This text is an excerpt from an article, published in 2003, that explores the complex relationship between the United States, Israel, and the Arab world. The author questions America’s unwavering support for Israel, examining historical and religious perspectives to understand the motivations behind this alliance. The article also discusses the historical connection of the Jewish people to the land of Canaan/Palestine, drawing on biblical narratives and Islamic scripture to support its claims. Furthermore, it analyzes the perspectives of various groups, including Palestinians, Israelis, and Americans, in order to shed light on this multifaceted conflict. Finally, the author proposes that the conflict’s resolution requires a deeper understanding of these interconnected historical, religious, and political dynamics.

Israel and American Foreign Policy: A Study Guide

Quiz

Instructions: Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.

1. According to the author, what historical event led to the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat?
2. What specific actions taken by the U.S. in the past have made the anti-Israel policies of Islamic countries ineffective, according to the author?
3. What does the author say is a misconception regarding the possibility of altering the borders of Israel?
4. According to the author, why does America’s support for Israel go beyond merely protecting its oil interests in the Middle East?
5. According to the text, how does the American public’s love for Christ relate to their perception of Israel?
6. What is the author’s view on the idea that the Jews control American politics through their wealth and media influence?
7. According to the author, what is the source of the moral foundation for a state’s long-term survival?
8. How does the author contrast the views of some Muslims on the Israeli-Palestinian issue with the views of the American people?
9. According to the author, how is the land of Canaan connected to Abraham and his descendants?
10. What Quranic verses does the author cite to argue for the legitimacy of Jewish claims to the land?

Quiz Answer Key

1. The author states that Anwar Sadat was assassinated for accepting the reality of Israel and visiting the holy land. This action was seen as a betrayal by some in the Arab world.
2. The author suggests that the U.S. has taken a turn that makes anti-Israel policies of Islamic countries meaningless. This shift involved building alliances and normalizing relations between Saudi Arabia, Israel, and other Arab nations.
3. The author claims it is a misconception that the Israeli border can be reduced or taken back. He argues that Israel has firmly established itself, and there is no realistic chance of reversing its territorial gains.
4. The text indicates the reason for America’s support of Israel is not merely because of oil interest but that the American people have an affinity with the Jewish people and believe in a shared moral code.
5. The author suggests the American people’s love for Christ makes them feel closer to the Jewish people since they believe the Jews gave a false statement about the message of Jesus Christ which in their view means that those who are in favor of Christ are therefore against his enemies, which they see as the Muslims.
6. The author acknowledges there is some weight in this idea but concludes it is not as much as it is being made out to be. He posits that while the Jews have wealth and influence in the media, they are outnumbered by the Christian population who largely support Israel.
7. The author states a moral basis or truth is the essential foundation of any group or state that survives for the long-term. In contrast to this, they argue that a state built on oppression and deception will ultimately crumble.
8. The author states some Muslims view Israel as an illegitimate state, while the American public is largely supportive of Israel. This difference in perspective highlights the clash in values.
9. The author connects the land of Canaan to Abraham through God’s covenant, promising it to Abraham and his descendants, specifically Isaac and Jacob (Israel). This land is presented as the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people.
10. The author references Surah Bani Israel, verse 104, in which God declares for Bani Israel to settle in the land and in Surah Maidah in which God tells Musa that the holy land, Arz Muqaddas, is written for Bani Israel. These verses, they say, point to the legitimacy of Jewish claims to the land according to the Quran.

Essay Questions

1. Analyze the author’s argument that America’s support for Israel is not primarily driven by its own strategic interests in the region.
2. Compare and contrast the author’s interpretation of the Bible and the Quran in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
3. Explore the author’s perspective on the role of religious identity and moral values in shaping America’s foreign policy toward Israel.
4. Discuss the author’s use of historical context and events in framing the current political situation.
5. Evaluate the author’s reasoning on whether the American support of Israel is justified in a morally or ethically defensible way.

Glossary of Key Terms

• OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation): An international organization founded in 1969, consisting of 57 member states, with a collective voice in the Muslim world.
• Two-State Formula: A proposed solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict calling for the creation of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel.
• Ibrahimi Accord: Refers to the Abraham Accords, a series of normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations.
• Syedna Masih (Jesus Christ): Refers to Jesus Christ and his role as a key figure in Christianity, which is mentioned to emphasize that Americans are largely Christian.
• Mashrak West/Middle East: The author uses both terms to refer to the region where Israel is situated and which is at the center of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
• Bani Israel: The “Children of Israel,” a term referring to the descendants of Jacob (also named Israel) in Abrahamic religious texts and to the Jewish people more generally.
• Canaan: The historical name for a region in the ancient Near East, encompassing parts of modern-day Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria. It is central to the Abrahamic religions and seen as the promised land in Jewish tradition.
• Ahadnama: This term refers to the Old Testament in the Bible which is also called “Kitab Atiq” which means “ancient book”.
• Arz Muqaddas: An Arabic term meaning “holy land” that has religious significance for Muslims, this refers to the land promised to the Jewish people in the Quran.
• Katab: An Arabic word meaning “written” or “prescribed,” often used in the Quran to indicate divine decrees or obligations.

America, Israel, and the Arab World: A Reassessment

Okay, here is a detailed briefing document reviewing the main themes and important ideas from the provided text, including quotes from the original source:

Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” on America, Israel, and the Arab World

Date: October 26, 2023

Subject: In-Depth Analysis of “Pasted Text” – Perspectives on America-Israel Relations, Arab World Dynamics, and Historical Claims to the Holy Land.

Executive Summary:

This document analyzes a complex and opinionated text, seemingly written from a Pakistani Muslim perspective, addressing the historical and contemporary relationship between the United States and Israel, the dynamics within the Arab world, and the theological and historical basis for Jewish claims to the land of Israel/Palestine. The text challenges commonly held beliefs about the motivations behind American support for Israel, delves into the complexities of Arab political and sectarian divides, and offers a detailed theological argument supporting Jewish claims to the land based on the Bible and the Quran. The author seems to be arguing against the standard anti-Israel viewpoints common in some Muslim communities by suggesting that America’s support for Israel has a moral element, and that the Jewish claim to Israel has biblical and Quranic roots.

Main Themes and Key Ideas:

1. America’s Support for Israel: Beyond Simple Geopolitics

• The text challenges the common narrative that American support for Israel is solely driven by strategic interests or a desire to control Arab resources. The author states: “But when we test this knowledge on the touchstone of truth, the hollowness of this simple argument becomes apparent to us immediately; rather, it becomes clear to us that it is not true. It seems that if Israel was not present in the Mashrak West or the Middle East, then America would have been in a much better position to achieve its interests over the Arabs.”
• Instead, the text suggests a deeper, more complex motivation, hinting at a shared moral or even spiritual element, with the author noting, “The entire American community worships Israel with all their heart and soul and looks at the actions of the Palestinians and Kush attacks with dislike, pain and anger. This is the thing that Darvesh liked the most about the American community. This is their self-respect against oppression.”
• The author also suggests that America sees the establishment of a Jewish state as a positive act that supports freedom movements, stating: “This is the reason why the American government has been openly or secretly supporting the freedom movements going on all over the world.”

1. Arab World Dynamics: Internal Divisions and the Palestinian Issue

• The author highlights the internal divisions within the Arab world, arguing that hatred between Arabs “on the basis of leftist sectarianism in the historical past against their own Shia people is probably also found against the Jews.” This complicates the picture of a united Arab front against Israel.
• The author also notes that the Arab world has largely accepted Israel’s existence: “At present, the situation in America is such that people like us have accepted the existence of Israel.” The text indicates that many Arab nations are moving toward normalizing relations with Israel which is described as a “turn that the anti-Israel policy of all the Islamic countries will become meaningless”.
• The text suggests that focusing solely on the Palestinian cause may be misguided and that such a focus could lead to destruction: “If the Arabs maintain a peaceful relationship with each other on the ground, then Palestine will be destroyed and there will be no peace.”

1. Theological Basis for Jewish Claims to the Land:

• The text presents a detailed argument, rooted in both the Bible and the Quran, for the Jewish people’s right to the land of Canaan/Israel/Palestine. The author makes a direct comparison of Abraham and his two sons to argue that God gave Canaan to the line of Isaac and Jacob, while God gave Arabia to the line of Ishmael (the prophet Muhammad’s line). The author says, “…the way God ordered Ibrahim or Ibrahim to settle Ismail in Arabia Mecca, and established Banu Ismail here In the same way, or even more than this, he had sworn to give Canaan to Sayyedna Ibrahim’s second son and grandson Yakub whose title is Israel and according to the Bible this oath was eternal and permanent…”
• The author emphasizes the Quranic view that God promised the land to the descendants of Jacob/Israel, stating: “…the earth belongs to Allah. Whoever among his servants wants can own it. He makes them his heirs and the final success is only for those who fear him.”
• The author cites verses from both the Old Testament and the Quran to bolster this point, pointing out that many verses in the Quran “have accepted that even in the present circumstances, its sources are seen coming from the same place from where the Quran came.”

1. Challenging Common Muslim Perspectives

• The text directly confronts common narratives within certain Muslim communities, particularly the view of Israel as a “dagger in the chest of Islam.” The author says “Such jokes are often spoken in our country that some powers, while conspiring against the Muslims in 1917 through the Declaration Bill, thrust the dagger of Israel into the chest of Islam.”
• The author dismisses arguments about Jews having a powerful hold over American politics, stating: “As strong as the Jews are, their numbers are still much higher than the Muslims in the whole of America.”
• The author seems to try and push for a more nuanced and open-minded view by emphasizing shared heritage, stating “when we say this It is said that the People of the Book, Jews and Sara are our cousins, then this is not against the truth, the ancestor of all of us is Syedna Ibrahim…”
• The author challenges the notion of a singular, monolithic Muslim view on the issue, noting that “Our people oppose Israel only on religious grounds.” and that “Anyway, there is a difference of sky and earth between the body of Hazrat Allama on Israel and the body of our Hazrat Aama.”

1. The Concept of a “Moral Basis” for Success

• The author repeatedly alludes to the idea that long-term success must have a moral base. The author says, “any such viewpoint, any thinking which is not backed by moral support may fool people for a while but it cannot be sustained forever.” This reinforces the idea that, in the author’s opinion, America’s support for Israel and Israel’s success has a sound and defensible moral base.

Key Quotes:

• “It is not that Palestinians should definitely get rights, but they will neither be at the cost of Israel nor will it be done to make the situation worse.”
• “By becoming the protector of Israel, America will bring the curse and blame of the whole world upon itself. I am feeling ashamed and the question arises that why is he getting his face blackened by the brokerage of coal and he is neither feeling ashamed nor repenting about it…”
• “The Jews followed the same message, which the Jews gave a false statement and did not even care about being put on their lap, then how can the love for Christ and the love for the enemies of Christ stay together in the same heart?”
• “We Palestinians have no status, they should have their own country, but the way we Muslim Palestinians think, if the same way is thought about Jews, then why do we feel bad…”
• “Then God appeared to Ibrahim and said that I will give this country to your descendants and he There for the God who appeared to him, a sacrifice was made…”
• “The original Quranic words are Allah ti Katab Allah Lakam which means that God has made this land necessary for you.”

Conclusion:

The provided text offers a provocative and unorthodox perspective on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The author challenges established narratives within certain Muslim circles, emphasizing a need for deeper understanding of both theological and historical arguments. The analysis goes beyond simplistic political and economic motives and presents a complex, nuanced view of the conflict that recognizes both a theological basis for Jewish claims to Israel and a moral dimension behind American support for the Jewish state. The text ultimately urges a more open-minded and religiously sensitive approach to this issue.

America, Israel, and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

FAQ on America’s Relationship with Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

1. Why does the United States consistently support Israel despite widespread criticism, especially from the Islamic world?
2. The text suggests several interwoven reasons for America’s support of Israel. These include a complex blend of perceived shared values, cultural and historical ties, and strategic considerations. Some argue that American Christians, with a deep understanding of the Bible, develop a natural inclination towards the Jewish people, who are seen as the descendants of the figures in their holy book, leading to significant empathy for the Jewish state. Additionally, the text hints that while the influence of the American Jewish community may play a role in US politics, it’s not the sole reason. Some within the U.S. see Israel as a Westernized, democratic ally in the Middle East and their support is rooted in a shared belief in ideals such as freedom and democracy. While other theories exist that claim US support for Israel is tied to resource control or as a means to counter Arab power, the article presents these views as incomplete and lacking truth.
3. How have Arab nations historically viewed Israel, and has this view changed?

Historically, many Arab nations held a stance of strong opposition to Israel, viewing it as an imposition on Palestinian land. This opposition was often rooted in the displacement of Palestinians during the creation of the state of Israel, and religious and political tensions. The text details the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat for recognizing Israel, showing a clear example of historical opposition. However, there’s evidence of a shift, with some Arab nations, including Saudi Arabia and Jordan, establishing or seeking closer ties with Israel, driven by practical considerations such as regional stability and trade. This shift doesn’t negate the existing tensions but does signal a significant change in dynamics from prior years. Some also see the conflict as being rooted in the sectarian divisions of the region, noting how historical hatreds between Sunni and Shia Muslims often mirror the animosity directed towards Jews.

1. What is the significance of the “two-state solution” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, according to the text?
2. The two-state solution, which proposes an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, is mentioned as a point of discussion but not necessarily seen as the end goal. While the text notes that Palestinians should have rights, the author clearly emphasizes that it should not come at the cost of Israel’s security or destabilizing the region. It is noted that America has reached a point where they accept the existence of Israel. This suggests a move away from a completely pro-Palestinian stance to one that recognizes both Israel and Palestinian rights, though the text doesn’t endorse the idea that it’s the only way forward, or even a likely reality. The author presents a more realist approach, understanding the difficulty in dislodging Israel, suggesting that while the aspirations for Palestinian autonomy are valid, they must coexist with Israel.
3. The text mentions a shift in Arab countries towards accepting Israel. What factors have contributed to this change?
4. The text identifies several factors that contribute to this change. Firstly, political and strategic shifts have led countries like Saudi Arabia and Jordan to seek pragmatic relationships with Israel. They also see that it is virtually impossible to take land away from Israel. Secondly, the text subtly hints that regional political realities, and possibly a shared understanding of the futility of continuous conflict, have played a part. Thirdly, the growing acceptance by the international community of Israel’s legitimacy has led many to accept that it’s here to stay. The normalization trend is also driven by common interests like counter-terrorism and economic cooperation, overriding historical animosities. The text points out that many Arab nations have already surrendered before half a century, and have been involved in establishing political, religious and cultural relations with Israel.
5. How does the text address the view that the US supports Israel because of Jewish influence in America?
6. The text acknowledges the argument that Jewish influence plays a role, but argues that the explanation is limited and insufficient. While recognizing that American Jews may have influence through media and money, the text dismisses the idea that they have complete control over American politics. It presents the perspective that the American people have overwhelmingly come to believe in the importance of supporting the Jewish state and feel this is right. The text argues that it doesn’t fully explain the depth of support among the broader American population, particularly the Christian community, as it notes that America has largely purged the sort of religious biases that exist in other nations. The influence may be there, but it’s not the core driver of US policy.
7. What does the text say about the moral or religious justifications for Israel’s existence, especially within the context of the Bible and Quran?
8. The text dives deeply into the religious justifications of Israel’s existence, using references from the Bible and Quran. From the biblical perspective, it cites verses from Genesis that suggest God promised the land of Canaan to Abraham and his descendants. It notes how these promises are reiterated through his son Isaac and grandson Jacob (Israel). From the Islamic perspective, the text argues that Islam accepts the validity of previous Abrahamic scriptures and that there are similar links between Abraham, his sons, and the promise to give Canaan to his descendants. It acknowledges the Quranic acceptance of the prophets of the Bible, including Jacob, and notes that Muslims must accept what is in their own scripture about the connections between the prophets and holy lands. The author argues that because of this there should be a general sympathy, not condemnation, of Israel’s existence.
9. How does the text describe the American attitude toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, beyond simple political calculations?
10. The text argues that the American support for Israel isn’t solely driven by political gains or strategic alliances. It emphasizes that the American people themselves harbor deep-seated sympathy for Israel and an aversion to oppression. It suggests that Americans have a moral compass that guides them to side with Israel, seeing the Palestinians and their violence as a form of oppression. This explains their tendency to support freedom movements worldwide, as they view the creation and continued presence of Israel as a right that has now been justified through time. The author sees this as a sign of moral superiority of the American people.
11. What is the author’s conclusion regarding the permanence of Israel and the future of the conflict?
12. The author presents the view that the State of Israel is a permanent reality that has been given the full support of America. This has been cemented through historical and religious ties, and the author suggests that these bonds make it unlikely to disappear. While they acknowledge that Palestinian grievances must be addressed, they emphasize that Israel cannot be removed from the equation. They point out that while the creation of the State may have been unjust initially, time and God’s promises have solidified its place as a country. The author urges readers to understand the history and religious underpinnings of the conflict, rather than simply blaming or attempting to eliminate Israel.

A History of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

Okay, here is a detailed timeline and cast of characters based on the provided text:

Timeline of Events

• Ancient Times:
• Abraham (Ibrahim): God commands Abraham to settle in Canaan (later known as Israel/Palestine), promising the land to his descendants.
• Ishmael (Ismail): Abraham has a son Ishmael with Hagar who is sent to Arabia, founding the line of Banu Ismail.
• Isaac (Izaak): Abraham has another son, Isaac, with Sarah. God reaffirms the promise of Canaan to his descendants, establishing a covenant.
• Jacob (Yaqoob): Isaac’s son, Jacob (also known as Israel), has 12 sons who become the founders of the 12 tribes of Israel. God reiterates the promise of Canaan to him and his descendants.
• Joseph (Yusuf): Jacob’s son, Joseph, is sold into slavery in Egypt. He rises to prominence and becomes caretaker of the Egyptian treasures.
• Bani Israel in Egypt: The descendants of Jacob, Bani Israel, settle in Egypt for 430 years.
• Oppression in Egypt: A period of oppression and harsh treatment of the Bani Israel begins under new rulers in Egypt.
• Moses (Musa): God chooses Moses to lead the Bani Israel out of Egypt. He receives revelations and the word of God.
• The Exodus: The Bani Israel are led by Moses out of Egypt. God drowns Pharaoh and his army when they pursue the fleeing Israelites.
• Promise of Canaan: God directs the Bani Israel to settle in the land of Canaan as promised to their ancestors.
• More recent events mentioned
• 1917: The text mentions the Balfour Declaration, implying an origin for the conflict during the British Mandate period.
• Anwar Sadat Assassination President Anwar Sadat of Egypt is assassinated for accepting the reality of Israel and traveling to the holy land.
• 1997 Washington wire is issued
• 1998 Al Khalil wire is issued
• 1999 Sham Sheikh Madeh with American Israeli Palestinian and Egyptian customs
• 2003: The original article that this excerpt is taken from was written between 2003 and July 14, 2003
• Debate Over US Support for Israel: The author discusses the lack of Islamic support for Israel, the questioning of why the US is so supportive, and the historical context of Arab/Israeli relations.
• Saudi-Israeli Meeting in Riyadh: A high-level Saudi delegation attends a UN-sponsored conference in Riyadh with Israeli leaders in attendance, including a public display of flags.
• Israeli PM’s UN Address: The Israeli Prime Minister shows the UN General Assembly a map that included a route to an Israeli port through Saudi Arabia.
• Ongoing (as of the writing of the article):
• US-Israel Relationship: The US remains a staunch supporter of Israel.
• Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: The text mentions the two-state solution but notes the violence and conflict ongoing between Palestine and Israel. The text also notes the ongoing struggle and oppression of the Palestinian people
• Arab Divisions: The text describes deep divisions among Arabs, including sectarian conflict, and animosity.
• Muslim Opposition to Israel: The text notes that the majority of opposition to Israel is coming from religious grounds.

Cast of Characters

• Afzal Rehan: Author of the article the excerpts come from.
• Anwar Sadat: Bold and outspoken President of Egypt, assassinated for accepting the reality of Israel and travelling to the Holy Land.
• King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz: Participated in the end of Saudi Arabia.
• Darwish: Author of an article published 20 years before, discussing America’s love for Israel.
• Clinton: President of the United States of America. His era of governance is referenced by the author of the text.
• Abraham (Ibrahim): A patriarch considered foundational to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. God promised him the land of Canaan for his descendants.
• Ishmael (Ismail): Abraham’s son by Hagar. Considered the progenitor of the Arabs.
• Isaac (Izaak): Abraham’s son by Sarah. An important patriarch in Jewish history.
• Jacob (Yaqoob/Israel): Isaac’s son, whose name was changed to Israel, and is the father of the 12 tribes of Israel.
• Joseph (Yusuf): Jacob’s son who was sold into slavery in Egypt and becomes an important leader in that country.
• Moses (Musa): A prophet in Judaism, Christianity and Islam who led the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt.
• Jesus Christ/Syedna Masih: (Religious figure from the Christian religion, and is considered to be a prophet in Islam). Mentioned as a significant figure in American culture, and how this makes their support for Israel confounding to the writer.
• Allama Iqbal (Muslim philosopher and poet): Quoted questioning Jewish rights to Palestine and referencing rights to Spain and three fruits.
• Dr. Sarman: A Muslim scholar with whom the author had a conversation about the Israel/Palestine conflict.
• Holy Maryam (Mary): Mother of Jesus, a descendant of Bani Israel.
• Prophet Dawood (David): An ancestor of Mary and an important figure in both the Jewish and Christian traditions.

Key Themes & Analysis

The sources present a complex picture of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Here are some of the key themes:

• Religious and Historical Claims: The text repeatedly refers to the Bible, Quran, and their narratives, showing how religious and historical claims are used to support both Jewish and Arab claims to the land. The importance of religious scripture to various factions is noted.
• American Support for Israel: The core question posed in the text is why the US supports Israel despite Israel’s actions and perceived injustices towards Palestinians.
• Arab Disunity: The text underscores that the Arab world is divided by internal conflicts (sectarian, political) and this division weakens their position and strategy against the state of Israel.
• Moral Justification: The author notes the importance of moral basis for any cause, implying that the US support for Israel may not be ultimately sustainable if it lacks moral grounding.
• The Two-State Solution: The text acknowledges the concept of a two-state solution but suggests that deep-seated issues make implementation difficult.
• External Influences: The text implies that external influences, like America, are strongly influencing the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Let me know if you would like a deeper analysis of any of these points.

US-Israel Relations: A Complex History

The sources discuss US-Israel relations, noting that the US is a strong supporter of Israel, and exploring reasons for this support [1, 2].

Key points about US-Israel relations mentioned in the sources:

• US Support for Israel: The US is a strong supporter of Israel, and this support is a key factor in Israel’s survival [1, 2]. Some sources claim that without the US, Israel could not have been established or continued to exist, especially given the wealth of natural resources in the surrounding Arab nations [2].
• US Motivations: The sources explore multiple explanations for why the US supports Israel [2]:
• Challenging Simple Explanations: The idea that America wants to suppress Arabs through Israel is considered too simplistic, and it is suggested that the US could achieve its interests more easily without the burden of supporting Israel [2].
• Jewish Influence: Another explanation suggests that the Jewish community in America is very powerful and influences American politicians through campaign contributions and media control [2, 3]. However, one source argues that while the Jewish community is influential, it is not as powerful as some believe, especially compared to the large Christian population in America [3].
• Shared Values and Culture: The sources suggest that the US and Israel may have similar values, culture, and interests, contributing to a strong relationship [3]. Some sources also imply the US’s affinity for Israel is related to shared religious traditions and reverence for the Bible, in which Jewish people are part of the story [4, 5].
• Moral Basis: Despite the perceived injustice towards Palestinians, the sources suggest that the US public generally supports Israel due to their self-respect against oppression [6]. This view is related to the idea that there is some moral basis for Israel’s existence, which resonates with the American public [6].
• Historical Context: The sources mention that the US support for Israel has evolved over time. There was a time when it was not widely accepted [1, 7]. The sources point out that there was opposition to Israel from many Islamic countries and that some leaders like Anwar Sadat were killed for accepting the reality of Israel [1]. Some believe that the US and Britain conspired to establish Israel [8].
• Impact on the Arab World: The US’s pro-Israel stance is seen as a major point of contention in the Arab world [1]. Some believe the US has damaged its relationship with Arab countries because of its support of Israel [2]. Some also believe that the US has allowed Israel to oppress Palestinians [2].

In conclusion, the sources suggest that the US-Israel relationship is complex, based on a combination of political, economic, religious, and cultural factors. While there are various explanations for US support of Israel, there is also acknowledgement that this support has significant implications in the Middle East.

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

The sources discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, highlighting the historical, religious, and political dimensions of the issue. Here’s a breakdown of key points:

• Historical Claims and the Land: The sources note that the land in question is historically significant to both Israelis and Palestinians [1, 2]. The land, referred to as Canaan, is considered the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people [1, 3, 4]. According to the Bible, God promised this land to Abraham and his descendants, specifically through Isaac and Jacob (also known as Israel), whose children formed the twelve tribes of Israel [2, 3, 5]. The sources also acknowledge that Palestinians have a claim to the land. Some believe that the establishment of Israel in Palestine was a forced act [6].
• Religious Significance: The conflict is deeply intertwined with religious beliefs [3, 7]. The sources point out the significance of the land to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, as it is considered holy by all three Abrahamic religions [1]. For Jews, the land is their promised homeland, while for Christians, it is significant as the land where Jesus lived [1, 7]. For Muslims, it’s a holy place, with connections to the prophets [1, 3]. The sources also note that the Quran recognizes the connection between Bani Israel (the children of Jacob) and the holy land [1].
• Palestinian Perspective: The sources convey the Palestinian perspective, including a sense of injustice and oppression due to the creation of Israel [6, 8, 9]. Some consider the establishment of Israel to be a “dagger in the chest of Islam” [10]. Some Muslims feel that Palestinians have no status and should have their own country [1, 10]. The sources refer to the suffering of Palestinians and the “mountains of audacity that Israel unleashes on the oppressed Palestinian Muslims” [8].
• Two-State Solution: One of the sources mentions the “two-state formula” without going into detail [8]. It also notes that some people believe the only way to solve the conflict is to establish a separate Palestinian state [9].
• American Role and Support for Israel: The sources examine America’s role in the conflict, noting its strong support for Israel [6, 8, 9, 11]. Some suggest that without US backing, Israel could not have been established or maintained its existence [6]. The US is criticized for being “blind, deaf and dumb” when it comes to the plight of the Palestinians [8]. It is also noted that America’s support of Israel has damaged its relationship with the Arab world [6]. The sources also present other viewpoints, including the idea that the US supports Israel because the American public views them as standing against oppression, which appeals to the American sense of self-respect [9]. The view that the American public supports Israel is supported in the sources by the statement that “The entire American community worships Israel with all their heart and soul and looks at the actions of the Palestinians and Kush attacks with dislike, pain and anger” [9].
• Arab Views on Israel: The sources discuss that some Arabs oppose Israel on religious grounds [8], but also note that there is division among Arabs, with some having established relations with Israel [8, 11]. There are also those who believe that the hatred for Jews among Arabs is rooted in historical and sectarian divisions and may not be based on the true facts of the situation [11].
• Moral Considerations: The sources raise questions about the moral implications of the conflict [7, 9]. Some sources question how a nation that claims to champion human rights can support Israel, given its actions towards the Palestinians [8]. However, other sources suggest that the American support for Israel is rooted in a perceived moral foundation for Israel’s existence [7, 9].

In summary, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is depicted as a complex issue with deep historical, religious, and political roots. The sources emphasize the competing claims to the land, the suffering of the Palestinians, the significant role of the US in the conflict, and the various moral questions that arise from the situation.

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

The sources discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, highlighting the historical, religious, and political dimensions of the issue. Here’s a breakdown of key points:

• Historical Claims and the Land: The sources note that the land in question is historically significant to both Israelis and Palestinians [1, 2]. The land, referred to as Canaan, is considered the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people [1, 3, 4]. According to the Bible, God promised this land to Abraham and his descendants, specifically through Isaac and Jacob (also known as Israel), whose children formed the twelve tribes of Israel [2, 3, 5]. The sources also acknowledge that Palestinians have a claim to the land. Some believe that the establishment of Israel in Palestine was a forced act [6].
• Religious Significance: The conflict is deeply intertwined with religious beliefs [3, 7]. The sources point out the significance of the land to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, as it is considered holy by all three Abrahamic religions [1]. For Jews, the land is their promised homeland, while for Christians, it is significant as the land where Jesus lived [1, 7]. For Muslims, it’s a holy place, with connections to the prophets [1, 3]. The sources also note that the Quran recognizes the connection between Bani Israel (the children of Jacob) and the holy land [1].
• Palestinian Perspective: The sources convey the Palestinian perspective, including a sense of injustice and oppression due to the creation of Israel [6, 8, 9]. Some consider the establishment of Israel to be a “dagger in the chest of Islam” [10]. Some Muslims feel that Palestinians have no status and should have their own country [1, 10]. The sources refer to the suffering of Palestinians and the “mountains of audacity that Israel unleashes on the oppressed Palestinian Muslims” [8].
• Two-State Solution: One of the sources mentions the “two-state formula” without going into detail [8]. It also notes that some people believe the only way to solve the conflict is to establish a separate Palestinian state [9].
• American Role and Support for Israel: The sources examine America’s role in the conflict, noting its strong support for Israel [6, 8, 9, 11]. Some suggest that without US backing, Israel could not have been established or maintained its existence [6]. The US is criticized for being “blind, deaf and dumb” when it comes to the plight of the Palestinians [8]. It is also noted that America’s support of Israel has damaged its relationship with the Arab world [6]. The sources also present other viewpoints, including the idea that the US supports Israel because the American public views them as standing against oppression, which appeals to the American sense of self-respect [9]. The view that the American public supports Israel is supported in the sources by the statement that “The entire American community worships Israel with all their heart and soul and looks at the actions of the Palestinians and Kush attacks with dislike, pain and anger” [9].
• Arab Views on Israel: The sources discuss that some Arabs oppose Israel on religious grounds [8], but also note that there is division among Arabs, with some having established relations with Israel [8, 11]. There are also those who believe that the hatred for Jews among Arabs is rooted in historical and sectarian divisions and may not be based on the true facts of the situation [11].
• Moral Considerations: The sources raise questions about the moral implications of the conflict [7, 9]. Some sources question how a nation that claims to champion human rights can support Israel, given its actions towards the Palestinians [8]. However, other sources suggest that the American support for Israel is rooted in a perceived moral foundation for Israel’s existence [7, 9].

In summary, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is depicted as a complex issue with deep historical, religious, and political roots. The sources emphasize the competing claims to the land, the suffering of the Palestinians, the significant role of the US in the conflict, and the various moral questions that arise from the situation.

Arab-Israeli Relations and the Prospects for Peace

The sources discuss various aspects of Arab-Israeli relations and the prospects for peace, highlighting both challenges and potential shifts in the dynamics of the conflict. Here’s a summary of the key points:

• Historical Opposition: Historically, many Arab nations have opposed Israel, with some even considering its existence to be a “dagger in the chest of Islam” [1]. This opposition is partly rooted in religious beliefs, with some Muslims viewing the land as rightfully belonging to Palestinians [1, 2]. There is also a sense of injustice among some Arabs regarding the displacement of Palestinians, with some feeling they have no status [3].
• Shifting Dynamics: Despite historical opposition, the sources suggest a shift in the dynamics of Arab-Israeli relations [2, 4]. Some Arab countries have begun to establish ties with Israel [2, 4]. For example, a top Saudi delegation reportedly attended a UN conference in Riyadh where Israeli leaders were present [4]. The sources also mention that Egypt and Jordan have seemingly accepted the existence of Israel [2].
• Two-State Solution: The concept of a “two-state formula” is mentioned as a possible solution, though the details are not provided [2]. This refers to the idea of establishing a separate Palestinian state alongside Israel, but the complexities of this solution are not discussed in detail.
• Internal Arab Divisions: The sources also note that there are divisions among Arabs regarding the conflict, with some of the hatred for Jews rooted in historical and sectarian issues, rather than on the facts of the current situation [4]. This suggests that a unified Arab stance against Israel may not be as strong as it once was.
• US Influence: The sources emphasize the significant role of the US in the conflict [2, 5]. The US’s strong support for Israel has been a major point of contention in the Arab world, with some believing that America’s backing has allowed Israel to oppress Palestinians [5, 6]. However, it is also noted that the US has been a key player in the peace process, and that some believe that America is the only nation that could ensure the survival of Israel [5].
• Challenges to Peace: The sources also suggest that there are significant challenges to achieving peace. One source suggests that any peace will not come at the expense of Israel [2]. Another concern is that if the Arabs achieve peace among themselves it would lead to the destruction of Palestine [4].
• Religious Perspectives: The sources note that the land is holy to all three Abrahamic religions, which could pose an obstacle to peace negotiations [3]. The sources also discuss that both the Bible and the Quran recognize the connection between the Jewish people and the land, as well as with the Muslim people, as they are considered to be cousins, descended from Ibrahim [7, 8]. These connections may suggest that, even though the religions have different views of the conflict, there may also be common ground on which to build a peace, and an end to the conflict [3, 7].

In conclusion, the sources paint a complex picture of the Arab-Israeli conflict, with both historical tensions and potential shifts in relations. While there are significant challenges to achieving peace, there are also indications that some Arab nations are willing to engage with Israel. The role of the US remains crucial, as its support for Israel continues to influence the dynamics of the conflict.

Abrahamic Faiths and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

The sources discuss religious perspectives related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, highlighting the significance of the land to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam [1, 2]. Here’s a breakdown of the key religious viewpoints:

• Judaism: The land, referred to as Canaan, is considered the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people, and is believed to have been promised to Abraham and his descendants through Isaac and Jacob (Israel) by God [2, 3]. This promise is a cornerstone of Jewish belief, and the establishment of Israel is seen by many as a fulfillment of this promise [2]. The sources indicate that the Jewish connection to this land is recorded in the Bible [1].
• Christianity: The sources suggest that Christian Americans have an affinity for the Jewish people, because of the shared history of the two religions [4]. The sources also discuss that Jesus, who Christians believe is the Messiah, is himself part of the lineage of Bani Israel through his mother Mary [2]. The sources mention that the American people are “overwhelmed with love for Syedna Masih” [4]. This shared religious history leads to an affinity toward the Jewish people and the land that they also consider to be a holy place [4].
• Islam: The sources acknowledge the Islamic perspective, noting that the land is holy to Muslims as well [1, 2]. The Quran recognizes the connection between the “Bani Israel” (the children of Jacob) and the holy land [1]. However, some Muslims also believe that the land rightfully belongs to the Palestinians, and that the establishment of Israel was an injustice, a “dagger in the chest of Islam” [5]. The sources also point out that Muslims revere many of the same prophets as Jews and Christians, with both Muslim and Jewish people tracing their lineage to Abraham [1, 2]. The sources mention that in Islam, Abraham is believed to have settled his son Ismail in Mecca, and it is from that line that Prophet Muhammad is descended [2]. The sources also refer to the Quranic verses describing the promise of the land of Canaan to the descendants of Jacob, which is the same promise made in the Bible [6, 7].
• Shared Lineage: The sources emphasize that all three Abrahamic religions have roots in the same land and the same lineage, and all have a connection to Abraham and his descendants, with Muslims considering themselves to be cousins with the Jewish people [2]. This shared lineage and recognition of the same prophets and holy figures are points of common ground, despite the conflicting views regarding the current conflict [1, 2].
• Moral and Spiritual Dimensions: The sources explore the moral and spiritual aspects of the conflict, mentioning that the American people’s support of Israel is based in part on their “self-respect against oppression” [8]. Some also consider the affinity that Americans feel toward Israel to be a “natural and spiritual act”, because of their shared religious traditions [2]. This viewpoint is based in part on the idea that Israel is a moral nation that defends itself against its enemies [8]. The sources also discuss that some Muslims believe that it would be wrong to deny the Jewish people their homeland, as that would be similar to having their own religious homeland taken from them [1].

In summary, the religious perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are complex and multifaceted. While the land holds deep religious significance for all three Abrahamic faiths, the interpretations of the historical events and the current political situation are different. The sources acknowledge that the conflict is deeply rooted in religious beliefs and historical claims that are not easily reconciled. However, the sources also suggest that the shared lineage and commonalities among the religions could provide a basis for understanding and reconciliation [1, 2].

A History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

The sources provide a rich historical context for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, discussing the ancient origins of the conflict as well as more recent historical events that have shaped the present situation. Here’s a breakdown of the key historical elements:

• Ancient Origins and the Land of Canaan: The sources describe the land, referred to as Canaan, as having ancient significance for the Jewish people. The land was promised to Abraham and his descendants through Isaac and Jacob (also known as Israel) [1, 2]. Jacob’s twelve sons are said to be the founders of the twelve tribes of Israel [3]. The sources mention the biblical accounts of God’s promise to Abraham and his descendants, and the land’s significance as their ancestral homeland [1, 2]. This historical connection forms a key part of the Jewish claim to the land. The sources also mention that the land has also been called Palestine [4].
• Bani Israel in Egypt: The sources describe how the children of Israel, also known as Bani Israel, were in Egypt for 430 years [5]. The sources note that they were eventually led out of Egypt by Moses, who according to the Quran and Bible, was instructed to lead them back to their ancestral homeland, Canaan [5, 6]. The sources note that it was the will of Yusuf that his bones be brought back to Canaan, which demonstrates the importance of that land to the descendants of Jacob [5].
• The Establishment of the State of Israel: The sources also discuss the more recent history of the establishment of the State of Israel in Palestine [7]. Some sources suggest that the establishment of Israel was a forced act, and was done without consideration of the rights of the Palestinians [7]. The sources describe this act as a “dagger in the chest of Islam” [8]. One source indicates that the establishment of Israel could not have happened without the support of the United States [7].
• The Role of the United States: The sources emphasize the significant role of the US in the conflict [7, 9]. The sources note that the United States has been a key supporter of Israel, and that without this support, it is unlikely that the State of Israel would have survived [7]. The sources note that the United States has also been a key player in the peace process, although the success of this is questioned [9]. The sources also suggest that the United States may have damaged its relationships in the Arab world because of its support of Israel [7].
• Arab Perspectives and Opposition: The sources also discuss the historical opposition of some Arab countries toward Israel, with some considering its existence to be an injustice to the Palestinians [8, 10]. Some Muslims believe that the land rightfully belongs to the Palestinians [8]. The sources mention that there have been attempts to create peace, and that some Arab countries have begun to establish ties with Israel [9, 10]. However, the sources also indicate that there are internal divisions within the Arab world regarding Israel, with some of the hatred for Jews rooted in historical and sectarian issues, rather than on the facts of the current situation [10].
• The Two-State Solution: The sources briefly mention the idea of a “two-state formula”, which involves the establishment of a separate Palestinian state alongside Israel [9]. The sources suggest that this idea has been around for some time, but they do not provide details on the history of how the idea has been proposed, nor any specific details on attempts to implement this solution.

In summary, the historical context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is complex and deeply rooted in both ancient religious claims and more recent political developments. The sources highlight the significance of the land to both Jews and Palestinians, the impact of the establishment of Israel, the role of the United States, and the ongoing efforts to find a peaceful resolution to this conflict. The sources suggest that the conflict cannot be understood without considering the long history of the claims to the land, from the ancient times to the present day.

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog

Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!