamic Republic of Pakistan)
    • Various members of their respective administrations

    Executive Summary:

    The meeting focused on reinforcing the strategic relationship between the United States and Pakistan, with a strong emphasis on counterterrorism cooperation, regional stability (particularly in Afghanistan and regarding India-Pakistan relations), and Pakistan’s internal development (economic, educational, and political). Both leaders expressed mutual trust and confidence. Key themes include combating extremism, promoting moderation, fostering economic development, and resolving regional conflicts. The discussion also addressed concerns about Pakistan’s nuclear program and the need for peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian and Kashmir disputes.

    Key Themes and Discussion Points:

    1. Counterterrorism and Extremism:
    • Shared Struggle: Both presidents emphasized the shared threat posed by extremists and terrorists. Bush stated, “He understands that we are in a struggle against extremists who will use terror as a weapon… I admire your leadership. I admire your courage, and I thank you very much for working on common strategies to protect our respective peoples.”
    • Intelligence Cooperation: Highlighted as crucial for preventing attacks, with specific mention of collaboration that helped prevent loss of life in the United Kingdom. “I want to remind the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because of the good work of our intelligence forces and Pakistani intelligence forces as we helped people in the United Kingdom we prevented the loss of innocent life that kind of cooperation is necessary.”
    • Pakistan’s Role: Bush acknowledged Musharraf’s role as a “strong defender of freedom” and a target of extremists.
    • Tribal Areas Strategy: Musharraf briefed Bush on the strategy in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), emphasizing a “holistic approach” involving military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements. He clarified that recent peace deals were “not to deal with the Taliban,” but rather “to fight the Taliban.” Specifically, he described the agreement with tribal elders that prohibited Al-Qaeda activity, Taliban activity, and Talibanization of the tribal agencies. Bush indicated satisfaction with this deal.
    • Osama Bin Laden: In response to a question about striking inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden were located there, Bush emphasized trust and collaboration. He expressed confidence that Musharraf would bring Bin Laden to justice if found. Musharraf affirmed total coordination at all levels of intelligence and operations.
    1. US-Pakistan Relationship:
    • Strategic Partnership: Both leaders affirmed the desire for a long-term, broad-based, and strategic relationship. Musharraf stated that the meeting reinforced their “trust and confidence in each other.”
    • Economic and Social Development: Discussions included economic assistance, trade and investment opportunities, and support for education and health sectors in Pakistan. Bush mentioned the need to move forward on a Reconstruction Opportunity Zone and a bilateral investment treaty.
    • Defense: The f16 deal was discussed.
    • Democracy in Pakistan: Bush reiterated Musharraf’s commitment to free and fair elections in 2007. “The last time I was with the president he assured me and assured the people that were listening to news commerce that there would be free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007 he renewed that commitment.”
    1. Regional Stability:
    • Afghanistan: The leaders discussed the situation in Afghanistan, with plans for a trilateral meeting involving Presidents Bush, Musharraf, and Karzai. Bush stressed the importance of Afghanistan’s success for regional peace.
    • India-Pakistan Relations: Bush expressed pleasure at the progress in relations between Pakistan and India and encouraged the peaceful resolution of the Kashmir issue. “I think it’s very important that the that the issue of Kashmir mu forward and be resolved peacefully and I appreciate your efforts mr. president.” Musharraf noted his “excellent meeting” with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Havana, calling it “a step forward towards resolution of disputes between India and Pakistan.”
    1. Interfaith Harmony and Moderation:
    • Combating Propaganda: Bush emphasized the need to counter extremist propaganda and promote understanding between the West and the Islamic world. “All of us need to step up and talk about a world in which we respect each other’s religions matter of fact is very important for Muslims around the world to know there’s a lot of Muslims living at peace here in the United States.”
    • Respect for Islam: Bush asserted that America respects Islam and highlighted the presence of peaceful Muslims in the United States.
    • Interfaith Harmony Initiative: Responding to a question, Bush praised Musharraf’s call for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony.
    1. Nuclear Issues and Energy:
    • Non-Proliferation Concerns: In response to a question about discriminatory practices related to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, Bush stated that they “talked about energy and we talked about our need to work through the recent history of that we’ve had together on dealing with proliferation matters.” This suggests ongoing concerns and discussions related to Pakistan’s nuclear program.
    1. Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and Kashmir:
    • Peace Process: Both leaders acknowledged the importance of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Bush reiterated his commitment to a two-state solution, emphasizing the need for both sides to recognize each other’s right to exist.
    • Kashmir Resolution: Bush stated that the Kashmir issue will be solved when the leaders of Pakistan and India decide to solve it and offered US assistance to facilitate an agreement if desired. “Kashmir issue will be solved when two leaders decide to solve it and we want to help the United States can’t force nations to to reach an agreement.”

    Points of Note:

    • Armitage Quote: Bush denied knowledge of reported threats from Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage to bomb Pakistan “back to the Stone Age” if it did not cooperate after 9/11. He maintained that Pakistan, under Musharraf’s leadership, was one of the first to offer support.
    • Trust and Confidence: The constant refrain of “trust and confidence” underscores the effort to portray a strong and reliable partnership despite underlying complexities and potential disagreements.
    • Focus on Personal Relationship: The meeting highlighted the personal relationship between Bush and Musharraf as a key factor in the strength of the US-Pakistan alliance.

    This briefing document provides a concise overview of the key discussions and themes from the meeting. It reflects the priorities and perspectives of both leaders at the time.

    US-Pakistan Relations: Counter-Terrorism, Trade, and Regional Security

    • Why was President Musharraf in Washington D.C. meeting with President Bush? The meeting was to reinforce the strong, long-term strategic relationship between the United States and Pakistan, focusing on a wide range of issues including cooperation in the fight against terrorism, economic development, trade, investment, education, health, defense, regional issues like the Palestinian dispute, and progress between Pakistan and India, including the Kashmir issue and Afghanistan. Both presidents emphasized mutual trust and a desire for peace and security in the region.
    • What role did the fight against terrorism play in the relationship between the US and Pakistan? Fighting terrorism was a central and critical aspect of the US-Pakistan relationship. President Bush lauded Musharraf’s commitment to combating extremism, noting Musharraf’s own personal risks and the need for intelligence cooperation. Musharraf detailed Pakistan’s holistic approach, including military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements to counter terrorism in its tribal agencies.
    • What is the “tribal deal” President Musharraf described, and what was its purpose? The tribal deal was an agreement signed with tribal elders in Pakistan’s North Waziristan Agency, aimed not at cooperating with the Taliban, but at fighting them. The core principles of the deal include preventing Al-Qaeda and Taliban activity in the tribal agencies and across the border into Afghanistan, as well as preventing “Talibanization” and obscurantist ideologies in the region. The tribal elders are obligated to enforce this agreement and act against those who violate it.
    • How did President Bush respond to questions about potential US military action within Pakistan to capture Osama bin Laden? President Bush emphasized the trust and collaboration between the US and Pakistan in the hunt for Al-Qaeda. Both leaders said they were working together in all areas, such as intelligence, operational, strategic, and tactical coordination. Bush deferred to the moment when such a situation arises and when the right decision will be taken to strike in such coordination.
    • What were the key issues discussed regarding the broader relationship between the US and the Islamic world? The discussion focused on promoting interfaith harmony and countering extremist propaganda. President Bush emphasized that America respects Islam and rejects the notion that the “war on terror” is a war against Islam. He stressed the importance of distinguishing between the peaceful Muslim faith and the actions of extremists and terrorists. The importance of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as well as supporting peaceful resolution of disputes like Kashmir was also discussed.
    • What specific economic development and trade initiatives were discussed? The focus was on creating Reconstruction Opportunity Zones to spur growth in Pakistan, along with a bilateral investment treaty. President Musharraf emphasized Pakistan’s need for assistance, particularly in trade and investment, as well as in education and health.
    • What was President Bush’s perspective on resolving the Kashmir dispute? President Bush believed that lasting agreements must be reached by the leaders of nations. He was encouraged by the discussions between President Musharraf and the Indian Prime Minister. He mentioned he is willing to help facilitate an agreement, and emphasized that the United States could not impose peace, but can create conditions where peace can flourish.
    • What did President Musharraf want from the meeting and the U.S. in general?
    • Musharraf sought a long-term, broad-based, strategic relationship with the United States. He emphasized Pakistan’s need for assistance in trade, investment, education, and health sectors. He pushed for a resolution to the Palestinian and Kashmir issues, and highlighted Pakistan’s commitment to fighting terrorism. Ultimately, he aimed to reinforce mutual trust and confidence between the two nations.

    Pakistan-United States Relations: Counter-terrorism, Economy, Democracy, and Regional Issues

    Pakistan and the United States have a relationship based on trust and a shared desire for security and peace. Both countries have common strategies to protect their people. The US president stated that the US desires the best for Pakistan and the region.

    Key aspects of the Pakistan-US relationship include:

    • Counter-terrorism cooperation Both countries recognize the importance of intelligence sharing to prevent terrorist attacks. Pakistan is taking a holistic approach to fighting terrorism using military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    • Economic Development The US recognizes that economic prosperity can help people improve their lives and is working with Pakistan on reconstruction opportunity zones and a bilateral investment treaty. The US has provided assistance to Pakistan in education and health.
    • Democracy and Education President Musharraf has committed to free and fair elections in Pakistan. He is also focused on improving Pakistan’s education system to prepare students for the global economy.
    • Regional Issues President Bush was encouraged by President Musharraf’s meetings with the Indian Prime Minister regarding the Kashmir issue. Both presidents discussed the situation in Afghanistan and the tribal agencies. The US President, along with President Musharraf and President Karzai, planned to have discussions regarding avenues for peace in Afghanistan.
    • Interfaith Harmony President Musharraf has called for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony between the West and the Islamic world. The US President spoke out against propaganda that tries to inflame passion and create conditions where terror is justified. He stated that the US respects Islam and that there are many Muslims living peacefully in the United States.

    US and Pakistan Cooperation Against Terrorism

    Pakistan and the United States are cooperating in the fight against terrorism. Both countries recognize the importance of intelligence sharing to prevent terrorist attacks.

    Key points include:

    • Common Strategies: Both countries share common strategies to protect their people from extremists who use terror as a weapon.
    • Intelligence Cooperation: The good work of US and Pakistani intelligence forces helped prevent the loss of innocent life in the United Kingdom.
    • Holistic Approach: Pakistan is taking a holistic approach to fighting terrorism, using military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements.
    • Tribal Deal: A peace treaty signed through a grand assembly of elders aims to fight the Taliban. The deal has three bottom lines: no al-Qaeda activity, no Taliban activity, and no Talibanization. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    • Mutual Interest: It’s in the interest of both the US and Pakistan that al-Qaeda be brought to justice. Both countries collaborate and strategize on how best to do this.

    US and Pakistan Presidents on Kashmir and Palestine

    The US and Pakistani presidents have discussed the issues of Kashmir and Palestine, agreeing that leadership from involved nations is key to resolving these conflicts.

    Key points from the discussion include:

    • Kashmir:President Bush was encouraged by President Musharraf’s meetings with the Indian Prime Minister, indicating a desire at the leadership level to solve this long-standing problem.
    • The US is willing to assist but cannot force nations to reach an agreement. Lasting agreements occur when leaders decide to put the past behind them and move forward.
    • The US can help create conditions for peace, lay out a vision, talk to world leaders, and provide aid to help institutional building so that democracy can flourish.
    • President Bush asked both leaders what the United States could do to facilitate an agreement.
    • Palestine:President Musharraf emphasized the need to resolve the Palestinian dispute, calling it the core of all problems, even terrorism and extremism.
    • President Bush expressed his desire and will to resolve the Palestinian dispute.
    • President Bush is the first president to have articulated a two-state solution, believing a Palestinian state as a democracy living side by side with Israel will yield peace.
    • For peace to occur and for a Palestinian state to exist, people have to recognize Israel’s right to exist.

    US-Pakistan Talks on Afghanistan Stability and Tribal Deal

    Afghanistan’s stability was discussed between the US and Pakistani presidents, with planned trilateral discussions involving the president of Afghanistan.

    Key points from the discussion include:

    • Mutual Interest: It is in the mutual interest of the US, Pakistan and Afghanistan for Afghanistan to succeed.
    • Avenues for Peace: Discussions were planned to find avenues for peace, considering Afghanistan has been devastated by war.
    • Tribal Deal: President Musharraf explained to President Bush what was happening in Afghanistan and the tribal agencies. He clarified that the peace treaty was signed through a grand assembly of elders, and it is intended to fight the Taliban. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    George W. Bush: The American Presidency Project

    The Original Text

    ladies and gentlemen the President of the United States and the president of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan thank you very much please be seated Laura and I appreciate the opportunity to welcome president mr. Musharraf here to Washington we remember finally mr. president to your great hospitality in Pakistan and and we remember that the importance of that visit it reconfirmed our friendship gave you and me a chance to discuss important issues and there’s no more important issue than defending our peoples this president is a strong defender of freedom and the people of Pakistan and I appreciate your leadership he understands that we are in a struggle against extremists who will use terror as a weapon he understands it just about as bit as good as anybody in the world after all they’ve tried to take his life they’ve these extremists who can’t stand the thought of a moderate leader leading an important country like Pakistan want to kill the president let’s just say things to none of the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because he has been a strong forceful leader he has become a target of those who can’t stand the thought of moderation prevailing I admire your leadership I admire your courage and I thank you very much for working on common strategies to protect our respective peoples we had a good discussion here today we talked about how our intelligence cooperation can continue I want to remind the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because of the good work of our intelligence forces and Pakistani intelligence forces as we helped people in the United Kingdom we prevented the loss of innocent life that kind of cooperation is necessary in a world in which extremists and radicals are willing to kill to try to achieve political objectives we talked about the earthquake recovery and our nation was proud to support you mister brethren because we care when we see people suffering in you I was briefed by you and your administration when I was there and I was impressed by the great organization and compassion shown for the Pakistani people by your government I hope all is going well particularly for those who suffered mightily now we talked about economic development and the need to move forward on a reconstruction Opportunity Zones as well as a bilateral and investment treaty was our relationship is more than just helping to secure our respective homelands ours is a relationship that recognizes that through economic prosperity people can can embedder themselves we had a very interesting briefing on the federally administered tribal areas the governor the areas are with us here and he briefed me and members of my national security team on the strategy to strengthen governance and to promote economic development we talked about education first time I ever met President Musharraf he talked about the need to make sure the school systems in Pakistan worked well I was impressed then I’m impressed now by your commitment to an education system that prepares students for the and gives students the skills necessary to compete in a in a global economy we talked about democracy the last time I was with the president he assured me and assured the people that were listening to news commerce that there would be free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007 he renewed that commitment because he understands that the best way to defeat radicalism and extremism is to give people a chance to participate in the political process of a nation we talked about we talked about India in relations and the president’s relations with India I was pleased to see it in Havana Prime Minister Singh and President Musharraf had another discussion I think it’s very important that the that the issue of Kashmir mu forward and be resolved peacefully and I appreciate your efforts mr. president we talked of course about Afghanistan and a president musharraf and President Karzai Karzai and I will have dinner right here in the White House next week and it’s going to be an important discussion it’s going to be important discussion because one of the most important avenues for peace is for Afghanistan’s to succeed and it’s in our mutual interest that we work together to help that a country that’s been devastated by war succeed and so I look forward to our trilateral discussion mr. president it’s going to be a good one it’s going to be an interesting one and it’s an important discussion all in all we’ve had yet another good meeting between people who are able to speak frankly with each other and people who share the common desire for people to live in security and peace welcome miss Miller go andreen I would like to first of all express my gratitude and also on behalf of my entire delegation for the warmth and hospitality that we have received and many courtesies that we are being extended to us since our arrival in the United States I had an excellent meeting with President Bush we first of all reinforced our trust and confidence in each other I trust President Bush and I have total confidence in him that he desires well for Pakistan and for our region and I trust him also that he’s trying to do his best for bringing peace to the world and I trust him also that he’s trying to resolve the core issue of the Palestinian dispute we discussed the entire gambit of relations bilaterally between United States and Pakistan and also in our region and on international issues bilaterally we reinforced our desire to have this relationship on a long-term basis broad-based and a strategic relationship when we are talking of broad-based whatever the president has said it involves all aspects which we discussed it has its political and diplomatic aspects which we reinforced and then our desire to fight terrorism and succeed against terrorism other than that issue in the social sector on the economy how whatever assistance is being given to us whatever assistance we require our requests on that especially in the field of Trade and Investment which are the main areas which we require assistance in otherwise on a broad-based level assistance in the education and health sector on the defense side the f16 deals all this was discussed on the regional issues on the international plane we did discuss the core issue of the Palestinian dispute which needs to be resolved and being at the core and I am extremely glad that the president has a desire and a will to resolve this Palestinian dispute I wish him very well because that lies at the heart of all problems even at the heart of terrorism and extremism on the regional side in our region we also discussed the reproach going on between Pakistan and India and I proudly told the president that we had I had an excellent meeting with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Havana and it was a step forward towards resolution of disputes between India and Pakistan I did tell him on the way forward that we are moving on the Kashmiri dispute special coming on the other side we had any in-depth discussion on what is happening in Afghanistan and our tribal agency they are I explained to him whatever we are doing in the form of the peace treaty that we have just signed through a grand Georgia which is an assembly of elders this treaty is not to deal with the Taliban it is actually to fight the Taliban the misperception in the media I did clarify to the president and may I very briefly say and what I explained to the president that this is a holistic approach that we are taking to fighting terrorism in Pakistan in the tribal agency tribal agencies of Pakistan this is a political side of the holistic strategy the holistic strategy being the military arm being used a political element and administrative element and a reconstruction element so we want to move on all these aspects forward confining myself to this deal this deal is not at all with the Taliban as I said this is against the Taliban actually this deal is with the tribal elders of North Waziristan agency and the deal has three bottom lines which we fix for ourselves and this is very important which I explained to the peloton number one there will be no al-qaeda activity in our tribal agencies or across the border in Afghanistan there will be no Taliban activity in our tribal agencies or across in Afghanistan there will be no Taliban ization which is a obscurantist thoughts or way of life Nothe liberalization so all these three have been agreed by the tribal elders who signed that deal and when they sign the deal they are honorbound and they have a very strict on a code to not only abide by it but also that whoever violates it they move against them so this is in brief the deal which I explained to the president and I I know that he is satisfied with that deal and maybe this shows the light or the way forward for bringing peace to the region so this is what we discussed holistically that I would like to conclude by saying we have we had a total understanding of views between President Bush and myself and as I said we reinforced our trust and confidence in either in each other thank you very much that you have two questions have pasted them after 9/11 would the United States have actually attacked Pakistan if President Musharraf had not agreed to cooperate with the war on terrorism he says that the United States was threatening to bomb his country back into the Stone Age and President Musharraf would Pakistan have given up its backing of the Taliban if this threat had not come from Armitage first let me let me let me that he’s asking about the our mother’s thing I am you know the first I heard of this is when I read it in the newspaper today III you know I was I guess I was taken aback by the harshness of the of the words all I can say is is that shortly after 9/11 secretary Colin Powell came in and said President Musharraf understands the stakes and he wants to join and help route out an enemy that has come and it killed 3,000 of our citizens matter of fact my recollection was that one of the first leaders to step up and say that the stakes have changed that attack on America that killed 3,000 the citizens needs to be dealt with firmly was the President and if I’m not mistaken : told us that if not the night of September the 11th shortly thereafter now I need to make sure I get my facts straight but it was soon I don’t know of any conversation that was reported in the newspaper like I just don’t know about it I would like to I’m launching my book on the 25th and I am honorbound to Simon & Schuster not to comment on the book before that Dave in other words by the book is what he’s saying my question is about the US president yes excellency president musharraf has issued a call for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony between the west and the Islamic world which is in the upheaval and in complete turmoil so your comments of Islamic fascist and then the comments of the Pope and in flipped and inflammation Islamic world and my question is that would you take the leading role along with President Musharraf to build these bridges and promote interfaith harmony to avert any wrong notion of clash of civilizations I appreciate the president’s leadership in promoting harmony there is unbelievable propaganda in the Middle East these days that try to inflame passion the the propagandists are attempting to create conditions where terror is justified and so at my speech at the United Nations I stood up and said loud and clear America respects Islam and we do we don’t respect people who kill in the name of Islam to achieve political objectives like the terrorists whose matter of fact I these extremists exploit propaganda in order justify their behavior all of us need to step up and talk about a world in which we respect each other’s religions matter of fact is very important for Muslims around the world to know there’s a lot of Muslims living at peace here in the United States they are proud Americans and they’re equal to me as a citizen we respect their religions I repeat to you however that the free world in the moderate world must stand up to these extremists and not let them spread their hateful propaganda now let them try to incite the incite people to acts of violence because these extremists are not only against Western people they’re also against moderate people and the president’s reaching out to help understand the world understand that the Muslim religion is a peaceful religion is very important and we can help and we will help one way we can help is to is to work with the Palestinians and the Israelis to achieve peace I’m the first president ever to have articulated a two-state solution I believe a Palestinian state as a democracy living side by side with Israel will yield the peace what’s important is for people to understand that in order to have that peace in that Palestinian state people have got to recognize Israel’s right to exist in order for this to happen you can’t ask people to negotiate with people who say you shouldn’t exist we will continue to give aid to people who suffer we didn’t ask the question whether you know what was the nature of the religion of the people who suffered in Pakistan when we spent a half a billion dollars to help this president we said they’re suffering and we want to help and so we will continue to outreach it’s important however for people in the Middle East to reject the extremist propaganda that is spreading in many cases absolute lies about the intentions of the United States they’d love to say this is a war against Islam I can’t think of anything more false these are moderate reasonable people who reject extremism in order for there to be peace so I work hard to do my part thank you for that question Steve thank you sir there’s been a back-and-forth this week over whether the US needs permission to strike inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden is located could each of you give your position on that and you did you are you satisfied with his assurances on the tribal deal well first of all I appreciate the briefing on the tribal deal when the president looks him in the eye and says the tribal deal is intended to reject the Taliban ization of the people and that there won’t be a Taliban and won’t be al Qaeda I believe you know I mean it that this is a person with whom I’ve now had close working relationships for five and a half years and when he says if we find or when we find Osama bin Laden he will be brought to justice I believe in and we’ll let the tactic speak for themselves after it happens we’re on the hunt together it’s in the president’s interest that al Qaeda be brought to justice and it’s in our interest and we collaborate and we strategize and we talk a lot about how best to do this all I can tell you is is that when Osama bin Laden is found he will be brought to justice and that’s what we’ve continually discussed later I think as the president said we are in the hunt together against these people now why are we bothering of how to the semantics of the tactics of how to deal with the situation you’ll deal with it we are in the hunt together you want the person if at all we confront him if at all we find out his location we are quite clear what to do so let’s not get involved in how it ought to be done by whom it ought to be done there is total coordination at the intelligence level between the two forces there is coordination at the operational level at the strategic level even at the tactical level so therefore we are working together and when the situation arises we need to take the right decision to strike that’s how I don’t want let me I what we’re thinking about anyway doing and missing may I also say that we need to have ladies and gentlemen here we have the basis of a relationship is trust and confidence if we don’t have that trust and confidence in each other and we think that we are bluffing each other I don’t think that’s a good way of moving forward anyway okay I’m sorry Zafar Jung group of the newspapers mr. president I have two-part question and first I must rejoice the remarks which you gave the outset about President Musharraf and second is mr. president in Pakistan we cherish the idea of having strategic and long partnership with United States of America but we found that there is a discriminatory regime is being forward by your great country pertaining to the fear of the nuclear technology for the peaceful purpose Pakistan leaves of energy and we have been denied of that could you insure us that this discrimination will come to an end after your disgrace waiting with President Musharraf and the second part of my question mr. president that President Musharraf has been asking resolution of the problem of Palestine and cash weed for the sustainable peace in the world especially in this part of the world are you going to contemplate are you contemplating some step to take some initiative to resolve these two problems and question for mr. president is how far free life how is a song about your relations with President Bush and the agenda the item for which you are going to take up with the president how far you have been successful in persuading thank you sir you represented the entire press corps there that’s good we talked about energy and we talked about our need to work through the recent history of that we’ve had together on dealing with proliferation matters secondly in terms of Kashmir and Palestine Kashmir issue will be solved when two leaders decide to solve it and we want to help the United States can’t force nations to to reach an agreement it’s because we want there to be an agreement lasting agreements occur when leaders of nations say let’s get the past behind us and let’s move forward I am I’m encouraged by the meetings that the president and the Prime Minister of India had it is an indication that there is desire at the leadership level to solve this long-standing problem leadership is also going to be required between Israel and Palestine we of course can help and will help but it’s important for you to understand that we cannot impose peace we can help create the conditions for peace to occur we can lay out vision we can talk to world leaders and we do we can provide aid to help institutional buildings so that a democracy can flourish but ultimately peace long standing peace depends upon the will of leaders I’m impressed by this president’s will to get something done in Kashmir he and I have talked about this issue in the past he is said he was going to reach out to the Prime Minister’s of India and he has and our hope is that this process continues forward I asked the president just like I would ask the Prime Minister of India what can we do to help what would you like the United States to do to facilitate an agreement would you like us to get out of the way would you like us not to show up would you like us to be actively involved how can we help you if you so desire achieve peace and that’s that’s the role of the United States as far as I’m concerned thank you I think the I’ve already answered we’ve had far-reaching discussion encompassing bilateral issues regional and international I think we have general consensus on all issues Thank You mr. brother good job by the board thank you thank you very much thank you all

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • President Musharraf address to World Economic Forum 2008 on the State of the Nation

    President Musharraf address to World Economic Forum 2008 on the State of the Nation

    This transcript features an interview with President Musharraf of Pakistan. He discusses Pakistan’s pivotal role in the 1971 US-China rapprochement, its strategic geopolitical location, and its economic progress under his leadership. He also addresses the ongoing fight against terrorism and extremism, emphasizing a multi-pronged approach, and details plans for upcoming free and fair elections. The interview concludes with a hopeful outlook for Pakistan’s future stability and prosperity. Significant attention is given to dispelling misconceptions about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and its handling of internal political challenges.

    Pakistan: A Review of President Musharraf’s Address

    Quiz

    Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.

    1. What significant historical event did Pakistan facilitate in 1971, and why was it important?
    2. According to President Musharraf, what is Pakistan’s strategic geographic importance in the region?
    3. What steps has President Musharraf’s government taken to empower the people of Pakistan?
    4. How does President Musharraf describe the state of Pakistan’s economy during his time in office?
    5. What is President Musharraf’s justification for Pakistan’s nuclear program?
    6. According to the speaker, how is Pakistan addressing terrorism, specifically al-Qaeda and the Taliban?
    7. What measure of success has Pakistan achieved against cross-border movement of militants?
    8. Why does President Musharraf emphasize the fairness and transparency of Pakistan’s electoral system?
    9. How does the President explain the different roles of the Prime Minister and President in Pakistan’s governmental system?
    10. What are the three courses that President Musharraf believes Pakistan must follow to ensure its future stability?

    Answer Key

    1. Pakistan facilitated a secret trip to China by Henry Kissinger in 1971, which led to the breaking of the divide between the United States and China and potentially prevented a longer Cold War. This event is important because it is an example of Pakistan serving as a bridge between different entities.
    2. Pakistan is strategically located between the East Gulf, Middle East, Afghanistan, Central Asian republics, China, India, and South Asia, allowing it to act as a trade and energy corridor. This position is significant because any interaction between those regions is likely to require Pakistan’s participation.
    3. The government empowered people through the introduction of a local government system, reserved seats for women in parliament, and joint electorates for minorities. These measures aimed to give a broader base of people more influence within the nation.
    4. President Musharraf states that Pakistan’s economy was in a failed state in 1999 but has since experienced an upsurge with a 7% growth rate for the past five years, which he also confirms with positive growth forecasts from other institutions.
    5. Pakistan went nuclear because of defensive compulsions, as a means to balance the threat it perceived. The President believes it was necessary to ensure the nation’s security when threats evolved beyond the conventional.
    6. Pakistan is fighting terrorism with a multi-pronged approach that includes military action, political engagement, and socioeconomic development. They are using this approach against al-Qaeda and the Taliban, with military force against the former, and working to wean the population away from the latter.
    7. Pakistan’s efforts to address cross-border movement between Afghanistan and Pakistan have led to a 42% reduction, and the government has successfully eliminated hundreds of militants in cities and valleys. These actions have also resulted in the movement of remaining militant groups into the mountains in smaller numbers.
    8. He emphasizes the fairness and transparency by noting that bugs have been removed, a caretaker government is in place for the election, that there is an elimination of gerrymandering, all polling locations are public, electoral rolls are on the internet, and results are declared at the returning officer level, and transparent ballots and boxes are used.
    9. The President states that in Pakistan’s parliamentary system, the President has specific powers but does not run the government, and that the Prime Minister is the chief executive. The Prime Minister, not the President, is responsible for forming a coalition government.
    10. The three courses are that the democratic transition and elections must lead to a stable, reconciled government, the economic growth must be maintained, and the fight against terrorism and extremism must continue.

    Essay Questions

    Consider the following questions for a more in-depth analysis.

    1. Analyze President Musharraf’s portrayal of Pakistan’s role in the global war on terror. To what extent does he present Pakistan as a victim and to what extent as a key player?
    2. Discuss the internal and external factors that contributed to the political instability in Pakistan, as described by President Musharraf. In your response, consider the various levels at which instability manifests in his descriptions.
    3. Compare and contrast President Musharraf’s view of Pakistan’s political and economic progress with potential criticisms of his governance. How does the speech both defend and present challenges to his own leadership?
    4. Evaluate President Musharraf’s strategy for addressing extremism and terrorism. What are the strengths and limitations of his approach, as described in his speech? How might this approach be viewed in the West?
    5. To what extent does President Musharraf’s emphasis on democracy and transparent elections address the core issues of political unrest in Pakistan? In your response, consider the various roles that the various parts of the Pakistani government play, according to Musharraf.

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • Al-Qaeda: A global militant Islamist organization founded by Osama bin Laden, known for its role in terrorist attacks.
    • Cold War: A period of geopolitical tension between the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective allies from the mid-1940s until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.
    • Democracy: A system of government where power is vested in the people, typically through elected representatives.
    • Extremism: The holding of extreme political or religious views; fanaticism.
    • Gerrymandering: The manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor one political party or group over another.
    • ISAF (International Security Assistance Force): A NATO-led security mission in Afghanistan authorized by the United Nations Security Council to provide security and support Afghan authorities.
    • Islamic Bomb: A term often used to describe Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program, though President Musharraf argues against this term.
    • Militant Taliban: Armed groups that have splintered from the original Taliban organization, often engaging in violence.
    • Multi-Prong Strategy: A multifaceted approach that addresses a problem from multiple angles (military, political, socioeconomic).
    • Pragmatists: People who are primarily concerned with practical solutions, rather than ideological ones.
    • Radicals: People who hold extreme political views, often supporting significant change within society.
    • Taliban: An Islamic fundamentalist political movement in Afghanistan.
    • Terrorism: The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

    Musharraf on Pakistan: Challenges and Future

    Okay, here’s a detailed briefing document based on the provided text, focusing on the key themes and ideas:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of President Musharraf’s Remarks

    Date: October 26, 2023

    Subject: Analysis of President Musharraf’s remarks on Pakistan’s domestic and foreign policy challenges and future trajectory.

    Sources: Excerpt from the provided “Pasted Text” of a speech/discussion involving President Musharraf.

    Executive Summary:

    This document analyzes President Musharraf’s remarks regarding the situation in Pakistan, his government’s policies, and his vision for the future. He emphasizes Pakistan’s strategic importance, its economic progress, and his efforts to foster democracy. He also addresses the challenges of terrorism and extremism while defending Pakistan’s nuclear program and his own actions. He stresses the need for a stable, democratic government after the upcoming elections. He makes the case that Pakistan has played a vital role in global affairs, such as its facilitating of the US-China rapprochement in 1971.

    Key Themes and Ideas:

    1. Strategic Importance and Geopolitical Role:
    • Pakistan’s location at the crossroads of South Asia, the Middle East, and Central Asia is strategically vital. “Pakistan is strategically located in the East Gulf and Middle East in the north Afghanistan and Central Asian republics Northeast China and East is India and South Asia so this strategic location actually gives Pakistan the the capability of acting as a trade and Energy Corridor.”
    • Pakistan has historically played a crucial role in international relations, particularly in facilitating the 1971 secret visit of Henry Kissinger to China. “In July 1971, Pakistan facilitated a very important event at that time that is the breaking of Thor between United States and China … that was the time when there was a tussle in China between pragmatists and radicals.”
    • The instability in the region has global implications: “anything that happens in the region in Afghanistan in Pakistan in the borders of Afghanistan and Pakistan has an impact on the whole region and may I also dare to say may have an impact in the streets of Europe.”
    1. Economic Progress and Reforms:
    • Musharraf highlights Pakistan’s economic turnaround, claiming significant growth rates: “today Pakistan’s economy from that failed state level is on an upsurge where we’ve had a 7% growth every year since the last 5 years.”
    • He emphasizes positive macroeconomic indicators and international projections of continued growth. “meril Lynch for this year projects a growth of 6.8%…The Economist the last page they show Pakistan growth this year is 7%.”
    1. Democratization and Empowerment:
    • Musharraf emphasizes reforms made during his administration to strengthen democracy: “…we have introduced the essence of democracy in Pakistan.”
    • He points to the local government system, reserved seats for women in parliament, joint electorates for minorities, and an independent media as evidence of these reforms. “we have empowered the women of Pakistan by give them giving them reserved seats at every tier of the parliament…we have liberated the media and I take pride in saying that there used to be only one Pakistan television channel in Pakistan today today there are 50 channels operating and the media the electronic and print media is totally independent.”
    • He defends the electoral system as free and transparent, outlining steps taken to eliminate flaws such as gerrymandering, ghost polling stations, and manipulation of results. “…inherently that this system is free and fair… we have not allowed any limitation of constituencies… all polling stations have been notified and they are on the internet…”
    1. The Fight Against Terrorism and Extremism:
    • Musharraf emphasizes Pakistan’s efforts to combat terrorism and extremism, particularly al-Qaeda and the Taliban, while addressing the unique challenges posed by each group. “we are fighting the alqaeda and we are fighting the militant Taliban through this strategy.”
    • He describes a multi-pronged strategy involving military, political, and socioeconomic measures. “…we are fighting terrorism on a multi-prong strategy multi-prong being military political and socioeconomic”
    • He claims successes in eliminating Al Qaeda from cities and valleys, and reducing cross-border movement into Afghanistan. “on the Pakistan side while the al-Qaeda was in our cities in hundreds and and we succeeded in almost eliminating them about 6 700 of them have been eliminated no more in our cities… the success is in the fact that isaf says that the crossborder movement from Pakistan into Afghanistan has reduced by 42 %”
    • He notes that the Taliban are their “own people” and the strategy with them must be to “wean away the population” while continuing to militarily strike those who are militant.
    1. Nuclear Program and Security:
    • Musharraf defends Pakistan’s nuclear program as a response to a perceived security threat, refuting the notion of it being an “Islamic bomb”. “This was because of our defensive compulsions…we had to balance out that threat again and that is how Pakistan went nuclear.”
    • He asserts the security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and the establishment of multi-layered custodial controls to prevent the weapons from falling into the wrong hands. “we have multi-layered custodial controls established in accordance with the best International practices and there is no way that these assets can fall into the hands of the terrorists”
    1. Political Instability and Extraordinary Measures:
    • Musharraf acknowledges the recent political turmoil in Pakistan, while claiming that his actions have been within the boundaries of Pakistan’s laws and Constitution. “I have always upheld the law and the constitution of Pakistan”
    • He explains that extraordinary measures had to be taken when the government was paralyzed, law enforcement was demoralized, and the democratic transition was derailed. “when one is faced with an extraordinary circumstance…Extraordinary Measures that to be taken and I’m very proud of the fact that we put everything back on rail.”
    1. Future Vision and the Upcoming Elections:
    • Musharraf stresses the importance of the upcoming elections on February 18th, asserting they will be fair, free, and transparent. “the elections will be held on 18th February they will be free Fair transparent and peaceful”
    • He emphasizes the need for a stable and politically reconciled government emerging from the elections. “this democratic transition and the elections on 18 February must lead to a very stable government a politically reconciled government”
    • He emphasizes the need to maintain economic progress and to continue the fight against terrorism and extremism. “…that the economic upsurge in Pakistan must be maintained and lastly we must carry on our fight against terrorism and extremism”

    Conclusion:

    President Musharraf’s remarks present a picture of a Pakistan that is both strategically important and facing complex challenges. He defends his government’s record on economic growth, democratic reforms, and the fight against terrorism. He also articulates a vision for the future focused on political stability, economic progress, and continued counter-terrorism efforts. His address is also a defense of his own actions, and serves to put forward his rationale for his own policies. While his claims of success can be assessed and examined, his remarks offer a clear insight into the Musharraf regime’s perspective at that particular moment in time.

    Pakistan: Geopolitics, Reforms, and the Path Forward

    • What role did Pakistan play in the 1970s relationship between the United States and China, and why is this significant?
    • In 1971, Pakistan facilitated a secret trip for Dr. Henry Kissinger to China using a Pakistan International Airlines flight. This was a crucial event that helped thaw the Cold War tensions between the U.S. and China and allowed for the emergence of pragmatists like Mr. Zhou Enlai to come into power in China. This act was pivotal in altering the course of international relations at the time, and it was viewed as a bridge between the two nations. However, the speaker notes that this role was largely forgotten by the 1990s, highlighting a perceived lack of recognition for Pakistan’s contributions.
    • What is the strategic importance of Pakistan’s geographical location?
    • Pakistan’s location is strategically vital, as it lies at the intersection of the East Gulf, the Middle East, Afghanistan, Central Asian republics, China, and India. This geographic position gives Pakistan the potential to act as a trade and energy corridor. Also, any security-related issues in the region, especially near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, can have far reaching effects, potentially even impacting Europe. This emphasizes the importance of stability in Pakistan for the region as a whole.
    • What economic and democratic reforms has Pakistan undertaken in recent years?
    • Pakistan has made significant strides in its economy, boasting 7% annual growth over the past 5 years, a vast improvement from a previously “failed state” position. The nation has empowered its people through a local government system, reserved seats for women in parliament, and joint electorates for minorities. A free media has also been established in Pakistan with a proliferation of channels as well as independent print media. The government has also worked to implement election systems that are transparent and fair, which the speaker explains in detail.
    • What is Pakistan’s approach to fighting terrorism and extremism, and how successful has it been?
    • Pakistan is fighting terrorism and extremism through a multi-pronged approach involving military, political, and socioeconomic strategies. Militarily, they have targeted al-Qaeda and militant Taliban, leading to successes in eliminating many terrorists in their cities and in reducing cross-border movement with Afghanistan. They are addressing extremism with the goal of changing the mindsets of those who support terrorism, which is viewed as a longer term process. Pakistan has emphasized cooperation with the United States in intelligence and tactical areas.
    • Why does Pakistan consider the term “Islamic bomb” to be unfair?
    • The speaker asserts that the term “Islamic bomb” is discriminatory because it does not reflect the necessity of the nuclear program for defensive purposes. He questions why the term is specific to Islam, rather than identifying other religious or ethnic associations with their nuclear programs, and asserts that the bomb was a direct response to threats to the nation.
    • What “extraordinary circumstances” did Pakistan face that led to “extraordinary measures,” and what does the speaker consider the ultimate measure of judging a country?
    • According to the speaker, “extraordinary circumstances” included a paralyzed government, demoralized law enforcement agencies, a derailing democratic transition, and economic instability caused by terrorism. In response, “extraordinary measures” were taken to bring things back on track. The speaker believes that the ultimate gauge of judging a country should be its economic performance, socioeconomic progress, and political stability via a well-considered democratic process.
    • How does the speaker believe the upcoming elections will be fair and transparent?
    • The speaker argues that the upcoming elections will be fair and transparent due to several systemic changes. There’s a caretaker government overseeing the process, which is a new measure. There has been no gerrymandering of constituencies. All polling stations are notified and accessible online. The electoral rolls have been published online. Returning officers now declare the results, which prevents manipulation from the election commission. Also, there are polling agents present in polling stations and the election boxes are transparent. These steps seek to ensure that there is no way to manipulate or tamper with the election process.
    • What is the anticipated political evolution of Pakistan following the upcoming elections?
    • The elections on February 18th are expected to lead to a stable and politically reconciled government. If a party wins with a simple majority, they will form the government and appoint a Prime Minister. In a hung parliament, a coalition government will form. The president of Pakistan will not run the government, instead he will coexist with whomever wins to ensure stability and prosperity for Pakistan.

    Pakistan’s Economic Resurgence

    Pakistan’s economy has seen significant growth and positive macroeconomic indicators.

    • Economic Growth: The economy of Pakistan has experienced an upsurge, with a 7% growth rate annually for the past 5 years. Even with turmoil in the region, a growth of 6.8% is projected by Merill Lynch. The Economist has also reported a 7% growth for Pakistan this year.
    • Previous Economic State: Pakistan was previously considered a “failed or defaulted state”. However, the country’s economy has been successfully turned around.
    • Positive Macroeconomic Indicators: All macroeconomic indicators for Pakistan are currently positive.

    In addition to the strong economic performance, the sources note that the government has prioritized the well-being and progress of the nation.

    Pakistan’s Political Transition

    Pakistan’s political landscape is characterized by a transition towards democracy, challenges with extremism and terrorism, and a focus on maintaining stability.

    • Democratic Reforms: The government has introduced reforms to empower the people. These include:
    • A local government system.
    • Reserved seats for women in parliament.
    • Joint electorates for minorities.
    • An independent media with 50 channels operating.
    • A functioning election commission with a fair and transparent election system.
    • A caretaker government in place to ensure fairness.
    • Electoral Process:
    • The election system is described as inherently fair and transparent.
    • Measures have been taken to prevent gerrymandering of constituencies, ghost polling stations, and tampering of electoral rolls.
    • Polling stations are now transparent, with polling agents present to monitor the process.
    • Results are to be declared by the returning officers.
    • Elections were scheduled for February 18th, after a delay due to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.
    • Government Structure:
    • Pakistan has a parliamentary system where the president has certain powers, but the government is run by the Prime Minister.
    • The President is elected by the Parliament, including the Senate, National Assembly, and four provincial assemblies.
    • The Prime Minister is the chief executive and is chosen after the elections.
    • If no single party wins a majority, a coalition government will be formed.
    • Challenges:
    • The country faces challenges with terrorism and extremism, requiring a multi-pronged strategy involving military, political, and socioeconomic elements.
    • There is a need to address the mindset that spawns terrorism, which is seen as a long-term strategy.
    • The presence of Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces on Pakistan’s territory remains a concern.
    • The government has implemented strategies to counter cross-border movement of militants and eliminate their presence in cities and valleys.
    • The government has faced extraordinary circumstances including paralysis, demoralized law enforcement agencies and the stalling of the economy
    • Political Stability: The government emphasizes the importance of political stability, a reconciled government, and maintaining the economic upsurge. The ultimate gauge of judging a country should be based on how the economy and socio-economic sector are performing and the progress and well-being of the people.
    • Future Outlook: The focus is on a democratic transition that leads to a stable and politically reconciled government, continued economic growth, and the ongoing fight against terrorism.

    Pakistan’s War on Terror: Alliances and Challenges

    Pakistan is positioned as a key ally in the war on terror, yet it faces internal challenges related to extremism and terrorism. The country’s approach to combating terrorism is multifaceted, involving military, political, and socioeconomic strategies.

    Here’s a breakdown of Pakistan’s role and challenges in the war on terror:

    • Strategic Alliance: Pakistan has been a key ally of the United States in the war on terror.
    • Combating Extremism: The Pakistani government is actively fighting against both Al-Qaeda and the militant Taliban, using a multi-pronged strategy. This includes military action, political measures, and socioeconomic programs.
    • Military Operations: Military force is used against militant groups. There is also cooperation with the United States at strategic and tactical levels, including intelligence sharing.
    • Successes: The Pakistani government claims to have eliminated hundreds of Al-Qaeda members from cities and valleys. They have also acted against the spread of Talibanization in settled districts.
    • Addressing Extremism: In addition to military action, the government aims to change the mindsets that lead to terrorism, acknowledging that this is a long-term process.
    • Border Control: Efforts are being made to control cross-border movement between Afghanistan and Pakistan. This includes establishing border posts and fencing in certain areas.
    • Challenges:
    • Taliban Presence: Despite efforts to combat them, there are still Taliban forces present on Pakistani territory.
    • Cross-Border Movement: While the government has seen success, the cross-border movement of militants remains a challenge.
    • Extremist Mindsets: Addressing the underlying causes of extremism in society is an ongoing challenge.
    • Internal Perspective: There are segments of the Pakistani population that hold different views on the war on terror, which presents an internal challenge for the government.

    Overall, Pakistan’s role in the war on terror is complex, with the country simultaneously acting as a key ally and facing internal challenges related to extremism and terrorism. The government has undertaken significant efforts to combat these challenges using a multi-faceted approach that includes military, political and socioeconomic strategies.

    Pakistan’s 2008 Democratic Elections

    Pakistan’s democratic elections are a key focus of the government, with significant efforts made to ensure fairness and transparency. The election system has been reformed to address past issues and build trust in the process.

    Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of the democratic elections in Pakistan:

    • Commitment to Democracy: The government has emphasized its commitment to democratic processes, with the goal of a stable and politically reconciled government. The elections are seen as a crucial step in the democratic transition of the country.
    • Fair and Transparent System: The election system is described as inherently fair and transparent.
    • Measures have been taken to prevent gerrymandering of constituencies, ghost polling stations, and tampering of electoral rolls.
    • Electoral rolls have been notified and made available on the internet for public scrutiny.
    • Polling stations have been made transparent, with polling agents from every candidate present to monitor the process. The ballot boxes are shown empty and then sealed in front of the polling agents. Ballot papers are counted in front of the agents as well.
    • The election results are declared by the returning officers, adding another level of transparency to the process.
    • A caretaker government is in place to oversee the elections, a measure that was not in place before.
    • Election Details:
    • Elections were initially scheduled for January 8th but were postponed to February 18th due to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.
    • The government has given assurances that the elections will be free, fair, transparent, and peaceful.
    • Government Structure Post-Election:
    • The president of Pakistan, who is elected by the Parliament, does not run the government. The government is run by the Prime Minister.
    • Following the elections, if any party wins a majority, they will form the government and select a Prime Minister. If no single party wins a majority, a coalition government will be formed.
    • The president may facilitate a coalition for the sake of harmony in Pakistan.
    • Emphasis on Stability: The government has stressed that the democratic transition and elections must result in a stable government. The well-being, progress and development of the country and its people are the main priority.

    In summary, Pakistan has made significant efforts to ensure the democratic elections are fair and transparent, with measures in place to prevent manipulation. The focus is on a stable and reconciled government, and the government has urged everyone to see the elections within the context of the laws and constitution of the country.

    Securing Pakistan’s Nuclear Assets

    Pakistan is a nuclear state and has taken measures to ensure the security of its nuclear assets. There is concern that these assets could fall into the wrong hands, particularly those of terrorists, but the government has put measures in place to prevent such a scenario.

    Here’s a breakdown of the key points regarding Pakistan’s nuclear assets:

    • Nuclear Capability: Pakistan developed nuclear weapons due to “defensive compulsions,” as a way to balance a perceived threat that had gone beyond conventional levels. The government states that this is not an “Islamic bomb,” and there is no other designation for other countries with nuclear capabilities.
    • Custodial Controls: The government has established multi-layered custodial controls over its nuclear assets, following the best international practices. These controls ensure that the assets cannot fall into the hands of terrorists.
    • Stability Concerns: There are concerns that Pakistan’s nuclear assets could fall into the wrong hands due to instability, but the government has taken steps to ensure such a scenario does not happen.
    • International standards: The custodial controls are in accordance with the best international practices
    President Musharraf address to World Economic Forum 2008

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • President Musharraf interview with Talat Pakistan: Crisis, Politics, and the Path Forward

    President Musharraf interview with Talat Pakistan: Crisis, Politics, and the Path Forward

    This text comprises excerpts from an interview featuring a high-ranking Pakistani official. The interview covers a wide range of topics, including political instability in Karachi, the role of political parties in inciting violence, and the challenges of counterterrorism efforts. The official discusses the complexities of governing Pakistan, navigating ethnic tensions, and addressing extremism, while also offering insights into foreign policy challenges concerning Afghanistan and Kashmir. The interview reveals internal political struggles and anxieties regarding national security, highlighting the difficulties in finding consensus on crucial issues. Significant portions of the interview are highly critical of the current government’s handling of critical issues.

    Comprehensive Study Guide: Analysis of “Pasted Text”

    Quiz

    Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

    1. According to the speaker, what is the media focusing on instead of reporting more serious issues?
    2. What does the speaker mean when he says the city was “mafed?”
    3. What is the speaker implying when they discuss helicopters being offered?
    4. What does the speaker mean when discussing “political answers” in various cities?
    5. What is the speaker’s critique of political rallies and public opinion?
    6. What is the main point of the speaker’s discussion about his role and that of the Prime Minister?
    7. According to the speaker, what is the root cause of increasing extremism?
    8. What are the speaker’s views on how to deal with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban?
    9. What does the speaker mean when he says “We are Pakistan versus Pakistan?”
    10. What does the speaker say is the biggest concern of America?

    Quiz Answer Key

    1. The speaker claims that the media is focusing on minor incidents, such as someone being hit with a stick during a cricket match, instead of covering the more critical violence and casualties occurring in the city. This is framed as a distraction from the real issues at hand.
    2. When the speaker states that the city was “mafed,” they are implying that the city was in a state of chaos, likely due to violence. This is connected to the idea that the media is downplaying the extent of the issues.
    3. The speaker is implying that the government is trying to bribe or persuade individuals, likely leaders or influential figures, by offering them helicopters instead of addressing the issues they are raising in a genuine way. This shows a lack of seriousness in resolving the actual issues.
    4. By “political answers,” the speaker means that actions and events in various cities like Islamabad and Karachi are being driven by political agendas rather than genuine attempts to solve existing issues. This suggests a pattern of politicization that avoids real solutions.
    5. The speaker is critical of political rallies, suggesting they are primarily for political parties to showcase strength and manipulate public opinion. The speaker implies that this use of political rallies distracts from the real issues and is used to show they are not weak and rally support.
    6. The speaker emphasizes that their role is to facilitate the government, contributing views and strategies, but not to run it. They make it very clear that they are not trying to take over, and that the Prime Minister and the cabinet is running the government.
    7. The speaker identifies the root cause of increasing extremism as the war in Afghanistan starting in 1979. They claim the training and support of the Mujahideen led to the current state of affairs with the rise of radical groups.
    8. The speaker advocates for a strategic approach to dealing with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. This includes intelligence gathering, political instrument development, and engaging with local leaders rather than simply using military force. They emphasize learning from the ground truth rather than from outside sources.
    9. By “we are Pakistan versus Pakistan,” the speaker refers to the internal conflict and divides within the country and the fact that Pakistan is fighting against itself with a lack of unity. He claims that it is not a matter of outsiders, but of the Pakistani people.
    10. The speaker says that America is most concerned about the Taliban’s growing influence in the region. The speaker is implying that their main concern is the possibility of them using this to create instability in the region and attack the U.S.

    Essay Questions

    Instructions: Develop a well-structured essay for each question, incorporating evidence and analysis from the source material.

    1. Analyze the speaker’s perspective on the role of the media, using specific examples from the text to support your argument. How does the speaker view the media’s portrayal of events and its impact on society?
    2. Discuss the various political forces and power dynamics described by the speaker. How do these dynamics affect the speaker’s analysis of current events, and what solutions are proposed in the text?
    3. Explore the speaker’s stance on the causes and implications of extremism, paying particular attention to the historical context given. How do these arguments connect to their critique of political leadership and governance?
    4. Compare and contrast the speaker’s role as he states it, and what can be implied from his overall comments. How does this understanding shape their critique of the government and political system?
    5. Evaluate the speaker’s analysis of the relationship between Pakistan, America, and the Taliban, focusing on the speaker’s suggested solutions. How does this analysis fit into a broader understanding of the region?

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • MKM: Likely refers to the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, a political party in Pakistan.
    • PML: Likely refers to the Pakistan Muslim League, a political party in Pakistan.
    • Gairfal: This term means “illegal” or “not following procedure” in Urdu, implying actions were done outside the legal framework.
    • Langar: A community kitchen in South Asia that serves free food to all, regardless of background or status.
    • Madrasas: Religious schools that can vary significantly in curriculum and viewpoint.
    • Al-Qaeda: A militant Sunni Islamist organization founded by Osama bin Laden.
    • Taliban: A fundamentalist Islamic movement that governed Afghanistan from 1996-2001 and has been in conflict with U.S. and Afghan forces.
    • Sharia: Islamic law based on the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad.
    • Mujahideen: Muslim fighters or those who engage in jihad; often used to refer to those involved in the Afghanistan-Soviet War.
    • Biometric System: Automated systems used to identify individuals based on unique biological traits.
    • Consensual Building: A process in which people work together to achieve agreement with the various viewpoints.
    • Micromanagement/Micromax: This term is used to mean focusing on the details of things rather than the overall big picture.
    • CBC: In this context it is a reference to a broadcasting corporation.

    Pakistan’s Political and Social Crisis

    Okay, here’s a detailed briefing document summarizing the main themes and important ideas from the provided text:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of Excerpts

    Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: Analysis of Political and Social Issues in Pakistan Sources: Excerpts from “Pasted Text”

    Executive Summary:

    This document analyzes a complex and often rambling discourse on the political, social, and security landscape of Pakistan. The speaker, likely a person of significant influence and experience, discusses a wide array of interconnected issues, including: political polarization, ethnic tensions, media bias, government dysfunction, the rise of extremism, the challenges of counter-terrorism, and the complexities of the Kashmir dispute. The discourse is marked by a sense of frustration with the current system and a desire for a more effective and unified approach to governance and nation-building. The speaker often emphasizes the need for consensus building and a departure from political gamesmanship.

    Key Themes and Ideas:

    1. Political Polarization and Dysfunction:
    • Cricket Match Analogy: The speaker uses the analogy of a “fruitless cricket match” between India and Pakistan to describe the unproductive and often repetitive nature of political conflict and media coverage.
    • Quote: “Right and truth are being sidelined and there is a fruitless game of cricket match going on between India and Pakistan”
    • Political Gamesmanship: The speaker criticizes political parties for prioritizing their own agendas and vote banks over national interest. There is a sense that political actions are often performative, designed to sway public opinion and demonstrate power, rather than address real issues.
    • Quote: “this political action was done by a political party and now this question is asked in us”
    • Dominant Parties and Opposition: The text highlights the tension between dominant parties and opposition, with accusations that both sides are engaging in political maneuvering.
    • Quote: “now here that political party is doing this with them, that opposition political party dominates the opposition, for they should also do this, they are doing politics”
    • Challenging the Government: The speaker questions the legitimacy of the existing system, implying the current government is not effective, which seems connected to the idea that the current government is being challenged politically for their power.
    • Quote: “now why are you converting this bangle into politics and why is this opposition expecting the major political, why are you challenging PML and the coalition party which is in the government, why are they being challenged in this way”
    • Lack of Consensus: A recurring theme is the lack of consensus in political decision-making, which the speaker believes is detrimental to progress.
    • Quote: “if you have to get it, you should be consensual and finally whatever happens, everyone should pay for it, but consensus building is something that I am not kind of open minded”
    1. Media Bias and Misinformation:
    • Sensationalism: The speaker criticizes media for sensationalizing events, particularly focusing on violence in certain areas, thereby creating a distorted picture of reality and exacerbating tensions.
    • Quote: “if someone from the north has been hit by a stick or something has happened or he has fallen, they are showing it again and again, from morning till night”
    • Lack of Nuance: There’s an undercurrent in the text that suggests media is failing to convey the complexity of events and the multiple viewpoints involved.
    • Quote: “the people who had caused disturbance to an event, it got hidden, the effect of which was hid”
    1. Ethnic and Sectarian Tensions:
    • Ethnic Coloring of Issues: The speaker expresses concern that political issues are often given an “ethnic color,” potentially leading to further divisions within society.
    • Quote: “the politician who is doing it, number two, who is giving it an ethnic color”
    • Sectarian extremism: The text talks about the impact of the rise of extremist forces in Pakistan, and how their rise goes back to 1979 with the war in Afghanistan, which could be a reason why it is so difficult to combat today.
    • Quote: “In 1979, when we started the war in Afghanistan, we took the Mujahideen for 10 years.”
    1. Government Ineffectiveness and Corruption:
    • Government Offers vs. Reality: There is a critique of government offers of aid that are perceived as empty gestures.
    • Quote: “they are being offered helicopters, do you want to take the helicopter, we will give you the helicopter, but they don’t want it”
    • Lack of Action: The speaker implies that the government struggles to implement effective policies, and can’t seem to keep track of who is in power, as demonstrated by the speaker pointing out that those they caught were released later by ministers.
    • Quote: “then in front of me the media person, we caught hold of them to release them, so the ministers and governors, those Taliban, they have released them, so this is our country”
    • Systemic Issues: The speaker is concerned that a systemic crisis is unfolding, not just an issue of individual leadership.
    • Quote: “the system which you have been building and running for the last 8 years, its crisis has started and you see all these same things”
    1. Rise of Extremism and Counter-Terrorism Challenges:
    • Roots of Extremism: The speaker identifies the war in Afghanistan in the 1970s as a starting point for the current issues with extremism, which lead to the rise of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The madrasas are criticized for spreading extremist teachings.
    • Quote: “From there all the Al-Kayda came over us, they all shifted here, its impact on Afghanistan is full now after 911”
    • Failed Counter-Terrorism Efforts: The speaker implies that current counter-terrorism efforts are not effective, despite significant investments from international partners.
    • Quote: “the byanaat that comes from Pentagon is quite soft that despite the investment of 6 billion in Pakistan, as per the report of Congress and so much help, it is still taking root and they are saying that maybe Pakistan is not combining it in the right way and you use this, I’m frankly I would like to share that thing this is not working”
    • Border Control Issues: The porous borders with Afghanistan are seen as a major challenge in controlling the movement of extremists.
    • Quote: “there are 50 crossing places, we don’t have that much resources, so they come and go”
    1. Kashmir Dispute and International Relations:
    • Need for Compromise: The speaker acknowledges the need for compromise on both sides to resolve the Kashmir dispute, but points out the difficulty in achieving consensus on this issue.
    • Quote: “The fact is that if we have to arrive at a solution, both have to give up something, and when both give up, then in the opposition of both of them in their countries, then again the same consensus issue has come up”
    • Backroad Diplomacy: The speaker talks about backroad diplomacy being used to prepare the basic contract for Kashmir, which suggests there is a quiet dialogue and diplomacy happening on this issue.
    • Quote: “the basic contract for Kashmir has been prepared through backroad diplomacy”
    1. Personal Authority and Influence
    • Acknowledging Authority: The speaker makes a point about his personal influence in Pakistani society, implying that he has influence beyond his title or position. He also criticizes people who only acknowledge his authority when he is in uniform.
    • Quote: “You are coming to me because of uniform I think I have crossed this stage maybe in one, two, three years that was the uniform time pack when and I will be in the country and the people were coming to me because of my coming to me because of my father’s but they nine they recognize me today as a person talking about myself”

    Conclusion:

    The excerpts reveal a deeply troubled picture of Pakistan, characterized by political infighting, social divisions, the threat of extremism, and ineffective governance. The speaker’s tone is often critical, but it is also infused with a desire for change. There is a strong emphasis on the need for unity, consensus-building, and a more strategic approach to addressing the complex challenges facing the nation. This text should be read as a call for introspection, critical analysis, and a genuine commitment to improving the lives of all Pakistanis.

    Further Research:

    • Investigate the specific political parties and personalities referenced in the text (e.g., PML, MKM).
    • Examine the history of the conflict in Afghanistan and its impact on Pakistan.
    • Analyze the role of the media in shaping public opinion and political discourse in Pakistan.
    • Research the complexities of the Kashmir dispute and potential solutions.
    • Research the specific counter-terrorism policies that the speaker is discussing.
    • Examine the relationship between Pakistan and the United States.
    • Consider the historical context of the conversation, including potential time periods.

    This briefing document provides a starting point for understanding the complex issues raised in the text, and hopefully provides a useful lens for future research on these topics.

    Pakistan’s Unrest: A Critical Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions

    1. What are some of the major issues highlighted regarding the media’s coverage of events in Pakistan? The media is criticized for prioritizing sensationalism and focusing on specific incidents (e.g., a person being hit by a stick) over more serious issues like violence and casualties. It’s accused of repetitive coverage, potentially exacerbating tensions. Additionally, there are implications that the media might be influenced by political and ethnic narratives rather than presenting a balanced view of events. There are also suggestions that the media isn’t giving proper attention to the underlying causes of the violence happening.
    2. How are political parties and political activity contributing to the unrest and violence? Political parties are frequently mentioned as a major source of the issues, manipulating events and public perception to gain support. They are accused of using rallies and public demonstrations to showcase their strength, playing political games, and focusing on vote bank politics. The sources point to the use of ethnic and political division to create tension. There is a feeling that political leaders use their power for personal gain and are not focused on the good of the country.
    3. What is the role of the military and security forces in these conflicts? There is a complex relationship between the military, security forces, and the political landscape. The military leadership is acknowledged to hold significant power, with some believing that people are attracted to them due to their uniform. The role of the military is described as facilitating the government, not actually running it. Additionally, the source references intelligence agencies being involved in violence, implying a lack of transparency and a potential abuse of power. The involvement of security forces in the release of captured Taliban members further complicates the situation.
    4. What are some of the concerns raised about extremism and its growth in Pakistan? Extremism is presented as a significant challenge, with its roots traced back to the Afghan war in 1979. The sources cite the growth of Madrassas and their role in fostering extremism. The proliferation of extremist literature and support networks is also highlighted. The sources also imply that previous attempts to counter extremism haven’t been effective. Some people point to the fact that the extremists are being supported by people within the country as well as across the border.
    5. How does the speaker describe the relationship between Pakistan and the United States, particularly in the context of the War on Terror? The United States’ perspective is described as concerned, noting that despite significant investment and assistance to Pakistan, extremism continues to take root. The speaker implies that the US sees Pakistan as not effectively utilizing the aid they receive and possibly even inadvertently contributing to the problem. The speaker also notes that the US is particularly concerned about the Taliban and its potential to pose a threat.
    6. What are the key arguments about the importance of consensus building and open discussion? The speaker repeatedly emphasizes the importance of open-mindedness, open discussion, and consensual building as essential for effective leadership. They criticize the tendency for leaders to impose their views and highlights the need for collaboration and consensus in decision making, arguing that everyone should pay attention and contribute to the resolution of these issues.
    7. What is the speaker’s stance on transparency and accountability? The speaker strongly advocates for transparency and against cover-ups. They emphasize the importance of acknowledging reality and using it to inform decision-making. They believe they understand the reality of the situation, and do not want to be told about the situation by outside forces. The speaker is critical of those who do not engage with the reality of the situation. There is a belief that when you are in the right, there is nothing to be afraid of.
    8. What are the ideas suggested for resolving complex issues like Kashmir? The speaker acknowledges the difficulty in resolving long-standing issues like Kashmir and emphasizes the need for both sides to make concessions. They highlight the limitations of solely relying on solutions from other parts of the world. Self-governance and joint management are mentioned as potential solutions, but the need for finding solutions unique to the dynamics of the region is stressed. They argue that people offer criticism, but not solutions.

    Political Turmoil and Instability

    Political turmoil is discussed extensively throughout the sources, with various factors contributing to the instability. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

    • Political Parties and Power Struggles: The sources highlight a constant struggle for power between political parties. Parties are accused of using rallies and public displays of strength to demonstrate dominance and gain support. The sources mention that political actions are often taken by parties to challenge the ruling government, and this is seen as a normal part of politics. There’s a sense that political parties are more interested in maintaining their power than in resolving issues. One source mentions that the opposition challenges the ruling party and coalition, which contributes to the turmoil.
    • Ethnic Tensions: The sources suggest that some political actors are giving an “ethnic color” to situations, which exacerbates the turmoil. There’s a mention of different ethnic backgrounds and how these differences can be used to create division.
    • Government Instability and Lack of Legitimacy: One source notes that there was no proper government in Karachi at a certain time, which contributed to violence. A crisis of legitimacy within the democratic system is mentioned. There is concern that the existing system, which has been in place for eight years, is failing.
    • Role of Media: The media is described as focusing on less important issues, such as a cricket match, rather than the real issues, such as violence and casualties. The media is also mentioned as reporting that guns were coming out from all sides.
    • Violence and Unrest: The sources make multiple references to violence, including shootings, killings, and general unrest. A specific event is mentioned where Karachi was blocked, followed by widespread violence. Rallies are mentioned as sites of violence and firing.
    • Systemic Issues: The sources suggest that the political turmoil is not just about individual leaders or events, but also about systemic issues within the country. There’s a discussion about the need for a national consensus on a broad agenda. There are also references to a crisis in the existing democratic system and the need for reforms.

    Overall, the sources paint a picture of a politically volatile environment characterized by power struggles, ethnic tensions, government instability, and violence. There is a sense that the political system itself is in crisis, with a lack of consensus and trust between different political actors. The sources also point to the influence of media in shaping public opinion and the impact of external factors, like the war in Afghanistan, on the internal political landscape.

    Media Bias and Violence Reporting

    The sources discuss media bias, particularly in relation to how certain events are covered and the focus given to different issues. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

    • Focus on Less Important Issues: One source indicates that the media is focusing on less important issues, such as a cricket match between India and Pakistan, instead of focusing on more serious issues, such as violence and casualties. This suggests a bias towards sensationalism or perhaps a lack of interest in covering more complex and challenging topics. The source states that while people in the north are being hurt by sticks, the media is showing it repeatedly instead of focusing on more serious violence.
    • Ignoring the Scale of Violence: The media is criticized for not accurately portraying the scale of violence and casualties. The source claims that the media is understating the number of casualties, which are said to be “very high,” and that the city is in a “mafed” (likely meaning “paralyzed” or “chaotic”) state. This suggests a bias towards downplaying the severity of the situation, possibly due to government pressure or a desire to avoid panic.
    • One-Sided View of Events: There is mention of the media presenting a “one side view” of events. This indicates a lack of objectivity, where the media may be favoring a particular narrative or perspective. The source also mentions how the media hid the actions of those who caused a disturbance.
    • Role in Shaping Public Opinion: The media’s role in shaping public opinion is implied, although not explicitly stated. By focusing on certain stories and downplaying others, the media can influence how the public perceives events and issues. The sources suggest that the media’s role is not objective and could serve to maintain power and promote certain political actions.
    • Media as a Source of Information About Violence: Despite the bias, the media is also mentioned as a source of information about violence. One source mentions that “guns were coming out from all sides and all these reports were present in the media”. This suggests that while the media may not be unbiased, it still plays a role in reporting what is happening.
    • Lack of Coverage of Critical Information: One source states that “this media does not give any information” about Pakistani hand grenades and intelligence agencies firing. This suggests that the media is not reporting on all aspects of the violence and political unrest in the country.

    Overall, the sources portray the media as biased and not fully reporting on the truth. The media is criticized for prioritizing less important issues, understating the scale of violence, and presenting a one-sided view of events. This bias is seen as contributing to the political turmoil by not fully informing the public.

    Ethnic Tensions and Political Turmoil

    The sources discuss ethnic tensions as a contributing factor to political turmoil. Here’s a breakdown of how the sources address this issue:

    • “Ethnic Color” of Situations: One source mentions that some political actors are giving an “ethnic color” to situations. This suggests that political actors are using ethnic differences to further their own agendas or to create division and tension. By framing events along ethnic lines, they may be trying to mobilize support from specific ethnic groups, or to create conflict with other groups.
    • Ethnic Backgrounds and Division: The source indicates that there are different ethnic backgrounds present, implying that this diversity is a factor in the tensions. The text suggests that these ethnic differences can be manipulated to create division and further political instability. This also indicates that ethnic identity is an important factor in the political landscape.
    • Rallies and Ethnic Identity: One source mentions that in 2019, a political party, the MKM, took out a very large rally, and they mention that “we are of whatever ethnic background”. This shows that the rallies are organized in part along ethnic lines, and the use of the phrase “whatever ethnic background” may suggest an attempt to unite people across ethnic groups, but it also highlights the importance of ethnic identity.
    • Impact on Political Landscape: The sources do not explicitly detail specific instances of ethnic clashes or violence, but the implication is that the manipulation of ethnic differences is a dangerous thing and is contributing to political instability. The sources suggest that the ethnic tensions are being used to gain political advantage.

    Overall, the sources suggest that ethnic tensions are a significant factor in the political turmoil. Political actors are accused of using ethnic differences to create divisions and mobilize support. The sources indicate that this manipulation of ethnic identity contributes to the instability and is a dangerous factor that should be addressed.

    Government Response to Political Turmoil

    The sources discuss the government’s response to the political turmoil and other issues, highlighting several key aspects:

    • Offers of Assistance: The government is described as offering assistance, such as helicopters, to people in certain situations. However, these offers are sometimes rejected, indicating a lack of trust or a perception that the government is not genuinely trying to help.
    • Lack of Proper Governance: One source notes that there was a period when there was no proper government in Karachi, which contributed to violence. This suggests a failure of the government to maintain order and stability in the region. This lack of governance also implies a lack of proper response to the turmoil.
    • Political Actions and Instability: The government’s actions are often seen as political moves rather than genuine attempts to address issues. The sources suggest that the government’s response to rallies and political actions is often politically motivated. This approach is seen as contributing to the instability rather than resolving it.
    • Systemic Issues and Lack of Legitimacy: There’s a concern that the government is facing a crisis of legitimacy within the democratic system. The sources suggest the government has been building a system for 8 years and the crisis has now started. This points to a deeper problem with the way the government is structured and the way it functions, which affects its ability to respond effectively to crises.
    • Focus on Power and Control: The sources indicate that the government’s focus is often on maintaining power rather than addressing the root causes of the problems. One source states that the government is trying to show its political strength by gathering people for rallies. There is a perceived lack of genuine concern for the issues themselves.
    • Response to Extremism: The government is noted as having made short and long term plans for army meetings in response to extremism. However, there is also a discussion of how extremism has increased despite efforts by the government and international banks. This suggests that the government’s response to extremism may not be effective or may be facing deep seated challenges.
    • Media Control: Although not explicitly stated as a government action, the lack of media coverage of critical information may be a result of government influence or pressure. One source mentions that the media doesn’t report on all aspects of violence, which could suggest that the government is controlling the narrative by limiting information available to the public.

    Overall, the sources portray the government’s response as inadequate, politically motivated, and ineffective in addressing the political turmoil and other issues. The government is criticized for its lack of proper governance, its focus on maintaining power, and its failure to address the root causes of the problems. There is a lack of trust between the government and the people and an ineffective response to crises and violence.

    Kashmir Conflict: Compromise and Solutions

    The sources discuss the Kashmir conflict, highlighting some key aspects of the issue and potential solutions:

    • Need for Compromise: The sources state that if a solution to the Kashmir conflict is to be reached, both sides must be willing to give up something. This implies that a peaceful resolution requires a willingness to compromise and make concessions, which is often difficult due to opposition in both countries. The sources highlight that consensus is difficult to achieve on this point.
    • Backroad Diplomacy: The sources mention that a basic contract for Kashmir has been prepared through “backroad diplomacy”. This suggests that there are ongoing, informal negotiations and discussions aimed at resolving the conflict. This indicates that despite public tensions, there are efforts to find common ground through discreet channels.
    • Self-Governance and Joint Management: The sources mention ideas for potential solutions, such as “self-governance” and “joint management”. These ideas suggest a possible framework where Kashmir would have a degree of autonomy while being jointly managed by both sides.
    • Lack of Public Solutions: The sources note that many people have criticized the proposed solutions, but few have offered their own ideas. When asked, very few people provide solutions to this conflict. This highlights the complexity of the issue and the challenge of finding a resolution that is acceptable to all parties. This also implies that despite many ideas being offered, a consensus has not been reached.
    • Unique Environment and Dynamics: The sources point out that the environment of every place is different, and that the dynamics of the Kashmir conflict are also unique. This suggests that solutions must be tailored to the specific context of Kashmir, and that lessons from other conflicts may not be directly applicable. A completely different generation with different dynamics requires a different approach.
    • Ongoing Study and Research: The sources indicate that the issue is being studied from all angles, with documents from various places being examined. This suggests a thorough approach to understanding the complexities of the conflict.
    • Rejection of Solutions: The sources imply that if the leaders do not like the offered solutions, they will reject them. It is also stated that the people who are already in favor of solutions must also let others leave out of the electoral process. These factors further complicate the search for an acceptable solution.

    Overall, the sources portray the Kashmir conflict as a complex issue requiring compromise and a tailored solution. The sources highlight the ongoing efforts to find a solution, including backroad diplomacy, and the need for innovative approaches like self-governance and joint management. However, they also acknowledge the difficulties in achieving a consensus, the unique dynamics of the conflict, and the lack of public solutions.

    President Musharraf interview with Talat

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • President Musharraf Address To Nation After Emergency Pakistan’s Turning Point: A Presidential Address

    President Musharraf Address To Nation After Emergency Pakistan’s Turning Point: A Presidential Address

    A Pakistani leader, addressing the nation, explains the rationale behind declaring a state of emergency. He cites escalating terrorism and extremism, a paralyzed governance system hampered by judicial activism, and obstacles to democratic transition as critical threats to Pakistan’s stability and progress. The leader emphasizes his commitment to Pakistan’s well-being above all else and assures the public that the emergency measures are necessary to restore order and advance democratic goals. He appeals for national unity and understanding, while also seeking international support. Ultimately, he frames his actions as a necessary, albeit drastic, measure to safeguard the nation’s future.

    A state of emergency was declared by President of Pakistan Pervez Musharraf on 3 November 2007 which lasted until 15 December 2007, during which the Constitution of Pakistan was suspended. When the state of emergency was declared, Musharraf controversially held both positions of President and Chief of Army Staff.

    He later resigned as Army Chief 25 days into the emergency on 28 November. The state of emergency and its responses are generally attributed to the controversies surrounding the re-election of Musharraf during the presidential election on 6 October 2007, including his holding of both offices of President and Chief of Army Staff at the time.

    Pakistan at a Crossroads: A Study Guide

    Quiz

    Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

    1. According to the speaker, what are the primary internal conflicts plaguing Pakistan?
    2. How does the speaker describe the state of the governance system in Pakistan?
    3. What three-stage transition strategy for democracy did the speaker implement, and at what stage did it stall?
    4. What examples does the speaker provide to demonstrate the growing threat of extremism?
    5. What are the key issues the speaker identifies with the judiciary’s actions?
    6. What specific incident involving the Lal Masjid is discussed and why is it significant?
    7. What action did the speaker take regarding the Presidential elections?
    8. What does the speaker suggest about the role of the media in Pakistan?
    9. What justification does the speaker give for declaring a state of emergency?
    10. According to the speaker, what is his overriding priority and motivation in his decisions?

    Quiz Answer Key

    1. The speaker identifies terrorism and extremism as primary internal conflicts, leading to widespread attacks, emboldened extremists, and the imposition of their extremist religious ideas. These issues have impacted the peace of the country and pose a serious threat to the stability of Pakistan.
    2. The speaker describes the governance system as semi-paralyzed, with officials preoccupied with court cases. This is due to the numerous suo motu cases and their fear of taking action, resulting in a muffled and ineffective administration.
    3. The speaker’s three-stage transition strategy involved: (1) direct control of the government from 1999-2002, (2) oversight of elected governments from 2002-2007, and (3) the final transition to complete democracy in 2007, which was stalled due to internal conflicts.
    4. The speaker notes that extremists are operating openly, even in Islamabad, challenging law enforcement agencies. Additionally, he cites the Lal Masjid incident as an example of extremists taking the law into their own hands and terrorizing the people.
    5. The speaker criticizes the judiciary for what he considers judicial activism, which has led to clashes with the executive and legislative branches. He argues that this interference in government operations and the challenging of laws is destabilizing the country.
    6. The Lal Masjid incident involved extremists who took control of the mosque, martyred and held police personnel hostage, burned property, and attacked Chinese citizens. This event, in the heart of the capital, greatly embarrassed Pakistan on the world stage.
    7. The speaker was reelected as president, receiving 57 votes from the Provincial Assemblies, Senate, and National Assembly. However, the official notification was postponed due to pending legal cases against him in the Supreme Court.
    8. The speaker claims that certain media channels contributed to a negative atmosphere and distrust, adding to Pakistan’s downslide. He regrets this because his government granted independence to the media, and he feels it should act responsibly toward the community.
    9. The speaker declares the emergency as a necessary measure to correct the course of the country. He feels it is essential to restore order, complete the democratic transition, and address the issues of terrorism and failing institutions.
    10. The speaker’s overriding priority is Pakistan, stating that it is in his heart, blood, and soul. He asserts that he will do what is necessary for the nation’s stability, even sacrificing his own life. All his decisions, he says, are made with Pakistan’s interest first.

    Essay Questions

    Instructions: Answer each question thoroughly and thoughtfully, drawing on the provided source material.

    1. Analyze the speaker’s diagnosis of Pakistan’s problems. What are the key issues he identifies, and how does he portray their interrelationship?
    2. Evaluate the speaker’s approach to democracy. How does his three-stage transition plan reflect his understanding of Pakistan’s political landscape, and what are the key challenges that he encounters?
    3. Discuss the role of the judiciary as presented in the source. How does the speaker perceive the judiciary’s influence, and what impact does he believe this has on the country?
    4. How does the speaker justify his decision to declare a state of emergency? Evaluate the arguments he presents in defense of this action.
    5. What is the speaker’s overall vision for Pakistan’s future? Consider both the immediate concerns and his broader ambitions.

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • Bismillah Rahman Rahim: An Arabic phrase meaning “In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful,” commonly used by Muslims to begin a task or speech.
    • Assalam Walekum: An Arabic greeting meaning “Peace be upon you,” commonly used by Muslims.
    • Suo Motu Cases: Cases taken up by a court on its own motion without a formal request from a party.
    • IG (Inspector General): A high-ranking police officer responsible for a particular region or force.
    • Lal Masjid: “Red Mosque,” a mosque and religious school in Islamabad, known for its extremist activities.
    • Provisional Constitution Order (PCO): A temporary order or decree issued by a government, often in times of crisis or to bypass established laws.
    • Judicial Activism: The practice of judges using their power to make legal decisions based on their own interpretation of social and political issues.
    • Executive Branch: The part of government that carries out laws and policies, often headed by a president or prime minister.
    • Legislative Branch: The part of government that makes laws, such as a parliament or congress.
    • Extremism: Holding extreme political or religious views, often involving intolerance or violence.

    Pakistan’s State of Emergency: A Critical Analysis

    Okay, here is a detailed briefing document based on the provided text, analyzing its main themes, important ideas, and key quotes:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” Speech

    Date: November 3, 2007 (assuming date of the emergency declaration being discussed)

    Subject: Analysis of a Public Address on the State of Pakistan

    Introduction:

    This document analyzes a public address delivered by a leader in Pakistan, outlining a critical situation within the country and justifying the implementation of a state of emergency. The address details a confluence of issues, including terrorism, a paralyzed government, judicial overreach, and a failing economy, culminating in a drastic decision aimed at stabilizing the nation and ensuring the continuation of a democratic transition.

    Key Themes and Analysis:

    1. Crisis of Instability and Internal Conflict:
    • Main Idea: The speaker emphasizes that Pakistan has reached a “dangerous turning point” due to internal conflict. He argues the nation is in peril and requires “important and painful decisions.”
    • Supporting Quotes:
    • “Pakistan has reached a very dangerous turning point. It is a victim of internal conflict.”
    • “And if I suspect that if this timely action is not taken at this time, then God forbid, the peace of Pakistan is in danger.”
    1. Escalating Terrorism and Extremism:
    • Main Idea: The speaker highlights the unchecked rise of terrorism and extremism, noting a surge in attacks and a feeling of impunity among extremists. He expresses particular concern about the spread of extremism even in the capital, Islamabad.
    • Supporting Quotes:
    • “Terrorism and extremism have reached their extreme in my view.”
    • “Extremist extremists are roaming around the country with their chests puffed out and are not even afraid of the law enforcement agencies.”
    • “But the sad thing is that in Islamabad, the heart of Pakistan, the capital of Pakistan, extremism has spread here too and people are very scared.”
    • “They want to run their own government within the government and the worst thing is that they have their own extremist religious ideas, a fanatical thought about Islam.”
    1. Paralyzed Governance and Judicial Overreach:
    • Main Idea: The speaker describes a “semi-paralyzed” government, with officials preoccupied with legal battles and feeling demoralized due to what he views as excessive judicial intervention, and in turn, making the government ineffective. He specifically points to numerous suo motu cases as evidence. He criticizes the judiciary for clashing with the legislative and executive branches.
    • Supporting Quotes:“In my view it is semi-paralyzed, that is it has become muffled. All the senior officials of the government are running around the courts, especially the Supreme Court.”
    • “Nearly 100 suo motu cases are going on in the Supreme Court…all these suo motu cases are related to the government department.”
    • “In my view, this judicial activism and the judiciary, which is one pillar of the state, clash with the other two pillars, i.e., the legislative, legislative and executive pillars of the government system, interference in it.”
    • “And the government system is failed in every respect, in every way.”
    1. Demoralized Law Enforcement Agencies:
    • Main Idea: Law enforcement agencies, particularly in Islamabad, are described as “de-moralized” and “victims of hopelessness” due to the legal actions taken against their officers. This perceived lack of support from the judicial system has made them hesitant to act.
    • Supporting Quotes:“If we look at the law enforcement agencies, in my view they are de-moralized, especially in Islamabad, they are victims of hopelessness.”
    • “They have lost hope because their officers have been Punishments are being given.”
    1. Interference with Democratic Transition:
    • Main Idea: The speaker expresses frustration with what he sees as deliberate obstacles to Pakistan’s democratic transition, particularly in the lead up to a scheduled election that was supposed to complete the third and final phase of the transition to full democracy. He claims there is unnecessary “uproar” designed to derail progress.
    • Supporting Quotes:“But in my view, I want to say with great regret that some people are interfering in this process, they are creating hurdles in it and they do not want to start it.”
    • “In my view, for the benefit of life, for political benefit and for the loss of Pakistan, this unnecessary uproar is being created and obstacles are being created.”
    1. Economic Downturn:
    • Main Idea: The speaker laments the halt in Pakistan’s economic progress due to the current state of instability, scaring off investors. He contrasts the current decline with the previous seven years of growth in infrastructure and the social sector, citing that the lack of stability and uncertainty is holding back economic growth.
    • Supporting Quotes:“The entire economy of our people is in a bad state…Pakistan has stopped. They are stopping.”
    • “I am very sorry that it is God’s will that all these years of hard work may go waste.”
    1. Lal Masjid Incident:
    • Main Idea: The speaker details the Lal Masjid incident as a major embarrassment, noting the extremists who “took the law into their own hands” and humiliated the nation. He emphasizes the government’s reluctance to use force, while also highlighting the subsequent release of those arrested in the operation despite being identified as confirmed terrorists and that this undermines the government’s efforts to tackle extremism.
    • Supporting Quotes:“The country has been embarrassed by this so much in the whole world that even though we are such a big power, we are not in control of our capital.”
    • “Those madrasas which were involved in extremism have been ordered to be opened…the decision has been taken to open the places where the extremists were sitting.”
    • “Now the situation is that 61 of them, who were declared black by the intelligence agency…have been released, they are roaming around freely.”
    1. Disappointment with the Media:
    • Main Idea: The speaker expresses disappointment with some media channels for what he perceives as adding to the atmosphere of distrust and negativity, instead of helping to stabilize the country.
    • Supporting Quotes:“I would like to say that the media too, I would say that some channels and in some programs of those channels, they also did not help in stopping this down slide negativity, negative thinking, negative projection, rather they only added to this atmosphere of distrust.”
    • “This does not mean that the media should be completely independent, but it should be a responsibility towards the community.”
    1. Presidential Election and Legal Challenges:
    • Main Idea: The speaker describes his re-election as President, where he won a vote at 57, but emphasizes that the case is still pending in the Supreme Court, contributing to uncertainty and hindering the democratic process.
    • Supporting Quotes:“I am thankful that my assembly elected me by voting for me at 57…but the case is still pending.”
    • “No decision is being taken on it and the uncertainty which is in a political environment is going on.”
    1. Justification for Emergency:
    • Main Idea: The speaker justifies declaring an emergency, stating it is necessary to correct the downward trajectory of Pakistan. He claims that it will help put the country “back on track” by bringing new directions to the judiciary, executive, and legislative branches of the government.
    • Supporting Quotes:“I have taken some decisions after discussing with all the military, government, political and private officials, friends from outside Pakistan…and this decision is basically to complete the third stage of democracy.”
    • “In my view, this is the easiest way. Pakistan should be put back on track as soon as possible.”
    1. Reassurance and Appeal to International Community:
    • Main Idea: The speaker reassures that there will be no change in government and appeals to Western nations to understand the dire situation. He asks for time and patience as Pakistan develops democracy, citing Abraham Lincoln’s actions during the US Civil War as an example of a leader taking necessary action for the sake of the nation.
    • Supporting Quotes:“Let me tell you that there will be no change in the government. The Prime Minister, Governors, Chief Ministers will all remain in their respective positions.”
    • “I would ask you to kindly understand the criticality of the environment inside Pakistan and around Pakistan. Pakistan is on the verge of destabilization.”
    • “I would like to say please do not expect and demand your level of democracy which you have learned over number of centuries…please give us time.”
    • “I felt that measures other than the one uncontested through the preservation of the nation’s rights and I assume this ground and now that it is not we are also learning democracy we are going through a difficult stage.”
    1. “Pakistan First” Principle:
    • Main Idea: The speaker repeatedly states that his decisions are driven solely by the interest of Pakistan, and that Pakistan should be prioritized above all other considerations. This is a central justification for all his actions.
    • Supporting Quote:“First of all, Pakistan should go beyond caste-based considerations and Pakistan First.”
    • “For me and every Pakistani Pakistan comes first and anyone else’s considerations come after that.”

    Conclusion:

    The speech paints a picture of a nation facing a multifaceted crisis. The speaker’s justification for the emergency centers on the need to reverse a downward trend in all areas, from security and economy to governance and the democratic transition. He emphasizes a commitment to Pakistan’s stability and progress while highlighting what he views as the destabilizing actions of the judiciary and political opponents. The speech ends with a call for national unity and an assertion that he will continue to fight for Pakistan’s well-being. The speaker emphasizes his personal willingness to sacrifice for the betterment of the country.

    Pakistan’s Crisis: A Turning Point

    FAQ: Key Issues and Actions in Pakistan

    1. What is the primary concern highlighted in the address?

    The primary concern is that Pakistan has reached a dangerous turning point due to internal conflict, with a significant increase in terrorism and extremism, a semi-paralyzed governance system, demoralized law enforcement agencies, and interference with the democratic process. These issues are causing a decline in Pakistan’s progress and creating a sense of despair and disbelief among the community.

    2. How is terrorism and extremism described in the speech?

    Terrorism and extremism are described as having reached an extreme level, with attacks occurring throughout Pakistan, including in the capital, Islamabad. Extremists are seen as challenging the government’s authority and attempting to impose their fanatical religious views on the people, posing a direct challenge to the stability of the state.

    3. What are the key problems within Pakistan’s governance system?

    The governance system is described as semi-paralyzed, primarily due to senior government officials being frequently involved in court cases, particularly the Supreme Court. This has led to an environment of fear, where officials are hesitant to take action, and the system is struggling to function effectively. Furthermore, there is a backlog of numerous cases against the government in the Supreme Court.

    4. What is the state of law enforcement agencies, according to the speaker?

    Law enforcement agencies, particularly in Islamabad, are described as demoralized and hopeless. This is attributed to the punishment and suspension of their officers, which has resulted in a lack of action and a sense of paralysis within these agencies.

    5. What democratic transition plan was in place and what obstacles were encountered?

    A three-stage transition plan towards democracy was in place, initiated in 1999. The first stage involved government control, followed by a second stage of elected governments with oversight. The third and final stage was intended to culminate in a presidential election followed by general elections and a complete return to civilian rule. However, this final stage has been hindered by interference and obstacles, threatening to derail the entire transition process.

    6. How has the judiciary contributed to the issues being described?

    The judiciary is seen as clashing with the executive and legislative pillars of the government, with judicial activism leading to interference. The judiciary is accused of creating obstacles in the implementation of democratic processes and causing government functions to fail by taking up numerous cases against the government, and for not properly handling certain legal issues (like the reference case that was sent to them by the PM). The release of known terrorists by order of the judiciary after the Lal Masjid incident is also a source of great concern.

    7. What action has been taken in response to these issues, and what is its justification?

    In response, an emergency has been declared along with a Provisional Constitutional Order. This decision was made, according to the speaker, after taking stock of the entire situation and consulting various stakeholders. The justification is to remove the obstacles in the democratic process and complete the third stage of democratic transition. The speaker argues that a firm and swift action is needed to stop Pakistan from sliding into further chaos.

    8. What is the speaker’s primary message to both the Pakistani people and the international community?

    The speaker’s primary message to the Pakistani people is that Pakistan comes first, above all other considerations, and he calls for unity and support in moving the country forward. To the international community, especially Western nations, he requests understanding of the critical situation, emphasizes that Pakistan is a country in a difficult transitional period that needs time to develop democracy. He also draws parallels with Abraham Lincoln’s actions during the American Civil War, suggesting that extraordinary measures may be necessary to preserve the nation.

    Pakistan’s Multifaceted Crisis

    Pakistan is facing a multifaceted crisis, according to the speaker, characterized by internal conflict, terrorism, a dysfunctional government, and a struggling economy.

    Key issues contributing to Pakistan’s crisis:

    • Internal Conflict: The nation is described as a victim of internal conflict, requiring painful decisions to ensure peace.
    • Terrorism and Extremism:
    • Terrorist attacks are occurring throughout Pakistan.
    • Extremists are operating openly, even in Islamabad, challenging law enforcement and the government with their fanatical ideas.
    • These extremists seek to impose their own rule and challenge the state.
    • Governance System Paralysis:
    • The government is described as “semi-paralyzed” with senior officials focused on court cases, particularly in the Supreme Court.
    • Numerous cases and applications against government departments are ongoing in the Supreme Court.
    • Demoralized Law Enforcement:
    • Law enforcement agencies, especially in Islamabad, are demoralized due to punishments and the suspension of officers.
    • They have lost hope and are reluctant to take action.
    • Interference with Democracy:
    • Obstacles are being created in the democratic process, hindering a smooth transition.
    • The speaker describes a three-stage transition to democracy, with the third stage, which was intended to complete in 2007, facing interference.
    • This interference includes a reference sent to the Supreme Judicial Council against the Prime Minister’s recommendation, which the speaker views as unconstitutional.
    • Economic Downturn:
    • The country’s economic progress has halted and is in decline.
    • Investors are hesitant due to the instability.
    • Infrastructure development is suffering.
    • Judicial Activism and Conflict:
    • The judiciary is clashing with the legislative and executive branches of government.
    • This conflict is challenging the authority of both the legislative and executive bodies.
    • Lal Masjid Incident:
    • Extremists took the law into their own hands at the Lal Masjid in Islamabad, leading to a crisis.
    • The incident caused international embarrassment, with extremists martyring police personnel, taking hostages, and damaging property.
    • Despite the government’s actions to address this, confirmed terrorists have been released and are at large.
    • Presidential Election Issues:
    • The Presidential elections, although conducted legally, were challenged in the Supreme Court.
    • The case has been repeatedly postponed, leading to political uncertainty.
    • Media Negativity: Some media channels are contributing to a negative atmosphere by promoting distrust, rather than acting responsibly.
    • Public Despair and Disbelief: The community is experiencing despair and disbelief, and is questioning the government’s ability to address the situation.

    Proposed Solutions and Actions:

    • Emergency Declaration: An emergency has been declared to address the crisis and complete the third stage of the democratic transition.
    • New Direction for State Pillars: The speaker believes a new direction is needed for the three pillars of the state: the judiciary, executive, and legislative.
    • No Change in Government: The Prime Minister, Governors, and Chief Ministers will remain in their positions, and the assemblies will continue to function.
    • Priority of Pakistan: All actions are to be taken with Pakistan’s best interests as the priority.
    • Preservation of Democratic Transition: The speaker states that their actions are to preserve the democratic transition and prevent Pakistan from falling into further chaos.

    The speaker emphasizes that these actions are necessary to stop the nation’s downward trend and to restore progress and stability. The speaker requests the international community to understand Pakistan’s critical situation and to support its efforts to stabilize.

    Pakistan’s Extremist Threat

    According to the speaker, terrorism and extremism have reached an extreme level in Pakistan. Here’s a breakdown of the issues:

    • Prevalence of Attacks: Terrorist attacks are occurring throughout Pakistan, with increased intensity after incidents in Rawalpindi and Sargodha.
    • Open Operation of Extremists: Extremists are operating openly and confidently across the country, including in Islamabad, the capital city. They are not afraid of law enforcement agencies.
    • Challenge to the Government: These extremists are challenging the writ of the government and seeking to establish their own rule. They aim to impose their extremist religious ideas on the population.
    • Extremist Ideology: The extremists are described as having a “fanatical thought about Islam,” which they are trying to forcefully impose on others.
    • Lal Masjid Incident:Extremists took the law into their own hands at the Lal Masjid in Islamabad.
    • This incident caused international embarrassment and highlighted the government’s lack of control.
    • Extremists martyred police personnel, took hostages, burned shops, and even attacked Chinese citizens.
    • Despite the government’s response, many confirmed terrorists were later released.
    • Madrasas and Extremism:Some madrasas (religious schools) are involved in extremism.
    • The government had planned to build model madrasas to provide better education and living standards for poor children.
    • However, some madrasas that were involved in extremism have been ordered to be reopened.
    • Ongoing Threat: The released terrorists are now at large, posing a continued threat to the country. These terrorists are a potential threat that can be linked to future bomb blasts.
    • Support for Extremists: Individuals are openly showing support for terrorists and challenging the government.

    The speaker views this situation as a serious challenge to the state and its citizens. The extremists are not only a threat to law and order, but also to the stability and international standing of Pakistan.

    Pakistan’s Governance Crisis

    The speaker describes a significant failure in governance in Pakistan, characterized by a semi-paralyzed system, demoralized law enforcement, and interference with the democratic process.

    Here’s a detailed breakdown of the governance failure:

    • Semi-Paralyzed Governance System:
    • The governance system is described as “muffled” because senior officials are preoccupied with court cases, particularly in the Supreme Court.
    • There are numerous cases and applications against government departments in the Supreme Court.
    • This focus on legal battles has hampered the government’s ability to function effectively.
    • Demoralized Law Enforcement:
    • Law enforcement agencies, especially in Islamabad, are demoralized and feel hopeless due to the punishments and suspensions of their officers.
    • They are hesitant to take action, preferring to remain idle, and some officers are making rounds of the Supreme Court.
    • Interference with Democracy:
    • Obstacles are being created in the democratic process, preventing a smooth transition.
    • The speaker describes a three-stage plan for transitioning to democracy. The third stage is facing interference which includes a reference sent to the Supreme Judicial Council against the Prime Minister’s recommendation, which is viewed as unconstitutional.
    • The speaker believes that some people are interfering with this democratic process and creating hurdles in it.
    • Judicial Overreach and Conflict:
    • The judiciary is clashing with the legislative and executive branches of government.
    • This judicial activism is interfering with the functioning of the legislative and executive bodies, undermining their authority.
    • The judiciary is challenging the laws made by the legislature and has led to a government system that has failed in every respect.
    • The speaker suggests that the series of events that led to the governance failure began on March 9th when a reference was sent to the Supreme Judicial Council against the Prime Minister’s recommendation.
    • Lal Masjid Incident and its Aftermath:
    • The Lal Masjid incident is seen as a significant failure in governance, as extremists took the law into their own hands in the capital city.
    • The government’s inability to maintain control is internationally embarrassing.
    • Despite the government’s actions against the extremists at Lal Masjid, the situation was not resolved.
    • Confirmed terrorists associated with the Lal Masjid incident were released and are now at large, posing a continuing threat.
    • Presidential Election Issues:The Presidential elections, while conducted legally, faced challenges in the Supreme Court that have led to uncertainty and delays.
    • The case has been repeatedly postponed, adding to the political instability and uncertainty.
    • The speaker expresses that the community is in a state of hopelessness due to these postponements.
    • Government Ineffectiveness: The Prime Minister has expressed difficulty in running the government under the current circumstances, indicating a breakdown in governance.

    The speaker emphasizes that these issues have led to a halt in Pakistan’s progress and a decline in its overall condition. The speaker has taken action to declare an emergency, with the stated goal of restoring order and stability, and restarting the democratic process.

    Obstacles to Democracy in Pakistan

    The speaker identifies several significant obstacles to democracy in Pakistan, primarily centered around interference with the democratic process, judicial overreach, and a lack of respect for the rule of law.

    Here’s a breakdown of these obstacles:

    • Interference with the Democratic Transition: The speaker outlines a three-stage transition to democracy, with the third stage facing significant hurdles. This final stage, intended to complete the transition to full democracy, has been deliberately disrupted. The speaker expresses regret that some individuals are creating obstacles, preventing the completion of this third phase.
    • Obstacles in the Implementation of Democracy: The speaker states that obstacles are being created in the democratic system, preventing its smooth implementation. This interference is preventing the country from moving towards full democracy and stability.
    • Judicial Overreach: The judiciary is described as overstepping its bounds and interfering with the functions of the legislative and executive branches. This is causing conflict and undermining the authority of these other branches. The speaker notes that the judiciary is challenging the laws made by the legislature, further destabilizing the government.
    • Constitutional Challenges: A key event in the disruption of the democratic process was a reference sent to the Supreme Judicial Council against the Prime Minister’s recommendation. The speaker deems this action unconstitutional.
    • Presidential Election Issues: The Presidential elections, while conducted legally, were challenged in the Supreme Court. The case has been repeatedly postponed, leading to political uncertainty and delays in the democratic process. These postponements further contribute to a sense of hopelessness and instability.
    • Lack of Respect for the Rule of Law: Extremist groups, such as those involved in the Lal Masjid incident, are challenging the rule of law by taking matters into their own hands. The speaker also notes that even after government action to counter them, confirmed terrorists have been released and are at large.
    • Media Negativity: Certain media channels are contributing to a negative atmosphere by promoting distrust. This media negativity is seen as an obstacle to the positive development of the democratic process.

    The speaker believes that these obstacles are hindering Pakistan’s progress and preventing it from moving forward with its democratic transition. In response to this, the speaker has declared an emergency, in part to remove these obstacles and complete the democratic process.

    Pakistan Emergency Declaration

    The speaker declared an emergency in Pakistan to address the severe issues facing the country and to complete the third stage of the democratic transition. Here’s a breakdown of the reasons for and the details surrounding the declared emergency:

    • Reasons for Declaring Emergency:
    • To stop the down slide of Pakistan: The speaker expresses deep concern over the deteriorating conditions in Pakistan, which include rising terrorism and extremism, a paralyzed governance system, and obstacles to the democratic process. The speaker feels that the country is taking a downward turn, and decisive action is needed to reverse this trend.
    • To bring a new direction to the three pillars of the state: The speaker wants to bring a new direction to the judiciary, executive, and legislative branches to improve governance and combat extremism and terrorism.
    • To complete the third stage of the democratic transition: The speaker emphasizes a commitment to complete the final stage of the three-stage transition to democracy, which they believe is being deliberately obstructed. The speaker states the emergency is intended to remove the obstacles that are in the way of this process.
    • Details of the Emergency Declaration:
    • Provisional Constitution Order: The emergency was declared through a Provisional Constitution Order.
    • No change in government: The speaker states that the Prime Minister, Governors, and Chief Ministers will remain in their positions, and all assemblies will continue to function as they were. This indicates that the emergency is not intended to remove the existing government but to stabilize the situation and restore order.
    • Intended to put Pakistan back on track: The speaker explains the emergency is meant to quickly restore Pakistan to its previous path of progress and development, and to ensure the completion of the democratic process.
    • Seeking International Understanding: The speaker addresses the international community, particularly the United States, the European Union, and the Commonwealth. The speaker asks them to understand the critical situation in Pakistan and the necessity for the actions taken. They emphasize that Pakistan is on the verge of destabilization and that immediate action is essential to prevent further decline.
    • Speaker’s Perspective:
    • Personal conviction: The speaker expresses a personal conviction that the action taken was necessary to preserve the democratic transition and to prevent the country from “committing suicide.”. The speaker states they cannot allow the country to continue on a downward trend.
    • Sacrifice for Pakistan: The speaker states that if a sacrifice of their life is needed for Pakistan, they are ready, and that they will continue to fight for the country and its people.
    • Pakistan First: The speaker emphasizes that Pakistan’s interests come before all other considerations. The speaker also appeals for support and understanding from the community.
    • Comparison to Abraham Lincoln: The speaker references Abraham Lincoln’s actions during the American Civil War as an example of a leader taking necessary steps during a national crisis, even if those steps might seem extreme. The speaker uses this example to justify the actions taken in the interest of preserving the nation.

    In summary, the speaker declared an emergency to address the critical and worsening conditions in Pakistan, with the goal of stabilizing the country, restoring order, and ensuring the completion of the democratic transition. The speaker views this action as a necessary step to prevent further decline and to put Pakistan back on a path toward progress.

    Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry reacted promptly to the emergency declaration, convening a seven-member bench which issued an interim order against this action. He also directed the armed forces of Pakistan not to obey any illegal orders. Subsequently, the 111th Brigade of the Pakistan Army entered the Supreme Court of Pakistan Building and removed Chaudhry and several other judges from the premises and arrested them.

    It was announced early that the state of emergency would likely end in late November or early December 2007. After being sworn in for a second presidential term on 29 November 2007, Musharraf immediately declared that the state of emergency would end on 16 December 2007, although the emergency actually ended one day earlier, on 15 December 2007, with an announcement by Musharraf.

    The general election previously scheduled to occur in early January 2008 was postponed. At the beginning of the emergency, Information Minister Tariq Azim Khan said on television that the general election could be delayed many months and perhaps up to a year. Later, the election was rescheduled to take place by 15 February 2008, as announced by Musharraf himself. A few days later he called for the election date to be on or before 9 January 2008, before a final date of 8 January 2008, was decided. However, because of unforeseen events that occurred after the state of emergency ended, primarily the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and its aftermath, the general elections were again postponed by the Election Commission, and were finally held on 18 February 2008

    Background
    Leading up to the 2007 presidential elections, the Election Commissioner approved General Pervez Musharraf as a candidate for re-election. One of his opponents, retired Supreme Court justice Wajihuddin Ahmed, challenged the ruling in the Supreme Court. The dispute was primarily regarding whether a member of the military was constitutionally permitted to run for the office of the president, as Musharraf held both titles of President and Chief of Army Staff.

    Responding to the challenge, on 28 September 2007, Pakistan’s Supreme court cleared the way for President Pervez Musharraf to seek another five-year term when it threw out a major legal challenge to his re-election plans. But barred the Election Commission from officially declaring a winner until it made its final decision. On 6 October, presidential elections were held with Musharraf winning 98% votes in the Senate, Parliament and the four provincial assemblies.

    While the Supreme Court was hearing the case of Musharraf’s eligibility as a candidate, it announced that it would likely need to delay the hearing until 12 November due to a personal engagement of one of the honourable members of the bench. On 2 November, the court reversed its decision to break, stating that it would now reconvene the following Monday on 5 November to attempt to resolve the political situation quickly. This reversal was in part due to criticism that the court’s continuing delay was adding to Pakistan’s general instability. Convening on 12 November would have left a tight schedule of just three days before the end of Musharraf’s previous presidential term on 15 November. Parliamentary elections were due to be held in February 2008, no later than a month after the original target date for elections. The 2008 Pakistani general election was held on 18 February 2008.

    Prior to the emergency declaration, Attorney General Malik Qayyum, representing Musharraf, had assured the court that there was no planned move by the government to impose martial law.

    President Musharraf address to nation after emergency

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • Bush and Musharraf: A US-Pakistan Dialogue

    Bush and Musharraf: A US-Pakistan Dialogue

    President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan held a joint press conference, discussing the strong relationship between their countries. Bush praised Musharraf’s courage in the face of extremism and highlighted their cooperation in fighting terrorism. The leaders addressed intelligence sharing, economic development, and Pakistan’s commitment to democracy. They also spoke about regional issues, such as relations with India and the situation in Afghanistan. Musharraf emphasized the desire for a long-term strategic partnership with the U.S. and explained Pakistan’s efforts to combat the Taliban. Both leaders expressed confidence in their ability to work together to achieve peace and security.

    A Meeting of Minds: Bush and Musharraf, 2006

    Study Guide

    I. Quiz: Short Answer Questions (2-3 Sentences Each)

    1. What specific accomplishment regarding intelligence cooperation between the US and Pakistan did President Bush highlight during the press conference?
    2. What commitment did President Musharraf renew regarding elections in Pakistan? Why was this commitment considered important in the context of combating radicalism?
    3. According to President Musharraf, what were the three “bottom lines” of the peace treaty signed with tribal elders in North Waziristan?
    4. How did President Bush respond to the question about whether the US needed permission to strike inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden was located?
    5. What issue did the reporter Zafar Jung raise concerning the United States’ policy toward Pakistan’s access to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes?
    6. What did Bush say the United States could do to facilitate an agreement between Pakistan and India regarding Kashmir?
    7. What was President Bush’s view on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and what role did he see the United States playing in resolving it?
    8. How did President Bush respond to claims that the United States is waging a war on Islam?
    9. What was the basis of the relationship between President Bush and President Musharraf, as described by President Musharraf?
    10. What did President Bush and President Musharraf emphasize as crucial for achieving lasting peace in regions of conflict?

    II. Quiz Answer Key

    1. President Bush highlighted the cooperation between US and Pakistani intelligence forces that helped prevent the loss of innocent life in the United Kingdom. This cooperation was seen as necessary in a world where extremists are willing to kill to achieve political objectives.
    2. President Musharraf renewed his commitment to holding free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007. This commitment was seen as important because giving people a chance to participate in the political process was considered the best way to defeat radicalism and extremism.
    3. The three “bottom lines” of the peace treaty were: no al-Qaeda activity in tribal agencies or across the border in Afghanistan, no Taliban activity in those areas or across the border, and no Talibanization or obscurantist way of life allowed. These were agreed to by the tribal elders.
    4. President Bush emphasized that the US and Pakistan were “on the hunt together” and that they would “deal with” the situation when Osama bin Laden was found, without getting into the specifics of tactics. He focused on the shared goal of bringing al-Qaeda to justice.
    5. Zafar Jung raised the issue of a discriminatory regime regarding the fear of nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, as Pakistan needed energy but was being denied access. He asked if this discrimination would end after the meeting between the two presidents.
    6. Bush stated that the United States could offer assistance in creating conditions for peace, laying out a vision, and providing aid for institutional building to foster democracy. Ultimately, the resolution of the Kashmir issue would depend on the will of the leaders involved to get the past behind them and move forward.
    7. President Bush supported a two-state solution with a democratic Palestinian state living side by side with Israel. The U.S. would give aid to those suffering, help create the conditions for peace to occur, lay out a vision, talk to world leaders, and provide aid to help institutional buildings so that a democracy can flourish.
    8. President Bush refuted claims of a war against Islam, calling them “false.” He emphasized the importance of rejecting extremist propaganda, noting that the US respects Islam and that many Muslims live peacefully in the United States.
    9. President Musharraf described the basis of their relationship as trust and confidence. He stated that without this trust, a productive relationship is impossible.
    10. President Bush and President Musharraf emphasized the importance of leadership will and mutual trust for achieving lasting peace in regions of conflict. This included the need for leaders to put the past behind them and work together toward a better future.

    III. Essay Questions

    1. Analyze the strategic importance of Pakistan to the United States in the context of the “War on Terror” following 9/11, as reflected in the statements made by Presidents Bush and Musharraf.
    2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the tribal deal in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) as a counterterrorism strategy, considering President Musharraf’s explanation of the deal and potential criticisms of its long-term impact.
    3. Discuss the challenges and opportunities for promoting interfaith harmony between the West and the Islamic world, drawing upon President Bush and President Musharraf’s comments on the issue.
    4. Compare and contrast the perspectives of President Bush and President Musharraf on the role of the United States in resolving conflicts in Kashmir and Palestine.
    5. Assess the significance of economic development and educational reform as tools for combating extremism in Pakistan, based on the points raised by Presidents Bush and Musharraf.

    IV. Glossary of Key Terms

    • Extremism: Holding extreme political or religious views; often associated with intolerance, radicalism, and violence.
    • Radicalism: Belief in or support for fundamental or revolutionary changes in the established order.
    • Terrorism: The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.
    • Talibanization: The process by which a region or society adopts the strict religious laws and customs associated with the Taliban.
    • Al-Qaeda: A militant Sunni Islamist multi-national organization founded in 1988 by Osama bin Laden, Abdullah Azzam and several other Arab volunteers during the Soviet–Afghan War.
    • Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA): A semi-autonomous tribal region in northwestern Pakistan, bordering Afghanistan.
    • Kashmir: A disputed territory between India and Pakistan, with ongoing conflict and political tensions.
    • Two-State Solution: A proposed resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict involving the establishment of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.
    • Proliferation: The spread of nuclear weapons, fissile material, or the technology and information necessary to manufacture them.
    • Interfaith Harmony: Promoting understanding, respect, and cooperation among different religions.

    Okay, here is a briefing document summarizing the key themes and ideas from the provided transcript of a meeting between President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf.

    Briefing Document: Meeting between President George W. Bush and President Pervez Musharraf

    Date: [Date not specified in document, but context suggests 2006]

    Location: Washington D.C., White House

    Attendees:

    • President George W. Bush (United States)
    • President Pervez Musharraf (Islamic Republic of Pakistan)
    • Various members of their respective administrations

    Executive Summary:

    The meeting focused on reinforcing the strategic relationship between the United States and Pakistan, with a strong emphasis on counterterrorism cooperation, regional stability (particularly in Afghanistan and regarding India-Pakistan relations), and Pakistan’s internal development (economic, educational, and political). Both leaders expressed mutual trust and confidence. Key themes include combating extremism, promoting moderation, fostering economic development, and resolving regional conflicts. The discussion also addressed concerns about Pakistan’s nuclear program and the need for peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian and Kashmir disputes.

    Key Themes and Discussion Points:

    1. Counterterrorism and Extremism:
    • Shared Struggle: Both presidents emphasized the shared threat posed by extremists and terrorists. Bush stated, “He understands that we are in a struggle against extremists who will use terror as a weapon… I admire your leadership. I admire your courage, and I thank you very much for working on common strategies to protect our respective peoples.”
    • Intelligence Cooperation: Highlighted as crucial for preventing attacks, with specific mention of collaboration that helped prevent loss of life in the United Kingdom. “I want to remind the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because of the good work of our intelligence forces and Pakistani intelligence forces as we helped people in the United Kingdom we prevented the loss of innocent life that kind of cooperation is necessary.”
    • Pakistan’s Role: Bush acknowledged Musharraf’s role as a “strong defender of freedom” and a target of extremists.
    • Tribal Areas Strategy: Musharraf briefed Bush on the strategy in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), emphasizing a “holistic approach” involving military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements. He clarified that recent peace deals were “not to deal with the Taliban,” but rather “to fight the Taliban.” Specifically, he described the agreement with tribal elders that prohibited Al-Qaeda activity, Taliban activity, and Talibanization of the tribal agencies. Bush indicated satisfaction with this deal.
    • Osama Bin Laden: In response to a question about striking inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden were located there, Bush emphasized trust and collaboration. He expressed confidence that Musharraf would bring Bin Laden to justice if found. Musharraf affirmed total coordination at all levels of intelligence and operations.
    1. US-Pakistan Relationship:
    • Strategic Partnership: Both leaders affirmed the desire for a long-term, broad-based, and strategic relationship. Musharraf stated that the meeting reinforced their “trust and confidence in each other.”
    • Economic and Social Development: Discussions included economic assistance, trade and investment opportunities, and support for education and health sectors in Pakistan. Bush mentioned the need to move forward on a Reconstruction Opportunity Zone and a bilateral investment treaty.
    • Defense: The f16 deal was discussed.
    • Democracy in Pakistan: Bush reiterated Musharraf’s commitment to free and fair elections in 2007. “The last time I was with the president he assured me and assured the people that were listening to news commerce that there would be free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007 he renewed that commitment.”
    1. Regional Stability:
    • Afghanistan: The leaders discussed the situation in Afghanistan, with plans for a trilateral meeting involving Presidents Bush, Musharraf, and Karzai. Bush stressed the importance of Afghanistan’s success for regional peace.
    • India-Pakistan Relations: Bush expressed pleasure at the progress in relations between Pakistan and India and encouraged the peaceful resolution of the Kashmir issue. “I think it’s very important that the that the issue of Kashmir mu forward and be resolved peacefully and I appreciate your efforts mr. president.” Musharraf noted his “excellent meeting” with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Havana, calling it “a step forward towards resolution of disputes between India and Pakistan.”
    1. Interfaith Harmony and Moderation:
    • Combating Propaganda: Bush emphasized the need to counter extremist propaganda and promote understanding between the West and the Islamic world. “All of us need to step up and talk about a world in which we respect each other’s religions matter of fact is very important for Muslims around the world to know there’s a lot of Muslims living at peace here in the United States.”
    • Respect for Islam: Bush asserted that America respects Islam and highlighted the presence of peaceful Muslims in the United States.
    • Interfaith Harmony Initiative: Responding to a question, Bush praised Musharraf’s call for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony.
    1. Nuclear Issues and Energy:
    • Non-Proliferation Concerns: In response to a question about discriminatory practices related to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, Bush stated that they “talked about energy and we talked about our need to work through the recent history of that we’ve had together on dealing with proliferation matters.” This suggests ongoing concerns and discussions related to Pakistan’s nuclear program.
    1. Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and Kashmir:
    • Peace Process: Both leaders acknowledged the importance of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Bush reiterated his commitment to a two-state solution, emphasizing the need for both sides to recognize each other’s right to exist.
    • Kashmir Resolution: Bush stated that the Kashmir issue will be solved when the leaders of Pakistan and India decide to solve it and offered US assistance to facilitate an agreement if desired. “Kashmir issue will be solved when two leaders decide to solve it and we want to help the United States can’t force nations to to reach an agreement.”

    Points of Note:

    • Armitage Quote: Bush denied knowledge of reported threats from Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage to bomb Pakistan “back to the Stone Age” if it did not cooperate after 9/11. He maintained that Pakistan, under Musharraf’s leadership, was one of the first to offer support.
    • Trust and Confidence: The constant refrain of “trust and confidence” underscores the effort to portray a strong and reliable partnership despite underlying complexities and potential disagreements.
    • Focus on Personal Relationship: The meeting highlighted the personal relationship between Bush and Musharraf as a key factor in the strength of the US-Pakistan alliance.

    This briefing document provides a concise overview of the key discussions and themes from the meeting. It reflects the priorities and perspectives of both leaders at the time.

    US-Pakistan Relations: Counter-Terrorism, Trade, and Regional Security

    • Why was President Musharraf in Washington D.C. meeting with President Bush? The meeting was to reinforce the strong, long-term strategic relationship between the United States and Pakistan, focusing on a wide range of issues including cooperation in the fight against terrorism, economic development, trade, investment, education, health, defense, regional issues like the Palestinian dispute, and progress between Pakistan and India, including the Kashmir issue and Afghanistan. Both presidents emphasized mutual trust and a desire for peace and security in the region.
    • What role did the fight against terrorism play in the relationship between the US and Pakistan? Fighting terrorism was a central and critical aspect of the US-Pakistan relationship. President Bush lauded Musharraf’s commitment to combating extremism, noting Musharraf’s own personal risks and the need for intelligence cooperation. Musharraf detailed Pakistan’s holistic approach, including military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements to counter terrorism in its tribal agencies.
    • What is the “tribal deal” President Musharraf described, and what was its purpose? The tribal deal was an agreement signed with tribal elders in Pakistan’s North Waziristan Agency, aimed not at cooperating with the Taliban, but at fighting them. The core principles of the deal include preventing Al-Qaeda and Taliban activity in the tribal agencies and across the border into Afghanistan, as well as preventing “Talibanization” and obscurantist ideologies in the region. The tribal elders are obligated to enforce this agreement and act against those who violate it.
    • How did President Bush respond to questions about potential US military action within Pakistan to capture Osama bin Laden? President Bush emphasized the trust and collaboration between the US and Pakistan in the hunt for Al-Qaeda. Both leaders said they were working together in all areas, such as intelligence, operational, strategic, and tactical coordination. Bush deferred to the moment when such a situation arises and when the right decision will be taken to strike in such coordination.
    • What were the key issues discussed regarding the broader relationship between the US and the Islamic world? The discussion focused on promoting interfaith harmony and countering extremist propaganda. President Bush emphasized that America respects Islam and rejects the notion that the “war on terror” is a war against Islam. He stressed the importance of distinguishing between the peaceful Muslim faith and the actions of extremists and terrorists. The importance of resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as well as supporting peaceful resolution of disputes like Kashmir was also discussed.
    • What specific economic development and trade initiatives were discussed? The focus was on creating Reconstruction Opportunity Zones to spur growth in Pakistan, along with a bilateral investment treaty. President Musharraf emphasized Pakistan’s need for assistance, particularly in trade and investment, as well as in education and health.
    • What was President Bush’s perspective on resolving the Kashmir dispute? President Bush believed that lasting agreements must be reached by the leaders of nations. He was encouraged by the discussions between President Musharraf and the Indian Prime Minister. He mentioned he is willing to help facilitate an agreement, and emphasized that the United States could not impose peace, but can create conditions where peace can flourish.
    • What did President Musharraf want from the meeting and the U.S. in general?
    • Musharraf sought a long-term, broad-based, strategic relationship with the United States. He emphasized Pakistan’s need for assistance in trade, investment, education, and health sectors. He pushed for a resolution to the Palestinian and Kashmir issues, and highlighted Pakistan’s commitment to fighting terrorism. Ultimately, he aimed to reinforce mutual trust and confidence between the two nations.

    Pakistan-United States Relations: Counter-terrorism, Economy, Democracy, and Regional Issues

    Pakistan and the United States have a relationship based on trust and a shared desire for security and peace. Both countries have common strategies to protect their people. The US president stated that the US desires the best for Pakistan and the region.

    Key aspects of the Pakistan-US relationship include:

    • Counter-terrorism cooperation Both countries recognize the importance of intelligence sharing to prevent terrorist attacks. Pakistan is taking a holistic approach to fighting terrorism using military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    • Economic Development The US recognizes that economic prosperity can help people improve their lives and is working with Pakistan on reconstruction opportunity zones and a bilateral investment treaty. The US has provided assistance to Pakistan in education and health.
    • Democracy and Education President Musharraf has committed to free and fair elections in Pakistan. He is also focused on improving Pakistan’s education system to prepare students for the global economy.
    • Regional Issues President Bush was encouraged by President Musharraf’s meetings with the Indian Prime Minister regarding the Kashmir issue. Both presidents discussed the situation in Afghanistan and the tribal agencies. The US President, along with President Musharraf and President Karzai, planned to have discussions regarding avenues for peace in Afghanistan.
    • Interfaith Harmony President Musharraf has called for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony between the West and the Islamic world. The US President spoke out against propaganda that tries to inflame passion and create conditions where terror is justified. He stated that the US respects Islam and that there are many Muslims living peacefully in the United States.

    US and Pakistan Cooperation Against Terrorism

    Pakistan and the United States are cooperating in the fight against terrorism. Both countries recognize the importance of intelligence sharing to prevent terrorist attacks.

    Key points include:

    • Common Strategies: Both countries share common strategies to protect their people from extremists who use terror as a weapon.
    • Intelligence Cooperation: The good work of US and Pakistani intelligence forces helped prevent the loss of innocent life in the United Kingdom.
    • Holistic Approach: Pakistan is taking a holistic approach to fighting terrorism, using military, political, administrative, and reconstruction elements.
    • Tribal Deal: A peace treaty signed through a grand assembly of elders aims to fight the Taliban. The deal has three bottom lines: no al-Qaeda activity, no Taliban activity, and no Talibanization. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    • Mutual Interest: It’s in the interest of both the US and Pakistan that al-Qaeda be brought to justice. Both countries collaborate and strategize on how best to do this.

    US and Pakistan Presidents on Kashmir and Palestine

    The US and Pakistani presidents have discussed the issues of Kashmir and Palestine, agreeing that leadership from involved nations is key to resolving these conflicts.

    Key points from the discussion include:

    • Kashmir:President Bush was encouraged by President Musharraf’s meetings with the Indian Prime Minister, indicating a desire at the leadership level to solve this long-standing problem.
    • The US is willing to assist but cannot force nations to reach an agreement. Lasting agreements occur when leaders decide to put the past behind them and move forward.
    • The US can help create conditions for peace, lay out a vision, talk to world leaders, and provide aid to help institutional building so that democracy can flourish.
    • President Bush asked both leaders what the United States could do to facilitate an agreement.
    • Palestine:President Musharraf emphasized the need to resolve the Palestinian dispute, calling it the core of all problems, even terrorism and extremism.
    • President Bush expressed his desire and will to resolve the Palestinian dispute.
    • President Bush is the first president to have articulated a two-state solution, believing a Palestinian state as a democracy living side by side with Israel will yield peace.
    • For peace to occur and for a Palestinian state to exist, people have to recognize Israel’s right to exist.

    US-Pakistan Talks on Afghanistan Stability and Tribal Deal

    Afghanistan’s stability was discussed between the US and Pakistani presidents, with planned trilateral discussions involving the president of Afghanistan.

    Key points from the discussion include:

    • Mutual Interest: It is in the mutual interest of the US, Pakistan and Afghanistan for Afghanistan to succeed.
    • Avenues for Peace: Discussions were planned to find avenues for peace, considering Afghanistan has been devastated by war.
    • Tribal Deal: President Musharraf explained to President Bush what was happening in Afghanistan and the tribal agencies. He clarified that the peace treaty was signed through a grand assembly of elders, and it is intended to fight the Taliban. The US President stated that he believes President Musharraf when he says the tribal deal is intended to reject Talibanization and that there won’t be al-Qaeda.
    George W. Bush: The American Presidency Project

    The Original Text

    ladies and gentlemen the President of the United States and the president of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan thank you very much please be seated Laura and I appreciate the opportunity to welcome president mr. Musharraf here to Washington we remember finally mr. president to your great hospitality in Pakistan and and we remember that the importance of that visit it reconfirmed our friendship gave you and me a chance to discuss important issues and there’s no more important issue than defending our peoples this president is a strong defender of freedom and the people of Pakistan and I appreciate your leadership he understands that we are in a struggle against extremists who will use terror as a weapon he understands it just about as bit as good as anybody in the world after all they’ve tried to take his life they’ve these extremists who can’t stand the thought of a moderate leader leading an important country like Pakistan want to kill the president let’s just say things to none of the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because he has been a strong forceful leader he has become a target of those who can’t stand the thought of moderation prevailing I admire your leadership I admire your courage and I thank you very much for working on common strategies to protect our respective peoples we had a good discussion here today we talked about how our intelligence cooperation can continue I want to remind the people of Pakistan and the people of America that because of the good work of our intelligence forces and Pakistani intelligence forces as we helped people in the United Kingdom we prevented the loss of innocent life that kind of cooperation is necessary in a world in which extremists and radicals are willing to kill to try to achieve political objectives we talked about the earthquake recovery and our nation was proud to support you mister brethren because we care when we see people suffering in you I was briefed by you and your administration when I was there and I was impressed by the great organization and compassion shown for the Pakistani people by your government I hope all is going well particularly for those who suffered mightily now we talked about economic development and the need to move forward on a reconstruction Opportunity Zones as well as a bilateral and investment treaty was our relationship is more than just helping to secure our respective homelands ours is a relationship that recognizes that through economic prosperity people can can embedder themselves we had a very interesting briefing on the federally administered tribal areas the governor the areas are with us here and he briefed me and members of my national security team on the strategy to strengthen governance and to promote economic development we talked about education first time I ever met President Musharraf he talked about the need to make sure the school systems in Pakistan worked well I was impressed then I’m impressed now by your commitment to an education system that prepares students for the and gives students the skills necessary to compete in a in a global economy we talked about democracy the last time I was with the president he assured me and assured the people that were listening to news commerce that there would be free and fair elections in Pakistan in 2007 he renewed that commitment because he understands that the best way to defeat radicalism and extremism is to give people a chance to participate in the political process of a nation we talked about we talked about India in relations and the president’s relations with India I was pleased to see it in Havana Prime Minister Singh and President Musharraf had another discussion I think it’s very important that the that the issue of Kashmir mu forward and be resolved peacefully and I appreciate your efforts mr. president we talked of course about Afghanistan and a president musharraf and President Karzai Karzai and I will have dinner right here in the White House next week and it’s going to be an important discussion it’s going to be important discussion because one of the most important avenues for peace is for Afghanistan’s to succeed and it’s in our mutual interest that we work together to help that a country that’s been devastated by war succeed and so I look forward to our trilateral discussion mr. president it’s going to be a good one it’s going to be an interesting one and it’s an important discussion all in all we’ve had yet another good meeting between people who are able to speak frankly with each other and people who share the common desire for people to live in security and peace welcome miss Miller go andreen I would like to first of all express my gratitude and also on behalf of my entire delegation for the warmth and hospitality that we have received and many courtesies that we are being extended to us since our arrival in the United States I had an excellent meeting with President Bush we first of all reinforced our trust and confidence in each other I trust President Bush and I have total confidence in him that he desires well for Pakistan and for our region and I trust him also that he’s trying to do his best for bringing peace to the world and I trust him also that he’s trying to resolve the core issue of the Palestinian dispute we discussed the entire gambit of relations bilaterally between United States and Pakistan and also in our region and on international issues bilaterally we reinforced our desire to have this relationship on a long-term basis broad-based and a strategic relationship when we are talking of broad-based whatever the president has said it involves all aspects which we discussed it has its political and diplomatic aspects which we reinforced and then our desire to fight terrorism and succeed against terrorism other than that issue in the social sector on the economy how whatever assistance is being given to us whatever assistance we require our requests on that especially in the field of Trade and Investment which are the main areas which we require assistance in otherwise on a broad-based level assistance in the education and health sector on the defense side the f16 deals all this was discussed on the regional issues on the international plane we did discuss the core issue of the Palestinian dispute which needs to be resolved and being at the core and I am extremely glad that the president has a desire and a will to resolve this Palestinian dispute I wish him very well because that lies at the heart of all problems even at the heart of terrorism and extremism on the regional side in our region we also discussed the reproach going on between Pakistan and India and I proudly told the president that we had I had an excellent meeting with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in Havana and it was a step forward towards resolution of disputes between India and Pakistan I did tell him on the way forward that we are moving on the Kashmiri dispute special coming on the other side we had any in-depth discussion on what is happening in Afghanistan and our tribal agency they are I explained to him whatever we are doing in the form of the peace treaty that we have just signed through a grand Georgia which is an assembly of elders this treaty is not to deal with the Taliban it is actually to fight the Taliban the misperception in the media I did clarify to the president and may I very briefly say and what I explained to the president that this is a holistic approach that we are taking to fighting terrorism in Pakistan in the tribal agency tribal agencies of Pakistan this is a political side of the holistic strategy the holistic strategy being the military arm being used a political element and administrative element and a reconstruction element so we want to move on all these aspects forward confining myself to this deal this deal is not at all with the Taliban as I said this is against the Taliban actually this deal is with the tribal elders of North Waziristan agency and the deal has three bottom lines which we fix for ourselves and this is very important which I explained to the peloton number one there will be no al-qaeda activity in our tribal agencies or across the border in Afghanistan there will be no Taliban activity in our tribal agencies or across in Afghanistan there will be no Taliban ization which is a obscurantist thoughts or way of life Nothe liberalization so all these three have been agreed by the tribal elders who signed that deal and when they sign the deal they are honorbound and they have a very strict on a code to not only abide by it but also that whoever violates it they move against them so this is in brief the deal which I explained to the president and I I know that he is satisfied with that deal and maybe this shows the light or the way forward for bringing peace to the region so this is what we discussed holistically that I would like to conclude by saying we have we had a total understanding of views between President Bush and myself and as I said we reinforced our trust and confidence in either in each other thank you very much that you have two questions have pasted them after 9/11 would the United States have actually attacked Pakistan if President Musharraf had not agreed to cooperate with the war on terrorism he says that the United States was threatening to bomb his country back into the Stone Age and President Musharraf would Pakistan have given up its backing of the Taliban if this threat had not come from Armitage first let me let me let me that he’s asking about the our mother’s thing I am you know the first I heard of this is when I read it in the newspaper today III you know I was I guess I was taken aback by the harshness of the of the words all I can say is is that shortly after 9/11 secretary Colin Powell came in and said President Musharraf understands the stakes and he wants to join and help route out an enemy that has come and it killed 3,000 of our citizens matter of fact my recollection was that one of the first leaders to step up and say that the stakes have changed that attack on America that killed 3,000 the citizens needs to be dealt with firmly was the President and if I’m not mistaken : told us that if not the night of September the 11th shortly thereafter now I need to make sure I get my facts straight but it was soon I don’t know of any conversation that was reported in the newspaper like I just don’t know about it I would like to I’m launching my book on the 25th and I am honorbound to Simon & Schuster not to comment on the book before that Dave in other words by the book is what he’s saying my question is about the US president yes excellency president musharraf has issued a call for building bridges and promoting interfaith harmony between the west and the Islamic world which is in the upheaval and in complete turmoil so your comments of Islamic fascist and then the comments of the Pope and in flipped and inflammation Islamic world and my question is that would you take the leading role along with President Musharraf to build these bridges and promote interfaith harmony to avert any wrong notion of clash of civilizations I appreciate the president’s leadership in promoting harmony there is unbelievable propaganda in the Middle East these days that try to inflame passion the the propagandists are attempting to create conditions where terror is justified and so at my speech at the United Nations I stood up and said loud and clear America respects Islam and we do we don’t respect people who kill in the name of Islam to achieve political objectives like the terrorists whose matter of fact I these extremists exploit propaganda in order justify their behavior all of us need to step up and talk about a world in which we respect each other’s religions matter of fact is very important for Muslims around the world to know there’s a lot of Muslims living at peace here in the United States they are proud Americans and they’re equal to me as a citizen we respect their religions I repeat to you however that the free world in the moderate world must stand up to these extremists and not let them spread their hateful propaganda now let them try to incite the incite people to acts of violence because these extremists are not only against Western people they’re also against moderate people and the president’s reaching out to help understand the world understand that the Muslim religion is a peaceful religion is very important and we can help and we will help one way we can help is to is to work with the Palestinians and the Israelis to achieve peace I’m the first president ever to have articulated a two-state solution I believe a Palestinian state as a democracy living side by side with Israel will yield the peace what’s important is for people to understand that in order to have that peace in that Palestinian state people have got to recognize Israel’s right to exist in order for this to happen you can’t ask people to negotiate with people who say you shouldn’t exist we will continue to give aid to people who suffer we didn’t ask the question whether you know what was the nature of the religion of the people who suffered in Pakistan when we spent a half a billion dollars to help this president we said they’re suffering and we want to help and so we will continue to outreach it’s important however for people in the Middle East to reject the extremist propaganda that is spreading in many cases absolute lies about the intentions of the United States they’d love to say this is a war against Islam I can’t think of anything more false these are moderate reasonable people who reject extremism in order for there to be peace so I work hard to do my part thank you for that question Steve thank you sir there’s been a back-and-forth this week over whether the US needs permission to strike inside Pakistan if Osama bin Laden is located could each of you give your position on that and you did you are you satisfied with his assurances on the tribal deal well first of all I appreciate the briefing on the tribal deal when the president looks him in the eye and says the tribal deal is intended to reject the Taliban ization of the people and that there won’t be a Taliban and won’t be al Qaeda I believe you know I mean it that this is a person with whom I’ve now had close working relationships for five and a half years and when he says if we find or when we find Osama bin Laden he will be brought to justice I believe in and we’ll let the tactic speak for themselves after it happens we’re on the hunt together it’s in the president’s interest that al Qaeda be brought to justice and it’s in our interest and we collaborate and we strategize and we talk a lot about how best to do this all I can tell you is is that when Osama bin Laden is found he will be brought to justice and that’s what we’ve continually discussed later I think as the president said we are in the hunt together against these people now why are we bothering of how to the semantics of the tactics of how to deal with the situation you’ll deal with it we are in the hunt together you want the person if at all we confront him if at all we find out his location we are quite clear what to do so let’s not get involved in how it ought to be done by whom it ought to be done there is total coordination at the intelligence level between the two forces there is coordination at the operational level at the strategic level even at the tactical level so therefore we are working together and when the situation arises we need to take the right decision to strike that’s how I don’t want let me I what we’re thinking about anyway doing and missing may I also say that we need to have ladies and gentlemen here we have the basis of a relationship is trust and confidence if we don’t have that trust and confidence in each other and we think that we are bluffing each other I don’t think that’s a good way of moving forward anyway okay I’m sorry Zafar Jung group of the newspapers mr. president I have two-part question and first I must rejoice the remarks which you gave the outset about President Musharraf and second is mr. president in Pakistan we cherish the idea of having strategic and long partnership with United States of America but we found that there is a discriminatory regime is being forward by your great country pertaining to the fear of the nuclear technology for the peaceful purpose Pakistan leaves of energy and we have been denied of that could you insure us that this discrimination will come to an end after your disgrace waiting with President Musharraf and the second part of my question mr. president that President Musharraf has been asking resolution of the problem of Palestine and cash weed for the sustainable peace in the world especially in this part of the world are you going to contemplate are you contemplating some step to take some initiative to resolve these two problems and question for mr. president is how far free life how is a song about your relations with President Bush and the agenda the item for which you are going to take up with the president how far you have been successful in persuading thank you sir you represented the entire press corps there that’s good we talked about energy and we talked about our need to work through the recent history of that we’ve had together on dealing with proliferation matters secondly in terms of Kashmir and Palestine Kashmir issue will be solved when two leaders decide to solve it and we want to help the United States can’t force nations to to reach an agreement it’s because we want there to be an agreement lasting agreements occur when leaders of nations say let’s get the past behind us and let’s move forward I am I’m encouraged by the meetings that the president and the Prime Minister of India had it is an indication that there is desire at the leadership level to solve this long-standing problem leadership is also going to be required between Israel and Palestine we of course can help and will help but it’s important for you to understand that we cannot impose peace we can help create the conditions for peace to occur we can lay out vision we can talk to world leaders and we do we can provide aid to help institutional buildings so that a democracy can flourish but ultimately peace long standing peace depends upon the will of leaders I’m impressed by this president’s will to get something done in Kashmir he and I have talked about this issue in the past he is said he was going to reach out to the Prime Minister’s of India and he has and our hope is that this process continues forward I asked the president just like I would ask the Prime Minister of India what can we do to help what would you like the United States to do to facilitate an agreement would you like us to get out of the way would you like us not to show up would you like us to be actively involved how can we help you if you so desire achieve peace and that’s that’s the role of the United States as far as I’m concerned thank you I think the I’ve already answered we’ve had far-reaching discussion encompassing bilateral issues regional and international I think we have general consensus on all issues Thank You mr. brother good job by the board thank you thank you very much thank you all

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • President Musharraf address to World Economic Forum 2008 on the State of the Nation

    President Musharraf address to World Economic Forum 2008 on the State of the Nation

    This transcript features an interview with President Musharraf of Pakistan. He discusses Pakistan’s pivotal role in the 1971 US-China rapprochement, its strategic geopolitical location, and its economic progress under his leadership. He also addresses the ongoing fight against terrorism and extremism, emphasizing a multi-pronged approach, and details plans for upcoming free and fair elections. The interview concludes with a hopeful outlook for Pakistan’s future stability and prosperity. Significant attention is given to dispelling misconceptions about Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and its handling of internal political challenges.

    Pakistan: A Review of President Musharraf’s Address

    Quiz

    Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.

    1. What significant historical event did Pakistan facilitate in 1971, and why was it important?
    2. According to President Musharraf, what is Pakistan’s strategic geographic importance in the region?
    3. What steps has President Musharraf’s government taken to empower the people of Pakistan?
    4. How does President Musharraf describe the state of Pakistan’s economy during his time in office?
    5. What is President Musharraf’s justification for Pakistan’s nuclear program?
    6. According to the speaker, how is Pakistan addressing terrorism, specifically al-Qaeda and the Taliban?
    7. What measure of success has Pakistan achieved against cross-border movement of militants?
    8. Why does President Musharraf emphasize the fairness and transparency of Pakistan’s electoral system?
    9. How does the President explain the different roles of the Prime Minister and President in Pakistan’s governmental system?
    10. What are the three courses that President Musharraf believes Pakistan must follow to ensure its future stability?

    Answer Key

    1. Pakistan facilitated a secret trip to China by Henry Kissinger in 1971, which led to the breaking of the divide between the United States and China and potentially prevented a longer Cold War. This event is important because it is an example of Pakistan serving as a bridge between different entities.
    2. Pakistan is strategically located between the East Gulf, Middle East, Afghanistan, Central Asian republics, China, India, and South Asia, allowing it to act as a trade and energy corridor. This position is significant because any interaction between those regions is likely to require Pakistan’s participation.
    3. The government empowered people through the introduction of a local government system, reserved seats for women in parliament, and joint electorates for minorities. These measures aimed to give a broader base of people more influence within the nation.
    4. President Musharraf states that Pakistan’s economy was in a failed state in 1999 but has since experienced an upsurge with a 7% growth rate for the past five years, which he also confirms with positive growth forecasts from other institutions.
    5. Pakistan went nuclear because of defensive compulsions, as a means to balance the threat it perceived. The President believes it was necessary to ensure the nation’s security when threats evolved beyond the conventional.
    6. Pakistan is fighting terrorism with a multi-pronged approach that includes military action, political engagement, and socioeconomic development. They are using this approach against al-Qaeda and the Taliban, with military force against the former, and working to wean the population away from the latter.
    7. Pakistan’s efforts to address cross-border movement between Afghanistan and Pakistan have led to a 42% reduction, and the government has successfully eliminated hundreds of militants in cities and valleys. These actions have also resulted in the movement of remaining militant groups into the mountains in smaller numbers.
    8. He emphasizes the fairness and transparency by noting that bugs have been removed, a caretaker government is in place for the election, that there is an elimination of gerrymandering, all polling locations are public, electoral rolls are on the internet, and results are declared at the returning officer level, and transparent ballots and boxes are used.
    9. The President states that in Pakistan’s parliamentary system, the President has specific powers but does not run the government, and that the Prime Minister is the chief executive. The Prime Minister, not the President, is responsible for forming a coalition government.
    10. The three courses are that the democratic transition and elections must lead to a stable, reconciled government, the economic growth must be maintained, and the fight against terrorism and extremism must continue.

    Essay Questions

    Consider the following questions for a more in-depth analysis.

    1. Analyze President Musharraf’s portrayal of Pakistan’s role in the global war on terror. To what extent does he present Pakistan as a victim and to what extent as a key player?
    2. Discuss the internal and external factors that contributed to the political instability in Pakistan, as described by President Musharraf. In your response, consider the various levels at which instability manifests in his descriptions.
    3. Compare and contrast President Musharraf’s view of Pakistan’s political and economic progress with potential criticisms of his governance. How does the speech both defend and present challenges to his own leadership?
    4. Evaluate President Musharraf’s strategy for addressing extremism and terrorism. What are the strengths and limitations of his approach, as described in his speech? How might this approach be viewed in the West?
    5. To what extent does President Musharraf’s emphasis on democracy and transparent elections address the core issues of political unrest in Pakistan? In your response, consider the various roles that the various parts of the Pakistani government play, according to Musharraf.

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • Al-Qaeda: A global militant Islamist organization founded by Osama bin Laden, known for its role in terrorist attacks.
    • Cold War: A period of geopolitical tension between the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective allies from the mid-1940s until the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991.
    • Democracy: A system of government where power is vested in the people, typically through elected representatives.
    • Extremism: The holding of extreme political or religious views; fanaticism.
    • Gerrymandering: The manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor one political party or group over another.
    • ISAF (International Security Assistance Force): A NATO-led security mission in Afghanistan authorized by the United Nations Security Council to provide security and support Afghan authorities.
    • Islamic Bomb: A term often used to describe Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program, though President Musharraf argues against this term.
    • Militant Taliban: Armed groups that have splintered from the original Taliban organization, often engaging in violence.
    • Multi-Prong Strategy: A multifaceted approach that addresses a problem from multiple angles (military, political, socioeconomic).
    • Pragmatists: People who are primarily concerned with practical solutions, rather than ideological ones.
    • Radicals: People who hold extreme political views, often supporting significant change within society.
    • Taliban: An Islamic fundamentalist political movement in Afghanistan.
    • Terrorism: The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.

    Musharraf on Pakistan: Challenges and Future

    Okay, here’s a detailed briefing document based on the provided text, focusing on the key themes and ideas:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of President Musharraf’s Remarks

    Date: October 26, 2023

    Subject: Analysis of President Musharraf’s remarks on Pakistan’s domestic and foreign policy challenges and future trajectory.

    Sources: Excerpt from the provided “Pasted Text” of a speech/discussion involving President Musharraf.

    Executive Summary:

    This document analyzes President Musharraf’s remarks regarding the situation in Pakistan, his government’s policies, and his vision for the future. He emphasizes Pakistan’s strategic importance, its economic progress, and his efforts to foster democracy. He also addresses the challenges of terrorism and extremism while defending Pakistan’s nuclear program and his own actions. He stresses the need for a stable, democratic government after the upcoming elections. He makes the case that Pakistan has played a vital role in global affairs, such as its facilitating of the US-China rapprochement in 1971.

    Key Themes and Ideas:

    1. Strategic Importance and Geopolitical Role:
    • Pakistan’s location at the crossroads of South Asia, the Middle East, and Central Asia is strategically vital. “Pakistan is strategically located in the East Gulf and Middle East in the north Afghanistan and Central Asian republics Northeast China and East is India and South Asia so this strategic location actually gives Pakistan the the capability of acting as a trade and Energy Corridor.”
    • Pakistan has historically played a crucial role in international relations, particularly in facilitating the 1971 secret visit of Henry Kissinger to China. “In July 1971, Pakistan facilitated a very important event at that time that is the breaking of Thor between United States and China … that was the time when there was a tussle in China between pragmatists and radicals.”
    • The instability in the region has global implications: “anything that happens in the region in Afghanistan in Pakistan in the borders of Afghanistan and Pakistan has an impact on the whole region and may I also dare to say may have an impact in the streets of Europe.”
    1. Economic Progress and Reforms:
    • Musharraf highlights Pakistan’s economic turnaround, claiming significant growth rates: “today Pakistan’s economy from that failed state level is on an upsurge where we’ve had a 7% growth every year since the last 5 years.”
    • He emphasizes positive macroeconomic indicators and international projections of continued growth. “meril Lynch for this year projects a growth of 6.8%…The Economist the last page they show Pakistan growth this year is 7%.”
    1. Democratization and Empowerment:
    • Musharraf emphasizes reforms made during his administration to strengthen democracy: “…we have introduced the essence of democracy in Pakistan.”
    • He points to the local government system, reserved seats for women in parliament, joint electorates for minorities, and an independent media as evidence of these reforms. “we have empowered the women of Pakistan by give them giving them reserved seats at every tier of the parliament…we have liberated the media and I take pride in saying that there used to be only one Pakistan television channel in Pakistan today today there are 50 channels operating and the media the electronic and print media is totally independent.”
    • He defends the electoral system as free and transparent, outlining steps taken to eliminate flaws such as gerrymandering, ghost polling stations, and manipulation of results. “…inherently that this system is free and fair… we have not allowed any limitation of constituencies… all polling stations have been notified and they are on the internet…”
    1. The Fight Against Terrorism and Extremism:
    • Musharraf emphasizes Pakistan’s efforts to combat terrorism and extremism, particularly al-Qaeda and the Taliban, while addressing the unique challenges posed by each group. “we are fighting the alqaeda and we are fighting the militant Taliban through this strategy.”
    • He describes a multi-pronged strategy involving military, political, and socioeconomic measures. “…we are fighting terrorism on a multi-prong strategy multi-prong being military political and socioeconomic”
    • He claims successes in eliminating Al Qaeda from cities and valleys, and reducing cross-border movement into Afghanistan. “on the Pakistan side while the al-Qaeda was in our cities in hundreds and and we succeeded in almost eliminating them about 6 700 of them have been eliminated no more in our cities… the success is in the fact that isaf says that the crossborder movement from Pakistan into Afghanistan has reduced by 42 %”
    • He notes that the Taliban are their “own people” and the strategy with them must be to “wean away the population” while continuing to militarily strike those who are militant.
    1. Nuclear Program and Security:
    • Musharraf defends Pakistan’s nuclear program as a response to a perceived security threat, refuting the notion of it being an “Islamic bomb”. “This was because of our defensive compulsions…we had to balance out that threat again and that is how Pakistan went nuclear.”
    • He asserts the security of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and the establishment of multi-layered custodial controls to prevent the weapons from falling into the wrong hands. “we have multi-layered custodial controls established in accordance with the best International practices and there is no way that these assets can fall into the hands of the terrorists”
    1. Political Instability and Extraordinary Measures:
    • Musharraf acknowledges the recent political turmoil in Pakistan, while claiming that his actions have been within the boundaries of Pakistan’s laws and Constitution. “I have always upheld the law and the constitution of Pakistan”
    • He explains that extraordinary measures had to be taken when the government was paralyzed, law enforcement was demoralized, and the democratic transition was derailed. “when one is faced with an extraordinary circumstance…Extraordinary Measures that to be taken and I’m very proud of the fact that we put everything back on rail.”
    1. Future Vision and the Upcoming Elections:
    • Musharraf stresses the importance of the upcoming elections on February 18th, asserting they will be fair, free, and transparent. “the elections will be held on 18th February they will be free Fair transparent and peaceful”
    • He emphasizes the need for a stable and politically reconciled government emerging from the elections. “this democratic transition and the elections on 18 February must lead to a very stable government a politically reconciled government”
    • He emphasizes the need to maintain economic progress and to continue the fight against terrorism and extremism. “…that the economic upsurge in Pakistan must be maintained and lastly we must carry on our fight against terrorism and extremism”

    Conclusion:

    President Musharraf’s remarks present a picture of a Pakistan that is both strategically important and facing complex challenges. He defends his government’s record on economic growth, democratic reforms, and the fight against terrorism. He also articulates a vision for the future focused on political stability, economic progress, and continued counter-terrorism efforts. His address is also a defense of his own actions, and serves to put forward his rationale for his own policies. While his claims of success can be assessed and examined, his remarks offer a clear insight into the Musharraf regime’s perspective at that particular moment in time.

    Pakistan: Geopolitics, Reforms, and the Path Forward

    • What role did Pakistan play in the 1970s relationship between the United States and China, and why is this significant?
    • In 1971, Pakistan facilitated a secret trip for Dr. Henry Kissinger to China using a Pakistan International Airlines flight. This was a crucial event that helped thaw the Cold War tensions between the U.S. and China and allowed for the emergence of pragmatists like Mr. Zhou Enlai to come into power in China. This act was pivotal in altering the course of international relations at the time, and it was viewed as a bridge between the two nations. However, the speaker notes that this role was largely forgotten by the 1990s, highlighting a perceived lack of recognition for Pakistan’s contributions.
    • What is the strategic importance of Pakistan’s geographical location?
    • Pakistan’s location is strategically vital, as it lies at the intersection of the East Gulf, the Middle East, Afghanistan, Central Asian republics, China, and India. This geographic position gives Pakistan the potential to act as a trade and energy corridor. Also, any security-related issues in the region, especially near the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, can have far reaching effects, potentially even impacting Europe. This emphasizes the importance of stability in Pakistan for the region as a whole.
    • What economic and democratic reforms has Pakistan undertaken in recent years?
    • Pakistan has made significant strides in its economy, boasting 7% annual growth over the past 5 years, a vast improvement from a previously “failed state” position. The nation has empowered its people through a local government system, reserved seats for women in parliament, and joint electorates for minorities. A free media has also been established in Pakistan with a proliferation of channels as well as independent print media. The government has also worked to implement election systems that are transparent and fair, which the speaker explains in detail.
    • What is Pakistan’s approach to fighting terrorism and extremism, and how successful has it been?
    • Pakistan is fighting terrorism and extremism through a multi-pronged approach involving military, political, and socioeconomic strategies. Militarily, they have targeted al-Qaeda and militant Taliban, leading to successes in eliminating many terrorists in their cities and in reducing cross-border movement with Afghanistan. They are addressing extremism with the goal of changing the mindsets of those who support terrorism, which is viewed as a longer term process. Pakistan has emphasized cooperation with the United States in intelligence and tactical areas.
    • Why does Pakistan consider the term “Islamic bomb” to be unfair?
    • The speaker asserts that the term “Islamic bomb” is discriminatory because it does not reflect the necessity of the nuclear program for defensive purposes. He questions why the term is specific to Islam, rather than identifying other religious or ethnic associations with their nuclear programs, and asserts that the bomb was a direct response to threats to the nation.
    • What “extraordinary circumstances” did Pakistan face that led to “extraordinary measures,” and what does the speaker consider the ultimate measure of judging a country?
    • According to the speaker, “extraordinary circumstances” included a paralyzed government, demoralized law enforcement agencies, a derailing democratic transition, and economic instability caused by terrorism. In response, “extraordinary measures” were taken to bring things back on track. The speaker believes that the ultimate gauge of judging a country should be its economic performance, socioeconomic progress, and political stability via a well-considered democratic process.
    • How does the speaker believe the upcoming elections will be fair and transparent?
    • The speaker argues that the upcoming elections will be fair and transparent due to several systemic changes. There’s a caretaker government overseeing the process, which is a new measure. There has been no gerrymandering of constituencies. All polling stations are notified and accessible online. The electoral rolls have been published online. Returning officers now declare the results, which prevents manipulation from the election commission. Also, there are polling agents present in polling stations and the election boxes are transparent. These steps seek to ensure that there is no way to manipulate or tamper with the election process.
    • What is the anticipated political evolution of Pakistan following the upcoming elections?
    • The elections on February 18th are expected to lead to a stable and politically reconciled government. If a party wins with a simple majority, they will form the government and appoint a Prime Minister. In a hung parliament, a coalition government will form. The president of Pakistan will not run the government, instead he will coexist with whomever wins to ensure stability and prosperity for Pakistan.

    Pakistan’s Economic Resurgence

    Pakistan’s economy has seen significant growth and positive macroeconomic indicators.

    • Economic Growth: The economy of Pakistan has experienced an upsurge, with a 7% growth rate annually for the past 5 years. Even with turmoil in the region, a growth of 6.8% is projected by Merill Lynch. The Economist has also reported a 7% growth for Pakistan this year.
    • Previous Economic State: Pakistan was previously considered a “failed or defaulted state”. However, the country’s economy has been successfully turned around.
    • Positive Macroeconomic Indicators: All macroeconomic indicators for Pakistan are currently positive.

    In addition to the strong economic performance, the sources note that the government has prioritized the well-being and progress of the nation.

    Pakistan’s Political Transition

    Pakistan’s political landscape is characterized by a transition towards democracy, challenges with extremism and terrorism, and a focus on maintaining stability.

    • Democratic Reforms: The government has introduced reforms to empower the people. These include:
    • A local government system.
    • Reserved seats for women in parliament.
    • Joint electorates for minorities.
    • An independent media with 50 channels operating.
    • A functioning election commission with a fair and transparent election system.
    • A caretaker government in place to ensure fairness.
    • Electoral Process:
    • The election system is described as inherently fair and transparent.
    • Measures have been taken to prevent gerrymandering of constituencies, ghost polling stations, and tampering of electoral rolls.
    • Polling stations are now transparent, with polling agents present to monitor the process.
    • Results are to be declared by the returning officers.
    • Elections were scheduled for February 18th, after a delay due to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.
    • Government Structure:
    • Pakistan has a parliamentary system where the president has certain powers, but the government is run by the Prime Minister.
    • The President is elected by the Parliament, including the Senate, National Assembly, and four provincial assemblies.
    • The Prime Minister is the chief executive and is chosen after the elections.
    • If no single party wins a majority, a coalition government will be formed.
    • Challenges:
    • The country faces challenges with terrorism and extremism, requiring a multi-pronged strategy involving military, political, and socioeconomic elements.
    • There is a need to address the mindset that spawns terrorism, which is seen as a long-term strategy.
    • The presence of Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces on Pakistan’s territory remains a concern.
    • The government has implemented strategies to counter cross-border movement of militants and eliminate their presence in cities and valleys.
    • The government has faced extraordinary circumstances including paralysis, demoralized law enforcement agencies and the stalling of the economy
    • Political Stability: The government emphasizes the importance of political stability, a reconciled government, and maintaining the economic upsurge. The ultimate gauge of judging a country should be based on how the economy and socio-economic sector are performing and the progress and well-being of the people.
    • Future Outlook: The focus is on a democratic transition that leads to a stable and politically reconciled government, continued economic growth, and the ongoing fight against terrorism.

    Pakistan’s War on Terror: Alliances and Challenges

    Pakistan is positioned as a key ally in the war on terror, yet it faces internal challenges related to extremism and terrorism. The country’s approach to combating terrorism is multifaceted, involving military, political, and socioeconomic strategies.

    Here’s a breakdown of Pakistan’s role and challenges in the war on terror:

    • Strategic Alliance: Pakistan has been a key ally of the United States in the war on terror.
    • Combating Extremism: The Pakistani government is actively fighting against both Al-Qaeda and the militant Taliban, using a multi-pronged strategy. This includes military action, political measures, and socioeconomic programs.
    • Military Operations: Military force is used against militant groups. There is also cooperation with the United States at strategic and tactical levels, including intelligence sharing.
    • Successes: The Pakistani government claims to have eliminated hundreds of Al-Qaeda members from cities and valleys. They have also acted against the spread of Talibanization in settled districts.
    • Addressing Extremism: In addition to military action, the government aims to change the mindsets that lead to terrorism, acknowledging that this is a long-term process.
    • Border Control: Efforts are being made to control cross-border movement between Afghanistan and Pakistan. This includes establishing border posts and fencing in certain areas.
    • Challenges:
    • Taliban Presence: Despite efforts to combat them, there are still Taliban forces present on Pakistani territory.
    • Cross-Border Movement: While the government has seen success, the cross-border movement of militants remains a challenge.
    • Extremist Mindsets: Addressing the underlying causes of extremism in society is an ongoing challenge.
    • Internal Perspective: There are segments of the Pakistani population that hold different views on the war on terror, which presents an internal challenge for the government.

    Overall, Pakistan’s role in the war on terror is complex, with the country simultaneously acting as a key ally and facing internal challenges related to extremism and terrorism. The government has undertaken significant efforts to combat these challenges using a multi-faceted approach that includes military, political and socioeconomic strategies.

    Pakistan’s 2008 Democratic Elections

    Pakistan’s democratic elections are a key focus of the government, with significant efforts made to ensure fairness and transparency. The election system has been reformed to address past issues and build trust in the process.

    Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of the democratic elections in Pakistan:

    • Commitment to Democracy: The government has emphasized its commitment to democratic processes, with the goal of a stable and politically reconciled government. The elections are seen as a crucial step in the democratic transition of the country.
    • Fair and Transparent System: The election system is described as inherently fair and transparent.
    • Measures have been taken to prevent gerrymandering of constituencies, ghost polling stations, and tampering of electoral rolls.
    • Electoral rolls have been notified and made available on the internet for public scrutiny.
    • Polling stations have been made transparent, with polling agents from every candidate present to monitor the process. The ballot boxes are shown empty and then sealed in front of the polling agents. Ballot papers are counted in front of the agents as well.
    • The election results are declared by the returning officers, adding another level of transparency to the process.
    • A caretaker government is in place to oversee the elections, a measure that was not in place before.
    • Election Details:
    • Elections were initially scheduled for January 8th but were postponed to February 18th due to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.
    • The government has given assurances that the elections will be free, fair, transparent, and peaceful.
    • Government Structure Post-Election:
    • The president of Pakistan, who is elected by the Parliament, does not run the government. The government is run by the Prime Minister.
    • Following the elections, if any party wins a majority, they will form the government and select a Prime Minister. If no single party wins a majority, a coalition government will be formed.
    • The president may facilitate a coalition for the sake of harmony in Pakistan.
    • Emphasis on Stability: The government has stressed that the democratic transition and elections must result in a stable government. The well-being, progress and development of the country and its people are the main priority.

    In summary, Pakistan has made significant efforts to ensure the democratic elections are fair and transparent, with measures in place to prevent manipulation. The focus is on a stable and reconciled government, and the government has urged everyone to see the elections within the context of the laws and constitution of the country.

    Securing Pakistan’s Nuclear Assets

    Pakistan is a nuclear state and has taken measures to ensure the security of its nuclear assets. There is concern that these assets could fall into the wrong hands, particularly those of terrorists, but the government has put measures in place to prevent such a scenario.

    Here’s a breakdown of the key points regarding Pakistan’s nuclear assets:

    • Nuclear Capability: Pakistan developed nuclear weapons due to “defensive compulsions,” as a way to balance a perceived threat that had gone beyond conventional levels. The government states that this is not an “Islamic bomb,” and there is no other designation for other countries with nuclear capabilities.
    • Custodial Controls: The government has established multi-layered custodial controls over its nuclear assets, following the best international practices. These controls ensure that the assets cannot fall into the hands of terrorists.
    • Stability Concerns: There are concerns that Pakistan’s nuclear assets could fall into the wrong hands due to instability, but the government has taken steps to ensure such a scenario does not happen.
    • International standards: The custodial controls are in accordance with the best international practices
    President Musharraf address to World Economic Forum 2008

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • President Musharraf interview with Talat Pakistan: Crisis, Politics, and the Path Forward

    President Musharraf interview with Talat Pakistan: Crisis, Politics, and the Path Forward

    This text comprises excerpts from an interview featuring a high-ranking Pakistani official. The interview covers a wide range of topics, including political instability in Karachi, the role of political parties in inciting violence, and the challenges of counterterrorism efforts. The official discusses the complexities of governing Pakistan, navigating ethnic tensions, and addressing extremism, while also offering insights into foreign policy challenges concerning Afghanistan and Kashmir. The interview reveals internal political struggles and anxieties regarding national security, highlighting the difficulties in finding consensus on crucial issues. Significant portions of the interview are highly critical of the current government’s handling of critical issues.

    Comprehensive Study Guide: Analysis of “Pasted Text”

    Quiz

    Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

    1. According to the speaker, what is the media focusing on instead of reporting more serious issues?
    2. What does the speaker mean when he says the city was “mafed?”
    3. What is the speaker implying when they discuss helicopters being offered?
    4. What does the speaker mean when discussing “political answers” in various cities?
    5. What is the speaker’s critique of political rallies and public opinion?
    6. What is the main point of the speaker’s discussion about his role and that of the Prime Minister?
    7. According to the speaker, what is the root cause of increasing extremism?
    8. What are the speaker’s views on how to deal with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban?
    9. What does the speaker mean when he says “We are Pakistan versus Pakistan?”
    10. What does the speaker say is the biggest concern of America?

    Quiz Answer Key

    1. The speaker claims that the media is focusing on minor incidents, such as someone being hit with a stick during a cricket match, instead of covering the more critical violence and casualties occurring in the city. This is framed as a distraction from the real issues at hand.
    2. When the speaker states that the city was “mafed,” they are implying that the city was in a state of chaos, likely due to violence. This is connected to the idea that the media is downplaying the extent of the issues.
    3. The speaker is implying that the government is trying to bribe or persuade individuals, likely leaders or influential figures, by offering them helicopters instead of addressing the issues they are raising in a genuine way. This shows a lack of seriousness in resolving the actual issues.
    4. By “political answers,” the speaker means that actions and events in various cities like Islamabad and Karachi are being driven by political agendas rather than genuine attempts to solve existing issues. This suggests a pattern of politicization that avoids real solutions.
    5. The speaker is critical of political rallies, suggesting they are primarily for political parties to showcase strength and manipulate public opinion. The speaker implies that this use of political rallies distracts from the real issues and is used to show they are not weak and rally support.
    6. The speaker emphasizes that their role is to facilitate the government, contributing views and strategies, but not to run it. They make it very clear that they are not trying to take over, and that the Prime Minister and the cabinet is running the government.
    7. The speaker identifies the root cause of increasing extremism as the war in Afghanistan starting in 1979. They claim the training and support of the Mujahideen led to the current state of affairs with the rise of radical groups.
    8. The speaker advocates for a strategic approach to dealing with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. This includes intelligence gathering, political instrument development, and engaging with local leaders rather than simply using military force. They emphasize learning from the ground truth rather than from outside sources.
    9. By “we are Pakistan versus Pakistan,” the speaker refers to the internal conflict and divides within the country and the fact that Pakistan is fighting against itself with a lack of unity. He claims that it is not a matter of outsiders, but of the Pakistani people.
    10. The speaker says that America is most concerned about the Taliban’s growing influence in the region. The speaker is implying that their main concern is the possibility of them using this to create instability in the region and attack the U.S.

    Essay Questions

    Instructions: Develop a well-structured essay for each question, incorporating evidence and analysis from the source material.

    1. Analyze the speaker’s perspective on the role of the media, using specific examples from the text to support your argument. How does the speaker view the media’s portrayal of events and its impact on society?
    2. Discuss the various political forces and power dynamics described by the speaker. How do these dynamics affect the speaker’s analysis of current events, and what solutions are proposed in the text?
    3. Explore the speaker’s stance on the causes and implications of extremism, paying particular attention to the historical context given. How do these arguments connect to their critique of political leadership and governance?
    4. Compare and contrast the speaker’s role as he states it, and what can be implied from his overall comments. How does this understanding shape their critique of the government and political system?
    5. Evaluate the speaker’s analysis of the relationship between Pakistan, America, and the Taliban, focusing on the speaker’s suggested solutions. How does this analysis fit into a broader understanding of the region?

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • MKM: Likely refers to the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, a political party in Pakistan.
    • PML: Likely refers to the Pakistan Muslim League, a political party in Pakistan.
    • Gairfal: This term means “illegal” or “not following procedure” in Urdu, implying actions were done outside the legal framework.
    • Langar: A community kitchen in South Asia that serves free food to all, regardless of background or status.
    • Madrasas: Religious schools that can vary significantly in curriculum and viewpoint.
    • Al-Qaeda: A militant Sunni Islamist organization founded by Osama bin Laden.
    • Taliban: A fundamentalist Islamic movement that governed Afghanistan from 1996-2001 and has been in conflict with U.S. and Afghan forces.
    • Sharia: Islamic law based on the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad.
    • Mujahideen: Muslim fighters or those who engage in jihad; often used to refer to those involved in the Afghanistan-Soviet War.
    • Biometric System: Automated systems used to identify individuals based on unique biological traits.
    • Consensual Building: A process in which people work together to achieve agreement with the various viewpoints.
    • Micromanagement/Micromax: This term is used to mean focusing on the details of things rather than the overall big picture.
    • CBC: In this context it is a reference to a broadcasting corporation.

    Pakistan’s Political and Social Crisis

    Okay, here’s a detailed briefing document summarizing the main themes and important ideas from the provided text:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of Excerpts

    Date: October 26, 2023 Subject: Analysis of Political and Social Issues in Pakistan Sources: Excerpts from “Pasted Text”

    Executive Summary:

    This document analyzes a complex and often rambling discourse on the political, social, and security landscape of Pakistan. The speaker, likely a person of significant influence and experience, discusses a wide array of interconnected issues, including: political polarization, ethnic tensions, media bias, government dysfunction, the rise of extremism, the challenges of counter-terrorism, and the complexities of the Kashmir dispute. The discourse is marked by a sense of frustration with the current system and a desire for a more effective and unified approach to governance and nation-building. The speaker often emphasizes the need for consensus building and a departure from political gamesmanship.

    Key Themes and Ideas:

    1. Political Polarization and Dysfunction:
    • Cricket Match Analogy: The speaker uses the analogy of a “fruitless cricket match” between India and Pakistan to describe the unproductive and often repetitive nature of political conflict and media coverage.
    • Quote: “Right and truth are being sidelined and there is a fruitless game of cricket match going on between India and Pakistan”
    • Political Gamesmanship: The speaker criticizes political parties for prioritizing their own agendas and vote banks over national interest. There is a sense that political actions are often performative, designed to sway public opinion and demonstrate power, rather than address real issues.
    • Quote: “this political action was done by a political party and now this question is asked in us”
    • Dominant Parties and Opposition: The text highlights the tension between dominant parties and opposition, with accusations that both sides are engaging in political maneuvering.
    • Quote: “now here that political party is doing this with them, that opposition political party dominates the opposition, for they should also do this, they are doing politics”
    • Challenging the Government: The speaker questions the legitimacy of the existing system, implying the current government is not effective, which seems connected to the idea that the current government is being challenged politically for their power.
    • Quote: “now why are you converting this bangle into politics and why is this opposition expecting the major political, why are you challenging PML and the coalition party which is in the government, why are they being challenged in this way”
    • Lack of Consensus: A recurring theme is the lack of consensus in political decision-making, which the speaker believes is detrimental to progress.
    • Quote: “if you have to get it, you should be consensual and finally whatever happens, everyone should pay for it, but consensus building is something that I am not kind of open minded”
    1. Media Bias and Misinformation:
    • Sensationalism: The speaker criticizes media for sensationalizing events, particularly focusing on violence in certain areas, thereby creating a distorted picture of reality and exacerbating tensions.
    • Quote: “if someone from the north has been hit by a stick or something has happened or he has fallen, they are showing it again and again, from morning till night”
    • Lack of Nuance: There’s an undercurrent in the text that suggests media is failing to convey the complexity of events and the multiple viewpoints involved.
    • Quote: “the people who had caused disturbance to an event, it got hidden, the effect of which was hid”
    1. Ethnic and Sectarian Tensions:
    • Ethnic Coloring of Issues: The speaker expresses concern that political issues are often given an “ethnic color,” potentially leading to further divisions within society.
    • Quote: “the politician who is doing it, number two, who is giving it an ethnic color”
    • Sectarian extremism: The text talks about the impact of the rise of extremist forces in Pakistan, and how their rise goes back to 1979 with the war in Afghanistan, which could be a reason why it is so difficult to combat today.
    • Quote: “In 1979, when we started the war in Afghanistan, we took the Mujahideen for 10 years.”
    1. Government Ineffectiveness and Corruption:
    • Government Offers vs. Reality: There is a critique of government offers of aid that are perceived as empty gestures.
    • Quote: “they are being offered helicopters, do you want to take the helicopter, we will give you the helicopter, but they don’t want it”
    • Lack of Action: The speaker implies that the government struggles to implement effective policies, and can’t seem to keep track of who is in power, as demonstrated by the speaker pointing out that those they caught were released later by ministers.
    • Quote: “then in front of me the media person, we caught hold of them to release them, so the ministers and governors, those Taliban, they have released them, so this is our country”
    • Systemic Issues: The speaker is concerned that a systemic crisis is unfolding, not just an issue of individual leadership.
    • Quote: “the system which you have been building and running for the last 8 years, its crisis has started and you see all these same things”
    1. Rise of Extremism and Counter-Terrorism Challenges:
    • Roots of Extremism: The speaker identifies the war in Afghanistan in the 1970s as a starting point for the current issues with extremism, which lead to the rise of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The madrasas are criticized for spreading extremist teachings.
    • Quote: “From there all the Al-Kayda came over us, they all shifted here, its impact on Afghanistan is full now after 911”
    • Failed Counter-Terrorism Efforts: The speaker implies that current counter-terrorism efforts are not effective, despite significant investments from international partners.
    • Quote: “the byanaat that comes from Pentagon is quite soft that despite the investment of 6 billion in Pakistan, as per the report of Congress and so much help, it is still taking root and they are saying that maybe Pakistan is not combining it in the right way and you use this, I’m frankly I would like to share that thing this is not working”
    • Border Control Issues: The porous borders with Afghanistan are seen as a major challenge in controlling the movement of extremists.
    • Quote: “there are 50 crossing places, we don’t have that much resources, so they come and go”
    1. Kashmir Dispute and International Relations:
    • Need for Compromise: The speaker acknowledges the need for compromise on both sides to resolve the Kashmir dispute, but points out the difficulty in achieving consensus on this issue.
    • Quote: “The fact is that if we have to arrive at a solution, both have to give up something, and when both give up, then in the opposition of both of them in their countries, then again the same consensus issue has come up”
    • Backroad Diplomacy: The speaker talks about backroad diplomacy being used to prepare the basic contract for Kashmir, which suggests there is a quiet dialogue and diplomacy happening on this issue.
    • Quote: “the basic contract for Kashmir has been prepared through backroad diplomacy”
    1. Personal Authority and Influence
    • Acknowledging Authority: The speaker makes a point about his personal influence in Pakistani society, implying that he has influence beyond his title or position. He also criticizes people who only acknowledge his authority when he is in uniform.
    • Quote: “You are coming to me because of uniform I think I have crossed this stage maybe in one, two, three years that was the uniform time pack when and I will be in the country and the people were coming to me because of my coming to me because of my father’s but they nine they recognize me today as a person talking about myself”

    Conclusion:

    The excerpts reveal a deeply troubled picture of Pakistan, characterized by political infighting, social divisions, the threat of extremism, and ineffective governance. The speaker’s tone is often critical, but it is also infused with a desire for change. There is a strong emphasis on the need for unity, consensus-building, and a more strategic approach to addressing the complex challenges facing the nation. This text should be read as a call for introspection, critical analysis, and a genuine commitment to improving the lives of all Pakistanis.

    Further Research:

    • Investigate the specific political parties and personalities referenced in the text (e.g., PML, MKM).
    • Examine the history of the conflict in Afghanistan and its impact on Pakistan.
    • Analyze the role of the media in shaping public opinion and political discourse in Pakistan.
    • Research the complexities of the Kashmir dispute and potential solutions.
    • Research the specific counter-terrorism policies that the speaker is discussing.
    • Examine the relationship between Pakistan and the United States.
    • Consider the historical context of the conversation, including potential time periods.

    This briefing document provides a starting point for understanding the complex issues raised in the text, and hopefully provides a useful lens for future research on these topics.

    Pakistan’s Unrest: A Critical Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions

    1. What are some of the major issues highlighted regarding the media’s coverage of events in Pakistan? The media is criticized for prioritizing sensationalism and focusing on specific incidents (e.g., a person being hit by a stick) over more serious issues like violence and casualties. It’s accused of repetitive coverage, potentially exacerbating tensions. Additionally, there are implications that the media might be influenced by political and ethnic narratives rather than presenting a balanced view of events. There are also suggestions that the media isn’t giving proper attention to the underlying causes of the violence happening.
    2. How are political parties and political activity contributing to the unrest and violence? Political parties are frequently mentioned as a major source of the issues, manipulating events and public perception to gain support. They are accused of using rallies and public demonstrations to showcase their strength, playing political games, and focusing on vote bank politics. The sources point to the use of ethnic and political division to create tension. There is a feeling that political leaders use their power for personal gain and are not focused on the good of the country.
    3. What is the role of the military and security forces in these conflicts? There is a complex relationship between the military, security forces, and the political landscape. The military leadership is acknowledged to hold significant power, with some believing that people are attracted to them due to their uniform. The role of the military is described as facilitating the government, not actually running it. Additionally, the source references intelligence agencies being involved in violence, implying a lack of transparency and a potential abuse of power. The involvement of security forces in the release of captured Taliban members further complicates the situation.
    4. What are some of the concerns raised about extremism and its growth in Pakistan? Extremism is presented as a significant challenge, with its roots traced back to the Afghan war in 1979. The sources cite the growth of Madrassas and their role in fostering extremism. The proliferation of extremist literature and support networks is also highlighted. The sources also imply that previous attempts to counter extremism haven’t been effective. Some people point to the fact that the extremists are being supported by people within the country as well as across the border.
    5. How does the speaker describe the relationship between Pakistan and the United States, particularly in the context of the War on Terror? The United States’ perspective is described as concerned, noting that despite significant investment and assistance to Pakistan, extremism continues to take root. The speaker implies that the US sees Pakistan as not effectively utilizing the aid they receive and possibly even inadvertently contributing to the problem. The speaker also notes that the US is particularly concerned about the Taliban and its potential to pose a threat.
    6. What are the key arguments about the importance of consensus building and open discussion? The speaker repeatedly emphasizes the importance of open-mindedness, open discussion, and consensual building as essential for effective leadership. They criticize the tendency for leaders to impose their views and highlights the need for collaboration and consensus in decision making, arguing that everyone should pay attention and contribute to the resolution of these issues.
    7. What is the speaker’s stance on transparency and accountability? The speaker strongly advocates for transparency and against cover-ups. They emphasize the importance of acknowledging reality and using it to inform decision-making. They believe they understand the reality of the situation, and do not want to be told about the situation by outside forces. The speaker is critical of those who do not engage with the reality of the situation. There is a belief that when you are in the right, there is nothing to be afraid of.
    8. What are the ideas suggested for resolving complex issues like Kashmir? The speaker acknowledges the difficulty in resolving long-standing issues like Kashmir and emphasizes the need for both sides to make concessions. They highlight the limitations of solely relying on solutions from other parts of the world. Self-governance and joint management are mentioned as potential solutions, but the need for finding solutions unique to the dynamics of the region is stressed. They argue that people offer criticism, but not solutions.

    Political Turmoil and Instability

    Political turmoil is discussed extensively throughout the sources, with various factors contributing to the instability. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

    • Political Parties and Power Struggles: The sources highlight a constant struggle for power between political parties. Parties are accused of using rallies and public displays of strength to demonstrate dominance and gain support. The sources mention that political actions are often taken by parties to challenge the ruling government, and this is seen as a normal part of politics. There’s a sense that political parties are more interested in maintaining their power than in resolving issues. One source mentions that the opposition challenges the ruling party and coalition, which contributes to the turmoil.
    • Ethnic Tensions: The sources suggest that some political actors are giving an “ethnic color” to situations, which exacerbates the turmoil. There’s a mention of different ethnic backgrounds and how these differences can be used to create division.
    • Government Instability and Lack of Legitimacy: One source notes that there was no proper government in Karachi at a certain time, which contributed to violence. A crisis of legitimacy within the democratic system is mentioned. There is concern that the existing system, which has been in place for eight years, is failing.
    • Role of Media: The media is described as focusing on less important issues, such as a cricket match, rather than the real issues, such as violence and casualties. The media is also mentioned as reporting that guns were coming out from all sides.
    • Violence and Unrest: The sources make multiple references to violence, including shootings, killings, and general unrest. A specific event is mentioned where Karachi was blocked, followed by widespread violence. Rallies are mentioned as sites of violence and firing.
    • Systemic Issues: The sources suggest that the political turmoil is not just about individual leaders or events, but also about systemic issues within the country. There’s a discussion about the need for a national consensus on a broad agenda. There are also references to a crisis in the existing democratic system and the need for reforms.

    Overall, the sources paint a picture of a politically volatile environment characterized by power struggles, ethnic tensions, government instability, and violence. There is a sense that the political system itself is in crisis, with a lack of consensus and trust between different political actors. The sources also point to the influence of media in shaping public opinion and the impact of external factors, like the war in Afghanistan, on the internal political landscape.

    Media Bias and Violence Reporting

    The sources discuss media bias, particularly in relation to how certain events are covered and the focus given to different issues. Here’s a breakdown of the key points:

    • Focus on Less Important Issues: One source indicates that the media is focusing on less important issues, such as a cricket match between India and Pakistan, instead of focusing on more serious issues, such as violence and casualties. This suggests a bias towards sensationalism or perhaps a lack of interest in covering more complex and challenging topics. The source states that while people in the north are being hurt by sticks, the media is showing it repeatedly instead of focusing on more serious violence.
    • Ignoring the Scale of Violence: The media is criticized for not accurately portraying the scale of violence and casualties. The source claims that the media is understating the number of casualties, which are said to be “very high,” and that the city is in a “mafed” (likely meaning “paralyzed” or “chaotic”) state. This suggests a bias towards downplaying the severity of the situation, possibly due to government pressure or a desire to avoid panic.
    • One-Sided View of Events: There is mention of the media presenting a “one side view” of events. This indicates a lack of objectivity, where the media may be favoring a particular narrative or perspective. The source also mentions how the media hid the actions of those who caused a disturbance.
    • Role in Shaping Public Opinion: The media’s role in shaping public opinion is implied, although not explicitly stated. By focusing on certain stories and downplaying others, the media can influence how the public perceives events and issues. The sources suggest that the media’s role is not objective and could serve to maintain power and promote certain political actions.
    • Media as a Source of Information About Violence: Despite the bias, the media is also mentioned as a source of information about violence. One source mentions that “guns were coming out from all sides and all these reports were present in the media”. This suggests that while the media may not be unbiased, it still plays a role in reporting what is happening.
    • Lack of Coverage of Critical Information: One source states that “this media does not give any information” about Pakistani hand grenades and intelligence agencies firing. This suggests that the media is not reporting on all aspects of the violence and political unrest in the country.

    Overall, the sources portray the media as biased and not fully reporting on the truth. The media is criticized for prioritizing less important issues, understating the scale of violence, and presenting a one-sided view of events. This bias is seen as contributing to the political turmoil by not fully informing the public.

    Ethnic Tensions and Political Turmoil

    The sources discuss ethnic tensions as a contributing factor to political turmoil. Here’s a breakdown of how the sources address this issue:

    • “Ethnic Color” of Situations: One source mentions that some political actors are giving an “ethnic color” to situations. This suggests that political actors are using ethnic differences to further their own agendas or to create division and tension. By framing events along ethnic lines, they may be trying to mobilize support from specific ethnic groups, or to create conflict with other groups.
    • Ethnic Backgrounds and Division: The source indicates that there are different ethnic backgrounds present, implying that this diversity is a factor in the tensions. The text suggests that these ethnic differences can be manipulated to create division and further political instability. This also indicates that ethnic identity is an important factor in the political landscape.
    • Rallies and Ethnic Identity: One source mentions that in 2019, a political party, the MKM, took out a very large rally, and they mention that “we are of whatever ethnic background”. This shows that the rallies are organized in part along ethnic lines, and the use of the phrase “whatever ethnic background” may suggest an attempt to unite people across ethnic groups, but it also highlights the importance of ethnic identity.
    • Impact on Political Landscape: The sources do not explicitly detail specific instances of ethnic clashes or violence, but the implication is that the manipulation of ethnic differences is a dangerous thing and is contributing to political instability. The sources suggest that the ethnic tensions are being used to gain political advantage.

    Overall, the sources suggest that ethnic tensions are a significant factor in the political turmoil. Political actors are accused of using ethnic differences to create divisions and mobilize support. The sources indicate that this manipulation of ethnic identity contributes to the instability and is a dangerous factor that should be addressed.

    Government Response to Political Turmoil

    The sources discuss the government’s response to the political turmoil and other issues, highlighting several key aspects:

    • Offers of Assistance: The government is described as offering assistance, such as helicopters, to people in certain situations. However, these offers are sometimes rejected, indicating a lack of trust or a perception that the government is not genuinely trying to help.
    • Lack of Proper Governance: One source notes that there was a period when there was no proper government in Karachi, which contributed to violence. This suggests a failure of the government to maintain order and stability in the region. This lack of governance also implies a lack of proper response to the turmoil.
    • Political Actions and Instability: The government’s actions are often seen as political moves rather than genuine attempts to address issues. The sources suggest that the government’s response to rallies and political actions is often politically motivated. This approach is seen as contributing to the instability rather than resolving it.
    • Systemic Issues and Lack of Legitimacy: There’s a concern that the government is facing a crisis of legitimacy within the democratic system. The sources suggest the government has been building a system for 8 years and the crisis has now started. This points to a deeper problem with the way the government is structured and the way it functions, which affects its ability to respond effectively to crises.
    • Focus on Power and Control: The sources indicate that the government’s focus is often on maintaining power rather than addressing the root causes of the problems. One source states that the government is trying to show its political strength by gathering people for rallies. There is a perceived lack of genuine concern for the issues themselves.
    • Response to Extremism: The government is noted as having made short and long term plans for army meetings in response to extremism. However, there is also a discussion of how extremism has increased despite efforts by the government and international banks. This suggests that the government’s response to extremism may not be effective or may be facing deep seated challenges.
    • Media Control: Although not explicitly stated as a government action, the lack of media coverage of critical information may be a result of government influence or pressure. One source mentions that the media doesn’t report on all aspects of violence, which could suggest that the government is controlling the narrative by limiting information available to the public.

    Overall, the sources portray the government’s response as inadequate, politically motivated, and ineffective in addressing the political turmoil and other issues. The government is criticized for its lack of proper governance, its focus on maintaining power, and its failure to address the root causes of the problems. There is a lack of trust between the government and the people and an ineffective response to crises and violence.

    Kashmir Conflict: Compromise and Solutions

    The sources discuss the Kashmir conflict, highlighting some key aspects of the issue and potential solutions:

    • Need for Compromise: The sources state that if a solution to the Kashmir conflict is to be reached, both sides must be willing to give up something. This implies that a peaceful resolution requires a willingness to compromise and make concessions, which is often difficult due to opposition in both countries. The sources highlight that consensus is difficult to achieve on this point.
    • Backroad Diplomacy: The sources mention that a basic contract for Kashmir has been prepared through “backroad diplomacy”. This suggests that there are ongoing, informal negotiations and discussions aimed at resolving the conflict. This indicates that despite public tensions, there are efforts to find common ground through discreet channels.
    • Self-Governance and Joint Management: The sources mention ideas for potential solutions, such as “self-governance” and “joint management”. These ideas suggest a possible framework where Kashmir would have a degree of autonomy while being jointly managed by both sides.
    • Lack of Public Solutions: The sources note that many people have criticized the proposed solutions, but few have offered their own ideas. When asked, very few people provide solutions to this conflict. This highlights the complexity of the issue and the challenge of finding a resolution that is acceptable to all parties. This also implies that despite many ideas being offered, a consensus has not been reached.
    • Unique Environment and Dynamics: The sources point out that the environment of every place is different, and that the dynamics of the Kashmir conflict are also unique. This suggests that solutions must be tailored to the specific context of Kashmir, and that lessons from other conflicts may not be directly applicable. A completely different generation with different dynamics requires a different approach.
    • Ongoing Study and Research: The sources indicate that the issue is being studied from all angles, with documents from various places being examined. This suggests a thorough approach to understanding the complexities of the conflict.
    • Rejection of Solutions: The sources imply that if the leaders do not like the offered solutions, they will reject them. It is also stated that the people who are already in favor of solutions must also let others leave out of the electoral process. These factors further complicate the search for an acceptable solution.

    Overall, the sources portray the Kashmir conflict as a complex issue requiring compromise and a tailored solution. The sources highlight the ongoing efforts to find a solution, including backroad diplomacy, and the need for innovative approaches like self-governance and joint management. However, they also acknowledge the difficulties in achieving a consensus, the unique dynamics of the conflict, and the lack of public solutions.

    President Musharraf interview with Talat

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

  • President Musharraf Address To Nation After Emergency Pakistan’s Turning Point: A Presidential Address

    President Musharraf Address To Nation After Emergency Pakistan’s Turning Point: A Presidential Address

    A Pakistani leader, addressing the nation, explains the rationale behind declaring a state of emergency. He cites escalating terrorism and extremism, a paralyzed governance system hampered by judicial activism, and obstacles to democratic transition as critical threats to Pakistan’s stability and progress. The leader emphasizes his commitment to Pakistan’s well-being above all else and assures the public that the emergency measures are necessary to restore order and advance democratic goals. He appeals for national unity and understanding, while also seeking international support. Ultimately, he frames his actions as a necessary, albeit drastic, measure to safeguard the nation’s future.

    A state of emergency was declared by President of Pakistan Pervez Musharraf on 3 November 2007 which lasted until 15 December 2007, during which the Constitution of Pakistan was suspended. When the state of emergency was declared, Musharraf controversially held both positions of President and Chief of Army Staff.

    He later resigned as Army Chief 25 days into the emergency on 28 November. The state of emergency and its responses are generally attributed to the controversies surrounding the re-election of Musharraf during the presidential election on 6 October 2007, including his holding of both offices of President and Chief of Army Staff at the time.

    Pakistan at a Crossroads: A Study Guide

    Quiz

    Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

    1. According to the speaker, what are the primary internal conflicts plaguing Pakistan?
    2. How does the speaker describe the state of the governance system in Pakistan?
    3. What three-stage transition strategy for democracy did the speaker implement, and at what stage did it stall?
    4. What examples does the speaker provide to demonstrate the growing threat of extremism?
    5. What are the key issues the speaker identifies with the judiciary’s actions?
    6. What specific incident involving the Lal Masjid is discussed and why is it significant?
    7. What action did the speaker take regarding the Presidential elections?
    8. What does the speaker suggest about the role of the media in Pakistan?
    9. What justification does the speaker give for declaring a state of emergency?
    10. According to the speaker, what is his overriding priority and motivation in his decisions?

    Quiz Answer Key

    1. The speaker identifies terrorism and extremism as primary internal conflicts, leading to widespread attacks, emboldened extremists, and the imposition of their extremist religious ideas. These issues have impacted the peace of the country and pose a serious threat to the stability of Pakistan.
    2. The speaker describes the governance system as semi-paralyzed, with officials preoccupied with court cases. This is due to the numerous suo motu cases and their fear of taking action, resulting in a muffled and ineffective administration.
    3. The speaker’s three-stage transition strategy involved: (1) direct control of the government from 1999-2002, (2) oversight of elected governments from 2002-2007, and (3) the final transition to complete democracy in 2007, which was stalled due to internal conflicts.
    4. The speaker notes that extremists are operating openly, even in Islamabad, challenging law enforcement agencies. Additionally, he cites the Lal Masjid incident as an example of extremists taking the law into their own hands and terrorizing the people.
    5. The speaker criticizes the judiciary for what he considers judicial activism, which has led to clashes with the executive and legislative branches. He argues that this interference in government operations and the challenging of laws is destabilizing the country.
    6. The Lal Masjid incident involved extremists who took control of the mosque, martyred and held police personnel hostage, burned property, and attacked Chinese citizens. This event, in the heart of the capital, greatly embarrassed Pakistan on the world stage.
    7. The speaker was reelected as president, receiving 57 votes from the Provincial Assemblies, Senate, and National Assembly. However, the official notification was postponed due to pending legal cases against him in the Supreme Court.
    8. The speaker claims that certain media channels contributed to a negative atmosphere and distrust, adding to Pakistan’s downslide. He regrets this because his government granted independence to the media, and he feels it should act responsibly toward the community.
    9. The speaker declares the emergency as a necessary measure to correct the course of the country. He feels it is essential to restore order, complete the democratic transition, and address the issues of terrorism and failing institutions.
    10. The speaker’s overriding priority is Pakistan, stating that it is in his heart, blood, and soul. He asserts that he will do what is necessary for the nation’s stability, even sacrificing his own life. All his decisions, he says, are made with Pakistan’s interest first.

    Essay Questions

    Instructions: Answer each question thoroughly and thoughtfully, drawing on the provided source material.

    1. Analyze the speaker’s diagnosis of Pakistan’s problems. What are the key issues he identifies, and how does he portray their interrelationship?
    2. Evaluate the speaker’s approach to democracy. How does his three-stage transition plan reflect his understanding of Pakistan’s political landscape, and what are the key challenges that he encounters?
    3. Discuss the role of the judiciary as presented in the source. How does the speaker perceive the judiciary’s influence, and what impact does he believe this has on the country?
    4. How does the speaker justify his decision to declare a state of emergency? Evaluate the arguments he presents in defense of this action.
    5. What is the speaker’s overall vision for Pakistan’s future? Consider both the immediate concerns and his broader ambitions.

    Glossary of Key Terms

    • Bismillah Rahman Rahim: An Arabic phrase meaning “In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful,” commonly used by Muslims to begin a task or speech.
    • Assalam Walekum: An Arabic greeting meaning “Peace be upon you,” commonly used by Muslims.
    • Suo Motu Cases: Cases taken up by a court on its own motion without a formal request from a party.
    • IG (Inspector General): A high-ranking police officer responsible for a particular region or force.
    • Lal Masjid: “Red Mosque,” a mosque and religious school in Islamabad, known for its extremist activities.
    • Provisional Constitution Order (PCO): A temporary order or decree issued by a government, often in times of crisis or to bypass established laws.
    • Judicial Activism: The practice of judges using their power to make legal decisions based on their own interpretation of social and political issues.
    • Executive Branch: The part of government that carries out laws and policies, often headed by a president or prime minister.
    • Legislative Branch: The part of government that makes laws, such as a parliament or congress.
    • Extremism: Holding extreme political or religious views, often involving intolerance or violence.

    Pakistan’s State of Emergency: A Critical Analysis

    Okay, here is a detailed briefing document based on the provided text, analyzing its main themes, important ideas, and key quotes:

    Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” Speech

    Date: November 3, 2007 (assuming date of the emergency declaration being discussed)

    Subject: Analysis of a Public Address on the State of Pakistan

    Introduction:

    This document analyzes a public address delivered by a leader in Pakistan, outlining a critical situation within the country and justifying the implementation of a state of emergency. The address details a confluence of issues, including terrorism, a paralyzed government, judicial overreach, and a failing economy, culminating in a drastic decision aimed at stabilizing the nation and ensuring the continuation of a democratic transition.

    Key Themes and Analysis:

    1. Crisis of Instability and Internal Conflict:
    • Main Idea: The speaker emphasizes that Pakistan has reached a “dangerous turning point” due to internal conflict. He argues the nation is in peril and requires “important and painful decisions.”
    • Supporting Quotes:
    • “Pakistan has reached a very dangerous turning point. It is a victim of internal conflict.”
    • “And if I suspect that if this timely action is not taken at this time, then God forbid, the peace of Pakistan is in danger.”
    1. Escalating Terrorism and Extremism:
    • Main Idea: The speaker highlights the unchecked rise of terrorism and extremism, noting a surge in attacks and a feeling of impunity among extremists. He expresses particular concern about the spread of extremism even in the capital, Islamabad.
    • Supporting Quotes:
    • “Terrorism and extremism have reached their extreme in my view.”
    • “Extremist extremists are roaming around the country with their chests puffed out and are not even afraid of the law enforcement agencies.”
    • “But the sad thing is that in Islamabad, the heart of Pakistan, the capital of Pakistan, extremism has spread here too and people are very scared.”
    • “They want to run their own government within the government and the worst thing is that they have their own extremist religious ideas, a fanatical thought about Islam.”
    1. Paralyzed Governance and Judicial Overreach:
    • Main Idea: The speaker describes a “semi-paralyzed” government, with officials preoccupied with legal battles and feeling demoralized due to what he views as excessive judicial intervention, and in turn, making the government ineffective. He specifically points to numerous suo motu cases as evidence. He criticizes the judiciary for clashing with the legislative and executive branches.
    • Supporting Quotes:“In my view it is semi-paralyzed, that is it has become muffled. All the senior officials of the government are running around the courts, especially the Supreme Court.”
    • “Nearly 100 suo motu cases are going on in the Supreme Court…all these suo motu cases are related to the government department.”
    • “In my view, this judicial activism and the judiciary, which is one pillar of the state, clash with the other two pillars, i.e., the legislative, legislative and executive pillars of the government system, interference in it.”
    • “And the government system is failed in every respect, in every way.”
    1. Demoralized Law Enforcement Agencies:
    • Main Idea: Law enforcement agencies, particularly in Islamabad, are described as “de-moralized” and “victims of hopelessness” due to the legal actions taken against their officers. This perceived lack of support from the judicial system has made them hesitant to act.
    • Supporting Quotes:“If we look at the law enforcement agencies, in my view they are de-moralized, especially in Islamabad, they are victims of hopelessness.”
    • “They have lost hope because their officers have been Punishments are being given.”
    1. Interference with Democratic Transition:
    • Main Idea: The speaker expresses frustration with what he sees as deliberate obstacles to Pakistan’s democratic transition, particularly in the lead up to a scheduled election that was supposed to complete the third and final phase of the transition to full democracy. He claims there is unnecessary “uproar” designed to derail progress.
    • Supporting Quotes:“But in my view, I want to say with great regret that some people are interfering in this process, they are creating hurdles in it and they do not want to start it.”
    • “In my view, for the benefit of life, for political benefit and for the loss of Pakistan, this unnecessary uproar is being created and obstacles are being created.”
    1. Economic Downturn:
    • Main Idea: The speaker laments the halt in Pakistan’s economic progress due to the current state of instability, scaring off investors. He contrasts the current decline with the previous seven years of growth in infrastructure and the social sector, citing that the lack of stability and uncertainty is holding back economic growth.
    • Supporting Quotes:“The entire economy of our people is in a bad state…Pakistan has stopped. They are stopping.”
    • “I am very sorry that it is God’s will that all these years of hard work may go waste.”
    1. Lal Masjid Incident:
    • Main Idea: The speaker details the Lal Masjid incident as a major embarrassment, noting the extremists who “took the law into their own hands” and humiliated the nation. He emphasizes the government’s reluctance to use force, while also highlighting the subsequent release of those arrested in the operation despite being identified as confirmed terrorists and that this undermines the government’s efforts to tackle extremism.
    • Supporting Quotes:“The country has been embarrassed by this so much in the whole world that even though we are such a big power, we are not in control of our capital.”
    • “Those madrasas which were involved in extremism have been ordered to be opened…the decision has been taken to open the places where the extremists were sitting.”
    • “Now the situation is that 61 of them, who were declared black by the intelligence agency…have been released, they are roaming around freely.”
    1. Disappointment with the Media:
    • Main Idea: The speaker expresses disappointment with some media channels for what he perceives as adding to the atmosphere of distrust and negativity, instead of helping to stabilize the country.
    • Supporting Quotes:“I would like to say that the media too, I would say that some channels and in some programs of those channels, they also did not help in stopping this down slide negativity, negative thinking, negative projection, rather they only added to this atmosphere of distrust.”
    • “This does not mean that the media should be completely independent, but it should be a responsibility towards the community.”
    1. Presidential Election and Legal Challenges:
    • Main Idea: The speaker describes his re-election as President, where he won a vote at 57, but emphasizes that the case is still pending in the Supreme Court, contributing to uncertainty and hindering the democratic process.
    • Supporting Quotes:“I am thankful that my assembly elected me by voting for me at 57…but the case is still pending.”
    • “No decision is being taken on it and the uncertainty which is in a political environment is going on.”
    1. Justification for Emergency:
    • Main Idea: The speaker justifies declaring an emergency, stating it is necessary to correct the downward trajectory of Pakistan. He claims that it will help put the country “back on track” by bringing new directions to the judiciary, executive, and legislative branches of the government.
    • Supporting Quotes:“I have taken some decisions after discussing with all the military, government, political and private officials, friends from outside Pakistan…and this decision is basically to complete the third stage of democracy.”
    • “In my view, this is the easiest way. Pakistan should be put back on track as soon as possible.”
    1. Reassurance and Appeal to International Community:
    • Main Idea: The speaker reassures that there will be no change in government and appeals to Western nations to understand the dire situation. He asks for time and patience as Pakistan develops democracy, citing Abraham Lincoln’s actions during the US Civil War as an example of a leader taking necessary action for the sake of the nation.
    • Supporting Quotes:“Let me tell you that there will be no change in the government. The Prime Minister, Governors, Chief Ministers will all remain in their respective positions.”
    • “I would ask you to kindly understand the criticality of the environment inside Pakistan and around Pakistan. Pakistan is on the verge of destabilization.”
    • “I would like to say please do not expect and demand your level of democracy which you have learned over number of centuries…please give us time.”
    • “I felt that measures other than the one uncontested through the preservation of the nation’s rights and I assume this ground and now that it is not we are also learning democracy we are going through a difficult stage.”
    1. “Pakistan First” Principle:
    • Main Idea: The speaker repeatedly states that his decisions are driven solely by the interest of Pakistan, and that Pakistan should be prioritized above all other considerations. This is a central justification for all his actions.
    • Supporting Quote:“First of all, Pakistan should go beyond caste-based considerations and Pakistan First.”
    • “For me and every Pakistani Pakistan comes first and anyone else’s considerations come after that.”

    Conclusion:

    The speech paints a picture of a nation facing a multifaceted crisis. The speaker’s justification for the emergency centers on the need to reverse a downward trend in all areas, from security and economy to governance and the democratic transition. He emphasizes a commitment to Pakistan’s stability and progress while highlighting what he views as the destabilizing actions of the judiciary and political opponents. The speech ends with a call for national unity and an assertion that he will continue to fight for Pakistan’s well-being. The speaker emphasizes his personal willingness to sacrifice for the betterment of the country.

    Pakistan’s Crisis: A Turning Point

    FAQ: Key Issues and Actions in Pakistan

    1. What is the primary concern highlighted in the address?

    The primary concern is that Pakistan has reached a dangerous turning point due to internal conflict, with a significant increase in terrorism and extremism, a semi-paralyzed governance system, demoralized law enforcement agencies, and interference with the democratic process. These issues are causing a decline in Pakistan’s progress and creating a sense of despair and disbelief among the community.

    2. How is terrorism and extremism described in the speech?

    Terrorism and extremism are described as having reached an extreme level, with attacks occurring throughout Pakistan, including in the capital, Islamabad. Extremists are seen as challenging the government’s authority and attempting to impose their fanatical religious views on the people, posing a direct challenge to the stability of the state.

    3. What are the key problems within Pakistan’s governance system?

    The governance system is described as semi-paralyzed, primarily due to senior government officials being frequently involved in court cases, particularly the Supreme Court. This has led to an environment of fear, where officials are hesitant to take action, and the system is struggling to function effectively. Furthermore, there is a backlog of numerous cases against the government in the Supreme Court.

    4. What is the state of law enforcement agencies, according to the speaker?

    Law enforcement agencies, particularly in Islamabad, are described as demoralized and hopeless. This is attributed to the punishment and suspension of their officers, which has resulted in a lack of action and a sense of paralysis within these agencies.

    5. What democratic transition plan was in place and what obstacles were encountered?

    A three-stage transition plan towards democracy was in place, initiated in 1999. The first stage involved government control, followed by a second stage of elected governments with oversight. The third and final stage was intended to culminate in a presidential election followed by general elections and a complete return to civilian rule. However, this final stage has been hindered by interference and obstacles, threatening to derail the entire transition process.

    6. How has the judiciary contributed to the issues being described?

    The judiciary is seen as clashing with the executive and legislative pillars of the government, with judicial activism leading to interference. The judiciary is accused of creating obstacles in the implementation of democratic processes and causing government functions to fail by taking up numerous cases against the government, and for not properly handling certain legal issues (like the reference case that was sent to them by the PM). The release of known terrorists by order of the judiciary after the Lal Masjid incident is also a source of great concern.

    7. What action has been taken in response to these issues, and what is its justification?

    In response, an emergency has been declared along with a Provisional Constitutional Order. This decision was made, according to the speaker, after taking stock of the entire situation and consulting various stakeholders. The justification is to remove the obstacles in the democratic process and complete the third stage of democratic transition. The speaker argues that a firm and swift action is needed to stop Pakistan from sliding into further chaos.

    8. What is the speaker’s primary message to both the Pakistani people and the international community?

    The speaker’s primary message to the Pakistani people is that Pakistan comes first, above all other considerations, and he calls for unity and support in moving the country forward. To the international community, especially Western nations, he requests understanding of the critical situation, emphasizes that Pakistan is a country in a difficult transitional period that needs time to develop democracy. He also draws parallels with Abraham Lincoln’s actions during the American Civil War, suggesting that extraordinary measures may be necessary to preserve the nation.

    Pakistan’s Multifaceted Crisis

    Pakistan is facing a multifaceted crisis, according to the speaker, characterized by internal conflict, terrorism, a dysfunctional government, and a struggling economy.

    Key issues contributing to Pakistan’s crisis:

    • Internal Conflict: The nation is described as a victim of internal conflict, requiring painful decisions to ensure peace.
    • Terrorism and Extremism:
    • Terrorist attacks are occurring throughout Pakistan.
    • Extremists are operating openly, even in Islamabad, challenging law enforcement and the government with their fanatical ideas.
    • These extremists seek to impose their own rule and challenge the state.
    • Governance System Paralysis:
    • The government is described as “semi-paralyzed” with senior officials focused on court cases, particularly in the Supreme Court.
    • Numerous cases and applications against government departments are ongoing in the Supreme Court.
    • Demoralized Law Enforcement:
    • Law enforcement agencies, especially in Islamabad, are demoralized due to punishments and the suspension of officers.
    • They have lost hope and are reluctant to take action.
    • Interference with Democracy:
    • Obstacles are being created in the democratic process, hindering a smooth transition.
    • The speaker describes a three-stage transition to democracy, with the third stage, which was intended to complete in 2007, facing interference.
    • This interference includes a reference sent to the Supreme Judicial Council against the Prime Minister’s recommendation, which the speaker views as unconstitutional.
    • Economic Downturn:
    • The country’s economic progress has halted and is in decline.
    • Investors are hesitant due to the instability.
    • Infrastructure development is suffering.
    • Judicial Activism and Conflict:
    • The judiciary is clashing with the legislative and executive branches of government.
    • This conflict is challenging the authority of both the legislative and executive bodies.
    • Lal Masjid Incident:
    • Extremists took the law into their own hands at the Lal Masjid in Islamabad, leading to a crisis.
    • The incident caused international embarrassment, with extremists martyring police personnel, taking hostages, and damaging property.
    • Despite the government’s actions to address this, confirmed terrorists have been released and are at large.
    • Presidential Election Issues:
    • The Presidential elections, although conducted legally, were challenged in the Supreme Court.
    • The case has been repeatedly postponed, leading to political uncertainty.
    • Media Negativity: Some media channels are contributing to a negative atmosphere by promoting distrust, rather than acting responsibly.
    • Public Despair and Disbelief: The community is experiencing despair and disbelief, and is questioning the government’s ability to address the situation.

    Proposed Solutions and Actions:

    • Emergency Declaration: An emergency has been declared to address the crisis and complete the third stage of the democratic transition.
    • New Direction for State Pillars: The speaker believes a new direction is needed for the three pillars of the state: the judiciary, executive, and legislative.
    • No Change in Government: The Prime Minister, Governors, and Chief Ministers will remain in their positions, and the assemblies will continue to function.
    • Priority of Pakistan: All actions are to be taken with Pakistan’s best interests as the priority.
    • Preservation of Democratic Transition: The speaker states that their actions are to preserve the democratic transition and prevent Pakistan from falling into further chaos.

    The speaker emphasizes that these actions are necessary to stop the nation’s downward trend and to restore progress and stability. The speaker requests the international community to understand Pakistan’s critical situation and to support its efforts to stabilize.

    Pakistan’s Extremist Threat

    According to the speaker, terrorism and extremism have reached an extreme level in Pakistan. Here’s a breakdown of the issues:

    • Prevalence of Attacks: Terrorist attacks are occurring throughout Pakistan, with increased intensity after incidents in Rawalpindi and Sargodha.
    • Open Operation of Extremists: Extremists are operating openly and confidently across the country, including in Islamabad, the capital city. They are not afraid of law enforcement agencies.
    • Challenge to the Government: These extremists are challenging the writ of the government and seeking to establish their own rule. They aim to impose their extremist religious ideas on the population.
    • Extremist Ideology: The extremists are described as having a “fanatical thought about Islam,” which they are trying to forcefully impose on others.
    • Lal Masjid Incident:Extremists took the law into their own hands at the Lal Masjid in Islamabad.
    • This incident caused international embarrassment and highlighted the government’s lack of control.
    • Extremists martyred police personnel, took hostages, burned shops, and even attacked Chinese citizens.
    • Despite the government’s response, many confirmed terrorists were later released.
    • Madrasas and Extremism:Some madrasas (religious schools) are involved in extremism.
    • The government had planned to build model madrasas to provide better education and living standards for poor children.
    • However, some madrasas that were involved in extremism have been ordered to be reopened.
    • Ongoing Threat: The released terrorists are now at large, posing a continued threat to the country. These terrorists are a potential threat that can be linked to future bomb blasts.
    • Support for Extremists: Individuals are openly showing support for terrorists and challenging the government.

    The speaker views this situation as a serious challenge to the state and its citizens. The extremists are not only a threat to law and order, but also to the stability and international standing of Pakistan.

    Pakistan’s Governance Crisis

    The speaker describes a significant failure in governance in Pakistan, characterized by a semi-paralyzed system, demoralized law enforcement, and interference with the democratic process.

    Here’s a detailed breakdown of the governance failure:

    • Semi-Paralyzed Governance System:
    • The governance system is described as “muffled” because senior officials are preoccupied with court cases, particularly in the Supreme Court.
    • There are numerous cases and applications against government departments in the Supreme Court.
    • This focus on legal battles has hampered the government’s ability to function effectively.
    • Demoralized Law Enforcement:
    • Law enforcement agencies, especially in Islamabad, are demoralized and feel hopeless due to the punishments and suspensions of their officers.
    • They are hesitant to take action, preferring to remain idle, and some officers are making rounds of the Supreme Court.
    • Interference with Democracy:
    • Obstacles are being created in the democratic process, preventing a smooth transition.
    • The speaker describes a three-stage plan for transitioning to democracy. The third stage is facing interference which includes a reference sent to the Supreme Judicial Council against the Prime Minister’s recommendation, which is viewed as unconstitutional.
    • The speaker believes that some people are interfering with this democratic process and creating hurdles in it.
    • Judicial Overreach and Conflict:
    • The judiciary is clashing with the legislative and executive branches of government.
    • This judicial activism is interfering with the functioning of the legislative and executive bodies, undermining their authority.
    • The judiciary is challenging the laws made by the legislature and has led to a government system that has failed in every respect.
    • The speaker suggests that the series of events that led to the governance failure began on March 9th when a reference was sent to the Supreme Judicial Council against the Prime Minister’s recommendation.
    • Lal Masjid Incident and its Aftermath:
    • The Lal Masjid incident is seen as a significant failure in governance, as extremists took the law into their own hands in the capital city.
    • The government’s inability to maintain control is internationally embarrassing.
    • Despite the government’s actions against the extremists at Lal Masjid, the situation was not resolved.
    • Confirmed terrorists associated with the Lal Masjid incident were released and are now at large, posing a continuing threat.
    • Presidential Election Issues:The Presidential elections, while conducted legally, faced challenges in the Supreme Court that have led to uncertainty and delays.
    • The case has been repeatedly postponed, adding to the political instability and uncertainty.
    • The speaker expresses that the community is in a state of hopelessness due to these postponements.
    • Government Ineffectiveness: The Prime Minister has expressed difficulty in running the government under the current circumstances, indicating a breakdown in governance.

    The speaker emphasizes that these issues have led to a halt in Pakistan’s progress and a decline in its overall condition. The speaker has taken action to declare an emergency, with the stated goal of restoring order and stability, and restarting the democratic process.

    Obstacles to Democracy in Pakistan

    The speaker identifies several significant obstacles to democracy in Pakistan, primarily centered around interference with the democratic process, judicial overreach, and a lack of respect for the rule of law.

    Here’s a breakdown of these obstacles:

    • Interference with the Democratic Transition: The speaker outlines a three-stage transition to democracy, with the third stage facing significant hurdles. This final stage, intended to complete the transition to full democracy, has been deliberately disrupted. The speaker expresses regret that some individuals are creating obstacles, preventing the completion of this third phase.
    • Obstacles in the Implementation of Democracy: The speaker states that obstacles are being created in the democratic system, preventing its smooth implementation. This interference is preventing the country from moving towards full democracy and stability.
    • Judicial Overreach: The judiciary is described as overstepping its bounds and interfering with the functions of the legislative and executive branches. This is causing conflict and undermining the authority of these other branches. The speaker notes that the judiciary is challenging the laws made by the legislature, further destabilizing the government.
    • Constitutional Challenges: A key event in the disruption of the democratic process was a reference sent to the Supreme Judicial Council against the Prime Minister’s recommendation. The speaker deems this action unconstitutional.
    • Presidential Election Issues: The Presidential elections, while conducted legally, were challenged in the Supreme Court. The case has been repeatedly postponed, leading to political uncertainty and delays in the democratic process. These postponements further contribute to a sense of hopelessness and instability.
    • Lack of Respect for the Rule of Law: Extremist groups, such as those involved in the Lal Masjid incident, are challenging the rule of law by taking matters into their own hands. The speaker also notes that even after government action to counter them, confirmed terrorists have been released and are at large.
    • Media Negativity: Certain media channels are contributing to a negative atmosphere by promoting distrust. This media negativity is seen as an obstacle to the positive development of the democratic process.

    The speaker believes that these obstacles are hindering Pakistan’s progress and preventing it from moving forward with its democratic transition. In response to this, the speaker has declared an emergency, in part to remove these obstacles and complete the democratic process.

    Pakistan Emergency Declaration

    The speaker declared an emergency in Pakistan to address the severe issues facing the country and to complete the third stage of the democratic transition. Here’s a breakdown of the reasons for and the details surrounding the declared emergency:

    • Reasons for Declaring Emergency:
    • To stop the down slide of Pakistan: The speaker expresses deep concern over the deteriorating conditions in Pakistan, which include rising terrorism and extremism, a paralyzed governance system, and obstacles to the democratic process. The speaker feels that the country is taking a downward turn, and decisive action is needed to reverse this trend.
    • To bring a new direction to the three pillars of the state: The speaker wants to bring a new direction to the judiciary, executive, and legislative branches to improve governance and combat extremism and terrorism.
    • To complete the third stage of the democratic transition: The speaker emphasizes a commitment to complete the final stage of the three-stage transition to democracy, which they believe is being deliberately obstructed. The speaker states the emergency is intended to remove the obstacles that are in the way of this process.
    • Details of the Emergency Declaration:
    • Provisional Constitution Order: The emergency was declared through a Provisional Constitution Order.
    • No change in government: The speaker states that the Prime Minister, Governors, and Chief Ministers will remain in their positions, and all assemblies will continue to function as they were. This indicates that the emergency is not intended to remove the existing government but to stabilize the situation and restore order.
    • Intended to put Pakistan back on track: The speaker explains the emergency is meant to quickly restore Pakistan to its previous path of progress and development, and to ensure the completion of the democratic process.
    • Seeking International Understanding: The speaker addresses the international community, particularly the United States, the European Union, and the Commonwealth. The speaker asks them to understand the critical situation in Pakistan and the necessity for the actions taken. They emphasize that Pakistan is on the verge of destabilization and that immediate action is essential to prevent further decline.
    • Speaker’s Perspective:
    • Personal conviction: The speaker expresses a personal conviction that the action taken was necessary to preserve the democratic transition and to prevent the country from “committing suicide.”. The speaker states they cannot allow the country to continue on a downward trend.
    • Sacrifice for Pakistan: The speaker states that if a sacrifice of their life is needed for Pakistan, they are ready, and that they will continue to fight for the country and its people.
    • Pakistan First: The speaker emphasizes that Pakistan’s interests come before all other considerations. The speaker also appeals for support and understanding from the community.
    • Comparison to Abraham Lincoln: The speaker references Abraham Lincoln’s actions during the American Civil War as an example of a leader taking necessary steps during a national crisis, even if those steps might seem extreme. The speaker uses this example to justify the actions taken in the interest of preserving the nation.

    In summary, the speaker declared an emergency to address the critical and worsening conditions in Pakistan, with the goal of stabilizing the country, restoring order, and ensuring the completion of the democratic transition. The speaker views this action as a necessary step to prevent further decline and to put Pakistan back on a path toward progress.

    Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry reacted promptly to the emergency declaration, convening a seven-member bench which issued an interim order against this action. He also directed the armed forces of Pakistan not to obey any illegal orders. Subsequently, the 111th Brigade of the Pakistan Army entered the Supreme Court of Pakistan Building and removed Chaudhry and several other judges from the premises and arrested them.

    It was announced early that the state of emergency would likely end in late November or early December 2007. After being sworn in for a second presidential term on 29 November 2007, Musharraf immediately declared that the state of emergency would end on 16 December 2007, although the emergency actually ended one day earlier, on 15 December 2007, with an announcement by Musharraf.

    The general election previously scheduled to occur in early January 2008 was postponed. At the beginning of the emergency, Information Minister Tariq Azim Khan said on television that the general election could be delayed many months and perhaps up to a year. Later, the election was rescheduled to take place by 15 February 2008, as announced by Musharraf himself. A few days later he called for the election date to be on or before 9 January 2008, before a final date of 8 January 2008, was decided. However, because of unforeseen events that occurred after the state of emergency ended, primarily the assassination of Benazir Bhutto and its aftermath, the general elections were again postponed by the Election Commission, and were finally held on 18 February 2008

    Background
    Leading up to the 2007 presidential elections, the Election Commissioner approved General Pervez Musharraf as a candidate for re-election. One of his opponents, retired Supreme Court justice Wajihuddin Ahmed, challenged the ruling in the Supreme Court. The dispute was primarily regarding whether a member of the military was constitutionally permitted to run for the office of the president, as Musharraf held both titles of President and Chief of Army Staff.

    Responding to the challenge, on 28 September 2007, Pakistan’s Supreme court cleared the way for President Pervez Musharraf to seek another five-year term when it threw out a major legal challenge to his re-election plans. But barred the Election Commission from officially declaring a winner until it made its final decision. On 6 October, presidential elections were held with Musharraf winning 98% votes in the Senate, Parliament and the four provincial assemblies.

    While the Supreme Court was hearing the case of Musharraf’s eligibility as a candidate, it announced that it would likely need to delay the hearing until 12 November due to a personal engagement of one of the honourable members of the bench. On 2 November, the court reversed its decision to break, stating that it would now reconvene the following Monday on 5 November to attempt to resolve the political situation quickly. This reversal was in part due to criticism that the court’s continuing delay was adding to Pakistan’s general instability. Convening on 12 November would have left a tight schedule of just three days before the end of Musharraf’s previous presidential term on 15 November. Parliamentary elections were due to be held in February 2008, no later than a month after the original target date for elections. The 2008 Pakistani general election was held on 18 February 2008.

    Prior to the emergency declaration, Attorney General Malik Qayyum, representing Musharraf, had assured the court that there was no planned move by the government to impose martial law.

    President Musharraf address to nation after emergency

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog