The text is a critical commentary on Pakistani media’s tendency towards hero-worship and its uncritical acceptance of authoritarian figures. It cites examples of dictators and controversial leaders lauded by the media, contrasting this with the suppression of dissenting voices. The author laments the lack of critical analysis and the perpetuation of propaganda, arguing this hinders Pakistan’s progress. The piece highlights the dangerous consequences of blindly accepting narratives presented by the media, urging a shift toward greater objectivity and independent thought. Ultimately, it calls for a rejection of uncritical hero-worship and a demand for media accountability.
Propaganda, Heroes, and Deception: A Study Guide
Quiz
Instructions: Answer each question in 2-3 sentences.
- What is the central critique the author makes about the Pakistani media’s treatment of leaders?
- According to the author, how has the concept of “hero” been used to manipulate public opinion?
- What examples does the author provide to illustrate the media’s inconsistent treatment of leaders once exposed as flawed?
- How does the author connect the glorification of certain figures to historical patterns of deception and manipulation?
- What does the author mean when they say the “clock has passed” for certain types of propaganda?
- Why is the author critical of the public’s attitude towards a figure known as “Prisoner number 804”?
- What is the significance of the author’s comments on the renaming of cities and the legacy of Saudi King Faisal?
- How does the author use the example of Moammar Qaddafi to illustrate the problems with hero worship?
- How does the author critique the media’s response to Bashar al-Assad, and what does it suggest about their values?
- What, according to the author, is the ultimate consequence of constantly glorifying flawed leaders and ignoring the common people?
Quiz Answer Key
- The author critiques the Pakistani media for consistently portraying flawed leaders as heroes while ignoring their wrongdoings and shifting narratives when their truth is exposed. They accuse the media of being dishonest by maintaining a false image of certain figures.
- The author argues that the concept of “hero” is used as a tool for propaganda to deceive the public. Leaders are elevated, even when deceitful, and this distracts from their flaws and real issues while also fostering hero worship instead of critical thinking.
- The author cites Saddam Hussein, who was once glorified and when found to be a murderer was then considered no longer a hero. This inconsistent approach shows the media’s inability to provide an honest assessment of leaders.
- The author claims that the creation of artificial personalities for the purpose of propaganda has been going on for centuries. The same methods are constantly repeated across generations.
- The author suggests that the methods of silent manipulation and crimes which once impacted the country should have been left behind. The use of those same tactics now by media is unacceptable and no longer can be justified.
- The author criticizes the public for accepting and glorifying “Prisoner number 804,” despite accusations and evidence of unethical behavior. This is seen as an example of how the public ignores reality in favor of a created narrative.
- The renaming of cities in honor of Saudi King Faisal highlights the problem of superficial cultural change that lacks love, dedication and proper planning. The author also cites his inability to criticize this action in his newspaper.
- The example of Moammar Qaddafi demonstrates how the media can present a dictator as a hero and then quickly change its narrative once he is exposed as a tyrant, but still not correct the wrong by taking his name from the stadium. This proves an example of how easily the public is swayed by the media without critical thought.
- The author is critical of the media’s acceptance of Bashar al-Assad while ignoring the suffering of Syrian refugees. The author further highlights their hypocrisy in focusing on Assad’s family and wealth and then disregarding the plight of common people.
- The author argues that the consequence of hero worship is that it continues to distract the public from the problems and needs of the common people. This practice leaves the public vulnerable to deception and continues the cycle of injustice.
Essay Questions
- Analyze the author’s use of historical examples (e.g., Arab Muslims in Spain, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Qaddafi, Bashar al-Assad) to support their argument about the cyclical nature of propaganda and hero worship.
- Discuss the author’s critique of the Pakistani media. How do their specific examples build a larger argument about the media’s role in shaping public opinion and perpetuating injustice?
- Explore the author’s use of figurative language and rhetorical devices (e.g., “lions of circus or donkeys hiding in lion’s skin”) to convey their message and engage the reader.
- How does the author portray the consequences of hero worship for both individuals and society as a whole?
- Based on the author’s critique, what steps could be taken to foster critical thinking and reduce the impact of propaganda and manipulation?
Glossary of Key Terms
- Propaganda: Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or point of view.
- Ideology: A system of ideas and ideals, especially one that forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy.
- Darvesh: In the context of the text, it is a person of truth who is critical of the media and is attempting to expose their misleading tactics.
- Khush Aqeedah: In the context of the text it means to have a specific belief system based on social norms, in this case the continued belief that certain individuals should be praised.
- Najat Hind: Literally, “Savior of India,” it is a title that was previously given to someone in order to manipulate the public.
- Tehseen: Meaning praise.
- Blass Family Laz: A forced tactic used by leaders and media to divert the public’s attention by pointing out the mistakes of others.
- Shaheen: A falcon, often used as a symbol of strength and leadership.
- Hakaa: A word used in the text to represent the world of reality.
- Mamad, Boston, Jina: A reference to names, both real and fictional, used as examples in dream-like stories.
- Maban Farsuda: Meaning slogans of the exhausted in reference to the repeating slogans of the public.
- Mujahid: A person engaged in a jihad, but more generally used to signify someone who is a great fighter.
- Chaap Losi: Meaning flattery or praise.
- Shami Dictator: Refers to the rulers of Syria such as Bashar al-Assad.
- Rafta: Meaning gone, past or dead.
Hero Worship and Media Manipulation in Pakistan
Okay, here’s a briefing document analyzing the provided text:
Briefing Document: Analysis of “Pasted Text” Excerpts
Date: October 26, 2023
Subject: Critical Analysis of Hero Worship, Propaganda, and Media Manipulation in a Pakistani Context
Introduction:
The provided text is a scathing critique of hero worship, propaganda, and the complicity of the Pakistani media in perpetuating harmful narratives. The author, seemingly writing from a critical and perhaps dissident perspective, lambasts the tendency to glorify dictators and questionable figures, highlighting how this process is fueled by propaganda and a media landscape that often prioritizes nationalistic fervor over truth and justice. The author uses a passionate, at times sardonic, tone to express frustration with the current state of affairs. The text is not structured in a formal way, but rather as a collection of points and examples that revolve around the central themes of manipulation, delusion and the consequences of uncritical hero worship.
Key Themes and Ideas:
- The Danger of Uncritical Hero Worship: The author argues that the Pakistani public has a penchant for elevating flawed figures to heroic status, often ignoring or downplaying their misdeeds. This tendency is not just misguided but actively detrimental, as it perpetuates cycles of injustice and prevents progress.
- Quote: “After all, when will we rise above the troubles of hero worship? When will we stop boasting about Kalma?”
- Example: The author uses several historical examples of leaders from the past whom the Pakistani media and public has seen as “heroes” despite their actions that included violence, corruption, and other forms of exploitation. The author uses figures such as Saddam Hussain, Moammar Qaddafi, Saudi King Faisal and Basher Al-Assad to illustrate this point.
- Propaganda and Media Manipulation: The text emphasizes the role of propaganda in creating and maintaining these false narratives of heroism. The media is portrayed as a willing accomplice, often sacrificing journalistic integrity for the sake of popular opinion or political expediency.
- Quote: “Centuries have passed since the artificially created personality became propaganda, but still the same is true.”
- Example: The author points out how the media first “praised” Saddam Hussein as a hero but turned around after his demise and condemned him as a “murderer”. This is used to illustrate the media’s propensity for following the prevailing narratives regardless of the truth.
- The Exposure of “Darvesh” and “Fraudsters”: The author refers to a group he labels as “Darvesh” which are essentially con-artists or people masquerading as something they are not. The author describes the media’s approach of covering up their wrongdoings, often “making those who exposed the wrong things worthy of hatred.” In essence, the author condemns the media’s complicity in this manipulation by failing to call out bad actors when their wrongdoings are revealed and instead attacking those who exposed them.
- The Perpetuation of a “Khush Aqeedah”: The author notes that many people begin to adhere to the prevailing narratives and systems without questioning from the moment they come to their senses and continue with this “Khush Aqeedah” or mindset. The author criticizes the lack of critical thinking and the complacency to accept the status quo as part of this blind adherence.
- Hypocrisy and Contradictions: The text highlights the hypocrisy within the Pakistani context, pointing out how figures who are considered heroes within the country are often condemned elsewhere or are themselves guilty of actions that are inconsistent with the values they are supposed to represent.
- Example: The author condemns the public’s glorification of Muammar Qaddafi even after Arab spring exposed his brutality. Also, The author’s story about how officials literally brought gifts to some visiting Turkish dignitaries who were seen as leaders while overlooking the needs of those in the country also showcases this hypocrisy.
- Consequences of Hero Worship: The author suggests that the cycle of hero worship and media manipulation is harmful to the country. The author mentions an example of a city renaming its cities for outside figures despite “how much hard work was done on the land, with the help of love, dedication and planning, we established such a beautiful new city in a moment.” In effect, the author argues that this constant cycle distracts and takes away from the good that people have already done.
- Call for Change: While the text primarily focuses on criticism, there’s an underlying call for a shift in mentality. The author expresses a desire for critical thinking, a rejection of blind faith, and a focus on the needs and voices of the common people.
- Quote: “Dictator mind should be respected, Darvesh Arz is saying that one day we will have to come out of this bad attitude and think about the call of common people.”
Important Facts/Ideas:
- Media Complicity: The media is depicted as a tool for propaganda, not a watchdog. The author condemns the media’s failure to hold figures accountable and its tendency to be manipulated.
- Historical Examples: The text uses specific examples of figures like Saddam Hussein, Moammar Qaddafi, and Saudi King Faisal to illustrate the cycle of hero worship.
- National Identity Critique: There is a subtle critique of aspects of Pakistani national identity related to Islam, as well as a condemnation of certain cultural tendencies related to hero worship and deference to authority.
- Underlying Hope: Despite the strong criticism, the author does express a hope for a future where critical thinking and truth are valued over blind hero worship.
Conclusion:
The “Pasted Text” excerpts represent a powerful indictment of the forces of propaganda and hero worship, particularly within the Pakistani context. The author’s sharp criticism and historical examples serve as a warning against the dangers of uncritical acceptance of narratives pushed by those in power. The document highlights the need for critical thinking, a free and independent media, and a populace willing to challenge narratives and hold leaders accountable. Ultimately, the author is seeking a way to break the cycle of manipulation and achieve a more just and truthful society.
This briefing document attempts to capture the main themes and ideas from your provided text. Please let me know if you need further analysis.
Pakistan’s Manufactured Heroes
FAQ
1. What is the central critique being made about the Pakistani media in this text?
The text heavily criticizes the Pakistani media for its consistent promotion of “fraudsters, opportunists,” and dictators as heroes, while simultaneously suppressing voices that expose their wrongdoings. It highlights a pattern of initially praising figures only to condemn them later when their actions become undeniable, suggesting a lack of critical thinking and a susceptibility to propaganda. This creates a cycle of hero-worship and prevents genuine accountability.
2. How does the text describe the process by which “artificial personalities” are created and maintained?
The text argues that “artificial personalities” are created through relentless propaganda and maintained by the media and those who benefit from them. These constructed figures, often dictators or flawed leaders, are presented in a positive light, obscuring their negative actions and suppressing dissenting voices. The text suggests that this method has been employed for centuries, demonstrating a consistent pattern of manipulation.
3. What are some specific examples of figures that the text cites as having been uncritically lauded by the Pakistani media, and what is the author’s stance on them?
The author provides numerous examples, including: Saddam Hussein, who was initially praised as a brave Mujahid before being revealed as a murderer; Saudi King Faisal, in whose name cities were renamed without proper consideration; Moammar Qaddafi, celebrated as a hero despite his brutality; and Bashar al-Assad, whose regime was responsible for the displacement and death of countless Syrians. The author’s stance is consistently critical of these figures and the media for their blind adoration and denial of their wrongdoings.
4. The text mentions “prisoner number 804”. Who is this likely referring to, and why is this figure significant in this context?
“Prisoner number 804” is highly likely a reference to a prominent political figure in Pakistan who has faced legal troubles and is currently or was formerly incarcerated. The text suggests that even a figure with a tarnished reputation is still being romanticized by many as a hero, highlighting the persistent issue of hero-worship despite a figure’s flaws. The author wishes to reveal the “treacherous reality” behind this individual.
5. The author suggests a dangerous pattern of hero worship. What does the text suggest are some of the negative consequences of such behavior?
The text argues that hero-worship prevents accountability and fosters an environment where the wrongdoings of powerful figures are excused or overlooked. It also discourages critical thinking and creates a culture of blind faith. This, according to the author, distracts from real issues and perpetuates a cycle of bad governance and manipulation. It leads to a society where personal flaws and outright cruelty are overlooked so long as a person maintains a “heroic” facade.
6. The author uses the term “Darvesh.” Who is this likely referring to, and what does their role appear to be?
“Darvesh” is likely referring to the author himself or an individual who represents an alternative voice or perspective. The “Darvesh” in this context is critical of the mainstream narratives and seeks to expose the deception perpetuated by the media and those in power. They function as a truth-teller, risking unpopularity in the process.
7. What does the text imply about the relationship between media narratives, public perception, and national identity in Pakistan?
The text argues that the Pakistani media, through its propagation of specific narratives and personalities, plays a key role in shaping public perception and a warped sense of national identity. This curated identity is based on the worship of potentially flawed or even cruel figures, rather than genuine achievements or societal values. This, in turn, inhibits progress and perpetuates a cycle of poor governance and lack of accountability. The media is portrayed as a tool that perpetuates harmful cultural norms rather than critically examining them.
8. What is the author’s overall call to action regarding the way Pakistan perceives its leaders and heroes?
The author’s call to action is to move beyond the pattern of hero-worship, to develop critical thinking skills, and to hold leaders accountable for their actions. The author is pleading for the society to recognize that what is often deemed heroic is instead a carefully constructed image meant to conceal the truth, while promoting a more rational and justice-based approach to leadership and civic engagement. Ultimately, the author desires that people stop relying on manufactured myths and instead look toward truth.
Pakistani Media and the Propaganda of Heroes
The source discusses media propaganda, particularly in the context of Pakistani media and its portrayal of various figures, including dictators, as heroes [1]. The text suggests that media often engages in the following:
- Propaganda and Deception: The media is accused of using propaganda to deceive people, creating artificial personalities and promoting them as heroes [1]. This is said to have been going on for centuries [1].
- Hero Worship: There’s a tendency to blindly follow and praise certain individuals, even those who are later revealed to be flawed or even cruel [1]. The text questions when people will rise above the troubles of hero worship [1].
- Ignoring Wrongdoing: The media is criticized for often ignoring or downplaying the wrongdoings of these “heroes,” focusing instead on their positive image and not holding them accountable [1].
- Selective Praise: The source claims that the media engages in selective praise of certain figures while being critical of those who expose the wrong things [1]. Those who expose the wrongdoings are treated with hatred, rather than being celebrated [1].
- Historical Repetition: The source notes that this pattern of creating heroes and ignoring their flaws has been repeated throughout history, citing examples of figures who were once praised and later criticized [1].
- Examples of “Heroes”: The source mentions several figures who were once considered heroes by the media but later exposed as having significant flaws, including:
- An unnamed figure referred to as ‘Najat Hind’ [1].
- Saddam Hussein, who was initially presented as a brave leader and a Mujahid [1].
- Saudi King Faisal, after whom cities were named without proper recognition of the hard work it took to develop the land [1].
- Moammar Qaddafi, who was called a great hero and hawk [1].
- Bashar al-Assad, who was considered a cruel and cold-hearted dictator [1].
- Ignoring the Plight of Common People: The media is also accused of ignoring the plight of common people while focusing on the “dictator mind” [1]. The text says it is important to think about the calls of common people [1].
- Shami Dictator Mindset: The source mentions a “Shami Dictator” mindset that influences how media portrays these figures [1].
- Consequences: The text implies that this kind of media propaganda has serious consequences, leading to a ruined country [1]. It also asserts that such actions are a silent crime [1].
In conclusion, the source criticizes the media for its role in creating and perpetuating false narratives about leaders and for ignoring their wrongdoings. It argues for a more critical and honest approach that does not blindly accept figures as heroes and to give voice to common people [1].
The Illusion of Heroes
The source strongly critiques the concept of hero worship, particularly as it is portrayed in the media, noting that it can be a dangerous and deceptive practice [1]. Here are some key points about hero worship from the source:
- Blind Following: The source suggests that people tend to blindly follow and praise certain individuals, even when those figures have serious flaws or are later revealed to be cruel [1]. The text questions when people will rise above the troubles of hero worship [1].
- Artificial Personalities: The media is accused of using propaganda to create artificial personalities, promoting these individuals as heroes without regard for their true nature [1]. The source states that this has been happening for centuries [1].
- Ignoring Wrongdoing: The media often ignores or downplays the wrongdoings of these “heroes”, focusing instead on their positive image and not holding them accountable [1]. This allows for the perpetuation of the hero’s image, regardless of their actions [1]. The source argues that instead of being celebrated, those who expose the wrongdoings of these “heroes” are treated with hatred [1].
- Examples of False Heroes: The source provides several examples of figures who were once considered heroes but were later revealed to have significant flaws. These include an unnamed figure referred to as ‘Najat Hind’, Saddam Hussein, Saudi King Faisal, Muammar Gaddafi, and Bashar al-Assad [1]. The media is portrayed as having been “crazy” about some of these figures [1].
- Consequences of Hero Worship: The source implies that this kind of hero worship and media propaganda has serious consequences, leading to a ruined country [1]. It suggests that these actions are a “silent crime” [1].
- Call for Change: The text emphasizes the need to move away from this pattern of hero worship and to stop boasting about the “Kalma.” [1] It advocates for a more critical and honest approach, where individuals are not blindly accepted as heroes, and the voices of common people are heard [1].
In conclusion, the source condemns hero worship, stating that it leads to the creation of false narratives and the overlooking of serious wrongdoings [1]. The media is identified as a key player in perpetuating this system, promoting certain figures while ignoring their flaws, and the source urges a change towards a more critical and honest approach [1].
The Dictator Mind
The source uses the term “dictator mind” to critique a mindset that reveres and defends dictatorial figures, even when they are known to be cruel or corrupt. Here’s a breakdown of the concept of “dictator mind” as presented in the source:
- Respect for Dictators: The source suggests that there’s an attitude of respect for dictators, regardless of their actions or impact on their people [1]. This “dictator mind” seems to be a mindset that ignores or downplays the negative aspects of dictatorial rule.
- Ignoring Cruelty and Wrongdoing: The source strongly criticizes the media for focusing on the positive image of dictators, while ignoring their cruelty, corruption and the harm they cause [1]. This is a part of the “dictator mind” where the wrongdoings of the dictator are overlooked or justified. The source argues that this type of behavior is a “silent crime” that leads to a ruined country [1].
- Examples of Dictators Revered: The source provides several examples of dictators who were once praised and celebrated by the media, despite their later exposure as cruel or corrupt:
- Saddam Hussein was initially portrayed as a brave leader and Mujahid [1].
- Muammar Qaddafi was hailed as a great hero [1].
- Bashar al-Assad, who was considered a cruel and cold-hearted dictator [1].
- Media’s Role in Perpetuating “Dictator Mind”: The source accuses the media of playing a crucial role in fostering this “dictator mind” by promoting these figures as heroes and ignoring their wrongdoings [1]. This media propaganda contributes to the public’s acceptance of these figures and their actions [1]. The source mentions that the media was “crazy” about some of these figures [1].
- “Shami Dictator” Mindset: The source also mentions a “Shami Dictator” mindset that influences how the media portrays these figures, suggesting a regional or cultural factor contributing to this phenomenon [1].
- Contrast with Common People: The source contrasts the focus on dictators with the neglect of the plight of common people [1]. The source asserts that it is essential to move away from the “dictator mind” and start thinking about the needs of common people [1].
- Call for Change: The source emphasizes the need to abandon the “dictator mind” and adopt a more critical approach [1]. It advocates for a focus on the common people’s needs and a rejection of hero worship, particularly when it involves figures who are known to be cruel and corrupt [1].
In summary, the “dictator mind” as presented in the source, is a mindset that blindly supports and defends dictators, ignores their wrongdoings, and neglects the plight of common people. The source criticizes this mindset and the media’s role in perpetuating it, arguing for a more critical and compassionate approach [1].
Pakistani Media: Propaganda, Hero Worship, and the Dictator Mind
The source provides a critical perspective on Pakistani media, particularly its role in shaping public perception of leaders and its tendency towards propaganda and hero worship [1]. Here’s a breakdown of the key points related to Pakistani media:
- Propaganda and Deception: The source accuses the Pakistani media of using propaganda to deceive the public, creating artificial personalities and promoting them as heroes [1]. This has been going on for centuries, according to the source [1].
- Hero Worship: The media is criticized for its tendency to blindly follow and praise certain individuals, even when those figures have serious flaws or are later revealed to be cruel. The text questions when people will rise above the troubles of hero worship [1]. The media has been “crazy” about some of these figures [1].
- Ignoring Wrongdoing: The Pakistani media is accused of ignoring or downplaying the wrongdoings of these “heroes,” focusing instead on their positive image and not holding them accountable [1]. Those who expose the wrongdoings are treated with hatred, rather than being celebrated [1].
- Selective Praise: The source claims that the media engages in selective praise of certain figures while being critical of those who expose the wrong things [1].
- Historical Repetition: This pattern of creating heroes and ignoring their flaws has been repeated throughout history [1]. The media is said to have previously gone “crazy” for figures such as Saudi King Faisal [1].
- Examples of “Heroes”: The source mentions several figures who were once considered heroes by the Pakistani media but later exposed as having significant flaws. These include:
- An unnamed figure referred to as ‘Najat Hind’ [1].
- Saddam Hussein, who was initially presented as a brave leader and a Mujahid. The media was “crazy” about him [1].
- Saudi King Faisal, after whom cities were named without proper recognition of the hard work it took to develop the land [1].
- Moammar Qaddafi, who was called a great hero and hawk. The source notes that even though no one in his own country is ready to say goodbye to him, the biggest stadium in Pakistan is named after him [1].
- Bashar al-Assad, who was considered a cruel and cold-hearted dictator [1]. The source notes that some sympathetic voices can still be heard in the media regarding this dictator [1].
- Ignoring the Plight of Common People: The media is also accused of ignoring the plight of common people while focusing on the “dictator mind” [1]. The text says it is important to think about the calls of common people [1].
- “Dictator Mind” and “Shami Dictator” Mindset: The source mentions a “Shami Dictator” mindset that influences how media portrays these figures, and the “dictator mind” which is a mindset that reveres and defends dictatorial figures, even when they are known to be cruel or corrupt [1].
- Consequences: The text implies that this kind of media propaganda has serious consequences, leading to a ruined country [1]. It also asserts that such actions are a silent crime [1].
In conclusion, the source presents a strong critique of Pakistani media, portraying it as a tool for propaganda and hero worship, which ignores wrongdoing and neglects the needs of common people [1]. The source advocates for a more critical and honest approach, urging a move away from this pattern of behavior [1].
Manufacturing Consent: Media, Propaganda, and False Narratives
The source discusses the creation and perpetuation of false narratives, particularly by the media, through propaganda and hero worship [1]. Here’s a breakdown of how false narratives are presented in the source:
- Media’s Role in Creating False Narratives: The source suggests that the media plays a central role in creating false narratives through the use of propaganda, which it uses to construct artificial personalities and promote them as heroes [1]. This is done to deceive the public [1].
- Hero Worship and False Images: The media promotes hero worship, presenting figures in a positive light while ignoring or downplaying their wrongdoings, thus constructing a false image of these individuals [1]. The source argues that this has been happening for centuries [1].
- Ignoring Wrongdoing: When the media ignores or downplays the wrongdoings of these “heroes”, the false narratives are further reinforced [1]. The media is also accused of treating those who expose the wrongdoings of the “heroes” with hatred [1].
- Examples of False Narratives: The source provides several examples of figures about whom the media created false narratives:
- An unnamed figure referred to as ‘Najat Hind’ was presented as a hero [1].
- Saddam Hussein was portrayed as a brave leader and a Mujahid, despite later being proven to be a murderer [1].
- Saudi King Faisal was celebrated, and cities were named after him, without acknowledging the hard work done to develop the land [1].
- Muammar Qaddafi was hailed as a great hero, despite his cruelty [1].
- Bashar al-Assad was also presented in a favorable light, despite his cruel and cold-hearted nature [1].
- Repetition of False Narratives: The source notes that the pattern of creating heroes and ignoring their flaws has been repeated throughout history, which reinforces the idea that the media is complicit in perpetuating these false narratives [1].
- Consequences of False Narratives: The source suggests that these false narratives, propagated by the media, have serious consequences, including contributing to a ruined country [1]. The source refers to the perpetuation of these false narratives as a “silent crime” [1].
- “Dictator Mind” and “Shami Dictator” Mindset: The source mentions the “dictator mind,” which is a mindset that reveres dictators, and the “Shami Dictator” mindset, which influences how the media portrays these figures. These mindsets can also contribute to the creation and acceptance of false narratives [1].
- Call for Change: The source emphasizes the need to move away from these false narratives and hero worship, urging a more critical and honest approach where people are not blindly accepted as heroes and the voices of common people are heard [1].
In conclusion, the source highlights how the media creates and maintains false narratives through propaganda and hero worship, ignoring the wrongdoings of those they promote, and perpetuating these false images throughout history [1].

By Amjad Izhar
Contact: amjad.izhar@gmail.com
https://amjadizhar.blog
Affiliate Disclosure: This blog may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. This comes at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products or services that I believe will add value to my readers. Your support helps keep this blog running and allows me to continue providing you with quality content. Thank you for your support!






