This text is a transcript of a discussion about the Pakistani judicial system and the arrest of Imran Khan. The speakers express strong opinions regarding the fairness and impartiality of recent court decisions, criticizing the treatment of political figures and raising concerns about the rule of law. The conversation also touches upon broader political instability in Pakistan and the role of the media in shaping public perception. Overall, the discussion reveals deep divisions and anxieties within Pakistani society concerning its political and legal landscape.

Political Discourse Analysis: A Study Guide

Quiz

Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 complete sentences.

1. According to the speaker, what is the issue with the way judges are treated within the judicial system?
2. What specific criticisms are made regarding Imran Khan’s arrest and treatment?
3. How does the speaker describe the current political climate, and what does the speaker feel is its cause?
4. What does the speaker say about the role of media in the current political situation?
5. According to the speaker, what is the problem with public support for political figures?
6. What is the speaker’s position on political stability and the military’s influence in government?
7. How does the speaker view the actions and behaviors of some political leaders?
8. What is the speaker’s main criticism of the current political atmosphere in Pakistan?
9. What historical event does the speaker reference when discussing the current political divisions in Pakistan?
10. What solutions does the speaker propose for the political situation in Pakistan?

Quiz Answer Key

1. The speaker criticizes the lack of respect for judges, stating they are not being treated with dignity or with the proper regard for their role, comparing it to a lack of “Brahma of justice” being kept. The speaker says judges are sometimes treated disrespectfully, as though they are “naked.”
2. The speaker criticizes Imran Khan’s arrest, stating he was taken from the Supreme Court in a terrifying manner, and a judge should show some humanity to anyone taken that way. Additionally, the speaker questions the conditions under which Khan was held.
3. The speaker describes a political climate fueled by “cheap thinking” and an “atmosphere of awe” and a lack of respect within the system. The speaker suggests that political leaders’ self-serving behaviors are creating the tense environment.
4. The speaker accuses the media of being sensationalist and biased, sometimes using propaganda and lies to incite hatred and cause devastation.
5. The speaker suggests the public’s support for leaders is often based on lies and theatrics. Furthermore, the speaker believes the public is too easily fooled by individuals who are dishonest.
6. The speaker advocates for political stability in society and believes the military’s interference in government needs to be reduced. Furthermore, the speaker believes political instability is a major deterrent to investment in the country.
7. The speaker criticizes political leaders for being dishonest, manipulative, and for prioritizing personal gain over the well-being of the country. The speaker often describes their behavior as theatrics and dramatics.
8. The speaker’s primary criticism is the lack of respect within the system, the use of violence, the spreading of misinformation, and the lack of accountability of government and political leaders.
9. The speaker references the incidents of 1947 when discussing current divisions, suggesting that the current situation is causing the same kinds of destruction. The speaker notes that these historical incidents are still present in the minds of some people.
10. The speaker proposes that the truth be valued, that people not be hateful, and that there should be political stability and less military influence on government. The speaker also argues that citizens must have the ability to recognize genuine leaders.

Essay Questions

1. Analyze the speaker’s critique of the Pakistani judicial system. What specific problems does the speaker identify, and what are the implications of these issues on public trust and the rule of law?
2. Explore the speaker’s criticisms of political leadership in Pakistan. How does the speaker portray the actions and motivations of political figures, and what does this suggest about the state of Pakistani politics?
3. Discuss the role of the media, according to the speaker, in shaping public opinion and political discourse. How does the speaker believe the media contributes to the current state of affairs in Pakistan, and what alternative role does the speaker seem to advocate for?
4. How does the speaker understand the relationship between political leaders, the military, and political stability in Pakistan? What solutions does the speaker propose to address the military’s influence and achieve a more stable political environment?
5. Using examples from the text, evaluate the speaker’s perception of the Pakistani people and their relationship to their political leaders. How does the speaker think the population should engage in politics, and what changes does the speaker suggest the people should make?

Glossary of Key Terms

Brahma of Justice: A reference to the Hindu concept of Brahma, the creator god, and his role in maintaining cosmic order. In this context, it refers to the idea of a higher, impartial force that ensures fairness and righteousness within the judicial system. Dramabaazi: A term used to describe theatrics, performance, or actions that are insincere, manipulative, or intended to create a false impression. Political Stability: A state of consistency and order in a government and its institutions, characterized by a lack of abrupt changes or disruption in political power. Military Interference: The involvement of the armed forces in the political processes of a country, including government actions, elections, or decisions of the judiciary. Cheap Thinking: A reference to shallow, self-serving or manipulative political tactics that prioritize personal gain or partisan interests over the good of the country. Human Seal: The use of people as shields or for protection in dangerous or conflict situations. In this context, it describes a method of protecting a leader by putting civilians in danger. Political Theives: A term for political actors who are corrupt or act in self-interest, often at the expense of their constituents. Executive Order: A directive issued by the president or head of state that carries the force of law. It is often used in situations where action is needed quickly. Qaumi Sata: Urdu term meaning “National Level”. In the context of the text, it refers to the status and conditions of things at the level of the nation. Dramabaaz: A person who engages in theatrics and manipulates situations.

Pakistan’s Political and Judicial Crisis

Okay, here is a detailed briefing document reviewing the main themes and important ideas from the provided text:

Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” Excerpts

Document Overview:

This document provides an analysis of a transcript, likely from a Pakistani media program, where individuals are discussing the current political and judicial landscape. The conversation is highly critical of the judiciary, the military, and certain political figures, particularly focusing on the arrest and treatment of Imran Khan and related events. The discussion is often passionate, using strong language and metaphors.

Key Themes & Ideas:

1. Criticism of the Judiciary and Justice System:

• Loss of Faith: There is a pervasive sense of disappointment and disillusionment with the judiciary. The speaker criticizes the Supreme Court’s decisions and actions, suggesting that justice is not being served. One speaker argues the court has become “completely naked,” meaning without any semblance of justice or respect.
• Lack of Respect & Integrity: The speaker is scandalized by reports of judges behaving improperly, suggesting they lack dignity and respect for the office. They suggest that some judges behave as if they are “wearing underwear” on the chair of justice, a metaphor for their lack of decorum.
• Manipulation: The speaker alleges that the judiciary is being manipulated, citing examples of decisions that seem biased or pre-determined. They claim, “This is being managed, when this is a blot on the name of justice…”
• Judicial Bias: The speaker expresses strong concerns about the judiciary’s treatment of individuals, particularly the perceived preferential treatment of some and the harsh treatment of others. A quote illustrates this: “when it is said that a Muslim is being presented in your court I and you are telling him that you are very happy to meet him so tell me after this there will be wishes, there will be peace, it is like the flower of spring.” The speaker here suggests the judiciary has bias, and is not meeting out justice impartially.

1. The Arrest and Treatment of Imran Khan:

• Unjust Treatment: The manner of Imran Khan’s arrest is heavily criticized, described as “terrifying,” and as if the person was “picked up in such a terrifying manner.” There is concern over how he was treated after his arrest and was not shown basic humanity.
• Questions of Security: The speaker raises concerns about Imran Khan’s safety in custody, suggesting that he could be poisoned or otherwise harmed, “it is possible that Maqsood, who is like a peon in Jai, will poison me and in this way the extra person may kill me.”
• Media Manipulation: The speaker also asserts that the narrative surrounding Imran Khan is being manipulated by the media to serve political ends; referring to him as being portrayed as “sitting on a wheelchair, it was not a pretense,” but then, “the next day when he had to appear in the Supreme Court, he was running and climbing the stairs.”

1. Criticism of Political Leadership & Parties:

• Lack of Genuine Leadership: The speaker argues that many political leaders are not genuine, that they are only looking out for themselves and will say anything to gain power.
• Party Division and Weakness: They critique the current government, stating that the parliament is weak and easily manipulated, and the team is not united, “His team is not complete, then how can he talk to the whole?”
• Political Opportunism: The speaker criticizes politicians for their shifting alliances and for using situations for their own personal gain.
• Drama and Deception: The speaker accuses several leaders of engaging in “dramabaazi” (play-acting) and creating fake scenarios to garner sympathy or political advantage.

1. Role of the Military:

• Interference in Politics: The speaker suggests that the military is interfering too much in politics. They want less army interference, “that the interference of the army should be reduced so that the Murius can do well in a proper manner”
• Accusations of Conspiracy: There are allusions to possible conspiracies by the military to harm political leaders like Imran Khan.
• Allegations of Misconduct: The speaker suggests that some individuals in the army are involved in violence and destruction. A quote states, “The number of vehicles that have been stolen from the Army Cantonment, oh my god, look at the effect of those vehicles, so much destruction, I am sure after seeing it. I am feeling very sad”.

1. Foreign Relations and International Perception

• India as a Point of Comparison: India is used as a point of comparison, both in terms of its influence and to contrast Pakistan’s situation. The speaker indicates that Pakistan’s internal problems make them look bad in the world, “whenever there is a big connection, the name of India will come on every tongue”.
• Concerns About External Perception: The speaker expresses worries about how Pakistan’s actions are viewed internationally, especially in light of accusations of human rights violations.

1. Media’s Responsibility

• Spread of Misinformation: The speaker suggests that the media has been spreading lies and hatred, rather than reporting truthful information, and is responsible for some of the tensions present in Pakistan, “Some have used it for hatred and you know the amount of devastation that has happened, it is so much sauce”
• Need for Truth and Responsibility: The speaker urges media outlets to present facts responsibly and to prioritize truth over sensationalism and popularity.

Specific Examples & Quotes:

• On the Judiciary: “He is sitting on the chair of the sahab, he must be so ashamed that even after keeping the Brahma of justice, here even the Brahma is not being kept, here he is completely naked…”
• On Imran Khan’s Arrest: “the way Imran Khan was arrested from outside the Supreme Court, after that, a feeling was developing that it is not known in what condition he will be kept…”
• On Political Leaders’ Deception: “It’s all dramabaazi, he makes himself a plot…”
• On the Military: “the interference of the army should be reduced so that the Murius can do well in a proper manner…”
• On Media Responsibility: “Our media should make efforts to deal with this kind of culture, see, the more life and power there is in irrigation, the more it is beneficial. It is there and that is why we need to stick to the truth…”

Overall Tone and Conclusion:

The tone of the discussion is highly critical and pessimistic, expressing significant concern over the state of affairs in Pakistan. There is a strong call for accountability, truth, and a return to principles of justice and respect for the law. The speakers seem deeply frustrated by what they perceive as a breakdown of institutions and a lack of honest leadership. The document highlights a deep sense of political and social instability within Pakistan, suggesting a pressing need for reforms and authentic leadership.

Pakistan’s Political Crisis: A Critical Analysis

FAQ

• What is the main criticism being leveled against the Supreme Court, according to the speaker?
• The speaker expresses deep concern over the Supreme Court’s perceived lack of impartiality and justice. They cite instances like the treatment of Muslims in court, where a judge’s behavior seemed inappropriate and undermined the gravity of their role, and the way Imran Khan was arrested outside the court as evidence of injustice. The speaker feels that the judiciary is behaving in a nakedly partisan manner, abandoning any pretense of impartiality. There is also criticism that the court is not removing judges in a procedural way, and it’s being influenced by parties.
• How does the speaker use historical examples to support their arguments?
• The speaker draws parallels with the time of Hazrat Umar Farooq, emphasizing how he treated people with respect in court, regardless of their status. This historical precedent is contrasted with the current perceived disrespect shown by some members of the judiciary. They also mention Mahatma Gandhi, highlighting how he brought politics out of the elite drawing rooms and how this made him effective, suggesting that modern leaders should be more in touch with the real issues. Furthermore, they reference the events of 1947 to illustrate a history of violence and division in the region.
• What issues does the speaker raise regarding the arrest and treatment of Imran Khan?

The speaker questions the way Imran Khan was arrested outside the Supreme Court, describing it as terrifying and inhumane. They note a lack of basic humanity in how he was treated, contrasting this with the expected behavior of a judge. They question the narrative that he was in a wheelchair initially but then seen walking normally, implying that this was a staged act. They worry about the lack of security during his detention and fear that he is being purposely exposed to danger, suggesting foul play. Additionally, they question the rationale for his arrest and its impact on justice, given his position as a former leader.

• What are some of the speaker’s concerns about the current political climate in Pakistan?
• The speaker expresses deep concern about the instability in Pakistani politics, seeing a lack of respect and integrity among politicians. They critique those who seek power through manipulation and dramatic tactics rather than genuine leadership. The speaker feels that the Parliament is weak and susceptible to executive influence. There is a fear that the current political situation may result in bloodshed, and a widespread lack of faith in the system. They also criticize the current caretaker government’s inability to provide funds for elections, seeing it as a deliberate effort to stall the process.
• What does the speaker imply about the role of the media in the current crisis?

The speaker is critical of the media, suggesting that they are part of the problem, acting as a tool for manipulation. The speaker feels that the media is enabling “dramabaazi” by showcasing leaders’ manipulated image and actions, contributing to the spread of misinformation and hatred, rather than promoting truth and responsible reporting. The media’s role in creating emotional responses, rather than focusing on facts, is brought up as an issue.

• What does the speaker say about the possibility of elections?

The speaker is suspicious of the current election process, suggesting that the caretaker government’s lack of funds for elections and the timing of the election announcement are part of a strategy to manipulate the outcome. The speaker notes that the demand for elections may not be completed in 90 days, because they feel the people in power are working towards other objectives. There are concerns that the current leadership will take advantage of the situation for their own benefit. They want the focus to be on the future of the country, not just the elections themselves.

• How does the speaker describe the need for honesty and integrity in leadership?
• The speaker repeatedly emphasizes the need for truth, honesty, and integrity in leaders. They criticize leaders who use deceit and manipulation for personal gain and for spreading hatred. They see genuine leadership as being rooted in a respect for human dignity, logic, and justice. The speaker wants people to see through leaders who only make promises of grandeur without realistic plans. They encourage the public to hold leaders to account, and to demand integrity. They express hope that people will be able to recognize those that are genuine.
• What does the speaker believe is the future of Pakistan based on the current trends they have been discussing?
• The speaker is concerned about the future of Pakistan due to the current state of injustice, manipulation, and political instability. They see a lack of political stability which is crucial for the country to grow and attract investment, and fear that the country is on a path to ruin if these problems are not resolved. The speaker’s remarks suggest that they are deeply worried about the future of the country if the culture of corruption and dishonesty continues. They feel that people must learn to look at leadership and situations with logic rather than emotion in order for the country to progress. They want the focus to be on the future of the country, not just elections.

Supreme Court Criticism and Reform

The sources discuss criticism of the Supreme Court, particularly in relation to recent decisions and the perceived behavior of judges [1-4].

Key points of criticism include:

• Perceived bias and lack of impartiality: There is a perception that the Supreme Court is not acting impartially, especially in cases involving certain individuals [1]. Some feel that judges are not showing enough respect for individuals appearing before them [1]. One source notes that it is as if a Muslim is being presented in court and being told that the judge is very happy to see him, and that this behavior is inappropriate [1].
• Questionable conduct of judges: Some sources describe behaviors of judges that are considered unbecoming, such as acting as if they have “underwear on” while in session, suggesting a lack of seriousness [1, 2]. There is discussion of judges holding parties, which is seen as compromising their ability to administer justice [1].
• Arrest of individuals: The manner in which individuals like Imran Khan have been arrested, sometimes outside the Supreme Court, has led to concerns about the judiciary’s role [2]. There is a feeling that the judiciary is not showing enough humanity, especially in the treatment of those arrested [2].
• Judicial System issues: The sources suggest there may be ways to remove a judge, but the process is long and complex [1, 5, 6]. The current methods of justice are questioned and viewed as having been compromised [3]. There are comments about how the judiciary system should be changed [4].
• Influence of external factors: It is suggested that decisions may be influenced by external factors, such as pressure from crowds or political parties [3, 4]. There are comments that some individuals are “doing sushi” which is also affecting the judiciary [7].
• Public perception and trust: The sources indicate a loss of trust in the judiciary, with people questioning their ability to deliver fair justice [3, 4]. There is a feeling that justice is being “murdered” by the current system and that there is a great injustice being done [4].
• Comparison to the past: Some sources compare the current situation to the British rule, suggesting that the judiciary’s behavior has regressed [3].

The criticisms in the sources cover issues of perceived bias, conduct, and the overall integrity of the justice system. The sources highlight a concern that justice is not being served fairly and that the system needs reform [1-4].

Imran Khan’s Arrest and Judicial Concerns

The sources discuss the arrest of Imran Khan and the circumstances surrounding it, raising concerns about the judiciary and the treatment of individuals [1].

Key points regarding Imran Khan’s arrest include:

• Manner of Arrest: Imran Khan’s arrest, particularly the way he was taken from outside the Supreme Court, is criticized as terrifying and inhumane [1]. The arrest is described as having been done in a “terrifying manner,” which is cause for concern about how he was treated [1].
• Concerns About Treatment: There was worry about the conditions in which Imran Khan would be held after his arrest, with questions about whether he would be kept in a “scary yellow cell” [1]. There are also mentions of him being placed in “Mundkadiya,” a term that is not clearly defined in the sources, but seems to denote a disturbing situation [1].
• Humanity of the Judiciary: The sources suggest that judges should have shown some humanity in handling Imran Khan’s case, especially given the manner of his arrest [1]. The sources question whether a judge is showing proper consideration and acting humanely [1].
• Potential for Violence: One source indicates that there is a concern that leaders might be willing to have people killed in order to gain fame or to increase hatred and start movements [2]. The arrest is seen as a way to suppress leaders [2].
• Security Concerns: There are mentions of Imran Khan admitting that he feels his life is in danger, with concerns that a peon could poison him [3]. He believes that he could be killed [3]. There are also concerns that security agencies are involved in his potential harm [3].
• Use of a Wheelchair: One source questions the authenticity of Imran Khan’s use of a wheelchair, noting that he was seen walking and climbing stairs the day after it was said he could not walk [4]. It is suggested this is a drama he is staging [4]. The source indicates that he was seen running and climbing the stairs the next day [4].
• Implications for the Judiciary: The arrest is described as part of a larger issue of the judiciary not acting justly. The perception is that the judiciary is not handling such cases fairly or impartially, particularly in cases where there is a public outcry and potential for unrest [1].

In summary, the sources describe Imran Khan’s arrest as a catalyst for broader criticisms about the judiciary, raising concerns about the treatment of individuals, and the fairness of the legal process. The arrest is seen as inhumane and lacking proper consideration for the person being arrested.

Pakistan’s Judiciary: Crisis of Impartiality and Trust

The sources present a critical view of the Pakistani judiciary, raising concerns about its impartiality, conduct, and overall integrity. Here’s a breakdown of the key issues:

• Lack of Impartiality and Bias: There’s a strong perception that the judiciary is not acting impartially, particularly in cases involving certain individuals [1, 2]. Some believe judges are biased and don’t treat everyone with equal respect [1]. One source notes a judge behaving as if he was very happy to see a Muslim person in court, which is viewed as inappropriate [1].
• Questionable Conduct of Judges: The sources describe some judges’ behavior as unbecoming, including a lack of seriousness and holding parties, which could be compromising their ability to administer justice [1, 2]. One source mentions that a judge was acting as if he had “underwear on” while in session, indicating a lack of decorum [1].
• Concerns About Arrests and Treatment: The manner of arrests, especially of individuals like Imran Khan, has raised significant concerns [2]. The arrest of Imran Khan, particularly how he was taken from outside the Supreme Court, is described as terrifying and inhumane [2]. The sources suggest a lack of humanity in the judiciary, with concerns about the conditions in which arrested individuals are held [2]. One source even mentions that there was concern about whether he would be kept in a “scary yellow cell” [2].
• Judicial System Issues: The sources indicate that there are mechanisms to remove a judge, but the process is long and complex [1, 3]. The overall methods of justice are questioned and viewed as compromised [1, 4]. There are calls for changes to the judiciary system [5].
• Influence of External Factors: The sources suggest that the judiciary’s decisions may be influenced by external pressures, such as from crowds or political parties [4]. There are mentions of individuals “doing sushi,” which seems to negatively affect the judiciary [2].
• Public Perception and Trust: There’s a clear indication of a loss of public trust in the judiciary, with people questioning its ability to deliver fair justice [4, 5]. The system is described as “murdering” justice, and there’s a sense of “great injustice” being done [5].
• Comparison to the Past: Some sources make unfavorable comparisons to the British rule, suggesting that the judiciary’s behavior has regressed [4].
• Specific Cases and Incidents:
• Imran Khan’s Arrest: The arrest of Imran Khan is a major focal point, with criticism of the way he was taken into custody and concerns about his treatment [2]. There are questions about the authenticity of his use of a wheelchair, which is seen as part of a “drama” [6].
• Elections: There are mentions of the elections being conducted on the 14th and that they must be announced by the government one day before, but that the government does not have money for the elections [5, 7].
• Removal of a Judge: One source questions the legality of the Parliament removing a judge in the way they did and that the process as set by the law is a long one [3, 8].
• Weak Parliament: One source indicates that the parliament is weak and that all those who are used to it on TV have their own government so they benefit [9]. The parliament is described as making a face and giving it before it was made [8].

In summary, the sources paint a picture of a Pakistani judiciary facing serious challenges related to its impartiality, conduct, and public trust. The concerns raised by the sources include perceptions of bias, questionable behavior by judges, inhumane treatment of individuals, and external influences impacting decisions. The sources clearly suggest a need for significant reforms in the system.

Pakistan’s Political Instability

The sources discuss several factors contributing to political instability in Pakistan, including issues with the judiciary, the parliament, and the actions of political leaders.

Key points related to political instability include:

• Weak Parliament: The sources describe the parliament as weak and easily manipulated [1]. It is suggested that those who are used to being on television are favored by the government, which is their own [1]. The parliament is also described as having made a face [2]. There are also comments about the parliament’s authority being challenged [2, 3].
• Judiciary Issues: The sources reveal that the judiciary is perceived as being biased and not acting impartially, which leads to a loss of trust in the legal system [4-6]. There are concerns about the behavior of judges and that they are not acting with proper decorum, further undermining public confidence [4, 5, 7, 8]. The judiciary is also seen as being influenced by external pressures [6]. The sources also suggest that the judiciary is “murdering justice” [6].
• Questionable Actions of Political Leaders: The sources criticize the actions of political leaders and suggest that they are contributing to the instability [9]. There are concerns about leaders using violence and hatred to gain fame [9]. The sources also mention that some leaders engage in “drama” and “lies”, which is also creating distrust in the political system [8, 10, 11].
• Imran Khan’s Arrest: The manner of Imran Khan’s arrest and the concerns raised about his treatment has added to the instability in the country [7, 12]. The public perception that this arrest was inhumane has created distrust in the government [7].
• Lack of Political Stability: One source states that there is no political stability in society [13]. The sources mention that until there is political stability, the problems in the country cannot be improved [11, 13]. The sources suggest that this instability is a scary thing [13].
• Interference of the Army: There is a desire for the interference of the army to be reduced so that the country can function better [13]. One source states that Imran Khan has put all his missiles behind the army and that the army is responsible for some of the unrest [14]. The sources also indicate there is a chase on camera emergency and martial arts [15].
• Elections: The sources mention that there is a demand for elections and that they should be done within 90 days [1, 14]. The sources also mention that the government does not have money to hold the elections [6].
• Public Discontent: The sources indicate a general public discontent with the current situation and political leadership [4, 16-18]. There is a call for leaders to be genuine and not deceitful [11, 18].

In summary, the sources indicate that political instability in Pakistan is caused by a combination of factors including a weak parliament, a biased judiciary, questionable behavior of political leaders, and a lack of public trust in the government. The sources suggest that political stability is essential for improving the overall situation in the country.

Pakistan’s Justice Crisis

The sources highlight numerous flaws in the Pakistani justice system, indicating a significant crisis of integrity and effectiveness. Here’s a breakdown of the key issues:

• Lack of Impartiality and Bias: The sources strongly suggest that the judiciary is not acting impartially [1-3]. There’s a perception of bias in favor of certain individuals or groups, while others are treated unfairly [1]. One source notes a judge behaving as if he was very happy to see a Muslim person in court, which is viewed as inappropriate [1].
• Questionable Conduct of Judges: The behavior of some judges is criticized as unbecoming and lacking in decorum [1, 4]. This includes instances of judges not taking their roles seriously [1, 4]. There are mentions of judges holding parties [1] and one source even notes a judge acting as if he had “underwear on” while in session, indicating a lack of professionalism [1]. These actions undermine the perception of justice and erode public trust.
• Inhumane Treatment of Individuals: The manner of arrests, particularly that of Imran Khan, has raised significant concerns about the humanity of the justice system [4]. The sources describe the arrest of Imran Khan as “terrifying” and inhumane [4]. There were also concerns about whether he would be kept in a “scary yellow cell” and in “Mundkadiya” [4].
• Flawed Procedures: The sources indicate that the process for removing a judge is long and complex [1, 3, 5]. There is a concern that the parliament is removing judges in a way that is not legal [3, 5].
• Influence of External Factors: The judiciary is perceived to be susceptible to external pressures, such as from crowds or political parties [2]. The sources indicate that the judiciary is influenced by external factors [2].
• Erosion of Public Trust: There’s a clear indication of a loss of public trust in the judiciary [2]. The public questions the system’s ability to deliver fair justice. The system is described as “murdering” justice [6].
• Inadequate Legal Processes: The sources reveal that the legal processes themselves are seen as flawed. One source questions the legality of the Parliament removing a judge, stating that there is a long process that must be followed [3, 5]. The sources suggest the current methods of justice are not working and call for change [1].
• Perception of Injustice: The sources indicate a widespread perception of injustice, with a sense that the system is not protecting the rights of all citizens [6]. There is a sense of “great injustice” being done [6].
• Comparison to the Past: Some sources make unfavorable comparisons to the British rule, suggesting that the judiciary’s behavior has regressed [2].

In summary, the sources paint a picture of a justice system plagued by serious flaws including bias, unprofessional conduct, inhumane treatment, external influences, flawed processes and an overall lack of public trust [1-4, 6]. The sources clearly suggest a need for significant reforms in the system [1, 6].

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog

Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!