IELTS Practice Tests

This extensive document is comprised of practice materials for the IELTS exam, covering various sections including reading comprehension, vocabulary, and grammar. The topics within the reading passages are diverse, ranging from travel advice and leisure trends to technological advancements, environmental concerns, and social issues. Each section typically includes a text followed by questions in different formats, such as True/False/Not Given, multiple choice, and sentence completion, along with accompanying answers. The material appears designed to prepare test-takers for the range of subjects and question types they might encounter in the actual exam.

Website Security Disclaimers and Precautions

Based on the sources, information regarding website security precautions is provided primarily within the “Warranties and Disclaimers” sections.

The sources state that precautions are taken to detect computer viruses and ensure security. However, they cannot guarantee that the website is virus-free and secure. Specifically, they give no warranties of any kind concerning the website or the content, and in particular, they do not warrant that the website or any of its contents is virus free.

The owners shall not be liable for any loss or damage which may occur as a result of any virus or breach of security. It is emphasized that you must take your own precautions in this respect, as they accept no responsibility for any infection by virus or other contamination or by anything which has destructive properties.

Regarding personal data, the sources mention making every attempt to secure it. However, they cannot accept responsibility for any unauthorised access or loss of personal information that is beyond their control.

Travel Safety and Transportation Options

Based on the sources provided, there is information regarding airport ground transportation options and related precautions in different contexts.

Specifically, concerning travel to Keystone via Denver International Airport (DEN) and Vail/Eagle County Airport (EGE):

  • Shuttles and car rentals via Hertz are available at DEN, EGE, and Colorado Springs Municipal Airport.
  • Keystone is easily accessible from DEN and EGE, with onsite scheduled and private shuttle pick up and rental cars available.
  • Colorado Mountain Express (CME) provides numerous, daily, door-to-door shuttles from Denver International Airport to Keystone.
  • CME also offers private chauffeured travel with CME Premier.
  • The scheduled shuttle service via CME operates throughout the day, but is not available for flights arriving at the airport later than 8:30 pm or departing earlier than 10:00 am.
  • The private shuttle service via CME has the same timetable restrictions, not being available for flights arriving after 8:30 pm or departing before 10:00 am.
  • If you are arriving or departing when the CME shuttle is not available, you should consider booking a rental car.

In a different regional context (Turkmenistan), the sources discuss local travel, which includes ground transportation modes:

  • Rail travel can be unreliable and dangerous due to criminal activity, particularly on overnight rail services.
  • When traveling overnight by rail, it is advised to store your valuables in a safe place, not leave the compartment unattended, and secure the door from the inside.
  • You should avoid using public transport after dark.
  • Travelers have been robbed when using unofficial taxis. You should seek assistance from staff at hotels, restaurants, or places of entertainment to book a licensed taxi.
  • Arbitrary police checks and security checkpoints on roads are common. You should carry a copy of your passport and visa at all times.

Modern Leisure: Trends in Activity and Quantity

Based on the sources, the concept of “Leisure time trends” can be discussed from two main perspectives: the types of activities people are choosing to do with their free time, and the overall amount of leisure time people have.

Firstly, the sources indicate a trend where learning is becoming a new form of travel and leisure. Instead of focusing on traditional holiday outcomes like a winter tan or memories of restaurant meals, people are now seeking to acquire new skills and come home with their own handcrafted items or abilities like making their own bread or filleting their own fish. This suggests a shift away from purely passive leisure towards activities that feel more worthwhile, industrious, and focused.

Several factors are contributing to this trend:

  • The recession, tight money, and job insecurity mean that weekends need to feel productive.
  • There is a huge resurgence of interest in home crafts, cookery, and gardening, as people find pleasure in growing and making their own things.
  • Concerns about the environment are also a motivation, leading to popularity in courses that help people become “good lifers,” even with limited space. Examples of skills people are learning include keeping hens, bees, or pigs, starting an allotment, building a wood-burning stove, or making their own biodiesel.
  • This trend extends to travel, with combining hobbies with holidays becoming very popular. Many courses are available throughout the UK catering to a wide variety of ages and interests.

Secondly, concerning the amount of leisure time, a study by economists Mark Aguiar and Erik Hurst looking at Leisure Time in America suggests a different kind of trend. Despite the common perception among working people in the United States that they are as busy as ever and technology has increased demands, the economists’ research indicates that Americans seem to have much more free time than before.

Their findings show that over the past four decades, the amount of time working-age Americans spend on leisure activities has risen by 4-8 hours a week. For someone working 40 hours weekly, this is equivalent to 5-10 weeks of extra holiday a year. This increase is seen across nearly every category of American, including single or married individuals, with or without children, and both men and women. While Americans may work longer hours in the office compared to other wealthy countries, this is because average work hours in those countries have dropped sharply.

Aguiar and Hurst attribute this finding partly to their definition of work and the data they used. Unlike traditional labor studies that focus narrowly on paid work, their research used time-use diaries that capture the entire day, including activities like shopping, cooking, running errands, and keeping house. They found that Americans actually spend much less time doing these chores than they did 40 years ago, due to a “revolution in the household economy” involving appliances, home delivery, the internet, 24-hour shopping, and more affordable domestic services. These advancements have increased flexibility and freed up people’s time. Time-use diaries are considered accurate because they account for every hour of the day.

It is noted that this study deliberately excluded the growing number of retirees (those 65 or older, or who retired early). As these individuals are significant leisure-gainers, the “true leisure boom” in America might be even bigger than estimated by the study. The potential for multitasking (combining work and leisure) is acknowledged as a theoretical problem with time diaries, although the study counted many such combinations, like reading a novel while commuting or using the internet at the office, as work time.

Ultimately, the sources present two perspectives on leisure time trends: one focusing on the increasing interest in skills-based activities and hobbies, often linked to economic and environmental factors, and another suggesting that Americans, despite feeling busy, have experienced a significant increase in the overall quantity of their leisure time over recent decades, largely due to efficiencies in household tasks.

Ecosystem Recovery and Protection Strategies

Based on the sources, a discussion of Ecosystem recovery reveals that ecosystems possess a significant capacity to recover from damage. Contrary to conventional wisdom that human damage is terminal and losses are permanent, the Earth’s ability to shrug off such things is often underestimated, except in cases where a species is driven to extinction. Transient threats caused by humans, such as oil spills and forest fires, can be overcome.

Alan Weisman’s work, referenced in the sources, illustrates nature’s great capacity to recover, suggesting that if humanity disappeared, nature would reclaim its territory with surprising speed. This would involve weeds colonising pavements, rivers flooding subway tunnels, and buildings collapsing. Residential neighbourhoods, for example, would return to forest in 500 years. Only some of the most stubborn human inventions, like certain plastics, might prove permanent.

This view is supported by a study conducted by Holly Jones and Oswald Schmitz. They analyzed 240 peer-reviewed scientific papers on recovery rates in large terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The data included studies on various types of damage, such as agriculture, deforestation, the introduction of invasive species, logging, mining, oil spills, overfishing, trawling damage, and even natural disasters like hurricanes. The researchers measured 94 aspects of ecosystem structure, including nutrient cycling, decomposition rates, and population sizes, to classify recovery. They found that 83 of the 240 papers demonstrated complete recovery, while 90 showed a mixed response. Only 67 showed no recovery at all. The authors note that more would likely have shown recovery if the projects had continued long enough to track changes in slower-recovering ecosystems, such as forests.

The recovery time for ecosystems is influenced by factors such as the number of pressures they face. Ecosystems exposed to more than one pressure, like a forest that is logged and then used for agriculture, take longer to recover. Even in such cases, the average recovery time found was 56 years, within a human lifetime. Sites experiencing single threats typically recovered in less than 20 years. Importantly, the researchers found that recovery rates are influenced more by the type of ecosystem than by the magnitude of the damage inflicted. Forests, for instance, take longer to renew (42 years) than ocean floors (typically less than ten years), regardless of the scale of stress.

Despite these positive findings, critics question whether total ecological recovery has been achieved as often as suggested, citing examples like the Grand Banks cod fishery collapse in 1992, which has shown no sign of recovery almost two decades later, possibly due to new predators. There is also a debate about what constitutes a “pristine” or “natural” state. Dartmoor, for example, is considered a wilderness but is a human construction shaped by thousands of years of alterations; yet, it is its current state that people wish to preserve. Most conservation work targets contemporaneous reference systems rather than returning landscapes to their original pre-human states.

Despite the study’s limitations and the difficulty in measuring recovery and choosing targets, the findings are presented as good news for conservationists.

In addition to discussing recovery after damage, the sources also touch upon protecting ecosystems before significant intervention is needed. Protecting wildlife habitats, particularly through parks, reserves, and other protected lands, which are often the only remaining untouched habitats, helps protect entire communities of animals. When communities are kept intact, less conservation intervention is required to ensure species survival.

Housing Benefit Eligibility Guide

Based on the sources, eligibility for Housing Benefit is determined by several factors related to your financial situation, living arrangements, and personal circumstances.

Generally, you may get Housing Benefit if you pay rent and your income and capital (savings and investments) are below a certain level. This applies whether you are out of work or in work and earning a wage.

However, there are specific circumstances where you usually can’t get Housing Benefit:

  • If you have savings of over £16,000, unless you are getting the ‘guarantee credit’ of Pension Credit.
  • If you live in the home of a close relative.
  • If you are a full-time student, unless you are disabled or have children.
  • If you are an asylum seeker or are sponsored to be in the UK.

There are also other restrictions:

  • If you live with a partner or civil partner, only one of you can get Housing Benefit.
  • If you are single and aged under 25, you can only get Housing Benefit for bed-sit accommodation or one room in shared accommodation.

An important change mentioned is that Child Benefit is no longer counted as income when working out Housing Benefit. This means that some low-income families who currently receive Housing Benefit will get more, and some low-income families may now qualify for Housing Benefit as a result of this change.

The amount of Housing Benefit you get is calculated differently depending on whether you rent from a private landlord (using Local Housing Allowance rules) or live in council or other social housing (up to the amount of your ‘eligible’ rent). ‘Eligible’ rent includes the rent for the accommodation and charges for some services like lifts, communal laundry, or play areas. However, it does not include charges for water, heating, hot water, lighting, cooking, or payments for food or fuel in board and lodgings or hostels, even if these are included in your rent.

To check if you may be eligible, you can use an online benefits adviser to get an estimate. If you think you may be eligible, you can also enter details of where you live to be taken to your local authority website for more information.

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog


Discover more from Amjad Izhar Blog

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

Leave a comment