The text analyzes Pakistan’s two-party system, criticizing its immaturity and susceptibility to external influence (“third umpire”). It highlights the historical context, including the Charter of Democracy, and the negative impacts of political infighting and reliance on smaller parties to gain power. The author advocates for strengthening the two major parties to enhance political stability and prevent the undermining of democracy by external forces. This requires improved cooperation between the major parties and a focus on good governance to discourage the rise of third parties. Ultimately, the text argues for a more mature and self-reliant democratic system in Pakistan.

Political Dynamics in Pakistan: A Study Guide

Quiz

Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.

1. According to the text, what is the primary problem that plagues Pakistani politics, and how does it manifest?
2. What is the “third umpire,” and why do politicians look to them?
3. How does the text describe the relationship between the establishment and politicians?
4. What is the significance of the Charter of Democracy (Misaq Jamhooriyat)?
5. According to the author, what should the two major political parties in Pakistan do to strengthen democracy?
6. How does the text describe the role of the “establishment” in Pakistani politics?
7. Why is the two-party system considered so important, according to the source?
8. How does the author characterize Bilawal Bhutto Zardari’s role in politics?
9. What does the text mean when it refers to “horse trading” in politics?
10. According to the author, what is the danger of a third political party in Pakistan?

Quiz – Answer Key

1. The primary problem is the lack of political maturity, which results in a reliance on external forces (like the military) and an unstable democracy. This manifests as politicians seeking intervention from the “third umpire” instead of building a strong, self-reliant system.
2. The “third umpire” is a euphemism for the military or other powerful, non-elected forces in Pakistan. Politicians turn to them, seeking their support in power struggles, often due to the politicians’ lack of public trust.
3. The text describes the relationship as exploitative, with the establishment using politicians (“horses”) for their own purposes. Once a politician becomes powerful independently, the establishment seeks to control them or discard them for a new “horse.”
4. The Charter of Democracy (Misaq Jamhooriyat) was a significant attempt by the two main political parties to agree on democratic principles and strengthen the political system. However, it has not been fully respected or implemented.
5. The two major political parties should prioritize national interests over personal ones. They should create a united front against any threat to democracy and create strong performances so that there is no room for the “third force” to manipulate.
6. The “establishment” is characterized as a powerful force that intervenes in politics to serve its own interests. It is seen as a major cause of political instability as they seek to undermine the democratic process.
7. The two-party system is considered crucial as it is seen as a sign of a healthy democracy, fostering political maturity and stability. The text suggests that strengthening the two-party system will prevent instability and reduce the third umpire’s influence.
8. The author describes Bilawal as a novice politician with good intentions for the nation. While he may make mistakes, he has not stooped to the personal attacks common among other politicians.
9. “Horse trading” refers to politicians seeking power through illicit means. This often involves the establishment of third parties that will be beholden to the establishment and undermine democracy.
10. A third party is a danger because it gives the establishment a way to manipulate politics. According to the text, the establishment uses third parties as pawns to serve their own interests, undermining the democratic process.

Essay Questions

1. Analyze the role of the “third umpire” in Pakistani politics, according to the text. Discuss how this external force affects democratic processes and political stability in Pakistan.
2. Explore the significance of the Charter of Democracy (Misaq Jamhooriyat) as described in the text. Why was it important, and why hasn’t it been fully effective in strengthening democracy?
3. Discuss how the text characterizes the relationship between the political establishment and the major political parties. How has this relationship contributed to the political landscape of Pakistan?
4. Evaluate the argument that a strong two-party system is crucial for political stability in Pakistan. What are the benefits and challenges to achieving a stronger two-party system in the current political climate?
5. In what ways does the text suggest that external forces and internal divisions weaken Pakistani democracy? How might these obstacles be overcome?

Glossary of Key Terms

Establishment: A term used to describe powerful, non-elected forces in Pakistan, often referring to the military and intelligence agencies. They are viewed as having undue influence in politics.

Third Umpire: A euphemism for the establishment, implying its role as an external arbitrator or intervener in political disputes, often against the interests of democracy.

Charter of Democracy (Misaq Jamhooriyat): A political document created by the two main parties, the PPP and PML-N, to strengthen democracy. It outlined the need for civilian rule, free and fair elections, and freedom of expression.

Two-Party System: A political system where two major parties dominate the political landscape. This is seen as a sign of democratic maturity, because of the ability to form stable governing structures.

Horse Trading: A term referring to political maneuvering where politicians seek power through means not supported by popular opinion or democratic processes. This includes forming new parties that can be manipulated by the establishment.

Mashallah: An Arabic phrase that expresses appreciation for something good. In the context of the source material, the text uses it as an example of a tradition that has lost significance in Pakistani politics.

Parliament (Lok Sabha): The legislative body in India. The text mentions India’s Parliament to provide an example of a well-functioning parliamentary system.

Public Servant: The text references this term to distinguish the role of military officers. Their duty is to serve the public rather than be influenced by personal or political aspirations.

Pressure Groups: Smaller political parties that exert influence through political pressure and lobbying rather than by holding a significant number of elected offices.

Pakistan’s Fragile Democracy: Establishment Influence and the Two-Party System

Okay, here’s a briefing document summarizing the key themes and ideas from the provided text:

Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” on Pakistani Politics

Date: October 26, 2023

Subject: Analysis of Pakistani Political Dynamics, Establishment Influence, and the Two-Party System.

Introduction:

This document analyzes an excerpt of text focusing on the political landscape of Pakistan, particularly concerning the dynamics between political parties, the influence of the “establishment” (likely referring to the military or other powerful non-elected institutions), and the challenges to democratic stability. The author expresses concern over the recurring interference of unelected forces in the political process and advocates for a stronger two-party system as a way to bolster democracy.

Key Themes and Ideas:

1. The Fragility of Democracy and the Shadow of “Swords and Guns”:

• The text argues that Pakistan’s democracy remains constantly threatened by external forces, preventing it from achieving maturity. This is symbolized by the phrase “under the shadow of swords and guns.”
• The author laments the repeated cycle of “Mashallah” (a phrase used to ward off the evil eye) implying that democracy is constantly vulnerable and in need of protection.
• Quote: “it remains under the shadow of swords and guns all the time, due to this, it could not attain the required maturity.”

1. The Blame Game and the “Third Umpire”:

• The text criticizes politicians for their infighting and tendency to seek the intervention of a “third umpire,” a reference to the establishment. This highlights a lack of self-reliance and a desire for external validation rather than resolving issues internally.
• It argues that seeking intervention from outside institutions stems from a political culture of indiscipline and a reliance on established “bad traditions.”
• Quote: “On one hand, if the politicians are blamed for this that in order to degrade each other or by being involved in personal matters, they start looking towards the third umpire with greedy and tempting eyes”

1. The Power of the Establishment and its “Horses”:

• The author uses a powerful metaphor: the establishment as a “Brahma establishment” that searches for “horses” (politicians) to ride to power. These politicians are initially controlled by the establishment but once they gain their own strength they want to rule without the “iron saddle”.
• The establishment tightens its reins or throws the horse out depending on how well it aligns with its interests.
• Quote: “The Brahma establishment is already on the lookout for such horses. When they find a genuine non-breed or fake horse of this type, they call it their horse in various ways and put their saddle on it.”

1. The Example of India and Civilian Supremacy:

• The author contrasts Pakistan with India, highlighting Pandit Nehru’s example of asserting civilian control over the military. Nehru’s reminder to an Army Chief to remain within his bounds and follow protocol of the chain of command demonstrates a clear hierarchy that upholds civilian supremacy.
• The author suggests this clarity on the roles and the power of the people contributes to a healthy democracy.
• Quote: “when an Army Chief tried to meet him directly, Pandit ji, while admonishing him to stay within his limits, reminded him that you are a public servant and you are prohibited from being influenced by the government.”

1. The Charter of Democracy (Misaq Jamhooriyat):

• The Charter of Democracy is presented as a significant attempt by the two major parties to overcome their differences and work against the establishment’s interference. However, the author laments its lack of importance in Pakistan’s political culture.
• The author acknowledges the political maturity both parties displayed by creating it.
• Quote: “Charter of Democracy or Misaq Jamhooriyat is the battle or masterpiece of this political bitterness or childish vision which was not given the importance in the politics of Missile State which this unique document deserves.”

1. The Need for a Strong Two-Party System:

• The text argues that a robust two-party system is vital for strengthening democracy and reducing political instability. In developed democracies, this system tends to be more resilient.
• The author believes that when democracy is weakened, the two-party system gets stronger naturally which provides a glimmer of hope.
• Quote: “It is very important to make the two party system stronger and stronger. This is the nature of democracy. Whenever it moves towards the end, the two party system gets stronger.”

1. The Problem of the “Third Party” and Establishment Influence:

• The author states that the establishment uses a third (weaker) party to advance its interests, thereby undermining democracy. This reinforces the notion of political actors being manipulated by external forces.
• The establishment uses these parties as pressure groups, making it hard for political stability to exist in the nation.

1. Call for Unity and Responsibility:

• The text concludes by urging the two major parties to unite against interference and improve their governance. The author proposes that any leader who undermines democracy should be met with unity to prevent further interference of external forces.
• The author also urges them to refrain from insulting or demeaning each other in the face of the challenges to democracy.

Conclusion:

This text presents a critical view of Pakistan’s political system, highlighting the persistent challenges to democracy posed by the influence of the “establishment,” the lack of internal unity and accountability among political parties, and the need for a more robust two-party system. The author emphasizes that the two-party system must form a unified front against those who do not respect the power of the people and democracy. The text is a call for political maturity, self-reliance, and a stronger commitment to democratic principles.

Pakistan’s Democratic Struggle: Establishment Interference and the Path to Stability

Okay, here’s an 8-question FAQ based on the provided text, formatted with markdown:

FAQ

1. What is the central issue plaguing Pakistani politics, as described in the text?
2. The central issue is the persistent interference of the “establishment” (often referring to the military or other non-civilian power structures) in the democratic process. This interference manifests in various ways, including supporting or manipulating political parties, influencing the government, and undermining the authority of elected officials. The text highlights a cycle of politicians seeking the establishment’s favor and the establishment, in turn, exploiting the weaknesses of political actors. This situation hinders the development of a mature and stable democracy.
3. What is meant by the “third umpire” in the context of Pakistani politics?

The “third umpire” is a metaphor for the establishment, especially the military or other unelected power structures. Politicians, when they fail to gain public trust or face internal conflicts, often turn to this “umpire” for support, rather than building consensus or resolving matters through democratic processes. This reliance on a non-democratic entity undermines the legitimacy of the elected government.

1. How does the text characterize the relationship between the major political parties and the establishment?
2. The text describes a dysfunctional, almost addictive, dynamic. Political parties, often driven by personal agendas and a thirst for power, readily seek the support of the establishment. The establishment, in turn, exploits this dependence by “saddling” and “reining” these parties, using them to its own advantage, and discarding them when they become too independent. This creates a cycle of instability and prevents the political parties from genuinely representing the people’s will.
3. What is the “Charter of Democracy” (Misaq Jamhooriyat) and why is it significant?
4. The “Charter of Democracy” is a document born out of political bitterness, developed by the two major parties, that can be seen as a “masterpiece” of an effort to overcome the power struggles in Pakistan. It represents a significant step towards political maturity, as it shows a mutual understanding of the establishment’s manipulative tactics, and highlights the need to collaborate in order to resist its interference. Its intent is that the major parties should not give the establishment any chance to exploit them. It is considered a unique document, which however, was not given the importance it deserves in Missile State Politics. Its significance also lies in the fact that it enabled the ruling government of PP to complete its term. However, the text criticizes the lack of respect for this charter among the PP members.
5. What does the author suggest is the path toward a more stable and mature democracy in Pakistan?
6. The author argues that a stronger two-party system is crucial for the health of democracy. The two main political parties should prioritize collaboration over personal feuds, especially when the democratic process is threatened by external interference. The text stresses that these parties need to improve their performance and leadership, preventing the establishment and any third party from exploiting any weakness in their standing. The text proposes the parties should agree on the principle that they will stand united when democracy is threatened, irrespective of their own differences.
7. Why are the minor political parties considered to be ineffective?
8. The minor political parties are seen as “pressure groups” rather than having any real power to effect change. They are more vulnerable to being manipulated by the establishment to further its goals. This weakens democracy by allowing the establishment to manipulate the political landscape. These groups are considered to be illegitimate pawns used by the establishment to undermine democracy.
9. What specific advice does the author give to the leaders of the major parties?
10. The author urges the leaders of the major political parties to act with greater maturity, tolerance, and statesmanship. They should refrain from personal attacks and infighting, and should instead focus on collaborative efforts to protect democracy from manipulation. They should recognize the importance of the opposing party, even with its faults, as a vital component of the country’s political system and be willing to support them, even when they have fallen due to their own mistakes. They are also called to control their own ministers that engage in illegal activities.
11. How does the text connect the strength of the two-party system to the stability of democracy?
12. The text explicitly links the strength of the two-party system to the stability of the country’s democracy. It argues that as democracy matures, the two-party system strengthens. A strong two-party system provides stability by preventing the establishment from using smaller parties to undermine democracy. It creates a more balanced and accountable system where the focus is on policy debates and public service rather than on personal power struggles and reliance on unelected actors.

Pakistan’s Two-Party System and Democratic Stability

The two-party system in Pakistan is discussed in the source as a key element of the nation’s political landscape and its struggle for democratic stability. Here are some key points:

• Instability and the “Third Umpire”: The source suggests that Pakistan’s two-party system is often undermined by the influence of a “third umpire,” which seems to refer to the military or establishment. This interference is seen as a threat to the country’s democratic maturity and stability.
• Political Immaturity and Blame: Politicians are criticized for prioritizing personal matters and for seeking the intervention of the “third umpire”. The source also argues that once a pattern of indiscipline or reliance on external forces is established, it becomes difficult to break.
• Tradition vs. Law: The source notes that while Pakistan is a tradition-oriented society, laws and principles must be upheld. The example of Pandit Nehru’s firm stance with an Army Chief in India is given to illustrate the importance of civilian control and adherence to protocol. This contrasts with Pakistan’s political situation where such standards appear to be lacking.
• The Establishment and “Horses”: The source uses an analogy of the establishment seeking “horses” (political figures) to gain power. When these “horses” gain strength and seek independence, the establishment tightens control or replaces them. This suggests a cycle of manipulation and control in Pakistani politics.
• Charter of Democracy: The Charter of Democracy (Misaq Jamhooriyat) is highlighted as an attempt by the two major parties to overcome their political bitterness and establish a united front against the establishment. However, the source also notes that this charter has not been given the importance it deserves.
• Importance of Unity: The source emphasizes the need for the two major parties to unite against any threat to democracy and to resolve issues through mutual agreement. It calls for an end to personal attacks and urges the parties to support each other, even when mistakes are made.
• Strengthening Democracy: The source argues that a strong two-party system is essential for strengthening democracy and ending political instability. It suggests that as democracy evolves, the two-party system should become more robust.
• Third Party Role: The source mentions the third party is used by the establishment to serve their interests which it sees as harmful for democracy. It asserts that even if other parties exist, they will likely function as pressure groups and not as serious contenders for power.
• Challenge to Parties: The source states that the major parties need to perform well enough that third parties do not get an opportunity to undermine democracy.

Pakistan’s Democratic Struggle

Pakistani politics, as depicted in the source, is characterized by a struggle between democratic ideals and the influence of the “establishment,” often referred to as the “third umpire”. Here’s a breakdown of key themes:

• The Two-Party System: The source focuses on the two-party system in Pakistan and how it is undermined by the interference of the “third umpire,” hindering the country’s democratic maturity. It’s suggested that the strengthening of this two-party system is essential for political stability and a robust democracy, drawing comparisons with developed democracies.
• Political Immaturity: Politicians are criticized for being self-serving and for inviting the intervention of the “third umpire,” indicating a lack of political maturity. This is exacerbated by an established tradition of indiscipline and reliance on external forces, making it difficult for the political system to evolve.
• Influence of the Establishment: The “establishment” is portrayed as a powerful force that manipulates the political landscape. It seeks out and supports political figures (“horses”) to maintain control, replacing them when they become too independent. This cycle of manipulation and control is detrimental to the growth of a truly democratic system.
• Charter of Democracy (Misaq Jamhooriyat): This document is seen as an attempt by the two major parties to overcome their past conflicts and form a united front against the establishment. However, the source suggests that this charter has not been given the importance it deserves and that its principles have not been fully implemented.
• Need for Unity and Cooperation: The source emphasizes the importance of unity between the two major parties to safeguard democracy, urging them to resolve issues through mutual agreement and to refrain from personal attacks. The text indicates the need for the parties to support each other, even when mistakes occur, highlighting a need for political tolerance.
• Third Party Dynamics: The establishment has been using the third weak party to serve its own interests, which is seen as detrimental to democracy. Although many parties may exist, they will likely act as pressure groups rather than real contenders for power.
• Challenge to Major Parties: The major parties need to improve their performance to prevent third parties from gaining opportunities to undermine democracy. The political stability of the country depends on the two major parties and their ability to work together.
• Public Authority and Law: The source points out that the public authority is being insulted when conditions are imposed on the elected parliament. This is seen as a blot on democracy, with the law and the people being disrespected.

In summary, the source portrays Pakistani politics as a complex interplay between the two-party system, the influence of the “establishment,” and the struggle for democratic stability. The key to strengthening the system is seen as unity, cooperation, and improved political maturity of the major parties to overcome the manipulation of the “third umpire.”

Pakistan’s Political Stability: Two-Party System and the “Third Umpire”

Political stability in Pakistan, as discussed in the source, is closely tied to the strength of the two-party system and the influence of the “establishment” or “third umpire”. Here’s a breakdown of how the source addresses political stability:

• Two-Party System as a Stabilizer: The source emphasizes that strengthening the two-party system is crucial for political stability and a robust democracy. It draws a parallel with developed democracies where a strong two-party system is seen as a key feature of a stable political landscape. The source argues that as democracy matures, the two-party system should also become stronger.
• Threat of the “Third Umpire”: The influence of the “third umpire,” which appears to be the establishment or military, is seen as a major threat to political stability. This interference undermines democratic processes and prevents the political system from reaching maturity. The source suggests that the “establishment” seeks to control politics through manipulation and interference, which creates instability.
• Political Immaturity: The political immaturity of politicians, who are often criticized for prioritizing personal matters and inviting the intervention of the “third umpire”, is also seen as a factor that hinders political stability. This immaturity is exacerbated by a tradition of indiscipline and reliance on external forces, making it difficult for the political system to stabilize.
• Need for Unity: The source highlights the importance of unity and cooperation between the two major parties as essential for political stability. It urges them to resolve issues through mutual agreement and to avoid personal attacks. The source indicates that the parties should support each other, even when mistakes are made, promoting political tolerance.
• Undermining Public Authority: Imposing conditions on the elected parliament is seen as a sign of political instability and disrespect for the rule of law and the will of the people. The source argues that undermining public authority in this way is a blot on democracy.
• Third Party Dynamics: The establishment has been using a third weak party to serve its own interests, which has been detrimental to democracy and political stability. The source suggests that any number of parties might exist but many will likely only serve as pressure groups, and the two major parties must unify and take responsibility to preserve the nation’s political stability.
• Challenge to Parties: According to the source, it is the responsibility of the two major political parties to ensure that they are performing well enough to ensure that third parties do not get an opportunity to undermine democracy. Political stability is reliant on these two parties and their ability to work together.

In summary, the source suggests that political stability in Pakistan depends on the ability of the two major parties to unite and overcome the negative influence of the “establishment” and the “third umpire.” A strong two-party system is seen as a prerequisite for a stable and functioning democracy. The source also points out that the political immaturity of politicians and the lack of respect for public authority contribute to instability.

Pakistan’s Democratic Deficit

Democracy in Pakistan faces significant challenges, according to the source, primarily stemming from the interference of the “establishment” and the political immaturity of its leaders. Here’s a breakdown of these challenges:

• Influence of the “Third Umpire”: The most prominent challenge to democracy is the constant interference of a “third umpire,” which the source suggests is the military or establishment. This interference undermines the democratic process, prevents the political system from maturing, and creates instability. The source indicates that the establishment seeks to control politics through manipulation, supporting and replacing political figures (“horses”) as needed.
• Political Immaturity: Politicians are criticized for prioritizing personal matters over national interests, often seeking the intervention of the “third umpire”. This lack of political maturity and an established tradition of indiscipline and reliance on external forces further weakens the democratic process.
• Undermining Public Authority: The source points out that imposing conditions on the elected parliament is a sign of disrespect for the rule of law and the will of the people. This undermining of public authority is seen as a significant challenge to democracy.
• Weak Two-Party System: Although a strong two-party system is crucial for a stable democracy, the source suggests that the existing system in Pakistan is weakened by the influence of the “third umpire”. This interference prevents the two-party system from effectively functioning as a stabilizing force.
• Lack of Unity: The source emphasizes the need for unity and cooperation between the two major parties. However, it suggests that personal attacks and a lack of mutual support create divisions and prevent the parties from presenting a unified front against threats to democracy.
• Manipulation by the Establishment: The source indicates that the establishment uses a third weak party to serve its interests, which further undermines democracy.
• Performance of Major Parties: The source states that it is crucial for the major parties to improve their performance so that third parties do not get opportunities to undermine democracy. The future of democracy and political stability is reliant on these two parties and their ability to work together.
• Tradition vs. Law: The source notes that while Pakistan is a tradition-oriented society, it is essential to uphold laws and principles. The interference of the “third umpire” and the political immaturity of leaders suggest a failure to do this. The source cites an example from India where an Army Chief was admonished to stay in his lane by Pandit Nehru as an example of respect for civilian control and adherence to protocol, suggesting a contrast with the political situation in Pakistan.
• The Charter of Democracy: While the Charter of Democracy (Misaq Jamhooriyat) was an attempt by the two major parties to unite against the establishment, the source indicates it has not been given the importance it deserves and has not been fully implemented. This suggests a missed opportunity to address some of the challenges to democracy.

In summary, the source portrays the challenges to democracy in Pakistan as stemming from the undue influence of the “establishment,” the political immaturity of leaders, a weakened two-party system, a lack of unity, and a disregard for democratic principles. The source suggests that overcoming these challenges requires strengthening the two-party system, fostering political maturity, and establishing a unified front against the “third umpire.”

The Charter of Democracy in Pakistan

The Charter of Democracy, or Misaq Jamhooriyat, is presented in the source as a significant, yet underutilized, attempt to strengthen democracy in Pakistan. Here’s a breakdown of its role and significance as discussed in the source:

• A Response to Political Bitterness: The Charter of Democracy is described as a “battle or masterpiece” born out of the political bitterness and “childish vision” of the two major parties. It is portrayed as an effort by these parties to move past their conflicts and unite against the influence of the “establishment”.
• Aims to Overcome Establishment Interference: The charter was created as a way to overcome the manipulation of the “establishment” which is described as constantly looking for “horses” to control. It was meant to allow the parties to take decisions according to their own will, without the influence of the “third umpire,” or “Brahma establishment,” with the law and the people being the only guiding factors.
• Lack of Importance: Despite its significance, the Charter of Democracy was not given the importance it deserved in the politics of the “Missile State”. The source indicates that the ruling government of the PP (Pakistan People’s Party) treated the charter as if it was not important, and that the charter has not been fully implemented. This lack of importance is a missed opportunity to address challenges to democracy.
• Potential for Political Stability: The source suggests that if the charter had been given due importance and its principles respected, there would have been more political stability. The fact that the PP’s government completed its term is attributed to the charter, but it could have had a more significant impact if fully utilized.
• Missed Opportunity for Unity: The source suggests that if the barrister of the PP had respected the charter as much as the Senate Chairman, there would have been political progress. This points to a missed opportunity for the two major parties to present a united front and strengthen democracy.
• Need for Implementation: The source implies that the principles of the Charter of Democracy should be implemented to safeguard democracy. The Charter represents an agreement between the two major parties to stand together against the undermining forces of the “establishment”, which is a key factor in ensuring political stability and a functioning democracy.

In summary, the Charter of Democracy is presented as a crucial agreement between the two major parties in Pakistan, designed to overcome their past differences and stand together against the interference of the “establishment.” However, the source emphasizes that the charter has been underutilized and not given the importance it deserves, representing a missed opportunity to strengthen democracy and achieve political stability in the country. The source suggests that if the principles of the charter were respected and implemented, it could play a key role in strengthening the two party system, and in preventing the “third umpire” from undermining the democratic process.

The Original Text

पाकिस्तान में दो पार्टी सिस्टम की अफ़ा दियत आर्टिक अलहाजा जंग में शाया हुआ इस मुल्क के बदनसीब की कौमी सियासत या जम्हूरियत का एक मखम या अलमिया है कि यह हर वक्त तलवारों और बंदूकों के साय में रहती है इस वजह से इसमें अनूज मतलूब मैच्योरिटी नहीं आ पाई इस इशू पर हमारे दानिश्वर में बहुत बहस हुई हैं कि आखिर हमारे ही मुल्क में बार-बार माशाल्लाह क्यों लगते हैं और जब नहीं लगते तब भी जम्हूरियत बूटो की चाप के खौफ से डरी सहमी हुई क्यों रहती है इसका इल्जाम एक तरफ अगर सियासत दानों पर धरा जाता है कि वह एक दूसरे को नीचा दिखाने के लिए या हिस्सो हफ्स इक्त में मुब्तला होकर थर्ड अंपायर की तरफ ललचा और लुभाई हुई नजरों से देखना शुरू कर देते हैं तो दूसरी तरफ यह भी कहा जाता है कि जब एक बार किसी के मुंह को मशरू बे तहूर की लत लग जाए तो फिर इसके लिए इस स्वास्थ से पीछा छुड़ाना मुश्किल हो जाता है या यूं कह लीजिए कि एक बार जो रिवायत पड़ जाएं अच्छी या बुरी तो फिर ताकतवर लोग इनको अपना हक ख्याल करने लगते हैं हालांकि जिस सोसाइटी में आईनो कानून की हुक्मरान का नजरिया पुख्ता हो जाए वहां गलत रवाया को दम तोड़ते देर नहीं लगती अंग्रेजों से बढ़कर रिवायत प्रस्त कौन सी कौम होगी लेकिन किसी इशू पर जब पार्लियामेंट स्टैंड ले ले तो रिवाय तों की ऐसी तैसी हो जाती है ज्यादा दूर जाने की बात नहीं हमारी अमसाय कीी में पंडित नेहरू के हवाले से बयान किया जाता है कि किसी आर्मी चीफ ने उन्हें डायरेक्ट मिलने की कोशिश की तो पंडित जी ने उसे औकात में रहने की तल कीन करते हुए याद दिलाया कि तुम एक पब्लिक सर्वेंट हो और तुम पर सरकारी दबते की पाबंदी है मेरे तहत रिक्षा मंत्री या डिफेंस मिनिस्टर है इसके नीचे डिफेंस सेक्रेटरी है तुम इसके मता हो लिहाजा कोई भी मसला है तो डिफेंस सेक्रेटरी से बात करो यही वजह है कि सात डाइयां गुजरने के बावजूद इंडिया में इक्त आला के आमल आवाम हैं और आवामी वोट की ताकत से मुंतखाब होने वाली पार्लियामेंट या लोकसभा के सामने तमाम अधारे सगू हैं और प्राइम मिनिस्टर की ताकत का मंबा लोकसभा या पार्लियामेंट है असल में होता यह है कि सियासत में जो शख्स आवामी एतमाद के हसूल से महरूम रह जाता है इसके साथ अगर व इक्त दार में आने का हद दर्जे हरीश है तो वो मुख्तलिफ शॉर्टकट्स ढूंढता है कि किसी तरह किसी भी कीमत पर लैला इक्त दार से हम आगोश हो जाए ऊपर ब्रामा एस्टेब्लिशमेंट तो पहले ही ऐसे घोड़ों की तलाश में होती है जब उन्हें इस ढब का असली गैर नसली या जाली घोड़ा मिलता है तो वो मुख्तलिफ तरीकों से उसे अपना घोड़ा करार देते हुए इस पर अपनी काठी डाल देते हैं लेकिन जब यह घोड़ा इतना तवाना हो जाता है कि आज खुद अपने बल बोते पर रेस में शरीक हो सके या जीत सके तो वो अपने ऊपर डली हुई लोहे की काठी उतरवाना चाहता है वो चाहता है कि आप वो अपनी मर्जी से फैसले करें आईन कानून या आवाम की काठी के अलावा इस पर कोई काठी ना हो और ना ही कोई लगाम ऐसी सूरत में एस्टेब्लिशमेंट इसकी लगाम मजीद कसती है और काठी भी मजीद मजबूत कर देती है ब सूरते दीगर उसे इवानी इदार से कहीं दूर फेंकते हुए नए घोड़े का बंदोबस्त कर लेती है इस तजार स्थान में पहले तो स्नो की हास ट्रेडिंग जोरों पर थी और दोनों बड़ी पार्टियां एक दूसरे पर सिक्योरिटी रिस्क जैसे इल्जा मात से भरकर इस लेवल पर पहुंच जाती थी कि एक दूसरे का जिक्र करने पर भी इनका का खून खोलने लगता था तमाम तर धक्के खाने और जिल तों का बोझ उठाने के बाद इस जबरस्त की दो नामवर शख्सियत में इतनी सियासी मैच्योरिटी आ गई कि वोह एस्टेब्लिशमेंट की तमाम चालों को समझते हुए इनसे छुटकारा पाने की तदबीर सोचने लगे चार्टर ऑफ डेमोक्रेसी या मिसाक जम्हूरियत इसी सियासी खार या बालक नजरी का समर या शाहकार है जिसे मिसाइल स्तान की सियासत में हनस वो अहमियत नहीं दी गई जिसकी यह मुनफरीद दस्तावेज हकदार है मोहतरमा बेनजीर की शहादत के बावजूद पीपी की साबत जूरी हुकूमत ने वो जैसी तैसी भी थी अगर मियाद पूरी की थी तो वह इसी दस्तावेज का फैजान था और आज भी अगर पीपी के बरिस्टर इसकी अहमियत का राख चेयरमैन सेनेट जितना ही कर लेते तो सियासी खलबली जम्हूर इस्तकाम्या वक्त लेकर बरिस्टर साहब से अलाद कीी में मुलाकात भी की जिस पर अलग कॉलम में बात होगी पनामा लीक्स करप्शन के हवाले से आपके जो भी मुतालबा हैं अब मामला पूरी तरह सुप्रीम जुडिशरी की प्रोसीडिंग में है लिहाजा आप बराह कर्म पर्सनल होने से तराज फरमाएं इशू यह है कि चार्टर ऑफ डेमोक्रेसी लागू होने के बावजूद हमारे यहां सियासी और जम्हूर अदम इस्तकाम्या कि थर्ड अंपायर की दुहाईयां शुरू हो जाती हैं और उंगली उठने या ना उठने पर शर्तें लगने लगती हैं यह तो मुंतखाब पार्लियामेंट की तस्ली है आवामी इक्त दार आला पर धब्बा है आईन और आवाम की इससे ज्यादा तोहीन हो ही नहीं सकती अपने तमाम तर खलाफा के बावजूद दोनों बड़ी पार्टियां इस इशू पर सर जोड़ कर बैठें और इसका काबले अमल हल निकालें एक दूसरे को तहज फराम करते हुए अमेट करें बा हम एक दूसरे को नीचा दिखाने या जलील करने की रव छोड़ दें अगर किसी जानवर से कोई नारवा बात हो भी जाती है तो लाजिम नहीं कि इसका तुर्की ब तुर्की जवाब दिया जाए या दन दन शिकन मौक इख्तियार किया जाए बिलावल हनू सियासत में नौ वाद बच्चा है लेकिन मुल्कों कौम के लिए अच्छे एसासा रखता है अगर वो कोई गलती भी कर जाए तो नून लीग के वजरा में हौसले और बर्दाश्त का मादा होना चाहिए जबी इल्जाम तराश के लिए क्या आपके पास साबिक खिलाड़ी काफी नहीं है और वो खिलाड़ी आप लोगों के खिलाफ जिस सतह तक चले जाता है बिलावल तो अपनी तमाम तर कोशिशों के बावजूद इतना नहीं गिर सकता लिहाज आप लोग अपने मुंह टेढ़े क्यों करते हैं आप इस वक्त इक्दर्म जोर पोलूशन में है आप सबको पीपी की दिलज करनी चाहिए अगरचे वह अपनी गलतियों और कताई हों की वजह से गिरी पड़ी है लेकिन बहरहाल वह एक मुल्क गीर कौमी सियासी पार्टी है एक सूबे में ही नहीं सेनेट में भी इसकी आवामी ताकत है कौमी असेंबली में वह कायदे हिज्ब इलाफ है मुस्लिम लीग नून को लाजिम है कि वह पीपी के साथ अपने तर्ज अमल को बेहतर बनाए बिलख सूस अपने वजीर दाखिला नसल अली को कंट्रोल करें कि वह गैस में दिराना छेड़खानी से बाज रहे डॉक्टर आसम और अयान अली के हवाले से आप लोगों की जो भी मजबूरियां थी अब इता में नवंबर तक इनमें तब्दीलियां आ जानी चाहिए दरवेश ने मुल्क में सियासी अदम इस्तकाम्या टू पार्टी सिस्टम को मजबूत से मजबूत तर बनाया जाना अहज जरूरी है जम्हूरियत का यह वस्फ है जब भी वह ब्लोद की तरफ बढ़ती है तो टू पार्टी सिस्टम मजबूत होता चला जाता है इस तजा स्थान में टू पार्टी सिस्टम सिस्टम को मजबूत करने का मतलब यह होगा कि आप तरकी याफ्ता डेमोक्रेसीज की तरह अपनी डेमोक्रेसी को मजबूत कर रहे हैं और पॉलिटिकल अन स्टेबिलिटी का खात्मा कर रहे हैं ब सूरते दीगर तीसरी पार्टी अपनी नाजायज सपोर्ट के लिए थर्ड अंपायर को आवाजें देने से कभी बाज नहीं आएगी चाहे साबिक खिलाड़ी मैदान सियासत से कुली आउट भी हो जाए फिर भी सियासत में तीन चार छोड़ चाहे 50 पार्टियां मौजूद रहे लेकिन इनकी अमली हैसियत प्रेशर ग्रुप्स की सी होगी और यही होनी चाहिए ऐसी आइडियल सूरत हाल किसी कानून साजी से मुमकिन नहीं है क्योंकि सियासत करना या सियासी पार्टी बनाना हर शहरी का बुनियादी सियासी हक है लेकिन बिल फेल हमारे जैसे मुल्क में तीसरी कमजोर पार्टी को एस्टेब्लिशमेंट अपना उल्लू सीधा करने के लिए इस्तेमाल करती रही है और कर रही है और करती रहेगी जिससे जम्हूरियत की जड़ें खोखली की जाती हैं इससे बचाओ की यही वह तदबीर है कि दोनों पार्टियां अपने सियासी और कौमी मफा दत के लिए अपनी-अपनी जगह पूरी जद्दोजहद करते हुए एक असूल तय कर दें कि जब भी डेमोक्रेसी को तिरछी नजर से देखा जाएगा वह बाहर सूरत इसके खिलाफ एका कायम करते हुए किसी तालिमा को मौका नहीं देंगे इससे भी बड़ा चैलेंज यह है कि वह अपनी कारक दगी इतनी बेहतर बनाएं कि किसी तीसरी ताकत को शहादत करने का मौका ही ना मिल सके

پاکستان میں دو جماعتی نظام کا چلن اس بدقسمت ملک کی قومی سیاست یا جمہوریت کی علامت ہے جس کی وجہ یہ ہے کہ یہ ہمیشہ تلواروں اور بندوقوں کے سائے میں رہتا ہے جس کی وجہ سے یہ وہ پختگی حاصل نہیں کرسکا کہ جب ہمارے ملک میں جمہوریت کا دھبہ دوبارہ کیوں نہ ہو جائے تو پھر ایسا کیوں ہوتا ہے؟ ایک طرف تو سیاستدانوں پر الزام لگایا جاتا ہے کہ وہ ایک دوسرے کو نیچا دکھانے یا ذاتی معاملات میں الجھنے کے لیے تھرڈ امپائر کو لالچی نظروں سے دیکھنا شروع کر دیتے ہیں تو دوسری طرف یہ بھی کہا جاتا ہے کہ جب کسی کو بے راہ روی کا عادی ہو جائے تو پھر اس عادت سے چھٹکارا پانا شروع ہو جاتا ہے یا پھر اس عادت سے چھٹکارا پانا شروع کر دیتے ہیں۔ لالچی اور دلکش آنکھوں کے ساتھ بند روایت اچھی ہو یا بری تو طاقتور لوگ اسے اپنا حق سمجھنا شروع کر دیتے ہیں، جس معاشرے میں حکمرانوں کا نظریہ مضبوط ہو، وہاں یہ غلط روایت مرنے میں دیر نہیں لگتی کہ کون سی قوم انگریزوں سے زیادہ روایت پسند ہو گی، لیکن جب پارلیمنٹ کسی معاملے پر مؤقف اختیار کرتی ہے، تو یہ بات تو دور کی بات نہیں کہ آرمی چیف نے کہا ان سے براہ راست ملاقات کریں، انہیں اپنی حدود میں رہنے کی تلقین کرتے ہوئے یاد دلایا کہ آپ ایک عوامی خدمتگار ہیں اور میرے تحت وزیر دفاع ہیں، آپ ان کے ماتحت ہیں، اس لیے اگر کوئی مسئلہ ہے تو اس کے باوجود پارلیمنٹ کے ساتوں لوگوں کے پاس کھڑے ہیں۔ سبھا جو عوام کے ووٹ کی طاقت سے منتخب ہوتی ہے۔ وزیر اعظم کی طاقت کا سرچشمہ لوک سبھا یا پارلیمنٹ ہوتا ہے جو کہ سیاست میں عوامی اعتماد سے محروم ہوتا ہے اور اگر وہ اقتدار حاصل کرنے کے لیے بے چین ہوتا ہے تو برہما اسٹیبلشمنٹ پہلے ہی ایسے گھوڑوں کی تلاش میں رہتی ہے جب وہ اسے اپنے گھوڑے پر چڑھا دیتے ہیں۔ لیکن جب یہ گھوڑا اتنا مضبوط ہو جائے کہ وہ اس سے آہنی کاٹھی ہٹا لے تو یہ چاہتا ہے کہ اس پر قانون یا عوام کی کاٹھی کے علاوہ کوئی اور لگام نہ ہو۔ کاٹھی بھی مضبوط ہوتی ہے، دوسرے معاملات میں اسے اسٹیبلشمنٹ سے بہت دور کر دیا جاتا ہے اور اس علاقے میں پہلے ہارس ٹریڈنگ زوروں پر تھی اور دونوں بڑی پارٹیاں سیکیورٹی رسک جیسے الزامات سے بھری ہوئی تھیں اور اس نہج پر پہنچ گئی تھیں کہ ایک دوسرے کے تذکرے پر بھی ان کا خون جوش مارتا تھا اور ان دونوں نے سیاسی اسٹیبلشمنٹ کا اتنا بوجھ اٹھانا شروع کر دیا تھا۔ ان سے جان چھڑانے کے لیے چارٹر آف ڈیموکریسی یا مصائق جمہوریت اس سیاسی وحشی یا بچگانہ وژن کا شاہکار ہے جسے میزائل سٹیٹ کی سیاست میں وہ اہمیت نہیں دی گئی جس کی یہ انوکھی دستاویز میڈم بے نظیر کی شہادت کے باوجود جس طرح بھی ہوتی تھی، اس کا نتیجہ یہ نکلتا تھا۔ آج بھی ، اگر پی پی کا بیرسٹر اس کی اہمیت کو اتنا ہی سمجھ گیا ہے کہ میں نے جمہوری استحکام کے لئے وقت نکالا تھا اور اس کے باوجود آپ کو جمہوری طور پر بدعنوانی کا مطالبہ کیا جائے گا۔ ، سیاسی اور جمہوری استحکام کی اپیلیں شروع کردی گئیں یا نہیں ، یہ منتخب کردہ پارلیمنٹ کی تصدیق ہے۔ دیگر شور مچانے کو چھوڑیں، اگر کسی جانور کے ساتھ کوئی بدتمیزی ہو جائے تو یہ ضروری نہیں کہ بلاول سیاست میں نوخیز ہیں، لیکن ان کے اندر ملک اور برادری کے لیے نیک نیتی ہے، کیا آپ کے پاس اتنی ہمت اور بردباری نہیں ہونی چاہیے کہ آپ لوگ اس کے خلاف کردار ادا کریں۔ اس کی تمام تر کوششوں کے باوجود آپ لوگ منہ کیوں موڑ رہے ہیں، آپ سب کو پی پی کا ساتھ دینا چاہیے، حالانکہ وہ اپنی غلطیوں اور جھوٹوں کی وجہ سے گر گئی ہے، لیکن یہ ایک قومی، قومی سیاسی جماعت ہے، نہ صرف ریاست میں بلکہ سینیٹ میں بھی۔

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog

Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!