The text comprises a lengthy, rambling discourse centered on Islamic theology, specifically addressing controversies surrounding the intercession of the Prophet Muhammad and the accusations of shirk (polytheism) against certain religious figures. A speaker refutes claims of promoting shirk, citing Quranic verses and Hadith to support their arguments. The speaker also criticizes certain interpretations of Islamic beliefs and practices, highlighting what they consider misinterpretations and distortions of the faith. The speaker repeatedly emphasizes the importance of strict monotheism (Tawheed) and criticizes those they believe stray from this principle. The overall tone is passionate and defensive.

Study Guide: Analysis of Religious Discourse

Quiz

Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 complete sentences.

1. What is the central criticism leveled against the Barelvi Mufti, Jamaluddin Qadri Baghdadi, in the text?
2. The text references Bayazid Bastami and a claim about his flag. What is this claim, and what does the speaker imply about it?
3. According to the text, how do some people distort the concept of intercession, and what are the implications?
4. How does the speaker use the Hadith of Shafa’at (intercession) to challenge the beliefs of the Barelvis?
5. What is the significance of the story about the Prophet’s saliva and healing, as recounted in the text?
6. What is the main concern raised regarding the beliefs and practices of some elders or religious figures in the text?
7. What is the significance of the story involving water miraculously appearing from the Prophet’s fingers or the blessing of food?
8. The speaker mentions the incident of Umar’s approach to the grave of the Prophet. How is this used to challenge practices of some Muslims?
9. How does the speaker interpret the concept of “help” as it is discussed in the Quran?
10. What is the speaker’s ultimate goal in critiquing these religious practices and beliefs?

Answer Key

1. The speaker criticizes Jamaluddin Qadri Baghdadi for making a speech that was titled “Wahabi Exposed” with a thumbnail featuring pictures of those he deemed to be Wahabi, including the speaker. He was also criticized for his distorted view of intercession, that the speaker believed amounted to shirk.
2. Bayazid Bastami is said to have claimed that his flag was larger than Muhammad’s, and that all prophets would be under his flag. The speaker uses this claim to imply that such beliefs are arrogant and blasphemous, and demonstrate a dangerous departure from true Islamic teachings.
3. Some people, according to the speaker, distort the concept of intercession by directly seeking help from prophets and saints rather than seeking Allah directly. This implies a form of shirk, by believing others possess divine power.
4. The speaker uses the Hadith of Shafa’at to show how some distort the purpose of intercession, stating it is meant to show the glory and special status of the Prophet, not as a means for bypassing direct prayer to God. The hadith is used to refute the idea that others can intercede as equals with Allah.
5. The story of the Prophet’s saliva and healing is used to illustrate the blessings and power bestowed upon him by Allah. The speaker emphasizes that these blessings came from Allah, not as an example of how someone else could possess a similar power.
6. The speaker is concerned that some elders or religious figures promote beliefs and practices that lead to shirk, or polytheism. The speaker implies that some leaders are distorting the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah to increase their power.
7. The stories of water and food miraculously appearing are used to illustrate the Prophet’s blessings and relationship to Allah’s power. The speaker argues that these are examples of God’s blessings on His Prophet, not an example of how the world works.
8. The incident of Umar approaching the Prophet’s grave is used to demonstrate the belief that after death, one cannot ask the deceased for help. The speaker emphasizes that Umar did not directly ask the Prophet for blessings, but rather asked Allah through the Prophet.
9. The speaker interprets the concept of “help” (madad) in the Quran as exclusively coming from Allah. The speaker argues that asking anyone other than Allah for help or assistance is a form of shirk and should be avoided.
10. The speaker’s ultimate goal is to promote a correct understanding of Tawhid, or the oneness of God, and to combat what he views as practices of shirk. He wishes to lead people back to a purer form of Islam, based directly on the Quran and Sunnah.

Essay Questions

1. Analyze the speaker’s use of specific anecdotes and stories from the Islamic tradition to support his arguments. How effective are these in establishing his position?
2. Explore the speaker’s concept of Tawhid. How does the text distinguish between true worship of Allah and what he identifies as forms of shirk?
3. Discuss the speaker’s view on the role of prophets and other religious figures in Islam, focusing on his arguments against seeking intercession or help from them.
4. Critically examine the speaker’s critique of Barelvi beliefs and practices. What specific points are most emphasized, and how does he support his claims?
5. Consider the relationship between tradition and innovation in the context of the speaker’s arguments. How does he use traditional texts to critique modern practices, and what implications does this have for religious authority?

Glossary

• Shirk: The act of associating partners with Allah, considered the gravest sin in Islam.
• Tawhid: The Islamic doctrine of the oneness of Allah. It is the most important concept in Islam.
• Barelvi: A South Asian Sunni movement that is known for devotion to the Prophet Muhammad and the Sufi saints. They are frequently criticized by more literalist Sunni groups for alleged excessive veneration.
• Wahabi: A puritanical Sunni Muslim reform movement that originated in Arabia in the 18th century, emphasizing a strict interpretation of Islam.
• Sunnah: The practices, customs, and traditions of the Prophet Muhammad, which Muslims are encouraged to follow.
• Quran: The central religious text of Islam, believed by Muslims to be the word of God revealed to the Prophet Muhammad.
• Hadith: A collection of sayings, actions, and approvals of the Prophet Muhammad, which serve as a guide for Muslims.
• Shafaat (Intercession): The act of mediating or pleading on behalf of another, particularly the belief that the Prophet Muhammad can intercede with Allah on behalf of believers.
• Ahl-e-Bait: The family of the Prophet Muhammad, which is highly respected in Islam.
• Sahaba Karam: The companions of the Prophet Muhammad, considered highly influential and trustworthy figures in Islam.
• Ghaus/Qutub/Abdal: Hierarchical titles or ranks within Sufi orders, often associated with figures believed to have special spiritual status.
• Khawarij: An early Islamic group that broke away from the main Muslim community and are noted for their extreme views and harsh actions.
• Tawassul: Seeking to draw near to God through an intermediary, such as a saintly person.
• Wasila: A means or intermediary through which one seeks to achieve something, often associated with seeking divine favor.
• Isti’ana: Seeking help directly from God.
• Istighatha: Seeking help from God in times of extreme need.
• Rizq: Sustenance or provision from Allah.
• Iya ka na’budu wa iya ka nasta’in: The phrase, “You alone we worship, and You alone we ask for help,” from Surah Al-Fatiha, emphasized as a call to only worship Allah and seek help only from Allah.
• Al Madad: “The help,” an expression used to seek assistance.

Critique of Islamic Doctrinal Deviations

Okay, here is a detailed briefing document analyzing the provided text, focusing on its main themes, key ideas, and important facts, and including relevant quotes.

Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text”

Introduction:

This document analyzes a lengthy text that appears to be a transcription of a religious lecture or discourse, delivered in a passionate and somewhat rambling style. The speaker is addressing various theological and doctrinal issues, primarily criticizing what he perceives as deviations from core Islamic teachings, particularly within Barelvi and Shia traditions. The central themes revolve around Tawhid (Oneness of God), the proper understanding of the Prophet Muhammad’s role, and the dangers of Shirk (associating partners with God). The speaker often uses strong language, sarcasm, and anecdotal stories to make his points. He positions himself as a defender of “true” Islamic principles, which he grounds in the Quran and Sunnah, often contrasting this with what he perceives as corrupted beliefs and practices of others.

Main Themes and Key Ideas:

1. Critique of Shirk: The most dominant theme is the speaker’s relentless condemnation of what he considers shirk. This is at the core of nearly every point he raises, focusing on practices that, in his view, wrongly attribute divine powers or characteristics to beings other than Allah.

• He criticizes practices like seeking intercession from the Prophet (peace be upon him) or saints (like Abdul Qadir Jilani), stating that only Allah can provide help and intercession. He asks rhetorically, “To whom will you go again in the end?” highlighting the belief that all should ultimately turn to Allah.
• He directly confronts the concept of intercession, specifically targeting statements like “We will intercede for the Prophet” as shirk. He argues, “How lovely is the shirk that all of us have together… All of them will not turn their face towards Allah,” highlighting what he sees as a widespread problem.
• He is incensed by ideas like “my flag is bigger than Mohammed’s flag” saying “Now this will be bigger than Mohammed’s flag” and sees this as an elevation of beings above their proper place. This is framed as a major example of deviating into shirk.

1. The Centrality of Tawhid: In contrast to what he considers shirk, the speaker emphasizes the absolute Tawhid and that no one shares in Allah’s attributes or powers:

• He declares, “There is no one except Allah, No one but Allah does everything, and He himself is not there.” He repeats this idea to stress the uniqueness and power of Allah.
• He often emphasizes the sole authority and power of Allah, stressing “Only Allah” can solve difficulties, stating, “There is no one except Allah. No one can solve difficulties except Allah.”
• He promotes a direct relationship with Allah. “There is no need to take it, there are ways to take it.”

1. The Role and Status of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH): The speaker is extremely respectful of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) but firmly rejects any notion of him having divine powers or acting as an intermediary with Allah.

• He criticizes those who seek help directly from the Prophet, stating, “These people refuse to recommend and there it is from Ambiya Karam Ali Salam will reach Rasulallah via Sallallahu a ji, we have reached there have you gone to Bayazid Basta and Wherever he has to go, he has taken you too.”
• He emphasizes the Prophet’s role as a messenger and guide but emphasizes he is a human like other prophets, “I am a servant of Allah and His messenger” . He critiques any attempt to elevate him to a divine level which has “been deposited in the account” that is now bigger than Mohammed, and rejects that as an attack on Tawhid.
• He views the love of the Prophet, and the respect of his tradition as essential, using language like “the blessings of the end of Prophethood of Wasallam” and “the correct Aqeedah.”

1. Criticism of Barelvi and Shia Practices: The speaker repeatedly targets Barelvi and Shia traditions, accusing them of corrupting core Islamic teachings.

• He attacks Barelvi scholars like Jamaluddin Qadri Baghdadi and criticizes the naat (devotional poetry) of Aala Hazrat Amaj Barelvi Sahab. He accuses them of “false accusation in contact with” and a “gustak aqad.”
• He criticizes “story telling” from books such as “Taskar ul Aulia” as a source of misguidance, “This book is full of stories You get to hear the stories, right?”
• He refutes ideas of divine intercession, particularly citing “the belief of Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Wasallam and Shafaat robbery on top of” the Barelvi beliefs. He rejects that “Abdul Qadir Jilani will save us from the fire.”
• He also critiques Shia beliefs, often referring to Maula Ali and the Ahl-e-Bayt to refute ideas he sees as incorrect. He refers to a letter by Maula Ali stating, “O my son Hasan, remember Allah, There is a court and a dargah that he has made for his court No guard was posted outside so that by whose permission, by whose charity, by whose means You have to come inside directly from Allah.”

1. Emphasis on Quran and Sunnah: The speaker consistently appeals to the Quran and Sunnah as the ultimate sources of authority.

• He refers to the “believers of Quran and Sunnah” and criticizes those who “haven’t read it openly.”
• He frequently cites Hadith (sayings and actions of the Prophet) from sources like Bukhari and Muslim, especially when refuting claims and promoting the importance of following correct religious practices that go “above the thumbnail”.
• He often criticizes those he claims are “selling in the name of Quran and Sunnah” but in fact are “eating donations”.

1. Use of Anecdotes and Sarcasm: The speaker uses a conversational and sometimes sarcastic style, often telling stories to illustrate his points and using humor or irony to highlight what he sees as flaws in opposing viewpoints.

• He refers to an incident where “a boy from that jail told me that it will happen like this” to support claims about future problems.
• He uses sarcasm to dismiss opposing viewpoints, saying things like “How lovely is shirk, How lovely is the shirk which is all together” to challenge those who engage in practices he sees as shirk.
• He often references humorous and strange stories to expose the strange things he perceives are being taught, such as “Then Baba went to the grave and Mirza to the jail will you tell me where did you go from.”

1. The Battle Against Innovation and Misguidance

• The speaker presents himself as a defender of the true faith by attacking religious innovation, as well as a critic of those who distort it for profit or power. He says, “The platform’s attempt to defame Daawat-e-Haq Effort I will directly tell his elders.”
• He views himself as one who is clearing away the filth of incorrect thinking, “Engineer sahab, dirty corn is not dirt Our elders had spread the blame Engineer sahab is not at fault, it is not ours of the elderly”

Important Facts and Claims:

• The speaker mentions a video by a Barelvi Mufti named Jamaluddin Qadri Baghdadi which he critiques, stating, “it was his video he I made a speech somewhere and when that video was uploaded He wrote its title as Wahabi Exposed.”
• He frequently cites historical figures and scholars, such as Bayazid Bastani, Fariduddin Attar, Junaid Baghdadi, and Imam Bukhari, often interpreting their views through his own lens.
• He cites specific verses from the Quran and Hadith, using them to support his arguments and refute the claims of others.
• He criticizes the concept of “Huzoor Gaus Azam that he is a martyr” saying, “In this era in which Huzoor Gaus It is being said about Azam that he is a martyr.”
• He critiques those who he says have claimed, “my flag is bigger than Mohammed’s flag” and “that it was Baba-e-Sahaaba Karam’s father is worse than animals worse than animals though I am.”
• He cites the story of the grave and “Baba went out and he said brother My devotee was Ghaus Pak, so I worshipped my Lord I said to him, O God, it is my relation, please give me relief Then Allah said that this lane is very long” and uses this to highlight what he believes are false tales.
• He claims “those whose elders are in this condition… These people were not telling false defense themselves Allah was speaking through their mouths, you oppressors.”

Conclusion:

The text represents a highly critical and passionate discourse aimed at challenging what the speaker views as deviations from core Islamic teachings. Through his analysis, he attempts to reinforce the fundamental principles of Tawhid, the unique role of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), and the importance of adhering to the Quran and Sunnah. He positions his work as a necessary intervention against false beliefs that are being peddled. He is very clear that he believes only his interpretation is the true one and critiques others for spreading “shirk” in the Muslim world.

Critiquing Shirk in Islamic Traditions

FAQ: Understanding Key Concepts from the Provided Text

1. What is the central concern being addressed in the text regarding religious beliefs and practices?

The text primarily focuses on critiquing what the speaker perceives as “shirk” (idolatry or polytheism) within certain Islamic traditions, particularly those associated with Barelvi beliefs and practices. The speaker argues that many actions, beliefs and practices that some Muslims engage in can be seen as taking focus away from the singular worship of Allah and instead attributing powers to prophets, saints, and other figures, essentially equating them with God, which is considered shirk in Islam.

2. What specific practices or beliefs are criticized as examples of “shirk”?

The speaker criticizes several practices and beliefs as examples of shirk, including:

• Seeking intercession (Shafaat) from the Prophet Muhammad or other figures on the Day of Judgment instead of directly appealing to Allah.
• Believing that figures like Abdul Qadir Jilani or other saints can help people in times of difficulty or save them from hellfire.
• Attributing divine qualities or powers to figures other than Allah, such as the ability to be present everywhere or control natural phenomena.
• Reciting certain names or phrases, such as calling out “Ya Ghaus” or “Ya Ali” for assistance, which is seen as attributing power to these figures.
• Believing that prophets or saints have power over life, death, sustenance, or any other aspect of reality, which, in Islam, is seen as belonging solely to Allah.

3. How does the speaker view the role of prophets and saints in relation to Allah?

The speaker emphasizes that prophets and saints are servants of Allah, and not divine entities, nor worthy of worship. He insists that all power and authority belong solely to Allah, and no intermediary can intercede between God and human beings. The speaker believes that prophets and saints can be good role models, guides in Islam, but they should not be venerated or attributed with divine qualities. The speaker considers excessive veneration, and requests for help, to be a deviation from the pure monotheism in Islam.

4. What is the speaker’s understanding of “Tawhid” (the oneness of God)?

Tawhid, in the speaker’s view, is the foundational principle of Islam, asserting the absolute oneness and uniqueness of Allah. It means believing that Allah is the sole creator, sustainer, and ruler of the universe, and that He alone deserves worship. The speaker sees any act that ascribes divine attributes or powers to anyone or anything besides Allah as a violation of Tawhid, and thus a major sin. It involves acknowledging that no one can compete with Allah, there is nothing that can compare to Allah and that one must always remain with this concept in mind in all one’s dealings with one’s faith.

5. What is the speaker’s position on the intercession (Shafaat) of the Prophet Muhammad?

The speaker believes that the Prophet Muhammad does have a special status in the sight of Allah, and will be a key figure on the Day of Judgment. However, the speaker strongly opposes the belief that Prophet Muhammad, or other figures, can directly intercede for believers with Allah. The speaker believes that asking the Prophet or any other figure for help is not allowed, as it assumes those figures have a level of power that belongs only to Allah. He states that believers must beseech Allah directly for salvation, and not rely on intermediaries.

6. How does the speaker interpret and use hadith (prophetic traditions) in their arguments?

The speaker frequently uses hadith to support their arguments, often citing hadith from reputable sources like Bukhari and Muslim. However, the speaker sometimes criticizes the interpretation and application of these hadith by other groups, often emphasizing the context and broader Islamic principles. They point out that traditions are sometimes misconstrued by those using them to validate problematic beliefs and practices. The speaker aims to correct interpretations, asserting that they should always align with the core belief of Tawhid.

7. What is the speaker’s critique of those who he refers to as “Babas” or elders?

The speaker is critical of religious leaders, figures or “Babas” who they believe have introduced beliefs and practices that deviate from the pure monotheism of Islam. The speaker accuses these figures of twisting texts to mislead people into shirk and using them to garner support and financial resources. They often refer to historical figures as examples of people whose words, when scrutinized in light of the Quran and hadith, are problematic and contradictory. They argue that many of the teachings and practices promoted by these elders contradict the fundamental principles of Islam.

8. How does the speaker portray the actions and beliefs of those he disagrees with?

The speaker often portrays those with differing beliefs as ignorant, misguided, and potentially deceitful. The speaker believes these groups are perpetuating un-Islamic practices by introducing new ideas into the faith that stray from traditional Islamic teaching. The speaker often states they are using the cloak of the Quran and Sunnah to justify practices that have no basis in Islam and that lead to shirk. They are often referred to as those who have strayed from the true path and are leading others astray.

Shirk in Islam: Definition, Manifestations, and Misinterpretations

Shirk, which is associating partners with Allah, is discussed in the sources as a grave sin with various forms and implications [1-5].

Key points about shirk include:

• Definition: Shirk is described as associating anyone or anything with Allah in worship, or believing that anyone other than Allah has ultimate power or can fulfill one’s needs [1-3, 5, 6].
• Severity: The sources emphasize that shirk is the most serious sin, and Allah does not forgive it [5]. It is described as a sensitive issue, and those who commit shirk will not be saved or receive intercession [5, 7].
• Manifestations of shirk:Intercession: Seeking intercession from anyone other than Allah, including prophets, is described as shirk [2-4, 8]. Some people are said to commit shirk by going to prophets for intercession and not turning towards Allah [1, 8].
• Seeking help from others than Allah: The sources mention that seeking help from anyone other than Allah, such as saints or deceased figures, is a form of shirk [3, 5, 9-13].
• Elevating prophets or saints: Exalting prophets or saints to a status that is due only to Allah is considered shirk [14, 15].
• Attributing divine qualities to others: Believing that anyone other than Allah has the power to create, provide, or control destiny is shirk [3, 9, 11, 15-17]. For example, it is stated that only Allah gives and distributes sustenance [11, 16].
• Shirk and the Prophet Muhammad: The sources highlight the importance of not elevating Prophet Muhammad in a way that resembles the Christian elevation of Jesus [14, 15]. The Prophet is described as a servant and messenger of Allah [7, 14, 15]. It is also mentioned that those who worship Muhammad are wrong because Muhammad is dead, and Allah is the only one who is alive and will never die [18].
• Misinterpretations and accusations of shirk:The sources note that some people accuse others of shirk incorrectly, often based on misinterpretations of Islamic texts [4, 19, 20].
• The sources contain accounts of people who accuse others of shirk, particularly regarding practices related to intercession or seeking help from figures other than Allah [2-4, 8, 19].
• The sources emphasize the need to understand the nuances of Tawhid (Oneness of God) and avoid falsely accusing others of shirk [20].
• Some people use the Quran to accuse others of shirk and misinterpret verses about idols, applying them to prophets and saints [21, 22].
• Tawhid vs. Shirk: The sources contrast shirk with the concept of Tawhid, which is the belief in the absolute oneness of Allah [5-7, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20, 23-25]. True believers should only seek help and guidance from Allah, and not associate any partners with Him [4, 10, 19, 20].
• The Barelvi perspective: The sources discuss a Barelvi Mufti’s video, which resulted in many accusations of shirk against them [2]. The response to this is that many of their practices and beliefs are misinterpreted [2].

These points emphasize the importance of understanding shirk and avoiding any practices or beliefs that could lead to it [5, 25].

The Prophet’s Intercession: A Corrected Understanding

The sources discuss the concept of the Prophet’s intercession (Shafa’at) in detail, often in the context of refuting what is considered to be incorrect beliefs and practices related to it [1, 2]. The sources emphasize that intercession is solely Allah’s right [3-5], but that the Prophet Muhammad has been granted permission to intercede for his followers under specific conditions [2].

Key points about the Prophet’s intercession include:

• Intercession is a right of Allah: The sources state that ultimately, only Allah has the power to grant intercession [3-5]. Any act of seeking intercession must be directed towards Allah, and not any other being.
• Prophet’s intercession with Allah’s permission: The Prophet Muhammad is granted the right to intercede for his followers on the Day of Judgment, but only with Allah’s permission [2, 6]. The Prophet’s intercession is not automatic but is a special favor from Allah to the Prophet and his Ummah [2].
• Conditions for intercession:
• Intercession will be granted to those who have not committed shirk [7, 8]. Shirk is considered the gravest sin and will not be forgiven, thus barring one from receiving intercession [2, 7, 8].
• Those who have created difficulties for the Prophet in this world will not receive his intercession on the Day of Judgment [2].
• The sources state that the Prophet’s intercession is part of the blessings of the end of Prophethood [5].
• Misconceptions about intercession:
• Some people are said to commit shirk by believing that they can go to the Prophet for intercession directly, instead of turning to Allah [3, 4]. They do this by making the Prophet a means of reaching Allah, which is considered as associating partners with Allah [4].
• Some believe that they can seek help from the Prophet in this world and on the Day of Judgment [2]. However, the sources argue that help should only be sought from Allah and the Prophet is not the ultimate source of help [9-11].
• The sources criticize those who believe that the Prophet has the ability to save them from the fire, stating that only Allah can do so [9, 12].
• Some have misinterpreted the concept of intercession, using hadiths about intercession to justify their own beliefs and practices [1, 2].
• The Day of Judgment: The Prophet will be a special guest on the Day of Judgment and will be a door to intercession, his hands blessed [6].
• Reaching the Prophet: The sources describe the process of people reaching the Prophet via the Ambiya Karam [13]. However, some use this to argue that people will not face Allah on the day of judgment [13]. This idea is refuted by saying that on the Day of Judgment everyone will be with the Prophet [12].
• Examples and Analogies:
• The sources use the example of a Barelvi Mufti’s video which was titled “Wahabi Exposed” to illustrate differing beliefs about intercession [1]. The video was criticized for accusing people of denying the Prophet’s intercession.
• The sources mention stories in Tajaktul Aulia which mention that the Prophet and other prophets are under the flag of a certain person, which is used to refute the idea that prophets have intercession [12, 14].
• The sources mention the story of Sheikh Ahmed Rafai kissing Abdul Qadir Jilani’s hand as a narrative that has been twisted to indicate that others besides the prophet also have powers of intercession [15].
• Tawassul
• The sources state that the act of tawassul (seeking a means to approach Allah) and intercession are two different things, but that people often mix them [16].

The sources emphasize the importance of maintaining a correct understanding of the Prophet’s intercession, as misinterpretations can lead to shirk. True believers should always seek help and guidance from Allah alone, understanding that the Prophet’s intercession is a favor from Allah and not an independent right.

Tawhid: The Oneness of Allah in Islam

Tawhid, the concept of the oneness of Allah, is a central theme in the sources, frequently discussed in contrast to shirk. The sources emphasize the absolute singularity of Allah and the importance of directing all worship, devotion, and reliance towards Him alone [1-3].

Key aspects of Tawhid, as discussed in the sources, include:

• Absolute Oneness of Allah: Tawhid is the belief that Allah is one and has no partners, equals, or rivals [1-3]. This means that all power, authority, and divinity belong solely to Allah.
• Rejection of Shirk: Tawhid is inseparable from the rejection of shirk [4, 5]. Shirk, which is associating partners with Allah, is considered the greatest sin and a direct contradiction of Tawhid. Therefore, recognizing Allah’s oneness requires avoiding any form of shirk.
• Worship of Allah Alone: Tawhid dictates that all forms of worship should be directed exclusively to Allah [6, 7]. This includes prayer, supplication, seeking help, and any other act of devotion. The sources reject the idea that any created being, including prophets, saints, or angels, should be the object of worship or devotion.
• Allah as the Sole Provider and Controller: Tawhid asserts that Allah is the sole provider, sustainer, and controller of all things [7]. This means that all blessings, sustenance, and events are from Allah, and no other being has any independent power or authority.
• Misconceptions about Tawhid:
• The sources discuss how some people have a flawed understanding of Tawhid and use it to accuse others of shirk. [4, 5, 8]
• Some people misinterpret the concept of seeking help through patience and prayer as shirk, when in fact these are acts of worship that are in line with Tawhid. [8]
• The sources criticize those who claim that deceased figures like Abdul Qadir Jilani can help people in times of trouble, arguing that only Allah can provide help. [9, 10]
• The sources refute the idea that those who call out “Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah” are committing shirk, because this phrase is an expression of love and not a request for help. [9]
• Some individuals incorrectly use verses about idols to apply them to prophets and saints. [11]
• Tawhid and the Prophets: The sources clarify the role of prophets in relation to Tawhid. Prophets are seen as messengers of Allah, who call people to Tawhid. The sources emphasize the need to follow the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad as a way to worship Allah properly and to act in accordance with the dictates of Tawhid. However, the prophets are not to be elevated to a divine status.
• Practical implications of Tawhid: The sources suggest that a correct understanding of Tawhid should guide all aspects of life, from daily actions to major decisions. This includes relying on Allah in times of difficulty, seeking His guidance in all matters, and remaining grateful to Him for all blessings.
• Tawhid and Intercession: The sources establish that the concept of intercession is connected to Tawhid. Intercession is a right of Allah alone, but He has granted Prophet Muhammad the right to intercede with certain conditions. Therefore, it is not appropriate to ask anyone other than Allah for intercession.
• Tawhid and the Quran and Sunnah: The sources emphasize that Tawhid should be understood through the Quran and Sunnah. The sources argue that by adhering to these principles, Muslims can avoid shirk.

The sources also highlight that the concept of Tawhid has been distorted by some people, and many innovations and practices have crept into religious life that contradict Tawhid. Therefore, the sources stress the importance of returning to the Quran and Sunnah as the only source of guidance.

Ultimately, the sources present Tawhid as the foundation of Islam and the most important concept for a Muslim to understand and practice. It requires a complete devotion to Allah and rejection of all forms of shirk.

Quran and Sunnah: Foundations of Islamic Faith

The Quran and Sunnah are presented in the sources as the foundational sources of guidance for Muslims, emphasizing their importance in understanding and practicing Islam, particularly in relation to Tawhid, shirk, and intercession [1-11].

Key points about the Quran and Sunnah include:

• Authority: The Quran and Sunnah are considered the ultimate authorities in matters of faith and practice [11]. The sources emphasize that Muslims should refer to them for guidance on all aspects of life [3, 10, 12, 13].
• Understanding Tawhid: The sources stress the importance of using the Quran and Sunnah to understand Tawhid, the oneness of Allah, correctly [3-6, 8, 10, 11]. A proper understanding of Tawhid is achieved through the Quran and Sunnah and is necessary to avoid shirk [6].
• Avoiding Shirk: The Quran and Sunnah are presented as the tools to identify and avoid shirk [1, 3, 4, 9-11]. The sources argue that many people fall into shirk due to misinterpretations of the Quran and Sunnah, or by relying on other sources of guidance [6].
• Guidance on Intercession: The sources state that the Quran and Sunnah provide the correct understanding of intercession, clarifying that it is only granted by Allah through the Prophet Muhammad with specific conditions [4, 5]. These sources are used to refute what are regarded as incorrect beliefs about intercession [1, 2, 4, 5].
• Following the Prophet: The sources highlight the importance of following the teachings and practices of the Prophet Muhammad (Sunnah) as a way to worship Allah properly [2, 4, 6, 9-11]. This includes following his example in prayer, supplication, and other acts of devotion [9, 12].
• Refutation of Incorrect Beliefs: The Quran and Sunnah are used to refute what are considered to be incorrect beliefs and practices that contradict Tawhid, such as seeking help from deceased figures, over-exalting the prophets, and innovation in religion [1-3, 5, 6, 10-13].
• Examples from the Prophet’s life: The sources cite specific hadith and incidents from the life of the Prophet Muhammad to demonstrate correct understanding of Tawhid, intercession, and prayer [10, 14-17]. For example, the Prophet’s actions regarding rain, healing, and his companions are mentioned to illustrate proper devotion [15, 16].
• The Importance of Context: The sources mention that some individuals misinterpret the Quran and Sunnah by taking verses and hadith out of context. Proper understanding of the Quran and Sunnah requires a comprehensive and contextual approach [3, 7, 18, 19].
• Criticism of those who misinterpret:
• The sources criticize those who use the Quran and Sunnah to support their own flawed beliefs or to accuse others of shirk [3, 6, 8, 9, 20].
• Some people are accused of using the Quran to accuse others of shirk by misinterpreting verses about idols and applying them to prophets and saints [1, 19, 21-23].
• The sources point out that many people use the Quran and Sunnah as a front to collect donations and build property while deviating from the correct teachings [24].
• The sources argue that some individuals prioritize their own interpretations or those of their elders over the clear guidance of the Quran and Sunnah [2, 3, 6, 13, 20].
• The Quran and Sunnah as a Complete System: The sources emphasize the Quran and Sunnah as a complete system for guiding Muslims, and there is no need to add or subtract anything from it [3, 6, 11, 25].

In summary, the Quran and Sunnah are presented as the ultimate sources of guidance for Muslims, providing the correct understanding of Tawhid, and warning against shirk. The sources emphasize the importance of turning to these sources for all matters of faith and practice, and avoiding any practices that contradict their teachings [3, 6, 9-11].

Bayazid Bastami: A Case Study in Misguided Beliefs

Bayazid Bastami is mentioned in the sources as an example of a figure whose statements and beliefs are used to highlight and refute what are considered to be incorrect understandings of Islamic concepts, particularly regarding the status of prophets and intercession [1-4].

Key points about Bayazid Bastami, based on the sources, include:

• Claims about his status: Bayazid Bastami is quoted as having made extravagant claims about his spiritual status, including the assertion that “Mohammed and all the prophets are under my flag” [2]. This statement is presented in the sources as an example of extreme and unacceptable claims. It is also said that Bayazid claimed his flag would be bigger than Prophet Mohammed’s [2-5].
• Refutation of his claims: These claims are used to demonstrate a flawed understanding of the hierarchy of prophets and the limits of spiritual authority [2, 3]. The sources explicitly reject the idea that any individual could be superior to or have authority over the prophets of Allah [2].
• Use as an example of misguidance: Bayazid Bastami’s statements are used as an example of beliefs that are contrary to the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah [1, 2, 4, 5]. The sources suggest that those who follow such beliefs are misguided and that they are following their own desires rather than the guidance of Allah.
• Connection to Shirk: The sources imply that such claims and beliefs could lead to shirk, as they involve elevating a human being to a status that belongs only to Allah [4]. By implying that an individual’s flag could be superior to the Prophet’s, these statements are seen as undermining the unique position of the prophets.
• Bayazid’s followers: The sources indicate that there are those who accept such claims, and that these people are misguided. In one instance, a person who is said to be a follower of Bayazid Bastami is criticized for saying that “Isa Salam is in jail” [4].
• Historical context: The sources cite that these claims by Bayazid Bastami were included in the book Tajaktul Aulia by Sheikh Fariduddin Attar who died almost 800 years ago [2]. This provides historical context but does not validate the claims, as the sources are critical of them.
• Comparison to other figures: In the sources, Bayazid Bastami is mentioned alongside other controversial figures such as Junayd Baghdadi and Huzoor Gaus Azam. These examples are used to show how people may later say bad things about these figures, implying that their current reverence may not be justified [6].
• Rejection of Extremism: The sources express an overall rejection of extremist views that elevate individuals over prophets [1-4].

In summary, Bayazid Bastami is presented in the sources not as a respected figure, but as an example of someone whose statements have been used to argue against beliefs and practices that are seen as extreme and potentially shirk. The sources stress the importance of the Quran and Sunnah as the only source of guidance and reject the idea that anyone can be superior to or have authority over the prophets of Allah.

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog

Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!