Shame and Secrets in a Pious Life

This text is a first-person account detailing the author’s struggle with purity culture instilled by her parents, which led to an unplanned pregnancy scare in college due to her lack of contraception knowledge and use. The author recounts her parents’ hypocrisy regarding premarital sex, later discovering they themselves were married only four months before the birth of their oldest child. Ultimately, the narrative highlights the harmful effects of shame-based sex education and advocates for open, honest information about contraception and female autonomy over reproductive decisions.

Upbringing, Shame, and Sexual Health Decisions

Based on the sources provided, the discussion of sexual health decisions revolves around the impact of upbringing, access to information, personal experiences, and relationships.

Here are some key points from the sources regarding sexual health decisions:

• Parental Influence and Purity Culture: The author’s parents held strong views against birth control, viewing its use as “sinning by anticipating sex”. Their household involved searching drawers and lectures on the “type of girl no decent man wanted” after discovering older sisters were sexually active. The mother even suggested getting pregnant without birth control would demonstrate “good intentions”. This strong parental admonition contributed to the author’s unpreparedness for her first sexual experience. The author notes that she took her parents’ words seriously as a viable ethical position due to a desire to please them. Decades later, the author discovered her parents were married shortly before her oldest sister was born, a fact they had concealed, revealing hypocrisy in their strict moral stance.
• Lack of Agency and Shame: The author reflects that she learned how to lack agency from her upbringing. The parental focus on purity and the use of shame were not effective methods of birth control. The author concludes that her sexual decisions were not her parents’ to make, nor did they belong to institutions like the university with its process for prescribing birth control.
• Seeking Information and Birth Control: A family friend provided a different perspective, suggesting the use of birth control while deciding about the morality of sex. Eventually, the author sought birth control from the student health clinic, which was within walking distance on campus. Obtaining the pill required attending a lecture, completing a long, invasive questionnaire, and watching a film. The author found the questionnaire humiliating, feeling judged.
• Challenges in Relationships: The author’s partner was unwilling to buy condoms due to embarrassment. This unwillingness, combined with her own hesitation, meant they were “gambling with [their] futures”. The partner also exhibited cruel behavior similar to the author’s father. The author realized her partner was not someone she could have an honest conversation with, particularly regarding her body or potential pregnancy.
• Anxiety and Uncertainty: Irregular periods caused the author significant anxiety about the possibility of pregnancy. This constant state of anxiety was something she hoped the birth control pill would alleviate.
• Potential Miscarriage: Shortly after starting the pill, the author experienced heavy bleeding and clots, leading her to suspect a potential miscarriage. She wanted to discuss this with her partner but was unable to. This event prompted reflection on her denial of reality, the waning affection in her relationship, and how a potential pregnancy termination altered the course of her life.
• Sex Education: In her career as a teacher librarian, the author found research showing that teens taking purity pledges are more likely to get pregnant than those who don’t. She advocates for informative sex education, emphasizing that shame is ineffective and that girls should know they only need their own permission regarding sexual decisions.

Overall, the sources highlight how family background, societal expectations, personal relationships, access to information, and the presence or absence of shame significantly influence an individual’s sexual health decisions and their consequences.

Parental Hypocrisy on Purity and Sex

Based on the sources provided, parental hypocrisy is a central theme, specifically regarding sexual health decisions and the concept of purity.

The sources describe the author’s parents as holding very strict views on sex before marriage and the use of birth control. The mother viewed a girl using birth control as “sinning by anticipating sex” and even suggested it would be better to get pregnant without birth control, believing it would demonstrate “good intentions”. The parents were described as “relentlessly belittling” their older sisters after discovering they were sexually active, resorting to “screaming and lectures on the ‘type of girl no decent man wanted’” and regularly searching their drawers. The author, as a 12-year-old, took these admonitions seriously, wanting to please her parents. Even when the author was 17, her mother continued to check her drawers and ensured she didn’t linger in cars after dates. The author felt she had “failed [her] mother’s strict chastity standard”.

Decades later, after her parents had passed away, the author and her sisters discovered their parents’ wedding certificate. They found it was dated April 18, 1954. All the sisters simultaneously realized that their oldest sister was born four months after this date. This contradicted the family narrative they had always been told, which was that their parents married in September 1953. This revelation explained why the wedding had taken place in the rectory with the mother in a blue tailored suit, rather than a traditional church wedding.

This discovery exposed the significant hypocrisy in their parents’ behavior and strict moral teachings. The second sister was particularly angry, noting that their parents had been cruelest to her. The sisters questioned if it was “purely hypocrisy” or if their parents genuinely thought they were doing a favor by trying to shame them into avoiding what they themselves had done. The author reflects that the primary lesson she learned from this upbringing was “how to lack agency”. Ultimately, the author concludes that shame, the tool often employed by her parents, was “no more an effective method of birth control than it ever was”.

In summary, the parental hypocrisy is highlighted by the stark contrast between the parents’ severe moral condemnation of their daughters’ sexual activity and birth control use and the later discovery that the parents themselves conceived their oldest child before marriage. This contradiction profoundly impacted the daughters, contributing to shame, anxiety, and a lack of agency.

The Harms of Purity Culture

Based on the sources, the harm caused by purity culture is vividly illustrated through the author’s personal experiences and reflections. Purity culture, as depicted here, involves strict moral views regarding sex before marriage, the condemnation of birth control, and the use of shame and fear as tools to enforce these standards.

Here are some of the key harms discussed:

• Unpreparedness and Risk-Taking: The author’s mother’s admonition that using birth control was “sinning by anticipating sex” directly contributed to the author’s unpreparedness for her first sexual intercourse, leading to potential risks. The author and her partner ended up “gambling with [their] futures” by not using condoms.
• Lack of Agency: A significant harm identified by the author is learning “how to lack agency” from her upbringing within this purity-focused environment. This suggests that purity culture, as practiced by her parents, stripped her of the ability to make informed and independent decisions about her own body and sexual health.
• Shame and Humiliation: The parents “relentlessly belittled” their older sisters with “screaming and lectures” after discovering they were sexually active, explicitly using shame by calling them the “type of girl no decent man wanted”. The author herself felt she had “failed [her] mother’s strict chastity standard” and found the process of obtaining birth control at the student health clinic, including an “invasive questionnaire,” to be “humiliating”. The author later asserts that “Shame is no more an effective method of birth control than it ever was”.
• Anxiety and Stress: The author experienced significant anxiety, leading to “anxiety pounds,” due to irregular periods and the constant fear of pregnancy. This persistent worry was something she hoped the birth control pill would alleviate.
• Impact on Relationships and Communication: The author’s difficulty communicating with her partner about sensitive issues like her body or potential pregnancy, potentially influenced by her background, highlighted the isolating effect of shame and lack of openness fostered by purity culture. She realized her partner was not someone she could have an honest conversation with.
• Hypocrisy and its Demoralizing Effect: The later discovery of the parents’ own premarital conception exposed the deep hypocrisy underlying their strict moral teachings. This revelation caused anger and pain for the sisters, particularly the second sister who felt their parents had been cruelest to her. The hypocrisy undermined the parents’ stated intentions and revealed the destructive nature of their judgment.
• Ineffectiveness as a Preventative Strategy: Research cited by the author demonstrates that, counterintuitively, teens who take purity pledges are more likely to get pregnant than those who do not. This stark finding underscores the failure of purity culture as a practical method for preventing unintended pregnancies, suggesting its focus on shame and prohibition is less effective than comprehensive sex education.

In essence, the sources portray purity culture, as enforced by the author’s parents, not as a protective framework, but as a source of shame, anxiety, lack of preparation, and compromised agency for their daughters, ultimately failing in its stated goals and causing lasting harm.

Autonomy in Reproductive Decisions

Based on the sources provided, the discussion of reproductive rights isn’t framed in a broad legal or political sense, but rather through the lens of individual autonomy and control over one’s sexual and reproductive health decisions. The sources strongly critique the forces that undermine this autonomy.

Key points related to reproductive rights that emerge from the sources include:

• The Right to Personal Decision-Making: The author explicitly states, “My sexual decisions were not my parents’ to make. Nor did they belong to the university with its lecture, invasive questionnaire, and film”. This highlights the central idea that decisions about one’s body and sexual activity are personal and should not be controlled by others or institutions.
• Autonomy and its Negation: The author reflects that the main lesson learned from her upbringing was “how to lack agency”. This upbringing involved strong parental control and the use of shame. The difficulty in accessing birth control, involving an “invasive questionnaire” and feeling judged by an “unseen judge” at the student clinic, is also portrayed as an institutional hurdle that felt like a lack of control.
• Access to Birth Control as Part of Autonomy: The narrative details the process of seeking and obtaining the birth control pill. The need to attend a lecture, complete a questionnaire, and feel judged underscores the barriers to accessing contraception, which is a fundamental aspect of reproductive health and autonomy.
• Consequences of Lacking Control: The author’s unpreparedness due to parental warnings against birth control led to risks. The anxiety surrounding irregular periods and the fear of pregnancy, as well as the uncertainty and inability to discuss a potential miscarriage, illustrate the emotional and physical consequences of lacking control over one’s reproductive status. The realization that a potential pregnancy termination could have “altered the course of [her] life” underscores the gravity of reproductive decisions and the impact of having (or not having) agency in such situations.
• Critique of External Control: The author directly criticizes the current trajectory in the U.S., stating that it is “hurling toward a dystopian invasion of women’s privacy and negation of their autonomy”. This is a strong statement linking the personal experiences described to a broader societal concern about women’s control over their bodies and decisions.
• Empowerment Through Self-Permission: As a teacher librarian, the author emphasizes that “Girls should know that the only permission they need is their own” regarding their sexual decisions. This directly counters the external control and shame often associated with discussions of sexuality and aligns with the principle of individual autonomy in reproductive matters.

In summary, while not delving into the legal specifics of “reproductive rights,” the sources powerfully argue for the fundamental right of individuals, particularly women, to make their own informed decisions about their sexual and reproductive health without external coercion, shame, or undue institutional barriers, highlighting the significant harm caused when this autonomy is denied or undermined.

The Harmful Ineffectiveness of Shame in Sexual Education

Based on the sources, shame is consistently portrayed as an ineffective and harmful method for controlling sexual behavior and preventing unintended pregnancies.

Here’s how the sources discuss shame’s ineffectiveness:

• Parents’ use of shame: The author’s parents “relentlessly belittled” their older sisters, using “screaming and lectures on the ‘type of girl no decent man wanted’” after discovering they were sexually active. They also subjected the author to scrutiny, checking her drawers and ensuring she didn’t “linger in the car parked in the driveway”, contributing to her feeling she had “failed [her] mother’s strict chastity standard”. The sisters later questioned if this was “purely hypocrisy” or if their parents genuinely hoped “to shame us into not doing what they did”.
• Institutional shame: The author found the “long, invasive questionnaire about [her] sexual activity” at the student health clinic to be “humiliating, as if an unseen judge was now my in loco parentis”.
• Shame doesn’t prevent behavior: Despite the intense parental focus on chastity and the use of shame, the author had her first sexual intercourse before college and continued to be sexually active. The fear of failing her mother’s standard and the shame did not stop her from having sex.
• Shame hinders open communication and decision-making: The author’s difficulty discussing a potential miscarriage with her partner, Mitch, who didn’t like talking about the female body due to an “ick” factor, highlights how shame and discomfort around sexuality prevent open communication necessary for making informed decisions. She realized he wasn’t someone she could have an “honest conversation with”.
• Research shows ineffectiveness: The author cites research from Peggy Orenstein’s book “Girls & Sex,” stating that “research shows teens who take purity pledges are more likely to get pregnant than those who don’t”. Purity pledges are typically rooted in shame-based approaches to sex education, and this finding directly supports the claim that shame is ineffective in preventing pregnancy; in fact, it may have the opposite effect.
• Author’s explicit conclusion: The author definitively states, “Shame is no more an effective method of birth control than it ever was“. This summarizes her personal experience and understanding based on the research she encountered.
• Shame contributes to a lack of agency: The author reflects that the primary lesson she learned from her upbringing, which heavily featured shame and strict rules, was “how to lack agency”. Lacking agency means being unable to make independent decisions, undermining the very ability to control one’s own body and sexual health, which is necessary for effective birth control use and sexual health management.

In essence, the sources demonstrate that shame, whether from parents or institutions, fails to deter sexual activity, hinders essential communication about sexual health, and is contradicted by research findings on pregnancy rates, ultimately proving to be an ineffective tool for promoting sexual well-being. Instead of shame, the author advocates for girls to know that “the only permission they need is their own”, emphasizing self-permission over external judgment and control.

Purity, Pregnancy, and Parental Hypocrisy

Quiz

1. What was the author’s primary reason for not using birth control before her first sexual experience?
2. Describe the parents’ reaction to the older sisters’ sexual activity.
3. What was the mother’s unusual advice regarding birth control and pregnancy?
4. How did the author’s perception of her parents’ advice change as she matured?
5. What circumstances led the author to live with family friends before starting college?
6. How did Laura, the daughter of the family friends, offer a different perspective on birth control?
7. Describe the author’s experience taking a potential pregnancy test at the time.
8. How did Mitch react when the author told him she had experienced significant bleeding and thought it might have been a miscarriage?
9. What discovery did the author and her sisters make after their parents’ death regarding their parents’ wedding date?
10. According to research mentioned by the author, what is the outcome for teens who take purity pledges compared to those who do not?

Essay Format Questions

1. Analyze the impact of the author’s parents’ beliefs about purity and sexuality on her personal development and decision-making during her late teens and early twenties.
2. Discuss the theme of hypocrisy as it is presented in the text, specifically focusing on the revelation about the parents’ wedding date.
3. Explore the contrasting approaches to sexual education and autonomy presented in the text, considering the author’s parents’ methods, the university health clinic, and the author’s later work as a librarian.
4. Evaluate the significance of the potential miscarriage incident in the author’s life, considering her emotional response at the time and her reflections on it decades later.
5. Examine the various dysfunctional relationships portrayed in the text (author and parents, author and Mitch, parents’ marriage) and their influence on the author’s experiences and perspectives.

Glossary of Key Terms

• Chastity: The state or practice of refraining from extramarital, or especially from all, sexual intercourse. In the context of the text, it refers to the expectation of sexual abstinence before marriage, particularly influenced by Catholic upbringing.
• Admonition: A warning or reprimand from an authority figure. In the text, it refers to the mother’s warning about using birth control.
• Philandering: Engaging in casual or illicit sexual relationships. This describes the father’s behavior in the text.
• Matriculated: Enrolled as a student at a college or university. The author matriculated at UCLA.
• Moral ambiguity: Uncertainty about whether something is right or wrong. Laura is described as having an understanding of this.
• Cipher: A secret or disguised way of writing. The author used a simple cipher to discuss the pregnancy test results with Mitch over the phone.
• Freshman 10: A common term referring to the weight gained by many students during their first year of college. The author attributes her anxiety pounds to this.
• Miscarriage: The spontaneous expulsion of a fetus from the womb before it is able to survive independently. The author suspects she may have had one.
• In loco parentis: Refers to a person or organization acting in place of a parent. The author felt the student health clinic questionnaire treated them this way.
• Purity pledges: Promises made, often by young people, to remain abstinent until marriage. Research cited in the text suggests these pledges may not be effective.
• Dystopian: Relating to or denoting an imagined place or state in which everything is unpleasant or bad, typically a totalitarian or environmentally degraded one. The author uses this term to describe a potential future regarding women’s privacy and autonomy.
• Autonomy: The right or condition of self-government. The author fears a negation of women’s autonomy.

Answer Key

1. The author’s primary reason for not using birth control was her mother’s admonition that doing so was a sin because it anticipated sex.
2. The parents reacted with screaming, lectures, and regularly searching drawers, telling their older sisters that they were the “type of girl no decent man wanted.”
3. The mother’s unusual advice was that she would feel better if her daughters got pregnant without using birth control because at least their intentions would be good.
4. As she matured, the author came to see her parents’ marriage as dysfunctional and their advice as less viable, but she still struggled with the desire to please them and internalizing their views.
5. The author ended up living with family friends before college because she was on a waiting list for student housing at UCLA and lived too far away to commute.
6. Laura offered a different perspective by suggesting that while the author could think about whether sex was right or wrong, she should use birth control while making that decision.
7. The author’s experience involved peeing in a mayonnaise jar, carrying it on a public bus to a clinic, and waiting two days for the results, all while feeling anxious and trying to maintain privacy.
8. When the author told Mitch about the significant bleeding, he stared for a moment, shrugged his shoulders, and turned back to the TV, demonstrating his discomfort with discussing female bodily issues.
9. After their parents’ death, the author and her sisters discovered their parents’ wedding certificate showing they were married in April 1954, four months before their oldest sister was born, rather than in September 1953 as they had been told.
10. According to research mentioned by the author, teens who take purity pledges are more likely to get pregnant than those who do not.

Purity Culture, Hypocrisy, and Lost Agency

Main Themes:

• The Damaging Impact of Purity Culture: The central theme revolves around the author’s experiences growing up under the oppressive weight of her parents’ extreme focus on sexual purity, particularly for their daughters. This culture is depicted as not only hindering open communication but also actively leading to negative outcomes.
• Quote: “My parents’ obsession With Purity Nearly Ruined Us.”
• Parental Hypocrisy and its Consequences: The revelation about the author’s parents’ own pre-marital pregnancy exposes a profound hypocrisy at the heart of their strict moral code, highlighting how their actions contradicted the values they so vehemently enforced on their children. This discovery casts a new light on their past behavior and the lasting damage it caused.
• Quote: “All of us were coming to the same realization at once. That was why they’d been married in the rectory rather than the church, our mother in a blue tailored suit. ‘I’m so angry,’ my second sister said, visibly shaking… Our parents had been cruelest to her…”
• The Lack of Agency and its Link to Shame: The author details how her parents’ approach, particularly her mother’s advice to get pregnant rather than use birth control, fostered a deep sense of shame and inhibited her ability to make informed decisions about her own body and sexuality.
• Quote: “‘I’d feel better if you weren’t using birth control and got pregnant,’ our mother yelled. ‘At least your intentions would be good.’”
• Quote: “The only lesson I’d learned was how to lack agency.”
• The Difficulties of Navigating Sexual Health and Decision-Making Without Adequate Education and Support: The narrative illustrates the confusion and anxiety the author faced in her first sexual experiences due to a lack of accurate information and open dialogue, in contrast to the more practical and supportive advice she received from a friend.
• Quote: “‘I’m on the pill,’ she said. ‘You can think about whether sex is right or wrong, but use birth control while you decide.’”
• The Enduring Impact of Past Experiences: The author reflects on how these early experiences, particularly her brush with potential pregnancy and the subsequent lack of emotional support from her partner, continued to resonate decades later.
• Quote: “Decades later, I still think back on that moment, my denial of reality.”
• The Importance of Comprehensive Sex Education and Personal Autonomy: The author, through her career choices and reflections, advocates for better sex education and emphasizes that young people, particularly girls, need to understand and exercise their own right to make decisions about their bodies.
• Quote: “Shame is no more an effective method of birth control than it ever was. Girls should know that the only permission they need is their own.”

Most Important Ideas or Facts:

• The author’s mother discouraged the use of birth control, believing getting pregnant showed “good intentions,” leading to the author’s unpreparedness for her first sexual encounter. This is a critical fact that directly links parental ideology to the author’s later struggles.
• The author experienced a potential miscarriage or early pregnancy loss shortly after starting birth control, highlighting the risks associated with delayed or inconsistent use, potentially influenced by her parents’ views. While not explicitly confirmed as a miscarriage, the description strongly suggests this possibility and its emotional impact.
• Quote: “A mass of blood flowed out, heavy, full of clots, pocked with fibrous strings… I wanted to tell Mitch I might have miscarried a pregnancy… I returned to the bathroom and flushed the toilet.”
• The discovery of the parents’ true wedding date reveals they were married only four months before their oldest daughter was born, exposing their hypocrisy regarding pre-marital sex. This is the pivotal revelation that reframes the entire narrative.
• Quote: “‘Mom and Dad’s wedding certificate,’ I said… ‘April 18, 1954.’ Four months before my oldest sister was born.”
• The author’s second sister suffered the most severe emotional abuse from their parents due to being sexually active, illustrating the harsh consequences of their purity standards. This highlights the unequal and cruel application of their rules.
• Quote: “Our parents had been cruelest to her, telling her that, having slept with her boyfriend, he would then bring his friends over to have sex with her in front of him.”
• Research indicates that teens who take purity pledges are more likely to get pregnant than those who don’t. This factual point, mentioned by the author in her capacity as a librarian, provides external validation for the ineffectiveness of purity culture as a preventative measure.
• Quote: “research shows teens who take purity pledges are more likely to get pregnant than those who don’t.”
• The author draws a direct connection between her difficult personal experiences and the current political climate regarding women’s reproductive rights. This adds a contemporary relevance to her personal story.
• Quote: “though the country should have progressed on the matter in the decades since then, the U.S. is now hurling toward a dystopian invasion of women’s privacy and negation of their autonomy.”

Conclusion:

This source provides a powerful and personal account of the detrimental effects of strict purity culture and parental hypocrisy. The author’s narrative underscores the importance of open communication, accurate information, and individual autonomy in matters of sexual health and decision-making. The discovery of her parents’ secret adds a layer of irony and anger, highlighting the deep and lasting damage caused by their actions. The author’s concluding reflections connect her personal story to broader societal issues around reproductive rights and the ongoing need for comprehensive sex education that empowers young people.

Autonomy and the Burden of Purity

What impact did the author’s parents’ strict views on purity have on her and her sisters?

The author and her sisters experienced significant emotional distress and public shaming due to their parents’ obsession with purity. Their household was filled with screaming and lectures, and their drawers were regularly searched. The author’s mother even expressed a preference for pregnancy over using birth control, believing it indicated “good intentions,” a notion the author, as a young teenager, initially took seriously.

How did the author’s parents’ own actions contradict their strict moral code?

Years after enduring their parents’ shaming and rules about premarital sex, the author and her sisters discovered their parents were married four months before their oldest sister was born. This revelation exposed a significant hypocrisy, demonstrating that their parents had engaged in the very behavior they vehemently condemned in their daughters.

What was the author’s experience with her first sexual encounter and the subsequent pregnancy scare?

The author’s first sexual intercourse was unplanned and occurred just before college. Due to her mother’s discouraging attitude towards birth control, she was unprepared. A subsequent pregnancy scare caused significant anxiety, leading her to take a public bus with a urine sample in a jar and call her boyfriend using a coded language from a public pay phone.

How did the author’s experience at the university health clinic shape her perspective on sexual health information?

While the university health clinic provided access to birth control, the process was described as humiliating. The invasive questionnaire and the required educational film, particularly a scene attempting to make condom use “hip,” felt awkward and ineffective. Despite the discomfort, the author acknowledged that the clinic ultimately provided the necessary “permission” to access birth control.

What difficult experience did the author have that she suspects might have been a miscarriage?

After starting the birth control pill irregularly due to not having her period, the author experienced severe cramps and passed a mass of blood with clots and fibrous strings. She suspected it could have been a miscarriage, a deeply impactful event that her then-boyfriend dismissed.

How did the author’s relationship with Mitch mirror her father’s behavior, and what was its primary appeal to him?

The author notes that Mitch sometimes treated her with cruelty, which she recognized as mimicking her father’s behavior. She came to realize that her “convenience as a sex partner was [her] primary appeal to him,” indicating a lack of genuine emotional connection and a focus on physical intimacy, similar to her father’s philandering.

What did the author learn about the effectiveness of shame as a method of birth control through her professional experience?

Working with teens as a teacher and high school librarian, the author encountered research showing that teens who take purity pledges are more likely to get pregnant than those who do not. This experience reinforced her belief that shame is not an effective method of birth control.

What is the main message the author wants to convey regarding women’s autonomy and sexual decisions?

The author strongly advocates for women’s autonomy over their sexual decisions. She argues that these choices should not be dictated by parents, institutions, or societal pressures. Her core message is that “the only permission they need is their own,” emphasizing the importance of self-determination in matters of sexual health and choices.

A Box of Secrets: Purity, Shame, and Autonomy

My Parents’ Obsession With Purity Nearly Ruined Us. Years Later, I Found Their Secret In A Box Of Their Things.

My first sexual intercourse, just before I started college, was unplanned. It would have been largely forgettable if we’d used birth control.

Looking back, it’s hard to admit to my own foolishness. I’d had the same boyfriend for 18 months. While our Catholic upbringings were a factor in this long period of chastity, my unpreparedness was also due to my mother’s admonition that a girl using birth control is sinning by anticipating sex

Five years before, my parents relentlessly belittled my older sisters after finding out that they were sexually active. Our household exploded in screaming and lectures on the “type of girl no decent man wanted.” Drawers were regularly searched.

“I’d feel better if you weren’t using birth control and got pregnant,” our mother yelled. “At least your intentions would be good.”

My sisters gave our mother’s advice all the consideration it deserved, but as a slowly maturing 12 year old, I took it seriously. Desperately wanting to please my parents, I took their words as a viable ethical position.

By the time I was 17, my parents’ dysfunctional marriage had become a vicious, albeit silent, war. My philandering father often stayed out all night. My mother lost so much weight that her co-workers thought she had cancer. Yet she would stand in the doorway when Mitch dropped me off from dates, making sure I didn’t linger in the car parked in the driveway. She had begun emptying my drawers.

I matriculated at the University of California, Los Angeles, a few months after my 18th birthday and about a month after I first had intercourse. I ended up on a waiting list for student housing. Since I lived too far away to commute, I stayed for the first quarter in the home of well-to-do family friends, taking a public bus to school.

The family’s eldest daughter, Laura, was a high school senior. Grateful that she’d agreed to share her room with me, I was also indebted to her for her understanding of moral ambiguity. “I’m on the pill,” she said. “You can think about whether sex is right or wrong, but use birth control while you decide.”

Meanwhile, my irregular periods were usually about 45 days apart, but I hadn’t menstruated in over two months. A few nights later, Laura crept into the kitchen to empty and wash a glass mayonnaise jar. The following morning, I peed in the jar, placed it in a brown paper bag and carried it on the bus, perfectly upright, hoping it looked like a bag lunch and that it wouldn’t leak or break.

I waited two days for the negative results. I’d set up a simple cipher for the conversation with Mitch because I’d have to call him on a very public pay phone. He was a sophomore at a college across town, far enough that there would be a charge for “local long distance.” I brought a coin purse full of quarters and dimes.

When Mitch answered the phone, I said, “I’m not going to the mountains.”

“Wait,” he said. I could hear him moving across the room, pulling the phone cord into the hallway.

“What?” he finally asked.

“I’m not going to the mountains.”

“Are you pregnant?”

“I’m NOT pregnant,” I exclaimed in frustration, my three minutes coming to a close, the automated operator’s voice giving me my first warning.

A girl standing in front of a vending machine turned to look at me. “Congratulations,” she said. I think she meant it. When she left, I got some chocolate chip cookies with change left over from the phone call. That was the beginning of my freshman 10, the anxiety pounds.

I didn’t have a period until the academic quarter was over, and I’d moved into the dorms. As if all three missing periods had accumulated until the dam burst, I woke in the middle of the night slick with blood. Fearful of disturbing my new roommate, I found a towel without turning on the light and puttered to the restroom. At that hour, no one was in the hallway to see my blood-soaked pajamas. I cleaned up under one in a row of showerheads separated by white curtains.

Multiple thoughts occurred to me: This could have been a miscarriage; I’d failed my mother’s strict chastity standard; Mitch and I were gambling with our futures.

And still, I hesitated to act. Mitch was unwilling to buy condoms because it was embarrassing. His interest in a girl he’d met at work blossomed, and he sometimes treated me with cruelty, a thing that mimicked my father’s behavior. Despite the dysfunction of our relationship and my guilt when I came home and caught my mother searching my bathroom cabinets, Mitch and I occasionally ended up in bed when one or the other of our roommates went home for the weekend. I missed another period.

Sin or not, I was pressing my luck. Now that I was on campus, the student health clinic was within walking distance. I made an appointment for the birth control lecture, a requirement before being prescribed the pill.

At the student health center, I filled out a long, invasive questionnaire about my sexual activity. I found it humiliating, as if an unseen judge was now my in loco parentis. Having never developed boundaries, I answered honestly.

After completing the survey, I sat with a group of girls watching a film. One memorable scene had a woman talking about how she was never without her “condominium” — an embossed leather pendant pouch, worn like a necklace, which she squeezed open, and from which she pulled a wrapped condom. Tooled leather had been wildly popular a decade earlier, but this effort to make birth control hip felt flat. All the girls snickered, shook their heads — and put up with it. Because at the end of the film, we got what we came for: permission.

Though I finally had monthly pill packs in hand, I’d been instructed not to start them until the end of my next period, which showed no sign of arriving soon.

Mitch’s parents were going away for a weekend, so we were meeting at their house for our next date. Five days before, I figured I’d waited long enough. With no way of knowing when my next period would start, but certain that we would have sex that weekend, I started taking the pill. I figured it would make my periods regular, and my constant state of anxiety about the possibility of pregnancy would disappear.

When I met Mitch at his parents’ house, we had a typical afternoon. A meal, sex, some TV. I started to feel cramps low in my abdomen. They quickly increased in strength. I went to the bathroom, sat on the toilet, and doubled over. A mass of blood flowed out, heavy, full of clots, pocked with fibrous strings.

I wanted to tell Mitch I might have miscarried a pregnancy. That it was in the toilet and I wasn’t sure what to do. But Mitch didn’t like talking about the female body, waving off what he felt had an “ick” factor. All I could manage to say was that I’d passed a lot of blood. He stared a moment, shrugged his shoulders and turned back to the TV. I returned to the bathroom and flushed the toilet.

Decades later, I still think back on that moment, my denial of reality. It was clear that Mitch’s affection for me had waned. My convenience as a sex partner was my primary appeal to him. He wasn’t someone I could have an honest conversation with, much less a baby, and I knew it. But I persisted in my hope that he would love me again, and imagined a future together. He was, after all, in the model of my father.

It’d be a lie to say that day haunts me. And I imagine if someone asked Mitch about it, he wouldn’t be able to recall it. But I do think of it periodically, knowing that if I did accidentally terminate a pregnancy, I altered the course of my life.

My parents died during the COVID-19 pandemic. My father had been declining for a few years. That, combined with my mother’s increasing dementia, brought my sisters and me into caregiving roles. With our father’s death, we were packing up what remained at their assisted-living apartment and moving our mom to more intensive care. I found a box of papers in the back of the closet. During the first move we’d pulled these papers from a safe bolted to the concrete floor, boxed them, and took them with us. Now, I was flipping through them.

“Mom and Dad’s wedding certificate,” I said. None of us had ever seen it. My sisters peered over my shoulders. “April 18, 1954.” Four months before my oldest sister was born.

We’d always been told our parents were married in September 1953.

All of us were coming to the same realization at once. That was why they’d been married in the rectory rather than the church, our mother in a blue tailored suit.

“I’m so angry,” my second sister said, visibly shaking. “I’m not kidding, I’m mad.” Our parents had been cruelest to her, telling her that, having slept with her boyfriend, he would then bring his friends over to have sex with her in front of him.

There was no way to talk with our mother about this. Deep into her dementia journey, she was forgetting our names. Our sister conversation pinged. Was this purely hypocrisy? Did our parents think they were doing us a favor, hoping to shame us into not doing what they did? The only lesson I’d learned was how to lack agency.

An old joke of my mother’s came back.

“You can eat an apple for birth control.”

“Before or after?”

“Instead of.”

My sexual decisions were not my parents’ to make. Nor did they belong to the university with its lecture, invasive questionnaire, and film. And though the country should have progressed on the matter in the decades since then, the U.S. is now hurling toward a dystopian invasion of women’s privacy and negation of their autonomy.

My adult career choices always had me working with teens, first as a teacher and later as a high school librarian. When I read “Girls & Sex” by Peggy Orenstein to see if it was a fit for our library collection, I wasn’t surprised to learn that research shows teens who take purity pledges are more likely to get pregnant than those who don’t.

Along with other informative sex ed titles, I featured the book in my library and reviewed iton my school library blog because I am certain of this: Shame is no more an effective method of birth control than it ever was. Girls should know that the only permission they need is their own.

Victoria Waddle is a Pushcart Prize-nominated writer and was included in “Best Short Stories From The Saturday Evening Post Great American Fiction Contest 2016.” The author of “Acts of Contrition” and “The Mortality of Dogs and Humans,” her upcoming novel about a teen escaping a polygamist cult is set to launch in 2025. Formerly the managing editor of the journal Inlandia: A Literary Journey and a teacher librarian, she discusses both writing and library book censorship in her Substack newsletter, “Be a Cactus.”

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog

Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!