This text is a study guide for the ACCA P7 Advanced Audit and Assurance exam. It covers international regulatory environments for audit and assurance services, professional ethics, professional liability, quality control, practice management, obtaining and accepting professional appointments, auditing historical financial information, group audits, audit-related services, prospective financial information, forensic audits, social, environmental and public sector auditing, internal audit and outsourcing, and reporting. The guide emphasizes key syllabus elements, exam expectations, and application of relevant International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and other standards. Numerous examples and practice questions are included to aid understanding and exam preparation. Specific attention is given to ethical considerations and risk assessment throughout the auditing process.
Advanced Audit and Assurance Study Guide
Short-Answer Questions Quiz
Instructions: Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences each.
- What is the role of the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) and who oversees its activities?
- Define a Public Interest Entity (PIE) and provide two examples.
- Explain the difference between a gift and hospitality in the context of auditor independence. What factors should be considered when evaluating their acceptability?
- List three non-audit services that are prohibited for auditors of listed companies in the US. Briefly explain why these services are restricted.
- Define a valuation and explain the threat to auditor independence when performing valuations for an audit client.
- What is an advocacy threat in auditing and provide two examples?
- When might an auditor have a duty to disclose confidential client information to a third party? List three factors to consider.
- Explain the concept of a disclaimer in audit reports. Why might an audit firm include a disclaimer?
- What is professional indemnity insurance (PII) and fidelity guarantee insurance? What do they cover?
- Define sampling units, stratification, tolerable misstatement, and tolerable rate of deviation in the context of audit sampling.
Answer Key
- The IAASB is responsible for setting International Standards on Auditing (ISAs), which aim to ensure high-quality audits globally. The Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB) oversees the IAASB’s activities to ensure its work serves the public interest.
- A PIE is an entity whose activities are of significant public interest due to the nature of its business, size, or number of stakeholders. Examples include banks, insurance companies, and listed companies.
- A gift is a tangible item given without expectation of a return, while hospitality refers to entertainment or services offered. Both can threaten independence if their value is significant. Factors to consider include the intent behind the offer, its value relative to the auditor’s position, and firm policies.
- Bookkeeping, financial information systems design, and internal audit services are prohibited. These restrictions aim to prevent self-review threats where the auditor would be evaluating their own work, compromising objectivity.
- A valuation involves making assumptions about future events and applying methodologies to estimate the value of assets, liabilities, or businesses. Performing valuations for an audit client creates a self-review threat as the auditor would be auditing their own work.
- An advocacy threat arises when the auditor promotes the client’s position or acts on their behalf, potentially compromising objectivity. Examples include providing legal services to defend the client or negotiating debt restructuring with their bank.
- An auditor might disclose confidential information if it involves illegal acts, fraud, or significant breaches of regulations. Factors to consider include the severity of the matter, potential harm to the public, and legal requirements.
- A disclaimer is a statement in the audit report that limits the auditor’s liability for specific aspects of the financial statements. Audit firms may include disclaimers to protect themselves from potential lawsuits from third parties who might rely on their work.
- PII covers civil claims made by clients or third parties against the auditor for professional negligence. Fidelity guarantee insurance covers losses arising from fraudulent or dishonest acts by the firm’s employees.
- Sampling units: Individual items in a population being audited. Stratification: Dividing the population into subgroups with similar characteristics. Tolerable misstatement: The maximum error the auditor is willing to accept without impacting their opinion. Tolerable rate of deviation: The maximum rate of deviations from internal controls acceptable to the auditor.
Essay Questions
Instructions: Answer the following questions in essay format.
- Discuss the key principles of the IESBA Code of Ethics and how they apply to professional accountants in their various roles.
- Explain the concept of materiality in auditing and its impact on the planning, execution, and reporting stages of an audit.
- Critically evaluate the different types of audit evidence and discuss their relative reliability and persuasiveness in forming an audit opinion.
- Analyze the auditor’s responsibilities regarding the detection and reporting of fraud in financial statements.
- Discuss the increasing importance of social and environmental audits and their implications for both companies and auditors.
Glossary of Key Terms
TermDefinitionAdverse OpinionAn audit opinion issued when the auditor concludes that the financial statements are materially misstated and do not present a true and fair view.Advocacy ThreatA threat to auditor independence that arises when the auditor promotes the client’s position or acts on their behalf, potentially compromising objectivity.Analytical ProceduresEvaluations of financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data.Assurance EngagementAn engagement where a practitioner expresses a conclusion designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended users other than the responsible party about the outcome of the evaluation or measurement of a subject matter against criteria.Audit RiskThe risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated.Audit SamplingThe application of audit procedures to less than 100% of items within an account balance or class of transactions to provide the auditor with a reasonable basis for forming a conclusion on the entire population.Client ConfidentialityThe ethical principle that prohibits auditors from disclosing confidential client information without proper authorization.Disclaimer of OpinionAn audit opinion issued when the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to form an opinion on the financial statements.Due DiligenceA process of investigation and review performed by a buyer to assess the financial, operational, and legal risks associated with a potential acquisition or investment.External ConfirmationThe process of obtaining and evaluating audit evidence from a third party in response to a request for information about a particular item affecting the financial statements.Familiarity ThreatA threat to auditor independence that arises from a close relationship between the auditor and the client, potentially compromising objectivity.Fidelity Guarantee InsuranceInsurance that protects a company from losses caused by fraudulent or dishonest acts by its employees.Forensic AuditAn audit that is conducted to investigate suspected fraud, embezzlement, or other financial irregularities.Going ConcernThe assumption that an entity will continue to operate in the foreseeable future.IndependenceThe ability of the auditor to act with objectivity and without bias when performing an audit.Inherent RiskThe susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transactions, account balance, or disclosure to a misstatement that could be material, either individually or when aggregated with other misstatements, before consideration of any related controls.Internal ControlThe processes and procedures implemented by an entity to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its financial reporting and to safeguard its assets.International Standards on Auditing (ISAs)A set of internationally recognized standards that provide guidance on the conduct of audits.Management AssertionsRepresentations by management, explicit or implicit, that are embodied in the financial statements, as used by the auditor to consider the different types of potential misstatements that could occur.MaterialityThe concept that information is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.Professional Indemnity Insurance (PII)Insurance that protects professionals, such as auditors, from claims arising from negligence or other professional misconduct.Public Interest Entity (PIE)An entity whose activities are considered to be of significant public interest due to its size, nature of business, or number of stakeholders.Qualified OpinionAn audit opinion issued when the auditor concludes that the financial statements are materially misstated, but the misstatement is not pervasive.Sampling UnitsIndividual items that make up a population in audit sampling.Self-Review ThreatA threat to auditor independence that arises when the auditor is asked to evaluate their own work, potentially compromising objectivity.StratificationThe process of dividing a population into subgroups with similar characteristics in audit sampling.Subsequent EventsEvents or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the date of the auditor’s report.Tolerable MisstatementThe maximum amount of misstatement that the auditor is willing to accept in a population without qualifying the audit opinion.Tolerable Rate of DeviationThe maximum rate of deviation from a prescribed internal control procedure that the auditor is willing to accept without modifying the planned reliance on the control.Unmodified OpinionAn audit opinion issued when the auditor concludes that the financial statements are free from material misstatement.ValuationThe process of determining the monetary worth of an asset, liability, or business.
Advanced Audit and Assurance: Key Themes and Ideas
This briefing document reviews excerpts from “023-ACCA P7 – Advanced Audit and Assurance” focusing on key themes and important ideas relevant to audit and assurance practices.
1. Regulatory Environment for Audit and Assurance Services
- International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) form the bedrock of audit practice, providing a globally recognized framework for conducting audits in accordance with ethical and professional standards. The document lists numerous ISAs, highlighting key ones related to fraud, internal control, risk assessment, and group audits.
- Public Interest Entities (PIEs): The document defines PIEs, emphasizing the need for heightened auditor scrutiny due to the wider impact their financial reporting has on various stakeholders. Factors like the nature of the business, size, and number of employees are crucial in determining PIE status.
“(i) The nature of the business, such as the holding of assets in a fiduciary capacity for a large number of stakeholders. Examples may include financial institutions, such as banks and insurance companies, and pension funds.”
- UK Regulatory Framework: The document highlights the EU Eighth Directive and its impact on UK audit regulation, emphasizing the role of Recognised Supervisory Bodies (RSBs) like ACCA in approving individuals for statutory audits.
2. Professional and Ethical Considerations
- Auditor Independence: The document emphasizes the importance of auditor independence, outlining threats like self-interest, self-review, familiarity, intimidation, and advocacy. Examples of potential conflicts of interest are detailed, including:
- Gifts and Hospitality: Accepting gifts and hospitality beyond a trivial value is prohibited.
- Loans and Guarantees: Loans from audit clients (except banks under normal commercial terms) are generally unacceptable.
- Overdue Fees: Overdue fees can create a self-interest threat, akin to providing a loan to the client.
- Non-Audit Services: The document discusses the limitations on providing non-audit services to audit clients, particularly for listed companies in the US. Concerns about auditor independence arise when services like bookkeeping, internal audit, or management functions are offered.
“In the US, rules concerning auditor independence for listed companies state that an accountant is not independent if they provide certain non-audit services to an audit client.”
- Valuation Services: Performing valuations that will be included in audited financial statements by the same firm poses a self-review threat.
- Advocacy Threat: Situations where the audit firm acts as the client’s advocate, such as providing legal services or corporate finance advice, create advocacy threats.
- Confidentiality: The document stresses the importance of client confidentiality while acknowledging exceptions where disclosure to authorities might be necessary in cases of suspected fraud or illegal acts.
- Duty of Care: The document explains that the auditor’s duty of care extends primarily to the client, but it can also extend to third parties like banks and investors in specific circumstances.
- Disclaimers: The effectiveness of disclaimers in limiting auditor liability to clients and third parties is discussed, highlighting legal precedents and jurisdiction-specific considerations.
3. Audit Planning, Risk Assessment, and Evidence
- Planning: The document emphasizes the importance of thorough audit planning, including determining materiality levels, identifying and assessing risks, and developing an appropriate audit strategy.
- Materiality: The concept of materiality is central to audit planning, recognizing that not all misstatements are significant enough to affect users’ economic decisions.
“Materiality. Misstatements, including omissions, are considered to be material if they, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.”
- Audit Risk: The document distinguishes between inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk, emphasizing the need to assess these risks to develop appropriate audit procedures.
- Analytical Procedures: The use of analytical procedures in planning, evidence gathering, and review stages is highlighted, emphasizing their importance in identifying unusual trends and potential misstatements.
- Audit Evidence: The document discusses different types of audit evidence, emphasizing the need for sufficient and appropriate evidence to support audit opinions. Specific consideration is given to procedures like external confirmations and the use of auditor’s experts.
4. Evaluation and Review
- Financial Statements Review: The document outlines the overall review process for financial statements, focusing on:
- Going Concern Assessment: Evaluating whether there are substantial doubts about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
- Specific Accounting Issues: Addressing audit considerations for issues like inventory valuation, goodwill, investment properties, foreign exchange, income recognition, leases, provisions, and earnings per share.
- Group Audits: The unique challenges of group audits are discussed, particularly the need for coordination between the group auditor and component auditors to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.
- Transnational Audits: The document defines transnational audits and highlights the increased complexities they pose, especially for entities operating across national borders and subject to various regulatory frameworks.
5. Other Assurance and Non-Assurance Engagements
- Audit-Related Services: The document explores a variety of audit-related services, both assurance and non-assurance engagements, including:
- Reviews of historical financial information
- Due diligence assignments
- Reporting on prospective financial information
- Assurance Services: The framework for assurance engagements beyond historical financial statements is explained, with reference to ISAE 3000 and other relevant standards.
- Social, Environmental, and Public Sector Auditing: The increasing importance of these specialized audit areas is acknowledged, covering topics like social audits, environmental audits, and the audit of performance information in the public sector.
6. Litigation Risk and Mitigation
The document acknowledges the inherent litigation risks faced by audit firms and highlights strategies for mitigation, including:
- Thorough client acceptance and continuance procedures
- Robust quality control systems
- Clear engagement letters
- Adherence to professional standards
- Professional indemnity insurance
In conclusion, this document provides a concise overview of key themes and ideas relevant to the practice of audit and assurance. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to professional standards, maintaining independence, understanding and mitigating risks, and adapting to the evolving landscape of audit and assurance services.
FAQ: Auditing
What is a public interest entity and why is it important in auditing?
A public interest entity is an entity where the public at large has a significant financial interest. This could be due to a large number of stakeholders relying on the entity’s financial stability, such as with banks and insurance companies. It can also be due to the size of the entity, such as with large publicly traded companies.
Public interest entities are subject to higher levels of scrutiny and regulation than other entities, meaning that the audits of public interest entities are more complex and require more resources.
What are the Ethical Principles that guide auditors and how do they apply to real-world scenarios?
There are five key ethical principles for professional accountants: Integrity, Objectivity, Professional Competence and Due Care, Confidentiality, and Professional Behavior. These principles are designed to guide professional accountants in their work, ensuring that they act ethically and in the public interest.
For example, the principle of objectivity means that auditors must not allow bias, conflict of interest, or undue influence of others to override their professional or business judgments. This could arise in situations where the auditor has a long-standing relationship with the client, or has accepted significant gifts or hospitality from the client. In these cases, the auditor must implement safeguards to mitigate the threat to their objectivity, such as inviting a second partner to provide a “hot review” of the audit or rotating off the audit engagement for a period.
What is the auditor’s responsibility regarding fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations?
Auditors are responsible for obtaining reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. However, the primary responsibility for the prevention and detection of fraud rests with management and those charged with governance.
When planning an audit, the auditor must assess the risk of material misstatement due to fraud. This includes considering factors such as the nature of the entity’s business, the effectiveness of internal control, and the incentives and opportunities for fraud.
The auditor must also consider the risk of material misstatement due to non-compliance with laws and regulations. This includes identifying laws and regulations that are relevant to the entity’s business and assessing the risk that the entity has not complied with those laws and regulations. If the auditor identifies instances of non-compliance, they must communicate these to the appropriate level of management and those charged with governance. In some cases, the auditor may be required to report the non-compliance to external authorities.
What is the concept of materiality in auditing and how is it determined?
Materiality is a concept in auditing that refers to the significance of an item or an aggregate of items to the users of the financial statements. A misstatement is considered to be material if it could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements.
The determination of materiality is a matter of professional judgment and is based on the auditor’s understanding of the users of the financial statements and their needs. The auditor will typically set a materiality level for the financial statements as a whole and may also set materiality levels for specific accounts or transactions.
What are analytical procedures and how are they used in audit planning and review?
Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. They are used in auditing to identify unusual trends or fluctuations that may indicate the presence of misstatements.
Analytical procedures can be used in both the planning and review stages of an audit. In the planning stage, analytical procedures are used to help the auditor understand the entity’s business and identify areas of potential risk. In the review stage, analytical procedures are used to help the auditor assess the overall reasonableness of the financial statements.
What is the role of sampling in auditing and what are the different types of sampling techniques?
Auditing often involves testing a sample of transactions or balances rather than examining every item in the population. This is because it is often not feasible or cost-effective to examine every item.
There are two main types of sampling techniques: statistical and non-statistical sampling. Statistical sampling uses probability theory to select the sample and to evaluate the results of the sample testing. Non-statistical sampling does not use probability theory and is based on the auditor’s judgment.
The choice of sampling technique will depend on the circumstances of the audit and the auditor’s assessment of the risk of material misstatement.
What are the challenges of auditing group financial statements, especially when component auditors are involved?
Auditing group financial statements presents unique challenges due to the complexity of the group structure and the need to rely on the work of component auditors. The group auditor is responsible for obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence about the group as a whole, including the financial information of the components.
When component auditors are involved, the group auditor must carefully consider the competence, capabilities, and objectivity of the component auditors. The group auditor must also communicate effectively with the component auditors to ensure that they understand the group audit strategy and their responsibilities.
What are the key audit considerations for specific accounting issues such as revenue recognition, leases, provisions, and going concern?
Revenue recognition: The auditor must assess the entity’s revenue recognition policies to ensure that they comply with the relevant accounting standards. This includes considering the timing of revenue recognition, the measurement of revenue, and the allocation of revenue to different performance obligations.
Leases: The auditor must assess the classification of leases as either finance leases or operating leases. The auditor must also ensure that the accounting for leases is in accordance with the relevant accounting standards.
Provisions: The auditor must assess the adequacy of provisions for liabilities, including provisions for warranties, legal claims, and restructuring costs. The auditor must also ensure that the accounting for provisions is in accordance with the relevant accounting standards.
Going concern: The auditor must assess whether the entity is a going concern. This includes considering the entity’s financial position, its operating results, and its future prospects. The auditor must obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support the assessment of going concern.
Audit Assurance: An Overview
Audit assurance is the independent auditor’s opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework [1]. The auditor’s objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error [1].
The auditor obtains reasonable assurance by reducing audit risk to an acceptably low level [2]. This is done by carrying out risk assessment procedures and then further audit procedures to respond to the risk assessment [2].
Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated [3]. It is a function of the risk of material misstatement and detection risk [3].
Risk of material misstatement breaks down into inherent risk and control risk [3]. Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transaction, account balance, or disclosure to a misstatement that could be material [3]. Control risk is the risk that client controls fail to detect material misstatements [4].
Detection risk is the risk that the auditor’s procedures will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be material [3].
In order to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level, the auditor must:
- Plan the audit. This includes obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement, and determining the audit strategy [1].
- Perform audit procedures. This includes tests of controls and substantive procedures [2].
- Evaluate the audit evidence. This includes considering the sufficiency and appropriateness of the audit evidence obtained [2].
- Form an audit opinion. This includes considering the audit risk and the risk of material misstatement [3].
The auditor’s report should communicate the key audit matters (KAMs), which are those matters that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period [5].
The auditor’s opinion is expressed in the auditor’s report. The opinion can be unmodified, qualified, adverse, or a disclaimer of opinion [6]. An unmodified opinion means that the auditor believes the financial statements are fairly presented [6]. A qualified opinion means that the auditor believes the financial statements are fairly presented except for a specific matter [6]. An adverse opinion means that the auditor believes the financial statements are not fairly presented [6]. A disclaimer of opinion means that the auditor is unable to form an opinion on the financial statements [6].
Audit assurance is an important part of the financial reporting process. It provides users of financial statements with confidence that the financial statements are reliable and can be used to make informed decisions.
Professional Ethics for Accountants
Professional ethics are principles that guide the behavior of professionals. They are especially important for accountants and auditors, who hold positions of trust and are relied upon by the public. [1, 2] The International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, which is similar to the ACCA’s guidance, is principles-based and provides a conceptual framework rather than a strict set of rules. [3-5] This framework allows for flexibility and professional judgment in its application. [6]
The IESBA and ACCA Codes of Ethics outline five fundamental principles: [7, 8]
- Integrity: Being straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships.
- Objectivity: Not allowing bias, conflict of interest, or undue influence to override professional or business judgments.
- Professional Competence and Due Care: Maintaining professional knowledge and skill at the level required to ensure clients or employers receive competent professional services; acting diligently and in accordance with applicable standards.
- Confidentiality: Respecting the confidentiality of information acquired and not disclosing it without proper authority, unless there is a legal or professional right or duty to do so.
- Professional Behavior: Complying with relevant laws and regulations and avoiding actions that discredit the profession.
These fundamental principles should be considered when identifying, evaluating, and responding to threats to compliance. [9] Some common threats to compliance include: [10]
- Self-interest threats, such as financial interests in a client or undue dependence on a client for fees.
- Self-review threats, such as auditing financial statements that the firm has prepared.
- Advocacy threats, such as promoting a client’s position in a legal dispute.
- Familiarity threats, such as having a close relationship with a client.
- Intimidation threats, such as being threatened with dismissal or litigation by a client.
Safeguards are actions or measures that can be taken to eliminate or reduce threats to compliance. [10] They can be created by the profession, legislation or regulation, or by the firm itself. [10] Examples of safeguards include: [10-12]
- Training requirements and continuing professional development.
- Professional standards and corporate governance regulations.
- Independent partner review.
- Rotation of senior personnel.
- Disclosure to those charged with governance.
The IESBA Code outlines procedures for firms when they conclude that a breach of the Code has occurred. [13] These procedures include addressing the consequences of the breach, reporting it to a member body or regulator if necessary, and communicating it to the engagement partner and other relevant personnel. [13]
The ACCA also has disciplinary procedures for members who breach regulations or fail to conduct themselves professionally. [14] These procedures can result in penalties, including reprimands, fines, and suspension or exclusion from membership. [15]
When encountering a conflict in the application of the fundamental principles, professional accountants should follow a process that includes considering relevant facts, identifying affected parties, and evaluating possible courses of action. [16] If the conflict remains unresolved after consulting with others within the firm and seeking external advice, members should consider withdrawing from the engagement team or resigning from the engagement altogether. [17]
It’s important to note that the application of ethical principles requires judgment, and there may be more than one “right answer” in a given situation. [18, 19] The goal is to apply professional judgment to resolve conflicts and reach a decision that is consistent with the fundamental principles and in the best interest of the public.
Understanding and Addressing Audit Risk
Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated [1]. In other words, it’s the risk that the auditor gives a “clean” opinion when the financial statements actually contain material errors. The auditor’s objective is to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level [1].
Audit risk is a function of two key components:
- Risk of material misstatement: This is the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated before the audit [2]. This risk is comprised of two elements:
- Inherent risk: The susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transaction, account balance, or disclosure to a misstatement that could be material, before consideration of any related controls [3]. For example, complex transactions or significant estimates have a higher inherent risk of misstatement.
- Control risk: The risk that a misstatement that could be material will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis by the entity’s internal control [4]. This relates to the effectiveness of the client’s internal controls in preventing or detecting errors.
- Detection risk: This is the risk that the procedures performed by the auditor to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be material [4]. This relates to the effectiveness of the auditor’s procedures in detecting errors.
The auditor can influence detection risk through the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures. However, the auditor cannot influence inherent risk or control risk, as these are inherent to the client and its environment.
To effectively address audit risk, auditors undertake a risk-based approach [5]:
- Identify risks: Throughout the audit process, auditors identify potential risks of material misstatement [6]. These risks can relate to the financial statements as a whole or specific assertions within the financial statements.
- Assess risks: Auditors assess the likelihood and magnitude of potential misstatements associated with each identified risk [6]. Factors that may indicate a significant risk include the risk of fraud, the subjectivity of financial information, unusual transactions, significant related party transactions, and the complexity of transactions [7].
- Respond to risks: Based on the assessed risks, auditors design and perform audit procedures to address those risks [8]. These procedures may include:
- Tests of controls to evaluate the operating effectiveness of internal controls.
- Substantive procedures to obtain direct evidence about the balances, transactions, and disclosures in the financial statements.
Documentation is crucial throughout the audit process. Auditors must document the identified and assessed risks of material misstatement, the overall responses to address those risks, the results of specific audit tests, any communications with management, and the reasons for their conclusions [9].
It is important to distinguish between audit risk and business risk [10]. While many business risks will have consequences for the audit by increasing audit risk, they are distinct concepts.
- Business risk is the risk arising to companies through their operations [11].
- Audit risk focuses specifically on the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements [12].
Business risks can impact the audit by affecting going concern [13]. If business risks materialize, they could threaten the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, potentially leading to a material misstatement in the financial statements. Auditors must consider the entity’s business risks as part of their risk assessment procedures.
The sources provide examples that illustrate the relationship between business risk and audit risk:
- The abandonment of an oil rig by an oil company increases the risk of material misstatement because the abandonment might not be properly reflected in the financial statements, resulting in an impairment loss that is not recorded [14].
- A company with significant trade receivables may face the business risk of not recovering cash from those receivables and the audit risk that trade receivables are overstated in the financial statements [15].
Understanding and addressing audit risk is fundamental to the audit process. It enables the auditor to tailor the audit procedures to the specific risks of the engagement, thereby obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support their opinion on the financial statements.
Financial Reporting and Auditing
Financial reporting is the process of providing financial information about an entity to external users, primarily investors and creditors. This information is used to make economic decisions about the entity. The sources emphasize the importance of financial reporting and its link to auditing.
The objective of financial reporting is to provide information about the reporting entity that is useful to existing and potential investors, lenders, and other creditors in making decisions about providing resources to the entity. [1] Those decisions involve buying, selling, or holding equity and debt instruments, and providing or settling loans or other forms of credit.
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are a set of accounting standards that are used by companies in over 140 countries around the world. The goal of IFRS is to make financial statements more transparent and comparable, regardless of where a company is located. [2, 3] The sources repeatedly mention IFRS and their importance for auditing. For example, the text stresses the need for a strong knowledge of accounting standards up to the P2 Corporate Reporting level to apply in the P7 Advanced Audit and Assurance exam. [4]
Key concepts in financial reporting include:
- Accrual accounting: Revenues are recognized when earned and expenses when incurred, regardless of when cash is received or paid.
- Going concern: The assumption that the entity will continue in operation for the foreseeable future. [5, 6]
- Materiality: Information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence the decisions of users. [7, 8]
- Fair presentation: The faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events, and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income, and expenses laid down in the framework. [9]
Financial statements are the primary means of communicating financial information. They typically include:
- Statement of financial position (balance sheet): Reports the entity’s assets, liabilities, and equity at a particular point in time.
- Statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income: Reports the entity’s revenues, expenses, and net income or loss for a period.
- Statement of cash flows: Reports the entity’s cash inflows and outflows for a period.
- Notes to the financial statements: Provide additional information about the amounts and items in the financial statements.
The relationship between financial reporting and auditing is very close. Auditors must have a strong understanding of financial reporting principles and standards to effectively audit financial statements. [1] They must be able to assess whether the financial statements are prepared in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework and whether they give a true and fair view. [1, 10, 11] For example, source [10] shows that knowledge from Paper F7 Financial Reporting and Paper P2 Corporate Reporting is assumed for the P7 Advanced Audit and Assurance exam, and that these are likely to be drawn upon by scenario-based questions.
Current issues in financial reporting include:
- Integrated reporting: Combining financial and non-financial information into a single report. [12, 13]
- Sustainability reporting: Disclosing information about the entity’s environmental, social, and governance performance. [14]
- The role of technology: The use of technology is changing the way financial information is prepared, audited, and communicated.
The quality of financial reporting is essential for the efficient functioning of capital markets. High-quality financial reporting provides users with the information they need to make informed decisions about investing in and lending to entities. This is why professional ethics are so important for accountants and auditors, as they are responsible for ensuring that financial reports are reliable.
Quality Control in Audits and Assurance
Quality control is crucial in the audit and assurance profession to ensure that firms and their personnel comply with professional standards, legal and regulatory requirements, and issue appropriate reports. ISQC 1, Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits and Reviews of Financial Statements, and Other Assurance and Related Services Engagements, provides guidance to audit firms on establishing quality control standards.
Key principles of quality control outlined in ISQC 1 include:
- Leadership responsibilities for quality within the firm: The firm’s leadership must foster a culture that emphasizes the importance of quality control. This includes setting clear expectations, providing resources, and monitoring compliance. [1-3]
- Relevant ethical requirements: The firm must establish policies and procedures to ensure compliance with ethical requirements, particularly independence. This includes training, monitoring, and addressing any breaches. [4-6]
- Acceptance and continuance of client relationships and specific engagements: The firm must have policies and procedures to assess the integrity of clients and its own competence to perform engagements before accepting or continuing them. [7-9]
- Human resources: The firm must ensure that it has sufficient personnel with the necessary capabilities, competence, and commitment to ethical principles. This includes recruiting, training, evaluating performance, and promoting professional development. [10, 11]
- Engagement performance: The firm must establish policies and procedures to ensure that engagements are performed in accordance with professional standards. This includes direction, supervision, review, consultation, and documentation. [12-17]
- Monitoring: The firm must monitor its system of quality control to ensure that it is relevant, adequate, operating effectively, and being complied with. This includes ongoing evaluation and periodic inspection of completed engagements. [18, 19]
ISA 220, Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements, applies these general principles to individual audit engagements. It highlights the engagement partner’s responsibility for:
- Leadership: Setting a tone of quality and emphasizing the importance of professional skepticism. [20]
- Ethical requirements: Remaining alert for and addressing any threats to independence or other ethical principles. [6]
- Acceptance/continuance: Ensuring compliance with ISQC 1 requirements regarding accepting and continuing audit engagements. [21]
- Assignment of engagement teams: Selecting qualified and experienced individuals for the audit team. [21]
- Engagement performance: Providing direction, supervision, and review of the audit work, including resolving any differences of opinion. [14-16]
- Quality control review: Appointing a reviewer (if required) and discussing significant matters with them. The reviewer evaluates significant judgments, the conclusions reached, and the appropriateness of the auditor’s report. This review must be completed before the audit report is issued, especially for listed entities. [17, 22, 23]
Practical aspects of quality control:
- Documentation: Thorough documentation is essential for all aspects of quality control, including policies and procedures, engagement planning, risk assessment, audit procedures, conclusions, and communications. [24, 25]
- Engagement quality control review: A hot (pre-issuance) review is carried out before the audit report is signed, while a cold (post-issuance) review is conducted after. [26]
- Proportionality: Smaller firms apply ISQC 1 in full but proportionately, meaning that the documentation and procedures are tailored to their size and the complexity of their engagements. [27, 28]
- Internal culture: A strong internal culture that prioritizes quality is crucial for effective quality control. This culture is fostered by leadership that sets a good example and promotes ethical behavior. [2]
Quality control is an ongoing process that requires commitment from all levels of the firm. It is essential for maintaining the integrity and credibility of the audit profession.

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!








