Amjad Izhar Blog

Category: Gaza

  • Israel’s Attack on Qatar and Hamas’s Predicament

    Israel’s Attack on Qatar and Hamas’s Predicament

    The source, an excerpt from a YouTube video transcript by , discusses an Israeli airstrike on Hamas targets in Doha, Qatar, and the resulting controversy surrounding U.S. involvement and Qatari sovereignty. The speaker expresses surprise and skepticism that the Hamas leadership survived the attack, suggesting the mission was a success in targeting a key leader and that the U.S., despite its alliance with Qatar, was complicit, evidenced by its large military base in Doha and prior knowledge or assistance in the operation. Furthermore, the transcript outlines the widespread condemnation of the Israeli actions and the immense human cost in Gaza, juxtaposing this with the speaker’s strong criticism of Hamas for prioritizing personal gain and poor governance over the well-being of the Palestinian people, even accusing them of prolonging the conflict for financial reasons. Finally, the discussion extends to regional geopolitical tensions, including warnings to Turkey and an overall critique of Muslim nations’ hypocrisy and failure to unite against injustices, whether in Palestine or elsewhere.

    Israel’s Strike on Hamas in Doha: US Involvement and Qatari Trust

    The discussion of the Israel-Qatar attack revolves around an Israeli airstrike on a Hamas center in Doha, Qatar, the conflicting reports regarding US involvement, and the implications for Qatar’s national security and diplomatic role.

    Details of the Attack and Targets

    The source notes that some time after Iran attacked Qatar, Israel conducted an aerial attack (फजाई हमला) on the Hamas center (हमास मरकज) located in Doha, the capital of Qatar.

    • Casualties: Six individuals were killed: the son of Hamas Chief Khalil ul Haya (खलील उल हया), three guards, and one helper.
    • Initial Target Assessment: Israel’s primary targets were the Hamas chief and leadership. Initially, it was believed they survived because they were not present at the determined location.
    • Revised Target Assessment: Later information suggested that the joint mission between President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu was successful, not a failure, in sending the person they deemed the “ringleader of terrorism” (टेररिज्म का सरगना) to “Haneya’s seat,” implying the successful elimination of a high-value target.
    • Context: Hamas leadership was gathered in Qatar to consider President Trump’s Gaza ceasefire proposals.

    Motivation for the Israeli Strike

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu publicly stated unequivocally (दो टोक) that the attack on Hamas was an immediate response (फरी जवाब) to a Hamas attack that had occurred the previous day in Jerusalem. That Hamas attack resulted in the deaths of five Jews and injuries to about 20 others. Additionally, on the same day, four Israeli soldiers were killed when an Israeli tank was destroyed by a landmine planted by Hamas.

    The source also suggests that Israel now attacks any country from which it perceives Hamas receiving assistance or shelter (मामनत), citing examples like Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Tunisia, and Yemen.

    US Role and Conflicting Accounts

    The US connection to the location of the strike is significant, as America’s largest military base (सबसे बड़ा फौजी अड्डा) is located in Doha. The source asserts that it is impossible for such a major operation to occur there without the US being taken into confidence. Furthermore, based on treaties, America is the guarantor of Qatari soil security, but these guarantees fail when the matter concerns Israel.

    There are contradictory statements concerning US knowledge and warning regarding the strike:

    1. Israeli Claim: Israeli leadership maintained that they not only took the US into confidence before the attack but that Washington also provided assistance (मदद भी फराहम की) during the attack.
    2. Qatari Claim: Qatar asserted that they were only informed by the US once the attack had already commenced (आगाज हो चुका था).
    3. US Official Stance: President Trump expressed regret over the attack. The White House spokesman stated that Trump disagreed with the attack on the soil of their ally, Qatar, and claimed they had given advance warning to their ally.

    The source interprets the attack as having occurred with American cooperation and assistance (तामनो मामनत). It further suggests that the attack was executed following the American President’s final warning to Hamas, meaning Trump himself orchestrated it.

    Implications for Qatar and International Reaction

    The attack on the soil of Qatar, described as the “closest American ally” (करीब तरीन अमकी इत्तहादी), was deemed to have no justification, unlike targeting Hamas leadership in Iran.

    • Trust and Dignity: This action risks destabilizing the confidence (एतमाद मुतलजल हो जाएगा) that other friends and allies hold in Qatar’s leadership. The source suggests that this act mocks Qatari dignity, given that the US had previously given Qatar permission to continue its mediating role.
    • Mediating Role: The attack may render Qatar incapable of performing its crucial mediating role (मसालती रोल) in the future, a role the US had previously urged them to maintain for indirect communication with groups like Hamas and the Taliban.
    • International Condemnation: Leaders across Europe and the Middle East, particularly the Saudi Crown Prince, condemned the Israeli attack. However, this condemnation is characterized by the source as “hollow” (खोखली मजम्मत) and yielding no result (ला हासिल).

    Hamas Leadership Targeted: Doha Strike and Future Threats

    The discussion of Hamas leadership targets, according to the sources, focuses on the Israeli aerial strike in Doha, Qatar, the conflicting outcomes reported for the mission, and the warning that future targets may include countries hosting Hamas leaders.

    The Attack in Doha

    Israel executed an aerial attack (फजाई हमला) on the Hamas center (हमास मरकज) located in Doha, the capital of Qatar.

    • Primary Target: Israel’s original target (असल टारगेट) was the Hamas chief (हमास सरबराह) and leadership (कयादत).
    • Context of Presence: Hamas leadership was gathered in Qatar to consider President Trump’s Gaza ceasefire proposals (गजा जंगबंदी तजावीज).

    Strike Outcome and Casualties

    The reporting on the success of targeting the leadership was initially contradictory:

    1. Initial Assessment (Failure): Initially, it was reported that the Hamas chief and senior leadership survived because they were not present at the determined location (मुतयन मुकाम पर मौजूद ना होने की वजह से बच गए).
    2. Revised Assessment (Success): Later reports suggested that the joint mission orchestrated by President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu was successful (कामयाब रहा है), not a failure. The goal was to eliminate the person they referred to as the “ringleader of terrorism” (टेररिज्म का सरगना), implying the successful dispatch of a high-value target to “Haneya’s seat”.
    3. Confirmed Casualties: Six individuals were killed in the strike: the son of Hamas Chief Khalil ul Haya (खलील उल हया), three guards, and one helper (मामन).

    Official Justification and Future Targets

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated unequivocally that the attack on Hamas was an immediate response (फरी जवाब) to a Hamas attack in Jerusalem that occurred the previous day.

    The source indicates that Israel now attacks any country from which it perceives Hamas receiving assistance or shelter (मदद या मामनत). Examples of countries that have been targeted include Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Tunisia, and Yemen.

    The source specifically mentions the potential for Turkey to be the next target. This is because Israel has issued a warning to the Turkish leadership to either immediately expel Hamas leaders (हमास रहनुमाओं को फौरी मुल्क बदर कर दे) or ensure that their security personnel remain at least 150 feet away from Hamas strongholds.

    Viewpoints on Hamas Leadership Actions

    The leadership of Hamas is criticized within the source material for actions that negatively affect the Palestinian people:

    • Responsibility for Destruction: The President of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, used severe language, stating that the Hamas leaders are the “actual responsible parties” (असल जिम्मेदार) for the destruction of the oppressed Palestinian people in Gaza due to their poor governance and personal interests.
    • Demand to Release Hostages: Abbas urged Hamas leadership to become unarmed (गैर मुसल्ला) and release the Israeli hostages (यरमालियों) to remove Israel’s justification (जवाज) for attacking Gaza.
    • Financial Accumulation: The source notes the vast personal wealth of Hamas leaders, citing $5.5 billion in assets and personal accounts recorded for Ismail Haniyeh. They question why the leadership “wants to trade their dirty business on the corpses” of the oppressed Palestinian people.

    US-Israel Complicity in Doha Attack

    The discussion of US-Israel complicity centers on the Israeli aerial attack on the Hamas center in Doha, Qatar, where sources suggest the operation was carried out with American knowledge, assistance, and possibly, direct orchestration.

    Claims of Joint Planning and Assistance

    The sources present strong evidence and claims pointing toward joint US-Israel planning and operational support:

    • Joint Action: The initial planning for the attack is described as stemming from “America and Israel’s joint planning (मुश्तरका प्लानिंग)”. Later reports suggested that the joint mission between President Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu was successful in eliminating a high-value target.
    • Direct Assistance: Israeli leadership claimed that they not only took the US into confidence before the attack but that Washington “provided assistance (मदद भी फराहम की)” during the operation.
    • Trump’s Orchestration: The source explicitly concludes that the attack occurred with “American cooperation and assistance (अमेरिकी तामनो मामनत के साथ)”. Furthermore, it suggests the attack happened after the American President gave Hamas a final warning, meaning “Trump himself orchestrated it (ट्रंप ने खुद करवाया है)”.

    Strategic Context and Security Guarantees

    The location of the attack makes US involvement highly probable, according to the source:

    • Military Presence: It is widely known that America’s largest military base (सबसे बड़ा फौजी अड्डा) is located in Doha. Therefore, it is deemed “impossible” for such a major operation to occur there “without the US being taken into confidence”.
    • Failure of Guarantees: Based on treaties, the US is the guarantor of Qatari soil security (कतरी सर जमीन के तहफुज़ का जामन. However, the sources note that these guarantees “fail” (धरी की धरी रह जाती हैं) when the matter concerns Israel. The source implies that this guarantee also fails, similar to how NATO Article 5 might be rendered ineffective in such a context.

    Contradictory Official Narratives

    Despite the operational evidence of complicity, the official US and Qatari narratives conflict regarding prior warning:

    • Israeli Claim: Israel maintains they took the US into confidence and received US assistance.
    • US Official Stance (White House): President Trump expressed regret over the attack, and the White House spokesman claimed Trump “disagreed” with the attack on their ally, Qatar. They also asserted that they had given “advance warning (पेशगी खबरदार)” to their ally.
    • Qatari Counter-Claim: Qatar asserted that they were only informed by the US “when the attack had already commenced (जब हमले का आगाज हो चुका था)”.

    Broader Moral Complicity

    Beyond the specific attack in Qatar, the source suggests a wider complicity in Israeli actions against Palestinians:

    • The source contends that the US President is an “equal participant (बराबर का शरीक)” in Israeli atrocities against Palestinians.
    • It is suggested that the Israeli Prime Minister would not have the “courage (मजाल नहीं थी)” to inflict even minor cruelty upon attackers without the US President’s “assistance and cooperation (मदद और तामन)”.

    )

    Israel’s Immediate and Expanding Retaliation Policy

    Israel’s retaliation policy, as reflected in the sources, is characterized by its immediacy, its expanding geographical scope, and its explicit justification as a direct response to attacks against Israelis.

    1. Justification as Immediate Response

    The primary basis for Israel’s retaliatory actions, as stated by its leadership, is the need for an immediate response to Hamas attacks:

    • Explicit Statement: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated unequivocally (दो टोक) that the aerial attack (फजाई हमला) on the Hamas center in Doha, Qatar, was an “immediate response (फरी जवाब)” to a Hamas attack that had occurred in Jerusalem the previous day.
    • Context of the Preceding Attack: The Hamas attack in Jerusalem resulted in the deaths of five Jews (पांच यहूदी हलाक) and injuries to about 20 others.
    • Other Casualties: On the same day, four Israeli soldiers were killed when an Israeli tank was destroyed by a landmine planted by Hamas.

    2. Expanding Geographical Scope of Targetsफजाई हमला**) on the Hamas center in Doha, Qatar, was an “immediate response (फरी जवाब)” to a Hamas attack that had occurred in Jerusalem the previous day.

    • Context of the Preceding Attack: The Hamas attack in Jerusalem resulted in the deaths of five Jews (पांच यहूदी हलाक) and injuries to about 20 others.
    • Other Casualties: On the same day, four Israeli soldiers were killed when an Israeli tank was destroyed by a landmine planted by Hamas.

    2. Expanding Geographical Scope of Targets

    Israel’s policy dictates that it will attack any country from which it perceives Hamas receiving assistance or shelter, significantly broadening the targets for retaliation beyond Gaza itself:

    • Targeting Countries: The source states that Israel now “attacks any country (इसी पर चढ़ दौड़ता है)” from which it sees Hamas receiving “assistance or shelter (मदद या मामनत)”.
    • Examples of Targeted Nations: Examples cited include Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Tunisia, and Yemen.
    • Attack on Qatar: The strike discussed extensively in the sources was carried out on the Hamas center in Doha, Qatar, illustrating this wide-ranging policy, despite Qatar being described as the “closest American ally (करीब तरीन अमकी इत्तहादी)”.

    3. Future Threats and Warnings

    Israel has extended its retaliation policy into explicit warnings to sovereign states regarding the hosting of Hamas leadership:

    • Threat to Turkey: The source notes that Israel’s “next target (अगला निशाना) may be Turkey”.
    • Warning Conditions: Israel issued a warning (इंतबाह) to the Turkish leadership demanding they either “immediately expel Hamas leaders (हमास रहनुमाओं को फौरी मुल्क बदर कर दे)” or ensure their security personnel remain at least 150 feet away from Hamas strongholds.
    • Disregard for International Guarantees: This policy of targeting allies or NATO members (like Turkey, which is a NATO member with an Article 5 defense clause) is viewed as likely to proceed regardless of international treaties. The source notes that such a defense clause, like NATO’s Article 5, may be rendered ineffective concerning Israel, similar to how US guarantees to Qatar “fail (धरी की धरी रह जाती हैं)” when Israel is involved.

    4. Severity and Outcome of Retaliation

    The retaliatory actions often involve severe military consequences, which are characterized by the source as significantly heavier than the initial damage incurred by Israel:

    • Disproportionate Force: The source notes that the destruction being inflicted upon Palestinians in Gaza—the “तोरा बोरा बनाया जा रहा है”—is “somewhere much heavier (कहीं ज्यादा भारी है)” compared to the recent Israeli losses (such as the five Jewish fatalities and four soldiers killed).
    • Destructive Impact (Fresh Reports): Examples of retaliatory military actions in Gaza include the martyrdom of 83 Palestinians (फ़िलस्तीनी शहीद, the designation of more tall buildings as targets, and the complete leveling of five high-rise buildings in three days, leading to 2009 crushed flats and 4100 people rendered homeless (बेघर).

    )

    Hamas, Gaza, and Palestinian Internal Conflict

    The internal conflict dynamics concerning Palestinians and Hamas, as discussed in the sources, center on the destruction caused by Israeli retaliation, the moral and financial conduct of Hamas leadership, and the severe condemnation leveled against Hamas by the Palestinian Authority (PA).

    1. Hamas’s Role and Actions

    Hamas is characterized both as a resistance group facing immediate Israeli retaliation and as a terrorist organization whose actions exacerbate Palestinian suffering:

    • Attack Justification for Retaliation: Israel explicitly launched an aerial attack on the Hamas center in Doha, Qatar, as an “immediate response (फरी जवाब)” to a Hamas attack that killed five Jews (पांच यहूदी हलाक) and injured about 20 others in Jerusalem. Additionally, four Israeli soldiers were killed when a tank was destroyed by a landmine planted by Hamas on the same day.
    • Hostage Taking and Atrocities: Hamas is accused of having entered Israel and “cutting the throats (गले काट रहे थे)” of 1200 Israelis. The leadership is criticized for holding Israeli hostages (यरमालियों) and questioned for wanting to “trade their dirty business on the corpses” of the oppressed Palestinian people. It is noted that some of these hostages have died in Hamas captivity.
    • Financial Conduct: Hamas leaders are scrutinized for their vast personal wealth. The source notes that Ismail Haniyeh’s assets and personal accounts reportedly exceed $5.5 billion. The source questions why they possess such “greed and avarice (हिल्स और लालच)” for external aid received in the name of the oppressed Palestinian people.
    • Gathering for Diplomacy: Despite the conflict, Hamas leadership was gathered in Qatar to “consider President Trump’s Gaza ceasefire proposals (गजा जंगबंदी तजावीज)”.

    2. Palestinian Authority Condemnation of Hamas

    The sources highlight a significant political conflict between the PA and Hamas, where the PA holds Hamas responsible for the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza:

    • Hamas as the “Actual Responsible Parties”: Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas used severe language against Hamas leadership. Abbas stated that the Hamas leaders are the “actual responsible parties” (असल जिम्मेदार) for the destruction of the oppressed Palestinian people in Gaza.
    • Accusations of Misgovernance: Abbas criticized Hamas for making the lives of the people of Gaza “hell” (जहन्नुम बना रखी हैं) due to their “poor governance and personal interests (बुरी हुक्मरानी और जाती मफाद)”.
    • Demand for Disarmament: Abbas urged Hamas to become “unarmed (गैर मुसल्ला)” and release the Israeli hostages to “remove Israel’s justification (जवाज) for attacking Gaza”.
    • Hamas as Netanyahu’s Benefactor: Abbas is cited as saying that Hamas is Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s “greatest benefactor (सबसे बड़ी मोहसन)”.

    3. The Humanitarian Cost of the Conflict

    The sources emphasize the grave consequences of the conflict for the ordinary Palestinian population in Gaza due to Israel’s aggressive retaliation:

    • Severity of Retaliation: The retaliatory actions against Palestinians in Gaza are described as creating a “Tora Bora” (तोरा बोरा बनाया जा रहा है), and the destruction is deemed “somewhere much heavier (कहीं ज्यादा भारी है)” compared to the recent Israeli losses.
    • Recent Casualties and Destruction: Fresh reports indicate that Israeli military actions resulted in 83 Palestinians martyred (फ़िलस्तीनी शहीद. Military actions targeted more tall buildings, resulting in five high-rise buildings (बुलंद इमारतें) being leveled in three days, turning 2009 flats into rubble and rendering 4100 people homeless (बेघर).
    • Widespread Suffering: There is international recognition of the “piteous state (हालते जार)” and suffering of the people of Gaza, with attacks occurring daily, leading to the deaths of their children, elderly, and young people.
    • Moral Double Standard: The source highlights a moral conflict among certain Muslim communities who cry over Israeli atrocities against Palestinians but simultaneously celebrated when Hamas attacked and killed 1200 Israelis.

    )

    इंसानों के नाम अफज़ार रिहान क़तर पर अफ़सोसनाक इसराइली हमला और प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप कुछ अरसा कब ईरान ने क़तर पर हमला किया था और अब इसराइल ने क़तर के दार हुकूमत दोहा में मौजूद हमास मरकज पर फजाई हमला किया है जिसमें हमास चीफ खलील उल हया का बेटा तीन मुहाफिज और एक मामन समेत छह अफराद जाम भाकिया राही मुल्के आदम या हलाक हो गए इसराइल का असल टारगेट हमास सरबराह और कयादत थी जो मुतयन मुकाम पर मौजूद ना होने की वजह से बच गए मेरे लिए यह हैरत की बात थी कि अमेरिका और इसराइल की मुश्तरका प्लानिंग से इतना अहम हमला हो और इस्माइल हनिया की सीट पर बैठा खलील अल हया हमास चीफ समेत हमास की सीनियर कयादत बच जाए यह कैसे मुमकिन है फिर सोचा कि शायद वो इधर-उधर हो गए हो या अफाकन बच गए हो लेकिन ज़हन नहीं मान रहा था अब इतलात मसूल हुई है कि ट्रंप और बनियामिन नेटन याू का यह मिशन नाकाम नहीं कामयाब रहा है वह जिसे टेररिज्म का सरगना करार देकर अपने दोस्त मुल्क पर हमले का रिस्क ले चुके थे उसे हनिया संवार के पास भेजने में नाकाम नहीं हुए यह यकीनन अफसोसनाक इतलात हैं खुदा करे कि फिलिस्तीनी आवाम के दुखों का खात्मा हो सके यह भी बताया गया है कि अमे प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप की गजा जंगबंदी तजावीज पर गौर करने के लिए हमा कयादत यहां जमा थी ट्रंप ने अगरचे इस हमले पर अफसोस का इज़हार किया है और तर्जमान वाइट हाउस ने यह कहा है कि ट्रंप अपने इतहादी क़तर की सर जमीन पर होने वाले हमले से मुतफिक नहीं थे और उन्होंने अपने इत्तहादी को पेशकी खबरदार कर दिया था जबकि क़तर का कहना है कि उन्हें अमेरिका की तरफ से इस वक्त आगाह किया गया जब हमले का आगाज हो चुका था दूसरी तरफ इसराइली कयादत का कहना है कि उन्होंने हमले से कब ना सिर्फ अमेरिका को एतमाद में लिया था बल्कि वाशिंगटन ने हमले में उन्हें मदद भी फराहम की यह हकीकत सारी दुनिया को मालूम है कि दोहा में अमेरिका का सबसे बड़ा फौजी अड्डा मौजूद है और यह किसी तरह मुमकिन नहीं है कि यहां इतनी बड़ी कारवाई अमेरिका को इतमाद में लिए बगैर की जा सके यह अम्र भी वाज़ है कि क़तर से किए गए मोहदे की रूह से अमेरिका कतरी सर जमीन के तहफुज़ का जामन है मगर जब बात इसराइल की आ जाए तो वह तमाम जमानतें धरी की धरी रह जाती हैं इसराइली प्राइम मिनिस्टर बेंजमिन नेतन याू ने बगैर कोई लगी लिपटी रखे दो टोक यह कह दिया है कि हमास पर यह हमला एक रोज कब यरूशलम में इसराइलियों पर होने वाले हमास के हमले का फरी जवाब था जिसमें पांच यहूदी हलाक हो गए थे और 20 के करीब जख्मी जिनमें चंद की हालत नाजुक बयान की गई अलाबाजी इसी रोज हमास की बिछाई हुई एक बारूदी सुरंग फटने के बायस इसराइली टैंक उड़ने से चार इसराइली फौजी भी मारे गए थे 7 अक्टूबर या हालिया इसराइली नुकसान के बिल मुकाबिल गज़ा में फिलिस्तीनियों का जो तोरा बोरा बनाया जा रहा है यह कहीं ज्यादा भारी है ताजा रिपोर्ट काबिले मुलाहजा है इसराइली फौज की इंतकामी कारवाइयों में 83 फ़िलस्तीनी शहीद गजा में मज़द ऊंची इमारतें निशानजदा तीन रोज़ में पांच बुलंद इमारतें जमीन बोस 2009 रशी फ्लैट मलबे का ढेर 4100 अफराद बेघर अब हालत यह है कि इसराइल जिस मुल्क से भी हमा को मदद या मामनत मिलती देखता है इसी पर चढ़ दौड़ता है इस सिलसिले में लबनान शाम ईरान अराक त्यूनस और यमन की मिसालें हमारे सामने हैं अमेरिकी थिंक टैंक के हवाले से कहा जा रहा है कि इसराइल का अगला निशाना तुर्की हो सकता है क्योंकि इसराइल ने तुर्क कयादत को इंतबाह कर दिया है कि वो हमास रहनुमाओं को फौरी मुल्क बदर कर दे या इनके ठिकानों से 150 फुट दूर रहे हालांकि तुर्की नेटो का रुकन मुल्क है जिसका आर्टिकल पांच वाज़ है कि किसी एक मुल्क पर हमला तमाम रुकन मुालिक पर हमला गर्लदाना जाएगा लेकिन इसराइल के हवाले से यह अमल सब पर वाज़ है कि यह आर्टिकल इसी तरह धरे का धरा रह जाएगा जिस तरह कतर के हवाले से अमकी गारंटी इसी बस 20 जनवरी के बाद कतरी कयादत ने ट्रंप के खतरनाक अज़ाइम देखते हुए उन्हें यह पेशकश की थी कि अगर आप लोगों को हमारी मसालहाना कावशें नापसंद है तो हम अपना यह रोल खत्म करते हुए अपने मुल्क से इन तमाम गिरोहों का इंखलाक करवाए देते हैं इसके जवाब में वाइट हाउस ने अपनी आला तरीन सतह से यह यकीनदानी करवाई थी कि आप लोग अपना यह रोल एज सच जारी सारी रखें क्योंकि इसी रोल की वजह से जिस तरह तालबान के साथ मामलात तय किए गए थे इसी तरह हमास या दीगर दहशतगर्द ग्रोहों से बिल वास्ता रवाबत में मामलत मिलती है बसूरते दीगर ये लोग खुले या छुपे दुश्मनों के पास जा सकते हैं असूली बात है कि जब अमेरिका ने आज खुद अपनी रजामंदी से कतरी कयादत को उसकी इजाजत दे रखी थी तो फिर कतरी वकार डिग्निटी और कौमी और मुल्की सलामती के साथ इस नौ का मजाक नहीं होना चाहिए था अभी कल ही इन लोगों ने आपका वालहाना इस्तकबाल किया इतनी ज्यादा इन्वेस्टमेंट अनाउंस की इतना कीमती जहाज तोफतन पेश किया जिसके बेडरूम की शीटें भी हूज़ मैली ना हुई होंगी ईरान में एहमास की आदत को इसराइल का टारगेट करना काबिल फहम था लेकिन क़तर जैसे करीब तरीन अमकी इत्तहादी की सरजमीन पर इस नौ की कारवाई का कोई जवाज़ ना था इससे क़तर की कयादत पर ना सिर्फ दीगर दोस्तों या इत्तहादियों का एतमाद मुतलजल हो जाएगा बल्कि आइंदा के लिए क़तर वो मसालती रोल अदा करने के काबिल भी नहीं रहेगा खुद अमेरिका जिसे जरूरी ख्याल करता है बिलाशुबा बशूल यूरोप और मिडिल ईस्ट की कयादत बिलखसूस सऊदी क्राउन प्रिंस सब ने इसराइली हमले की मजम्मत की है लेकिन वाज़ बात है कि यह खोखली मजम्मत ला हासिल है तो फिर क्या करना चाहिए क्या इन सबको इसराइल और अमेरिका पर बदले में जंगी यलगार कर देनी चाहिए क्या वो इस पोजीशन में हैं कि अमेरिका से स्नो की जंग लड़ सकें जी हां यह सब इस पोजीशन में है कि मिलकर मिडिल ईस्ट के लिए अमेरिका से अमन मायदा मनवा सके जिसका अवलीन तकाजा यह है कि हमास जैसे टेररिस्ट ग्रुप को गैर मुसल्ला करते हुए तमाम इसराइली बेगुनाह यमाली शहरी रिहा करवाए जाएं सऊदी क्राउन प्रिंस भी इसका अंधियाजा जाहिर कर चुके हैं फिलस्तीनी अथॉरिटी के सदर महमूद अब्बास ने इस सिलसिले में हमास लीडरशिप के लिए जो जुबान इस्तेमाल की है अगर दरवेश इसके असल अफवा यहां तहरीर कर दे तो हमारे अखबार वाले वो शाया नहीं कर सकेंगे फस्तीनी अथॉरिटी के सरबराह की सारी जिंदगी हमारे सामने है जिनके मुतालिक कोई यह नहीं कह सकता कि वह अपने फिलिस्तीनी आवाम के दुश्मन है या इसराइल के एजेंट हैं जब वो हमास टेररिस्ट ग्रुप के खिलाफ इतना शदीद बोल रहे हैं और उन्हें बार-बार समझा चुके हैं कि गजा के मजलूम फिलिस्तीनी आवाम की तबाही के असल जिम्मेदार हमास वालों तुम हो अपनी बुरी हुक्मरानी और जाती मफाद की खातिर तुम लोगों ने गजा के आवाम कीिंदगियां जहन्नुम बना रखी हैं तुम गैर मुसल्ला होते हुए इसराइली यरमालियों को छोड़ दो ताकि इसराइल के पास गजा पर हमलों का कोई जवाज ना रहे सच तो यह है कि मास्क नतन याऊ की सबसे बड़ी मोहसन है और अमकी प्रेसिडेंट को भी चाहिए कि वो अपने बुलंद बांग दामों का कुछ तो भरम रहने दें दुनिया में कौन सा दिल दर्द है जिसे गजा के आवाम की हालते जार का अदराक और दुख नहीं है रोज इन पर हमले हो रहे हैं इनके बच्चे बूढ़े जवान मर रहे हैं लेकिन हमास आदत को जरा शर्म नहीं आ रही कि हम लोगों ने इसराइली यमाली किस खुशी में अपने पास रखे हुए हैं वो इनकी लाशों पर भी अपना गंदा व्यापार क्यों करना चाहते हैं उन्हें मजदूम फस्तनी आवाम के नाम पर हासिल करदा बरूनी अमदाद की इस कदर हिल्स और लालच क्यों है हमासफ लीडरान के जाती अकाउंट्स कई कई अरब डॉलर से क्यों भरे पड़े हैं जिसे शक है वो इस्माइल हनिया की जायदाद और जाती अकाउंट्स में दर्ज $5.5 अरब डॉलर की तफसीलात मुलाजा कर ले हमारे पाकिस्तान जैसे रवायती मुसलमान मुालिक के आवाम को आखिर इस नौ के हक़यक बताने से हमारा मीडिया क्यों ग्रेज या परहेज करता है नतीजातन वो दुनिया भर के मुस्लिम दहशतगर्दों और इनकी हमास इस्लामी जिहाद लश्कर तबा हजबुल्ला अखानुल मुस्लिमून बोको हराम तालबान जैश मोहम्मद अलकायदा दाश जैसी खूनखार तंजीमों के मुालिक ये गमान रखते हैं कि शायद वो खालिस इस्लामी काज के लिए जद्दोजहद कर रहे हैं अमेरिका यूरोप और मगबी दुनिया तो इनके साथ इस्लामोफोबिया की वजह से हकारत या बैर रखते हैं इसराइल को हम लोग जिस कदर मर्जी बुरा भला कह ले जितनी मर्जी लान तन कर लें लेकिन क्या वो इसी सर जमीन पर एक अटल हकीकत नहीं है जिसकी कुछ ना कुछ तारीख तहजीबी जिग्राफियाई और मजहबी अखलाकी बुनियादों से भी आप लोग इंकार नहीं कर सकते जिस तरह का बयान हमारी मुकद्दस तरीन किताब में मौजूद है इंसानी बुनियादों पर भी अगर हम गौर करें तो हम मुसलमानों के पास अपने माशा्लाह 57 मुस्लिम मुालिक हैं आखिर हम यहूद के लिए पूरी दुनिया में सिर्फ एक मुल्क के वजूद से भी क्यों इंकारी हैं हम लोगों ने अपने पासपोर्ट पर भी नफरतंगेज तहरीर क्यों लिख रखी है दरवेश अद गुजार है कि वो शख्स जो इसराइली मुजालिम की मजम्मत नहीं करता वो इंसान कहलाने का भी हकदार नहीं लेकिन जब हम्मास जैसे टेररिस्ट ग्रुप इसराइल के अंदर घुसकर 1200 इसराइलियों के गले काट रहे थे क्या हमारे अपने मुसलमान आवाम ने मुजम्मत करने की बजाय इस पर खुशियों के शादियाने नहीं बजाए या कितने लोग यह सवाल करते पाए गए हैं कि हमास ने जो बेगुनाह इसराइली नाजायज यमाली बना रखे थे उन्हें क्यों रिहा नहीं किया जा रहा इनकी बच्चियों से रेप किया गया इनके बुजुर्ग जवान हमास की कैद में मरे तुम इनकी लाशों पर भी व्यापार करते हो ऐ मुसलमान भाइयों इंसानी हमदर्दी का क्या यह दोहरा म्याल नहीं है तुम किस कदर दोगले और मुनाफिक लोग हो एक तरफ फिस्तीनियों पर इसरली मुज़ालिम का रोना रोते नहीं थकते हो दूसरी तरफ इसी इसराइल की तरह सेम पेज पर प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप के लिए अमन नोबेल प्राइज के बाजाफ्ता सफारशी बनकर खड़े हो जाते हो हालांकि दिन रात ये चीखते पाए जाते हो कि अमकी प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप फस्तीनियों पर इसराइली मज़ालिम में बराबर का शरीक है वो बंजमन नेत्र याू के साथ खड़े हैं इसकी मदद और तामन के बगैर इसराइली प्राइम मिनिस्टर की मजाल नहीं थी कि वो अपने ऊपर हमलावर होने वालों पर थोड़ा सा जुल्म भी कर सकता तुम्हारे लीडरान अमरी सिफारखाने में पहुंचकर ट्रंप की शान में कसीदे पढ़ते पाए जाते हैं वाइट हाउस में खुफिया या जली मुलाकातों के लिए मादा हदीस खड़े दिखाई देते हैं ताकि इनकी हुक्मरानी कहीं कमजोर ना पड़ जाए इस्लाम इस्लाम के नारे जपने वाले खुशामदी हो सं्यांग के मुसलमानों पर जब मुज़ालम के पहाड़ तोड़े जाते हैं तब इस्लाम और मुसलमानों से तुम्हारी मोहब्बत कहां चली जाती है कश्मीरी मुसलमानों से तुम्हें बड़ी मोहब्बत है सं्यांग के मुसलमानों से नफरत क्यों है इनका नाम तक क्यों नहीं लेते हो जमूरियत और इंसानी हुकूक की आवाज जरा कभी प्रेसिडेंट शी जिनपिंग के सामने भी उठा कर देखो प्यूटन के साथ हाथ मिलाने के लिए बेवकूफों की तरह ललचा रहे थे मांगतों की तरह आगे बढ़कर अपने मुल्क की तजील करवा रहे थे क्या कभी यह पूछने की जरूरत कर सकते हो कि प्यूटन तुमने चनीया और रशिया के मुसलमानों पर कितने मुज़ाम ढए हैं यूक्रेन में कितने बेगुनाह मौत के घाट उतारे हैं सब ढकोसलेबाजी है यह दो चेहरों वाले मुनाफिक लोग हैं छर अफगानों से खाते हैं नफरत के भगोले दिल्ली की तरफ मुंह करके छोड़ते हैं आज ट्रंप तुम्हारा हीरो है कि मोदी के खिलाफ बोल रहा है सोचो इस दिन का जब उसने तुमसे यह मुतालबा कर दिया कि इसराइल को फौरी तस्लीम करो वरना आ रही हैं तुम पर बंदिशें पेशगी सोच लो कि इस दिन अपने इस अंकल को क्या जवाब दोगे हमारे कुछ ज्यादा सयाने कतर को समझाते हुए इस नो की लंबी-लंबी छोड़ रहे हैं कि तुम लोगों ने अपने आवाम की तरक्की और खुशहाली और अपनी मजबूत मशत पर फोकस करने की बजाय हमारे यानी पाकिस्तान की तरह आवाम को भूखे मारकर मजबूत दफा पर खर्च क्यों नहीं किया हमारी तरह तगड़ी फौज क्यों नहीं बनाई आवाम कलाम तो जानवरों की तरह होते हैं पाकिस्तानियों की तरह वो भूखे मरते हैं तो मरने दो अपनी बेहतर जिंदगी के लिए अपने मुल्क को छोड़कर दूसरे मुल्कों में भाग जाने के लिए मरते हैं तो उन्हें मर जाने दो बस दफा मजबूत होना चाहिए फौज तगड़ी होनी चाहिए इन लोगों को यह हकीकत पेशज़र रहनी चाहिए कि इसराइली हमला कतर पर नहीं हुआ एक आलमी टेररिस्ट ग्रुप हमास पर हुआ है और अमेरिकी तामनो मामनत के साथ हुआ है सच तो यह है कि यह हमला अमेरिकी प्रेसिडेंट की हमास को आखिरी वार्निंग के बाद हुआ है दूसरे लफ्जों में ट्रंप ने खुद करवाया है ऐ मेरे असरी ज़हनियत के ज्यादा सयानों डरो इस दिन से जब किसी अमेरिकी प्रेसिडेंट की फिरकी घूम गई और अमेरिका ने इस हमारे मुल्क के बदनसीब पर हमला कर दिया तब आपको चांदन हो जाएगा कि अपने आवाम को भूखा मारने के बावजूद आपकी अस्रियत किस तरह दुम दबाती है और मुल्क कौम की कितनी बड़ी तबाही लाती है यह जैसा तैसा इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर आपको नजर आता है इसका क्या बनता है बड़ी-बड़ी बढ़के हाकने वाले 48 65 71 और कारगिल की बहादरियां याद फरमा लें बिलखसूस 71 में जब 93 थाउज ने भीगी बिल्ली बनकर गर्दनें झुकाते हुए सर नग होकर हथियार डाले और इंडियन कैदी बनना कबूल किया अपनी हालिया जिस नामद कामयाबी पर अतरा रहे हो यह सब मसनूई शराब और मिसअंडरस्टैंडिंग है किसे मालूम नहीं है कि हकीकत में जंग हुई ही नहीं सिर्फ मोदी की हिमाकत थी कि आतंकवाद के अड्डों तक जाना है किसी मिलिट्री बेस को टच नहीं करना नहीं छूना इस सारे ड्रामे को फतेह करार देते हुए बड़े-बड़े एजाजात या जाली तमके बांटते फिरते हो तो ऐसी मस्त जमूरियत में कुछ सवालात उठाने का यारा किस में हो सकता है बहुत सारी हकीकतें हैं जो यहां बयान ही नहीं की जा

    انسانوں کے نام، اظفر ریحان، قطر پر اسرائیلی حملہ افسوسناک اور صدر ٹرمپ۔ کچھ عرصہ قبل ایران نے قطر پر حملہ کیا تھا اور اب اسرائیل نے قطر کے دارالحکومت دوحہ میں واقع حماس کے مرکز پر زبردست حملہ کیا ہے جس میں حماس کے سربراہ خلیل الحیا کے بیٹے، تین محافظوں اور ایک ماموں سمیت 6 افراد مارے گئے تھے۔ اسرائیل کا اصل ہدف حماس کے سربراہ اور قیادت تھے، جو اس لیے بچ گئے کہ وہ مقررہ جگہ پر موجود نہیں تھے۔ میرے لیے یہ بات حیران کن تھی کہ اتنا اہم حملہ امریکا اور اسرائیل کی مشترکہ منصوبہ بندی کی وجہ سے ہوا اور یہ کیسے ممکن ہے کہ حماس کی اعلیٰ قیادت سمیت اسماعیل ہنیہ کی نشست پر بیٹھے حماس کے سربراہ خلیل الحیا بچ گئے۔ پھر میں نے سوچا کہ شاید وہ کہیں چلے گئے ہوں گے یا اتفاقاً بچ گئے ہوں گے، لیکن میرا دماغ اسے قبول نہیں کر رہا تھا۔ اب مجھے اطلاع ملی ہے کہ ٹرمپ اور بنجمن نیتن یاہو کا یہ مشن ناکام نہیں ہوا ہے۔ وہ جس شخص کو دہشت گرد قرار دے کر اپنے دوست ملک پر حملے کا خطرہ مول لیا تھا، اسے ہانیہ سنور کے پاس بھیجنے میں کامیاب ہو گیا ہے۔ یہ یقیناً ایک افسوسناک خبر ہے۔ خدا فلسطینی عوام کے مصائب کا خاتمہ کرے۔ یہ بھی بتایا گیا ہے کہ حما کی قیادت امریکی صدر ٹرمپ کی غزہ جنگ بندی کی تجاویز پر غور کرنے کے لیے یہاں جمع ہوئی تھی۔ ٹرمپ نے اس حملے پر افسوس کا اظہار کیا ہے اور وائٹ ہاؤس نے اپنے لیڈر کی حیثیت سے کہا ہے کہ ٹرمپ اپنے اتحادی قطر کی سرزمین پر حملے سے متفق نہیں تھے اور انہوں نے اپنے اتحادی کو پیشگی خبردار کر دیا تھا۔ قطر کا کہنا ہے کہ انہیں امریکہ نے اس وقت خبردار کیا تھا جب حملہ شروع ہو چکا تھا۔ دوسری جانب اسرائیلی قیادت کا کہنا ہے کہ انہوں نے حملے کے بارے میں نہ صرف امریکا کو اعتماد میں لیا بلکہ واشنگٹن نے بھی حملے میں ان کی مدد کی۔ یہ حقیقت پوری دنیا کو معلوم ہے کہ دوحہ میں امریکہ کا سب سے بڑا فوجی اڈہ ہے اور یہ ایک دور افتادہ علاقے میں واقع ہے۔ یہ ناممکن ہے کہ امریکہ کو اعتماد میں لیے بغیر یہاں اتنی بڑی کارروائی کی جائے۔ یہ بھی واضح ہے کہ قطر کے ساتھ کیے گئے معاہدے کی روح کے تحت امریکا قطری سرزمین کے تحفظ کا ضامن ہے لیکن جب بات اسرائیل کی ہو تو وہ تمام ضمانتیں رائیگاں جاتی ہیں۔ اسرائیلی وزیراعظم بنجمن نیتن یاہو نے بغیر کسی ہچکچاہٹ کے کہا ہے کہ حماس پر یہ حملہ گزشتہ روز یروشلم میں اسرائیلیوں پر حماس کے حملے کا جوابی ردعمل تھا، جس میں پانچ یہودی ہلاک اور بیس کے قریب زخمی ہوئے تھے، جن میں سے بعض کی حالت نازک بتائی جاتی ہے۔ اسی دن حماس کی بچھائی گئی بارودی سرنگ سے اسرائیلی ٹینک کو اڑا کر چار اسرائیلی فوجی بھی مارے گئے۔ 7 اکتوبر یا حالیہ اسرائیلی نقصانات کے مقابلے میں غزہ میں فلسطینیوں پر جو عذاب ڈھایا جا رہا ہے وہ زیادہ بھاری ہے۔ تازہ ترین رپورٹ قابل غور ہے۔ جوابی کارروائیوں میں 83 فلسطینی شہید۔ غزہ میں کئی اونچی عمارتوں کو نشانہ بنایا گیا۔ تین دن میں پانچ اونچی عمارتیں زمین بوس ملبے میں 2009 فلیٹ؛ 4100 افراد بے گھر؛ اب صورتحال یہ ہے کہ اسرائیل کسی بھی ملک پر حملہ کرتا ہے جہاں سے اسے حماس کی مدد یا حمایت ملتی نظر آتی ہے۔ اس سلسلے میں لبنان، شام، ایران، اراک، طوس اور یمن کی مثالیں ہمارے سامنے ہیں۔ ایک امریکی تھنک ٹینک کے حوالے سے کہا جا رہا ہے کہ اسرائیل کا اگلا ہدف ترکی ہو سکتا ہے کیونکہ اسرائیل نے ترک قیادت کو حماس کے رہنماؤں کو فوری طور پر نکالنے کی ہدایت کی ہے۔

    یہ سچ ہے کہ جو شخص اسرائیلی مسلمانوں کی مذمت نہیں کرتا وہ انسان کہلانے کا بھی مستحق نہیں لیکن جب حماس جیسے دہشت گرد گروہ نے اسرائیل میں گھس کر 1200 اسرائیلیوں کے گلے کاٹے تو کیا ہمارے اپنے مسلمان عوام نے مذمت کرنے کی بجائے اس پر جشن نہیں منایا یا کتنے لوگ یہ سوال کرتے پائے گئے کہ حماس کے ہاتھوں ناجائز شہری بنائے گئے معصوم اسرائیلیوں کو کیوں مروا دیا گیا، حماس میں ان کی بوڑھی بچیوں کو رہا نہیں کیا جا رہا؟ اسیری، تم ان کی لاشوں کا سودا بھی کرتے ہو، اے مسلمان بھائیو، کیا یہ انسانی ہمدردی کا دوہرا معیار نہیں، تم لوگ کتنے منافق اور منافق ہو، ایک طرف فلسطینیوں کے خلاف اسرائیلی مسلمانوں کا رونا روتے نہیں تھکتے، دوسری طرف اسی اسرائیل کی طرح صدر ٹرمپ کے حامی بن کر ایک ہی صفحے پر کھڑے ہیں، کہ رات کو نوبل انعام حاصل کرنے کے لیے تم سچے ہو گئے ہو۔ امریکی صدر ٹرمپ فلسطینیوں پر اسرائیلی مظالم میں برابر کے شریک ہیں۔ وہ بنجمن نیتن یاہو کے ساتھ کھڑے ہیں۔ ان کی تائید و حمایت کے بغیر اسرائیلی وزیر اعظم ان پر حملہ کرنے والوں پر ذرہ برابر بھی ظلم ڈھانے کی جرأت نہ کرتا۔ آپ کے لیڈر امریکی سفارت خانے پہنچ کر ٹرمپ کی تعریفیں کرتے پائے جاتے ہیں۔ وائٹ ہاؤس میں وہ خفیہ یا خفیہ ملاقاتوں کے لیے قطاروں میں کھڑے نظر آتے ہیں تاکہ ان کی حکمرانی کمزور نہ ہو۔ اسلام اور اسلام کے نعرے لگانے والے شرپسند ہیں۔ جب سنیانگ کے مسلمانوں پر مسلمانوں کے پہاڑ ریزہ ریزہ ہو جائیں تو اسلام اور مسلمانوں سے تمہاری محبت کہاں جاتی ہے؟ تم کشمیری مسلمانوں سے اتنی محبت کرتے ہو، سنیانگ کے مسلمانوں سے نفرت کیوں کرتے ہو؟ تم ان کا نام کیوں نہیں لیتے؟ صدر شی جن پنگ کے سامنے جمہوریت اور انسانی حقوق کی آواز بلند کرنے کی کوشش کریں۔ وہ بے وقوفی سے انہیں کافروں سے مصافحہ کرنے کا لالچ دے رہا تھا اور اب بھکاریوں کی طرح آگے بڑھ کر اپنے ملک کی تذلیل کر رہا ہے۔ کیا آپ کو کبھی پیوٹن سے پوچھنے کی ضرورت ہے کہ آپ نے چین اور روس کے مسلمانوں پر کتنے مظالم ڈھائے ہیں؟ آپ نے یوکرین میں کتنے معصوم لوگوں کو قتل کیا ہے؟ یہ سب دھوکہ ہے۔ یہ دو چہروں والے منافق افغانوں سے بدلہ لیتے ہیں، دہلی کے خلاف نفرت پھیلاتے ہیں۔ آج ٹرمپ تمہارا ہیرو ہے جو مودی کے خلاف بول رہا ہے۔ اس دن کے بارے میں سوچیں جب وہ آپ سے مطالبہ کرے گا کہ فوری طور پر اسرائیل کو تسلیم کر لیں، ورنہ آپ پر پابندیاں عائد کر دی جائیں گی۔ پہلے سے سوچ لو اس دن اپنے اس چچا کو کیا جواب دو گے؟ ہمارے کچھ سمجھدار لوگ قطر کو بہت زیادہ لیکچر دیتے ہیں کہ تم نے اپنے لوگوں کی ترقی اور خوشحالی اور اپنے مضبوط ارادے پر توجہ دینے کے بجائے ہم جیسے لوگوں کو یعنی پاکستان کو بھوکا مار کر ایک مضبوط فوج پر خرچ کیوں نہیں کیا، ہم جیسی مضبوط فوج کیوں نہیں بنائی؟ لوگ جانوروں کی طرح ہیں۔ اگر وہ پاکستانیوں کی طرح بھوک سے مرتے ہیں تو انہیں بہتر زندگی کے لیے مرنے دو۔ اگر لوگ ملک چھوڑ کر دوسرے ملکوں میں فرار ہونے کے لیے مرتے ہیں تو انہیں مرنے دو۔ ملک مضبوط ہونا چاہیے، فوج مضبوط ہونی چاہیے۔ ان لوگوں کو اس حقیقت سے آگاہ ہونا چاہیے کہ اسرائیلی حملہ قطر پر نہیں ہوا، یہ عالمی دہشت گرد گروہ حماس پر ہوا ہے اور یہ امریکی رضامندی سے ہوا ہے۔ سچ تو یہ ہے کہ یہ حملہ امریکی صدر کی حماس کو آخری وارننگ کے بعد ہوا ہے۔ دوسرے لفظوں میں، ٹرمپ نے خود یہ کام کرایا۔ اے میرے بااثر ذہنیت والے عقلمندو، اس دن سے ڈرو جب کسی امریکی صدر کی خواہش بدل جائے اور امریکہ ہمارے ملک کے اس بدقسمت شخص پر حملہ کر دے، تو تم حیران رہو گے کہ اپنے عوام کو بھوکے مرنے کے باوجود تمہارا ملک کس طرح دم چھپاتا ہے اور ملک و قوم کی کتنی بڑی تباہی لاتا ہے۔ آپ دیکھتے ہیں کہ یہ انفراسٹرکچر جیسا ہے، اس کا کیا فائدہ؟ فخر کرنے والوں کو 48، 65، 71 اور کارگل کی بہادری کو یاد رکھنا چاہیے، خاص طور پر 71 میں جب 93 ہزار لوگوں نے خوفزدہ بلیوں کی طرح سر جھکائے، ہتھیار ڈال دیے اور ہندوستانی قیدی بننا قبول کیا۔ آپ جس حالیہ شاندار کامیابی پر فخر کر رہے ہیں وہ سب مصنوعی شراب اور غلط فہمی ہے۔ کون نہیں جانتا کہ حقیقت میں کوئی جنگ نہیں تھی، یہ صرف مودی کی جرات تھی کہ دہشت گردوں کے ٹھکانوں پر جائیں، کسی فوجی اڈے کو ہاتھ نہ لگائیں، ہاتھ نہ لگائیں۔ آپ اس سارے ڈرامے کو فتح قرار دیتے ہوئے بڑے بڑے ایوارڈز یا جعلی تمغے بانٹتے پھرتے ہیں، پھر ایسی بے فکر جمہوریت میں سوال اٹھانے کی جرأت کس میں ہو سکتی ہے؟ بہت سی حقیقتیں ہیں جنہیں یہاں بیان نہیں کیا جا سکتا۔

  • Doha Arab Islamic Summit Aftermath and Analysis

    Doha Arab Islamic Summit Aftermath and Analysis

    The source provides an overview and critical analysis of the Arab Islamic Summit in Doha, focusing on the strong anti-Israel rhetoric presented by various leaders, including those from Qatar, Iran, Pakistan, and Turkey, who called for measures ranging from Israel’s accountability for war crimes to the suspension of its UN membership. The summit resulted in a joint declaration supporting Qatar’s role as a mediator, rejecting Israeli actions as war crimes, and endorsing the two-state solution, but the source critiques the fiery speeches as being largely performative and highlights the contrast between the bold rhetoric and the cautious reaction from neighboring Arab states like Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Furthermore, the source includes analysis of the US perspective—particularly President Trump’s pressure on Qatar—and presents Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s defense of targeting Hamas by equating it with US action against Al-Qaeda. Finally, the source criticizes the summit’s limited practical impact on the conflict, suggesting that the focus on a united Islamic task force is unrealistic, and concludes with a call for the Muslim world to prioritize addressing terrorism as a shared global threat.

    Doha Emergency Summit on Israel-Palestine Conflict

    The Arab Islamic Summit was an emergency summit held in Doha, Qatar, the capital of the country. Approximately 50 heads of state or representatives from Arab and Islamic nations participated in the event.

    The summit served as a platform for strong rhetoric and calls for action, although the subsequent joint communiqué revealed a degree of caution among some participating states.

    Key Rhetoric and Concerns Raised

    Leaders delivered speeches emphasizing that Israel had crossed all “red lines” and must be held accountable for violating international laws and the UN Charter.

    Specific concerns and statements included:

    • Ameer of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, stated that the agenda of “Greater Israel” poses a threat to global peace. He noted that Qatar, acting as a mediator, had made sincere efforts for peace in the region, but Israel sabotaged the negotiation process by targeting Hamas leadership. He condemned the attack on the sovereignty of countries in the region by Israel and accused Israel of genocide (nasl kushi) against the Palestinians.
    • The Iranian President demanded that Israel’s membership in the United Nations be revoked.
    • The Pakistani Prime Minister called for the establishment of a joint task force of Muslim nations and demanded the implementation of the two-state solution. He warned that history would not forgive Islamic countries if they failed to unite at this juncture. (However, the source later notes skepticism, stating that the proposal for an Arab Islamic Task Force or “Islamic NATO” is currently impractical).
    • The Turkish President remarked that Israel acts as if it believes it is beyond questioning.
    • Leaders of Iran, Iraq, Egypt, and the Palestinian Authority, in addition to the Secretary Generals of the Arab League and the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation), addressed the summit.

    The Joint Communiqué (Mustarka Ilamiya)

    The common declaration issued at the end of the Arab Islamic Summit included several important points:

    • It expressed complete solidarity with Doha.
    • It declared unconditional support (ghair mashroot himayat) for every possible retaliatory measure (jawab-i-iqdam).
    • The communiqué rejected Israeli justifications and claims.
    • It declared the use of siege and hunger as a weapon a “war crime”.
    • The leaders praised the “wise and sensible role of Qatar”.
    • They condemned the annexation or forced migration (jabri hijrat) of Palestinian territories under any potential Israeli decision.
    • The declaration demanded that the international community halt the continuous aggression occurring in Qatar, Gaza, the West Bank, and other areas.
    • The communiqué welcomed the recent endorsement of the two-state solution and the related announcement in the UN General Assembly.
    • It stressed the need to make the Middle East a zone free of destructive weapons.

    Geopolitical Context and Critical Commentary

    The sources highlight significant geopolitical dynamics surrounding the summit:

    • Arab Caution: Powerful neighboring Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan, and Syria, adopted an extremely cautious approach and avoided the fiery rhetoric that characterized other speeches.
    • Skepticism on Outcomes: The source critically assesses the outcome, suggesting that much of the highly rhetorical speeches (shola bayanian) were merely for cheap fame or display. The communiqué’s general points suggest that the grand claims made in speeches were not important enough to be included in the common declaration.
    • Continuation of Suffering: Despite the meeting of 50 Muslim nations, the source observes that the oppressed people of Gaza continue to suffer the same painful deaths, suggesting that the summit did not fundamentally alter the ground reality.
    • The “Arab Islamic” Terminology: The source notes the interesting use of the term “Arab Islamic” in referring to the summit, suggesting a fusion of the Arab League and the OIC. This terminology is linked to the idea that the Arab temperament often favors Arab nationalism over general Islamic identity.

    American Pressure and Response

    The United States responded swiftly after the summit, indicating strong pressure on Qatar:

    • Immediately after the summit concluded, Marco Rubio (referred to as the Secretary of State in the source) arrived in Doha to meet the Ameer of Qatar.
    • Rubio explicitly advised the Ameer of Qatar not to fall for the schemes of the various “loudmouths” (barkbazon).
    • Prior to the summit, the Qatari Prime Minister had already been subjected to extensive pressure and “brainwashing” at the White House.
    • President Trump used a “carrot and stick” approach with the Ameer of Qatar (Sheikh Tamim), directly stating that his people were unhappy and that he should prioritize solving the problems of his own people rather than engaging in grandstanding. This action is described as typical American pressure.

    Arab Islamic Summit: Condemnations and Israeli Justifications

    The Israel-Gaza conflict was the central topic of discussion at the Arab Islamic Summit, leading to strong condemnations of Israeli actions, specific demands, and an articulation of Israel’s justifications for its military campaign.

    Condemnations and Accusations Against Israel

    Leaders at the summit articulated that Israel had crossed all “red lines”. They demanded that Israel be held accountable for violating the UN Charter and international laws.

    Specific actions and intentions attributed to Israel included:

    • Genocide and Aggression: The Ameer of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, accused Israel of committing “genocide (nasl kushi)” against the Palestinians. The common declaration demanded that the international community halt the continuous aggression occurring in Gaza, the West Bank, and other areas.
    • Sabotaging Peace: The Ameer of Qatar stated that Israel targeted Hamas leadership, thereby sabotaging the negotiation process that Qatar had pursued as a mediator for peace.
    • War Crimes: The joint communiqué declared the use of siege and hunger as a weapon a “war crime”.
    • Territorial Threat: The summit leaders rejected Israeli justifications. The communiqué condemned the annexation or forced migration (jabri hijrat) of Palestinian territories under any potential Israeli decision. Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani specifically warned that the agenda of “Greater Israel” poses a threat to global peace.
    • Sovereignty Violations: Israel was condemned for attacking the sovereignty of countries in the region. The Turkish President also remarked that Israel acts as if it believes it is beyond questioning.

    Israeli Justification and Strategy

    The sources outline the justification provided by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the offensive:

    • Targeting Terrorism: Netanyahu’s rationale is that Israel is targeting the culprits of the “biggest terrorist attack”—Hamas leadership. He described Hamas leadership as criminals of terrorism, much like how the US viewed Bin Laden and Al Qaeda after 9/11.
    • Right to Self-Defense: Netanyahu asserted that Israel will not rest until their hostages are released and “terrorist Hamas” is eliminated, regardless of the cost. He stated that every country has the right to defend itself, even outside its borders.
    • Comparison to US Actions: Netanyahu argued that when the US attacked Pakistan to eliminate a terrorist like Bin Laden, the world praised the action rather than condemning it. He suggested that based on this precedent, there is no justification for condemning Israel’s actions.
    • International Isolation: Netanyahu accused European countries of trying to push Israel into “global isolation” that could last for years, emphasizing that Israel would have to rely on its own resources.

    Impact and Calls for Action

    The source notes that despite the meeting of 50 Muslim nations, the oppressed people of Gaza continue to suffer the same painful deaths. They are described as being ground between two millstones. Protests against the Israeli atrocities are widespread globally, originating from Muslim and non-Muslim nations alike, including the Vatican City and European countries.

    The Arab Islamic Summit resulted in several key demands regarding the conflict:

    • Political Solutions: The joint communiqué welcomed the recent endorsement of the two-state solution in the UN General Assembly. The Pakistani Prime Minister had also specifically called for the implementation of the two-state solution.
    • Halt Aggression: The declaration called upon the international community to halt the continuous aggression in Gaza, the West Bank, and other areas.
    • Global Unity: The Pakistani Prime Minister warned that history would not forgive Islamic countries if they failed to unite at this juncture. The Iranian President demanded that Israel’s membership in the United Nations be revoked.
    • Demilitarization: The communiqué stressed the need to make the Middle East a zone free of destructive weapons.

    Furthermore, it is expected that UN discussions will lead to significant global pressure on Israel to spare the lives of the oppressed people of Gaza.

    The Two-State Solution at the Arab Islamic Summit

    The Two-state solution (Do Riyasate Hal) emerged as a key point of discussion and demand during and immediately following the Arab Islamic Summit.

    Endorsement and Demands

    The concept was officially acknowledged and supported in the common declaration issued at the conclusion of the summit:

    • UN Endorsement Welcome: The joint communiqué (Mustarka Ilamiya) welcomed the recent endorsement and related announcement of the two-state solution in the UN General Assembly.
    • Call for Implementation: The Pakistani Prime Minister, during his address at the summit, specifically called for the establishment of a joint task force of Muslim nations and demanded that the implementation of the two-state solution be ensured.

    Future Outlook and Debate

    The sources indicate that the Two-state solution is expected to be the subject of intense global discussion following the current conflict:

    • Intensified Debates: It is anticipated that extensive debates (khub bahsein chhidne wali hain) will erupt concerning the two-state solution.
    • European Advocacy: European countries are expected to strongly highlight (khub uthayenge) this issue. This focus is linked to their disputes with American President Trump.
    • Need for Critique: One source suggests that the debate on the two-state solution in the Middle East warrants critical analysis (tanqeedi jaye).

    The summit’s endorsement of the Two-state solution was part of a broader set of demands, including asking the international community to halt the continuous aggression occurring in Qatar, Gaza, the West Bank, and other areas, and stressing the need to make the Middle East a zone free of destructive weapons.

    US Diplomatic Pressure on Qatar and the Ameer

    The United States exerted significant diplomatic pressure (Amki pressure) on Qatar, particularly in the immediate aftermath of the Arab Islamic Summit held in Doha, as well as on Qatar’s leadership prior to the event.

    Key aspects of this pressure included:

    Direct Warnings to the Ameer of Qatar

    President Trump utilized a “carrot and stick” approach (Gaajar ke saath stick ka istemal) when dealing with the Ameer of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim. Trump reportedly disregarded conventional diplomatic protocols (kisi mooh rakhi ya bharam ka bhi koi khayal nahin rakha) and delivered a blunt message:

    • Trump clearly stated that the Ameer’s people were unhappy.
    • He advised Sheikh Tamim to stop focusing on grandstanding (idhar udhar ki badi-badi chhod dein) or big ideas.
    • Instead, the Ameer was instructed to worry about the dissatisfaction of his own people and focus on solving their problems.

    The source characterizes this interaction as containing a “wrapped message” (malfouf paigham) that exemplifies American pressure.

    Diplomatic Missions and Scolding

    US diplomatic efforts targeted Qatari officials before and after the summit:

    • Pre-Summit “Brainwashing”: Prior to the Arab Islamic Summit, the Qatari Prime Minister was called to the White House where he was subjected to extensive pressure, described as “good brainwashing” (acchi khaasi brain washing).
    • Post-Summit Warning: Immediately after the summit concluded, Marco Rubio (referred to as the Secretary of State in the source) arrived in Doha to meet the Ameer of Qatar. Rubio explicitly advised the Ameer “not to fall for the schemes of the various loudmouths” (mukhtalif nau barkbazon ke jhanse mein mat aiyega).

    Pressure Regarding Israel and the Region

    The sources also detail how the US maintained diplomatic contact with Israel to offer support while engaging in pressure tactics with allies:

    • Support for Israel: During the period of the Arab Islamic Summit, Marco Rubio was present in Israel, assuring them, “Don’t worry, we are with you”.
    • Treatment of Netanyahu: While Trump generally supports Israel, he is described as sparing nobody, occasionally giving Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a “dressing down,” “scolding,” or “laundering” (thodi bahut jhaadphoonk lati laayi dhulai ya sajnash kar dete hain). However, when Netanyahu seemed troubled, Trump would send Rubio to offer encouragement (hausla dilane ke liye).
    • Critique of US Stance: The sources pose a critical question regarding the perceived inconsistency of US pressure, noting that when an Iranian attack previously threatened Qatari sovereignty (targeting a foreign base), the outcry of “loudmouth statements” (shola bayanian) and concerns over Qatari sovereignty did not rise to the level seen after the current conflict.

    Arab Islamic Summit: Conflict, Divisions, and US Pressure

    Middle East politics, as reflected by the discussions and fallout from the Arab Islamic Summit, are characterized by intense conflict, internal divisions among Arab and Islamic nations, significant external pressure from the United States, and ongoing debates over political solutions like the Two-state solution.

    The Central Conflict and Israeli Rationale

    The Israel-Gaza conflict formed the core of the political discourse. Leaders at the summit asserted that Israel had crossed all “red lines” and must be held accountable for violating international laws and the UN Charter. Accusations against Israel included committing “genocide (nasl kushi)” against the Palestinians and employing siege and hunger as a weapon, which was declared a “war crime”. Concerns were also raised about the continuation of the “Greater Israel” agenda, which is seen as a threat to global peace.

    In contrast, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu justified the military offensive by framing it as a necessary response to the “biggest terrorist attack”:

    • Netanyahu argued that Israel is targeting the culprits of terrorism—Hamas leadership.
    • He claimed the right to defend Israel, even outside its borders, and vowed to eliminate “terrorist Hamas” regardless of the cost.
    • He used the precedent of the US attack on Pakistan to eliminate Bin Laden, arguing that if that action was praised, condemnation of Israel’s actions targeting Hamas leadership is unjustified.

    Geopolitical Divisions and Organizational Dynamics

    The sources highlight a crucial split in regional political strategy between the core Arab states and other participating Islamic nations:

    • Arab Caution: Powerful neighboring Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan, and Syria, adopted an “extremely cautious approach” (intihai mohthat ta’ssur) during the summit, deliberately refraining from the fiery rhetoric used by others.
    • Rhetoric vs. Action: Critical commentary noted that much of the highly rhetorical speeches (shola bayanian) delivered by some leaders (such as the Pakistani Prime Minister) appeared to be for “cheap fame or display” and lacked the importance necessary to be included in the cautious joint communiqué. Despite the meeting of 50 Muslim nations, the ground reality for the suffering people of Gaza remains unchanged.
    • Arab Nationalism vs. Islamic Identity: The sources analyze the significance of the summit being termed “Arab Islamic,” suggesting a fusion of the Arab League and the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation). This is tied to the concept that the “Arab temperament” (Arbon ka mizaj) often favors Arab nationalism over a generalized Islamic identity.

    External Influence: US Diplomatic Pressure

    The politics of the Middle East are heavily influenced by the United States, which applies significant diplomatic pressure (Amki pressure), particularly on its allies like Qatar:

    • Direct Scolding: US President Trump used a “carrot and stick” approach with the Ameer of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim. Trump told the Ameer directly to stop focusing on “big ideas” and instead focus on addressing the “dissatisfaction of his own people”.
    • Post-Summit Warnings: Immediately after the summit, Marco Rubio (referred to as the Secretary of State in the source) arrived in Doha and explicitly warned the Ameer “not to fall for the schemes of the various loudmouths”, referring to the highly rhetorical speeches delivered by other leaders.
    • Support for Israel: During the summit period, Rubio was in Israel, reassuring them, “Don’t worry, we are with you”.

    Proposed Solutions and Future Alliances

    Political efforts focused on finding a resolution to the conflict and establishing new regional structures:

    • The Two-State Solution: This remains a critical point for resolving the conflict. The joint communiqué welcomed the recent endorsement of the two-state solution in the UN General Assembly. It is anticipated that this issue will generate extensive debates (khub bahsein chhidne wali hain) globally, particularly driven by European countries.
    • Failed Alliance Proposals: The suggestion by the Pakistani Prime Minister to establish a “joint task force of Muslim nations”, or an “Islamic NATO,” was deemed by the sources to be “currently impractical” (naqabil amal). This proposal faces severe internal hurdles, including deep internal “sectarian, religious, and political divisions” among Muslim nations.

    इंसानों के नाम अफजार रिहान दोहा की अरब इस्लामिक समिट का हासिल क़तर के दाल हुकूमत दोहा में अरब इस्लामिक इमरजेंसी समिट मुनकद हुई जिसमें 50 के करीब अरब और इस्लामी मुालिक के सरबराहान या नुमाइंदों ने शिरकत की यहां की गई तकारीर में इस बात पर जोर दिया गया कि इसराइल ने तमाम रेड लाइंस अबूर कर ली है यूएन चार्टर और आलमी कवानीन की खिलाफवर्जी पर इसराइल को जवाबदेह ठहराना होगा अमीर कतर शेख तमीम बिन हमद सानी ने कहा कि ग्रेटर इसराइल का एजेंडा आलमी अमन के लिए खतरा है कतर ने सालस के तौर पर ख्ते में अमन के लिए मुखलसाना कोशिशें की लेकिन इसराइल ने मजाकराती अमल को सबूताज करते हुए हमास कयादत को निशाना बनाया इसराइल की जानिब से ख्ते के मुालिक की खुद मुख्तारी पर हमला काबिल मुज़म्मत है इसराइल के हाथों फस्तीनियों की नस्ल कुशी हो रही है इसने इजराइम की तमाम हदूद पार कर ली है इसराइली रबालियों की पुर अमन रिहाई के तमाम दावे भी झूठे हैं ईरानी प्रेसिडेंट ने कहा अकवामे मुतहदा से इसराइल की रकनियत मुतल करवा दी जाए पाकिस्तानी प्राइम मिनिस्टर ने कहा कि मुस्लिम अकवाम की मुश्तका टास्क फोर्स बनाई जाए और दो रियासी हल पर अमल दरामद यकीनी बनाया जाए उन्होंने कहा कि अगर अब भी इस्लामी मुालिक मुतहिद ना हुए तो तारीख हमें माफ़ नहीं करेगी तुर्क प्रेसिडेंट ने कहा कि इसराइल यह समझता है कि उसे कोई पूछ नहीं सकता इस अरब इस्लामिक समर से अरब लीग और ओआईसी के सेक्रेटरी जनरल्स के अलावा ईरान अराक मिस्र और फस्तीनी अथॉरिटी के सुदूल ने भी खिताब किया अलबत्ता कतर की हमसायगी में वाकयात ताकतवर अरब मुालिक बिलखसूस सऊदी अरब मुतहदा अरब अमरात कुवैत बहरीन जॉर्डन और सीरिया जैसे मुालिक ने इंतहाई मोहतात तज़ अमल अपनाते हुए बयानबाजी से एतराज किया अरब इस्लामिक समिट के इताम पर मुश्तका इलामिया में दोहा के साथ मुकम्मल यकीियती का इज़हार करते हुए कहा गया कि हम हर मुमकना जवाबी इदाम की गैर मशहूद हिमायत करते हैं एक गैर जानबदार सालसी मरकज को निशाना बनाना अमन कावशों को नाकाम बनाने के मुतरादिफ है कतर के दानिशमंदाना और होशमंदाना किरदार की तहसीन करते हुए इजिप्ट और अमेरिका की जारी सालसी मसाई को आम करार दिया गया इलामिया में इसराइली दामों और तौजीहात को मुस्तरद करते हुए मुहासरे और भूख को बतौर हथियार इस्तेमाल करना जंगी जुर्म करार दिया गया किसी भी मुमकना इसराइली फैसले के तहत फस्तीनी इलाकों के इंतजामाम या जबरी हिजरत की मज़म्मत की गई और आलमी बिरादरी से मुतालबा किया गया कि क़तर गजा वेस्ट बैंक और दीगर खतों पर जारी मुसलसल जारियत को रोका जाए यूएन जनरल असेंबली में हालिया ऐलान न्यूयॉर्क और दो रियासती हल की तौसीक का खैरमकदम करते हुए इस अम्र पर जोर दिया गया कि मिडिल ईस्ट को तबाह कुंदन हथियारों से पाक खाता बनाया जाए दशहां अपने अहले दानिश की खिदमत में कुछ अहम पॉइंट्स उजागर करने का खास्तकार है दुआ की अरब इस्लामिक समिट में जितनी भी शोला बयानियों पर मबनी तकरारी थी आप उन्हें बगौर पढ़िए इसके बाद जारी होने वाले मुश्तकालामिया के आम नकात का भी जायजा लीजिए आप पर वाज़ हो जाएगा कि बहुत सी शोला बयानिया बहुत सस्ती शहरत या दिखावे की बयानबाजी के लिए होती हैं जिनकी अहमियत इतनी भी नहीं कि उन्हें मुश्तरका इलामिया का हिस्सा भी बनाया जा सके बिलखसूस पाकिस्तानी अल्फाज़ शायद दीगर तमाम अरबो अजम या इस्लामिक हुक्मरानों से कहीं भरी हुई होती है इसके बिल मुकाबल शायद खुद निशाना बनने वाला मेजबान मुल्क भी इस हद तक जाना पसंद नहीं करता अगरचे हमारे पाकिस्तानी हुक्मरान भगोले छोड़ने के लिए उन्हें खूब पंप मारते पाए जाते हैं इस कारनामे पर हमारे मौजूदा जिहादी हुक्मरानों को निशाने इम्तियाज जरूर मिलना चाहिए पाकी लीडरान का सनसनीखेज बयानिया शायद अपने इस्लामी आवाम की जैसी तैसी खुशनूदी के लिए या इनकी बढ़ती ईमानी ख्वाहिशात को मुतमिन करने की खातिर तशकील पाता है अब अगर हमारे मीडिया की सुर्खियां मुलाहजा करें ख्वाब प्रिंट हो या इलेक्ट्रॉनिक या सोशल मीडिया तो यूं महसूस होता है कि जैसे कोई इंकलाब आ गया है और कुफ्र के खिलाफ इस्लामी दुनिया इकट्ठी हो गई है लिहाजा अब इसराइल की खैर नहीं बल्कि हमारा आवामी सलूब तो यह होता है कि ऐ मुसलमानों इकट्ठे होकर इसराइल का नापाक वजूद सफा हस्ती से मिटा दो पाकिस्तानी नहीं इस्लामी ईरान से भी स्नो की आवाजें निचली नहीं इख्तेदार की आला तरीन सतह से बारहब उठती रही है अलबत्ता ईरान इसराइल जंग के बाद अब इसमें थोड़ा ठहराव आया है रह गई रजा के अरब आवाम पर इसराइली ज्यादतियां इन पर तो कोई दो अरा है ही नहीं इस पर मुस्लिम ही नहीं गैर मुस्लिम अकवाम की जानिब से भी पूरी दुनिया में सख्त एतजाज किया जा रहा है हत्ता के वेटिकन सिटी से भी दर्द अंगेज बयानात जारी होते रहते हैं यूरोपियन मुालिक और इनके आवाम भी खुलकर बोल रहे हैं अरब इस्लामिक समिट के बाद हमारे सादा हबाब अगर यह समझते हैं कि अब कोई बहुत बड़ा इस्लामी तूफान उठ खड़े होगा दस्त बस्ता अज़ है कि वो अगर हालात हाजरा पर नजर रखते हैं तो उन्हें मालूम होना चाहिए कि गजा के मजलूम आवाम चक्की के जिन दो पार्टों में पहले से पिसते चले आ रहे हैं 50 मुस्लिम मुालिक की समट के बाद भी वो इसी तरह पिस रहे हैं इसी तरह दर्दनाक अमवात का शिकार हो रहे हैं दरवेश को कहा जाता है कि ज्यादा सच्चाई मत लिखो ठीक है जितना चाहो अपनी मर्जी का लिखवा लो लेकिन क्या इससे तल्ख जमीनी हकायक खत्म हो सकेंगे अगर हमारी बड़कों से इसराइल खत्म हो सकता तो शायद पैदा होने से कब ही फना हो चुका होता दरवेश की नजरों में सऊदी अरब से ज्यादा इस्लामी मुल्क तो दुनिया में कोई नहीं जो इस्लाम का मंबा और तू इस्लाम का मरकज है ना चीज ढूंढ रहा था कि इस अरब इस्लामिक समट में सऊदी कयादत ने क्या फरमाया है और फिर हाशमी सल्तनत के वारिस खानदाने नबूवत के चश्मो चिराग एक्सीलेंसी शाह अब्दुल्ला दोम ने क्या रहनुमाई फरमाई है पहले नजर की खिदमत में एक और दिलचस्प पॉइंट काबिल तवज्जो है माकबल जब भी इस नो की अफताद आती थी जैसे कि 69 में मस्जिद अक्सा को आग लगाने का मुबईना सानिया पेश आया तो ओआईसी की तंजीम वजूद में आई और फिर तब से मुस्लिम उमा की एक तरह से नुमाइंदा तंजीम ओआईसी को ही करार दिया जाता रहा अब वो क्या वजू है जिनके कारण एक अरसे से ओआईसी किसी हद तक पसमंजर में जाती दिखाई दे रही है जी चाहता है कि इसकी जेन्युइन वजूह पर किसी वक्त जामिया आर्टिकल तहरीर किया जाए और अरब लीग के बिल मुकाबिल इसका तकाबली जायजा पेश किया जाए इन दिनों अलबत्ता एक नई दिलचस्प टर्म अरब इस्लामिक इस्तेमाल हो रही है जैसे कि अरब लीग और ओआईसी को इकट्ठे कर दिया गया हो क्योंकि अरबों का मिजाज बिल उम इस्लामिक से ज्यादा अरब नेशनलिज्म की सूरत जलवा कर रहा है यह बात मज इजिप्ट या जमाल अब्दुल नासिर तक महदूद नहीं हमारे यहां जिन्हें इस्लामी उमा का बहुत बड़ा हीरो बनाकर पेश किया जाता है किंग फैसल बिन अब्दुल अजीज इनका यह बयान रिकॉर्ड पर मौजूद है कि मैं जब अरब वर्ड बोलता हूं तो इससे मेरी मुराद इस्लामिक वर्ल्ड ही होती है सवाल पैदा होता है कि अगर आपकी यह मुराद होती है तो आप बोल भी यही दिया करें इस गु्थी का दरा के लोगों को बखूबी हो सकता है जो मिडिल ईस्ट में अरब नेशनलिज्म के पसमंजर से आगाही रखते हैं बिलाश इन दिनों यूएन की रौनके बुलंदियों पर पहुंचने वाली है इस मर्तबा इसराइल पर भरपूर आलमी दबाव बढ़ने वाला है कि वो गजा के मजलूमों की जान बखशी करें अलावा अजी दो रियासती हल पर भी खूब बहसें छिड़ने वाली हैं बिलखसूस यूरोपियन मुालिक बावजूद इस इशू को खूब उठाएंगे जिसकी बड़ी वजह अमकी प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप से इनकी छेड़छाड़ होगी क्योंकि ट्रंप टेरिफ के हाथों करीबी अमकी इत्तहादी इस अनोखे सदर से खासे नाला है ट्रंप बखशते किसी को भी नहीं हत्ता कि कभी बंजमन नैतननिया की भी थोड़ी बहुत झाड़फूंक लती लाई धुलाई या सजनश कर देते हैं लेकिन साथ ही जब उन्हें परेशान देखते हैं तो हौसला दिलाने के लिए सेक्रेटरी ऑफ़ स्टेट मार्को रूबियो को तलबीब या यरूशलम रवाना कर देते हैं जैसे कि हालिया अरब इस्लामिक समिट के दौरान मार्को रूबियो इसराइल में मौजूद रहे यह इत्मीनान दिलाते हुए कि फिक्र ना करो हम तुम्हारे साथ हैं अरब इस्लामिक समिट इताम पजीर होने के फौरन बाद मार्को रूबियो दोहा पहुंचे अमीर कतर से मिले और साफ फरमा दिया कि इन मुख्तलिफ नौ बड़कबाजों के झांसे में मत आइएगा इससे कब कतरी प्राइम मिनिस्टर को वाइट हाउस बुलाकर इनकी अच्छी खासी ब्रेन वाशिंग खातिर तवाजा या दलाई की जा चुकी है अमीर कतर के लिए गाजर के साथ स्टिक का इस्तेमाल करते हुए प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप ने किसी मुंह रखी या भरम का भी कोई ख्याल नहीं रखा साफ कह दिया कि शेख तमीम आपके आवाम आपसे खुश नहीं है इधर-उधर की बड़ी-बड़ी छोड़ दें या सोचने की बजाय अपने लोगों की नाराजगी का सोें इनके मसाइल हल करने के लिए फिकरमंद हो जरा गौर फरमाइए इसका क्या मतलब है इन अल्फाज़ में क्या मलफूफ पैगाम है शायद इसी को कहते हैं अमकी प्रेशर अहले मगरब के सामने यह सवाल भी अहम है कि इसी क़तर पर जब ईरानी हमला हुआ था इस वक्त अगरचे ईरान के खिलाफ भी खासे मजमती बयानात आए थे मगर इस नौ की शोला बयानियों का गुलगला तब क्यों नहीं उठा था तब क़तर की अप्ला मुख्तारी खतरे में क्यों नहीं आई थी क्या इसलिए कि तब ईरानी हमले का हदफ कतरी नहीं गैर मुल्की अड्डा था मसला तो अब भी वही है इसराइली हमले का हदफ कतरी नहीं गैर मुल्की हमास की आदत थी जिन्हें इसराइल टेररिज्म के वैसे ही आदमी मुजरम गिरदानता है जैसे 91 के बाद अमेरिकी बिन लादन और इनकी अलकायदा को समझते हैं बेंजमिन नेतन याू का इस्तदलाल यही है कि जब अमेरिका ने बिन लादन जैसे टेररिस्ट को मारने के लिए पाकिस्तान पर हमला किया था तो पूरी दुनिया ने इसकी मजम्मत नहीं सताइश की थी आज हमने भी अपने ऊपर होने वाले सबसे बड़े टेररिस्ट अटैक के मुजरमों यानी हम्मास कयादत को टारगेट किया है तो इस साबका उसूल के तहत इसकी मजम्मत का भी कोई जवाब नहीं बनता है दुनिया को चाहिए कि वो टेररिज्म के खिलाफ एका करे यूरोपियन मुालिक की तरफ इशारा करते हुए उन्होंने कहा कि यह लोग उल्टे हमें आलमी तन्हाई में धकेल रहे हैं जो बरसों चल सकती है लिहाजा हमें अपने वसाइल के साथ अपने पांव पर खड़े होना पड़ेगा हम इस वक्त तक चैन से नहीं बैठेंगे जब तक हम अपने यमालियों को रिहा करवाते हुए टेररिस्ट हमास का खात्मा नहीं कर देते चाहे हमें इसकी जो भी कीमत चुकानी पड़े हर मुल्क को अपनी सरहदों से बाहर भी अपने दफा का हक हासिल है यह कहते हुए नेतन याऊ रियासतों की सोवनिटी का असूल बयान करना भूल गए हमारे बुलंद परवाज ने इसी समिट में अरब इस्लामिक टास्क फ़ोर्स या इस्लामिक नेटो की जो फुलझड़ी छोड़ी है अगरचे आवामी सतह पर वह जितनी चाहे क्लैपिंग ले लें बिलफेल या नाकाबिल अमल बड़क से आगे कुछ नहीं बुलंद बांग दावे जो भी हो वेस्टर्न मिलिट्री अलायंस के बिल मुकाबल इसी तर्ज पर इस्लामिक मिलिट्री अलायंस के लिए जिस नौ की ताकत दरकार है इसका तो शायद दूरदूर तक शबा तक नहीं फी जमाना मजहब की बुनियाद पर इस नौ के अलायसेस को दुनिया मौज हैरत हकारत से ही देख सकती है जबकि मुस्लिम अकवाम की अंदरूनी कदूरतें और मुनाफरत भरी फिरकाना मजहबी और सियासी तकसीम इसके अलावा पूरी गहराई के साथ मौजूद है हम पाकिस्तानियों के लिए बेहतर यही है कि हम अपनी डूबती मशत लड़ में डुबकियां खाते आवाम और इनके अनगिनत दुखों और मसाइलों मसायब को दूर करने का सोचें अकवाम आलम के सामने हमारी मुस्लिम अकवाम का मौकफ यह होना चाहिए कि टेररिज्म या दहशतगर्दी या आतंकवाद इंसानियत की मुश्तका दुश्मन है इसकी मुर्तकब कोई भी तंजीम हो तमाम अकवाम को बिला तमीज मजहबो नस्ल इसके खिलाफ खड़े होना पड़ेगा इसराइल को भी अपने वजूद की बका इतना ही हक असल है जितना किसी और मुल्कों कौम को रह गई बेगुनाह इंसानी हलाकतें वो चाहे मुसलमानों की हो या यह यहूद की हिंदुओं की हो या मसीहों की इनकी मुर्तकब कोई भी कौम तंजीम या पार्टी हो काबिल मजम्मत और नाकाबिल कबूल है मिडिल ईस्ट में दो रियासती हाल की बहस पर तनकी दी जाए

    اظفر ریحان انسانیت کے نام پر دوحہ میں عرب اسلامی سربراہی اجلاس کا کارنامہ دوحہ میں عرب اسلامی ہنگامی سربراہی اجلاس منعقد ہوا جس میں 50 کے قریب عرب اور اسلامی ممالک کے سربراہان یا نمائندوں نے شرکت کی۔ یہاں کی گئی تقاریر میں اس بات پر زور دیا گیا کہ اسرائیل نے تمام سرخ لکیریں عبور کر لی ہیں۔ اسرائیل کو اقوام متحدہ کے چارٹر اور عالمی قوانین کی خلاف ورزی پر جوابدہ ہونا چاہیے۔ قطر کے امیر شیخ تمیم بن حمد ثانی نے کہا کہ گریٹر اسرائیل کا ایجنڈا عالمی امن کے لیے خطرہ ہے۔ قطر نے سلامتی کے طور پر خطے میں امن کے لیے مخلصانہ کوششیں کیں لیکن اسرائیل نے اپنے غدارانہ اقدامات کا مظاہرہ کرتے ہوئے حماس کی قیادت کو نشانہ بنایا۔ خطے کے مالک کی خود مختاری پر اسرائیل کا حملہ قابل مذمت ہے۔ اسرائیل کی طرف سے فلسطینیوں کی نسل کشی کی جا رہی ہے۔ یہ اسرائیل کی تمام حدیں پار کر چکا ہے۔ اسرائیلی باغی قطری کی پرامن رہائی کے تمام دعوے جھوٹے ہیں۔ ایرانی صدر نے کہا کہ اقوام متحدہ سے اسرائیل کی حیثیت منسوخ کی جائے۔ پاکستانی وزیر اعظم نے کہا کہ مسلم اقوام کی مشترکہ ٹاسک فورس بنائی جائے اور دو ریاستی حل پر عمل درآمد کو یقینی بنایا جائے۔ انہوں نے کہا کہ اگر اسلامی ممالک اب بھی متحد نہ ہوئے تو تاریخ ہمیں معاف نہیں کرے گی۔ ترک صدر نے کہا کہ اسرائیل سمجھتا ہے کہ کوئی اس پر سوال نہیں اٹھا سکتا۔ اس عرب اسلامی سربراہی اجلاس سے عرب لیگ اور او آئی سی کے سیکرٹری جنرلز کے علاوہ ایران، عراق، مصر اور فلسطینی اتھارٹی کے نمائندوں نے بھی خطاب کیا۔ تاہم قطر کے پڑوس میں طاقتور عرب ممالک بالخصوص سعودی عرب، متحدہ عرب امارات، کویت، بحرین، اردن اور شام نے انتہائی احتیاط سے کام لیا اور بیان بازی پر اعتراض کیا۔ عرب اسلامی سربراہی اجلاس کے اختتام پر متحدہ اسلامی ممالک نے دوحہ پر مکمل یقین کا اظہار کرتے ہوئے کہا کہ ہم ممکنہ انتقامی کارروائی کے لیے نامعلوم حمایتی ہیں، ایک غیر جاندار فوجی مرکز کو نشانہ بنانا امن کے اقدامات کو سبوتاژ کرنے کے مترادف ہے، قطر کے ذہین اور سمجھدار کردار کی تعریف، مصر اور امریکا کی جاری فوجی کارروائیوں کو دنیا میں نارمل پالیسیوں کا استعمال کرتے ہوئے اسرائیل اور اسرائیل کی پالیسیوں کو نارمل پالیسی قرار دیا گیا۔ اسلحے کے طور پر محاصرے اور بھوک کو جنگی جرم قرار دیتے ہوئے فلسطینی علاقوں کو آباد کرنے یا ہجرت پر مجبور کرنے کے کسی بھی ممکنہ اسرائیلی فیصلے کی مذمت کرتے ہوئے عالمی برادری پر زور دیا گیا کہ وہ قطر، غزہ، مغربی کنارے اور دیگر علاقوں میں جاری تنازعات کو روکنے کے لیے اقوام متحدہ کی جنرل اسمبلی، نیویارک میں حالیہ اعلان کا خیرمقدم کرتے ہوئے مشرق وسطیٰ کو صاف ستھرا بنانے کے لیے دو طرفہ حل کی ضرورت پر زور دیا۔ غیر قانونی ہتھیاروں سے پاک تباہی داعش اپنے اہل علم کے لیے چند اہم نکات پیش کرتا ہوں، دعا ہے کہ میں اسے بے نقاب کر دوں۔ وہ تمام اشتعال انگیز بیانات پڑھیں جو عرب اسلامی سربراہی اجلاس میں ہونے والی بحث کی بنیاد تھے۔ اس کے بعد جاری ہونے والی مشترکہ اسلامی سربراہی کانفرنس کی عمومی خبروں پر بھی ایک نظر ڈالیں۔ آپ کو اندازہ ہو گا کہ بہت سے اشتعال انگیز بیانات سستی تشہیر یا دکھاوے کے لیے دئیے جاتے ہیں جن کی اہمیت اس قدر بھی نہیں کہ مشترکہ اسلامی سربراہی اجلاس کا حصہ بنایا جائے۔ خاص طور پر پاکستانی الفاظ شاید دوسری عرب اقوام یا اسلامی حکمرانوں سے زیادہ بھرے ہوئے ہیں۔ اس کے مقابلے میں شاید جس میزبان ملک کو نشانہ بنایا جا رہا ہے وہ بھی اس حد تک جانا پسند نہیں کرتا، حالانکہ ہمارے پاکستانی حکمران مفروروں کی رہائی کے لیے ان پر زور لگاتے پائے جاتے ہیں۔ ہمارے موجودہ جہادی حکمرانوں کو اس فعل کا نشانہ ضرور بنایا جانا چاہیے۔ پاکستانی رہنماؤں کے سنسنی خیز بیانات شاید کسی نہ کسی طرح اپنے اسلامی لوگوں کو مطمئن کرنے یا ان کی بڑھتی ہوئی مذہبی خواہشات کی تسکین کے لیے بنائے گئے ہیں۔ اب اگر ہمارا میڈیا شہ سرخیوں پر غور کریں، چاہے پرنٹ ہو، الیکٹرانک ہو یا سوشل میڈیا، تو ایسا محسوس ہوتا ہے کہ ایک انقلاب آگیا ہے، اور عالم اسلام کفر کے خلاف متحد ہو گیا ہے۔ اس لیے اسرائیل اب خطرے میں ہے۔ بلکہ ہماری عوامی صلیبی جنگ یہ ہے کہ اے مسلمانو متحد ہو کر اسرائیل کے ناپاک وجود کو روئے زمین سے مٹا دو۔ احتجاج کی آوازیں پاکستان سے نہیں اسلامی ایران سے اٹھ رہی ہیں بلکہ اعلیٰ ترین سطح سے اٹھ رہی ہیں۔ تاہم ایران اسرائیل جنگ کے بعد اس میں کچھ جمود آ گیا ہے۔ جہاں تک رضا کے عرب عوام پر اسرائیلی مظالم کا تعلق ہے تو اس میں کوئی شک نہیں۔ اس پر پوری دنیا میں نہ صرف مسلمان بلکہ غیر مسلم بھی شدید احتجاج کر رہے ہیں۔ ویٹی کن سٹی سے بھی دردناک بیانات آتے رہتے ہیں۔ یورپی شہری اور ان کے لوگ بھی کھل کر بول رہے ہیں۔ عرب اسلامک سمٹ کے بعد اگر ہمارے عام لوگ سمجھتے ہیں کہ اب ایک بہت بڑا اسلامی طوفان اٹھے گا تو کیوں نہیں؟ بات یہ ہے کہ اگر وہ موجودہ حالات پر نظر رکھیں تو انہیں معلوم ہونا چاہیے کہ غزہ کے مظلوم عوام عرصہ دراز سے چکی کے دو حصوں کے درمیان پسے ہوئے ہیں۔ 50 مسلم لیڈروں کے قتل کے بعد بھی انہیں اسی طرح کچلنے کا سلسلہ جاری ہے۔ وہ اسی دردناک خشک سالی کا شکار ہو رہے ہیں۔ درویش سے کہا جاتا ہے کہ زیادہ سچ نہ لکھو۔ اچھا، جتنا چاہو لکھو، لیکن کیا یہ تلخ زمینی حقائق کو مٹا سکے گا؟ اگر ہمارے بزرگ اسرائیل کو تباہ کر سکتے تو یہ اس کی پیدائش سے بہت پہلے ہی تباہ ہو چکا ہوتا۔ درویشوں کی نظر میں دنیا میں سعودی عرب سے بڑھ کر کوئی اسلامی ملک نہیں جو اسلام کا باپ اور اسلام کا مرکز ہو۔ میں یہ تلاش کر رہا تھا کہ سعودی قیادت نے اس عرب اسلامی ملک میں کیا کیا ہے اور پھر ہاشمی سلطنت کے وارث، خاندانِ نبوی کے چشم و چراغ محترم شاہ عبداللہ ڈوم نے کیا رہنمائی فراہم کی ہے۔ پہلی نظر کی خدمت میں ایک اور دلچسپ نکتہ۔ یہ بات قابل توجہ ہے کہ جب بھی یہ

    خواہ وہ عوامی سطح پر جتنی چاہیں تالیاں حاصل کر لیں لیکن ان کی ناکامی یا نا کامی ایک بڑی بات سے زیادہ کچھ نہیں۔ بلند و بانگ دعوے جتنے بھی ہوں، مغربی ملٹری الائنس کے مقابلے میں، انہی خطوط پر اسلامی فوجی اتحاد کے لیے جو طاقت درکار ہے، وہ شاید دور دور تک نظر نہیں آتی۔ دنیا صرف مذہب کی بنیاد پر اس اتحاد کے اتحادیوں کو حیرت اور نفرت کی نگاہ سے دیکھ سکتی ہے جب کہ امت مسلمہ کی اندرونی خرابیاں اور نفرت انگیز فرقہ وارانہ، مذہبی اور سیاسی تقسیم پوری گہرائی میں موجود ہے۔ ہم پاکستانیوں کے لیے بہتر ہے کہ اس ڈوبتی جدوجہد میں ڈوبے ہوئے اپنے لوگوں کے مسائل اور ان کے ان گنت دکھوں اور مسائل کے حل کے لیے سوچیں۔ دنیا کے سامنے ہماری امت مسلمہ کا موقف یہ ہونا چاہیے کہ دہشت گردی یا دہشت گردی یا دہشت گردی انسانیت کی سب سے بڑی دشمن ہے۔ اس سے کوئی فرق نہیں پڑتا ہے کہ کوئی بھی تنظیم اسے انجام دے رہی ہے، تمام برادریوں کو بغیر کسی آداب کے نقصان پہنچایا جانا چاہئے۔ نسل کو اس کے خلاف کھڑا ہونا پڑے گا۔ اسرائیل کو بھی اپنے وجود کے دفاع کا اتنا ہی حق حاصل ہے جتنا کہ کسی دوسرے ملک یا کمیونٹی کو۔ جو بے گناہ انسانی موتیں رہ گئی ہیں، خواہ وہ مسلمانوں کی ہوں یا یہودیوں کی، ہندوؤں کی ہوں یا عیسائیوں کی، ان کی اموات خواہ وہ کسی بھی برادری، تنظیم یا جماعت کی ہوں، قابل مذمت اور ناقابل قبول ہیں۔ مشرق وسطیٰ میں دو ریاستوں کے بارے میں حالیہ بحث پر توجہ دی جانی چاہیے۔

  • Israel, Palestine, and the UN General Assembly

    Israel, Palestine, and the UN General Assembly

    The provided text, an excerpt from a YouTube video transcript by , primarily offers a critical analysis of contemporary global political events, with a specific focus on the Israel-Palestine conflict and United Nations proceedings. The author begins by discussing the difficulty of selecting topics given the current political climate, quickly moving to criticize the media’s one-sided reporting on issues like the defense agreement between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. The core of the discussion scrutinizes the possibility of a Palestinian state being established, arguing that while theoretically no one, including the U.S. and Israel, opposes it, the actions of groups like Hamas have made the realization of a state unlikely. Furthermore, the source provides a detailed critique of U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial speech at the UN General Assembly, condemning his rhetorical style and his criticisms of European immigration policies and the UN itself.

    The Struggle for Palestinian Statehood

    Palestinian statehood is a complex topic discussed in the sources, focusing primarily on international sentiment, historical attempts, and the impact of recent events and the role of Hamas.

    International Support and Aims

    The sources indicate that, in principle, no one in the world opposes the establishment of a separate Palestinian state in the land of Canaan (Khata-e-Kanan) or the land of Israel (Khata-e-Israel)—a stance that includes both the United States and Israel.

    Many powerful countries have reportedly issued statements in favor of establishing a Palestinian state, including European nations like England, France, and Germany, as well as Canada, Australia, and Portugal.

    Historically, it was the US that worked to convince Israel on this matter, leading to formal agreements and negotiations with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).

    Historical and Negotiated Progress

    Several key moments were identified as steps toward realizing statehood:

    1. 1948 Establishment: A separate Palestinian state was theoretically established by Britain at the same time as the Israeli state. However, the sources note that the Arabs themselves refused to accept this plan and subsequently launched an attack on Israel.
    2. Palestinian Authority (PA): The creation of the Palestinian Authority under Yasser Arafat and later Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) was viewed as a concrete, practical step toward establishing a separate Palestinian state.
    3. Conditions for Statehood: This progress was contingent upon the Palestinians recognizing Israel and refraining from attacking its security.
    4. Gaza Withdrawal (2005): The negotiation process led to the Israeli Prime Minister Sharon being forced (due to US pressure) to end the occupation and hand Gaza over to the Palestinian Authority in 2005. This resulted in millions of Jews leaving their fortified homes in tears. The sources also note that prior to 1967, Gaza was not held by any Palestinian authority but was part of the capital territory of the Arab Republic of Egypt.

    Despite these opportunities, the sources ask who the elements were that sabotaged the renewed progress toward a separate Palestinian state following the 1993 agreement, which was facilitated by American goodwill.

    Current Obstacles and Future Doubts

    The sources point to current geopolitical realities and the actions of Hamas as major impediments to statehood:

    • Hamas’s Actions: The attacks of October 7th by Hamas are seen as having destroyed all agreements that had been reached between Israelis and Palestinians under American guidance.
    • Loss of Trust: Following this “bitter experience,” the sources express doubt that the previous American and Israeli trust can ever be restored. Consequently, the view is put forward that no such state will be established now.
    • Rewarding Terrorism: Former US President Trump’s viewpoint was mentioned, suggesting that recognizing a Palestinian state under current conditions would be a gift or reward for Hamas.
    • International Conditions for Recognition: The Italian Prime Minister stated that Italy would not recognize any Palestinian state until the government of Hamas is separated (or removed), despite facing considerable domestic pressure on the issue.
    • The Conflict: The ongoing conflict is characterized as the helpless Palestinian people being crushed like wheat between the two millstones of Hamas and Israel. A ceasefire is currently being delayed because of the need for Hamas to release all Israeli hostages.

    Media and Propaganda

    The sources challenge the prevailing media narrative which suggests that “Jews and Christians” have formed a unified alliance of hatred (“Al Kuff Millat Wahida”) to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state. The text contends that this notion is propagated unfairly, suggesting that the root causes of the failure lie in internal historical rejections and subsequent sabotage.

    Trump’s Criticism and UN General Assembly Debates

    The sources discuss the UN General Assembly (UNGA) primarily in the context of recent global debates, US President Donald Trump’s controversial address, and discussions surrounding the Gaza conflict and illegal immigration.

    General Context and Focus

    The UN General Assembly sessions, along with the address by President Donald Trump, were identified as a main topic of interest in the sources. The sources specifically mention the “colorful global debates” (रंगारंगी आलमी बहसों) that occur within the UN General Assembly.

    Criticism of the UN and its Role

    President Trump used his address and platform to severely criticize the United Nations, characterizing it as a “failed and useless organization” (नाकामो नकारा इदारा).

    Key criticisms leveled at the UN by Trump, according to the sources, include:

    • Failure to Cooperate on Peace: Trump claimed that he had worked diligently as the American President to establish peace (citing ceasefires between Pakistan and India, and in seven countries), but the UN—the global institution responsible for this work—did not cooperate with him at all.
    • Patronage of Illegal Immigration: Trump asserted that the UN agency has become a patron of illegal immigrants (गैर कानानूनी तारकीने वतन का सरपरस्त). He alleged that the UN is orchestrating an attack by these people on Western countries, under the pretense of settling migrants, while the institution’s core objective was the establishment of world peace.
    • Moral Responsibility: Trump also claimed that China and India were responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Ukraine because they continued to purchase Russian fuel.

    President Trump’s UNGA Address

    The sources highlight the controversial nature of President Trump’s address at the UNGA, noting that he was threatening his opponents and the entire world while standing there. Specific details about his conduct and statements include:

    • Suppression of Free Speech: A question was raised as to why the microphone was being shut off during the speeches of other world leaders at the UN General Assembly, particularly given that the US is supposedly the world’s leading proponent of freedom of expression.
    • Personal Attacks: Trump was criticized for displaying such a “small-mindedness” (छोटापन) that he would attack the elected Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, during his speech in the UNGA. He claimed Khan was ruining the city and trying to impose Sharia law.
    • Immigration Warning: Trump warned that European nations like Greece, Germany, and Switzerland were turning their countries into “hell” by opening their borders to illegal immigrants.

    Interactions and Discussions within the UNGA Context

    The sources indicate that the UNGA served as a key location for discussions and anticipated meetings related to the Gaza conflict:

    • Anticipated Meeting: There was considerable anticipation that a special meeting would occur during the UNGA session involving six Arab Muslim rulers and President Trump.
    • Hope for Ceasefire: It was hoped that these influential rulers would be able to convince the American President to enforce a ceasefire in Gaza.
    • Clashes of Leaders: Details were reportedly observed regarding the “squabbles and bickering” (नोकझोंक और छेड़छाड़) that took place during the speeches delivered by Turkish President Erdogan and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu at the UN General Assembly.
    • Palestinian Statehood: Trump’s view that recognizing a Palestinian state under current conditions would be a gift or reward for Hamas was mentioned in the context of the proceedings.

    Trump’s Controversial UN Address and World View

    Donald Trump is discussed extensively in the sources, primarily concerning his controversial address at the UN General Assembly (UNGA), his severe criticism of international bodies, his claims regarding global peacekeeping, and his stance on Palestinian statehood.

    The Controversial UN General Assembly Address

    President Trump’s address at the UN General Assembly was a central topic of discussion in the sources, characterized as “unsettling or surprising” (pareshank ya hairank) and even “meaningless” or “absurd” (laayaani).

    Behavior and Conduct:

    • While delivering his address at the UN, Trump was described as “threatening his opponents and the entire world”.
    • The sources questioned why the microphone was being shut off during the speeches of other world leaders at the UN General Assembly, especially since America is considered the greatest “propagator and champion of freedom of expression” worldwide.

    Personal Attacks and “Small-mindedness”:

    • Trump was criticized for displaying such “small-mindedness” (chotaapan) that he attacked the elected Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, during his UNGA speech.
    • He alleged that Khan was ruining London, a beautiful cultural city, and trying to impose Sharia law.
    • He also claimed that Khan had given London over to the control of immigrants.
    • The sources noted that Trump had previously made similar remarks about an Asian-origin candidate for the Mayor of New York in Medship.

    Criticism of the UN and Immigration Policy

    Trump used his platform to deliver severe criticism, characterizing the United Nations as a “failed and useless organization” (naakaamo nakaara idaara).

    UN and Immigration:

    • Trump asserted that the UN agency has become the “patron of illegal immigrants” (ghair kaanaanuni taarikine watan ka sarparast).
    • He alleged that the UN is orchestrating an “invasion” (yalgaar) of these people on Western countries under the guise of settling migrants, despite the UN’s core objective being the establishment of world peace.
    • He warned that European nations like Greece, Germany, and Switzerland were turning their countries into “hell” by opening their borders to illegal immigrants.
    • He claimed that the jails in these European countries were filled with criminals who entered through illegal immigration.

    Claims of Peacekeeping and Global Responsibility

    Trump claimed that he, as the American President, had done more work for “the establishment of peace” than the UN.

    • He cited achieving a ceasefire between Pakistan and India.
    • He listed seven other countries where, according to his claims, he enforced a ceasefire or truce.
    • He specifically complained that the UN, which is the major global institution responsible for peace, “did not cooperate with him at all” in this work.

    In a different critical vein, Trump claimed that China and India were responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent people in Ukraine because they continued to purchase Russian fuel. The sources questioned whether this kind of language was appropriate for an American President.

    Stance on Palestinian Statehood

    A key viewpoint held by Trump regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict was highlighted:

    • He suggested that recognizing a Palestinian state under current conditions would be a “gift or reward for Hamas”.

    Diplomatic Interactions and Public Perception

    • There was anticipation that a special meeting would occur during the UNGA session involving six Arab Muslim rulers and President Trump. It was hoped that these influential rulers would be able to convince the American President to enforce a ceasefire in Gaza.
    • The sources noted that traditional flatterers (rawayati khushamadi) went to extremes in their flattery (khushamad ki hadd kar di), praising Trump as the “greatest champion of peace” (aman ka dai aalam bardar) in the world, claiming he was ending wars globally and highlighting the ceasefire with India as a great favor (ehsaan azeem).

    Saudi Arabia and Pakistan: Defense and MbS Reforms

    The discussion of Saudi Arabia in the sources focuses on the relationship between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, the character of the current leadership, and the postponement of a critical review of a defense agreement.

    The Pakistan-Saudi Defense Agreement

    The sources state that the author’s original intention was to discuss the “fruits of the Pak-Saudi defense agreement”. However, this discussion was ultimately deferred, as a critical review of the defense deal or agreement between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan was deemed to require a separate, dedicated article.

    Regarding media coverage of this agreement:

    • The sources criticize the media for presenting a “one-sided emotional picture”.
    • It is suggested that the narrative of an “Islamic NATO” is being propagated to appeal to the political interests of the established powers.

    Affection and Leadership

    The sources express “full love” for Saudi Arabia, mentioning the holy sites, such as the Baladul Ameen.

    Particular attention is given to the current Saudi leadership:

    • The current Saudi ruler, Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman (MbS), is described as a “charismatic personality”.
    • MbS is praised for undertaking “revolutionary steps” intended to transform his country’s conservatism into modernity and progress.
    • The author states that they have been a vocal supporter (hamnumai) of the Crown Prince’s planning and execution of reforms from the very first day.

    Hamas, Hostages, and the Collapse of Israeli-Palestinian Peace

    The sources discuss the Hamas-Israel conflict primarily through the lens of recent events, the destruction of existing agreements, international efforts toward a ceasefire, and the role of HamasThe sources discuss the Hamas-Israel conflict primarily through the lens of recent events, the destruction of existing agreements, international efforts toward a ceasefire, and the role of Hamas as a significant obstacle to peace and Palestinian statehood.

    The Impact of October 7th

    The sources identify the October 7th attacks by Hamas as a pivotal moment that fundamentally altered the dynamics of the conflict:

    • Hamas’s actions on October 7th are stated to have “destroyed all agreements” (tiya panca kar dala hai) that had been reached between Israelis and Palestinians under American guidance.
    • Following this “bitter experience” (salḳ tağribah), doubt is expressed that the previous American and Israeli trust can ever be restored. Consequently, the sources conclude that no Palestinian state will be established now.

    Obstacles to Ceasefire and Peace

    The immediate issue stalling a ceasefire is the fate of the hostages held by Hamas:

    • The current conflict is stuck because “the problem is the same: until the dog leaves the well, how can the well be clean?”.
    • A ceasefire is being delayed and “will remain a victim of delay” (iltwa ka shikaar rahegi) until Hamas releases all Israeli hostages (tamam isriliy yajmaliyon ko riha nahi karta).
    • The sources question why influential Arab Muslim rulers meeting at the UN General Assembly “cannot put a bridle on Hamas” (Hamas ko kyon lagaam nahi daal sakte).
    • The sources criticize Hamas for keeping the hostages, noting that if 20 Israeli hostages are alive and the bodies of 28 or 38 Israeli hostages are also being held, keeping them is a “barbaric act devoid of humanity” (insaniyat se guri hui gunaani harkat nahi hai).
    • The question is raised as to what Hamas ultimately desires, given the immense human devastation and the thousands of Palestinians killed.

    International Views and Diplomacy

    The conflict was a major topic during the UN General Assembly session, spurring diplomatic efforts and statements:

    • There was anticipation that six Arab Muslim rulers would hold a special meeting with US President Trump during the UNGA session, with the hope that these influential leaders could “convince the American President to enforce a ceasefire in Gaza”.
    • The Prime Minister of Italy stated that Italy would not recognize any Palestinian state until the government of Hamas is separated (or removed).
    • Former US President Donald Trump’s view was noted: recognizing a Palestinian state under current conditions would be a “gift or reward for Hamas”.
    • The Emir of Qatar was quoted as making a critical comment about Israel’s policy, stating that “killing opponents after inviting them for negotiations is the policy of Israel”.
    • Details were observed regarding the “squabbles and bickering” (nokjhoṇk aur chheṛchhāṛ) that took place during the speeches delivered by Turkish President Erdogan and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu at the UN General Assembly.

    The Plight of Palestinians

    The sources characterize the situation of the Palestinian people caught in the conflict as helpless:

    • The “helpless Palestinian people” (bebas filistini awam) are being “crushed like wheat” (gehū̃ ki tarah pise ja rahe hain) between the two millstones of Hamas and Israel.

    Media and Propaganda

    The sources also address the handling of the conflict in the media:

    • The sources criticize the media for not highlighting the humanitarian issue surrounding the hostages held by Hamas.
    • The prevailing media narrative that “Jews and Christians” (Yahud-o-Nasara) have formed an alliance of hatred (Al Kuff Millat Wahida) to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state is challenged as unfair propaganda.

    इंसानों के नाम अफजार रिहान यूएन का आलमी रोल और प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप आज मौजुआत की इस कदर भरमार है समझ नहीं आ रही कि किस पर कलम उठाया जाए और किसे नजरअंदाज कर दिया जाए दरवेश की हमेशा यह तमन्ना होती है कि सिर्फ इन्हीं इश्यूज को उठाया जाए जहां कोई कजी या टेढ़ हो जहां हमारा मीडिया हालातो वाक्यात की याक रुखी तस्वीर पेश कर रहा हो तो वहां लाजमन तस्वीर का दूसरा रुख वाज़ किया जाना चाहिए जिसकी बुनियाद सिर्फ और सिर्फ ह्यूमन इंटरेस्ट हो लेकिन अगर हमारा स्वाद आजम दुरुस्त समत में जा रहा हो तो वहां अपनी डेढ़ मरले की अलग मस्जिद बनाना या मौबे दरैन के लिए वाजे हकाय की जिगली करते जाना ना सिर्फ अपने बल्कि अमतुनास के औकात का जिया महसूस होता है आज इरादा तो पाक सऊदिया दफाई मुयदे के समररा पर बहस करने और इनका तनकीदी जायजा लेने का था बिलखसूस इसलिए कि हमारा मीडिया इसकी बहुत यख रुखी जज्बाती तस्वीर कशी कर रहा है बहुत से सवालात हकायक हैं जिन पर ना किसी का ध्यान जा रहा है ना उन्हें कोई ज़रे बहस ला रहा है बल्कि अपने आतुल मुस्लिमीन को बेवकूफ बनाने के लिए किसी इस्लामी नेटो के ज़हूर की कहानियां गड़ी जा रही हैं यह सराबकि हमारी ताकतवर इस्टैब्लिशमेंट के सियासी मफाद में जाता है लिहाजा इस नो का सौदा खूब बेचा और खरीदा जा रहा है बिलाश सऊदी अरब से हम सब भरपूर मोहब्बत रखते हैं हजाजी अज़ मुकद्दस बलादुल अमीन हो या इसराइलीनानी अज़ मुकद्दस यरूशलम हो तीनों जतून या तुरसीना हो इनकी मोहब्बतें ना चीज़ के खून में मोजन है और फिर सऊदिया के मौजूदा हुक्मरान क्राउन प्रिंस इज्जत मा मोहम्मद बिन सलमान तो एक शमाती शख्सियत हैं जो अपने मुल्क की कदामत पसंदी को जिद्द और तरक्की में बदलने के लिए इंकलाबी इदामात उठा रहे हैं यह दरवेश रोजे अवल से इनकी हमनुमाई और पेशबंदी में अहम आवाज उठाते चले आ रहा है किंगडम ऑफ सऊदी अरेबिया और पाकिस्तान के दरमियान तय पाने वाली दफाई डील या मुदे पर बहस किसी अलग आर्टिकल की मुतकाजी है इसलिए उसे तभी तक के लिए उठाए रखे हैं आज का मौजू यूएन जनरल असेंबली में होने वाली रंगारंगी आलमी बहसों बिलखसूस अनोखे अमकी प्रेसिडेंट डोनाल्ड ट्रंप के परेशानक या हैरानक खिताब का जायजा होना चाहिए और यह भी कि क्या वाकई कोई फिलिस्तीनी रियासत ख्ता-ए-कनान या ख़्ता इसराइल में बिल फेल बनने जा रही है जिस तरह यह शोर है कि इंग्लैंड फ्रांस और जर्मनी जैसे ताकतवर यूरोपी मुालिक ही नहीं कनाडा ऑस्ट्रेलिया और पुर्तगाल जैसे मुालिक भी फिलिस्तीनी रियासत कायम करने के हक में बयानात दे रहे हैं अगर असूली तौर पर देखा जाए तो ख्ता-कनान में अलग फिलिस्तीनी रियासत के कयाम का दुनिया में मुखालिफ कोई भी नहीं है अमेरिका और इसराइल भी नहीं क्योंकि ये अमेरिका ही था जिसने इस हवाले से इसराइल को कायल करते हुए पीएलओ से मजाकात ही नहीं बाजाप्ता मुयदे भी करवाए थे यासिर अरफाज और अबू माजन महमूद अब्बास की कयादत में फस्तीनी अथॉरिटी का कयाम दर हकीकत अलग फस्तीनी रियासत की तरफ ठोस अमली पेशरफ्त थी शर्त मौज यह थी कि आप लोग इसराइल को तस्लीम करते हुए इसकी सलामती पर हमलावर नहीं होंगे यह इसी मजाकराती प्रोसेस का सम था जिसने 2005 में इसरली प्राइम मिनिस्टर शेरून को मजबूर किया अमेरिका ने 40 बरस कब इसका कब्जा खत्म करवाते हुए गजा फस्तीनी अथॉरिटी को सौंप दिया हत्ता के लाखों यहूद रोते हुए अपनी मजबूत किला नुमा रहशगाहें छोड़ते हुए यहां से अमकी दबाव पर निकले यह अम्र भी वाज़ रहे कि 1967 से कब भी यह ख्ा किसी फिलस्तीनी अथॉरिटी के पास नहीं था बल्कि अरब रिपब्लिक इजिप्ट की राजदानी का हिस्सा था हमारे मीडिया में नारवा तौर पर यह प्रोपोगेंडा है कि जैसे यहूदो नसारा ने हम मुसलमानों के खिलाफ किसी नौक का कोई नफरत भरा एकका कर रखा है अल कुफ मिल्लत वाहिदा जैसे स्लोगन बुलंद करते हुए इस नौ का शदीद इस्तलाल किया जाता है कि वो सब इकट्ठे होकर बेचारे फिलिस्तीनी मुसलमानों को मरवा रहे हैं और इनकी अलग फिलिस्तीनी रियासत बनने नहीं दे रहे हमारे इन भोले सादा लो अहबाब पर वाज़ होना चाहिए कि असूली तौर पर अलग फ़िलस्तीनी रियासत का कयाम 1948 में इसी वक्त कर दिया गया था जब इसराइली रियासत का कयाम वकूफ पज़र हुआ और इसी बर्तनानिया ने किया जिसने इसराइल और पाकिस्तान मजहब के नाम पर बनवाए लेकिन वो क्या आमल थे जिनके कारण तब खुद अरबों ने उसे कबूल करने से इंकार करते हुए यकबार्गी नजायदा इसराइल पर यलगार कर दी और फिर 1993 में अमकी मेहरबानी से उस मुहदा कराते हुए दोबारा अलग फिलिस्तीनी रियासत की तरफ पेशर भी तो उसे दोबारा सबूताई करने वाले कौन से अनासिर थे अगर हम इसकी तफसील में जाएंगे तो यूएन में होने वाली दिलचस्प तारीर बिलखसूस प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप के लायानी खिताब का मोहकात्मा नहीं कर सकेंगे जो यूएन में खड़े होकर अपने मुखालफिन को ही नहीं पूरी दुनिया को धमका रहे थे और हद है कि इनका अपना टेलीप्रटर तो खराब हुआ या जो भी कहानी थी अकवामेदा की जनरल असेंबली में खिताब करते हुए दीगर आलमी लीडरान की तकरीर पर माइक क्यों बंद किया जा रहा था अमेरिका तो दुनिया भर में आजादी इज़हार का सबसे बड़ा प्रचार को आलम बरदार है तो फिर मुखालफाना आवाजों पर यह सलूक करते हुए आप अकवामे आलम और इन पर मुसल्लत इस्तबदादी कुतों को क्या पैगाम दे रहे हैं क्या अमकी प्रेसिडेंट इतना छोटापन भी दिखा सकता है कि वो यूएन जनरल असेंबली में खड़े अपने तई दिल की बातें करते हुए लंदन के मुंतखब मेयर पर चढ़ाई कर दे ये कहते हुए कि सादर खान लंदन जैसे खूबसूरत तहजीबी शहर को बर्बाद कर रहा है वो लंदन में शरीयत नाफज़ करना चाहता है उसे इमीग्रेंट्स के कंट्रोल में दे चुका है और मैं आइंदा वहां नहीं जाऊंगा मा कब्ल इसी नो के अल्फाज़ उन्होंने न्यूयॉर्क में मेडशिप के एशियाई नियाद उम्मीदवार के मुतलिक भी कहने शुरू कर दिए थे यहां यूएन में ट्रंप कह रहे थे कि यूरोपीय मुालिक गैर कानानूनी तारकीने वतन के लिए सरहदें खोलकर अपने मुालिक को जहन्नुम बना रहे हैं यूनान जर्मनी स्विट्जरलैंड और दीगर यूरोपीय मुालिक की जेलों में जरा पेशा गैर कानूनी इमीग्रेशन से पहुंचे हुए कैदी हैं यूएन का अदारा गैर कानानूनी तारकीने वतन का सरपरस्त बन चुका है यह मुहाजरीन को बसाने के नाम पर वेस्टर्न कंट्रीज पर अपने इन लोगों की यलगार करवा रहा है जबकि इस अदारे का असल मकसद दुनिया में अमन का कयाम था प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप ने यूएन पर शदीद तनकीद करते हुए कहा कि मैंने अमेकी प्रेसिडेंट की हैसियत से कयाम अमन के लिए ज्यादा काम किया है पाकिस्तान और इंडिया में फायरबंदी से लेकर उन्होंने सात मुालिक के नाम गिनवाए जहां ट्रंप के बकौल उन्होंने जंगबंदी करवाई लेकिन जिस बड़े आलमी इदारे का यह काम था यानी यूनाइटेड नेशन इसने इस काम में मेरे साथ जरा भी तामन नहीं किया यह एक नाकामो नकारा इदारा है चाइना और इंडिया रशियन ईंधन खरीदते हुए यूक्रेन में हजारों बेगुनाहों की अमवात के जिम्मेदार हैं सवाल पैदा होता है कि क्या किसी अमकी प्रेसिडेंट को इस नौ की जुबान या अल्लाम तराशी जेब देती है अलबत्ता इनकी एक बात दिलचस्प थी कि मौजूदा हालात में फिलस्तीनी रियासत को तस्लीम करना हमा के लिए तोहफा या नाम होगा अमीर कतर ने खूबसूरत बात कही कि मजाकात पर बुलाकर मुखालफीन को कत्ल करना इसराइल की पॉलिसी है हम यहां यूएन में गजा जंग रुकवाने और इसराइली यरगमालियों को छुड़वाने के लिए आए हैं इटली के प्राइम मिनिस्टर ने कहा कि हमास की हुकूमत से अदगी तक हम किसी फिलिस्तीनी रियासत को तस्लीम नहीं करेंगे हालांकि इन पर अपने मुल्क में इस हवाले से खासा दबाव है अभी पिछले रोज मैलान में फिलिस्तीनी रियासत के लिए खून रेज झड़पें हुई हैं जिनमें 60 के करीब इटालियन पुलिस वाले जख्मी हुए अमेरिकी रहनुमाई में इसराइलियों और फिलस्तीनियों में अब तक जितने भी मुहायदे हुए हैं हमास ने 7 अक्टूबर के इदाम से इन सब का तिया पंचा कर डाला है इस सल्ख तजुर्बे के बाद दरवेश को नहीं दिखता कि वो साबका अमकी और इसराइली एतमाद कभी दोबारा बहाल हो सकेगा नतीजातन ऐसी कोई रियासत अब बिल फेल कभी ना बन सकेगी इस सिलसिले में यूएन जनरल असेंबली में तुर्क प्रेसिडेंट अर्दवान और इसराइली प्राइम मिनिस्टर नेतन याू की तकारीर में होने वाली नोकझोंक और छेड़छाड़ की तफसीलात मुलाहजा की जा सकी हैं जो खासी दिलचस्प है कई रोज से बहुत शोर था कि यूएन जनरल असेंबली इजलास के दौरान छ अरब मुस्लिम हुक्मरानों की अमकी प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप के साथ खुसूसी मुलाकात होने जा रही है उम्मीद की जा रही थी कि यह बासर हुक्मरान अमेरिकी प्रेसिडेंट को गजा जंगबंदी पर कायल कर लेंगे लेकिन मसला वही जब तक कुत्ता कुएं से ना निकले कुआं पाक कैसे होगा जब तक हमास तमाम इसरलीय जमालियों को रिहा नहीं करता ये जंगबंदी भी इल्तवा का शिकार रहेगी सवाल यह है कि तमाम बासर अरब मुस्लिम हुक्मरान वहां मिलकर हमास को क्यों लगाम नहीं डाल सकते चक्की के इन दो पार्टों में यानी हमास और इसराइल बेबस फिलिस्तीनी आवाम गेहूं की तरह पिसे जा रहे हैं हमास ऐसा कौन सा मुंहजोर घोड़ा है जिसे काबू नहीं किया जा सकता अगर 20 इसराइली यर्गमाली जिंदा है और 28 या 38 के करीब मारे गए इसरली यर्गमालियों की लाशें हैं तो हमास उन्हें अपने पास किस खुशी में रखे हुए हैं क्या यह इंसानियत से गुरी हुई गुनानी हरकत नहीं है इतनी इंसानी तबाही करवाने के बावजूद इतने हजारों फिलस्तीनी मरवाने के बावजूद हमास वाले आखिर और क्या चाहते हैं इस खालिस्तान इंसानी इशू को हमारे मीडिया में क्यों हाईलाइट नहीं किया जाता हमारा बुलंद परवाज गजा इशू पर बड़ी-बड़ी छोड़ता था कि ना जाने प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप को मिलकर क्या कहेगा रवायती खुशामदी ने तो खुशामद की हद कर दी ट्रंप की तारीफों के पुल बांध दिए ट्रंप जी आपसे बड़ा अमन का दाई आलम बरदार तो दुनिया में कोई है ही नहीं आप अमन के दायू प्रचारक हैं दुनिया भर में जंगे खत्म करवा रहे हैं आपने इंडिया से हमारी जंगबंदी करवा कर एहसान अजीम किया है

    انسانوں کے نام، اظفر ریحان، اقوام متحدہ اور صدر ٹرمپ کا عالمی کردار، آج مسائل کی ایسی بھرمار ہے کہ میں یہ سمجھنے سے قاصر ہوں کہ کس پر قلم اٹھاؤں اور کس کو نظر انداز کروں۔ درویش کی ہمیشہ خواہش ہوتی ہے کہ صرف وہی مسائل اٹھائے جائیں جہاں کوئی تنقید یا تحریف ہو۔ جہاں ہمارا میڈیا حالات کی تلخ تصویر پیش کر رہا ہے وہیں تصویر کا دوسرا رخ بھی پیش کرنا چاہیے جس کی بنیاد صرف انسانی مفاد پر ہونی چاہیے۔ لیکن اگر ہمارا ذوق صحیح سمت کی طرف جا رہا ہے تو ڈیڑھ مرلہ کی الگ مسجد بنانا یا اہلِ دنیا کے لیے حق گوئی کا نعرہ لگانا نہ صرف اپنی بلکہ عوام کے رتبے کی بھی توہین ہے۔ آج کا مقصد پاک سعودی عرب کے معاملے پر بحث اور تنقیدی جائزہ لینا تھا۔ خاص طور پر اس لیے کہ ہمارا میڈیا اس کی سخت اور جذباتی تصویر پیش کر رہا ہے۔ بہت سے حقیقی سوالات ہیں جن پر کوئی توجہ نہیں دے رہا۔ ان پر کوئی بحث بھی نہیں کر رہا، بلکہ ہمارے عاجز مسلمانوں کو بے وقوف بنانے کے لیے اسلامی نیٹ ورک کے وجود میں آنے کی کہانیاں گھڑ رہے ہیں۔ یہ معلومات ہماری طاقتور اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے سیاسی مفادات کو پورا کرتی ہیں، اس لیے یہ معلومات بکثرت خریدی اور فروخت کی جا رہی ہیں۔ درحقیقت ہم سب کو سعودی عرب سے بے پناہ محبت ہے۔ حضور صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ہوں یا رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم بیت المقدس، تینوں سیارے ہوں یا ترسینا، ان کی محبت ان کے خون میں پیوست ہے۔ سعودی عرب کے موجودہ حکمران، ولی عہد شہزادہ محمد بن سلمان، ایک لچکدار شخصیت ہیں جو اپنے ملک کی ترقی کے جذبے کو عزم اور ترقی میں تبدیل کرنے کے لیے انقلابی اقدامات کی قیادت کر رہے ہیں۔ یہ درویش سال کے آغاز سے ہی ان کی حمایت اور وکالت میں نمایاں آواز اٹھا رہا ہے۔ سعودی عرب اور پاکستان کے درمیان طے پانے والے سیکیورٹی ڈیل یا ایشو پر بحث ایک الگ مضمون کا معاملہ ہے۔ یہ متنازعہ ہے، اس لیے اسے اس وقت تک زیر التواء رکھا گیا ہے۔ آج کا موضوع اقوام متحدہ کی جنرل اسمبلی میں ہونے والے رنگا رنگ عالمی مباحثوں کا جائزہ ہونا چاہیے، خاص طور پر منفرد امریکی صدر ڈونلڈ ٹرمپ کا پریشان کن یا حیران کن عنوان، اور یہ بھی کہ آیا واقعی ایک فلسطینی ریاست خطہ کنعان میں بننے والی ہے یا خطہ اسرائیل۔ جس طرح یہ چرچا ہے کہ انگلینڈ، فرانس اور جرمنی جیسے طاقتور یورپی ممالک ہی نہیں بلکہ کینیڈا، آسٹریلیا اور پرتگال جیسے ممالک بھی فلسطینی ریاست کے قیام کے حق میں بیانات دے رہے ہیں، اگر اصولی طور پر دیکھا جائے تو دنیا میں کوئی بھی خطہ کنعان میں علیحدہ فلسطینی ریاست کے قیام کا مخالف نہیں، حتیٰ کہ امریکہ یا اسرائیل بھی نہیں، جب کہ اس مسئلے پر صرف امریکہ، اسرائیل سے ہی نہیں بلکہ بہت سے ممالک کو جوڑ دیا گیا ہے۔ پی ایل او یاسر عرفاز اور ابو مازن محمود عباس کی قیادت میں فلسطینی اتھارٹی کا قیام درحقیقت ایک علیحدہ فلسطینی ریاست کی جانب ٹھوس عملی پیش رفت کی شرط تھی۔ مزے کی بات یہ تھی کہ آپ لوگ اسرائیل کو تسلیم کرتے ہوئے اس کی سلامتی پر حملہ نہیں کرتے۔ یہی مضحکہ خیز عمل تھا جس نے 2005 میں اسرائیلی وزیر اعظم شیرون کو مجبور کیا۔جب امریکہ نے اپنا 40سالہ قبضہ ختم کرکے غزہ کو فلسطینی اتھارٹی کے حوالے کیا تو لاکھوں یہودی اپنی مضبوط قلعہ نما رہائش گاہیں روتے ہوئے چھوڑ کر امریکی دباؤ پر چلے گئے۔ یہ بھی واضح رہے کہ 1967 کے بعد سے یہ خطہ کبھی بھی کسی فلسطینی اتھارٹی کے ماتحت نہیں تھا بلکہ عرب جمہوریہ مصر کے دارالحکومت کا حصہ تھا۔ ہمارے میڈیا میں اس طرح پروپیگنڈہ کیا جا رہا ہے کہ گویا یہود و نصاریٰ نے ہم مسلمانوں کے خلاف کوئی نفرت انگیز اتحاد بنا لیا ہے۔ القف ملت واحدہ جیسے نعرے لگا کر اس اتحاد کا یہ کہہ کر شدید استحصال کیا جاتا ہے کہ یہ سب مل کر غریب فلسطینی مسلمانوں کا قتل عام کر رہے ہیں اور انہیں علیحدہ فلسطینی ریاست نہیں بنانے دے رہے ہیں۔ یہ ہمارے معصوم اور سادہ لوح لوگ ہیں واضح رہے کہ اصل میں ایک علیحدہ فلسطینی ریاست 1948 میں اسی وقت قائم ہوئی تھی جب اسرائیل کی ریاست قائم ہوئی تھی اور یہ انہی ترکمنوں نے کی تھی جنہوں نے مذہب کے نام پر اسرائیل اور پاکستان کو بنایا تھا لیکن وہ کون سی حرکتیں تھیں جن کی وجہ سے خود عربوں نے اسے ماننے سے انکار کر دیا اور اچانک ایک بار پھر امریکہ کے ساتھ مل کر اسرائیل کے خلاف ہو گئے۔ علیحدہ فلسطینی ریاست اور پھر وہ کون سے عوامل تھے جنہوں نے اسے دوبارہ ثابت کیا؟ اگر ہم اس کی تفصیلات میں جائیں تو اقوام متحدہ میں ہونے والی دلچسپ تقریر کا مقابلہ نہیں کر پائیں گے، خاص طور پر صدر ٹرمپ کا وہ مزاحیہ بیان جو اقوام متحدہ میں کھڑے ہو کر نہ صرف اپنے مخالفین کو بلکہ پوری دنیا کو دھمکیاں دے رہا تھا اور سب سے بری بات یہ ہے کہ ان کا اپنا ٹیلی پیٹر ٹوٹ گیا یا کہانی جو بھی تھی، اقوام متحدہ کی جنرل اسمبلی سے خطاب کے دوران دیگر عالمی رہنماؤں کی مائیکرو فون پر تقریریں ٹوٹ گئیں۔ امریکہ کو کیوں بند کیا جا رہا تھا؟ دنیا میں آزادی اظہار کی سب سے بڑی پروموٹر دنیا ہے۔ پھر مخالف آوازوں کے ساتھ ایسا سلوک کرکے آپ دنیا اور ان پر حملہ آور کتے نما اسٹیبلشمنٹ کو کیا پیغام دے رہے ہیں؟ کیا ہمارا صدر اتنی گھٹیا پن کا مظاہرہ کر سکتا ہے کہ وہ اقوام متحدہ کی جنرل اسمبلی میں کھڑے ہو کر لندن کے منتخب میئر پر حملہ کر کے اپنے دل کی بات کہہ دے کہ سر خان لندن جیسے خوبصورت، ثقافتی شہر کو برباد کر رہے ہیں۔ وہ لندن میں شریعت کا نفاذ چاہتا ہے۔ اس نے اسے تارکین وطن کے کنٹرول میں دے دیا ہے اور میں دوبارہ وہاں نہیں جاؤں گا۔ لیکن اس سے قبل انہوں نے نیویارک میں صدارتی انتخابات کے لیے ایشیائی امیدوار کے حوالے سے بھی ایسے ہی الفاظ استعمال کرنا شروع کر دیے تھے۔ یہاں اقوام متحدہ میں ٹرمپ کہہ رہے تھے کہ یورپی ممالک یونان، جرمنی، سوئٹزرلینڈ اور دیگر یورپی ممالک میں غیر قانونی امیگریشن کے لیے سرحدیں کھول کر اپنے ملکوں کو جہنم بنا رہے ہیں۔

  • Trump’s Gaza Peace Roadmap Analysis

    Trump’s Gaza Peace Roadmap Analysis

    The source provides an overview and analysis of a twenty-point Gaza peace roadmap proposed by American President Donald Trump, created in consultation with eight Islamic nations, including both Arab and non-Arab states. The plan aims to end the ongoing conflict, focusing on de-escalation, reconstruction, and the demilitarization of Gaza, with an explicit goal of targeting and neutralizing Hamas while offering its members amnesty if they agree to disarmament and peaceful coexistence. Key features of the proposal include the exchange of prisoners and hostages, a phased Israeli withdrawal replaced by international forces, and the possibility of a future Palestinian autonomous state, though Israeli leadership has publicly stated they do not interpret the plan as accepting a two-state solution. The analysis also questions the plan’s feasibility, particularly given the deep-seated mutual distrust and the potential for domestic opposition within both the Palestinian and Israeli populations, suggesting that a lack of addressing fundamental religious animosities could ultimately cause the roadmap to fail.

    The Trump Gaza Ceasefire Roadmap and Provisions

    The Trump Gaza Roadmap (also referred to as the Gaza Ceasefire Road Map or Gaza Peace Plan) is a 20-point proposal presented by US President Donald Trump under significant international pressure, following a period in which 64,000 people were reported killed. The stated primary goal of the roadmap is the cessation of the bloody war that has been ongoing for two years and has resulted in the destruction of Gaza, turning cities and towns into ruins.

    Development and Support

    The roadmap was developed in consultation with eight Islamic and Arab countries. Trump’s team, which included his son-in-law Jared Kushner, worked with these countries to devise 21 points, which were consolidated into the 20-point plan intended to be enforced upon Israel.

    The eight consulted nations included three non-Arab states (Turkey, Indonesia, and Pakistan) and five Arab states (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates). The Foreign Ministers of these eight nations issued a joint declaration strongly supporting the plan, deeming it indispensable or key for peace and security in the region, while also leaving room for further negotiations.

    Key Provisions of the Roadmap

    The roadmap establishes several crucial steps aimed at stabilizing the region and restructuring Gaza:

    • Security and Demilitarization: The foremost point (Point 1) is to make Gaza a territory free of terrorism and extremism, ensuring it poses no threat to its neighbors, Israel and Egypt.
    • Hamas or any other militant group will have no direct or indirect role in the governance of Gaza (Point 13).
    • All terrorist centers and infrastructure, including tunnels and weapons manufacturing facilities, must be destroyed.
    • Gaza will be demilitarized under the supervision of neutral observers.
    • No Israeli Occupation or Annexation (Point 16): The plan explicitly clarifies that Israel will neither occupy Gaza nor annex any part of it.
    • Transition of Power: As Israeli Security Forces gradually withdraw, International Defense Forces will incrementally assume control to establish stability in Gaza. If Hamas rejects the roadmap, these International Defense and Stability Forces will still continue peaceful aid operations in the regions handed over to them.
    • Reconstruction: Gaza’s reconstruction will be carried out to benefit its population.

    Focus on Hamas and Reconciliation

    The sources suggest that the primary target of the Gaza peace plan is Hamas.

    • Amnesty for Fighters (Point 6): Following the release of hostages and a prisoner exchange, Hamas members who agree to peaceful coexistence and surrender their weapons will be granted general amnesty. They will be given safe passage and the necessary facilities to travel to countries that accept them if they wish to leave Gaza.
    • Prisoner and Hostage Exchange (Point 5): In exchange for 20 living Israeli hostages and 24 bodies, Israel will release 250 prisoners who have received life sentences from Israeli courts for proven crimes, along with 1,700 other Palestinians arrested after October 7 (including women and children). Furthermore, 15 bodies of Palestinians will be returned for every one body of an Israeli hostage.
    • Inter-Religious Dialogue (Point 18): Point 18 is highlighted as the most beneficial aspect of the roadmap. It stipulates the initiation of an inter-religious dialogue to transform the mindset of Israelis and Palestinians, eliminate mutual hatred, and highlight the benefits of peace. The sources contend that this religious hatred is the root of the conflict, and without addressing it, other schemes will fail.

    Concerns and Challenges

    Several challenges and questions regarding the plan’s viability are raised in the sources:

    1. Hamas Rejection: It is anticipated that Hamas may reject the plan, believing it signals the death of its political power. However, Hamas is reportedly in a position of weakness, lacking external support, except for limited assistance from Iran, Turkey, and Qatar.
    2. Israeli Commitment and the Two-State Solution: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured his citizens that accepting the Gaza peace plan in no way means accepting a two-state solution in the region. This confirms public pressure within Israel against the two-state solution.
    3. Future Palestinian State (Point 19): Point 19 states that, in deference to the eight Islamic/Arab nations, possibilities for establishing a Palestinian autonomous state will emerge once Gaza is reconstructed and the Palestinian Authority completes necessary reforms. The US would then initiate negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians to establish a political horizon for peaceful coexistence. However, the sources note that due to the events of October 7, 2023, the trust between the two factions has been destroyed, and neither the two-nation theory nor the two-state solution seems currently possible.
    4. Motives and Guarantees: Questions are raised about the actual intent behind the plan, suggesting it might be an extension of the Abraham Accords aimed at compelling Muslim Arab states to recognize Israel. There is also concern that Israel, after achieving its objectives (such as the release of hostages), might violate its commitments and launch attacks on other neighboring Arab or Muslim countries once American pressure subsides.
    5. Contextual Pressure: The introduction of the plan occurred shortly after the Israeli Prime Minister, under pressure from the US President, apologized to the Qatari Prime Minister for an “illegal attack” on Qatari territory that resulted in the death of a security guard, promising compensation and pledging never to attack Qatar again.

    Trump’s Gaza Ceasefire Roadmap and Core Provisions

    with these countries to devise the points which were consolidated into the final plan intended to be enforced upon Israel.

    The Foreign Ministers of these eight nations issued a joint declaration strongly supporting the Gaza Ceasefire Road Map, deeming it indispensable or key for peace and security in the region, while also leaving room for further negotiations.

    Core Provisions of the Ceasefire Plan

    The plan establishes strict criteria for the governance and demilitarization of the territory:

    • Security and Demilitarization (Point 1): The foremost point states that Gaza must be made a territory free of terrorism and extremism that poses no threat to its neighbors, Israel and Egypt.
    • Hamas Exclusion (Point 13): Hamas or any other militant group will have no direct or indirect role in the governance of Gaza. All terrorist centers, infrastructure (including tunnels), and weapons manufacturing facilities must be destroyed. Gaza will be demilitarized under the supervision of neutral observers.
    • No Israeli Occupation or Annexation (Point 16): The roadmap explicitly ensures that Israel will neither occupy Gaza nor annex any part of it.
    • Transition of Control: As Israeli Security Forces withdraw incrementally, International Defense Forces will gradually take control to establish stability in Gaza. Even if Hamas rejects the plan, these International Defense and Stability Forces will continue peaceful aid operations in the regions handed over to them.
    • Reconstruction: The reconstruction of Gaza is mandated to benefit its population.

    Focus on Hamas and Reconciliation

    The sources contend that the primary target of the Gaza peace plan is Hamas.

    • Prisoner and Hostage Exchange (Point 5): The plan outlines a comprehensive exchange deal:
    • Israel will receive 20 living Israeli hostages and 24 bodies.
    • In return, Israel will release 250 prisoners serving life sentences for proven crimes, alongside 1,700 other Palestinians arrested after October 7 (including women and children).
    • Additionally, Israel will return 15 bodies of Palestinians for every one body of an Israeli hostage.
    • Amnesty for Fighters (Point 6): Hamas members who agree to peaceful coexistence and surrender their weapons will be granted general amnesty and life security. Those wishing to leave Gaza will receive safe passage and facilities to travel to countries that accept them.
    • Inter-Religious Dialogue (Point 18): Point 18 is highlighted as the most beneficial provision, calling for an inter-religious dialogue to change the mindset of Israelis and Palestinians. The goal is to eliminate mutual hatred and emphasize the benefits of peace. The sources argue that religious hatred is the root of the conflict, and without addressing this, all other schemes will fail.

    Challenges and Concerns

    Several significant concerns surround the viability and intent of the plan:

    1. Hamas Rejection: Hamas is expected to reject the plan, as it views the proposal as the death of its political power. The sources note, however, that Hamas is currently in a weak position, lacking significant external support except for limited assistance from Iran, Turkey, and Qatar.
    2. Israeli Commitment to Peace: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu assured his citizens that accepting the Gaza peace plan in no way means accepting a two-state solution in the region. This reflects the public pressure within Israel against the two-state solution.
    3. Future of Trust and Statehood: The events of October 7, 2023, are seen as having destroyed the trust between the two factions, suggesting that neither the two-nation theory nor the two-state solution seems possible at present.
    4. Political Horizon (Point 19): Point 19 states that possibilities for establishing a Palestinian autonomous state will emerge once Gaza is reconstructed and the Palestinian Authority completes necessary reforms. The US would then initiate negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians to establish a political horizon for peaceful coexistence.
    5. Guarantees and Motives: Questions have been raised regarding whether the plan is an extension of the Abraham Accords, aiming to compel Muslim Arab states to recognize Israel. There is also concern about the guarantee that Israel will adhere to its commitments and not violate the agreement or attack neighboring countries once American pressure subsides, especially after achieving objectives like the release of its hostages.

    The Gaza Roadmap and the Demise of Hamas

    The Trump Gaza Roadmap, or Gaza Ceasefire Plan, establishes a very specific and limited future role for Hamas, primarily focused on the cessation of its political and military activities. The sources contend that Hamas is the “actual target” of the entire peace plan.

    Exclusion from Governance and Demilitarization

    The roadmap dictates a complete removal of Hamas from any position of authority in Gaza:

    • No Role in Governance: Point 13 stipulates that Hamas or any other militant group will have no direct or indirect role in the governance of Gaza.
    • Demilitarization: Gaza must be transformed into a territory free of terrorism and extremism. This requires that all terrorist centers, infrastructure, including tunnels and weapons manufacturing facilities, be destroyed. Gaza will be demilitarized under the supervision of neutral observers.

    Anticipated Reaction and Current Weakness

    Hamas is expected to view this roadmap as an existential threat to its power:

    • Political Demise: It is suspected that Hamas will reject the plan because it perceives the proposal as the death of its political power (“सियासत या ताकत की मौत”).
    • Weakened Position: The sources note that Hamas is currently in a state of helplessness, as it has no substantial external support (“बैरूनी सपोर्ट हासिल नहीं रही”). While it receives limited financial aid (“महदूद माली इमदाद”) from Iran, Turkey, and Qatar, it is not in a position to leverage significant help.
    • Unsustainable Resistance: It is believed that Hamas will not be able to sustain its resistance movement for much longer. The sources suggest this is a crucial opportunity for the group not to waste the offered amnesty.

    Amnesty and Peaceful Exit Option

    For individual Hamas members, the roadmap offers a specific path toward amnesty:

    • General Amnesty (Point 6): Hamas members who agree to peaceful coexistence and surrender their weapons will be granted general amnesty and life security. This amnesty is granted following the completion of the hostage release and prisoner exchange process.
    • Safe Passage: Those who wish to leave Gaza will be provided safe passage and the necessary facilities to travel to countries willing to accept them.

    Plan Enforcement Regardless of Rejection

    Even if Hamas rejects the Gaza Ceasefire Plan or attempts to use delaying tactics, the sources indicate that the international transition will still proceed:

    • If Hamas rejects the roadmap, the International Defense and Stability Forces will still continue peaceful aid operations in the regions that have been handed over to them. These forces are scheduled to take control incrementally as Israeli Security Forces withdraw.

    Trump Gaza Roadmap Security Analysis

    The Trump Gaza Roadmap addresses Israel’s security concerns primarily through the demilitarization of Gaza, the destruction of terrorist infrastructure, and the permanent exclusion of Hamas from governance. However, the plan also introduces long-term security questions regarding regional stability and Israel’s commitment to future agreements.

    Core Security Objectives for Israel

    The foremost security objective stipulated in the roadmap is ensuring Gaza poses no threat to Israel:

    • Demilitarization of Gaza: Point 1 states that Gaza must be made a territory free of terrorism and extremism that poses no threat to its neighbors, Israel and Egypt.
    • Destruction of Infrastructure: Security measures include the mandate that all terrorist centers and infrastructure, including tunnels and weapons manufacturing facilities, must be destroyed. Gaza will be demilitarized under the supervision of neutral observers, rendering its weapons unusable (“सलाह को नकारा बनाते हुए”).
    • Exclusion of Militant Groups: Point 13 ensures that Hamas or any other militant group will have no direct or indirect role in the governance of Gaza.

    Immediate Security Gain: Hostage and Prisoner Exchange

    The ceasefire plan provides for an immediate security and humanitarian gain for Israel by securing the return of its captured citizens and bodies:

    • Hostage Release (Point 5): Israel is set to receive 20 living Israeli hostages and 24 bodies.
    • Prisoner Exchange: In exchange, Israel will release 250 prisoners serving life sentences and 1,700 other Palestinians arrested after October 7. For every one body of an Israeli hostage, 15 bodies of Palestinians will be returned.

    Concerns Regarding Long-Term Security and Commitments

    Despite the immediate security concessions outlined in the plan, the sources highlight major long-term concerns regarding Israel’s future actions and regional stability:

    • Guarantee of Non-Aggression: A significant concern is the lack of guarantee that Israel will adhere to its commitments once American pressure subsides and it achieves its objectives (like the release of hostages). The question is raised: “What is the guarantee that Israel, after having its demands met… will not violate other matters, ignoring the Palestinians?”.
    • Attacks on Neighbors: There is specific concern about whether Israel will “attack any other neighboring Arab or Muslim country” in the future if American pressure is lifted. This concern is raised despite the Israeli Prime Minister, under pressure from the US President, having already apologized to the Qatari Prime Minister for an “illegal attack” on Qatari territory, promising compensation, and pledging never to attack Qatar again.
    • Rejection of Two-State Solution: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu found it necessary to assure his citizens that accepting the Gaza peace plan “in no way means accepting a two-state solution” in the region. This reflects the powerful public pressure within Israel against the two-state solution and indicates a lack of political horizon for long-term peace sought by the Arab nations involved in the roadmap’s creation.
    • Destruction of Trust: Following the events of October 7, 2023, the trust between the Israeli and Palestinian factions has been “destroyed”. This loss of trust means that neither the two-nation theory nor the two-state solution seems possible at present, undermining the potential for a secure, negotiated future.

    No Occupation or Annexation

    While addressing security, the plan explicitly restricts Israel’s territorial actions, which may alleviate regional tension but could be viewed by hardliners as a security constraint:

    • No Annexation (Point 16): The roadmap clarifies that Israel will neither occupy Gaza nor annex any part of it.
    • Phased Withdrawal: Israeli Security Forces will incrementally withdraw from Gaza, with International Defense Forces taking control in phases to establish stability.

    Importance of Dialogue for Enduring Security

    Point 18 of the roadmap is identified as potentially the most effective measure for long-term security because it addresses the root cause of the conflict:

    • Inter-Religious Dialogue: This point calls for initiating an inter-religious dialogue to “change the mental state” (“ज़हनी काया पलट”) of Israelis and Palestinians,eliminate mutual hatred, and highlight the benefits of peace. The sources emphasize that religious hatred is the “root of all bloodletting and unrest,” and without addressing this fundamental issue, all other schemes will fail.

    Trump Gaza Roadmap: Inter-Religious Dialogue and Peace

    The inter-religious dialogue is outlined as a specific provision within the Trump Gaza Roadmap (Gaza Ceasefire Plan). It is featured as Point 18 of the 20-point proposal.

    Purpose and Importance

    The sources highlight the inter-religious dialogue as potentially the “most beneficial” or “most beautiful” aspect of the entire roadmap.

    The dialogue is intended to address the root cause of the conflict:

    • Eliminating Hatred: The primary purpose of the inter-religious dialogue is to initiate a process that will “change the mental state” (“ज़हनी काया पलट”) of Israelis and Palestinians. The goal is toeliminate mutual hatred and highlight the benefits of peace.
    • Addressing the Root Cause: The sources stress that religious hatred is the “root of all bloodletting and unrest” (“तमामतर खून रेजी फसाद की जड़ यही मजहबी मुनाफरत है”)Necessity for Success: The source material explicitly states that unless this religious aspect is addressed through true improvement and cleansing (“शरी बेहतरी और सफाई”), all other schemes and plans will fail (“आप लाख स्कीमें बना लें सब फेल हो जाएंगी”).

    Implementation

    The plan stipulates that an inter-religious dialogue process will be started to:

    • Transform the mindset of Israelis and Palestinians.

    Intellectually and mentally expose the benefits of peace (“ज़हनी फिक्री तौर पर अमन के फ़वायद उजागर किए जा सके”).

    इंसानों के नाम अफजार रिहान खजा जंगबंदी मंसूबा कामयाब या नाकाम 64,000 इंसानों को मरवाने के बाद बिल आखिर आलमी दबाव पर अमेरिकी प्रेसिडेंट डोनाल्ड ट्रंप ने आठ इस्लामिक अरब मुालिक की मुशावरत से अपना 20 नकाती गजा अमन रोड मैप पेश कर दिया है इन आठ मुालिक में तीन गैर अरब टर्किया इंडोनेशिया और पाकिस्तान है जबकि सऊदी अरब इजिप्ट जॉर्डन कतर और यूनाइटेड अरब अमरात समेत पांच अरब मुालिक शामिल हैं जिन्होंने प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप की टीम जिसमें इनके दामाद जर्ड कुशनर भी शामिल है के साथ मिलकर गजा रोड मैप के 21 पॉइंट तैयार किए जिन्हें इसराइल से मनवाने के लिए 20 नकाती मंसूबा बना दिया गया है या करार दिया गया है इन आठ मुालिक के फॉरेन मिनिस्टरर्स ने अपने मुश्तका इलामिया या जॉइंट डिक्लेरेशन में ट्रंप के गजा असीज फायर रोड मैप की भरपूर हिमायत करते हुए उसे ख्ते में अमनो सलामती के लिए नागजीर या कली करार दिया है जिसे आगे बढ़ाने के लिए मजीद बातचीत की गुंजाइश भी रखी है ट्रंप का यह गजा अमन रोड मैप है क्या इसके 20 पॉइंट्स का जायजा लेने के साथ इस अम्र पर बहस जरूरी है कि यह किस कदर काबिले अमल है और क्या इसके नतीजे में गज़ा की खून रेज़ी वाकई बंद हो जाएगी इससे फ़स्तीनी आवाम को क्या मिलेगा क्या यह मंसूबा दो रियासती हाल में मुआवनत करेगा क्या बशूल हमास आम अरब और मुस्लिम आवाम इसकी मुखालफत में कहीं अपनी ही रियासतों या हुकूमतों के खिलाफ खड़े तो नहीं हो जाएंगे क्या यह इब्राहिम अकाट की ही तौसी शक्ल नहीं है जो मुस्लिम अरब रियासतों के लिए इसराइल को तस्लीम करवाने की तरफ ले जाएगी क्या यह लफाजी हमाश जैसी मज़ामती तहरीक को कुचलने और इसराइली ख्वाहिशात को तहफुज़ देने के लिए तो नहीं है सवाल यह है कि खुद पसंदसंद और मुंहज़र इसराइल 64,000 बेगुनाहों को मारते हुए अपने टारगेट सनूस अचीव नहीं कर सका क्या अब वो मुस्लिम फर्सेस को मुस्लिम तहरीक मुज़ामत से लड़वा कर हासिल करना चाहता है जिस तरह लोहे को लोहा काटता है क्या इसी तरह अब मुस्लिम को मुस्लिम काटेगा इस अम्र की क्या गारंटी है कि इसराइल अपने तमाम यमाली छुड़वाने या अपना उल्लू सीधा करवाने के बाद फिलस्तीनियों को ठेंगा दिखाते हुए दीगर मामलात से मुनहरफ़ नहीं हो जाएगा आज इसराइली प्राइम मिनिस्टर ने अमेरिकी प्रेसिडेंट के दबाव पर वाशिंगटन से दोहा काल मिलाते हुए कतरी प्राइम मिनिस्टर से अपने नाजायज हमले की माफी मांगी है कतरी सर जमीन की खिलाफवर्जी और एक सिक्योरिटी गार्ड की हलाकत पर ज़हरे अफसोस करते हुए मरने वाले के खानदान को मुआवजा देने और क़तर पर दोबारा हमला ना करने का अहद किया है लेकिन इस अम्र की क्या गारंटी है कि जब अमकी प्रेशर हटेगा इसराइल अपने इस अहद की पासदारी करते हुए आइंदा किसी दूसरे अरब हमसाए या मुस्लिम मुल्क पर हमलावर नहीं होगा जैसे कि प्रेसिडेंट ट्रंप के साथ मुश्तका प्रेस कॉन्फ्रेंस करते हुए बंचम नितिन याू ने एकदम अंग्रेजी रोक करानी जुबान में अपने हम वतनों को यह यकीनदानी करवाना जरूरी समझा कि इस गजा अमन मंसूबे को कबूल करने का यह मतलब कती नहीं है कि हम ख्ते में दो रियासी हल को कबूल करने जा रहे हैं इसराइल के अंदर आवामी सतह पर मौजूद इस दबाव का दरा किया जा सकता है जो टू स्टेट्स हल की बात भी नहीं सुनना चाहता और यह दरवेश 7 अक्टूबर 2023 से वहम वाज़ करता चला आ रहा है कि इस बदतरीन साने का अफसोसनाक पहलू यह भी है कि अब दोबारा कभी कैंप डेविड या उसका कार्ड जैसा कोई मुयदा इसराइलियों और फिलिस्तीनियों के दरमियान ना हो पाएगा क्योंकि 7 अक्टूबर के रोज मोज़ 1200 बेगुनाह इसराइलियों का ही खून नहीं हुआ बल्कि हर दो फिरकों के बीच रहे स एतमाद का खून भी इसी दिन हो गया नतीजातन अब यहां टू नेशन थ्योरी चलेगी ना टू स्टेट्स हल मुमकिन हो पाएगा अगरचे ट्रंप अमन रोड मैप में आठ इस्लामिक अरब मुालिक की ख्वाहिश के एतराम में 19वां पॉइंट यह वाज़ करता है कि जब गजा की तामीर नौ में पेशरफ्त होगी और फिलस्तीनी अथॉरिटी इस हवाले से इस्लाहात मुकम्मल कर लेगी तब फिलस्तीनी खुद मुख्तार रियासत को कायम करने के इमकानात पैदा हो सकेंगे अमेरिका इसराइल और फिलिस्तीनियों के दरमियान मजाकात शुरू करवाएगा ताकि पुरन बकाए बामी के लिए एक सियासी उफ तय किया जा सके यह अमर बहाल सूरत वाज़ रहना चाहिए कि गजा अमन रोड मैप का बुनियादी मकसद दो बरसों से जारी इस खून रे जंग का खात्मा है जो इतने बेगुनाहों की जाने ले चुकी है जिससे गजा का तोड़ा बुरा बनाया जा चुका है हंसते बंसते शहर और कस्बे खंडरात के ढेर दिखते हैं तबा हाल इंफ्रास्ट्रक्चर में खाम बस्तियों की बातें हो रही थी बल्कि इस नो की तजावीज ज़रे बहस थी कि अगर हमास वाले अपनी बका के लिए अपने आवाम और यमालियों को बतौर ढाल इस्तेमाल कर रहे हैं तो क्यों ना इन आवाम ही को मुख्तलिफ गिरोहों और टुकड़ियों में बांट ते हुए दीगर मुख्तलिफ मुालिक और खतों में बसाने का एतमाम कर दिया जाए नतीजातन इसराइल गजा ही नहीं वेस्ट बैंक का इलाहाक भी अपनी रियासत के साथ कर ले अब कम से कम ट्रंप के इस अमन मंसूबे में यह सराहत वाज़ तौर पर कर दी गई है कि बाबाला पॉइंट नंबर 16 इसराइल ना तो गजा पर कब्जा करेगा और ना ही इसके किसी हिस्से को अपने में जम करेगा इसराइली सिक्योरिटी फर्सेस जैसे ही मरहलावार गजा से इंखला करेंगी इंटरनेशनल डिफेंस फर्सेस मरहला बार इसका कंट्रोल लेते हुए यहां इस्तहकाम कायम करेंगी अगर मास इस अमन रोड मैप को मुस्तरद कर देगी या ताख़री हरबे इख्तियार करेगी तब भी इंटरनेशनल डिफेंस और स्टेबिलिटी फोर्सेस इन खतों में पुर अमन इमदादी कारवाया जारी रखेंगी जो इनके हवाले कर दिए गए होंगे ट्रंप के गजा अमन मंसूबेब का अवली नुक्ता यह है कि गजा को दहशतगर्दी और इंतहाबसंधी से पाक खता बनाया जाएगा जो अपने हमसाइयों इसराइल और इजिप्ट के लिए खतरा ना हो गजा की तामीर नौ की जाएगी ताकि वहां बसने वाले आवाम इससे मुस्तफीद हो सके दरवेश यहां यह अमर वाज़ करना चाहता है कि इस गजा अमन मंसूबे का असल नुकसान ना तो किसी आम फिलिस्तीनी को है और ना इसराइलियों को ना ही किसी आम अरब या गैर अरब को है इसका असल टारगेट सिर्फ और सिर्फ हमास है जिसके टेररिस्टों को अगरचे आम माफी और लाइफ सिक्योरिटी की जमानत दी गई है शक नंबर छह के मुताबिक यमालियों की रिहाई और कैदियों के तबादले की कारवाई होने के बाद हमास के वो अरकान जो पुर अमन बकाए बामी पर राजी हो और हथियार डाल दें उन्हें आम माफी दी जाएगी जो गजा में रहना चाहेंगे और जो छोड़ना चाहेंगे उन्हें महफूज़ रास्ता दिया जाएगा और कबूल करने वाले मुालिक जाने की सहूलत दी जाएगी इसके बावजूद दरवेश का गुमान है कि हमाश क्योंकि इस मंसूबे को अपनी सियासत या ताकत की मौत समझ रही है इसलिए वो उसे मुस्तरद कर सकती है या कर देगी हालांकि यह इसकी बेबसी भी है कि अब उसे कमाू कोई बैरूनी सपोर्ट हासिल नहीं रही सिवाय ईरान के जिसकी रसाई पहले ही कमतर हो चुकी है नीव टर्किया या क़तर भी अब सिवाय महदूद माली इमदाद के कोई ज्यादा ताव करने की पोजीशन में नहीं रहे हां अलबत्ता आवामी सतह पर अरब और गैर अरब मुस्लिम आवाम में मौजूद शिद्दत पसंद गिरोह या तंजीमे एक हद तक अब भी हमास को सपोर्ट कर सकती है या कर रही है इसके बावजूद हमास अपनी बका के लिए ज्यादा देर अपनी मजामती तहरीक जारी नहीं रख पाएगी और खुद इसके लिए यह नादर मौका है कि जो माफी तलाफी मिल रही है इस मौका को जाया ना होने दे जैसे कि श नंबर पांच में वाज़ किया गया है कि अपने 20 जिंदा यर्कमालियों और 24 लाशों को वसूल करने के बाद इसराइल हमास या गजा के 250 ऐसे कैदियों को रिहा कर देगा जिन्हें इनके जरा साबित होने पर इसराइली अदालतों से उम्र कैद की सजाएं सुनाई जा चुकी हैं और 7 अक्टूबर के बाद गिरफ्तार किए गए दीगर 1700 फिलिस्तीनियों को भी रिहा कर दिया जाएगा जिनमें खवातीन और बच्चे भी शामिल होंगे एक इसराइली यमाली की लाश के बदले 15 फिलस्तीनियों की लाशें वापस की जाएंगी शक नंबर 13 के मुताबिक हमास या किसी दूसरे मुशद्द ग्रोह का गजा की हुक्मरानी में बराएरा या बिल वास्ता कोई किरदार नहीं होगा दहशतगर्दी के तमाम अड्डे ढांचे बशूल सुरंगे और हथियार बनाने की फैक्ट्रियां तबाह कर दी जाएंगी गैर जानबदार मुबरीन की निगरानी में असला को नकारा बनाते हुए गजा को गैर मुसल्ला किया जाएगा दरवेश की नजर में इस रोड मैप की सबसे खूबसूरत शिक 18 है जिसके मुताबिक एक इंटर रिलजन डायलॉग का अमल शुरू किया जाएगा ताकि इसराइलियों और फस्तीनियों की ज़हनी काया पलट करते हुए बामी मुनाफरतों को खत्म किया जाए और ज़हनी फिक्री तौर पर अमन के फ़वायद उजागर किए जा सके तमामतर खून रेजी फसाद की जड़ यही मजहबी मुनाफरत है जब तक इस हवाले से शरी बेहतरी और सफाई नहीं होती आप लाख स्कीमें बना लें सब फेल हो जाएंगी

    انسانوں کے نام، اظفر ریحان خازا، جنگ بندی کا منصوبہ، کامیابی یا ناکامی؟ 64 ہزار افراد کو قتل کرنے کے بعد بالآخر عالمی دباؤ میں آکر امریکی صدر ڈونلڈ ٹرمپ نے آٹھ اسلامی عرب ممالک کی مشاورت سے اپنا 20 نکاتی غزہ پیس روڈ میپ پیش کیا۔ ان آٹھ ممالک میں تین غیر عرب ممالک ترکی، انڈونیشیا اور پاکستان شامل ہیں جب کہ پانچ عرب ممالک جن میں سعودی عرب، مصر، اردن، قطر اور متحدہ عرب امارات شامل ہیں، صدر ٹرمپ کی ٹیم کے ساتھ ان کے داماد جیرڈ کشنر کے ساتھ تعاون کیا تاکہ غزہ روڈ میپ کے 21 نکات مرتب کیے جائیں، جن کو اسرائیل نے اپنانے کے لیے متفقہ طور پر اپنایا یا 20 نکات کا منصوبہ بنایا۔ ان آٹھ ممالک کے وزرائے خارجہ نے اپنے مشترکہ اعلامیے میں ٹرمپ کے غزہ پیس روڈ میپ کی بھرپور حمایت کرتے ہوئے اسے خطے میں امن و سلامتی کے لیے سنگ میل قرار دیا ہے اور اسے آگے لے جانے کے لیے مزید مذاکرات کی گنجائش بھی رکھی ہے۔ ٹرمپ کا یہ غزہ پیس روڈ میپ اپنے 20 نکات کا جائزہ لینے کے ساتھ ساتھ اس معاملے پر بحث بھی ضروری ہے کہ یہ کتنا ممکن ہے اور کیا اس سے غزہ میں خونریزی کا صحیح معنوں میں خاتمہ ہو گا۔ اس سے فلسطینی عوام کو کیا فائدہ ہوگا؟ کیا یہ منصوبہ دو ریاستی صورت حال میں مفاہمت کا باعث بنے گا؟ کیا حماس عام عرب اور مسلم عوام کے ساتھ مل کر اپنی ہی ریاستوں یا حکومتوں کے خلاف مخالفت میں اٹھے گی؟ کیا یہ ابراہیم عقات کی اعتکاف نہیں ہے، جو مسلم عرب ریاستوں کو اسرائیل کو قبول کرنے پر لے جائے گا؟ کیا اس بیان بازی کا مقصد حماس جیسی بنیاد پرست تحریک کو کچلنا اور اسرائیلی عزائم کو تحفظ دینا نہیں؟ سوال یہ ہے کہ اسرائیل، جو خود ایک وفادار اور بے رحم اسرائیل ہے، 64000 بے گناہ لوگوں کو مار کر اپنا ہدف کیوں حاصل نہیں کر سکا؟ کیا اب وہ مسلمانوں کی تحریک مزاحمت کو لوہے کے خلاف کھڑا کر کے مسلمانوں کی سرزمین حاصل کرنا چاہتا ہے جس طرح لوہا لوہے کو کاٹتا ہے؟ کیا اب مسلمان اس طرح مسلمانوں کو ماریں گے؟ اس بات کی کیا گارنٹی ہے کہ اسرائیل اپنے تمام یامالوں کو رہا کرنے یا اپنا کام مکمل کرنے کے بعد فلسطینیوں کی طرف آنکھیں بند کرکے دوسرے معاملات کو نظرانداز نہیں کرے گا؟ آج امریکی صدر کے دباؤ پر اسرائیلی وزیر اعظم نے واشنگٹن سے دوحہ فون کر کے غیر قانونی حملے پر قطری وزیر اعظم سے معافی مانگ لی۔ انہوں نے قطری سرزمین کی بے حرمتی اور سیکیورٹی گارڈ کے قتل پر گہرے افسوس کا اظہار کرتے ہوئے مقتول کے اہل خانہ کو معاوضہ دینے اور قطر پر دوبارہ حملہ نہ کرنے کا وعدہ کیا۔ لیکن اس بات کی کیا گارنٹی ہے کہ جب امریکی دباؤ ہٹ جائے گا تو اسرائیل اس وعدے کی پاسداری کرتے ہوئے مستقبل میں کسی دوسرے عرب پڑوسی یا مسلم ملک پر حملہ نہیں کرے گا۔ جس طرح صدر ٹرمپ کے ساتھ مشترکہ پریس کانفرنس کے دوران بنچم نتن یادیو نے انتہائی روکھے انگریزی میں بات کرتے ہوئے اپنے ہم وطنوں کو یہ یقین دلانا ضروری سمجھا کہ غزہ کے اس امن منصوبے کو قبول کرنے کا مطلب یہ نہیں ہے کہ ہم دو ریاستی حل کو قبول کرنے والے ہیں۔ اسرائیل کے اندر عوامی سطح پر موجود دباؤ کو کوئی سمجھ سکتا ہے جو دو ریاستی حل کے بارے میں سننا بھی نہیں چاہتا اور یہ درویش 7 اکتوبر 2023 سے اپنے آپ کو دھوکہ دے رہا ہے۔ اس بدترین صورتحال کا افسوسناک پہلو یہ ہے کہ اب دوبارہ کبھی کیمپ ڈیوڈ یا اس کے کارڈ جیسا کوئی مسئلہ اسرائیلیوں اور فلسطینیوں کے درمیان نہیں ہوگا کیونکہ 7 اکتوبر کو اسرائیل کے درمیان نہ صرف 120 اعتماد کا قتل ہوا بلکہ 120 سے زائد افراد کے درمیان اعتماد کا خاتمہ ہوا۔ اس دن فرقوں کو بھی مارا گیا۔ نتیجے کے طور پر، اب

    یہاں نہ تو دو قومی نظریہ غالب ہو گا اور نہ ہی دو ریاستی حل ممکن ہو گا۔ تاہم ٹرمپ پیس روڈ میپ کے نکتہ نمبر 19 میں اسلامی عرب حکمرانوں کی خواہشات کا احترام کرتے ہوئے کہا گیا ہے کہ جب غزہ 9 ماہ میں مکمل ہو جائے گا اور فلسطینی اتھارٹی اس سلسلے میں اصلاحات مکمل کر لے گی تو فلسطینیوں کو اپنی خود مختار ریاست کے قیام کا امکان ہو گا۔ امریکہ اسرائیل اور فلسطینیوں کے درمیان کشمکش کا آغاز کرے گا تاکہ پرانے بقایاجات کے لیے سیاسی حل تک پہنچا جا سکے۔ خیال رہے کہ غزہ پیس روڈ میپ کا بنیادی مقصد دو سال سے جاری اس خونریز جنگ کو ختم کرنا ہے، جس میں اب تک کئی بے گناہ جانیں جا چکی ہیں، جس کی وجہ سے غزہ تباہی کا شکار ہے۔ کبھی خوشحال شہر اور قصبے کھنڈرات کے ڈھیر لگتے ہیں۔ اس دوران بستیوں کے انفراسٹرکچر میں خامیوں پر بات ہوئی۔ درحقیقت اس نکتے کی تجویز کے بارے میں یہ بحث چل رہی تھی کہ اگر حماس کی افواج اپنی بقا کے لیے اپنے لوگوں کو ہراساں کر رہی ہیں تو وہ ایسا کر سکیں گی۔ اور اگر وہ یمنیوں کو ڈھال کے طور پر استعمال کر رہے ہیں تو پھر کیوں نہ ان لوگوں کو مختلف گروہوں اور دھڑوں میں تقسیم کرکے دوسرے مختلف علاقوں میں ان کی آباد کاری کو یقینی بنایا جائے۔ اس کے نتیجے میں اسرائیل نہ صرف غزہ بلکہ مغربی کنارے کے علاقے کو بھی ضم کر لے گا۔ اب کم از کم ٹرمپ کے امن منصوبے میں یہ واضح کر دیا گیا ہے کہ اسرائیل نہ تو غزہ پر قبضہ کرے گا اور نہ ہی اس کے کسی حصے کو الحاق کرے گا۔ جیسے ہی اسرائیلی سکیورٹی فورسز ایک ایک کر کے غزہ سے نکلیں گی، بین الاقوامی دفاعی افواج آہستہ آہستہ اس کا کنٹرول سنبھالیں گی اور یہاں استحکام قائم کر لیں گی۔ یہاں تک کہ اگر امریکہ اس امن روڈ میپ کو مسترد کرتا ہے یا کوئی عارضی اقدام اختیار کرتا ہے تو بھی بین الاقوامی دفاعی اور استحکام کی افواج ان علاقوں میں اپنی امن امدادی کارروائیاں جاری رکھیں گی جو ان کے حوالے کیے گئے ہیں۔ ٹرمپ کے غزہ امن منصوبے کا بنیادی نکتہ یہ ہے کہ غزہ کو دہشت گردی اور انتہا پسندی سے پاک ایک خالص علاقہ بنایا جائے گا جس سے اس کے ہمسایہ ممالک اسرائیل اور مصر کو کوئی خطرہ نہیں ہوگا۔ غزہ کو دوبارہ تعمیر کیا جائے گا تاکہ وہاں کے رہنے والے اس سے مستفید ہو سکیں۔ درویش یہاں ایک لافانی اعلان کرنا چاہتا ہے کہ غزہ کے اس امن منصوبے کا اصل نقصان نہ تو کسی عام فلسطینی کو ہے، نہ اسرائیلیوں کو، نہ کسی عام عرب یا غیر عرب کو۔ اس کا اصل ہدف صرف حماس ہے جس کے دہشت گردوں کو عام معافی اور جان کی حفاظت دی گئی ہے۔ شک نمبر چھ کے مطابق یمنیوں کی رہائی اور قیدیوں کی منتقلی کے بعد حماس کے وہ ارکان جو مکمل امن اور ہتھیار ڈالنے پر رضامند ہوں گے انہیں عام معافی دی جائے گی۔ جو لوگ غزہ میں رہنا چاہتے ہیں اور جو لوگ وہاں سے نکلنا چاہتے ہیں انہیں محفوظ راستہ دیا جائے گا اور انہیں قبول کرنے والے ملک جانے کی سہولت دی جائے گی۔ اس کے باوجود درویش کو یقین ہے کہ حماس اس منصوبے کو اپنی سیاست یا اقتدار کی موت سمجھے گی۔ اس لیے یہ اسے ترک کر سکتا ہے یا کر سکتا ہے۔ تاہم یہ اس لحاظ سے بھی بے بس ہے کہ اسے اب ایران کے علاوہ کوئی بیرونی حمایت حاصل نہیں ہے جس کا اثر پہلے ہی کم ہو چکا ہے۔ نہ ہی ترکی اور نہ ہی قطر محدود مالی امداد کے علاوہ زیادہ اثر و رسوخ استعمال کرنے کی پوزیشن میں ہیں۔ تاہم عوامی سطح پر عرب اور غیر عرب مسلمانوں کے بنیاد پرست گروہ اور تنظیمیں حماس کی کسی حد تک حمایت کر سکتی ہیں یا کر رہی ہیں۔ اس کے باوجود حماس اپنے آپ کو بچانے کے لیے زیادہ دیر تک اپنی عسکری تحریک جاری نہیں رکھ سکے گی۔ یہ اس کے لیے ایک اہم موقع ہے کہ وہ جو معافی وصول کر رہی ہے اسے ضائع نہ ہونے دیں۔ جیسا کہ پیراگراف پانچ میں کہا گیا ہے، اپنی 20 زندہ اور 24 لاشیں برآمد کرنے کے بعد، اسرائیل حماس یا غزہ کے 250 قیدیوں کو رہا کرے گا جنہیں اسرائیلی عدالتوں نے سزا کے بعد عمر قید کی سزا سنائی ہے۔ بعد ازاں گرفتار کیے گئے 1700 دیگر فلسطینیوں کو بھی رہا کر دیا جائے گا جن میں خواتین اور بچے بھی شامل ہیں۔ ایک اسرائیلی کی لاش کے بدلے 15 فلسطینیوں کی لاشیں واپس کی جائیں گی۔ شک نمبر 13 کے مطابق حماس یا کسی دوسرے جنگجو گروپ کا غزہ کی حکمرانی میں براہ راست یا بالواسطہ کوئی کردار نہیں ہوگا۔ دہشت گردی کے تمام ٹھکانے، ڈھانچے، سرنگیں اور اسلحہ بنانے والی فیکٹریوں کو تباہ کر دیا جائے گا۔ غزہ کو غیر مسلم قرار دیا جائے گا، غیر جان لیوا مبصرین کی نگرانی میں ہتھیاروں کو غیر موثر کر دیا جائے گا۔ درویش کے خیال میں اس روڈ میپ کا سب سے خوبصورت پہلو شک نمبر 18 ہے جس کے مطابق اسرائیلیوں اور فلسطینیوں کی ذہنی حالت کو بدلنے، بنیادی اختلافات کو ختم کرنے اور امن کے فوائد کو ذہنی نقطہ نظر سے اجاگر کرنے کے لیے بین المذاہب مکالمے کا آغاز کیا جائے گا۔ یہ مذہبی منافرت سب سے زیادہ خونریزی اور تشدد کی جڑ ہے۔ جب تک یہ مسئلہ حل نہیں ہو گا، سماجی اصلاح کے میدان میں کوئی پیش رفت نہیں ہو گی۔ اور اگر صفائی نہ ہو تو لاکھوں سکیمیں بنا لیں سب ناکام ہو جائیں گی۔

  • Saudi Arabia’s Role in Gaza Ceasefire Agreement by Ibrahim Al-Nahaas – Al-Riyaaz

    Saudi Arabia’s Role in Gaza Ceasefire Agreement by Ibrahim Al-Nahaas – Al-Riyaaz

    Saudi Arabia’s leadership played a crucial role in brokering a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip in January 2025, ending a fifteen-month conflict that began in October 2023. This accomplishment stemmed from significant diplomatic efforts, including Arab-Islamic summits convened by Saudi Arabia. The agreement aims to achieve a lasting peace, including the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. The Saudi government emphasizes the importance of adhering to the ceasefire and addressing the underlying issues of the conflict to secure Palestinian rights. This success is viewed as a testament to Saudi Arabia’s commitment to the Palestinian cause.

    Saudi Arabia’s Role in the 2025 Gaza Ceasefire Agreement

    Study Guide

    Short Answer Questions:

    1. What specific event does the source text primarily focus on, and when did it occur?
    2. According to the source, what motivated Saudi Arabia’s involvement in addressing the conflict?
    3. How did Saudi Arabia attempt to unify the Arab and Islamic world in response to the conflict? What were two specific actions taken?
    4. What role did other countries or organizations play in the eventual ceasefire agreement, as acknowledged by the source?
    5. Beyond the immediate ceasefire, what long-term goal does the source emphasize for the Palestinian people?
    6. What specific casualty figures are cited in the source regarding the conflict?
    7. How does the source characterize Saudi Arabia’s approach to the Palestinian cause compared to “other societies”?
    8. What historical context is provided to highlight the long-standing nature of the Palestinian issue?
    9. How does the source depict the leadership style and actions of King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman?
    10. What is the main argument or message that the source aims to convey to the reader?

    Answer Key:

    1. The source text focuses on the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, which occurred in January 2025.
    2. Saudi Arabia’s involvement was motivated by its commitment to the Palestinian cause, based on its Arab and Islamic values, and its belief in human rights and dignity.
    3. Saudi Arabia hosted two Arab-Islamic summit conferences, one in November 2023 and another in November 2024, to unify the Arab and Islamic world in response to the conflict.
    4. The source acknowledges the efforts of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States in achieving the ceasefire agreement.
    5. Beyond the ceasefire, the source emphasizes the long-term goal of establishing an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.
    6. The source cites over 45,000 martyrs and more than 100,000 wounded as casualties of the conflict.
    7. The source contrasts Saudi Arabia’s genuine support for the Palestinian cause with “other societies” that exploit Arab and Islamic issues for political gains.
    8. The source highlights the historical context of the Palestinian struggle, mentioning that it has been ongoing for eight decades.
    9. The source depicts King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as wise, competent, and deeply committed to the Palestinian cause.
    10. The main message of the source is to highlight Saudi Arabia’s leadership role in achieving the 2025 Gaza ceasefire agreement and its ongoing commitment to the Palestinian cause.

    Essay Questions:

    1. Analyze the source’s portrayal of Saudi Arabia’s role in the 2025 Gaza ceasefire. To what extent is this portrayal objective and balanced? Consider potential biases or omissions.
    2. Discuss the source’s emphasis on the “centrality of the Palestinian cause” at various levels. What is the significance of this framing, and what implications does it have for international relations and diplomacy?
    3. Evaluate the effectiveness of Saudi Arabia’s approach to resolving the conflict, as described in the source. What were the strengths and limitations of its strategy?
    4. Compare and contrast the roles and interests of the different international actors mentioned in the source, including Qatar, Egypt, and the United States. How did their involvement contribute to or complicate the situation?
    5. Based on the information provided in the source, what are the prospects for a lasting peace between Israel and Palestine? What challenges and opportunities do you foresee in the future?

    Glossary of Key Terms:

    • Aggression: In this context, refers to the Israeli military actions against the Gaza Strip.
    • Ceasefire Agreement: A formal agreement to stop fighting or hostilities.
    • Centrality of the Palestinian Cause: The idea that the Palestinian issue is of paramount importance in Arab, Islamic, and international affairs.
    • Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques: An honorific title used by the King of Saudi Arabia, signifying his role as protector of the holy cities of Mecca and Medina.
    • Gaza Strip: A Palestinian territory located on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea.
    • Independent Palestinian State: The goal of establishing a sovereign and independent state for the Palestinian people.
    • Israeli Occupation: Refers to Israel’s control over Palestinian territories since the 1967 Six-Day War.
    • Martyrs: Individuals who have died in the conflict, often used to emphasize their sacrifice.
    • Summit Conference: A high-level meeting of leaders to discuss important issues.
    • 1967 Borders: The boundary lines that existed between Israel and the Palestinian territories before the Six-Day War.

    Briefing Document: Saudi Arabia’s Role in the 2025 Gaza Ceasefire Agreement

    This briefing document analyzes the main themes and key facts presented in the provided excerpt regarding the cessation of hostilities in the Gaza Strip in January 2025. The source, which appears to be an official statement or commentary originating from Saudi Arabia, emphasizes the instrumental role of the Kingdom in achieving the ceasefire.

    Main Themes:

    1. Saudi Leadership in Arab-Islamic Unity: The source consistently highlights the pivotal role of Saudi Arabia, under the leadership of King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, in unifying Arab and Islamic efforts to address the Israeli aggression in Gaza. This unity, demonstrated through two Arab-Islamic summits in 2023 and 2024, is presented as a crucial factor leading to the ceasefire agreement.
    2. “The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip…represents a genuine fruit of the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”
    3. Centrality of the Palestinian Cause: The document underscores the importance of the Palestinian issue for Saudi Arabia, both regionally and internationally. It frames the Kingdom’s efforts as a defense of Palestinian rights and a pursuit of justice for the Palestinian people.
    4. “The wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia emphasizes the centrality of the Palestinian cause at all Arab, Islamic and international levels”
    5. Ceasefire as a Stepping Stone: While celebrating the end of hostilities, the source emphasizes that the agreement is only the first step towards a more comprehensive solution. The ultimate goal remains the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.
    6. “The Kingdom stresses the importance of building on this agreement to address the basis of the conflict by enabling the brotherly Palestinian people to obtain their rights, foremost of which is the establishment of their independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.”

    Key Facts and Information:

    • Timeline: The Israeli aggression on Gaza began on October 7, 2023, and lasted for fifteen months, culminating in the ceasefire agreement on January 15, 2025.
    • Casualties: The conflict resulted in a heavy toll, with over 45,000 martyrs and more than 100,000 wounded.
    • Diplomatic Efforts: Saudi Arabia convened two Arab-Islamic summits, in November 2023 and November 2024, to galvanize support for the Palestinian cause and pressure Israel to cease its aggression.
    • International Collaboration: The source acknowledges the efforts of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States in facilitating the ceasefire agreement.

    Analysis:

    The document presents a narrative that underscores Saudi Arabia’s leading role in achieving the ceasefire agreement in Gaza. It emphasizes the Kingdom’s commitment to the Palestinian cause and portrays the agreement as a victory for Arab-Islamic unity. However, it’s important to note that this is a single perspective and further research into various sources is necessary for a more nuanced understanding of the events and the various actors involved.

    FAQ: The 2025 Gaza Ceasefire Agreement

    1. What event marked a significant step towards peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in January 2025?

    The signing of the ceasefire agreement on January 15, 2025, brought an end to the fifteen-month Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, which began on October 7, 2023. This agreement represents a critical milestone in the pursuit of peace in the region.

    2. What role did Saudi Arabia play in achieving the ceasefire?

    Saudi Arabia played a pivotal leadership role in achieving the ceasefire. The Kingdom spearheaded joint Arab and Islamic efforts, convening two Arab-Islamic summits in November 2023 and 2024 to unify support for the Palestinian cause and advocate for an end to the aggression on Gaza. Their diplomatic efforts, combined with their long-standing support for the Palestinian people, were instrumental in reaching the agreement.

    3. What are the key terms of the ceasefire agreement?

    The agreement mandates a complete cessation of hostilities, a withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip, and the return of displaced Palestinians to their homes. It also emphasizes the need for a lasting solution based on enabling the Palestinian people to obtain their rights, including the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

    4. What are the hopes for the future following this agreement?

    The agreement is seen as a foundation for addressing the root causes of the conflict. It is hoped that it will lead to a permanent end to the violence and pave the way for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

    5. What were the human costs of the conflict in Gaza?

    The brutal conflict that lasted for over fifteen months resulted in a tragic loss of life, with over 45,000 martyrs and more than 100,000 wounded. The ceasefire agreement aims to prevent further suffering and loss.

    6. How does Saudi Arabia view its role in supporting the Palestinian cause?

    Saudi Arabia considers supporting the Palestinian cause as a core principle rooted in its Arab and Islamic values. The Kingdom believes in upholding human rights and dignity and seeks to achieve a just and lasting solution through diplomacy and international cooperation.

    7. What other countries played a role in brokering the ceasefire?

    The State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, and the United States of America also played significant roles in mediating and facilitating the ceasefire agreement. Their collaborative efforts contributed to the success of the peace process.

    8. What is the overall message emphasized in the aftermath of the ceasefire?

    The agreement underscores the importance of unity and collaboration among Arab and Islamic nations in supporting the Palestinian cause. It also highlights the need for a comprehensive and enduring solution that ensures the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people and leads to a peaceful future for the region.

    Saudi Arabia’s Role in Ending Gaza Conflict

    The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025 represents a genuine fruit of the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [1]. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia worked alongside Arab and Islamic countries to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip that began on October 7, 2023, and lasted for fifteen months [1]. Saudi Arabia’s leadership in defending the Palestinian cause and stopping the aggression against the Palestinian people escalated since the beginning of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip [1]. Saudi Arabia hosted two Arab-Islamic summits, one on November 11, 2023, and another on November 11, 2024, to reaffirm the centrality of the Palestinian cause, stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, and demand the lifting of injustice against the Palestinian people [1]. The efforts of Saudi Arabia and other Arab and Islamic countries resulted in an agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip on January 15, 2025 [1]. The agreement is a great achievement for Saudi Arabia, which reaffirms the necessity of defending the Palestinian cause until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital [1].

    Saudi Arabia Welcomes Gaza Ceasefire Agreement

    The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, which lasted fifteen months starting from October 7, 2023, was reached on January 15, 2025. [1] The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia welcomed the ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip and expressed appreciation for the efforts made by the State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, and the United States of America to reach the agreement. [1] The Kingdom stressed the necessity of adhering to the agreement, stopping the Israeli aggression on Gaza, the complete withdrawal of the Israeli occupation forces from the Strip and all other Palestinian and Arab territories, and the return of the displaced to their areas. [1] The Kingdom also stressed the importance of building on this agreement to address the basis of the conflict by enabling the Palestinian people to obtain their rights, foremost of which is the establishment of their independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. [1] The agreement is hoped to permanently end the war, which has claimed more than 45 thousand martyrs and more than 100 thousand wounded. [1]

    Palestinian Statehood: A 2025 Agreement

    The establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital is a key goal of the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025. [1] The agreement, reached with Saudi Arabia leading the joint Arab and Islamic work, is a step towards achieving this goal. [1] The agreement is hoped to build on the ceasefire and address the basis of the conflict by enabling the Palestinian people to obtain their rights, foremost of which is the establishment of their independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. [1]

    Arab-Islamic Unity and the Gaza Truce

    The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025 is a result of the unity of Arab and Islamic countries [1, 2]. The agreement, led by Saudi Arabia, is a demonstration of the joint Arab and Islamic work to defend the Palestinian cause [1, 2]. The first Arab-Islamic summit, held on November 11, 2023, was able to unify the ranks, words, and Arab and Islamic efforts in defending the Palestinian cause at all international and global levels [1].

    Ending Israeli Aggression in Gaza

    The agreement to stop Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip was reached on January 15, 2025, after fifteen months of aggression that began on October 7, 2023 [1]. The Israeli aggression resulted in more than 45,000 martyrs and more than 100,000 wounded [1]. Saudi Arabia, along with other Arab and Islamic countries, worked to stop the Israeli aggression and achieve a ceasefire [1]. The agreement that resulted from these efforts stresses the necessity of adhering to the agreement and stopping the Israeli aggression on Gaza [1]. The agreement also calls for the complete withdrawal of the Israeli occupation forces from the Strip and all other Palestinian and Arab territories, as well as the return of the displaced to their areas [1].

    The Original Text

    The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025 represents a genuine fruit of the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its wise leadership – may God protect it – with all wisdom and competence, and will continue until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital..

    On January 15, 2025, the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip was completed, which lasted for fifteen months starting from October 7, 2023. With the signing of this agreement, which stops the Israeli crimes and immoral against the Gaza Strip and its sons from the Palestinian people, the great political efforts made by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in order to serve the Palestinian cause, and to demand the lifting of injustice and the cessation of aggression against the sons of the honorable Palestinian people throughout its history extending for eight decades until the present time, are recalled once again. Yes, if the records of history bear witness to the honor and pride of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for its great stance in supporting the Palestinian cause and advocating and backing the Palestinian people at all political, diplomatic, economic, material, financial and humanitarian levels, then the records of the present and future will bear witness to the chivalry, loyalty, sincerity and magnanimity of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia towards supporting the Palestinian cause and the constant endeavor to support and back the sons of the Palestinian people, based on the wise directives of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, and His Highness the Crown Prince, Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud – may God protect them. Yes, while the wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia emphasizes the centrality of the Palestinian cause at all Arab, Islamic and international levels.

    it has been extremely keen on the necessity of stopping the successive Israeli attacks on the Palestinian people in all Palestinian territories, and the level of this keenness has escalated since the beginning of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip on October 7, 2023. In its constant endeavor to maintain the centrality of the Palestinian cause in international politics and stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, the wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia invited the leaders of Arab and Islamic countries to a summit conference to discuss the Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip. In response to the generous invitation of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud – may God protect him – the extraordinary Arab-Islamic summit was held on November 11, 2023, one month after the beginning of the Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip on October 7, 2023. This summit was able to unify the ranks, words and Arab and Islamic efforts in defending the Palestinian cause at all international and global levels.

    In confirmation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s leadership in defending the Palestinian cause and stopping the aggression against the honorable Palestinian people, the wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia called for a second Arab-Islamic summit on November 11, 2024 to reaffirm the centrality of the Palestinian cause and the necessity of stopping the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, and to demand the lifting of injustice against its sons from the Palestinian people. Yes, these are great efforts made by the wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and it has harnessed great capabilities and resources, believing in the justice of the Palestinian cause and the right of the Palestinian people to reside in their state and live in it with dignity like other peoples who have obtained their full rights.

    If these hopes and future aspirations are what the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is working on and emphasizing in all international and global forums, then its great efforts, in conjunction with Arab and Islamic countries, have resulted in an agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip on January 15, 2025. Yes, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is making great efforts to defend the Palestinian cause based on the authenticity of its Arab and Islamic values, and its belief in constructive and sublime principles that are fully compatible with the rules of international law that preserve human rights and dignity. This is what distinguishes it from other societies that employ Arab and Islamic issues to achieve political gains aimed at serving a party, doctrine, or sect. If the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip represents a great achievement credited to the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, then this great achievement reaffirms once again the necessity of constantly striving to defend the Palestinian cause until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. This is what was keen on and confirmed by the statement issued on January 15, 2025 by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which stated the following:

    “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs expresses the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s welcome of the ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip, and appreciates the efforts made by the State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, and the United States of America in this regard. The Kingdom stresses the necessity of adhering to the agreement and stopping the Israeli aggression on Gaza, and the complete withdrawal of the Israeli occupation forces from the Strip and all other Palestinian and Arab territories, and the return of the displaced to their areas. It also stresses the importance of building on this agreement to address the basis of the conflict by enabling the brotherly Palestinian people to obtain their rights, foremost of which is the establishment of their independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. The Kingdom hopes that this agreement will permanently end this brutal Israeli war that has claimed more than 45 thousand martyrs, and more than 100 thousand wounded.”.

    In conclusion, it is important to say that the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025 represents an authentic fruit of the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its wise leadership – may God protect it – with all wisdom and competence, and will continue until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. Yes, the unity of ranks, words and position – Arab and Islamic – towards the Palestinian issue

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

    Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!

  • Saudi Arabia’s Role in Gaza Ceasefire Agreement by Ibrahim Al-Nahaas – Al-Riyaaz

    Saudi Arabia’s Role in Gaza Ceasefire Agreement by Ibrahim Al-Nahaas – Al-Riyaaz

    Saudi Arabia’s leadership played a crucial role in brokering a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip in January 2025, ending a fifteen-month conflict that began in October 2023. This accomplishment stemmed from significant diplomatic efforts, including Arab-Islamic summits convened by Saudi Arabia. The agreement aims to achieve a lasting peace, including the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. The Saudi government emphasizes the importance of adhering to the ceasefire and addressing the underlying issues of the conflict to secure Palestinian rights. This success is viewed as a testament to Saudi Arabia’s commitment to the Palestinian cause.

    Saudi Arabia’s Role in the 2025 Gaza Ceasefire Agreement

    Study Guide

    Short Answer Questions:

    1. What specific event does the source text primarily focus on, and when did it occur?
    2. According to the source, what motivated Saudi Arabia’s involvement in addressing the conflict?
    3. How did Saudi Arabia attempt to unify the Arab and Islamic world in response to the conflict? What were two specific actions taken?
    4. What role did other countries or organizations play in the eventual ceasefire agreement, as acknowledged by the source?
    5. Beyond the immediate ceasefire, what long-term goal does the source emphasize for the Palestinian people?
    6. What specific casualty figures are cited in the source regarding the conflict?
    7. How does the source characterize Saudi Arabia’s approach to the Palestinian cause compared to “other societies”?
    8. What historical context is provided to highlight the long-standing nature of the Palestinian issue?
    9. How does the source depict the leadership style and actions of King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman?
    10. What is the main argument or message that the source aims to convey to the reader?

    Answer Key:

    1. The source text focuses on the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, which occurred in January 2025.
    2. Saudi Arabia’s involvement was motivated by its commitment to the Palestinian cause, based on its Arab and Islamic values, and its belief in human rights and dignity.
    3. Saudi Arabia hosted two Arab-Islamic summit conferences, one in November 2023 and another in November 2024, to unify the Arab and Islamic world in response to the conflict.
    4. The source acknowledges the efforts of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States in achieving the ceasefire agreement.
    5. Beyond the ceasefire, the source emphasizes the long-term goal of establishing an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.
    6. The source cites over 45,000 martyrs and more than 100,000 wounded as casualties of the conflict.
    7. The source contrasts Saudi Arabia’s genuine support for the Palestinian cause with “other societies” that exploit Arab and Islamic issues for political gains.
    8. The source highlights the historical context of the Palestinian struggle, mentioning that it has been ongoing for eight decades.
    9. The source depicts King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman as wise, competent, and deeply committed to the Palestinian cause.
    10. The main message of the source is to highlight Saudi Arabia’s leadership role in achieving the 2025 Gaza ceasefire agreement and its ongoing commitment to the Palestinian cause.

    Essay Questions:

    1. Analyze the source’s portrayal of Saudi Arabia’s role in the 2025 Gaza ceasefire. To what extent is this portrayal objective and balanced? Consider potential biases or omissions.
    2. Discuss the source’s emphasis on the “centrality of the Palestinian cause” at various levels. What is the significance of this framing, and what implications does it have for international relations and diplomacy?
    3. Evaluate the effectiveness of Saudi Arabia’s approach to resolving the conflict, as described in the source. What were the strengths and limitations of its strategy?
    4. Compare and contrast the roles and interests of the different international actors mentioned in the source, including Qatar, Egypt, and the United States. How did their involvement contribute to or complicate the situation?
    5. Based on the information provided in the source, what are the prospects for a lasting peace between Israel and Palestine? What challenges and opportunities do you foresee in the future?

    Glossary of Key Terms:

    • Aggression: In this context, refers to the Israeli military actions against the Gaza Strip.
    • Ceasefire Agreement: A formal agreement to stop fighting or hostilities.
    • Centrality of the Palestinian Cause: The idea that the Palestinian issue is of paramount importance in Arab, Islamic, and international affairs.
    • Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques: An honorific title used by the King of Saudi Arabia, signifying his role as protector of the holy cities of Mecca and Medina.
    • Gaza Strip: A Palestinian territory located on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea.
    • Independent Palestinian State: The goal of establishing a sovereign and independent state for the Palestinian people.
    • Israeli Occupation: Refers to Israel’s control over Palestinian territories since the 1967 Six-Day War.
    • Martyrs: Individuals who have died in the conflict, often used to emphasize their sacrifice.
    • Summit Conference: A high-level meeting of leaders to discuss important issues.
    • 1967 Borders: The boundary lines that existed between Israel and the Palestinian territories before the Six-Day War.

    Briefing Document: Saudi Arabia’s Role in the 2025 Gaza Ceasefire Agreement

    This briefing document analyzes the main themes and key facts presented in the provided excerpt regarding the cessation of hostilities in the Gaza Strip in January 2025. The source, which appears to be an official statement or commentary originating from Saudi Arabia, emphasizes the instrumental role of the Kingdom in achieving the ceasefire.

    Main Themes:

    1. Saudi Leadership in Arab-Islamic Unity: The source consistently highlights the pivotal role of Saudi Arabia, under the leadership of King Salman and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, in unifying Arab and Islamic efforts to address the Israeli aggression in Gaza. This unity, demonstrated through two Arab-Islamic summits in 2023 and 2024, is presented as a crucial factor leading to the ceasefire agreement.
    2. “The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip…represents a genuine fruit of the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia”
    3. Centrality of the Palestinian Cause: The document underscores the importance of the Palestinian issue for Saudi Arabia, both regionally and internationally. It frames the Kingdom’s efforts as a defense of Palestinian rights and a pursuit of justice for the Palestinian people.
    4. “The wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia emphasizes the centrality of the Palestinian cause at all Arab, Islamic and international levels”
    5. Ceasefire as a Stepping Stone: While celebrating the end of hostilities, the source emphasizes that the agreement is only the first step towards a more comprehensive solution. The ultimate goal remains the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.
    6. “The Kingdom stresses the importance of building on this agreement to address the basis of the conflict by enabling the brotherly Palestinian people to obtain their rights, foremost of which is the establishment of their independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.”

    Key Facts and Information:

    • Timeline: The Israeli aggression on Gaza began on October 7, 2023, and lasted for fifteen months, culminating in the ceasefire agreement on January 15, 2025.
    • Casualties: The conflict resulted in a heavy toll, with over 45,000 martyrs and more than 100,000 wounded.
    • Diplomatic Efforts: Saudi Arabia convened two Arab-Islamic summits, in November 2023 and November 2024, to galvanize support for the Palestinian cause and pressure Israel to cease its aggression.
    • International Collaboration: The source acknowledges the efforts of Qatar, Egypt, and the United States in facilitating the ceasefire agreement.

    Analysis:

    The document presents a narrative that underscores Saudi Arabia’s leading role in achieving the ceasefire agreement in Gaza. It emphasizes the Kingdom’s commitment to the Palestinian cause and portrays the agreement as a victory for Arab-Islamic unity. However, it’s important to note that this is a single perspective and further research into various sources is necessary for a more nuanced understanding of the events and the various actors involved.

    FAQ: The 2025 Gaza Ceasefire Agreement

    1. What event marked a significant step towards peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in January 2025?

    The signing of the ceasefire agreement on January 15, 2025, brought an end to the fifteen-month Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, which began on October 7, 2023. This agreement represents a critical milestone in the pursuit of peace in the region.

    2. What role did Saudi Arabia play in achieving the ceasefire?

    Saudi Arabia played a pivotal leadership role in achieving the ceasefire. The Kingdom spearheaded joint Arab and Islamic efforts, convening two Arab-Islamic summits in November 2023 and 2024 to unify support for the Palestinian cause and advocate for an end to the aggression on Gaza. Their diplomatic efforts, combined with their long-standing support for the Palestinian people, were instrumental in reaching the agreement.

    3. What are the key terms of the ceasefire agreement?

    The agreement mandates a complete cessation of hostilities, a withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip, and the return of displaced Palestinians to their homes. It also emphasizes the need for a lasting solution based on enabling the Palestinian people to obtain their rights, including the establishment of an independent Palestinian state.

    4. What are the hopes for the future following this agreement?

    The agreement is seen as a foundation for addressing the root causes of the conflict. It is hoped that it will lead to a permanent end to the violence and pave the way for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

    5. What were the human costs of the conflict in Gaza?

    The brutal conflict that lasted for over fifteen months resulted in a tragic loss of life, with over 45,000 martyrs and more than 100,000 wounded. The ceasefire agreement aims to prevent further suffering and loss.

    6. How does Saudi Arabia view its role in supporting the Palestinian cause?

    Saudi Arabia considers supporting the Palestinian cause as a core principle rooted in its Arab and Islamic values. The Kingdom believes in upholding human rights and dignity and seeks to achieve a just and lasting solution through diplomacy and international cooperation.

    7. What other countries played a role in brokering the ceasefire?

    The State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, and the United States of America also played significant roles in mediating and facilitating the ceasefire agreement. Their collaborative efforts contributed to the success of the peace process.

    8. What is the overall message emphasized in the aftermath of the ceasefire?

    The agreement underscores the importance of unity and collaboration among Arab and Islamic nations in supporting the Palestinian cause. It also highlights the need for a comprehensive and enduring solution that ensures the rights and dignity of the Palestinian people and leads to a peaceful future for the region.

    Saudi Arabia’s Role in Ending Gaza Conflict

    The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025 represents a genuine fruit of the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [1]. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia worked alongside Arab and Islamic countries to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip that began on October 7, 2023, and lasted for fifteen months [1]. Saudi Arabia’s leadership in defending the Palestinian cause and stopping the aggression against the Palestinian people escalated since the beginning of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip [1]. Saudi Arabia hosted two Arab-Islamic summits, one on November 11, 2023, and another on November 11, 2024, to reaffirm the centrality of the Palestinian cause, stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, and demand the lifting of injustice against the Palestinian people [1]. The efforts of Saudi Arabia and other Arab and Islamic countries resulted in an agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip on January 15, 2025 [1]. The agreement is a great achievement for Saudi Arabia, which reaffirms the necessity of defending the Palestinian cause until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital [1].

    Saudi Arabia Welcomes Gaza Ceasefire Agreement

    The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, which lasted fifteen months starting from October 7, 2023, was reached on January 15, 2025. [1] The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia welcomed the ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip and expressed appreciation for the efforts made by the State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, and the United States of America to reach the agreement. [1] The Kingdom stressed the necessity of adhering to the agreement, stopping the Israeli aggression on Gaza, the complete withdrawal of the Israeli occupation forces from the Strip and all other Palestinian and Arab territories, and the return of the displaced to their areas. [1] The Kingdom also stressed the importance of building on this agreement to address the basis of the conflict by enabling the Palestinian people to obtain their rights, foremost of which is the establishment of their independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. [1] The agreement is hoped to permanently end the war, which has claimed more than 45 thousand martyrs and more than 100 thousand wounded. [1]

    Palestinian Statehood: A 2025 Agreement

    The establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital is a key goal of the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025. [1] The agreement, reached with Saudi Arabia leading the joint Arab and Islamic work, is a step towards achieving this goal. [1] The agreement is hoped to build on the ceasefire and address the basis of the conflict by enabling the Palestinian people to obtain their rights, foremost of which is the establishment of their independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. [1]

    Arab-Islamic Unity and the Gaza Truce

    The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025 is a result of the unity of Arab and Islamic countries [1, 2]. The agreement, led by Saudi Arabia, is a demonstration of the joint Arab and Islamic work to defend the Palestinian cause [1, 2]. The first Arab-Islamic summit, held on November 11, 2023, was able to unify the ranks, words, and Arab and Islamic efforts in defending the Palestinian cause at all international and global levels [1].

    Ending Israeli Aggression in Gaza

    The agreement to stop Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip was reached on January 15, 2025, after fifteen months of aggression that began on October 7, 2023 [1]. The Israeli aggression resulted in more than 45,000 martyrs and more than 100,000 wounded [1]. Saudi Arabia, along with other Arab and Islamic countries, worked to stop the Israeli aggression and achieve a ceasefire [1]. The agreement that resulted from these efforts stresses the necessity of adhering to the agreement and stopping the Israeli aggression on Gaza [1]. The agreement also calls for the complete withdrawal of the Israeli occupation forces from the Strip and all other Palestinian and Arab territories, as well as the return of the displaced to their areas [1].

    The Original Text

    The agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025 represents a genuine fruit of the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its wise leadership – may God protect it – with all wisdom and competence, and will continue until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital..

    On January 15, 2025, the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip was completed, which lasted for fifteen months starting from October 7, 2023. With the signing of this agreement, which stops the Israeli crimes and immoral against the Gaza Strip and its sons from the Palestinian people, the great political efforts made by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in order to serve the Palestinian cause, and to demand the lifting of injustice and the cessation of aggression against the sons of the honorable Palestinian people throughout its history extending for eight decades until the present time, are recalled once again. Yes, if the records of history bear witness to the honor and pride of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for its great stance in supporting the Palestinian cause and advocating and backing the Palestinian people at all political, diplomatic, economic, material, financial and humanitarian levels, then the records of the present and future will bear witness to the chivalry, loyalty, sincerity and magnanimity of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia towards supporting the Palestinian cause and the constant endeavor to support and back the sons of the Palestinian people, based on the wise directives of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, and His Highness the Crown Prince, Prince Mohammed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud – may God protect them. Yes, while the wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia emphasizes the centrality of the Palestinian cause at all Arab, Islamic and international levels.

    it has been extremely keen on the necessity of stopping the successive Israeli attacks on the Palestinian people in all Palestinian territories, and the level of this keenness has escalated since the beginning of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip on October 7, 2023. In its constant endeavor to maintain the centrality of the Palestinian cause in international politics and stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, the wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia invited the leaders of Arab and Islamic countries to a summit conference to discuss the Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip. In response to the generous invitation of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud – may God protect him – the extraordinary Arab-Islamic summit was held on November 11, 2023, one month after the beginning of the Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip on October 7, 2023. This summit was able to unify the ranks, words and Arab and Islamic efforts in defending the Palestinian cause at all international and global levels.

    In confirmation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s leadership in defending the Palestinian cause and stopping the aggression against the honorable Palestinian people, the wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia called for a second Arab-Islamic summit on November 11, 2024 to reaffirm the centrality of the Palestinian cause and the necessity of stopping the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip, and to demand the lifting of injustice against its sons from the Palestinian people. Yes, these are great efforts made by the wise leadership in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and it has harnessed great capabilities and resources, believing in the justice of the Palestinian cause and the right of the Palestinian people to reside in their state and live in it with dignity like other peoples who have obtained their full rights.

    If these hopes and future aspirations are what the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is working on and emphasizing in all international and global forums, then its great efforts, in conjunction with Arab and Islamic countries, have resulted in an agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip on January 15, 2025. Yes, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is making great efforts to defend the Palestinian cause based on the authenticity of its Arab and Islamic values, and its belief in constructive and sublime principles that are fully compatible with the rules of international law that preserve human rights and dignity. This is what distinguishes it from other societies that employ Arab and Islamic issues to achieve political gains aimed at serving a party, doctrine, or sect. If the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip represents a great achievement credited to the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, then this great achievement reaffirms once again the necessity of constantly striving to defend the Palestinian cause until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. This is what was keen on and confirmed by the statement issued on January 15, 2025 by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which stated the following:

    “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs expresses the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s welcome of the ceasefire agreement in the Gaza Strip, and appreciates the efforts made by the State of Qatar, the Arab Republic of Egypt, and the United States of America in this regard. The Kingdom stresses the necessity of adhering to the agreement and stopping the Israeli aggression on Gaza, and the complete withdrawal of the Israeli occupation forces from the Strip and all other Palestinian and Arab territories, and the return of the displaced to their areas. It also stresses the importance of building on this agreement to address the basis of the conflict by enabling the brotherly Palestinian people to obtain their rights, foremost of which is the establishment of their independent Palestinian state on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. The Kingdom hopes that this agreement will permanently end this brutal Israeli war that has claimed more than 45 thousand martyrs, and more than 100 thousand wounded.”.

    In conclusion, it is important to say that the agreement to stop the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in January 2025 represents an authentic fruit of the joint Arab and Islamic work led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its wise leadership – may God protect it – with all wisdom and competence, and will continue until the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. Yes, the unity of ranks, words and position – Arab and Islamic – towards the Palestinian issue

    By Amjad Izhar
    Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
    https://amjadizhar.blog

    Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!