This text excerpts a “Critical Companion to William Faulkner,” offering a comprehensive guide to the life and works of the Nobel laureate. The book details Faulkner’s extensive literary output, including novels, short stories, and poems, and addresses inconsistencies in his character names and spellings. Extensive biographical information is provided, tracing Faulkner’s family history and influences. The excerpts also feature synopses and critical analyses of many of his works, along with character descriptions and cross-references. Finally, the text includes a chronology of Faulkner’s life and a comprehensive index.

FAQ: William Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County

1. What is Yoknapatawpha County?

Yoknapatawpha County is a fictional county in north-central Mississippi created by William Faulkner as the setting for many of his novels and short stories. It is based on Lafayette County, where Faulkner lived most of his life, with the town of Jefferson representing Oxford, Mississippi. Yoknapatawpha serves as a microcosm of the American South, exploring themes of race, class, history, and family.

2. What is the significance of the Snopes family?

The Snopes family, introduced in The Hamlet, is a large, interconnected clan known for their cunning, avarice, and ambition. They represent the encroaching forces of modernity and materialism that threaten traditional Southern values and social structures. The Snopes trilogy (The Hamlet, The Town, and The Mansion) charts the family’s rise to power, particularly through the patriarch Flem Snopes.

3. Who is Thomas Sutpen, and what is his story?

Thomas Sutpen is the central character of Absalom, Absalom!, a ruthless and ambitious man who arrives in Yoknapatawpha with a grand design to establish a dynasty. His story, told through fragmented and unreliable narratives, unravels the dark secrets of his past, including his abandonment of his first wife and son because of their mixed race heritage, his attempts to secure a legitimate heir, and the tragic downfall of his family.

4. How does the theme of race influence Faulkner’s work?

Race is a pervasive theme in Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha stories, reflecting the complex and often brutal realities of the Jim Crow South. He explores the legacy of slavery, the enduring impact of racial prejudice, and the psychological effects of miscegenation. Characters like Joe Christmas (Light in August) and Charles Bon (Absalom, Absalom!) grapple with their mixed-race identities in a society obsessed with racial purity.

5. What role do narrative techniques play in Faulkner’s writing?

Faulkner is renowned for his experimental narrative techniques, including multiple narrators, stream-of-consciousness, and fragmented timelines. These techniques, evident in novels like The Sound and the Fury and As I Lay Dying, challenge conventional storytelling and force readers to actively piece together events and interpret characters’ perspectives. They also reflect the complexities of memory, perception, and the passage of time.

6. What are some recurring locations in Yoknapatawpha County?

Several locations recur across Faulkner’s works, grounding the fictional world in a sense of place. Varner’s Store, a gathering place for men in Frenchman’s Bend, symbolizes the rural, gossipy nature of Southern society. The Sartoris Bank, founded by the prominent Sartoris family, represents the declining power of the old aristocracy. Other notable locations include the courthouse, the jail, and the Compson family home.

7. What is the significance of the Compson family?

The Compsons, prominently featured in The Sound and the Fury, are a once-powerful family whose decline mirrors the decay of the Old South. Their story, told through the fragmented perspectives of four family members, reveals their struggles with guilt, loss, and the changing social order. The Compsons embody the themes of family dysfunction, the burden of history, and the fragility of Southern tradition.

8. What is the impact of William Faulkner’s work?

William Faulkner is considered one of the most important American novelists of the 20th century. His complex narratives, innovative use of language, and exploration of Southern history and identity have had a profound influence on literature and continue to be studied and debated by readers and scholars alike. His Yoknapatawpha County, with its vivid characters and intricate stories, offers a timeless and deeply resonant portrait of the American South.

William Faulkner: A Literary Companion

Short-Answer Quiz

Instructions: Answer the following questions in 2-3 sentences.

What was the nature of Philip Stone’s influence on William Faulkner’s early writing career?
**Describe the central conflict that drives the plot of Absalom, Absalom! **
What is the significance of the setting of Frenchman’s Bend in Faulkner’s Snopes trilogy?
How does Faulkner utilize humor in his short story, “Don Giovanni”?
Explain the significance of the title “Light in August.”
What are some key stylistic characteristics of Faulkner’s writing?
How does Faulkner portray the theme of race in Light in August ?
What is the role of V.K. Ratliff in the Snopes trilogy?
Discuss the significance of the Compson family in The Sound and the Fury.
How does Faulkner explore the theme of Southern history and legacy in his works?

Answer Key

Philip Stone, a lawyer and literary enthusiast, acted as a mentor to the young Faulkner. He introduced him to a wide range of classic and modern literature, shaping his artistic viewpoint and influencing his writing style.
The central conflict in Absalom, Absalom! revolves around Thomas Sutpen’s ambition to establish a dynasty and the tragic consequences that result from his past actions, including his rejection of his mixed-race wife and son.
Frenchman’s Bend serves as a microcosm of the changing South. The arrival of the Snopes family disrupts the traditional social order and highlights the themes of greed, ambition, and the decline of Southern values.
Faulkner uses humor in “Don Giovanni” to satirize Herb’s inflated ego and misguided attempts to woo women. The story’s comedic elements emphasize the absurdity of Herb’s self-deception.
The title “Light in August” is multifaceted. It alludes to Lena Grove’s pregnancy, symbolizing new life and hope, but also references the fiery destruction of Joanna Burden’s house, representing violence and racial tension.
Faulkner’s writing is known for its complex sentence structures, stream-of-consciousness narration, multiple perspectives, and use of Southern dialect.
Faulkner portrays the theme of race in Light in August through the tragic figure of Joe Christmas, a man of ambiguous racial identity who is ostracized and ultimately destroyed by the prejudices of Southern society.
V.K. Ratliff acts as a shrewd observer and commentator on the events of the Snopes trilogy. As an itinerant salesman, he gains insights into the motivations of the various characters and serves as a voice of reason and morality.
The Compson family in The Sound and the Fury represents the decay of a once-proud Southern family. Through the fragmented narratives of the Compson children, Faulkner explores themes of loss, memory, and the disintegration of the Old South.
Faulkner consistently examines the legacy of slavery, the Civil War, and the changing social landscape of the South. His works often grapple with the complexities of race relations, class divisions, and the persistence of the past in shaping the present.

Essay Questions

Analyze the use of multiple narrators in Absalom, Absalom! How does this technique contribute to the novel’s exploration of truth, memory, and storytelling?
Compare and contrast the characters of Thomas Sutpen and Flem Snopes. What do they represent in terms of ambition, social mobility, and the changing South?
Discuss the role of women in Faulkner’s fictional world. Choose two or three female characters from different works and analyze how they challenge or conform to societal expectations.
Explore the theme of alienation and isolation in Faulkner’s works. Consider the experiences of characters like Joe Christmas, Quentin Compson, or Mink Snopes.
Analyze the use of symbolism in one of Faulkner’s novels or short stories. How do symbolic elements contribute to the overall meaning and themes of the work?

Glossary

TermDefinitionBenbow, HoraceThe protagonist of Sartoris and Sanctuary. A World War I veteran, he is an idealistic lawyer who is disillusioned with the corruption and violence he encounters in the South.Big BottomA vast wilderness area in Yoknapatawpha County. It symbolizes the untamed nature of the South and serves as a significant location in several of Faulkner’s works.Christamas, JoeThe tragic protagonist of Light in August. He is a man of ambiguous racial identity who is haunted by his past and ultimately destroyed by the racism and violence of Southern society.Compson FamilyA prominent but declining family in The Sound and the Fury. Their story represents the decay of the Old South and the loss of traditional values.Frenchman’s BendA small rural community in Yoknapatawpha County. It serves as the setting for much of the Snopes trilogy and represents a microcosm of the changing South.Jefferson, MississippiThe county seat of Yoknapatawpha County, based on Faulkner’s hometown of Oxford, Mississippi. It represents the center of Southern life and culture in Faulkner’s fictional world.Snopes, FlemThe ruthless and ambitious protagonist of the Snopes trilogy. He embodies the greed, cunning, and social climbing that characterize Snopesism.SnopesismA term coined by Faulkner to describe the disruptive and corrosive influence of the Snopes family. It represents the erosion of traditional Southern values and the rise of a crass materialism.Sutpen, ThomasThe enigmatic and ambitious protagonist of Absalom, Absalom!. His quest to build a dynasty is driven by a desire to overcome a traumatic childhood and achieve a position of power and respect.Yoknapatawpha CountyFaulkner’s fictional county, based on Lafayette County, Mississippi. It serves as the setting for most of his works and represents a complete and complex world of his own creation.

A Guide to Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County

Source: Excerpts from “021-Critical Companion to William Faulkner: A Literary Reference to His Life And Work”

I. Faulkner’s Life and Influences

Early Life and Mentors: This section explores Faulkner’s upbringing in Oxford, Mississippi, and the significant influence of Estelle Oldham and Philip Avery Stone on his artistic development. Stone, in particular, introduced Faulkner to various literary works and helped shape his writing style.
Yoknapatawpha County: An overview of Faulkner’s fictional county, inspired by his native Lafayette County, which serves as the setting for many of his most famous works. This section introduces the historical and geographical context of Yoknapatawpha.

II. Major Works

Absalom, Absalom!: A summary of Faulkner’s complex novel, focusing on the rise and fall of Thomas Sutpen and his ambition to establish a dynasty. This section highlights key plot points, including Sutpen’s backstory, the family’s involvement in the Civil War, and the tragic consequences of his actions.
“Don Giovanni” (Uncollected Stories): An analysis of this humorous short story, focusing on Herb, a vain widower who attempts to woo women with disastrous results. This section explores themes of self-deception and the complexities of male-female relationships.
A Fable: A brief overview of Faulkner’s allegorical novel set during World War I, highlighting key characters like General Bidet and the historical aviator Billy Bishop. This section touches on themes of war, faith, and humanity.
The Hamlet: A detailed exploration of the first novel in the Snopes Trilogy, focusing on the arrival of Flem Snopes in Frenchman’s Bend and the subsequent impact of the Snopes family on the community. This section highlights key characters, including V. K. Ratliff, Will Varner, and various members of the Snopes family.
Light in August: A summary of this complex novel, focusing on the interconnected lives of Lena Grove, Joe Christmas, and Gail Hightower in the context of racial prejudice and societal pressures. This section highlights key themes and plot points, including Christmas’s struggle with identity, Lena’s search for the father of her child, and the community’s reaction to their presence.
The Mansion: An exploration of the final novel in the Snopes Trilogy, focusing on the continued rise of Flem Snopes in Jefferson and his eventual demise at the hands of Mink Snopes. This section examines the themes of power, greed, and revenge, and highlights the roles of characters like Linda Snopes Kohl, Gavin Stevens, and V. K. Ratliff.
“Miss Zilphia Gant” (Uncollected Stories): A summary of this short story, focusing on Zilphia Gant’s upbringing under her domineering and misanthropic mother and her struggle to break free from her influence. This section explores themes of family, control, and the lasting impact of past trauma.
Mosquitoes: An overview of Faulkner’s satirical novel, focusing on a group of artists and intellectuals on a yachting trip. This section highlights key characters like Patricia Robyn, Jenny Steinbauer, and Ernest Talliaferro, and explores themes of artistic pretension and social dynamics.
“The Priest” (Uncollected Stories): An analysis of this introspective short story, focusing on an unnamed seminarian wrestling with feelings of guilt and sexual desire on the eve of his ordination. This section explores themes of faith, doubt, and the conflict between spiritual and earthly desires.
The Reivers: A summary of Faulkner’s final novel, a lighthearted tale of young Lucius Priest’s adventures with Boon Hogganbeck and Ned McCaslin. This section highlights themes of coming-of-age, rebellion, and the complexities of family relationships.
Requiem for a Nun: A blend of historical narrative and dramatic play, focusing on Temple Drake’s past and her struggles with guilt and redemption. This section highlights the key characters of Temple, Nancy Mannigoe, and Gavin Stevens, and explores themes of sin, forgiveness, and the enduring legacy of the past.
Sartoris: An overview of Faulkner’s novel that introduces the Sartoris family and their legacy in Yoknapatawpha County. This section highlights key characters like Bayard Sartoris, his grandfather Colonel John Sartoris, and explores themes of family, tradition, and the impact of the Civil War on the South.
Sanctuary: A summary of this dark and controversial novel, focusing on Temple Drake’s harrowing experience after witnessing a murder and being held captive by the bootlegger Popeye. This section explores themes of violence, innocence, and the corruption of Southern society.
“That Will Be Fine” (Uncollected Stories): A summary of this short story, narrated by a young boy named Georgie, which reveals the damaging consequences of his Uncle Rodney’s dishonesty and infidelity. This section explores themes of family, betrayal, and the loss of innocence.
The Town: An exploration of the second novel in the Snopes Trilogy, focusing on Flem Snopes’s continued rise to power in Jefferson and his manipulative tactics to achieve social and financial success. This section examines the complex relationship between Flem and Eula Varner Snopes, as well as the efforts of Gavin Stevens and V. K. Ratliff to oppose Snopesism.
The Unvanquished: A collection of interconnected stories focusing on the Sartoris family during and after the Civil War. This section highlights the exploits of Bayard Sartoris and his grandmother, Rosa Millard, during the war, and explores themes of family, loyalty, and the changing South.
“Wash” (Collected Stories): A summary of this short story, focusing on the tragic relationship between Wash Jones and Thomas Sutpen. This section explores themes of class, power, and the destructive consequences of obsession.

III. Important Concepts and Themes

Snopesism: An analysis of the term coined to describe the disruptive and invasive nature of the Snopes family in Yoknapatawpha County. This section explores the Snopeses’ methods of achieving power and wealth, often at the expense of others, and their impact on the social fabric of the community.
The Southern Past: An exploration of Faulkner’s recurring engagement with the history and legacy of the South, particularly the Civil War and its lasting effects on the region’s social and racial dynamics. This section examines how characters grapple with their inherited past and its influence on their present lives.
Family and Legacy: An analysis of Faulkner’s recurring theme of family relationships, often fraught with complexities, secrets, and conflicting loyalties. This section examines how family ties shape characters’ identities and destinies, and explores the burden of legacy in a rapidly changing world.
Race and Class: An exploration of Faulkner’s treatment of racial and social hierarchies in the South, highlighting the injustices and tensions inherent in a segregated society. This section examines how characters navigate these complex dynamics and the consequences of racial prejudice and social inequality.

IV. Characters and Locations

Major Characters: This section provides brief descriptions of significant recurring characters in Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County, including the Sartoris family, the Snopes family, V. K. Ratliff, Gavin Stevens, and key figures from individual novels.
Important Locations: This section outlines key fictional locations within Yoknapatawpha County, including Jefferson, Frenchman’s Bend, Varner’s Store, and other notable sites that feature prominently in Faulkner’s works.

V. Critical Reception and Legacy

Early Reviews: Excerpts from contemporary reviews of Faulkner’s major works, highlighting the initial critical responses to his innovative style and complex narratives.
Modern Criticism and Influence: This section explores the evolution of Faulkner criticism over time and his enduring influence on subsequent generations of writers and literary scholars. This section also examines the ways in which Faulkner’s works continue to resonate with modern audiences.

This table of contents provides a comprehensive guide to understanding the rich and intricate world of William Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County, offering insights into his life, major works, recurring themes, and enduring literary legacy.

Timeline of Events

Please note: It’s impossible to create a detailed, precise timeline from the provided source material. The excerpts offer fragmented glimpses into Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County, spanning decades and often alluding to events without clearly dating them. This timeline reconstructs a broad chronological framework focusing on key figures and their interconnected stories.

Early Yoknapatawpha History (pre-1800s)

Pre-colonial Era: Chickasaw inhabit the land, including the Big Bottom wilderness. Ikkemotubbe reigns as their chief.

Founding and Growth (1800s – early 1900s)

1699: Ikkemotubbe grants land to the grandson of a Scottish refugee, initiating the Compson lineage.
Early 1800s: Settlers like Louis Grenier and Dr. Samuel Habersham arrive, laying the foundation for Jefferson.
1833: Thomas Sutpen arrives in Yoknapatawpha, acquires land from Ikkemotubbe, and begins constructing his plantation, Sutpen’s Hundred.
Mid-1800s: The Civil War erupts, impacting families like the Sartoris and Sutpen. Colonel John Sartoris emerges as a war hero.
Post-Civil War: Reconstruction era brings change and upheaval. The aristocratic South declines, leading to social shifts depicted in works like “The Hamlet.”
Late 1800s/ Early 1900s: Lucius Priest establishes his bank, rivaling Colonel Sartoris’s. The Snopes family starts appearing in Frenchman’s Bend.

The Snopes Era (1900s – 1940s)

1902: Flem Snopes arrives in Frenchman’s Bend, marking the beginning of the Snopes trilogy’s timeline.
1907 (approx.): Events of “The Hamlet” unfold as Flem manipulates his way into power, eventually marrying Eula Varner.
1910s – 1920s: Flem and Eula move to Jefferson. The events of “The Sound and the Fury” (1929) take place, showcasing the decline of the Compson family.
1927: Eula Varner Snopes commits suicide.
1930s: The events of “Light in August” occur, including the arrival of Lena Grove and the tragic story of Joe Christmas. The Great Depression impacts the region.
1940s: World War II influences Yoknapatawpha life.
1946: Mink Snopes, released from Parchman, murders Flem in Jefferson, culminating the Snopes saga.

Post-Snopes Era (1950s onward)

1950s and beyond: Yoknapatawpha continues to evolve, grappling with social and racial tensions. “The Reivers” (set in 1905) offers a later perspective on the county’s past.

Cast of Characters

Note: This cast focuses on the principle individuals, offering concise summaries. Many minor characters populate the excerpts and aren’t listed here.

Armstid, Henry: A gullible farmer from Frenchman’s Bend, repeatedly exploited by Flem Snopes.
Avery, Philip Stone: A cultured lawyer who mentors a young William Faulkner, shaping his literary views.

Ball, Albert: A British World War I flying ace, referenced in Faulkner’s works.
Beauchamp, Lucas: A figure in “Go Down, Moses”, intertwined with the McCaslin family history and themes of race and inheritance.
Benbow, Horace: A lawyer and World War I veteran, features in “Sartoris” and embodies a changing South, struggling with tradition and modernity.
Binford, Dewitt: A resident of Frenchman’s Bend.
Bishop, William (“Billy”): Canadian World War I flying ace, referenced in “A Fable”.
Bookwright, Odum: A thoughtful, independent blacksmith in Frenchman’s Bend, skeptical of the Snopes family’s rise.
Brown, Joe (Lucas Burch): Lena Grove’s irresponsible lover who abandons her while she is pregnant. He later resurfaces in Jefferson, working at a planing mill under an assumed name.
Burch, Lucas: See Brown, Joe.
Burden, Joanna: A woman associated with Joe Christmas. Her house is burned down under mysterious circumstances.

Christmas, Joe: The protagonist of “Light in August”, a racially ambiguous and troubled man haunted by his unknown parentage. He grapples with identity, prejudice, and violence throughout his life, ultimately meeting a tragic end.
Coldfield, Ellen: Thomas Sutpen’s second wife, deeply affected by her traumatic experiences at Sutpen’s Hundred. She becomes a recluse, obsessed with the past.
Compson, Quentin: A member of the declining Compson family, features in “The Sound and the Fury”. He is deeply troubled and commits suicide, haunted by his family’s decay and Southern ideals.

De Spain, Manfred: A charismatic and ambitious politician from Jefferson, later becoming mayor. He has a long-standing affair with Eula Varner Snopes.
Dodge, Granby (“Smoke”): A cunning and ruthless relative of the Holland twins, he orchestrates murders to inherit their property.

Eckrum (Eck) Snopes: A kindhearted, simple Snopes, unlike many of his relatives. He works for Will Varner and later helps raise Ike Snopes.

Fairchild, Dawson: A cynical novelist in “Mosquitoes”, offering commentary on art and society.
Falkner, Jack: William Faulkner’s brother, a pilot and source of inspiration for some of Faulkner’s characters.
Falkner, John Wesley Thompson (J.W.T.): William Faulkner’s grandfather, a former Confederate colonel and author, had a significant influence on Faulkner’s life and literary ambitions.
Flem Snopes: The central antagonist of the Snopes trilogy, a quiet, scheming, and avaricious man who rises to power through manipulation and ruthlessness. His ambition and lack of morals embody the destructive force of “Snopesism.”

Gant, Jim: Zilphia Gant’s unfaithful father, a horse trader who abandons his family.
Gant, Miss Zilphia: The protagonist of the short story “Miss Zilphia Gant”, she is raised in isolation by her mother and struggles to break free from her controlling influence.
Gibson, Dilsey: The Compson family’s black cook and a central figure in “The Sound and the Fury”, she represents resilience, faith, and moral strength amidst the family’s decline.
Ginotta, Pete: A young man associated with bootleggers, he attends the yachting party in “Mosquitoes” with his girlfriend, Jenny Steinbauer.
Gordon: An artist and sculptor, drawn to the allure of Patricia Robyn in “Mosquitoes”.
Grinnup, Lonnie: A descendant of early Yoknapatawpha settlers, left with a small plot of land and embodies the displacement of old families.

Hampton, Hub: The Yoknapatawpha County Sheriff, a tough and sometimes morally ambiguous figure.
Hines, Eupheus (Doc): The fanatical grandfather of Joe Christmas, convinced that Joe has “Negro blood” and relentlessly pursues him.
Hines, Mrs.: Doc Hines’ wife, she briefly cares for Joe Christmas as a baby and later seeks him out in Mottstown.
Holston, Alexander: One of the original settlers of Jefferson.
Houston, Jack: A bitter and isolated widower in Frenchman’s Bend, he is murdered by Mink Snopes, leading to a cycle of revenge.

Ikkemotubbe: The powerful Chickasaw chief, a symbol of the land’s pre-colonial past. He sells a large portion of his territory to Thomas Sutpen.

Jameson, Dorothy: A member of the yachting party in “Mosquitoes”, she observes the social dynamics and interactions between the characters.
Jones, Wash: A poor white man who works for Thomas Sutpen. He becomes increasingly disillusioned with Sutpen and ultimately murders him in a desperate act of revenge.

Kohl, Linda Snopes: The daughter of Eula Varner Snopes and raised by Flem, though her biological father is Hoake McCarron. She later becomes involved in Mink Snopes’s release from prison.

Littlejohn, Mrs.: A resident of Frenchman’s Bend, she offers temporary shelter to Ike Snopes.
Lowe, Cadet Julian: A young soldier traveling with Joe Gilligan in “Soldiers’ Pay”, he represents the lost generation of World War I veterans.

Mahon, Donald: Cecily Saunders’ war-wounded fiancé in “Soldiers’ Pay”, he represents the physical and psychological toll of war.
Maurier, Mrs.; A wealthy patron of the arts who hosts the yachting party in “Mosquitoes”.
McEachern, Simon: The harsh and unforgiving foster father of Joe Christmas, he tries to instill his strict religious beliefs in Joe, but his methods only lead to rebellion and resentment.
McCarron, Hoake: The true father of Linda Snopes, conceived during his relationship with Eula Varner before her marriage to Flem.
McCaslin, Isaac (“Ike”): A member of the McCaslin family, featured in “Go Down, Moses”, he renounces his inheritance due to the family’s history of slavery and miscegenation.
Millard, Rosa: A spinster in “The Unvanquished”, determined to seek justice and reclaim her family’s honor during the Civil War.

Priest, Lucius: A prominent banker in Jefferson, his family represents the new wealth and power emerging in Yoknapatawpha.

Quick, Ratliff: A resident of Frenchman’s Bend.

Ratliff, V.K.: The shrewd and observant sewing machine salesman, he acts as a key narrator and commentator on the events in the Snopes trilogy, providing insight into the characters and social dynamics.
Rivers, Reba: A madam in Memphis, running a brothel frequented by some of Faulkner’s characters.
Robyn, Patricia: The impulsive and attention-seeking young woman who organizes the yachting party in “Mosquitoes”.

Sartoris, Bayard (1): Colonel John Sartoris’s son and grandfather to young Bayard, embodies the old Southern aristocracy.
Sartoris, Bayard (2): Grandson of the Colonel, haunted by his family’s legacy and reckless in his actions, he becomes a pilot and dies in a plane crash.
Sartoris, Colonel John: A legendary Civil War hero and figure in Yoknapatawpha history. His actions and legacy cast a shadow on his descendants.
Sartoris, Drusilla Hawk: Colonel John Sartoris’s young war bride, she is deeply affected by the war and becomes an almost mythical figure in the family lore.
Saunders, Cecily: A young woman engaged to Donald Mahon in “Soldiers’ Pay”, she struggles with her obligations and the changing social landscape after the war.
Snopes, Ab: Flem Snopes’s father, a sharecropper who initiates the family’s presence in Frenchman’s Bend.
Snopes, Byron: A Snopes relative who works at the Sartoris bank and later robs it, fleeing to Mexico.
Snopes, Clarence Eggleston: A Snopes who climbs the political ladder through manipulation and becomes a state senator.
Snopes, Eula Varner: Will Varner’s daughter, she is a symbol of sexuality and beauty, trapped in a loveless marriage to Flem.
Snopes, I.O.: A bigamist and father to various Snopeses, often involved in shady dealings.
Snopes, Ike: A mentally disabled Snopes with a peculiar attachment to a cow. He becomes a symbol of the family’s grotesque and exploitative nature.
Snopes, Lump: A morally ambiguous Snopes, known for his petty schemes and loyalty to his family.
Snopes, Mink: Considered the “meanest” of the Snopeses, he murders Jack Houston over a perceived injustice and becomes obsessed with revenge against Flem.
Snopes, Montgomery Ward: A Snopes who served in World War I, he later runs a photography studio that fronts for pornography, leading to his imprisonment orchestrated by Flem.
Snopes, Wallstreet Panic: Eck Snopes’s son, he represents a more honest and hardworking branch of the family, unlike many of his relatives.
Steinbauer, Genevieve (“Jenny”): Pete Ginotta’s girlfriend, she attends the yachting party in “Mosquitoes”, and her presence stirs a mix of desire and discomfort among the other guests.
Stevens, Gavin: A lawyer in Jefferson, he becomes romantically obsessed with Linda Snopes. He often provides a moral and intellectual perspective on events.
Stone, Phil: See Avery, Philip Stone
Stribling, Henry (“Hawkshaw”): A man with a peculiar private life that contrasts with his public persona.
Sutpen, Henry: Thomas Sutpen’s son, he kills Charles Bon, his half-brother and friend, after learning of Charles’s mixed-race heritage.
Sutpen, Judith: Thomas Sutpen’s daughter, she is drawn to the mysterious Charles Bon, unaware of his true connection to her family.
Sutpen, Thomas: The ambitious and enigmatic founder of Sutpen’s Hundred. He is driven by a desire to establish a dynasty, but his past actions, including the abandonment of his mixed-race first wife, ultimately lead to his downfall.

Talliaferro, Ernest: A former department store clerk who reinvents himself as an aesthete, he seeks guidance on women from Dawson Fairchild in “Mosquitoes”, often with humorous and self-defeating results.
Trumbull: A blacksmith who works for Will Varner.

Varner, Will: The wealthy and influential patriarch of Frenchman’s Bend, he owns the store where Flem Snopes gets his start. He embodies the old power structure gradually overtaken by the Snopes family.

Winbush, Grover Cleveland: Flem Snopes’s business partner, he later becomes the town’s night marshall but is fired due to his association with Montgomery Ward Snopes’s activities.

Young, Mr. and Mrs.: Caretakers of the Compson family home.

This detailed timeline and character list help navigate the complex world of William Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County. Remember that the fragmented nature of the source material necessitates interpretation and deduction.

Briefing Doc: Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County

This document reviews key themes and information from various sources on William Faulkner’s fictional Yoknapatawpha County and its inhabitants.

I. Yoknapatawpha: Faulkner’s “Little Postage Stamp”

Faulkner described Yoknapatawpha as his “own little postage stamp of native soil,” inspired by Lafayette County, Mississippi. Sartoris (1929) marked his first venture into this fictional world, populated by interconnected families whose stories unfold across numerous novels and short stories.

II. Major Families and Characters

The Sartoris Family: A declining aristocratic family grappling with the legacy of the Civil War and their role in the changing South. Key figures include:
Colonel John Sartoris: A larger-than-life figure, both revered and feared.
Bayard Sartoris (1): John’s grandson, haunted by his wartime experiences.
Bayard Sartoris (2): John’s great-grandson, struggles to find his place in a modernizing world.
Aunt Jenny Du Pre: The strong-willed sister of John Sartoris, representing traditional Southern values.
The Compson Family: Another declining aristocratic family, marked by tragedy and decay. Key figures include:
Quentin Compson: Haunted by the past and obsessed with his sister Caddy’s perceived loss of honor.
Caddy Compson: A rebellious and independent spirit, ostracized by her family.
Jason Compson: A bitter and misogynistic figure, representative of the family’s moral decline.
Benjy Compson: A mentally disabled character whose fragmented perceptions offer a unique perspective on the family’s history.
The Sutpen Family: Driven by the ambitious and enigmatic Thomas Sutpen, determined to establish a dynasty. Key figures include:
Thomas Sutpen: A self-made man with a dark secret, seeking to erase his past and build a new life.
Henry Sutpen: Torn between loyalty to his family and his rejection of his half-brother.
Charles Bon: Sutpen’s son from his first marriage, rejected by his father due to his mixed race.
Judith Sutpen: Haunted by her family’s legacy and the tragic events that unfold.
The Snopes Family: A sprawling clan of opportunistic and often unscrupulous individuals, epitomizing a new force encroaching on Yoknapatawpha. Key figures include:
Flem Snopes: The ambitious and calculating leader of the Snopeses, driven by greed and a desire for respectability.
Mink Snopes: A vengeful and violent figure, consumed by resentment and a twisted sense of justice.
V. K. Ratliff: An itinerant salesman and shrewd observer of Yoknapatawpha society, often narrating events and offering insights.
Will Varner: A wealthy landowner and patriarch of Frenchman’s Bend, representing the old order challenged by the Snopeses.

III. Key Themes

The Legacy of the Past: The Civil War, slavery, and the antebellum South cast a long shadow over Yoknapatawpha, shaping the lives and destinies of its inhabitants.
Race and Identity: The complex and often fraught relationships between white and Black characters are central to Faulkner’s work, reflecting the realities of the Jim Crow South.
Family and Community: The dynamics within families, the bonds of kinship, and the interconnectedness of communities are recurring themes, both positive and destructive.
Morality and Corruption: Faulkner explores the complexities of human nature, examining characters who exhibit both virtue and vice, and the forces that drive them towards good or evil.
Social Change and Modernity: The tension between the old ways of the South and the forces of modernization is a recurring theme, reflected in the changing economic and social landscape of Yoknapatawpha.

IV. Literary Techniques

Multiple Narrators and Perspectives: Faulkner frequently employs shifting narrators and points of view, offering fragmented and often unreliable accounts of events, challenging readers to piece together the truth.
Stream of Consciousness: Faulkner’s innovative use of stream of consciousness allows readers access to the interior thoughts and feelings of his characters, conveying their psychological complexities.
Southern Gothic: Faulkner’s writing often employs elements of Southern Gothic, including grotesque imagery, macabre events, and a fascination with the dark side of human nature.
Myth and Symbolism: Faulkner imbues his stories with rich symbolism and allusions to myth and history, adding layers of meaning and complexity.

V. Critical Reception

Faulkner’s work has been praised for its originality, complexity, and profound exploration of Southern life and the human condition. Critics have noted his innovative use of language, his masterful storytelling, and his ability to create a vividly realized world that transcends its regional setting.

Quotes from Reviews:

Malcolm Cowley, The New Republic (April 29, 1942): “Faulkner is a novelist in the great tradition, a writer who tries to discover and project the central truths of human experience.”
Richard Church, John O’ London’s Weekly (September 20, 1940): “Reading ‘The Hamlet’ is like listening to the gossip of a country store, with its cruelty, its extravagance, its tall stories, and its deadly comment upon human nature.”

This briefing doc provides an overview of the rich and complex world of William Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County, inviting further exploration of his groundbreaking fiction.

Recurring Themes in Faulkner’s Work

The End of Innocence: This theme appears in Faulkner’s short stories like “Adolescence” and “Miss Zilphia Gant”, where a parent figure interfering with a daughter’s relationship with a boy leads to a loss of innocence [1].
The American South’s Obsession with Race and the Past: Faulkner’s Light in August is cited as an example of his confrontation with Southern racial prejudice [2].
Man in Tension with Nature, Alienation from the Community, and Man’s Inability to Fulfill Himself Outside of the Community: These themes are present in Faulkner’s Light in August [2].
Snopesism: This theme, exploring the demoralization of a community by the Snopes family, is particularly prominent in The Hamlet and The Town [3, 4]. The character Flem Snopes is central to this theme, his actions and personality greatly impacting the community [3, 4].
The Relaxation of Social Duty: This theme, which can be seen as the need to escape responsibility, appears in “The Bear”, Go Down, Moses, and The Reivers [5].
The Changing Understanding of Work and Its Relation to Personal Profit and Community Service: This theme, alongside the relationship between grace and works, is explored in the short story “Shingles for the Lord” [6].

Motifs and Techniques

Use of Multiple Narrators: This technique, frequently used by Faulkner, enhances the realism of his novels by offering diverse perspectives on events. The Town exemplifies this, with three narrators providing differing viewpoints on Snopesism and Flem Snopes’s character [4].
Stream of Consciousness and Interior Monologue: These modernist techniques, influenced by writers like James Joyce, are used to represent the flow of a character’s thoughts and impressions [7, 8]. The Sound and the Fury is particularly noted for its use of stream of consciousness [9].
Time and the Past: Faulkner’s novels frequently feature characters grappling with their personal, familial, or regional history. The Yoknapatawpha novels, set in a fictional Mississippi county, weave real events and figures into the lives of their characters [10]. Requiem for a Nun utilizes history symbolically, illuminating the moral dimension of present events [10].
Borrowing and Recycling from Earlier Works: Faulkner often reused scenes, ideas, and characters from previous works, both published and unpublished. Mosquitoes, for example, incorporates elements from the New Orleans Sketches and the short story “Don Giovanni” [11].

Significance of Themes and Motifs

The recurring themes and motifs in Faulkner’s works provide a framework for understanding his complex narratives.
They reflect his deep engagement with the history, culture, and social issues of the American South.
Faulkner’s innovative narrative techniques, particularly his use of stream of consciousness and multiple perspectives, contribute to the richness and depth of his character portrayals.
His exploration of universal themes, such as the loss of innocence and the struggle against societal forces, gives his work a timeless quality that continues to resonate with readers today.

It’s important to note that this is not an exhaustive list of all the themes and motifs present in Faulkner’s vast body of work. However, it provides a starting point for understanding the key concerns and recurring elements that contribute to the complexity and richness of his writing.

Setting as Foundation and Driving Force in Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County

William Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County, a fictional region in Mississippi, acts as both foundation and driving force for his characters and the narratives they inhabit. This “little postage stamp of native soil” [1] is much more than a simple backdrop for Faulkner’s stories. Yoknapatawpha itself becomes a character, shaping the destinies, perspectives, and voices of those who live within its boundaries.

The very name Yoknapatawpha, though Faulkner incorrectly stated its meaning, speaks to a land “ripped or cut open for disemboweling” [2]. This violent imagery underscores the profound and often painful history embedded in the land, a history that weighs heavily on its inhabitants.
Faulkner populates Yoknapatawpha with recurring families, such as the Sartorises and the Snopeses [3], who represent opposing forces in the county’s social fabric. The Sartorises are the old, declining planter class, while the Snopeses are the “grotesque and villainous” newcomers who exploit the changing social landscape [4].
Characters like Dilsey Gibson in The Sound and the Fury rise to heroic stature amidst the suffering and defeat that permeates Yoknapatawpha [4]. Their strength, resilience, and hope stand in contrast to the darker aspects of the setting, offering a glimmer of redemption.
In Absalom, Absalom!, the setting becomes so intertwined with the narrative that it shapes the very language and consciousness of the characters. [5-7] Quentin Compson, the novel’s narrator, becomes a vessel for the story of Thomas Sutpen and his troubled legacy. [5] His understanding of Sutpen’s rise and fall is inextricably linked to the history and landscape of Yoknapatawpha. [6] The novel explores themes of race, history, and the sins of the past, all of which are deeply embedded in the setting. [8]

The specific geographical features and locations within Yoknapatawpha County also play a significant role in shaping Faulkner’s narratives.

Jefferson, the county seat, is often a place of conflict and moral decay. [9, 10] The journey from rural Frenchman’s Bend to Jefferson in As I Lay Dying becomes an odyssey filled with hardships and symbolic resonance. [9] The Bundrens’ journey highlights the challenges and complexities of life in Yoknapatawpha, where the grotesque and the heroic often collide.
Sutpen’s Hundred, the site of Thomas Sutpen’s grand design and its eventual collapse, stands as a testament to the destructive power of ambition and the enduring legacy of the past. [11]
The McCaslin plantation, featured in The Unvanquished and Go Down, Moses, represents both the beauty and the burden of the land. [11]

Faulkner’s intricate use of time further complicates the relationship between setting and narrative.

The past is ever-present in Yoknapatawpha, haunting both characters and readers. [12] Flashbacks, shifting perspectives, and the blurring of past and present create a sense of timelessness, where history continues to shape the present. [12, 13]
Characters like Quentin Compson in Absalom, Absalom! struggle to reconcile the past with the present, grappling with the weight of history and its impact on their own identities. [14] His famous line, “You can’t understand it. You would have to be born there” [14], emphasizes the profound influence of Yoknapatawpha on its people.

Ultimately, Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County transcends its geographical boundaries to become a microcosm of the American South and the human condition. It is a place where the past and present are eternally intertwined, where the land itself bears witness to the triumphs and tragedies of its inhabitants. Faulkner’s masterful use of setting makes Yoknapatawpha a powerful and unforgettable literary creation.

Here is how Faulkner’s exploration of race, particularly the complexities of race relations in the American South, shapes his literary works:

Faulkner’s literary works are heavily shaped by his exploration of race, particularly within the context of the American South. He uses his fictional county, Yoknapatawpha, to explore themes of guilt, shame, and racial injustice, demonstrating the corrupting influence of racism and slavery on individuals and society. [1] Black-white relations, often portrayed as easy and affectionate as long as racial boundaries are respected, turn fiercely antagonistic when those lines are crossed. [2]
This exploration of race is not superficial. Faulkner creates fully realized and sympathetic black characters, more so than any other white writer of his time. [3] Examples of such characters include:
Dilsey Gibson in The Sound and the Fury, a character who embodies loyalty, fidelity, sacrifice, and endurance while struggling to hold a white family together. [4]
Joe Christmas in Light in August, a man deeply wounded by his mixed-race heritage and whose violent actions are an attempt to break free from the societal constraints imposed upon him. [5]
Faulkner depicts the deep-seated racism of the South through the experiences of his characters. [6] For example, in Go Down, Moses, the character of Lucas Beauchamp faces resentment from the white community because he acts more like his white ancestors than a descendant of slaves. [6]
Faulkner’s work reveals the profound impact of the South’s racial history on both black and white individuals. [7, 8] The legacy of slavery and the destructive consequences of racism echo throughout his narratives. [9] He captures the transition of the South after the Civil War, highlighting the continued presence of racial tensions. [9]
Despite his insightful portrayal of race relations, Faulkner’s personal views on race were complex and sometimes contradictory. [3, 10] While he created nuanced and sympathetic black characters, he also exhibited unconscious racism in his personal life. [11] For example, he used racial slurs in correspondence with his editor. [11] Some critics also consider his treatment of African Americans condescending, particularly in his earlier works. [12] Nevertheless, Faulkner’s work, taken as a whole, offers a powerful and unflinching examination of the complexities of race in the American South.
Faulkner’s engagement with the theme of race is woven into the very fabric of his most celebrated novels. Works like Absalom, Absalom!, The Sound and the Fury, Go Down, Moses, and the Snopes Trilogy all delve into the South’s past, using it to illuminate the present and to examine the enduring legacy of slavery and racial injustice. [9] His narratives often juxtapose the idealized romanticized version of the Old South with the harsh realities of its racist past. [13]

Faulkner’s exploration of race is a defining feature of his work, adding depth and complexity to his narratives while offering a poignant commentary on the American South’s troubled history and the enduring struggle for racial equality.

Faulkner’s Troubled Relationship with His Father

The sources suggest that William Faulkner’s relationship with his father, Murry Falkner, significantly influenced his writing, particularly in shaping recurring themes of absent or inadequate fathers and family decline.

Murry Falkner struggled with alcoholism and a lack of ambition, relying heavily on his own father’s financial support. [1-3] He held various jobs, including working on the family railroad, but ultimately failed to achieve the success of his father and grandfather. [3, 4] This pattern of dependence and failure contributed to strains in his marriage with Maud Butler Falkner, who was described as “steely and determined” and critical of her husband’s drinking. [2]
William Faulkner’s childhood was marked by tension in the household, with his mother holding dominant authority. [2] His father’s struggles and seeming inability to succeed created a difficult environment for the young Faulkner. This challenging familial dynamic is reflected in many of his works, where characters often grapple with absent, inadequate, or abusive fathers.
The sources point to Murry Falkner’s favoritism towards his second son, Jack, who physically resembled the Falkner side of the family, as another source of strain in the father-son relationship. [5] Murry even nicknamed William “Snake Lips,” a derogatory comment about his physical features inherited from his mother’s side. [5] This rejection and lack of paternal approval likely contributed to Faulkner’s complex feelings towards his father.
Critics have observed that key Faulkner characters are boys or men with absent or inadequate fathers. [4] Examples include Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury, Joe Christmas in Light in August, and Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom!. [4] This recurring theme suggests a deep exploration of fatherhood and its impact on individuals, likely stemming from Faulkner’s own troubled relationship with Murry.
The theme of family decline, another recurring element in Faulkner’s fiction, also seems to echo his family history. [2, 4] Both his father and grandfather experienced periods of decline and failure, casting a shadow over the once-prosperous Falkner lineage.
Despite the difficult relationship, the sources also acknowledge some positive aspects of Murry Falkner’s influence. [4] He taught his sons to ride and shoot, shared Sunday afternoon rides, and provided experiences in the “big woods” of the Mississippi Delta that Faulkner later drew upon in works like “The Bear” and The Reivers. [4] The character of Maury Priest in The Reivers is even described as an affectionate portrait of Murry. [4]

While Faulkner’s relationship with his father was complex and undoubtedly shaped by Murry’s shortcomings, it was not entirely negative. Nevertheless, the sources strongly suggest that the strained dynamic between father and son significantly influenced Faulkner’s writing, contributing to his exploration of fatherhood, family decline, and the complexities of familial relationships.

Influence of Faulkner’s Brothers on His Writing

While the sources do not directly address how Faulkner’s relationship with each of his brothers influenced his writing in detail, they do offer some insights into their relationships and how some aspects may have shaped his work.

Dean Swift Faulkner: The sources mention that William encouraged Dean to pursue flying, which ultimately led to Dean’s tragic death in an airplane crash in 1935 [1]. William deeply blamed himself for this tragedy, experiencing nightmares about it long afterward [1]. This traumatic event could have influenced the themes of guilt, responsibility, and mortality often explored in his writing, though the sources do not explicitly state this.
John Wesley Thompson Falkner III (Johncy): The sources note that Johncy published a novel, “By Their Fruits,” through Harcourt, Brace in 1941 [2]. The fact that both brothers became published authors suggests a shared interest in literature and storytelling, potentially fostering a sense of creative kinship between them. Johncy’s observation about William’s fondness for farmers and farming, quoted in source [3], indicates a level of understanding and insight into his brother’s character, though the extent to which their relationship directly impacted William’s writing is not discussed in the sources. The sources also highlight Johncy’s strong opposition to integration, contrasting with William’s more complex and conflicted views on race [4]. This difference in views could reflect a broader divergence in their perspectives, though the sources do not elaborate on how these differences might have played out in their relationship or influenced William’s writing.
Murry Charles Falkner Jr. (Jack): The sources depict Jack as a “large, bluff man” who shared his father’s physique and personality traits [5]. This contrasts with William, who physically resembled the Butler side of the family and had a more strained relationship with their father [6]. The sources describe William and Jack’s relationship as generally positive but not particularly intimate [5]. Jack’s memoir, “The Falkners of Mississippi,” is acknowledged as a valuable source of family lore [5], implying a certain level of closeness and shared history despite not being extremely close. However, the sources do not provide specific examples of how their interactions might have influenced William’s literary work.

It is important to note that the sources focus primarily on William Faulkner’s life and literary career, with limited information on the specific dynamics and impact of his relationships with his brothers. Therefore, it is difficult to definitively assess how these relationships directly shaped his writing.

However, the available information suggests a complex interplay of shared interests, familial tensions, and individual experiences that likely contributed to his understanding of family dynamics, loss, and the human condition, all of which are prominent themes in his work.

The Recurring Theme of Absent or Inadequate Fathers

The most prominent recurring theme in Faulkner’s fiction stemming from his strained relationship with his father is the presence of absent or inadequate fathers.

Murry Falkner, William’s father, is described as “feckless and alcoholic” [1], failing at most of his business endeavors and relying on his own father for financial support. [1] He was emotionally distant, favoring his other son, Jack. [1, 2] This difficult paternal figure appears to have deeply impacted Faulkner’s writing.
This strained father-son dynamic is reflected in many of Faulkner’s most famous works, where key characters are boys or men with absent or inadequate fathers. [3] Some prominent examples include:
Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury
Joe Christmas in Light in August
Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom! [3]
The theme of family decline, also prevalent in Faulkner’s fiction, can be connected to his family history, where both his father and grandfather faced periods of failure and diminished status. [3]

These recurring themes suggest that Faulkner grappled with the complexities of fatherhood and the lasting impact of parental relationships throughout his literary career. His own experience with a flawed father likely fueled his exploration of these themes, providing him with rich material to examine the psychological and emotional consequences of broken families and the search for identity in the absence of strong paternal figures.

The Impact of the Old Colonel’s Decision

The sources indicate that William Faulkner’s grandfather, John Wesley Thompson Falkner (the Young Colonel), made the decision to sell the Gulf & Chicago Railroad in 1902. This decision had a significant impact on Faulkner’s father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner’s, life and career.

Murry worked for the Gulf & Chicago Railroad, holding positions as mail agent, general passenger agent, and finally treasurer and auditor [1]. He loved this job and had aspirations of eventually becoming president, following in his father’s footsteps [2].
The sale of the railroad meant Murry lost his job, forcing him to relocate to Oxford and rely on his father’s financial support [2, 3]. This loss of vocation and financial independence marked a turning point in his life, leading to a long period of decline and dependence [2, 4].
Murry’s inability to find a fulfilling and successful career after the railroad’s sale was compounded by his alcoholism [2, 4]. He attempted various businesses, such as a livery stable, a coal-oil agency, and a hardware store, but failed to achieve lasting success [2]. This pattern of failure further eroded his self-confidence and contributed to the strain in his marriage [4, 5].
The sources highlight Murry’s deep resentment of his father’s decision to sell the railroad. The loss of his job robbed him of his passion and left him feeling adrift, unable to find a suitable replacement for his beloved railroad [4]. This sense of disappointment and resentment likely contributed to his struggles with alcohol and his growing dependence on his father.

It’s important to note that the sources focus primarily on William Faulkner’s life and work, with less detail on his father’s experiences. However, the information provided clearly indicates that the Young Colonel’s decision to sell the Gulf & Chicago Railroad had a profoundly negative impact on Murry Falkner’s life, leading to job loss, financial dependence, and a downward spiral marked by alcoholism and a lack of fulfillment.

This event also plays into the recurring themes of absent or inadequate fathers and family decline that are prominent in William Faulkner’s fiction, which were discussed in our previous conversation. The sources suggest that William Faulkner viewed his great-grandfather, William Clark Falkner (the Old Colonel), as his true father figure [6]. This admiration likely stemmed in part from the Old Colonel’s success and drive, qualities that Murry lacked after the sale of the railroad. The sale, therefore, may have not only directly impacted Murry’s life but also indirectly influenced William’s perception of his father and shaped his literary exploration of fatherhood and family dynamics.

The Evolution of a Complex Relationship

The sources offer a nuanced perspective on how William Faulkner’s relationship with his father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner, evolved as he grew older. While the specific details of their interactions are not extensively explored, the sources provide enough information to suggest a complex and evolving dynamic between father and son.

Early Life: During Faulkner’s childhood, the relationship was likely marked by tension and emotional distance. Murry’s struggles with alcoholism and lack of ambition created a challenging home environment, dominated by Faulkner’s mother, Maud. [1-3] Murry’s favoritism towards his other son, Jack, who physically resembled the Falkner side of the family, added further strain to the relationship. Murry even nicknamed William “Snake Lips,” a comment about his physical appearance that highlights this preference. [3] These early experiences likely contributed to Faulkner’s later literary explorations of absent or inadequate fathers and family decline.
Adolescence: As Faulkner reached adolescence, the relationship with his father became increasingly difficult. [3] This period may have been particularly challenging, as Faulkner was developing his own identity and artistic aspirations while navigating a strained home life. The sources don’t elaborate on specific incidents from this period, but it’s likely that the existing tensions were exacerbated as Faulkner became more independent and sought his own path.
Adulthood: The sources don’t provide a detailed account of their interactions during Faulkner’s adulthood. However, some information suggests a continued distance and lack of deep understanding between them. Murry claimed to have never read any of Faulkner’s work, highlighting a disconnect between their lives and interests. [4] Faulkner, in turn, seemed to view his father as a failure, finding greater inspiration in the figure of his great-grandfather, William Clark Falkner (the Old Colonel). [5] This suggests a continued emotional gap between them, with Faulkner seeking paternal validation from a figure from the past rather than his own father.
Murry’s Death: Despite the complexities and challenges, Faulkner assumed the role of head of the family upon his father’s death in 1932. [6] This action suggests a sense of duty and responsibility, even in the absence of a close emotional bond. The sources don’t mention any specific emotional response from Faulkner regarding his father’s passing, but it’s possible that the event prompted reflection and a reevaluation of their complicated history.
Later Years: The sources point to a possible softening of Faulkner’s view of his father in his later years. The character of Maury Priest in Faulkner’s last novel, The Reivers (1962), is described as an affectionate portrait of Murry. [5] This suggests a potential reconciliation or at least a more understanding perspective on his father’s flaws and complexities. It’s important to note that the sources don’t explicitly state a change in their relationship, but this literary representation hints at a possible shift in Faulkner’s perception of his father towards the end of his life.

While the sources primarily focus on William Faulkner’s perspective, they also indicate that Murry struggled with his own insecurities and frustrations. His lack of success in business and dependence on his father likely contributed to his alcoholism and emotional detachment. [2, 4, 7] This context adds another layer to understanding the complex dynamics of their relationship. It’s possible that both father and son were trapped in a cycle of disappointment and unmet expectations, making it difficult to bridge the gap between them.

Overall, the sources suggest an evolving and multifaceted relationship between William Faulkner and his father. While early experiences were marked by tension and distance, there are hints of a possible shift in understanding and perspective in Faulkner’s later years. Nevertheless, the impact of their complex and often strained relationship is evident in the recurring themes of absent or inadequate fathers and family decline that permeate Faulkner’s literary work.

The Profound Influence of the Old Colonel

William Faulkner’s grandfather, John Wesley Thompson Falkner, significantly influenced his life, although it was his great-grandfather, William Clark Falkner (the Old Colonel), who played a more profound and lasting role in shaping both his life and literary work.

A Larger-Than-Life Figure: The Old Colonel was a charismatic and complex figure who served as a Confederate soldier, lawyer, railroad developer, and even an author. His life story, filled with ambition, violence, and entrepreneurial spirit, captured Faulkner’s imagination from a young age. The sources describe the Old Colonel as a “near-legendary figure” and Faulkner’s “spiritual father.” This admiration stemmed from the Old Colonel’s embodiment of traditional Southern values of honor, courage, and self-reliance, qualities that Faulkner found lacking in his own father, Murry.
Model for Literary Creations: The Old Colonel served as the primary model for Colonel John Sartoris, a recurring character in Faulkner’s fiction. Colonel Sartoris appears in numerous novels, including Sartoris, The Unvanquished, Go Down, Moses, Requiem for a Nun, The Hamlet, The Town, The Mansion, and The Reivers, as well as several short stories. Through this fictional representation, Faulkner explored the complexities of Southern history and identity, drawing inspiration from his great-grandfather’s life and experiences. The Old Colonel’s violent past, including killing two men in self-defense and participating in the Civil War, provided rich material for Faulkner’s exploration of violence, honor, and the legacy of the past.
Impact on Faulkner’s Father: The Old Colonel’s decision to sell the Gulf & Chicago Railroad had a profound impact on Faulkner’s father, Murry, as discussed in our previous conversation. This event not only led to Murry’s job loss and financial decline but also likely contributed to Faulkner’s perception of his father as a failure. In contrast, the Old Colonel represented success, ambition, and strength, qualities that Murry struggled to embody. This dynamic further solidified the Old Colonel’s position as a dominant figure in Faulkner’s life, influencing his understanding of masculinity and fatherhood.
Thematic Resonance: The Old Colonel’s influence extends beyond specific characters and storylines. His life story resonates with some of the central themes that permeate Faulkner’s work:
The weight of history and its impact on the present: The Old Colonel’s participation in the Civil War and his role in shaping the postbellum South provided Faulkner with a framework for exploring how the past continues to shape the present.
The complexities of Southern identity: The Old Colonel embodied both the positive and negative aspects of Southern culture, including honor, courage, but also violence and racism. Faulkner grappled with these complexities in his work, using the Old Colonel as a starting point for exploring the contradictions and challenges of Southern life.
The tension between tradition and modernity: The Old Colonel represented a bygone era of Southern aristocracy and power. His life story served as a counterpoint to the changing social and economic landscape of the South, allowing Faulkner to examine the conflict between tradition and progress.
Absence as a Catalyst: Interestingly, the Old Colonel died in 1889, well before Faulkner’s birth. This absence, rather than diminishing his influence, seems to have heightened it. Faulkner was surrounded by stories about his great-grandfather, passed down through family lore and community memory. This created a sense of mystique and legend around the Old Colonel, making him an even more potent symbol in Faulkner’s mind. This dynamic also reflects a broader theme in Faulkner’s work: the power of the past to shape the present, even in its absence.

While Faulkner’s relationship with his grandfather, the Young Colonel, was undoubtedly significant, it was the legacy of the Old Colonel that played a more defining role in his life and literary work. The Old Colonel’s larger-than-life persona, embodiment of Southern values, and complex life story provided Faulkner with a rich source of inspiration, shaping his characters, themes, and understanding of the South.

Major Themes in “The Big Shot” and Faulkner’s Later Works

The sources provide insights into how “The Big Shot,” a short story written around 1929, introduces several major themes that Faulkner would continue to explore in his later, more mature works.

The Unscrupulous Quest for Power: “The Big Shot” features Dal Martin, a nouveau riche contractor and political boss who embodies the theme of ruthless ambition and the pursuit of power at any cost. Martin’s willingness to bribe and manipulate others to achieve his goals foreshadows characters like Thomas Sutpen in Absalom, Absalom! and Flem Snopes in the Snopes trilogy. These later characters, like Martin, are driven by a relentless desire for power and control, often disregarding ethical boundaries and the well-being of those around them.
Rapacity and Materialism: The sources note that “The Big Shot” touches upon the theme of rapacity, which is prominently featured in Faulkner’s later works, particularly the Snopes trilogy. Dal Martin’s desire for wealth and social status, even at the expense of others, reflects a broader critique of materialism and its corrosive effects on individuals and communities. The sources highlight how this theme is further developed in the character of Flem Snopes, whose insatiable greed and cunning manipulation drive the narrative of the Snopes trilogy.
The Pursuit of Social Respectability and Approbation: The sources state that “The Big Shot” explores the desire for social acceptance and the lengths to which individuals will go to achieve it. Dal Martin’s efforts to secure his daughter’s inclusion in the exclusive Chickasaw Guards Ball, even through bribery, illustrate this yearning for social recognition and the validation it brings. This theme is revisited in Faulkner’s later works through characters like Flem Snopes, who seeks to mask his unscrupulous methods with a veneer of respectability.
The Corrupting Influence of Power: While not explicitly stated, the sources imply that “The Big Shot” touches upon the corrupting influence of power. Dal Martin’s willingness to sacrifice his integrity and exploit others for personal gain suggests a broader critique of power and its potential to distort moral values. This theme is more fully realized in later works like Sanctuary, where Popeye’s ruthlessness and Temple Drake’s descent into moral depravity reflect the destructive consequences of unchecked power and societal decay.
Connections to Sanctuary: The sources draw direct parallels between the characters in “The Big Shot” and those in Sanctuary. Popeye and Wrennie Martin in “The Big Shot” are described as anticipating the character traits of Popeye and Temple Drake in Sanctuary. This connection highlights how Faulkner’s early exploration of power dynamics, corruption, and the vulnerability of innocence in “The Big Shot” would later be expanded upon in the more complex and disturbing world of Sanctuary.

It’s important to note that “The Big Shot” is considered an early work, and Faulkner’s treatment of these themes would evolve and deepen in his later fiction. The sources emphasize that the reworked version of “The Big Shot,” titled “Dull Tale,” provides a more nuanced exploration of these themes. By shifting to a third-person point of view centered on Dr. Blount, Faulkner creates a more psychologically complex narrative that examines the internal struggles and moral compromises of a man grappling with the corrupting forces around him. This evolution from “The Big Shot” to “Dull Tale” exemplifies Faulkner’s growing mastery of narrative technique and his increasingly sophisticated approach to exploring the complexities of human nature.

Murry Falkner’s Decline and its Impact on William Faulkner’s Fiction

The sources offer a complex portrait of Murry Falkner, William Faulkner’s father, and his influence on the novelist’s life and work. While Murry is often described as a “hapless” and “inebriate” figure whose decline cast a long shadow over the family, his impact on William Faulkner’s fiction is multifaceted and extends beyond simple biographical parallels. [1, 2]

A Model for Absent and Inadequate Fathers: Murry’s alcoholism, lack of ambition, and dependence on his own father contributed to a strained relationship with William Faulkner. [2, 3] The sources suggest that Murry’s shortcomings as a father figure deeply affected Faulkner, leading him to explore this theme repeatedly in his fiction. [4, 5] Key Faulkner characters, like Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury, Joe Christmas in Light in August, and Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom!, grapple with the absence or inadequacy of their fathers, reflecting Faulkner’s own struggles with paternal disappointment. [5]
The Theme of Family Decline: Murry’s inability to live up to the legacy of his father, the Old Colonel, contributed to a broader sense of decline within the Falkner family. [6] This decline is mirrored in Faulkner’s fictional world, where families like the Compsons, Sutpens, and McCaslins struggle to maintain their status and legacy amidst changing social and economic conditions. [7] The sources explicitly state that “the theme of family decline” runs through much of Faulkner’s work, suggesting a connection between his personal experience and his literary exploration of this theme. [4, 5]
A Source of Inspiration for Complex Characters: While Murry’s failures undoubtedly shaped Faulkner’s writing, it’s important to note that his influence wasn’t entirely negative. The sources reveal that Faulkner drew on aspects of his father’s personality and experiences to create more nuanced and sympathetic characters. [5] For example, Murry’s love of hunting, fishing, and spending time at the family cabin in the woods along the Tallahatchie River likely informed Faulkner’s vivid depictions of the “big woods” in works like “The Bear” (from Go Down, Moses) and other stories. [5] Moreover, Faulkner’s portrayal of Maury Priest, the livery stable owner in The Reivers, is described as an “affectionate portrait” based on Murry, suggesting a more complex and perhaps even forgiving perspective on his father in his later years. [5]
The Cycle of Alcoholism: Murry’s alcoholism, passed down from his own father, was a destructive force in the Falkner family. [3] This cycle of addiction is reflected in Faulkner’s fiction, where characters like Uncle Willy in “Uncle Willy” and the Young Colonel in Sartoris and Flags in the Dust grapple with the consequences of alcohol abuse. [3, 8] While the sources do not explicitly link Murry’s alcoholism to specific characters or storylines, it’s plausible that Faulkner’s personal experience with this issue informed his sensitive and often tragic depictions of alcoholic characters.
Understanding Faulkner’s Creative Choices: It’s essential to acknowledge that drawing direct causal links between Murry’s decline and specific aspects of Faulkner’s fiction is challenging. Literary creation is a complex process, and attributing creative choices solely to biographical events risks oversimplification. However, considering Murry’s struggles within the context of Faulkner’s work provides a richer understanding of the novelist’s preoccupation with themes of family, decline, and the complexities of Southern masculinity.

Murry Falkner’s decline, while undeniably a source of pain and disappointment for William Faulkner, ultimately became a wellspring of inspiration for his fiction. By exploring the consequences of paternal failure, family disintegration, and the destructive nature of addiction, Faulkner created a body of work that grapples with some of the most profound and enduring challenges of human experience.

Patterns of Alcoholism in the Falkner Family

The sources describe a clear pattern of alcoholism in William Faulkner’s family, passed down through at least three generations:

William Clark Falkner (the Old Colonel): The sources mention that Faulkner’s grandfather, a prominent figure in the family and the model for Colonel John Sartoris in Faulkner’s fiction, was a “legendary drinker” [1-3]. To deal with his alcoholism, he would periodically check himself into the Keeley Institute in Memphis for treatment [1-3].
John Wesley Thompson Falkner (the Young Colonel): The pattern of heavy drinking continued with Faulkner’s father [2]. Like his father before him, Murry Falkner also sought treatment at the Keeley Institute to address his alcoholism [1, 2]. The sources highlight that his drinking problem significantly strained his marriage and negatively impacted his career [4].
William Faulkner: The sources confirm that William Faulkner, continuing the family tradition, also struggled with alcoholism [1, 2]. His drinking escalated over time, moving from casual drinking to more serious, problematic bouts that often followed the completion of a major work or period of intense stress [5-7]. The sources note that he sought treatment at Wright’s Sanatorium in Byhalia, Mississippi on multiple occasions [7, 8].

The sources describe the Keeley Institute as a treatment center popular at the time, with the founder, Dr. Leslie E. Keeley, claiming that alcoholism was a disease and not a moral failing [9, 10]. The treatment involved injections of double chloride of gold, believed to induce a strong aversion to alcohol [9, 11]. However, both the Old Colonel and Murry Falkner relapsed despite undergoing the Keeley cure [11, 12].

The persistence of alcoholism across three generations of Falkner men suggests a possible hereditary component to the problem. Although Dr. Keeley argued against the heritability of alcoholism [9], the repeated instances within the Falkner family might have challenged his theory [12].

Beyond the direct lineage, the sources also note that other members of the extended Falkner family, like William Faulkner’s brother Dean, exhibited a penchant for risk-taking behaviors, with Dean developing a passion for flying that ultimately led to his death in an airplane crash [4, 13]. While not directly related to alcoholism, this tendency towards risky behavior might suggest a broader familial pattern of impulsivity or a predisposition towards addictive tendencies.

The Profound Influence of Caroline Barr on William Faulkner

The sources portray Caroline Barr, known as Mammy Callie, as a deeply influential figure in William Faulkner’s life, extending far beyond her role as a domestic servant. She served as a source of stability, inspiration, and cultural connection, shaping both his personal development and his literary imagination.

A “Second Mother”: Barr arrived in Oxford, Mississippi in 1902 to assist Maud Butler Falkner with her three young sons [1]. From that point on, she became an integral part of the Falkner household, providing care and support that extended beyond the typical duties of a domestic worker. The sources emphasize that Faulkner viewed Barr as a “second mother,” highlighting the depth of their bond and her significant presence in his formative years [1]. This close relationship is especially poignant considering the challenges Faulkner faced with his biological parents, particularly his father Murry’s struggles with alcoholism and lack of ambition, as discussed in our previous conversation.
A Bridge to the Past: Born into slavery in Mississippi, Barr possessed a wealth of knowledge about pre-Civil War Lafayette County and the turbulent period of Reconstruction [1]. Although illiterate, she was a gifted storyteller, sharing with Faulkner a rich oral history of the region and its people [2]. The sources suggest that these stories profoundly impacted Faulkner’s understanding of Southern history, culture, and race relations, influencing his literary exploration of these themes.
Inspiration for Iconic Characters: The sources directly connect Barr to several memorable Faulkner characters, particularly strong, resilient Black women who endure hardship and offer unwavering loyalty. Most notably, she is identified as a model for Dilsey Gibson in The Sound and the Fury, a character widely praised for her strength, compassion, and moral grounding amidst the Compson family’s decline [3]. The sources also draw parallels between Barr and Mammie Cal’line Nelson in Soldiers’ Pay and Molly Beauchamp in Go Down, Moses, further demonstrating her influence on Faulkner’s portrayal of Black female characters [3].
A Witness to Faulkner’s Life: Barr lived for almost a century, residing in a cottage behind Faulkner’s home, Rowan Oak, until her death in 1940 [1]. This extended lifespan allowed her to witness much of Faulkner’s life, including his marriage to Estelle Oldham, the birth of his daughter Jill, and the development of his literary career. She even played a role in raising Jill, further solidifying her place within the Faulkner family [1].
Faulkner’s Public Acknowledgement: The sources reveal Faulkner’s deep respect and affection for Barr, evident in his actions and words. He organized her funeral, delivered her eulogy, and even requested that a Black choral group perform “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” at the service [3]. Additionally, he dedicated his 1942 novel Go Down, Moses to Barr, a public testament to her significance in his life [4].

While the sources focus primarily on Barr’s positive influence, it’s worth noting that her presence also reflects the complex and often problematic nature of race relations in the South during Faulkner’s time. As a Black woman born into slavery, Barr’s position within the Falkner household, even as a beloved “second mother,” was inherently shaped by the social and racial hierarchies of the Jim Crow era. This context adds another layer to understanding her role in Faulkner’s life and the potential complexities of their relationship.

The Oxford Dandy and the War Hero: Two Roles Embraced by Young William Faulkner

The sources highlight two distinct roles that William Faulkner embraced in his early life: the Oxford dandy and the war hero, both of which reveal his complex and evolving personality during his formative years.

The Oxford Dandy: This persona emerged during Faulkner’s time as a student at the University of Mississippi (Ole Miss) between 1919 and 1920. [1] The sources describe him as cultivating a deliberately fashionable appearance, earning him the nickname “Count No ‘Count” among his peers, a moniker that speaks to his perceived aloofness and lack of seriousness. [1] This period reflects Faulkner’s exploration of self-expression and a desire to stand out in a society where conformity to traditional Southern masculinity was expected. The sources note his indifference to much of college life and his preference for attending only classes that piqued his interest, further reinforcing his image as an unconventional and somewhat rebellious figure. [2]
The War Hero: This role emerged after Faulkner’s brief stint as a cadet in the Royal Air Force (RAF) in 1918. [3, 4] The sources emphasize that Faulkner, despite not seeing active combat, fabricated a more dramatic and heroic narrative of his wartime experience upon his return to Oxford. [5] He sported his British officer’s uniform, complete with unearned medals and a manufactured limp, even accepting salutes from actual veterans. [5, 6] This behavior suggests a fascination with the romantic ideal of the war hero, a figure deeply ingrained in Southern culture. The sources suggest that this role-playing was not merely for attention but may have served a deeper purpose in helping Faulkner to process his experiences, develop his storytelling abilities, and navigate the complex social dynamics of his hometown after the war. [6, 7] One biographer even proposes that his elaborate war hero persona provided a way for Faulkner to distinguish himself from his brother Jack, who had enlisted as a private soldier in the U.S. Marine Corps. [3, 7]

These two early roles, the Oxford dandy and the war hero, offer valuable insights into the young William Faulkner’s character. They demonstrate his willingness to experiment with identity, his fascination with storytelling and performance, and his struggle to find his place within the expectations and traditions of the South. These themes would later become central to his literary work as he explored the complexities of Southern identity, masculinity, and the enduring power of the past.

The Murder of William Clark Falkner and its Fictional Echoes

The sources reveal that a significant event in William Faulkner’s family history, the murder of his great-grandfather William Clark Falkner, served as inspiration for various elements in his fictional works.

The Assassination: William Clark Falkner, known as the Old Colonel, was a prominent figure in Ripley, Mississippi, serving as a lawyer, businessman, politician, and railroad builder. On election day in 1889, he was fatally shot by a business and political rival, Richard J. Thurmond [1, 2]. This event, which took place on the Courthouse Square, deeply impacted the Falkner family and became a part of local lore [2].
Fictional Transformations: The sources specifically mention two novels where Faulkner fictionalized this assassination: Sartoris (1929) and The Unvanquished (1938) [2]. These works feature characters and storylines inspired by the Old Colonel’s life and death, showcasing Faulkner’s tendency to draw upon his family history for literary inspiration.
Beyond Specific Novels: While Sartoris and The Unvanquished directly address the murder, it’s likely that this event had a broader impact on Faulkner’s writing, shaping his exploration of themes like violence, family legacies, Southern history, and the cyclical nature of revenge. The sources note that Faulkner’s work frequently explores the lingering effects of the past on the present, and the murder of his great-grandfather could be seen as a prime example of this dynamic.
Connections to Conversation History: Our previous conversation about alcoholism in the Falkner family adds another layer to understanding the significance of the Old Colonel’s murder. The sources describe him as a “legendary drinker” who underwent treatment for his alcoholism at the Keeley Institute [3]. This detail, combined with the violent circumstances of his death, highlights the potential for destructive cycles within families, a theme that resonates with Faulkner’s portrayal of the Compson family’s decline due to alcoholism, among other factors, as discussed in our previous conversation.

The murder of William Clark Falkner represents a key event in Faulkner’s family history that he transformed into literary material, demonstrating his tendency to draw upon personal experiences and family lore for his fictional creations. This event likely had a lasting impact on his writing, informing his exploration of complex themes related to violence, family legacies, and the enduring influence of the past.

The Snopes Trilogy: Chronicling the Rise of a Family

The sources identify three novels that Faulkner wrote featuring the Snopes family: The Hamlet (1940), The Town (1957), and The Mansion (1959) [1-4]. These books, collectively known as the Snopes Trilogy, chart the family’s ascent from humble beginnings as sharecroppers to positions of power and influence in the fictional Yoknapatawpha County.

The Hamlet: This first installment introduces the Snopes family and their arrival in the rural community of Frenchman’s Bend. The novel focuses on Flem Snopes, the most cunning and ambitious member of the clan, as he begins his rise to wealth and status through shrewd business dealings and manipulation.
The Town: This second book shifts the setting to the county seat of Jefferson, where Flem Snopes continues his climb to power, eventually becoming president of a bank. The novel explores the impact of the Snopes family’s growing influence on the town’s social fabric and the ways in which their ambition and greed clash with the traditional values of the community.
The Mansion: This final volume brings the Snopes saga to a close, focusing on Flem’s ultimate downfall. The novel also explores the lives of other Snopes family members, highlighting the ways in which they have both benefited and suffered from Flem’s ruthless pursuit of power.

The sources emphasize the comedic and tragic elements of the Snopes Trilogy, noting that Faulkner explores the family’s rise through a lens of both humor and pathos. He presents the Snopeses as both shrewd and cunning, capable of both great success and great cruelty. Through their stories, Faulkner offers a complex and nuanced portrait of Southern society in the early 20th century, capturing the tensions between tradition and modernity, rural and urban life, and the enduring legacy of the past.

The sources also provide details about Faulkner’s creative process in writing the Snopes Trilogy:

Early Origins: The trilogy’s roots can be traced back to the late 1920s when Faulkner started a manuscript titled Father Abraham. Although he abandoned this work, his interest in the Snopes family persisted, and he continued to develop their stories in short stories and novel fragments that he would eventually incorporate into the trilogy. [4]
“Lightning Bolt” Inspiration: In an interview at the University of Virginia in 1957, Faulkner described the moment when the full scope of the Snopes Trilogy came to him: “I thought of the whole story at once like a bolt of lightning lights up a landscape and you see everything but it takes time to write it.” [4]
Discrepancies and Revisions: The fact that the three novels were written over a 30-year period led to some inconsistencies. Faulkner acknowledged this in a note in The Mansion. James B. Meriwether, a textual critic, assisted Random House in addressing some of these discrepancies. [5]

The Snopes Trilogy stands as a significant achievement in Faulkner’s literary career, providing a sweeping and multifaceted exploration of Southern society through the lens of one ambitious and often ruthless family.

The Real-World Inspiration for Yoknapatawpha County

The sources confirm that Faulkner’s fictional Yoknapatawpha County is directly based on Lafayette County, Mississippi [1, 2]. While Yoknapatawpha County possesses unique fictional elements and diverges from Lafayette County in specific details, it is fundamentally rooted in the geography, history, and culture of this real-world location.

Geographic Similarities: The sources highlight several geographic parallels between Yoknapatawpha and Lafayette Counties. Both are situated in north-central Mississippi and feature similar landscapes, including “rich bottomlands, broad cotton fields, eroded hills, and pine barrens” [3]. The Tallahatchie River forms a significant portion of the northern border of both counties [1, 4], and the Yocona River, whose name is the basis for Yoknapatawpha, drains the southern portion of Lafayette County [1, 5].
Oxford as the Model for Jefferson: The county seat of Yoknapatawpha, Jefferson, is modeled after the real city of Oxford, Mississippi, which serves as the seat of Lafayette County [6, 7]. However, Faulkner made intentional changes to differentiate his fictional town from its real-life counterpart. For instance, he chose to keep the University of Mississippi in the town of “Oxford” in his fiction but situated it 40 to 50 miles away from Jefferson [8], whereas in reality, the University of Mississippi is located within the city of Oxford. This separation highlights Faulkner’s desire to create a distinct fictional world while still drawing inspiration from the familiar.
Historical and Cultural Influences: The sources emphasize that Yoknapatawpha County embodies a microcosm of the American South, drawing heavily on the history and culture of Lafayette County and the broader region. Faulkner weaves actual historical events and figures into his fictional narratives, including:
The Chickasaw Nation: The presence of Chickasaw Indians is prominent in both Yoknapatawpha and Lafayette Counties. The sources mention Chickasaw burial mounds found in Lafayette County [1] and note that Faulkner incorporated Chickasaw history and culture into his works, such as the characters of Issetibbeha and Ikkemotubbe who appear in several stories, including “Red Leaves” and “The Bear” [9, 10]. The very name “Yoknapatawpha” itself is derived from Chickasaw words [11].
The Civil War and Reconstruction: Our conversation history about the murder of William Clark Falkner underscores the impact of the Civil War and Reconstruction on both the real and fictional counties. The Old Colonel’s assassination, which Faulkner fictionalized in Sartoris and The Unvanquished, exemplifies the violence and social upheaval that characterized this era. The sources also mention that Faulkner’s grandfather, J.W.T. Falkner, aligned himself with the populist movement that emerged in the wake of the Civil War [12], a political dynamic that likely influenced Faulkner’s portrayal of class conflicts and social change in Yoknapatawpha County.
Beyond Exact Replication: While Yoknapatawpha County is firmly grounded in Lafayette County, it’s important to note that Faulkner did not aim for a strictly literal representation. He altered geographical details, population statistics, and historical timelines to suit his fictional purposes. The sources emphasize that Faulkner was ultimately more interested in creating a symbolic landscape that captured the essence of the South rather than adhering to a precise historical or geographical record [4, 13].
Malcolm Cowley’s Observation: Critic Malcolm Cowley’s statement in 1946 accurately summarizes the relationship between Lafayette and Yoknapatawpha Counties: “Faulkner performed a labor of imagination that has not been equaled in our time … first, to invent a Mississippi county that was like a mythical kingdom, but was complete and living in all its details; second, to make his story of Yoknapatawpha stand as a parable or legend of all the Deep South” [14]. This quote highlights how Faulkner took inspiration from a specific location but transformed it through his artistic vision into a universal symbol of the South.

In conclusion, while Faulkner drew inspiration from various sources and experiences, Lafayette County, Mississippi, serves as the undeniable foundation for his fictional Yoknapatawpha County. Through his creative lens, Faulkner transformed this real-world location into a rich and complex fictional landscape that explores the depths of Southern history, culture, and the human condition.

“Flags in the Dust”: The Precursor to Sartoris

The sources confirm that William Faulkner’s novel Sartoris (1929) was originally titled “Flags in the Dust”. [1-3]

Composition and Rejection: Faulkner completed “Flags in the Dust” in late September 1926 and submitted it to his publisher, Boni & Liveright. [1] The publisher rejected the novel, deeming it “diffuse and non-integral,” lacking plot and character development. [1] This rejection left Faulkner feeling dejected, but he quickly recovered and sought a new publisher for his work. [1]
Revision and Publication as Sartoris: Harcourt, Brace and Company agreed to publish the novel, but only on the condition that it be significantly shortened. [1, 4, 5] Faulkner, though initially reluctant, allowed his friend and agent, Ben Wasson, to make the necessary revisions. [4] This heavily edited version of “Flags in the Dust” was ultimately published as Sartoris in January 1929. [1, 3, 5]
Restoration of the Original Text: In 1973, Random House published Flags in the Dust, which aimed to reconstruct Faulkner’s original text. [2] This edition, edited by Douglas Day, was based on a composite typescript from the Faulkner collection at the University of Virginia. [2] The publication of Flags in the Dust allowed readers to experience the novel as Faulkner initially intended, restoring approximately 20,000 words that were cut from the Sartoris version. [6, 7]
Significance of “Flags in the Dust”: The sources underscore the importance of both “Flags in the Dust” and Sartoris in Faulkner’s literary development:
Yoknapatawpha County’s Genesis: Both versions mark Faulkner’s significant foray into his fictional Yoknapatawpha County, the setting for many of his most celebrated works. [1, 3, 8] These novels introduced the Sartoris family, laying the foundation for Faulkner’s exploration of Southern history, family legacies, and the complex social dynamics of the region.
Germs of Faulkner’s “Apocrypha”: Faulkner himself acknowledged that “Flags in the Dust” contained the “germ of [his] apocrypha,” referring to the interconnected stories and characters that populate his fictional world. [3, 8] The novel’s themes and characters resonate throughout his later works, showcasing the interconnectedness of his literary universe.
Marking a Turning Point: Critics see “Flags in the Dust” as a pivotal work in Faulkner’s career, revealing a significant leap in his artistry. [7] Richard Adams, in his review of Flags in the Dust, argues that the publication of the complete text offers a clearer understanding of Faulkner’s rapid development as a writer between 1926 and 1928. [7]
Connections to Our Conversation History: Our previous discussions about the murder of William Clark Falkner and the Snopes family highlight the richness and interconnectedness of Faulkner’s fictional world that began to take shape in “Flags in the Dust”:
The Sartoris Family and the Old Colonel: Flags in the Dust and Sartoris introduce the Sartoris family, whose history and dynamics are intertwined with the legacy of the Old Colonel, Faulkner’s murdered great-grandfather. [8] These novels offer a fictionalized exploration of the Old Colonel’s life and death, providing a glimpse into the ways in which Faulkner transformed personal and family history into literary material.
The Snopeses and the Sartorises: “Flags in the Dust,” with its focus on the Sartoris family, lays the groundwork for the complex social landscape of Yoknapatawpha County, a world that will later be further populated by the Snopes family in Faulkner’s Snopes Trilogy. [8] The contrasting values and ambitions of these two families highlight the tensions and transformations occurring in Southern society during this period.

In summary, William Faulkner’s “Flags in the Dust,” originally titled “Sartoris,” serves as a crucial work in his literary career. It represents a turning point in his writing and marks the genesis of his fictional Yoknapatawpha County. The publication of the complete text under the title Flags in the Dust in 1973 allows readers to appreciate the novel in its entirety, showcasing the depth and complexity of Faulkner’s vision.

Faulkner’s Self-Proclaimed Magnum Opus: A Fable

While Faulkner expressed fondness for The Sound and The Fury, calling it “the book I feel tenderest towards” due to the challenges it presented him [1], the sources definitively state that he considered A Fable to be his most significant work [2].

Extensive Writing Process: Faulkner dedicated nearly nine years to writing A Fable [2]. This prolonged effort speaks to the ambition and importance he placed on the novel. He persisted despite encountering difficulties and even sought distractions from the demanding manuscript, including taking on film work [3].
Thematic Scope and Ambition: A Fable departs from Faulkner’s typical Southern settings and instead takes place in France during World War I [3]. This shift in setting suggests an attempt to grapple with larger, more universal themes of war, faith, and humanity. The sources mention that the novel’s plot centers on a Christ-like figure [3], further indicating a desire to explore profound philosophical and spiritual questions.
Faulkner’s Own Words: While the sources don’t directly quote Faulkner on why he considered A Fable his most significant work, they do highlight his dedication to the project and the sheer amount of time and effort he invested in its creation.
Critical Recognition: A Fable received prestigious awards, including the Pulitzer Prize for fiction and the National Book Award in 1955 [2]. While not a direct measure of Faulkner’s own assessment, these accolades suggest the novel’s impact and literary merit.
Connections to Our Conversation History: While our conversation history hasn’t specifically addressed A Fable, our previous discussion of “Flags in the Dust” and Sartoris provides a helpful contrast. These earlier works marked Faulkner’s entry into his fictional Yoknapatawpha County and dealt primarily with Southern themes and history. A Fable represents a departure from this familiar territory, suggesting a conscious attempt to expand his artistic horizons and engage with wider thematic concerns.

In conclusion, the sources explicitly identify A Fable as the novel Faulkner deemed his most significant work. Although they don’t elaborate on his reasons, the extensive writing process, the shift in setting, and the ambition of its themes point to a deliberate effort to create a work of profound literary and thematic weight.

Faulkner’s “Best Failure”: The Sound and the Fury

The sources directly identify The Sound and the Fury as the novel Faulkner referred to as his “best failure.” [1] He held a deep affection for this challenging work, even expressing that it was “the book I feel tenderest towards” in a later interview. [2]

Published in 1929: The Sound and the Fury was Faulkner’s fourth published novel, following Soldiers’ Pay, Mosquitoes, and Sartoris. [3] Its experimental narrative structure and complex themes marked a significant departure from his earlier works.
Narrative Innovation: The novel is told from four distinct points of view, each offering a fragmented and subjective perspective on the decline of the Compson family. This unconventional structure likely contributed to its initial difficulty for readers and perhaps to Faulkner’s own sense of it as a “failure” despite its critical acclaim.
The Compson Family Saga: The novel centers on the Compsons, a once-prominent Southern family grappling with loss, decay, and the changing social landscape of the South. The four narrators – Benjy, Quentin, Jason, and the third-person perspective focusing on Dilsey – each offer a unique and often contradictory view of the family’s history and internal dynamics.
Caddy Compson as a Catalyst: The sources highlight Caddy Compson as a central figure in the novel’s emotional core. Faulkner explained that the initial inspiration for the story was the image of Caddy climbing a tree to peek into a window. [3] Caddy’s loss of innocence and her subsequent downfall serve as the catalyst for the family’s disintegration.
Connections to Our Conversation: While our previous conversation hasn’t directly focused on The Sound and the Fury, our exploration of Faulkner’s fictional Yoknapatawpha County offers a relevant connection. The Compson family, though not featured in “Flags in the Dust” or Sartoris, becomes a key part of the intricate web of families and histories that populate Faulkner’s fictional world. The novel’s exploration of the Compsons’ decline reflects Faulkner’s broader interest in examining the changing social order and the complexities of Southern identity.
Faulkner’s Continued Engagement: Interestingly, even after its publication, Faulkner continued to revisit and revise The Sound and the Fury. He wrote an appendix to the novel approximately twenty years later, in an attempt to further refine and clarify his vision for the story. [1] He even admitted in an interview that he was trying “to make that book … match the dream.” [1]

In conclusion, The Sound and the Fury stands out as a significant work in Faulkner’s oeuvre, and one that he considered to be both his “best failure” and the book he held the most affection for. While challenging for readers, the novel’s innovative narrative structure, complex themes, and exploration of the Compson family’s decline cemented its place as a landmark achievement in American literature.

Rejection and the Path to Publication: Understanding Faulkner’s Early Challenges

The sources offer insights into Faulkner’s early experiences with publishers, highlighting both rejections and successes. While the sources don’t explicitly detail events leading to rejections before his first published novel, Soldiers’ Pay, they do mention early rejections of specific works, offering a glimpse into the challenges he faced before gaining critical recognition.

Early Rejections:
Poetry Submissions: The sources mention that Faulkner initially tried to establish himself as a poet. The Four Seas Company, a Boston publishing house specializing in young poets, rejected a collection of his verse in June 1923. [1] This suggests that his early poetic endeavors didn’t resonate with publishers.
Submissions to Magazines: The sources indicate that Faulkner faced numerous rejections from prominent literary magazines in the 1920s. For instance, both The Saturday Evening Post and Women’s Home Companion rejected his short story “Evangeline” in 1931. [2] Similarly, Scribner’s Magazine declined several of his stories in the late 1920s, with one editor commenting that Faulkner’s writing leaned too heavily on atmosphere at the expense of a compelling narrative. [3] These rejections highlight the difficulty he had breaking into the literary market and establishing his voice in short fiction.
Factors Contributing to Rejection:
Experimental Style: While not directly cited as a reason for early rejections, Faulkner’s later success with experimental works like The Sound and the Fury suggests that his innovative narrative techniques might have been initially challenging for publishers accustomed to more conventional storytelling. The sources mention that early critics often criticized his “perplexing style.” [4]
Thematic Focus: Faulkner’s unflinching exploration of the darker aspects of Southern life, including racism, violence, and social decay, might have also contributed to early resistance from publishers. Some reviewers found his subject matter “too revolting” for their tastes. [5]
Eventual Success:
Sherwood Anderson’s Influence: A turning point came when Faulkner befriended the established writer Sherwood Anderson. Anderson’s recommendation helped Faulkner secure the publication of his first novel, Soldiers’ Pay, with Boni & Liveright in 1926. [6, 7] This initial success opened doors for him in the publishing world.
Persistence and Evolution: Despite early setbacks, Faulkner continued to refine his craft and experiment with different narrative approaches. This persistence, coupled with a growing recognition of his talent among some critics, eventually led to the publication of key works like Sartoris and The Sound and the Fury, marking his emergence as a significant literary voice.
Connections to Conversation History:
“Flags in the Dust” Rejection: Our earlier discussion of the rejection of “Flags in the Dust” by Boni & Liveright provides a concrete example of the kind of setbacks Faulkner faced early on. The publisher’s criticism that the novel lacked plot and character development suggests that his writing style might not have aligned with prevailing literary tastes at the time. [8]
Shift to Random House: Our conversation also touched on Faulkner’s eventual success with Random House, which became his long-term publisher. The sources indicate that Random House, though not always expecting blockbuster sales, recognized Faulkner’s talent and provided him with a supportive platform for his work. [9, 10] This partnership proved crucial to his later career and widespread recognition.

In summary, while the sources offer limited insight into the specific reasons for Faulkner’s rejections before Soldiers’ Pay, they do paint a picture of a young writer struggling to find his footing in the literary world. Early rejections of his poetry and short stories, coupled with later criticism of his style, suggest that publishers and readers might have initially found his work unconventional or challenging. However, his persistence, evolution as a writer, and the support of influential figures like Anderson eventually led to the publication of his novels and the beginning of his journey toward becoming a celebrated author.

Malcolm Cowley: Architect of Faulkner’s Literary Revival

The sources overwhelmingly portray Malcolm Cowley as a pivotal figure in the resurgence of William Faulkner’s literary reputation. During a period when Faulkner’s works were largely out of print and his name had become “mud” in publishing circles, Cowley recognized the author’s immense talent and embarked on a dedicated campaign to reintroduce him to the literary world [1]. This effort proved remarkably successful, elevating Faulkner from relative obscurity to the front ranks of American literature.

Recognizing Faulkner’s Undervalued Genius: In 1944, Cowley wrote to Faulkner, stating, “In publishing circles your name is mud… They are all convinced your books won’t sell. Now when you talk to writers, it’s quite a different story; there you hear almost nothing but admiration, and the better the writer the greater the admiration is likely to be” [1]. This astute observation encapsulated the disconnect between Faulkner’s critical acclaim among fellow writers and his lack of commercial success.
“William Faulkner’s Human Comedy”: Cowley initiated his “reclamation project” with the publication of a highly appreciative essay, “William Faulkner’s Human Comedy,” in the New York Times Book Review in October 1944 [2]. This widely read essay served as a powerful introduction to Faulkner’s work for a broader audience, emphasizing the depth and complexity of his fictional world.
Advocating for a Second Reading: Cowley furthered his efforts by publishing “William Faulkner Revisited” in The Saturday Review in April 1945, encouraging readers to revisit Faulkner’s novels for a deeper understanding [2]. He argued that a second reading allowed for a more nuanced appreciation of Faulkner’s “aims, his shortcomings and his achievements as a novelist” and that he deserved a “much more important place in American literature than almost any of his critics have been willing to grant” [2].
The Portable Faulkner (1946): A Turning Point: Cowley’s most significant contribution was undoubtedly his role as editor of The Portable Faulkner, published in 1946 [3]. This thoughtfully curated anthology presented a selection of Faulkner’s most important works, along with a comprehensive introduction and insightful prefaces by Cowley. The anthology served as a crucial entry point for readers who were unfamiliar with Faulkner’s complex and often challenging prose. It also helped to frame his work within a broader context, highlighting recurring themes and the interconnected nature of his Yoknapatawpha saga.
Faulkner’s Own Recognition of Cowley’s Impact: Even Faulkner himself acknowledged the transformative effect of Cowley’s efforts. In a letter to Cowley regarding The Portable Faulkner, he wrote, “The job is splendid. Damn you to hell anyway. . . . By God, I didn’t know myself what I had tried to do, and how much I had succeeded” [4]. This candid admission underscores the impact Cowley’s critical insights had on Faulkner’s own understanding of his literary achievements.
Reviving Commercial Interest: Cowley’s advocacy extended beyond the realm of literary criticism. He actively lobbied publishers to reprint Faulkner’s works, contributing to the resurgence of commercial interest in his novels [3]. This renewed attention from publishers ultimately led to increased sales and wider availability of Faulkner’s books, solidifying his position as a major literary figure.
The Nobel Prize and Beyond: While Cowley’s efforts were instrumental in laying the groundwork for Faulkner’s recognition, the author’s own talent and the growing appreciation for his work among critics ultimately culminated in his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1949 [5]. By that time, Faulkner’s reputation was firmly established, thanks in no small part to Cowley’s tireless championing.
Connection to Our Conversation: Our earlier conversations about the early rejections of works like “Flags in the Dust” and the critical and commercial success of A Fable provide a helpful context for understanding the significance of Cowley’s interventions. During a period when Faulkner was struggling to find a consistent audience, Cowley’s efforts provided much-needed support and helped to reshape the critical narrative surrounding his work.

In conclusion, the sources clearly demonstrate that Malcolm Cowley’s criticism played a crucial role in rescuing William Faulkner from relative obscurity and establishing him as a major force in American literature. By thoughtfully analyzing and contextualizing Faulkner’s works, Cowley illuminated their significance for a wider audience and helped to pave the way for his eventual recognition as a literary giant.

Faulkner’s Family History: A Source of Literary Inspiration

The sources clearly show that William Faulkner’s family history played a significant role in shaping his literary themes, particularly those revolving around family decline, the South’s complex racial legacy, and the lingering impact of the Civil War. He drew heavily from his own ancestral narratives to craft compelling stories exploring the complexities of Southern identity and the weight of the past on the present.

The Old Colonel and the Sartoris Legacy:
Model for Fictional Characters: Faulkner’s great-grandfather, William Clark Falkner (known as the Old Colonel), served as a direct model for the fictional character of Colonel John Sartoris, a prominent figure in several of his works, including Sartoris, Flags in the Dust, and The Unvanquished [1-3]. The Old Colonel was a larger-than-life figure—a soldier, author, banker, and railroad builder who embodied the spirit of the antebellum South [1, 4]. Faulkner, who considered the Old Colonel his “spiritual father” [4], imbued his fictional counterpart with similar traits, making Colonel John Sartoris a symbol of both the South’s grandeur and its tragic downfall [3].
Congenital Recklessness and Family Decline: The sources note that Faulkner often attributed the Sartoris family’s troubles to a “congenital recklessness,” a trait passed down through generations [5]. This theme of inherited flaws leading to family decline mirrors Faulkner’s own family history. His grandfather, John Wesley Thompson Falkner, known as the Young Colonel, expanded the family’s business ventures but also struggled with alcoholism, a problem that would continue to plague his son, Murry, and eventually Faulkner himself [3, 6, 7]. This cyclical pattern of destructive behavior within a family is a recurring motif in Faulkner’s works, most notably in the tragic downfall of the Compson family in The Sound and the Fury [8-10].
The Civil War’s Enduring Shadow:
Living History and the Weight of the Past: Faulkner grew up surrounded by the stories of Civil War veterans, and the conflict’s legacy permeated his childhood in Oxford, Mississippi [11, 12]. This intimate connection to the past, particularly the South’s defeat and the enduring bitterness toward General Sherman, profoundly influenced his writing [12, 13]. The Civil War becomes more than a historical event in his novels; it transforms into a psychological force shaping the lives and destinies of his characters [14].
Family Experiences Woven into Fiction: Faulkner incorporated specific family experiences related to the Civil War into his fiction. For instance, he transformed the story of a Yankee officer’s encounter with his great-grandmother into a scene with Granny Rosa Millard in The Unvanquished [15]. Similarly, the Old Colonel’s experience as a Confederate cavalryman found its way into the character of Bayard Sartoris in Sartoris and Flags in the Dust [3, 5]. These fictional adaptations of real events highlight how Faulkner used his family history to explore the war’s lasting impact on Southern culture and individual psyches.
The Theme of “Never Forgiving”: The conversation about Quentin Compson’s line in Absalom, Absalom!, “‘Gettysburg,’ Quentin said. ‘You cant understand it. You would have to be born there’” [14], underscores the deeply personal nature of the Civil War’s legacy for Faulkner. His characters, like Quentin, are haunted by the past, unable to escape the shadow of a conflict that continues to define their present [14].
The South’s Racial Dilemma:
Early Exposure to Racial Dynamics: The sources highlight Faulkner’s early exposure to the complexities of race relations in the South. His childhood included close friendships with Black children, yet he also witnessed the stark realities of segregation and racial injustice in Oxford [16, 17]. This early awareness of the South’s “racial dilemma” [18] informed his exploration of race as a major theme in his mature works, particularly in novels like Light in August, Absalom, Absalom!, and Go Down, Moses [16].
Contradictory Views on Race: Faulkner’s own views on race were often complex and contradictory, reflecting the broader societal tensions of his time [19, 20]. The sources mention his conflicted stance on the Emmett Till case, illustrating his struggle to reconcile his personal beliefs with the ingrained racism of his upbringing [19, 20]. This internal conflict finds expression in the moral ambiguities of his characters and the often-unflinching portrayal of racial violence and prejudice in his novels.
The Absent Father Figure:
Murry Falkner’s Influence: Faulkner’s relationship with his father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner, was strained due to Murry’s alcoholism and inability to live up to the expectations set by his own father, the Young Colonel [8, 10]. This dynamic of a “feckless and alcoholic” father failing to provide a strong presence in the family [8] had a profound impact on Faulkner’s writing.
Recurring Theme of Absent Fathers: The sources note that many of Faulkner’s key characters are men with absent or inadequate fathers, reflecting this personal experience [10]. Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury, Joe Christmas in Light in August, and Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom! all grapple with the emotional consequences of fatherlessness [10]. This recurring theme speaks to the profound influence of Faulkner’s own family dynamics on his literary explorations of masculinity, identity, and the search for belonging.

In conclusion, William Faulkner’s family history served as a rich wellspring of inspiration for his literary themes. He transformed personal experiences, family legends, and the historical realities of his Southern upbringing into compelling narratives that explored the enduring power of the past, the complexities of race and identity, and the universal struggles of families grappling with decline and dysfunction.

Faulkner’s Narrative Techniques: A Tapestry of Innovation

The sources illustrate that William Faulkner was a master of innovative narrative techniques, constantly experimenting with form and style to create a distinct and powerful literary voice. His works are characterized by a complex interplay of stream-of-consciousness, multiple perspectives, fragmented timelines, and a rich, evocative prose style.

Stream-of-Consciousness and Interior Monologue:
Faulkner was heavily influenced by James Joyce’s use of stream-of-consciousness, a technique that aims to capture the flow of a character’s thoughts and feelings [1, 2]. He employed this technique extensively, particularly in The Sound and the Fury and As I Lay Dying, to offer readers an intimate glimpse into the minds of his characters.
The sources highlight the use of interior monologue as a specific form of stream-of-consciousness that presents the unfiltered and often chaotic inner world of a character [1, 3]. The first three chapters of The Sound and the Fury, narrated by Benjy, Quentin, and Jason Compson respectively, are prime examples of this technique. Critics have noted the challenge posed to readers by this technique, particularly in Benjy’s chapter, which is characterized by its fragmented and non-linear structure [1].
Critics argue that Faulkner’s use of interior monologue allowed him to achieve a deeper level of characterization than in his earlier works [1, 2]. By presenting the unmediated thoughts of his characters, he could bypass traditional narrative structures and create a more direct and visceral connection between the reader and the character’s inner world.
Multiple Perspectives and Unreliable Narrators:
Faulkner frequently employed multiple narrators, each offering a unique perspective on the same events. This technique, evident in novels like Absalom, Absalom! and The Sound and the Fury, compels the reader to piece together the “truth” from a mosaic of subjective viewpoints.
Faulkner also often made use of unreliable narrators, whose biases, limitations, and agendas color their accounts of events. This technique adds layers of complexity and ambiguity to the narrative, challenging the reader to question the validity of different perspectives and to engage in an active process of interpretation.
Absalom, Absalom! is a prime example of this technique, with the story of Thomas Sutpen gradually unfolding through the fragmented memories and interpretations of Quentin Compson, Rosa Coldfield, and Shreve McCannon [4]. The novel’s reliance on multiple, often conflicting, accounts underscores the elusive nature of truth and the powerful influence of subjective perception.
Fragmented Timelines and Non-Linear Storytelling:
Faulkner’s novels often disregard chronological order, presenting events out of sequence and jumping back and forth in time [5]. This technique, sometimes referred to as non-linear storytelling, mirrors the way memory functions, with the past constantly intruding upon the present.
The sources point out that Faulkner’s approach to time is not merely chronological; it is deeply rooted in the Greek concept of kairos—time as a memorable event [5]. His narratives are often structured around key moments or turning points that reverberate throughout the lives of his characters and shape their understanding of the present.
The fragmented timelines in novels like The Sound and the Fury force the reader to assemble the narrative puzzle, actively engaging with the text to create a coherent understanding of the story. This approach to time reinforces Faulkner’s central theme: the past is not dead; it is not even past.
Rich, Evocative Prose Style:
Faulkner was renowned for his distinctive prose style—a blend of lyrical, poetic language and long, complex sentences. Critics have both praised and criticized his style, noting its capacity for both beauty and obscurity [4, 6-9].
Some critics have argued that Faulkner’s prose could be “confused and tedious” at times, particularly when applied to commonplace situations [9]. Others have defended his style as an integral part of his artistic vision, arguing that his complex sentences and evocative language are essential for conveying the nuances of his characters’ thoughts and the rich tapestry of Southern life [4, 10].
Source [4] specifically addresses the use of “prose-poetry” in Absalom, Absalom!, suggesting that Faulkner’s style attempts to capture the essence of the experience itself, going beyond what can be expressed in traditional narrative speech. This stylistic choice reflects Faulkner’s ambition to create a prose that is as emotionally and psychologically resonant as poetry.
Tall Tales and the Oral Tradition:
The sources mention Faulkner’s fascination with the Southern oral tradition and his collaboration with Sherwood Anderson and Phil Stone in crafting “tall tales” about characters like Al Jackson [11]. This influence is evident in his use of storytelling techniques that mimic the rhythms and cadences of spoken language.
The sources also note that Faulkner’s early short stories, though considered apprentice works, demonstrate his early exploration of vivid imagery, particularly in evoking the dreamlike quality of his characters’ inner lives [12]. This focus on sensory detail and the interplay between reality and fantasy would become a hallmark of his mature style.

In conclusion, William Faulkner’s narrative techniques were both innovative and deeply rooted in the literary and cultural traditions of the American South. His willingness to experiment with form, style, and perspective helped him to create a unique and powerful literary voice, one that continues to challenge and captivate readers today.

Time as a Fluid Dimension: Faulkner’s Departure from Chronological Order

The sources emphasize that Faulkner’s use of time in his novels is a defining characteristic of his style, setting him apart from authors who employ a strictly chronological approach. He manipulates time not merely as a linear progression of events, but as a fluid and multifaceted dimension that shapes the experiences and perceptions of his characters. This manipulation of time allows him to explore the complex relationship between past, present, and future in the context of the American South, particularly the enduring legacy of the Civil War, slavery, and the decline of Southern aristocracy.

Greek Concepts of Chronos and Kairos:
The sources explain that Faulkner’s understanding of time aligns more closely with the Greek concept of ** kairos—time as a significant or memorable event—rather than chronos, which refers to chronological or measured time** [1]. This distinction is crucial for understanding how Faulkner’s narratives unfold.
Instead of adhering to a linear progression, he structures his stories around key moments, often traumatic or life-altering, that reverberate throughout the lives of his characters and continue to influence their present actions and thoughts. These “moments of truth and disillusion” [2] disrupt the expected flow of time, forcing the reader to piece together a fragmented narrative and confront the lasting impact of the past on the present.
Examples of Non-Linear Storytelling:
Absalom, Absalom! serves as a powerful example of Faulkner’s manipulation of time. The novel’s central mystery, the life and downfall of Thomas Sutpen, is gradually revealed through the disjointed memories and interpretations of multiple narrators. The reader is challenged to sift through these conflicting accounts, often jumping back and forth across decades, to construct a coherent understanding of Sutpen’s story.
This non-linear structure mirrors the way memory itself operates—fragmented, subjective, and often unreliable. It also reinforces Faulkner’s belief that “the past is not dead; it is not even past.” [77, our conversation] The past continually intrudes upon the present, shaping the lives and destinies of his characters in profound ways.
Interior Monologue and the Fluidity of Time:
Faulkner’s innovative use of interior monologue, particularly in The Sound and the Fury, further disrupts chronological order and allows him to depict the inner workings of his characters’ minds as they grapple with the weight of their pasts [3, 4].
In Benjy Compson’s section, for example, time becomes completely fluid, shifting seamlessly between different periods of his life based on sensory triggers and associations. The reader experiences time as Benjy does—non-linear, fragmented, and dictated by emotional rather than chronological order.
Time as a Thematic Element:
Faulkner’s manipulation of time is not simply a stylistic choice; it’s a deliberate strategy to explore the complex themes that permeate his works. The fragmented timelines and shifting perspectives highlight:
The enduring influence of the past: The past haunts the present, shaping individual lives and the collective fate of the South.
The subjective nature of memory and truth: Multiple perspectives demonstrate how the past is constantly reinterpreted and reshaped by those who remember it.
The psychological impact of trauma: Faulkner’s characters often struggle to come to terms with traumatic events, and the non-linear structure reflects their attempts to process and make sense of their experiences.
Chronological Markers as Counterpoint:
While Faulkner’s novels are characterized by their non-linear structure, it’s important to note that he does include chronological markers—specific dates, years, and seasons—that provide readers with a framework for understanding the sequence of events [5].
These markers serve as a counterpoint to the more fluid and subjective experience of time presented through interior monologue and multiple perspectives. This interplay between chronological and psychological time creates a complex and challenging reading experience, demanding active engagement from the reader.

In conclusion, Faulkner’s use of time in his novels represents a radical departure from traditional chronological approaches. By disrupting linear order, he creates a dynamic and multifaceted temporal landscape that reflects the complexities of memory, the enduring power of the past, and the psychological struggles of his characters. This innovative approach to time is central to his unique style and his exploration of the enduring themes that define his literary legacy.

Evolution of Faulkner’s Writing Process: From Oxford Dandy to Hollywood Screenwriter

The sources provide a glimpse into how Faulkner’s writing process and work habits transformed as his career progressed, mirroring his evolving relationship with his craft, his financial circumstances, and the demands of a changing literary landscape.

Early Years: The Oxford Dandy and Disciplined Routine:
During his early years as a writer, Faulkner cultivated the persona of an “Oxford dandy,” [1] a pose that reflected his youthful experimentation with identity and his evolving artistic sensibility. He later adopted the guise of a returned war hero, further demonstrating his tendency to craft carefully constructed public images.
The sources highlight the disciplined writing routine Faulkner established early in his career. While living in New Orleans and working on his first novel, Soldiers’ Pay, he adhered to a strict schedule, rising early and dedicating his mornings to writing. [2] He described his ideal daily output as “3,000 words,” [2] a testament to his commitment to consistent creative production.
This disciplined approach is also evident in his process for writing As I Lay Dying. While working the night shift at the Ole Miss power plant, he utilized his downtime to write, claiming to have completed the novel in six weeks. [3] Although he later admitted to revising and augmenting passages, this feat underscores his ability to focus intensely and produce work even under challenging circumstances.
Financial Pressures and Hollywood Interludes:
As Faulkner gained recognition, financial pressures began to influence his writing process. He found himself caught between his artistic ambitions and the need to earn a living. The sources mention how he reluctantly turned to Hollywood screenwriting to alleviate his financial burdens, even interrupting work on major novels like Absalom, Absalom! to fulfill studio contracts. [4, 5]
Faulkner’s time in Hollywood significantly altered his work habits. Instead of the solitary routine of a novelist, he had to adapt to the collaborative nature of screenwriting, working alongside directors, producers, and other writers. [6] His studio work required him to adhere to strict deadlines and conform to the demands of the film industry, a stark contrast to the freedom he enjoyed as a novelist.
The sources note that despite his initial misgivings about Hollywood, Faulkner developed into a competent screenwriter. He received screen credit for notable films like To Have and Have Not and The Big Sleep. [6] However, he continued to view his Hollywood work as a necessary evil, a means to an end rather than a fulfilling artistic pursuit.
Later Years: Public Figure and Shifting Priorities:
As Faulkner’s literary stature grew, he transitioned from a relatively obscure Southern writer to an internationally acclaimed figure. The sources mention how he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1949, an honor that thrust him further into the public spotlight. [7]
This newfound fame influenced his writing process in various ways. He became more conscious of his public image and began to use his platform to address social and political issues, particularly race relations in the South. [8] This engagement with public discourse is evident in his essays and letters to the editor, which reflected his evolving views on race and the changing South.
While Faulkner continued to write fiction in his later years, his output slowed considerably compared to the prolific period of the late 1920s and 1930s. [9] The sources suggest that he may have grown weary of the “Yoknapatawpha County chronicle” [10] or felt a diminished sense of urgency in his creative pursuits.
His later novels, such as Intruder in the Dust and The Reivers, reflected a shift in style and thematic focus. He adopted a more conversational and discursive prose style, a departure from the dense, lyrical language of his earlier works. [11] Thematically, his later novels often explored the complexities of race relations, social justice, and the changing South, demonstrating his evolving engagement with the issues of his time.

In conclusion, the sources paint a picture of a writer whose work habits and creative process adapted to the changing circumstances of his life and career. From the disciplined routine of his early years to the demands of Hollywood screenwriting and the public engagement of his later life, Faulkner’s writing process mirrored his personal and professional evolution. Despite these shifts, his commitment to exploring the complexities of the human condition and the enduring legacy of the South remained constant, shaping his unique and enduring literary legacy.

The Shadow of Murry: Recurring Themes in Faulkner’s Work Informed by His Father’s Struggles

The sources offer insights into the complex relationship between William Faulkner and his father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner, revealing how the latter’s struggles with alcoholism, lack of ambition, and overdependence on his own father cast a long shadow over Faulkner’s literary work. The recurring themes of absent or inadequate fathers, family decline, and the corrosive effects of alcoholism, often explored through deeply flawed characters, can be traced back to the challenges Murry faced throughout his life.

Absent and Inadequate Fathers:
The sources portray Murry as a man who failed to live up to the expectations set by his powerful and successful father, John Wesley Thompson Falkner. The abrupt sale of the Gulf & Chicago railroad, where Murry worked, robbed him of his vocation and plunged him into a state of despondency [1].
This sense of failure, coupled with his alcoholism and lack of ambition, created a strained relationship with his son William, who perceived him as “dull, uninteresting, a failure” [2]. Murry’s inability to provide a strong paternal presence left a lasting impact on Faulkner, as evidenced by the recurring motif of absent or inadequate fathers in his fiction.
Characters like Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury, Joe Christmas in Light in August, and Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom! all grapple with the absence of a reliable and supportive father figure. Their struggles with identity, belonging, and moral compass can be viewed as reflections of Faulkner’s own experiences with a father who was emotionally unavailable and unable to provide guidance.
The Weight of Family Decline:
The sources note that Murry’s struggles contributed to the overall decline of the Falkner family, once a prominent force in Oxford, Mississippi. The theme of family decline, often intertwined with the loss of Southern tradition and the disintegration of the old social order, permeates Faulkner’s work.
Novels like The Sound and the Fury and Absalom, Absalom! depict the collapse of once-powerful families, tracing their downfall to internal conflicts, moral decay, and the changing social landscape of the South. The Compsons and the Sutpens serve as cautionary tales, illustrating the destructive consequences of pride, ambition, and the inability to adapt to a new era.
This preoccupation with family decline can be interpreted as a manifestation of Faulkner’s anxieties about his own family’s dwindling fortunes and the broader decline of the Southern aristocracy in the face of modernization and social change.
Alcoholism as a Destructive Force:
Murry’s alcoholism is presented as a key factor in his personal struggles and the strained dynamics within his family. The sources describe him as a “feckless and alcoholic” husband whose drinking habits created a “tense, emotionally edgy household” [1].
Faulkner, who also struggled with alcoholism throughout his life, frequently depicts the corrosive effects of alcohol on individuals and families in his work. Characters like Popeye in Sanctuary and Anse Bundren in As I Lay Dying exemplify the destructive nature of addiction, showcasing how it can lead to violence, moral decay, and the disintegration of personal relationships.
The sources acknowledge that Faulkner’s own experiences with alcoholism likely informed his portrayal of this theme, suggesting a personal dimension to his exploration of addiction’s impact on the human psyche.
The Search for Alternate Father Figures:
In contrast to his fraught relationship with his father, Faulkner developed a deep admiration for his great-grandfather, William Clark Falkner, the “Old Colonel,” a larger-than-life figure who embodied the ideals of the Old South.
The sources suggest that Faulkner came to view his great-grandfather as his “true father,” finding inspiration in his military exploits and entrepreneurial spirit [3]. This search for alternative father figures is reflected in Faulkner’s fiction, where characters often find guidance and mentorship from older, more experienced men who represent traditional values and a connection to the past.
The character of Ike McCaslin in Go Down, Moses exemplifies this dynamic. Ike learns valuable lessons about nature, morality, and responsibility from seasoned hunters and woodsmen, finding in them the paternal guidance that his own father, a descendant of the flawed Carothers McCaslin, is unable to provide.

In conclusion, while Faulkner’s literary genius cannot be solely attributed to his father’s struggles, it’s clear that Murry’s life and challenges served as a significant source of inspiration for the recurring themes that permeate his work. The absent or inadequate fathers, the weight of family decline, and the destructive force of alcoholism that populate Faulkner’s fictional world resonate with the personal experiences and anxieties shaped by his complex relationship with his father. These themes, often explored through deeply flawed and compelling characters, highlight Faulkner’s profound understanding of the human condition and the enduring impact of the past on the present.

The Historical Tapestry of Yoknapatawpha: Faulkner’s Fictional County as a Microcosm of the American South

Faulkner’s fictional Yoknapatawpha County, meticulously crafted over decades of writing, stands as a powerful reflection of the historical context of the American South. The sources reveal how Faulkner wove together elements of real-life history, family lore, and personal experiences to create a fictional landscape that captures the region’s complexities, contradictions, and enduring legacy.

The Legacy of Slavery and Racial Tensions:
Yoknapatawpha is haunted by the legacy of slavery, which continues to shape social relations and individual destinies long after its abolition. The sources emphasize how this theme permeates Faulkner’s work, reflecting the South’s ongoing struggle with racial prejudice and the deep scars left by its history.
Novels like Absalom, Absalom! and Go Down, Moses explore the complexities of race relations in the South, exposing the destructive consequences of slavery and the enduring impact of racial injustice on both black and white communities. The tragic fate of Thomas Sutpen in Absalom, Absalom!, whose grand design for a dynasty is ultimately shattered by his refusal to acknowledge his biracial son, serves as a powerful indictment of the South’s deeply ingrained racial hierarchy.
The sources note that Faulkner’s portrayal of race relations evolved throughout his career, reflecting his own changing views and the shifting social dynamics of the South. While some critics argue that his early works exhibit a degree of racial insensitivity, others point to his later novels, such as Intruder in the Dust, as evidence of his growing awareness of the complexities of racial injustice and his advocacy for social change.
The Decline of the Southern Aristocracy:
Yoknapatawpha bears witness to the decline of the Southern aristocracy, a once-powerful class grappling with the loss of its social and economic dominance in the wake of the Civil War and the rise of a new, more modern South. The sources highlight Faulkner’s fascination with this theme, which is often linked to his own family’s history and the broader transformation of the South.
The Compson family in The Sound and the Fury serves as a prime example of this decline. Once a prominent and respected family, the Compsons are reduced to poverty and despair as they struggle to maintain their social standing in a changing world. Their downfall is attributed to a combination of internal conflicts, moral decay, and an inability to adapt to the new realities of the South.
The sources mention that Faulkner’s own family, the Falkners, experienced a similar decline in fortunes. This personal connection likely informed his exploration of this theme, imbuing it with a sense of melancholy and loss that resonates throughout his Yoknapatawpha novels.
The Enduring Presence of the Past:
The sources underscore how Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha is a place where the past is a palpable presence, constantly shaping the present and influencing the lives of its inhabitants. The Civil War, in particular, casts a long shadow over the county, its legacy evident in the physical landscape, the memories of its people, and the ongoing social and racial tensions.
Novels like The Unvanquished and Absalom, Absalom! vividly depict the impact of the Civil War on Yoknapatawpha, showcasing how its legacy of violence, loss, and social upheaval continues to haunt the region. The characters in these novels are often obsessed with the past, their present actions and motivations inextricably linked to events that transpired generations ago.
The sources draw parallels between Faulkner’s preoccupation with the past and the South’s own struggle to come to terms with its history. Faulkner’s complex and nuanced exploration of this theme reflects the region’s ongoing efforts to reconcile its past with its present, confronting the enduring legacy of slavery, the Civil War, and the changing social order.
The Transformation of the Landscape:
Yoknapatawpha undergoes a profound transformation throughout Faulkner’s fictional chronicle, mirroring the real-life changes occurring in the South during the first half of the 20th century. The sources note how the encroachment of modernity, symbolized by the arrival of automobiles, logging companies, and new industries, disrupts the traditional way of life and alters the physical landscape of the county.
In Go Down, Moses, the destruction of the Big Woods, a once-vast wilderness, serves as a potent symbol of this transformation. The loss of this pristine landscape reflects the broader environmental and social changes taking place in the South as modernization encroaches upon traditional values and ways of life.
The sources point to Faulkner’s deep connection to the land and his concern for its preservation. His portrayal of Yoknapatawpha’s changing landscape reflects his anxieties about the impact of progress on the South’s natural beauty and its traditional agrarian society.
The Power of Storytelling and Oral Tradition:
Yoknapatawpha is a place where storytelling and oral tradition hold immense power, shaping individual identities and preserving the collective memory of the community. The sources emphasize how Faulkner’s novels often employ multiple narrators, shifting perspectives, and stream-of-consciousness techniques to evoke the oral storytelling traditions of the South.
Novels like The Sound and the Fury and As I Lay Dying rely heavily on the voices and perspectives of their characters to piece together fragmented narratives and illuminate the complexities of the human condition. This emphasis on oral tradition reflects the importance of storytelling in Southern culture, where shared narratives serve to transmit history, values, and a sense of community.
The sources connect Faulkner’s innovative narrative techniques to the influence of Southern storytelling traditions, highlighting how he adapted these traditions to create a uniquely modern literary style that captures the region’s distinct voice and rhythms.

In conclusion, Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County stands as a powerful testament to the historical context of the American South. By weaving together elements of real-life history, personal experiences, and family lore, Faulkner created a fictional landscape that captures the region’s enduring legacy of slavery and racial tensions, the decline of the Southern aristocracy, the omnipresent weight of the past, the transformation of the landscape, and the enduring power of storytelling and oral tradition. Yoknapatawpha, with its complex characters, intricate narratives, and evocative setting, transcends the boundaries of a fictional county to become a microcosm of the American South, reflecting its struggles, contradictions, and enduring spirit.

Examining the Literary Echoes: Hemingway and Fitzgerald’s Influence on Faulkner

While the sources provide ample information about Faulkner’s life and work, there isn’t any direct evidence to suggest any notable influence from F. Scott Fitzgerald on Faulkner’s writing. However, the sources do offer some insights into the complex relationship and literary parallels between Faulkner and Ernest Hemingway.

A Relationship Tinged with Rivalry:
The sources suggest that Faulkner and Hemingway shared a relationship marked by a mixture of admiration and wariness [1]. Hemingway acknowledged Faulkner’s talent, even ranking him above himself in terms of ability, but also criticized his writing style as being uneven and undisciplined [1]. He felt Faulkner wrote too much and lacked the necessary care in his prose.
Faulkner, on the other hand, did not hold Hemingway in the same high regard [1]. While he admired Hemingway’s style, he found the underlying ideas in his work lacking in depth [2]. This difference in values, particularly the perceived absence of a “Creator” in Hemingway’s work, contributed to their literary and personal divide [2].
This rivalry is further underscored by an incident at the University of Mississippi where Faulkner, in an unguarded moment, ranked Hemingway near the bottom of a list of leading writers of their generation [3]. This public assessment, based on Hemingway’s perceived lack of artistic courage, reportedly caused a rift between the two authors [3].
Shared Themes and Divergent Approaches:
Despite their differences, both Faulkner and Hemingway grappled with similar themes, particularly the disillusionment and trauma experienced by individuals in the aftermath of World War I. Their exploration of masculinity, violence, and the search for meaning in a fragmented world reflects the shared anxieties of their generation.
However, their approaches to these themes diverged significantly. Faulkner delved into the complexities of Southern history and the psychological depths of his characters, employing experimental narrative techniques and a dense, lyrical prose style. Hemingway, on the other hand, favored a more minimalist and direct style, focusing on the actions and dialogue of his characters to convey their inner struggles.
Faulkner’s Acknowledged Debt to Joyce:
Interestingly, the sources emphasize Faulkner’s admiration for James Joyce, whose influence on his writing is well-documented [4, 5]. Faulkner saw himself as Joyce’s heir, particularly when writing The Sound and the Fury, a novel that heavily utilizes stream-of-consciousness and interior monologue techniques pioneered by Joyce [4].
This connection to Joyce further highlights Faulkner’s distinct literary path, one that embraced modernist experimentation and delved into the depths of human consciousness. While Hemingway also explored similar themes, his stylistic choices and philosophical underpinnings differed significantly from those of Faulkner and Joyce.

In conclusion, while there’s no evidence in the sources to suggest an influence from Fitzgerald, the relationship between Faulkner and Hemingway was marked by a complex mix of admiration and rivalry. Despite their shared interest in themes of disillusionment and the search for meaning, their writing styles and philosophical approaches diverged considerably. Faulkner’s acknowledged debt to Joyce, a writer who embraced modernist experimentation and psychological depth, further distinguishes his literary path from Hemingway’s.

A Literary Renaissance: Malcolm Cowley’s Pivotal Role in Resurrecting Faulkner’s Career

The sources paint a vivid picture of Malcolm Cowley’s profound impact on William Faulkner’s literary career. In the mid-1940s, Faulkner’s works were largely out of print, his reputation waning in American literary circles. Cowley, a respected critic and editor, recognized Faulkner’s genius and embarked on a mission to revive his standing in the literary world.

Recognizing Faulkner’s Undervalued Genius:
In 1944, Cowley wrote to Faulkner, stating bluntly, “In publishing circles your name is mud. They are all convinced your books won’t sell.” [1] This stark assessment highlights the extent to which Faulkner’s work had fallen out of favor with publishers and the general reading public.
However, Cowley also noted the sharp contrast in how Faulkner was perceived by fellow writers. “Now when you talk to writers, it’s quite a different story; there you hear almost nothing but admiration, and the better the writer the greater the admiration is likely to be.” [1] This observation underscores Cowley’s belief that Faulkner was an author’s author, deeply respected by his peers but largely overlooked by the broader literary establishment.
Launching the “Faulkner Boom”:
Cowley’s appreciation for Faulkner’s work extended beyond mere admiration. He actively sought to “redress the balance between his worth and his reputation.” [2] His efforts began with a series of influential essays published in prominent literary journals, including The New York Times Book Review and The Saturday Review.
These essays, which explored the thematic depth and artistic merit of Faulkner’s work, sparked renewed interest in the author. Cowley’s insightful analyses helped readers navigate the complexities of Faulkner’s prose and appreciate the interconnectedness of his novels, set in the fictional Yoknapatawpha County.
Cowley’s championing of Faulkner’s work resonated with readers and critics alike, particularly in France, where Faulkner already enjoyed a devoted following. Jean-Paul Sartre famously declared, “For the young people of France, Faulkner is a god.” [2] This growing international acclaim further fueled the “Faulkner boom” that Cowley had ignited.
The “Portable Faulkner”: A Literary Milestone:
Cowley’s most significant contribution to Faulkner’s career was “The Portable Faulkner,” an anthology published in 1946. [3] This carefully curated collection, featuring selections from Faulkner’s major works, served as an introduction to his fictional world for a new generation of readers.
Cowley’s insightful introduction and prefaces to each section provided context and guidance, helping readers grasp the thematic connections and narrative intricacies of Faulkner’s work. Faulkner himself collaborated on the project, supplying character genealogies and an updated map of Yoknapatawpha County. [3]
The “Portable Faulkner” proved to be a critical and commercial success, bringing Faulkner’s work back into print and solidifying his reputation as a major literary figure. [4] It became a gateway for countless readers into the rich and complex world of Yoknapatawpha County, introducing them to Faulkner’s distinctive style and enduring themes.
A Catalyst for Critical Acclaim and Commercial Success:
Cowley’s tireless efforts had a ripple effect on Faulkner’s career. His advocacy helped persuade Random House to publish a combined Modern Library edition of The Sound and the Fury and As I Lay Dying. [4]
While the challenging The Sound and the Fury had initially received mixed reviews, Cowley’s reassessment of Faulkner’s work helped shift critical opinion in its favor. The novel, with its innovative use of stream-of-consciousness and multiple perspectives, came to be recognized as a masterpiece of modernist literature.
The “Portable Faulkner,” along with Cowley’s essays and lobbying efforts, played a pivotal role in Faulkner’s resurgence, culminating in his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1949. [5] This prestigious award cemented Faulkner’s place in the literary canon and brought him international recognition.
A Complex Relationship:
Despite their shared respect and mutual admiration, the relationship between Faulkner and Cowley was not without its complexities. Faulkner, a private man by nature, often bristled at the attention Cowley’s efforts brought him. [3, 6]
He declined Cowley’s request to be profiled for Life magazine, fearing the intrusion into his personal life. Faulkner’s ambivalence toward fame and publicity contrasted with Cowley’s more public approach to literary championing.

In conclusion, Malcolm Cowley’s influence on William Faulkner’s career cannot be overstated. At a time when Faulkner’s works were languishing in obscurity, Cowley’s insightful criticism, his carefully curated anthology, and his tireless advocacy efforts brought Faulkner’s genius to the forefront of American literature. Cowley’s work served as a catalyst for a literary renaissance, reviving Faulkner’s reputation and securing his place among the giants of 20th-century literature.

Philip Avery Stone: A Guiding Force in Faulkner’s Formative Years

The sources highlight Philip Avery Stone’s significant role in shaping William Faulkner’s early literary development. Stone, a lawyer and Faulkner’s senior by four years, recognized the young writer’s talent and became his friend, mentor, and ardent supporter during Faulkner’s formative years.

A Cultivator of Literary Taste and Style:
Their relationship began in 1914, when Stone, having just returned from Yale, read some of Faulkner’s early poetry [1]. Recognizing his potential, Stone became a literary guide for the aspiring writer, introducing him to classic and modern authors, including Yeats, Eliot, and Pound [1].
He engaged Faulkner in extensive discussions about literature, its purpose, and techniques, providing a level of intellectual exchange that was rare in Oxford at the time [1]. This mentorship had a profound impact on Faulkner, shaping his artistic perspective and influencing his writing style [2].
Inspiration Drawn from Local Lore and Experiences:
Stone’s influence extended beyond the realm of literary theory. He shared his knowledge of Lafayette County hill people and regaled Faulkner with tales of hunting and the Mississippi Delta wilderness [1].
Stone’s childhood experience of killing a bear at his father’s Delta hunting camp became the basis for Faulkner’s celebrated novella, “The Bear,” which explores themes of nature, family legacy, and the changing Southern landscape [1, 3].
Faulkner also drew inspiration from Stone’s family history. The names and some experiences of Stone’s uncles, Theophilus and Amodeus Potts, were given to the McCaslin twins, Theophilus and Amodeus (Uncle Buck and Uncle Buddy), in Go Down, Moses [4].
Exposure to the Mississippi Underworld:
Stone also introduced Faulkner to the seedier side of Mississippi life, taking him to gambling dens, roadhouses, and brothels in northern Mississippi and Memphis [4]. These experiences provided Faulkner with rich material that he would later use in many of his works, including Sanctuary (1931) and The Reivers (1962) [3, 4].
The character of Gavin Stevens, the Jefferson lawyer in Intruder in the Dust, is also said to be partly based on Stone himself [4].
Facilitating Faulkner’s Early Career:
Stone’s support went beyond intellectual and experiential inspiration. He actively facilitated Faulkner’s entry into the literary world, acting as his agent and promoter [5].
He had Faulkner’s poems and stories typed at his law office, edited his manuscripts, and sent them to magazines [5]. He also negotiated with publishers on Faulkner’s behalf, trying to secure publication deals for his friend [5].
Securing Publication and Financial Stability:
In 1921, Stone used his family’s influence to help Faulkner get the job of postmaster at the University of Mississippi, providing him with a steady income that allowed him to focus on his writing [6].
Stone played a crucial role in the publication of Faulkner’s first book, the poetry collection The Marble Faun, in 1924 [7, 8]. He wrote the preface, arranged for its promotion and sale, and even contributed financially to the printing costs [7, 8].
A Shift in the Relationship:
The sources suggest that their relationship became strained in the late 1920s [9]. Faulkner seemed to resent Stone’s possessiveness over his work and a loan of several hundred dollars further complicated matters [9].
Their interactions decreased, with Faulkner taking on more responsibility for typing and editing his own manuscripts [9]. The Great Depression and Stone’s marriage to a much younger woman further distanced the two friends [9].
Despite the later estrangement, Stone’s impact on Faulkner’s early literary development was undeniable. Faulkner dedicated all three novels of the Snopes Trilogy—The Hamlet, The Town, and The Mansion—”To Phil Stone,” acknowledging his friend’s enduring influence [10, 11].

In conclusion, Philip Avery Stone played a pivotal role in nurturing William Faulkner’s literary talent. He provided intellectual guidance, shared personal experiences that inspired Faulkner’s writing, exposed him to diverse social environments, actively promoted his work, and helped him achieve financial stability to pursue his literary ambitions. While their relationship eventually soured, Stone’s impact on Faulkner’s early development and his eventual success as a writer was significant and enduring.

The Downfall of Murry Falkner: A Life Marked by Loss and Disappointment

The sources present a poignant account of the events that culminated in the decline of Murry Cuthbert Falkner, William Faulkner’s father. These events, characterized by a series of professional setbacks, personal struggles, and the shadow of a powerful and successful father, paint a picture of a man grappling with unfulfilled potential and a growing sense of inadequacy.

A Fateful Sale: The Loss of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad:
Murry’s early career was promising. He followed in his father’s footsteps, working for the family-owned Gulf & Chicago Railroad. He rose through the ranks, serving as fireman, engineer, conductor, and eventually treasurer and auditor [1, 2]. He found fulfillment in this work and envisioned a future leading the company.
However, his aspirations were dashed when his father, John Wesley Thompson Falkner (the Young Colonel), unexpectedly sold the railroad in 1902 [1-3]. This decision, made without Murry’s input, left him jobless and deeply disheartened. He mourned the loss of his beloved vocation, feeling robbed of his purpose and identity.
This event marks a turning point in Murry’s life, initiating a downward spiral that he struggled to overcome.
Living in the Shadow of a Dominant Father:
The sale of the railroad forced Murry to relocate his family to Oxford, where he was financially dependent on his father [3, 4]. He felt the weight of his father’s success and struggled to establish his own independent path.
While the Young Colonel supported Murry’s various business ventures, none could replace the railroad [3]. He tried his hand at running a livery stable, a coal-oil agency, and a hardware store, but none of these endeavors brought him success or satisfaction [5, 6].
The sources suggest that Murry lacked the business acumen and drive of his father and grandfather, further contributing to his sense of failure [6]. He seemed trapped in a cycle of unfulfilled aspirations, unable to escape the shadow of his father’s legacy.
A Marriage Fraught with Strain and Incompatibility:
Adding to Murry’s woes were the growing tensions in his marriage to Maud Butler Falkner [3]. They were temperamentally mismatched: Maud was intellectual and artistic, while Murry was a more rugged outdoorsman who found solace in hunting, fishing, and drinking [3, 7, 8].
Maud detested Murry’s drinking, which became increasingly problematic [7, 8]. She resorted to sending him to the Keeley Institute in Memphis for “cures,” further highlighting the strain on their relationship [7, 9].
William Faulkner, caught in the middle of this discord, sided with his mother and came to view his father as a failure [8]. This familial discord further contributed to Murry’s sense of isolation and despair.
Alcoholism: A Coping Mechanism and a Downward Spiral:
Murry’s drinking, inherited from his father and grandfather [10, 11], escalated as his personal and professional struggles intensified [6]. It became both a symptom of his decline and a contributing factor to his worsening circumstances.
His heavy drinking ultimately led to health problems and further alienated him from his wife and children [12]. It became a destructive cycle, exacerbating his feelings of inadequacy and hopelessness.
Loss of His Final Position and Deteriorating Health:
Despite his shortcomings, Murry secured a position in the University of Mississippi’s business office in 1918 [6], likely through his father’s influence. He rose to become business manager and secretary of the university, a position that provided some stability and respite from his earlier failures.
However, this reprieve was short-lived. He lost this final job in a “political shuffle” in the late 1920s [13, 14], plunging him back into financial uncertainty and deepening his sense of defeat.
His health deteriorated rapidly in the following years, fueled by heavy drinking and despair [13]. His doctor’s warnings about the consequences of his alcohol consumption went unheeded [12].

Murry Cuthbert Falkner’s decline was a tragic culmination of interconnected events. The forced sale of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad, his inability to find success in subsequent ventures, the strain in his marriage, and his escalating alcoholism all contributed to his downfall. He died of a heart attack in 1932, leaving behind a legacy of unfulfilled potential and a son who would immortalize his struggles in his fiction.

A Complex and Evolving Relationship: William Faulkner and his Father

The sources offer glimpses into the complex and evolving relationship between William Faulkner and his father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner. While a comprehensive account of their interactions remains elusive, the available information suggests a dynamic marked by early affection, growing estrangement, and a lingering sense of ambivalence on William’s part.

Early Influences and Shared Interests:
The sources indicate that Murry played a role in shaping William’s early life, imparting knowledge of horses, horsetrading, and outdoor pursuits. These experiences, particularly those shared at the Falkners’ cabin, the “Club House,” along the Tallahatchie River, would later find expression in William’s fiction. The “big woods” of the Delta country, a setting central to the novella “The Bear” and other works, likely stemmed from these shared moments with his father [1, 2].
Despite their contrasting temperaments, with Murry drawn to more rugged pursuits and Maud favoring books and art, there were instances of shared family activities, such as Sunday afternoon rides in the trap [1, 3]. These moments suggest that the early years of William’s life were not entirely devoid of paternal warmth and connection.
Growing Estrangement and Disillusionment:
As William reached adolescence, the relationship with his father became increasingly strained. Murry’s nickname for him, “Snake Lips,” referencing his Butler features and physique, hints at a lack of paternal acceptance and perhaps even a preference for his brother Jack, who physically resembled the Falkners [1].
The sources, particularly the account of Murry’s decline, portray him as a man struggling with professional setbacks, financial dependence on his father, and escalating alcoholism [3-5]. William, witnessing these struggles and siding with his mother, likely developed a sense of disillusionment towards his father.
Murry’s claim to have never read any of William’s work further suggests a growing distance between father and son [3]. This statement, whether true or not, highlights a lack of interest and perhaps even a resentment on Murry’s part towards William’s chosen path.
Literary Representation and Ambivalence:
The sources reveal that William drew upon his relationship with his father when crafting certain characters in his fiction. Murry’s struggles with alcohol and unfulfilled potential seem to have informed the recurring theme of absent or inadequate fathers in William’s works [2, 4, 6]. Characters like Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury, Joe Christmas in Light in August, and Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom! all grapple with the emotional and psychological consequences of father figures who are either physically or emotionally absent.
Despite this, William also offered a more affectionate portrayal of his father in the character of Maury Priest, the livery stable owner in The Reivers [2]. This seemingly contradictory representation suggests a lingering ambivalence on William’s part, acknowledging both the negative impacts of his father’s struggles and the remnants of early positive influences.
Reconciliation and Lasting Impacts:
There’s no indication in the sources of a direct reconciliation between William and Murry before the latter’s death in 1932. William did not attend his father’s funeral.
However, it is noteworthy that William acknowledged Murry’s positive attributes and influence in his later years, particularly in interviews and conversations with students [2, 7]. This suggests that while their relationship was complex and fraught with tension, William ultimately recognized his father’s impact on his life and art.

The sources provide a fragmented but insightful view of William Faulkner’s evolving relationship with his father. From early influences and shared interests to growing estrangement and disillusionment, their bond was marked by complexity and a degree of ambivalence that William explored in his fiction. While reconciliation may have remained elusive, William’s later reflections suggest a degree of understanding and perhaps even a grudging acceptance of the man who, despite his shortcomings, shaped his early life and ultimately influenced his literary creations.

The Enduring Legacy of the Old Colonel: William C. Falkner’s Influence on his Great-Grandson

The sources highlight the significant influence of William Clark Falkner, William Faulkner’s paternal grandfather (often referred to as the Old Colonel), on both his life and literary work. This influence, stemming from the Old Colonel’s larger-than-life personality, colorful exploits, and the weight of his legacy in Lafayette County, permeated Faulkner’s personal development and found expression in recurring themes and characterizations within his fiction.

A Larger-Than-Life Figure:
William Clark Falkner, born in 1825, led a life filled with adventure, ambition, and violence, traits that captured the imagination of his great-grandson. [1-3] He was a soldier, lawyer, businessman, farmer, railroad builder, and even an author. He epitomized the archetype of the Southern gentleman, with a touch of rogue, leaving an indelible mark on the history and folklore of Lafayette County. [1, 2]
Faulkner, who never met his grandfather (the Old Colonel died in 1889), nonetheless grew up surrounded by stories of his exploits, likely fueled by the recollections of family members, particularly his great-aunt, Alabama Leroy Falkner (“Aunt ‘Bama”). [4] The Old Colonel’s story became a foundational element in Faulkner’s understanding of his family history and the social fabric of the South. [4]
The sources suggest that Faulkner viewed his great-grandfather as a “spiritual father,” a figure who embodied the virtues and vices of the Southern past. [2] He recognized the Old Colonel’s impact on shaping the landscape of Yoknapatawpha County, both literally, through his railroad building endeavors, and figuratively, through the lasting legacy of his actions and personality. [3, 5, 6]
The Old Colonel as Literary Inspiration:
The sources explicitly state that Faulkner modeled the character of Colonel John Sartoris, a central figure in numerous novels and short stories, on his great-grandfather. [1, 3, 7-10] Sartoris, much like the Old Colonel, is portrayed as a man of action, a Confederate soldier, a railroad builder, and a force to be reckoned with in the political and social life of Yoknapatawpha County.
The character of Sartoris appears in Sartoris, The Unvanquished, Go Down, Moses, Requiem for a Nun, The Hamlet, The Town, The Mansion, and The Reivers, as well as in several short stories, including “Barn Burning” and “There Was a Queen.” [7, 8] This recurring presence underscores the profound impact the Old Colonel had on Faulkner’s literary imagination.
It is important to note that while Faulkner often explicitly linked Sartoris to his great-grandfather, the sources also suggest that some aspects of the Old Colonel’s personality might have influenced the character of Flem Snopes. [3] This connection is less direct but hints at the complexities of Faulkner’s relationship with his ancestor’s legacy, seeing in him both heroic and morally ambiguous traits.
The Shadow of History and Family Lore:
Beyond specific characterizations, the Old Colonel’s influence can be seen in Faulkner’s broader exploration of Southern history, family legacy, and the cyclical nature of violence and redemption. [11, 12] The Old Colonel’s life, marked by both triumphs and moral failings, served as a microcosm of the South’s complex and troubled past. [12]
Faulkner’s work often grapples with the lingering consequences of slavery, the Civil War, and the enduring social structures of the South. [11, 12] These themes, while not exclusive to the Old Colonel’s influence, were undoubtedly shaped by Faulkner’s understanding of his great-grandfather’s role in these historical events.
Our previous conversations about Murry Falkner’s decline also shed light on the Old Colonel’s indirect influence. Murry, living in the shadow of his dominant father, struggled to achieve success and autonomy. [13, 14] This dynamic, which mirrored the relationship between the Old Colonel and his son (Faulkner’s grandfather), suggests a pattern of generational influence that Faulkner observed and explored in his fiction.

William Clark Falkner, the Old Colonel, stands as a towering figure in both William Faulkner’s personal history and his literary universe. His legacy, passed down through family lore and woven into the fabric of Yoknapatawpha County, provided Faulkner with a rich source of inspiration and a lens through which to examine the complexities of Southern identity, the burdens of history, and the enduring power of family ties.

The Sale’s Impact on Murry Falkner: Loss, Decline, and a Broken Dream

The sources paint a clear picture of the profound negative impact the sale of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad had on William Faulkner’s father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner. The sale, orchestrated by Murry’s father (the Young Colonel) in 1902, robbed Murry of a vocation he loved and set him on a path of professional decline and personal struggle that would define much of his life.

A Beloved Vocation Lost:
Murry had a deep passion for his work on the Gulf & Chicago. He rose through the ranks, serving as fireman, engineer, conductor, and eventually treasurer and auditor [1, 2]. This wasn’t simply a job for him; it was a calling, a source of pride, and a connection to the legacy of his father and grandfather, both prominent figures in the railroad industry.
The sources state that Murry “expected to succeed his father as president” of the railroad [3]. The sale, therefore, shattered not only his present employment but also his aspirations for the future, leaving him feeling professionally adrift and robbed of a clear purpose.
The sources directly state that Murry “mourned the loss” of the railroad and that “nothing could replace his beloved railroad” [4]. This language emphasizes the depth of his attachment to the work and the sense of bereavement he experienced after the sale.
Forced Relocation and a Vetoed Dream:
The sale of the railroad forced Murry to relocate his family from Ripley, Mississippi, to Oxford, where he was compelled to live in a house owned by his father [5]. This relocation further contributed to his sense of displacement and reliance on his domineering father.
Murry, longing for a fresh start and a sense of autonomy, dreamed of moving to Texas and becoming a rancher. However, his wife, Maud, “refused to consider the idea” [5]. This thwarted dream adds another layer of frustration and disappointment to Murry’s already diminished state.
A Downward Spiral and Lasting Consequences:
The sources describe Murry’s life after the sale as a period of “long decline and defeat” compounded by “alcoholism” [3]. The loss of his vocation seems to have triggered a downward spiral, stripping him of his confidence, ambition, and ability to find fulfillment in other pursuits.
Despite attempts by his father to support him financially in various small businesses, Murry “seemed to fail at everything he attempted” [4]. This pattern of failure further eroded his self-esteem and solidified his image as a “hapless” and “inebriate” figure in the family [1].
As discussed in our previous conversation, this decline had a profound impact on William Faulkner, who witnessed his father’s struggles and likely developed a sense of disillusionment and ambivalence towards him. This dynamic would later manifest in Faulkner’s fiction, with recurring themes of absent or inadequate fathers and the psychological toll of family decline.

The sale of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad was a turning point in Murry Falkner’s life. It marked the loss of a cherished vocation, a shattered dream, and the beginning of a downward spiral that would define his later years. This event, and its lasting consequences, cast a long shadow over the Falkner family, influencing both Murry’s personal struggles and the literary themes explored by his son, William Faulkner.

Murry’s Alcoholism: A Difficult Legacy

William Faulkner’s father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner, struggled with alcoholism throughout his life, a pattern passed down from his father, the Young Colonel [1, 2]. While the sources don’t explicitly detail William Faulkner’s emotional response to his father’s drinking, they do reveal that Murry’s alcoholism contributed to a strained family dynamic, a sense of familial decline, and financial dependence on the Young Colonel, all of which likely affected William Faulkner deeply. This difficult legacy would later find expression in the themes and characterizations of Faulkner’s fiction.

A Strained Family Dynamic:
The sources describe Murry and Maud Falkner as “temperamentally incompatible” [3]. Maud, described as “steely and determined,” held dominion over the household, while Murry, “feckless and alcoholic,” seemed to recede into the background [3].
This imbalance created a “tense, emotionally edgy household” where young William Faulkner likely witnessed the detrimental effects of his father’s drinking on family life [3].
It is worth noting that the sources also mention that William Faulkner’s relationship with his father grew more difficult during his adolescence [4]. While not explicitly linked to Murry’s drinking, this strained relationship further suggests a difficult family dynamic that likely shaped William Faulkner’s emotional landscape.
Financial Dependence and the Shadow of the Young Colonel:
As discussed in our previous conversation, Murry’s decline after the sale of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad was exacerbated by his alcoholism. He struggled to find success in subsequent ventures, deepening his financial reliance on the Young Colonel [1, 3].
This dependence placed Murry firmly under his father’s control, reinforcing a pattern of generational influence that William Faulkner would later explore in his writing.
Literary Echoes and the Theme of Family Decline:
Critics have noted that key Faulkner characters are often boys or men with absent or inadequate fathers, mirroring the dynamic William Faulkner experienced in his own life [5]. Examples include Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury, Joe Christmas in Light in August, and Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom! [5].
The sources also point out that the theme of family decline, a prevalent motif in Faulkner’s work, reflects the reality of the Falkner family’s trajectory [3, 5]. This decline, while not solely attributed to Murry’s alcoholism, was undoubtedly influenced by his struggles and the broader dysfunction it brought to the family unit.
Exposure to the “Cure” at the Keeley Institute:
The sources reveal that Murry, like his father before him, would check into the Keeley Institute in Memphis for treatment of his alcoholism [1, 2]. William Faulkner and his brothers would sometimes accompany their mother on these trips [6].
While the trips to Memphis don’t seem to have been unpleasant for the boys, who would enjoy streetcar excursions and other diversions [6], their exposure to the Keeley Institute likely gave William Faulkner an early awareness of the destructive nature of alcoholism and its impact on individuals and families.

While the sources don’t offer a detailed account of William Faulkner’s personal feelings about his father’s alcoholism, it is clear that Murry’s drinking contributed to a challenging upbringing. The strained family relationships, the financial instability, and the constant presence of the Young Colonel’s influence likely shaped William Faulkner’s worldview and provided him with the raw material for exploring complex themes of family, legacy, and the burdens of the past in his fiction.

Family History’s Enduring Imprint on Faulkner’s Writing

The sources and our conversation history provide numerous examples of how William Faulkner’s family history profoundly impacted his writing. Recurring themes of family decline, absent or inadequate fathers, the legacy of slavery and the Civil War, and the transformation of the South all stem from his own family experiences and the lore surrounding his ancestors. The larger-than-life figure of his great-grandfather, the sale of the family railroad, and his father’s alcoholism all served as creative fodder for Faulkner’s literary explorations of Southern identity and the complexities of the human condition.

William Clark Falkner, the “Old Colonel,” as Archetype:
The sources repeatedly emphasize the profound influence of William Clark Falkner, Faulkner’s great-grandfather, on his work. This figure, known as the “Old Colonel,” embodied the paradoxical nature of the Southern gentleman, exhibiting traits of ambition, violence, entrepreneurship, and a strong sense of personal honor.
Faulkner, although born after the Old Colonel’s death, grew up immersed in stories about him, likely passed down through family members. This created a mythic aura around the Old Colonel, making him a symbolic representation of the South’s past, with its glories and its sins.
This influence manifests directly in the character of Colonel John Sartoris, who appears in several of Faulkner’s works. Sartoris, like the Old Colonel, is a Confederate soldier, a railroad builder, and a dominant figure in Yoknapatawpha County.
The sources also suggest that aspects of the Old Colonel’s personality, particularly his ambition and ruthlessness, might have contributed to Faulkner’s creation of Flem Snopes. This connection, while less direct than the Sartoris parallel, highlights the complexity of Faulkner’s view of his ancestor, recognizing in him both heroic and morally ambiguous qualities.
The Gulf & Chicago Railroad: A Symbol of Loss and Decline:
As we discussed earlier, the sale of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad in 1902 had a devastating impact on Faulkner’s father, Murry. This event, more than a simple business transaction, represented a loss of family legacy, a broken dream, and a catalyst for Murry’s descent into alcoholism and professional failure.
This theme of decline, rooted in the family’s actual financial and social trajectory after the railroad’s sale, permeates Faulkner’s fiction. He frequently portrays families grappling with the loss of former status, struggling to maintain a semblance of order amidst a changing world.
The railroad itself, a symbol of progress and ambition, becomes a haunting reminder of past glories and the corrosive effects of time and changing fortunes. Faulkner, by fictionalizing his family’s connection to the railroad, elevates this personal experience to a commentary on the South’s broader struggle to adapt to modernity.
Murry Falkner’s Alcoholism and the Absent Father Figure:
As we explored in our previous conversations, Murry Falkner’s alcoholism contributed to a difficult family dynamic. This, coupled with Murry’s professional struggles and financial reliance on his own father, resulted in a strained relationship with William Faulkner and a sense of disappointment in the younger generation.
This experience profoundly impacted Faulkner’s writing. The absent or inadequate father figure becomes a recurring trope in his novels. Characters like Quentin Compson, Joe Christmas, and Charles Bon all grapple with the psychological and emotional consequences of lacking a strong paternal presence.
Faulkner’s portrayal of these characters often goes beyond simple condemnation of the absent father. He explores the complexities of such relationships, showing how they shape individual identity, fuel resentment, and perpetuate cycles of dysfunction.
The Civil War, Slavery, and the Burden of History:
The sources highlight the presence of the Civil War and slavery as prominent themes in Faulkner’s work. This thematic focus undoubtedly stems from his family’s deep roots in the South and their direct involvement in these historical events.
The Old Colonel’s participation in the Civil War, the burning of family properties by Union troops, and the stories passed down through generations created a vivid sense of the war’s enduring impact on the South.
Faulkner, going beyond simply recounting historical events, explored the psychological and social ramifications of this legacy. His works grapple with the guilt, the racism, the economic disparity, and the persistent social hierarchies that continued to shape the South long after the war’s end.
Oxford, Mississippi, as the Microcosm of Yoknapatawpha:
Faulkner’s childhood in Oxford, Mississippi, provided him with a rich tapestry of characters, social dynamics, and racial tensions that he would later weave into his fictional world of Yoknapatawpha County.
The sources mention specific events and locations in Oxford, such as the Opera House owned by Faulkner’s grandfather and the presence of racial segregation in schools, that directly correlate with settings and situations in his novels.
By transposing his own lived experiences onto the fictional canvas of Yoknapatawpha, Faulkner created a world that felt both specific and universal. He captured the essence of the Southern experience, not as a romanticized ideal, but as a complex and often troubling reality shaped by its history, its social structures, and its enduring contradictions.

William Faulkner’s writing is inextricably linked to his family history. He transformed personal experiences into compelling narratives that explored the complexities of Southern identity, the weight of the past, and the universal struggles of the human heart.

The Death of the Young Colonel: Shaping Faulkner’s Themes and Characterizations

While the sources provide detailed information about the impact of William Faulkner’s great-grandfather, the “Old Colonel,” on his writing, they don’t offer specific insights into how the death of his grandfather, John Wesley Thompson Falkner (the “Young Colonel”), might have directly affected his work.

However, considering our conversation history and the information provided in the sources, we can explore several potential ways in which this significant family event could have indirectly shaped Faulkner’s writing:

Shift in Family Dynamics: The Young Colonel’s death in 1922 likely brought about a shift in family dynamics. As the patriarch, his passing left a void that likely impacted the family’s social standing and financial security. This could have further contributed to the theme of family decline that runs through much of Faulkner’s work. [1-3]
Loss of a Strong Male Figure: While our conversations focused on Murry Falkner’s struggles with alcoholism, the Young Colonel emerges as a more traditionally successful figure. He expanded the family’s banking and railroad enterprises and was active in Mississippi politics. [1] His death may have further emphasized the absence of a stable and successful male role model in Faulkner’s life. [1, 2, 4] This theme of absent or inadequate fathers is prevalent in his fiction.
Financial Instability: The sources mention that Murry Falkner was financially dependent on the Young Colonel, even undertaking various businesses with his father’s backing. [1, 2] It’s possible that the Young Colonel’s death led to financial strain for the family, reinforcing the theme of decline and impacting Faulkner’s own financial stability, particularly as he was expected to become the head of the family after Murry’s death. [5]
Heightened Awareness of Mortality: The death of a close family member often serves as a stark reminder of mortality. This experience could have influenced Faulkner’s preoccupation with themes of time, death, and the past in his writing. [6, 7]
Inspiration for Characterization: While the sources primarily link the Old Colonel to the character of John Sartoris, some aspects of the Young Colonel’s personality and experiences, such as his involvement in banking and politics, might also have contributed to Faulkner’s portrayal of Sartoris and other characters in his Yoknapatawpha saga. [8]

It’s important to acknowledge that these are potential areas of influence based on the available information. Further biographical research might reveal more specific connections between the Young Colonel’s death and Faulkner’s literary output.

The Enduring Theme of Family Decline in Faulkner’s Work

The sources and our conversation history reveal a consistent and powerful theme running through much of William Faulkner’s writing: the decline of families. This theme isn’t merely a plot device; it’s deeply rooted in Faulkner’s personal experiences and the history of his own family, offering a lens through which he explores broader social and cultural shifts in the American South.

The Sale of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad (1902): This event, as we’ve discussed, marked a turning point for the Falkner family. Murry Falkner, deeply invested in the railroad, was devastated by its sale, leading to his professional and personal decline. This real-life instance of financial and social downfall echoes in Faulkner’s fiction, where families grapple with lost fortunes, diminished status, and the struggle to maintain a semblance of their former glory [1, 2].
Murry Falkner’s Alcoholism and Professional Failures: The sources depict Murry Falkner as a man trapped in the shadow of his powerful father, unable to find success in various business ventures and succumbing to alcoholism [2]. This pattern of the inadequate or absent father figure, deeply informed by Faulkner’s own experience, appears repeatedly in his novels. Characters like Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury and Joe Christmas in Light in August are haunted by the absence of strong paternal figures, leading to psychological and emotional turmoil, shaping their identities, and influencing their often self-destructive paths [2, 3].
The Weight of History and the Post-Civil War South: The sources emphasize Faulkner’s exploration of the Civil War’s lasting impact on the South. This thematic focus reflects his family’s history, the stories he inherited about the “Old Colonel” and the war’s aftermath. Faulkner’s novels portray families burdened by the past, struggling with guilt, racism, economic hardship, and the disintegration of traditional social structures in the wake of the Confederacy’s defeat [4, 5].
Specific Examples of Family Decline in Faulkner’s Work:
The Compsons in The Sound and the Fury: This family, once prominent, crumbles under the weight of financial mismanagement, internal conflicts, and the inability to adapt to changing times. Their decline is a microcosm of the South’s broader struggle to come to terms with its past and forge a new identity [6-8].
The Sutpens in Absalom, Absalom!: Thomas Sutpen’s ambitious plan to establish a dynasty is ultimately thwarted by his own flaws, the legacy of slavery, and the violence that permeates Southern society. His family’s downfall becomes a powerful symbol of the South’s inability to escape its history [4, 9].
The Sartorises in Sartoris and other works: While the Sartorises represent a more heroic archetype in Faulkner’s work, they too face decline, grappling with recklessness, the loss of loved ones in war, and the challenge of maintaining their legacy in a modernizing world [1, 10, 11].

Faulkner’s portrayal of family decline isn’t simply a pessimistic observation. It’s a complex exploration of human nature, societal forces, and the enduring impact of the past. Through these stories of crumbling families, he reveals the vulnerabilities of the human heart, the fragility of social structures, and the enduring quest for meaning amidst loss and change.

Absent and Inadequate Fathers in Faulkner’s Fiction: A Reflection of Personal Experience

William Faulkner’s fiction is populated with fathers who are either physically absent or emotionally inadequate, leaving lasting impacts on their children. This recurring theme stems directly from Faulkner’s own upbringing and the complex relationships he had with his father and grandfather.

Murry Cuthbert Falkner, the Model for Inadequacy: The sources paint a picture of Murry Falkner as a man who struggled to live up to the legacy of his own father, the “Young Colonel” [1, 2]. He is described as “feckless and alcoholic,” failing in business ventures and unable to provide emotional stability for his family [2]. This deeply affected his relationship with his son, William. Murry called him “Snake Lips,” a cruel reference to his physical appearance, and openly favored his other son, Jack [3].
A Legacy of Absent Fathers in Faulkner’s Work: This pattern of paternal inadequacy is mirrored in several of Faulkner’s most famous novels. For instance, Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury grapples with the emotional absence of his father, Mr. Compson, who offers philosophical platitudes but fails to provide genuine guidance or connection.
Joe Christmas in Light in August is an orphan raised in harsh and loveless environments, forever searching for a sense of belonging and a father figure. The lack of a stable and loving paternal presence contributes to his alienation and fuels his tragic journey.
Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom! is another poignant example. Abandoned by his father, Thomas Sutpen, he is driven by a desperate need for recognition and acceptance, leading to devastating consequences.
Seeking Solace in the “Old Colonel”: The sources suggest that Faulkner, seeking a stronger paternal figure, embraced the memory of his great-grandfather, the “Old Colonel,” a Confederate soldier, author, and railroad builder [4, 5]. While he acknowledged the “Old Colonel’s” flaws – his violence and impulsiveness – Faulkner saw in him a source of creativity and imagination, qualities he clearly admired.
The “Old Colonel” as Inspiration for John Sartoris: This idealized version of his great-grandfather served as the model for the character of John Sartoris, who appears in several of Faulkner’s works [6]. John Sartoris, despite his flaws, embodies a sense of strength and leadership that is notably lacking in Murry Falkner and many of the other fathers in Faulkner’s fiction.
The Complexity of Faulkner’s Portrayals: It’s important to note that Faulkner’s portrayal of absent or inadequate fathers is nuanced and complex. He doesn’t simply vilify these characters; he explores the psychological and societal forces that contribute to their shortcomings.
In some cases, like Murry Falkner’s, alcoholism plays a role. In others, historical events, such as the Civil War and its aftermath, contribute to the breakdown of families and leave men struggling to find their place in a changing world.
Enduring Impact on Characters: The consequences of absent or inadequate fathers are a central focus in Faulkner’s work. His characters grapple with feelings of abandonment, worthlessness, and a longing for connection. They often make reckless choices, seeking validation and attempting to fill the void left by their fathers. This theme, rooted in Faulkner’s personal experience, speaks to the universal human need for love, guidance, and belonging.

Comparing “The Sound and the Fury” and “Hamlet”: Shared Themes and Divergent Approaches

While the sources do not directly compare and contrast “The Sound and the Fury” with Shakespeare’s “Hamlet,” they offer valuable insights into Faulkner’s work and the literary influences that shaped his writing. Additionally, our conversation history provides context regarding Faulkner’s family background and recurring themes, enabling a more informed exploration of the connections and contrasts between these two literary works.

Shared Thematic Concerns:

Family Decline and Dysfunction: Both “The Sound and the Fury” and “Hamlet” center around families in crisis, grappling with loss, betrayal, and the disintegration of their social standing.
In “The Sound and the Fury,” the Compson family, once prominent in Yoknapatawpha County, is depicted in a state of moral and financial decay, haunted by the past and unable to adapt to the changing South. [1-3]
Similarly, in “Hamlet,” the royal family of Denmark is shattered by murder, incestuous relationships, and the struggle for power, leading to a tragic cycle of revenge and death.
Absent or Inadequate Fathers: As discussed in our conversation, Faulkner’s own experiences with his father, Murry, profoundly shaped his portrayal of absent or inadequate fathers in his fiction. [4]
In “The Sound and the Fury,” Mr. Compson, the patriarch, is a detached and ineffectual figure, offering little guidance or support to his children as they navigate the complexities of life and loss.
In “Hamlet,” the ghost of Hamlet’s father reveals the betrayal and murder committed by his brother, Claudius. This absent father figure fuels Hamlet’s thirst for revenge and shapes his moral dilemmas throughout the play.
Obsession and Madness: Both works feature characters consumed by obsession and driven to the brink of madness.
Quentin Compson, in “The Sound and the Fury,” is fixated on his sister Caddy’s loss of innocence and purity, ultimately choosing suicide as a way to escape the torment of his thoughts. [2]
Hamlet, haunted by the ghost of his father and grappling with the corruption in the court, descends into a spiral of melancholy, doubt, and feigned madness as he plots his revenge.

Divergent Artistic Choices:

Narrative Perspective and Style: One of the most striking contrasts lies in the narrative strategies employed by Faulkner and Shakespeare.
“The Sound and the Fury” utilizes multiple narrators, including Benjy, an intellectually disabled character whose stream-of-consciousness narration offers a fragmented and challenging perspective. [1, 5, 6]
This experimental technique, influenced by James Joyce’s “Ulysses,” [5, 7] forces readers to piece together the events and grapple with the subjective experiences of each narrator.
In contrast, “Hamlet” unfolds primarily through dialogue and action, with a more traditional third-person perspective that allows for a clearer understanding of the plot and characters’ motivations.
Setting and Historical Context: While both works explore universal themes of family, loss, and revenge, they are rooted in distinct settings and historical periods.
“The Sound and the Fury” is deeply embedded in the American South, with its decaying aristocracy, racial tensions, and the lingering legacy of the Civil War. Faulkner uses this specific context to explore the psychological and social consequences of a society grappling with change and loss. [2, 8]
“Hamlet,” set in medieval Denmark, engages with themes of political intrigue, religious beliefs, and the nature of revenge within the framework of a royal court.
Genre and Tone: While “The Sound and the Fury” is a modernist novel known for its experimental style and bleak tone, “Hamlet” is a Shakespearean tragedy that blends elements of revenge drama, psychological thriller, and philosophical reflection.
Faulkner’s prose, at times dense and challenging, aims to capture the inner turmoil and fragmented consciousness of his characters, often using stream-of-consciousness and interior monologue. [5, 9]
Shakespeare, on the other hand, utilizes poetic language, dramatic irony, and soliloquies to reveal the depth of Hamlet’s inner conflicts and the play’s broader themes.

“Hamlet” as a Potential Influence:

While the sources do not explicitly state that Faulkner directly modeled “The Sound and the Fury” on “Hamlet,” the shared themes and the fact that Faulkner was a keen reader of Shakespeare [10] suggest a possible influence.

Thematic Resonance: The parallels in themes of family decline, revenge, and madness indicate that Faulkner might have been drawing on “Hamlet” as a source of inspiration, consciously or unconsciously.
Literary Allusions: The sources highlight Faulkner’s use of literary allusions in his work, particularly references to Shakespeare. [10] This suggests that Faulkner was engaging in a broader literary conversation, drawing on classic works to enrich his own narratives.
The Critic’s Perspective: Interestingly, one source notes that Faulkner’s complex technique in As I Lay Dying might be seen as melodramatic, but then points out that the same critique could be applied to “Hamlet.” [11] This comment implies a recognition of the shared thematic and stylistic complexity in both works.

In conclusion, while “The Sound and the Fury” and “Hamlet” are distinct works separated by genre, style, and historical context, they share a compelling thematic core. Both explore the disintegration of families, the consequences of absent or inadequate fathers, and the descent into obsession and madness. Faulkner’s modernist approach, influenced by writers like Joyce, stands in contrast to Shakespeare’s more traditional dramatic structure, yet both works offer profound insights into the human condition and the enduring power of these timeless themes.

Differentiating Interior Monologue and Stream of Consciousness in Faulkner’s Works

The sources offer valuable insights into interior monologue and stream-of-consciousness, two narrative techniques that Faulkner utilized to great effect in his fiction. While these terms are often used interchangeably, the sources emphasize a key distinction that enhances our understanding of Faulkner’s literary craft.

Interior Monologue: Unfiltered Access to a Character’s Thoughts

Definition: The sources define interior monologue as a technique that presents the reader with the unfiltered flow of a character’s inner thought processes, impressions, and sensations [1]. This method allows for a deeper, more intimate understanding of a character’s psyche than traditional narrative approaches.
Key Characteristics: Importantly, the sources point out that interior monologue often disregards basic grammatical and syntactical rules [1]. This stylistic choice mirrors the often chaotic and nonlinear nature of human thought, giving the reader a sense of immediacy and unmediated access to the character’s mind.
Examples in Faulkner’s Work: Faulkner’s use of interior monologue is particularly evident in The Sound and the Fury. The first chapter, narrated by Benjy Compson, a character with intellectual disabilities, exemplifies this technique. Benjy’s narration is fragmented, associative, and often disjointed, mirroring his unique way of experiencing the world.
Source [2] highlights the challenge that Benjy’s narration presents to readers, noting that he is “nonlingual” and that the language of the first chapter is ultimately Faulkner’s “visual representation” of Benjy’s perceptions.

Stream of Consciousness: A More Structured Representation of Thought

Definition: While similar to interior monologue, stream of consciousness, as defined in the sources, focuses on representing the fluency of thoughts, perceptions, and sensations [3]. This technique aims to capture the continuous and ever-changing flow of consciousness, but it does so in a way that generally adheres to grammatical and syntactical rules.
Key Distinction: The crucial difference lies in the level of structure and coherence. Stream of consciousness, while still representing the inner workings of a character’s mind, retains a degree of grammatical and syntactical order that distinguishes it from the more unfiltered and disjointed nature of the interior monologue.
Faulkner’s Use: The sources associate Faulkner with both techniques [3], suggesting that he skillfully employed each to achieve specific narrative effects. While The Sound and the Fury showcases his mastery of interior monologue, particularly in Benjy’s section, other works likely utilize a blend of both approaches, tailoring the technique to suit the character and narrative perspective.

Influence of James Joyce: A Pivotal Figure

Joyce’s Innovations: The sources point to James Joyce as a pioneer of both techniques, specifically highlighting his groundbreaking novel Ulysses [4]. Joyce’s experimentation with language and narrative structure profoundly influenced Faulkner and other modernist writers.
Impact on Faulkner: The sources explicitly acknowledge the influence of Ulysses on Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury and As I Lay Dying [4, 5]. Faulkner adopted and adapted Joyce’s innovations, particularly the use of interior monologue, to create his own distinctive style and explore the complexities of human consciousness.

The Critic’s Perspective: Adding Nuance to the Discussion

Early Reviews of Faulkner’s Work: The sources include excerpts from contemporary reviews of Faulkner’s novels. These reviews offer further insights into how critics perceived his use of these techniques.
For example, some reviewers found Faulkner’s style to be “difficult” or “exasperating,” suggesting that the experimental nature of his narratives, particularly his use of interior monologue, posed challenges for readers accustomed to more traditional storytelling approaches [6, 7].
However, other critics lauded Faulkner’s ability to capture the nuances of human thought and experience, praising his innovative use of language and narrative perspective [2, 8].

Conclusion: Enhancing Our Understanding of Faulkner’s Style

By drawing this distinction between interior monologue and stream of consciousness, the sources invite us to consider the deliberate choices Faulkner made in crafting his narratives. His use of these techniques was not merely a stylistic flourish but a deliberate strategy to delve into the depths of human consciousness, laying bare the thoughts, feelings, and motivations of his characters in a way that few other writers have achieved.

It’s worth noting that some literary scholars may offer different perspectives or nuances in their interpretations of these techniques. Further exploration of critical essays and scholarly works on Faulkner would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the ongoing discussions surrounding his use of interior monologue and stream of consciousness.

The “Critical Companion to William Faulkner”: A Guide to Navigating Faulkner’s Complex World

The “Critical Companion to William Faulkner” serves as a valuable resource for readers seeking to unravel the intricacies of Faulkner’s work. It provides a range of features that enhance comprehension and offer a deeper understanding of his literary techniques, themes, and historical context. Here’s how this companion aids readers:

Explanations of Complex Prose and Narrative Techniques

Clarity and Accessibility: The companion acknowledges that Faulkner’s writing can be “bewildering at times” due to his complex prose style and narrative techniques [1]. It aims to assist students and general readers in understanding his challenging works [1].
Guidance Through Narrative Labyrinths: As we discussed in our conversation, Faulkner’s works, like The Sound and the Fury, often feature experimental techniques like stream-of-consciousness and interior monologue, multiple narrators, and fragmented timelines. The companion provides explanations and analysis of these techniques, making them more accessible to readers.
For instance, the entry for As I Lay Dying explains that despite its experimental structure, the story is not difficult to follow. It even suggests studying the appendix and chronological chart to enhance comprehension [2].

In-Depth Character Analysis and Relationships

Character Descriptions and Cross-References: The companion includes detailed descriptions of Faulkner’s numerous characters, many of whom appear in multiple works [3]. It provides cross-references to other works in which a character appears, helping readers track their development and understand their interconnectedness within the Yoknapatawpha universe.
Genealogies and Family Trees: For complex family sagas like the Compson family in The Sound and the Fury, the companion offers genealogical charts and family trees.
As noted in the entry for The Portable Faulkner, Faulkner himself provided a set of character genealogies titled “The Compsons” [4]. This feature helps readers untangle intricate family relationships and understand the impact of lineage and history on Faulkner’s characters.

Historical and Literary Contextualization

Biographical Information: The companion includes a biography of Faulkner, situating his life and experiences within the historical context of the American South [5]. This information, as highlighted in our conversation, sheds light on how Faulkner’s own family background, particularly his relationship with his father, influenced his portrayal of family dynamics and absent fathers in his fiction.
Contemporary Reviews: The companion provides excerpts from contemporary reviews of Faulkner’s major works [5]. These reviews offer insights into how Faulkner’s writing was initially received and how critical perspectives have evolved over time.
For example, the entry for Go Down, Moses includes an excerpt from a 1942 review by Lionel Trilling that acknowledges the effort required to understand Faulkner’s “literary mannerisms” but ultimately deems the work worthwhile [6].

Extensive Bibliographies and Further Reading Lists

Scholarly Resources: The companion includes extensive bibliographies and further reading lists for those who wish to explore specific works or themes in greater depth [5]. These lists point readers to scholarly articles, critical essays, and books that offer a wide range of interpretations and analyses of Faulkner’s work.
Research Tools: The companion provides a wealth of information on reference works, guides, periodicals, and online resources dedicated to Faulkner studies [7]. This comprehensive approach supports research and encourages a deeper engagement with Faulkner scholarship.

Critical Commentary and Analysis

Insights from Scholars: The companion includes critical commentary sections on Faulkner’s major works, drawing on the insights of prominent Faulkner scholars [5]. These analyses illuminate key themes, symbolism, and literary techniques, providing readers with a framework for understanding the complexities of Faulkner’s narratives.
Engagement with Critical Debates: As we discussed, certain aspects of Faulkner’s work, like his use of stream-of-consciousness and interior monologue, have generated ongoing critical debates. The companion acknowledges these discussions and provides different perspectives, encouraging readers to engage with the complexities of interpretation.

Overall, the “Critical Companion to William Faulkner” acts as a bridge between the intricacies of Faulkner’s writing and the reader’s desire for comprehension. It offers a roadmap for navigating Faulkner’s complex world, providing the tools and insights needed to appreciate his literary genius.

Purpose of the “Critical Companion to William Faulkner”

The main purpose of the “Critical Companion to William Faulkner” is to provide readers, especially students, with a clear and organized supplement to the reading of William Faulkner’s works. [1] The companion recognizes that Faulkner’s significance as a literary figure and stylistic innovator is coupled with a challenging complexity that can make understanding his plots, themes, and characters difficult. [1]

To assist readers, the “Critical Companion” offers:

Explanations of Faulkner’s challenging writing style. The companion acknowledges that Faulkner’s “complex, sometimes convoluted” prose and narrative techniques can be “bewildering” for readers. [1]
Clarification of plot, themes, and characters. The goal is to make Faulkner’s work more understandable and enjoyable, and to help readers place his work “in a larger literary and historical context.” [1]
A convenient, one-volume reference source. The companion aims to be a helpful resource for those already familiar with Faulkner’s works. [1]

As we discussed, this goal is achieved through features like:

In-depth character entries. This includes descriptions and cross-references to help readers track characters across multiple works. [2]
Critical commentary sections. These draw on the expertise of Faulkner scholars to illuminate key aspects of the works. [3]
Excerpts from contemporary reviews. These provide historical context and insight into the initial reception of Faulkner’s work. [4]
Extensive bibliographies and further reading lists. These direct readers to additional scholarly resources. [5]

The “Critical Companion” is intended to enrich the reading experience, not replace it. [6] It aims to guide readers through Faulkner’s complex world and ultimately enhance their appreciation of his artistry. [1, 6]

Collaboration and Acknowledgements in the “Critical Companion to William Faulkner”

The sources indicate that the “Critical Companion to William Faulkner” was written by A. Nicholas Fargnoli, Michael Golay, and Robert W. Hamblin. This book is an expanded and updated version of an earlier collaboration, “William Faulkner A to Z.” [1] The authors express gratitude to several individuals and institutions who provided assistance in the writing of both books.

Specific Contributors:

Eva Weber: Contributed to the entries on 39 of Faulkner’s short stories from the Collected Stories and Uncollected Stories. [1]
Don Bowden, Matthew J. Bruccoli, J. D. Chapman, Wenhui Chen, Cynthia Cox, Joan Crane, Christina Deane, Larry Donato, Kathleen Duffy, Alessandro Fargnoli, Gioia Fargnoli, Giuliana Fargnoli, Harriet Fargnoli, Sister Elizabeth Gill, O.P., Joel Greenberg, Gregory A. Johnson, Robert Kinpoitner, Mark Lerner, Robert Martin, Trisha O’Neill, Brian Quinn, Regina Rush, Norman Weil: Assisted with the preparation of the “Critical Companion.” [2]
Reference Department at the Great Neck Library: Also provided assistance with the books. [2]

Institutional Support and Acknowledgements:

Jeff Soloway: Executive editor at Facts On File, provided insights and professionalism during the project. [3]
Anne Savarese: Previous editor at Facts On File, facilitated the publication of “William Faulkner A to Z.” [3]
Committee for Faculty Scholarship and Academic Advancement at Molloy College: Provided funding for photo-reproduction costs. [3]
Southeast Missouri State University: Provided support for the project. [3]

The authors’ acknowledgements highlight the collaborative nature of scholarly research and publication, recognizing the contributions of individuals with specialized knowledge and the support of institutions that make such projects possible.

Financial Pressures and a Need for a Break from Absalom, Absalom!

The sources indicate that financial pressures and a desire for a change of pace from his work on Absalom, Absalom! prompted Faulkner to write Pylon.

Financial Difficulties: By the summer of 1935, Faulkner was facing serious financial problems and was nearing bankruptcy [1]. He needed to find a way to generate income quickly.
A Break from Absalom, Absalom!: Faulkner began working on Absalom, Absalom! in 1934 but set it aside for a period, feeling it was “not quite ripe” [1]. During this break, he wrote Pylon.
In a later interview at the University of Virginia, Faulkner stated that he wrote Pylon to get away from Absalom, Absalom! [2].
A Quick and Engaging Project: Pylon was written rapidly in the last few months of 1934 [2]. Cleanth Brooks suggests that the speed and relative simplicity of Pylon may have offered Faulkner “a sense of freshness and even release” from the demanding work of Absalom, Absalom! [2].

The sources also highlight Faulkner’s long-standing fascination with barnstorming flyers, which found expression in Pylon. He saw these aviators as modern-day gypsies, representing a fleeting and somewhat incongruous element in the evolving landscape of the American South [3].

While Pylon is generally considered a minor work in Faulkner’s canon, it reflects a convergence of financial necessity, a desire for creative respite, and an enduring interest in the transient world of early aviation.

Literary Echoes in Faulkner’s Pylon: A Blend of Modernism and Poetic Influence

The sources point to James Joyce and T. S. Eliot as significant literary influences on Pylon. This aligns with the broader context of Faulkner’s engagement with literary modernism during this period.

Joycean Techniques and Allusions

Journalistic Style: Faulkner adopts a journalistic style in certain sections of Pylon, reminiscent of the “Aeolus” episode in Joyce’s Ulysses [1]. This episode features a stream of newspaper headlines and snippets, creating a fragmented and fast-paced narrative that reflects the frenetic energy of modern life.
Portmanteau Words: Another Joycean element in Pylon is the use of portmanteau words, which are words formed by combining two or more existing words [1]. This technique reflects a playful experimentation with language and adds a layer of linguistic complexity to the novel.

The Shadow of T. S. Eliot

“Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock” Chapter Title: The penultimate chapter of Pylon is directly titled “Lovesong of J. Alfred Prufrock,” referencing Eliot’s famous poem [1]. This deliberate allusion suggests a thematic connection between the poem’s exploration of isolation and alienation in modern society and the experiences of the novel’s characters.
The Waste Land Imagery: The sources draw parallels between the barren setting of the airport in Pylon and the desolate landscapes of Eliot’s The Waste Land [1]. This connection highlights the sense of spiritual emptiness and societal fragmentation that permeates both works.

Pylon as a Self-Consciously Modernist Work

Modernist Lens on Aviation Heroes: Daniel J. Singal, a Faulkner scholar cited in the sources, argues that Pylon represents a self-conscious engagement with modernist themes and aesthetics [2]. He notes that Faulkner portrays the aviators, often seen as romantic heroes, in a decidedly unglamorous light. They are depicted as ordinary individuals who seek escape from the mundane through dangerous pursuits, reflecting a sense of disillusionment and the search for meaning in a rapidly changing world.

While the sources emphasize Joyce and Eliot as prominent influences, they also acknowledge that Faulkner’s poetry was influenced by other writers like A. E. Housman, Algernon Charles Swinburne, and John Keats [3, 4]. Given the overlap in style and thematic concerns between Faulkner’s poetry and Pylon, it’s possible that these poets also exerted some influence on the novel.

“Pantaloon in Black” and its Place in Go Down, Moses

The sources point to a limited connection between “Pantaloon in Black” and the other stories in Go Down, Moses, noting that this inclusion has been a subject of debate among critics.

Passing Connection: “Pantaloon” has only a passing connection to the other stories. [1] The protagonist, Rider, is one of Roth Edmonds’s tenants, just like Lucas Beauchamp in “The Fire and the Hearth.” [1] Both Rider and Lucas build permanent fires in their hearths on their wedding nights. [1]
Thematic Link of Black-White Relations: While the narrative connection is slight, “Pantaloon” shares with the other stories the overarching theme of black-white relations in the South. [1] This theme, as we’ve previously discussed, is central to Go Down, Moses and is explored through various lenses, including racial injustice, inheritance, and identity. [2]
Cleanth Brooks’s Perspective: Critic Cleanth Brooks suggests that Faulkner might have included “Pantaloon” in Go Down, Moses “simply because it reveals one more aspect of the world in which ‘The Bear’ takes place.” [1] This suggests that Faulkner may have aimed to create a broader sense of the social and racial dynamics at play in the Yoknapatawpha County of that era.

Critical Debate and Lionel Trilling’s Critique

Questioning the Story’s Placement: Some critics, including Lionel Trilling, have argued that the inclusion of “Pantaloon” weakens the novel’s coherence. [1, 3]
Trilling, in his 1942 review of Go Down, Moses, explicitly questioned why Faulkner included “Pantaloon,” finding it misplaced and not as well-conceived or executed as the other stories. [3]
Defending the Story’s Power: Despite Trilling’s criticism, the sources note that “Pantaloon” is a powerful and moving story in its own right, effectively portraying the tragedy of racial injustice in the South. [1]
The sources offer contrasting opinions on “Pantaloon,” emphasizing the critical debate surrounding its placement and significance within the larger context of Go Down, Moses.

Insights from Contemporary Reviews

Excerpts from contemporary reviews offer further perspectives on the inclusion of “Pantaloon”:

Robert Littell: In his review, Littell focuses on the complexity and sometimes confusing nature of Faulkner’s stories, suggesting that readers might feel like they’ve entered a play midway through. [4] While he doesn’t address “Pantaloon” directly, his observation highlights the challenges readers can face when encountering Faulkner’s fragmented narratives, which might contribute to the perceived lack of coherence.
Malcolm Cowley: Cowley, in his review, suggests viewing Go Down, Moses as an installment of the Mississippi legend, highlighting the cumulative effect of Faulkner’s work in building a comprehensive picture of Yoknapatawpha County. [5] This perspective suggests that “Pantaloon,” even with its limited connection to other stories, contributes to the overall tapestry of the Yoknapatawpha world.

In summary, “Pantaloon in Black,” while thematically linked to Go Down, Moses through its exploration of black-white relations, has a weak narrative connection to the other stories. Its inclusion has sparked debate among critics, with some questioning its contribution to the novel’s coherence while others find it a powerful standalone piece that enriches the portrayal of racial dynamics in Yoknapatawpha County.

Faulkner’s Life as Inspiration: From War Hero to Literary Icon

The sources provide rich insights into how Faulkner’s experiences outside of the classroom shaped his writing. While he did engage in formal study, including courses at the University of Mississippi [1, 2], his life outside academia offered a wealth of material that he wove into his fiction.

The Impact of War and Role-Playing

World War I and Storytelling: Though Faulkner never saw active combat in World War I, his time with the Royal Air Force in Canada profoundly impacted his artistic development [1]. Biographer Frederick Karl suggests that the war transformed Faulkner “into a storyteller, a fictionalist,” marking a pivotal moment in his life. This experience likely fostered his ability to create compelling narratives, even if drawn from imagination rather than direct experience.
Embracing Personas: Faulkner’s tendency to adopt different personas, starting with the “Oxford dandy” and then the “returned war hero,” is highlighted [1]. This suggests a fascination with performance and an ability to inhabit different roles, which might have informed his skill in crafting diverse and multifaceted characters in his fiction.

Family History and Southern Heritage as Literary Fuel

The Weight of Ancestry: Faulkner’s family history, particularly his connection to the “Old Colonel” [3], his great-grandfather, deeply influenced his work. The sources note that many key Faulkner characters grapple with absent or inadequate fathers, reflecting a recurring theme of family decline [4]. This suggests that Faulkner drew upon personal and familial experiences to explore complex relationships and the legacies of the past.
Confronting the South’s Past: The sources emphasize Faulkner’s profound engagement with Southern history, particularly the Civil War and the legacy of slavery [5, 6]. He recognized the South’s “sins,” including the “despoliation of the natural world” [6], and grappled with these issues in his work. His portrayal of the South was not romanticized; he presented it as morally complex and burdened by its past [7].

Everyday Life in Oxford and Beyond

Oxford and Lafayette County: The sources highlight the importance of Oxford and Lafayette County, the real-world counterparts to Faulkner’s fictional Yoknapatawpha County [3, 8]. He drew inspiration from the people, places, and events of his surroundings, transforming them into literary landscapes populated with memorable characters.
Beyond the Classroom Walls: Faulkner’s life outside the classroom was filled with activities and experiences that informed his writing. He sailed, played at farming [9], worked in a power plant [10], and spent time in Pascagoula, drawing inspiration from its coastal setting and engaging in a courtship with Helen Baird [11]. These varied experiences provided him with a broad range of material and broadened his understanding of human nature.

Alcoholism: A Destructive Force and Potential Catalyst

Alcoholism as a Family Legacy: Faulkner’s struggles with alcoholism, inherited from his father and grandfather [12], cannot be ignored. While a destructive force in his life, some speculate that he might have, at times, seen alcohol as a creative fuel, similar to the Romantic and Symbolist poets he admired [13]. It’s impossible to determine the exact role alcohol played in his creative process, but it was undoubtedly a significant presence in his life.

Conclusion: Life as the Wellspring of Faulkner’s Fiction

While Faulkner’s formal education provided him with a foundation in literature, it was his experiences outside of the classroom—his wartime service, family history, engagement with Southern heritage, and everyday life in Oxford and beyond—that truly shaped his writing. His ability to transform these experiences into powerful narratives cemented his place as a literary giant.

The Past as a Living Presence: Faulkner’s Literary Tapestry of Time and Memory

The sources illuminate how Faulkner’s work deeply engages with the past, not as a static backdrop but as a dynamic force that shapes the present. This engagement is evident in various aspects of his fiction, from character development and thematic concerns to the very structure of his narratives.

Yoknapatawpha County: A Microcosm of Southern History

The Creation of a Fictional World: Faulkner’s creation of Yoknapatawpha County, a fictionalized version of his native Lafayette County in Mississippi, serves as a primary stage for his exploration of the past. This fictional county, as described in the sources, becomes a “permanent feature of the world’s literary geography“, embodying the complexities and contradictions of Southern history [1, 2].
This fictional setting allows Faulkner to weave together historical events and social dynamics, creating a rich and layered world that reflects the enduring impact of the past on the present.
“Go Down, Moses” and the McCaslin Family Legacy: The sources provide the example of “Go Down, Moses,” a collection of interconnected stories that center on the McCaslin family and their entanglement with the legacy of slavery. Through the exploration of family history, Faulkner exposes the deep wounds and enduring consequences of the South’s racial past [3, 4].
The McCaslin family’s story becomes a microcosm of the South’s struggle to come to terms with its past and the ongoing impact of racial injustice.
The Snopes Trilogy and the Rise of Modernity: The Snopes Trilogy (The Hamlet, The Town, and The Mansion) also exemplifies Faulkner’s use of the past. The trilogy charts the rise of the Snopes family, representing the encroachment of modern commercialism on traditional Southern society [5].
The Snopeses, with their ambition and ruthlessness, embody the forces of change that disrupt the old order, signaling a shift in Southern life and values.
“Requiem for a Nun” and Historical Underpinnings: The sources note that “Requiem for a Nun” stands out in its direct use of history as a “symbolic underpinning” [6]. The novel incorporates prose passages that chronicle the history of Yoknapatawpha County and the town of Jefferson, providing a context for the moral dilemmas faced by the characters in the present.
This explicit integration of historical narrative underscores the idea that the past is not merely a collection of facts but a living force that shapes individual lives and moral choices.

Time as a Fluid and Multifaceted Dimension

Disrupting Linear Time: As we’ve discussed, Faulkner’s work often disrupts linear time, weaving together past, present, and future through innovative narrative techniques like stream-of-consciousness and interior monologue. This fluidity of time allows him to explore how memories and historical events continue to resonate in the present [7, 8].
This echoes our earlier conversation about the literary influences on Pylon, where Faulkner’s engagement with modernist techniques, particularly those of James Joyce, is apparent.
“Absalom, Absalom!” and the Reconstruction of the Past: “Absalom, Absalom!” is cited as a prime example of Faulkner’s exploration of time and memory [5, 9]. The novel, told through multiple and unreliable narrators, pieces together the tragic history of Thomas Sutpen and his family, demonstrating how the past is constantly reinterpreted and reshaped by those who inherit it.
The novel’s fragmented narrative structure reflects the difficulty of accessing a singular and objective truth about the past.
“The Sound and the Fury” and the Compson Family’s Decline: “The Sound and the Fury,” another key work, also highlights Faulkner’s use of the past. The novel, narrated by members of the declining Compson family, reveals how past traumas and family secrets haunt the present, leading to psychological disintegration and social decay [5, 10, 11].
The Compsons, like the McCaslins, exemplify how the weight of history, both personal and societal, can shape individual destinies.

The Past as a Source of Trauma and Moral reckoning

Absence of Nostalgia and Confrontation with “Sins”: It’s crucial to note that Faulkner’s use of the past is rarely nostalgic [12]. Instead, the sources emphasize his willingness to confront the South’s “sins,” including slavery and the destruction of the natural world. The past, in Faulkner’s work, is often a source of trauma and moral reckoning.
This aligns with our earlier discussion of Faulkner’s own life experiences, where his engagement with Southern history and his confrontation with the South’s troubled legacy are evident.
Modernity as a Destructive Force: Faulkner also portrays the encroachment of modernity as a destructive force that erodes traditional values and further complicates the relationship between past and present [13]. The loss of wilderness, the rise of commercialism, and the shifting social landscape all contribute to a sense of loss and displacement.
This is exemplified in “Delta Autumn,” a story in “Go Down, Moses”, where the destruction of the Big Woods symbolizes the vanishing of a way of life and the disruption of the natural order.

Beyond Regional Boundaries: Universal Themes

The Human Condition and Man’s Relationship with Nature: While Faulkner’s work is deeply rooted in the American South, the sources suggest that his concerns extend beyond regional boundaries, addressing universal themes of time, memory, guilt, and the human condition [1, 13].
Man’s Place in Nature: His exploration of man’s relationship with nature, often depicted as a casualty of progress and exploitation, has resonated with readers across time and cultures.

In conclusion, Faulkner’s work demonstrates a masterful and multifaceted use of the past. Through his fictional world of Yoknapatawpha County, his innovative manipulation of time, and his unflinching portrayal of the South’s troubled legacy, he illuminates how the past continues to shape the present, both in individual lives and in the larger fabric of society. His exploration of these themes, while rooted in the specific context of the American South, transcends regional boundaries to address enduring questions about the human condition and our relationship with the world around us.

Enduring Themes in Faulkner’s Fiction

The sources offer a compelling overview of the major themes that consistently emerge in Faulkner’s body of work. These themes, often deeply intertwined, reflect his profound engagement with the human condition, the complexities of Southern history, and the enduring power of the past.

The Weight of the Past and Southern History

The Past as a Living Presence: As we’ve discussed, Faulkner’s fiction consistently underscores the idea that the past is not simply a collection of bygone events but a potent force that shapes the present. This is evident in his portrayal of families haunted by their history, communities grappling with the legacy of slavery, and individuals struggling to reconcile their personal experiences with larger historical forces.
This theme is central to our earlier analysis of how Faulkner utilizes the past. We saw how he weaves together past, present, and future, creating narratives where time is fluid and memory plays a crucial role.
Yoknapatawpha County as a Microcosm: The creation of Yoknapatawpha County, his fictionalized version of Lafayette County, Mississippi, provides a stage for Faulkner to explore the intricacies of Southern history and its impact on the lives of his characters.
The sources describe Yoknapatawpha as a “permanent feature of the world’s literary geography,” a place where the past is vividly present and deeply intertwined with the present. [1]
The Legacy of Slavery and Racial Injustice: Faulkner confronts the “sins” of the South, including slavery and its enduring legacy, in his work. He recognizes the profound impact of racial injustice on individuals and communities, highlighting the complexities and contradictions inherent in Southern society.
This theme is powerfully explored in works like “Go Down, Moses,” which examines the McCaslin family’s entanglement with slavery and its aftermath, and “Intruder in the Dust,” which addresses racial prejudice and the search for justice in a racially charged South. [2, 3]
The End of Innocence: A recurring motif in Faulkner’s fiction is the loss of innocence, often linked to the confrontation with the harsh realities of the past, the complexities of human relationships, and the violence that permeates Southern society.
The sources highlight this theme in the context of “Adolescence” and “Miss Zilphia Gant,” where young characters experience a jarring transition from innocence to experience. [4]

The Human Condition: Struggle, Loss, and the Search for Meaning

The Complexity of Human Relationships: Faulkner’s work often centers on intricate and often dysfunctional family dynamics. He portrays families wrestling with secrets, betrayals, and the weight of generational trauma, offering insights into the enduring impact of family history on individual lives.
We see this in “As I Lay Dying,” which depicts the Bundren family’s arduous journey to bury their matriarch, Addie, exposing their hidden motives and the complexities of their relationships. [5]
The Search for Identity: Many of Faulkner’s characters embark on journeys of self-discovery, grappling with questions of identity, belonging, and purpose in a world often marked by uncertainty and disillusionment.
This theme is evident in the struggles of the Compson brothers in “The Sound and the Fury,” each trapped in their own internal world and unable to find solace or meaning in their lives. [6]
Alienation and Isolation: Faulkner’s characters often experience a profound sense of alienation from their communities and the world around them. This isolation can stem from personal trauma, social ostracism, or a sense of displacement in a rapidly changing world.
The sources note that “Light in August” explores the theme of “man in tension with nature, alienation from the community, and man’s inability to fulfill himself outside the community.” [7]
The Grotesque and the Heroic: Faulkner’s work often juxtaposes the grotesque and the heroic, revealing the capacity for both darkness and nobility within human nature. He portrays characters capable of acts of great cruelty and compassion, highlighting the complexities of morality and the contradictions inherent in human behavior.
This duality is evident in “As I Lay Dying,” where the Bundren family’s journey is described as both “heroic” and “absurd.” [5]
The Nature of Evil: Faulkner explores the nature of evil in various forms, from the casual cruelty of individuals to the systemic injustices that plague society. His work suggests that evil is not an abstract concept but a palpable force that shapes human lives and actions.
“Sanctuary” is cited as a prime example of this theme, where Faulkner examines the dark underbelly of Southern society and the destructive power of violence and corruption. [8]

Modernity and the Changing South

The Encroachment of Modernity: Faulkner’s fiction often depicts the South in a state of transition, grappling with the intrusion of modernity and the erosion of traditional values. He portrays the tension between the old order and the new, highlighting the social, economic, and cultural shifts that transform Southern life.
The Rise of Commercialism and the Snopeses: The Snopes family, introduced in “Sartoris” and featured prominently in the Snopes Trilogy, represents the rise of commercialism and materialism in the South. Their ambition, greed, and willingness to exploit others embody the forces of change that disrupt traditional social structures and moral codes. [9-11]
The Loss of Wilderness and the Destruction of Nature: Faulkner expresses a deep concern for the destruction of the natural world, often depicting the encroachment of civilization on wilderness as a symbol of moral decay and the loss of a vital connection to the land.
This theme is especially prominent in “Go Down, Moses,” where the destruction of the Big Woods represents the vanishing of a way of life and a profound sense of loss. [12, 13]

Style and Technique: Experimentation and Innovation

Stream-of-Consciousness and Interior Monologue: Faulkner is renowned for his innovative use of stream-of-consciousness and interior monologue, allowing readers access to the innermost thoughts and feelings of his characters. These techniques break from traditional narrative structures, creating a sense of immediacy and psychological depth.
As we discussed, this aspect of Faulkner’s style is likely influenced by modernist writers like James Joyce, whose influence is apparent in works like “Pylon”.
Multiple Narrators and Shifting Perspectives: Faulkner frequently employs multiple narrators and shifting perspectives within his narratives, allowing readers to piece together events from different viewpoints and challenging notions of objective truth.
“Absalom, Absalom!” is a prime example of this technique, where the fragmented and unreliable narratives of various characters contribute to the novel’s overall sense of mystery and ambiguity.
Complex Sentence Structures and Poetic Language: Faulkner’s prose style is often characterized by its complexity and poetic qualities. He uses long, intricate sentences, evocative imagery, and a rich vocabulary to create a distinctive and often challenging reading experience.

Conclusion:

Faulkner’s fiction is characterized by its exploration of enduring themes that resonate with readers across generations. His work grapples with the complexities of human nature, the weight of history, and the challenges of modernity, offering insights into the human condition that transcend regional boundaries. Through his innovative use of language and narrative techniques, Faulkner created a body of work that continues to challenge and inspire readers, inviting them to engage with his fictional world of Yoknapatawpha County and the enduring questions he raises about life, loss, and the search for meaning.

Connecting The Sound and the Fury and Hamlet

The sources make a brief but insightful connection between William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury and Shakespeare’s Hamlet. While they don’t offer a detailed analysis of the parallels between the two works, they suggest a shared complexity and potential for misinterpretation that invites further exploration.

Complexity as a Defining Feature: One source argues that Faulkner’s technique in The Sound and the Fury might seem overly intricate for its subject matter, leading some to simplify the story as melodrama [1]. However, the source immediately counters this point by stating that the same could be said of Hamlet [1]. This comparison implies that both works possess a depth and richness that resist easy categorization or reduction to simplistic interpretations.
Melodrama and the Human Condition: The reference to melodrama is significant, as it hints at the intense emotions, heightened conflicts, and potentially sensational elements present in both narratives. Both Hamlet and The Sound and the Fury grapple with themes of betrayal, revenge, family dysfunction, and the decay of a once-noble lineage. These themes, often associated with melodrama, are explored with psychological depth and complexity in both works, elevating them beyond mere sensationalism.
Shared Thematic Resonance: While the sources don’t explicitly detail the specific thematic connections, our previous discussion of recurring themes in Faulkner’s work provides a framework for understanding the potential parallels with Hamlet.
The Weight of the Past: Both works are deeply concerned with the impact of the past on the present. Hamlet is haunted by the ghost of his father and driven by a desire for revenge, while the Compson family in The Sound and the Fury is burdened by a history of loss, decline, and moral decay.
Family Dysfunction and Betrayal: Both narratives center on deeply troubled families. Hamlet’s family is torn apart by murder, incest, and power struggles, while the Compsons are fractured by their inability to confront their past and their destructive relationships with each other.
The Search for Meaning and Identity: Both Hamlet and Quentin Compson, one of the narrators in The Sound and the Fury, are consumed by existential angst and a sense of alienation from the world around them. They struggle to find meaning and purpose in a world that seems to have lost its moral compass.

Conclusion:

The sources’ comparison of The Sound and the Fury to Hamlet highlights the complexity and thematic depth of Faulkner’s novel. It suggests that, like Shakespeare’s tragedy, The Sound and the Fury resists simple interpretations and invites readers to engage with its intricate layers of meaning. By recognizing the potential parallels between these two works, we can gain a deeper appreciation for Faulkner’s exploration of the human condition, the enduring power of the past, and the complexities of family relationships.

New Orleans as Inspiration: Faulkner’s Mosquitoes

The sources directly connect Faulkner’s experiences within the artistic community of New Orleans to his novel Mosquitoes. He drew heavily on real-life individuals and events, creating a satirical portrait of the bohemian scene he encountered in the French Quarter during the early 1920s.

A “Roman à Clef”: The sources explicitly characterize Mosquitoes as a “roman à clef,” meaning that it uses fictional characters to represent actual people. Faulkner populates his novel with artists, writers, and socialites based on individuals he knew in New Orleans. [1]
Specific Individuals as Models:Dawson Fairchild, the Indiana novelist in the book, is clearly based on Sherwood Anderson, a well-known writer whom Faulkner befriended in New Orleans. [2, 3]
Gordon, the sculptor, might be a fictionalized version of Faulkner’s friend William Spratling, also an artist who was part of the New Orleans art scene. [2, 4]
The character of Patricia Robyn is suggested to be based on Helen Baird, a woman whom Faulkner was romantically interested in at the time. [2, 5] He even dedicated Mosquitoes to her. [6]
Setting and Atmosphere: The novel’s early scenes are set in the Vieux Carré, the historic French Quarter of New Orleans, where Faulkner lived and interacted with other artists. [7] The atmosphere of the novel reflects the intellectual and artistic ferment of this bohemian community.
Themes and Concerns:Mosquitoes is described as a “novel of ideas,” with characters engaging in lengthy conversations about literature and sex. [1] This focus on intellectual and artistic debates mirrors Faulkner’s own experiences within the New Orleans literary scene, where such discussions were commonplace.
The sources identify a number of influential writers of the time, including T.S. Eliot, James Joyce, Aldous Huxley, and D.H. Lawrence, whose works likely shaped the ideas explored in Mosquitoes. [1] This suggests that Faulkner was deeply engaged with the literary currents of the period and used his novel to explore these ideas in a satirical and often humorous way.

Beyond Direct Representation:

While Mosquitoes draws directly on Faulkner’s experiences in New Orleans, it’s important to note that the novel goes beyond simple biographical retelling.

Satire and Artistic Exploration: The novel is notable for its satirical tone and its exploration of artistic creation. Faulkner uses humor and social commentary to critique the pretensions and eccentricities of the artistic community. [1]
Narrative Techniques: The sources highlight some of Faulkner’s early experiments with narrative techniques in Mosquitoes. [8] He uses a device common in mystery novels, bringing a group of characters together in a confined setting (a yacht on Lake Ponchartrain) to facilitate interaction and dialogue. This foreshadows Faulkner’s later use of more complex narrative structures in his major works.

The Shadow of Later Work:

It’s worth acknowledging that Mosquitoes is often viewed as a lesser work in Faulkner’s oeuvre. It’s seen as an “apprenticeship” novel, showing promise but lacking the depth and sophistication of his later writing. [9, 10] Even Faulkner himself came to dismiss it. [10] However, understanding the novel’s connection to his New Orleans experiences sheds light on his artistic development. Mosquitoes can be read as a stepping stone toward the more mature and complex works that would establish his literary reputation.

Narrative Innovation in The Sound and the Fury

The sources confirm that Faulkner utilizes the interior monologue technique in The Sound and the Fury. This experimental approach, significantly influenced by James Joyce’s Ulysses, marked a departure from the narrative strategies he employed in his earlier novels.

Interior Monologue and Modernism: The sources define interior monologue as a technique that reveals the unfiltered flow of a character’s thoughts, feelings, and memories. [1] This approach, often associated with modernist literature, breaks from traditional narrative conventions by prioritizing subjective experience over objective reality. [2]
Joyce’s Influence: The sources directly link Faulkner’s use of interior monologue in The Sound and the Fury to the influence of James Joyce’s Ulysses. [3, 4] Both novels employ this technique to explore the inner lives of their characters in a fragmented and non-linear way.
Evolution from Earlier Works: While Faulkner experimented with stream-of-consciousness techniques in his earlier novels, Soldiers’ Pay and Mosquitoes, the sources suggest that his use of interior monologue in The Sound and the Fury represented a more fully realized and sophisticated application of this modernist approach. [5]
Multiple Narrators and Perspectives: The Sound and the Fury is told from the perspectives of four different narrators, three of whom – Benjy, Quentin, and Jason – deliver their narratives through interior monologue. [6, 7] This multiplicity of voices allows Faulkner to present a fragmented and multifaceted portrait of the Compson family’s decline.
Impact on Characterization: One source argues that interior monologue allowed Faulkner to overcome the “crucial problems in characterization” he faced in his first three novels (Soldiers’ Pay, Mosquitoes, and Sartoris). [5] By granting readers direct access to the minds of his characters, Faulkner could create more psychologically complex and nuanced portraits.
Narrative Indeterminacy: The interior monologue sections, particularly Benjy’s, are challenging for readers due to their non-linearity, grammatical irregularities, and the difficulty of separating the narrator’s thoughts from objective reality. [3] This ambiguity, however, is a deliberate strategy on Faulkner’s part, as it mirrors the psychological states of his characters and forces readers to actively participate in constructing meaning.
“Progression from Murkiness to Enlightenment”: One source describes the reading experience of The Sound and the Fury as a “progression from murkiness to increasing enlightenment.” [3] The fragmented and challenging nature of the interior monologue sections gradually gives way to a clearer understanding of the Compson family’s tragedy as the novel progresses.

From Experimentation to Mastery:

The sources suggest that The Sound and the Fury is a pivotal work in Faulkner’s development as a novelist. [8, 9] His use of interior monologue and multiple narrators, techniques he would refine in later works like As I Lay Dying and Absalom, Absalom!, helped him achieve a new level of narrative complexity and psychological depth.

Comparing Critical Receptions: Absalom, Absalom! and The Sound and the Fury

While both Absalom, Absalom! (1936) and The Sound and the Fury (1929) are considered major works in Faulkner’s oeuvre, their initial critical receptions differed considerably. The Sound and the Fury was met with more immediate acclaim, while Absalom, Absalom! faced a more mixed and, at times, negative response.

The Sound and the Fury: Initial Success and Modernist Recognition

Favorable Early Reviews: The sources indicate that The Sound and the Fury received a number of favorable reviews upon its release. Critic Lyle Saxon, writing in the New York Herald Tribune Books in 1929, praised the novel for its “extraordinary effect.” [1] Other critics acknowledged Faulkner’s innovative use of interior monologue and his exploration of complex themes related to family, memory, and the passage of time. [1-5]
Modernist Experimentation: The Sound and the Fury was recognized for its experimental narrative techniques and its alignment with modernist literature. The novel’s use of stream-of-consciousness, interior monologue, and fragmented perspectives challenged traditional storytelling conventions and resonated with the literary trends of the time. [6]
Joyce’s Influence: Critics acknowledged the clear influence of James Joyce’s Ulysses on Faulkner’s use of interior monologue. This connection to a major figure in modernist literature likely contributed to the novel’s critical recognition and its placement within the broader context of 20th-century literary innovation. [1, 7]

Absalom, Absalom!: Mixed Reactions and Charges of Difficulty

Mixed Early Reviews: Unlike The Sound and the Fury, Absalom, Absalom! received a mixed response from critics. While some acknowledged its ambition and power, many found it challenging, confusing, and even “boring.” [8]
Clifton Fadiman’s Scathing Critique: Clifton Fadiman, a prominent critic of the time, famously panned Absalom, Absalom! in The New Yorker. He called it “the most consistently boring novel by a reputable writer” he had encountered in a decade. [8, 9] This highly negative review likely influenced the broader critical reception of the novel.
Complaints about Complexity and Style: Reviewers frequently criticized Absalom, Absalom! for its technical complexity, its convoluted prose style, and the difficulty of following its non-linear narrative. [10] They found the multiple narrators and shifting perspectives difficult to navigate, leading to frustration and a sense of detachment from the story.
Defense of Complexity as Integral to Meaning: However, even among those who found the novel challenging, there were voices that recognized the importance of its complexity. Critics like Cleanth Brooks argued that the difficulty of Absalom, Absalom! was necessary to achieve its “power and significance.” [11] They saw the novel’s intricate structure and demanding style as integral to its exploration of complex themes related to history, race, and the legacy of the South.

Shifting Critical Perspectives and Re-Evaluation

Growing Appreciation and Recognition of Artistic Merit: Over time, the critical perception of Absalom, Absalom! shifted. As scholars and readers engaged more deeply with the novel’s intricate layers of meaning, its reputation grew. It came to be recognized as one of Faulkner’s most ambitious and accomplished works, a masterpiece of modernist literature.
Elevating to the Status of “Everest”: Faulkner biographer Frederick Karl hails Absalom, Absalom! as the “Everest” of Faulkner’s achievement and places it among the great works of modernist fiction, alongside novels by Proust, Mann, Kafka, Conrad, Woolf, and Joyce. [12]
The Role of Critics in Shaping Faulkner’s Reception: The sources suggest that critics played a significant role in shaping both the initial reception and the subsequent re-evaluation of Faulkner’s works. As critics like Malcolm Cowley championed Faulkner and provided insightful interpretations of his complex narratives, readers gained a greater appreciation for his artistry and thematic depth. [13-15]

Conclusion: Complexity as a Double-Edged Sword

The contrasting critical receptions of The Sound and the Fury and Absalom, Absalom! reveal the challenges and rewards of Faulkner’s experimental approach to storytelling. The Sound and the Fury, while innovative, remained more accessible to contemporary readers, garnering immediate praise for its modernist techniques and emotional impact. Absalom, Absalom!, on the other hand, alienated some readers with its density and difficulty. However, its challenging nature ultimately contributed to its lasting power, leading to its recognition as a landmark achievement in Faulkner’s body of work.

Restoring Faulkner’s Literary Reputation: Malcolm Cowley’s Project

The sources reveal Malcolm Cowley’s motivations for undertaking a project to restore William Faulkner to a prominent position in American literature. By the mid-1940s, Faulkner’s literary standing had diminished significantly. The sources and our conversation history offer several factors that prompted Cowley to take action:

Faulkner’s Works Largely Out of Print: By 1945, most of Faulkner’s 17 published books were out of print, making them inaccessible to readers [1-3]. Only the controversial novel Sanctuary remained in print [4]. Cowley, a respected critic, recognized the irony of this situation, given Faulkner’s high regard among fellow writers [1].
Disparity Between Critical and Popular Reception: Cowley observed a significant gap between Faulkner’s critical acclaim among writers and his lack of recognition within the publishing industry. He wrote to Faulkner in 1944, stating, “In publishing circles your name is mud. They are all convinced your books won’t sell. Now when you talk to writers, it’s quite a different story; there you hear almost nothing but admiration, and the better the writer the greater the admiration is likely to be” [1].
The Impact of Negative Reviews: The sources and our conversation history highlight the impact of negative reviews on Faulkner’s reputation. For example, Clifton Fadiman’s scathing critique of Absalom, Absalom! in The New Yorker likely contributed to the novel’s mixed reception and its perception as a difficult and “boring” work [5]. Cowley sought to counter these negative assessments by offering more insightful interpretations of Faulkner’s work and highlighting its artistic merit.
Belief in Faulkner’s Literary Value: Cowley recognized Faulkner’s talent and believed that his innovative narrative techniques, exploration of complex themes, and creation of the mythical Yoknapatawpha County deserved a more prominent place in American literature. The sources note Cowley’s judgment that Faulkner performed “a labor of imagination that has not been equaled in our time” [6, 7].
Championing a Neglected Writer: Cowley’s project can be understood as an act of advocacy for a writer he believed had been unjustly neglected by the literary establishment. The sources suggest that Cowley, in his role as a critic, felt a responsibility to draw attention to Faulkner’s work and to correct the “imbalance between his worth and his reputation” [3, 4].

Cowley’s Reclamation Project: Key Strategies

Publication of “William Faulkner’s Human Comedy”: Cowley initiated his project with a series of essays, starting with “William Faulkner’s Human Comedy” published in the New York Times Book Review in October 1944. This essay presented a comprehensive and appreciative overview of Faulkner’s fictional world, highlighting its thematic unity and artistic significance [3, 4].
The Portable Faulkner Anthology: Cowley’s most significant contribution was editing The Portable Faulkner, published in 1946 [2, 3, 8, 9]. This anthology brought together selections from Faulkner’s major works, including excerpts from novels and short stories, along with a map of Yoknapatawpha County and character genealogies provided by Faulkner himself [8, 10]. Cowley’s introduction and prefaces to each section provided crucial context and interpretation, helping readers navigate Faulkner’s complex narratives and appreciate his literary achievements [5, 8].
Advocacy within the Publishing Industry: Cowley used his influence to encourage the republication of Faulkner’s works. He persuaded Random House to release a Modern Library edition of The Sound and the Fury and As I Lay Dying [11, 12].

Outcomes of Cowley’s Efforts

Renewed Interest in Faulkner’s Work: The Portable Faulkner was a critical and commercial success, introducing a new generation of readers to Faulkner’s fiction. This resurgence of interest led to the republication of many of his out-of-print works [12].
Faulkner’s Nobel Prize and Recognition: Cowley’s efforts contributed to a wider appreciation of Faulkner’s literary merit, culminating in his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1949 [13, 14].

Conclusion

Malcolm Cowley’s project to elevate William Faulkner’s literary standing was a conscious and deliberate act of critical advocacy. He recognized Faulkner’s genius at a time when his work was largely neglected. By bringing Faulkner’s fiction back into print, providing insightful interpretation, and advocating for his recognition, Cowley played a key role in establishing Faulkner as a major figure in American literature.

Malcolm Cowley: The Architect of Faulkner’s Literary Revival

By the mid-1940s, William Faulkner’s literary reputation had fallen into decline, with most of his books out of print. Recognizing the significant disparity between Faulkner’s esteem among fellow writers and his neglect by the publishing industry, critic Malcolm Cowley initiated a project to restore Faulkner to a prominent position in American literature [1, 2].

Cowley observed that while Faulkner’s name was “mud” in publishing circles, writers held him in high regard [1]. He attributed this disconnect to several factors, including the negative impact of reviews like Clifton Fadiman’s scathing critique of Absalom, Absalom!, the inherent complexity of Faulkner’s prose style, and the unavailability of his works due to their out-of-print status [1-3].

Cowley’s “reclamation project”, as he termed it, involved several key strategies:

He published a series of essays, starting with “William Faulkner’s Human Comedy” (1944), which provided a comprehensive and appreciative analysis of Faulkner’s work [2, 4]. These essays highlighted Faulkner’s thematic unity, innovative narrative techniques, and creation of the mythical Yoknapatawpha County [2].
Cowley’s most significant contribution was editing The Portable Faulkner (1946) [2, 5]. This anthology contained selections from Faulkner’s major works, along with a map of Yoknapatawpha County and character genealogies provided by Faulkner himself. Cowley’s introduction and prefaces offered crucial context and interpretation, making Faulkner’s complex narratives more accessible to readers [2, 5].
Beyond his writing, Cowley actively lobbied within the publishing industry to bring Faulkner’s works back into print [6, 7]. He persuaded Random House to publish a Modern Library edition of The Sound and the Fury and As I Lay Dying [6, 7].

Cowley’s efforts proved remarkably successful. The Portable Faulkner was both a critical and commercial triumph, introducing a new generation of readers to Faulkner’s writing [3]. This renewed interest led to the republication of many of Faulkner’s out-of-print books and helped solidify his reputation as a major American literary figure, culminating in his being awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1949 [3, 8].

Even Faulkner himself acknowledged the impact of Cowley’s work, expressing surprise and satisfaction with the way The Portable Faulkner illuminated his own artistic intentions [6].

In essence, Cowley acted as a literary archaeologist, excavating and meticulously reconstructing the then-fragmented and obscured edifice of Faulkner’s literary legacy. He provided readers with the tools and insights needed to appreciate Faulkner’s challenging yet rewarding fiction, ultimately securing his place as a giant of American literature.

Murry Falkner’s Downward Spiral: A Life Marred by Loss and Disappointment

The sources paint a poignant picture of Murry Falkner’s life, a man trapped in the shadow of his imposing father, the “Young Colonel,” and burdened by personal struggles. Several factors contributed to his decline:

Loss of Vocation: Murry’s life took a downward turn when his father sold the Gulf & Chicago Railroad in 1902 [1]. This sale robbed Murry of his position as treasurer and, more importantly, his beloved vocation. The railroad represented his identity and purpose, and its loss left him feeling adrift and demoralized.
Failed Business Ventures: Despite financial backing from his father, Murry struggled to find success in a series of small businesses [1]. His attempts to run a livery stable, a coal-oil agency, and a hardware store all ended in failure [2]. His lack of business acumen and his growing dependence on alcohol exacerbated his struggles [2].
Strained Marriage: The sources depict a troubled marriage between Murry and Maud Butler Falkner [1, 3]. Their personalities clashed: Maud, strong-willed and intellectual, found herself at odds with Murry, a feckless and alcoholic outdoorsman [1, 3]. This incompatibility created a tense and emotionally fraught home environment for their children, including the future novelist William Faulkner [1].
Alcoholism: Murry inherited a predisposition for alcoholism from his father, who regularly sought treatment at the Keeley Institute in Memphis [4, 5]. This pattern repeated itself with Murry, who endured periods of heavy drinking that necessitated trips to the same institute accompanied by his wife and children [6]. His alcoholism, far from a source of solace, contributed to his professional failures and strained his family relationships.
Living in the Shadow of his Father: Murry’s life unfolded under the domineering presence of his successful father, the “Young Colonel” [1]. This constant comparison served to highlight Murry’s shortcomings and deepen his sense of inadequacy. As William Faulkner later reflected, he considered his great-grandfather, the “Old Colonel,” to be his true father figure, a testament to Murry’s inability to fulfill that role [7].

Murry’s Influence on William Faulkner’s Fiction

Despite Murry’s personal struggles, he did have some positive influence on his son. The Sunday afternoon rides in the trap and the lessons in riding and shooting provided shared experiences that found their way into William Faulkner’s fiction [7]. Notably, the character of Maury Priest in The Reivers offers an affectionate, if somewhat ironic, portrayal of Murry as a livery stable owner [7]. However, the dominant impact of Murry’s life on his son’s writing was his role as a model for the recurring theme of absent or inadequate fathers. This motif manifests itself in characters like Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury, Joe Christmas in Light in August, and Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom! [7]. The specter of Murry’s decline, his inability to live up to the legacy of his forefathers, and the consequences of his alcoholism cast a long shadow over William Faulkner’s fictional world, contributing to the recurring exploration of family decline and the search for identity in a changing South.

Murry Falkner’s Railroad Career: A Path Derailed

Before moving to Oxford, Mississippi, in 1902, William Faulkner’s father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner, worked for the Gulf & Chicago Railroad. [1-3] Murry’s career with the railroad began as a young man, and he held various positions within the company, including:

Mail agent [4]
General passenger agent [4]
Treasurer and auditor [4]

The sources emphasize that Murry genuinely loved his work with the railroad, viewing it as his true vocation. [5] His father, John Wesley Thompson Falkner, known as the “Young Colonel,” owned and operated the Gulf & Chicago Railroad, which was created by merging three smaller rail lines. [4]

However, Murry’s career was abruptly cut short when his father sold the railroad in 1902 to the Mobile, Jackson and Kansas City Railroad Company. [4] This event had a devastating impact on Murry, as it deprived him of his job and his passion. [5]

The sale of the railroad forced the family to relocate to Oxford, where Murry’s father owned property. [3] Despite attempts to establish himself in various business ventures, Murry never regained the sense of purpose he experienced during his time with the railroad. [5] His subsequent business ventures, including a livery stable, coal-oil agency, and hardware store, all failed. [5, 6]

The sources suggest that the loss of his railroad career marked a turning point in Murry Falkner’s life, leading to a decline marked by a series of failed business ventures and increasing dependence on alcohol. [5, 6] This decline significantly impacted his family life, creating a tense and strained environment for his wife and children, including William Faulkner. [5, 7] As our previous conversation established, the sources and the recurring theme of absent or inadequate fathers in William Faulkner’s fiction suggest that Murry’s personal struggles and inability to live up to his father’s legacy deeply affected the future novelist.

The Old Colonel: Faulkner’s True Patriarch

The sources and our conversation history reveal that William Faulkner considered his great-grandfather, William Clark Falkner, the “Old Colonel,” as his true father figure. This perception stemmed from the stark contrast between the Old Colonel’s dynamic and successful life and the struggles and failures that plagued his father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner.

Murry Falkner’s Decline: As we have established, Murry’s life took a downward spiral after the sale of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad in 1902. This event deprived him of his vocation and precipitated a series of failed business ventures. His growing dependence on alcohol and strained relationship with his wife, Maud, created a tense and challenging home environment for young William. [1, 2]
The Old Colonel as a Mythic Figure: In contrast to Murry’s struggles, William Clark Falkner, the Old Colonel, looms large in Faulkner family lore. He was a Confederate soldier, lawyer, railroad developer, and even an author. Faulkner explicitly stated that he drew inspiration from his great-grandfather for the character of Colonel John Sartoris, a recurring figure in his fiction. [3]
Spiritual Kinship: Faulkner evidently saw in the Old Colonel a reflection of his own creative and ambitious spirit. The sources note that Faulkner regarded the Old Colonel as his “spiritual father,” admiring his impulsiveness, energy, and creative drive. [4] This connection transcended the limitations of Murry’s role as a biological father, offering Faulkner a model for the kind of man he aspired to be. [5]
Literary Manifestations: This dynamic plays out in Faulkner’s fiction through the recurring theme of absent or inadequate fathers. Characters like Quentin Compson in The Sound and the Fury, Joe Christmas in Light in August, and Charles Bon in Absalom, Absalom! all grapple with the consequences of flawed or missing paternal figures. This recurring motif, in conjunction with Faulkner’s explicit statements about his admiration for the Old Colonel, suggests a profound longing for a strong and inspiring father figure, a void that Murry was unable to fill. [5]

In essence, William Faulkner sought and found in his great-grandfather a model of masculinity and ambition that he could admire and emulate. The Old Colonel’s legacy, passed down through family stories and embodied in the fictional Colonel John Sartoris, provided Faulkner with a source of inspiration and a framework for understanding his own place within the complex history of the South.

A Fabricated Identity: The RAF and Faulkner’s Name Change

The sources indicate that William Faulkner adopted the “u” in his last name when he enlisted in the Royal Air Force (RAF) in June 1918 [1]. However, this seemingly minor alteration was part of a larger fabrication Faulkner crafted to create a more compelling persona for his entry into the RAF.

Faulkner created an elaborate fictional biography for his RAF application, including details about his flying experience and war injuries that were entirely untrue [1, 2].
When Faulkner’s hometown newspaper, the Oxford Eagle, reported on his enlistment, it used the traditional “Falkner” spelling, suggesting the name change occurred during the application process [2].
This fabricated identity extended beyond his name. Faulkner invented a dramatically eventful (and entirely false) flying career for himself [2]. He even claimed to have downed enemy planes and sustained significant injuries, going so far as to affect a limp and attribute his drinking to the pain of these imagined wounds.

Interpretations of the Name Change

While the immediate cause of the name change was Faulkner’s desire to enhance his image for the RAF, scholars offer varying interpretations of its deeper significance:

A Symbolic Break from Family: Some scholars suggest that the change, though small, represented Faulkner’s desire to distance himself from his family, particularly his father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner. Our previous conversations highlighted Murry’s struggles with alcoholism and professional failures, casting a shadow over the Falkner name [3-5]. The “u,” therefore, could be seen as a symbolic act of rebellion and a rejection of his father’s legacy. This aligns with the recurring theme of absent or inadequate fathers in Faulkner’s fiction and his expressed admiration for his great-grandfather, the “Old Colonel” [6].
An Assertion of Artistic Independence: Another interpretation links the name change to Faulkner’s burgeoning literary ambitions. The sources note that Faulkner expressed concern about “rising on grandfather’s coat-tails” and saw the addition of the “u” as an easy way to establish his own distinct identity as a writer [7].

The sources do not definitively settle the question of Faulkner’s motivations, leaving room for interpretation. However, it is clear that the name change, like his fabricated war stories, was a deliberate choice that reflected his evolving self-perception and his desire to shape his own narrative. The “u” became a marker of Faulkner’s artistic persona, separating the writer from the family history he both embraced and sought to transcend in his fiction.

Symbolic Haven: The Meaning of Rowan Oak

While the sources directly state that Faulkner renamed the “old Shegog place” Rowan Oak after purchasing it in 1930 [1], they offer limited insight into his specific reasoning. However, drawing on our conversation history and the contextual details within the sources, we can explore some potential motivations behind this symbolic act:

Seeking Stability and Security: Our conversation revealed the tumultuous nature of Faulkner’s family history, marked by his father’s decline and his own complex relationship with his heritage. Rowan Oak, a dilapidated antebellum house, offered Faulkner the opportunity to create a stable and secure home for himself and his family, a stark contrast to the instability of his childhood. The name “Rowan Oak,” derived from Scottish folklore, signifies good fortune, safety, and security [1], suggesting Faulkner’s desire to establish a sense of permanence and grounding in his life.
Connection to Heritage: Despite his conflicted feelings towards his family, Faulkner remained deeply connected to his Southern roots. The choice of a historic antebellum house as his home reflects his fascination with the past and his desire to reclaim and reshape the legacy of his ancestors. Renaming the house with a name steeped in Celtic tradition further underscores this connection, linking his personal history to a broader cultural heritage.
Artistic Sanctuary: The sources emphasize Faulkner’s need for solitude and a space conducive to his writing. Rowan Oak, situated on the outskirts of Oxford, provided a retreat from the distractions of town life and a haven for creative exploration. The name “Rowan Oak” evokes a sense of tranquility and peace, suggesting a deliberate effort to create an environment that nurtured his artistic spirit.
Symbolic Transformation: Faulkner’s tendency to reshape reality, evident in his fabricated RAF identity and his creation of the fictional Yoknapatawpha County, extends to his renaming of his home. The act of renaming itself signifies a transformation, imbuing the house with a new identity that reflected Faulkner’s personal aspirations and artistic vision. The “old Shegog place,” with its connotations of previous occupants and their stories, became Faulkner’s Rowan Oak, a place where he could rewrite his own narrative and forge a new path for himself.

The sources present contrasting perspectives on Rowan Oak. Estelle, Faulkner’s wife, disliked the house, finding it lacking in comfort and amenities [1]. Visitors often found it “deteriorated” and “tasteless” [2]. However, for Faulkner, the house and grounds represented “shelter from a hostile world” [3], a space where he could escape the pressures of fame and the changing landscape of the South.

In conclusion, the renaming of Rowan Oak reflects a confluence of personal and artistic motivations. The name itself, imbued with symbolism, suggests Faulkner’s desire for stability, a connection to heritage, and a creative sanctuary. The house became an extension of his identity, a space where he could grapple with the complexities of the past, find solace in the present, and shape his artistic vision for the future.

A Troubling Legacy: The Inheritance of Alcoholism

The sources and our conversation history highlight a troubling pattern in Faulkner’s family: alcoholism, a problem that plagued both his father, Murry Cuthbert Falkner, and his grandfather, John Wesley Thompson Falkner (the “Young Colonel”).

The Young Colonel’s Drinking: The sources reveal that John Wesley Thompson Falkner, a successful lawyer, banker, and politician, struggled with alcohol throughout his life [1, 2]. His wife insisted he periodically seek treatment at the Keeley Institute in Memphis to address his drinking [2]. Despite his professional achievements, the “Young Colonel” grappled with the debilitating effects of alcoholism.
Murry Falkner’s Inherited Struggle: Murry Falkner, Faulkner’s father, followed in his father’s footsteps, inheriting a predisposition for alcohol abuse [1, 3]. This pattern repeated the cycle of dependence, casting a shadow over Murry’s life and significantly impacting his family.
Murry’s Decline and Its Consequences: As we discussed earlier, Murry’s life took a downward turn after the sale of the Gulf & Chicago Railroad. His inability to find fulfilling work coupled with his growing reliance on alcohol created a strained and difficult home environment for his wife and children [4, 5]. The sources suggest that Murry’s drinking played a significant role in his professional failures and personal struggles, ultimately leading to his death from a heart attack at the age of 62 [6].
Faulkner’s Own Battle: The sources also note that Faulkner himself struggled with alcoholism throughout his life, inheriting the family’s vulnerability to this destructive pattern [1, 3]. His drinking, often attributed to emotional pain and anxieties [3], had a profound impact on his relationships and creative process.

The sources underscore the cyclical nature of alcoholism within the Falkner family, revealing how this destructive pattern was passed down through generations, impacting the lives of Faulkner’s grandfather, father, and himself. The sources suggest that Faulkner, acutely aware of this inherited struggle, explored the themes of family decline, absent fathers, and the devastating consequences of addiction in his fiction.

Themes of “The Big Shot” Revisited in Faulkner’s Later Works

The sources provide insights into the thematic connections between Faulkner’s early short story “The Big Shot” and his more well-known later works. [1, 2] Specifically, the sources identify three major themes that Faulkner explored in “The Big Shot” and revisited in subsequent novels:

Unscrupulous Quest for Power: In “The Big Shot,” the character of Dal Martin embodies this theme. Martin is a ruthless contractor and political boss who uses bribery and intimidation to achieve his goals. [1] This theme resurfaces in later novels like Sanctuary with the character of Popeye, a violent and powerful gangster, and in the Snopes trilogy with the character of Flem Snopes, a master manipulator who climbs the social and economic ladder through cunning and ruthlessness. [1, 2] The sources highlight how these later characters, like Dal Martin, represent the dark side of ambition and the corrosive effects of power on morality. [2, 3]
Rapacity and Greed: This theme is interwoven with the quest for power in “The Big Shot,” as Dal Martin’s desire for wealth fuels his ambition. [1] The sources note that Faulkner revisited this theme extensively in his later works, particularly in the Snopes trilogy. [2, 3] Flem Snopes, the epitome of avarice, becomes the central figure in this exploration of greed, demonstrating how the insatiable desire for material gain can corrupt individuals and communities. [3-5] The sources also point to the short story “Centaur in Brass” as a foreshadowing of Flem’s unscrupulous greed. [3]
Pursuit of Social Respectability and Approbation: “The Big Shot” explores the lengths to which individuals will go to gain social acceptance, even if it means compromising their values. [1] Dal Martin’s desire to have his daughter, Wrennie, included in the prestigious Chickasaw Guards Ball demonstrates this yearning for respectability. [1] The sources suggest that Faulkner continued to examine this theme in later novels, exploring how societal pressures and the allure of status can influence human behavior. [2] The character of Temple Drake in Sanctuary, for example, reflects this desire for social standing, even as her choices lead her down a path of moral compromise. [2]

Faulkner’s Reworking of “The Big Shot”

It is important to note that Faulkner reworked the material from “The Big Shot” into a later short story titled “Dull Tale.” [2, 6] The sources indicate that this revision significantly improved the narrative, shifting the focus from Dal Martin to Dr. Blount, a member of the old Memphis aristocracy who is ultimately corrupted by Martin’s offer. [1, 2] This change in perspective allowed Faulkner to delve deeper into the psychological and moral complexities of his characters, foreshadowing the nuanced character development that would become a hallmark of his later novels. [2]

The sources emphasize that “The Big Shot,” despite its flaws as an early work, served as a testing ground for themes and character types that Faulkner would develop more fully in his mature fiction. [2] The unscrupulous ambition of Dal Martin, the corrosive power of greed, and the allure of social respectability all find their echoes in the richer and more complex worlds of Faulkner’s later novels.

Faulkner on The Sound and the Fury: A “Splendid Failure”

The sources reveal that William Faulkner held a complex and ambivalent view of his novel The Sound and the Fury. While he acknowledged its flaws and challenges, he also expressed a deep affection for the work, considering it a significant milestone in his artistic development.

“The Damndest Book I Ever Read”: In a letter to his great-aunt Bama in late 1928, Faulkner describes The Sound and the Fury as “the damndest book I ever read,” expressing doubt that it would be published for at least ten years [1]. This comment suggests an early awareness of the novel’s experimental nature and potential difficulty for readers.
A “Best Failure”: On multiple occasions, Faulkner referred to The Sound and the Fury as his “best failure” [1], indicating a recognition of the novel’s shortcomings while also suggesting a certain pride in its ambition and innovation. This phrase implies that the novel, though flawed, represented a significant artistic achievement for Faulkner, pushing the boundaries of traditional storytelling and exploring new narrative techniques.
The Book He “Loved the Most”: Despite its challenges, Faulkner consistently stated that The Sound and the Fury was the book he “loved the most” [1]. This sentiment reveals a deep personal connection to the work, perhaps stemming from the emotional and creative investment he poured into its creation.
Attempting to “Match the Dream”: Faulkner’s decision to write an appendix to The Sound and the Fury approximately 20 years after its initial publication further highlights his enduring fascination with the novel [2]. He explained that the appendix was another attempt at trying “to make that book…match the dream” [1], suggesting an ongoing desire to refine and clarify his vision for the novel, even decades later.

The sources provide insights into the critical reception of The Sound and the Fury. Some early reviewers, like Lyle Saxon, praised its “extraordinary effect” [3], while others criticized its obscurity and difficulty [4-7]. The sources note that the novel’s use of interior monologue, influenced by James Joyce’s Ulysses, presented readers with “serious interpretative challenges” [3], particularly in the first chapter narrated by Benjy Compson.

However, the sources also highlight that Faulkner saw the novel’s narrative complexity as a deliberate choice, allowing him to explore the psychological depths of his characters and the fragmentation of time and memory. Cleanth Brooks, a prominent Faulkner scholar, argues that the reader’s experience of the novel is “a progression from murkiness to increasing enlightenment” [3], suggesting that the initial confusion ultimately gives way to a deeper understanding of the characters and their tragic fate.

In conclusion, Faulkner’s own statements about The Sound and the Fury reveal a mixture of pride and frustration. He recognized the novel’s imperfections, referring to it as a “failure,” yet he also cherished it as his “best” and the one he “loved the most.” This seeming contradiction reflects the ambitious nature of the work and Faulkner’s willingness to experiment with narrative form, pushing the boundaries of traditional storytelling. While the novel’s complexity may have alienated some readers, it also cemented Faulkner’s reputation as a literary innovator, paving the way for his subsequent masterpieces.

Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County: A “Postage Stamp” with Universal Significance

The sources provide several insights into Faulkner’s intentions in creating the fictional Yoknapatawpha County. This fictional county, inspired by his real-life home of Lafayette County, Mississippi, became the setting for many of his most acclaimed works, forming a cohesive literary world that allowed him to explore universal themes through the lens of a specific place and its inhabitants.

A Literary “Cosmos” Rooted in Reality

Faulkner’s “Little Postage Stamp of Native Soil”: In a 1950s interview with The Paris Review, Faulkner described Yoknapatawpha County as his “little postage stamp of native soil,” emphasizing its connection to the actual geography and history of Lafayette County [1]. He recognized the richness of this Southern landscape, recognizing that its stories and complexities provided him with ample material for a lifetime of writing.
Exhaustive Exploration of a Familiar World: Faulkner’s assertion that he would “never live long enough to exhaust it” [1] points to his intention to create a comprehensive and multi-layered fictional world within Yoknapatawpha County. He wanted to capture the intricacies of its social fabric, its history, its people, and its enduring relationship with the past.
A “Keystone in the Universe”: In another interview, Faulkner described Yoknapatawpha as “a kind of keystone in the universe” [2]. This statement suggests that he saw his fictional county as a microcosm of the human experience, a place where universal themes of love, loss, ambition, greed, race, and the enduring power of the past played out on a smaller, more intimate scale.

Yoknapatawpha as a Stage for Exploring Universal Themes

The Human Spirit and the Universal Element of Life: The sources point to Aristotle’s concept of art as an expression of the human spirit and universal elements of life [3]. Faulkner, through the creation of Yoknapatawpha, aimed to achieve this artistic ideal. His fictional county, while rooted in the specificities of the American South, transcended geographical boundaries to touch upon timeless human experiences and dilemmas.
“The Germ of [His] Apocrypha”: Faulkner, reflecting on his earlier work, stated that both Flags in the Dust and Sartoris contained “the germ of [his] apocrypha” [1, 4]. These novels, set in the early stages of Yoknapatawpha’s development, laid the foundation for his fictional world, introducing key families like the Sartorises and the Snopeses who would populate his later works.
From Chickasaw Signal Fires to Drugstore Neon Signs: The sources highlight the vast historical scope of Yoknapatawpha, stretching from the time of Chickasaw Indians and early settlers to the modern era [5]. This historical depth allowed Faulkner to explore the changing social, economic, and racial dynamics of the South, tracing the impact of the past on the present and highlighting the cyclical nature of human behavior.
A “Parable or Legend of All the Deep South”: As Malcolm Cowley, a prominent Faulkner scholar, observed, Yoknapatawpha became “a parable or legend of all the Deep South” [6]. It transcended its fictional boundaries to become a representative landscape, embodying the complexities, contradictions, and enduring legacies of the Southern experience.

The Enduring Power of Place

A “Shelf of Books” with “Unity and Purpose”: The sources suggest that Faulkner, inspired by authors like Dickens and Balzac, envisioned Yoknapatawpha as a multi-volume project from the outset [7]. He wanted to create a cohesive body of work, linked by setting and recurring characters, that would offer a comprehensive and nuanced portrait of a particular place and time.
A “Fusion of the Real and the Imaginary”: The sources highlight the interplay of real and fictional elements in Yoknapatawpha. While inspired by Lafayette County, Faulkner made significant alterations to its geography and demographics, shaping it to suit his artistic vision [8]. He blended the familiar landmarks of his childhood with imagined towns and families, forging a unique literary space.
A “Suffering, Defeated Place” with Enduring Hope: The sources describe Yoknapatawpha as a place marked by a “troubled heritage of slavery and war,” a landscape populated by both “grotesque and villainous” characters and “ordinary men and women who rise to heroic stature” [9]. This duality reflects Faulkner’s complex view of the South, acknowledging its dark history and societal injustices while also celebrating the resilience and moral courage of its people.

In conclusion, Faulkner’s creation of Yoknapatawpha County was a deliberate and multifaceted artistic endeavor. He intended to create a self-contained literary world, grounded in the realities of his Mississippi upbringing, yet capable of encompassing universal truths about human nature and the complexities of the Southern experience. Yoknapatawpha became his canvas, a “postage stamp” of land that allowed him to paint a vast and intricate portrait of humanity grappling with history, race, identity, and the search for meaning in a changing world.

Here is a discussion of William Faulkner’s life, based on the sources provided:

William Cuthbert Falkner was born in New Albany, Mississippi on September 25, 1897. [1] He was the first child of Murry Cuthbert and Maud Butler Falkner. [1] Later in life, Faulkner changed the spelling of his last name to Faulkner. [1]
Faulkner’s great-grandfather, William Clark Falkner, was known as “The Old Colonel.” [1] The Old Colonel was a soldier, author, banker, and railroad builder, and was a near-legendary figure in the area. [1] He was the prototype for the character of Colonel John Sartoris, who appears in Faulkner’s fictional town of Jefferson, Mississippi, located in Yoknapatawpha County. [1]
The sources describe Faulkner’s fictional Yoknapatawpha County as a “permanent feature of the world’s literary geography” and note that it is a “suffering, defeated place.” [2]
Faulkner’s ancestry was mostly Scots or Scots-Irish. [2] He looked up to The Old Colonel, who was “violent, impulsive, grasping, creative,” and considered him to be his “spiritual father.” [2]
The Old Colonel was born in 1825 and migrated from North Carolina, eventually settling in Ripley, Mississippi. [2] He was a lawyer and businessman who served in the Mexican War and owned slaves. [2]
Faulkner’s father, Murry Falkner, experienced a period of decline after his father, The Old Colonel, abruptly sold the Gulf & Chicago railroad in 1902. [3] Murry had worked for the railroad and “mourned the loss” of his job. [3] Despite the fact that The Old Colonel supported Murry financially in several subsequent business ventures, Murry was never able to replicate his success with the railroad. [3]
Murry and Maud’s marriage was strained. [3] Maud’s interests were intellectual, while Murry preferred activities like hunting. [3] Maud was the dominant force in the household and, according to the sources, “Murry seemed to fail at everything he attempted.” [3] The dynamic between Murry and Maud would later be echoed in Faulkner’s fiction, where themes of family decline and weak or absent fathers feature prominently. [3]
The sources describe how in his later years, Faulkner used his fame to speak out about social issues that were important to him. [4]
Faulkner did not enjoy publicity. [5] In 1954, he was angered by a profile published in Life magazine that discussed details about his personal life. [5]
Faulkner frequently collaborated with other writers and editors, such as Saxe Commins and Malcolm Cowley. [5, 6]
Malcolm Cowley worked with Faulkner to create The Portable Faulkner, an anthology of the author’s work that was published in 1946. [6] In the introduction to The Portable Faulkner, Cowley discussed the overall unity of Faulkner’s body of work. [7] Cowley also wrote an essay in the New York Times Book Review that was an early attempt to improve Faulkner’s literary reputation. [8] The two men maintained a professional relationship until Faulkner’s death in 1962. [8]
Saxe Commins, an editor at Random House, was a friend of Faulkner’s. [5] Faulkner stayed at Commins’ home in Princeton while he was finishing his 1954 novel, A Fable. [5] A Fable, which is set in France during World War I, is the only one of Faulkner’s novels that does not take place in the South. [4]
In 1950, Faulkner won the Nobel Prize in Literature. [1, 5] He also won National Book Awards for Collected Stories and A Fable and was awarded the Howells Medal from the American Academy of Arts and Letters. [5]
Faulkner struggled with alcoholism. [9] Literary critic Frederick Karl characterizes Faulkner’s drinking as “suicidal,” speculating that Faulkner may have used alcohol as fuel for his creative process in the same way that Romantic and Symbolist poets did. [9]
Faulkner worked in Hollywood on a number of film projects, though the sources note that he did not enjoy his time there. [10]

The sources include a great deal of information about Faulkner’s literary career and the critical reception of his work, but there is relatively little information about other aspects of his life, such as his family or his personal relationships. However, it is apparent that Faulkner’s family history and his relationship with the South had a profound impact on his life and work.

An Imaginary Place Based on Reality

Yoknapatawpha County is a fictional county created by William Faulkner as the setting for many of his novels and short stories. The county is based on Lafayette County, Mississippi, where Faulkner lived for most of his life [1, 2].

Yoknapatawpha County is described as a “permanent feature of the world’s literary geography” [3].
Although based on a real place, the county differs in some details. For instance, the fictional county is more than three times larger than Lafayette County and has only two-thirds of its population [4]. In addition, the real Lafayette County never had a black majority, while the fictional Yoknapatawpha County does [4].
Faulkner first named the county in his novel As I Lay Dying [5, 6]. In the novel Absalom, Absalom!, he included a hand-drawn map of the county [7]. For the 1946 Portable Faulkner anthology, he created a second map [4, 8]. Interestingly, the routes and landmarks described in As I Lay Dying do not correspond to those in Faulkner’s other novels [9].
Yoknapatawpha County first appeared in Faulkner’s 1929 novel Sartoris. The county would go on to be featured in many of his most famous works, including:
The Sound and the Fury (1929)
As I Lay Dying (1930)
Light in August (1932)
Absalom, Absalom! (1936)
The Hamlet (1940)
Go Down, Moses (1942)
The Town (1957)
The Mansion (1959)
The Reivers (1962) [2].
The geography of Yoknapatawpha is largely consistent across these books [9]. The county seat is Jefferson, which is located near the center of the county. The Tallahatchie River forms the county’s northern border, while the Yocona River makes up the southern border [4, 9]. There are no formal eastern or western boundaries [4].
The history of Yoknapatawpha County spans roughly 170 years, from the time before 1800, when a Chickasaw agency and trading post was established, to the 1960s [10]. The county’s history reflects that of the American South, and the books set there deal with themes such as:
Native American tradition
Early exploration and settlement
The rise of the plantation system
The Civil War
The emancipation of slaves and Reconstruction
The decline of the planter aristocracy
Modern commercial culture [10].
The sources describe Yoknapatawpha County as a “suffering, defeated place” that is home to “grotesque and villainous Snopeses and Sutpens” [3]. However, the county is also populated with “ordinary men and women” who achieve heroic stature, such as Dilsey Gibson, V. K. Ratliff, and Isaac McCaslin [3].
Yoknapatawpha County represents more than just a fictional location or a microcosm of the South. Faulkner himself once called it “a kind of keystone of the universe“, stating that if it were removed, “the universe itself would collapse” [6].
Faulkner claimed that the name Yoknapatawpha comes from a Chickasaw phrase meaning “water runs slow through flat land” [6]. However, linguistic experts state that the term actually translates to “land or earth that has been ripped or cut open for disemboweling” [6].

Here are some of the literary themes present in William Faulkner’s works, based on the sources:

The Elusive Nature of Truth. The critic Michael Millgate wrote that Absalom, Absalom! is “about the inextricable confusion of fact and fiction, of observation and interpretation, involved in any account of human experience.” [1] The novel is structured around moments of truth and disillusionment that are “arrested at a particular point in time” and examined from various perspectives. [2] The use of multiple narrators in Absalom, Absalom! highlights the difficulty of arriving at a definitive understanding of the past. [3] As Faulkner biographer Joseph Blotner observed, Quentin Compson, who appears in both The Sound and the Fury and Absalom, Absalom!, is particularly sensitive to the theme of incest, due to his own complex feelings for his sister, Caddy. [3]
The Power of Art. The sources celebrate Faulkner’s artistic daring and his success in employing unconventional literary techniques. In his works, Faulkner attempts to recreate the totality of lived experience, going beyond what can be easily said in narrative speech to capture the essence of human experience. [4] Faulkner scholar and biographer Joseph Blotner pointed out that Faulkner’s innovative use of Quentin as a character was a “master stroke.” [3]
The End of Innocence. In several of Faulkner’s stories, a young couple is discovered in a compromising situation by an older, authority figure. This interference disrupts the couple’s relationship and signals the end of their innocence. [5]
The Destruction of the Wilderness. In the collection Big Woods, Faulkner examines the decline of the natural world and the way that human beings have diminished it. [6]
The Corrupting Influence of Racism. Faulkner’s works frequently engage with the legacy of slavery and the enduring power of racism in the American South. [1, 6]
The Human Heart in Conflict with Itself. One of Faulkner’s major themes is the internal struggle between competing desires and loyalties. In “Barn Burning,” for instance, the young protagonist, Sarty Snopes, is torn between his loyalty to his father and his sense of morality. [7]
The Nature of the Heroic Deed. Faulkner’s characters often engage in actions that are both heroic and absurd, such as the Bundren family’s journey to bury Addie in As I Lay Dying. [8] According to the critic Cleanth Brooks, this combination of the grotesque and the heroic creates a complexity of tone that some readers find difficult. [8]
The Relationship Between the Real and the Ideal. In the story “Barn Burning,” the protagonist’s father quotes from Keats’ “Ode on a Grecian Urn,” highlighting the challenge of finding the ideal within the real. [9]
Greed and Corruption. Several of Faulkner’s novels and stories, such as “Centaur in Brass” and “Dull Tale,” focus on characters who are motivated by greed and ambition, leading to corruption and destruction. These themes are particularly prominent in the Snopes Trilogy. [10, 11]
Sexual and Economic Opportunism. In some of Faulkner’s works, such as “Centaur in Brass,” sexual desire is intertwined with economic motives, suggesting the complex ways in which power and desire operate in society. [10]
The Aridity of Talk. In the novel Mosquitoes, Faulkner contrasts characters who are prone to endless chatter with those who act decisively. The novel suggests that words can be empty and ultimately meaningless. [12]
The Changing South. Many of Faulkner’s works reflect on the transformation of the South from a rural, agrarian society to a more modern, industrialized one. This transition is often accompanied by a sense of loss and nostalgia for the past. [13]
Modernism. Faulkner’s works often exhibit characteristics of literary modernism, such as stream-of-consciousness narration, multiple perspectives, and an interest in the workings of the human mind. [14]
Postmodernism. Some critics see Faulkner as a precursor to postmodernism, particularly in his use of self-reflexive narrative techniques and his questioning of the nature of reality. [15]
The Decline of the Planter Aristocracy. Throughout his works, Faulkner traces the decline of the old Southern families, such as the Compsons and the Sutpens, and the rise of new, often less scrupulous, figures. [13, 16]
The Storytelling Process. Faulkner’s works often draw attention to the act of storytelling itself, highlighting the role of memory, perspective, and language in shaping our understanding of the past. [17]

These are just a few of the many themes that can be found in Faulkner’s works. Faulkner’s exploration of these themes, along with his innovative use of language and narrative structure, make his writing both challenging and rewarding.

Keep in mind that the sources provided focus heavily on literary criticism of Faulkner’s work. There may be additional themes present in his works that are not discussed in these sources.

Here is a discussion of family dynamics in William Faulkner’s works, based on the sources provided.

Complicated Family Relationships

The sources provide numerous examples of the complicated family relationships found in Faulkner’s fiction. For example, in the novel As I Lay Dying, the Bundren family embarks on a difficult and often absurd journey to bury their matriarch, Addie. [1]
The family members in As I Lay Dying have hidden motives for going on the journey, and each is determined to pursue their own objectives. [2]
The critic Cleanth Brooks suggests that the combination of the absurd and the honorable in the family’s journey is one of the reasons for the novel’s literary success. [2]
Faulkner himself stated that he subjected the Bundren family to “the two greatest catastrophes which man can suffer—flood and fire”. [2]
The sources also note that Faulkner’s works often examine the corrosive effects of racism on families. For instance, in Absalom, Absalom!, the character Henry Sutpen murders his half-brother Charles Bon to prevent an interracial union between Bon and his sister, Judith. [3]

Family Conflicts

The critic Hyatt Waggoner argues that Henry’s decision to kill Bon rather than accept interracial brotherhood represents the “immemorial curse of the South.” [3]
The sources highlight the conflicts that often arise between fathers and sons. For instance, in Absalom, Absalom!, Thomas Sutpen rejects his son Charles Bon because Bon’s mother was a woman of mixed race. [4]
This act of rejection sets in motion a chain of events that ultimately leads to Sutpen’s destruction and the demise of his family. [5]
In the short story “Barn Burning,” the young protagonist, Sarty Snopes, is torn between his loyalty to his abusive father and his own developing sense of morality. [6] He eventually chooses to betray his father in order to warn a wealthy landowner that his father is planning to burn down the man’s barn. This decision signifies a break from his family and suggests the possibility of a different future for Sarty.

Generational Divide

The sources also point to the complex dynamics that exist between mothers and daughters. In Absalom, Absalom!, Rosa Coldfield blames her father for her mother’s death and dutifully takes over managing the household after her aunt leaves. [7]
Later, Rosa becomes disillusioned when Thomas Sutpen, whom she once regarded as an ogre, proposes marriage to her. [8]
In The Sound and the Fury, Caddy Compson’s promiscuity deeply disturbs her brother Quentin, who ultimately commits suicide because of his inability to reconcile his idealized view of his sister with her actual behavior. [9, 10]
Caddy’s daughter, Quentin, is raised by her grandmother, Mrs. Compson. Jason, Caddy’s brother, resents Quentin and treats her poorly. [11]
Quentin eventually runs away from home, taking a significant amount of Jason’s money with her. [10]

Family Legacies

Faulkner’s works show how family legacies can both burden and empower individuals. Characters like Quentin Compson and Isaac McCaslin are haunted by the actions of their ancestors.
The sources mention a recurring theme in Faulkner’s work of a young man’s struggle for independence from a dominant father figure.
The sources also note that Faulkner often examines the role of women in Southern society. Women are often portrayed as victims of patriarchal structures, but they can also exhibit resilience and strength in the face of adversity.

Overall, the sources provided focus on the complex and often troubled dynamics within families. Faulkner’s works explore themes of loyalty, betrayal, love, hate, and the ways in which the past can shape the present. It’s important to note that this discussion is based solely on the excerpts provided. Faulkner’s complete works likely offer a wider and deeper understanding of family dynamics in his fictional world.

Here is a discussion of the characters and plots found in the provided sources.

Characters and Plots in Faulkner’s Works

Thomas Sutpen is a key figure in Faulkner’s Absalom, Absalom!. Sutpen’s story is told in fragments and from various perspectives, revealing his ambition, cruelty, and the tragic consequences of his actions. The sources note that the novel is structured around a series of “moments of recognition, truth, and disillusion,” such as when Henry Sutpen shoots Charles Bon. [1, 2]
Quentin Compson is a significant character in both Absalom, Absalom! and The Sound and the Fury. He acts as a listener, absorbing stories about the Sutpen family and piecing together their history. The sources emphasize Quentin’s sensitivity and his struggle to make sense of the past. Quentin’s own complicated family history makes him especially aware of the destructive forces at play in the Sutpen family. [3-5]
The Snopes Family plays a central role in Faulkner’s Snopes Trilogy, which includes The Hamlet, The Town, and The Mansion. The trilogy chronicles the rise of the Snopes family and their corrupting influence on the community. The sources emphasize the amorality and greed of Flem Snopes, the central figure in the trilogy. [6-8] The sources note that Flem consistently manipulates others to achieve his goals, often exploiting family connections for his own gain.
The Short Story “Wash” is a precursor to Absalom, Absalom!. It focuses on the character Wash Jones, a poor white man who serves Thomas Sutpen. When Sutpen betrays Wash’s trust, Wash takes revenge, killing Sutpen, his granddaughter Milly, and their child. The story explores themes of class, race, and the destructive nature of revenge. [9, 10]
The Plot of “Spotted Horses”, like “Wash,” revolves around deception and exploitation. Flem Snopes tricks the residents of Frenchman’s Bend into buying wild ponies, revealing his cunning and heartlessness. [6] The sources note that “Spotted Horses” is an example of Faulkner’s use of humor to expose the darker aspects of human nature.
Multiple Narrators are a hallmark of Faulkner’s storytelling, as exemplified in Absalom, Absalom! and The Town. These narrators often offer contradictory or incomplete accounts of events, highlighting the subjectivity of truth and the difficulty of piecing together a coherent narrative. [11, 12]
Frequent Use of Flashbacks is another characteristic of Faulkner’s work. The past is often intertwined with the present, revealing how the legacy of previous generations weighs on the characters’ lives. For instance, in Absalom, Absalom!, the novel moves back and forth in time to reconstruct the history of the Sutpen family. [13-15]
Exploration of the American South, particularly Mississippi, is a central feature of Faulkner’s fiction. His works depict the complexities of Southern society, grappling with issues of race, class, and the legacy of the past. [16, 17]
Many of the plots revolve around the decline of the old planter aristocracy and the emergence of new, often less reputable, figures.
The sources frequently mention Yoknapatawpha County, Faulkner’s fictional creation, as a microcosm of the South, showcasing its unique culture, traditions, and conflicts.
Faulkner’s Style is often experimental and demanding, employing stream-of-consciousness narration, shifting perspectives, and complex sentence structures. [18, 19] Critics have both praised and criticized Faulkner’s writing for its difficulty, but his innovative approach has undeniably influenced generations of writers. The sources indicate that Faulkner’s novels and short stories often feature a sense of mystery or unresolved questions.

Faulkner’s works are populated with a diverse range of characters, whose motivations and actions drive the intricate plots. The themes of family, race, the South, and the human condition are interwoven throughout his stories, making his work both challenging and enduringly relevant.

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog

Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!

Critical Companion to William Faulkner A Literary Reference to His Life and Work