Madaras Registration, Government Policy, and the Path Forward by Mufti Tariq Masood – Study Notes

Mufti Tariq Masood’s podcast discusses a controversy surrounding a bill passed in Pakistan’s Senate and Assembly concerning the regulation of madrasas (religious schools). The central conflict involves differing opinions among prominent religious scholars, particularly regarding the involvement of Jamaat-e-Rasheed and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, on whether madrasas should come under the Ministry of Education. The podcast features Masood expressing his neutral stance while addressing concerns raised by various parties, including the potential loss of autonomy for madrasas and the fairness of the government’s actions. Masood presents arguments from both sides, highlighting the complexities of the issue and the strong emotions it evokes. He concludes by calling for unity among religious scholars and a resolution that respects the rights of all stakeholders.

Pakistan’s Madaris: A Conflict of Control

This study guide will focus on the key topics and figures discussed in the provided sources, which primarily consist of a podcast transcript discussing a conflict within the Islamic community regarding the management of Madaris (religious schools) in Pakistan.

Key Topics

• The 2019 Agreement: A central point of discussion is a 2019 agreement regarding the registration and management of Madaris [1]. This agreement involved the government and various Ulama (religious scholars) [2].
• The agreement stipulated that Madaris would be brought under the purview of Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) [1, 2].
• Key aspects of the agreement included the registration of Madaris, the opening of bank accounts, and the issuance of visas for foreign students [2, 3].
• There is debate as to whether the government fulfilled its obligations under this agreement, particularly concerning the opening of bank accounts and the issuance of visas for foreign students [3, 4].
• The Society Act: A new bill was passed under the Society Act which would have brought Madaris under a different regulatory framework [5, 6]. This is viewed as a reversal of the 2019 agreement.
• This bill was passed by the Assembly and Senate [6, 7].
• The bill would require Madaris to register under the Society Act, with a one-month period for existing Madaris and a one-year period for new ones [6].
• The bill was passed without consulting all stakeholders, leading to the current conflict [8, 9].
• Wizarat Talim vs. Wizarat Dakhla: A major point of contention is whether Madaris should be under the control of the Ministry of Education (Wizarat Talim) or the Ministry of Interior (Wizarat Dakhla) [10].
• Wizarat Talim is seen as a more favorable option by some because it facilitates registration within 7 days without requiring lawyer fees, and provides training and financial benefits to teachers [11-13].
• Wizarat Dakhla is seen by some as a means of government control over Madaris, that can lead to arrests of foreign students and other issues [9, 12].
• Accusations of being a “Darbari Mullah”: The term “Darbari Mullah” (courtier Mullah) is used to accuse religious figures of being too close to the government and acting in its interests rather than the interests of the community [14-16]. This is a key point of criticism made against some religious figures involved in the conflict [15, 17].
• The Role of Ulama: The podcast discusses the differing opinions among various Ulama, particularly concerning the 2019 agreement and the Society Act [6, 7, 14, 16].
• Hazrat Maulana Fazlur Rehman is a central figure, who introduced a bill that is now under scrutiny [8, 18].
• Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb is another significant figure, who is seen by some as being against the interests of the Madaris [7, 14].
• Mufti Taqi Usmani Saheb is a highly respected scholar whose opinion is sought and valued by many [2, 16].
• Other figures include Qari Hanif Jalandhari Saheb and Mufti Muneeb Rehman Saheb [2, 10].

Key Figures

• Mufti Tariq Masood: The host of the podcast, who aims to provide a neutral perspective on the conflict [7, 15]. He claims to be an employee of Jamat Rasheed while also maintaining a neutral stance [14].
• Hazrat Maulana Fazlur Rehman: A political leader and religious figure who is seen as having a key role in the current conflict, he introduced the bill that has created the dispute [7, 8].
• Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb: A respected scholar who is seen as a key figure in the dispute, criticized by some for his stance on the Madaris and for his perceived closeness with Jam Rashid [7, 14, 15].
• Mufti Taqi Usmani Saheb: A highly respected and influential scholar whose opinion is valued by many [2, 16].
• Usman Yusuf Saheb: A representative of Jamat Rasheed, who is interviewed by Mufti Tariq Masood in the podcast [14, 15].
• Qari Hanif Jalandhari Saheb: A religious scholar who was involved in the 2010 agreement and the 2019 agreement with the government [1, 2, 10].
• Mufti Muneeb Rehman Saheb: A religious scholar who was involved in the 2019 agreement [2, 10].

Core Conflicts and Issues

• Disagreement on the management of Madaris: The central conflict is about which ministry should control the Madaris. The 2019 agreement placed them under Wizarat Talim while a new bill under the Society Act would make that impossible [1, 5, 10].
• Lack of consultation: The bill that was passed under the Society Act did not involve full consultation with all the Madaris and their representatives, leading to a backlash [6, 8].
• Accusations of government influence: Some religious figures are accused of being too close to the government and promoting its interests over those of the Madaris [5, 14, 16, 17].
• Question of the legal status of the 2019 agreement: Some argue that the 2019 agreement was merely a “piece of paper” and not a legally binding document, while others contend that it is still valid [4, 19].
• Concerns about government control over Madaris: There are concerns that bringing Madaris under government control will result in a loss of independence and influence on curriculum and hiring decisions [12, 17].
• Conflicting viewpoints within the Ulama: The Ulama are not united in their stance on these issues, which further complicates the situation [7, 14, 16].

Areas for Further Study

• The specific content of the 2019 agreement and the Society Act bill.
• The historical context of the relationship between the government and Madaris in Pakistan.
• The different viewpoints and affiliations of the various Ulama involved in the conflict.
• The implications of Madaris being under the control of either Wizarat Talim or Wizarat Dakhla.
• The role of political influence and motivations in this conflict.
• The specific procedures for registration of Madaris under both systems.
• The role and function of Wifa Kul Madaris Al Arabia [20].
• The potential benefits and drawbacks of each system for Madaris and their students [12, 17].

By examining these key topics, figures, and conflicts, one can gain a better understanding of the complex issues surrounding the management of Madaris in Pakistan. It is also important to note the podcast host is trying to remain neutral and is presenting different points of view. This is not a simple issue and does not have a simple answer.

Madaris Management Conflict in Pakistan

Okay, here is a briefing document based on the provided sources and our conversation history, focusing on the key issues surrounding the management of Madaris in Pakistan:

Briefing Document: Madaris Management Conflict in Pakistan

Background: This document provides a briefing on the ongoing conflict concerning the management of Madaris (religious schools) in Pakistan, drawing from a podcast transcript [1-3]. The conflict primarily revolves around a 2019 agreement between the government and various Ulama (religious scholars) and a subsequent bill passed under the Society Act, which is seen as a reversal of that agreement [4-6].

Key Issues:

• The 2019 Agreement:This agreement stipulated that Madaris would be brought under the control of Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) [4].
• It included provisions for the registration of Madaris, opening bank accounts, and issuing visas for foreign students [7, 8].
• There are conflicting views about whether the government fulfilled its obligations under the agreement [8, 9]. Some argue that accounts were not opened for all Madaris, while others claim that the agreement was fulfilled and that benefits were given to Madaris [8, 10].
• The legal status of the agreement is also debated, with some considering it a mere “piece of paper” [5, 11], while others view it as a valid and binding contract [12].
• The Society Act Bill:A new bill was passed under the Society Act, which would place Madaris under a different regulatory framework [5, 6].
• This bill was passed without consulting all stakeholders, leading to the current conflict [6, 13].
• The bill requires existing Madaris to register within one month, and new Madaris within one year [6].
• This is seen as undermining the 2019 agreement and reversing the progress made under it [14, 15].
• Wizarat Talim vs. Wizarat Dakhla:A major point of contention is whether Madaris should be under the Ministry of Education (Wizarat Talim) or the Ministry of Interior (Wizarat Dakhla) [4].
• Wizarat Talim is favored by some because it facilitates registration quickly (within 7 days) and without requiring lawyer fees. Additionally it provides training and financial benefits to teachers [16, 17].
• Wizarat Dakhla is seen by others as a potential means of government control over Madaris. This can lead to problems such as arrests of foreign students and other issues [14].
• Accusations of being a “Darbari Mullah”:The term “Darbari Mullah” (courtier Mullah) is used to accuse religious figures of being too close to the government and acting in its interests [3, 18].
• This accusation is leveled against figures perceived to be supporting the Society Act bill or who are seen as too closely aligned with Jam Rashid [3, 9].
• Differing Opinions Among Ulama:The Ulama are not united on these issues [19, 20].
• Hazrat Maulana Fazlur Rehman is a key figure who introduced the bill under scrutiny [6, 13].
• Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb is seen as a significant figure in the dispute, with some accusing him of working against the interests of Madaris and for being too closely aligned with Jam Rashid [2, 9, 21].
• Mufti Taqi Usmani Saheb is a highly respected scholar whose opinion is valued by many and who is seen as a neutral figure [19, 22, 23].

Key Figures:

• Mufti Tariq Masood: The podcast host who aims to present a neutral view on the conflict. He is an employee of Jamat Rasheed but claims to maintain a neutral stance [1-3].
• Hazrat Maulana Fazlur Rehman: A political and religious leader who introduced the bill that is the center of the dispute [1, 4, 13, 24].
• Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb: A respected scholar criticized for his stance on the Madaris issue, and for his perceived closeness to Jam Rashid [1-3, 9, 21].
• Mufti Taqi Usmani Saheb: A highly respected and influential scholar [7, 19, 22, 23].
• Usman Yusuf Saheb: A representative of Jamat Rasheed, interviewed by Mufti Tariq Masood [2, 3].

Core Conflicts:

• Disagreement on which ministry should control Madaris.
• Lack of consultation with all stakeholders when the Society Act bill was passed.
• Accusations of some religious figures being too closely aligned with the government.
• Debates about the legal status of the 2019 agreement.
• Concerns that government control will result in a loss of Madaris’ independence and the ability to control curriculum and hiring decisions [18].
• Differing viewpoints among the Ulama [19, 20].

Potential Solutions:

• The podcast host suggests that Madaris should be allowed to choose whether they want to register under Wizarat Talim or the Society Act [25].
• There is a proposal that those who want to remain under Wizarat Talim should be allowed to do so, while those who want to go to Wizarat Dakhla should be allowed to go there as well [25].
• The importance of unity among the Ulama to avoid further conflict is emphasized [26].

Analysis: The conflict is complex, with a mix of legal, political, and religious considerations. It is also important to note the podcast host is trying to remain neutral and is presenting different points of view. This is not a simple issue and does not have a simple answer. The differing opinions among the Ulama further complicate the situation. There is a clear desire to resolve the issues peacefully and to ensure the independence and well-being of Madaris and their students.

Pakistan’s Madaris Management Conflict: A Comprehensive FAQ

Okay, here’s an FAQ based on the provided sources and our conversation history, addressing common questions about the Madaris management conflict in Pakistan:

Frequently Asked Questions: Madaris Management Conflict

Q: What is the main issue of the Madaris conflict?

• The core issue is a disagreement over the management of Madaris (religious schools) in Pakistan. This conflict arose due to the passing of a bill under the Society Act that is seen as undermining the 2019 agreement between the government and various Ulama [1, 2]. The 2019 agreement stipulated that Madaris would come under the control of Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) but the Society Act could move them to a different regulatory framework [2, 3].

Q: What was the 2019 agreement about?

• The 2019 agreement was a significant accord between the government and Ulama [3, 4]. It stated that Madaris would be registered under Wizarat Talim and would receive benefits, including:
• Registration of Madaris [4]
• Opening of bank accounts for Madaris [5]
• Issuance of visas for foreign students [5, 6]
• The agreement aimed to bring Madaris into the formal education system and provide them with necessary facilities [4, 5].

Q: What is the Society Act and why is it controversial?

• The Society Act is a new bill that was passed by the Assembly and Senate [1, 7]. It is controversial because:
• It requires Madaris to register under a different regulatory framework, potentially reversing the 2019 agreement [2].
• It was passed without consulting all stakeholders, leading to opposition from some Madaris and Ulama [8].
• It is seen by some as a move by the government to exert more control over Madaris [2].

Q: What is the difference between Wizarat Talim and Wizarat Dakhla?

• The conflict revolves around whether Madaris should be managed by Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) or Wizarat Dakhla (Ministry of Interior) [3].
• Wizarat Talim is favored by some because it offers quick registration (within 7 days) without lawyer fees and provides training and financial benefits to teachers [9, 10].
• Wizarat Dakhla is viewed by others as a means for the government to exert more control over Madaris, which may lead to arrests of foreign students and other issues [10, 11].

Q: What is a “Darbari Mullah”?

• “Darbari Mullah” (courtier Mullah) is a term used to accuse religious figures of being too closely aligned with the government [12, 13]. These figures are seen as promoting the government’s interests over the interests of the Madaris and the community [14, 15].

Q: Who are the key figures involved in this conflict?

• Key figures include:
• Mufti Tariq Masood: The podcast host, who tries to remain neutral. [1]
• Hazrat Maulana Fazlur Rehman: A political and religious leader who introduced the bill under the Society Act [1, 3].
• Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb: A respected scholar criticized for his perceived closeness to Jam Rashid and for his stance on the Madaris issue [16, 17].
• Mufti Taqi Usmani Saheb: A highly respected and influential scholar who is seen as a neutral figure [5, 13].
• Usman Yusuf Saheb: A representative of Jamat Rasheed, who is interviewed in the podcast [12].
• Qari Hanif Jalandhari Saheb: A religious scholar involved in the 2010 and 2019 agreements [3].
• Mufti Muneeb Rehman Saheb: A religious scholar involved in the 2019 agreement [3, 5].

Q: Why are some Ulama against the Society Act?

• Some Ulama oppose the Society Act because:
• They feel it undermines the 2019 agreement [7, 18].
• They were not consulted before the bill was passed [8].
• They believe it will lead to greater government control over Madaris [19, 20].
• They fear it will compromise the independence of Madaris and their ability to control curriculum and hiring decisions [19].

Q: What are the benefits of being under Wizarat Talim?

• The benefits of being under Wizarat Talim include:
• Faster registration: Registration can be completed in 7 days [19]
• No lawyer fees: Madaris do not need to pay lawyer fees [21]
• Financial support for teachers: Training and financial assistance is provided to teachers [11]
• Assistance for foreign students: Visas and NOCs (No Objection Certificates) are facilitated for foreign students [19]

Q: What is the proposed solution to this conflict?

• The podcast host suggests that Madaris should be allowed to choose whether they want to register under Wizarat Talim or the Society Act [22]. The proposed solution includes:
• Allowing Madaris that want to remain under Wizarat Talim to do so [22].
• Allowing Madaris that want to go to Wizarat Dakhla to do so [22].
• Emphasizing the need for unity among the Ulama to resolve the conflict peacefully [23].

Q: What is the significance of the 2019 agreement?

• The 2019 agreement is seen as:
• A crucial step toward formalizing the status of Madaris [4].
• An agreement that would benefit Madaris by providing access to resources and facilities [4].
• A point of contention, as some argue that it was never fully implemented and that it was merely a “piece of paper” [9, 18, 24].
• A basis for claims that the government and some religious leaders are not acting in good faith [25].

Q: What are the potential consequences of this conflict?

• Potential consequences include:
• A disruption to the education of Madaris students [26, 27].
• Increased government control over Madaris [19, 20].
• A loss of independence for Madaris [19, 20].
• Further division among the Ulama and within the Islamic community [13, 28].

This FAQ should provide a comprehensive overview of the Madaris management conflict based on the provided sources and our conversation history.

Madaris Management Conflict Timeline

Okay, here is a timeline of the key events related to the Madaris management conflict, based on the provided sources and our conversation history:

Timeline of Madaris Management Conflict:

• 2005: Initial discussions and disagreements about the management of Madaris begin [1].
• 2010:A significant agreement is signed between Madaris and Rehman Malik Sahab, who was the Wazir at the time [1].
• This agreement, signed by Qari Hanif Jalandhari Saheb and Mufti Munib Saheb among others, aimed to bring Madaris under Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) and move them away from traditional education [1].
• The agreement was not fully implemented and faced obstacles [2].
• 2010-2019: The issue of Madaris registration remains deadlocked [2].
• 2017: Efforts to resolve the Madaris issue gain momentum during the PMLN government [2].
• August 29, 2019:A new agreement is signed between the government of Pakistan, Ittehad Tanji Maa Ban Ji of Maat Madaris, and Shafqat Mahmood Saheb, who was Wazire Talim at the time [2].
• This agreement included the registration of Madaris, opening bank accounts, and issuing visas for foreign students [3].
• Mufti Taqi Usmani Saheb, Mufti Muneeb Rehman Saheb, and other religious leaders were part of this agreement [3].
• This agreement stipulated that Madaris would be under Wizarat Talim [3].
• It is stated that Jam Rashid was part of Vifa at the time but did not have the power to make decisions regarding the agreement [2].
• Post-2019:Some Madaris are registered under Wizarat Talim, with around 4500 being registered under the agreement [4].
• Disagreements arise about the implementation of the agreement, with some claiming that bank accounts were not opened for all Madaris, and that the government did not fulfill its promises [4, 5].
• Jam Rashid took advantage of the situation to register their own degree-awarding institute [6].
• Recent Events (Time not specified, but after 2019):Hazrat Maulana Fazlur Rehman introduces a bill under the Society Act [7].
• The bill is passed unanimously by the Assembly and the Senate [8, 9].
• This bill is controversial as it is seen as reversing the 2019 agreement and placing Madaris under a different regulatory framework [7].
• The bill was passed without consulting all stakeholders including Madaris leaders, leading to the current conflict [9].
• The bill would require existing Madaris to register under the Society Act within a month and new ones within a year [9].
• Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb comes out against the bill on the media [1].
• Accusations of being a “Darbari Mullah” (courtier Mullah) begin against those who are perceived to support the bill [6, 8, 10].
• The issue of whether Madaris should be under Wizarat Talim or Wizarat Dakhla (Ministry of Interior) becomes a central point of contention [1, 11].
• A podcast featuring Mufti Tariq Masood is produced to discuss the issue and attempt to remain neutral [8].
• The podcast host argues that Madaris should be allowed to choose whether they want to register under Wizarat Talim or the Society Act [12].

This timeline highlights the key moments in the ongoing conflict, from the initial agreements to the recent controversies. The timeline makes clear the major points of contention and how the current issues emerged from past agreements and disagreements.

Fractured Faith: Divisions Within the Ulama

The sources reveal significant challenges to Ulama unity, particularly regarding the management of Madaris and differing views on government engagement [1-3]. Here’s a breakdown of the complexities:

• Divisions over Madaris Management: A central issue causing disunity is the disagreement over whether Madaris should be under Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) or Wizarat Dakhla (Ministry of Interior) [4].
• Some Ulama, like Hazrat Maulana Fazlur Rehman, have supported a bill under the Society Act, which could move Madaris from the Education Ministry to a different regulatory framework, potentially reversing the 2019 agreement. This move is seen as a betrayal by some and a major source of division among the Ulama [5-7].
• Other Ulama, like those aligned with Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb, oppose this bill and feel it undermines the agreements and autonomy of Madaris [1-3].
• Accusations of Being a “Darbari Mullah”: The term “Darbari Mullah” (courtier Mullah) is frequently used to criticize religious figures perceived as too close to the government [3, 8, 9].
• This accusation is levied against those seen as supporting government policies over the interests of the Madaris and the wider community, further deepening the divide among Ulama [3, 9].
• The podcast host, Mufti Tariq Masood, attempts to remain neutral, highlighting the complexity of the situation and the difficulty in achieving unity when some Ulama are accused of being government stooges [1-3].
• Differing Interpretations of Agreements: There are disagreements over the interpretation and implementation of the 2019 agreement [4, 5, 10, 11].
• Some Ulama argue the agreement was a crucial step for formalizing Madaris, while others see it as a mere “piece of paper” that was never fully implemented [11, 12].
• This difference in interpretation is a significant point of contention and prevents a unified approach to the issue of Madaris management [11, 12].
• Conflicting Loyalties and Personal Relationships: The sources indicate that personal loyalties and relationships also play a role in the disunity among the Ulama [13-15].
• Some Ulama prioritize their personal relationships with influential figures, such as their peers or Murshids, over a unified stance on the issue [2, 13, 14].
• For example, while Mufti Taqi Usmani Saheb is a highly respected figure, even those who admire him may disagree with him based on their allegiance to another respected figure like Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb [13].
• Lack of Consultation: The sources suggest that a major reason for disunity is the lack of consultation with all stakeholders before decisions are made [6, 7].
• The Society Act bill was passed without consulting all the Madaris leaders and stakeholders, creating a sense of betrayal and leading to opposition [6, 7].
• This lack of consultation undermines trust among the Ulama and contributes to their disunity [7].
• The Quest for a Solution: Despite the disunity, there are calls for the Ulama to unite and find a solution [16, 17].
• The podcast host proposes a solution that would allow Madaris to choose whether they want to register under Wizarat Talim or the Society Act, accommodating different preferences and hopefully bridging the divide [16].
• There is a plea for unity, emphasizing that internal fighting among the Ulama will weaken their collective position [17].

In conclusion, the sources reveal that Ulama unity is severely challenged due to conflicting views on Madaris management, accusations of government alignment, varying interpretations of agreements, conflicting loyalties, lack of consultation, and a host of other factors. The path to unity remains complex, with calls for mutual respect and understanding in the midst of deeply entrenched disagreements.

Madaris Registration in Pakistan: A Contentious Issue

The sources discuss Madaris registration as a complex and contentious issue, with multiple perspectives and significant disagreements. Here’s an overview of the key points regarding Madaris registration, drawing from the sources and our conversation history:

• 2019 Agreement: A major point of reference is the 2019 agreement between the government and Ittehad Tanji Maa Ban Ji of Maat Madaris [1]. This agreement aimed to register Madaris under the Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) [2].
• This agreement was a significant breakthrough, with the intention of bringing Madaris into the formal education system [1, 3].
• The agreement also included provisions for opening bank accounts for Madaris and issuing visas for foreign students [2].
• However, the implementation of this agreement is disputed, with some claiming that not all Madaris received bank accounts and foreign student visas as promised [4].
• The Society Act Bill: A more recent development is the introduction of a bill under the Society Act, which has caused considerable controversy [5, 6].
• This bill is seen by some as an attempt to reverse the 2019 agreement and place Madaris under a different regulatory framework, potentially under the Wizarat Dakhla (Ministry of Interior) [5].
• This bill was passed without consulting all stakeholders which has lead to major disagreements [7].
• The bill stipulates that existing Madaris must register under the Society Act within a month and new Madaris within a year [6].
• This bill has created significant conflict among the Ulama, with some opposing it vehemently and others seeming to support it [8].
• Wizarat Talim vs. Society Act: A core issue is the debate over whether Madaris should be registered under Wizarat Talim or the Society Act [9].
• Those in favor of Wizarat Talim argue it provides a more suitable framework for education and aligns with the 2019 agreement.
• They also state that the Wizarat Talim provides easier access to resources and recognition for Madaris [10].
• Those in favor of the Society Act argue that it provides more autonomy and reduces the government’s control over Madaris [5].
• Those who are against the Society Act and support Wizarat Talim view the Society Act as an encroachment on their rights [11].
• Registration Challenges: The sources highlight the difficulties Madaris face in the registration process [10].
• Registering under the Society Act is described as complex, requiring fees, lawyers, and clearances from multiple agencies, which is particularly burdensome for smaller Madaris [12].
• Registration under Wizarat Talim is presented as a more streamlined process, with registration possible within 7 days and without the need for legal assistance or fees [10].
• The lack of proper registration can lead to various problems including difficulties in opening bank accounts [4] and obtaining visas for foreign students [13].
• Accusations of Government Influence: The debate over registration is also tied to concerns about government influence over Madaris [7, 14].
• Some argue that registering under the Society Act or Wizarat Dakhla would lead to greater government control over Madaris’ curriculum and operations [14, 15].
• On the other hand, registering under Wizarat Talim is seen by some as a way to secure funding and support for Madaris.
• The lack of clarity on this issue has led to accusations of some Ulama being “Darbari Mullahs” and collaborating with the government, further deepening the conflict [16, 17].
• Differing Views within Madaris: It is also important to note that not all Madaris share the same view regarding registration [7].
• Some Madaris are keen to be under Wizarat Talim, while others prefer to remain independent or under different frameworks [7, 18].
• There is a concern that forcing all Madaris to register under one system ignores their individual preferences and needs [7].
• Proposed Solutions: A proposed solution is to allow Madaris to choose whether to register under Wizarat Talim or under the Society Act, respecting their autonomy and addressing different needs [19].
• This solution aims to prevent the imposition of a single system that is not acceptable to all Madaris, and to reduce the conflict [19].
• It also aims to honor the previous agreements while accommodating the legitimate concerns about government interference [20].

In conclusion, Madaris registration is a multifaceted issue with deep historical roots, and current debates are tied to power dynamics, differing opinions about autonomy, and the implementation of past agreements. The key point is that there is no simple answer and that a solution must address the legitimate needs and concerns of all stakeholders.

Government Policies and Madaris in Pakistan

Government policies, as depicted in the sources, are a major source of contention and division, particularly regarding the regulation and oversight of Madaris [1-41]. Here’s a breakdown of the key government policies discussed and their implications:

• The 2019 Agreement: A significant policy is the 2019 agreement between the government and Ittehad Tanji Maa Ban Ji of Maat Madaris, which aimed to bring Madaris under the purview of Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) [4-6].
• This agreement was intended to formalize the Madaris system, providing avenues for registration, opening bank accounts, and facilitating visas for foreign students [6, 8].
• However, there are differing interpretations regarding the implementation of this agreement, with some claiming that the government failed to fulfill its promises, leading to distrust [7-9].
• Some Ulama feel that the government did not fully implement the agreement’s provisions which has led to significant tension and disagreement about the government’s intentions [7, 8].
• The Society Act Bill: A more recent government policy is the introduction of a bill under the Society Act, which is seen by some as a reversal of the 2019 agreement and a source of conflict [4, 11-13].
• This bill proposes to move Madaris from the Ministry of Education to a different regulatory framework, potentially under the Ministry of Interior or other government bodies [11, 12].
• This has led to considerable opposition from some Ulama who feel it undermines their autonomy and control over Madaris [1, 11, 13, 16, 17].
• The bill was passed without proper consultation with all stakeholders which has further deepened the divide and created distrust in the government’s motives [1, 11, 13, 16, 17].
• Government Influence and Control: Concerns about government control and influence over Madaris are central to the debates [28-30].
• Some Ulama fear that the government is trying to exert too much control over the curriculum, finances, and overall management of Madaris [27-30].
• Accusations of some Ulama being “Darbari Mullahs” (courtier Mullahs) who are too close to the government have further complicated the situation [2, 3, 7, 10, 12, 28, 39].
• The fear that the government will use these policies to influence the religious teachings and values of Madaris is a major cause for concern [27-30].
• Registration and Bureaucracy: The sources highlight the bureaucratic hurdles and challenges faced by Madaris during the registration process [25-28].
• Registering under the Society Act is described as a complex and time-consuming process, involving legal fees and clearances from multiple agencies [25-27].
• In contrast, registration under Wizarat Talim is portrayed as a more straightforward and efficient process [25, 26].
• The issues around registration are presented as a way for the government to control and impose conditions on Madaris [27-29].
• Differing Views Within the Government: The sources also show that there are differing views within the government itself, which adds complexity to the situation.
• Some government officials may genuinely want to facilitate Madaris and bring them into the formal education system, while others may be more interested in control [1, 12, 13, 17-19].
• The policies are sometimes influenced by political considerations rather than educational goals [17-19, 39, 40].
• The podcast suggests that some government entities have been more supportive of the 2019 agreement, while others seem to favor the Society Act, leading to inconsistencies in implementation [4-6].
• Impact on Madaris: The government’s policies directly impact the functioning and future of Madaris [11, 13, 27, 28].
• The debates around registration, government control, and curriculum development create an uncertain future for Madaris, making it difficult for them to plan and operate effectively [27-29].
• The policies are not just about registration but also about the very identity and purpose of Madaris, making them a highly contentious issue [27-30].
• Proposed Solutions: There are calls for the government to engage with all stakeholders and find a solution that addresses the concerns of all parties [1, 11, 13, 17-19, 31, 40].
• A proposed solution is to allow Madaris to choose whether they want to register under Wizarat Talim or the Society Act, respecting their autonomy and addressing their different needs [1, 40].
• It is also suggested that the government should focus on facilitating and supporting Madaris rather than controlling them, building trust and reducing conflict [1, 40].

In conclusion, government policies, particularly regarding the registration and oversight of Madaris, are a major source of tension and division. The government’s actions, the lack of consultation with stakeholders, and varying interpretations of past agreements have contributed to the complex situation. The sources reveal a need for more inclusive and respectful dialogue to find a solution that accommodates the diverse needs and perspectives of all stakeholders.

Jamaat Rasheed and the Madaris Controversy

Jamaat Rasheed is a significant entity within the context of the Madaris (religious schools) and the controversies surrounding their registration and governance, as detailed in the sources. Here’s a comprehensive breakdown of Jamaat Rasheed, incorporating the information from the sources and our conversation history:

• Position and Affiliation:
• Jamaat Rasheed is a part of Wifaq-ul-Madaris Al-Arabia, though it doesn’t hold a leadership position within that organization [1].
• The sources indicate that Jamaat Rasheed is sometimes seen as being aligned with the government, leading to accusations that it is a “Darbari Mullah” (courtier Mullah) organization [2, 3].
• There are allegations that Jamaat Rasheed follows a different policy than other Ulama (religious scholars) and is not part of the Ulama’s unity [4].
• Despite this, the sources note that Jamaat Rasheed has been part of the Madaris system for 30 years [4].
• Role in Madaris Registration:
• Jamaat Rasheed has been involved in the Madaris registration process and is seen as having taken advantage of the situation to get its own institutions registered [5].
• It has been noted that Jamaat Rasheed itself has a degree-awarding institute and a proper Viva Board [5].
• Some sources note that Jamaat Rasheed registered under Wizarat Talim (Ministry of Education) as a degree awarding institute [5].
• There are claims that Jamaat Rasheed was able to get its Madaris registered under Wizarat Talim when others were unable to [5].
• Accusations and Controversies:
• Jamaat Rasheed faces accusations of being a “courtier” or “establishment” entity, suggesting that it prioritizes government interests over the interests of the wider Madaris community [4, 5].
• The sources also reveal that Jamaat Rasheed has been accused of benefiting from government policies while other Madaris have not, which further fuels the controversy [6].
• Some believe that Jamaat Rasheed has been given undue favor by the government and accuse it of not representing the views of all Madaris [6].
• It is noted that Jamat Rasheed does not have a say in the Shura Management, but one source states that his status was that of an employee of Jamat Rasheed [4].
• Relationship with Other Ulama:
• There are conflicting views among the Ulama about Jamaat Rasheed with some being critical of their policies and perceived alignment with the government [2, 4].
• Some scholars have chosen to distance themselves from Jamaat Rasheed due to its perceived close ties with the government and their policies [3, 4].
• The sources mention that some Ulama have turned against Jamaat Rasheed because they feel that it does not represent their interests [2, 4].
• Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb is also mentioned to have the same “scent” as Jam Rashid [4].
• Views on Wizarat Talim and Society Act:
• Jamaat Rasheed seems to have favored registration under Wizarat Talim as a way to streamline the registration process [5, 7].
• They are also accused of seeking benefits and privileges under the Wizarat Talim system [5, 8].
• The sources note that the issues with the Society Act is that it is more difficult and complex to register under it [8, 9].
• Role in the Current Conflict:
• Jamaat Rasheed’s actions and perceived alignment with the government are seen as contributing to the conflict between different factions of the Madaris system [2-4].
• The sources portray Jamaat Rasheed as a divisive force, due to its history and perceived favoritism in its relationship with the government [4].
• Criticisms of Jamaat Rasheed:
• Jamaat Rasheed is criticized for not being aligned with the Ulama’s unity and accused of being a government puppet [2, 4].
• They are also accused of exploiting the registration process for their benefit while disregarding the issues of other Madaris [5].
• Some believe that Jamaat Rasheed’s involvement has complicated the Madaris registration issues further [4].
• There are accusations that it is only concerned with its own interests [6].

In summary, Jamaat Rasheed is a prominent entity within the Madaris system that has been embroiled in controversies regarding government policies and Madaris registration. They are often viewed with suspicion and accused of being too closely aligned with the government, which has made them a focal point in the ongoing conflict between different factions of the Ulama. The sources suggest that while they have been part of the system for a long time, they have also been a source of division and tension in the Madaris community.

Mufti Abdul Rahim: A Profile

Mufti Abdul Rahim is a significant figure in the context of the Madaris (religious schools) and the ongoing debates about their governance and registration, according to the sources. Here’s a detailed overview of Mufti Abdul Rahim’s role, views, and relationships, based on the information in the sources:

• Position and Respect:
• Mufti Abdul Rahim is a respected scholar, and is referred to as “Hazrat Mufti Abdul Rahim Saheb” [1, 2].
• He is considered worthy of respect by various individuals in the sources [2].
• Despite his respected status, he is also a point of contention in the debates, with some disagreeing with his stance and actions [1, 2].
• Relationship with Jamaat Rasheed:
• Mufti Abdul Rahim is said to have the same “scent” as Jamaat Rasheed, implying he is aligned with their policies [2].
• This perceived alignment with Jamaat Rasheed is a point of criticism for some, who view Jamaat Rasheed as being too close to the government [1].
• Despite this perceived alignment, one source mentions that he is also against them [2].
• Opposition to Government Policies:
• The sources indicate that Mufti Abdul Rahim has been critical of certain government policies, especially concerning the regulation of Madaris [1, 3].
• He opposed a bill that was passed by the Assembly and Senate, and questioned why the government was given the right to implement it [1].
• He is also noted to have come on media to discuss the issue of Madaris [3].
• Conflict with Maulana Fazlur Rehman:
• Mufti Abdul Rahim is portrayed as being in conflict with Maulana Fazlur Rehman, especially regarding the latter’s stance on government policies [1, 4].
• Their disagreement is not just about policies but also about the broader direction of the Madaris system [1, 5].
• It’s noted that Mufti Abdul Rahim came out against Maulana Fazlur Rehman’s bill [3].
• One source indicates that during a speech Maulana Fazul Rehman criticized Mufti Abdul Rahim [1].
• Views on Madaris Governance
• Mufti Abdul Rahim emphasizes that Madaris should be independent of political interference and government control [6]
• He believes that Madaris should maintain their autonomy and resist attempts by the government to exert undue influence over them [6]
• He is concerned that government policies are aimed at controlling the curriculum and finances of Madaris [7].
• Personal Conduct and Values:
• Mufti Abdul Rahim is described as being a pious and principled individual who is more concerned about religious matters than worldly gains [8].
• There is an anecdote in the sources where Mufti Abdul Rahim rejects a plot of land given to him, emphasizing that his children should not inherit any property, which indicates his detachment from material possessions [9].
• The sources highlight that Mufti Abdul Rahim is strict in his training [10].
• The sources indicate that Mufti Abdul Rahim is respected for his knowledge and piety [11].
• Relationship with Mufti Taqi Usmani:
• One of the sources highlights a comparison between Mufti Taqi Usmani and Mufti Abdul Rahim, noting that they are both respected scholars, but that Mufti Taqi Usmani’s views are being favored over Mufti Abdul Rahim’s views in the debate [12].
• It is also mentioned that Mufti Abdul Rahim had tied the turban on Mufti Taqi Usmani [13].
• Role in Turban Tying Ceremony:
• Mufti Abdul Rahim is noted to have played a role in the turban-tying ceremonies of prominent figures in the Madaris system [11, 13].
• This role in such ceremonies highlights his senior status and influence within the religious community [13].
• Accusations and Criticisms
• Despite his respected status, Mufti Abdul Rahim is not without his critics, as he is sometimes accused of being a “courtier Mullah”, suggesting he is too close to the government [1, 2].
• There are also claims that he is influenced by passion or money, though these are refuted by the sources, which emphasize his integrity and piety [14].
• He was also accused of being against the Ulama [2]
• Advocacy for Madaris:
• Mufti Abdul Rahim is shown to be advocating for the rights and autonomy of Madaris [15, 16].
• He is particularly concerned about the challenges faced by smaller and less established Madaris [17].
• He also believes that those who control and manage Madaris should have the right to decide their future [18].

In summary, Mufti Abdul Rahim is portrayed as a complex figure who is highly respected within the Madaris community but also a point of conflict due to his views on government policies and his perceived alignment with Jamaat Rasheed. He is depicted as someone who values religious principles and autonomy, while also facing criticism for his views and actions. The sources show him to be a significant player in the ongoing debates, advocating for the rights and independence of Madaris.

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog

Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!